Final Folder Approved - CMYK toolkit final.pdf · GAD perspective integrated in all areas of the...

EN

HA

NC

ED

GE

ND

ER

MA

INS

TR

EA

MIN

G E

VA

LU

AT

ION

FR

AM

EW

OR

K

GENDERMAINSTREAMINGEVALUATIONFRAMEWORK

. Handbook

. Toolkit

1145 J.P. Laurel St., San Miguel Manila, 1005 PhilippinesTelephone: +632.7365249 / +632.7367712 / 632.7351654

Fax Number: +632.7364449http://www.pcw.gov.ph/

Office of the President

PHILIPPINE COMMISSION ON WOMEN

GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - POLICY

GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - PEOPLE

GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - ENABLING MECHANISMS

GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - PROGRAMS/ACTIVITIES/PROJECTS

GMEF - SCORESHEET

A TOOLKIT ON THE ENHANCED GENDER MAINSTREAMING EVALUATION FRAMEWORK A HANDBOOK ON THE APPLICATION OF THE ENHANCED GENDER MAINSTREAMING EVALUATION FRAMEWORK

Acronyms Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: Gender Mainstreaming in the Context of Implementing the Magna Carta of Women

The WID, WAD & GAD Approach GAD Mainstreaming as a National Strategy

Chapter 3: Enhancing the Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation Framework

Historical Background Enhanced GMEF Entry Points of Gender Mainstreaming Levels of Gender Mainstreaming GMEF Descriptor Matrix

Chapter 4: Guide for Administering the Enhanced Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation Framework

Accomplishing the Individual Organizational Assessment Questionnaires Analyzing the Results of Administering the Enhanced GMEF Possible Means of Verification per Descriptor

Glossary of Terms References

The Policy questionnaire consists of 13 descriptors that track the progress of an organization’s efforts in integrating GAD in its plans and policy issuances.

³ At the Foundation Formation level, organizations issue policies supporting the elements of GAD Planning and Budgeting, review existing policies to ensure consistency with new GAD issuances, and issue documents to support attendance to PCW-led GAD-related events.

³ At the Installation of Strategic Mechanisms level, organizations progress to the issuance of policies to address gender issues using gender-fair language and images among its internal and external clients.

³ At the GAD Application level, a GAD agenda or strategic framework is already adopted and implemented to ensure that GAD is being integrated in the organization’s major programs and projects.

³ At the Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization level, the plans and policies of the organization have already resulted in positive impacts.

³ At the Replication and Innovation level, these plans and policies are continually enhanced and used as standards by other organizations in developing their own gender-sensitive policies and plans.

GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE-

POLICY

A Toolkit on the Enhanced Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation Framework© Copyright 2016 - Philippine Commission on Women 1145 J.P. Laurel St., San Miguel Manila 1005 Philippines Telephone: +632.7365249 or +632.7367712Fax Number: +632.7364449

2 GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Policy

GUIDE FOR ANSWERING THE GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRES

1. Each item is marked with specific scores representing (1) YES; (2) PARTLY YES; and (3) NO. Indicate a score in the appropriate column to signify the degree to which your organization has complied with the GAD element required.

2. Under the MOV/Remarks column, indicate/attach the means of verification required or provide an explanation in support of your response. Failure to provide the appropriate MOVs could disregard/invalidate the “partly yes” or “fully yes” scores of the organization.

3. Transfer all the scores per questionnaire to the GMEF Score Sheet.

GMEF SCORESHEET

Name of the Organization Assessed: ________________________________ Date Administered: _______________________________________________

Inclusive Period of Assessment: ____________________________________

Key Areas ScorePolicy1. Issuance of initial policies on GAD2. Issuance of policies to mainstream GAD in the organization3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Policies4. Updating and Continuous Enhancement of GAD Policies5. Model GAD Policy

Sub-Total:Level for Policy:

People1. On Establishing GFPS & GAD Champions/Advocates2. On GAD Initiatives & Capacity Development Activities3. GAD Sponsorship & Related Programs4. GAD Champions as Program Implementers5. GAD Experts

Sub-Total:

3GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Policy

4. To get the total score per entry point, add the sub-total scores per questionnaire and refer to the following legend of scores to determine the organization’s level of GAD mainstreaming efforts:

Level Per Entry

Point

RANGES LEVEL DESCRIPTION0-7.99 points 1: Foundation Formation8-14.99 points 2: Installation of Strategic

Mechanisms15-19.99 points 3: GAD Application20-23.99 points 4: Commitment Enhancement and

Institutionalization24-25 points 5: Replication and Innovation

5. To get the overall level of the GAD mainstreaming efforts of the organization, add all the scores per entry point and refer to the following legend of scores to interpret the ratings:

Over-all Level




6. Organizations should take note of questions/descriptors with “NO” and “PARTLY YES” responses and design programs or undertake activities to improve their score.

7. The organization may re-administer the GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaires after a specified period of time (e.g. every 3 years) to keep track of its GAD mainstreaming efforts.


POLI

CY

OR

GA

NIZ

ATIO

NA

L A

SSES

SMEN

T Q

UES

TIO

NN

AIR

E

DES

CR

IPTO

RS

SCO

RE

Scor

e pe

r ite

mM

eans

of V

erifi

catio

n/R

emar

ksN

OPA

RTL

YYE

S1.

Issu

ance

of F

ound

atio

nal P

olic

ies

(max

sco

re: 5

; for

eac

h ite

m o

r que

stio

n, 1

.67)

1.1

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

issu

ed

polic

ies

artic

ulat

ing

supp

ort t

o G

AD

m

anda

tes

and

esta

blis

hing

the

esse

ntia

l ele

men

ts o

f G

AD

Pla

nnin

g an

d B

udge

ting?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.83

and

1.67

)

No

polic

y/po

licie

s

artic

ulat

ing

supp

ort

to G

AD

man

date

s an

d es

tabl

ishi

ng

esse

ntia

l ele

men

ts

of G

AD

pla

nnin

g an

d bu

dget

ing

issu

ed

Pol

icy/

polic

ies

artic

ulat

ing

supp

ort

to G

AD

man

date

s an

d es

tabl

ishi

ng

at le

ast o

ne (1

) es

sent

ial e

lem

ent o

f G

AD

pla

nnin

g an

d bu

dget

ing

issu

ed

Pol

icy/

polic

ies

artic

ulat

ing

supp

ort t

o G

AD

man

date

s an

d

esta

blis

hing

all

four

es

sent

ial e

lem

ents

of

GA

D p

lann

ing

and

budg

etin

g is

sued

Enu

mer

ate

the

GA

D re

late

d po

licie

s is

sued

(e

.g.,

polic

y on

set

ting

up G

FPS

or G

AD

Offi

ce;

colle

ctio

n an

d m

aint

enan

ce o

f sex

-dis

aggr

egat

ed

data

base

; con

duct

of o

rgan

izat

ion-

wid

e ge

nder

au

dit;

capa

city

-bui

ldin

g pl

an fo

r GFP

S a

nd H

R o

f or

gani

zatio

n).

Pol

icy

Title

Pur

pose

/ S

ubje

ct

Mat

ter

Dat

e Is

sued

1.2

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

cond

ucte

d a

revi

ew o

f exi

stin

g po

licie

s fo

r con

sist

ency

w

ith e

mer

ging

GA

D

issu

es?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.83

and

1.67

)

No

polic

y re

view

edS

ome

exis

ting

polic

ies

revi

ewed

but

no

new

po

licie

s re

-issu

ed a

nd/

or re

vise

d

Som

e ex

istin

g po

licie

s re

view

ed, r

evis

ed a

nd

re-is

sued

Enu

mer

ate

polic

ies

revi

ewed

and

/or r

e-is

sued

/re

vise

d fo

r con

sist

ency

with

new

GA

D is

suan

ces

(e.g

. pol

icy

reco

nstit

utin

g th

e G

AD

Foc

al P

oint

S

yste

m b

ased

on

MC

201

1-01

, etc

.).

Titl

e T

ype

Pur

pose

/ S

ubje

ct

Mat

ter

Dat

eIs

sued


1.3

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

issu

ed

broa

d st

atem

ents

of

inte

ntio

ns o

r as

pira

tions

refle

ctin

g its

sup

port

for G

AD

- re

late

d ac

tiviti

es?

(p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.

83 a

nd 1

.67)

No

broa

d st

atem

ent

supp

ortin

g G

AD

-re

late

d ac

tiviti

es

issu

ed

1-2

broa

d st

atem

ents

su

ppor

ting

GA

D-

rela

ted

activ

ities

is

sued

3 or

mor

e br

oad

stat

emen

ts s

uppo

rting

G

AD

-rel

ated

act

iviti

es

issu

ed

Enu

mer

ate

broa

d st

atem

ents

issu

ed in

su

ppor

t of G

AD

rela

ted

activ

ities

/issu

es (e

.g.,

mem

oran

dum

for t

he o

rgan

izat

ion

to p

artic

ipat

e in

Wom

en’s

Mon

th a

ctiv

ities

, 18-

day

Cam

paig

n on

VAW

, etc

).

Titl

e T

ype

Pur

pose

/ S

ubje

ct

Mat

ter

Dat

eIs

sued

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

1 P

olic

y)

2. I

ssua

nce

of P

olic

ies

to m

ains

trea

m G

AD

in th

e O

rgan

izat

ion

(max

sco

re: 5

; for

eac

h ite

m o

r que

stio

n, 1

.67)

2.1

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

issu

ed

polic

ies

refle

ctin

g its

in

tere

st fo

r gen

der

mai

nstre

amin

g?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,

0.83

and

1.6

7)

No

polic

y re

flect

ing

the

orga

niza

tion’

s in

tere

st fo

r gen

der

mai

nstre

amin

g is

sued

1-2

polic

ies

refle

ctin

g th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

inte

rest

for g

ende

r m

ains

tream

ing

issu

ed

3 or

mor

e po

licie

s

refle

ctin

g th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

inte

rest

for g

ende

r m

ains

tream

ing

issu

ed

List

all

polic

ies

issu

ed b

y th

e or

gani

zatio

n re

late

d to

gen

der m

ains

tream

ing

(e.g

. iss

uanc

e of

D

OH

dep

artm

ent o

rder

to in

tegr

ate

GA

D in

all

prog

ram

s):

Titl

e T

ype

Pur

pose

/ S

ubje

ct

Mat

ter

Dat

eIs

sued


2.2

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

issu

ed

polic

ies

addr

essi

ng th

e ge

nder

nee

ds o

f the

cl

ient

s (in

tern

al a

nd

exte

rnal

)? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.8

3 an

d 1.

67)

No

polic

y re

flect

ing

gend

er n

eeds

of

int

erna

l and

/or

exte

rnal

clie

nts

issu

ed

1-2

polic

ies

refle

ctin

g ge

nder

nee

ds o

f in

tern

al a

nd/o

r ext

erna

l cl

ient

s is

sued

3 or

mor

e po

licie

s re

flect

ing

gend

er

need

s of

inte

rnal

and

/or

ext

erna

l clie

nts

issu

ed

Enu

mer

ate

all p

olic

ies

issu

ed a

ddre

ssin

g ge

nder

ne

eds

of in

tern

al a

nd e

xter

nal c

lient

s of

the

orga

niza

tion

(e.g

. iss

uanc

e of

pol

icy

for t

he

esta

blis

hmen

t of a

chi

ld-m

indi

ng c

ente

r for

use

of

em

ploy

ees

and

clie

nts

with

sm

all c

hild

ren)

Titl

e T

ype

Pur

pose

/ S

ubje

ct

Mat

ter

Dat

eIs

sued

2.3

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

used

ge

nder

-fair

lang

uage

an

d im

ages

in it

s po

licy

issu

ance

s? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.8

3 an

d 1.

67)

Gen

der-

fair

lang

uage

an

d im

ages

not

ye

t use

d in

pol

icy

issu

ance

s

Gen

der-

fair

lang

uage

an

d im

ages

use

d in

so

me

polic

y is

suan

ces

Gen

der-

fair

lang

uage

an

d im

ages

use

d in

all

polic

y is

suan

ces

Atta

ch s

ampl

e po

licy

of th

e or

gani

zatio

n di

rect

ing

the

use

of g

ende

r-fa

ir la

ngua

ge a

nd p

olic

es a

s w

ell a

s po

licie

s of

the

orga

niza

tion

that

use

d ge

nder

-fair

lang

uage

and

imag

es.

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

2 P

olic

y)

3. In

tegr

atio

n of

GA

D in

the

Org

aniz

atio

n’s

Polic

ies

(max

sco

re: 5

; for

eac

h ite

m o

r que

stio

n, 1

.67)

3.1

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

adop

ted

a G

AD

Age

nda/

Stra

tegi

c Fr

amew

ork?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.83

and

1.67

)

No

GA

D A

gend

a/S

trate

gic

Fram

ewor

k fo

rmul

ated

GA

D A

gend

a/S

trate

gic

Fram

ewor

k fo

rmul

ated

bu

t not

ado

pted

by

man

agem

ent

GA

D A

gend

a/S

trate

gic

Fram

ewor

k fo

rmul

ated

an

d ad

opte

d by

m

anag

emen

t

Atta

ch a

cop

y of

the

GA

D A

gend

a/ S

trate

gic

Fram

ewor

k of

the

orga

niza

tion

(or G

AD

Cod

e, if

LG

U)


3.2

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

inte

grat

ed

GA

D p

ersp

ectiv

e in

its

org

aniz

atio

nal a

nd/

or n

atio

nal/s

ecto

ral

plan

/s?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

ar

e 0,

0.8

3 an

d 1.

67)

GA

D p

ersp

ectiv

e no

t yet

inte

grat

ed in

or

gani

zatio

nal a

nd/

or n

atio

nal/

sect

oral

pl

an/s

GA

D p

ersp

ectiv

e in

tegr

ated

in

sele

cted

are

as o

f the

or

gani

zatio

nal a

nd/

or n

atio

nal/s

ecto

ral

plan

/s

GA

D p

ersp

ectiv

e in

tegr

ated

in a

ll ar

eas

of th

e or

gani

zatio

nal

and/

or n

atio

nal/

sect

oral

pla

n/s

Enu

mer

ate

the

orga

niza

tiona

l and

/or n

atio

nal/

sect

oral

pla

n/s

in w

hich

GA

D h

as b

een

inte

grat

ed (e

.g. P

hilip

pine

Dev

elop

men

t Pla

n,

Ann

ual B

udge

t Cal

l or G

ende

r-Res

pons

ive

LGU

P

lans

suc

h as

Com

preh

ensi

ve D

evel

opm

ent

Pla

n fo

r LG

U) O

rgan

izat

iona

l Pla

ns (e

.g.,

Wor

k P

lan,

Cap

acity

Dev

elop

men

t Pla

n, P

rocu

rem

ent

Pla

n; S

ecto

ral P

lan

i.e. Y

outh

Pla

n, D

isas

ter

Pla

n, D

isab

ility

Pla

n et

c.)

Titl

eTy

peD

ate

Issu

ed

3.3

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

form

ulat

ed

orga

niza

tiona

l/nat

iona

l/se

ctor

al p

olic

ies

on

GA

D?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

ar

e 0,

0.8

3 an

d 1.

67)

No

orga

niza

tiona

l/ na

tiona

l/sec

tora

l po

licie

s on

GA

D

issu

ed

1-2

orga

niza

tiona

l/na

tiona

l/ se

ctor

al

polic

ies

on G

AD

is

sued

3 or

mor

e or

gani

zatio

nal/

natio

nal/s

ecto

ral

polic

ies

on G

AD

is

sued

Pro

vide

com

plet

e tit

le o

f sec

tor s

peci

fic G

AD

po

licie

s is

sued

(e.g

. Age

ncy

prov

isio

n in

the

MC

W i.

e. C

SC

-Spe

cial

Lea

ve fo

r Wom

en, D

FA-

esta

blis

hmen

t of G

ende

r Foc

al P

oint

Offi

cer i

n P

hilip

pine

Em

bass

ies

and

Con

sula

tes,

GA

D

Cod

e, R

H C

ode

and

NA

P W

PS

) and

atta

ch

copi

es if

ava

ilabl

e.

Titl

e T

ype

Pur

pose

/ S

ubje

ct

Mat

ter

Dat

eIs

sued

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

3 P

olic

y)


4. U

pdat

ing

and

Con

tinuo

us E

nhan

cem

ent o

f GA

D P

olic

ies

(max

sco

re: 5

; for

eac

h ite

m o

r que

stio

n, 1

.67)

4.1

Has

the

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

po

licy/

polic

ies

resu

lted

in b

ridgi

ng g

ende

r gap

s of

its

clie

nts

(inte

rnal

an

d ex

tern

al)?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.83

and

1.67

)

No

gend

er g

aps

addr

esse

d by

GA

D

polic

y/po

licie

s

Gen

der g

aps

of e

ither

in

tern

al a

nd/o

r ext

erna

l cl

ient

s ar

e ad

dres

sed

by 1

-2 G

AD

pol

icie

s

Gen

der g

aps

of e

ither

in

tern

al a

nd/o

r ext

erna

l cl

ient

s ar

e ad

dres

sed

by 3

or m

ore

GA

D

polic

ies

List

dow

n ex

istin

g G

AD

pol

icie

s of

the

orga

niza

tion

and

how

it b

ridge

d ge

nder

gap

s of

its

inte

rnal

and

/or e

xter

nal c

lient

s (e

.g. l

ower

ing

and

resp

ondi

ng to

the

case

s Vi

olen

ce a

gain

st

Wom

en

Titl

e of

GA

D

Pol

icy

Issu

edIn

tend

ed

Clie

nt/

Ben

efici

arie

s

Gen

der G

aps

Add

ress

ed

Atta

ch a

cop

y of

the

polic

y as

sess

men

t or

Gen

der I

mpa

ct A

sses

smen

t con

duct

ed b

y th

e or

gani

zatio

n, if

app

licab

le.

4.2

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

used

th

e re

sults

of g

ende

r an

alys

is in

the

deve

lopm

ent a

nd/

or e

nhan

cem

ent o

f po

licie

s? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.8

3, a

nd

1.67

)

Res

ults

of g

ende

r an

alys

is w

as n

ot u

sed

in th

e de

velo

pmen

t an

d/or

enh

ance

men

t of

pol

icie

s

Res

ults

of g

ende

r an

alys

is u

sed

in th

e de

velo

pmen

t and

/or

enha

ncem

ent o

f 1-2

po

licie

s

Res

ults

of g

ende

r an

alys

is u

sed

in th

e de

velo

pmen

t and

/or

enha

ncem

ent o

f 3 o

r m

ore

polic

ies

Enu

mer

ate

enha

nced

pol

icie

s, g

uide

lines

and

/or

doc

umen

ts e

nhan

ced

base

d on

the

resu

lts o

f ge

nder

ana

lysi

s.

Pol

icy/

G

uide

lines

an

d/or

D

ocum

ents

E

nhan

ced

Gen

der

Ana

lysi

s To

ols

Use

d

Rem

arks


4.3

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

inte

grat

ed

GA

D p

ersp

ectiv

e in

its

Vis

ion,

Mis

sion

and

G

oals

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es

are

0, 0

.83,

and

1.6

7)

GA

D p

ersp

ectiv

e no

t ye

t int

egra

ted

in th

e Vi

sion

, Mis

sion

or

Goa

ls

GA

D p

ersp

ectiv

e

inte

grat

ed in

eith

er

the

Visi

on, M

issi

on o

r G

oals

GA

D p

ersp

ectiv

e in

tegr

ated

in th

e Vi

sion

, Mis

sion

and

G

oals

Iden

tify

whe

re G

AD

per

spec

tive

is in

tegr

ated

in

the

Visi

on, M

issi

on a

nd/o

r Goa

ls (V

MG

) of t

he

orga

niza

tion.

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

4 P

olic

y)

5.

Mod

el G

AD

Pol

icie

s (m

ax s

core

: 5; f

or e

ach

item

or q

uest

ion,

5)

5.1

Has

the

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

po

licie

s be

en u

sed

as m

odel

/sta

ndar

d by

ot

her o

rgan

izat

ions

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 2.

5 an

d 5)

Oth

er o

rgan

izat

ions

ha

ve n

ot u

sed

the

orga

niza

tion’

s po

licy/

polic

ies

as m

odel

or

stan

dard

1-2

orga

niza

tion/

s ha

ve u

sed

the

orga

niza

tion’

s po

licy/

polic

ies

as m

odel

/st

anda

rd

3 or

mor

e or

gani

zatio

ns

have

use

d th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

polic

y/po

licie

s as

mod

el/

stan

dard

List

dow

n ex

istin

g G

AD

pol

icie

s us

ed a

s a

mod

el

or re

plic

ated

by

othe

r org

aniz

atio

ns (e

.g.,

GA

D

Age

nda

or S

trate

gic

Fram

ewor

k fo

r NG

As;

Pol

icy

crea

ting

a P

rovi

ncia

l GA

D O

ffice

or G

AD

Cod

e fo

r LG

Us)

GA

D P

olic

yO

rgan

izat

ion/

Age

ncy

Ado

ptin

g/R

eplic

atin

g th

e P

olic

y

Rem

arks

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

5 P

olic

y)

TOTA

L G

MEF

SC

OR

E

(Pol

icy)

The People questionnaire consists of 27 questions that assess the progress of an organization’s efforts in ensuring that its people, whether top management, GAD Focal Point System (GFPS) members or employees are gender-responsive and supportive of the organization’s gender mainstreaming efforts.

³ At the Foundation Formation level, the organization designates key people to be part of its GFPS and ensures that the appropriate capacity development sessions on GAD are provided to its top management, GFPS and staff members;

³ At the Installation of Strategic Mechanisms level, the organization moves from the conduct of GAD orientation sessions towards ensuring that its program implementers are trained to do gender analysis, and clients are given opportunities to articulate their gender issues as per direction of its top management;

³ During the GAD Application level, top management GFPS members and program implementers are consciously integrating GAD in the organization’s regular operations.

³ At the Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization level, the organization’s GFPS members are already tapped as GAD resource person within the organization and are able to develop GAD-related tools, customized to the mandate of the organization; and

³ At the Replication and Innovation level, the people of the organization are already recognized and tapped as GAD experts by other organizations, while its top management is able to raise GAD concerns during high level meetings/discussions.


PEOPLE


2 GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People





GMEF SCORESHEET






Sub-Total:

3GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-People


Level Per Entry

Point





Over-all Level







PEO

PLE

OR

GA

NIZ

ATIO

NA

L A

SSES

SMEN

T Q

UES

TIO

NN

AIR

E

DES

CR

IPTO

RS

SCO

RE

Scor

e pe

r ite

mM

eans

of V

erifi

catio

n/R

emar

ksN

OPA

RTL

YYE

S1.

On

the

Esta

blis

hmen

t of G

FPS

& G

AD

Cha

mpi

ons/

Adv

ocat

es (

max

sco

re: 5

; for

eac

h ite

m o

r que

stio

n, .0

83)

1.1

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

desi

gnat

ed

peop

le in

stra

tegi

c po

sitio

ns a

s m

embe

rs

of it

s G

AD

Foc

al P

oint

S

yste

m (G

FPS

)?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,

0.41

, and

0.8

3)

The

orga

niza

tion

has

yet t

o id

entif

y ke

y pe

ople

to b

e m

embe

rs o

f its

G

FPS

Som

e m

embe

rs o

f th

e G

FPS

occ

upy

stra

tegi

c po

sitio

ns in

th

e or

gani

zatio

n

Maj

ority

of t

he

mem

bers

of t

he

GFP

S o

ccup

y st

rate

gic

posi

tions

in

the

orga

niza

tion

If ye

s, p

rovi

de d

etai

ls o

n th

e po

licy

form

aliz

ing

the

crea

tion/

reco

nstit

utio

n of

the

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

Foc

al P

oint

Sys

tem

(GFP

S) a

nd a

ttach

a

copy

for v

alid

atio

n.

If no

, exp

lain

why

the

orga

niza

tion

has

not

desi

gnat

ed p

eopl

e in

stra

tegi

c po

sitio

ns a

s m

embe

rs o

f its

GA

D F

ocal

Poi

nt S

yste

m

(GFP

S)?

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

*Maj

ority

is d

efine

d at

leas

t 50%

+ 1

of a

ll G

FPS

mem

bers

as

per

SO

, AO

, DA

O o

r pol

icy

crea

ting/

reco

nstit

utin

g th

e G

AD

Foc

al P

oint

Sys

tem

of t

he o

rgan

izat

ion

1.2

Hav

e th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

GA

D

Foca

l Poi

nt S

yste

m

(GFP

S) m

embe

rs

atte

nded

app

ropr

iate

an

d re

leva

nt tr

aini

ng o

n G

AD

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es

are

0, 0

.41,

and

0.8

3)

GFP

S m

embe

rs

have

not

atte

nded

an

y of

the

basi

c G

AD

trai

ning

GFP

S m

embe

rs

atte

nded

1-2

bas

ic

GA

D tr

aini

ng

GFP

S m

embe

rs

atte

nded

all

thre

e ba

sic

GA

D tr

aini

ng

List

dow

n ba

sic

GA

D tr

aini

ng a

ttend

ed b

y G

AD

Fo

cal P

oint

Sys

tem

mem

bers

(e.g

. Gen

der

Sen

sitiv

ity T

rain

ing

(GS

T), G

ende

r Ana

lysi

s (G

A) a

nd G

A To

ols

and

GA

D P

lann

ing

and

Bud

getin

g).

Titl

e of

G

AD

Tr

aini

ng

Num

ber o

f P

artic

ipan

tsTr

aine

r/In

stitu

tiona

l P

rovi

der

Dat

e


1.3

Has

the

orga

niza

tion’

s to

p m

anag

emen

t atte

nded

B

asic

GA

D O

rient

atio

n or

Gen

der S

ensi

tivity

Tr

aini

ng (G

ST)

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.

41, a

nd 0

.83)

Top

man

agem

ent

has

not y

et

atte

nded

Bas

ic G

AD

O

rient

atio

n or

GS

T

Onl

y se

lect

ed

mem

bers

of t

he

top

man

agem

ent

atte

nded

Bas

ic G

AD

O

rient

atio

n or

GS

T

All

top

man

agem

ent

offic

ials

hav

e at

tend

ed B

asic

GA

D

Orie

ntat

ion

or G

ST

List

dow

n to

p m

anag

emen

t offi

cial

/s w

ho

atte

nded

Bas

ic G

AD

Orie

ntat

ion/

Gen

der

Sen

sitiv

ity T

rain

ing

(GS

T)

Nam

e of

Top

M

anag

emen

t O

ffici

al

Bas

ic G

AD

O

rient

atio

n/

GS

T A

ttend

ed

Inst

itutio

nal/

Trai

ning

P

rovi

der

Dat

e

1.4

Hav

e th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

staf

f m

embe

rs b

een

orie

nted

on

GA

D?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.41,

and

0.

83)

Less

than

50%

of

the

orga

niza

tion’

s st

aff m

embe

rs h

ave

atte

nded

Bas

ic G

AD

O

rient

atio

n or

GS

T

50-9

9% o

f the

or

gani

zatio

n’s

staf

f m

embe

rs h

ave

atte

nded

Bas

ic G

AD

O

rient

atio

n or

GS

T

100%

of t

he

orga

niza

tion’

s st

aff

mem

bers

hav

e at

tend

ed B

asic

GA

D

Orie

ntat

ion

or G

ST

Atta

ch a

ttend

ance

she

ets

of a

ll B

asic

GA

D

Orie

ntat

ions

or G

ende

r Sen

sitiv

ity T

rain

ing

(GS

T)

cond

ucte

d/at

tend

ed b

y th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

staf

f m

embe

rs.

1.5

Are

the

orga

niza

tion’

s to

p m

anag

emen

t and

GA

D

Foca

l Poi

nt S

yste

m

(GFP

S) m

embe

rs

awar

e an

d co

nsci

ous

of G

AD

-rel

ated

pol

icie

s an

d m

anda

tes?

(p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.

41, a

nd 0

.83)

Top

man

agem

ent

and

GFP

S m

embe

rs

are

not y

et a

war

e an

d co

nsci

ous

of

GA

D-r

elat

ed p

olic

ies

and

man

date

s

Som

e G

FPS

m

embe

rs a

re a

war

e an

d co

nsci

ous

of

GA

D-r

elat

ed p

olic

ies

and

man

date

s

Som

e to

p m

anag

emen

t and

al

l GFP

S m

embe

rs

are

awar

e an

d co

nsci

ous

of G

AD

-re

late

d po

licie

s an

d m

anda

tes

If ye

s, e

xpla

in h

ow th

e to

p m

anag

emen

t and

G

FPS

mem

bers

man

ifest

aw

aren

ess

and

cons

ciou

snes

s of

GA

D-r

elat

ed p

olic

ies

and

man

date

s (e

.g. t

op m

anag

emen

t app

rove

s an

d di

rect

s im

plem

enta

tion

of G

PB

s, a

ttend

s G

AD

-re

late

d ac

tiviti

es, a

llow

s st

aff t

o pa

rtici

pate

in

GA

D-r

elat

ed a

ctiv

ities

, sup

ports

app

oint

men

t of

qual

ified

wom

en to

man

agem

ent p

ositi

ons,

etc

.)

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

__


1.6

Doe

s th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

top

man

agem

ent a

llow

sta

ff m

embe

rs to

par

ticip

ate

in G

AD

-rel

ated

ac

tiviti

es?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.41,

and

0.

83)

Top

man

agem

ent

does

not

allo

w

staf

f mem

bers

to

parti

cipa

te in

GA

D-

rela

ted

activ

ities

Top

man

agem

ent

allo

ws

only

the

GFP

S m

embe

rs to

pa

rtici

pate

in G

AD

-re

late

d ac

tiviti

es

Top

man

agem

ent

allo

ws

all k

ey

offic

ials

, GFP

S

mem

bers

and

st

aff m

embe

rs to

pa

rtici

pate

in G

AD

-re

late

d ac

tiviti

es

Atta

ch c

opie

s of

pol

icie

s is

sued

by

top

man

agem

ent a

llow

ing

staf

f mem

bers

to

parti

cipa

te in

GA

D-r

elat

ed a

ctiv

ities

(e.g

. offi

ce

orde

rs, t

rave

l ord

ers,

dep

artm

ent o

rder

s,

exec

utiv

e or

ders

, adm

in m

emos

, etc

.) or

ac

com

plis

h th

e ta

ble

belo

w:

GA

D-

rela

ted

Act

ivity

Par

ticip

ants

O

rgan

izer

Dat

e

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

1 P

eopl

e)

2. G

AD

Initi

ativ

es &

Cap

acity

Dev

elop

men

t Act

iviti

es (m

ax s

core

: 5; f

or e

ach

item

: 0.8

3)

2.1

Doe

s th

e to

p m

anag

emen

t dire

ct

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

GA

D P

lan

and

Bud

get (

GP

B) o

f the

or

gani

zatio

n? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.4

1, a

nd

0.83

)

Top

man

agem

ent

does

not

dire

ct G

PB

im

plem

enta

tion

Top

man

agem

ent

appr

oves

GP

B b

ut

not v

isib

le d

urin

g cr

itica

l/sig

nific

ant

GA

D a

ctiv

ities

Top

man

agem

ent

appr

oves

GP

B a

nd

atte

nds

criti

cal /

sign

ifica

nt G

AD

ac

tiviti

es

Cite

crit

ical

inci

dent

s of

top

man

agem

ent

dire

ctin

g th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

GP

B (e

.g. p

rese

nce

or p

artic

ipat

ion

durin

g th

e se

tting

of G

AD

age

nda,

stra

tegi

c pl

anni

ng o

n G

AD

, etc

.)

Atta

ch re

leva

nt d

ocum

ents

indi

catin

g su

ppor

t of

top

man

agem

ent t

o th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of

the

GA

D P

lan

and

Bud

get o

f the

org

aniz

atio

n (e

.g. a

ttend

ance

she

et, c

opy

of O

peni

ng/C

losi

ng

Rem

arks

dur

ing

GA

D tr

aini

ng, p

hoto

s ta

ken

durin

g G

AD

trai

ning

, etc

.)


2.2

Are

pro

gram

im

plem

ente

rs tr

aine

d on

ge

nder

ana

lysi

s (G

A)

and

the

use

of g

ende

r an

alys

is (G

A) t

ools

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.

41, a

nd 0

.83)

Pro

gram

im

plem

ente

rs n

ot y

et

train

ed o

n G

A an

d us

e of

GA

tool

s

Onl

y se

lect

ed

prog

ram

im

plem

ente

rs a

re

train

ed o

n G

A an

d us

e of

GA

tool

s

All

prog

ram

im

plem

ente

rs a

re

train

ed o

n G

A an

d us

e of

GA

tool

s

Enu

mer

ate

train

ing

on G

ende

r Ana

lysi

s (G

A) a

nd

Gen

der A

naly

sis

(GA

) Too

ls a

ttend

ed b

y pr

ogra

m

impl

emen

ters

.

Title

of G

A Tr

aini

ng P

artic

ipan

tsTr

aine

r/

Pro

vide

r D

ate

Atta

ch tr

aini

ng d

esig

n an

d at

tend

ance

she

ets

of

Gen

der A

naly

sis

and

GA

Tool

s tra

inin

g at

tend

ed

by p

rogr

am im

plem

ente

rs.

2.3

Are

con

cern

ed s

taff

mem

bers

trai

ned

in th

e im

porta

nce

of c

olle

ctin

g se

x-di

sagg

rega

ted

data

(SD

D) a

nd g

ende

r st

atis

tics?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.41,

and

0.

83)

Con

cern

ed s

taff

mem

bers

are

not

ye

t tra

ined

in th

e im

porta

nce

of

colle

ctin

g S

DD

and

ge

nder

sta

tistic

s

Con

cern

ed s

taff

mem

bers

are

trai

ned

in th

e im

porta

nce

of

colle

ctin

g S

DD

and

ge

nder

sta

tistic

s

Con

cern

ed s

taff

mem

bers

are

trai

ned

in th

e im

porta

nce

of

colle

ctin

g S

DD

and

ge

nder

sta

tistic

s,

and

are

colle

ctin

g th

em

List

dow

n tra

inin

gs c

ondu

cted

for c

once

rned

sta

ff m

embe

rs o

n th

e im

porta

nce

of c

olle

ctin

g se

x-di

sagg

rega

ted

data

and

gen

der s

tatis

tics.

Title

of T

rain

ing

Par

ticip

ants

Dat

e

Con

duct

ed

2.4

Are

mal

e em

ploy

ees

invo

lved

an

d ap

prec

iativ

e of

the

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

PA

Ps?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

ar

e 0,

0.4

1, a

nd 0

.83)

Mal

e em

ploy

ees

do

not p

artic

ipat

e in

the

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

PA

Ps

Mal

e em

ploy

ees

parti

cipa

te in

the

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

PA

Ps

Mal

e em

ploy

ees

initi

ate

and

parti

cipa

te in

the

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

PA

Ps

Pro

vide

list

of t

he o

rgan

izat

ion’

s PA

Ps

initi

ated

an

d/or

par

ticip

ated

by

mal

e em

ploy

ees:

GA

D P

AP

sTy

pe o

f In

volv

emen

t of

Mal

e E

mpl

oyee

s

Par

ticip

ants

*Typ

e of

Invo

lvem

ent o

f Mal

e E

mpl

oyee

s: a

s pa

rtici

pant

s,

orga

nize

rs a

nd/o

r res

ourc

e pe

rson

s in

the

cond

uct o

f the

or

gani

zatio

n’s

GA

D e

fforts

.


2.5

Are

clie

nts

(inte

rnal

an

d ex

tern

al) a

war

e of

th

e G

AD

effo

rts o

f the

or

gani

zatio

n? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.4

1, a

nd

0.83

)

Clie

nts

are

not y

et

orie

nted

on

the

GA

D e

fforts

of t

he

orga

niza

tion

Eith

er in

tern

al o

r ex

tern

al c

lient

s ar

e or

ient

ed o

n th

e G

AD

effo

rts o

f the

or

gani

zatio

n

Bot

h in

tern

al a

nd

exte

rnal

clie

nts

are

orie

nted

on

the

GA

D e

fforts

of t

he

orga

niza

tion

If ye

s, id

entif

y ef

forts

to o

rient

clie

nts

on th

e G

AD

ef

forts

of t

he o

rgan

izat

ion

(e.g

. PC

W w

ebsi

te,

new

s, G

AD

cor

ner i

n th

e or

gani

zatio

n, s

ocia

l m

edia

(FB

, Tw

itter

), am

ong

othe

rs.

Act

ivity

Tar

gete

d A

udie

nce

Dat

e

Con

duct

ed

Als

o at

tach

resu

lts o

f ass

essm

ents

or s

urve

ys

cond

ucte

d to

mea

sure

aw

aren

ess

of c

lient

s (in

tern

al a

nd e

xter

nal)

on th

e G

AD

effo

rts o

f the

or

gani

zatio

n, if

app

licab

le.

2.6

Are

the

clie

nts

(inte

rnal

and

ext

erna

l) ab

le to

arti

cula

te th

eir

gend

er n

eeds

/issu

es

in th

e de

velo

pmen

t of

the

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

PA

Ps?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

ar

e 0,

0.4

1, a

nd 0

.83)

Clie

nts

(inte

rnal

and

ex

tern

al) a

re n

ot

able

to a

rticu

late

ge

nder

nee

ds/is

sues

in

the

deve

lopm

ent

of th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

GA

D P

AP

s

Eith

er in

tern

al o

r ex

tern

al c

lient

s ar

e ab

le to

arti

cula

te

gend

er is

sues

/nee

ds

in th

e de

velo

pmen

t of

the

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

PA

Ps

Bot

h in

tern

al a

nd

exte

rnal

clie

nts

are

able

to a

rticu

late

ge

nder

issu

es/n

eeds

in

the

deve

lopm

ent

of th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

GA

D P

AP

s

Atta

ch d

ocum

enta

tion

of c

onsu

ltatio

ns/

mee

tings

(e.g

. sur

vey,

focu

s gr

oup

disc

ussi

ons,

ke

y in

form

ant i

nter

view

s) a

nd li

st o

f iss

ues

rais

ed b

y cl

ient

s (in

tern

al a

nd e

xter

nal)

durin

g co

nsul

tatio

ns, e

tc.

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

2 P

eopl

e)


3. G

AD

Spo

nsor

ship

& R

elat

ed P

rogr

ams

(max

sco

re: 5

; for

eac

h ite

m: .

83)

3.1

Doe

s th

e to

p m

anag

emen

t dire

ct

the

inte

grat

ion

of

GA

D p

ersp

ectiv

e in

th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

prog

ram

s/ac

tiviti

es/

proj

ects

(PA

Ps)

and

pe

rform

ance

indi

cato

rs?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,

0.41

, and

0.8

3)

No

initi

al d

iscu

ssio

n am

ong

top

man

agem

ent

offic

ials

on

the

inte

grat

ion

of G

AD

pe

rspe

ctiv

e in

the

orga

niza

tion’

s PA

Ps

and

perfo

rman

ce

indi

cato

rs

With

initi

al

disc

ussi

on a

mon

g to

p m

anag

emen

t of

ficia

ls re

gard

ing

inte

grat

ion

of G

AD

pe

rspe

ctiv

e in

the

orga

niza

tion’

s PA

Ps

and

perfo

rman

ce

indi

cato

rs

Top

man

agem

ent

issu

ed d

irect

ive/

s to

inte

grat

e G

AD

pe

rspe

ctiv

e in

the

orga

niza

tion’

s PA

Ps

and

perfo

rman

ce

indi

cato

rs

Atta

ch d

irect

ive/

s is

sued

by

top

man

agem

ent t

o in

tegr

ate

GA

D p

ersp

ectiv

e in

the

orga

niza

tion’

s pr

ogra

m/a

ctiv

ities

/pro

ject

s (P

AP

s) a

nd

perfo

rman

ce in

dica

tors

.

3.2

Are

the

GFP

S

mem

bers

and

pro

gram

im

plem

ente

rs a

ble

to in

tegr

ate

GA

D

pers

pect

ive

in th

e de

velo

pmen

t of

the

orga

niza

tion’

s pr

ogra

ms/

activ

ities

/ pr

ojec

ts (P

AP

s)?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,

0.41

, and

0.8

3

GFP

S m

embe

rs

and

prog

ram

im

plem

ente

rs

are

not y

et a

ble

to in

tegr

ate

GA

D

pers

pect

ive

in th

e de

velo

pmen

t of t

he

orga

niza

tion’

s PA

Ps

Eith

er G

FPS

m

embe

rs

or p

rogr

am

impl

emen

ters

are

ab

le to

inte

grat

e G

AD

per

spec

tive

in

the

deve

lopm

ent o

f th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

PAP

s

Bot

h th

e G

FPS

m

embe

rs

and

prog

ram

im

plem

ente

rs a

re

able

to in

tegr

ate

GA

D p

ersp

ectiv

e in

th

e de

velo

pmen

t of

the

orga

niza

tion’

s PA

Ps

Enu

mer

ate

orga

niza

tion

prog

ram

s/ac

tiviti

es/

proj

ects

(PA

Ps)

and

per

form

ance

indi

cato

rs

inte

grat

ed w

ith G

AD

per

spec

tive

by G

FPS

m

embe

rs a

nd p

rogr

am im

plem

ente

rs.

Res

pons

ible

U

nit

Typ

eP

urpo

se/

Sub

ject

M

atte

r

Dat

eIs

sued

GFPS

Prog

ram

Im

plem

ente

rs


3.3

Are

con

cern

ed s

taff

mem

bers

abl

e to

util

ize

sex-

disa

ggre

gate

d da

ta (S

DD

) and

/or

gen

der s

tatis

tics

for g

ende

r ana

lysi

s (G

A) t

o en

hanc

e th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

GA

D

PAP

s? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es

are

0, 0

.41,

and

0.8

3)

Con

cern

ed s

taff

mem

bers

are

not

ye

t abl

e to

util

ize

SD

D a

nd/o

r gen

der

stat

istic

s fo

r GA

Con

cern

ed s

taff

mem

bers

util

ize

SD

D a

nd/o

r gen

der

stat

istic

s fo

r GA

Con

cern

ed s

taff

mem

bers

util

ize

SD

D a

nd/o

r gen

der

stat

istic

s fo

r GA

and

reco

mm

end

stra

tegi

es to

en

hanc

e th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

GA

D

PAP

s

If ye

s, e

xpla

in h

ow c

once

rned

sta

ff m

embe

rs

utili

ze s

ex-d

isag

greg

ated

dat

a an

d/or

gen

der

stat

istic

s fo

r gen

der a

naly

sis

to e

nhan

ce th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

GA

D P

AP

s.

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

__

Type

of S

DD

/G

ende

r S

tatis

tics

P/A

/P w

here

S

DD

was

A

pplie

d

GA

D E

fforts

E

nhan

ced

3.4

Doe

s th

e to

p m

anag

emen

t sup

port

the

appo

intm

ent o

f qu

alifi

ed w

omen

sta

ff m

embe

rs to

lead

ersh

ip

posi

tions

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.4

1, a

nd

0.83

)

Top

man

agem

ent

does

not

app

oint

w

omen

to le

ader

ship

po

sitio

ns

Top

man

agem

ent

appo

ints

wom

en to

le

ader

ship

pos

ition

bu

t pro

vide

s lim

ited

supp

ort

Top

man

agem

ent

appo

ints

wom

en to

le

ader

ship

pos

ition

an

d pr

ovid

es fu

ll su

ppor

t

Atta

ch d

ocum

ents

issu

ed b

y to

p m

anag

emen

t su

ppor

ting

the

appo

intm

ent o

f qua

lified

wom

en

staf

f mem

bers

in le

ader

ship

pos

ition

s (e

.g.

depa

rtmen

t ord

er o

r exe

cutiv

e or

ders

, lis

t of

train

ing

avai

labl

e, d

ocum

enta

tion

of m

ento

ring

activ

ities

, etc

.).

3.5

Do

wom

en

assu

me

criti

cal r

oles

an

d au

thor

ity in

the

orga

niza

tion?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.41,

and

0.

83)

Wom

en o

ccup

y le

ss

than

50%

of t

he

third

leve

l, m

iddl

e m

anag

emen

t and

te

chni

cal p

ositi

ons

in

the

orga

niza

tion

Wom

en o

ccup

y le

ss

than

50%

of t

hird

le

vel p

ositi

ons

but

com

pris

e 50

% o

r m

ore

of th

e m

iddl

e m

anag

emen

t and

te

chni

cal p

ositi

ons

in

the

orga

niza

tion

Wom

en o

ccup

y 50

%

or m

ore

of th

e th

ird

leve

l pos

ition

s in

the

orga

niza

tion

Iden

tify

the

num

ber o

f em

ploy

ees

in th

e fo

llow

ing

posi

tions

:

Pos

ition

No.

of M

enN

o. o

f W

omen

% o

f W

omen

Top

M

anag

emen

t

Mid

dle

M

anag

emen

t

Tech

nica

l Sta

ff


3.6.

Are

the

clie

nts

(inte

rnal

and

ext

erna

l),

able

to p

artic

ipat

e in

the

plan

ning

and

im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

GA

D

PAP

s? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es

are

0, 0

.41,

and

0.8

3)

No

clie

nt (i

nter

nal

and

exte

rnal

) in

volv

emen

t in

the

plan

ning

and

im

plem

enta

tion

of

the

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

PA

Ps

Eith

er in

tern

al o

r ex

tern

al c

lient

s pa

rtici

pate

in th

e pl

anni

ng a

nd

impl

emen

tatio

n of

th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

GA

D P

AP

s

Bot

h in

tern

al a

nd

exte

rnal

clie

nts

parti

cipa

te in

the

plan

ning

and

im

plem

enta

tion

of

the

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

PA

Ps

If ye

s, d

escr

ibe

how

clie

nts

(inte

rnal

or e

xter

nal)

parti

cipa

te in

the

plan

ning

and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

GA

D P

AP

s.

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

__A

ttach

doc

umen

ts s

how

ing

exte

rnal

clie

nts’

m

embe

rshi

p in

the

tech

nica

l wor

king

gro

ups

(TW

Gs)

and

pro

ject

man

agem

ent o

ffice

s (T

WG

s)

as w

ell a

s at

tend

ance

she

ets

and

docu

men

tatio

n of

mee

tings

par

ticip

ated

by

inte

rnal

and

ext

erna

l cl

ient

s.

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

3 P

eopl

e)

4. G

AD

Cha

mpi

ons

as P

rogr

am Im

plem

ente

rs (m

ax s

core

: 5; f

or e

ach

item

: 0.8

3)

4.1

Are

the

GA

D F

ocal

P

oint

Sys

tem

(GFP

S)

mem

bers

abl

e to

ser

ve

as G

AD

reso

urce

pe

rson

s w

ithin

the

orga

niza

tion,

incl

udin

g its

regi

onal

offi

ces

and

atta

ched

age

ncie

s?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,

0.41

and

0.8

3)

GFP

S m

embe

rs a

re

not y

et s

ervi

ng a

s re

sour

ce p

erso

ns

on G

AD

with

in th

e or

gani

zatio

n

Less

than

50%

of

the

GFP

S m

embe

rs

are

serv

ing

as

GA

D re

sour

ce

pers

ons

with

in th

e or

gani

zatio

n

50%

or m

ore

of th

e G

FPS

mem

bers

ar

e se

rvin

g as

G

AD

reso

urce

pe

rson

s w

ithin

the

orga

niza

tion

Atta

ch li

st a

nd p

rofil

e of

the

GFP

S m

embe

rs

incl

udin

g th

e G

AD

-rel

ated

trai

ning

con

duct

ed.

Nam

e of

G

FPS

M

embe

r w

ho s

erve

d as

GA

D

Res

ourc

e P

erso

n

Title

of G

AD

A

ctiv

ities

C

ondu

cted

Nam

e of

O

ffice

/Uni

t, R

egio

nal

Offi

ce a

nd/

or A

ttach

ed

Age

ncy

Dat

e C

ondu

cted


4.2

Doe

s th

e to

p m

anag

emen

t dire

ct

the

mon

itorin

g of

the

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

PA

Ps?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

ar

e 0,

0.4

1 an

d 0.

83)

No

initi

al d

iscu

ssio

n am

ong

top

man

agem

ent

offic

ials

on

the

mon

itorin

g of

the

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

PA

Ps

With

ini

tial

disc

ussi

on a

mon

g to

p m

anag

emen

t of

ficia

ls o

n th

e m

onito

ring

of th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

GA

D

PAP

s

Top

man

agem

ent

issu

ed d

irect

ive/

s to

mon

itor t

he

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

PA

Ps

Atta

ch c

opie

s of

dire

ctiv

e/s

issu

ed b

y to

p m

anag

emen

t reg

ardi

ng th

e m

onito

ring

of th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

GA

D P

AP

s as

wel

l as

mon

itorin

g re

ports

, as

appl

icab

le.

4.3

Are

con

cern

ed s

taff

mem

bers

abl

e to

adj

ust

GA

D P

AP

s to

add

ress

em

ergi

ng g

ende

r is

sues

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.4

1 an

d 0.

83)

Con

cern

ed s

taff

m

embe

rs n

ot a

ble

to a

djus

t GA

D P

AP

s

to a

ddre

ss e

mer

ging

ge

nder

issu

es

Con

cern

ed s

taff

m

embe

rs a

ble

to

iden

tify

emer

ging

ge

nder

issu

es b

ut

are

not c

apab

le o

f ad

dres

sing

them

Con

cern

ed s

taff

m

embe

rs a

ble

to

iden

tify

and

adju

st

GA

D P

AP

s to

ad

dres

s em

ergi

ng

gend

er is

sues

List

dow

n G

AD

PA

Ps

calib

rate

d to

add

ress

em

ergi

ng g

ende

r iss

ues.

Titl

e of

A

djus

ted

GA

D

PAP

s

Em

ergi

ng

Gen

der I

ssue

s A

ddre

ssed

Uni

t/ C

once

rned

S

taff

R

espo

nsib

le

4.4

Do

top

man

agem

ent

and

conc

erne

d st

aff

mem

bers

refle

ct G

AD

fu

nctio

ns in

thei

r pe

rform

ance

con

tract

s or

term

s of

refe

renc

e (T

OR

s)?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.41

and

0.83

)

GA

D is

not

refle

cted

in

the

perfo

rman

ce

cont

ract

s or

TO

Rs

of b

oth

top

man

agem

ent a

nd

conc

erne

d st

aff

mem

bers

GA

D re

flect

ed in

th

e pe

rform

ance

co

ntra

cts

or T

OR

s of

eith

er to

p m

anag

emen

t or

conc

erne

d st

aff

mem

bers

GA

D re

flect

ed in

th

e pe

rform

ance

co

ntra

cts

or

TOR

s of

bot

h to

p m

anag

emen

t or

conc

erne

d st

aff

mem

bers

Atta

ch s

ampl

e of

Ter

ms

of R

efer

ence

(TO

Rs)

, P

erfo

rman

ce C

ontra

ct,

Indi

vidu

al P

erfo

rman

ce

Com

mitm

ent a

nd R

evie

w (I

PC

R) f

orm

s of

st

aff m

embe

rs a

nd C

aree

r Exe

cutiv

e S

ervi

ce

Per

form

ance

Eva

luat

ion

Sys

tem

(CE

SP

ES

) of

top

man

agem

ent o

ffici

als

of th

e or

gani

zatio

n


4.5

Are

con

cern

ed

staf

f mem

bers

abl

e to

de

velo

p to

ols

and/

or

know

ledg

e pr

oduc

ts

(KP

s) o

n G

AD

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.

41 a

nd 0

.83)

Con

cern

ed s

taff

mem

bers

not

yet

ab

le to

dev

elop

GA

D

tool

s an

d K

Ps

on

GA

D

Con

cern

ed s

taff

mem

bers

dev

elop

G

AD

tool

s an

d K

Ps

on G

AD

with

as

sist

ance

from

ex

tern

al G

AD

ex

perts

/reso

urce

pe

rson

s

Con

cern

ed s

taff

mem

bers

dev

elop

G

AD

tool

s an

d K

Ps

on G

AD

on

thei

r ow

n

Ple

ase

prov

ide

deta

ils o

f too

ls a

nd/o

r kno

wle

dge

prod

ucts

(KP

s) o

n G

AD

dev

elop

ed.

GA

D T

ools

an

d/or

KP

s D

evel

oped

Pur

pose

Nam

e an

d D

esig

natio

n of

GA

D

expe

rts

tapp

ed fo

r as

sist

ance

4.6

Are

clie

nts

(inte

rnal

an

d ex

tern

al) a

ble

to p

artic

ipat

e in

3

or m

ore

leve

ls o

f th

e de

velo

pmen

t pl

anni

ng c

ycle

of t

he

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

PA

Ps?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

ar

e 0,

0.4

1 an

d 0.

83)

No

parti

cipa

tion

from

cl

ient

s in

all

leve

ls

of th

e de

velo

pmen

t pl

anni

ng c

ycle

of t

he

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

PA

Ps

Eith

er in

tern

al o

r ex

tern

al c

lient

s ha

ve p

artic

ipat

ed

in 1

-2 le

vels

of

the

deve

lopm

ent

plan

ning

cyc

le o

f the

or

gani

zatio

n’s

GA

D

PAP

s

Bot

h in

tern

al a

nd

exte

rnal

clie

nts

have

par

ticip

ated

in

all

leve

ls o

f th

e de

velo

pmen

t pl

anni

ng c

ycle

of t

he

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

PA

Ps

If ye

s, d

escr

ibe

the

parti

cipa

tion

of in

tern

al

and/

or e

xter

nal c

lient

s in

the

deve

lopm

ent

plan

ning

cyc

le (p

lann

ing,

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t, m

onito

ring

and

eval

uatio

n) o

f the

or

gani

zatio

n’s

GA

D P

AP

s.

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

__

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

4 P

eopl

e)


5.

GA

D E

xper

ts (m

ax s

core

: 5; f

or e

ach

item

, 1.6

7)

5.1

Doe

s th

e to

p m

anag

emen

t rai

se

GA

D c

once

rns

durin

g hi

gh-le

vel m

eetin

gs/

disc

ussi

ons?

(e.g

. C

abin

et c

lust

er

mee

ting,

inte

rnat

iona

l co

nfer

ence

s) (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.8

3 an

d 1.

67)

Top

man

agem

ent

has

not r

aise

d G

AD

co

ncer

ns d

urin

g hi

gh- l

evel

mee

tings

Top

man

agem

ent i

s ab

le to

rais

e G

AD

co

ncer

ns d

urin

g hi

gh-le

vel m

eetin

gs

Top

man

agem

ent

is a

ble

to ra

ise

and

rece

ive

supp

ort o

n G

AD

con

cern

s fro

m

colle

ague

s du

ring

high

-leve

l mee

tings

Atta

ch d

ocum

enta

tion

of m

eetin

gs a

nd/o

r di

scus

sion

s w

here

GA

D c

once

rn/s

was

/wer

e ra

ised

by

the

orga

niza

tion’

s to

p m

anag

emen

t.

Mee

ting/

D

iscu

ssio

nG

AD

C

once

rns

Dis

cuss

ed/

Rai

sed

Nam

e of

Top

M

anag

emen

t w

ho R

aise

d G

AD

C

once

rn

Nam

e of

P

erso

n w

ho

Sup

porte

d th

e G

AD

C

once

rn

5.2

Are

the

orga

niza

tion’

s st

aff

mem

bers

reco

gniz

ed

as G

AD

exp

erts

by

othe

r org

aniz

atio

ns?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,

0.83

and

1.6

7)

Sta

ff m

embe

rs n

ot

yet t

appe

d by

oth

er

orga

niza

tions

Sta

ff m

embe

rs

reco

gniz

ed a

s G

AD

ex

perts

and

tapp

ed

by 1

-4 o

rgan

izat

ions

Sta

ff m

embe

rs

reco

gniz

ed a

s G

AD

exp

erts

and

ta

pped

by

5 or

mor

e or

gani

zatio

ns

Atta

ch li

st a

nd p

rofil

e of

inte

rnal

GA

D e

xper

ts.

Enu

mer

ate

sem

inar

s/co

nfer

ence

s/tra

inin

g fa

cilit

ated

by

inte

rnal

GA

D e

xper

ts fo

r oth

er

agen

cies

and

org

aniz

atio

ns.

Nam

e of

In-

tern

al G

AD

E

xper

t

Title

of G

AD

A

ctiv

ities

C

ondu

cted

Nam

e of

In

vitin

g

O

rgan

izat

ions

Dat

e

Con

duct

ed


5.3

Are

ext

erna

l clie

nts

of th

e or

gani

zatio

n re

cogn

ized

as

GA

D c

ham

pion

s by

re

puta

ble

loca

l, na

tiona

l an

d in

tern

atio

nal

orga

niza

tions

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.

83 a

nd 1

.67)

Ext

erna

l clie

nts

not y

et re

cogn

ized

fo

r the

ir ge

nder

m

ains

tream

ing

effo

rts

Ext

erna

l clie

nts

rece

ived

no

min

atio

ns o

r ha

ve s

hortl

iste

d an

d/or

cite

d in

thei

r re

spec

tive

loca

litie

s fo

r the

ir ge

nder

m

ains

tream

ing

effo

rts b

y re

puta

ble

loca

l, na

tiona

l an

d in

tern

atio

nal

orga

niza

tions

Ext

erna

l clie

nts

rece

ived

aw

ards

fo

r the

ir ge

nder

m

ains

tream

ing

effo

rts fr

om

repu

tabl

e lo

cal,

natio

nal a

nd

inte

rnat

iona

l or

gani

zatio

ns

Awar

ds/

Cita

tions

/ N

omin

atio

ns

Rec

eive

d

Org

aniz

atio

n C

onfe

rrin

g th

e Aw

ard/

Cita

tion

Dat

e

Con

ferr

ed

Atta

ch c

opie

s of

new

s ar

ticle

s, o

ther

writ

e-up

s or

doc

umen

tatio

n (e

.g. T

V in

terv

iew

s) re

gard

ing

gend

er m

ains

tream

ing

effo

rts o

f the

ext

erna

l cl

ient

s of

the

orga

niza

tion,

if a

pplic

able

.

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

5 P

eopl

e)

TOTA

L G

MEF

SC

OR

E

(Peo

ple)

The Enabling Mechanisms questionnaire consists of 23 questions that assess the progress of an organization’s efforts in ensuring that mechanisms to mainstream the GAD perspective are established and fully functional.

³ At the Foundation Formation level, the organization has established or reconstituted its GAD Focal Point System (GFPS) as a catalyst for gender mainstreaming. It is also at this level where the organization has conducted exploratory engagements with PCW and other GAD-related institutions and experts;

³ At the Installation of Strategic Mechanisms level, other GAD mechanisms that will address the needs of the organization’s internal and external clients are established, and there is a marked increase in the utilization of the GAD Budget.

³ At the GAD Application level, the organization judiciously utilizes more than the minimum 5% GAD budget allocation while boasting of a fully functioning M&E System and has set-up a Knowledge Management System.

³ At the Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization level, the organization’s enabling mechanisms can now track desired gender-related impacts and are able to produce GAD-related knowledge products; and

³ At the Replication and Innovation level, the enabling mechanisms are recognized as models by other organizations and the whole budget of the organization is fully gender-responsive.



ENABLING MECHANISMS

2 GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Enabling Mechanisms





GMEF SCORESHEET






Sub-Total:

3GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Enabling Mechanisms


Level Per Entry

Point





Over-all Level







GM

EF O

RG

AN

IZAT

ION

AL

ASS

ESSM

ENT

QU

ESTI

ON

NA

IRE

- EN

AB

LIN

G M

ECH

AN

ISM

S

DES

CR

IPTO

RS

SCO

RE

Scor

e pe

r ite

mM

eans

of V

erifi

catio

n/R

emar

ksN

OPA

RTL

YYE

S1.

Set

ting

up o

f Ess

entia

l GA

D M

echa

nism

s (m

ax s

core

: 5; f

or e

ach

item

or q

uest

ion,

1.6

7)

1.1

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

crea

ted/

re

cons

titut

ed it

s G

AD

Fo

cal P

oint

Sys

tem

(G

FPS

) in

acco

rdan

ce

with

Mag

na C

arta

of

Wom

en Im

plem

entin

g R

ules

and

Reg

ulat

ions

(M

CW

IRR

) Sec

. 37-

C

and

othe

r per

tinen

t po

licie

s is

sued

by

over

sigh

t age

ncie

s?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,

0.83

, and

1.6

7)

GFP

S n

ot c

reat

ed/

reco

nstit

uted

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith

MC

W IR

R S

ec

37-C

and

per

tinen

t po

licie

s is

sued

by

conc

erne

d ov

ersi

ght

agen

cies

GFP

S o

r sim

ilar

GA

D m

echa

nism

cr

eate

d/re

cons

titut

ed in

the

cent

ral o

ffice

and

/or

sel

ecte

d re

gion

al

and/

or a

ttach

ed

agen

cies

/offi

ces

only

GFP

S o

r sim

ilar

GA

D m

echa

nism

cr

eate

d/re

cons

titut

ed in

the

cent

ral o

ffice

and

all

regi

onal

offi

ces

and

atta

ched

age

ncie

s

Atta

ch th

e di

rect

ory

of th

e ne

wly

-cre

ated

/reco

n-st

itute

d G

FPS

of t

he o

rgan

izat

ion,

incl

udin

g its

re

gion

al a

nd a

ttach

ed o

ffice

s as

app

licab

le*

*Age

ncie

s w

ith c

reat

ed/re

cons

titut

ed G

FPS

or s

imila

r GA

D

mec

hani

sms

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith m

entio

ned

perti

nent

gui

de-

lines

with

no

regi

onal

and

atta

ched

offi

ces

will

be

awar

ded

1.67

poi

nts

equi

vale

nt to

a “y

es” a

nsw

er

1.2

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

initi

ated

ex

plor

ator

y ac

tiviti

es

with

the

Phi

lippi

ne

Com

mis

sion

on

Wom

en (P

CW

) or

othe

r age

ncie

s/LG

Us,

in

stitu

tions

and

/or

indi

vidu

als

to fa

cilit

ate

gend

er m

ains

tream

ing?

(p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.

83 a

nd 1

.67)

No

expl

orat

ory

activ

ities

initi

ated

at

all

Org

aniz

atio

n

cond

ucte

d in

itial

mee

tings

/ co

nsul

tatio

ns w

ith

PC

W, o

rgan

izat

ions

an

d/or

indi

vidu

als

to fa

cilit

ate

gend

er

mai

nstre

amin

g

Org

aniz

atio

n in

itiat

ed e

xplo

rato

ry

activ

ity/a

ctiv

ities

with

P

CW

, org

aniz

atio

ns

and/

or in

divi

dual

s to

faci

litat

e ge

nder

m

ains

tream

ing

If ye

s, li

st d

own

the

expl

orat

ory

activ

ities

initi

ated

by

the

orga

niza

tion

(e.g

. mee

ting

with

PC

W fo

r th

e id

entifi

catio

n of

nec

essa

ry c

apac

ity d

evel

op-

men

t act

iviti

es fo

r GFP

S a

nd s

taff

mem

bers

) to

faci

litat

e ge

nder

mai

nstre

amin

g

Lis

t of

Org

aniz

atio

ns/

Indi

vidu

als

Exp

lora

tory

A

ctiv

ities

C

ondu

cted

Rem

arks


1.3

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

colle

cted

in

form

atio

n to

war

ds th

e es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f sex

-di

sagg

rega

ted

data

base

an

d en

hanc

emen

t of i

ts

M&

E s

yste

m?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.83,

and

1.

67)

No

info

rmat

ion

colle

cted

Dat

a an

d in

form

atio

n co

llect

ed b

ut a

re n

ot

yet d

isag

greg

ated

by

sex

Inta

ke fo

rms

deve

lope

d an

d us

ed to

col

lect

sex

-di

sagg

rega

ted

data

or

gen

der s

tatis

tics

Atta

ch in

take

form

s su

ch a

s at

tend

ance

she

ets,

pr

ofile

form

s, e

tc.,

with

sep

arat

e co

lum

ns fo

r se

x, u

sed

by th

e or

gani

zatio

n to

gat

her s

ex-

disa

ggre

gate

d da

ta. I

nclu

de li

st o

f inf

orm

atio

n th

at c

an b

e di

sagg

rega

ted

by s

ex (e

.g. l

ist o

f cl

ient

ben

efici

arie

s, s

ervi

ce p

rovi

ders

, par

tner

s,

etc.

)

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

1 E

nabl

ing

Mec

hani

sms)

2. F

unct

iona

l GA

D M

echa

nism

s (m

ax s

core

: 5; f

or e

ach

item

or q

uest

ion,

1)

2.1

Doe

s th

e or

gani

zatio

n ha

ve a

fu

nctio

nal G

AD

Foc

al

Poi

nt S

yste

m b

ased

on

the

prov

isio

ns o

f th

e gu

idel

ines

issu

ed

by re

leva

nt o

vers

ight

ag

enci

es?

(e.g

. PC

W

MC

201

1-01

for N

GA

s,

JMC

201

3-01

for L

GU

s an

d C

HE

D M

O 2

015-

01 fo

r SU

Cs)

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

. 5 a

nd

1)

No

func

tiona

l G

FPS

bas

ed o

n th

e pr

ovis

ions

of t

he

guid

elin

es is

sued

by

rele

vant

ove

rsig

ht

agen

cies

GFP

S p

erfo

rmin

g lim

ited

func

tions

ba

sed

on th

e pr

ovis

ions

of t

he

guid

elin

es is

sued

by

rele

vant

ove

rsig

ht

agen

cies

GFP

S m

embe

rs

activ

ely

perfo

rmin

g al

l the

func

tions

ba

sed

on th

e pr

ovis

ions

of

guid

elin

es is

sued

by

rele

vant

ove

rsig

ht

agen

cies

If G

FPS

is p

erfo

rmin

g lim

ited

func

tions

, exp

lain

th

e ch

alle

nges

face

d by

the

GFP

S o

f the

or

gani

zatio

n in

mai

nstre

amin

g G

AD

.

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___


2.2

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

esta

blis

hed

othe

r GA

D

mec

hani

sms?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

. 5 a

nd

1) *Oth

er G

AD

Mec

hani

sms

refe

r to

thos

e in

add

ition

to

the

GFP

S a

nd th

e G

AD

D

atab

ase

No

othe

r GA

D

mec

hani

sm

esta

blis

hed

1 ot

her G

AD

m

echa

nism

es

tabl

ishe

d

2 or

mor

e ot

her

GA

D m

echa

nism

s es

tabl

ishe

d

Enu

mer

ate

othe

r GA

D m

echa

nism

s es

tabl

ishe

d [e

.g. C

omm

ittee

on

Dec

orum

and

Inve

stig

atio

n (C

OD

I), V

iole

nce

agai

nst W

omen

and

thei

r C

hild

ren

(VAW

C) R

efer

ral S

yste

m, B

aran

gay

Viol

ence

aga

inst

Wom

en (V

AW) D

esk,

Wom

en’s

E

cono

mic

Em

pow

erm

ent (

WE

E) D

esk,

etc

.]

Oth

er G

AD

M

echa

nism

/s

Est

ablis

hed

Fun

ctio

n/s

Mem

bers

Dat

eE

stab

lishe

d

2.3.

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

utili

zed

at

leas

t 5%

of i

ts b

udge

t*

to im

plem

ent G

AD

PA

Ps?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

ar

e 0,

0. 5

and

1)

*ref

ers

to th

e to

tal G

AA

of

NG

As

and

LGU

s or

CO

B

for G

OC

Cs

No

GA

D b

udge

t ut

ilize

dO

rgan

izat

ion

utili

zed

less

than

5%

of t

otal

bu

dget

to im

plem

ent

GA

D P

AP

s

Org

aniz

atio

n ut

ilize

d 5%

or m

ore

of to

tal

budg

et to

impl

emen

t G

AD

PA

Ps

Atta

ch th

e G

AD

Pla

n an

d B

udge

t (G

PB

) and

G

AD

Acc

ompl

ishm

ent R

epor

t (G

AD

AR

) of t

he

orga

niza

tion

for t

he s

ame

fisca

l yea

r (e.

g. 2

013

GP

B a

nd G

AD

AR

)

If no

, exp

lain

why

bud

get a

lloca

ted

for t

he im

ple-

men

tatio

n of

GA

D P

AP

s is

less

than

5%

?

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___


2.4.

Has

eng

agem

ent

with

org

aniz

atio

ns

such

as

PC

W, L

GU

s an

d/or

oth

er a

genc

ies,

an

d in

divi

dual

s be

en

esta

blis

hed

tow

ards

th

e co

nduc

t of G

AD

-re

late

d PA

Ps

for t

he

orga

niza

tion?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

. 5 a

nd

1)

Org

aniz

atio

n ha

s no

t eng

aged

with

ag

enci

es/L

GU

s,

inst

itutio

ns a

nd/o

r in

divi

dual

s to

war

ds

the

cond

uct o

f GA

D-

rela

ted

PAP

s

Org

aniz

atio

n ha

s sp

orad

ic

enga

gem

ent w

ith

agen

cies

/LG

Us,

in

stitu

tions

and

/or

indi

vidu

als

tow

ards

th

e co

nduc

t of G

AD

-re

late

d PA

Ps

Org

aniz

atio

n ha

s es

tabl

ishe

d w

orki

ng

enga

gem

ent w

ith

agen

cies

/LG

Us,

in

stitu

tions

and

/or

indi

vidu

als

tow

ards

th

e co

nduc

t of G

AD

-re

late

d PA

Ps

List

dow

n co

nsul

tatio

ns w

ith o

rgan

izat

ions

/in

divi

dual

s re

gard

ing

the

cond

uct o

f GA

D-r

elat

ed

PAP

s of

the

orga

niza

tion

(e.g

. con

duct

of a

se

ries

of c

apac

ity d

evel

opm

ent a

ctiv

ities

and

te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e fo

r the

pre

para

tion

of G

PB

, et

c.):

List

of

Org

aniz

atio

ns/

Indi

vidu

als

Eng

aged

Pur

pose

of

Eng

agem

ent

(e.g

., re

ques

t fo

r rev

iew

of

GA

D P

B e

tc.)

Res

ults

of

Eng

agem

ent

2.5.

Is th

e or

gani

zatio

n ab

le to

col

lect

or

gene

rate

sex

-di

sagg

rega

ted

data

(S

DD

) and

/or g

ende

r st

atis

tics*

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0. 5

and

1)

No

effo

rt fro

m th

e or

gani

zatio

n ye

t to

colle

ct o

r gen

erat

e S

DD

and

/or g

ende

r st

atis

tics

Org

aniz

atio

n is

in

the

proc

ess

of c

olle

ctin

g or

ge

nera

ting

SD

D

and/

or g

ende

r st

atis

tics

Org

aniz

atio

n co

llect

ing

and

gene

ratin

g S

DD

an

d/or

gen

der

stat

istic

s

If ye

s, e

num

erat

e ty

pes

of S

DD

and

/or g

ende

r st

atis

tics

colle

cted

or g

ener

ated

(e.g

., se

x-di

sagg

rega

ted

profi

le o

f em

ploy

ees,

clie

nt

bene

ficia

ries,

cas

es o

f VAW

, etc

.).

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

If ap

plic

able

, lis

t dow

n in

stal

led

gend

er-

resp

onsi

ve d

ata

colle

ctio

n sy

stem

/s o

f the

or

gani

zatio

n (e

.g. N

atio

nal V

iole

nce

Aga

inst

W

omen

(NVA

W) r

efer

ral s

yste

m, g

ende

r-re

spon

sive

Com

mun

ity-B

ased

Mon

itorin

g S

yste

m (C

BM

S) e

tc.)

__

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

_

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

2 E

nabl

ing

Mec

hani

sms)


3. In

tegr

atio

n of

GA

D in

the

Org

aniz

atio

n’s

Mec

hani

sms

(max

sco

re: 5

; for

eac

h ite

m o

r que

stio

n, 1

)

3.1

Do

the

orga

niza

tion’

s ot

her

GA

D m

echa

nism

s co

ordi

nate

, mon

itor a

nd

repo

rt th

e pr

ogre

ss o

f th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of

its fu

nctio

ns?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.5 a

nd 1

)

Oth

er G

AD

m

echa

nism

s es

tabl

ishe

d bu

t not

fu

nctio

nal

Oth

er G

AD

m

echa

nism

s co

ordi

nate

and

m

onito

r pro

gres

s of

impl

emen

tatio

n bu

t do

not g

ener

ate

stat

us/p

rogr

ess

repo

rt

Oth

er G

AD

m

echa

nism

s co

ordi

nate

, mon

itor

and

gene

rate

sta

tus/

prog

ress

repo

rt of

im

plem

enta

tion

Atta

ch s

tatu

s/pr

ogre

ss re

port

of th

e ot

her G

AD

m

echa

nism

s es

tabl

ishe

d by

the

orga

niza

tion,

in

clud

ing

anal

ysis

of i

ts fu

nctio

ns a

nd

reco

mm

enda

tions

.

3.2

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

utili

zed

30%

or m

ore

of it

s to

tal

budg

et*

to im

plem

ent

GA

D P

AP

s? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.5

and

1)

*ref

ers

to th

e to

tal G

AA

of

NG

As

and

LGU

s or

CO

B fo

r G

OC

Cs

Org

aniz

atio

n ut

ilize

d 5%

or l

ess

of to

tal

budg

et to

impl

emen

t G

AD

PA

Ps

Org

aniz

atio

n ut

ilize

d 6-

29%

of t

otal

bu

dget

to im

plem

ent

GA

D P

AP

s

Org

aniz

atio

n ut

ilize

d 30

% o

r mor

e of

tota

l bu

dget

to im

plem

ent

GA

D P

AP

s

Atta

ch th

e G

PB

and

GA

D A

R fr

om th

e sa

me

fisca

l yea

r (e.

g. 2

013

GP

B a

nd 2

013

GA

D A

R)


3.3

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

judi

ciou

sly

utili

zed

its G

AD

bud

get

to im

plem

ent G

AD

ac

tiviti

es b

ased

on

its

GP

B?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

ar

e 0,

0.5

and

1)

With

AO

M in

dica

ting

non-

utili

zatio

n of

at l

east

5%

of

its

budg

et fo

r G

AD

or N

otic

e of

Dis

allo

wan

ce

from

CO

A w

ith n

o ju

stifi

catio

n fro

m th

e or

gani

zatio

n

With

AO

M in

dica

ting

non-

utili

zatio

n of

at

leas

t 5%

of i

ts

budg

et fo

r GA

D

with

acc

epta

ble

just

ifica

tion

from

the

orga

niza

tion

With

AO

M

com

men

ding

the

judi

ciou

s us

e of

G

AD

fund

s or

no

AO

M fr

om C

OA

indi

catin

g no

n-ut

iliza

tion

of a

t lea

st

5% o

f its

bud

get f

or

GA

D

Atta

ch a

cop

y of

the

Aud

it O

bser

vatio

n M

emo

(AO

M) o

r Not

ice

of S

uspe

nsio

n an

d D

isal

low

ance

s (N

Ds)

rece

ived

from

th

e C

omm

issi

on o

n A

udit

(CO

A) a

nd th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

just

ifica

tion,

if a

pplic

able

.

3.4

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

partn

ered

w

ith a

genc

ies/

LGU

s, in

stitu

tions

an

d/or

indi

vidu

als

tow

ards

the

stra

tegi

c im

plem

enta

tion

of it

s G

AD

PA

Ps?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.5 a

nd 1

)

Has

not

par

tner

ed

with

oth

er

orga

niza

tions

to

war

ds th

e st

rate

gic

impl

emen

tatio

n of

G

AD

PA

Ps

Par

tner

ed w

ith

1 or

gani

zatio

n to

war

ds th

e st

rate

gic

impl

emen

tatio

n of

G

AD

PA

Ps

Par

tner

ed w

ith 2

or

mor

e or

gani

zatio

ns

tow

ards

the

stra

tegi

c im

plem

enta

tion

of

GA

D P

AP

s

List

the

partn

ersh

ip/s

or j

oint

pro

gram

/s to

war

ds

the

stra

tegi

c im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

GA

D P

AP

s (e

.g.

partn

ersh

ip fo

r the

con

duct

of a

G

AD

-rel

ated

pro

gram

)

Nam

e of

P

artn

er

Age

ncy/

Inst

itutio

n/In

divi

dual

GA

D

Effo

rt

Impl

emen

ted

Type

of

Eng

agem

ent

Incl

usiv

e D

ates

If ap

plic

able

, atta

ch c

opie

s of

Mem

oran

dum

of

Agr

eem

ent (

MO

A),

Mem

oran

dum

of

Und

erst

andi

ng (M

OU

), Te

rms

of R

efer

ence

(T

OR

s), P

artn

ersh

ip A

gree

men

t, et

c.


3.5

Is th

e or

gani

zatio

n ut

ilizi

ng s

ex-

disa

ggre

gate

d da

ta a

nd/o

r gen

der

stat

istic

s in

the

deve

lopm

ent p

lann

ing

cycl

e (p

lann

ing,

im

plem

enta

tion

and

man

agem

ent

and

mon

itorin

g an

d ev

alua

tion)

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.5

and

1)

No

SD

D o

r gen

der

stat

istic

s ut

ilize

d in

th

e de

velo

pmen

t pl

anni

ng c

ycle

SD

D a

nd/o

r gen

der

stat

istic

s ut

ilize

d in

1-2

sta

ges

of

the

deve

lopm

ent

plan

ning

cyc

le

SD

D a

nd/o

r gen

der

stat

istic

s ut

ilize

d in

all

stag

es o

f th

e de

velo

pmen

t pl

anni

ng c

ycle

List

GA

D-r

elat

ed d

ata

and

indi

cato

rs u

sed

in th

e de

velo

pmen

t pla

nnin

g cy

cle.

Dev

elop

men

t P

lann

ing

Cyc

le S

tage

Dat

a U

tiliz

edO

utpu

tIn

dica

tors

U

sed

to

Mea

sure

G

ende

r-R

elat

ed

Impa

cts

of

PAP

s

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

3 E

nabl

ing

Mec

hani

sms)

4. A

dvan

ced

GA

D M

echa

nism

s (m

ax s

core

: 5; f

or e

ach

item

or q

uest

ion,

1)

4.1

Are

the

orga

niza

tion’

s ot

her

GA

D m

echa

nism

s ab

le

to c

ontri

bute

tow

ards

th

e at

tain

men

t of i

ts

desi

red

impa

ct/s

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.

5 an

d 1)

Oth

er G

AD

m

echa

nism

s ar

e fu

lly fu

nctio

nal

but s

till h

as t

o co

ntrib

ute

to th

e at

tain

men

t of

desi

red

impa

ct/s

Oth

er G

AD

m

echa

nism

s ar

e fu

lly fu

nctio

nal

and

cont

ribut

ing

to

the

atta

inm

ent o

f de

sire

d im

pact

/s

Oth

er G

AD

m

echa

nism

s ar

e fu

lly fu

nctio

nal a

nd

resu

lted

in d

esire

d im

pact

/s

Atta

ch s

tatu

s/pr

ogre

ss re

port,

clie

nt s

atis

fact

ion

surv

ey, r

esul

ts o

f gen

der i

mpa

ct a

sses

smen

t, do

cum

ente

d te

stim

onie

s, e

tc.


4.2

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

utili

zed

70%

or m

ore

of it

s to

tal

budg

et*

to im

plem

ent

GA

D P

AP

s? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.5

and

1)

*ref

ers

to th

e to

tal G

AA

of

NG

As

and

LGU

s or

CO

B fo

r G

OC

Cs

Org

aniz

atio

n ut

ilize

d 30

% o

r les

s of

tota

l bu

dget

to im

plem

ent

GA

D P

AP

s

Org

aniz

atio

n ut

ilize

d 31

-69%

of t

otal

bu

dget

to im

plem

ent

GA

D P

AP

s

Org

aniz

atio

n ut

ilize

d 70

% o

r mor

e of

tota

l bu

dget

to im

plem

ent

GA

D P

AP

s

Atta

ch th

e G

PB

and

GA

D A

R o

f the

org

aniz

atio

n fo

r the

sam

e fis

cal y

ear (

e.g.

201

3 G

PB

and

20

13 G

AD

AR

).

4.3

Is th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

data

base

with

sex

-di

sagg

rega

ted

data

an

d/or

gen

der s

tatis

tics

able

to g

ener

ate

sect

or-

spec

ific

know

ledg

e pr

oduc

ts (K

Ps)

on

GA

D?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

ar

e 0,

0.5

and

1)

Dat

abas

e ha

s no

S

DD

and

/or g

ende

r st

atis

tics

and

is n

ot

able

to g

ener

ate

sect

or-s

peci

fic K

Ps

on G

AD

Dat

abas

e w

ith

SD

D a

nd/o

r gen

der

stat

istic

s ge

nera

ted

1-2

sect

or-s

peci

fic

KP

s on

GA

D

Dat

abas

e w

ith

SD

D a

nd/o

r gen

der

stat

istic

s ge

nera

ted

3 or

mor

e se

ctor

- sp

ecifi

c K

Ps

on G

AD

Enu

mer

ate

sect

or-s

peci

fic K

Ps

deve

lope

d fro

m

data

base

with

SD

D a

nd/o

r gen

der s

tatis

tics

(e.g

. ca

sele

ts, c

ase

stud

ies,

brie

fers

, fac

t she

ets,

et

c.).

Title

of S

ecto

r S

peci

fic

Kno

wle

dge

Pro

duct

s

Con

tent

of t

he

Kno

wle

dge

Pro

duct

s

Util

izat

ion

of

the

K

now

ledg

e P

rodu

cts


4.4

Is th

e or

gani

zatio

n’s

M&

E s

yste

m a

ble

to tr

ack

the

desi

red

gend

er-r

elat

ed im

pact

s of

its

GA

D P

AP

s on

cl

ient

s (in

tern

al a

nd

exte

rnal

)? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.5

and

1)

M&

E s

yste

m is

not

ab

le to

trac

k ge

nder

-re

late

d im

pact

s of

GA

D P

AP

s on

cl

ient

s (in

tern

al a

nd

exte

rnal

)

M&

E s

yste

m a

ble

to tr

ack

gend

er-

rela

ted

impa

cts

of

GA

D P

AP

s on

eith

er

inte

rnal

or e

xter

nal

clie

nts

M&

E s

yste

m a

ble

to tr

ack

gend

er-

rela

ted

impa

cts

of

GA

D P

AP

s o

n bo

th

inte

rnal

and

ext

erna

l cl

ient

s

Atta

ch c

opie

s of

M&

E re

ports

refle

ctin

g ge

n-de

r-re

late

d im

pact

s of

the

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

PA

Ps

on it

s in

tern

al a

nd e

xter

nal c

lient

s, s

uch

as:

1. N

GA

s: G

ende

r Im

pact

Ass

essm

ent (

GIA

); A

nnua

l Aud

it R

epor

ts (A

AR

s); A

udit

Fina

ncia

l Rep

orts

(AFR

s); S

peci

al A

udit

Rep

orts

(SA

Rs)

; Soc

io-E

cono

mic

Rep

orts

(S

ER

s), P

hilip

pine

Dev

elop

men

t Pla

n (P

DP

) Rep

orts

, pro

gram

/pro

ject

repo

rts,

acco

mpl

ishm

ent r

epor

ts a

nd o

ther

rela

ted

know

ledg

e pr

oduc

ts (K

Ps)

;

2. L

GU

s: E

nd o

f ter

m re

ports

; Ann

ual

Aud

it R

epor

ts (A

AR

s); a

dmin

istra

tive/

acco

mpl

ishm

ent r

epor

ts; S

tate

of t

he

Mun

icip

al A

ddre

ss (S

OM

A);

Sta

te o

f th

e P

rovi

nce

Add

ress

(SO

PA),

Soc

io-

Eco

nom

ic R

epor

ts (S

ER

s), R

egio

nal

Pro

ject

Mon

itorin

g &

Eva

luat

ion

Sys

tem

(R

PM

ES

) Rep

orts

, pro

gram

/pro

ject

re

ports

, and

oth

er re

late

d kn

owle

dge

prod

ucts

Iden

tify

indi

cato

rs th

at m

easu

re g

ende

r-re

late

d im

pact

s of

the

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

PA

Ps.


4.5

Doe

s th

e or

gani

zatio

n ha

ve

a K

now

ledg

e M

anag

emen

t (K

M)

Sys

tem

with

GA

D-

rela

ted

know

ledg

e pr

oduc

ts (K

Ps)

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.

5 an

d 1)

KM

sys

tem

doe

s no

t ha

ve G

AD

-rel

ated

K

Ps

KM

sys

tem

has

G

AD

-rel

ated

KP

s ac

cess

ed a

nd

utili

zed

by e

ither

in

tern

al o

r ext

erna

l cl

ient

s

KM

sys

tem

has

G

AD

-rel

ated

KP

s ac

cess

ed a

nd

utili

zed

by b

oth

inte

rnal

and

ext

erna

l cl

ient

s

Exp

lain

how

the

orga

niza

tion’

s K

M s

yste

m

faci

litat

es th

e sh

arin

g of

GA

D-r

elat

ed K

Ps

to it

s cl

ient

s (in

tern

al a

nd/o

r ext

erna

l).

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

Atta

ch th

e lis

t of K

Ps

prod

uced

and

sha

red

thro

ugh

the

KM

sys

tem

as

wel

l as

the

KM

Pla

n/fra

mew

ork

or li

nk o

f the

KM

sys

tem

, if a

pplic

able

.

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

4 E

nabl

ing

Mec

hani

sms)

5.

Mod

el G

AD

Str

uctu

res

and

Syst

ems

(max

sco

re: 5

; for

eac

h ite

m o

r que

stio

n:1)

5.1

Has

the

orga

niza

tion’

s G

AD

Fo

cal P

oint

Sys

tem

be

en re

cogn

ized

or

awar

ded

as a

mod

el

GA

D m

echa

nism

by

repu

tabl

e lo

cal,

natio

nal,

and

inte

rnat

iona

l or

gani

zatio

ns o

n ge

nder

mai

nstre

amin

g?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,

0.5

and

1)

GFP

S n

ot y

et

reco

gniz

ed a

s m

odel

G

AD

mec

hani

sm

by re

puta

ble

orga

niza

tions

on

gen

der

mai

nstre

amin

g

GFP

S n

omin

ated

, sh

ortli

sted

or

cite

d as

mod

el

GA

D m

echa

nism

by

repu

tabl

e or

gani

zatio

ns

on g

ende

r m

ains

tream

ing

GFP

S a

war

ded

as m

odel

GA

D

mec

hani

sm

by re

puta

ble

orga

niza

tions

on

gen

der

mai

nstre

amin

g

List

aw

ards

/cita

tions

/doc

umen

ted

test

imon

ies

rece

ived

.

Awar

ding

In

stitu

tions

Loca

l/

Nat

iona

l/In

tern

atio

nal

Awar

d/C

itatio

ns

Rec

eive

d

Year


5.2

Has

the

orga

niza

tion’

s ot

her

GA

D m

echa

nism

s be

en

reco

gniz

ed a

s m

odel

s by

oth

er o

rgan

izat

ions

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.

5 an

d 1)

Oth

er G

AD

m

echa

nism

s no

t yet

re

cogn

ized

by

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns a

s m

odel

s

Oth

er G

AD

m

echa

nism

s re

cogn

ized

as

mod

els

by 1

-2

orga

niza

tions

Oth

er G

AD

m

echa

nism

s re

cogn

ized

as

mod

els

by 3

or m

ore

orga

niza

tions

List

aw

ards

/cita

tions

/doc

umen

ted

test

imon

ies

rece

ived

.

Awar

ding

In

stitu

tions

Loca

l/

Nat

iona

l/In

tern

atio

nal

Awar

d/C

itatio

ns

Rec

eive

d

Year

5.3

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

utili

zed

100%

of i

ts to

tal

budg

et*

to im

plem

ent

GA

D P

AP

s? (

poss

ible

sc

ores

are

0, 0

.5 a

nd 1

)

*ref

ers

to th

e to

tal G

AA

of

NG

As

and

LGU

s or

CO

B fo

r G

OC

Cs

Org

aniz

atio

n ut

ilize

d 70

% o

r les

s of

its

tota

l bud

get t

o im

plem

ent

GA

D

PAP

s

Org

aniz

atio

n ut

ilize

d 71

-99%

or l

ess

of

its to

tal b

udge

t to

impl

emen

t GA

D

PAP

s

Org

aniz

atio

n ut

ilize

d 10

0% o

f its

tota

l bu

dget

to im

plem

ent

GA

D P

AP

s

Atta

ch th

e G

PB

and

GA

D A

R o

f the

org

aniz

atio

n fo

r the

sam

e fis

cal y

ear (

e.g.

201

3 G

PB

and

20

13 G

AD

AR

)


5.4

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

esta

blis

hed

a ce

ntra

lized

dat

abas

e w

ith s

ex-d

isag

greg

ated

da

ta a

nd/o

r gen

der

stat

istic

s ac

cess

ible

to

its

regi

onal

offi

ces

and

atta

ched

age

ncie

s,

as w

ell a

s ex

tern

al

clie

nts

and

partn

er

orga

niza

tions

?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,

0.5

and

1)

Dat

abas

e w

ith

SD

D a

nd/o

r gen

der

stat

istic

s es

tabl

ishe

d bu

t acc

essi

ble

only

to

the

cent

ral o

ffice

Dat

abas

e w

ith

SD

D a

nd/o

r gen

der

stat

istic

s es

tabl

ishe

d an

d ac

cess

ible

to

the

cent

ral o

ffice

, re

gion

al o

ffice

s an

d at

tach

ed a

genc

ies

Dat

abas

e w

ith

SD

D a

nd/o

r gen

der

stat

istic

s es

tabl

ishe

d an

d ac

cess

ible

to

the

cent

ral o

ffice

, re

gion

al o

ffice

s an

d at

tach

ed

agen

cies

, as

wel

l as

to e

xter

nal

clie

nts

and

partn

er

orga

niza

tions

Ple

ase

prov

ide

link

of d

atab

ase

with

SD

D.

If th

e da

ta is

not

upl

oade

d in

a w

ebsi

te, l

ist t

he

info

rmat

ion/

data

that

are

acc

essi

ble

to re

gion

al

offic

es, a

ttach

ed a

genc

ies,

ext

erna

l clie

nts

and

partn

er o

rgan

izat

ions

.

5.5

Is th

e K

now

ledg

e M

anag

emen

t (K

M)

syst

em o

f the

or

gani

zatio

n in

tegr

ated

w

ith G

AD

and

repl

icat

ed

by o

ther

org

aniz

atio

ns?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,

0.5

and

1)

KM

sys

tem

of t

he

orga

niza

tion

not

inte

grat

ed w

ith G

AD

an

d no

t rep

licat

ed b

y ot

her o

rgan

izat

ions

KM

sys

tem

of

the

orga

niza

tion

inte

grat

ed w

ith G

AD

an

d re

plic

ated

by

1-2

orga

niza

tions

KM

sys

tem

of

the

orga

niza

tion

inte

grat

ed w

ith

GA

D a

nd re

plic

ated

by

3 o

r mor

e or

gani

zatio

ns

Exp

lain

how

GA

D is

inte

grat

ed in

the

KM

sy

stem

of t

he o

rgan

izat

ion

and

list d

own

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns th

at re

plic

ated

the

KM

sys

tem

.

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

5 E

nabl

ing

Mec

hani

sms)

TOTA

L G

MEF

SC

OR

E

(Ena

blin

g M

echa

nism

s)


PROGRAMS/ACTIVITIES/PROJECTS (PAPs)The PAPs questionnaire consists of 30 questions that assess the organization’s

progress in mainstreaming GAD in all of its programs, activities and projects, whether through policy and/or plan formulation and issuances, capacitating the GFPS members, generating top-level management support on GAD and the establishment of enabling GAD mechanisms.

³ At the Foundation Formulation level, the organization has expressed initial support to gender mainstreaming through conduct of GAD capacity development sessions for its GFPS members, top management and the rest of its employees. It has also involved clients to ensure that their gender issues are taken into account, while also engaging with PCW and relevant organizations and individual experts on GAD. It is also at this stage that the organization plans or sets-up a GAD corner containing GAD IEC materials or references for the use of its clients (internal and external).

³ At the Installation of Strategic Mechanisms level, the organization already has a GAD agenda or strategic framework to guide its gender mainstreaming efforts through the implementation of its GAD Plan and Budget. Deepening sessions for GFPS members and concerned staff members are also conducted, especially on the application of gender analysis tools. These sessions are meant to further guide them on how to intensify gender mainstreaming efforts in the organization. Lastly, IEC materials are customized for the organization’s use and a GAD section in the website is planned or set-up.

³ At the GAD Application level, the organization ensures that the implementation of its GAD PAPs, especially those in the GAD Plan and Budget are monitored. External clients are also capacitated through relevant GAD sessions. Finally, a Knowledge Management (KM) system to ensure the transfer of knowledge on GAD is set-up.

³ At the Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization level, the organization ensures that monitoring of its GAD PAPs is sustained and its impacts evaluated. Sector-specific GAD capacity development sessions for both internal and external clients are also conducted, as well as periodic applications and re-application of gender analysis tools to ensure integration of GAD in the organization’s PAPs. A sustainability action plan for GAD is also developed.

³ At the Replication and Innovation level, the organization is now recognized as a learning hub for its noteworthy GAD efforts with convergence models resulting from its partnerships. GAD knowledge products and IEC materials produced by the organization are also utilized by other organizations as references or models to develop their own GAD-related materials.A Toolkit on the Enhanced Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation Framework© Copyright 2016 - Philippine Commission on Women 1145 J.P. Laurel St., San Miguel Manila 1005 Philippines Telephone: +632.7365249 or +632.7367712Fax Number: +632.7364449

2 GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Programs/Activities/Projects





GMEF SCORESHEET






Sub-Total:

3GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaire-Programs/Activities/Projects


Level Per Entry

Point





Over-all Level







PRO

GR

AM

S, A

CTI

VITI

ES A

ND

PR

OJE

CTS

(PA

Ps)

ASS

ESSM

ENT

QU

ESTI

ON

NA

IRE

DES

CR

IPTO

RS

SCO

RE

Scor

e pe

r ite

mM

eans

of V

erifi

catio

n/R

emar

ksN

OPA

RTL

YYE

S1.

Ini

tial A

ctiv

ities

to F

acili

tate

GA

D M

ains

trea

min

g (m

ax s

core

: 5; f

or e

ach

item

or q

uest

ion:

0.83

)

1.1

Is th

e or

gani

zatio

n ob

serv

ing

inte

rnat

iona

l/na

tiona

l/loc

al G

AD

-re

late

d ev

ents

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.41

and

0.83

)

Org

aniz

atio

n ha

s no

t ini

tiate

d or

pa

rtici

pate

d in

th

e ob

serv

ance

of

inte

rnat

iona

l/na

tiona

l/ lo

cal G

AD

-re

late

d ev

ents

Org

aniz

atio

n in

itiat

ed o

r pa

rtici

pate

d in

1-

2 ob

serv

ance

of

inte

rnat

iona

l/na

tiona

l/ lo

cal G

AD

-re

late

d ev

ents

Org

aniz

atio

n in

itiat

ed o

r pa

rtici

pate

d in

3 o

r m

ore

obse

rvan

ce

of in

tern

atio

nal/

natio

nal/

loca

l GA

D-

rela

ted

even

ts

Enu

mer

ate

GA

D-r

elat

ed e

vent

s in

itiat

ed

or p

artic

ipat

ed b

y th

e or

gani

zatio

n (e

.g.

Inte

rnat

iona

l Wom

en’s

Day

cel

ebra

tion)

.

GA

D-

rela

ted

even

t

Initi

ated

Par

ticip

ated

Dat

e

Con

duct

ed

1.2

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

cond

ucte

d B

asic

GA

D O

rient

atio

n or

Gen

der S

ensi

tivity

Tr

aini

ng (G

ST)

for i

ts

clie

nts

(inte

rnal

and

ex

tern

al)?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.41

and

0.83

)

No

Bas

ic G

AD

or

ient

atio

n or

GS

T co

nduc

ted

for i

ts

clie

nts

Bas

ic G

AD

O

rient

atio

n or

GS

T co

nduc

ted

for e

ither

in

tern

al o

r ext

erna

l cl

ient

s

Bas

ic G

AD

O

rient

atio

n or

GS

T co

nduc

ted

for b

oth

inte

rnal

and

ext

erna

l cl

ient

s

Atta

ch tr

aini

ng d

esig

n, a

ttend

ance

she

ets

and

resu

lts o

f tra

inin

g ev

alua

tion,

if a

vaila

ble.

If no

, exp

lain

why

GA

D O

rient

atio

n or

Gen

der

Sen

sitiv

ity T

rain

ing

(GS

T) h

as n

ot b

een

cond

ucte

d fo

r the

org

aniz

atio

n’s

clie

nts.


1.3

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

cond

ucte

d co

nsul

tatio

n ac

tiviti

es

with

clie

nts

(inte

rnal

an

d ex

tern

al) t

o id

entif

y ge

nder

issu

es

and

corr

espo

ndin

g st

rate

gies

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.4

1 an

d 0.

83)

No

cons

ulta

tion

cond

ucte

d w

ith

clie

nts

Con

duct

ed

cons

ulta

tion

with

ei

ther

inte

rnal

or

exte

rnal

clie

nts

to id

entif

y ge

nder

is

sues

and

co

rres

pond

ing

stra

tegi

es

Con

duct

ed

cons

ulta

tion

with

bo

th in

tern

al a

nd

exte

rnal

clie

nts

to id

entif

y ge

nder

is

sues

and

co

rres

pond

ing

stra

tegi

es

Dis

cuss

the

resu

lts o

f con

sulta

tion

activ

ities

co

nduc

ted.

Gro

up

Con

sulte

d (In

tern

al/

Ext

erna

l)

Pur

pose

Res

ults

of

Con

sulta

tion

(g

ende

r is

sues

and

st

rate

gies

id

entifi

ed)

If co

nsul

tatio

ns w

ere

cond

ucte

d, w

hat g

ende

r-re

late

d is

sues

wer

e re

flect

ed in

the

GP

B?

1.4

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

cons

ulte

d P

CW

and

rele

vant

or

gani

zatio

ns/

indi

vidu

als

on it

s G

AD

m

ains

tream

ing

effo

rts?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,

0.41

and

0.8

3)

No

cons

ulta

tion

cond

ucte

d at

all

Initi

ated

con

sulta

tion

with

eith

er P

CW

or

rele

vant

or

gani

zatio

ns/

indi

vidu

als

on it

s G

AD

mai

nstre

amin

g ef

forts

Initi

ated

con

sulta

tion

with

bot

h P

CW

an

d re

leva

nt

orga

niza

tions

/ in

divi

dual

s on

its

GA

D m

ains

tream

ing

effo

rts

Enu

mer

ate

resu

lts o

f con

sulta

tions

initi

ated

in

clud

ing

nam

es o

f org

aniz

atio

ns/in

divi

dual

s co

nsul

ted.

Nam

e of

or

gani

zatio

ns/

indi

vidu

als

Con

sulte

d

Age

nda

of th

e C

onsu

ltatio

nR

esul

ts o

f the

C

onsu

ltatio

n


1.5

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

revi

ewed

an

d re

vise

d ex

istin

g In

form

atio

n/E

duca

tion/

Com

mun

icat

ion

(IEC

) mat

eria

ls a

nd

Kno

wle

dge

Pro

duct

s (K

Ps)

to e

nsur

e us

e of

ge

nder

-fair

lang

uage

an

d im

ages

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.4

1 an

d 0.

83)

No

revi

ew o

f exi

stin

g IE

C m

ater

ials

and

K

Ps

cond

ucte

d

1-3

exis

ting

IEC

m

ater

ials

and

KP

s re

view

ed b

ut n

ot

revi

sed

4 or

mor

e ex

istin

g IE

C m

ater

ials

and

K

Ps

revi

ewed

and

re

vise

d

Pro

vide

a li

st o

f IE

C m

ater

ials

revi

ewed

and

re

vise

d to

ens

ure

use

of g

ende

r-fa

ir la

ngua

ge

and

imag

es.

1.6

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

set u

p a

GA

D c

orne

r? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.4

1 an

d 0.

83)

No

plan

to s

et u

p G

AD

cor

ner

GA

D IE

C m

ater

ials

an

d K

Ps

com

pile

d an

d co

llect

ed to

set

up

GA

D c

orne

r

Est

ablis

hed

GA

D

corn

er w

ith u

pdat

ed

GA

D IE

C m

ater

ials

an

d K

Ps

Pro

vide

a c

opy

of th

e pl

an o

r pho

to la

yout

of

the

GA

D c

orne

r and

list

dow

n tit

les

of e

xist

ing

Info

rmat

ion/

Edu

catio

n/C

omm

unic

atio

n (IE

C)

mat

eria

ls a

nd K

Ps

avai

labl

e fo

r use

and

re

fere

nce

of c

lient

s an

d G

AD

Foc

al P

oint

Sys

tem

(G

FPS

) mem

bers

.

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

1 P

APs

)


2. E

stab

lishi

ng C

omm

itmen

t tow

ards

Gen

der M

ains

trea

min

g (m

ax s

core

: 5; f

or e

ach

item

or q

uest

ion:

0.6

2)

2.1

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

form

ulat

ed

GA

D a

gend

a or

st

rate

gic

fram

ewor

k?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,

0.31

and

0.6

2)

No

GA

D a

gend

a or

st

rate

gic

fram

ewor

k fo

rmul

ated

Dra

ft G

AD

age

nda

or s

trate

gic

fram

ewor

k fo

rmul

ated

GA

D a

gend

a or

st

rate

gic

fram

ewor

k fo

rmul

ated

and

ap

prov

ed

Atta

ch d

raft

or a

ppro

ved

GA

D a

gend

a an

d/or

stra

tegi

c fra

mew

ork

(e.g

. Dep

artm

ent O

rder

se

tting

3-y

ear G

AD

age

nda

of a

genc

ies

or G

AD

C

ode

for L

GU

s).

2.2

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

deve

lope

d its

GA

D P

lan

and

Bud

get (

GP

B) b

ased

on

GA

D a

gend

a,

emer

ging

gen

der

issu

es, i

nter

natio

nal/

natio

nal G

AD

man

date

s an

d/or

resu

lts o

f gen

der

anal

ysis

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.3

1 an

d 0.

62)

GP

B is

not

bas

ed o

n G

AD

age

nda/

GA

D

Cod

e, e

mer

ging

ge

nder

issu

es,

inte

rnat

iona

l/nat

iona

l G

AD

man

date

s an

d/or

resu

lts o

f gen

der

anal

ysis

GP

B is

bas

ed o

n at

leas

t 1 o

f the

fo

llow

ing:

GA

D

agen

da/G

AD

Cod

e,

emer

ging

gen

der

issu

es, i

nter

natio

nal/

natio

nal G

AD

m

anda

tes

and/

or

resu

lts o

f gen

der

anal

ysis

GP

B is

bas

ed o

n at

leas

t 3 o

f the

fo

llow

ing:

GA

D

agen

da/G

AD

Cod

e,

emer

ging

gen

der

issu

es, i

nter

natio

nal/

natio

nal G

AD

m

anda

tes

and/

or

resu

lts o

f gen

der

anal

ysis

Atta

ch G

PB

for t

he m

ost r

ecen

t fisc

al y

ear c

iting

th

e ba

sis

for i

ts d

evel

opm

ent.

Con

tent

of

GP

BB

asis

of

Dev

elop

men

t(G

AD

age

nda/

GA

D C

ode,

em

ergi

ng

gend

er is

sues

, in

tern

atio

nal/

natio

nal G

AD

m

anda

tes/

resu

lts o

f gen

der

anal

ysis

)

Rem

arks


2.3

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

cond

ucte

d de

epen

ing

sess

ions

on

GA

D b

ased

on

the

resu

lts o

f the

Tra

inin

g N

eeds

Ass

essm

ent

(TN

A) o

r upd

ated

GA

D

polic

ies

and

tool

s as

pa

rt of

the

cont

inui

ng

capa

city

dev

elop

men

t of

GA

D F

ocal

Poi

nt

Sys

tem

(GFP

S)

and

conc

erne

d st

aff

mem

bers

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.3

1 an

d 0.

62)

No

deep

enin

g se

ssio

ns o

n G

AD

co

nduc

ted

Con

duct

ed

deep

enin

g se

ssio

n/s

on G

AD

for e

ither

th

e G

FPS

or

conc

erne

d st

aff

mem

bers

but

not

ba

sed

on th

e re

sults

of

TN

A or

upd

ated

G

AD

pol

icie

s or

to

ols

Con

duct

ed

deep

enin

g se

ssio

ns

on G

AD

for e

ither

G

FPS

or c

once

rned

st

aff m

embe

rs

base

d on

the

resu

lts

of T

NA

or u

pdat

ed

GA

D p

olic

ies

or

tool

s

Enu

mer

ate

the

deep

enin

g se

ssio

ns o

n G

AD

co

nduc

ted

for G

FPS

and

con

cern

ed s

taff:

Titl

e of

of

Dee

peni

ng

Ses

sion

TA P

rovi

der

(in h

ouse

tra

iner

, PC

W)

Dat

e

Con

duct

ed

Als

o at

tach

a c

opy

of T

rain

ing

Nee

ds A

naly

sis

(TN

A) r

esul

ts a

nd d

esig

n of

dee

peni

ng s

essi

ons.

If TN

A w

as n

ot a

dmin

iste

red,

ple

ase

expl

ain

how

the

orga

niza

tion

iden

tified

the

need

for

deep

enin

g se

ssio

ns a

nd e

xpla

in th

e ba

sis

for t

he

train

ing

desi

gn/s

use

d.

2.4

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

used

G

ende

r Ana

lysi

s (G

A)

tool

s an

d te

chni

ques

in

the

revi

ew,

enha

ncem

ent o

r de

velo

pmen

t of P

AP

s?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,

0.31

and

0.6

2)

No

GA

tool

app

lied

to d

evel

op, r

evie

w

and/

or e

nhan

ce

PAP

s

Res

ults

of t

he

appl

icat

ion

of G

A to

ols

used

to re

view

, en

hanc

e or

dev

elop

1-

2 PA

Ps

Res

ults

of t

he

appl

icat

ion

of G

A to

ols

used

to re

view

, en

hanc

e or

dev

elop

3

or m

ore

PAP

s

Enu

mer

ate

GA

tool

s us

ed to

dev

elop

, rev

iew

an

d/or

enh

ance

PA

Ps.

Nam

e of

PA

Ps

GA

tool

s

App

lied

Res

ults

of

App

licat

ion


2.5

Doe

s th

e or

gani

zatio

n ha

ve

faci

litie

s an

d se

rvic

es

that

add

ress

the

gend

er

issu

es a

nd c

once

rns

of

its c

lient

s (in

tern

al a

nd

exte

rnal

)? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.3

1 an

d 0.

62)

No

faci

litie

s an

d se

rvic

es a

ddre

ssin

g ge

nder

issu

es a

nd

conc

erns

of t

he

orga

niza

tion’

s cl

ient

s

With

exi

stin

g fa

cilit

ies

and

serv

ices

that

ad

dres

s th

e ge

nder

is

sues

and

con

cern

s of

eith

er in

tern

al o

r ex

tern

al c

lient

s

With

exi

stin

g fa

cilit

ies

and

serv

ices

that

ad

dres

s ge

nder

is

sues

and

con

cern

s of

bot

h in

tern

al a

nd

exte

rnal

clie

nts

Enu

mer

ate

faci

litie

s an

d se

rvic

es a

ddre

ssin

g ge

nder

issu

es a

nd c

once

rns

of th

e or

gani

zatio

n.

GA

D F

acili

ties

and

Ser

vice

sC

lient

s

(inte

rnal

/ ex

tern

al)

Gen

der

Issu

es a

nd

Con

cern

s A

ddre

ssed

(e.g

. Fac

ilitie

s to

add

ress

stra

tegi

c an

d pr

actic

al

gend

er n

eeds

of w

omen

and

men

em

ploy

ees

such

as

child

-min

ding

cen

ter,

brea

stfe

edin

g ce

nter

, and

CO

DI,

amon

g ot

hers

)

2.6

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

deve

lope

d or

ient

atio

n m

odul

es fo

r ne

w e

mpl

oyee

s w

ith

gend

er-s

ensi

tivity

as

a co

re c

ompe

tenc

y?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,

0.31

and

0.6

2)

No

GA

D o

rient

atio

n m

odul

e w

ith g

ende

r se

nsiti

vity

as

a co

re c

ompe

tenc

y de

velo

ped

Dev

elop

ed G

AD

or

ient

atio

n m

odul

e bu

t not

yet

incl

uded

in

the

orie

ntat

ion

of

new

em

ploy

ees

Dev

elop

ed G

AD

or

ient

atio

n m

odul

e an

d in

clud

ed in

the

orie

ntat

ion

of n

ew

empl

oyee

s

Atta

ch c

opy

of G

AD

orie

ntat

ion

mod

ule(

s) w

ith

gend

er-s

ensi

tivity

as

a co

re c

ompe

tenc

y.

2.7

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

deve

lope

d an

d di

ssem

inat

ed n

ew

Info

rmat

ion/

Edu

catio

n/C

omm

unic

atio

n (IE

C)

mat

eria

ls o

n G

AD

to

clie

nts

(inte

rnal

and

ex

tern

al)?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.31

and

0.62

)

No

new

GA

D IE

C

mat

eria

ls d

evel

oped

Dev

elop

ed b

ut h

as

not d

isse

min

ated

ne

w G

AD

IEC

m

ater

ials

Dev

elop

ed a

nd

diss

emin

ated

new

G

AD

IEC

mat

eria

ls

Pro

vide

list

of n

ew G

AD

IEC

mat

eria

ls a

nd th

e ta

rget

aud

ienc

e.

GA

D IE

C

mat

eria

lsTa

rget

A

udie

nce

Rem

arks


2.8

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

crea

ted

a G

AD

sec

tion

in it

s w

ebsi

te?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.31

and

0.62

)

No

GA

D s

ectio

n in

th

e ag

ency

web

site

Dev

elop

ed

GA

D s

ectio

n in

or

gani

zatio

n w

ebsi

te

but n

ot u

pdat

ed

Dev

elop

ed

GA

D s

ectio

n in

or

gani

zatio

n w

ebsi

te

and

regu

larly

up

date

d

Ple

ase

list w

ebsi

te li

nk fo

r the

GA

D S

ectio

n of

th

e or

gani

zatio

n.

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

2 P

APs

)

3. G

AD

App

licat

ion

(max

sco

re: 5

; for

eac

h ite

m o

r que

stio

n: 0

.71)

3.1

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

mon

itore

d th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of it

s G

AD

Pro

gram

s/A

ctiv

ities

/Pro

ject

s (P

AP

s)?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.35

and

0.

71)

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

GA

D P

AP

s no

t m

onito

red

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

GA

D P

AP

s in

term

itten

tly

mon

itore

d an

d no

t re

porte

d

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

G

AD

PA

Ps

regu

larly

m

onito

red

and

repo

rted

Atta

ch m

onito

ring

repo

rts o

n th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of G

AD

PA

Ps.

3.2

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

prep

ared

an

d su

bmitt

ed o

n tim

e its

GA

D P

lan

and

Bud

get (

GP

B) a

nd G

AD

A

ccom

plis

hmen

t Rep

ort

(GA

D A

R)?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.35

and

0.71

)

*PC

W e

ndor

ses

GP

Bs

of

NG

As,

GO

CC

s an

d S

UC

s

**D

ILG

end

orse

s G

PB

s of

LG

Us

GP

B a

nd G

AD

AR

no

t su

bmitt

ed to

P

CW

/DIL

G

GP

B a

nd G

AD

AR

su

bmitt

ed to

PC

W*/

DIL

G**

but

not

en

dors

ed

GP

B a

nd G

AD

AR

en

dors

ed b

y P

CW

*/D

ILG

**

Pro

vide

cop

ies

of s

ubm

itted

and

/or e

ndor

sed

GA

D P

lans

and

Bud

gets

(GP

Bs)

and

GA

D

Acc

ompl

ishm

ent R

epor

ts (G

AD

AR

s), i

nclu

ding

co

ver l

ette

rs.


2.8

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

crea

ted

a G

AD

sec

tion

in it

s w

ebsi

te?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.31

and

0.62

)

No

GA

D s

ectio

n in

th

e ag

ency

web

site

Dev

elop

ed

GA

D s

ectio

n in

or

gani

zatio

n w

ebsi

te

but n

ot u

pdat

ed

Dev

elop

ed

GA

D s

ectio

n in

or

gani

zatio

n w

ebsi

te

and

regu

larly

up

date

d

Ple

ase

list w

ebsi

te li

nk fo

r the

GA

D S

ectio

n of

th

e or

gani

zatio

n.

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

2 P

APs

)

3. G

AD

App

licat

ion

(max

sco

re: 5

; for

eac

h ite

m o

r que

stio

n: 0

.71)

3.1

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

mon

itore

d th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of it

s G

AD

Pro

gram

s/A

ctiv

ities

/Pro

ject

s (P

AP

s)?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.35

and

0.

71)

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

GA

D P

AP

s no

t m

onito

red

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

GA

D P

AP

s in

term

itten

tly

mon

itore

d an

d no

t re

porte

d

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

G

AD

PA

Ps

regu

larly

m

onito

red

and

repo

rted

Atta

ch m

onito

ring

repo

rts o

n th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of G

AD

PA

Ps.

3.2

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

prep

ared

an

d su

bmitt

ed o

n tim

e its

GA

D P

lan

and

Bud

get (

GP

B) a

nd G

AD

A

ccom

plis

hmen

t Rep

ort

(GA

D A

R)?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.35

and

0.71

)

*PC

W e

ndor

ses

GP

Bs

of

NG

As,

GO

CC

s an

d S

UC

s

**D

ILG

end

orse

s G

PB

s of

LG

Us

GP

B a

nd G

AD

AR

no

t su

bmitt

ed to

P

CW

/DIL

G

GP

B a

nd G

AD

AR

su

bmitt

ed to

PC

W*/

DIL

G**

but

not

en

dors

ed

GP

B a

nd G

AD

AR

en

dors

ed b

y P

CW

*/D

ILG

**

Pro

vide

cop

ies

of s

ubm

itted

and

/or e

ndor

sed

GA

D P

lans

and

Bud

gets

(GP

Bs)

and

GA

D

Acc

ompl

ishm

ent R

epor

ts (G

AD

AR

s), i

nclu

ding

co

ver l

ette

rs.

3.3

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

cond

ucte

d an

d su

stai

ned

the

GA

D

capa

city

dev

elop

men

t of

its

clie

nts

(inte

rnal

an

d ex

tern

al)?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.35

and

0.

71)

No

GA

D c

apac

ity

deve

lopm

ent

cond

ucte

d an

d su

stai

ned

for c

lient

s

GA

D c

apac

ity

deve

lopm

ent

cond

ucte

d an

d su

stai

ned

for e

ither

in

tern

al o

r ext

erna

l cl

ient

s

GA

D c

apac

ity

deve

lopm

ent

cond

ucte

d an

d su

stai

ned

for b

oth

inte

rnal

and

ext

erna

l cl

ient

s

List

GA

D c

apac

ity d

evel

opm

ent a

ctiv

ities

co

nduc

ted

for c

lient

s.

GA

D C

apac

ity

Dev

elop

men

t A

ctiv

ities

Targ

et

Par

ticip

ants

Incl

usiv

e D

ates

3.4

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

cond

ucte

d G

AD

cap

acity

de

velo

pmen

t ses

sion

s fo

r its

inte

rnal

GA

D

expe

rts?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.35

and

0.

71)

No

GA

D c

apac

ity

deve

lopm

ent

sess

ion

cond

ucte

d to

dev

elop

inte

rnal

G

AD

exp

erts

Con

duct

ed

GA

D c

apac

ity

deve

lopm

ent

sess

ion

but n

o in

tern

al G

AD

exp

erts

de

velo

ped

Con

duct

ed

GA

D c

apac

ity

deve

lopm

ent

sess

ion

that

resu

lted

in th

e de

velo

pmen

t of

inte

rnal

GA

D

expe

rts

Enu

mer

ate

GA

D c

apac

ity d

evel

opm

ent s

essi

ons

cond

ucte

d, a

nd p

rovi

de a

list

of i

nter

nal e

xper

ts

and

thei

r are

as o

f exp

ertis

e de

velo

ped

thro

ugh

thes

e se

ssio

ns.

Title

and

D

ate

of G

AD

C

apac

ity

Dev

elop

men

t A

ctiv

ity

Con

duct

ed

Inte

rnal

GA

D

Exp

erts

D

evel

oped

Rem

arks

3.5

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

regu

larly

ap

plie

d G

ende

r Ana

lysi

s (G

A) t

ools

in th

e de

velo

pmen

t pla

nnin

g cy

cle

(pla

nnin

g,

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t, an

d m

onito

ring

and

eval

uatio

n)?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0, 0

.35

and

0.

71)

No

GA

tool

s ap

plie

d in

dev

elop

men

t pl

anni

ng c

ycle

GA

tool

s ap

plie

d in

1-2

lev

els

of

the

deve

lopm

ent

plan

ning

cyc

le

GA

tool

s ap

plie

d in

all

leve

ls o

f th

e de

velo

pmen

t pl

anni

ng c

ycle

Enu

mer

ate

GA

tool

s ap

plie

d in

any

sta

ge o

f the

de

velo

pmen

t pla

nnin

g cy

cle

and

the

frequ

ency

of

appl

icat

ion.

GA

D T

ools

A

pplie

d P

urpo

se o

f A

pplic

atio

n R

esul

t of

App

licat

ion

Dat

e of

A

pplic

atio

n


3.6

Has

the

or

gani

zatio

n re

gula

rly

upda

ted

its G

AD

se

ctio

n in

the

web

site

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.

35 a

nd 0

.71)

GA

D s

ectio

n ha

s no

t be

en u

pdat

ed fo

r m

ore

than

a y

ear

GA

D s

ectio

n up

date

d an

nual

ly

GA

D s

ectio

n up

date

d qu

arte

rly o

r m

ore

ofte

n

Pro

vide

a s

ched

ule

invo

lvin

g th

e up

date

of t

he

GA

D s

ectio

n in

the

orga

niza

tion’

s w

ebsi

te.

3.7

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

set

up a

Kno

wle

dge

Man

agem

ent (

KM

) sy

stem

as

a m

echa

nism

to

tran

sfer

kno

wle

dge

on G

AD

? (p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.3

5 an

d 0.

71)

No

exis

ting

plan

to

set u

p K

MH

as in

itial

pla

n to

set

up

KM

H

as s

et u

p a

KM

sy

stem

to tr

ansf

er

know

ledg

e on

GA

D

Atta

ch th

e K

now

ledg

e M

anag

emen

t (K

M) s

yste

m

plan

/fram

ewor

k or

web

link

.

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

3 P

APs

)

4. G

AD

Com

mitm

ent a

nd In

stitu

tiona

lizat

ion

(max

sco

re: 5

; for

eac

h ite

m o

r que

stio

n, 1

.0)

4.1

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

sust

aine

d im

plem

enta

tion

and

mon

itorin

g of

in

tern

atio

nal,

natio

nal

and

loca

l GA

D

man

date

s in

its

PAP

s?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,

0.5,

and

1)

GA

D m

anda

te n

ot

impl

emen

ted

and

mon

itore

d

GA

D m

anda

tes

cont

inuo

usly

im

plem

ente

d bu

t not

re

gula

rly m

onito

red

by th

e or

gani

zatio

n

GA

D m

anda

tes

cont

inuo

usly

im

plem

ente

d an

d re

gula

rly m

onito

red

by th

e or

gani

zatio

n

List

dow

n G

AD

-rel

ated

man

date

s be

ing

impl

emen

ted

and

mon

itore

d by

the

orga

niza

tion

and

atta

ch th

e re

leva

nt m

onito

ring

repo

rts.


4.2

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

cond

ucte

d or

gani

zatio

nal/s

ecto

r-

spec

ific

capa

city

de

velo

pmen

t ses

sion

s on

GA

D fo

r clie

nts

(inte

rnal

and

ext

erna

l)?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,

0.5,

and

1)

No

orga

niza

tiona

l se

ctor

- spe

cific

ca

paci

ty

deve

lopm

ent

sess

ion/

s on

GA

D

cond

ucte

d

Org

aniz

atio

nal/

sect

or-s

peci

fic

GA

D c

apac

ity

deve

lopm

ent

sess

ion/

s co

nduc

ted

for e

ither

inte

rnal

or

exte

rnal

clie

nts

Org

aniz

atio

nal/

sect

or-s

peci

fic

GA

D c

apac

ity

deve

lopm

ent

sess

ion/

s co

nduc

ted

for b

oth

inte

rnal

or

exte

rnal

clie

nts

List

dow

n tit

les

of o

rgan

izat

iona

l/sec

tor-

spec

ific

capa

city

dev

elop

men

t ses

sion

/s

on G

AD

con

duct

ed o

r dis

cuss

sta

tus

of th

e de

velo

pmen

t of s

ecto

r-sp

ecifi

c G

AD

cap

acity

de

velo

pmen

t ses

sion

/s fo

r clie

nts

bein

g do

ne

by th

e or

gani

zatio

n (e

.g. W

omen

’s E

cono

mic

E

mpo

wer

men

t, G

ende

r and

Jus

tice,

Gen

der a

nd

Clim

ate

Cha

nge)

.

Title

of

Org

aniz

atio

nal/

Sec

tor-

Spe

cific

C

apac

ity

Dev

elop

men

t P

rogr

am o

n G

AD

Par

ticip

ants

Pur

pose

Atta

ch a

ctiv

ity re

ports

and

/or d

ocum

enta

tion

of th

e se

ctor

-spe

cific

cap

acity

dev

elop

men

t se

ssio

ns c

ondu

cted

.

4.3

Doe

s th

e or

gani

zatio

n re

gula

rly

appl

y ge

nder

ana

lysi

s (G

A) t

ools

to a

sses

s ge

nder

-res

pons

iven

ess

of p

rogr

ams/

activ

ities

/ pr

ojec

ts (P

AP

s)?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,

0.5,

and

1)

GA

D to

ols

not

appl

ied

to a

sses

s PA

Ps

GA

D to

ols

used

to

ass

ess

gend

er-

resp

onsi

vene

ss o

f 1-

2 P

AP

s

GA

D to

ols

used

to

ass

ess

gend

er-

resp

onsi

vene

ss o

f 3

or m

ore

PAP

s

List

dow

n P

rogr

ams/

Act

iviti

es/P

roje

cts

(PA

Ps)

as

sess

ed a

nd li

st o

f gen

der a

naly

sis

(GA

) too

ls

regu

larly

app

lied

by th

e or

gani

zatio

n.

GA

Tool

s A

pplie

dPA

P A

sses

sed

Res

ults

of

App

licat

ion


4.4

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

deve

lope

d a

sust

aina

bilit

y ac

tion

plan

for i

ts G

AD

PA

Ps?

(p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re

0,0.

5, a

nd 1

)

No

sust

aina

bilit

y ac

tion

plan

on

GA

D

PAP

s fo

rmul

ated

Dra

ft su

stai

nabi

lity

actio

n pl

an o

n G

AD

PA

Ps

form

ulat

ed

Sus

tain

abili

ty a

ctio

n pl

an o

n G

AD

PA

Ps

form

ulat

ed a

nd

appr

oved

Atta

ch d

raft

or a

ppro

ved

sust

aina

bilit

y ac

tion

plan

on

GA

D P

AP

s of

the

orga

niza

tion.

4.5

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

cond

ucte

d im

pact

eva

luat

ion

of it

s G

AD

PA

Ps?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,0

.5, a

nd

1)

Gen

der i

mpa

ct

asse

ssm

ent n

ot y

et

cond

ucte

d

Impa

ct a

sses

smen

t of

GA

D P

AP

s on

-go

ing

Impa

ct a

sses

smen

t of

GA

D P

AP

s co

mpl

eted

and

re

porte

d

Atta

ch a

cop

y of

Gen

der I

mpa

ct A

sses

smen

t R

epor

t of t

he o

rgan

izat

ion’

s G

AD

PA

Ps.

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

4 P

APs

)

5.

Mod

el P

APs

(max

sco

re: 5

; for

eac

h ite

m o

r que

stio

n: 1

.25)

5.1

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

been

re

cogn

ized

as

a G

AD

le

arni

ng h

ub fo

r its

no

tabl

e G

AD

PA

Ps?

(p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.

62 a

nd 1

.25)

Org

aniz

atio

n is

stil

l de

velo

ping

not

able

G

AD

PA

Ps

Org

aniz

atio

n ha

s be

en re

cogn

ized

as

a le

arni

ng h

ub b

ut

GA

D P

AP

s ar

e no

t ye

t rep

licat

ed

Org

aniz

atio

n ha

s be

en re

cogn

ized

as

a le

arni

ng h

ub a

nd

its G

AD

PA

Ps

are

repl

icat

ed b

y ot

her

orga

niza

tions

List

dow

n aw

ards

/cita

tions

/reco

gniti

ons/

nom

inat

ions

rece

ived

.

GA

D

Pro

gram

/A

ctiv

ity/

Pro

ject

R

ecog

nize

d

Awar

d/C

itatio

n R

ecei

ved

Year

If no

min

ated

/cite

d/ce

rtifie

d, k

indl

y at

tach

ph

otoc

opy

of c

ertifi

cate

/reco

gniti

on re

ceiv

ed a

nd

incl

ude

pres

s re

leas

es, p

hoto

s, a

nd d

ocum

ente

d te

stim

onie

s, if

app

licab

le.


4.4

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

deve

lope

d a

sust

aina

bilit

y ac

tion

plan

for i

ts G

AD

PA

Ps?

(p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re

0,0.

5, a

nd 1

)

No

sust

aina

bilit

y ac

tion

plan

on

GA

D

PAP

s fo

rmul

ated

Dra

ft su

stai

nabi

lity

actio

n pl

an o

n G

AD

PA

Ps

form

ulat

ed

Sus

tain

abili

ty a

ctio

n pl

an o

n G

AD

PA

Ps

form

ulat

ed a

nd

appr

oved

Atta

ch d

raft

or a

ppro

ved

sust

aina

bilit

y ac

tion

plan

on

GA

D P

AP

s of

the

orga

niza

tion.

4.5

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

cond

ucte

d im

pact

eva

luat

ion

of it

s G

AD

PA

Ps?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,0

.5, a

nd

1)

Gen

der i

mpa

ct

asse

ssm

ent n

ot y

et

cond

ucte

d

Impa

ct a

sses

smen

t of

GA

D P

AP

s on

-go

ing

Impa

ct a

sses

smen

t of

GA

D P

AP

s co

mpl

eted

and

re

porte

d

Atta

ch a

cop

y of

Gen

der I

mpa

ct A

sses

smen

t R

epor

t of t

he o

rgan

izat

ion’

s G

AD

PA

Ps.

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

4 P

APs

)

5.

Mod

el P

APs

(max

sco

re: 5

; for

eac

h ite

m o

r que

stio

n: 1

.25)

5.1

Has

the

orga

niza

tion

been

re

cogn

ized

as

a G

AD

le

arni

ng h

ub fo

r its

no

tabl

e G

AD

PA

Ps?

(p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.

62 a

nd 1

.25)

Org

aniz

atio

n is

stil

l de

velo

ping

not

able

G

AD

PA

Ps

Org

aniz

atio

n ha

s be

en re

cogn

ized

as

a le

arni

ng h

ub b

ut

GA

D P

AP

s ar

e no

t ye

t rep

licat

ed

Org

aniz

atio

n ha

s be

en re

cogn

ized

as

a le

arni

ng h

ub a

nd

its G

AD

PA

Ps

are

repl

icat

ed b

y ot

her

orga

niza

tions

List

dow

n aw

ards

/cita

tions

/reco

gniti

ons/

nom

inat

ions

rece

ived

.

GA

D

Pro

gram

/A

ctiv

ity/

Pro

ject

R

ecog

nize

d

Awar

d/C

itatio

n R

ecei

ved

Year

If no

min

ated

/cite

d/ce

rtifie

d, k

indl

y at

tach

ph

otoc

opy

of c

ertifi

cate

/reco

gniti

on re

ceiv

ed a

nd

incl

ude

pres

s re

leas

es, p

hoto

s, a

nd d

ocum

ente

d te

stim

onie

s, if

app

licab

le.

5.2

Has

the

orga

niza

tion’

s pa

rtner

ship

with

st

akeh

olde

rs re

sulte

d in

a

conv

erge

nce

mod

el

that

is re

cogn

ized

an

d re

plic

ated

by

othe

r org

aniz

atio

ns?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,

0.62

and

1.2

5)

No

conv

erge

nce

mod

el re

sulti

ng fr

om

partn

ersh

ip

Con

verg

ence

mod

el

reco

gniz

ed b

ut n

ot

repl

icat

ed

Con

verg

ence

mod

el

reco

gniz

ed a

nd

repl

icat

ed

Des

crib

e G

AD

con

verg

ence

mod

el th

at re

sulte

d fro

m th

e pa

rtner

ship

and

list

dow

n or

gani

zatio

ns

that

repl

icat

ed it

.

5.3

Has

the

orga

niza

tion’

s K

now

ledg

e P

rodu

cts

(KP

s) a

nd

Info

rmat

ion/

Edu

catio

n/C

omm

unic

atio

n (IE

C) m

ater

ials

on

GA

D b

een

used

by

othe

r org

aniz

atio

ns?

(pos

sibl

e sc

ores

are

0,

0.62

and

1.2

5)

GA

D K

Ps

and

GA

D

IEC

mat

eria

ls n

ot y

et

cite

d as

refe

renc

e by

ot

her o

rgan

izat

ions

GA

D K

Ps

and

GA

D IE

C m

ater

ials

us

ed a

nd c

ited

as

refe

renc

e by

at 1

-2

orga

niza

tions

GA

D K

Ps

and

GA

D IE

C m

ater

ials

us

ed a

nd c

ited

as

refe

renc

e by

3 o

r m

ore

orga

niza

tions

List

dow

n G

AD

KP

s an

d G

AD

Info

rmat

ion/

Edu

catio

n/C

omm

unic

atio

n (IE

C) m

ater

ials

de

velo

ped

and

utili

zed

by th

e or

gani

zatio

n (e

.g.

MC

W m

obile

app

licat

ion,

vid

eos,

bro

chur

es,

etc.

). Type

of

GA

D K

P/

GA

D IE

C

Mat

eria

l

GA

D K

P/

GA

D IE

C

Mat

eria

l D

evel

oped

Org

aniz

a-tio

ns th

at

Util

ized

G

AD

KP

/G

AD

IEC

M

ater

ial

Rem

arks


5.4

Has

the

orga

niza

tion’

s ex

istin

g aw

ard/

ince

ntiv

e sy

stem

be

en in

tegr

ated

with

G

AD

per

spec

tive?

(p

ossi

ble

scor

es a

re 0

, 0.

62 a

nd 1

.25)

Awar

d sy

stem

not

ye

t int

egra

ted

with

G

AD

per

spec

tive

Awar

d sy

stem

be

ing

revi

ewed

for

inte

grat

ion

of G

AD

pe

rspe

ctiv

e

Awar

d/in

cent

ive

syst

em in

tegr

ated

w

ith G

AD

pe

rspe

ctiv

e

Atta

ch c

riter

ia fo

r the

exi

stin

g aw

ard/

ince

ntiv

e sy

stem

inte

grat

ed w

ith G

AD

per

spec

tive

and

prov

ide

list o

f the

aw

arde

es.

Sub-

tota

l GM

EF S

core

(L

evel

5 P

APs

)

TOTA

L G

MEF

SC

OR

E

(PA

Ps)

GMEF SCORESHEETName of Organization Assessed: _________________________________________________________________

Date Administered:______________________________________________________________________________

Inclusive Period of Assessment: __________________________________________________________________

Key Areas Score

Policy

1. Issuance of initial policies on GAD

2. Issuance of policies to mainstream GAD in the organization3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Policies4. Updating and Continuous Enhancement of GAD Policies5. Model GAD Policy


People1. For Establishing GFPS & GAD Champions/Advocates2. For GAD Initiatives & Capacity Development Activities3. For GAD Sponsorship & Related Programs4. GAD Champions as Program Implementers5. GAD Experts

Sub-Total:Level for People:

Enabling Mechanisms1. Setting-up of Essential GAD Mechanisms2. Functional GAD Mechanisms3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Mechanisms4. Advanced GAD Structures and Systems5. Model GAD Structures and Systems

Sub-Total:Level for Enabling Mechanisms:

Programs, Activities and Projects (PAPs)1. Initial Activities to Facilitate GAD Mainstreaming2. Establishing Commitment towards GAD Mainstreaming3. GAD Application4. GAD Commitment and Institutionalization5. Model PAPs

Sub-Total:Level for PAPs:

TOTAL SCOREOver-all Level:


2 GMEF Scoresheet

Level Per Entry Point

RANGES LEVEL DESCRIPTION0-7.99 points 1: Foundation Formation8-14.99 points 2: Installation of Strategic Mechanisms15-19.99 points 3: GAD Application20-23.99 points 4: Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization24-25 points 5: Replication and Innovation

Over-all Level

RANGES LEVEL DESCRIPTION0-30.99 points 1: Foundation Formation31-60.99 points 2: Installation of Strategic Mechanisms61-80.99 points 3: GAD Application81-95.99 points 4: Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization96-100 points 5: Replication and Innovation

Date post:	24-Apr-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times

Final Folder Approved - CMYK toolkit final.pdf · GAD perspective integrated in all areas of the...

Documents