+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Final OM -I

Final OM -I

Date post: 06-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: anuvrat-lakra
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 19

Transcript
  • 8/3/2019 Final OM -I

    1/19

    BMW: THE DIGITALCAR PROJECT

    Group 4

  • 8/3/2019 Final OM -I

    2/19

    History of BMW

    Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (BMW)(English: Bavarian Motor Works) is a Germanautomobile, motorcycle and engine manufacturingcompany founded in 1916.

    It also owns and produces the Mini marque, and isthe parent company of Rolls-Royce Motor Cars.

    BMW produces motorcycles under BMWMotorrad and Husqvarna brands.

    In 2010, the BMW group produced 1,481,253automobiles and 112,271 motorcycles across allits brands.

  • 8/3/2019 Final OM -I

    3/19

    BMW Journey

  • 8/3/2019 Final OM -I

    4/19

    What were the competitive challenges in theAutomotive industry when the case was written?

    From the Consumer point of view: By the Mid-1990s the Automobile market had become Consumerdriven.

    Fickle consumer tastes: The predictability made thecompetitive environment harder to predict.

    Competitors: The competition was strong among US,Japanese , Korean and German Car makers.

    Competition was strongest between MercedesBenz and BMW.

    Product development cycle had become animportant factor to leverage competition.

  • 8/3/2019 Final OM -I

    5/19

    How is BMW affected?

    Running in profits but had slower productdevelopment cycles.

    It was decided to reduce the Product

    development cycle time by 50% and theproject was named as Digital Car Project .

    Hard negotiations with the designers,

    engineers, and Middle-level managers. Risk of the New method failing.

  • 8/3/2019 Final OM -I

    6/19

    Question 2

    How would you evaluate the productdevelopment process at BMW?

    Why does the senior management want to

    reengineer the product development process?

  • 8/3/2019 Final OM -I

    7/19

    The product developmentprocess Typically a 5 year cycle- involving development of

    package and the skin.

    Emphasis on intricate designing.

    Designers handpicked from art schools and otherindustrial design schools.

    Modelers were those who had prior experience inthe field and had mastered the art.

  • 8/3/2019 Final OM -I

    8/19

    Design process

    The first part included creation of handsketched designs from pencil, charcoal orwater colors.

    1922 model by Paul Jaray

  • 8/3/2019 Final OM -I

    9/19

    Clay Models

    After the paper designs the company createdclay models of the size of 1:2.5 for betterunderstanding the design.

  • 8/3/2019 Final OM -I

    10/19

    Clay Models

    A final choice of design was made afterdiscussing on the basis of feedback received.A few life size clay models were made to

    choose from.

  • 8/3/2019 Final OM -I

    11/19

    Digitization of models

    Digital sensors were used to digitize data onthe models to be used for computer aideddesign process.

    The digitization would help in speeding uprefinements in the design process itself.

    BMW relied heavily on handcraftsmanship.They considered it as a reason for theirsuperior designs ultimately leading to successover competitors.

  • 8/3/2019 Final OM -I

    12/19

    Evolution of product developmentprocess

    The number of prototyping cycles was reducedto 2.

    The help of computer based processesensured that parallel processing of informationcould be done.

    Identification of potential problems could bedone much earlier in the developmentschedule.

  • 8/3/2019 Final OM -I

    13/19

    Evaluating the product developmentprocess

    Superior handcraftsmanship demanded extratime which could prove to be hazardous.

    Market demand was changing and peoplewanted new models at a faster rate thanbefore.

    Japanese and US competitors were workinghard to reduce lead time in order to better suitthe customer needs.

  • 8/3/2019 Final OM -I

    14/19

    Evaluating the product developmentprocess

    BMW had typically high fixed costs.

    The number of units produced of the samemodel were less and they relied on cashingtheir models for a longer period of time.

    Extending current process could meanreduction in sales and an inability in recoveringhigh costs.

  • 8/3/2019 Final OM -I

    15/19

    Reengineer the product developmentprocess

    Reengineering aimed at reducing the productdevelopment time by 50%.

    They aimed at streamlining their existing

    engineering processes.

    Computer aided simulations to be implementedright up to the brainstorming stage.

    The actual number of prototypes generated werehigher.

  • 8/3/2019 Final OM -I

    16/19

    Question 3

    What are the risks if BMW changes its product

    development process quickly? What are therisks of changing too slowly?

  • 8/3/2019 Final OM -I

    17/19

    Risk: BMW changes its productdevelopment process quickly

    Holding back data

    One generation of prototypes might besufficient to identify all potential design

    problems Employee dissatisfaction

    Barrier to Creativity

    Time Management

  • 8/3/2019 Final OM -I

    18/19

    Risk: BMW changes its productdevelopment process slowly

    Delay in time to market

    Giving competitive advantage to others

    Losing market share to competitors

  • 8/3/2019 Final OM -I

    19/19

    Q4: How to implement New DevelopmentProcess

    Derivative 3 series project or flagship 7 seriesproject? BMW should go follow more conservative approach

    and use derivative 3 series project for implementingNDP BMW management is not familiar with the new process

    and structure of the organization may not be prepared tosupport the new process

    Changing rapidly can result in compromise in quality forspeed of production, quality product is BMWs USP

    Change is not absolutely critical as revenues aregrowing

    After gaining experience and learning frommistakes the should im lement the rocess


Recommended