Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits
Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic)
Authors Esser, Alan James, 1946-
Publisher The University of Arizona.
Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this materialis made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona.Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such aspublic display or performance) of protected items is prohibitedexcept with permission of the author.
Download date 13/08/2021 15:36:07
Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/554718
FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF SHALLOW
BURIED RIGID CONDUITS
by
Alan James E sse r
A T hesis Submitted to th e Faculty of the
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MECHANICS
In P ar tia l Fulfillm ent of the Requirements . For the D egree of
MASTER OF SCIENCE WITH A MAJOR IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
In the G raduate C ollege
THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
1 9 7 4
STATEMENT BY AUTHOR
This th e s i s h as been subm itted in partia l fu lfillm ent of re quirem ents for an advanced degree at The U niversity of Arizona and is d ep o s ited in the U niversity Library to be made av a ilab le to borrowers under ru les of the Library.
Brief quo ta tions from th is th e s is are a llow able w ithout sp e c ia l p e rm iss io n , provided th a t accu ra te acknowledgm ent of source is m a d e . R equests for perm iss ion for ex tended quotation from or reproduction of th is m anuscrip t in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major departm ent or the Dean of the G raduate C ollege when in h is ju d g ment the proposed use of the m ateria l is in the in te re s ts of sch o la r sh ip . In a ll o ther in s ta n c e s , how ever, perm iss ion m ust be obta ined from the au thor.
SIGNED:
APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR
This th e s i s h a s been approved on the date shown below:
iLPH M . 'RICHARD P rofessor of C iv il Engineering
and Engineering M echan ics
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I w ish to e x p re ss my g ra titude to my re se a rc h d irec to r . Prof.
Ralph M. Richard, for h is encouragem ent, a s s i s t a n c e , and gu idance dur
ing th is r e se a rc h and throughout my g radua te s tu d ie s . In add it ion , I
ex p re ss my a p p rec ia t io n to Prof. Robert L. Sogge for h is support and
advice and p a r t ic u la r ly for h is g en e ro s i ty in providing the com puter p ro
grams u se d in th is s tu d y . Thanks are ex tended to Prof. H a s s a n A. Su ltan
for h is h e lp fu l su g g e s t io n s and for serv ing as an ad d it io n a l member of
the exam ining com m ittee .
S p ec ia l th an k s are e x p re sse d to my w ife , Sandra Rae, for her
p a t ie n c e and encouragem ent and for h e r a s s i s ta n c e during the p repara
t io n of th is m an u sc rip t .
i l l
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v
ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v i
1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2 . LITERATURE SURVEY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
C urren t D e s ig n P rac tice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6Proposed D es ig n M ethods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Ring C om press ion M ethod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.B alanced D es ig n M ethod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3 . RESEARCH TOOLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Program SSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12Program F e a tu r e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12Program M odifica tion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
F in i te -e le m e n t M odels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15V erifica tion of M odels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
4 . DISCUSSION OF RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
P ar tia l D is tr ib u ted Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23C o n cen tra ted Loads and In fluence C harts . . . . . . . . . . . . 30In te rface Slip . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
4 . CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Recomm endations for Further Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
APPENDIX A: CHARTS AND DATA FOR MOMENTINFLUENCE COEFFICIENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
APPENDIX B: CHARTS AND DATA FOR NORMAL FORCEINFLUENCE COEFFICIENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
APPENDIX C: NOTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
iv
LIST,OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure Page
1 „ Region Inc luded in the A nalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2 . F in i te -e le m e n t Id e a l iz a t io n for Grid 1 and Grid 2 . . . . . . . . 16
3 . P a r tia l F in i te -e le m e n t Id e a l iz a t io n for G rid 3 and Grid 4 ... .. 19
4 . ' Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 1 to 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
5 . Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 5 to 8 . i . . . . . . . . . . 25
6. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 1 to 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
7. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 5 to 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
8. Moment Variation for Various Loading C onditions . . . . . . . . 29
9 . D iam etric Change for Various Loading C o n d it io n s . . . . . . . . 29
10. Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 9 to 12 . . . . . . . . . . . 31
11. Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 13 to 16 . . . . . . . . . . 32
12. Bending M oments for Loading C a s e s 17 to 20 . . . . . . . . . . 33
13. Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 21 to 24 . . . . . . . . . . 34
14. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 9 to 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
15. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 13 to 16 . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
16. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 17 to 20 . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
17. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 21 to 24 . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
18. In te rp o la tio n of C o eff ic ien ts for S t if fn esses Not G ivenin In fluence C h a r t s . ................... 41
19. Some C a s e s for A nalysis by In fluence C harts ................ 43
20. Effect of In te rface Slip on Bending M o m e n t s ................. 47
21. Effect of In te rface Slip on Normal F o r c e s ................. 48
v
ABSTRACT
F in i te -e le m e n t a n a ly s is u s ing e la s t ic m ate ria l p ropert ies is
u se d to ev a lu a te the e f fec t of l ive loads on shallow r ig id condu its „ It
i s shown th a t the a ssu m p tio n th a t l ive lo ad s are uniformly d is tr ib u ted
oyer the su rface w ill u n d eres tim a te the moments and o v eres t im a te the
normal fo rces in the in c lu s io n for p a r t ia l loading cond it ions „
Extending the in fluence line c o n c e p t , a c o l le c t io n of in fluence
c h a r ts is deve loped for th e d a ta o b ta ined from the f in i te -e le m e n t a n a ly
s i s . U sing the c h a r t s , nondim ensional bending moment and normal force
in fluence c o e f f ic ie n ts c a n be determ ined for any su rface lo a d in g . The
in fluence ch a r ts may be app lied d irec tly to the b a lan ced d es ig n method
and .a re a v a lu ab le ad ju n c t to th is p rocedure .
N either of the assu m p tio n s u se d in e la s t i c s o lu t io n s , full
s l ip p ag e or no s l ip p a g e , is s e e n to h av e any p a r t ic u la r advantage in
es tim a tin g the bending moments and normal forces for shallow buried
rig id c o n d u i t s .
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Today the trend is toward g rea te r concern for the e s th e t ic and
environm enta l qua lity of our u t i l i ty and t ra n sp o r ta t io n s y s t e m s . The
an tiq u a ted com bined sew er sy s tem s of many large c i t i e s are being s y s
te m a tic a l ly r e p l a c e d . The buried s truc tu re is rece iv ing more a t ten t io n
a s an a l te rn a t iv e to the som etim es u n s ig h tly appearan ce of overhead
and g ro u n d -lev e l u t i l i ty i n s t a l l a t i o n s .
The s o i l - c u lv e r t system is one of the more im portant of th e se
underground i n s t a l l a t i o n s . Large sums of money are being in v e s te d in
cu lv e r t in s ta l la t io n s each y e a r . Due to the m agnitude of th e se expen
d itu res any u n n e c e s sa ry c o n se rv a t ism in des ign ing a s o i l - c u lv e r t s y s
tem should be s e r io u s ly q u e s t io n e d .
Current d e s ig n p ra c t ic e does not provide for a r e a l i s t i c a s s e s s
ment of the sa fe ty and re l ia b i l i ty o f buried cu lv e r ts under an assum ed
loading c o n d it io n . The m ost commonly u sed d e s ig n te c h n iq u e s are la rg e
ly em p ir ica l . The s e le c t io n of co n d u its is b a se d on y ea rs of experience
and the o b se rv a tio n of the perform ance of in - s e rv ic e c u l v e r t s . A g rea t
d e a l of re se a rc h h a s b een done in the p a s t s ev e ra l y ea rs ; how ever,>-
l i t t le of th is know ledge h a s found i ts way into eng ineering p r a c t i c e .
This is due to the d e f in it io n of-cu lvert supporting s treng th and to the
fa c t th a t too l i t t le is known of the e x a c t nature of the load ing and the
r e su l ta n t s t r e s s e s d eve loped in the sy s te m .
2
The r e s u l t s of th is w ork , u sed in co n ju n c tio n with the d e s ig n
p rocedures d e sc r ib e d in a la te r c h a p te r , provide an im portant s tep toward
m aking an a c c u ra te ev a lu a t io n of cu lv e r t sa fe ty p o s s ib le .
The em pirica l d e s ig n p ro ced u res u sed today hav e been made
n e c e s s a r y by th e com plex ity of the s o i l - c u lv e r t sy s te m . Soil p roperties
are non lin ea r and s t r e s s d ep en d en t. They are a ffec ted by the tim e-
dependen t p re se n c e of pore w ate r , and many are s e n s i t iv e .to d is tu rb an ce
by o u ts id e fo rc e s . The system is c h a ra c te r iz e d by a high degree of in
de te rm in an cy . In ad d it io n , boundary cond it ions in troduced when lim iting
th e e x te n t of the system to be an a ly zed a s w ell as in te rface p roperties
b e tw een the so i l and the cu lv e r t are h igh ly com plex .
The follow ing assu m p tio n s are made:
1 . Only sha llow buried condu its are co n s id e re d . For pu rposes of
th is s tudy a sha llow co n d u it sh a l l be one buried a t a depth of
one d iam e te r .
2 . In the developm ent of the in f lu en ce ch a r ts in C hap te r 4, no s lip
i s a llow ed a t the s o i l - c u lv e r t in te r fa c e . P a r tia l and full s lip a t
th e in te rface are t re a ted s e p a ra te ly .
3 . A nalys is i s lim ited to r ig id s tru c tu res ; th u s , buckling is not a
c o n s id e ra t io n .
4 . The so il medium, is a s s ig n e d l in e a r e la s t ic hom ogeneous prop
e r t i e s , and the p re se n c e of w ate r is e x c lu d e d .
5 . The a c tu a l th re e -d im e n s io n a l system is t re a te d as a tw o-
d im ensiona l p lan e s tra in problem . The p lane c o n s id e red is
ta k e n p e rp en d icu la r to the long itud ina l ax is of the condu it .
6 . W eigh t of the so il medium is n e g le c te d .
The follow ing s ign conven tion is adhered to throughout th is
th e s i s . P os it iv e bending moments produce te n s io n on the ou te r su rface
o f the condu it w a l l . T en s ile normal fo rces in the condu it w a ll are p o s i
t iv e . The X -coord inate d ire c t io n is p o s i t iv e to the r ig h t , the Y-
co o rd in a te d ire c t io n i s p o s i t iv e downward, and the o r ig in is tak en a t the
ce n te r of the co n d u it . The angle 9 u sed to lo ca te po in ts along the c i r
cum ference of the condu it is m easured in the co u n te rc lo ck w ise d ire c t io n
from the p o s i t iv e X a x is .
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE SURVEY
The shallow buried condu it is of in te re s t a s a d e s ig n problem
in i t s own r ight and as an in te rm ed ia te c a s e which o ccu rs during the
ea r ly c o n s tru c t io n p h a s e s of d eep er c o n d u i t s . In both c a s e s of shallow
co n d u its > the live lo ad s c o n s t i tu te the m ost s ig n if ican t loads app lied to
the s y s te m . In i t ia l s t r e s s e s due to th e so il f il l are u s u a lly su ff ic ien tly
sm all to be n e g le c te d . Of th e re se a rc h th a t h a s been under taken , su r
p r is in g ly l i t t le h a s b een devo ted to th is s p e c ia l c a s e .
An e x te n s iv e s ta te of the art e v a lu a t io n of p ipe cu lver t t e c h
nology h a s b e e n g iven by K r iz e k e ta l . (1971). The report o r ig ina ted as
an effort to develop new d e s ig n p r o c e d u re s . H ow ever, there was not
su ff ic ie n t inform ation a v a i la b le to develop a com ple te ly new d es ig n p ro
c e d u re . Severa l recom m endations were m a d e .
The M ars to n -S p an g le r theory for determ ining lo ad s due to the
so il prism above the condu it h a s b een p re se n te d by Spangler and Handy
(1973). According to th is theory , the loads developed on buried condu its
are dependen t on the re la t iv e se tt le m e n t of the so il prism above the c o n
duit with re s p e c t to the surrounding s o i l , c h a ra c te r is t ic s of the i n s t a l l a
t io n , w eigh t and h e ig h t of the so il prism above the c o n d u it , and the
fr ic t ion deve loped b e tw een the so il prism above the co n d u it and the s u r
rounding m edium . The e ffec t of l ive lo ad s is b a se d on the B oussinesq
so lu t io n . They have d is c u s s e d the e f fe c ts of arching and bedding along
4
with various m ethods of determ ining the a v a i la b le supporting s trength o f
c o n d u i t s . They have a lso d e sc r ib e d the " im perfect d itch" te c h n iq u e ,
which is u sed to reduce the v e r t ic a l load th a t m ust be supported by the
c o n d u it . In th is method", a lay e r of lo o se or soft m ate r ia l is in s ta l le d
above the c o n d u it . This in su re s g rea te r re la t iv e se tt lem en t of the so il
prism d irec tly over the co n d u it , the reby genera ting upward f ic tion fo rces
on the s id e s of the prism and reducing the load on the c o n d u i t .
E la s t ic formulas for the s t r e s s e s developed in condu its and the
surrounding medium under the in fluence of a uniformly d is tr ib u ted su rface
load were p roposed by Burns and Richard (1964). The theory is deve loped
for c a s e s of fu ll s lip and no s lip a t the s o i l - s t ru c tu re in t e r f a c e . D e f le c
t io n re la t io n s are a lso g iv en . Very rap id a t ten u a tio n of s t r e s s e s in the
so il medium w as r e p o r te d . T h u s , the th e o r ie s p re se n te d are equally
v a l id for shallow and deep s o i l - c u lv e r t s y s te m s .
D ar and Bates (1974) u sed c l a s s i c a l e la s t i c theory to develop a
s e t of equa tions for s t r e s s e s and deform ation which app ly w ith in the c u l
vert w a lls as w ell as in the surrounding medium. A uniformly d is tr ib u ted
su rface load is a s s u m e d . These r e se a rc h e rs have done an e x ten s iv e a n
a ly s is of cu lv e r t behav io r as a ffec ted by the s t i f fn e ss p ro p ertie s of both
the in c lu s io n and the surrounding so il medium. Except in the v ic in ity
im m ediately a d ja c e n t to th e s o i l - s t ru c tu re in te r fa c e , e x c e l le n t agreem ent
with the r e su l ts of Burns and Richard (1964) were r e p o r te d .
- Abel, M ark, and Richards (1973) reported the re s u l t s of a f in i te -
e lem en t a n a ly s is of the so i l - c u lv e r t system for e l l ip t ic a l p i p e s . Their
work inc luded experim en ta l s tu d ie s us ing p h o to e la s t ic te c h n iq u e s . They
d i s c u s s e d the im portance of s lip and s truc tu ra l f le x ib i l i ty in inducing
so il a rch ing in l igh t of the e l l ip t ic a l geom etry; how ever, only the fu l l -
s lip and n o - s l ip c a s e s w ere c o n s id e re d . The use of so ft bedding m ateri
a l w as found to provide no a d v a n ta g e .
An in c rem en ta l c o n s tru c t io n a n a ly s is of the deep buried s o i l -
c u lv e r t sy s tem h a s b een performed by L e r t lak san a (19 73). N onlinear
s o i l p ro p ert ie s and the p re se n c e of pore w ate r in the so il f i l l were c o n
s id e red „ B ased on the r e s u l t s of h is s tu d y , L e rtlaksana conc luded th a t
th e M ars to n -S p an g 1 er procedure for c a lc u la t in g v e r t ic a l p re s su re s on
r ig id c u lv e r ts y ie ld s c o n se rv a tiv e r e s u l t s . The Iowa d e f le c t io n formula
for computing crow n d e f le c t io n s in f le x ib le condu its w as a lso found to be
ex trem ely c o n se rv a t iv e „
P a r tia l d is tr ib u ted loading con d it io n s for sha llow buried rig id
co n d u its w ere in v e s t ig a te d by Anand (1974). He dem onstra ted th a t the
moments p roduced by a p a r t ia l load in th e v ic in i ty of the condu it are un
d e res t im a ted by the e l a s t i c i ty so lu t io n . The normal fo rces s im ilarly p ro
duced are o v e re s t im a te d . This is a m atter for some c o n ce rn , s ince the
bending moment is the more im portant c o n s id e ra t io n in the d e s ig n of
r ig id c u l v e r t s . F in a l ly , he conc luded th a t the th e o re t ic a l e la s t ic i ty s o lu
t io n is not a p p lic a b le to the sha llow s o i l - c u lv e r t s y s te m . H ow ever, th is
co n c lu s io n i s in co rrec t , a s w ill be show n in C hap ter 4 .
Current D es ig n P rac tice
Except for very large condu its , d e s ig n p ra c t ic e to da te has b een
b a s e d on the M ars to n -S p an g le r th eo r ie s developed during the 1920 's and
1 9 3 0 's . This theory c o n s i s t s of the de term ina tion of to ta l v e r t ic a l loads
assu m ed to a c t on the condu it and a p p lic a t io n of load fac to rs th a t re la te
required lo ad -ca rry in g a b i l i ty to th a t a v a ilab le in m anufactured conduit
s e c t io n s . An appropria te factor of sa fe ty is in c lu d e d .
The to ta l v e r t ic a l earth load Wc ac ting on the condu it is g iven
by
Wc = CiYBj2 (1)
in w h ich 'V is the unit w eight of the fill m a te r ia l , Bj is the horizon ta l
d im ension e ith e r of the d itch at the top of the pipe or the o u ts id e d iam
e te r of the p ipe depending on the method of in s ta l la t io n , and is the
load c o e f f ic ie n t . C i is determ ined from an appropriate ch a r t and is a
function of the geom etry of the s o i l - c u lv e r t sy s tem , the method of in
s ta l la t io n , and the m ate ria l p roperties of both the so il f ill and the
c u lv e r t .
The live load tran sfe rred to the cu lver t Wt is determ ined from
Wt = ( l /£ ) I c C t P (2)
in which ^ is the length of the conduit s e c t io n on which the load is com
p u ted , tak en as the length of a s ing le s e c t io n of p ipe or an e ffec tive
length in the c a s e of very long s e c t io n s , a s with c a s t - i r o n pipe; Ic is
an im pact factor; P is a co n cen tra ted load applied at the f ill surface;
and Cj- is the load c o e f f ic ie n t , b a sed on the B oussinesq th e o ry . The
w eigh t of w ater and the pipe may a lso be added .
The v e r t ic a l p re ssu re d is tr ib u tio n on any ho rizo n ta l p lane below
a co n cen tra ted load is b e l l s h a p e d . As the depth below the surface in
c r e a s e s , the d is tr ib u t io n becom es more uniform. Thus, the assum ption
of a uniform d is tr ib u tio n of live load p re ssu re applied to the conduit is
r e a so n a b le for deep i n s t a l l a t i o n s . H ow ever, for shallow c o n d u its , th is
assum ption ca n y ie ld r e su l ts which are su b s ta n t ia l ly d iffe ren t than the
8
true co n d it io n , p a r t ic u la r ly i f the condu it is large enough th a t s ig n if ic a n t
v a r ia t io n in the p re s su re d is tr ib u t io n w ill o ccu r over the w idth of the
s t ru c tu re .
C onduit s treng th is commonly sp e c if ie d in term s of the D - l o a d .
This is the th re e -e d g e s treng th e x p re s s e d in terms of th e load supported
pe r un it foot of d iam e te r . Using th e D - lo a d a llow s sp e c i f ic a t io n s to be
w ritten in a form th a t is indep en d en t of condu it d ia m e te r . The th re e -e d g e
s treng th is m odified through the u se of load f a c to r s , Lf, tak ing into a c
coun t la te ra l earth p re s s u re s th a t develop in - s i tu and bedding con d it io n s .
The sa fe supporting s treng th of the r ig id conduit i s th en the D -lo ad m ul
t ip l ie d by the d iam eter and a load fac to r d iv ided by an appropria te fac to r
of s a fe ty . A s e c t io n is s e le c te d th a t h a s a safe supporting strength
g re a te r th a n the to ta l ap p lied v e r t ic a l lo a d .
W hile the procedure is c o n v e n ie n t , i t does not provide a d ire c t
re la t io n sh ip be tw een the requ ired s treng th and the sa fe supporting
s t r e n g th . D es ig n by th is method therefo re tends to be very c o n s e rv a t iv e .
P roposed D es ig n M ethods
S evera l r e se a rc h e r s have p roposed a l te rn a t iv e p rocedures for
the d e s ig n of buried c o n d u i ts . Some are simply m od ifica tions of the
M ars to n -S p an g le r m ethods, w hile o thers adopt a fresh approach to the
p ro b le m . Two of th e se a l te rn a t iv e s are p re se n te d in the following d i s
c u s s io n .
Ring C om press ion M ethod
The ring co m p ress io n method p roposed by W atk in s (1966) is
b a se d on the a s s e r t io n th a t the d e s ig n of c irc u la r condu its is con tro lled
by condu it d e fo rm a tio n s . These deform ations fall into two c a te g o r ie s ,
w all c rippling and ring d e f lec t io n , with ad d it iona l co n s id e ra t io n g iven
to hand ling and p lacem en t.
Crippling is con tro lled by lim iting the maximum com press ive
s t r e s s in the conduit w all T/Ac to a va lu e th a t is l e s s th an the ring com
p re s s iv e s trength S by some factor of s a f e t y . T is the co m p ress iv e force
in the condu it w a l l , and Ac is the c r o s s - s e c t io n a l a rea of the w all per
unit of le n g th . For a r ig id so il (friction angle = 90), the ring com p res
s ive strength is eq u iv a len t to Syp, the y ie ld strength of the conduit ma
t e r ia l . For the c a s e of h y d ro s ta t ic so il 0 = 0 ) , the ring com press ive
s trength is e x p re s se d as
S = (l/E) (D /k )2 (3)
where E is the modulus of e la s t i c i ty of the conduit m a te r ia l , D is the d i
am eter, and k is the rad ius of gyra tion of the conduit w all per unit l e n g th .
It is apparen t th a t th is equa tion is of the same form as the Euler column
formula, e x cep t th a t the condu it d iam eter is su b s t i tu te d for the column
le n g th . W atk ins (1966) provided a p lo t of the ring co m p ress io n strength
as a function of the condu it p roperties and the so il f r ic tion a n g le . The
maximum co m p ress iv e s t r e s s in the condu it w all , T/Aq , is determ ined
from a th ru s t fac to r, which is a function of the so il and ring s t i f fn e s s e s
and K, the ra tio of ho r izo n ta l to v e r t ic a l p ressu re in la te ra l ly confined
so il due to a v e r t ic a l so il p re ssu re pv . For a c o n se rv a t iv e d e s ig n , take
K = 1 and the re la t io n sh ip s T = 3 /4 pvD for f lex ib le co n d u its or T = pvD
for rigid co n d u its can be u s e d . For more accu ra te d e s ig n s , v a lu es of the
th ru s t fac tor can be ob ta ined from a p lot provided by W a tk in s .
10
A quick c o n se rv a t iv e e s tim a te of ring d e f lec t io n for f lex ib le
co n d u its is ob ta ined by the c o n se rv a tiv e assum ption th a t the ring d e f le c
tio n fac to r is g iven by A y / D = € # where e is the v e r t ic a l so il s tra in from
a conso lid o m ete r t e s t , and Ay is the v e r t ic a l change in the conduit d iam
e te r . This is the r e s u l t of tak ing K = 0, th a t i s , no la te ra l p ressu re a c ts
on the co n d u it . G rea te r accu racy may be ob ta ined by using the p lot pro
v ided by W a tk in s . Ring d e f lec t io n s for nonflexib le co n d u its are e s t i
mated by applying m odification fac to rs to the ring d e f lec t io n factors for
f lex ib le c o n d u i ts .
B alanced D es ig n M ethod
The b a lan ced d e s ig n method proposed by Allgood and T akahash i
(1972) is b a se d on ring co m p ress io n and e la s t ic th e o ry . The procedure
perm its the c o n s id e ra t io n of a ll s t i f fn e s s e s and g e o m e tr ie s , arching ,
and b ack p ack in g . C o n s id e ra tio n is g iven to a l l modes of fa i lu re , and
p ro v is io n is made for the com putation of fac to rs of sa fe ty for each m ode.
The u se of the D -lo ad s p e c if ic a t io n for the s e le c t io n of the proper c o n
duit is e lim ina ted and the em phas is p la c e d on the more fam iliar approach
of s e le c t in g a s e c t io n b ase d on the requ ired e x te n s io n a l and bending
s t i f f n e s s e s . Using th is method, the d e s ig n e r can a t ta in a d es ired
"b a lan ce" be tw een the fac to rs of s a fe ty of the various fa ilure m odes.
The following is a b rie f summary of the s te p s in th is des ign
p rocedure .
1. Estim ate the arching and c a lc u la te the normal th ru s t in the c o n
duit w all by the modified ring com press ion theory as
N = pv (1 - A) (D/2) (4)
where A is the a rc h in g , pv is the v e r t ic a l s t r e s s a t the crown
e le v a t io n , and D is the mean cy lin d er d iam eter .
2 . C a lc u la te the s t i f fn e s s , El, required by the handling c r i te r ion
^ 0 .0433 (5)
where E is the modulus of e la s t i c i ty of the condu it m ateria l
and I is the moment of in e r t ia per unit l e n g th .
3 . D eterm ine the moment using the th e o re t ic a l e l a s t i c so lu tion as
M = Cmpv (l - A) D2 (6)
where C m is a co e f f ic ie n t dependen t on the so il and conduit
p r o p e r t i e s .
4 . Using e la s t i c fo rm u las , com pute the s t i f fn e ss El required to
r e s i s t the normal force N and bending moment M . Choose the
con tro lling s t i f fn e ss v a lu e .
5. Compute the arching and compare it to the a ssu m ed v a lu e . I t
e ra te over s te p s 1-5 as n e c e s s a r y .
6 . Determ ine conform ance with d e s ig n c r i te r ia and the factors of
sa fe ty for the various p o s s ib le failure m odes. These include
d e f le c t io n , w all c ru sh in g , seam s treng th , and b u c k l in g .
The arching term is inc luded in Eqs. 4 and 6 to co rrec t some of the w eak
n e s s e s of the e la s t i c so lu tion , which does not take into accoun t such
fac to rs as the nonhom ogeneity of the so il medium, non linearity of the
s t r e s s - s t r a i n c h a r a c te r i s t i c s , and the time e f fe c ts . In ad d it io n , the
boundary cond it ions in troduce c o n s tra in ts th a t do not e x i s t in the ac tu a l
in s ta l la t io n . Allgood (19 72) p re sen ted a d e ta iled developm ent of arching
re la ted to buried c y l in d e r s .
The ch a r ts developed in su b seq u en t ch ap te rs are d irec tly a p
p l ic a b le to th is d es ig n method in the de term ination of the normal force
and bending moment.
CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH TOOLS
The com puter program and f in i te -e le m e n t grids u se d in th is
s tudy are the product of a g rea t d ea l of prelim inary in v e s t ig a t io n . Pro
gram SSI w as p repared by Sogge ( n . d . ) . No attem pt i s made here to p re
se n t an ex h au s t iv e a n a ly s is of the f in i te -e le m e n t method or the
developm ent of the p rog ram . H ow ever, a summary of the program docu
m enta tion is p re se n te d . The f in i te -e le m e n t grids are the end re su l t of
se v e ra l r e f in e m e n ts . The prime o b jec t iv e in th e i r developm ent was to
o b ta in a h igh degree of accu racy in the v ic in i ty of the co n d u it .
Program SSI
Program SSI, "S o il-S tru c tu re I n te r a c t io n ," com putes the d i s
p la c e m e n ts , s t r e s s e s , and moments in a f in i te -e le m e n t system com pris
ing so il and s tru c tu ra l e le m e n ts .
Program F ea tu res
The program s y n th e s iz e s and so lv e s the eq u a tio n s for e q u il ib r i
um, force deform ation, and geom etric com patib ili ty for the so i l - s t ru c tu re
continuum id e a l iz e d a s an a s sem b lag e of d isc re te e lem en ts . The m atrix
s t i f fn e ss method is u s e d . This procedure h a s been p re se n te d by Z ien-
k iew icz (1971) and by o ther w o rk e rs . In order to m inim ize s to rage r e
qu irem en ts , a banding tech n iq u e is u se d to store the system equa tions in
12
13
the s t i f fn e ss a r r a y . The eq u a tio n s are th en so lved us ing a banded sym
m etrica l equa tion so lv e r .
For s o i l - s t ru c tu re sy s te m s , two degree o f freedom nodes are
predom inant in the f in i te -e le m e n t id e a l iz a t io n . H ow ever, the system is
u su a l ly an a ly zed assum ing th ree d eg rees of freedom a t each node. Since
th is would be w a s te fu l of com puter s to r a g e , a m odifica tion th a t m akes
u se of a v e c to r of the cum ulative system d eg rees of freedom a t each node
is in c lu d e d . Using th is p ro c e d u re , nu ll d eg rees of freedom are e lim i
n a ted and s to rage is r e se rv e d for th o se d eg rees of freedom th a t are
p r e s e n t .
C o n s tan t s tra in t r ia n g le s (TRIMS) are u se d to model the so il
medium. These e lem ents are programed to include non lin ea r strength
p r o p e r t ie s , as d e sc r ib e d by D uncan and Chang (1970). Elements are
a v a i la b le to s im ula te the s o i l - s t ru c tu re in te rface c h a r a c te r is t ic s . These
e lem en ts are programed to include non lin ea r behav io r , as d esc rib ed by
Clough and D uncan (1971). L inea riza tio n of both the tr ian g u la r and in
te r fa c e e lem ents is accom plished by a s s ig n in g a fa ilu re ra tio va lue
Rf = 0 and in se r t in g a l in e a r va lue of the e la s t i c m o d u lu s . P o is so n 's
ra tio p m ust a lso be s p e c if ie d .
The s truc tu re is id e a l iz e d a s a se r ie s of in te rc o n n ec ted beam
e lem ents w hose m ateria l behavior is approxim ated by a l in ea r s t r e s s -
s tra in r e la t io n . Boundary d isp lace m e n ts of ad jacen t t r ian g u la r and beam
e lem en ts are not c o m p a t ib le , s in ce th e ir d isp lace m e n t p a t te rn s are c h a r
a c te r iz e d by f i r s t - and th ird -o rd e r d isp lace m e n t fu n c t io n s , r e sp e c t iv e ly .
In the lim it, convergence re s u l t s as the m esh s ize i s made f ine r. . For
c o a rse m e s h e s , the so il is s tif fe r th an a c tu a l , re su lt in g in low er mo
m ents in the s t ru c tu re .
Program M odif ica tion
In order to fit the very large system of equa tions re su lt in g from
the f in i te -e le m e n t m esh es u se d in to the av a i lab le com puter c en tra l mem
ory , s e v e ra l m odifica tions of Program SSI were n e c e s s a ry .
.1 . Common arrays, are modified to co n ta in the d a ta .
2 . F ile len g th s are sp e c if ie d to override th o se a s su m ed by the
CDC com puter sy s te m .
3 . Element d a ta are s to red ex te rn a l ly on a tap e f i l e . The order of
en ter ing e lem en t d a ta is not im portan t, s in ce th e order in w hich
the system eq u a tio n s are g en e ra ted is im m aterial as long as
th ey are co rrec t ly s to red .
4 . The portion of the m ain program th a t com putes the v ec to r of
cum ula tive system d eg rees of freedom i s rem oved. These r e
s u l ts are o b ta ined beforehand and are subm itted as d a ta .
5. BAR and STRBAR subrou tines are rem oved. In ad d it io n , the
INFACE and STRESI sub rou tines are rem oved, e x c e p t for th o se
c a s e s w here they are ac tiv e in the a n a ly s is .
6 . Statements, to perform n o n d im ensiona liza tion of th e conduit
moments and normal fo rces are added in subrou tine STRESB.
W ith th e s e m o d if ic a t io n s , more c e n tra l memory is r e se rv e d for the s to r
age of the s t i f fn e ss e q u a t io n s , w hile the in teg rity of the program as a
too l for the a n a ly s is o f non linear so il behav io r i s p re se rv e d .
F in ite -e lem en t M odels
Four f in i te -e le m e n t grids are u sed in the a n a ly s is of the s o i l -
condu it sy s te m . The com plete reg ion is shown in F ig . 1. In a ll g r id s ,
beam e lem en ts are u sed to model the condu it and c o n s ta n t - s t r a in t r ia n
gu lar e lem en ts are u sed to model the surrounding so il medium.
The region inc luded for a n a ly s is is sym m etrical about a v e r t ic a l
line through the c e n te r of the condu it (the dashed portion is excluded
h e r e ) . Taking advan tage of th is symmetry, only the r ight h a lf of the r e
gion is m odeled for Grid 1 and Grid 2. These are shown in F ig . 2 . As a
re s u l t of th is sym m etrical c o n s tru c t io n , only loading con d it io n s th a t are
a lso sym m etrical about th is v e r t ic a l ax is ca n be a n a ly z e d . In both of
th e se g r id s , the s truc tu re is co n s tru c te d of 24 beam e lem en ts and the
surrounding so il medium is made up of 4 74 tr iangu la r e le m e n ts . These
e lem en ts are in te rco n n ec ted at 2 71 node p o in ts . In add it io n to th is .
8d 2d
Figure 1. Region Included in the A nalysis
Figure 2. F in ite -e lem en t Id ea l iza tio n for Grid 1 and Grid 2
17
Grid 2 in c lu d e s 24 in te rface e lem ents b e tw een the so il and the s t ru c tu re .
S ince th e s e e lem en ts are a s s ig n e d a zero th ic k n e s s , the ap pearance of
both g rids is id e n t ic a l . Grid. 2 h a s a to ta l of 522 e lem en ts and 296 co n
nec ting node p o i n t s . U tiliz ing Grid 2 , the e ffec t of s lip a t the s o i l -
s truc tu re in te rface c a n be in v e s t ig a te d .
A m ain po in t of in te re s t in th is s tudy is to in v e s t ig a te the e f fec t
of nonsym m etrica l load ing c o n d i t io n s . Therefore , i t is n e c e s s a ry to d e
velop an ad d it io n a l model th a t in c lu d es the cu lver t and medium on both
s id e s of th e c e n t ra l ax is (the d ash ed portion of the reg io n is om itted
h e r e ) . S ince th e p rev ious m odels requ ire very nearly a l l of the com
p u te r c e n tra l memory a v a i l a b le , Grid 3 m ust n e c e s s a r i ly be made co n
s id e rab ly c o a r s e r . The m esh is kep t r e la t iv e ly fine im m ediate ly a d ja c e n t
to the condu it in order to p rese rve a good degree of a c c u racy in the c o n
duit s t r e s s e s .
It i s a lso n e c e s sa ry to determ ine the e ffec t of the boundary
co n d it io n s on the s t r e s s e s induced in the condu it by lo ad s p laced near
po in ts of support. Grid 4 is co n s tru c te d for th is p u r p o s e . The entire
reg io n , inc lud ing an e x te n s io n eq u iv a len t in width to two conduit diam
e te rs (dashed portion of the reg ion in F ig . 1) is inc luded in th is m o d e l .
A com parison of the condu it moments produced by lo ad s a t various d i s
ta n c e s from the la te ra l support po in ts u s in g Grid 3 and Grid 4 is m a d e .
The r e s u l t s show th a t the e ffec t of the boundary co n d it io n s is in s ig n if i
c a n t for loads ap p lied no neare r th an two d iam eters from the supports .
Grid 4 c a n therefore be u se d for po in t lo ad s p laced up to four d iam eters
to the r igh t of a l ine through the c e n te r of the co n d u it .
18
F ig . 3 is a p a r t ia l v iew of the f in i te -e le m e n t id e a l iz a t io n for
Grid 3 and Grid 4 . The le f t -h a n d portion of both is a mirror image of
th a t show n. The e x te n s io n of the reg ion for Grid 4 is not show n. In bo th ,
the condu it c o n s is t s of 18 beam e le m e n ts , the so il medium is made up of
tr ian g u la r e lem en ts and no in te rface is p rov ided . Grid 3 h a s 266 nodes
and 496 e lem en ts ; Grid 4 h a s 269 nodes and 502 e le m e n ts .
Following the p rep ara tio n of node po in t and c o n n e c tiv i ty d a ta ,
the maximum node po in t s ep a ra t io n w as m inimized us ing an in te ra tiv e
schem e s im ila r to th a t p roposed by Grooms (1972).
V erification of M odels
V erification of the com puter program and the f in i te -e le m e n t
grids d e sc r ib e d in the preced ing s e c t io n is accom plished by performing
e la s t i c a n a ly s is of problem s with known c l a s s i c a l s o lu t io n s . The com
pu ted re s u l t s are th en com pared with the known s o lu t io n s .
Three s e p a ra te problem s w ere u se d in the te s t in g of Grids 1 and
2 . F i r s t , the so il e lem en ts are a s s ig n e d zero m ateria l s t i f fn e ss p roper
t i e s leav ing only the s t ru c tu re . An a n a ly s is of the co n d u it as a c i rc u la r
ring su b jec te d to a co n cen tra ted ax ia l load is perfo rm ed . The r e su l ts are
in e x c e l le n t ag reem ent with the e l a s t i c so lu tion as p re se n te d by Roark
(1965). Secondly , the beam e lem ents rep resen ting the condu it are a s
s igned zero s t i f fn e ss p ro p ertie s leav ing only the s o i l . This is an a lyzed
a s a s e m i- in f in i te p la te with a h o le . The s t r e s s d is tr ib u t io n through the
medium is th en com pared with the known so lu tion g iven by Timoshenko
and G oodier (1970). Again there is e x c e l le n t .a g re e m e n t . F in a lly , the
beam e lem en ts are a s s ig n e d very large s t i f fn e ss p ro p e r t ie s . This is
Figure 3 . Partia l F in ite -e lem en t Id ea liza tio n for Grid 3 and Grid 4
20
an a ly zed and com pared to the known so lu tio n for a s e m i- in f in i te e la s t i c
p la te with a r ig id cy lin d r ic a l in c lu s io n as p roposed by G oodier (1933).
■Again, the medium s t r e s s e s are in e x c e l le n t agreem ent with the known
so lu t io n , ex c e p t in the lay e r im m ediately a d ja c e n t (0 .20 diam eters) to
th e in c lu s io n . This is a t tr ibu ted to an in ab il i ty to m ain ta in su ff ic ien t
s ig n if ic a n t f igures in the com puter sy s tem to model com plete r ig id i ty .
S in c e .i t w as n e c e s s a ry to c o n s tru c t G rids 3 and 4 with l e s s
d ef in it ion in the so il medium away from the co n d u it , v e r if ic a t io n of
th e s e g rids by the lim iting c a s e approach u se d above w ill in d ica te l e s s
a c c u racy in the s t r e s s e s ob ta ined for the medium. A nalys is of the s tru c
ture a s a c i rc u la r ring under an a x ia l load ag a in is in e x c e l le n t ag ree
ment with the known so lu t io n . S ince th is study is concerned with mo
m ents and forces in the co n d u it , l e s s accu racy o f the s t r e s s e s in the
so il medium away from the condu it is of no c o n s e q u e n c e . In order to
verify the accu racy of th e se grids in ob ta in ing the d e s ire d moments and
normal fo r c e s , an a n a ly s is of the s o i l - c u lv e r t system is performed and
com pared to the known so lu tio n p roposed by Burns and Richard (1964).
E xce llen t agreem ent is o b ta in ed .
Anand (19 74), u s ing s im ilar a n a l y s e s , co n c lu d e s th a t the Burns
and Richard so lu tion is not va lid for the c a s e of a sha llow buried con
d u i t . H ow ever, a n a ly s e s performed us ing Grid 1 in d ic a te th a t the f in i te -
e lem ent model u sed by Anand w as overrig id . In ad d it io n , he did not co n
s id e r the full d is tr ib u ted load assu m ed in the e la s t i c so lu t io n . This
work is p re se n te d in d e ta i l in C hap te r 4 .
CHAPTER 4
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
The a ssu m p tio n of a uniformly d is tr ib u ted su rface load over an
in fin ite e x ten t is a common fac to r in the th e o re t ic a l e l a s t i c so lu tions
th a t have b een p roposed for the s o i l - c u lv e r t s y s te m . H ow ever, as w as
s ta te d e a r l ie r , a n a ly s e s b a se d on th is assum ption may se r io u s ly under
e s t im a te the s t r e s s e s induced in shallow buried c o n d u i ts . In order to in
v e s t ig a te the e ffec t of various p a r t ia l loading con d it io n s on a shallow
co n d u it , se v e ra l c a s e s are an a ly zed us ing the f in i te -e le m e n t grids p re
v io u s ly d e s c r ib e d .
In a l l c a s e s , the condu it and so il m ateria l are a ssum ed to b e
have e l a s t i c a l ly . The so il is a s s ig n e d an e la s t ic modulus v a lu e , Eg =
200 k s f = 9 . 58x10® N/m2 and a Pois s o n 's ra t io , ^as = 0 . 4 . These
v a lu e s are re p re se n ta t iv e of den se g ranu lar s o i l s . The co n d u it is a s
sumed to be made of co n cre te with an e l a s t i c modulus v a lu e , E = 2 .5
x 10® p s i = 17 .25 x 10® kN/m2 .
The loading c a s e s c o n s id e red in the a n a ly s is , a long with the
f in i te -e le m e n t grid u se d , are sum m arized in Table 1. The conduit s t i f f
n e s s , e x p re s se d as the ra tio of the in te rio r d iam eter, d , to w all th ic k
n e s s , t , i s in d ica ted for each c a s e .
The in fluence of uniformly d is tr ib u te d loads of in te n s i ty , p ,
c en te re d about a v e r t ic a l l ine through .the condu it are c o n s id e red in the
f ir s t e ig h t c a s e s . The loads are of varying leng th , b . C a s e s 9 to 24
21
Table 1. Load and C onduit S tiffness for Analyzed C a s e s
22
Load
3ase Grid D e sc r ip t io n L ocation In te n s i ty d/i
1 1 D is tr ib u ted b = d P 402 1 D is tr ib u ted b = 2d P 403 1 D is tr ib u ted b = 3d P 404 D is tr ib u ted b = 4d P 405 1 D is tr ib u ted b = 5d P 40
6 D is tr ib u ted b = 6d P 407 1 D is tr ib u ted b = 7d P 408 1 D is tr ib u ted b = 8d P 409 3 C oncen tra ted C en te r P = pd 40
10 3 C o n cen tra ted 0 . 250d P = pd 40
11 3 C o n cen tra ted O.SOOd P = pd 4012 3 C o n ce n tra ted 0 . 875d P = pd 4013 3 C o n cen tra ted 1 . 250d P = pd 4014 4 C oncen tra ted 1 . 750d P = pd 4015 4 C o n cen tra ted 2 . 625d P = pd 40
16 4 C o n cen tra ted 4 . OOOd P = pd 4017 3 C o n cen tra ted C en te r P - pd 2018 3 C o n cen tra ted 0 . 250d P = pd 2019 3 C o n cen tra ted O.SOOd P = Pd 2020 3 C o n cen tra ted 0 . 875d P = pd 20
21 3 C o n cen tra ted 1 . 250d P = Pd 2022 4 C oncen tra ted 1 . 750d P = pd 2023 4 C oncen tra ted 2 . 625d P = pd 2024 4 C o n cen tra ted 4 . OOOd P — pd 2025 2 D is tr ib u ted b — 8d P 40
23
c o n s id e r a co n c e n tra te d load of in te n s i ty , P = pd, lo ca ted with r e sp e c t
to the c e n te r of the co n d u it , as show n. Two condu it s t i f fn e s s e s are c o n
s id e re d . For C a s e s 1 -1 6 , d / t = 40 , w hile for C a s e s 17 -24 , d / t = 20. In
the l a s t c a s e , the e f fec t of s lip a t the in te rface is a n a ly z e d .
P artia l D is tr ibu ted Loads
The bending moments induced in the conduit for the various d i s
tr ibu ted loading c a s e s are p re se n te d in nondim ensional form in F ig s . 4
and 5. S im ilarly , the normal fo rces are g iven in F ig s . 6 and 7.
For p u rp o ses of com parison , the e la s t i c formulas p roposed by
Burns and Richard (1964) for no in te rface s lip are u sed to c a lc u la te the
bending m om ents, M, and normal fo rc e s , _N, in the c o n d u i t . For the m a
te r ia l and geom etric p roperties s ta te d the equa tions are g iven in nondi
m ensional form as follows
M /p d 2 = 0 .0001 + 0 .0059 co s 28 (7)
N /pd = 0 .4961 + 0 .0992 c o s 29 (8)
where 9 is m easured around the c ircum ference of the c o n d u it . If the a p
propria te v a lu es are in se r te d for 9 and the re su lt in g moments and normal
force are p lo t te d , the th e o re t ic a l e la s t i c so lu tion ag rees very c lo se ly
with the r e su l ts of loading c a s e 8. F i g s . 4 and 5 show th a t the bending
moments in c re a se rap id ly for the f irs t two c a s e s and th en appear to lev e li
off. H ow ever, as the length b of the load in c re a se s beyond four d iam
e te r s , there is a reduc tion in the m agnitude of the moments and the th e o
re t ic a l so lu tion is ap p roached . F i g s . 6 and 7 show a g radual in c re a se in
the normal fo rces through the f irs t five loading c a s e s . Beyond th is p o in t ,
the change a t the crown and b ase is more g ra d u a l . There is v ir tua lly no
d / t = 40 1.0x10
0.0
- - - - V
Case 2 y
\ Cose \ Case\4 ^
OX)
0 .5x10
1.0x10
Figure 4 . Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 1 to 4
25
d / t = 40
0.0
Case 5
-U
Case 7 \ \Case 8 (elastic so
0.0
0 .5x10
Figure 5. Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 5 to 8
Figure 6. Normal Forces for Loading C a se s 1 to 4
27
- 0.6
d / t = 40
0.2
0.0
Case 5
0.0
- 0.2
CaseCase 8 (feiqstio' solution)*
- 0 . 4
- 0.6
Figure 7. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 5 to 8
28
change a t the s p r in g l in e . The normal fo rces a lso approach the th eo re t
ic a l so lu t io n .
F ig . 8 shows the v a r ia t io n of the bending moments a t the
crow n, sp r in g l in e , and b a se of the c o n d u it . The bending moment a t the
crown is s e e n to reach a maximum s lig h tly before th o se a t the sp ring line
and b a s e . The maximum v a lu e s are about tw ice a s la rge as th o se p re
d ic ted by the th e o re t ic a l so lu t io n . Some feeling for the movement tak ing
p la c e c a n be ob ta ined from Fig . 9, w hich show s the change in d iam eter
a long the h o r iz o n ta l ( sp r in g lin e ) . The d iam etric shorten ing along the v e r
t ic a l follow s the same path but is 3 .5 to 4 .0 p e rcen t g re a te r in m agn itude .
The above o b se rv a t io n s c a n be in te rp re ted by cons ide ring the
re la t iv e s t i f fn e s s of the so il-s tru c tu re system under lo a d . For loads over
a short length (Case 1), the large so il m ass ad ja c e n t to the conduit is
e ffec t iv e in r e s is t in g d isp la c e m e n ts and thereby a s s i s t s in carrying the
lo ad . Thus, com pared to c a s e s with lo ad s of in te rm ed ia te ex ten t , the
bending moments in the condu it are low . Loads of in term ed ia te length
(C ases 2-5) becom e the dom inant fac to r cau s in g g rea te r movement in th e i
so il a d ja c e n t to the prism above the co n d u it . This motion reduces the
arching e ffec t in the so il and induces the larger moments o b se rv ed . The
loads rem ain dom inant as the full load cond it ion is app roached . How
ever , here the loads provide a confin ing su rface o v e rp re s su re , thus in
c re a s in g the re la t iv e s t i f fn e ss of the so il and reducing the m om ents.
The normal fo rces prove to be re la t iv e ly in se n s i t iv e to the arching e f
f e c ts and are more d ire c t ly dependen t on the load in te n s i ty .
As d i s c u s s e d in C hap te r 3, the p re se n c e of the supports along
the s id e s of the reg ion a f fe c ts the a c t io n of loads p la c e d nea rb y . T h u s ,
29
0.0150
V ln me0.0100
0.0050
0.0
d / t = 40
-0 .0 0 5 0Base
0.0100
Crown
-0 .0 1 5 08d2d
load length, b
Figure 8. Moment Variation for Various Loading Conditions
0.0100
Ad 0.0050 (ft)
0.0
d / t = 40
4 d 6 d 8 d2d0load length, b
Figure 9. Diametr ic Change for Various Loading Condit ions
30
the fo rces and moments reported for C a s e s 6 and 7 are s lig h tly g rea te r
th an a c tu a l . In C a s e 8, the full load e ffec t is ach iev ed for a load leng th ,
b , som ew hat shorter th a n a c tu a l . The r e su l ts for th e se c a s e s are q u a l i
ta t iv e ly c o r re c t , a s w ill becom e more apparen t in the d is c u s s io n th a t
fo llo w s .
C o n cen tra ted Loads and Influence C harts
The p rev ious d i s c u s s io n i s lim ited to the e ffec t of sym m etrical
p a r t ia l d is tr ib u ted loads on buried c o n d u i t s . In order to com plete the
s tudy of the e ffec t of p a r t ia l loading co n d i t io n s , unsym m etrica lly lo c a te d
co n c e n tra te d su rface lo ad s are c o n s id e red in the following d is c u s s io n .
F ig s . 10 through 13 show the bending moments induced in the
condu it for the v a r io u s co n cen tra ted loading c a s e s s tu d ie d . These r e
s u l ts show th a t the moments produced in the s tif fe r condu it (d /t = 2 0 )
are co n s id e ra b ly g re a te r in m agnitude th an th o se in the more f lex ib le
c o n d u it . The more f lex ib le s tru c tu re , b e c a u se i t d e f le c ts to a g rea te r
e x ten t under load , encourages the developm ent of arching in the s o i l .
The so i l c a r r ie s the load around the co n d u it , th u s , low er moments are
deve loped in the s tru c tu re . The maximum moments d eve loped at the
crown for co n c e n tra te d loads lo ca ted up to one d iam eter from the c e n te r
are a s much as two and o n e -h a l f t im es g rea te r than p red ic ted by the
e l a s t i c so lu tio n s th a t assu m e a full uniform load on the su rfa c e .
The normal fo rces developed by co n cen tra ted lo ad s are shown in
F ig s . 14 through 17. A com parison of th e s e p lo ts show s th a t the induced
normal fo rces are s l ig h t ly h igher for the rigid conduit but become nearly
equa l for both s t i f fn e s s v a lu e s as the load moves away from the ce n te r
31
d / t = 40 - 2
- 2
C ase / 9
Figure 10. Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 9 to 12
32
d / t = 40
e 15
Case it
Figure 11. Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 13 to 16
33
= 20—2 J h
—CL£L
XX
\ x j \
Figure 12. Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 17 to 20
34
d /t = 20
- 2 . 0 x l Q
-Case 2,1 v
Case y23 Case 24
Z Z
Figure 13. Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 21 to 24
35
d / t = 40
Case 19 Case j\0
Case 11 Case
Figure 14. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 9 to 12
36
d / t = 40
^ Case ) Case/14
A—
Figure 15. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 13 to 16
37
- 0 . 3
d /t = 20
I X
Case 19 Case 2C
Figure 16. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 17 to 20
38
d /t = 20
X\
Case 21
Case ]
Case 23 ^ Case 2;
Figure 17. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 21 to 24
39
of the co n d u it . Some te n s io n is developed near the crown for loads lo
c a te d near the c e n te r of the co n d u it . This due to the assum ption of fix ity
be tw een the so il and the s t ru c tu re . The forces developed at the crown
and invert are c o n s id e ra b ly lower th an th o se p red ic ted by an a n a ly s is
b a se d on the full su rface load a ssu m p tio n .
H aving ob ta ined th e se d a ta , in fluence c h a r ts are made up by
p lo tting the bending moment and normal force in fluence of each load
a g a in s t the lo ca t io n of the load with r e s p e c t to a v e r t ic a l line drawn
through the c e n te r of the co n d u it . The c u r v e s , or in fluence l in e s , are
p lo tted at in te rv a ls of 15 d eg rees around the c ircum ference of the c o n
d u it .
The in fluence c h a r ts are nondim ensional p lo ts of Cm = M /pd^
and C n = _N/pd on the v e r t ic a l ax is a g a in s t the load lo c a t io n along the
h o r iz o n ta l . Cm and C n are the bending moment and normal force c o e f f i
c i e n t s , r e s p e c t iv e ly . The bending moment ch a r ts are p re se n te d in Ap
pendix A along with a l l the da ta u sed to co n s tru c t the c h a r t s . S im ilarly ,
the normal force c h a r ts are p re sen ted in Appendix B along with the a p
p lic a b le d a ta .
It is observed th a t the in fluence cu rves are not zero at 4 d . This
in d ic a te s th a t loads lo ca ted more than four d iam eters from the cen te r
have an e f fec t on the bending moments and normal fo rces in the co n d u it .
If ex tended beyond four d iam e te rs , the cu rves will approach zero at a
poin t where the load is su ff ic ien tly far away from the condu it th a t it h a s
no in fluence on the bending moment and normal fo rce . H ow ever, in su f
f ic ie n t da ta were o b ta ined to determ ine the lo ca tio n of th a t po in t .
40
The in fluence ch a r ts may be app lied to any loading co n d it io n .
The moment, in g e n e ra l , is g iven by
M = C mp d 2 . (9)
H ow ever, for a co n c e n tra te d load , P = pd , so the eq u a tio n becom es
M = C mPd. (10)
For d is tr ib u ted lo a d s , the moments are ob ta ined by in teg ra ting the c h a r ts
over the loaded leng th , b . S im pson 's ru le for num erical in teg ra tio n c a n
be co n v en ien tly a p p l ie d . T h u s ,
M = Cmp d 2 (11)
where
Cm Cm • (12)
Cm and C m are the bending moment c o e f f ic ie n ts . S im ilarly , the normal
fo rce , in g e n e ra l , is g iven by
N = C npd. (13)
For a c o n cen tra ted load , P = pd , and th is reduces to
N = C nP. (14)
For d is tr ib u ted lo a d s , in teg ra tio n is performed as befo re , and
N = C npd (15)
where
C n = / C n . (16)
C n and C n are the normal force c o e f f i c i e n t s .
For r ig id co n d u its with s t i f fn e s s e s o ther than th o se g iven by the
c h a r t s , an in te rp o la tio n may be ca rr ied ou t, as shown in F ig . 18. The
c a s e shown is for the spring line moment due to a co n c e n tra te d load
above the c e n te r of the co n d u it . Using both char t s t i f fn e s s v a lu e s , the
bending moment or normal force c o e f f ic ie n ts are determ ined for the
41
0.0400
0.0300
0.0200
0.0100
0.04.01.0 3.00.0 2.0
In (d/t)
Figure 18. In te rpo la tion of C o e ff ic ien ts for S t i f fn e sse s Not G iven in Influence C har ts
42
d e s ire d lo a d in g . The com puted in fluence c o e f f ic ie n ts are p lo tted a g a in s t
In ( d / t ) . A s tra ig h t l ine is p a s s e d through the po in ts and a c lo se approx
im ation to the c o e f f ic ie n t for the d e s ire d s t i f fn e ss is o b ta in e d . D a ta for
d / t of 11 .5 and 30 are o b ta ined as a ch eck in F ig . 18. This procedure is
ve r if ied for a range of s t i f fn e s s e s from d / t = 11 .5 to d / t = 40 .
Thus, for r ig id condu it s t i f f n e s s e s , the bending moment and
normal force d iagram s c a n be c o n s tru c te d by computing the appropriate
c o e f f ic ie n ts from the c h a r ts a t 1 5 -deg ree i n t e r v a l s . The range of s t i f f
n e s s e s for which the v a l id i ty of in te rp o la t io n is e s ta b l i s h e d in c lu d es
m ost com m ercia lly av a i la b le concre te s e c t io n s conforming to ASTM
(C 7 6 -7 2 ) .
For loads to the r igh t of the c e n te r , the cu rv es for the d es ired
ang les are u s e d . For lo ad s to the le f t , the cu rves corresponding to the
supplem ent of th is angle are u s e d . The ch a r ts are p re se n te d in a format
th a t in c lu d es the cu rv es for supplem entary an g les on the same c h a r t .
Some exam ples w ill serve to c la r ify the ap p l ic a t io n of thex- -
c h a r t s . Four ty p es of problem s are show n in F ig . 19. Assume in each
th a t the moment a t 9 = 60° from the h o r iz o n ta l is d e s i r e d . . A po in t load
is co n s id e re d in F ig . 19a. The moment is determ ined by going to the
appropria te c h a r t , F ig . A -3 (Appendix A) for an angle of 9 = 600 and o b
ta in in g the va lue of Cm for the appropria te s t i f fn e s s . In th is c a s e , if
d / t = 20 and the load is a t 1 . 25d, Cm ?= - 0 .0 1 5 0 . Eq. 10 is then u sed to
com pute the moment. For the sym m etrical d is tr ib u ted load in F ig . 19b,
the co e f f ic ie n t Cm is o b ta ined from Eq. 12, where the in teg ra tio n is p e r
formed on the curve for 9 = 60° , correspond ing to the load on the r ig h t ,
and the curve for 9 = 120°, co rrespond ing to the load on the le f t . Due
to symmetry, both are in teg ra te d over a length of 0 to l .O d . The moment
1.250'l.Odl.Od
1 0.75d r 1.25dr
Figure 19. Some C a s e s for A nalysis by Influence Charts
(a), point load; (b), sym m etrically d is tr ibu ted load; (c), unsymmetrically d is t r ib uted load; and (d), randomly d is tr ibu ted load . ax
co
44
a t 9 = 60° from the h o r izo n ta l is th en com puted us ing Eq. 11. For unsym -
m etr ica l d is tr ib u ted lo ad s a s in F ig . 1 9 c , the same procedure is follow ed
e x c e p t th a t in teg ra tio n is performed only over the length a f fec ted by the
l o a d . For the c a s e show n, the curve for 6 = 60° is in teg ra te d from 0 to
1 .2 5 d and the curve for 9 = 120° is in teg ra te d from 0 to 0 , 7 5 d . It should
be c le a r th a t loads skew ed to one s ide only m ust be c o n s id e re d . Loads
skew ed to the o p p o s ite c a n be accom m odated by changing the poin t of
v iew . Random d is tr ib u ted lo a d s , such as th o se shown in F ig . 19d c a n
be an a ly zed by co n s id e r in g the load to be made up of a s e r ie s of sho rte r
uniform l o a d s .
The normal fo rces can be com puted in a s im ila r m anner by us ing
the ch a r ts in Appendix B .
The accu racy o b ta ined in com puting the c o e f f ic ie n ts for d is t r ib
u ted lo ad s us ing a num erical in teg ra tio n procedure w ill depend on the
care with which po in ts are s e le c te d and the s iz e of the in te rv a l be tw een
p o in ts . M oments for s e v e ra l of the d is tr ib u ted loading con d it io n s a n a
lyzed in th is study (C ases 1-8) are com puted with the c h a r t s . D iffer
e n c e s of l e s s th a n 1 p e rc e n t are o b ta in ed us ing S im pson1 s rule with an
in te rv a l of 0 . Id .
The v a r ia t io n in bending moments due to the in fluence of p a r t ia l
d is tr ib u ted loads of p ro g re s s iv e ly in c re a s in g la te ra l e x te n t may be further
v isu a l iz e d by exam ining the in fluence c h a r t s . Reference is made to the
moment in fluence cu rves for d / t = 40 and 9 = 0° and 180° g iven in F ig .
A -7 (Appendix A). It is o b se rv ed th a t the a re a under the curve is p o s i
t iv e up to 1 .9 d for 9 = 0° and up to 1 .3 for 9 = 180°; both are nega tive
beyond th a t p o in t . Thus, the moment at the spring line w ill in c re a se with
45
an in c re a se in the la te ra l ex ten t of the load until the a rea becom es n e g a
t iv e . Beyond th a t p o in t , the moment w ill d e c r e a s e . This co rresponds to
F ig . 8 where the moment a t the spring line beg ins to d e c re a se betw een
b = 3d and 4 d .
The ch a r ts may be d irec tly app lied in the b a lan ced d es ig n
method p re se n te d in C h ap te r 2. T h u s . E q . 4 is eq u iv a len t to
N = C n (l - A)P (17)
for c o n cen tra ted l o a d s , and
N = C n (l - A)pd (18)
for d is tr ib u ted l o a d s . E q . 6 is eq u iv a len t to
M = C m (l - A)Pd (19)
for c o n cen tra ted l o a d s , and
M = C m (l - A)pd2 (20)
for d is tr ib u ted l o a d s . In th e se e q u a t io n s , the term (1 - A) is used to
e s tim a te the e ffec t of a rch ing , A , due to backpack ing
In te rface Slip
The e f fec t of in te rface s lip is determ ined by including a layer
of in te rface e lem ents be tw een the so il and the condu it , as d esc rib ed in
C hap te r 3 . Relating s t r e s s to d isp la c e m e n t, th e se e lem en ts are a s s ig n e d
a sh ea r s t i f fn e ss va lue of Ej = 170 kef = 2 .67 x 107 N /m 3 . This mod
u lus va lue is r e p re se n ta t iv e of the fr ic tion developed be tw een a rough
su rface and a g ranu lar b a c k f i l l .
The sh ea r strength of the in te r fa c e , r f , is p roportional to the
normal force acting on the in te r fa c e , dfn , and may be e x p re s se d as a
function of the ang le of w all f r ic tion , 8 , or rf = <5"n t a n S . For a rough
s u r f a c e , the la rg e s t angle of fric tion th a t ca n be developed is eq u iv a len t
. 46
to the so il ang le of fr ic t ion In th is a n a ly s is , the la rg e s t ang le d e
ve loped i s l e s s th an 10°, thus in d ica tin g th a t the l in e a r portion of the
s t r e s s - s t r a i n curve h a s not b een ex ceed ed and the assu m p tio n of e la s t i c
behav io r for the in te rface is v a l id .
F ig . 20 show s the e ffec t of full s l ip , as c a lc u la te d by the e l a s
t ic so lu tio n p roposed by Burns and Richard (1964) and p a r t ia l s lip (Case
25) com pared to the n o - s l ip cond it io n (Case 8). The moments for full
s l ip are g re a te r in m agnitude than for no s l ip by approx im ate ly 10 p e r
c e n t . For the a c tu a l c a s e as id e a l iz e d by the f in i te -e le m e n t a n a ly s is ,
th e re is only a s l ig h t in c re a se in the moments as com pared to the no
s lip c a s e .
F ig . 21 s im ila r ly shows the e f fe c t of full and p a r t ia l s lip on the
normal force in the co n d u it . For bo th , the normal force is in c re a se d at
the crown and the b a s e and d e c re a se d a t the sp ring line as com pared to
the n o - s l ip co n d it io n . For full s l ip , th e change is about 20 p e rc e n t ,
w h ile for p a r t ia l s lip the change is only 10 p e r c e n t .
Slip r e l e a s e s the s truc tu re and a llow s the so il to se t t le around
the co n d u it . Thus, the condu it is forced to carry more load in b en d in g ,
w hile the normal force d is t r ib u te s more ev en ly . N either the fu ll-s l ippage
or no-s lippage a ssu m p tio n is s e e n to offer any p a r t ic u la r advan tage in
e s tim a tin g the a c tu a l co n d it io n . The fu l l - s l ip con d it io n g iv es a c o n s e r
v a tiv e e s tim a te of bending m om ents. The n o -s l ip c o n d it io n g ives a c o n
se rv a t iv e e s tim a te of the maximum normal fo rces .
0.0075
d /t = 400.0050
0.0025
0,0
0.0025
-0 .0 0 5 0
-0 .0 0 7
Case 18, No Slippage Casq 25 \
-0 .0 0 7 5
-0 .0 0 5 0
-0 .0 0 2 5
0.0
0.0025
0.0050
Figure 20. Effect of In te rface Slip on Bending Moments
48
-0.60
d / t = 40
- 0 .4 0
-0 .3 0
- 0.20
- 0.10
0.0
Case 8 / No Slippage I Case \\ Full Slippage \
0.0
0.10
- 0.20
- 0 .3 0
-0 .4 0
Figure 21. Effect of In te rface Slip on Normal Forces
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the r e s u l t s of th is s tu d y , the fo llow ing c o n c lu s io n s
are drawn:
1. M ethods cu rren tly u se d in the d e s ig n of buried condu its tend to
be qu ite c o n s e rv a t iv e .
2 . Solu tions b a se d on e la s t i c theory are ap p licab le to shallow
buried r ig id condu its for uniformly d is tr ib u ted loads over an
in fin ite e x te n t .
3 . E la s t ic so lu tio n b a se d on the assu m p tio n of a uniformly d i s
tr ib u ted load u n deres tim ate the bending moments and o v e re s t i
mate the normal fo rces produced by p a r t ia l su rface loads for
sha llow buried c o n d u i ts .
4 . The in f lu en ce line co n cep t c a n be ex tended to buried c o n d u i ts .
In fluence c h a r ts are deve loped which c a n be u t i l iz e d to d e te r
mine the bending moment and normal force a t any point along
the c ircum ference of the sha llow conduit for any d es ired lo a d
ing c o n d it io n . The procedure is d irec tly a p p lic a b le to the b a l
anced d e s ig n m ethod.
5. N either the fu ll-S lip or n o - s l ip a ssum ption h a s any p a r t icu la r
advan tage in approximating the true c a s e where some slip o c
curs a t the s o i l - s t ru c tu re in te r f a c e .
Recomm endations for Further Research
R esearch p u b lish ed s in ce the m id -1 9 6 0 's h a s provided c o n s id
erab le in s ig h t into the behav io r of both shallow and deep buried c o n d u i t s .
H ow ever, sev e ra l a s p e c ts of the s o i l - c o n d u i t system rem ain to be
s tu d ie d . N oncircu lar geom etr ies and m ultip le condu it in s ta l la t io n s have
rec e iv e d only lim ited a t te n t io n . In te rm ed ia te s t i f f n e s s e s , such as for
p la s t i c m a te r ia ls , need to be s tu d ied so th a t d es ig n s c a n be. ca rr ied o u t .
Experim ental d a ta from f u l l - s c a le or model t e s t s are bad ly needed in or
der th a t the re la t iv e m erits of d e s ig n p ra c t ic e s c a n be e v a lu a te d .
APPENDIX A
CHARTS AND DATA FOR MOMENT INFLUENCE COEFFICIENTS
The c o l le c t io n of cu rves and ta b le s p re sen ted in th is appendix
is an e x te n s io n of the in fluence line co n c e p t app lied to the so i l - c o n d u i t
s y s te m . Each curve re p re se n ts the e f fec t of a unit su rface load on the
bending moment a t a sp ec if ied poin t along the c ircum ference of the
buried co n d u it . C o l le c t iv e ly , the cu rves are referred to as the moment
in fluence c h a r t s . They c a n be u sed to determ ine the in f luence of any
su rface load , co n cen tra ted or d is t r ib u te d , sym m etrically or unsym m et-
r ic a l ly p l a c e d , on the bending moment in the s t ru c tu re .
It should be noted th a t th e se c h a r ts are ob ta ined using e la s t ic
m ateria l p roperties as fo llow s: for the cu lvert,E = 2 .5 x 10^ p s i =
17. 25 x 1C)6 k N / m 2 and for the so il medium, Es = 200 k s f = 9 . 58 x 10^
N/m2 and p s = 0 .4 .
51
52
0.0100
A----0.0
^ 0 = 270
- 0.0100
m
- 0.0200
O d / t = 20
A d / t = 40
—0.0300
-0 .0 4 0 0
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure A - l . Moment In fluence Curves for 9 = 90° and 270°
53
0.0100
0.00500 = 105
—A-----— -A—. _ _
0.00 = 75
-0 .0 0 5 0
0.0100'
- 0.0200
- 0.0250
° d /t =-0 .0 3 0 0
A d /t =
-0 .0 3 5 0
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure A-2. Moment Influence Curves for 9 = 75° and 105°
0.0150
0.0100
0 = 1200.0050
0.0
0 = 60
-0 .0 0 5 0
- 0.0100
-0 .0 1 5 0O d /t = 20
A d /t = 40- 0.0200
-0 .0 2 5 0
-0 .0 3 0 0
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure A - 3 . Moment Inf luence Curves for 0 = 60° and 120°
55
0.0200
0.0100
Q = 135
A --A0.0050
0.0
Cm
-0 .0 0 5 0
- 0.0100
O d/ t =
-0 .0 1 5 0
A d /t =
- 0.0200
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure A-4 . Moment Influence Curves for 9 = 45° and 135°
56
0.0250
O d /t = 20
d /t = 400.0200
0.0150
0.0100
Cm
0.0050
150
0.0
0 = 30
-0 .0 0 5 0
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure A -5. Moment Influence Curves for 9 = 30° and 150°
57
0.0250
O d/ t = 20
A d /t = 40
0.0200
0.0150
0.0050m
0= 1650.0
A— — A —
-0 .0 0 5 0
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure A-6. Moment Influence Curves for 9 = 15° and 165°
0.0300
0.0250
O d/ t = 20
A d /t = ̂00.0200
0.0150
m
0.0100
0.0050
0.0
0= 180
-0 .0 0 5 0
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure A - 7. Moment Influence Curves for 9 = 0 ° and 180°
59
0.0250
O d / t =
A d /t =
0.0200
0.0150
0.0100
•m
0.0050
0.0
- 0.0050
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure A-8. Moment Inf luence Curves for 9 = 195° and 34 5°
60
0.0200
A d /t = 40
0.01000 = 330 ^
A'
0.0" * &-J---- a -------- A-
<?= 210
- 0.0100
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure A-9 . Moment Inf luence Curves for 0 = 210° and 330°
0.0120
0.0080
0 = 3150.0040
- -A---------A——A
0.0Cm
"A- --0.0040
0 = 225/O d /t = 20
-0.0080A d/1 = ̂0
- 0.0120 ~TDistance from Center, Diameters
Figure A - 10. Moment Influence Curves for 0 = 225° and 315°
61
0.0100
0.0050
0. 0J
Cm -0.0050
- 0.0100
-0.0150
- 0.0200
Figure A - l l . Moment Inf luence Curves for 0 = 240° and 300°
0.00500 = 285 v
0.0
< 0 = 255
-0.0050
- 0.0100
O d / t =
-0.0150A d / t =
- 0.0200
-0.0250
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure A-12. Moment Inf luence Curves for 9 = 255° and 285°
Table A - l . Bending Moments for Various Loading C o n d i i t io n s , d / t = 40
Loading C aseAngle : : : : ;
9 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
0° 0.0061 0 .0075 0.0076 0.0059 0 .0031 0 .0007 -0 .0 0 1 3 -0 .0 0 1 215 .00 74 .0077 .0070 - .0032 - .0001 - .0016 - .0018 - .001030 .0067 .0054 .0029 - .0015 - .0034 - .0033 - .0015 - .000545 .0037 .0007 - .0032 - .0060 - .0052 - .0033 - .0007 .0000
60 - .0019 - .0066 - .0095 - .0087 - .004 7 - .0019 .0003 .000575 - .0095 - .0125 - .0113 - .0058 - .0021 .0001 .0010 .000890 - .0128 - .0106 - .0068 - .0017 .0005 .0015 .0013 .0008
105 - .0095 - .0049 - .0008 .0017 .0023 .0021 .0012 .0007120 - .0019 .0018 .0038 .0040 .0031 .0020 .0008 .0004135 .003 7 .0057 .0057 .0043 .0028 .0015 .0003 .0001150 .0067 .0069 .0058 .0037 .0020 .0007 - .0002 - .0003165 .0074 .0064 .0047 .0025 .0011 .0000 - .0006 - .0006
180 .0061 .0046 .0030 .0011 .0001 - .0006 - .0009 - .0007195 .0038 .0025 .0010 - .0001 - .0006 - .0009 - .0009 - .0006210 .0011 .0001 - .0007 - .0013 - .0013 - .0011 - .0008 - .0005225 - .0013 - .0020 - .0024 - .0022 - .0018 - .0012 - .0006 - .0003
240 - .0033 - .0037 - .0035 - .0029 - .0021 - .0011 - .0002 .0000255 - .0044 - .0046 - .0041 - .0031 - .0020 - .0008 .0003 .00042 70 - .004 8 - .0047 — .0041 - .0028 - .0015 - .0004 .0007 .0007285 - .0044 - .0040 - .0034 - . 002 0 - .0007 .0004 .0011 .0009
300 — .0033 - .0028 - .0019 - .0004 .0007 .0012 .0013 .0009315 - .0013 - .0004 .0005 .0019 .0023 .0020 .0011 .0005330 .0011 .0024 .0034 .0041 .0036 .0023 .0004 - .0002345 .0038 .0053 .0060 .0056 .0040 .0020 - .0004 - .0008
Table A-2 . Bending Moments for Various Loading C o n d i t io n s , d / t = 20
Loading C a setogle
9 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
0° 0 .0256 0.0280 0 .0255 0 .0167 0.0074 0.0004 -0 .0046 -0 .0 0 3 915 .0259 .0243 .0185 .0066 - .0018 - .0057 - .0057 - .003530 .0198 .0134 .0049 - .0067 - .0108 - .0099 - .0050 - .002245 .0063 - .0038 - .0125 - .0184 - .0155 - .0101 - .0025 - .0003
60 - .0114 - .0226 - .0281 - .0246 - .0149 - .0067 .0006 .001575 - .0284 - .0343 - .0317 - .0190 - .0086 - .0014 .0030 .002690 - .0365 - .0327 - .0234 - .0091 - .0010 ,0034 .0045 .0031
105 - ,0284 - .0189 - .0084 .0020 .0057 .0065 .0046 .0028102 - .0114 - .0009 .0067 .0110 .0101 .0075 .0036 .0018135 .0063 .0139 .0169 . .0 1 5 3 .0110 .0066 .0018 .0005150 .0198 .0232 .0219 .0159 .0098 .0043 - .0002 - .0009165 .0259 .0253 .0210 .0128 .0064 .0014 - .0020 - .0020
180 .0256 .0219 .0160 .0076 .0020 - .0016 - .0035 - .0028195 .0190 .0135 .0078 ,0010 - .0025 - .0040 - .0040 - .0027210 .0086 .0032 - .0013 - .0054 - .0063 — .0056 - - .0037 - .0022225 - .0027 - .0073 - .0099 - .0107 - .0090 - .0061 - .0025 - .0010240 - .0131 - .0163 - .0167 - .0141 - .0100 - .0054 - .0007 .0004255 - .0198 - .0212 - .0196 - .0143 - .0086 - .0034 .0014 .0020270 . - .0225 - .0220 - .0186 - .0116 - .0053 - .0004 .0034 .0031285 . 019 8 . - .0174 - .0130 - .0056 - .0002 .0030 .0045 .0035
300 - .0131 - .0090 - .0041 .0024 .0056 .0062 .0048 .0029315 - .0027 .0025 .0069 .0108 ■ .0107 .0080 ' .0034 .0012330 .0086 .0142 .0172 .0174 .0135 .0078 .0009 - .0009345 .0190 .0233 .0239 .0196 .0123 .0051 - .0020 - .0028
APPENDIX B
CHARTS AND DATA FOR NORMAL FORCE INFLUENCE COEFFICIENTS
The curve and t a b le s p re sen ted are a further app l ica t ion of the
inf luence line co n cep t to the so i l - c o n d u i t s y s t e m . These curves are r e
ferred to as the normal force inf luence c h a r t s . The char t s are u t i l ized
to determine the normal force in the condui t wall due to the inf luence of
any d es i red surface l o a d .
It i s important to note tha t th e s e cha r t s are ob ta ined using the
following e l a s t i c mater ia l p roper t ies : for the condu i t , E = 2 . 5 x 106 p s i
= 17.25 x 106 kN/m2; for the soil medium, Es = 200 k s f = 9 .58 x 10^
N/m2 and p s = 0 . 4 .
64
65
-0.10
. 0 = 270'
0.0
0 = 90°
0.0!
Distance from Center, Diameters
- 0.10
0 = 270'
-0.05
0 = 90'0.0
0.05
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure B - l . Normal Force Influence Curves for 9 = 90° and 2 70°
(a ) , d / t = 20; (b), d / t = 40 .
66
-0 .1 6
-0.08
Cn
0.0
0.080 2 3 4
Distance from Center, Diameters
-0.16
0 = 105°
x-0.08
0.0
0.08
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure B-2 . Normal Force Influence Curves for 9= 75° and 105°
(a), d / t = 20; (b), d / t = 40 .
67
-0.20
-0.150 = 120'
— 0 . 10,
-0.05
0.0
0 = 60 '
0.05
Distance from Center, Diameters
- 0.20
-0.15
- 0 .10
-0.05
0.0
0.05
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure B - 3 . Normal Force Inf luence Curves for 0 = 60° and 120°
(a), d / t = 20; (b) # d / t = 40.
68
-0.25
- 0.20
-.0.15
n 0 = 135°- 0.10
-0.05
0=45'
0.0
Distance from Center, Diameters
-0.25
- 0.20
-0.15
- 0.10
-0.05
0.0
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure B-4 . Normal Force Influence Curves for 0 = 45° and 13 5°
(a) d / t = 20; (b) d / t = 40.
69
- 0.3CV
- 0.20
n
- 0.10
e = 30°
o.o
Distance from Center, Diameters
- 0.30
- 0.20
0 = 150'
- 0.10
0 = 30°
0.0
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure B - 5 . Normal Force Influence Curves for 9= 30° and 150°
(a), d / t / = 20; (b), d / t = 40 .
70
-0.30
- 0.20
Cn 0 = 15°
- 0.10
0 = 165°
0.0
Distance from Center, Diameters
-0.30
- 0.20
- 0.10
0 = 165°
0.0
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure B - 6 . Normal Force Influence Curves for 0= 15° and 165°
(a), d / t = 20; (b), d / t = 40.
71
- 0.20
n
- 0.10
0 = 180'
0.0
Distance from Center, Diameters
-0.30
- 0.20
•n
- 0.10
0 = 180'
0.0
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure B-7. Normal Force Influence Curves for 0 = 0° and 180°
(a), d / t = 20; (b), d / t = 4 0 .
72
-0.30
- 0.20
n
0 = 345°- 0.10
0.0
Distance from Center, Diameters
-0.30
- 0.20
.0= 345'
- 0.10
0 = 195'
0.0
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure B-8. Normal Force Influence Curves for 0= 195° and 34 5°
(a), d / t = 20; (b), d / t = 40 .
73
-0.25
- 0.20
-0.150 = 330
- 0.10
-0.055 = 210'
0.0
Distance from Center, Diameters
-0.25
- . 0.20 / ) -----
0 = 330'-0.15,
-0.05
0.0
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure B-9 . Normal Force Influence Curves for 6 = 2 1 0 ° and 330°
(a) , d / t = 20; (b), d / t = 40 .
74
-0.20
-0.15
0 = 315'- 0.10n
-0.05
0 = 225'
0.0
Distance from Center, Diameters
- 0.20
-0.15
- 0.10n
-0.050 = 225°
0.03 40 2
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure B-10 . Normal Force Influence Curves for 9 = 225° and 315°
(a) , d / t = 20; (b) , d / t = 40 .
75
-0.15
- 0.10
n
-0 .0 5
0 = 240'
Distance from Center, Diameters
-0 .1 5
- 0.10
0 = 300'
n
- 0.0
0 = 240'
0.0
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure B - l 1. Normal Force Influence Curves for 0 = 240° and 300°
(a), d / t = 20; (b), d / t = 40.
76
- 0.075
- 0.050
n
-0.025
0.0
0.025Distance from Center, Diameters
- 0.100
-0.075-J) = 285'
-0.050
n-0.02
0 = 225°
0.0
0.025
Distance from Center, Diameters
Figure B-12. Normal Force Influence Curves for 9 = 255° and 285°
(a) , d / t = 20; (b), d / t = 40 .
Table B - l , Normal Forces for Various Loading C o n d i t io n s » d / t - ’40
■ ' . Loading C a s e Angle " “ : 1 1 " —
e 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ' 16
0° -0 .2358 - 0 .2 6 3 0 -0 .2 6 0 0 -0 .2 1 2 3 -C1.1506 -C1.0876 -C1.0220 ' C1.002415 • - .2589 - .2737 - .2542 - .1815 - .1114 - .0559 - .0116 .00273.0 - .2500 - .2300 - .1947 - .1100 .0535 - .0235 - .0110 - .003645 - .1943 - .1503 - .1032 - .0296 - .0135 - .0117 - .0197 — .012760 — .1215 - .0605 - .0250 .0057 — .0164 - .0270 - ,0305 — .0192 '75 - .0339 .0227 . .0094 - .0126 - .0380 - .0454 - .0387 - .023790 .0120 .0100 - .0345 - .0621 - .0710- - .0634 - .0425 - .0250
105 - .0339 - .0725 - ,1130 - .1146 — .0982 - .0723 - .0395 - .0221
120 — .1215 - .1500 - .1660 - .1389 - .1060 - .0700 — .0326 — .0172135 — .1943 - .2077 - .1982 - .1492 . 1052 - .0623 - .0243 - .0114150 - .2500 - .2375 - .2065 - .1418 ■ - .0929 - .0488 - .0138 - .0042165 - .2589 - .2303 - .1878 - .1197 - .0739 - .0345 - .0055 .0013
180 - .2358 - .2000 - .1582 - .0967 — .0580 - .0255 — .0023 . .0032195 - .2021 - .1645 - .1256 - .0738 - .0437 - .0188 ' - .0014 .0035210 - .1480 - .1100 - .0829 - .0480 - .0308 - .0160 - .0054 .0003225 - .0893 - .0638 - .0464 - .0299 - .0254 - .0197 - .0140 - .0058240 - .0535 - .0362 - .0283 - .0248 - .0285 - .0275 - .0234 - .0122255 — .0265 - .0173 - .0179 - .0257 - .0361 - .0381 .0340 - .01922 70 - .0147 — .0162 - .0258 - .0432 - .0572 - .0576 - .0477 - .0268285 . - .0265 - .0384 - .0546 - .0759 - .0871 - .0800 - ,0582 - .0306
300 — .0535 - .0730 - .0920 - .1113 - .1150 — .0972 - .0618 — .0293315 — .0893 - .1165 - .1396 - .1513 - .1442 - .1128 - .0611 - .0242330 - .1480 - .1800 - .1970 - .1960 - .1690 - .1200 - .0510 - .0134345 - .2021 - .2360 - .2441 - .2198 .1720 - .1103 - .0355 - .0026
Table B-2 . Normal Forces for Various Loading C o n d i t io n s , d / t - 20
Loading C aseAngle • — -------------- —----- :----------------- ——
9 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
0° -0 .2600 -0 .2 8 7 0 -0 .2 7 9 2 -0 .2234 -0 .1542 -0 .0860 -0 .0174 0 .006015 - .2788 - . . 2 8 7 9 - .2610 - .1783 - .1037 - .0478 - .0064 .005530 - .2550 - .2340 - .1880 - .0935 - .0400 - .0141 - .0073 - .002345 . - .1906 - .1380 - .0855 - .0096 .0026 - .0017 - .0177 - .012860 - .0994 - .0305 .0063 .0308 - .0014 - .0206 - .0320 — .021475 .0026 .0609 .0418 .0062 - .0299 - .0446 - .0428 - .027290 .0500 .0442 - .0080 - .0493 - .0680 - .0660 - .0475 - .0288
105 .0026 - .0423 - .0932 - .1092 - .1006 - .0781 - .0454 - .0261
120 - .0994 - .1390 - .1626 - .1450 - .1150 - .0777 - .0380 — .0203135 - .1906 - .2120 - .2080 - .1623 - .1171 - .0707 - .0281 - .0131150 - .2550 - .2520 - .2240 - .1585 - .1107 - .0565 - .0159 - .0046165 - .2788 - .2539 - .2108 - .1377 - .0855 - .0400 - .0053 .0024
180 — .2600 - .2240 - .1780 — .1091 — .0642 — .0267 .0003 .0058195 - .2217 - .1804 - .1366 . - .0779 - .0434 - .0159 .0026 .0065210 - .1600 - .1192 - .0845 - .0442 - .0250 - .0103 - .0012 .0030225 - .0905 - .0586 - .0370 — .0182 - .0149 - .0121 . — .0105 - .0042
240 — .0392 - .0171 - .0080 - .0071 - .0158 - .0205 - .0224 - .0128255 ■ ■ — .0008 .0106 .0079 - .0069 - .0251 - .0340 - .0362 .0220270 ' .0137 .0116 - .0027 - .0296 - .0515 - .0577 .0521 - .0306285 - .0008 - .0164 - .0388 - .0700 - .0879 - .0842 - .0640 - .0348
300 — .0392 - .0646 - .0900 - .1170 - .1239 - .1055 - .0674 -" .0324315 - .0905 - .1246 - .1501 - .1680 - .1591 ' - . 1228 - .0643 - .0248330 - .1600 - .1978 - .2173 - .2151 .1832 ■ - .1276 - .0516 — .0122345 - .2217 - .2588 - .2665 - .2377 - .1831 - .1148 - .0337 .0000
APPENDIX C
NOTATION
Symbol Explanation
A Arching
Ac C r o s s - s e c t i o n a l a rea of condui t wal l per unit length
Bj H or izon ta l d im ension of ditch or condui t
b Length of d is t r ibu ted surface load
Ci Load co e f f ic ien t for so i l load
Cm/ Cm Bending moment coe f f ic ien ts
Cn» Cn Normal force co e f f ic ien ts
c t Load co e f f ic ien t for l ive load
D M ean d iam eter of condui t
d In te rna l d iameter of pipe
E Modulus of e l a s t i c i t y of condu i t mater ia l
El Modulus of e l a s t i c i t y of in te r face
Es Modulus of e l a s t i c i t y of so il medium
I Moment of ine r t ia of unit longi tud ina l s e c t io n of condui t wall
Ic Impact fac tor
•K Ratio of hor izon ta l to v e r t ic a l p re s su re in a l a te ra l ly confined so i l
k Radius of gyra t ion of condu i t wal l per unit length
Lf Load fac tor
t Length of s e c t io n of condui t on which load is computed
M Bending moment in condui t wal l per unit length• 79
Symbol Explanation
N Normal force in condui t wal l per unit length
P Concen tra ted surface load
pv Ver tical so i l p re ssu re
p D is t r ibu ted load in ten s i ty
Rf Failure ra t io
5 Ring com press ive s trength
Syp Yield s trength of condui t mater ia l
T Normal th rus t in condui t wal l
t Condui t w a l l th i c k n e s s
W c Vertical load appl ied to the condu i t due to so i l f i l l
Wt Vertical load app l ied to pipe due to live load
Ad Diametr ic change
Ay Vertica l change in d iameter
6 Angle of wal l f r ic t ion
0 Angle m easured from hor izon ta l in coun te rc lockw ise d i rec t ion
$ Soil f r ic t ion angle
7 Unit weight of so i l medium
€ Vertical Soil s t r a in
Ps Pols s o n 1 s rat io for so i l
<5n Normal force ac t ing on the in te r face
T f Shear s trength of the in terface
REFERENCES
Abel, John R„, Mark, Robert, and Richards , Rowland, J r . , 1973," S t r e s s e s around Flexib le El liptic P ip e s , " Journal of the Soil M ec h a n ic s and Foundations D iv i s io n , ASCE, Vol. 99, No.SM7-, Proc. Paper 9858, July , pp . 509-526 .
Allgood, J. R . , 1972, Summary of Soi l -S tructure In te r a c t io n , U .S . Naval C iv i l Eng. Laboratory, Port Huenem e, C a l i f . , Tech. Rept. R -7,7.1,
Allgood, J. R . , and Takahash i , S. K„, 1972, "Balanced D es ig n andF in i t e -e le m e n t Analys is of C u lv e r t s , " Highway Research Record 413, pp . 4 5 - 5 6 .
Anand, Subhash C . , 1974, "S t re s s D is tr ibu t ions around Shallow Buried Rigid P i p e s , " Journal of the Structural D i v i s i o n , ASCE, Vol.100, No. ST1, Proc. Paper 10258, January, p p . 161-174.
Burns , Jerome Q . , and Richard, Ralph M . , 1964, "Attentuat ion ofS t r e s s e s for Buried C y l in d e r s ," Proceedings of the Symposium on Soi l -S truc ture In te r a c t io n , The Univers i ty of Arizona, Tucson , Arizona, S ep tem b er , .p p . 378-392 .
C lough, G . W ayne , and D uncan , James M . , 1971, "Fin i te Element Analys is of Retaining W al l B e h a v io r , " Journal of the Soil M ech an ic s and Foundat ions D i v i s io n , ASCE, Vol. 97, No.SM12, Proc. Paper 8583, December , pp . 1657-1673 .
Dar , Sidig M . , and B a tes , Robert C . , 1974, " S t re s s Analys is of Hollow Cyl indr ica l I n c l u s i o n s , " Journal of the G e o te ch n ica l Engineering D i v i s i o n , ASCE, Vol. 100, No. GT2, Proc. Paper 10364, February , pp . 123-138 .
Duncan , James M . , and Chang, Chin-Yung, 1970, " Nonlinear Analysis of S t ress and Strain in S o i l s , " Journal of the Soil M echan ics and Foundat ions D i v i s i o n , ASCE, Vol. 96, No. SM5, Proc.Paper 7513, September , pp . 1629-1653.
Goodier , J. N . , 1933, "C oncen t ra t ion of S t ress around Spherical and Cy l indr ica l Inc lus ions and F l a w s , " Transac t ions of the Ameri c a n Socie ty of M ech an ica l E n g in ee rs , Vol. 55, pp . 39-44 .
Grooms, Henry R . , 19 72, "Algorithm for Matr ix Bandwidth Reduction ," Journal of the Structural D i v i s io n , ASCE, Vol. 98, No. ST1,Proc. Paper 8636, January, pp . 203-214 .
Krizek, R. J . , Parmelee, R. A . , Kay, J. N . , and Elnaggar, H . A . , 1971, Structural Analysis and D es ign of Pipe C u l v e r t s . NCHRP Rept. 116.
81
82
L er t laksana , Voravit, 1973, "Fini te Element Analysis of Culver ts under Embankments with Time Dependent and Nonlinear P roper t ie s ," unpub l ished P h .D . D i s se r t a t io n , Oregon State Univers i ty , C o r v a l l i s .
Roark, Raymond, J. , 1965, Formulas for S t ress and S t r a in , ed . 4, M cG raw -H i l l , New York.
Sogge, Robert L. , n . d . , "Fini te Element Analysis of Anchored Bulkhead Behavior ," P h .D . d i s s e r ta t io n , D ept , of Civi l Engineering and Engineering M e c h a n ic s , Univers i ty of Arizona, in p repara t ion .
Spangler , M. G . , and Handy, R. L . , 1973, Soil Eng inee r ing , ed . 3, In text Educational Pub l i she rs , New York.
Timoshenko, S. P . , and Goodier , J. N. , 1970, Theory of E la s t i c i t y , e d . 3 . , M cG raw -H il l , New York.
W a tk in s , Raynold K. , 1966, "Structura l D es ign of Buried C ircu lar Cond u i t s , " Highway Research Record 14 5, pp. 1 -16 .
Z ienk iew icz , O. C . , 1971, The Fin ite Element Method in Engineering S c i e n c e , M cG raw -H il l , London.