+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Fehr & Peers | December 13 th, 2011 Traffic Access and Circulation Analysis Pinole Valley High...

Fehr & Peers | December 13 th, 2011 Traffic Access and Circulation Analysis Pinole Valley High...

Date post: 18-Jan-2018
Category:
Upload: barrie-evelyn-hensley
View: 219 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Scope of Work 1.Data Collection and Field Observations 2.Existing Conditions Traffic Model Development/Validation 3.Development of Access/Circulation Alternatives 4.Analysis of Alternatives 5.District and City Review 6.Selection of Preferred Alternative 7.Construction Period Traffic and Parking Management Plan
11
Fehr & Peers | December 13 th , 2011 Traffic Access and Circulation Analysis Pinole Valley High School Reconstruction
Transcript
Page 1: Fehr & Peers | December 13 th, 2011 Traffic Access and Circulation Analysis Pinole Valley High School Reconstruction.

Fehr & Peers | December 13th, 2011

Traffic Access and Circulation AnalysisPinole Valley High School Reconstruction

Page 2: Fehr & Peers | December 13 th, 2011 Traffic Access and Circulation Analysis Pinole Valley High School Reconstruction.

Presentation Overview

1. Scope of Work

2. Data Collection and Existing Conditions Analysis

3. Guiding Principles for the Future Access Plan

4. Alternatives Considered

5. Current Plan

6. Discussion / Questions

Page 3: Fehr & Peers | December 13 th, 2011 Traffic Access and Circulation Analysis Pinole Valley High School Reconstruction.

Scope of Work

1. Data Collection and Field Observations

2. Existing Conditions Traffic Model Development/Validation

3. Development of Access/Circulation Alternatives

4. Analysis of Alternatives

5. District and City Review

6. Selection of Preferred Alternative

7. Construction Period Traffic and Parking Management Plan

Page 4: Fehr & Peers | December 13 th, 2011 Traffic Access and Circulation Analysis Pinole Valley High School Reconstruction.

Data Collection and Field Observations

• February 9, 2011• Counted autos, pedestrians, bicyclists, buses• 7:00 – 9:00 AM, 2:15 – 4:00 PM• Observed directionality, parking behavior, traffic queuing, jaywalking, and

unsafe maneuvers

AM Peak Hour Observations• Traffic queues extend back to shopping center• Unsafe pedestrian movements• Poorly regulated traffic flows

PM Peak Hour Observations• Traffic jams on-site• Traffic queues from north end to Ramona• Unsafe pedestrian movements• Poorly regulated traffic flows

Page 5: Fehr & Peers | December 13 th, 2011 Traffic Access and Circulation Analysis Pinole Valley High School Reconstruction.

Existing Observations

Page 6: Fehr & Peers | December 13 th, 2011 Traffic Access and Circulation Analysis Pinole Valley High School Reconstruction.

Existing Observations

Page 7: Fehr & Peers | December 13 th, 2011 Traffic Access and Circulation Analysis Pinole Valley High School Reconstruction.

Development of Access/Circulation Alternatives

• Reduce congestion during peak periods

• Accommodate drop-offs and pick-ups on-site

• Accommodate more parking on-site

• Separate ingress and egress traffic flows

• Separate traffic flows to/from parking lot and to/from drop-off aisle

• Provide for safe, controlled pedestrian crossings on Pinole Valley Road

Goals:

Page 8: Fehr & Peers | December 13 th, 2011 Traffic Access and Circulation Analysis Pinole Valley High School Reconstruction.

Alternatives Analysis

All alternatives have a new signal at the northern parking lot driveway

Alternative 1 : Traffic signal at School Exit/Estrella only

Alternative 2 : Traffic signal at Shea/Granada only

Alternative 3 : Traffic signal at School Exit/Estrella and Shea/Granada

Alternative 4 : No traffic signal at School Exit, Shea/Granada as existing

Page 9: Fehr & Peers | December 13 th, 2011 Traffic Access and Circulation Analysis Pinole Valley High School Reconstruction.

Alternatives Analysis

Page 10: Fehr & Peers | December 13 th, 2011 Traffic Access and Circulation Analysis Pinole Valley High School Reconstruction.

Evaluation Matrix

Ease of making Ease of user Effects on Controlled

On-site congestion/ left turns out of understanding and Average delay at Corridor Ped Crossing

Access/Circulation Option Ease of drop-offs/pick-ups drop-off aisle exit safety/sight distance Shea/Granada Travel Times Opportunities

Alternative 1 -- Signal Only at Drop-off Exit

Alternative 2 -- Signal Only at Shea/Granada

Alternative 3 -- Two signals (at Drop-off Exit and at Shea/Granada)

Alternative 4 -- No Signal at Either Location

Notes:

* NB = northbound, SB = southbound

Green - good

Yellow - OK

Red - poor

Fatal Flaw

Source: Fehr & Peers, August 2011.

TABLE 5PINOLE VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION PLAN

ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION MATRIX

Page 11: Fehr & Peers | December 13 th, 2011 Traffic Access and Circulation Analysis Pinole Valley High School Reconstruction.

Current Plan: Alternative 3


Recommended