+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in...

Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in...

Date post: 14-Mar-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 6 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
90
Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Esser, Alan James, 1946- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 13/08/2021 15:36:07 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/554718
Transcript
Page 1: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits

Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic)

Authors Esser, Alan James, 1946-

Publisher The University of Arizona.

Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this materialis made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona.Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such aspublic display or performance) of protected items is prohibitedexcept with permission of the author.

Download date 13/08/2021 15:36:07

Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/554718

Page 2: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF SHALLOW

BURIED RIGID CONDUITS

by

Alan James E sse r

A T hesis Submitted to th e Faculty of the

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MECHANICS

In P ar tia l Fulfillm ent of the Requirements . For the D egree of

MASTER OF SCIENCE WITH A MAJOR IN CIVIL ENGINEERING

In the G raduate C ollege

THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

1 9 7 4

Page 3: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

STATEMENT BY AUTHOR

This th e s i s h as been subm itted in partia l fu lfillm ent of re ­quirem ents for an advanced degree at The U niversity of Arizona and is d ep o s ited in the U niversity Library to be made av a ilab le to borrowers under ru les of the Library.

Brief quo ta tions from th is th e s is are a llow able w ithout sp e c ia l p e rm iss io n , provided th a t accu ra te acknowledgm ent of source is m a d e . R equests for perm iss ion for ex tended quotation from or reproduction of th is m anuscrip t in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major departm ent or the Dean of the G raduate C ollege when in h is ju d g ­ment the proposed use of the m ateria l is in the in te re s ts of sch o la r ­sh ip . In a ll o ther in s ta n c e s , how ever, perm iss ion m ust be obta ined from the au thor.

SIGNED:

APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR

This th e s i s h a s been approved on the date shown below:

iLPH M . 'RICHARD P rofessor of C iv il Engineering

and Engineering M echan ics

Page 4: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I w ish to e x p re ss my g ra titude to my re se a rc h d irec to r . Prof.

Ralph M. Richard, for h is encouragem ent, a s s i s t a n c e , and gu idance dur­

ing th is r e se a rc h and throughout my g radua te s tu d ie s . In add it ion , I

ex p re ss my a p p rec ia t io n to Prof. Robert L. Sogge for h is support and

advice and p a r t ic u la r ly for h is g en e ro s i ty in providing the com puter p ro ­

grams u se d in th is s tu d y . Thanks are ex tended to Prof. H a s s a n A. Su ltan

for h is h e lp fu l su g g e s t io n s and for serv ing as an ad d it io n a l member of

the exam ining com m ittee .

S p ec ia l th an k s are e x p re sse d to my w ife , Sandra Rae, for her

p a t ie n c e and encouragem ent and for h e r a s s i s ta n c e during the p repara­

t io n of th is m an u sc rip t .

i l l

Page 5: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v

ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v i

1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2 . LITERATURE SURVEY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

C urren t D e s ig n P rac tice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6Proposed D es ig n M ethods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

Ring C om press ion M ethod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.B alanced D es ig n M ethod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

3 . RESEARCH TOOLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

Program SSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12Program F e a tu r e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12Program M odifica tion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

F in i te -e le m e n t M odels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15V erifica tion of M odels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

4 . DISCUSSION OF RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

P ar tia l D is tr ib u ted Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23C o n cen tra ted Loads and In fluence C harts . . . . . . . . . . . . 30In te rface Slip . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

4 . CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

Recomm endations for Further Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50

APPENDIX A: CHARTS AND DATA FOR MOMENTINFLUENCE COEFFICIENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51

APPENDIX B: CHARTS AND DATA FOR NORMAL FORCEINFLUENCE COEFFICIENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64

APPENDIX C: NOTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79

REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81

iv

Page 6: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

LIST,OF ILLUSTRATIONS

Figure Page

1 „ Region Inc luded in the A nalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

2 . F in i te -e le m e n t Id e a l iz a t io n for Grid 1 and Grid 2 . . . . . . . . 16

3 . P a r tia l F in i te -e le m e n t Id e a l iz a t io n for G rid 3 and Grid 4 ... .. 19

4 . ' Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 1 to 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

5 . Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 5 to 8 . i . . . . . . . . . . 25

6. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 1 to 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

7. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 5 to 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

8. Moment Variation for Various Loading C onditions . . . . . . . . 29

9 . D iam etric Change for Various Loading C o n d it io n s . . . . . . . . 29

10. Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 9 to 12 . . . . . . . . . . . 31

11. Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 13 to 16 . . . . . . . . . . 32

12. Bending M oments for Loading C a s e s 17 to 20 . . . . . . . . . . 33

13. Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 21 to 24 . . . . . . . . . . 34

14. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 9 to 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

15. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 13 to 16 . . . . . . . . . . . . 36

16. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 17 to 20 . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

17. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 21 to 24 . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

18. In te rp o la tio n of C o eff ic ien ts for S t if fn esses Not G ivenin In fluence C h a r t s . ................... 41

19. Some C a s e s for A nalysis by In fluence C harts ................ 43

20. Effect of In te rface Slip on Bending M o m e n t s ................. 47

21. Effect of In te rface Slip on Normal F o r c e s ................. 48

v

Page 7: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

ABSTRACT

F in i te -e le m e n t a n a ly s is u s ing e la s t ic m ate ria l p ropert ies is

u se d to ev a lu a te the e f fec t of l ive loads on shallow r ig id condu its „ It

i s shown th a t the a ssu m p tio n th a t l ive lo ad s are uniformly d is tr ib u ted

oyer the su rface w ill u n d eres tim a te the moments and o v eres t im a te the

normal fo rces in the in c lu s io n for p a r t ia l loading cond it ions „

Extending the in fluence line c o n c e p t , a c o l le c t io n of in fluence

c h a r ts is deve loped for th e d a ta o b ta ined from the f in i te -e le m e n t a n a ly ­

s i s . U sing the c h a r t s , nondim ensional bending moment and normal force

in fluence c o e f f ic ie n ts c a n be determ ined for any su rface lo a d in g . The

in fluence ch a r ts may be app lied d irec tly to the b a lan ced d es ig n method

and .a re a v a lu ab le ad ju n c t to th is p rocedure .

N either of the assu m p tio n s u se d in e la s t i c s o lu t io n s , full

s l ip p ag e or no s l ip p a g e , is s e e n to h av e any p a r t ic u la r advantage in

es tim a tin g the bending moments and normal forces for shallow buried

rig id c o n d u i t s .

Page 8: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

Today the trend is toward g rea te r concern for the e s th e t ic and

environm enta l qua lity of our u t i l i ty and t ra n sp o r ta t io n s y s t e m s . The

an tiq u a ted com bined sew er sy s tem s of many large c i t i e s are being s y s ­

te m a tic a l ly r e p l a c e d . The buried s truc tu re is rece iv ing more a t ten t io n

a s an a l te rn a t iv e to the som etim es u n s ig h tly appearan ce of overhead

and g ro u n d -lev e l u t i l i ty i n s t a l l a t i o n s .

The s o i l - c u lv e r t system is one of the more im portant of th e se

underground i n s t a l l a t i o n s . Large sums of money are being in v e s te d in

cu lv e r t in s ta l la t io n s each y e a r . Due to the m agnitude of th e se expen­

d itu res any u n n e c e s sa ry c o n se rv a t ism in des ign ing a s o i l - c u lv e r t s y s ­

tem should be s e r io u s ly q u e s t io n e d .

Current d e s ig n p ra c t ic e does not provide for a r e a l i s t i c a s s e s s ­

ment of the sa fe ty and re l ia b i l i ty o f buried cu lv e r ts under an assum ed

loading c o n d it io n . The m ost commonly u sed d e s ig n te c h n iq u e s are la rg e ­

ly em p ir ica l . The s e le c t io n of co n d u its is b a se d on y ea rs of experience

and the o b se rv a tio n of the perform ance of in - s e rv ic e c u l v e r t s . A g rea t

d e a l of re se a rc h h a s b een done in the p a s t s ev e ra l y ea rs ; how ever,>-

l i t t le of th is know ledge h a s found i ts way into eng ineering p r a c t i c e .

This is due to the d e f in it io n of-cu lvert supporting s treng th and to the

fa c t th a t too l i t t le is known of the e x a c t nature of the load ing and the

r e su l ta n t s t r e s s e s d eve loped in the sy s te m .

Page 9: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

2

The r e s u l t s of th is w ork , u sed in co n ju n c tio n with the d e s ig n

p rocedures d e sc r ib e d in a la te r c h a p te r , provide an im portant s tep toward

m aking an a c c u ra te ev a lu a t io n of cu lv e r t sa fe ty p o s s ib le .

The em pirica l d e s ig n p ro ced u res u sed today hav e been made

n e c e s s a r y by th e com plex ity of the s o i l - c u lv e r t sy s te m . Soil p roperties

are non lin ea r and s t r e s s d ep en d en t. They are a ffec ted by the tim e-

dependen t p re se n c e of pore w ate r , and many are s e n s i t iv e .to d is tu rb an ce

by o u ts id e fo rc e s . The system is c h a ra c te r iz e d by a high degree of in ­

de te rm in an cy . In ad d it io n , boundary cond it ions in troduced when lim iting

th e e x te n t of the system to be an a ly zed a s w ell as in te rface p roperties

b e tw een the so i l and the cu lv e r t are h igh ly com plex .

The follow ing assu m p tio n s are made:

1 . Only sha llow buried condu its are co n s id e re d . For pu rposes of

th is s tudy a sha llow co n d u it sh a l l be one buried a t a depth of

one d iam e te r .

2 . In the developm ent of the in f lu en ce ch a r ts in C hap te r 4, no s lip

i s a llow ed a t the s o i l - c u lv e r t in te r fa c e . P a r tia l and full s lip a t

th e in te rface are t re a ted s e p a ra te ly .

3 . A nalys is i s lim ited to r ig id s tru c tu res ; th u s , buckling is not a

c o n s id e ra t io n .

4 . The so il medium, is a s s ig n e d l in e a r e la s t ic hom ogeneous prop­

e r t i e s , and the p re se n c e of w ate r is e x c lu d e d .

5 . The a c tu a l th re e -d im e n s io n a l system is t re a te d as a tw o-

d im ensiona l p lan e s tra in problem . The p lane c o n s id e red is

ta k e n p e rp en d icu la r to the long itud ina l ax is of the condu it .

6 . W eigh t of the so il medium is n e g le c te d .

Page 10: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

The follow ing s ign conven tion is adhered to throughout th is

th e s i s . P os it iv e bending moments produce te n s io n on the ou te r su rface

o f the condu it w a l l . T en s ile normal fo rces in the condu it w a ll are p o s i ­

t iv e . The X -coord inate d ire c t io n is p o s i t iv e to the r ig h t , the Y-

co o rd in a te d ire c t io n i s p o s i t iv e downward, and the o r ig in is tak en a t the

ce n te r of the co n d u it . The angle 9 u sed to lo ca te po in ts along the c i r ­

cum ference of the condu it is m easured in the co u n te rc lo ck w ise d ire c t io n

from the p o s i t iv e X a x is .

Page 11: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

CHAPTER 2

LITERATURE SURVEY

The shallow buried condu it is of in te re s t a s a d e s ig n problem

in i t s own r ight and as an in te rm ed ia te c a s e which o ccu rs during the

ea r ly c o n s tru c t io n p h a s e s of d eep er c o n d u i t s . In both c a s e s of shallow

co n d u its > the live lo ad s c o n s t i tu te the m ost s ig n if ican t loads app lied to

the s y s te m . In i t ia l s t r e s s e s due to th e so il f il l are u s u a lly su ff ic ien tly

sm all to be n e g le c te d . Of th e re se a rc h th a t h a s been under taken , su r­

p r is in g ly l i t t le h a s b een devo ted to th is s p e c ia l c a s e .

An e x te n s iv e s ta te of the art e v a lu a t io n of p ipe cu lver t t e c h ­

nology h a s b e e n g iven by K r iz e k e ta l . (1971). The report o r ig ina ted as

an effort to develop new d e s ig n p r o c e d u re s . H ow ever, there was not

su ff ic ie n t inform ation a v a i la b le to develop a com ple te ly new d es ig n p ro ­

c e d u re . Severa l recom m endations were m a d e .

The M ars to n -S p an g le r theory for determ ining lo ad s due to the

so il prism above the condu it h a s b een p re se n te d by Spangler and Handy

(1973). According to th is theory , the loads developed on buried condu its

are dependen t on the re la t iv e se tt le m e n t of the so il prism above the c o n ­

duit with re s p e c t to the surrounding s o i l , c h a ra c te r is t ic s of the i n s t a l l a ­

t io n , w eigh t and h e ig h t of the so il prism above the c o n d u it , and the

fr ic t ion deve loped b e tw een the so il prism above the co n d u it and the s u r ­

rounding m edium . The e ffec t of l ive lo ad s is b a se d on the B oussinesq

so lu t io n . They have d is c u s s e d the e f fe c ts of arching and bedding along

4

Page 12: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

with various m ethods of determ ining the a v a i la b le supporting s trength o f

c o n d u i t s . They have a lso d e sc r ib e d the " im perfect d itch" te c h n iq u e ,

which is u sed to reduce the v e r t ic a l load th a t m ust be supported by the

c o n d u it . In th is method", a lay e r of lo o se or soft m ate r ia l is in s ta l le d

above the c o n d u it . This in su re s g rea te r re la t iv e se tt lem en t of the so il

prism d irec tly over the co n d u it , the reby genera ting upward f ic tion fo rces

on the s id e s of the prism and reducing the load on the c o n d u i t .

E la s t ic formulas for the s t r e s s e s developed in condu its and the

surrounding medium under the in fluence of a uniformly d is tr ib u ted su rface

load were p roposed by Burns and Richard (1964). The theory is deve loped

for c a s e s of fu ll s lip and no s lip a t the s o i l - s t ru c tu re in t e r f a c e . D e f le c ­

t io n re la t io n s are a lso g iv en . Very rap id a t ten u a tio n of s t r e s s e s in the

so il medium w as r e p o r te d . T h u s , the th e o r ie s p re se n te d are equally

v a l id for shallow and deep s o i l - c u lv e r t s y s te m s .

D ar and Bates (1974) u sed c l a s s i c a l e la s t i c theory to develop a

s e t of equa tions for s t r e s s e s and deform ation which app ly w ith in the c u l ­

vert w a lls as w ell as in the surrounding medium. A uniformly d is tr ib u ted

su rface load is a s s u m e d . These r e se a rc h e rs have done an e x ten s iv e a n ­

a ly s is of cu lv e r t behav io r as a ffec ted by the s t i f fn e ss p ro p ertie s of both

the in c lu s io n and the surrounding so il medium. Except in the v ic in ity

im m ediately a d ja c e n t to th e s o i l - s t ru c tu re in te r fa c e , e x c e l le n t agreem ent

with the r e su l ts of Burns and Richard (1964) were r e p o r te d .

- Abel, M ark, and Richards (1973) reported the re s u l t s of a f in i te -

e lem en t a n a ly s is of the so i l - c u lv e r t system for e l l ip t ic a l p i p e s . Their

work inc luded experim en ta l s tu d ie s us ing p h o to e la s t ic te c h n iq u e s . They

d i s c u s s e d the im portance of s lip and s truc tu ra l f le x ib i l i ty in inducing

Page 13: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

so il a rch ing in l igh t of the e l l ip t ic a l geom etry; how ever, only the fu l l -

s lip and n o - s l ip c a s e s w ere c o n s id e re d . The use of so ft bedding m ateri­

a l w as found to provide no a d v a n ta g e .

An in c rem en ta l c o n s tru c t io n a n a ly s is of the deep buried s o i l -

c u lv e r t sy s tem h a s b een performed by L e r t lak san a (19 73). N onlinear

s o i l p ro p ert ie s and the p re se n c e of pore w ate r in the so il f i l l were c o n ­

s id e red „ B ased on the r e s u l t s of h is s tu d y , L e rtlaksana conc luded th a t

th e M ars to n -S p an g 1 er procedure for c a lc u la t in g v e r t ic a l p re s su re s on

r ig id c u lv e r ts y ie ld s c o n se rv a tiv e r e s u l t s . The Iowa d e f le c t io n formula

for computing crow n d e f le c t io n s in f le x ib le condu its w as a lso found to be

ex trem ely c o n se rv a t iv e „

P a r tia l d is tr ib u ted loading con d it io n s for sha llow buried rig id

co n d u its w ere in v e s t ig a te d by Anand (1974). He dem onstra ted th a t the

moments p roduced by a p a r t ia l load in th e v ic in i ty of the condu it are un­

d e res t im a ted by the e l a s t i c i ty so lu t io n . The normal fo rces s im ilarly p ro ­

duced are o v e re s t im a te d . This is a m atter for some c o n ce rn , s ince the

bending moment is the more im portant c o n s id e ra t io n in the d e s ig n of

r ig id c u l v e r t s . F in a l ly , he conc luded th a t the th e o re t ic a l e la s t ic i ty s o lu ­

t io n is not a p p lic a b le to the sha llow s o i l - c u lv e r t s y s te m . H ow ever, th is

co n c lu s io n i s in co rrec t , a s w ill be show n in C hap ter 4 .

Current D es ig n P rac tice

Except for very large condu its , d e s ig n p ra c t ic e to da te has b een

b a s e d on the M ars to n -S p an g le r th eo r ie s developed during the 1920 's and

1 9 3 0 's . This theory c o n s i s t s of the de term ina tion of to ta l v e r t ic a l loads

assu m ed to a c t on the condu it and a p p lic a t io n of load fac to rs th a t re la te

Page 14: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

required lo ad -ca rry in g a b i l i ty to th a t a v a ilab le in m anufactured conduit

s e c t io n s . An appropria te factor of sa fe ty is in c lu d e d .

The to ta l v e r t ic a l earth load Wc ac ting on the condu it is g iven

by

Wc = CiYBj2 (1)

in w h ich 'V is the unit w eight of the fill m a te r ia l , Bj is the horizon ta l

d im ension e ith e r of the d itch at the top of the pipe or the o u ts id e d iam ­

e te r of the p ipe depending on the method of in s ta l la t io n , and is the

load c o e f f ic ie n t . C i is determ ined from an appropriate ch a r t and is a

function of the geom etry of the s o i l - c u lv e r t sy s tem , the method of in ­

s ta l la t io n , and the m ate ria l p roperties of both the so il f ill and the

c u lv e r t .

The live load tran sfe rred to the cu lver t Wt is determ ined from

Wt = ( l /£ ) I c C t P (2)

in which ^ is the length of the conduit s e c t io n on which the load is com ­

p u ted , tak en as the length of a s ing le s e c t io n of p ipe or an e ffec tive

length in the c a s e of very long s e c t io n s , a s with c a s t - i r o n pipe; Ic is

an im pact factor; P is a co n cen tra ted load applied at the f ill surface;

and Cj- is the load c o e f f ic ie n t , b a sed on the B oussinesq th e o ry . The

w eigh t of w ater and the pipe may a lso be added .

The v e r t ic a l p re ssu re d is tr ib u tio n on any ho rizo n ta l p lane below

a co n cen tra ted load is b e l l s h a p e d . As the depth below the surface in ­

c r e a s e s , the d is tr ib u t io n becom es more uniform. Thus, the assum ption

of a uniform d is tr ib u tio n of live load p re ssu re applied to the conduit is

r e a so n a b le for deep i n s t a l l a t i o n s . H ow ever, for shallow c o n d u its , th is

assum ption ca n y ie ld r e su l ts which are su b s ta n t ia l ly d iffe ren t than the

Page 15: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

8

true co n d it io n , p a r t ic u la r ly i f the condu it is large enough th a t s ig n if ic a n t

v a r ia t io n in the p re s su re d is tr ib u t io n w ill o ccu r over the w idth of the

s t ru c tu re .

C onduit s treng th is commonly sp e c if ie d in term s of the D - l o a d .

This is the th re e -e d g e s treng th e x p re s s e d in terms of th e load supported

pe r un it foot of d iam e te r . Using th e D - lo a d a llow s sp e c i f ic a t io n s to be

w ritten in a form th a t is indep en d en t of condu it d ia m e te r . The th re e -e d g e

s treng th is m odified through the u se of load f a c to r s , Lf, tak ing into a c ­

coun t la te ra l earth p re s s u re s th a t develop in - s i tu and bedding con d it io n s .

The sa fe supporting s treng th of the r ig id conduit i s th en the D -lo ad m ul­

t ip l ie d by the d iam eter and a load fac to r d iv ided by an appropria te fac to r

of s a fe ty . A s e c t io n is s e le c te d th a t h a s a safe supporting strength

g re a te r th a n the to ta l ap p lied v e r t ic a l lo a d .

W hile the procedure is c o n v e n ie n t , i t does not provide a d ire c t

re la t io n sh ip be tw een the requ ired s treng th and the sa fe supporting

s t r e n g th . D es ig n by th is method therefo re tends to be very c o n s e rv a t iv e .

P roposed D es ig n M ethods

S evera l r e se a rc h e r s have p roposed a l te rn a t iv e p rocedures for

the d e s ig n of buried c o n d u i ts . Some are simply m od ifica tions of the

M ars to n -S p an g le r m ethods, w hile o thers adopt a fresh approach to the

p ro b le m . Two of th e se a l te rn a t iv e s are p re se n te d in the following d i s ­

c u s s io n .

Ring C om press ion M ethod

The ring co m p ress io n method p roposed by W atk in s (1966) is

b a se d on the a s s e r t io n th a t the d e s ig n of c irc u la r condu its is con tro lled

Page 16: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

by condu it d e fo rm a tio n s . These deform ations fall into two c a te g o r ie s ,

w all c rippling and ring d e f lec t io n , with ad d it iona l co n s id e ra t io n g iven

to hand ling and p lacem en t.

Crippling is con tro lled by lim iting the maximum com press ive

s t r e s s in the conduit w all T/Ac to a va lu e th a t is l e s s th an the ring com ­

p re s s iv e s trength S by some factor of s a f e t y . T is the co m p ress iv e force

in the condu it w a l l , and Ac is the c r o s s - s e c t io n a l a rea of the w all per

unit of le n g th . For a r ig id so il (friction angle = 90), the ring com p res­

s ive strength is eq u iv a len t to Syp, the y ie ld strength of the conduit ma­

t e r ia l . For the c a s e of h y d ro s ta t ic so il 0 = 0 ) , the ring com press ive

s trength is e x p re s se d as

S = (l/E) (D /k )2 (3)

where E is the modulus of e la s t i c i ty of the conduit m a te r ia l , D is the d i­

am eter, and k is the rad ius of gyra tion of the conduit w all per unit l e n g th .

It is apparen t th a t th is equa tion is of the same form as the Euler column

formula, e x cep t th a t the condu it d iam eter is su b s t i tu te d for the column

le n g th . W atk ins (1966) provided a p lo t of the ring co m p ress io n strength

as a function of the condu it p roperties and the so il f r ic tion a n g le . The

maximum co m p ress iv e s t r e s s in the condu it w all , T/Aq , is determ ined

from a th ru s t fac to r, which is a function of the so il and ring s t i f fn e s s e s

and K, the ra tio of ho r izo n ta l to v e r t ic a l p ressu re in la te ra l ly confined

so il due to a v e r t ic a l so il p re ssu re pv . For a c o n se rv a t iv e d e s ig n , take

K = 1 and the re la t io n sh ip s T = 3 /4 pvD for f lex ib le co n d u its or T = pvD

for rigid co n d u its can be u s e d . For more accu ra te d e s ig n s , v a lu es of the

th ru s t fac tor can be ob ta ined from a p lot provided by W a tk in s .

Page 17: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

10

A quick c o n se rv a t iv e e s tim a te of ring d e f lec t io n for f lex ib le

co n d u its is ob ta ined by the c o n se rv a tiv e assum ption th a t the ring d e f le c ­

tio n fac to r is g iven by A y / D = € # where e is the v e r t ic a l so il s tra in from

a conso lid o m ete r t e s t , and Ay is the v e r t ic a l change in the conduit d iam ­

e te r . This is the r e s u l t of tak ing K = 0, th a t i s , no la te ra l p ressu re a c ts

on the co n d u it . G rea te r accu racy may be ob ta ined by using the p lot pro­

v ided by W a tk in s . Ring d e f lec t io n s for nonflexib le co n d u its are e s t i ­

mated by applying m odification fac to rs to the ring d e f lec t io n factors for

f lex ib le c o n d u i ts .

B alanced D es ig n M ethod

The b a lan ced d e s ig n method proposed by Allgood and T akahash i

(1972) is b a se d on ring co m p ress io n and e la s t ic th e o ry . The procedure

perm its the c o n s id e ra t io n of a ll s t i f fn e s s e s and g e o m e tr ie s , arching ,

and b ack p ack in g . C o n s id e ra tio n is g iven to a l l modes of fa i lu re , and

p ro v is io n is made for the com putation of fac to rs of sa fe ty for each m ode.

The u se of the D -lo ad s p e c if ic a t io n for the s e le c t io n of the proper c o n ­

duit is e lim ina ted and the em phas is p la c e d on the more fam iliar approach

of s e le c t in g a s e c t io n b ase d on the requ ired e x te n s io n a l and bending

s t i f f n e s s e s . Using th is method, the d e s ig n e r can a t ta in a d es ired

"b a lan ce" be tw een the fac to rs of s a fe ty of the various fa ilure m odes.

The following is a b rie f summary of the s te p s in th is des ign

p rocedure .

1. Estim ate the arching and c a lc u la te the normal th ru s t in the c o n ­

duit w all by the modified ring com press ion theory as

N = pv (1 - A) (D/2) (4)

Page 18: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

where A is the a rc h in g , pv is the v e r t ic a l s t r e s s a t the crown

e le v a t io n , and D is the mean cy lin d er d iam eter .

2 . C a lc u la te the s t i f fn e s s , El, required by the handling c r i te r ion

^ 0 .0433 (5)

where E is the modulus of e la s t i c i ty of the condu it m ateria l

and I is the moment of in e r t ia per unit l e n g th .

3 . D eterm ine the moment using the th e o re t ic a l e l a s t i c so lu tion as

M = Cmpv (l - A) D2 (6)

where C m is a co e f f ic ie n t dependen t on the so il and conduit

p r o p e r t i e s .

4 . Using e la s t i c fo rm u las , com pute the s t i f fn e ss El required to

r e s i s t the normal force N and bending moment M . Choose the

con tro lling s t i f fn e ss v a lu e .

5. Compute the arching and compare it to the a ssu m ed v a lu e . I t ­

e ra te over s te p s 1-5 as n e c e s s a r y .

6 . Determ ine conform ance with d e s ig n c r i te r ia and the factors of

sa fe ty for the various p o s s ib le failure m odes. These include

d e f le c t io n , w all c ru sh in g , seam s treng th , and b u c k l in g .

The arching term is inc luded in Eqs. 4 and 6 to co rrec t some of the w eak

n e s s e s of the e la s t i c so lu tion , which does not take into accoun t such

fac to rs as the nonhom ogeneity of the so il medium, non linearity of the

s t r e s s - s t r a i n c h a r a c te r i s t i c s , and the time e f fe c ts . In ad d it io n , the

boundary cond it ions in troduce c o n s tra in ts th a t do not e x i s t in the ac tu a l

in s ta l la t io n . Allgood (19 72) p re sen ted a d e ta iled developm ent of arching

re la ted to buried c y l in d e r s .

The ch a r ts developed in su b seq u en t ch ap te rs are d irec tly a p ­

p l ic a b le to th is d es ig n method in the de term ination of the normal force

and bending moment.

Page 19: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

CHAPTER 3

RESEARCH TOOLS

The com puter program and f in i te -e le m e n t grids u se d in th is

s tudy are the product of a g rea t d ea l of prelim inary in v e s t ig a t io n . Pro­

gram SSI w as p repared by Sogge ( n . d . ) . No attem pt i s made here to p re ­

se n t an ex h au s t iv e a n a ly s is of the f in i te -e le m e n t method or the

developm ent of the p rog ram . H ow ever, a summary of the program docu­

m enta tion is p re se n te d . The f in i te -e le m e n t grids are the end re su l t of

se v e ra l r e f in e m e n ts . The prime o b jec t iv e in th e i r developm ent was to

o b ta in a h igh degree of accu racy in the v ic in i ty of the co n d u it .

Program SSI

Program SSI, "S o il-S tru c tu re I n te r a c t io n ," com putes the d i s ­

p la c e m e n ts , s t r e s s e s , and moments in a f in i te -e le m e n t system com pris ­

ing so il and s tru c tu ra l e le m e n ts .

Program F ea tu res

The program s y n th e s iz e s and so lv e s the eq u a tio n s for e q u il ib r i­

um, force deform ation, and geom etric com patib ili ty for the so i l - s t ru c tu re

continuum id e a l iz e d a s an a s sem b lag e of d isc re te e lem en ts . The m atrix

s t i f fn e ss method is u s e d . This procedure h a s been p re se n te d by Z ien-

k iew icz (1971) and by o ther w o rk e rs . In order to m inim ize s to rage r e ­

qu irem en ts , a banding tech n iq u e is u se d to store the system equa tions in

12

Page 20: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

13

the s t i f fn e ss a r r a y . The eq u a tio n s are th en so lved us ing a banded sym ­

m etrica l equa tion so lv e r .

For s o i l - s t ru c tu re sy s te m s , two degree o f freedom nodes are

predom inant in the f in i te -e le m e n t id e a l iz a t io n . H ow ever, the system is

u su a l ly an a ly zed assum ing th ree d eg rees of freedom a t each node. Since

th is would be w a s te fu l of com puter s to r a g e , a m odifica tion th a t m akes

u se of a v e c to r of the cum ulative system d eg rees of freedom a t each node

is in c lu d e d . Using th is p ro c e d u re , nu ll d eg rees of freedom are e lim i­

n a ted and s to rage is r e se rv e d for th o se d eg rees of freedom th a t are

p r e s e n t .

C o n s tan t s tra in t r ia n g le s (TRIMS) are u se d to model the so il

medium. These e lem ents are programed to include non lin ea r strength

p r o p e r t ie s , as d e sc r ib e d by D uncan and Chang (1970). Elements are

a v a i la b le to s im ula te the s o i l - s t ru c tu re in te rface c h a r a c te r is t ic s . These

e lem en ts are programed to include non lin ea r behav io r , as d esc rib ed by

Clough and D uncan (1971). L inea riza tio n of both the tr ian g u la r and in ­

te r fa c e e lem ents is accom plished by a s s ig n in g a fa ilu re ra tio va lue

Rf = 0 and in se r t in g a l in e a r va lue of the e la s t i c m o d u lu s . P o is so n 's

ra tio p m ust a lso be s p e c if ie d .

The s truc tu re is id e a l iz e d a s a se r ie s of in te rc o n n ec ted beam

e lem ents w hose m ateria l behavior is approxim ated by a l in ea r s t r e s s -

s tra in r e la t io n . Boundary d isp lace m e n ts of ad jacen t t r ian g u la r and beam

e lem en ts are not c o m p a t ib le , s in ce th e ir d isp lace m e n t p a t te rn s are c h a r ­

a c te r iz e d by f i r s t - and th ird -o rd e r d isp lace m e n t fu n c t io n s , r e sp e c t iv e ly .

In the lim it, convergence re s u l t s as the m esh s ize i s made f ine r. . For

Page 21: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

c o a rse m e s h e s , the so il is s tif fe r th an a c tu a l , re su lt in g in low er mo­

m ents in the s t ru c tu re .

Program M odif ica tion

In order to fit the very large system of equa tions re su lt in g from

the f in i te -e le m e n t m esh es u se d in to the av a i lab le com puter c en tra l mem­

ory , s e v e ra l m odifica tions of Program SSI were n e c e s s a ry .

.1 . Common arrays, are modified to co n ta in the d a ta .

2 . F ile len g th s are sp e c if ie d to override th o se a s su m ed by the

CDC com puter sy s te m .

3 . Element d a ta are s to red ex te rn a l ly on a tap e f i l e . The order of

en ter ing e lem en t d a ta is not im portan t, s in ce th e order in w hich

the system eq u a tio n s are g en e ra ted is im m aterial as long as

th ey are co rrec t ly s to red .

4 . The portion of the m ain program th a t com putes the v ec to r of

cum ula tive system d eg rees of freedom i s rem oved. These r e ­

s u l ts are o b ta ined beforehand and are subm itted as d a ta .

5. BAR and STRBAR subrou tines are rem oved. In ad d it io n , the

INFACE and STRESI sub rou tines are rem oved, e x c e p t for th o se

c a s e s w here they are ac tiv e in the a n a ly s is .

6 . Statements, to perform n o n d im ensiona liza tion of th e conduit

moments and normal fo rces are added in subrou tine STRESB.

W ith th e s e m o d if ic a t io n s , more c e n tra l memory is r e se rv e d for the s to r ­

age of the s t i f fn e ss e q u a t io n s , w hile the in teg rity of the program as a

too l for the a n a ly s is o f non linear so il behav io r i s p re se rv e d .

Page 22: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

F in ite -e lem en t M odels

Four f in i te -e le m e n t grids are u sed in the a n a ly s is of the s o i l -

condu it sy s te m . The com plete reg ion is shown in F ig . 1. In a ll g r id s ,

beam e lem en ts are u sed to model the condu it and c o n s ta n t - s t r a in t r ia n ­

gu lar e lem en ts are u sed to model the surrounding so il medium.

The region inc luded for a n a ly s is is sym m etrical about a v e r t ic a l

line through the c e n te r of the condu it (the dashed portion is excluded

h e r e ) . Taking advan tage of th is symmetry, only the r ight h a lf of the r e ­

gion is m odeled for Grid 1 and Grid 2. These are shown in F ig . 2 . As a

re s u l t of th is sym m etrical c o n s tru c t io n , only loading con d it io n s th a t are

a lso sym m etrical about th is v e r t ic a l ax is ca n be a n a ly z e d . In both of

th e se g r id s , the s truc tu re is co n s tru c te d of 24 beam e lem en ts and the

surrounding so il medium is made up of 4 74 tr iangu la r e le m e n ts . These

e lem en ts are in te rco n n ec ted at 2 71 node p o in ts . In add it io n to th is .

8d 2d

Figure 1. Region Included in the A nalysis

Page 23: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

Figure 2. F in ite -e lem en t Id ea l iza tio n for Grid 1 and Grid 2

Page 24: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

17

Grid 2 in c lu d e s 24 in te rface e lem ents b e tw een the so il and the s t ru c tu re .

S ince th e s e e lem en ts are a s s ig n e d a zero th ic k n e s s , the ap pearance of

both g rids is id e n t ic a l . Grid. 2 h a s a to ta l of 522 e lem en ts and 296 co n ­

nec ting node p o i n t s . U tiliz ing Grid 2 , the e ffec t of s lip a t the s o i l -

s truc tu re in te rface c a n be in v e s t ig a te d .

A m ain po in t of in te re s t in th is s tudy is to in v e s t ig a te the e f fec t

of nonsym m etrica l load ing c o n d i t io n s . Therefore , i t is n e c e s s a ry to d e ­

velop an ad d it io n a l model th a t in c lu d es the cu lver t and medium on both

s id e s of th e c e n t ra l ax is (the d ash ed portion of the reg io n is om itted

h e r e ) . S ince th e p rev ious m odels requ ire very nearly a l l of the com­

p u te r c e n tra l memory a v a i l a b le , Grid 3 m ust n e c e s s a r i ly be made co n ­

s id e rab ly c o a r s e r . The m esh is kep t r e la t iv e ly fine im m ediate ly a d ja c e n t

to the condu it in order to p rese rve a good degree of a c c u racy in the c o n ­

duit s t r e s s e s .

It i s a lso n e c e s sa ry to determ ine the e ffec t of the boundary

co n d it io n s on the s t r e s s e s induced in the condu it by lo ad s p laced near

po in ts of support. Grid 4 is co n s tru c te d for th is p u r p o s e . The entire

reg io n , inc lud ing an e x te n s io n eq u iv a len t in width to two conduit diam ­

e te rs (dashed portion of the reg ion in F ig . 1) is inc luded in th is m o d e l .

A com parison of the condu it moments produced by lo ad s a t various d i s ­

ta n c e s from the la te ra l support po in ts u s in g Grid 3 and Grid 4 is m a d e .

The r e s u l t s show th a t the e ffec t of the boundary co n d it io n s is in s ig n if i ­

c a n t for loads ap p lied no neare r th an two d iam eters from the supports .

Grid 4 c a n therefore be u se d for po in t lo ad s p laced up to four d iam eters

to the r igh t of a l ine through the c e n te r of the co n d u it .

Page 25: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

18

F ig . 3 is a p a r t ia l v iew of the f in i te -e le m e n t id e a l iz a t io n for

Grid 3 and Grid 4 . The le f t -h a n d portion of both is a mirror image of

th a t show n. The e x te n s io n of the reg ion for Grid 4 is not show n. In bo th ,

the condu it c o n s is t s of 18 beam e le m e n ts , the so il medium is made up of

tr ian g u la r e lem en ts and no in te rface is p rov ided . Grid 3 h a s 266 nodes

and 496 e lem en ts ; Grid 4 h a s 269 nodes and 502 e le m e n ts .

Following the p rep ara tio n of node po in t and c o n n e c tiv i ty d a ta ,

the maximum node po in t s ep a ra t io n w as m inimized us ing an in te ra tiv e

schem e s im ila r to th a t p roposed by Grooms (1972).

V erification of M odels

V erification of the com puter program and the f in i te -e le m e n t

grids d e sc r ib e d in the preced ing s e c t io n is accom plished by performing

e la s t i c a n a ly s is of problem s with known c l a s s i c a l s o lu t io n s . The com ­

pu ted re s u l t s are th en com pared with the known s o lu t io n s .

Three s e p a ra te problem s w ere u se d in the te s t in g of Grids 1 and

2 . F i r s t , the so il e lem en ts are a s s ig n e d zero m ateria l s t i f fn e ss p roper­

t i e s leav ing only the s t ru c tu re . An a n a ly s is of the co n d u it as a c i rc u la r

ring su b jec te d to a co n cen tra ted ax ia l load is perfo rm ed . The r e su l ts are

in e x c e l le n t ag reem ent with the e l a s t i c so lu tion as p re se n te d by Roark

(1965). Secondly , the beam e lem ents rep resen ting the condu it are a s ­

s igned zero s t i f fn e ss p ro p ertie s leav ing only the s o i l . This is an a lyzed

a s a s e m i- in f in i te p la te with a h o le . The s t r e s s d is tr ib u t io n through the

medium is th en com pared with the known so lu tion g iven by Timoshenko

and G oodier (1970). Again there is e x c e l le n t .a g re e m e n t . F in a lly , the

beam e lem en ts are a s s ig n e d very large s t i f fn e ss p ro p e r t ie s . This is

Page 26: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

Figure 3 . Partia l F in ite -e lem en t Id ea liza tio n for Grid 3 and Grid 4

Page 27: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

20

an a ly zed and com pared to the known so lu tio n for a s e m i- in f in i te e la s t i c

p la te with a r ig id cy lin d r ic a l in c lu s io n as p roposed by G oodier (1933).

■Again, the medium s t r e s s e s are in e x c e l le n t agreem ent with the known

so lu t io n , ex c e p t in the lay e r im m ediately a d ja c e n t (0 .20 diam eters) to

th e in c lu s io n . This is a t tr ibu ted to an in ab il i ty to m ain ta in su ff ic ien t

s ig n if ic a n t f igures in the com puter sy s tem to model com plete r ig id i ty .

S in c e .i t w as n e c e s s a ry to c o n s tru c t G rids 3 and 4 with l e s s

d ef in it ion in the so il medium away from the co n d u it , v e r if ic a t io n of

th e s e g rids by the lim iting c a s e approach u se d above w ill in d ica te l e s s

a c c u racy in the s t r e s s e s ob ta ined for the medium. A nalys is of the s tru c ­

ture a s a c i rc u la r ring under an a x ia l load ag a in is in e x c e l le n t ag ree ­

ment with the known so lu t io n . S ince th is study is concerned with mo­

m ents and forces in the co n d u it , l e s s accu racy o f the s t r e s s e s in the

so il medium away from the condu it is of no c o n s e q u e n c e . In order to

verify the accu racy of th e se grids in ob ta in ing the d e s ire d moments and

normal fo r c e s , an a n a ly s is of the s o i l - c u lv e r t system is performed and

com pared to the known so lu tio n p roposed by Burns and Richard (1964).

E xce llen t agreem ent is o b ta in ed .

Anand (19 74), u s ing s im ilar a n a l y s e s , co n c lu d e s th a t the Burns

and Richard so lu tion is not va lid for the c a s e of a sha llow buried con ­

d u i t . H ow ever, a n a ly s e s performed us ing Grid 1 in d ic a te th a t the f in i te -

e lem ent model u sed by Anand w as overrig id . In ad d it io n , he did not co n ­

s id e r the full d is tr ib u ted load assu m ed in the e la s t i c so lu t io n . This

work is p re se n te d in d e ta i l in C hap te r 4 .

Page 28: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

CHAPTER 4

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

The a ssu m p tio n of a uniformly d is tr ib u ted su rface load over an

in fin ite e x ten t is a common fac to r in the th e o re t ic a l e l a s t i c so lu tions

th a t have b een p roposed for the s o i l - c u lv e r t s y s te m . H ow ever, as w as

s ta te d e a r l ie r , a n a ly s e s b a se d on th is assum ption may se r io u s ly under­

e s t im a te the s t r e s s e s induced in shallow buried c o n d u i ts . In order to in ­

v e s t ig a te the e ffec t of various p a r t ia l loading con d it io n s on a shallow

co n d u it , se v e ra l c a s e s are an a ly zed us ing the f in i te -e le m e n t grids p re ­

v io u s ly d e s c r ib e d .

In a l l c a s e s , the condu it and so il m ateria l are a ssum ed to b e ­

have e l a s t i c a l ly . The so il is a s s ig n e d an e la s t ic modulus v a lu e , Eg =

200 k s f = 9 . 58x10® N/m2 and a Pois s o n 's ra t io , ^as = 0 . 4 . These

v a lu e s are re p re se n ta t iv e of den se g ranu lar s o i l s . The co n d u it is a s ­

sumed to be made of co n cre te with an e l a s t i c modulus v a lu e , E = 2 .5

x 10® p s i = 17 .25 x 10® kN/m2 .

The loading c a s e s c o n s id e red in the a n a ly s is , a long with the

f in i te -e le m e n t grid u se d , are sum m arized in Table 1. The conduit s t i f f ­

n e s s , e x p re s se d as the ra tio of the in te rio r d iam eter, d , to w all th ic k ­

n e s s , t , i s in d ica ted for each c a s e .

The in fluence of uniformly d is tr ib u te d loads of in te n s i ty , p ,

c en te re d about a v e r t ic a l l ine through .the condu it are c o n s id e red in the

f ir s t e ig h t c a s e s . The loads are of varying leng th , b . C a s e s 9 to 24

21

Page 29: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

Table 1. Load and C onduit S tiffness for Analyzed C a s e s

22

Load

3ase Grid D e sc r ip t io n L ocation In te n s i ty d/i

1 1 D is tr ib u ted b = d P 402 1 D is tr ib u ted b = 2d P 403 1 D is tr ib u ted b = 3d P 404 D is tr ib u ted b = 4d P 405 1 D is tr ib u ted b = 5d P 40

6 D is tr ib u ted b = 6d P 407 1 D is tr ib u ted b = 7d P 408 1 D is tr ib u ted b = 8d P 409 3 C oncen tra ted C en te r P = pd 40

10 3 C o n cen tra ted 0 . 250d P = pd 40

11 3 C o n cen tra ted O.SOOd P = pd 4012 3 C o n ce n tra ted 0 . 875d P = pd 4013 3 C o n cen tra ted 1 . 250d P = pd 4014 4 C oncen tra ted 1 . 750d P = pd 4015 4 C o n cen tra ted 2 . 625d P = pd 40

16 4 C o n cen tra ted 4 . OOOd P = pd 4017 3 C o n cen tra ted C en te r P - pd 2018 3 C o n cen tra ted 0 . 250d P = pd 2019 3 C o n cen tra ted O.SOOd P = Pd 2020 3 C o n cen tra ted 0 . 875d P = pd 20

21 3 C o n cen tra ted 1 . 250d P = Pd 2022 4 C oncen tra ted 1 . 750d P = pd 2023 4 C oncen tra ted 2 . 625d P = pd 2024 4 C o n cen tra ted 4 . OOOd P — pd 2025 2 D is tr ib u ted b — 8d P 40

Page 30: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

23

c o n s id e r a co n c e n tra te d load of in te n s i ty , P = pd, lo ca ted with r e sp e c t

to the c e n te r of the co n d u it , as show n. Two condu it s t i f fn e s s e s are c o n ­

s id e re d . For C a s e s 1 -1 6 , d / t = 40 , w hile for C a s e s 17 -24 , d / t = 20. In

the l a s t c a s e , the e f fec t of s lip a t the in te rface is a n a ly z e d .

P artia l D is tr ibu ted Loads

The bending moments induced in the conduit for the various d i s ­

tr ibu ted loading c a s e s are p re se n te d in nondim ensional form in F ig s . 4

and 5. S im ilarly , the normal fo rces are g iven in F ig s . 6 and 7.

For p u rp o ses of com parison , the e la s t i c formulas p roposed by

Burns and Richard (1964) for no in te rface s lip are u sed to c a lc u la te the

bending m om ents, M, and normal fo rc e s , _N, in the c o n d u i t . For the m a­

te r ia l and geom etric p roperties s ta te d the equa tions are g iven in nondi­

m ensional form as follows

M /p d 2 = 0 .0001 + 0 .0059 co s 28 (7)

N /pd = 0 .4961 + 0 .0992 c o s 29 (8)

where 9 is m easured around the c ircum ference of the c o n d u it . If the a p ­

propria te v a lu es are in se r te d for 9 and the re su lt in g moments and normal

force are p lo t te d , the th e o re t ic a l e la s t i c so lu tion ag rees very c lo se ly

with the r e su l ts of loading c a s e 8. F i g s . 4 and 5 show th a t the bending

moments in c re a se rap id ly for the f irs t two c a s e s and th en appear to lev e li

off. H ow ever, as the length b of the load in c re a se s beyond four d iam ­

e te r s , there is a reduc tion in the m agnitude of the moments and the th e o ­

re t ic a l so lu tion is ap p roached . F i g s . 6 and 7 show a g radual in c re a se in

the normal fo rces through the f irs t five loading c a s e s . Beyond th is p o in t ,

the change a t the crown and b ase is more g ra d u a l . There is v ir tua lly no

Page 31: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

d / t = 40 1.0x10

0.0

- - - - V

Case 2 y

\ Cose \ Case\4 ^

OX)

0 .5x10

1.0x10

Figure 4 . Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 1 to 4

Page 32: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

25

d / t = 40

0.0

Case 5

-U

Case 7 \ \Case 8 (elastic so

0.0

0 .5x10

Figure 5. Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 5 to 8

Page 33: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

Figure 6. Normal Forces for Loading C a se s 1 to 4

Page 34: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

27

- 0.6

d / t = 40

0.2

0.0

Case 5

0.0

- 0.2

CaseCase 8 (feiqstio' solution)*

- 0 . 4

- 0.6

Figure 7. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 5 to 8

Page 35: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

28

change a t the s p r in g l in e . The normal fo rces a lso approach the th eo re t­

ic a l so lu t io n .

F ig . 8 shows the v a r ia t io n of the bending moments a t the

crow n, sp r in g l in e , and b a se of the c o n d u it . The bending moment a t the

crown is s e e n to reach a maximum s lig h tly before th o se a t the sp ring line

and b a s e . The maximum v a lu e s are about tw ice a s la rge as th o se p re ­

d ic ted by the th e o re t ic a l so lu t io n . Some feeling for the movement tak ing

p la c e c a n be ob ta ined from Fig . 9, w hich show s the change in d iam eter

a long the h o r iz o n ta l ( sp r in g lin e ) . The d iam etric shorten ing along the v e r ­

t ic a l follow s the same path but is 3 .5 to 4 .0 p e rcen t g re a te r in m agn itude .

The above o b se rv a t io n s c a n be in te rp re ted by cons ide ring the

re la t iv e s t i f fn e s s of the so il-s tru c tu re system under lo a d . For loads over

a short length (Case 1), the large so il m ass ad ja c e n t to the conduit is

e ffec t iv e in r e s is t in g d isp la c e m e n ts and thereby a s s i s t s in carrying the

lo ad . Thus, com pared to c a s e s with lo ad s of in te rm ed ia te ex ten t , the

bending moments in the condu it are low . Loads of in term ed ia te length

(C ases 2-5) becom e the dom inant fac to r cau s in g g rea te r movement in th e i

so il a d ja c e n t to the prism above the co n d u it . This motion reduces the

arching e ffec t in the so il and induces the larger moments o b se rv ed . The

loads rem ain dom inant as the full load cond it ion is app roached . How­

ever , here the loads provide a confin ing su rface o v e rp re s su re , thus in ­

c re a s in g the re la t iv e s t i f fn e ss of the so il and reducing the m om ents.

The normal fo rces prove to be re la t iv e ly in se n s i t iv e to the arching e f ­

f e c ts and are more d ire c t ly dependen t on the load in te n s i ty .

As d i s c u s s e d in C hap te r 3, the p re se n c e of the supports along

the s id e s of the reg ion a f fe c ts the a c t io n of loads p la c e d nea rb y . T h u s ,

Page 36: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

29

0.0150

V ln me0.0100

0.0050

0.0

d / t = 40

-0 .0 0 5 0Base

0.0100

Crown

-0 .0 1 5 08d2d

load length, b

Figure 8. Moment Variation for Various Loading Conditions

0.0100

Ad 0.0050 (ft)

0.0

d / t = 40

4 d 6 d 8 d2d0load length, b

Figure 9. Diametr ic Change for Various Loading Condit ions

Page 37: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

30

the fo rces and moments reported for C a s e s 6 and 7 are s lig h tly g rea te r

th an a c tu a l . In C a s e 8, the full load e ffec t is ach iev ed for a load leng th ,

b , som ew hat shorter th a n a c tu a l . The r e su l ts for th e se c a s e s are q u a l i ­

ta t iv e ly c o r re c t , a s w ill becom e more apparen t in the d is c u s s io n th a t

fo llo w s .

C o n cen tra ted Loads and Influence C harts

The p rev ious d i s c u s s io n i s lim ited to the e ffec t of sym m etrical

p a r t ia l d is tr ib u ted loads on buried c o n d u i t s . In order to com plete the

s tudy of the e ffec t of p a r t ia l loading co n d i t io n s , unsym m etrica lly lo c a te d

co n c e n tra te d su rface lo ad s are c o n s id e red in the following d is c u s s io n .

F ig s . 10 through 13 show the bending moments induced in the

condu it for the v a r io u s co n cen tra ted loading c a s e s s tu d ie d . These r e ­

s u l ts show th a t the moments produced in the s tif fe r condu it (d /t = 2 0 )

are co n s id e ra b ly g re a te r in m agnitude th an th o se in the more f lex ib le

c o n d u it . The more f lex ib le s tru c tu re , b e c a u se i t d e f le c ts to a g rea te r

e x ten t under load , encourages the developm ent of arching in the s o i l .

The so i l c a r r ie s the load around the co n d u it , th u s , low er moments are

deve loped in the s tru c tu re . The maximum moments d eve loped at the

crown for co n c e n tra te d loads lo ca ted up to one d iam eter from the c e n te r

are a s much as two and o n e -h a l f t im es g rea te r than p red ic ted by the

e l a s t i c so lu tio n s th a t assu m e a full uniform load on the su rfa c e .

The normal fo rces developed by co n cen tra ted lo ad s are shown in

F ig s . 14 through 17. A com parison of th e s e p lo ts show s th a t the induced

normal fo rces are s l ig h t ly h igher for the rigid conduit but become nearly

equa l for both s t i f fn e s s v a lu e s as the load moves away from the ce n te r

Page 38: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

31

d / t = 40 - 2

- 2

C ase / 9

Figure 10. Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 9 to 12

Page 39: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

32

d / t = 40

e 15

Case it

Figure 11. Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 13 to 16

Page 40: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

33

= 20—2 J h

—CL£L

XX

\ x j \

Figure 12. Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 17 to 20

Page 41: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

34

d /t = 20

- 2 . 0 x l Q

-Case 2,1 v

Case y23 Case 24

Z Z

Figure 13. Bending Moments for Loading C a s e s 21 to 24

Page 42: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

35

d / t = 40

Case 19 Case j\0

Case 11 Case

Figure 14. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 9 to 12

Page 43: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

36

d / t = 40

^ Case ) Case/14

A—

Figure 15. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 13 to 16

Page 44: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

37

- 0 . 3

d /t = 20

I X

Case 19 Case 2C

Figure 16. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 17 to 20

Page 45: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

38

d /t = 20

X\

Case 21

Case ]

Case 23 ^ Case 2;

Figure 17. Normal Forces for Loading C a s e s 21 to 24

Page 46: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

39

of the co n d u it . Some te n s io n is developed near the crown for loads lo ­

c a te d near the c e n te r of the co n d u it . This due to the assum ption of fix ity

be tw een the so il and the s t ru c tu re . The forces developed at the crown

and invert are c o n s id e ra b ly lower th an th o se p red ic ted by an a n a ly s is

b a se d on the full su rface load a ssu m p tio n .

H aving ob ta ined th e se d a ta , in fluence c h a r ts are made up by

p lo tting the bending moment and normal force in fluence of each load

a g a in s t the lo ca t io n of the load with r e s p e c t to a v e r t ic a l line drawn

through the c e n te r of the co n d u it . The c u r v e s , or in fluence l in e s , are

p lo tted at in te rv a ls of 15 d eg rees around the c ircum ference of the c o n ­

d u it .

The in fluence c h a r ts are nondim ensional p lo ts of Cm = M /pd^

and C n = _N/pd on the v e r t ic a l ax is a g a in s t the load lo c a t io n along the

h o r iz o n ta l . Cm and C n are the bending moment and normal force c o e f f i ­

c i e n t s , r e s p e c t iv e ly . The bending moment ch a r ts are p re se n te d in Ap­

pendix A along with a l l the da ta u sed to co n s tru c t the c h a r t s . S im ilarly ,

the normal force c h a r ts are p re sen ted in Appendix B along with the a p ­

p lic a b le d a ta .

It is observed th a t the in fluence cu rves are not zero at 4 d . This

in d ic a te s th a t loads lo ca ted more than four d iam eters from the cen te r

have an e f fec t on the bending moments and normal fo rces in the co n d u it .

If ex tended beyond four d iam e te rs , the cu rves will approach zero at a

poin t where the load is su ff ic ien tly far away from the condu it th a t it h a s

no in fluence on the bending moment and normal fo rce . H ow ever, in su f ­

f ic ie n t da ta were o b ta ined to determ ine the lo ca tio n of th a t po in t .

Page 47: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

40

The in fluence ch a r ts may be app lied to any loading co n d it io n .

The moment, in g e n e ra l , is g iven by

M = C mp d 2 . (9)

H ow ever, for a co n c e n tra te d load , P = pd , so the eq u a tio n becom es

M = C mPd. (10)

For d is tr ib u ted lo a d s , the moments are ob ta ined by in teg ra ting the c h a r ts

over the loaded leng th , b . S im pson 's ru le for num erical in teg ra tio n c a n

be co n v en ien tly a p p l ie d . T h u s ,

M = Cmp d 2 (11)

where

Cm Cm • (12)

Cm and C m are the bending moment c o e f f ic ie n ts . S im ilarly , the normal

fo rce , in g e n e ra l , is g iven by

N = C npd. (13)

For a c o n cen tra ted load , P = pd , and th is reduces to

N = C nP. (14)

For d is tr ib u ted lo a d s , in teg ra tio n is performed as befo re , and

N = C npd (15)

where

C n = / C n . (16)

C n and C n are the normal force c o e f f i c i e n t s .

For r ig id co n d u its with s t i f fn e s s e s o ther than th o se g iven by the

c h a r t s , an in te rp o la tio n may be ca rr ied ou t, as shown in F ig . 18. The

c a s e shown is for the spring line moment due to a co n c e n tra te d load

above the c e n te r of the co n d u it . Using both char t s t i f fn e s s v a lu e s , the

bending moment or normal force c o e f f ic ie n ts are determ ined for the

Page 48: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

41

0.0400

0.0300

0.0200

0.0100

0.04.01.0 3.00.0 2.0

In (d/t)

Figure 18. In te rpo la tion of C o e ff ic ien ts for S t i f fn e sse s Not G iven in Influence C har ts

Page 49: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

42

d e s ire d lo a d in g . The com puted in fluence c o e f f ic ie n ts are p lo tted a g a in s t

In ( d / t ) . A s tra ig h t l ine is p a s s e d through the po in ts and a c lo se approx­

im ation to the c o e f f ic ie n t for the d e s ire d s t i f fn e ss is o b ta in e d . D a ta for

d / t of 11 .5 and 30 are o b ta ined as a ch eck in F ig . 18. This procedure is

ve r if ied for a range of s t i f fn e s s e s from d / t = 11 .5 to d / t = 40 .

Thus, for r ig id condu it s t i f f n e s s e s , the bending moment and

normal force d iagram s c a n be c o n s tru c te d by computing the appropriate

c o e f f ic ie n ts from the c h a r ts a t 1 5 -deg ree i n t e r v a l s . The range of s t i f f ­

n e s s e s for which the v a l id i ty of in te rp o la t io n is e s ta b l i s h e d in c lu d es

m ost com m ercia lly av a i la b le concre te s e c t io n s conforming to ASTM

(C 7 6 -7 2 ) .

For loads to the r igh t of the c e n te r , the cu rv es for the d es ired

ang les are u s e d . For lo ad s to the le f t , the cu rves corresponding to the

supplem ent of th is angle are u s e d . The ch a r ts are p re se n te d in a format

th a t in c lu d es the cu rv es for supplem entary an g les on the same c h a r t .

Some exam ples w ill serve to c la r ify the ap p l ic a t io n of thex- -

c h a r t s . Four ty p es of problem s are show n in F ig . 19. Assume in each

th a t the moment a t 9 = 60° from the h o r iz o n ta l is d e s i r e d . . A po in t load

is co n s id e re d in F ig . 19a. The moment is determ ined by going to the

appropria te c h a r t , F ig . A -3 (Appendix A) for an angle of 9 = 600 and o b ­

ta in in g the va lue of Cm for the appropria te s t i f fn e s s . In th is c a s e , if

d / t = 20 and the load is a t 1 . 25d, Cm ?= - 0 .0 1 5 0 . Eq. 10 is then u sed to

com pute the moment. For the sym m etrical d is tr ib u ted load in F ig . 19b,

the co e f f ic ie n t Cm is o b ta ined from Eq. 12, where the in teg ra tio n is p e r ­

formed on the curve for 9 = 60° , correspond ing to the load on the r ig h t ,

and the curve for 9 = 120°, co rrespond ing to the load on the le f t . Due

to symmetry, both are in teg ra te d over a length of 0 to l .O d . The moment

Page 50: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

1.250'l.Odl.Od

1 0.75d r 1.25dr

Figure 19. Some C a s e s for A nalysis by Influence Charts

(a), point load; (b), sym m etrically d is tr ibu ted load; (c), unsymmetrically d is t r ib ­uted load; and (d), randomly d is tr ibu ted load . ax

co

Page 51: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

44

a t 9 = 60° from the h o r izo n ta l is th en com puted us ing Eq. 11. For unsym -

m etr ica l d is tr ib u ted lo ad s a s in F ig . 1 9 c , the same procedure is follow ed

e x c e p t th a t in teg ra tio n is performed only over the length a f fec ted by the

l o a d . For the c a s e show n, the curve for 6 = 60° is in teg ra te d from 0 to

1 .2 5 d and the curve for 9 = 120° is in teg ra te d from 0 to 0 , 7 5 d . It should

be c le a r th a t loads skew ed to one s ide only m ust be c o n s id e re d . Loads

skew ed to the o p p o s ite c a n be accom m odated by changing the poin t of

v iew . Random d is tr ib u ted lo a d s , such as th o se shown in F ig . 19d c a n

be an a ly zed by co n s id e r in g the load to be made up of a s e r ie s of sho rte r

uniform l o a d s .

The normal fo rces can be com puted in a s im ila r m anner by us ing

the ch a r ts in Appendix B .

The accu racy o b ta ined in com puting the c o e f f ic ie n ts for d is t r ib ­

u ted lo ad s us ing a num erical in teg ra tio n procedure w ill depend on the

care with which po in ts are s e le c te d and the s iz e of the in te rv a l be tw een

p o in ts . M oments for s e v e ra l of the d is tr ib u ted loading con d it io n s a n a ­

lyzed in th is study (C ases 1-8) are com puted with the c h a r t s . D iffer­

e n c e s of l e s s th a n 1 p e rc e n t are o b ta in ed us ing S im pson1 s rule with an

in te rv a l of 0 . Id .

The v a r ia t io n in bending moments due to the in fluence of p a r t ia l

d is tr ib u ted loads of p ro g re s s iv e ly in c re a s in g la te ra l e x te n t may be further

v isu a l iz e d by exam ining the in fluence c h a r t s . Reference is made to the

moment in fluence cu rves for d / t = 40 and 9 = 0° and 180° g iven in F ig .

A -7 (Appendix A). It is o b se rv ed th a t the a re a under the curve is p o s i ­

t iv e up to 1 .9 d for 9 = 0° and up to 1 .3 for 9 = 180°; both are nega tive

beyond th a t p o in t . Thus, the moment at the spring line w ill in c re a se with

Page 52: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

45

an in c re a se in the la te ra l ex ten t of the load until the a rea becom es n e g a ­

t iv e . Beyond th a t p o in t , the moment w ill d e c r e a s e . This co rresponds to

F ig . 8 where the moment a t the spring line beg ins to d e c re a se betw een

b = 3d and 4 d .

The ch a r ts may be d irec tly app lied in the b a lan ced d es ig n

method p re se n te d in C h ap te r 2. T h u s . E q . 4 is eq u iv a len t to

N = C n (l - A)P (17)

for c o n cen tra ted l o a d s , and

N = C n (l - A)pd (18)

for d is tr ib u ted l o a d s . E q . 6 is eq u iv a len t to

M = C m (l - A)Pd (19)

for c o n cen tra ted l o a d s , and

M = C m (l - A)pd2 (20)

for d is tr ib u ted l o a d s . In th e se e q u a t io n s , the term (1 - A) is used to

e s tim a te the e ffec t of a rch ing , A , due to backpack ing

In te rface Slip

The e f fec t of in te rface s lip is determ ined by including a layer

of in te rface e lem ents be tw een the so il and the condu it , as d esc rib ed in

C hap te r 3 . Relating s t r e s s to d isp la c e m e n t, th e se e lem en ts are a s s ig n e d

a sh ea r s t i f fn e ss va lue of Ej = 170 kef = 2 .67 x 107 N /m 3 . This mod­

u lus va lue is r e p re se n ta t iv e of the fr ic tion developed be tw een a rough

su rface and a g ranu lar b a c k f i l l .

The sh ea r strength of the in te r fa c e , r f , is p roportional to the

normal force acting on the in te r fa c e , dfn , and may be e x p re s se d as a

function of the ang le of w all f r ic tion , 8 , or rf = <5"n t a n S . For a rough

s u r f a c e , the la rg e s t angle of fric tion th a t ca n be developed is eq u iv a len t

Page 53: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

. 46

to the so il ang le of fr ic t ion In th is a n a ly s is , the la rg e s t ang le d e ­

ve loped i s l e s s th an 10°, thus in d ica tin g th a t the l in e a r portion of the

s t r e s s - s t r a i n curve h a s not b een ex ceed ed and the assu m p tio n of e la s t i c

behav io r for the in te rface is v a l id .

F ig . 20 show s the e ffec t of full s l ip , as c a lc u la te d by the e l a s ­

t ic so lu tio n p roposed by Burns and Richard (1964) and p a r t ia l s lip (Case

25) com pared to the n o - s l ip cond it io n (Case 8). The moments for full

s l ip are g re a te r in m agnitude than for no s l ip by approx im ate ly 10 p e r ­

c e n t . For the a c tu a l c a s e as id e a l iz e d by the f in i te -e le m e n t a n a ly s is ,

th e re is only a s l ig h t in c re a se in the moments as com pared to the no­

s lip c a s e .

F ig . 21 s im ila r ly shows the e f fe c t of full and p a r t ia l s lip on the

normal force in the co n d u it . For bo th , the normal force is in c re a se d at

the crown and the b a s e and d e c re a se d a t the sp ring line as com pared to

the n o - s l ip co n d it io n . For full s l ip , th e change is about 20 p e rc e n t ,

w h ile for p a r t ia l s lip the change is only 10 p e r c e n t .

Slip r e l e a s e s the s truc tu re and a llow s the so il to se t t le around

the co n d u it . Thus, the condu it is forced to carry more load in b en d in g ,

w hile the normal force d is t r ib u te s more ev en ly . N either the fu ll-s l ippage

or no-s lippage a ssu m p tio n is s e e n to offer any p a r t ic u la r advan tage in

e s tim a tin g the a c tu a l co n d it io n . The fu l l - s l ip con d it io n g iv es a c o n s e r ­

v a tiv e e s tim a te of bending m om ents. The n o -s l ip c o n d it io n g ives a c o n ­

se rv a t iv e e s tim a te of the maximum normal fo rces .

Page 54: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

0.0075

d /t = 400.0050

0.0025

0,0

0.0025

-0 .0 0 5 0

-0 .0 0 7

Case 18, No Slippage Casq 25 \

-0 .0 0 7 5

-0 .0 0 5 0

-0 .0 0 2 5

0.0

0.0025

0.0050

Figure 20. Effect of In te rface Slip on Bending Moments

Page 55: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

48

-0.60

d / t = 40

- 0 .4 0

-0 .3 0

- 0.20

- 0.10

0.0

Case 8 / No Slippage I Case \\ Full Slippage \

0.0

0.10

- 0.20

- 0 .3 0

-0 .4 0

Figure 21. Effect of In te rface Slip on Normal Forces

Page 56: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

CHAPTER 5

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the r e s u l t s of th is s tu d y , the fo llow ing c o n c lu s io n s

are drawn:

1. M ethods cu rren tly u se d in the d e s ig n of buried condu its tend to

be qu ite c o n s e rv a t iv e .

2 . Solu tions b a se d on e la s t i c theory are ap p licab le to shallow

buried r ig id condu its for uniformly d is tr ib u ted loads over an

in fin ite e x te n t .

3 . E la s t ic so lu tio n b a se d on the assu m p tio n of a uniformly d i s ­

tr ib u ted load u n deres tim ate the bending moments and o v e re s t i ­

mate the normal fo rces produced by p a r t ia l su rface loads for

sha llow buried c o n d u i ts .

4 . The in f lu en ce line co n cep t c a n be ex tended to buried c o n d u i ts .

In fluence c h a r ts are deve loped which c a n be u t i l iz e d to d e te r ­

mine the bending moment and normal force a t any point along

the c ircum ference of the sha llow conduit for any d es ired lo a d ­

ing c o n d it io n . The procedure is d irec tly a p p lic a b le to the b a l ­

anced d e s ig n m ethod.

5. N either the fu ll-S lip or n o - s l ip a ssum ption h a s any p a r t icu la r

advan tage in approximating the true c a s e where some slip o c ­

curs a t the s o i l - s t ru c tu re in te r f a c e .

Page 57: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

Recomm endations for Further Research

R esearch p u b lish ed s in ce the m id -1 9 6 0 's h a s provided c o n s id ­

erab le in s ig h t into the behav io r of both shallow and deep buried c o n d u i t s .

H ow ever, sev e ra l a s p e c ts of the s o i l - c o n d u i t system rem ain to be

s tu d ie d . N oncircu lar geom etr ies and m ultip le condu it in s ta l la t io n s have

rec e iv e d only lim ited a t te n t io n . In te rm ed ia te s t i f f n e s s e s , such as for

p la s t i c m a te r ia ls , need to be s tu d ied so th a t d es ig n s c a n be. ca rr ied o u t .

Experim ental d a ta from f u l l - s c a le or model t e s t s are bad ly needed in or­

der th a t the re la t iv e m erits of d e s ig n p ra c t ic e s c a n be e v a lu a te d .

Page 58: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

APPENDIX A

CHARTS AND DATA FOR MOMENT INFLUENCE COEFFICIENTS

The c o l le c t io n of cu rves and ta b le s p re sen ted in th is appendix

is an e x te n s io n of the in fluence line co n c e p t app lied to the so i l - c o n d u i t

s y s te m . Each curve re p re se n ts the e f fec t of a unit su rface load on the

bending moment a t a sp ec if ied poin t along the c ircum ference of the

buried co n d u it . C o l le c t iv e ly , the cu rves are referred to as the moment

in fluence c h a r t s . They c a n be u sed to determ ine the in f luence of any

su rface load , co n cen tra ted or d is t r ib u te d , sym m etrically or unsym m et-

r ic a l ly p l a c e d , on the bending moment in the s t ru c tu re .

It should be noted th a t th e se c h a r ts are ob ta ined using e la s t ic

m ateria l p roperties as fo llow s: for the cu lvert,E = 2 .5 x 10^ p s i =

17. 25 x 1C)6 k N / m 2 and for the so il medium, Es = 200 k s f = 9 . 58 x 10^

N/m2 and p s = 0 .4 .

51

Page 59: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

52

0.0100

A----0.0

^ 0 = 270

- 0.0100

m

- 0.0200

O d / t = 20

A d / t = 40

—0.0300

-0 .0 4 0 0

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure A - l . Moment In fluence Curves for 9 = 90° and 270°

Page 60: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

53

0.0100

0.00500 = 105

—A-----— -A—. _ _

0.00 = 75

-0 .0 0 5 0

0.0100'

- 0.0200

- 0.0250

° d /t =-0 .0 3 0 0

A d /t =

-0 .0 3 5 0

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure A-2. Moment Influence Curves for 9 = 75° and 105°

Page 61: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

0.0150

0.0100

0 = 1200.0050

0.0

0 = 60

-0 .0 0 5 0

- 0.0100

-0 .0 1 5 0O d /t = 20

A d /t = 40- 0.0200

-0 .0 2 5 0

-0 .0 3 0 0

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure A - 3 . Moment Inf luence Curves for 0 = 60° and 120°

Page 62: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

55

0.0200

0.0100

Q = 135

A --A0.0050

0.0

Cm

-0 .0 0 5 0

- 0.0100

O d/ t =

-0 .0 1 5 0

A d /t =

- 0.0200

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure A-4 . Moment Influence Curves for 9 = 45° and 135°

Page 63: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

56

0.0250

O d /t = 20

d /t = 400.0200

0.0150

0.0100

Cm

0.0050

150

0.0

0 = 30

-0 .0 0 5 0

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure A -5. Moment Influence Curves for 9 = 30° and 150°

Page 64: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

57

0.0250

O d/ t = 20

A d /t = 40

0.0200

0.0150

0.0050m

0= 1650.0

A— — A —

-0 .0 0 5 0

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure A-6. Moment Influence Curves for 9 = 15° and 165°

Page 65: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

0.0300

0.0250

O d/ t = 20

A d /t = ̂00.0200

0.0150

m

0.0100

0.0050

0.0

0= 180

-0 .0 0 5 0

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure A - 7. Moment Influence Curves for 9 = 0 ° and 180°

Page 66: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

59

0.0250

O d / t =

A d /t =

0.0200

0.0150

0.0100

•m

0.0050

0.0

- 0.0050

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure A-8. Moment Inf luence Curves for 9 = 195° and 34 5°

Page 67: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

60

0.0200

A d /t = 40

0.01000 = 330 ^

A'

0.0" * &-J---- a -------- A-

<?= 210

- 0.0100

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure A-9 . Moment Inf luence Curves for 0 = 210° and 330°

0.0120

0.0080

0 = 3150.0040

- -A---------A——A

0.0Cm

"A- --0.0040

0 = 225/O d /t = 20

-0.0080A d/1 = ̂0

- 0.0120 ~TDistance from Center, Diameters

Figure A - 10. Moment Influence Curves for 0 = 225° and 315°

Page 68: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

61

0.0100

0.0050

0. 0J

Cm -0.0050

- 0.0100

-0.0150

- 0.0200

Figure A - l l . Moment Inf luence Curves for 0 = 240° and 300°

0.00500 = 285 v

0.0

< 0 = 255

-0.0050

- 0.0100

O d / t =

-0.0150A d / t =

- 0.0200

-0.0250

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure A-12. Moment Inf luence Curves for 9 = 255° and 285°

Page 69: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

Table A - l . Bending Moments for Various Loading C o n d i i t io n s , d / t = 40

Loading C aseAngle : : : : ;

9 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

0° 0.0061 0 .0075 0.0076 0.0059 0 .0031 0 .0007 -0 .0 0 1 3 -0 .0 0 1 215 .00 74 .0077 .0070 - .0032 - .0001 - .0016 - .0018 - .001030 .0067 .0054 .0029 - .0015 - .0034 - .0033 - .0015 - .000545 .0037 .0007 - .0032 - .0060 - .0052 - .0033 - .0007 .0000

60 - .0019 - .0066 - .0095 - .0087 - .004 7 - .0019 .0003 .000575 - .0095 - .0125 - .0113 - .0058 - .0021 .0001 .0010 .000890 - .0128 - .0106 - .0068 - .0017 .0005 .0015 .0013 .0008

105 - .0095 - .0049 - .0008 .0017 .0023 .0021 .0012 .0007120 - .0019 .0018 .0038 .0040 .0031 .0020 .0008 .0004135 .003 7 .0057 .0057 .0043 .0028 .0015 .0003 .0001150 .0067 .0069 .0058 .0037 .0020 .0007 - .0002 - .0003165 .0074 .0064 .0047 .0025 .0011 .0000 - .0006 - .0006

180 .0061 .0046 .0030 .0011 .0001 - .0006 - .0009 - .0007195 .0038 .0025 .0010 - .0001 - .0006 - .0009 - .0009 - .0006210 .0011 .0001 - .0007 - .0013 - .0013 - .0011 - .0008 - .0005225 - .0013 - .0020 - .0024 - .0022 - .0018 - .0012 - .0006 - .0003

240 - .0033 - .0037 - .0035 - .0029 - .0021 - .0011 - .0002 .0000255 - .0044 - .0046 - .0041 - .0031 - .0020 - .0008 .0003 .00042 70 - .004 8 - .0047 — .0041 - .0028 - .0015 - .0004 .0007 .0007285 - .0044 - .0040 - .0034 - . 002 0 - .0007 .0004 .0011 .0009

300 — .0033 - .0028 - .0019 - .0004 .0007 .0012 .0013 .0009315 - .0013 - .0004 .0005 .0019 .0023 .0020 .0011 .0005330 .0011 .0024 .0034 .0041 .0036 .0023 .0004 - .0002345 .0038 .0053 .0060 .0056 .0040 .0020 - .0004 - .0008

Page 70: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

Table A-2 . Bending Moments for Various Loading C o n d i t io n s , d / t = 20

Loading C a setogle

9 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

0° 0 .0256 0.0280 0 .0255 0 .0167 0.0074 0.0004 -0 .0046 -0 .0 0 3 915 .0259 .0243 .0185 .0066 - .0018 - .0057 - .0057 - .003530 .0198 .0134 .0049 - .0067 - .0108 - .0099 - .0050 - .002245 .0063 - .0038 - .0125 - .0184 - .0155 - .0101 - .0025 - .0003

60 - .0114 - .0226 - .0281 - .0246 - .0149 - .0067 .0006 .001575 - .0284 - .0343 - .0317 - .0190 - .0086 - .0014 .0030 .002690 - .0365 - .0327 - .0234 - .0091 - .0010 ,0034 .0045 .0031

105 - ,0284 - .0189 - .0084 .0020 .0057 .0065 .0046 .0028102 - .0114 - .0009 .0067 .0110 .0101 .0075 .0036 .0018135 .0063 .0139 .0169 . .0 1 5 3 .0110 .0066 .0018 .0005150 .0198 .0232 .0219 .0159 .0098 .0043 - .0002 - .0009165 .0259 .0253 .0210 .0128 .0064 .0014 - .0020 - .0020

180 .0256 .0219 .0160 .0076 .0020 - .0016 - .0035 - .0028195 .0190 .0135 .0078 ,0010 - .0025 - .0040 - .0040 - .0027210 .0086 .0032 - .0013 - .0054 - .0063 — .0056 - - .0037 - .0022225 - .0027 - .0073 - .0099 - .0107 - .0090 - .0061 - .0025 - .0010240 - .0131 - .0163 - .0167 - .0141 - .0100 - .0054 - .0007 .0004255 - .0198 - .0212 - .0196 - .0143 - .0086 - .0034 .0014 .0020270 . - .0225 - .0220 - .0186 - .0116 - .0053 - .0004 .0034 .0031285 . 019 8 . - .0174 - .0130 - .0056 - .0002 .0030 .0045 .0035

300 - .0131 - .0090 - .0041 .0024 .0056 .0062 .0048 .0029315 - .0027 .0025 .0069 .0108 ■ .0107 .0080 ' .0034 .0012330 .0086 .0142 .0172 .0174 .0135 .0078 .0009 - .0009345 .0190 .0233 .0239 .0196 .0123 .0051 - .0020 - .0028

Page 71: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

APPENDIX B

CHARTS AND DATA FOR NORMAL FORCE INFLUENCE COEFFICIENTS

The curve and t a b le s p re sen ted are a further app l ica t ion of the

inf luence line co n cep t to the so i l - c o n d u i t s y s t e m . These curves are r e ­

ferred to as the normal force inf luence c h a r t s . The char t s are u t i l ized

to determine the normal force in the condui t wall due to the inf luence of

any d es i red surface l o a d .

It i s important to note tha t th e s e cha r t s are ob ta ined using the

following e l a s t i c mater ia l p roper t ies : for the condu i t , E = 2 . 5 x 106 p s i

= 17.25 x 106 kN/m2; for the soil medium, Es = 200 k s f = 9 .58 x 10^

N/m2 and p s = 0 . 4 .

64

Page 72: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

65

-0.10

. 0 = 270'

0.0

0 = 90°

0.0!

Distance from Center, Diameters

- 0.10

0 = 270'

-0.05

0 = 90'0.0

0.05

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure B - l . Normal Force Influence Curves for 9 = 90° and 2 70°

(a ) , d / t = 20; (b), d / t = 40 .

Page 73: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

66

-0 .1 6

-0.08

Cn

0.0

0.080 2 3 4

Distance from Center, Diameters

-0.16

0 = 105°

x-0.08

0.0

0.08

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure B-2 . Normal Force Influence Curves for 9= 75° and 105°

(a), d / t = 20; (b), d / t = 40 .

Page 74: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

67

-0.20

-0.150 = 120'

— 0 . 10,

-0.05

0.0

0 = 60 '

0.05

Distance from Center, Diameters

- 0.20

-0.15

- 0 .10

-0.05

0.0

0.05

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure B - 3 . Normal Force Inf luence Curves for 0 = 60° and 120°

(a), d / t = 20; (b) # d / t = 40.

Page 75: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

68

-0.25

- 0.20

-.0.15

n 0 = 135°- 0.10

-0.05

0=45'

0.0

Distance from Center, Diameters

-0.25

- 0.20

-0.15

- 0.10

-0.05

0.0

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure B-4 . Normal Force Influence Curves for 0 = 45° and 13 5°

(a) d / t = 20; (b) d / t = 40.

Page 76: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

69

- 0.3CV

- 0.20

n

- 0.10

e = 30°

o.o

Distance from Center, Diameters

- 0.30

- 0.20

0 = 150'

- 0.10

0 = 30°

0.0

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure B - 5 . Normal Force Influence Curves for 9= 30° and 150°

(a), d / t / = 20; (b), d / t = 40 .

Page 77: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

70

-0.30

- 0.20

Cn 0 = 15°

- 0.10

0 = 165°

0.0

Distance from Center, Diameters

-0.30

- 0.20

- 0.10

0 = 165°

0.0

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure B - 6 . Normal Force Influence Curves for 0= 15° and 165°

(a), d / t = 20; (b), d / t = 40.

Page 78: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

71

- 0.20

n

- 0.10

0 = 180'

0.0

Distance from Center, Diameters

-0.30

- 0.20

•n

- 0.10

0 = 180'

0.0

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure B-7. Normal Force Influence Curves for 0 = 0° and 180°

(a), d / t = 20; (b), d / t = 4 0 .

Page 79: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

72

-0.30

- 0.20

n

0 = 345°- 0.10

0.0

Distance from Center, Diameters

-0.30

- 0.20

.0= 345'

- 0.10

0 = 195'

0.0

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure B-8. Normal Force Influence Curves for 0= 195° and 34 5°

(a), d / t = 20; (b), d / t = 40 .

Page 80: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

73

-0.25

- 0.20

-0.150 = 330

- 0.10

-0.055 = 210'

0.0

Distance from Center, Diameters

-0.25

- . 0.20 / ) -----

0 = 330'-0.15,

-0.05

0.0

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure B-9 . Normal Force Influence Curves for 6 = 2 1 0 ° and 330°

(a) , d / t = 20; (b), d / t = 40 .

Page 81: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

74

-0.20

-0.15

0 = 315'- 0.10n

-0.05

0 = 225'

0.0

Distance from Center, Diameters

- 0.20

-0.15

- 0.10n

-0.050 = 225°

0.03 40 2

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure B-10 . Normal Force Influence Curves for 9 = 225° and 315°

(a) , d / t = 20; (b) , d / t = 40 .

Page 82: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

75

-0.15

- 0.10

n

-0 .0 5

0 = 240'

Distance from Center, Diameters

-0 .1 5

- 0.10

0 = 300'

n

- 0.0

0 = 240'

0.0

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure B - l 1. Normal Force Influence Curves for 0 = 240° and 300°

(a), d / t = 20; (b), d / t = 40.

Page 83: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

76

- 0.075

- 0.050

n

-0.025

0.0

0.025Distance from Center, Diameters

- 0.100

-0.075-J) = 285'

-0.050

n-0.02

0 = 225°

0.0

0.025

Distance from Center, Diameters

Figure B-12. Normal Force Influence Curves for 9 = 255° and 285°

(a) , d / t = 20; (b), d / t = 40 .

Page 84: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

Table B - l , Normal Forces for Various Loading C o n d i t io n s » d / t - ’40

■ ' . Loading C a s e Angle " “ : 1 1 " —

e 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ' 16

0° -0 .2358 - 0 .2 6 3 0 -0 .2 6 0 0 -0 .2 1 2 3 -C1.1506 -C1.0876 -C1.0220 ' C1.002415 • - .2589 - .2737 - .2542 - .1815 - .1114 - .0559 - .0116 .00273.0 - .2500 - .2300 - .1947 - .1100 .0535 - .0235 - .0110 - .003645 - .1943 - .1503 - .1032 - .0296 - .0135 - .0117 - .0197 — .012760 — .1215 - .0605 - .0250 .0057 — .0164 - .0270 - ,0305 — .0192 '75 - .0339 .0227 . .0094 - .0126 - .0380 - .0454 - .0387 - .023790 .0120 .0100 - .0345 - .0621 - .0710- - .0634 - .0425 - .0250

105 - .0339 - .0725 - ,1130 - .1146 — .0982 - .0723 - .0395 - .0221

120 — .1215 - .1500 - .1660 - .1389 - .1060 - .0700 — .0326 — .0172135 — .1943 - .2077 - .1982 - .1492 . 1052 - .0623 - .0243 - .0114150 - .2500 - .2375 - .2065 - .1418 ■ - .0929 - .0488 - .0138 - .0042165 - .2589 - .2303 - .1878 - .1197 - .0739 - .0345 - .0055 .0013

180 - .2358 - .2000 - .1582 - .0967 — .0580 - .0255 — .0023 . .0032195 - .2021 - .1645 - .1256 - .0738 - .0437 - .0188 ' - .0014 .0035210 - .1480 - .1100 - .0829 - .0480 - .0308 - .0160 - .0054 .0003225 - .0893 - .0638 - .0464 - .0299 - .0254 - .0197 - .0140 - .0058240 - .0535 - .0362 - .0283 - .0248 - .0285 - .0275 - .0234 - .0122255 — .0265 - .0173 - .0179 - .0257 - .0361 - .0381 .0340 - .01922 70 - .0147 — .0162 - .0258 - .0432 - .0572 - .0576 - .0477 - .0268285 . - .0265 - .0384 - .0546 - .0759 - .0871 - .0800 - ,0582 - .0306

300 — .0535 - .0730 - .0920 - .1113 - .1150 — .0972 - .0618 — .0293315 — .0893 - .1165 - .1396 - .1513 - .1442 - .1128 - .0611 - .0242330 - .1480 - .1800 - .1970 - .1960 - .1690 - .1200 - .0510 - .0134345 - .2021 - .2360 - .2441 - .2198 .1720 - .1103 - .0355 - .0026

Page 85: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

Table B-2 . Normal Forces for Various Loading C o n d i t io n s , d / t - 20

Loading C aseAngle • — -------------- —----- :----------------- ——

9 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

0° -0 .2600 -0 .2 8 7 0 -0 .2 7 9 2 -0 .2234 -0 .1542 -0 .0860 -0 .0174 0 .006015 - .2788 - . . 2 8 7 9 - .2610 - .1783 - .1037 - .0478 - .0064 .005530 - .2550 - .2340 - .1880 - .0935 - .0400 - .0141 - .0073 - .002345 . - .1906 - .1380 - .0855 - .0096 .0026 - .0017 - .0177 - .012860 - .0994 - .0305 .0063 .0308 - .0014 - .0206 - .0320 — .021475 .0026 .0609 .0418 .0062 - .0299 - .0446 - .0428 - .027290 .0500 .0442 - .0080 - .0493 - .0680 - .0660 - .0475 - .0288

105 .0026 - .0423 - .0932 - .1092 - .1006 - .0781 - .0454 - .0261

120 - .0994 - .1390 - .1626 - .1450 - .1150 - .0777 - .0380 — .0203135 - .1906 - .2120 - .2080 - .1623 - .1171 - .0707 - .0281 - .0131150 - .2550 - .2520 - .2240 - .1585 - .1107 - .0565 - .0159 - .0046165 - .2788 - .2539 - .2108 - .1377 - .0855 - .0400 - .0053 .0024

180 — .2600 - .2240 - .1780 — .1091 — .0642 — .0267 .0003 .0058195 - .2217 - .1804 - .1366 . - .0779 - .0434 - .0159 .0026 .0065210 - .1600 - .1192 - .0845 - .0442 - .0250 - .0103 - .0012 .0030225 - .0905 - .0586 - .0370 — .0182 - .0149 - .0121 . — .0105 - .0042

240 — .0392 - .0171 - .0080 - .0071 - .0158 - .0205 - .0224 - .0128255 ■ ■ — .0008 .0106 .0079 - .0069 - .0251 - .0340 - .0362 .0220270 ' .0137 .0116 - .0027 - .0296 - .0515 - .0577 .0521 - .0306285 - .0008 - .0164 - .0388 - .0700 - .0879 - .0842 - .0640 - .0348

300 — .0392 - .0646 - .0900 - .1170 - .1239 - .1055 - .0674 -" .0324315 - .0905 - .1246 - .1501 - .1680 - .1591 ' - . 1228 - .0643 - .0248330 - .1600 - .1978 - .2173 - .2151 .1832 ■ - .1276 - .0516 — .0122345 - .2217 - .2588 - .2665 - .2377 - .1831 - .1148 - .0337 .0000

Page 86: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

APPENDIX C

NOTATION

Symbol Explanation

A Arching

Ac C r o s s - s e c t i o n a l a rea of condui t wal l per unit length

Bj H or izon ta l d im ension of ditch or condui t

b Length of d is t r ibu ted surface load

Ci Load co e f f ic ien t for so i l load

Cm/ Cm Bending moment coe f f ic ien ts

Cn» Cn Normal force co e f f ic ien ts

c t Load co e f f ic ien t for l ive load

D M ean d iam eter of condui t

d In te rna l d iameter of pipe

E Modulus of e l a s t i c i t y of condu i t mater ia l

El Modulus of e l a s t i c i t y of in te r face

Es Modulus of e l a s t i c i t y of so il medium

I Moment of ine r t ia of unit longi tud ina l s e c t io n of condui t wall

Ic Impact fac tor

•K Ratio of hor izon ta l to v e r t ic a l p re s su re in a l a te ra l ly confined so i l

k Radius of gyra t ion of condu i t wal l per unit length

Lf Load fac tor

t Length of s e c t io n of condui t on which load is computed

M Bending moment in condui t wal l per unit length• 79

Page 87: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

Symbol Explanation

N Normal force in condui t wal l per unit length

P Concen tra ted surface load

pv Ver tical so i l p re ssu re

p D is t r ibu ted load in ten s i ty

Rf Failure ra t io

5 Ring com press ive s trength

Syp Yield s trength of condui t mater ia l

T Normal th rus t in condui t wal l

t Condui t w a l l th i c k n e s s

W c Vertical load appl ied to the condu i t due to so i l f i l l

Wt Vertical load app l ied to pipe due to live load

Ad Diametr ic change

Ay Vertica l change in d iameter

6 Angle of wal l f r ic t ion

0 Angle m easured from hor izon ta l in coun te rc lockw ise d i rec t ion

$ Soil f r ic t ion angle

7 Unit weight of so i l medium

€ Vertical Soil s t r a in

Ps Pols s o n 1 s rat io for so i l

<5n Normal force ac t ing on the in te r face

T f Shear s trength of the in terface

Page 88: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

REFERENCES

Abel, John R„, Mark, Robert, and Richards , Rowland, J r . , 1973," S t r e s s e s around Flexib le El liptic P ip e s , " Journal of the Soil M ec h a n ic s and Foundations D iv i s io n , ASCE, Vol. 99, No.SM7-, Proc. Paper 9858, July , pp . 509-526 .

Allgood, J. R . , 1972, Summary of Soi l -S tructure In te r a c t io n , U .S . Naval C iv i l Eng. Laboratory, Port Huenem e, C a l i f . , Tech. Rept. R -7,7.1,

Allgood, J. R . , and Takahash i , S. K„, 1972, "Balanced D es ig n andF in i t e -e le m e n t Analys is of C u lv e r t s , " Highway Research Record 413, pp . 4 5 - 5 6 .

Anand, Subhash C . , 1974, "S t re s s D is tr ibu t ions around Shallow Buried Rigid P i p e s , " Journal of the Structural D i v i s i o n , ASCE, Vol.100, No. ST1, Proc. Paper 10258, January, p p . 161-174.

Burns , Jerome Q . , and Richard, Ralph M . , 1964, "Attentuat ion ofS t r e s s e s for Buried C y l in d e r s ," Proceedings of the Symposium on Soi l -S truc ture In te r a c t io n , The Univers i ty of Arizona, Tuc­son , Arizona, S ep tem b er , .p p . 378-392 .

C lough, G . W ayne , and D uncan , James M . , 1971, "Fin i te Element Analys is of Retaining W al l B e h a v io r , " Journal of the Soil M ech an ic s and Foundat ions D i v i s io n , ASCE, Vol. 97, No.SM12, Proc. Paper 8583, December , pp . 1657-1673 .

Dar , Sidig M . , and B a tes , Robert C . , 1974, " S t re s s Analys is of Hollow Cyl indr ica l I n c l u s i o n s , " Journal of the G e o te ch n ica l Engineer­ing D i v i s i o n , ASCE, Vol. 100, No. GT2, Proc. Paper 10364, February , pp . 123-138 .

Duncan , James M . , and Chang, Chin-Yung, 1970, " Nonlinear Analysis of S t ress and Strain in S o i l s , " Journal of the Soil M echan ics and Foundat ions D i v i s i o n , ASCE, Vol. 96, No. SM5, Proc.Paper 7513, September , pp . 1629-1653.

Goodier , J. N . , 1933, "C oncen t ra t ion of S t ress around Spherical and Cy l indr ica l Inc lus ions and F l a w s , " Transac t ions of the Amer­i c a n Socie ty of M ech an ica l E n g in ee rs , Vol. 55, pp . 39-44 .

Grooms, Henry R . , 19 72, "Algorithm for Matr ix Bandwidth Reduction ," Journal of the Structural D i v i s io n , ASCE, Vol. 98, No. ST1,Proc. Paper 8636, January, pp . 203-214 .

Krizek, R. J . , Parmelee, R. A . , Kay, J. N . , and Elnaggar, H . A . , 1971, Structural Analysis and D es ign of Pipe C u l v e r t s . NCHRP Rept. 116.

81

Page 89: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

82

L er t laksana , Voravit, 1973, "Fini te Element Analysis of Culver ts under Embankments with Time Dependent and Nonlinear P roper t ie s ," unpub l ished P h .D . D i s se r t a t io n , Oregon State Univers i ty , C o r v a l l i s .

Roark, Raymond, J. , 1965, Formulas for S t ress and S t r a in , ed . 4, M cG raw -H i l l , New York.

Sogge, Robert L. , n . d . , "Fini te Element Analysis of Anchored Bulkhead Behavior ," P h .D . d i s s e r ta t io n , D ept , of Civi l Engineering and Engineering M e c h a n ic s , Univers i ty of Arizona, in p repara t ion .

Spangler , M. G . , and Handy, R. L . , 1973, Soil Eng inee r ing , ed . 3, In text Educational Pub l i she rs , New York.

Timoshenko, S. P . , and Goodier , J. N. , 1970, Theory of E la s t i c i t y , e d . 3 . , M cG raw -H il l , New York.

W a tk in s , Raynold K. , 1966, "Structura l D es ign of Buried C ircu lar Con­d u i t s , " Highway Research Record 14 5, pp. 1 -16 .

Z ienk iew icz , O. C . , 1971, The Fin ite Element Method in Engineering S c i e n c e , M cG raw -H il l , London.

Page 90: Finite element analysis of shallow buried rigid conduits...Neither of the assumptions used in elastic solutions, full slippage or no slippage, is seen to have any particular advantage

Recommended