+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic...

Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic...

Date post: 27-Mar-2015
Category:
Upload: savannah-byrd
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
39
Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics (www.bioforensics.com) [email protected] Dan E. Krane Biological Sciences, Wright State University, Dayton OH 45435
Transcript
Page 1: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential

elements of a competent defense review

Forensic Bioinformatics (www.bioforensics.com)[email protected]

Dan E. KraneBiological Sciences, Wright State University,

Dayton OH 45435

Page 2: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Three generations of DNA testing

DQ-alphaTEST STRIPAllele = BLUE DOT

RFLPAUTORADAllele = BAND

Automated STRELECTROPHEROGRAMAllele = PEAK

Page 3: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

DNA content of biological samples:Type of sample Amount of DNA

Blood 30,000 ng/mLstain 1 cm in area 200 ngstain 1 mm in area 2 ng

Semen 250,000 ng/mLPostcoital vaginal swab 0 - 3,000 ng

Hairpluckedshed

1 - 750 ng/hair1 - 12 ng/hair

Saliva

Urine5,000 ng/mL

1 - 20 ng/mL

2

2

Page 4: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Basic terminology: Genetics

• DNA Polymorphism (“many forms”)– Regions of DNA which differ from person to

person • Locus (plural = loci)

– Site or location on a chromosome• Allele

– Different variants which can exist at a locus• DNA Profile

– The combination of alleles for an individual

Page 5: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Basic terminology: Technology

• Amplification or PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction)– A technique for ‘replicating’ DNA in the

laboratory (‘molecular Xeroxing’)– Region to be amplified defined by PRIMERS– Can be ‘color coded’

• Electrophoresis– A technique for separating molecules according

to their size

Page 6: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

STR• Short tandem repeat• Describes a type of DNA polymorphism in

which:– a DNA sequence repeats– over and over again– and has a short (usually 4 base pair) repeat

unit• A length polymorphism -- alleles differ in their

length

5 repeats: AATG AATG AATG AATG AATG

6 repeats: AATG AATG AATG AATG AATG AATG

4 repeats: AATG AATG AATG AATG

3 repeats: AATG AATG AATG

Page 7: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Reading an electropherogramPeaks correspond to alleles

Electropherogram

D3 vWA FGA

D8 D21 D18

D5 D13 D7

BLUE

GREEN

YELLOW

RED

AmelogeninAmelogeninXX = femaleXY = male

75 100 139

150

160

200 245 300 bpsRed = ROX size standard

Page 8: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Automated STR Test

Page 9: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Crime Scene Samples & Reference Samples

Differential extraction in sex assault cases separates out DNA from sperm cells

• Extract and purify DNA

Page 10: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Extract and Purify DNA

• Add primers and other reagents

Page 11: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

PCR Amplification

Groups of amplified STR products are labeled with different colored dyes (blue, green, yellow)

• DNA regions flanked by primers are amplified

Page 12: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

The ABI 310 Genetic Analyzer:SIZE, COLOR & AMOUNT

Page 13: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

ABI 310 Genetic Analyzer: Capillary Electrophoresis

•Amplified STR DNA injected onto column

•Electric current applied

•DNA separated out by size:

– Large STRs travel slower

– Small STRs travel faster

•DNA pulled towards the positive electrode

•Color of STR detected and recorded as it passes the detector

DetectorWindow

Page 14: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Profiler Plus: Raw data

Page 15: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Statistical estimates: the product rule

0.222 x 0.222 x 2

= 0.1

Page 16: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Statistical estimates: the product rule

= 0.1

1 in 79,531,528,960,000,000

1 in 80 quadrillion

1 in 10 1 in 111 1 in 20

1 in 22,200

x x

1 in 100 1 in 14 1 in 81

1 in 113,400

x x

1 in 116 1 in 17 1 in 16

1 in 31,552

x x

Page 17: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

What more is there to say after you have said: “The chance of a

coincidental match is one in 80 quadrillion?”

Page 18: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

What more is there to say after you have said: “The chance of a

coincidental match is one in 80 quadrillion?”

• Two samples really do have the same source

• Samples match coincidentally• An error has occurred

Page 19: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Sources of ambiguity in DNA testing results

• Mixtures: deconvolution and relatives• Degradation, inhibition• Background noise• Stutter (n+4)• Pull-up• Spikes and blobs

Page 20: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Opportunities for subjective interpretation?

Page 21: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Opportunities for subjective interpretation?

D3: 12, 17 vWA: 15, 17 FGA: 22, 26

Page 22: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Sources of ambiguity in DNA testing results

• Mixtures: deconvolution and relatives• Degradation, inhibition• Background noise• Stutter (n+4)• Pull-up• Spikes and blobs

Page 23: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Mixed DNA samples

Page 24: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

How many contributors to a mixture if analysts can discard a locus?

How many contributors to a mixture?

Maximum # of alleles observed in a 3 person mixture # of occurrences Percent of cases

2 0 0.00

3 310 0.00

4 2,498,139 5.53

5 29,938,777 66.32

6 12,702,670 28.14

There are 45,139,896 possible different 3-way mixtures of the 648 individuals in the MN BCI database.

8,151

1,526,550

32,078,976

11,526,219

0.02

3.38

71.07

25.53

Page 25: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Sources of ambiguity in DNA testing results

• Mixtures: deconvolution and relatives• Degradation, inhibition• Background noise• Stutter (n+4)• Pull-up• Spikes and blobs

Page 26: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Accounting for relatives

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%

14.00%

16.00%

18.00%

20.00%

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23

Number of Shared Alleles

Percent of Total

Synthetic

Cousins

Siblings

Page 27: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Likelihood ratios for allele sharing:

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23

Number of Shared Alleles

Likelihood

Synthetic

Cousins

Siblings

Page 28: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Sources of ambiguity in DNA testing results

• Mixtures: deconvolution and relatives• Degradation, inhibition• Background noise• Stutter (n+4)• Pull-up• Spikes and blobs

Page 29: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Degradation

• When biological samples are exposed to adverse environmental conditions, they can become degraded

– Warm, moist, sunlight, time• Degradation breaks the DNA at random• Larger amplified regions are affected first• Classic ‘ski-slope’ electropherogram• Degradation is unusual.

LARGE

SMALL

Page 30: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Degradation

The Leskie Inquest

• Undegraded samples can have “ski-slopes” too.

• How negative does a slope have to be to an indication of degradation?

• Experience, training and expertise.

• Positive controls should not be degraded.

Page 31: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Degradation

The Leskie Inquest

• DNA profiles in a rape and a murder investigation match.

• Everyone agrees that the murder samples are degraded.

• If the rape sample is degraded, it could have contaminated the murder samples.

• Is the rape sample degraded?

Page 32: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Degradation

The Leskie Inquest

Page 33: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Sources of ambiguity in DNA testing results

• Mixtures: deconvolution and relatives• Degradation, inhibition• Background noise• Stutter (n+4)• Pull-up• Spikes and blobs

Page 34: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Background noise

Page 35: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Stutter peaks

Page 36: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Pull-up (software differences)

Advanced Classic

Page 37: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

“Spikes” and “blobs”

Page 38: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Spikes and blobs

Peak height

Peak

are

a

spike

blob

Peak Height

Pe

ak

Are

a

Blob: Peak Area / Peak Height > 10 +Spike: Peak Area / Peak Height < 4.5 -Blob: Peak Area / Peak Height > 10 +Spike: Peak Area / Peak Height < 4.5 -

Page 39: Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: essential elements of a competent defense review Forensic Bioinformatics () help@bioforensics.com.

Resources

• Books– ‘Forensic DNA Typing’ by John M. Butler (Academic Press)

• Internet– Applied Biosystems Website: http://www.appliedbiosystems.com/ (see

human identity and forensics)– Forensic Bioinformatics Website: http://www.bioforensics.com/– STR base: http://www.cstl.nist.gov/biotech/strbase/ (very useful)

• Scientists– Larry Mueller (UC Irvine)– Simon Ford (Lexigen, Inc. San Francisco, CA)– William C. Thompson (UC Irvine)– William Shields (SUNY, Syracuse, NY)– Marc Taylor (Technical Associates, Ventura, CA)– Keith Inman (Forensic Analytical, Haywood, CA)

• Testing laboratories– Technical Associates (Ventura, CA)– Indiana State Police (Indianapolis, IN)

• Other resources– Forensic Bioinformatics (Dayton, OH)


Recommended