+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Faculty of Resource Science and Technology … and testing of locally... · Acknowledgement ......

Faculty of Resource Science and Technology … and testing of locally... · Acknowledgement ......

Date post: 07-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: vungoc
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
24
FORMULATION AND TESTING OF LOCALLY ISOLATED EFFECTIVE MICROBES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BIOFERTILIZERS Shruti Prashant Talwar Bachelor of Science with Honours (Biotechnology Resource) 2013 Faculty of Resource Science and Technology
Transcript

FORMULATION AND TESTING OF LOCALLY ISOLATED EFFECTIVE

MICROBES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BIOFERTILIZERS

Shruti Prashant Talwar

Bachelor of Science with Honours

(Biotechnology Resource)

2013

Faculty of Resource Science and Technology

FORMULATION AND TESTING OF LOCALLY ISOLATED EFFECTIVE

MICROBES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BIOFERTILIZERS

SHRUTI PRASHANT TALWAR

This project report is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree

of Bachelor of Science with Honours (Resource Biotechnology)

Resource Biotechnology Programme

Department of Molecular Biology

Faculty of Resource Science and Technology

Universiti Malaysia Sarawak

2013

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Above all, I am grateful to God for all his blessings.

I owe sincere gratitude, to my supervisor, Dr Awang Ahmad Sallehin Awang Husaini for

giving me this invaluable opportunity to work under him and also for his patience,

motivation, enthusiasm, and immense knowledge and most important of all, for believing in

me. His guidance has helped me through this research and writing of this thesis. I could not

have imagined having a better advisor and mentor for my final year project.

Also, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my amazing parents for their

never – ending love and support through good times and through challenging times.

I would also like to acknowledge 1IPTA 1Menteri (Kementerian Tenaga, Teknologi Hijau

dan Air), for providing a financial grant for my research.

I would also like to acknowledge and express my thanks to the postgraduate students from

the Molecular Genetics lab for all their help and guidance.

And last but not the least I would like to thank my dearest friends who have come into my

life and inspired, touched, and illuminated me with their presence.

Table of Contents

Title Page

Acknowledgement………………………………………………………... I

Table of Contents…………………………………………………………. II

List of Abbreviations…………………………………………………….. V

List of Tables and Figures………………………………………………… VI

Abstract.....………………………………………………………………... 1

1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................... 2

2.0 Literature Review………………………………................................. 6

2.1 Sustainable Agriculture………………………………………….. 6

2.2 Biofertilizer ……………………………………………………... 7

2.3 Effective Microbes………………………………………………. 8

2.3.1 Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR)………...... 10

2.3.2 Nitrogen Fixing Bacteria (NFB)………………………….. 11

2.3.3 Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (PSB)…………………… 12

2.4 Compost as the Natural Carrier…………………………………... 12

2.5 Biofertilizer in Malaysia………………………………………… 13

3.0 Materials and Method………………………………………………... 16

3.1 Soil Sampling…………………………………………………… 16

3.2 Media Preparation ……………………………………………… 16

3.3 Sampling………………………………………………………... 19

3.4 Isolation………………………………………………………… 19

3.5 Characterization and Identification……………………………... 19

3.6 Genomic DNA isolation………………………………………… 20

3.7 16S rDNA Analysis……………………………………………... 21

3.8 Polymerase Chain Reaction…………………………………….. 21

3.9 Agarose Gel Electrophoresis……………………………………. 22

3.10 Maintenance of Isolates………………………………………... 22

3.11 Developing Biofertilizer using OPEFB As Base Medium…….. 23

3.12 Compost Analysis……………………………………………... 23

3.12.1 Bacterial Count………………………………………….. 23

3.12.2 Moisture Content………………………………………… 24

3.12.3 pH ……………………………………… ……………….. 24

3.12.4 Phytotoxicity Test……………………………………… 25

3.12.5 Germination Index………………………………………. 25

3.13 Pot Trial Testing……….……………………………………… 26

4.0 Results and Discussion…………………………………………. 27

4.1 Characterization and Identification…………………………. 27

4.2 Genomic DNA Isolation…………………………………….. 28

4.3 Polymerase Chain Reaction………………………………… 29

4.4 DNA Purification……………………………………………. 30

4.5 Sequencing Results…………………………………………. 31

4.6 Compost Analysis ………………………………………….. 33

4.6.1 Bacterial Count……………………………………….. 33

4.6.2 Moisture Content………………………………………. 34

4.6.3 pH……………………………………………………... 35

4.6.4 Phytotoxicity Test……………………………………. 36

4.7 Pot Trials…………………………………………………… 37

5.0 Conclusion ………………………………………………........... 38

6.0 References……………………………………………………... 40

Appendix A: Sequencing results of unknown isolates using 16S r DNA 45

List of Abbreviations

AMF Arbuscular mycorrhizial fungi

BNF Biological nitrogen fixation

BLAST Basic local alignment tool

CTAB Cetyl trimethylammonium bromide

DNA Deoxyribonucleic acid

EM Effective microbes

LB Luria Bertani

NFB Nitrogen fixing bacteria

NA Nutrient agar

PGPM Plant growth promoting microbes

PGPR Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria

PSB Phosphate solubilizing bacteria

List of Tables and Figures

Tables

Table 1: Optimized PCR reaction mixture……………………………………………………… 21

Table 2: Optimized thermocycling profile………………………………… 21

Table 3: Morphological characteristics of the unknown isolate…………... 27

Table 4: Profiles of moisture content of inoculated compost and control

compost……………………………………………………………….

34

Table 5: Germination Index of water spinach seeds in inoculated compost and

control compost on day 30 of composting period……………………..

36

Table 6: Statistical analysis of the pot trials using t – test……………………... 37

Figures

Figure 1: Results of Gram staining visualized with 1000 X modification…….. 27

Figure 2: Visualised genomic DNA extracted from unknown bacteria………. 28

Figure 3: Visualized PCR product showing dominant band of 1500bp……….. 29

Figure 4: Results of purification of the PCR product………………………….. 30

Figure 5: Total bacterial count on day 10 in the compost inoculated with

bacteria and control compost………………………………………….

34

Figure 6: Total bacterial count on day 30 in the compost inoculated with

bacteria and control compost………………………………………….

34

Figure 7: pH profiles of inoculated compost and control compost…………….. 35

1

Formulation and testing of locally isolated effective microbes for the development of

biofertilizers

Shruti Prashant Talwar

Resource Biotechnology Faculty of Resource Science and Technology

Universiti Malaysia Sarawak

ABSTRACT

The soil is a complex and heterogeneous environment constituting a large diversity of effective microbes

which can be utilized as biofertilizers. In the present study, local soil samples were collected for isolation of

beneficial bacteria. Genomic DNA was extracted from the unknown isolate and subjected to the

amplification of 16S rDNA gene for identification. The similarity searching of the sequence obtained after

sequencing showed 99% similarity with Enterobacter Cloacae, a gram negative rod shaped bacteria

belonging to the community of PGPR. This makes it a promising strain to be developed as a biofertilizer.

Additionally, biofertilizers were developed using four bacterial isolates namely, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus

amyloliquefaciens, Bacilus licheniformis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa This consortium was then inoculated

onto OPEFB compost and compared with uninoculated compost as control. Over a 30 day period, various

types of compost analysis were also conducted. On day 30, the moisture content of inoculated compost was

83.58%. The pH was slightly acidic at 6.42 with bacterial count higher than uninoculated compost. The

Germination Index (GI) was at 95% indicating that the compost was mature and free from phytotoxins. After

curing, pot trials evaluating the effects of this formulation on the growth factors of Capsicum annum L,

showed a significant increase in root and shoot length. Hence, combination of these bacterial strains could be

a good biofertilizer for sustainable agriculture.

Key Words: Biofertilizer, Enterobacter Cloacae, consortium, OPEFB compost.

ABSTRAK

Tanah adalah satu persekitaran yang kompleks dan berbeza-beza yang membentuk satu kepelbagaian

mikrob efektif yang mungkin boleh digunakan sebagai baja bio. Dalam kajian ini, sampel tanah tempatan

telah dikumpulkan untuk pengasingan bakteria berfaedah. DNA genomik telah diambil dari pengasingan

yang tidak diketahui dan merujuk kepada amplifikasi gen 16S rDNA untuk pengenalan. Persamaan mencari

jujukan diperolehi setelah jujuk menunjukkan 99% persamaan dengan Enterobakter cloacae, satu rod gram

negatif membentuk bakteria kepunyaan komuniti PGPR. Ini menjadikan ia satu terikan yang baik untuk

dikembangkan sebagai satu baja bio. Sebagai tambahan, baja bio dikembangkan menggunakan empat

bakteria terasing iaitu, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacilus licheniformis dan Pseudomonas

aeruginosa. Konsortium ini kemudiannya diinokulat ke kompos OPEFB dan dibanding dengan kompos

tanpa inokulasi sebagai kawalan. Selepas tempoh 30 hari, pelbagai jenis analisis baja telah dijalankan.

Pada hari ke 30, kandungan kelembapan kompos disuntik adalah 83.58%. pH adalah sedikit berasid pada

tahap 6.42 dengan kiraan bakteria yang tinggi daripada baja pokok tanpa inokulasi. Indeks Percambahan

(GI) adalah pada 95% menunjukkan bahawa kompos itu matang dan bebas daripada phytotoxins. Selepas

pengawetan, ujian periuk menilai kesan penggubalan ini kepada faktor-faktor pertumbuhan Capsicum

annum L, menunjukkan peningkatan yang ketara dalam akar dan panjang menembak. Oleh itu, gabungan

jenis bakteria ini boleh menjadi biobaja baik untuk pertanian lestari.

Kata Kunci: Biofertilizer, Enterobakter cloacae, konsortium , kompos OPEFB.

2

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Agriculture has sustained human lives since ancient times. Today, with global population

exceeding 7 billion, agriculture inexorably continues to play a very important role in the

survival of mankind.

Since many years, farmers have been depending on chemical fertilizers for enhancing

the growth of plants. But the continuous use of these chemical fertilizers and pesticides has

not only made it difficult to sustain the soil fertility but also contaminated and damaged

soil health. Hence, it has become necessary to reduce the use of chemical fertilizers in

order to lessen the pressure on the environment due to irresponsible agricultural practises.

Nowadays, factors such as soil degradation, chemical pollution, the demand for safe

food and more importantly, the rising cost of petroleum have forced farmers to seek other

alternatives (Zakaria, 2006). This has also led researchers to devise methods to increase

soil fertility and to develop sustainable agricultural cultivation techniques, more than ever

before.

In this context, biofertilizers can be considered as key components of integrated

nutrient management (Mohammadi & Sohrabi, 2012). The term “Biofertilizer” or more

appropriately “Microbial inoculants” can generally be defined as preparation containing

live or latent cells of efficient strains of Nitrogen fixing, Phosphate solubilising or

cellulolytic microorganisms used for application to seeds, soil with the objective of

increasing the number of such microorganisms and accelerate those microbial process

which augment the availability of nutrients that can be easily assimilated by plants (Pandit

et al., 2011). Biofertilizers enhance the productivity and sustainability of soil as they are

3

low cost, eco-friendly and renewable source of plant nutrients. Thereby, they play an

important role in sustainable agricultural system.

In recent years there has been an upsurge into the research related to biofertilizers

since they act as natural stimulators of plant growth and development. Consequently, there

is considerable interest in the possible use of inoculants of effective microbes for the

development of biofertilizer. This mainly involves the selection and multiplication of

plant-beneficial microorganisms such as bacteria, algae and fungi, either alone or in

combination.

Since, bacteria are extremely perishable and sensitive to environmental factors, there is

always a need for developing efficient and hardy strains of these microbes which can

withstand local ecological conditions, replenish soil fertility and improve nutrient uptake

for the plant. These improved strains can also be designed so that they are suitable for

different conditions and thereby for greater crop diversification.

The formulation of biofertilizer typically consists of establishing viable bacteria in a

suitable carrier together with additives that aid in stabilization and protection of microbial

cell during storage, transport and at the target (Brahmaprakash & Sahu, 2012). A good

quality carrier material for the microbial inoculants should generally consist of carbon,

nitrogen and vitamin sources, which can promote growth and survival of bacteria.

Compost is one such carrier material which has these characteristics.

Compost is a natural agro-management method, utilizing agricultural waste and

indigenous soil microorganisms (Phua et al., 2012). Composting through the modified

‘Natural Farming’ method, has been gaining acceptance in several countries and in

Malaysia, by the Department of Agriculture (Phua et al., 2012). It is a simple and cheap

4

method to turn wastage like empty fruit bunches (EFB) of oil palm industries into

compost. Composts which are inoculated with biofertilizer containing appropriate

functional microbes increase the decomposition rate, shorten the maturity period and

thereby improve the compost quality (Wei et al., 2007).

At present, Malaysia is striving to adopt sustainable and zero waste agricultural

practises in response to growing environmental concerns. And, in keeping with the spirit of

times, there is an ongoing attempt to promote the use of biofertilizers in the Malaysian

farming systems so that they can be used as eco-friendly and cost effective inputs by the

farmers.

The ultimate goal of sustainable agriculture is to develop farming systems that are

productive, profitable, energy conserving, environmentally sound, conserving of natural

resources and that ensures food safety and quality (Namasivayam & Kirithiga, 2010). This

study endeavours to give a new input into the research of using biofertilizers containing

effective microbes so as to move away from conventional and chemical based agriculture.

This basically involves reducing the loss to the environment by increasing organic

farming systems and decreasing the input of inorganic chemical fertilizers. Hence, the

need for the amalgamation of microbial waste management into agro-industries, and their

roles in creating a better environment and sustain agriculture, cannot be over emphasized.

In view of these facts, the main objectives of this research study were:

• Isolation and characterization of unknown bacteria from local soil samples.

• Formulation of Bacillus cereus, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacilus licheniformis and

Pseudomonas aeuriginosa for the development of biofertilizer, so as to enhance plant

yield and growth.

5

• To characterize the biofertilizer produced in terms of their physiochemical and

microbiological properties.

• Pot trial testing using the formulated biofertilizer, on selected plants so as to enhance

plant yield and growth.

6

2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Sustainable Agriculture

Over the past decades, world population has increased dramatically. According to United

Nations (UN, 2009) reports, the global population, which was approximately 6 billion in

2000 is likely to increase to 9 billion by the year 2050. With focus on feeding a rapidly

growing human population, world agriculture too has shown phenomenal growth. This

increase in crop productivity has mainly been due to intensive off- farm inputs such as

synthetic chemical fertilizers and pesticides.

Unfortunately, the excessive and indiscriminate use of these chemical inputs for

enhancing agricultural production has led to a number of environmental problems. Amidst

the current situation, there is a growing awareness and concern about the harmful effects of

these agrochemicals which has led to increased demand for sustainable food production

and agriculture. Therefore, improving agricultural sustainability has become an important

goal (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO], 2002).

The term ‘sustainable agriculture’ implies regenerative practices which optimally use

locally available resources and natural processes, such as nutrient recycling; build on

biodiversity; regenerate and develop natural resources; and limit the use of external inputs

of agro-chemicals, minerals and non-renewable energy (Roling & Wagemakers, 1998).

The challenge for agriculture over the coming decades, therefore, will be to meet the

worlds increasing demand for food in a sustainable way (Gruhn et al., 2000)

In order to reach such a situation, research and development plays a key role in

providing the technologies and products to enable all this to happen. In this present

7

context, the role of biofertilizers in sustainable agriculture assumes special significance

(Kannaiyan & Kumar, 2006).

2.2 Biofertilizer

According to Mosttafiz et al. (2012), the most promising strategy to reach the goal of

sustainable agriculture, is to substitute hazardous agrochemicals with environment-friendly

preparations for symbiotic microbes which could improve the nutrition of crops and

livestock, as well as their protection from biotic (pathogens, pests) and abiotic (including

pollution and climate change) stresses. Consequently, biofertilizers have emerged as one of

the alternatives for transition towards more sustainable development pathways through

biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) (Sangar, 2010) and have become important components

of integrated nutrient management (Mohammadi & Sohrabi , 2012).

According to the definition proposed by Vessey (2003), Biofertilizer is a substance

which contains living microorganisms which, when applied to seed, plant surfaces, or soil,

colonizes the rhizosphere or the interior of the plant and promotes growth by increasing

the supply or availability of primary nutrients to the host plant.

Research in the field of biofertilzer has resulted in the development of different kinds

of microbial inoculant or biofertilizers such as nitrogen fixing bacteria, phosphate

solubilizing microorganism, vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae (VAM) and PGPR

(Dhamangaonkar & Misra, 2009). Moreover, studies on the interaction between plant, soil

and the different microorganisms have shed light on their inter-relationships thus providing

new possible ways to exploit them for agricultural purposes (Malusa et al., 2011).

As reported by Wani et al, (1995), biofertilizers are now being increasingly used as a

part of Integrated Plant Nutrient System (IPNS) that advocate involving a combination of

8

fertilizers, organic manures and microbial inoculants which are imperative to sustain crop

production and maintain soil health and soil diversity in the long run. The use of BNF

technology for maintenance of soil health and sustainable agriculture can be an alternate to

chemical fertilizer.

According to Chien et al. (2007), the main and direct purposes of applying

biofertilizers to the soil are: to provide nutrient sources and good soil conditions for the

growths of crops when used as a live body; to partially substitute and enhance the function

of chemical fertilizer and then subdue the application quantities of fertilizers and still

maintain the same crop yields and the capital used for making bio-fertilizers is cheaper

than that of chemical fertilizers and to lessen the negative effect aroused from applying

chemical fertilizers to soil. Chien et al. (2007) also stated that, the indirect purposes of

using bio-fertilizers to soil are: to enhance the growth of root system to increase the water

and nutrient absorption abilities of crops, extend the life of root, neutralize and degrade

harmful materials accumulated in soil, promote survival efficiency of seedling after

transplanting and get shorter time for the flower to come out.

Thus the manifold advantages of biofertilizer leads to its wide applicability in

sustainable agriculture (Bashan, 1998). The success of biofertilzer depends on several

factors, such as selecting the most effective microbial strain, seeking optimum conditions

for its growth, formulation of the inocula and the method of its application (Bashan, 1998).

2.3 Effective Microbes

Microbes are an important component of world biodiversity (Phua et al., 2012). Effective

Microorganisms (EM), is a concept suggested by Professor Teruo Higa. (Higa & Parr

,1994) from the University of Ryukyus, Japan, and it consists of beneficial and naturally

9

occurring microorganisms that can be applied as inoculants so as to shift the soil

microbiological equilibrium in ways that can improve soil quality, enhance crop

production and protection, conserve natural resources, and ultimately create a more

sustainable agriculture and environment. According to Abdullah et al. (2011), EM

solutions which were used for the preparation of biofertilizer helped to increase the

number of beneficial microbes in the soil; which in turn improved the soils microbial

health and thereby promoted a healthy environment for plants.

According to Parr et al. (2010), the exact mechanisms of how EM interacts and

functions in the soil-plant ecosystem is not known. However, there is evidence that

supports several theories concerning its action including a) suppression of plant pathogens

and diseases, b) enhanced nutrient availability, c) stimulated plant growth (i.e., auxin-

mediated effects), and d) improved root surface-rhizosphere relationships (Higa &

Wididana, 1991 as cited in Parr et al., 2010).

Numerous field and greenhouse trials indicate the benefits of EM as a biofertilizer in

crop production, as a probiotic in poultry and livestock rations, and as a starter to improve

composting and recycling of municipal/industrial wastes and effluents (Hussain et al.,

1999 as cited in Javaid, 2010).

Biofertilisers based on beneficial and effective microorganisms belong to a wide array

of genera, classes and phyla; ranging from bacteria to yeasts and fungi (Malusa et al.,

2012). A specific group of this kind of biofertiliser includes products based on plant

growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPM), which include nitrogen fixing

microorganism, mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (Sahai,

1999).

10

The prospects for improved agriculture by the use of effective microbial inoculant as

biofertiliser are particularly good, especially in developing countries, because they give

better yields, have lower costs and thereby lead to reduced dependence on chemicals

(Sahai, 1999).

2.3.1 Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR)

Most of the bacteria included in biofertilizer have close relationship with plant roots.

Rhizobium has symbiotic interaction with legume roots and rhizobacteria inhabit on root

surface or rhizosphere of soil (Forum for Nuclear Cooperation in Asia [FNCA], 2006).

These species of soil bacteria flourish in the rhizosphere of plants, may grow in, on, or

around plant tissues and stimulate plant growth (Muraleedhara et al., 2010). They are

collectively known as PGPR and among them are strains from genera such as Alcaligenes,

Acinetobacter, Arthrobacter, Azospirillum, Bacillus, Burkholderia, Enterobacter, Erwinia,

Flavobacterium, Paenibacillus, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, and Serratia (Sharma et al.,

2011).

PGPR have been reported to directly enhance plant growth by a variety of

mechanisms: fixation of atmospheric nitrogen, solubilisation of minerals such as

phosphorus, production of siderophores, and synthesis of plant growth hormones i.e.

Indole-3- acetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid, cytokinins, and ethylene (Nelson, 2004 as

cited by Kumar et al., 2012) Indirect mechanisms involves the biological control of plant

pathogens and deleterious microbes, through the production of antibiotics, lytic enzymes,

hydrogen cyanide, catalase and siderophore or through competition for nutrients and space

11

can improve significantly plant health and promote growth, as evidenced by increases in

seedling emergence, vigour, and yield (Khan, 2006 as cited by Kumar et al., 2012).

A range of PGPR have shown their ability to significantly increase the vegetative

growth and grain yield of crop plants like rice, wheat, maize, sugarcane and cotton

(Figueiredo et al., n.d).

2.3.2 Nitrogen Fixing Bacteria (NFB)

Nitrogen which is one of the major nutrients required for the growth of crops is often

limited. Bacteria mediate fixation of nitrogen at temperature and pressure enzymatically,

by a process known as biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) (Brahmaprakash & Sahu, 2012)

According to Mohammadi and Sohrabi (2012), nitrogen-fixing bacteria (NFB)

transforms inert atmospheric N2 to organic compounds; and are grouped into free-living

bacteria (Azotobacter and Azospirillium) and the blue green algae and symbionts such as

Rhizobium, Frankia and Azolla. According to Brahmaprakash and Sahu, (2012) biological

nitrogen fixation by prokaryotes is a beneficial process in returning nitrogen to the soil

towards crop production and leading to sustainable nutrient management.

Nitrogen-fixing bacteria of Azotobacter and Azospirillum genera have been widely

tested to increase yield of cereals and legumes under field conditions. Azolla biofertilizer

were used for rice cultivation in different countries such as Vietnam, China, Thailand and

Philippines; and the field trials indicated that rice yields increased by 0.5-2 t/ha (Gupta,

2004 as cited by Mohammadi & Sohrabi, 2012). According to Mohammadi and Sohrabi

(2012), co-inoculation of some Pseudomonas and Bacillus strains along with effective

Rhizobium spp. has shown to stimulate chickpea growth, nodulation and nitrogen fixation.

12

2.3.3 Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (PSB)

After nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilisation is a very important plant growth

promoting activity. Several soil bacteria particularly belonging to genera Bacillus and

Pseudomonas, possess the ability to change insoluble forms into soluble form by secreting

organic acids as formic acid, acidic, propionic, lactic, glycolic, fumaric and succinic acid

(Vazquez et al., 2000). According to Sharma et al. (2011) phosphorus solubilizing bacteria

play an important role in phosphorus nutrition by enhancing its availability to plants

through the release from inorganic and organic soil phosphorous pools, by solubilisation

and mineralization.

Crop plants such as peanut, various horticultural plants and vegetables were

successfully inoculated with PSBs to obtain higher yields. PSB such as Pseudomonas spp.

enhanced the number of nodules, dry weight of nodules, yield components, grain yield,

nutrient availability and uptake in soybean crop (Sharma et al., 2011). Several field

experiments concluded that PSBs not only improved the growth and quality of crops but

also drastically reduced the usage (by 1/3-1/2) of chemical or organic fertilizers (Chien et

al., 2007). As reported by Sharma et al. (2011) Phosphate solubilizing bacteria enhanced

the seedling length of Cicer arietinum while co-inoculation of PSM and PGPR reduced

phosphorous application by 50 % without affecting corn yield.

2.4 Compost as the natural carrier

According to Bhramaprakash and Sahu (2012), carrier is a delivery vehicle which is used

to transfer live microorganism from an agar slant of laboratory to a rhizosphere and

therefore plays a major role in formulating microbial inoculant.

13

Compost can be a good nutrient carrier material for bacterial biofertilizer. It can

support the growth and survival of bacteria. It is a biodegradable and a non-polluting

material, since it is generally prepared from naturally abundant waste materials.

According to Mwegoha (2012), composting has been established as one of the low

cost alternatives for minimizing the volume of solid waste disposed off to the environment

with the potential of economic gain from resource recovery. This viable means of

transforming various organic wastes into products can be used safely and beneficially as

biofertilizers and soil conditioners (Parr et al., 2010). According to Yeoh et al. (2011), by

converting the biowastes into composts, the nutrients in the waste can be harnessed and

potentially utilized as a valuable soil amendment, hence creating a zero waste process.

2.5 Biofertilizer In Malaysia

In the early years of developing the agricultural sector, Malaysia has relied heavily on

conventional methods to produce, increase and sustain food production (Faridah, 2001).

However, in recent years responding to environmental issues, the nation is steadily

adopting sustainable agricultural practises. According to Phua et al. (2012), enhancement

of biodiversity and agrowaste management are the approaches towards sustainability. This

can be implemented by introducing integrated agriculture, with main emphasis on organic

farming and use of organic matter, composting, conservation measure and production of

organic fertilizers using the available agricultural waste (Faridah, 2001)

According to Zakaria (2006), soil enhancers in the form of compost, indigenous

microbes and enzymes from natural farming technology; effective microbes and

Arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi are all the alternatives that are presently being used. Several

14

states in Malaysia have reported increased plant growth, weight and sizes of plants, using

these soil-enhancing technologies (Zakaria, 2006).

The effective microbe (EM) technology brought from Japan, which makes use of

isolated groups of specific microbes such as photosynthetic bacteria, lactic acid bacteria

and yeasts, is currently being practised in many states of Malaysia, including Sarawak

(Zakaria, 2006). These effective microbes have been used to accelerate decomposition of

organic residues and agricultural byproducts through various stages, with a concomitant

release of plant nutrients through mineralization process, as evident from the good, healthy

harvest of crops (Rahim, 2002).

Malaysia has an abundance of agricultural waste that can be turned into compost

(Zakaria, 2006). At present empty fruit bunches (EFB) of oil palm are one of the

agricultural waste that are building up at alarming rates at palm oil factories (Phua et al.,

2012). This waste product which is hazardous to the environment if disposed off

indiscriminately, can be treated, recycled and turned into valuable product like compost

(Faridah, 2001).

According to Rahim (2002) there is a great potential for the biofertilizer industry in

Malaysia, producing products from local sources and natural resources. However most of

the microbial inoculants available in the market are imported (Zakaria, 2006). Therefore

for quarantine purpose the Ministry of Agriculture advocates the production of EM for

biofertilizer, using selected local microorganisms (Zakaria, 2006). In Malaysia,

mycorrhizal products are perceived to be more versatile than others and therefore it has

greatly appealed to the agricultural industry. Nevertheless, according to Rahim (2002)

there is also a good potential for biofertilizer products based on Azorhizobium and

Azospirillum.

15

Effective microorganisms that have the ability to degrade fat, lignin, cellulose and

hemicelluloses are given priority while preparing the inoculum specifically for the EFB

substrates (Yeoh et al., 2011). But there is always a challenge with microbial products and

hence research in the field of effective microbes will enhance biofertilizer use in the

country. Therefore, in the current attempt to make the agriculture industry in Malaysia a

viable component of a healthy and pleasant ecosystem, the use of biofertilizer and other

microbial products is very crucial (Rahim, 2002).


Recommended