Date post: | 29-Mar-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | harley-arch |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Find The Better Way
Strengthen IVR Self-Service
MTA Conference
May 10, 2005
2
Premise
Strengthen IVR Self-Service – What does it mean?
After attending this seminar you will have an understanding of how to reduce cost to serve and enhance customer experience on your IVR platform.
3
Customer Contact Has Changed
The Internet and Cell Phones have created
a more savvy customer wanting instant
information.
Customers require “any time access”.
Customers demand contact options.
The Customer Experience is a strategic differentiator regardless of channel.
4
True or False?
“92% of all customer transactions happen over the phone.”
Gartner, CRM Today 2004
TRUE!
5
Self-Service
Order online
Banking at ATMs/ Kiosks
Self check out lanes
Turbo Tax!
Travel Reservations
Photo Development
Self-Service is a customer’s expectation.
6
Options
Does providing self-service take away from a customer’s desire to interact with a human being?
Can organizations predict when a customer will chose self-service over live help?
What effect does it have on your customer relationship to provide a communication choice?
Providing service options empowers your customer.
?
7
Key Points –
The phone is the most chosen communication
channel for contacting organizations today.
Self-Service needs to be an option for customers.
Providing options empowers customers and enhances their service experience.
8
How is this relevant?
IVR plays a very critical role in providing service to your customers.
Customers’ experience on the IVR influences their perception of an organization.
The IVR is a customer communications channel - a touch-point for your organization.
9
The IVR has Proven Value to Businesses
Consistent Service Delivery Provides consistency unless programmed otherwise
Media Channel Branding opportunity through hold music, voice talent, etc.
Contact Center Support Provides operational efficiencies for the Contact Center
Customer Relationship Information
Utilizes customer data
(pulls, gathers, & validates)
Not all organizations recognize the value of the IVR.
10
Why is this happening?
Executive Direction
$$$ invested elsewhere
Little visibility to ROI
11
Critical IVR Measurements
Customer Experience
Utilization
Usability
Cost to Serve
12
Cost to Serve
Datamonitor
Forrester Research SearchCRM
Annual Call Volume 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Agent Cost per Call 13.00$ 13.00$ 13.00$ 13.00$ 13.00$ 13.00$ 13.00$ 13.00$ 13.00$ 13.00$ 13.00$ IVR Cost per Call 1.10$ 1.10$ 1.10$ 1.10$ 1.10$ 1.10$ 1.10$ 1.10$ 1.10$ 1.10$ 1.10$ Agent Handling Ratio 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%IVR Utilization 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%Annual Agent Cost -$ 1,300,000$ 2,600,000$ 3,900,000$ 5,200,000$ 6,500,000$ 7,800,000$ 9,100,000$ 10,400,000$ 11,700,000$ 13,000,000$ Annual IVR Cost 1,100,000$ 990,000$ 880,000$ 770,000$ 660,000$ 550,000$ 440,000$ 330,000$ 220,000$ 110,000$ -$
Total Cost to Serve 1,100,000$ 2,290,000$ 3,480,000$ 4,670,000$ 5,860,000$ 7,050,000$ 8,240,000$ 9,430,000$ 10,620,000$ 11,810,000$ 13,000,000$
Agent Handling Ratio 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%Cost to Serve 1,100,000$ 2,290,000$ 3,480,000$ 4,670,000$ 5,860,000$ 7,050,000$ 8,240,000$ 9,430,000$ 10,620,000$ 11,810,000$ 13,000,000$
Value of 10% Improvement 1,190,000$ Value of 1% Improvement 119,000$
Annual Call Volume 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Agent Cost per Call 6.17$ 6.17$ 6.17$ 6.17$ 6.17$ 6.17$ 6.17$ 6.17$ 6.17$ 6.17$ 6.17$ IVR Cost per Call 2.00$ 2.00$ 2.00$ 2.00$ 2.00$ 2.00$ 2.00$ 2.00$ 2.00$ 2.00$ 2.00$ Agent Handling Ratio 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%IVR Utilization 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%Annual Agent Cost -$ 617,000$ 1,234,000$ 1,851,000$ 2,468,000$ 3,085,000$ 3,702,000$ 4,319,000$ 4,936,000$ 5,553,000$ 6,170,000$ Annual IVR Cost 2,000,000$ 1,800,000$ 1,600,000$ 1,400,000$ 1,200,000$ 1,000,000$ 800,000$ 600,000$ 400,000$ 200,000$ -$
Total Cost to Serve 2,000,000$ 2,417,000$ 2,834,000$ 3,251,000$ 3,668,000$ 4,085,000$ 4,502,000$ 4,919,000$ 5,336,000$ 5,753,000$ 6,170,000$
Agent Handling Ratio 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%Cost to Serve 2,000,000$ 2,417,000$ 2,834,000$ 3,251,000$ 3,668,000$ 4,085,000$ 4,502,000$ 4,919,000$ 5,336,000$ 5,753,000$ 6,170,000$
Value of 10% Improvement 417,000$ Value of 1% Improvement 41,700$
13
IVR Deployment – Lessons Learned
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
More Customer Input & Feedback
Keep Design Simple
Better Promo of IVR
Keep Current with Technology
Ascent Group
14
How do some organizations gather feedback?
Installed surveys on the IVR
Focus Groups
Usability Labs
Wizard of Oz
Others?
15
Utilizes 500+ participants providing statistically significant data.
Provides recorded surveyed calls made on the IVR that can be accessed via the web.
Establishes key performance indicators (KPIs) by providing a baseline and ongoing measurements.
Meets Marketing Department research demands of specific demographic / geographic participants.
Provides detailed and summarized results that can be grouped as desired.
Identifies statistically reliable and relevant IVR process improvement opportunities to enhance usability.
Measures all communication channels
A Singular Approach
16
The Method
SetupDetermine study
participantsDevelop scripts and instructions
(within data parameters)
Determine channel and identify
processes within it
Select a process to study
Create study questionnaire
Measure Capture and catalog study
results
Consolidate resultsConduct study Capture and catalog call recordings
Produce baseline metrics report
Evaluate Results,Develop Recommendations
Prepare recommendations
Review and prioritize
recommendations
Analyze study results
Identify gaps and opportunities
Develop Go Forward Plans
Develop business case
Develop high level project plans
3-6
Weeks
ValidateRepeat Measure Compare to
Baseline Determine ROI
ImplementDevelop
Requirements Design Construct Implement
17
Real Results
Organizations working with this process and methodology realized the following results:
(upon implementation of recommendations)
10% increase in one call resolution
22% increase in the usability of an IVR call flow
13% increase in overall IVR utilization
18
In Summary
Provides clear path and action plan to implement improvements to:
– Enhance customer facing processes and procedures
– Reduce cost to serve through increasing utilization & usability
– Increase customer satisfaction
Defines benchmarking strategy and methods
Establishes operational performance baseline for continuous improvement
19
Recognized Business Drivers
Strategic Cost to Serve Customers is high Customer/Client Retention New Service / Product Launch Relationship of Performance Standards to Marketplace
– Competition
– Six Sigma / Other quality review
Operational Increase in Call Volume Change in Technology / Infrastructure support Change to Contact Center staffing Customer Service provided across multiple channels
- Branding
- Process Enhancements
20
Case Study #1Industry: InsuranceApplication: Speech-Based Policy Information
The client was building a new speech-based application for providing automated policy information to consumers. The client desired to measure the performance of the application and provide benchmarking as the final step before full deployment. The application was evaluated using 500 panelists selected from the client’s customer demographic profile.
MeasureThe initial evaluation found that the performance of the application was poor:
– 25% of callers reported the application was hard to use– 17% reported unable to find the needed information to complete the assigned process– 56% cited poor recognition of entered application commands– 41% claimed a high degree of dissatisfaction with the application, and 29% reported it was the worst speech
application they'd ever used. – 31% of the callers could not complete the assigned process in the first attempt causing them to call back to
complete the process or give up.
Engineer & ImplementUsing the data and call recordings collected during the study, a number of specific issues were identified and fixed including prompting, error handling, and menu options.
ValidateOnce the determined changes were implemented the Measure phase was repeated. 6% of callers reported the application was hard to use versus 25%. Only 7% of callers were unable to find the information they needed to complete the assigned process. Overall customer satisfaction increased significantly as 81% of callers were able to complete the assigned process in a single call reducing the cost to serve.
21
Case Study #1 Continued
Cost Savings
The revised application resulted in much lower operational expenses than the original design, due to the significant improvement in callers’ ability to get the information they needed without talking to an agent or calling back.
Initial
Application
Revised
Application
Assumed Calls/Month 83,334 83,334Single Call Completion in 69% 81%Assumed Cost/Call (automated) 2.00$ 2.00$ Assumed Cost/Call (live agent) 6.17$ 6.17$ Cost/Month to Automated IVR 115,001.00$ 135,001.00$ Cost/Month to Live Agents 159,393.00$ 97,692.00$ Total Cost/Month 274,394.00$ 232,693.00$ Monthly Savings 41,701.00$
Over half a million $’s annually in cost reduction
Forrester Research SearchCRM.com
22
Thank You
Find The Better Way
for your organization to succeed, contact
Sue Fairchild
612.743.7810
23
What is the Marketplace Saying?
“…most industries in the past couple of years have switched to self service…The bottom line is reduced costs, increased efficiency and productivity. But the other driving force – the one that will cause companies to fine tune their deployments – is customer demand for self-service.”“The Self-Service Movement” Peppers & Rogers Group, July 2004
“Given the history of the technology (IVR) and its potential, companies hoping to reap the benefits of IVR must understand that the customer experience is everything…“The Customer Experience is It!” The Ascent Group, Inc. 2003
“Best in Class firms invest more heavily in customer-facing capabilities (Alerting, Self-Service, Case Management, IVR, Chat), while Industry Norm and Laggard companies invest more heavily in agent-facing capabilities (e-learning, recording / monitoring).”“Proactive Service The Next-Generation Contact Center” Aberdeen Group December, 2004
“Metrics will change focus from operational efficiency to customer effectiveness as customer service becomes a strategic function at the business level and starts to be counted as a revenue center, rather then a cost center.” Gartner, 2004