Existing Ecological Conditions:
Maplewood Marine Restoration Project Prepared for: Vancouver Fraser Port Authority 100 The Pointe, 999 Canada Place Vancouver, BC V6C 3T4 Prepared by: Hemmera Envirochem Inc. 18th Floor, 4730 Kingsway Burnaby, BC V5H 0C6 July 2018
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - i - July 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 PROJECT RATIONALE ............................................................................................................. 2
2.0 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................................................................... 3
3.0 HABITAT ENHANCEMENT PROJECT .......................................................................................... 6
3.1 SITE HISTORY ....................................................................................................................... 6
3.2 PROPOSED WORKS ............................................................................................................... 7
4.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................. 10
5.0 EXISTING BIOPHYSICAL CONDITIONS ..................................................................................... 12
5.1 BIOGEOCLIMATIC DESCRIPTION OF SITE ............................................................................... 12
5.2 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS ............................................................................................... 13
5.3 MARINE VEGETATION .......................................................................................................... 15
5.4 FISH AND MARINE INVERTEBRATES....................................................................................... 16
5.4.1 Fish Species ......................................................................................................... 16
5.4.2 Marine Invertebrate Species ................................................................................ 19
5.5 WILDLIFE ............................................................................................................................ 19
6.0 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................... 27
7.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 28
List of Tables
Table 5-1 Listed Fish Species with the Potential to Occur Near the Project Site (B.C. Ministry of
Environment 2013) ............................................................................................................ 18
Table 5-2 Wildlife Species Observed at the Maplewood Conservation Area that may Utilize Areas the
Adjacent to the Project Site (WBT 2014a) ........................................................................ 20
Table 5-3 Listed Wildlife Species with Potential to Occur at the Project Site ................................... 22
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - ii - July 2018
List of Figures
Figure 2-1 Maplewood Marine Restoration Project Site ....................................................................... 4
Figure 2-2 Proposed Habitat Enhancements for the Maplewood Marine Restoration Project ............ 5
Figure 3-1 Maplewood Conservation Area in Relation to the Maplewood Marine Restoration Site .... 7
Figure 3-2 Artist’s Illustration Showing Proposed Enhanced Habitats for the Maplewood Marine
Restoration Project.............................................................................................................. 9
Figure 5-1 Biogeoclimatic Subzones of the Project Site and Surrounding Metro Vancouver Areas . 12
Figure 5-2 Mapped Substrate of the Intertidal Habitat Surrounding the Project Site (CMN 2010) .... 14
Figure 5-3 Marine Vegetation at the Project Site and Adjacent Intertidal Flats (CMN 2010) ............. 15
List of Appendices
Appendix A Aerial Photography Review
Appendix B Balanced Biophysical Survey Report
Appendix C Bird Use Studies
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 1 - July 2018
This Work was performed in accordance with the Contract for Environmental Advisory Services for Phase
2 of the Habitat Enhancement Program (Contract Number 81303) between Hemmera Envirochem Inc. and
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, dated July 1, 2015 (“Contract”). This Report has been prepared by
Hemmera, based on fieldwork conducted by Hemmera, for sole benefit and use by the Vancouver Fraser
Port Authority. In performing this Work, Hemmera has relied in good faith on information provided by others,
and has assumed that the information provided by those individuals is both complete and accurate. This
Work was performed to current industry standard practice for similar environmental work, within the relevant
jurisdiction and same locale. The findings presented herein should be considered within the context of the
scope of work and project terms of reference; further, the findings are time sensitive and are considered
valid only at the time the Report was produced. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this
Report are based upon the applicable guidelines, regulations, and legislation existing at the time the Report
was produced; any changes in the regulatory regime may alter the conclusions and/or recommendations.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Maplewood Marine Restoration Project (MMRP, or the “Project”) is a habitat enhancement project
proposed by the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority (VFPA) Habitat Enhancement Program (HEP). HEP is a
VFPA program whose goal is to balance a healthy environment with infrastructure development
opportunities. HEP creates and enhances fish and wildlife habitat for habitat banking purposes, use as
offsetting for port infrastructure projects, or a combination of both. The Project lies within VFPA jurisdiction
on the north shore of Burrard Inlet, approximately two kilometres east of the Ironworkers Memorial Bridge
(Figure 2-1).
The Project is located within a manmade marine tidal basin (the Northeast Basin; Figure 2-2), and an
intertidal area to the south of the Maplewood Basin (the Southern Intertidal Area; Figure 2-2). The
Maplewood Basin consists of the previously dredged area of Maplewood Flats, encompassing the
Northeast Basin and Main Basin. The Maplewood Basin was dredged in the 1940s to support gravel
extraction and was later used as a log storage facility. The Project is anticipated to enhance approximately
seven hectares of generally low-value marine habitat into higher-value marine habitat for fish, birds, and
other wildlife. Proposed habitat enhancements include a tidal channel, subtidal rock reef habitat, eelgrass
habitat, and intertidal flat habitat (Figure 2-2).
The objective of this report is to document the existing ecological conditions and potential species use of
the Project site. Existing ecological conditions and potential species use will be used to inform the Project
design and construction mitigation at the Project site.
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 2 - July 2018
1.1 PROJECT RATIONALE
As part of the HEP, VFPA is applying a landscape approach to identify potential sites where the productivity
of fish habitat can be increased, existing habitat can be enhanced, or degraded habitat can be restored to
benefit fish and wildlife species.
The Project is located within the “Fraser Estuary, Boundary Bay, Burrard Inlet, Fraser and North Arms”
Geographic Service Area (GSA). Site selection was based on factors including need, habitat productivity,
site location, feasibility and cost, sustainable habitat creation, ownership and tenure, and consideration
towards Aboriginal groups and communities.
VFPA is proposing to use MMRP as a fisheries habitat offsetting site for the proposed Centerm Expansion
Project (CEP) in Vancouver Harbour. In developing MMRP, a surplus of enhanced habitat will be created,
in excess of the requirements anticipated to offset the CEP residual serious harm to fish. This additional
habitat is being proposed for deposit into VFPA’s Habitat Bank. Habitat proposed for deposit into VFPA’s
Habitat Bank will be deposited in accordance with the 2012 working agreement between VFPA and
Fisheries and Oceans Canada entitled “Working Agreement Concerning Procedures for Development and
Operation of the Port Metro Vancouver Habitat Bank”. As part of the overall Project objectives, all habitats
created by the Project have been designed to synergistically provide broad fish habitat benefits within the
Maplewood Basin.
The Project is located within the Central Harbour of Burrard Inlet. Burrard Inlet shorelines (including Port
Moody Arm, Indian Arm, Central Harbour, Inner Harbour, False Creek and Outer Harbour) were assessed
on behalf of the Burrard Inlet Environmental Action Program (BIEAP) in 2009 (Stantec 2009). The
assessment report recommended that habitat enhancement projects focus on areas with the greatest
potential value for important marine organisms including migrating salmon and waterfowl. In particular, the
Central Harbour section of Burrard Inlet was highlighted as an area where enhancements would provide
high potential to contribute to juvenile salmon survival (Stantec 2009).
Prior to development and dredging in the area, Maplewood Flats was reported to support significant
eelgrass and kelp bed habitats (KWL 2017). It was also an important shellfish harvesting site for Aboriginal
groups (KWL 2017). Creation of high value intertidal and shallow subtidal fish and wildlife habitats with this
Project are anticipated to improve the overall productivity of the Central Harbour and Burrard Inlet, and
provide high-quality habitat for a variety of fish, bird and wildlife species.
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 3 - July 2018
2.0 PROJECT LOCATION
The Project site is located on the north shore of Burrard Inlet, in the Central Harbour, approximately two
kilometres east of the Ironworkers Memorial Bridge (Figure 2-1). The Project site is within VFPA’s
jurisdiction, immediately south of the Maplewood Flats Conservation Area, which is leased to Environment
and Climate Change Canada and managed by the Wild Bird Trust of British Columbia.
The Project site consists of two distinct areas: the Northeast Basin area, centered at approximately
49°18’10” N and 123°00’05” W; and, the proposed Southwest Channel (in the Southern Intertidal Area),
centered at approximately 49°17’55” N and 123°00’25” W (Figure 2-2).
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 4 - July 2018
Source: Kirk & Co. 2018
Figure 2-1 Maplewood Marine Restoration Project Site
Path: S:\Geomatics\Projects\989565\Maplewood\05\mxd\HEP\Fig2-2__989565_05_Maplewood_HEP_ProposedHEP_180726.mxd
Prod uction Date: Jul 26, 2018
Page Size: 11" x 17"
989565-05 Figure 2-2
NAD 1983 UTM Z one 10N
1. All m ap p ed features are ap p roxim ate and should b e used for d iscussionp urp oses only.2. This m ap is not intend ed to b e a “stand -alone” d ocument, b ut a visual aidof the inform ation contained within the referenced R ep ort. It is intend ed tob e used in conjunction with the scop e of services and lim itations d escrib edtherein.
- Project Bound ary, Basins, Channel, and Prop osed EnhancementFeatures: AECO M, 2018- Aerial Im age: North Vanc ouver, 2013
Ä Ä Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä Ä Ä
Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä Ä Ä Ä
(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
SO UTHER NINTER TIDAL AR EA
SO UTHEASTCHANNEL
MAPLEWO O D BASIN
MAIN BASIN
NO R THEASTBASIN
SO UTHWESTCHANNEL (NEW)
MAPLEWO O DFLATS
MAPLEWO O D FLATSCO NSER VATIO N AR EA
FORESTER ST
Notes
Sources
Proposed Habitat Enhancements at the Site
Map lewood Marine R estoration ProjectNorth Vanc ouver, BC
Legend
±1:4,000
0 50 100 150 200 250Metres
Map lewood Marine R estoration Project Bound aryMap lewood BasinBarge Channel
Northeast BasinIntertid al Flat (19,000 m 2)
ÄÄÄ Eelgrass (16,000 m 2)
R oc k R eef (11,000 m 2)Southwest Channel
((((((((((((R oc k R eef (24,000 m 2)
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 6 - July 2018
3.0 HABITAT ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
3.1 SITE HISTORY
In the late 1800’s, tidal flats bordered the northern shore of Burrard Inlet’s Central Harbour providing
productive habitat for waterfowl, fish, and shellfish (PMV 1998). Modifications to the upland areas of
Maplewood, in the form of logging, began around the turn of the 20th century (PMV 1998). Over a period of
almost 100 years, logging, land “reclamation” and industry shaped the upland and intertidal portions of the
area (PMV 1998). Aerial photographs suggest that the Maplewood Basin was dredged in the 1940’s to
1960’s but has largely remained in its present form since that time (Appendix A). The dredged areas were
formerly utilized for log sorting and storage operations (early 1940’s to early 1980’s) and gravel extraction
operations via barge (early 1940’s to 1961; PMV 1998). Infilling of dredged areas between 1969 and 1979
on the north side of the Maplewood Basin created uplands that were used for a wide range of industrial
operations until the late-1980’s (PMV 1998).
By the 1940’s a small community of squatters had become established in the foreshore area of Maplewood
Mudflats (Wei 2014). The community grew and by the 1960’s had attracted a number of artists, writers, and
activists (Wei 2014, Griffin 2015). Residents of the District of North Vancouver opposed the squatters and
civic authorities burned community structures in December 1971 (Griffin 2015).
In 1991, 21 ha of VFPA lands adjacent to the Project site were designated as a conservation area (Figure
3-1; PMV 1998, WBT 2014a). These uplands are currently leased to Environment and Climate Change
Canada and are managed by the Wild Bird Trust of British Columbia, a not-for-profit organization (WBT
2014a). Over the last couple of decades, the upland conservation area has been restored from a degraded
industrial site into high value habitat for birds and other wildlife (PMV 1998, WBT 2014a).
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 7 - July 2018
Source: District of North Vancouver GEOweb 2018
Figure 3-1 Maplewood Conservation Area in Relation to the Maplewood Marine Restoration Site
3.2 PROPOSED WORKS
The scope of the proposed Project includes the creation and enhancement of nearshore fish habitat within
the Northeast Basin and Southwest Channel and encompasses approximately seven hectares. Proposed
enhancements in the Northeast Basin and Southwest Channel include the creation of three habitat types
(AECOM 2018):
• Intertidal flat habitat to support bivalve shellfish and other fauna;
• Shallow subtidal eelgrass habitat to provide nursery habitat for CRA fishery species (e.g.,
Dungeness crab (Metacarcinus magister) and juvenile salmonids); and,
• Rock reef habitat to support broad-bladed kelp and encrusting or colonial invertebrates, providing
habitat and food for a variety of CRA fishery species (e.g., lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus)) in the
Northeast Basin and Southwest Channel.
Habitat in the Northeast Basin will be created by beneficially using approximately 87,000 m3 of dredge
material from the Southern Intertidal Area (resulting from the creation of the proposed Southwest Channel),
and approximately 95,000 m3 of imported clean fill material, to raise the elevation of the existing substrate
Maplewood Flats
Conservation Area
Project Site
N
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 8 - July 2018
(Figure 2-2). Fraser River sand, or a suitable clean alternate (e.g., approved Sechelt sand), is proposed as
the additional fill material. This imported material is anticipated to be placed over the dredge material from
the Southwest Channel to form the upper sediment layer in the Northeast Basin.
The newly created intertidal flat habitat and shallow subtidal eelgrass habitat in the Northeast Basin
(Figure 2-2) will be located between approximately +2.0 m and -2.0 m CD. Construction of a rock dyke is
required to contain the fill material needed to establish the intertidal and shallow subtidal areas in the
Northeast Basin. Subtidal rock reef habitat south of the rock dyke, at the southernmost end of the
Northeast Basin (Figure 2-2), will be constructed by placing appropriately sized rock material between
approximately -3.0 m and -4.0 m CD. The rock reef habitat will be constructed using rock of varying
diameter, with an average (median) diameter (D50) of approximately 600 mm. A total of approximately
8,500 m3 of rock material is anticipated to be placed in the Northeast Basin.
Rock reef habitat will also be created in the Southern Intertidal Area (Figure 2-2) following dredging of the
Southwest Channel. The Southwest Channel will improve tidal flushing in the Maplewood Basin and
enhance nutrient transport, improve water quality, reduce siltation of marine vegetation, and facilitate
suspension and distribution of eggs and larvae of pelagic spawning fish and invertebrates, including marine
vegetation spores (AECOM 2018). A total of approximately 14,000 m3 of rock material will be placed in the
Southwest Channel, both along the base of the channel to function as subtidal rock reef habitat, and along
the side slopes of the excavated Southwest Channel to protect against scour from tidal currents as well as
to function as rock reef habitat. The rocks along the side slopes will have a D50 of approximately 500 mm,
and the rocks on the base of the channel will have a D50 of approximately 600 mm. The rock in the
Southwest Channel will be placed between approximately +2.0 m and -4.0 m CD.
The intertidal flat habitat in the Northeast Basin is expected to support colonization by bivalve shellfish and
other infaunal and epifaunal macroinvertebrate species. Shallow subtidal eelgrass beds will be transplanted
with native eelgrass (Zostera marina) from suitable donor beds and the rock reef habitat will provide hard
substrate for the establishment of kelp, algae and encrusting/colonial invertebrates. The eelgrass and rock
reef/kelp habitat will increase primary productivity at the Project site, which will benefit the rearing stages
of many commercially important species, including rearing salmonids, juvenile Pacific herring (Clupea
pallasii), rockfish and Dungeness crab. These habitat types will also increase the diversity of marine
invertebrates (e.g., bivalves) associated with the Northeast Basin. Reef habitat will provide substrate for
sessile invertebrate attachment (e.g., anemones) and habitat for motile invertebrates (e.g. chiton). The
intertidal and shallow subtidal habitat is also anticipated to increase foraging habitat for waterfowl and
shorebirds. An artist’s illustration depicting a cross-section of proposed habitat enhancements at the Project
site is included in Figure 3-2 for reference.
More information regarding the proposed works is presented in the Project’s design report (AECOM 2018).
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 9 - July 2018
Source: Kirk & Co 2018
Figure 3-2 Artist’s Illustration Showing Proposed Enhanced Habitats for the Maplewood Marine Restoration Project
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 10 - July 2018
4.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
Background information considered during preparation of this report included:
• Desktop study and background research of available online databases, peer review literature and
professional reports;
• A review of current and historical aerial photographs (Appendix A);
• Biophysical information from the Maplewood Basin and Southern Intertidal Area collected by
Balanced Environmental Services Inc. in 2017 (Appendix B);
• Supplemental biophysical information from the Southwest Channel collected by Hemmera in 2018
(Hemmera 2018);
• Preliminary field investigations conducted by Precision Identification (Precision 2013) and
Hemmera Envirochem Inc. (Hemmera 2013) in 2013; and
• Bird Use Studies for MMRP from Hemmera (Appendix C).
Recent biophysical surveys of the Project site were undertaken between October 18 and 20, 2017, and on
October 27, 2017 by Balanced (Appendix B) to support development of a preliminary design report
(AECOM 2018). Hemmera undertook a subsequent survey of the proposed Southwest Channel on June
14, 2018 to supplement existing biophysical information for this area. The goal of these surveys was to
document existing ecological conditions at the Project site including substrates, species abundance and
distribution, and to confirm the findings of preliminary field investigations conducted by Precision (2013a)
and Hemmera (2013). The subsections below summarize the methodology used during the surveys
conducted by Balanced and Hemmera in 2017 and 2018, respectively. More detailed information on
Balanced’s methodology is provided in Appendix B.
Balanced implemented underwater dive and land-based surveys between October 18 and 20, 2017. The
surveys were undertaken along fourteen pre-determined transects spanning intertidal and subtidal habitats
through the Northeast Basin, proposed Southwest Channel and the Main Basin (Appendix B: Drawing
3910-D-01.1). Surficial substrate composition and relative cover, marine vegetation species composition
and percent areal coverage, faunal composition and abundance, and changes in general habitat
characteristics were recorded along each transect. Four additional drop dives were also conducted in the
central portion of the Main Basin (outside the proposed enhancement areas).
Bivalve surveys were conducted by Balanced on October 27, 2017 to collect additional information on
bivalve species presence and abundance throughout the Maplewood Basin and Southern Intertidal Area.
In addition, Balanced re-assessed areas where Precision and Hemmera had identified high value habitat
in 2013. Density, health, growth characteristics, and biota abundance were assessed with quadrats placed
along dive transects.
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 11 - July 2018
Hemmera undertook a biophysical survey of the proposed Southwest Channel during a low tide on June
14, 2018. Field data was collected relating to substrate composition, dominant habitat types (e.g. described
by encrusting invertebrate and macroalgae communities), and bivalve shellfish presence and densities. A
pre-typed, georeferenced aerial photograph was used to guide establishment of two longitudinal transects
within the Southwest Channel, with one metre square sampling quadrats established throughout the length
of each transect. To provide more detailed information on the presence and abundance of intertidal
bivalves, Hemmera undertook clam digs using smaller quadrats (25 cm by 25 cm) at approximately 45% of
the sampling quadrats.
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 12 - July 2018
5.0 EXISTING BIOPHYSICAL CONDITIONS
Background information related to the existing biophysical conditions of the Project site was obtained from
the following sources:
• Online Sensitive Habitat Inventory and Mapping (CMN 2018);
• Online Burrard Inlet Environmental Action Program (BIEAP) Habitat Atlas (CMN 2010);
• Online Fisheries Information Summary System (Government of BC 2018a);
• Online E-Fauna BC database (Klinkenberg 2018);
• Online BC Species & Ecosystems Explorer (MOE 2018);
• Online iMapBC database (Government of BC 2018b);
• Aerial photographs (Appendix A); and
• Biophysical reports and field studies conducted at the Project site.
5.1 BIOGEOCLIMATIC DESCRIPTION OF SITE
The Project site falls within the Dry Maritime Coastal Western Hemlock (CWHdm) biogeoclimatic subzone
(Figure 5-1; CMN 2018, BC 2012). The CWHdm subzone occurs at lower elevations (0 to 650 m), and is
typified by warm, relatively dry summers and moist, mild winters with little snowfall (Green and Klinka 1994).
The mean annual temperatures in the CWH zone ranges from approximately 5.2 to 10.5°C, with a mean
annual precipitation ranging from 1000 to 4400 mm (Pojar et al 1991). The Project site occurs in the marine
subtidal zone adjacent to forested upland habitats.
Source: Government of B.C. 2012
Figure 5-1 Biogeoclimatic Subzones of the Project Site and Surrounding Metro Vancouver Areas
Project Site
N
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 13 - July 2018
5.2 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Burrard Inlet is a 11,300 ha drainage basin consisting of six sub-areas: the Outer Harbour and English Bay,
False Creek, the Inner Harbour, the Central Harbour, Indian Arm and Port Moody Arm (Georgia Strait
Alliance 2003, Stantec 2009). The shoreline through the Inner Harbour to Central Harbour of Burrard Inlet
is heavily industrialized and the Central Harbour (between Second Narrows and Admiralty Point) is typified
by a high percentage of riprap per total shoreline area (Stantec 2009). However, the tidal flat and estuary
at Maplewood Flats (covering approximately 123 ha) is described as the second largest unaltered tidal flat
area in Burrard Inlet (Stantec 2009).
The Northeast Basin was last dredged in the 1960’s (Appendix A). This basin exhibits depths up to
approximately -9.0 m CD and is poorly flushed. Drainage is impeded by the shallow drainage channel to
the southeast (the Southeast Channel; AECOM 2018).
BIEAP undertook biophysical feature mapping in Burrard Inlet in 2010 (CMN 2010, Figure 5-2). The
Maplewood Basin is bordered by intertidal habitats that vary widely in physical properties such as width,
steepness and substrate size. The intertidal benches surrounding the Project site are comprised primarily
of coarse and fine gravel substrates, with areas of sand. To the east of the Project site, coarser sediments
slowly transition to mud in the upper intertidal area of the Maplewood Flats (Figure 5-2).
Appendix B Drawing 3910-D-03.1 shows the substrates present in the Maplewood Basin and adjacent
intertidal areas. The shoreline along the northern edge of the Maplewood Basin is a narrow strip of intertidal
habitat with steep grades and with predominantly pebble, cobble and concrete debris substrates
(Appendix B). The eastern and southern portion of the Northeast Basin has pebble and cobble substrates,
with patches of sand and shell debris (Appendix B). The floor of the Northeast Basin and Main Basin is
composed primarily of fine sediments (mud) with accumulations of wood debris (Appendix B).
The proposed Southwest Channel area between the Main Basin (to the north) and the main channel of
Burrard Inlet (to the south) consists of a mixture of cobble, gravel, sand and shell debris. In general, the
higher northern portion of this area can be characterized as primarily cobble substrate (with the exception
of a distinct sand/shell ridge), while the majority of the mid-intertidal zone is primarily a mixture of cobble
and sand/shell, and the low-intertidal area is primarily gravel substrate (Hemmera 2018).
A dredged tidally-influenced “Barge Channel” is located north of the Northeast Basin. The Barge Channel
conveys some brackish flows into the Northeast Basin (Figure 2-2). This channel receives freshwater inputs
from an ephemeral watercourse located north of Dollarton Highway, in addition to stormwater and
groundwater inputs. The fresh water in this channel is diluted by salt water from the Northeast Basin during
high tides (AECOM 2018).
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 14 - July 2018
Blueridge Creek and McCartney Creek provide freshwater inputs to the Maplewood Flats to the northeast
of the Project site. Blueridge Creek and McCartney Creek have been modified by residential developments
and experience flashy flows (PSKF n.d.) (see inset map on Figure 5-2, CMN 2010).
Note: Inset map shows watercourses located near the Project site.
Figure 5-2 Mapped Substrate of the Intertidal Habitat Surrounding the Project Site (CMN 2010)
Barge Channel
Northeast Basin
Main Basin
McCartney Creek
Blueridge Creek
Barge Channel
Maplewood Flats
N
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 15 - July 2018
5.3 MARINE VEGETATION
According the BIEAP Atlas, parts of the eastern and western bank of the Northeast Basin and surrounding
intertidal bank support rockweed (Fucus sp.) (Figure 5-3) (CMN 2010 from BIEAP). Bull kelp (Nereocystis
luetkeana) is present on hard substrates on the eastern and western side of the Maplewood Basin and
within the Southeast Channel, and along the southern edge of the Southern Intertidal Area (Figure 5-3;
CMN 2010Sea lettuce (Ulva sp.) is interspersed on the intertidal areas to the south and east of the
Maplewood Basin (Figure 5-3; CMN 2010). A sparse patch of broad iodine seaweed (Prionitis lyallii) is
present to the east of the Main Basin (Figure 5-3; CMN 2010).
Figure 5-3 Marine Vegetation at the Project Site and Adjacent Intertidal Flats (CMN 2010)
N
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 16 - July 2018
The overall abundance of marine vegetation in the Northeast Basin is low with species abundance largely
classified as rare (1 individual per transect) or sparse (2 to 5 individuals per transect; Appendix B).
However, where coarse substrates provide adequate attachment sites, marine vegetation includes sugar
kelp (Saccharina latissima), rockweed (Fucus gardineri), Turkish washcloth (Mastocarpus papillatus), and
iodine seaweed (Appendix B).
In the intertidal zone overlapping the proposed Southwest Channel, sea lettuce (Ulva sp.) is the most
frequently encountered algae with high coverage in the low intertidal zone and sparser coverage in the
lower mid-intertidal zone. Marine vegetation coverage in the low intertidal zone of the Southwest Channel
is significantly higher, with species including sea lettuce, winged kelp, sugar wrack, split kelp (Saccharina
groenlandica), sea felt (Pylaiella littoralis) and non-native Japanese wireweed (Sargassum muticum)
(Hemmera 2018).
While eelgrass was not observed in the Northeast Basin or Southern Intertidal Area, it is present in two very
small patches in the Main Basin and in the Southeast Channel (Precision 2013a, Appendix B).
More information regarding marine vegetation recorded during the biophysical surveys conducted by
Balanced, is provided in Appendix B Drawing 3910-D-04.1 and the supporting “Species Tables” therein.
No at-risk marine vegetation species (or ecological communities) are known to be present at the Project
site (MOE 2018). Any at-risk terrestrial species present nearby, would not be affected by the Project.
5.4 FISH AND MARINE INVERTEBRATES
5.4.1 Fish Species
High quality fish habitat in Burrard Inlet is limited by urban and industrial development, however the inlet
hosts a diversity of fish species. Juvenile salmon occupy nearshore habitats from early spring to fall,
particularly chum (Oncorhynchus keta), chinook (O. tshawytscha) and, every second year, pink (O.
gorbuscha) salmon (Haggarty, 2001). Juvenile coho salmon (O. kisutch), sockeye salmon (O. nerka),
steelhead (O. mykiss) and cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki) are also present, in lower abundances
(Haggarty 2001). Adult salmon have been observed within 17 streams that flow into Burrard Inlet and are
known to spawn in rivers on the north shore of the inlet, particularly in the Capilano and Seymour rivers that
support salmon hatcheries (Haggarty 2001). The Maplewood Flats receive freshwater inputs from
McCartney and Blueridge creeks, streams that sustain spawning coho salmon and cutthroat trout, as well
as a few chum salmon (PSKF n.d., Fraser River Action Plan 1999, G. Parker (North Shore Streamkeepers),
pers. comm., 10 June 2018) (see inset map on Figure 5-2). There is also anecdotal evidence that suggests
juvenile chum salmon have historically used the Barge Channel at the northwest end of the Northeast Basin
(AECOM 2018).
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 17 - July 2018
Approximately 63 other fish species utilize nearshore areas of Burrard Inlet, including: Pacific herring,
northern anchovy (Engraulis mordax), lingcod (Ophiodon elongates), flatfish (i.e., English sole (Parophrys
vetulus)), starry flounder (Platichthys stellatus), rock sole (Lepidopsetta bilineata)), Pacific staghorn sculpin
(Leptocottus armatus), shiner perch (Cymatogaster aggregata) and quillback rockfish (Sebastes maliger)
(Haggarty 2001). There are three Rockfish Conservation Areas in eastern portions of Burrard Inlet, one of
which (Subarea 28-11) occurs south of the Project site on the southern bank of Burrard Inlet (DFO 2008).
The Project site, which is characterized by a variety of unconsolidated substrates and some marine
vegetation would support habitat for some of these fish species. For example, sand and mudflat habitat is
typically used by flatfish, while kelp can be used by lingcod and rockfish, and nearby eelgrass areas could
be utilized by juvenile herring and salmonids. Finfish observed with the Maplewood Basin (including the
Northeast Basin) (Appendix B) were classified as rare (1 individual per transect) or sparse (2 to 5
individuals per transect) and included scalyhead sculpin (Artedius harringtoni), saddle back gunnel (Pholis
ornate) and black-eyed goby (Coryphopterus nichols). Four fish species were observed in the Maplewood
Basin in surveys conducted in 2013 including Pacific staghorn sculpin (Leptocottus armatus), sand sole
(Psettichthys melanostictus), poacher (Family Agonidae) and sculpin (Family Cottidae) (Precision 2013a).
Provincially and federally at-risk fish species with ranges that potentially overlap the Project site are
included in Table 5-1. It should be noted however, that the majority of these species would be very unlikely
to be found at the Project site due to their known habitat preferences. However, coastal cutthroat trout
(Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii) is likely to utilize habitat present at the Project site and surrounding areas
(including kelp and eelgrass areas).
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 18 - July 2018
Table 5-1 Listed Fish Species with the Potential to Occur Near the Project Site (B.C. Ministry of Environment 2013)
English Name
Scientific Name Provincial
Listing1 SARA2 COSEWIC3 Comments Construction Effects
Post-Enhancement Effects
Bluntnose sixgill shark
Hexanchus griseus
No status 1-SC
(2009) SC (2007)
Range overlaps with Burrard Inlet. However, it is unlikely to occur near the Project site as it is typically found at depths greater than 91 m (COSEWIC 2007).
n/a n/a
Coastal cutthroat trout
Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii
Blue Not
listed Not listed
Found in Burrard Inlet, although they tend to occur at lower densities than chum, chinook and pink salmon. Can use nearshore marine areas for feeding such as those available at the Project site.
Potential temporal impacts to feeding and refuge areas
Nutrient and prey availability would increase following enhancement
Eulachon – Fraser River population
Thaleichthys pacificus
Blue Not
listed E/T (2011)
Not commonly found in Burrard Inlet but could potentially stray into the inlet (COSEWIC 2011a).
Not likely to be affected by construction
n/a
Green sturgeon
Acipenser medirostris
Red 1-SC
(2006) SC (1987)
Not commonly found in Burrard Inlet but could potentially stray into the inlet (COSEWIC 2013).
Not likely to be affected by construction
May marginally benefit from an increase in prey availability
Quillback rockfish
Sebastes maliger
No status Not
listed T (2009)
Occurs in the Burrard Inlet but is unlikely to use the Project site as it prefers deeper habitats (≥ 16 m) (COSEWIC 2009a).
Not likely to be affected by construction
May marginally benefit from an increase in prey availability
Yelloweye rockfish
Sebastes ruberrimus
No status 1-SC SC (2008)
Occurs in the Burrard Inlet but adults unlikely to be found at the Project site due to its preferred depth range (i.e., ≥ 19 m). Considered to be an opportunistic feeder (COSEWIC 2008).
Not likely to be affected by construction
May marginally benefit from an increase in prey availability
Notes: 1 Red = Endangered or Threatened, Blue = Special Concern 2 Schedule 1 = Federal species at risk 3 E = Endangered, T = Threatened, SC = Special Concern
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 19 - July 2018
5.4.2 Marine Invertebrate Species
The Northeast Basin supports a variety of invertebrates including crabs, crustaceans, molluscs, anemones,
and sea stars. However, densities in the Northeast Basin are low, and it has been described as providing
minimal habitat for macroinvertebrate species (AECOM 2018). The wood debris accumulation in the
Northeast Basin has adversely affected habitat quality and productivity, likely contributing to the low
abundance of macroinvertebrate species (AECOM 2018). Intertidal areas in the Northeast Basin supported
sessile invertebrates including acorn barnacles (Balanus glandula), bay mussels (Mytilus trossulus) and
shore crabs (green shore (Hemigrapsus oregonensis) and purple shore (H. nudus) crabs) (Appendix B).
The subtidal areas in the Northeast Basin supported invertebrates such as plumose anemone (Metridium
farcimen) and crabs (e.g. Dungeness crab) at low densities.
Visual observation of the Main Basin indicates that it supports similar macroinvertebrate communities as
the Northeast Basin. In addition, benthic sampling undertaken in the northeast corner of the Main Basin
identified butter clam (Saxidomus gigantea), littleneck clam (Protothaca staminea), bent-nosed clam
(Macoma nasuta), Manila clam (Venerupis philippinarum), and Nuttall’s cockle (Clinocardium nuttallii)
(Appendix B).
Dense accumulations of habitat forming sessile invertebrates (i.e., acorn barnacles and bay mussels) were
observed across the proposed Southwest Channel area. Sea stars and Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas)
were also observed. Shore crabs were common throughout the intertidal zone (AECOM 2018, Hemmera
2018). Benthic sampling in the Southern Intertidal Area by Balanced in 2017 and Hemmera in 2018 yielded
butter clam, littleneck clam, bent-nosed clam, manila clam, Nuttall’s cockle, and gaper clam (Tresus sp.)
(Appendix B, AECOM 2018, Hemmera 2018).
No listed invertebrate species were observed during surveys in the Maplewood Basin or the surrounding
intertidal banks (Appendix B). Northern abalone (Haliotis kamtschatkana), an Endangered Schedule 1
Species at Risk Act species and provincially red-listed species (i.e. endangered or threatened) has a range
that overlaps Burrard Inlet. Northern abalone are typically found in more exposed areas with good water
exchange (e.g. tidal currents) (COSEWIC 2009b) and this species is not likely to occur in the Project site.
However, creation of large quantities of rock reef habitat is anticipated to increase drift algae (e.g. kelp),
which is a prime food source for northern abalone.
5.5 WILDLIFE
Designated as an internationally recognized Important Bird Area (IBA), Burrard Inlet is an important
migratory bird corridor, providing essential habitat for significant concentrations of waterfowl species, such
as western grebe (Aechmophorus occidentalis), Barrow’s goldeneye (Bucephala islandica), and surf scoter
(Melanitta perspicillata; IBA 2018). A variety of bird species use Burrard Inlet and the surrounding shoreline,
most of which are waterbirds, such as loons, grebes, cormorants, geese, ducks, gulls, coots and alcids
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 20 - July 2018
(Haggarty 2001). However, there are also birds of prey, such as northern pygmy owl (Glaucidium gnoma),
osprey (Pandion haliaetus) and bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), as well as marsh and shorebirds,
including great blue heron (Ardea herodias), plovers and western sandpiper (Calidris mauri) (Haggarty
2001). Over 246 bird species have been observed at the Maplewood Conservation Area, many of which
would also use the Project site. Nest boxes for purple martin (Progne subis) have been constructed on
wooden dolphins (i.e. bollard, pile, or buoy for mooring) in the mudflat areas east of the Project site to
encourage nesting, with an estimate of 34 nesting pairs in 2008 (WBT 2009).
A review of available reports and studies on bird use in the Maplewood Flats Conservation Area was
undertaken by Hemmera in 2018. An on-site survey of raptor and heron nests was also conducted on March
9, 2018 to document any existing stick nests near the Project site that would be afforded year-round
protection. The results of this literature review and nest survey are available in Appendix C.
The most common marine mammal in Burrard Inlet, and one that is commonly sighted around the
Maplewood Flats Conservation Area, is the harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) (KWL 2017). Steller sea lion
(Eumetopias jubatus), harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena), false killer whale (Pseudorca crassidens),
killer whale (Orcinus orca) and grey whale (Eschrichtius robustus) are also occasionally observed and could
potentially interact with the Project site (Haggarty 2001, KWL 2017).
In addition to birds and marine mammals, a number of terrestrial mammals have been observed adjacent
to the Project site in the Maplewood Flats Conservation Area. Use of the Project site would be limited to
those species that utilize intertidal and subtidal marine areas. Raccoons (Procyon lotor), black-tailed deer
(Odocoileus hemionus) and black bears (Ursus americanus) are all know to utilize intertidal areas at least
some of the time. River otters (Lontra canadensis) forage in intertidal and subtidal marine habitats. A list of
mammalian species observed at Maplewood Flats Conservation Area which may utilize the Project site is
provided in Table 5-2.
Table 5-2 Wildlife Species Observed at the Maplewood Conservation Area that may Utilize Areas the Adjacent to the Project Site (WBT 2014a)
English Name Scientific Name Likelihood of Occurrence
Black bear Ursus americanus Rare
Black-tailed deer Odocoileus hemionus Likely
Coyote Canis latrans Likely
Mink Mustela vison Likely
Racoon Procyon lotor Likely
River otter Lontra canadensis Likely
Short-tailed weasel Mustela erminea Possible
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 21 - July 2018
As the Project site is located entirely within subtidal and intertidal zones of a marine environment, amphibian
and reptile species are not anticipated to occur at the Project site. However, the upland areas in Maplewood
Flats Conservation Area do support reptiles such as northwestern garter snake (Thamnophis ordinoides),
and amphibians such as Pacific tree frog (Pseudacris regilla) (WBT 2014b).
A search of the BC CDC returned 61 federally- and provincially-listed bird and mammal species (including
species associated primarily with terrestrial habitat) that are known to occur in MOE Region 2 that may use
intertidal or subtidal habitat. Of these 61 species, 29 species of listed birds that use intertidal and/or subtidal
habitat have been documented at the Maplewood Flats Conservations Area or within the Maplewood Basin
(Table 5-3) at various times throughout the year (eBird 2018); eight mammal species have the potential to
occur at or near the Project site (Table 5-3).
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 22 - July 2018
Table 5-3 Listed Wildlife Species with Potential to Occur at the Project Site
English Name
Scientific Name Provincial Listing1 SARA2, 3 COSEWIC3 Comments4 Construction Effects Post-Enhancement
Effects
Birds
American bittern
Botaurus lentiginosus
Blue Not listed Not listed
May occur in marsh area surrounding the Project site; this species is tied to wetlands with tall emergent vegetation (e.g., cattails) year-round and not likely to occur at the Project site.
n/a n/a
American white pelican
Pelecanus erythrorhynchos
Red NAR (May 1987)
Not listed Observed in 2001, considered unlikely to occur, but has potential.
n/a n/a
Barn swallow Hirundo rustica Blue T (May 2011)
1-T (Nov 2017)
Seen in marsh habitat near Project site; this species may nest under bridges near river banks and wetlands from which mud is collected to construct nests; forage over open areas such as water bodies.
Not likely to be affected by construction.
Likely no effect. Foraging on the wing over water will not be affected.
Barn owl Tyto alba Blue 1-SC
(2003) T (2010)
May be found foraging in marsh habitat near the Project site.
Not likely to be affected by construction.
No effect. Species does not utilize subtidal habitats.
Black scoter Melanitta americana
Blue Not listed Not listed Historically abundant at the Project site, last observation from eBird was 2014.
Construction activities (e.g., noise, artificial lighting) may affect foraging.
Increase in forage opportunity.
Black swift Cypseloides niger
Blue E (May 2015)
Not listed Commonly observed species at Maplewood Flats Conservation Area.
Not likely to be affected by construction.
Likely no effect. Foraging on the wing over water will not be affected.
Brandt's cormorant
Phalacrocorax penicillatus
Red Not listed Not listed
Uncommon at the Project site, but occasional observation from Maplewood Flats.
Construction activities (e.g., noise, artificial lighting) may affect foraging.
Increase in prey abundance, productivity.
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 23 - July 2018
English Name
Scientific Name Provincial Listing1 SARA2, 3 COSEWIC3 Comments4 Construction Effects Post-Enhancement
Effects
Brant Branta bernicla Blue Not listed Not listed
No observations at Maplewood Flats Conservation Area since 2014.
Construction activities (e.g., noise, artificial lighting) may affect foraging.
Increase in forage opportunity.
California gull Larus californicus
Blue Not listed Not listed Commonly occurring bird at the Project site.
Not likely to be affected by construction.
Likely no effect.
Caspian tern Hydroprogne caspia
Blue Not listed NAR
(1999) May forage for fish at the Project site.
Construction activities (e.g., noise, artificial lighting) may affect foraging.
May benefit from increased prey availability.
Common nighthawk
Chordeiles minor Yellow 1-T
(2010) SC (2018)
May nest on exposed gravel beds above the intertidal zone
Construction activities (e.g., noise, artificial lighting) may affect foraging.
Likely no effect. Foraging on the wing over water will not be affected.
Double-crested cormorant
Phalacrocorax auritus
Blue Not listed NAR
(1978)
May over-winter at the Project site; between foraging for fish on open water it often spends time perched on pilings and rocks. Large nesting colony on Iron Workers Memorial Bridge (Second Narrows Crossing), located < 2 km to the west of the Project site.
Construction activities (e.g., noise, artificial lighting) may affect foraging.
Increase in prey abundance, productivity.
Eared grebe Podiceps nigricollis
Blue Not listed Not listed Occasional observations yearly from 2012 to present.
Construction activities (e.g., noise, artificial lighting) may affect foraging.
Increase in prey abundance, productivity.
Great blue heron, fannini subspecies
Ardea herodias fannini
Blue 1-SC
(2010) SC (2008)
Species may forage for fish at the Project site; no nesting colonies located at or near the Project site.
Construction activities (e.g., noise, artificial lighting) may affect foraging.
Increase in prey abundance.
Green heron Butorides virescens
Blue Not listed Not listed Commonly observed species at Maplewood Flats Conservation Area.
Not likely to be affected by construction.
Likely no effect.
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 24 - July 2018
English Name
Scientific Name Provincial Listing1 SARA2, 3 COSEWIC3 Comments4 Construction Effects Post-Enhancement
Effects
Horned grebe Podiceps auritus Yellow SC (Apr 2009)
1-SC Commonly occurring bird at the Project site.
Construction activities (e.g., noise, artificial lighting) may affect foraging.
Increase in prey abundance, productivity.
Long-billed curlew
Numenius americanus
Blue SC (May
2011) 1-SC (Jan
2005) Occasional observations yearly from 2004 to 2017.
Not likely to be affected by construction.
Likely no effect.
Long-tailed duck
Clangula hyemalis
Blue Not listed Not listed Commonly occurring bird at the Project site.
Construction activities (e.g., noise, artificial lighting) may affect foraging.
Increase in foraging opportunity.
Marbled murrelet
Brachyramphus marmoratus
Blue T (May 2012)
1-T (Jun 2003)
Occasionally observed using upland habitat. May nest in vicinity of Maplewood Flats Conservation Area, but habitat is not considered optimal for this species.
Not likely to be affected by construction.
No effect. Species does not utilize subtidal habitats.
Peregrine falcon, anatum subspecies
Falco peregrinus anatum
Red 1-SC
(2012) SC (2007)
May forage for birds, bats and rodents within marsh habitat near the Project site.
Construction activities (e.g., noise, artificial lighting) may affect foraging.
May benefit from increased prey availability.
Purple martin Progne subis Blue Not listed Not listed
Breeds in nest boxes adjacent to the Project site; species feeds on flying insects, over marsh and mudflat habitat.
Not likely to be affected by construction.
Likely no effect. Foraging on the wing over water will not be affected.
Red-necked phalarope
Phalaropus lobatus
Blue SC
(2014) Not listed
Historically occurrence at Maplewood Flats Conservation Area, last observation from eBird was 2012.
Not likely to be affected by construction.
Likely no effect.
Rough-legged hawk
Buteo lagopus Blue Not listed NAR
(1995)
May forage in marsh adjacent to the Project site; this species forage over treeless areas including marshlands.
Construction activities (e.g., noise, artificial lighting) may affect foraging.
Likely no effect.
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 25 - July 2018
English Name
Scientific Name Provincial Listing1 SARA2, 3 COSEWIC3 Comments4 Construction Effects Post-Enhancement
Effects
Short-billed dowitcher
Limnodromus griseus
Blue Not listed Not listed
Occasional, sporadic observations from the Maplewood Flats Conservation Area
Not likely to be affected by construction.
Likely no effect.
Surf scoter Melanitta perspicillata
Blue Not listed Not listed Commonly occurring bird at the Project site.
Construction activities (e.g., noise, artificial lighting) may affect foraging.
Increase in forage opportunity.
Tundra swan Cygnus columbianus
Blue Not listed Not listed Occasionally observed from the Maplewood Flats Conservation Area.
Not likely to be affected by construction.
Likely no effect.
Wandering tattler
Tringa incana Blue Not listed Not listed
One recorded occurrence from 1980. Considered unlikely to occur, but has potential.
Not likely to be affected by construction.
Likely no effect.
Western grebe
Aechmophorus occidentalis
Red SC (May
2014) 1-SC
(2017) Commonly occurring bird at the Project site.
Construction activities (e.g., noise, artificial lighting) may affect foraging.
Increase in prey abundance, productivity.
Yellow-billed loon
Gavia adamsii Blue NAR (May 1997)
- Observed in 1994, considered unlikely to occur, but has potential.
Not likely to be affected by construction.
Likely no effect.
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 26 - July 2018
English Name
Scientific Name Provincial Listing1 SARA2, 3 COSEWIC3 Comments4 Construction Effects Post-Enhancement
Effects
Mammals
Grey whale Eschrichtius robustus
Blue 1-SC
(2005) SC/E/NAR
(2004) Occasional observations in Burrard Inlet.
Not likely to be affected by construction.
Low use; likely no effect.
Harbour porpoise
Phocoena phocoena
Blue 1-SC
(2005) SC (2016)
Occasional observations in Burrard Inlet.
Not likely to be affected by construction.
Low use; likely no effect.
Keen's myotis Myotis keenii Blue 3 (2005) DD (2003) Likely found foraging insects over the Project site.
If artificial light or loud construction activities occurring at night, potential to affect foraging.
Foraging will not be affected.
Killer whale (Transient population)
Orcinus orca pop. 3
Red 1-T
(2003) T (2008)
Occasional observations in Burrard Inlet (e.g., when feeding on harbour seals).
Not likely to be affected by construction.
Low use; likely no effect.
Killer Whale (Southern resident population)
Orcinus orca pop. 5
Red 1-E
(2003) E (2008)
Potential to enter Burrard Inlet when foraging.
Not likely to be affected by construction.
Low use; likely no effect.
Little brown myotis
Myotis lucifugus Yellow Not listed E (2012) Likely found foraging insects over the Project site.
If artificial light or loud construction activities occurring at night, potential to affect foraging.
Foraging will not be affected.
Long-tailed weasel, altifrontalis subspecies
Mustela frenata altifrontalis
Red Not listed Not listed
May be found at Project site; species prefers slow moving water bodies with soft substrate.
Not likely to be affected by construction.
Low use; likely no effect.
Steller sea lion
Eumetopias jubatus
Blue 1-SC
(2005) SC (2013)
May be found in subtidal marine habitat adjacent to Project site.
May be some temporal disturbance to their habitat.
Increased productivity may benefit this species.
Townsend's big-eared bat
Corynorhinus townsendii
Blue Not listed Not listed Likely found foraging insects over the Project site.
If artificial light or loud construction activities occurring at night, potential to affect foraging.
Foraging will not be affected.
Notes: 1 Red = Endangered or Threatened, Blue = Special Concern 2 Schedule 1 = federal species at risk 3 E= Endangered, T = Threatened, SC = Special Concern, NAR = Not at Risk 4 Species information was taken from The Birds of North American Online 2013, E-Fauna B.C. 2013, and eBird 2018.
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 27 - July 2018
6.0 CONCLUSION
Construction of the Project will result in the creation of variety of high-value habitat (intertidal flats, shallow
eelgrass, and rock reefs) that will provide long-term benefits for fish and invertebrates that depend on these
habitat types for nursery, rearing and feeding habitat, along with other fish and wildlife species such as
waterfowl and wading birds. Creation of the Southwest Channel will also result in a marked improvement
to the tidal exchange in the Maplewood and Northeast Basins, in turn, improving habitat productivity and
value for fish and wildlife.
Creation and enhancement of these habitats will contribute to a myriad of ecological functions including:
• Increasing primary productivity;
• Supplementing the detritus-based food web;
• Creating intertidal habitat for benthic and epibenthic invertebrates that are important prey items for
juvenile salmonids and other fishes;
• Providing intertidal and subtidal marine vegetation cover and refuge for juvenile salmonids, as they
utilize shoreline habitats in Burrard Inlet prior to out-migrating to the Strait of Georgia and the Pacific
Ocean, and juvenile rockfish species;
• Increasing the habitat diversity of the study area by converting degraded subtidal habitat to tidal
flats, eelgrass and rocky reef habitat; and,
• Creating habitat for waterfowl feeding, nesting, loafing, and refuge.
We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to have assisted you with this project and if there are any questions,
please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned by phone at 604.669.0424.
Report prepared by: Report peer reviewed by: Hemmera Envirochem Inc. Hemmera Envirochem Inc.
Anne Rutherford, M.Env.Sc., R.P.Bio. Scott Northrup, B.Sc., R.P.Bio. Biologist, Permitting Lead Senior Biologist
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 28 - July 2018
7.0 REFERENCES
AECOM. 2018. Maplewood Marine Restoration Project: Habitat Design – 60% Design Report. Prepared
for the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority. July 2018.
Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). 2007. COSEWIC assessment
and status report on the bluntnose sixgill shark Hexanchus griseus in Canada. vii + 33 pp.
Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). 2008. COSEWIC assessment
and status report on the Yelloweye Rockfish Sebastes ruberrimus, Pacific Ocean inside waters
population and Pacific Ocean outside waters population, in Canada. Ottawa. vii + 75 pp.
Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). 2009a. COSEWIC assessment
and status report on the Quillback Rockfish Sebastes maliger in Canada. Ottawa. vii + 71 pp.
Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). 2009b. COSEWIC assessment
and update status report on the Northern Abalone Haliotis kamtschatkana in Canada. Committee
on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vii + 48 pp.
Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). 2011a. COSEWIC assessment
and status report on the Eulachon, Nass / Skeena Rivers population, Central Pacific Coast
population and the Fraser River population. Thaleichthys pacificus in Canada. Ottawa. Xv + 88
pp.
Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). 2013. COSEWIC status
appraisal summary on the Green Sturgeon Acipenser medirostris in Canada. Ottawa. xvi pp.
Community Mapping Network. 2010. Burrard Inlet Environmental Action Program and Fraser River
Estuary Management Program. Accessed May 2018
<http://cmnmaps.ca/FREMP/map.php?agree=0>.
Community Mapping Network. 2018.Sensitive Habitat Inventory and Mapping. Accessed May 2018
<http://www.cmnmaps.ca/SHIM/>.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). 2008. Rockfish Conservation Areas - Pacific Region
Area 28. Accessed May 2018 <http://www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/fm-gp/maps-cartes/rca-acs/areas-
secteurs/28-eng.html>.
Fraser River Action Plan. 1999. Lower Fraser Valley Streams Strategic Review. Department of Fisheries
and Oceans Canada. Vancouver, B.C.
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 29 - July 2018
Georgia Strait Alliance. 2003. A Review of Burrard Inlet Effluent Discharges. Accessed May 2018
<https://georgiastrait.org/wp-content/uploads/share/PDF/BurrardEffluent031.pdf>.
Government of British Columbia (Government of BC). 2012. Biogeoclimatic ecosystem classification
subzone map. Accessed May 2018
<https://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hre/becweb/resources/maps/fieldmaps.html>.
Government of British Columbia (Government of BC). 2018a. Fisheries Inventory Data Queries (FIDQ).
Accessed May 2018 <https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/environment/plants-animals-
ecosystems/fish/fish-and-fish-habitat-data-information/search-fish-fish-habitat-data-
information/fisheries-inventory-data-queries>.
Government of British Columbia (BC). 2018b. iMapBC. Accessed May 2018
<https://maps.gov.bc.ca/ess/hm/imap4m/>.Green, R.N. and Klinka. 1994. A Field Guide for Site
Identification and Interpretation for the Vancouver Forest Region. Ministry of Forests. 185 pp.
http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/docs/lmh/lmh28.htm
Green, R. and K. Klinka. 1994. A Field Guide to Site Identification and Interpretation for the Vancouver
Forest Region. Ministry of Forests Research Program. Accessed May 2018
<https://www.for.gov.bc.ca/HFD/Pubs/Docs/Lmh/Lmh28.pdf>.
Griffin, Kevin. 2015. Tom Burrows & the Mythology of the Maplewood Mudflats Squatter Community.
Vancouver Sun Community Blogs. Accessed May 2018
<http://blogs.vancouversun.com/2015/01/09/tom-burrows-the-mythology-of-the-maplewood-
mudflats-squatter-community/>.
Haggarty, Dana. R. 2001. An Evaluation of Fish Habitat in Burrard Inlet, British Columbia. Master Thesis.
Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia. Accessed May 2018
<https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/831/items/1.0074846>.
Hemmera Envirochem Inc. (Hemmera). 2013. Maplewood Log Pond Field Data – September 16, 2013.
Hemmera Envirochem Inc. (Hemmera). 2018. Biophysical Sampling Results from the Proposed
Southwest Channel. Prepared for Vancouver Fraser Port Authority.
Important Bird Area (IBA) Canada. 2018. English Bay and Burrard Inlet IBA Site Summary. April 2018
<http://www.ibacanada.ca/site.jsp?siteID=BC020&lang=EN>.
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP – Existing Ecological Conditions - 30 - July 2018
Kerr Wood Leidel Associated Ltd. (KWL). 2017. Burrard Inlet Action Plan: A science-based First Nations-
led initiated to improve the health of the Burrard Inlet ecosystem by 2025. Prepared for Tseleil-
Waututh Nation.
Klinkenberg, B. (Editor) 2018. E-Flora BC: Electronic Atlas of the Plants of British Columbia. Lab for
Advanced Spatial Analysis, Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Ministry of Environment (MOE). 2018. B.C. Species and Ecosystems Explorer. Accessed May 2018
<http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/eswp/>.
Pacific Streamkeepers Federation (PSKF). n.d. Watershed Profiles. Accessed May 2018
<http://www.pskf.ca/ecology/watershed/index.html>.
Pojar, J. Klinka, K., & Demarchi, D.A. 1991. Chapter 6: Coastal Western Hemlock Zone. Ecosystems of
British Columbia. Special Report Series 06. B.C. Ministry of Forests. Pp 96-111. Retrieved on
September 29, 2014 from http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/Docs/Srs/Srs06.htm
Port Metro Vancouver (PMV). 1998. Management Plan: Port of Vancouver Wildlife Conservation Area,
Maplewood South, North Vancouver.
Precision Identification (Precision). 2013. Assessment of Potential Eelgrass Transplant Sites. Maplewood,
North Vancouver. Report prepared for Port Metro Vancouver Habitat Enhancement Program. 47
pgs.
Stantec Consulting Ltd. (Stantec). 2009. Burrard Inlet Shoreline Change – Baseline Assessment: Final
Report. Prepared for Burrard Inlet Environmental Action Program.
Wei, Michael. 2014. From Shangri-la to Shangri-la. Accessed February 2015
<http://wildbirdtrust.org/shacks>.
Wild Bird Trust (WBT). 2009. Wingspan Winter/Spring Newsletter. Accessed September 2014
<www.wildbirdtrust.org/upload/doc/Wingspan_wingbeats%20winter%20spring%202009.pdf>.
Wild Bird Trust (WBT). 2014a. Wild Bird Trust Website. Accessed (September 29, 2014) from:
<www.wildbirdtrust.org/>.
Wild Bird Trust (WBT). 2014b. Bird Checklist: The Conservation Area at Maplewood Flats, North
Vancouver, British Columbia.
.
APPENDIX A
Aerial Photography Review
Page | i
Appendix A - Maplewood Historic Aerial Overview.docx
Maplewood Marine Restoration Project
Historical Aerial Overview
Appendix A Maplewood Marine Restoration Project: Historical Aerial Overview
Page | ii
Appendix A - Maplewood Historic Aerial Overview.docx
APPENDIX B
Balanced Biophysical Report
BALANCED 3910‐R‐01.2
1 | P a g e
BIOPHYSICAL SURVEY MAPLEWOOD FLATS, NORTH VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA December 20, 2017
PREPARED BY:
BALANCED ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC. 120 Garden Ave. North Vancouver, B.C. V7P 3H2 PREPARED FOR:
AECOM 3292 Production Way Burnaby, BC V5Z4R4 Canada
BALANCED 3910‐R‐01.2
2 | P a g e
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 3
1.1 Project Overview ..................................................................................................................... 3
1.2 Project Location ....................................................................................................................... 3
SECTION 2 BIOPHYSICAL SURVEY METHODOLOGIES ................................................................................ 3
2.1 General .................................................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Survey Methods ...................................................................................................................... 4
2.2.1 Above‐Water ............................................................................................................ 4
2.2.2 Below Water ............................................................................................................ 5
SECTION 3 BIOPHYSICAL CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................... 5
3.1 Physical Conditions .................................................................................................................. 5
3.2 Biological Conditions ............................................................................................................... 6
3.2.1 Intertidal Zone ......................................................................................................... 6
3.2.2 Subtidal Zone ........................................................................................................... 6
3.2.3 Eelgrass .................................................................................................................... 7
3.2.4 Bivalves .................................................................................................................... 7
3.2.5 Kelps ......................................................................................................................... 7
SECTION 4 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................... 8
SECTION 5 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 8
SECTION 6 CLARIFICATIONS AND SIGNATURES......................................................................................... 9
APPENDIX 1 DRAWINGS
3910‐D‐01.1 Site Map
3910‐D‐02.3 Habitat
3910‐D‐03.1 Substrate
3910‐D‐04.1 Biota
3910‐D‐05.1 Photographs
3910‐D‐06.1 Northeast Basin Biota
3910‐D‐07.1 Main Basin Biota
3910‐D‐08.1 Southern Intertidal Area
APPENDIX 2
Table A1.1 – A1.5: Observed Biota Abundance and Tidal Range
Table A2 – Bivalve Survey Findings
BALANCED 3910‐R‐01.2
3 | P a g e
BIOPHYSICAL SURVEY, MAPLEWOOD FLATS,
NORTH VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Overview AECOM (Client) retained Balanced Environmental Services Inc. (Balanced) to conduct a Biophysical Survey of the intertidal and subtidal areas within the Maplewood Flats area, adjacent to the Maplewood Flats Conservation Area in North Vancouver, British Columbia. The purpose of this biophysical survey was the documentation of substrate types, observed species abundance and distribution, and general ecological conditions. This report also provides a comparison with a biophysical survey completed in 2013 by Hemmera Envirochem Inc. (File 302‐035.04), to determine if conditions have shifted in species presence or substrate types over the 4 year time period between field surveys. 1.2 Project Location This site is located in Burrard Inlet along a south facing shoreline, 1.5 km east of the Second Narrows Bridge in North Vancouver, British Columbia. The latitude and longitude coordinates (degrees decimal) for the site are approximately: Latitude: 49.300, Longitude: –123.005 The project site is located immediately south of the Pacific Environmental Science Centre, and the Maplewood
Flats Conservation Area: 2645 Dollarton Hwy, North Vancouver, BC V7H 1B1.
Refer to Drawing 3910‐D‐01.1 for additional location information.
SECTION 2 BIOPHYSICAL SURVEY METHODOLOGIES
2.1 General Balanced carried out above and below‐water surveys from October 18th to 20th, and on October 27th, 2017. Tide heights during the surveys ranged from +1.7m to +4.5m Chart Datum (CD). The survey team included four Qualified Environmental Professionals (QEPs) with knowledge and experience of the local aquatic biology and ecology. The survey area included 14 transects and a general overview of approximately 400,000m2 of intertidal and subtidal seabed (see Drawing D‐01.1 Site Map). The survey included the mapping of surface substrates and biota as well as their abundance, elevation and distribution. Substrate conditions were identified on the basis of the following criteria (Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 1990):
Substrate Type Diameter (mm)
mud <0.0625
sand 0.0625 to <2
pebble 2 to <64
cobble 64 to <255
boulders >255
rip rap (angular rock) >255
BALANCED 3910‐R‐01.2
4 | P a g e
Additional substrate conditions noted during the survey included any significant build‐up of shell hash, woody debris and/or anthropogenic materials. Photographs illustrating typical substrate conditions are provided in Drawings 3910‐D‐03.1 and 3910‐D‐05.1 Species and biota groups chosen for surveying and mapping purposes were selected by the QEPs at the time of the survey as those that best represented the environmental and habitat conditions present. The abundance levels of selected species or biota groups were based on the following criteria:
Abundance
Amount % Areal Coverage
Individuals per Transect
Rare <5% 1
Sparse 5% to 25% 2 to 5
Few 26% to 50% 6 to 10
Common 51% to 75% 11 to 30
Abundant >75% >30
Abundance categories have been adapted from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans’ Coastal/Estuarine Fish Habitat Description and Assessment Manual (1990). Percent areal coverage refers specifically to areas along transects where the species was observed within the specified species depth range Locations where species were observed can be found on Drawing 3910‐D‐04.1, and tidal depth ranges for observed species can be found in Tables A1.1 – A1.5. Elevations and boundaries between different substrate and biota types were mapped using estimated tidal elevations, local geographical features and survey tapes. General survey observations were documented between transects, including change in substrate types, and biota abundance or distribution. Elevations were related to Canadian Hydrographic Service Chart Datum. Photographs illustrating typical species and biota observations are provided in Drawings 3910‐D‐04.1 and 3910‐D‐05.1. Substrate and biota are mapped to drawings on the basis of "presence" (not density), however, the number of tags/symbols present in a given area can provide, in relative terms, an indication of abundance and uniformity. Where tags/symbols are grouped together in an area, the tagged substrate or biota can be assumed to be contiguous. 2.2 Survey Methods 2.2.1 Above‐Water Survey methods were adapted from Fisheries and Oceans Canada protocols (1990). The above‐water portions of the survey were conducted during periods of lower tides from October 18th to 20th, 2017. Low tides ranged from +1.7m to +2.4m CD. Transect tapes were placed from either the high water mark (+5m CD), or the highest intertidal shoreline elevation available, to the water line (see Drawing 3910‐D‐01.1 for above and below‐water transect locations). Substrate conditions and species presence and abundance were documented within a 2 metre belt (1 metre on each side of the transect tape). Photographs of typical and rare observations were recorded for each transect. A reconnaissance survey was performed within areas between transects to confirm that transect observations were representative of overall site habitat conditions.
BALANCED 3910‐R‐01.2
5 | P a g e
2.2.2 Below‐water A SCUBA (Self Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus) equipped QEP dive team familiar with the local ecology performed an underwater biophysical survey of the lower intertidal and subtidal zone from October 18th to 20th, 2017. The below‐water biophysical survey extended the above water transects approximately 60m offshore, to depths ranging from ‐5.0m to ‐10m CD, depending on the location characteristics. Below‐water procedures followed the same protocol as those outlined for above‐water, including belt transect widths, photographs and between transect reconnaissance observations. Drop‐dives were completed at 4 locations (Drawing 3910‐D‐01.1) within the dredge basin, along with swims between transects to confirm that conditions were similar to those found on adjacent transects. An additional below‐water survey was completed on October 27th, 2017 to collect greater detail on bivalve presence throughout the survey area. Twelve locations were selected based on previous reconnaissance work (see Drawing 3910‐D‐01.1) to document signs of bivalve presence, including clam siphons, infaunal burrows, signs of predation (including predators and shells), and the presence of juvenile bivalves within the top 20cm of sand/sediment. SCUBA equipped QEPs used quadrats to quantify the abundance of siphons and potential bivalve burrows. Box samplers were used to collect sand and sediment samples; each sample was sifted at the surface to identify the presence of juvenile clam species. Samples and observations were collected at multiple elevations, ranging from +3m to ‐7m CD at each location. High value habitats, including eelgrass patches, bull kelp, and bands of sugar wrack kelp were identified, mapped, and assessed for general health and abundance; see Balanced Drawing 3910‐D‐02.3 Habitat in Appendix 1 for an illustration of their distribution. Endpoints of eelgrass, bull kelp and sugar wrack habitat areas were mapped using GPS points. The width of eelgrass habitat was measured using transect tapes. Sugar wrack kelp was mapped using abundance estimates and depth ranges measured during transect surveys. This information was extrapolated between transects based on observations made during reconnaissance surveys as illustrated on Balanced Drawing 3910‐D‐02.3 Habitat. General abundance of eelgrass and sugar wrack kelp was quantified using 1m2 quadrats. Bull kelp coverage was sparse, and estimated with surface and diver observations.
SECTION 3 BIOPHYSICAL CONDITIONS
3.1 Physical Conditions – see Drawing 3910‐D‐03.1 Substrate in Appendix 1 The survey area contains a protected subtidal basin along the northern shoreline of Burrard Inlet. This area was repeatedly dredged in the 1940s, 50s and 60s, leaving dredge basins varying in depth from ‐5m to ‐8m CD, and an intertidal berm (Southern Intertidal Area) along the dredge basin’s southern edge (+2m to +3m CD) sheltering the area from tidal currents, large waves and wash created by passing vessel traffic. An anthropogenic dredged channel flows into the northwest corner of the Northeast Basin. Locally known as the "Barge Channel", this brackish channel receives fresh storm‐water and groundwater inputs from upslope areas that mix with saltwater inflows during periods of high tide. Along the northern shoreline of the dredge basin, the foreshore area above the high water line (+5.0m CD) consisted mostly of cobble and woody debris. Concrete debris covered parts of the north and northwest shoreline, where this material had likely been placed historically to stabilize the intertidal zone between the
BALANCED 3910‐R‐01.2
6 | P a g e
upland riparian and the intertidal dredge cut. The margins between the high intertidal zone and the upland riparian were often characterized by signs of upland erosion, where soils had been washed away leaving an exposed edge of soil, roots, and loose rock. The high to mid intertidal zone (+5m to +2.5m CD) throughout the inside of the dredge basin was typically covered with various blends of cobble, pebble, and sand. Substrates generally became finer as depth increased. The low intertidal and shallow subtidal (+2.5m to ‐2.5m CD) were generally composed of a mix of cobble, pebble, and sand that gradually transitioned to finer materials as the slopes decreased. The base of the dredge cut slope was often covered in clam and cockle shells, and woody debris. The bottom of the main dredge basin varied in depth from approximately ‐5 to ‐8m CD. Substrate at these depths consisted of fine sand, silt, and mud; materials generally became finer towards the middle of the dredge basin. Woody debris and various anthropogenic materials were found scattered throughout the main dredge basin. Intertidal areas along the east and west slopes of the dredge basin (+5 to 0m CD) consisted of mixed cobble, pebble and sand that generally transitioned from larger to smaller and finer substrates with increasing depth. The Southern Intertidal Area between the dredge basin and Burrard Inlet consisted of various mixtures of cobble, pebble, sand, and shell hash throughout the intertidal (+3m to 0m CD). As the slope increased along the southern edge, cobble and pebble covered a sandy, current swept bottom from 0m to ‐10m CD. In the southeast corner of the survey area, a shallow channel (approximately 200m long, 50m wide, and 0m to ‐2m CD in depth) between the dredge basin and Burrard Inlet consisted of cobble and pebble covering a mostly sand bottom. 3.2 Biological Conditions ‐ see Drawing 3910‐D‐04.1 Biota in Appendix 1 3.2.1 Intertidal Zone The foreshore situated above the high water line along the northern shoreline was often found at the edge of an eroded bank or covered with concrete rubble and blasted rock, precluding marsh plants from becoming established. In areas where conditions permitted the growth of marsh plants (shallow slopes and finer substrates), rare occurrences of marsh plants including pickleweed (Salicornia sp.), silverweed (Argentina anserine), seashore saltgrass (Distichlis spicata), and common orache (Atriplex sp.) were observed. The intertidal zone (+5m to 0m CD) contained an abundance of acorn barnacles (Balanus glandula) and bay mussels (Mytilus trossulus) found attached to cobble and other large substrates. Green and purple shore crabs (Hemigrapsus oregonensis and Hemigrapsus nudus) were also common in sandy burrows and beneath larger cobbles. Limpets (Tectura scutum) and dogwinkle snails (Nucella sp.) were commonly observed within pebble and cobble substrates. On the Southern Intertidal Area, between the dredge basin and Burrard Inlet, Turkish washcloth (Mastocarpus papillatus) and Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas) were found scattered amongst the cobbles and sand. Sea lettuce (Ulva fenestrata) was abundant in large patches along the eastern and outer shorelines at mid‐intertidal elevations. At low intertidal elevations (+1.5m to 0m CD) sugar wrack kelp (Saccharina latissimi) and red spaghetti (Gracilaria sp.) were found where stable substrate allowed for attachment. 3.2.2 Subtidal Zone The shallow subtidal zone (0m to ‐5m CD) provided habitat for a number of brown and red algae species; abundance and diversity at these depths was likely driven by the amount of current and tidal flushing. Within
BALANCED 3910‐R‐01.2
7 | P a g e
the dredge basin and along the slopes of the dredge cut there was an abundance of sugar wrack kelp attached to scattered cobbles. These kelps were most common in the Southeast Channel, and along the southern and western shorelines of the dredge basin, but could be found in most shallow subtidal locations where substrates were large enough for attachment. Red seaweeds, sea lettuce, Japanese wireweed (Sargassum muticum), and winged kelp (Alaria esculenta) were most commonly observed on the slopes of the Southern Intertidal Area in Burrard Inlet, and within the Southeast Channel, where currents and tidal flow were comparatively high. Mobile invertebrate species, including Dungeness (Cancer magister), red rock (Cancer productus), and graceful (Metacarcinus gacilis) crabs, and ochre (Pisaster ochraceus), mottled (Evasterias troschelii) and leather (Dermasterias imbricata) sea stars were found throughout the shallow subtidal zone. Red rock crabs and mottled stars were occasionally observed feeding on cockles that had been excavated from the shallow sediments. The abundance of mobile invertebrates increased in Burrard Inlet and within the Southeast Channel, where currents were high, and decreased in the deeper subtidal zone, where currents were low and sediments were comparatively fine. Fish were rarely observed within the dredge basin. Rare sightings included sculpins (Artedius harringtoni), gunnels (Pholis ornata), and gobies (Coryphopterus nicholsi). Fish sightings were more common within the Southeast Channel and in Burrard Inlet; species observed here included sculpins, gunnels, kelp greenling (Hexagrammos decagrammus), English sole (Parophrys vetulus), and one spiny lumpsucker (Eumicrotremus orbis). 3.2.3 Eelgrass Eelgrass (Zostera marina) patches were found in two locations, on the northern slopes of the main dredge basin, and within the Southeast Channel. Two small patches were found along the northern slope, measuring 3m2 and 5m2 in size, with approximately 10 shoots per square metre. One comparatively large patch was found in the Southeast Channel, and appeared healthier than those found in the dredge basin, measuring approximately 250m2 in size, with an average of 19 shoots per square metre. By comparison, the eelgrass patch mapped in the Southeast Channel by Precision Identification in 2013 measured 300m2 in size. 3.2.4 Bivalves Various clam species and cockles were present throughout the dredge basin, in the Southeast Channel, and along the Burrard Inlet shoreline. Signs of presence included siphons extending from the sediment, shells, infaunal burrows, and juveniles found in collections of surface sediment. Fat gaper (Tresus capax) siphons were observed in the lower intertidal and shallow subtidal along the southern shoreline of the dredge basin, and in the Southeast Channel. The highest density of infaunal burrows was found in soft sediments along the northern shoreline of the dredge basin; these however likely belonged to ghost shrimp (Neotrypaea californiensis), also observed in the area. Nuttall’s cockles (Clinocardium nuttallii) and butter clams (Saxidomus gigantea) were observed (rarely) on the surface of soft sediments. Juveniles clams found in collected sediments included butter, manila (Venerupis philippinarum), littleneck (Protothaca staminea), and macoma (Macoma nasuta). Juveniles (typically macomas and littlenecks) were most abundant in locations along the Burrard Inlet shoreline. The presence of juveniles in sediment samples does not necessarily indicate the concentration or distribution of adults. 3.2.5 Kelps Bands of sugar wrack kelp were found throughout the main dredge basin, in the Southeast Channel, and along the southern slopes of the Southern Intertidal Area at similar densities and elevations to those found by Hemmera in 2013. Sugar wrack found in the main dredge basin was typically covered with a dusting of silt, and
BALANCED 3910‐R‐01.2
8 | P a g e
was generally more tattered than sugar wrack found in the Southeast Channel and along the southern slopes of the Southern Intertidal Area. Bull kelp (Nereocystis luetkeana) was found along the western margins of the southern slope of the Southern Intertidal Area (from ‐1m to ‐3m CD), while no bull kelp was found inside the main dredge basin. Density along the Southern Intertidal Area was estimated at less than 1 stipe per square metre. Bull kelp is an annual species that often washes away in winter storms. The abundance and distribution of stipes observed during the October survey may vary in comparison to the abundance and distribution during spring and summer months.
SECTION 4 CONCLUSION
Substrate conditions and biota extent and density were similar to those documented by Hemmera in 2013. Eelgrass abundance had declined slightly in the Southeast Channel (from 300 m2 to 250m2); changes in the size and shape of eelgrass meadows are common as sediment conditions shift over time. Bull kelp was not found inside the main dredge basin, as it was in 2013, but this may be due to seasonal differences in abundance and distribution. The inferred presence of common clam species and cockles was similar to findings from 2013. Common biota observed in the dredge basin were also similar, including barnacles, mussels, and shore crabs in the intertidal, extensive bands of sugar wrack kelp, and a variety of crab and sea star species in the shallow subtidal. The highest abundance and diversity of species, including aggregations of eelgrass and bull kelp, continues to occur in the Southeast Channel and along the southern slopes of the Southern Intertidal Area, in Burrard Inlet. Based on the findings from this survey, there are opportunities for habitat enhancement in both the intertidal and subtidal regions of the dredge basin that could improve productivity and habitat values for marine species found in and around Burrard Inlet. At the time of this survey, the overall productivity of the dredge basin was notably lower than adjacent habitats found in the Southeast Channel and along the southern slopes of the Southern Intertidal Area in Burrard Inlet, where exposure to currents and tidal flushing were comparatively high.
SECTION 5 REFERENCES
Fisheries and Oceans Canada. 1990. Coastal/Estuarine Fish Habitat Description and Assessment Manual. Habitat Description Procedures, Part II. Vancouver, BC. 61p. Hemmera Envirochem Inc. 2015. Existing Ecological Conditions: Proposed Maplewood Subtidal Restoration Project. 102p. Precision Identification. 2013. Assessment of Potential Eelgrass Transplant Sites, Maplewood, North Vancouver. Port Metro Vancouver Habitat Enhancement Program.
BALANCED 3910‐R‐01.2
9 | P a g e
SECTION 6 CLARIFICATIONS AND SIGNATURES
This report has been prepared by Balanced Environmental Services Inc. (Balanced) in accordance with generally accepted Qualified Environmental Professional (QEP) practices and is intended for the exclusive use of the Client. The contents, implied or written, of this document and related media may not be utilized in part or in whole by parties other than the Client without the signed written authorization of Balanced. The information contained within this report reflects Balanced’s best judgment in light of the information available to it at the time of preparation and has been developed in a manner consistent with that level of care and standard normally exercised by QEPs currently practicing under similar conditions and is accurate and complete to the best of Balanced’s knowledge. This report does not constitute approval under any municipal, provincial, or federal legislation and does not relieve the Client from their obligation to comply with the requirements of the Fisheries Act or any other municipal, provincial, or federal rules or regulations. PRODUCED BY: REVIEWED / APPROVED BY: __________________________________ __________________________________ Mark Thompson, MSc. Scott Christie, R.P.Bio. Project Biologist Principal and Senior Biologist
APPENDIX 1 – DRAWINGS
Drawing 3910‐D‐01.1 Site Map
Drawing 3910‐D‐02.3 Habitat
Drawing 3910‐D‐03.1 Substrate
Drawing 3910‐D‐04.1 Biota
Drawing 3910‐D‐05.1 Photographs
Drawing 3910‐D‐06.1 Northeast Basin Biota
Drawing 3910‐D‐07.1 Main Basin Biota
Drawing 3910‐D‐08.1 Southern Intertidal Area Biota
BALANCED 3910‐R‐01.2
APPENDIX 2 – SPECIES TABLES
Table A1.1 – A1.5: Observed Biota Abundance and Tidal Range
Table A2: Bivalve Survey Findings
BALANCED 3910‐R‐01.2
Table A1.1: Observed Biota Abundance and Tidal Range. Transects 1 – 3.
Abundance Abundance Abundance
Description Upper Lower Description Upper Lower Description Upper Lower
Barnacles
Acorn Balanus glandula PAC Common 3 -6.5 Common 3 -6.5 Common 3 -6.5
Bivalves
Bay Mussel Mytilus trossulus PAC Common 3 1.5 Common 2.5 1.5 Common 3 1.5
Butter Clam Saxidomus gigantea IOT
False Jingle Pododesmus macrochisma IOT
Fat Gaper Tresus capax IOT
Littleneck Protothaca staminea IOT
Macoma Macoma nasuta IOT
Manila Venerupis philippinarum IOT
Nuttall's Cockle Clinocardium nuttallii IOT
Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas IOT Few 3 0 Few 3 0.5
Shipworm Bankia setacea IOT
Brown Algae
Bull Kelp Nereocystis luetkeana IOT Sparse -1 -3
Rockweed Fucus gardneri IOT
Sargassum Sargassum muticum IOT Rare 0 -1.5 Rare 0 -2.5
Sugar Wrack Saccharina latissima IOT Few 0 -4 Few 0 -4 Few 1 -3
Winged Kelp Alaria esculenta IOT Rare 1 -2 Rare 0 -1.5
Green Algae
Sea Lettuce Ulva fenestrata PAC Few 3 1 Sparse 3 1 Few 3 1
Red Algae
Iodine Seaweed Prionitis lyallii PAC Rare -1 -4 Rare -1 -2.5
Pacfic Rose Rhodymenia pacifica PAC Rare 0 -3.5
Red Fringe Smithora naiadum PAC
Red Spaghetti Gracilaria sp. PAC Rare 1 -3 Rare 0 -3 Rare -2 -3
Turkish Washcloth Mastocarpus papillatus PAC Sparse 3.5 1 Rare 3.5 2
Seagrass
Eelgrass Zostera marina PAC
Chitons
Lined Chiton Tonicella sp. IOT
Crabs
Dungeness Cancer magister IOT Sparse 1 -6.5 Rare -2 -2 Rare 0 -5
Graceful Metacarcinus gracilis IOT Rare 0 -1.5
Green Shore Hemigrapsus oregonensis IOT Few 2 -1 Few 2 -1 Sparse 2 0
Northern Kelp Pugettia producta IOT Rare -1 -3
Purple Shore Hemigrapsus nudus IOT Few 3 -1.5 Few 3 0 Few 3 0
Red Rock Cancer productus IOT Rare 0 -2 Rare -2 -2
Limpets and Snails
Dogwinkle Snail Nucella sp. IOT
Plate Limpet Tectura scutum IOT
Nudibranchs
Hooded Melibe leonina IOT
Opalescent Hermissenda crassicornis IOT Rare 0 -2
Sea Anemones
Giant Plumose Metridium farcimen IOT Rare -2 -3.5 Rare -1 -3
Tube-dwelling Pachycerianthus fimbriatus IOT Rare -1.5 -2
Sea Cucumbers
Giant Red Parastichopus californicus IOT Rare 0 -2 Rare -1.5 -2
Sea Urchins
Green Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis IOT
Sea Stars
Leather Dermasterias imbricata IOT Sparse 1 -3.5 Rare 0 -2 Sparse -1 -3.5
Mottled Evasterias troschelii IOT Sparse 0 -3 Sparse 1 -3 Few 1 -4
Ochre Pisaster ochraceus IOT Sparse 1.5 -2 Rare 1.5 0
Jellies
Moon Jelly Aurelia lab iata IOT Rare 1 1
Comb Jelly Euplokamis dunlapae IOT Rare 0 -3 Rare -3 -3
Fish
English Sole Parophrys vetulus IOT Rare -4 -4 Rare -3 -4
Black-eyed Goby Coryphopterus nicholsi IOT
Kelp Greenling Hexagrammos decagrammus IOT Rare -2 -3
Spiny Lumpsucker Eumicrotremus orb is IOT Rare -3 -3
Scalyhead Sculpin Artedius harringtoni IOT
Saddleback Gunnel Pholis ornata IOT
Shrimp
Ghost Shrimp Neotrypaea californiensis IOT Sparse -1 -2.5
T3
Chart Datum RangeChart Datum Range
T1
Common Name Scientific Name
T2
Chart Datum RangeMethod
See Section 2: Biophysical Survey Methodologies, for species abundance and range descriptions.
PAC: Percent Area Coverage
IOT: Individuals on Transect
BALANCED 3910‐R‐01.2
Table A1.2: Observed Biota Abundance and Tidal Range. Transects 4 – 6.
Abundance Abundance Abundance
Description Upper Lower Description Upper Lower Description Upper Lower
Barnacles
Acorn Balanus glandula PAC Few -1 -2 Few -1 -2 Few -1 -2
Bivalves
Bay Mussel Mytilus trossulus PAC
Butter Clam Saxidomus gigantea IOT Rare -2 -2
False Jingle Pododesmus macrochisma IOT
Fat Gaper Tresus capax IOT
Littleneck Protothaca staminea IOT
Macoma Macoma nasuta IOT
Manila Venerupis philippinarum IOT
Nuttall's Cockle Clinocardium nuttallii IOT
Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas IOT Sparse 0 -2.5
Shipworm Bankia setacea IOT
Brown Algae
Bull Kelp Nereocystis luetkeana IOT
Rockweed Fucus gardneri IOT
Sargassum Sargassum muticum IOT Sparse -1 -2 Few -1 -2
Sugar Wrack Saccharina latissima IOT Abundant -1 -2.5 Abundant -1 -2 Abundant -1 -2
Winged Kelp Alaria esculenta IOT
Green Algae
Sea Lettuce Ulva fenestrata PAC Common -0.5 -2 Common 0 -2
Red Algae
Iodine Seaweed Prionitis lyallii PAC Sparse -1 -2.5 Rare -1 -2
Pacfic Rose Rhodymenia pacifica PAC
Red Fringe Smithora naiadum PAC Common -1 -2
Red Spaghetti Gracilaria sp. PAC Few -1 -2 Few -1 -2
Turkish Washcloth Mastocarpus papillatus PAC Few -1 -2
Seagrass
Eelgrass Zostera marina PAC Common -1 -2
Chitons
Lined Chiton Tonicella sp. IOT
Crabs
Dungeness Cancer magister IOT Sparse 0 -2.5 Few 0 -2 Rare 0 -2
Graceful Metacarcinus gracilis IOT
Green Shore Hemigrapsus oregonensis IOT Sparse -0.5 -2.5 Rare 0 -2 Rare 0 -2
Northern Kelp Pugettia producta IOT Rare -2 -2
Purple Shore Hemigrapsus nudus IOT Rare 0 -2 Rare 0 -2
Red Rock Cancer productus IOT Rare -2 -2 Rare -1 -2 Rare -1 -2
Limpets and Snails
Dogwinkle Snail Nucella sp. IOT
Plate Limpet Tectura scutum IOT
Nudibranchs
Hooded Melibe leonina IOT Rare -2 -2.5 Common -1 -2
Opalescent Hermissenda crassicornis IOT
Sea Anemones
Giant Plumose Metridium farcimen IOT
Tube-dwelling Pachycerianthus fimbriatus IOT
Sea Cucumbers
Giant Red Parastichopus californicus IOT
Sea Urchins
Green Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis IOT Rare -1 -2.5 Rare -1 -2
Sea Stars
Leather Dermasterias imbricata IOT
Mottled Evasterias troschelii IOT Sparse 0 -2.5 Sparse 0 -2
Ochre Pisaster ochraceus IOT
Jellies
Moon Jelly Aurelia lab iata IOT
Comb Jelly Euplokamis dunlapae IOT
Fish
English Sole Parophrys vetulus IOT
Black-eyed Goby Coryphopterus nicholsi IOT
Kelp Greenling Hexagrammos decagrammus IOT
Spiny Lumpsucker Eumicrotremus orb is IOT
Scalyhead Sculpin Artedius harringtoni IOT
Saddleback Gunnel Pholis ornata IOT
Shrimp
Ghost Shrimp Neotrypaea californiensis IOT
Common Name Scientific Name Method
T4 T5 T6
Chart Datum Range Chart Datum Range Chart Datum Range
See Section 2: Biophysical Survey Methodologies, for species abundance and range descriptions.
PAC: Percent Area Coverage
IOT: Individuals on Transect
BALANCED 3910‐R‐01.2
Table A1.3: Observed Biota Abundance and Tidal Range. Transects 7 – 9.
Abundance Abundance Abundance
Description Upper Lower Description Upper Lower Description Upper Lower
Barnacles
Acorn Balanus glandula PAC Sparse 2 -4 Common 3.5 -4 Common 3.5 -5
Bivalves
Bay Mussel Mytilus trossulus PAC Rare 2.5 1 Sparse 3 1.5 Common 3 1.5
Butter Clam Saxidomus gigantea IOT
False Jingle Pododesmus macrochisma IOT Rare -1 -2
Fat Gaper Tresus capax IOT Rare 2 -1.5
Littleneck Protothaca staminea IOT
Macoma Macoma nasuta IOT
Manila Venerupis philippinarum IOT
Nuttall's Cockle Clinocardium nuttallii IOT Rare -3 -6
Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas IOT
Shipworm Bankia setacea IOT Rare -2 -3 Rare 0 -2 Rare -2 -2
Brown Algae
Bull Kelp Nereocystis luetkeana IOT
Rockweed Fucus gardneri IOT Rare 2.5 1.5 Rare 3.5 1.5
Sargassum Sargassum muticum IOT
Sugar Wrack Saccharina latissima IOT Sparse 0 -2.5 Sparse 0 -2.5 Sparse 0 -3
Winged Kelp Alaria esculenta IOT
Green Algae
Sea Lettuce Ulva fenestrata PAC
Red Algae
Iodine Seaweed Prionitis lyallii PAC Rare 0.5 -2
Pacfic Rose Rhodymenia pacifica PAC
Red Fringe Smithora naiadum PAC
Red Spaghetti Gracilaria sp. PAC
Turkish Washcloth Mastocarpus papillatus PAC Rare 3.5 2.5
Seagrass
Eelgrass Zostera marina PAC
Chitons
Lined Chiton Tonicella sp. IOT Rare 0 -2
Crabs
Dungeness Cancer magister IOT Rare -1 -4 Sparse 0 -6.5 Rare -1 -6.5
Graceful Metacarcinus gracilis IOT Sparse 0 -3.5 Rare -1 -2 Sparse -1 -2
Green Shore Hemigrapsus oregonensis IOT Sparse 2 -1 Sparse 2 -1 Abundant 2 -1
Northern Kelp Pugettia producta IOT
Purple Shore Hemigrapsus nudus IOT Rare 3 0 Sparse 3 0
Red Rock Cancer productus IOT Rare -2 -2
Limpets and Snails
Dogwinkle Snail Nucella sp. IOT Rare 4.5 2 Rare 4.5 2
Plate Limpet Tectura scutum IOT Rare 2.5 1
Nudibranchs
Hooded Melibe leonina IOT Common -1 -2
Opalescent Hermissenda crassicornis IOT Sparse -4 -6 Rare -4 -5
Sea Anemones
Giant Plumose Metridium farcimen IOT Sparse -1 -4 Rare -2 -3
Tube-dwelling Pachycerianthus fimbriatus IOT
Sea Cucumbers
Giant Red Parastichopus californicus IOT
Sea Urchins
Green Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis IOT
Sea Stars
Leather Dermasterias imbricata IOT
Mottled Evasterias troschelii IOT Sparse -2 -3 Rare 0 -4
Ochre Pisaster ochraceus IOT
Jellies
Moon Jelly Aurelia labiata IOT
Comb Jelly Euplokamis dunlapae IOT
Fish
English Sole Parophrys vetulus IOT
Black-eyed Goby Coryphopterus nicholsi IOT
Kelp Greenling Hexagrammos decagrammus IOT
Spiny Lumpsucker Eumicrotremus orbis IOT
Scalyhead Sculpin Artedius harringtoni IOT Sparse -1 -1
Saddleback Gunnel Pholis ornata IOT
Shrimp
Ghost Shrimp Neotrypaea californiensis IOT Rare -3 -4
Common Name Scientific Name Method Chart Datum Range
T8 T9T7
Chart Datum Range Chart Datum Range
See Section 2: Biophysical Survey Methodologies, for species abundance and range descriptions.
PAC: Percent Area Coverage
IOT: Individuals on Transect
BALANCED 3910‐R‐01.2
Table A1.4: Observed Biota Abundance and Tidal Range. Transects 10 – 12.
Abundance Abundance Abundance
Description Upper Lower Description Upper Lower Description Upper Lower
Barnacles
Acorn Balanus glandula PAC Common 3.5 -5 Common 3.5 -5 Common 3 -4
Bivalves
Bay Mussel Mytilus trossulus PAC Rare 3 1.5 Few 3 1.5 Rare 3 1.5
Butter Clam Saxidomus gigantea IOT
False Jingle Pododesmus macrochisma IOT
Fat Gaper Tresus capax IOT Rare 0 -1.5
Littleneck Protothaca staminea IOT
Macoma Macoma nasuta IOT
Manila Venerupis philippinarum IOT
Nuttall's Cockle Clinocardium nuttallii IOT Rare -4 -4 Rare -2.5 -4
Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas IOT
Shipworm Bankia setacea IOT
Brown Algae
Bull Kelp Nereocystis luetkeana IOT
Rockweed Fucus gardneri IOT
Sargassum Sargassum muticum IOT
Sugar Wrack Saccharina latissima IOT Common 0 -4.5 Common 0 -4.5
Winged Kelp Alaria esculenta IOT
Green Algae
Sea Lettuce Ulva fenestrata PAC
Red Algae
Iodine Seaweed Prionitis lyallii PAC Rare 0.5 -2
Pacfic Rose Rhodymenia pacifica PAC
Red Fringe Smithora naiadum PAC
Red Spaghetti Gracilaria sp. PAC
Turkish Washcloth Mastocarpus papillatus PAC Rare 3.5 1
Seagrass
Eelgrass Zostera marina PAC
Chitons
Lined Chiton Tonicella sp. IOT
Crabs
Dungeness Cancer magister IOT Rare -5 -6.5 Rare 0 -6.5 Rare -2 -5
Graceful Metacarcinus gracilis IOT Sparse -1 -4 Sparse -1 -2
Green Shore Hemigrapsus oregonensis IOT Abundant 3.5 -2 Abundant 3.5 -2 Few 2.5 0
Northern Kelp Pugettia producta IOT Rare -1.5 -1.5
Purple Shore Hemigrapsus nudus IOT Sparse 3 0 Sparse 3 1 Rare 3 1
Red Rock Cancer productus IOT Rare -1 -6.5 Rare -3 -6
Limpets and Snails
Dogwinkle Snail Nucella sp. IOT Rare 4.5 2 Rare 4.5 3
Plate Limpet Tectura scutum IOT Rare 1.5 0 Rare 1 0
Nudibranchs
Hooded Melibe leonina IOT
Opalescent Hermissenda crassicornis IOT Sparse -3 -5
Sea Anemones
Giant Plumose Metridium farcimen IOT Rare -1 -4 Rare -2 -4
Tube-dwelling Pachycerianthus fimbriatus IOT
Sea Cucumbers
Giant Red Parastichopus californicus IOT
Sea Urchins
Green Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis IOT
Sea Stars
Leather Dermasterias imbricata IOT
Mottled Evasterias troschelii IOT Rare -1 -4
Ochre Pisaster ochraceus IOT
Jellies
Moon Jelly Aurelia labiata IOT
Comb Jelly Euplokamis dunlapae IOT
Fish
English Sole Parophrys vetulus IOT
Black-eyed Goby Coryphopterus nicholsi IOT
Kelp Greenling Hexagrammos decagrammus IOT
Spiny Lumpsucker Eumicrotremus orb is IOT
Scalyhead Sculpin Artedius harringtoni IOT Rare 1 -2.5
Saddleback Gunnel Pholis ornata IOT Rare 1.5 -1
Shrimp
Ghost Shrimp Neotrypaea californiensis IOT Few -2 -5.5
Common Name Scientific Name Method Chart Datum RangeChart Datum Range Chart Datum Range
T10 T11 T12
See Section 2: Biophysical Survey Methodologies, for species abundance and range descriptions.
PAC: Percent Area Coverage
IOT: Individuals on Transect
BALANCED 3910‐R‐01.2
Table A1.5: Observed Biota Abundance and Tidal Range. Transects 13 – 14.
Abundance Abundance
Description Upper Lower Description Upper Lower
Barnacles
Acorn Balanus glandula PAC Common 3 -5 Common 3.5 -4
Bivalves
Bay Mussel Mytilus trossulus PAC Sparse 3 1.5 Rare 3 1.5
Butter Clam Saxidomus gigantea IOT
False Jingle Pododesmus macrochisma IOT
Fat Gaper Tresus capax IOT
Littleneck Protothaca staminea IOT
Macoma Macoma nasuta IOT
Manila Venerupis philippinarum IOT
Nuttall's Cockle Clinocardium nuttallii IOT Rare -2 -2.5
Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas IOT
Shipworm Bankia setacea IOT
Brown Algae
Bull Kelp Nereocystis luetkeana IOT
Rockweed Fucus gardneri IOT Rare 3 1.5 Rare 3 1.5
Sargassum Sargassum muticum IOT
Sugar Wrack Saccharina latissima IOT Few 0 -5 Sparse 0 -4.5
Winged Kelp Alaria esculenta IOT
Green Algae
Sea Lettuce Ulva fenestrata PAC
Red Algae
Iodine Seaweed Prionitis lyallii PAC
Pacfic Rose Rhodymenia pacifica PAC
Red Fringe Smithora naiadum PAC Sparse -1 -2
Red Spaghetti Gracilaria sp. PAC Few 0 -3
Turkish Washcloth Mastocarpus papillatus PAC Rare 3 1
Seagrass
Eelgrass Zostera marina PAC ü
Chitons
Lined Chiton Tonicella sp. IOT
Crabs
Dungeness Cancer magister IOT Sparse 0 -4.5
Graceful Metacarcinus gracilis IOT Rare -2 -3 Rare 0 -2.5
Green Shore Hemigrapsus oregonensis IOT Common 3 -2 Common 3 0
Northern Kelp Pugettia producta IOT
Purple Shore Hemigrapsus nudus IOT Rare 2 0 Rare 0 -2.5
Red Rock Cancer productus IOT
Limpets and Snails
Dogwinkle Snail Nucella sp. IOT Rare 3 3 Rare 3 3
Plate Limpet Tectura scutum IOT
Nudibranchs
Hooded Melibe leonina IOT Rare -2 -3
Opalescent Hermissenda crassicornis IOT Sparse -3 -6
Sea Anemones
Giant Plumose Metridium farcimen IOT Rare -1 -4
Tube-dwelling Pachycerianthus fimbriatus IOT
Sea Cucumbers
Giant Red Parastichopus californicus IOT
Sea Urchins
Green Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis IOT
Sea Stars
Leather Dermasterias imbricata IOT
Mottled Evasterias troschelii IOT Sparse 1.5 -3
Ochre Pisaster ochraceus IOT
Jellies
Moon Jelly Aurelia labiata IOT
Comb Jelly Euplokamis dunlapae IOT
Fish
English Sole Parophrys vetulus IOT
Black-eyed Goby Coryphopterus nicholsi IOT Rare -1.5 -3
Kelp Greenling Hexagrammos decagrammus IOT
Spiny Lumpsucker Eumicrotremus orbis IOT
Scalyhead Sculpin Artedius harringtoni IOT Rare 1 0
Saddleback Gunnel Pholis ornata IOT
Shrimp
Ghost Shrimp Neotrypaea californiensis IOT Rare -4 -5 Rare -5 -5.5
T13 T14
Chart Datum Range Chart Datum RangeCommon Name Scientific Name Method
See Section 2: Biophysical Survey Methodologies, for species abundance and range descriptions.
PAC: Percent Area Coverage
IOT: Individuals on Transect
BALANCED 3910‐R‐01.2
Table A2: Bivalve Survey Findings
Bivalve numbers at each site aggregated from 1 to 3 benthic samples (see brackets).
1(2) 2(2) 3(3) 4(1) 5(2) 6(1) 7(1) 8(1) 9(1) 10(1) 11(1) 12(1)
Butter Clam Saxidomus gigantea 1 1 1 1
Fat Gaper Tresus capax
Littleneck Protothaca staminea 1 1 2 1 1 2 2
Macoma Macoma nasuta 2 4 4 1 12 21
Manila Venerupis philippinarum 1 8 12 11 2
Nuttall's Cockle Clinocardium nuttallii 2 1 1 1
Sample Location (number of benthic samples)Common Name Scientific Name
APPENDIX C
Bird Use Studies
Hemmera Envirochem Inc.
18th Floor, 4730 Kingsway
Burnaby, BC V5H 0C6
T: 604.669.0424
F: 604.669.0430
hemmera.com
July 26, 2018 File: 302-035.05 (989565-05) Vancouver Fraser Port Authority 100 The Pointe 999 Canada Place Vancouver, BC V6C 3T4
Attn: Charlotte Olson, P.Geo., PMP, Manager, Infrastructure Habitat Development
Dear Ms. Olson,
Re: Bird Use Studies for Maplewood Marine Restoration Project, Burrard Inlet, North Vancouver, BC
This Work was performed in accordance with the Contract for Environmental Advisory Services for Phase
2 of the Habitat Enhancement Program between Hemmera Envirochem Inc. (“Hemmera”) and Vancouver
Fraser Port Authority (VFPA) (“Client”), dated July 1, 2015 (“Contract”). This Report has been prepared by
Hemmera, based on a desktop review and fieldwork conducted by Hemmera for the sole benefit of, and
use by, VFPA. In performing this Work, Hemmera has relied in good faith on information provided by others
and has assumed that the information provided by those individuals is both complete and accurate. This
Work was performed to current industry standard practice for similar environmental work, within the relevant
jurisdiction and same locale. The findings presented herein should be considered within the context of the
scope of work and project terms of reference; further, the findings are time sensitive and are considered
valid only at the time the Report was produced. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this
Report are based upon the applicable guidelines, regulations, and legislation existing at the time the Report
was produced; any changes in the regulatory regime may alter the conclusions and/or recommendations.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
The Maplewood Marine Restoration Project (MMRP, or “Project”) is a habitat enhancement project
proposed by the VFPA Habitat Enhancement Program (HEP). HEP is a VFPA program whose goal is to
balance a healthy environment with infrastructure development opportunities. HEP creates and enhances
fish and wildlife habitat for habitat banking purposes, use as offsetting for port infrastructure projects, or a
combination of both. The Project lies within VFPA jurisdiction on the north shore of Burrard Inlet,
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP Bird Studies - 2 - July 2018
approximately two kilometres east of the Ironworkers Memorial Bridge. The Project is immediately south of
a wildlife conservation area, the Maplewood Flats Conservation Area (MFCA), which is leased to
Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) and managed by the Wild Bird Trust (WBT) of British
Columbia (Figure 1). WBT’s mandate is to protect wild birds and their habitat.
The Project area is located within a marine tidal basin up to nine metres deep (the Maplewood Basin) and
an intertidal area to the south of the Maplewood Basin. The Maplewood Basin consists of the previously
dredged area of Maplewood Flats, encompassing the Northeast Basin and Main Basin. The Maplewood
Basin was dredged in the 1940s to support gravel extraction and was later used as a log storage facility.
The Project is anticipated to enhance approximately seven hectares of low-value marine habitat into higher-
value marine habitat for fish, birds, and other wildlife. Proposed habitat enhancements include a tidal
channel, subtidal rock reef habitat, eelgrass habitat, and intertidal flat habitat (Figure 1). The majority of
the construction work is scheduled to occur during the appropriate least-risk timing windows for Burrard
Inlet. The least-risk timing windows to mitigate risk of negative effects to juvenile salmonids is August 16th
to February 28th. Any work outside the windows would occur with appropriate mitigation in place. (August
16 through to February 28; AECOM Canada Ltd. 2018).
This report describes the results of a review of available data for bird use of the Project area and a raptor
and heron stick nest survey completed in March 2018.
1.2 FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL REGULATIONS
The provincial BC Wildlife Act protects vertebrate animals from direct harm, except as allowed by regulation
(e.g. hunting or trapping). Under this legislation, any vertebrate species other than fish can be legally
designated as endangered or threatened. The BC Conservation Data Centre (CDC) assesses the level that
species or ecological communities are at risk of being lost, and, based on this assessment, assigns a
provincial conservation status rank. Based on each species’ conservation status rank, an assignment to
the red, blue or yellow list helps set conservation priorities and provides a simplified view of the status of
BC's species. These lists help to identify species that can be considered for designation as "Endangered"
or "Threatened."
The federal Species at Risk Act (SARA) exists to prevent wildlife species in Canada from disappearing, to
provide for the recovery of wildlife species that are extirpated (no longer exist in the wild in Canada),
endangered, or threatened as a result of human activity, and to manage species of special concern to
prevent them from becoming endangered or threatened (Environment and Climate Change Canada 2016).
The federal Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994 (MBCA), exists to protect and conserve migratory birds—
as populations and individual birds—and their nests. Under the MBCA, no person shall, without lawful
excuse, be in possession of a migratory bird or nest, or, buy, sell, exchange or give a migratory bird or nest
or make it the subject of a commercial transaction.
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP Bird Studies - 3 - July 2018
As there is no anticipated spatial (i.e., no construction activities proposed in the upland) or temporal (i.e.,
no construction activities proposed during the general nesting periods of migratory birds1 in the region (i.e.,
mid-March to mid-August)) overlap with birds covered under the MBCA and Project construction activities,
contravention of the MBCA is not anticipated. As such, only birds listed under BC’s red and blue lists, SARA,
and the BC Wildlife Act will be considered for potential interactions with the Project.
1 The general nesting period for migratory birds in Canada (Government of Canada 2017) covers most federally protected
migratory bird species; raptor nesting windows are more varied, and are described in Guidelines for Raptor Conservation During Urban and Rural Land Development in British Columbia (MOE 2013).
Path: S:\Geomatics\Projects\989565\Maplewood\05\mxd\Bird Studies\Fig1__302_035_05_Maplewood_BirdStudies_ProjectArea_180508.mxd
P roduction Date: Jul 26, 2018
P a ge Size: 11" x 17"
Figure 1
N AD 1983 UTM Zon e 10N
1. All m a pped fea tures are approxim a te a n d should b e used for discussionpurposes on ly.2. This m ap is n ot in ten ded to b e a “sta n d-a lon e” docum en t, b ut a visua l a idof the in form ation con ta in ed within the referen ced Report. It is in ten ded tob e used in con jun ction with the scope of services a n d lim itation s describ edtherein .3. BC Coasta l W a terb ird Survey (BCCW S) Area: surveys are typica llycon ducted durin g high tide, a n d do n ot provide spatia lly explicit records,on ly the n um b er a n d species of b irds ob served within a n d b eyon d 500 mfrom shore.
- P roject Boun da ry, Basin s, Cha n n e, a n d P roposed En ha n cm en t Featuresl:AECOM, 2018- Aeria l Im a ge: N orth Va n couver, 2013
Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä ÄÄ Ä ÄÄ Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä
Ä Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä ÄÄ Ä Ä Ä
(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
SOUTHERNIN TERTIDAL AREA
MAP LEW OOD BASIN MAIN BASIN
BARGE CHAN N EL
N ORTHEASTBASIN
SOUTHW ESTCHAN N EL(N EW )
MAP LEW OODFLATS
SOUTHEASTCHAN N EL
MAP LEW OOD FLATSCON SERVATION AREA
Osprey nest
07
08
11a
11b
12
13
18
19
23
24
00
0102
0304
05
06
0910
1415
16
17
20
2122
2526
BRIDGEST
RIVERSIDEDR
RIVERSIDEDRW
SEYMOUR BLVD
FORESTER ST
SEY MOURRIVERPL
DOLLARTON HW Y ON RAMP
MTSEY MOURP KY
MAIN ST
P LY MOUTH
DR
ELLISST
DOLLARTON HW Y
MUN STER AVE
HARBOUR RD
AMHERSTAVE
CHARLESST
W IN DRIDGE DR
RAILW AY ST
BOURN EMOUTHCRES
SP ICER RD
EKEITHRD
EDDY STON ECRES
OLD DOLLARTON RD
FRON T ST
N otes
Sources
Legen d
±1:7,500
0 100 200 300 400Metres
Stick N estW ild Bird Trust Mon thly Survey StationW ild Bird Trust Mon thly Survey Station with Clear Lin e ofSight to MMRP AreaCoasta l W a terb irds Survey exten t at Maplewood Flats(see n ote 3)Maplewood Marin e Restoration P roject Boun daryMaplewood BasinBarge Cha n n el
Northeast BasinIn tertida l Flat
ÄÄ
ÄÄÄ
EelgrassRock Reef
Southwest Channel
((((((((((((Rock Reef
Maplewood Marine Restoration Project Area
Bird Studies forMaplewood Marin e Restoration P roject
Burrard In let, Va n couver, BC
989565-05
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP Bird Studies - 5 - July 2018
2.0 OBJECTIVES
2.1 REVIEW OF AVAILABLE DATA FOR BIRD USE OF THE PROJECT AREA
The area proposed for the MMRP is immediately south of the MFCA. As such, it is necessary to understand
bird species richness, abundance, and distribution in the vicinity of the Project area to assist VFPA in
determining if Project construction activities could have an impact on local bird populations or individuals,
as well as to evaluate the need to implement mitigation measures. With consideration to the above acts
and assignations, a literature review was conducted to increase understanding of bird use of the Project
area.
The objectives of the literature review were to:
1. Provide a greater understanding of the bird species richness, abundance and distribution in the
vicinity of the proposed Project (including federally protected species at risk) to inform the
Ecological Conditions Report, VFPA Project Environmental Review (PER) application, and
potentially the development of mitigation measures to avoid or reduce impacts to birds; and
2. Based on the available information, determine whether additional fall, winter, or spring bird surveys
are required to inform the PER application.
2.2 RAPTOR AND HERON STICK NEST SURVEY – WINTER 2018
Under the BC Wildlife Act (s34b), the nests of select species (e.g., osprey (Pandion haliaetus), bald eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus), and great blue heron (Ardea herodias), among others) are afforded year-round
protection, regardless of activity status. Osprey, bald eagles, and great blue herons will reuse nests
annually. Hemmera was informed that an osprey nest is located on the southernmost piling to the east of
the main basin (Ravi Chatterji, AECOM; personal communication), approximately 130 m from the Northeast
Basin (Figure 1). Peak Project construction activities (August 16 to February 28) have the potential to
overlap with the nesting periods of bald eagle (February to September), osprey (mid-March to mid-
September), and great blue heron (March to mid-August). If nest(s) of these species are present in the
vicinity of the Project, the need to implement mitigation measures will be evaluated.
The objective of the stick nest survey was to document any stick nests afforded year-round protection.
3.0 METHODS
3.1 REVIEW OF AVAILABLE DATA FOR BIRD USE OF THE PROJECT AREA
Hemmera conducted a review of available data summarizing information on bird use of the Project area
from surveys conducted in previous years. The review was focused on waterbirds and water associated
birds which may be affected by Project activities. For the purposes of this review, the term waterbird was
used to refer to bird species that live in or around water and includes the following taxonomic orders:
Anseriformes (ducks, geese, and swans), Gaviiformes (loons), Podicipediformes (grebes), Suliformes
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP Bird Studies - 6 - July 2018
(cormorants and allies), Pelecaniformes (pelicans, herons, and allies), Gruiformes (cranes and coots), and
Charadriiformes (plovers, sandpipers, and allies). Water associated birds are species which do not live in
the water, but forage over open water habitat (e.g., some Passeriformes (swallows, martins, dippers),
Apodiformes (swifts), and Caprimulgiformes (nighthawks)).
Fall migration, winter, and spring migration are the temporal periods where Project activities are anticipated
to overlap with bird use, so only data from these periods were reviewed.
Federally (SARA) or provincially (red or blue list) listed birds that may use the marine tidal area were
determined using the BC Conservation Data Centre Species and Ecosystems Explorer (BC CDC 2018). A
list of at risk species known to occur in Ministry of Environment (MOE) region 2 (Lower Mainland) and/or
ocean habitat (e.g., intertidal marine and subtidal marine) was downloaded and cross-referenced for
observations at the Project area using eBird (eBird 2018). Habitat associations for each species were
reviewed, and only species using habitat where construction activities are anticipated to occur (i.e., intertidal
or subtidal habitat) were cross-referenced. No temporal filter was applied to the eBird cross-referencing
assessment.
Data from the British Columbia Marine Conservation Analysis (BCMCA) Marine Atlas of Pacific Canada
(BCMCA 2018) and Nature Counts (Bird Studies Canada 2018) were reviewed and summarized. Data
acquired from the BCMCA and Nature Counts primarily came from BC Coastal Waterbirds Surveys
(BCCWS). BCCWS surveys are conducted by volunteers, typically during high tide, and do not provide
spatially explicit records, only the number and species of birds observed within and beyond 500 m from
shore. The results of the data review were focused on birds identified as species of management or
conservation concern (i.e., federally listed under the SARA or provincially listed (red or blue list)) and that
were documented using the Project area during fall, winter, and spring (October through May, RIC 1999).
The review focused on these seasons because this is the time when bird diversity and abundance are
highest (eBird 2018), and when construction activities are anticipated to occur (i.e., August 16 to February
28). Bird observations from the eBird and BCCWS data cannot be confirmed to have occurred within the
Project footprint, however occurrence of water associated birds anywhere within the Maplewood Basin is
assumed likely.
In addition to the data acquired from the BCMCA and Nature Counts, data from ongoing WBT monthly bird
surveys of the Maplewood Flats Conservation Area were also reviewed. Ten stations (i.e., Station 7, 8, 11a,
11b, 12, 13, 18, 19, 23, and 24) with clear lines of sight to the intertidal flats or Maplewood Basin were used
to estimate abundance and distribution. Of these ten stations, five of them are directly adjacent to the
MMRP Northeast Basin boundary (i.e., 11a, 11b, 12, 13, and 23, Figure 1). As with the BCMCA and Nature
Counts data, this review focused on listed species occurring in fall, winter, and spring, with a spatial focus
on the intertidal flats and Maplewood Basin (i.e., birds observed from stations with clear lines of sight to
these areas).
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP Bird Studies - 7 - July 2018
3.2 RAPTOR AND HERON STICK NEST SURVEY – WINTER 2018
A survey for stick nests, with a focus on raptor and great blue heron nests, was conducted on March 9,
2018 in upland areas of the MFCA, using adapted methods described in Inventory Methods for Raptors
(RIC 2001) and Inventory Methods for Colonial-Nesting Fresh Water Birds (RIC 1998). The nest survey
was conducted prior to vegetation green-up in the spring, when leaves were absent from trees and stick
nests were easily detected. A grid, with transects spaced 50 m apart, was established, which was then
overlaid on a georeferenced map of the forested area around the Project (Figure 2). A Hemmera biologist
and field assistant from the Tsleil-Waututh Nation surveyed the forested area on foot, keeping within 50 m
of all forested locations, whenever possible. Binoculars were used for a closer examination of any nests
observed.
All trees that could support a large stick nest (i.e., trees > 3 m tall, with large branches or crotches) within
the MFCA were inspected, and the location of each stick nest observed was recorded on a handheld GPS
device. Information collected for each nest detected included location, condition, activity level, and tree
species, if possible. If any identified nests were suspected to belong to a raptor or great blue heron, these
nests were to be revisited in summer (June) to confirm avian species use, as well as to check for signs of
nesting activity. Nests where no birds or signs of nesting activity were observed were to be reported as
unknown activity status.
Additionally, any species observed during the survey whose nests are protected year-round were recorded,
along with age and sex (if possible), behaviour (perching, standing, or flying), and perpendicular distance
to the bird from the observation location.
4.0 RESULTS
4.1 REVIEW OF AVAILABLE DATA FOR BIRD USE OF THE PROJECT AREA
The BC CDC search returned 42 federally- and provincially-listed bird species (including birds associated
primarily with terrestrial habitat) that are known to occur in MOE region 2 and/or ocean habitat. Twenty-
seven (27) species of listed birds that use intertidal and/or subtidal habitat have been documented at the
MFCA or within the Maplewood Basin (Table 1) at various times throughout the year (eBird 2018).
In addition to the lack of spatial specificity and the lack of data from low tides, data from BCCWS for the
Maplewood Flats area (Figure 1) contained large and inconsistent temporal gaps. BCCWS data were only
available from surveys conducted in 1999, 2000, and 2010-2014. Over the 7 years in which BCCWS data
were collected, there were a total of 237 observations (of one or more waterbirds), with 45 species recorded
during the fall, winter, and/or spring (Appendix A). Of these 45 species, 2 are federally listed and 6 are
provincially listed (Table 1).
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP Bird Studies - 8 - July 2018
Data from WBT bird surveys were more fulsome and consistently collected than eBird or BCCWS data.
WBT survey data was available for surveys conducted in all years between 1979 and 2016; station locations
for each observation were available for all surveys that occurred after 1997 (Figure 1). Over the 20 years
in which station-specific data have been collected (i.e., 1997 to 2016), there were a total of 5,825 waterbird
observations made from a survey station with a clear line of sight to the intertidal flats or Maplewood Basin
(i.e., Station 7, 8, 11a, 11b, 12, 13, 18, 19, 23, or 24) of one or more water associated birds. Of these 5,825
waterbird observations, 833 were of provincially- or federally-listed species (Table 1).
Surf scoter (Melanitta perspicillata), double-crested cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus), and California gull
(Larus californicus) were the most abundant listed species observed (>3 observations per month, averaged
over 20 years), followed by horned grebe (Podiceps auritus), great blue heron, and purple martin (Progne
subis) (1 to 3 observations per month, Table 1).
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP Bird Studies - 9 - July 2018
Table 1 Average of Historic Federally and/or Provincially Listed Species Occurrences at Maplewood Flats
English Name Scientific Name BC List
SARA Schedule
COSEWIC eBird ‡ BCCWS ‡
WBT Mean Count §
Spring Winter Fall Fall, Winter, and Spring
American bittern Botaurus lentiginosus Blue - - N/A 0 0 0 0 0
American white pelican* Pelecanus erythrorhynchos
Red NAR (May
1987) - N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Barn swallow † Hirundo rustica Blue T (May 2011) 1-T (Nov
2017) N/A 0 0.3 0 0 0.1
Black scoter † Melanitta americana Blue - - N/A N/A 0 1.2 0 0.4
Black swift Cypseloides niger Blue E (May 2015) - N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Brandt's cormorant Phalacrocorax penicillatus
Red - - N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Brant* Branta bernicla Blue - - N/A 0 0 0 0 0
California gull Larus californicus Blue - - N/A N/A 2.1 4.9 1.8 3.0
Caspian tern † Hydroprogne caspia Blue NAR (May
1999) - N/A 0 0.3 0 0 0.1
Common nighthawk* Chordeiles minor Yellow T (Apr 2007) 1-T (Feb
2010) N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Double-crested cormorant
Phalacrocorax auritus Blue NAR (May
1978) - N/A N/A 4.7 8.9 11.0 7.8
Eared grebe Podiceps nigricollis Blue - - N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Great blue heron, fannini subspecies
Ardea herodias fannini
Blue SC (Mar
2008) 1-SC (Feb
2010) N/A N/A 3.0 1.0 3.8 2.4
Green heron Butorides virescens Blue - - N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Horned grebe Podiceps auritus Yellow SC (Apr 2009)
1-SC N/A 0 1.6 2.9 3.4 2.5
Long-billed curlew Numenius americanus
Blue SC (May
2011) 1-SC (Jan
2005) N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Long-tailed duck Clangula hyemalis Blue - - N/A 0 0.1 0.1 0 0.1
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP Bird Studies - 10 - July 2018
English Name Scientific Name BC List
SARA Schedule
COSEWIC eBird ‡ BCCWS ‡
WBT Mean Count §
Spring Winter Fall Fall, Winter, and Spring
Marbled murrelet* Brachyramphus marmoratus
Blue T (May 2012) 1-T (Jun
2003) N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Purple martin Progne subis Blue - - N/A 0 3.5 0 0 1.3
Red-necked phalarope* Phalaropus lobatus Blue SC (2014) - N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Rough-legged hawk* Buteo lagopus Blue NAR (May
1995) - N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Short-billed dowitcher Limnodromus griseus Blue - - N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Surf scoter Melanitta perspicillata Blue - - N/A N/A 37.7 11.2 15.7 21.6
Tundra swan Cygnus columbianus Blue - - N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Wandering tattler* Tringa incana Blue - - N/A 0 0 0 0 0
Western grebe Aechmophorus occidentalis
Red SC (May
2014) 1-SC
(2017) N/A N/A 0 0.1 1.5 0.4
Yellow-billed loon* Gavia adamsii Blue NAR (May
1997) - N/A 0 0 0 0 0
‡ N/A = species abundance is not available, however, species has been documented in the area.
§ Mean of total observations per month, assuming one survey was conducted per month.
† Species observation from WBT at Maplewood Flats > 3 years ago.
* Species observation from eBird at Maplewood Flats > 3 years ago.
While the specific locations of birds cannot be determined, waterbird or water associated bird observations made from Station 11a, 11b, 12, 13, or
23 are assumed to occur within the Northeast Basin, while those made from Station 7, 8, 18, 19, or 24 have potential to use habitat within the
Northeast Basin (Table 2).
Surf scoter and double-crested cormorant were the most abundant listed species observed, both within the Northeast Basin and adjacent habitat in
the Project area. Horned grebe and California gull were the next most abundant species within the Northeast Basin and adjacent areas, respectively
(Table 2). Long-tailed duck (Clangula hyemalis) was the only listed species that was observed in the Project Area, but with no observations in the
Northeast Basin.
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP Bird Studies - 11 - July 2018
Table 2 Average of Federally and/or Provincially Listed Species Occurrences Within Northeast Basin and Project Area from Wild Bird Trust Monthly Survey Data
Species
Observations within the Northeast Basin
(Station 11a, 11b, 12, 13, or 23) §
Observations within the Project Area
(Station 7, 8, 18, 19, or 24) §
Spring Winter Fall Fall, Winter, and Spring
Spring Winter Fall Fall, Winter, and
Spring
Avg SD Avg SD Avg SD Avg SD Avg SD Avg SD Avg SD Avg SD
Barn Swallow 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Black Scoter 0.0 0.0 0.7 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8
California Gull 0.7 2.7 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 1.0 1.4 2.4 4.9 17.8 1.7 5.1 2.8 6.7
Caspian Tern 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3
Double-crested Cormorant 2.5 2.5 3.1 2.7 6.0 5.2 3.5 1.7 2.3 1.4 5.8 17.6 5.0 5.1 4.2 6.3
Great Blue Heron 1.2 1.2 0.6 1.2 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.8 1.8 1.3 0.5 0.9 2.2 1.0 1.4 0.7
Horned Grebe 0.8 2.0 1.7 3.0 2.1 3.6 1.5 2.6 0.8 1.8 1.1 1.7 1.3 2.4 1.0 1.7
Long-tailed Duck 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2
Purple Martin 1.3 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 2.2 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.3
Surf Scoter 6.0 16.2 4.6 7.5 3.5 11.2 4.8 9.7 31.7 106.5 6.6 19.5 12.3 41.1 16.8 40.5
Western Grebe 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.1 2.3 0.3 0.6
§ Mean of total observations per month, assuming one survey was conducted per month.
An overview summary of water and water associated bird species recorded in the MFCA is presented in Appendix A.
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP Bird Studies - 12 - July 2018
4.2 RAPTOR AND HERON STICK NEST SURVEY – WINTER 2018
The majority of the forested area at the MFCA was surveyed from a distance ≤ 50 m (Figure 2). Due to the
abundance of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), some treed areas could not be viewed within 50
m, and were surveyed from a distance of approximately 65 m. As both observers were equipped with
binoculars, and as the survey occurred prior to spring vegetation green up, surveyors were able to clearly
see all potential nest trees and any potential raptor and heron stick nests.
Six stick nests were observed and documented during the March 9, 2018 survey, none of which
were suspected to be eagle, osprey, or great blue heron (Figure 2). All observed stick nests (Photo 1 to
Photo 6) were considered too small to be nests of raptor or heron, and were suspected to belong to
northwestern crows (Corvus caurinus). One stick nest was smaller (approximately 0.25 m diameter) than
all others observed (Photo 1) and was located in the branches of a red alder (Alnus rubra). The remaining
five stick nests (Photo 2 to Photo 6) were slightly larger (approximately 0.5 m diameter) and were all
located in black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa).
In addition to the observed stick nests, two bald eagles were observed flying over the MFCA (Figure 2).
One eagle was a juvenile, observed circling near the southern shoreline and then flying from east to west;
the second eagle observed was a mature individual, flying from south to north, at the western edge of the
MFCA. No nests or evidence of nesting by species afforded year-round protection under the Wildlife Act
were documented in proximity to the stick nest survey area (i.e., survey track, as shown on Figure 2).
Path: O:\!300-325\302-035_HEP\Maplewood\05\mxd\HEP\Fig2__302_035_05_Maplewood_HEP_Stick_Nest_Survey_180315.mxd
P roduction Date: Mar 15, 2018
P a ge Size: 11" x 17"
302-035.05
N AD 1983 UTM Zon e 10N
1. All m a pped fea tures are approxim a te a n d should b e used for discussionpurposes on ly.2. This m ap is n ot in ten ded to b e a “sta n d-a lon e” docum en t, b ut a visua l a idof the in form ation con ta in ed within the referen ced Report. It is in ten ded tob e used in con jun ction with the scope of services a n d lim itation s describ edtherein .
- Aeria l Im a ge: N orth Va n couver, 2013
BRIDGEST
FORESTER ST
DO LLARTO N HW Y
O LD DO LLARTO N RD
BAEA
BAEA
Osprey nest
23
5
1
4
6
N otes
Sources
Stick Nest Survey Area andObserved Stick Nests and Raptors
Bird Studies forMaplewood Marin e Restoration P roject
Burrard In let, Va n couver, BC
Legen d
±1:4,000
0 20 40 60 80 100Metres
Ba ld Ea gle (Adult)Ba ld Ea gle (Juven ile)Stick N estStick N est Survey Track50 m Grid
Figure 2
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP Bird Studies - 14 - July 2018
Photo 1 Small stick nest (1) in red alder Photo 2 Medium stick nest (2) in black cottonwood
Photo 3 Medium stick nest (3) in black cottonwood
Photo 4 Medium stick nest (4) in black cottonwood
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP Bird Studies - 15 - July 2018
Photo 5 Medium stick nest (5) in black cottonwood
Photo 6 Medium stick nest (6) in black cottonwood
5.0 DISCUSSION
Existing survey data from eBird, BCCWS, and WBT, provide season-specific knowledge of waterbird
species richness and abundance (Appendix A, Table 1, Table 2) within the Project area dating back
multiple decades. Existing WBT data provides a coarse representation of the distribution of water
associated birds in the Northeast Basin and adjacent habitats based on survey station locations.
Of the listed species that are known to occur within or adjacent to the Project area, barn swallow (Hirundo
rustica), black scoter (Melanitta americana), and horned grebe had higher average abundancies within the
Northeast Basin than in adjacent habitats; the remaining eight listed species had higher abundancies in
habitats adjacent to the Northeast Basin (Table 2). No species were observed in the Northeast Basin that
were not also observed in adjacent habitats. These results suggest that similar habitat in the vicinity of the
Northeast Basin is available to meet the life requisites of these listed species during Project construction.
Spring and fall were found to be the seasons with the highest abundancies of waterbirds in the Project area,
both within and adjacent to the Northeast Basin (Table 2). Barn swallow, Caspian tern (Hydroprogne
caspia), purple martin, and surf scoter abundancies were highest in the spring, the temporal period
anticipated to have the least amount of overlap with Project construction activities (Table 2). Black scoter
abundance was highest in winter, while great blue heron, horned grebe, and western grebe (Aechmophorus
occidentalis) had highest abundance levels in the fall (Table 2). Double-crested cormorant abundance
levels were highest in winter and fall, and California gull abundance varied seasonally between Project area
and adjacent habitat.
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP Bird Studies - 16 - July 2018
Based on the anticipated timing and location of construction activities, black scoter, double-crested
cormorant, great-blue heron, horned grebe, and western grebe may be the most likely listed species to
have an interaction with the Project construction activities. California gull, which had relatively low use of
the Northeast Basin (but used adjacent habitats) in winter and fall may also experience an interaction with
the Project.
Construction activities related to the MMRP are anticipated to occur when many waterbirds and water
associated birds may be using the intertidal marine and subtidal marine habitats at Maplewood Flats for
foraging and resting. The information provided herein will help to inform the Ecological Conditions Report
and assist in establishing appropriate mitigation measures to be implemented during Project construction,
if necessary. Based on the review of existing information, sufficient waterbird data exists for the Project
area to adequately develop and implement measures to mitigate potential effects to birds, should they be
required.
The stick nest survey conducted on March 9, 2018 did not result in the detection of any stick nests afforded
year-round protection. Nests that were observed were determined to be too small for nesting raptors or
herons, and likely belonged to northwestern crows. As such, no follow up surveys are recommended.
The osprey nest located on a piling southeast of the MFCA was not observed during the survey of upland
habitat, but may be active during construction activities. This nest site is approximately 130 m southeast of
the Northeast Basin (Figure 1). Osprey are tolerant of human activity and readily nest on human-made
structures (MOE 2013). The recommended minimum buffer distance for osprey nests, as described in
Guidelines for Raptor Conservation during Urban and Rural Land Development in British Columbia
(MOE 2013), is 1.5 tree lengths (in this case, the height of the piling where the nest is present) in urban
settings. Given the proximity to industrial areas, shipping and major arterial roads (Ironworkers Memorial
Bridge), the setting is considered urban. In the event that land contouring, construction, or any other unusual
or sudden loud activities occur during the osprey breeding window (i.e., March 21 to September 5), an
additional 100 m buffer should be established to minimize disturbance to nesting individuals (MOE 2013).
Due to the sensitivity of the Project being located adjacent to a conservation area, it is recommended that
the 100 m buffer plus 1.5 tree lengths (conservatively considered 20 m for this osprey nest on a marine
pile) be implemented during Project construction as a best management practice. Appropriate mitigation
measures, if required, are anticipated to be identified as construction methodology and design development
proceeds. Measures are also anticipated to be informed by input from relevant permitting processes for the
proposed Project, including Aboriginal group input.
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP Bird Studies - 17 - July 2018
6.0 CLOSURE
The review of available data has provided a baseline understanding of the waterbird species richness and
abundance in the Project area, including listed species, during the proposed construction period. The
available data is deemed to be sufficient to inform the need for, and development of appropriate mitigation
measures. No additional studies are recommended at this time.
As the stick nest survey did not result in the detection of any stick nests afforded year-round protection, no
follow up surveys to verify nest activity status are recommended.
We have appreciated the opportunity of working with you on this project and trust that this report is
satisfactory to your requirements. Please feel free to contact the undersigned regarding any questions or
further information that you may require.
Report prepared by: Report peer reviewed by: Hemmera Envirochem Inc. Hemmera Envirochem Inc.
Kyle Routledge, B.Sc., R.P.Bio. James Rourke, M.Sc., R.P.Bio. Wildlife Biologist Senior Biologist 604.669.0424 (104) 604.669.0424 (233) [email protected] [email protected]
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Hemmera MMRP Bird Studies - 18 - July 2018
7.0 REFERENCES
AECOM Canada Ltd. 2018. Maplewood Marine Restoration Project. Habitat Design - 60% Design Report.
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, Vancouver, BC.
BCMCA. 2018. Marine atlas of Pacific Canada: a product of the British Columbia Marine Conservation
Analysis (BCMCA). <http://www.cmnmaps.ca/BCMCA/index.html?agree=0>.
Bird Studies Canada. 2018. NatureCounts. <https://www.birdscanada.org/birdmon>.
BC CDC. 2018. BC Species and Ecosystems Explorer. BC Conservation Data Centre (CDC); BC Ministry
of Environment, Victoria, BC. <http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/eswp/>. Accessed 11 Oct 2017.
eBird. 2018. eBird: An online database of bird distribution and abundance. eBird, Ithaca, New York.
<http://www.ebird.org>.
Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2016. About the Species at Risk Act. Canada.ca. Government
of Canada. <https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/environmental-
enforcement/acts-regulations/about-species-at-risk-act.html>. Accessed 12 Apr 2018.
Government of Canada. 2017. General Nesting Periods of migratory birds.
<https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/avoiding-harm-migratory-
birds/general-nesting-periods.html>.
MOE. 2013. Guidelines for Raptor Conservation During Urban and Rural Land Development in British
Columbia. Best Management Practices, B.C. Ministry of Environment.
<http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wld/documents/bmp/raptor_conservation_guidelines_2013.pdf>.
Accessed 15 Aug 2013.
RIC. 1998. Inventory methods for colonial-nesting freshwater birds: eared grebe, red-necked grebe,
western grebe, American white pelican, and great blue heron. Standards for Components of
British Columbia’s Biodiversity No. 8, Version 2.0, Prepared by Ministry of Environment, Lands
and Parks Resources Inventory Branch for the Terrestrial Ecosystems Task Force Resources
Inventory Committee (RIC), Vancouver, BC.
<https://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hts/risc/pubs/tebiodiv/colonial/assets/colonial.pdf>. Accessed 26 Jul
2016.
RIC. 1999. British Columbia Wildlife Habitat Rating Standards. Resources Inventory Committee (RIC).
<http://www.ilmb.gov.bc.ca/risc/pubs/teecolo/whrs/assets/whrs.pdf>.
RIC. 2001. Inventory methods for raptors. Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management, Environmental
Inventory Branch for the Terrestrial Ecosystems Task Force, Resources Inventory Committee
(RIC), Victoria, BC.
<https://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hts/risc/pubs/tebiodiv/raptors/version2/rapt_ml_v2.pdf>.
APPENDIX A
Historic Fall, Winter, and Spring Water Associated
Bird Observations from the Maplewood Flats
Conservation Area
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority APPENDIX A Hemmera MMRP Bird Studies - 1 - July 2018
Common Name Scientific Name COSEWIC BC List SARA Schedule Observed During BCCWS Survey?
Observed in Maplewood Basin or
Intertidal Flats? 2
Observed in MFCA? 3
Mean Survey Abundance in
MFCA 3 §
Mean Survey StdDev in MFCA 3 §
American Bittern Botaurus lentiginosus - Blue - N N Y 0.0 0.1
American Black Duck1 Anas rubripes - Exotic - N N N 0.0 0.2
American Coot Fulica americana NAR (May 1991) Yellow - Y Y Y 0.0 0.1
American Dipper Cinclus mexicanus - Yellow - N Y Y 0.1 0.1
American White Pelican Pelecanus erythrorhynchos NAR (May 1987) Red - N N Y 0.0 0.0
American Wigeon Anas americana - Yellow - Y Y Y 103.4 130.0
Baird's Sandpiper1 Calidris bairdii - Unknown - N N N 0.2 0.4
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus NAR (May 1984) Yellow - Y Y Y 4.0 3.9
Bank Swallow1 Riparia riparia T (Apr 2013) Yellow 1-T (Nov 2017) N N N 0.0 0.0
Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica T (May 2011) Blue 1-T (Nov 2017) N Y Y 5.8 6.7
Barrow's Goldeneye Bucephala islandica - Yellow - Y Y Y 21.3 26.9
Belted Kingfisher Megaceryle alcyon - Yellow - Y Y Y 1.7 1.6
Black Oystercatcher Haematopus bachmani - Yellow - Y Y Y 0.9 1.4
Black Scoter Melanitta americana - Blue - Y Y Y 0.9 2.3
Black Swift Cypseloides niger E (May 2015) Blue - N N Y 0.2 0.3
Black Turnstone Arenaria melanocephala - Yellow - Y Y Y 2.2 3.9
Black-bellied Plover Pluvialis squatarola - Yellow - N N Y 0.1 0.3
Blue-winged Teal Anas discors - Yellow - N Y Y 0.4 0.5
Bonaparte's Gull Chroicocephalus philadelphia - Yellow - N Y Y 4.7 14.7
Brandt's Cormorant Phalacrocorax penicillatus - Red - N N Y 0.0 0.0
Brant Branta bernicla - Blue - N N Y 0.0 0.1
Bufflehead Bucephala albeola - Yellow - Y Y Y 10.7 16.4
Cackling Goose Branta hutchinsii - Yellow - N N Y 0.2 1.2
California Gull Larus californicus - Blue - Y Y Y 3.6 6.0
Canada Goose Branta canadensis - Yellow - Y Y Y 94.2 94.5
Canvasback Aythya valisineria - Yellow - N N Y 0.0 0.1
Caspian Tern Hydroprogne caspia NAR (May 1999) Blue - N Y Y 0.8 1.4
Cinnamon Teal Anas cyanoptera - Yellow - N Y Y 0.1 0.1
Cliff Swallow Petrochelidon pyrrhonota - Yellow - N N Y 0.1 0.4
Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula - Yellow - Y Y Y 17.6 16.4
Common Loon Gavia immer NAR (May 1997) Yellow - Y Y Y 3.8 4.4
Common Merganser Mergus merganser - Yellow - Y Y Y 5.5 5.9
Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor T (Apr 2007) Yellow 1-T (Feb 2010) N N Y 0.0 0.1
Common Tern Sterna hirundo NAR (May 1998) Unknown - N N Y 0.3 1.0
Double-crested Cormorant Phalacrocorax auritus NAR (May 1978) Blue - Y Y Y 9.2 11.4
Dunlin Calidris alpina - Yellow - Y Y Y 32.4 46.6
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority APPENDIX A Hemmera MMRP Bird Studies - 2 - July 2018
Common Name Scientific Name COSEWIC BC List SARA Schedule Observed During BCCWS Survey?
Observed in Maplewood Basin or
Intertidal Flats? 2
Observed in MFCA? 3
Mean Survey Abundance in
MFCA 3 §
Mean Survey StdDev in MFCA 3 §
Eared Grebe Podiceps nigricollis - Blue - N N Y 0.0 0.1
Eurasian Wigeon Anas penelope - No Status - Y Y Y 0.3 0.4
Franklin's Gull Leucophaeus pipixcan - Unknown - N N Y 0.1 0.3
Gadwall Anas strepera - Yellow - Y Y Y 2.5 3.8
Glaucous Gull Larus hyperboreus - No Status - N N Y 0.0 0.0
Glaucous-winged Gull Larus glaucescens - Yellow - Y Y Y 56.6 56.8
Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos NAR (May 1996) Yellow - N N Y 0.0 0.0
Great Blue Heron, fannini subspecies
Ardea herodias fannini SC (2008) No Status 1-SC (2010) Y Y Y 8.5 7.7
Greater Scaup Aythya marila - Yellow - Y Y Y 28.3 35.5
Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons - Yellow - N Y Y 0.1 0.3
Greater Yellowlegs Tringa melanoleuca - Yellow - Y Y Y 5.4 4.9
Green Heron Butorides virescens - Blue - N N Y 0.1 0.2
Green-winged Teal Anas crecca - Yellow - Y Y Y 46.8 55.9
Harlequin Duck Histrionicus histrionicus - Yellow - N Y Y 3.1 6.9
Herring Gull Larus argentatus - Yellow - Y N Y 0.1 0.3
Hooded Merganser Lophodytes cucullatus - Yellow - Y Y Y 2.4 2.5
Horned Grebe Podiceps auritus SC (Apr 2009) Yellow 1-SC Y Y Y 4.1 6.6
Killdeer Charadrius vociferus - Yellow - Y Y Y 7.4 5.1
Least Sandpiper Calidris minutilla - Yellow - N Y Y 4.5 5.7
Lesser Scaup Aythya affinis - Yellow - N Y Y 1.2 2.7
Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes - Yellow - N Y Y 0.3 0.4
Long-billed Curlew Numenius americanus SC (May 2011) Blue 1-SC (Jan 2005) N N Y 0.0 0.1
Long-billed Dowitcher Limnodromus scolopaceus - Yellow - N Y Y 0.5 1.6
Long-tailed Duck Clangula hyemalis - Blue - N Y Y 0.1 0.3
Mallard Anas platyrhynchos - Yellow - Y Y Y 213.9 182.6
Marbled Godwit Limosa fedoa - Unknown - N N Y 0.0 0.0
Marbled Murrelet Brachyramphus marmoratus T (May 2012) Blue 1-T (Jun 2003) N N Y 0.0 0.1
Mew Gull Larus canus - Yellow - Y Y Y 67.4 56.3
Mute Swan Cygnus olor - Exotic - N N Y 0.0 0.0
Northern Harrier Circus cyaneus NAR (May 1993) Yellow - Y N Y 0.1 0.2
Northern Pintail Anas acuta - Yellow - Y Y Y 10.6 15.0
Northern Rough-winged Swallow
Stelgidopteryx serripennis - Yellow - N Y Y 0.6 0.6
Northern Shoveler Anas clypeata - Yellow - N Y Y 2.1 3.5
Osprey Pandion haliaetus - Yellow - N Y Y 3.4 3.3
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority APPENDIX A Hemmera MMRP Bird Studies - 3 - July 2018
Common Name Scientific Name COSEWIC BC List SARA Schedule Observed During BCCWS Survey?
Observed in Maplewood Basin or
Intertidal Flats? 2
Observed in MFCA? 3
Mean Survey Abundance in
MFCA 3 §
Mean Survey StdDev in MFCA 3 §
Pacific Loon Gavia pacifica - Yellow - Y Y Y 0.0 0.1
Parasitic Jaeger1 Stercorarius parasiticus - Red - N N N 0.0 0.0
Pectoral Sandpiper Calidris melanotos - Unknown - N N Y 0.1 0.2
Pelagic Cormorant Phalacrocorax pelagicus - Yellow - Y Y Y 7.6 8.0
Pied-billed Grebe Podilymbus podiceps - Yellow - Y Y Y 0.5 0.8
Pigeon Guillemot Cepphus columba - Yellow - N N Y 0.1 0.2
Pomarine Jaeger Stercorarius pomarinus - Unknown - N N Y 0.0 0.0
Purple Martin Progne subis - Blue - N Y Y 11.1 17.1
Red-breasted Merganser Mergus serrator - Yellow - Y Y Y 0.8 1.3
Redhead Aythya americana - Yellow - N N Y 0.0 0.2
Red-necked Grebe Podiceps grisegena NAR (May 1982) Yellow - Y Y Y 0.6 0.8
Red-necked Phalarope Phalaropus lobatus SC (Nov 2014) Blue - N N Y 0.0 0.1
Red-throated Loon Gavia stellata - Yellow - N Y Y 0.1 0.2
Ring-billed Gull Larus delawarensis - Yellow - Y Y Y 1.8 2.4
Ring-necked Duck Aythya collaris - Yellow - N N Y 1.8 2.7
Ruddy Duck Oxyura jamaicensis - Yellow - N N Y 0.1 0.3
Ruddy Turnstone Arenaria interpres - Yellow - N N Y 0.0 0.1
Sanderling Calidris alba - Yellow - N N Y 0.4 2.1
Sandhill Crane Antigone canadensis NAR (May 1979) Yellow - N N Y 0.0 0.1
Semipalmated Plover Charadrius semipalmatus - Yellow - N Y Y 0.2 0.5
Semipalmated Sandpiper1 Calidris pusilla - Unknown - N N N 0.2 0.8
Short-billed Dowitcher Limnodromus griseus - Blue - N N Y 0.0 0.0
Snow Goose Chen caerulescens - Yellow - N Y Y 3.7 14.0
Solitary Sandpiper Tringa solitaria - Yellow - N N Y 0.0 0.0
Sora Porzana carolina - Yellow - N N Y 0.1 0.1
Spotted Sandpiper Actitis macularius - Yellow - N Y Y 2.1 1.6
Surf Scoter Melanitta perspicillata - Blue - Y Y Y 27.5 45.1
Thayer's Gull Larus thayeri - - - N Y Y 0.1 0.2
Tree Swallow Tachycineta bicolor - Yellow - N Y Y 3.6 4.1
Trumpeter Swan Cygnus buccinator NAR (May 1996) Yellow - Y Y Y 1.5 2.5
Tundra Swan Cygnus columbianus - Blue - N N Y 0.0 0.2
Vaux's Swift Chaetura vauxi - Yellow - N Y Y 2.9 3.6
Violet-green Swallow Tachycineta thalassina - Yellow - N Y Y 3.3 3.4
Virginia Rail Rallus limicola - Yellow - N N Y 0.5 0.7
Wandering Tattler1 Tringa incana - Blue - N N N 0.0 0.0
Western Grebe Aechmophorus occidentalis SC (May 2014) Red 1-SC (Nov 2017) Y Y Y 1.3 2.0
Vancouver Fraser Port Authority APPENDIX A Hemmera MMRP Bird Studies - 4 - July 2018
Common Name Scientific Name COSEWIC BC List SARA Schedule Observed During BCCWS Survey?
Observed in Maplewood Basin or
Intertidal Flats? 2
Observed in MFCA? 3
Mean Survey Abundance in
MFCA 3 §
Mean Survey StdDev in MFCA 3 §
Western Gull Larus occidentalis - Unknown - N Y Y 0.0 0.1
Western Sandpiper Calidris mauri - Yellow - N Y Y 3.8 6.4
Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus - Unknown - N N Y 0.0 0.1
White-winged Scoter Melanitta fusca - Yellow - Y Y Y 4.8 7.7
Wilson's Phalarope1 Phalaropus tricolor - Yellow - N N N 0.0 0.0
Wilson's Snipe Gallinago delicata - Yellow - N Y Y 0.7 0.8
Wood Duck Aix sponsa - Yellow - N Y Y 2.1 2.5
Yellow-billed Loon Gavia adamsii NAR (May 1997) Blue - N N Y 0.0 0.0
§ Mean of total observations per month, assuming one survey was conducted per month. 1 Observed during summer only. 2 Assumed to occur in the Project area as observation was made from a Station with a clear line of sight to the Maplewood Basin or Intertidal flats (i.e., Stations 7, 8, 11a, 11b, 12, 18,19, 23, and/or 24). 3 Observation made from the Maplewood Flats Conservation Area (including flying individuals and observations made from the forested upland area); data from monthly WBT surveys.