+ All Categories
Home > Documents > For the Public Good-

For the Public Good-

Date post: 14-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: marv
View: 32 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
For the Public Good- Academically Engaging African-American Students and Students in Poverty in the Life of Their Schools Blue Ribbon Schools Blue Print for Educational Excellence National Institute Reading Public Schools, Massachusetts Superintendent, Patrick A. Schettini, Jr., J.D. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
63
For the Public Good- Academically Engaging African-American Students and Students in Poverty in the Life of Their Schools Blue Ribbon Schools Blue Print for Educational Excellence National Institute Reading Public Schools, Massachusetts Superintendent, Patrick A. Schettini, Jr., J.D. April 16 & 17, 2009 Dr. Gary L. Burgess, Sr. C.O.O. Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence Superintendent- Retired
Transcript
Page 1: For the Public Good-

For the Public Good-

Academically Engaging African-American Students and Students in Poverty in the Life of Their Schools

Blue Ribbon Schools Blue Print for Educational Excellence

National Institute

Reading Public Schools, Massachusetts

Superintendent, Patrick A. Schettini, Jr., J.D.

April 16 & 17, 2009

Dr. Gary L. Burgess, Sr.

C.O.O. Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence

Superintendent- Retired

Page 2: For the Public Good-

Objectives of this session are

• To re-state that public education is an effort to democratize the populace for the public good

• To engage in an open and frank dialogue suggesting how schools might academically engage African-American students and students in poverty

• To discuss possible reasons why African-American students and students in poverty are not achieving at higher academic levels

• To suggest some strategies that might academically engage African-American students and students in poverty in their school’s academic culture

• To develop preliminary action steps to take in participants’ schools to facilitate the successful academic engagement of African-American students and students in poverty

Page 3: For the Public Good-

• Expectations• Parameters• Procedures

• Some Theories• Some Research

• Some Effective School/Classroom Practices• District/School Action Planning

Sections

Page 4: For the Public Good-

My Expectations-

I expect professional dialogue! I expect professional engagement! I expect to be challenged! (Make a note of

something I say that bothers you!)No blame, no victimization- frank,

professional dialogue!

Page 5: For the Public Good-

Your Expectations-

• What do you expect to get from this session?

Page 6: For the Public Good-

Parameters of Exchange:

• We will be respectful of each others ideas.• We will be frank in our discussion.• We will focus on what we can do to continue to make a positive difference

academically for African-American students and students in poverty.

• We will leave this session as we entered, as professional colleagues.

Page 7: For the Public Good-

Let me say it up front-

• It’s difficult to discuss race (black/white), socio-economic status, gender and religion

in America!!!Why?

We want to believe we live in a colorblind, classless, genderless, religiously free

society.

Page 8: For the Public Good-

Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence

is dedicated to improving academic excellence for all children and celebrating

the successes of schools.

Page 9: For the Public Good-

Caution-• Statements made are

of a general nature and do not apply to all

African-American students and students

in poverty, but to these students as

distinct disaggregate groups.

• Not all African-students are poor.

• Not all poor students are African-American.

• Not all African-American students are underperforming.

• Not all poor students are underperforming.

Page 10: For the Public Good-

Procedure-

• We will divide into random groups and district/school groups during this session• Each group will assign a recorder and

spokesperson• Each spokesperson will report at the end

of group dialogue

Page 11: For the Public Good-

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Preamble

Page 12: For the Public Good-

W.E.B. Dubois states-Of all the civil rights for which the world has

struggled and fought for 5000 years, the right to learn, is undoubtedly the most

fundamental…whatever we may think of the curtailment of other civil rights, we

should fight to the last ditch to keep open the right to learn…. We must insist upon this to give our children the fairness of a start which will equip them with such an

array of facts and such an attitude toward truth that they can have a real chance…

Page 13: For the Public Good-

Some Theories

Page 14: For the Public Good-

Random Group-List five reasons why public schools might not be effectively engaging

African-American students and students in poverty academically in their schools.

• 1.

• 2.

• 3.

• 4.

• 5.

Page 15: For the Public Good-

Random Group-List five reasons (characteristics/coping strategies) why

African-American students and students in poverty might not be effectively engaging academically in their schools.

• 1.

• 2.

• 3.

• 4.

• 5.

Page 16: For the Public Good-

Theories

• Why might a theoretical frame be helpful?

Page 17: For the Public Good-

Critical Social Theory-

Resistance and Reproduction• Ogbu’s Research • Centripetal and Centrifugal Forces• Non-Synchrony• Stereotype Threat• The Tical Factor

Page 18: For the Public Good-

Ogbu’s Research Reveals

• Involuntary/transplanted immigrant groups (African Americans) usually perceive cultural differences as barriers and markers of group identity; therefore, when such groups cross cultural lines (becoming educated), it’s seen as a loss of identity.

• Voluntary immigrant groups (Africans, Europeans, Asians, South Americans, Indians, etc) usually perceive cultural differences as barriers to be overcome; therefore, are more likely to be successful in crossing cultural boundaries (becoming educated).

Page 19: For the Public Good-

Steele’s Work-Stereotype Threat

Negative stereotypes about disaggregate groups might depress academic performance, particularly with members of

disaggregate groups that have historically been discriminated against. Therefore, for members of these groups who

identified with domains in which these stereotypes apply, the threat of these stereotypes can be sharply felt and, in several

ways, hamper academic achievement.

Page 20: For the Public Good-

Centripetal & Centrifugal ForcesDuBois

• Centripetal Forces- forces that tend to draw members of a minority group toward that minority group.

• Centrifugal Forces- forces that tend to draw members of a minority group toward the life styles of the

dominant culture.

Page 21: For the Public Good-

Non-Synchrony

The interface of gender, race, and class are linked in a non-synchronized arrangement. One affects the other, with all having some effect on the other’s acceptance, with regard to society’s

emphasis, expression, and interest in that construct at certain historical intersections.

Page 22: For the Public Good-

The Tical Factor

• The feeling of being trapped in one’s current life-circumstances, not perceiving a means of escape or power over one’s

situation, believing something to be deficient about self; therefore, getting

what one deserves.Burgess, Distorted, 2009

Page 23: For the Public Good-

Does Race/Culture Matter?

Often educators express their ability to ignore the color of children, however, race does matter

in addressing the needs of African-American children; to ignore the presence of race in the

fabric of American culture contributes to the fact that African-American children are oftentimes

academic underachievers.

Page 24: For the Public Good-

A Color-blind/Classless/Genderless Society

How might this assumed social reality affect African-American students and students in poverty?

How might this assumed social reality affect the school as an institution in dealing with African-

American students and students in poverty?

Page 25: For the Public Good-

Centuries of negative psychological and social

conditioning• Transatlantic Slave Trade

Seasoning Process

• Paranoia of wealth whites- slave owners

• Miseducation of slaves

• Education seen as an asset of the white male landed gentry

• The Constitution-o Article I, Section 2,

Paragraph 3: Representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the several States…which shall be determined by adding to the whole number of free persons, including those bound to service for a term of years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other persons.

• Jim Crow codes• Separate but Equal

Page 26: For the Public Good-

Some Research

Page 27: For the Public Good-

How is the achievement gap defined in the U.S.?

Page 28: For the Public Good-

Public Schools systematically exclude African-American students and students in poverty from

exposure to high-level-quality academiccurriculum and instruction. Currently exclusion is

achieved throughreadiness measures administered to children prior to

their entranceinto the public school system and “objective”

screening criteria, suchas standardized tests in upper grades.

Burgess, 2009- Distorted, p.32.

“Tested into Remediation”

Page 29: For the Public Good-

Framing Vs. Expanding

Page 30: For the Public Good-

Skills’ Deficit vs. Intellectual Deficit

Page 31: For the Public Good-

The Trap-

• Schools with large numbers of students in poverty and/or large numbers of African-

American students and students in poverty value control more than learning!

Page 32: For the Public Good-

Local Research

• Did students who scored Below Basic or Basic on the ELA and/or math portion of PACT score at the Proficient or Advance levels on the science and social studies portion of PACT?

• Did students who scored at the Proficient or Advance levels on the science and social studies portion on PACT score at the Below Basic or Basic level on the ELA and/or math portion of PACT?

Page 33: For the Public Good-

Research Generalization Regarding Practice

• The actions of the district and the school can have a powerful effect on individual student achievement.

(School District educatorship that Works, The College of William & Mary Superintendents’ Retreat, Feb. 2007)

Page 34: For the Public Good-

Meta-analyses involving:

• 4,500 studies• 2,714 school districts (14,000)

• 3.4 million student scores

Page 35: For the Public Good-

Focus of School-Level Leadership: Influences on

Student LearningSchool Practices

1. Guaranteed & Viable Curriculum2. Challenging Goals & Effective Feedback3. Parent & Community Involvement4. Safe & Orderly Environment5. Collegiality & Professionalism

Teacher/Classroom Practices6. Instructional Strategies7. Classroom Management8. Classroom Curriculum Design

Student Characteristics9. Home Environment10.Learned Intelligence/Background Knowledge11.Motivation

Page 36: For the Public Good-

Consider this …

The general assumption is that the school’s job is to see to it that students learn rather than merely being taught, and to hold the expectation that all students can and should learn at high levels.

Page 37: For the Public Good-
Page 38: For the Public Good-

Black Immigrants, An Invisible 'Model Minority'

March 19, 2007

• WASHINGTON-Do African immigrants make the smartest Americans? The question may sound outlandish, but if you were judging by statistics alone, you could find plenty of

evidence to back it up.• In a side-by-side comparison of 2000 census data by

sociologist John R. Logan at the Mumford Center, State University of New York at Albany, black immigrants from Africa average the highest educational attainment of any

population group in the country, including whites and Asians.• For example, 43.8 percent of African immigrants had

achieved a college degree, compared to 42.5 of Asian Americans, 28.9 percent for immigrants from Europe, Russia

and Canada, and 23.1 percent of the U.S. population as a whole.

By Clarence Page is a Pulitzer Prize-winning syndicated columnist specializing in urban

issues.

Page 39: For the Public Good-

• Some Effective School/Classroom Practices

Page 40: For the Public Good-

Outstanding Educators Invite Students to

Learn!!!!!Levels of Invitation

I. Unintentionally Uninviting I wonder why these kids don’t like my class?

II. Intentionally Uninviting (replicate)

My classroom is not a place for kids to have fun, it’s a place to learn!

III.Unintentionally Inviting I wonder why these kids are having fun learning in my class.

IV. Intentionally Inviting (replicate)

I take responsibility for my students’ learning.

I understand my students as individuals, as members of distinct ethnic, racial and social economic groups, and as members of the student body at-

large.

Page 41: For the Public Good-

Invitational Educators Believe it to be Their

Moral and Civic Responsibility to Create Inviting

Classroom Environments in which Learners Learn and a Culture of Learning is

Developed – A Learning Community!

Page 42: For the Public Good-

Intentionally Inviting Educators Understand the How and Why of School

Improvement?

Aligned classroom practices with outcome indicators (test -

qualitative/quantitative) for all members and groups within their classroom. Particularly, student

growth measured against outcome indicators.

Page 43: For the Public Good-

LUCKY

High Results, low understanding of

antecedents

Replication of success unlikely

LOSING

Low Results, low understanding of

antecedents

Replication of failure likely

LEADING

High Results, high understanding of

antecedents

Replication of success likely

LEARNING

Low Results, high understanding of

antecedents

Replication of success likely

Ach

ieve

men

t o

f R

esu

lts

Antecedents of Excellence

Source: The Learning Leader

The Teaching for Learning Framework

Page 44: For the Public Good-

The Six Elements of the Explicit Teaching Model

• Review• Presentation

• Guided Practice• Correction and feedback

• Independent practice• Daily, weekly and monthly reviews

Page 45: For the Public Good-

Invitational Educators do not

lower their expectations or

support of African-

American children or children in

poverty.

Page 46: For the Public Good-

Some Effective Classroom/School Strategies for Academically Engaging African American Students and

Students in Poverty

• Helping students understand the power they possess to determine their ideological position within their schools

• Invitational teaching• Provide an adult (older person/student) reading to/with every child in grades

pre-K – 2 on a daily basis• The invitational hunt to include African-American students and students in

poverty in high quality, rigorous and relevant academic work• High academic expectations of children coupled with unparalleled

school/educator support of students• African-American students’ academic success seen as the rule and not the

exception• Multiple entry points into high level-high quality curriculum programs• Celebration of Learning• Teaching opposed to covering material• Mastery Learning• Use of the Explicit Teaching Model• Inclusion teaching model• Correlating classroom practices, school practices, and teacher practices with

student achievement (how students are measured academically)• Adopting varied and diverse instructional methodologies that allow for a wide

range of learning styles that exist within a multiracial and multiethnic student population

Page 47: For the Public Good-

Continued- Some Effective Classroom/School Strategies for Academically Engaging African American Students and Students in Poverty

• Scaffolding without lower academic expectations• Ensuring classroom observations are conducted systematically

and frequently• Focusing on nonfiction reading• Focusing on reading, writing and ciphering at every grade level• Teachers becoming reading and writing instructors in their

content area• Peer teaching and tutoring• Advisory Programs• Mentoring Programs (School/Community based)• Community Volunteer Programs• Rethinking assessment, particularly K-4 - 2nd grade• Assessment vs. Grading• Help African American students and students in poverty

understand the values of the middle class without demeaning the students’ culture

• Start with the end in mind

Page 48: For the Public Good-

Yes, We Can!!!

We can, whenever and wherever we choose, successfully teach all children whose schooling is of interest to us. We already know more than we need,

in order to do this. Whether we do it must finally depend on how we feel about the fact that we haven't

done it so far…

Ron Edmunds

Page 49: For the Public Good-

District/School Action Planning

Page 50: For the Public Good-

Cowardice asked the question, is this safe? Expendeniecy asked the question, is this politic? Vanity ask the question, is it popular? But conscience ask the question, is it right? There comes a time when one must take a position that’s

neither safe, nor political, nor popular, but right!

Martin Luther King, Jr.

Page 51: For the Public Good-

Emergency Academic Action Team (EAAT)

Stop the regular business of school to assess which curriculum and instruction programs are having a

positive academic impact for these students-------------------------------------------------------------------

Replicate and strengthen those programs that are working

Adopt programs that have a proven record of success

Immediately abandon those programs that have been in place two or more years that are not

working

Page 52: For the Public Good-

Results of Strategies Used in Your District/School

Successful Strategies

Why? Non-Successful Strategies

Why?

Page 53: For the Public Good-

District/School GroupList immediate action steps you can take to engage African-

American students and students in poverty in the academic culture of their schools/classrooms.

• 1.

• 2.

• 3.

• 4.

• 5.

Page 54: For the Public Good-

Action Steps(one sheet per goal)

Goal to be accomplished-

How does this goal tie into your district’s/school’s mission?

Who? What? When? Where? Cost?

Page 55: For the Public Good-

• Remember-

Page 56: For the Public Good-

Invitational educators Help Learners Understand that Learning is-

• A Journey• A Process• Continuous• Near Chaotic• Risky but required to survive

& thrive

Page 57: For the Public Good-

Invitational educators See

Learning...

Organized Around the Future

Instead of the Past

Ends

Purposes

Results

Outcomes

Goals

Learning

Achievement

Performance

Standards

Competence

LifeLife

Means

Procedures

Resources

Processes

Roles

Teaching

Programs

Curriculum

Time

Content

School

Page 58: For the Public Good-

Objectives of this session were-

• To suggest that public education is an effort to democratize the populace for the public good

• To engage in an open and frank dialogue suggesting how schools might academically engage African-American students and students in poverty

• To discuss possible reasons why African-American students and students in poverty are not achieving at higher academic levels

• To suggest some strategies that might successfully engage African-American students and students in poverty in their school’s academic culture

• To develop preliminary action steps to take in participants’ schools to facilitate the successful academic engagement of African-American students and students in poverty

Page 59: For the Public Good-

Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence- Invitationally Leading the charge for academic excellence for the Public Good!

Page 60: For the Public Good-

Research and works in progress by Dr. Burgess-

• College Start: Smooth Transitions for Minority Students, NASSP,

Bulletin, May 1988.• Successfully Navigating the Main

Stream: The perceptions of working class African-American males to academic barriers in

their own school’s culture (Dissertation)

• Are Pride and Persistence Attributes Needed to Make

Successful Progress Against Great Societal Odds? (Monograph)

• Distorted- Three-fifths of a Pupil, Restoring the Intellectual Image of Students of American Slave Descent: Together and Still Unequal! Publish America,

Baltimore, MD 2009• Work in progress- Tested Into

Remediation: Framing Not Expanding

Page 61: For the Public Good-

My Contact Information

• 864.760.3656• [email protected]

• 202 Sweetheart Nook• Pendleton, South Carolina 29670

Page 62: For the Public Good-

ReferencesReferences

Brandt, R. S. (2000). Education in a new era.

Burgess, G.L. (2006). Are pride and persistence attributes to make successful progress against great societal odds?

Burgess, G.L. (2009). Distorted: Restoring the intellectual image of students of american slave descent, together and still unequal

Burgess, G. L. (1999). Navigating the mainstream: The perceptions of working class african-american males to barriers of academic success in their local school cultures’.

The Center for High Performance- A division of the North Carolina Partnership for Excellence

Covey, S. T. (1989). Seven habits of highly effective people.

English, F. (2000). Deciding what to teach and test.

Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change.

Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities.

Meek, A. (1999). Communicating with the public: A guide for school educators.

Milken, L. (2000). A matter of quality: A strategy for assuring the high caliber of America’s educators.

Page 63: For the Public Good-

References ContinuedReferences Continued

Molnar, A. (1987). Social issues and education: Challenge and responsibility.

National Study of School Evaluation (1997). School improvement: Focusing on student performance.

National Study of School Evaluation (1997). Indicators of schools of quality.

Page, C (March 19, 2007) Real Clear Politics. Black Immigrants an ‘Invisible Model Minority’

Patterson, J. L., Purkey, S. C., and Parker, J. V. (1986). Productive school systems for a nonrational world.

Popham, J. W. (2001). The Truth About Testing: An educators call to action.

Purkey, W. W. (1978). Inviting school success.

Schwahn, C.J. & Spady, W.G. (1998). Total educators: Applying the best future-focused change strategies to education.

Schmoker, M. (2006). Results Now.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral educatorship: Getting to the heart of school improvement.

Shujaa, M.J. (1994). Too much schooling to little education.

Steele, (2006). The stereotype threat.

Tomlinson, C.A. & Allan, S.D. (2000). educatorship for differentiating schools & Classrooms

Waters, J.T. (2006). School District educatorship that WorksSchool District educatorship that Works . The College of William & Mary . The College of William & Mary Superintendents’ Retreat, Feb. 2007Superintendents’ Retreat, Feb. 2007


Recommended