FIELD-MIND Interaction

7/30/2019 FIELD-MIND Interaction

1/13

FIELD MIND Interaction

A hypothesis has been put forward that proposes that all Creation is

underpinned by a fundamental Information Field. This concept is simply

labelled as FIELD and its prime function is record/remember all events

(otherwise called pattern) in the Material Reality (MR) of our universe.

The FIELD lies outside space-time and is hence a Virtual Reality (VR)

from our MR perspective. FIELD-Pattern has the property of combining

like-with-like pattern into localised bubbles of information that we call i-

pacs, via the process that quantum physics calls entanglement. Living

cells use their DNA + Proteome + water superposition to create a

quantum computer. This process in turn creates biophotons that interact

with the FIELD based i-pacs that are the store of all Lifes own pattern.

The next slide shows the whole process in diagrammatic form.

It seems likely that a prime function of this biophoton oscillation process is

to maintain the overall state of the cell proteome as a coherentfunctioning unit. Although a single living cell may seem very small and


2/13

insignificant to our eyes in fact the complexity of the protein enzyme

driven biochemical reactions is unbelievable. It seems very probable that

the i-pacs that are generated in the FIELD create a mechanism whereby

via quantum coherence principles this whole complex chemical soup that

is held within the cell membrane is prevented from degenerating into amass of un-coordinated chemical reactions such as might occur in the test

tube. This mechanism is in addition to the controlled structure that is

afforded by intracellular cytoskeletal elements, such as the nucleus,

cytoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria. In a large multicellular organism

the multitudinous individual cells entangle their own i-pac/SELF into the

greater i-pac/OTHER, within which is also entangled the i-pac/MIND. It is a

tenet ofFIELD theory that pattern is accessible to both sides of this

VRMR split, and that this process is all mediated via biophotons. In

single cells this FIELD access mechanism can be summarised as keep on

doing what you are doing, with the occasional change to reproduce or

perhaps form a spore.

In complex animals the same process takes place at the whole mind

level with the i-pac/ANIMAL. This we recognise in Nature as being the

instinctive behaviour patterns that all creatures utilise. Indeed humankind

has its own well-recognised instincts. Currently neuroscience has to

regard such behaviours as having been hard-wired into the brain (animal

or human) as a consequence of the cell-computations of embryogenesis

via DNA based heredity, in exactly the same kind of way a computer

based chip might be designed to drive the behaviour of a modern toy

robotic teddy bear. This way of looking at how Nature works implies

something rather different. The neural networks need to resonate with

their relevant i-pacs, and they are more akin to a radio-set, then a

complex computer circuitry with its own complex specific wiring to drive

specific actions. If this idea has any validity then logic dictates that our

minds should be able to access different but similarly stored i-

pac/pattern in exactly the same way. Hence we should be able to

remember our own past-life histories or dead relatives whose own i-pacs

are nevertheless still in store and are thus entangled with our own. This

is obviously not the case it seems, but nevertheless there are tantalising

hints that this might in fact sometimes occur and this is where the whole

discipline of Para-psychology, and the associated abilities of Psychic minds

start to interact. The occasional occurrence of apparently true re-

incarnation memories are another case in point that might accord with

this kind of process.


3/13

We need to understand therefore how our minds have come to exist in

their present form upon the evolutionary stage and much will become

clearer. Since these ideas tend to espouse that our brain/minds are

perhaps rather more akin to radio-sets in many ways as compared to a

complex computer robot style of design, it is necessary to put forward aproposed explanation as to how such radio-sets might come to be

created, and then perhaps a better understanding about how they may

actually work. Such further comprehension in turn may enable us to use

our radio-set minds to somewhat better effect.

The slide above is the first step is the first step in our explanation for the

state of affairs. Our brains are not in fact unitary constructions even

though they may seem to be from our own conscious perspective. They

have been built up by evolution over aeons and are really made in a kind

of series of modules with each new one being bolted on top of the one

below. The simple slide above shows the approximate sites of where each

module is currently sited inside our modern brains. The Fish is far downthe scale and is the sense of smell really. Reptiles are now our


4/13

hindbrains. This region acts as a Slave man (SM) and gets on with

running bodily aspects like our heart rates, digestive processes, sexual

functions and eye pupils amongst other things. All of this is utterly

unconscious for the most part. Above this level is the Rat or early

mammal which is the mid-brain level (Palaeo-mammalian). In the cortexthere is the Ape mind of our own very early ancestors (neo-mammalian).

We have grouped these two into a single functioning unit which we call

Little Fella (LF). Here such aspects as jealousy and love (= pair-bonding)

and curiosity start to emerge. This emotional palette is much closer to

our levels, and hence we start to create emotional links with mammalian

creatures much more readily, than with spiders or crocodiles (although all

sorts of pets are kept by some people). In humankind the cortex has

expanded greatly and in the forebrain (neo-cortex) lies our conscious

sense of self. This level we call Big Fella (BF).

This slide is a schematic representation of this concept. There is one

player still missing however from this trio of BF, LF and SM and that is

the sense of self, or the Ego as it was originally described by Sigmund

Freud. This player is very ancient since even fish have a sense of self,

and especially at the breeding season, fish ego levels can lead to strongaggression behaviours (think Siamese fighting fish). There is also another


5/13

aspect to remember to complete this simple metaphor which is a known

neural mechanism called the Spotlight of Attention. Like a real stage

spotlight this illuminates/focuses anything that seems needful in the

mind at a particular given instant. In this particular metaphor the ego has

been given the name Happy Guy since in modern mankind the sense ofself-importance or pecking-order is very strongly bound up with

occupational status (are you happy in your work?). This stage-like

metaphor is not suggesting that these players are some kind of brain-

sized homunculi, they are just a shorthand way of indicating a point of

computed decision/current activity. As such we can now see on a slide

how these four players normally function in the minds stage-play.

This simple slide is to show a fundamental fact of our minds organisation

that has been determined as a consequence of evolutionary pressures.

Reptiles are a single SM in principle with its primitive emotional palette

which is raw and unstructured and very basic from our viewpoint. The

appropriate descriptive terms one might use would be Rage, Lust and

Jealousy. Baby crocodiles and snakes are on their own after emerging

from the egg, and do not indulge in play behaviour and are not taught

by their parents in any way. Even so they can as adults still exhibit theneedful instincts that lead to nest building, hiding eggs and specific


6/13

mating displays. In mammals LF arrives onto the stage, and one observes

traits such as curiosity, pair-bonding, play-learning and we sense the

behaviours of anger (simply being rather cross) or envy. This is a similar

emotional palette to our own, and hence we tend to empathise with

various mammals much more readily when it comes to keeping a pet, andprefer dogs to lizards as a general rule. This mammalian LFSM

relationship has developed over many millions of years, back into the age

of the dinosaurs at least. Hence the connections/interactions between our

two players are very close, a fact that is shown in the slide by them

holding hands. In a dog a little anger or crossness can easily and rather

unpredictably flare into utter rage and hence cause an ensuing dog fight

as the older centres are much closer to the surface in the animal mind.

Zoo keepers are still occasionally badly harmed by their charges which

they have cared for and related to for years for example.

The human mind as we all know is different. We have this greatly

enlarged neo-cortical forebrain that can articulate, and also plan and

foresee events. There are likely sources for both of these new

capacities that already have been shown to have a basis in the more

ancient mammalian monkey-mind. These are nocturnal dreams and the

use of alarm calls. Both are of interest, but when it comes to considering

MINDFIELD interactions it is dreaming that seems to be of greater

relevance. Remember that in reptiles and birds the very strong behaviour

instincts are postulated to be created by creating brain radio-sets thattune into Weaver-bird FM FIELD-pattern rather than all the exact

behaviour circuits for their complex and un-taught nests being somehow

hard-wired into their brains via DNA. Mammals too have their innate and

complex behaviours, but we can all see even without scanners that dogs

for instance do dream when they are asleep. Our pet dog, (Woodstock),

will sometimes chase rabbits when he is asleep, and one can watch his

legs move and twitch and sometime faint whimpers/growls will emerge so

there are no doubts there. However when Woody is awake he has to

see a real rabbit to chase or else use a thrown ball as a substitute. This iswell shown by his behaviour when our grand-daughter who is a great

favourite of his appears on the screen monitor when using Skype. He is

very excited to see her, but immediately rushes to the window to look for

her in reality, he cannot conceive of her only being present in a kind of

purely virtual form. Our dog, cannot day-dream as it were, whereas the

human mind can do this only too easily. This day-dream ability is what

planning and foresight is all about, and science has probably identified

the neural circuitry that is responsible for this ability, which is called the

Default Mode Network (DMN). Why should this particular talent have

come to exist in our minds?


7/13

The most plausible answer to this is that it has come about as a

consequence of survival pressures involved in trying to survive as a

group hunter-predator species. Humankind has for millions of years

existed as proto-hominids and thus been prey, basically to large cats

such as leopards. They had no claws, fangs, tusks protective armour orspeed when compared to other predators, although there is an element of

endurance (for the fit!). Taking on the role of becoming a predator upon

much larger and more fearsome animals has involved the necessity of not

only forming a group, or pack (like the wolf), but also the need to co-

ordinate and plan hunting forays. The latter creates some kind of inter-

personal accurate communication imperative (language, and also gesture

together with tool-making), but also necessitates the creation of this

what-if or day dreaming scenario that is needed to drive whole herds off

cliffs or kill a mammoth. So far so good perhaps, but it was a survival

strategy that posed great problems for the early hominid mind.

Remember our pet dog Woodstock, and his reactions to the monitor

screen image. Anything he sees when in the waking state is treated by his

mind as being absolutely real. He has no imagination, and neither did

our early hominids. Indeed when we are asleep we too treat all mental

imagery as being real as any nightmare will confirm. For an early

hominid hunting a mammoth all too easily becomes a waking nightmare

once the mental image of the proposed forthcoming hunt is built up. Early

hominids in such a case would simply make a prey response, which of

course is to bolt for safety up in the trees or wherever. In order for such a

hunter-predator strategy to have any long-term success, somehow this

innate LF-based emotional response has to be suppressed to allow any

hunt planning to take place at all.

This has been done effectively by separating close communications

between our neo-cortex modern planning networks, and the earlier more

primitive mammalian monkey-mind emotional responses. In our slide

diagram we show this by drawing a telephone link between our now

dominant BF who does all the planning, and will only consult LF viacontrollable links. LF is now relegated to what the psychometric sciences

call the subconscious. HG tends to go with the top player in this

metaphor, which would be LF in the chimp and BF in human or SM in the

Lizard. Very occasionally HG will branch out on his own, which has very

bad consequences that we recognise as narcissism or megalomania. In

our slide we show HG and BF holding hands and generally being

entangled with each other.

It seems likely that what we call instinct is to be thought of as FIELD-

access. It has been in fact a natural progression over time from the firstunicellular life forms, and simply incorporated into the neural networks of


8/13

animals as they grew ever more complex. The next slide shows the whole

process in graphic form.

The price that humankind has paid for the evolutionary path that has been

chosen has been the separation of our centre of consciousness (set in

BF) from FIELD-awareness. The biblical phrase and they ate of the fruit

of the tree of knowledge and were cast out of the Kingdom of Heaven

pretty much sums it up really. This simple insight when applied to

paranormal phenomena such as telepathy or Psychic abilities means that

any investigation procedures that involve the mind must take account of

the fact that all such events are mediated by entirely subconscious mind

networks.

Everyone has a mental concept of what the commonly used word belief

means, but few seem to pause for a moment to consider what is actually

really meant by the term and where in the human mind this activity mightoperate or be lodged. In this theory belief has a strict definition which is as

follows:- Belief is a logical proposition which is incorporated into the

subconscious neural networks (LF). One can easily see this process in

operation when such topics as religion, football teams or political

ideologies are discussed in bars. Emotions (also in LF) are soon aroused,

and add a little alcohol which itself diminishes BF control circuits and then

fists start to fly only too easily. However for the BF-dominated scientific

outlook a paradox now arises when it comes to studying paranormal

abilities. The paradox is that belief really matters, since it is themechanism whereby our minds can still access the FIELD. The dilemma


9/13

can simply underlined by using the scientific phrase I will believe it when

I can see it, and then comparing it with the religious one of Only believe

and then you will see. When described in this way it can be seen how this

particular split in our world-view and both be understood and reconciled.

When a badger builds its sett it is not taught, it simply believes in what itis doing. If you wish to pray then words are not very useful really, but a

mental image accompanied by a feeling and a knowingness/belief that it

will be heard are much more powerful.

There are certain predictions that one can make using this simplistic

model. Firstly all FIELD-input is comprised of subconscious gut-feelings

or hunches. Secondly dreams might indeed occasionally effect FIELD-

access (the author has personal experience of that). Thirdly if there are

any useful methods whereby BF can be at least temporarily subdued so

that LF is now put in command, then perhaps paranormal abilities couldbe made more readily visible to any outside observer. In fact there are at

least well known three ways by which this can be achieved, and science

hi-tech has recently added a fourth. The most ancient is the tribal dance-

trance tradition. Drawn upon cave walls in stone-age times, ancient

Shamans are depicted dancing wearing the deer-head skulls/skins of their

quarry in the hunt. Modern science dismisses this as complete

superstition. FIELD theory takes a rather different view however. What

the hours of the dance ritual does with its repetitive drumming is to

entrain the subconscious (neuroscience based observation, musicalrhythm is wired straight into SM). That is to say that by such means LF is

now placed in charge/dominance, and together with the smell of the

hide, the Shamans mind can now see through the deers own eyes via

a process ofFIELD-entanglement, and thus enter the animals mind and

also see what the quarry is currently seeing. Via this process and with an

associated recognition of the deers surroundings upon re-awakening the

Shaman can now instruct the hunting parties where to seek the herds.

These concepts place a great deal more depth of understanding as to just

why our ancestors behaved in this way.

The Buddhist tradition of Yoga also effects the same reversal of the norm

with a LF>>BF style of outcome. We see Buddhist priests in trance states

sending telepathic para-pics occasionally and also pick up para-pics of

Christian-driven motifs sent under deep meditation. That by entering into

this state the mind can control SM networks directly can be shown by how

Yoga adepts are able to control heart rates, body temperature and blood

pressure levels by purely mentally driven actions. This also explains the

rare phenomenon of the appearance of stigmata as is sometimes

encountered in the highly religious. The third method, hypnosis, alsoachieves a similar effect, and in fact this LF>>BF state is actually is what


10/13

the hypnotic state is all about. The hypnotised subject believes what his

interlocutor tells him, which in turn becomes a fixed instruction in LF.

When re-awakened this instruction can be made to be re-enacted to the

bafflement of the subject (it is all subconscious), and also to the

audiences amusement/wonder. This interpretation also suggests thatpast-life reports under hypnosis should be taken more seriously by

science than they currently happen to be. They are it seems memories of

FIELD-store that are being reported upon perfectly genuinely. This

interaction model about the stage players of our minds can explain how

Psychics can operate as can be shown by this slide:-

Unlike the majority of us, the Psychic mind has a talent of some kind, at

least in the genuine article. This can be simply visualised in this model by

ascribing good communication links between the cut off verbal higher

conscious state that we label as BF, and the subconscious, primitive and

older networks that we have labelled as LF and SM.

Much more recently science has added a tool that can do the same thing

by more artificial means. Called Transcutaneous Magnetic Stimulation

(TMS) this device can shut down small areas of the working brain,

(occasionally enhance), by the local application of very complex


11/13

sophisticated magnetic fields. The underlying neurons are thereby

temporarily disrupted or inhibited and TMS thus becomes in itself a useful

research/therapeutic tool. In fact science is already applying this concept

to the human mind/brain (1). This opens the exciting possibility that direct

MindMind communications may one day become more possible and ifcombined with the FIELD property ofnon-locality then distance factors

cease to be of import. This para-pic image may be one of the most

important photographs of all time, but of course this claim is only valid if

the viewer accepts the case made here (and in the previous essay), and

that water-vapour is indeed a medium within which modern photography

can fix quantum-derived FIELD-pattern that has been accessed by the

mind.

This is a very strange image. It shows an alien head over to the R with its

ear well defined wearing some kind of monocle, which is looking into the

frame. In the centre is another similar image, which in fact looks like amirror-image, which is to say it is a reflection. A reflection in what? is a

reasonable question. Well we do not know of course, but the possibility

that it might be water is not lost upon us. Why is the monocle there

then? Again the answer can only be a guess, but it does suggest some

kind visual aid technology. A look at the overall form of the figure/face

shown does not really accord with any known human race, and labelling it

as an ET does not seem unreasonable. Perhaps it is a real ET using

exactly or at least very similar technology to that which has just been

discussed?


12/13

There is fifth method whereby BF can be demoted, and that is by the use

drugs, of which alcohol is by far the most commonly used. A prime effect

of alcohol ingestion is to depress the function of the cerebral cortex, or BF

in our simple metaphor. Many para-pics seem to show that alcohol may be

an important driving factor by promoting LF network dominance, andthus set up this LF>>BF framework in our mental networks. This finding

suggests that various ideas regarding the achievement of access to states

of higher consciousness via other specific drugs such as ayahuasca or

MDME may not lie outside the bounds of reality. Unfortunately para-pics

as such do not appear to give any obvious hints that we have been able to

identify that might allow any particular image to be attributed to some

kind of chemical-related enhancement effects, and so we currently have

to rely upon the associated clues such as glasses and bottles in the

downloads.

Glass of whisky Bottle of spirits Wine

glass

The Glassofwhiskyshowsclearlyenough,butalsonotethe fluted wine

glass depicted immediately to its R. Received during the Libyan crisis the

Bottle of spirits shows in the centre, with military faces/personnel in

various quarters. Wine glass is quite easily missed, since the viewer

often looks right through it. It fills the whole frame at a slight angle with

the stem at the BR corner. It is beautifully depicted to show both its

translucency, and some added refraction effects. The point of this trio of

images is to show how telepathically driven para-pic messages do seem to

be helped by imbibing alcohol, and this observation seems to support

the general thrust of theoretical model just outlined. Science is starting to

support it as well and the following appendix is attached for evidence. In

simpler lay terms this is a report about the use of TMS to detect

synchronous biophoton emissions being teleported between two

separated, but entangled minds.


13/13

Appendix 1

Experimental Demonstration of Potential Entanglement ofBrain Activity Over 300 Km for Pairs of Subjects Sharing the

Same Circular Rotating, Angular Accelerating Magnetic Fields:Verification by s_LORETA, QEEG MeasurementsRyan C. Burke, Melanie Y. Gauthier, Nicolas Rouleau, Michael A. Persinger

Hugh Fairman

Tina Laurent

September 2013

Date post:	14-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	hugh-fairman
View:	220 times
Download:	0 times

FIELD-MIND Interaction

Documents