Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 1
Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals
Format for reports of Parties on implementation of the
Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species
of Wild Animals (revision of June 2003)
Reporting format agreed by the Standing Committee at its 26th Meeting (Bonn, June 2003) for mandatory use by
Parties, for reports submitted to the Eighth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP8) (Nairobi, 2005).
The questions below combine elements of Resolution 4.1 (Party Reports) adopted by the Fourth Meeting of the
Conference of the Parties (Nairobi, June 1994) and Resolution 6.4 (Strategic Plan for the Convention on Migratory
Species 2000-2005), adopted by the Sixth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (Cape Town, November 1999), as well
as commitments arising from other operational Resolutions and Recommendations of the Conference of the Parties.
Please refer to the separate instructions on completing the report. Parties are encouraged to respond to all questions,
since it cannot be assumed that the absence of a response indicates that no activities taken have place in the current
reporting period. Parties are also requested to provide comprehensive answers, including, where appropriate, a
summary of activities, information on factors limiting action and details of any assistance required.
Which agency has been primarily responsible for the preparation of this report? #
Krkonose National Park Administration
List any other agencies that have provided input:
Ministry of Environment
Agency of Nature and Landscape Conservation
Czech Society for Ornithology
Czech Bat Conservation Trust
I(a). General Information
Please complete any unfilled boxes and amend and/or update as appropriate the information provided in the table below:
Reports submitted: 1997, 1999, 2002
Period covered by this report: 1 January 2002 – 30 April 2005
Date of entry into force of the Convention in Czech Republic: 1 May 1994
Territory to which the Convention applies: Czech Republic
Reservations (against species listings): None
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 2
Designated Focal Point:
Ms. Libuse Vlasakova
Ministry of Environment
Vrsovicka 65
CZ-10010 Praha 10
Czech Republic
Tel.: (+420) 267 122 372
Fax: (+420) 267 311 096
E-mail: [email protected]
Appointment to the Scientific Council:
Dr. Jiri Flousek
Deputy Director
Krkonose National Park Administration
CZ-54311Vrchlabi
Czech Republic
Tel: (+420) 499 456 212
Fax: (+420) 499 422 095
E-mail: [email protected]
Dr. Jiri Pykal (Alternate Member)
Agency of Nature and Landscape Conservation
Nam. Premysla Otakara II 34
CZ-60200 Ceske Budejovice
Czech Republic
E-mail: [email protected]
Membership of the Standing Committee: N/A
Competent authority: The Ministry of Environment is the competent authority for
protection of nature and landscape, and is responsible for the
implementation of the CMS.
The Ministry of Agriculture is the competent authority for
hunting.
Implementing legislation: Czech National Council Act No. 114/1992 on Nature and
Landscape Protection, in wording of 13 amendments (last one
from 2004, covering legislation of the European Union)
- and its implementing Regulation of the Ministry of
Environment No. 395/1992 (amendment under preparation)
Czech National Council Act No. 449/2001 on Hunting,
in wording of 2 amendments (2002, 2003)
- and its implementing Regulation of the Ministry of
Agriculture No. 244/2002
Czech National Council Act No. 246/1992 on the Protection
of Animals against Cruelty, in wording of 6 amendments (last
one from 2004)
Czech National Council Act No. 100/2004 on Conditions of
Import and Export of Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and
Flora and on Other Measures on the Conservation of these
Species
- and its implementing Regulation of the Ministry of
Environment No. 227/2004
Czech National Council Act No. 123/1998 on Right to Know
Information on the Environment, in wording of 2 amendments
(2000, 2004)
Czech National Council Act No. 115/2000 on Compensation
for Damages Caused by Selected Particularly Protected Animal
Species, in wording of 2 amendments (2001, 2002)
Other relevant conventions/agreements (apart from CMS) to
which the Czech Republic is a Party:
Convention on Wetlands of International Importance
Especially as Waterfowl Habitat 1971 ("Ramsar Convention")
Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and
Natural Habitats 1979 ("Bern Convention")
Convention on Biological Diversity 1992
National policy instruments (e.g. national biodiversity
conservation strategy, etc.):
State Programme on the Conservation of Nature and
Landscape 1998
State Environmental Politics 2004-2010
National Strategy of the Biodiversity Conservation 2005
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 3
Great Bustard MoU: Signatory Non-signatory
National Contact Point Name: Dr. Vlasta Skorpikova
Address: District Council (South Moravia)
Zerotinovo nam. 3/5
CZ-60182 Brno
Czech Republic
Tel.: (+420) 515 218 655
Fax:
E-mail: [email protected]
EUROBATS: Party Signed but not yet entered force Non-party
Competent authority
Name: Ms. Libuse Vlasakova
Address: Ministry of Environment
Vrsovicka 65
CZ-10010 Praha 10
Czech Republic
Tel.: (+420) 267 122 372
Fax: (+420) 267 311 096
E-mail: [email protected]
Appointed member of the Advisory Committee
Name: Dr. Eva Cepakova
Address: Agency of Nature and Landscape Conservation
Kalisnicka 4-6
CZ-13000 Praha 3
Czech Republic
Tel.: (+420) 283 069 251
Fax:
E-mail: [email protected]
Membership of other committees or working groups:
AEWA: Party Signed but not yet entered force Non-party
Administrative Authority
Name: Ms. Libuse Vlasakova
Address: Ministry of Environment
Vrsovicka 65
CZ-10010 Praha 10
Czech Republic
Tel.: (+420) 267 122 372
Fax: (+420) 267 311 096
E-mail: [email protected]
Appointed member of the Technical Committee
Name: N/A
Address:
Tel.:
Fax:
E-mail:
Membership of other committees or working groups:
I(b). Additional General Information
1 Which other government departments are involved in activities/initiatives for the conservation of migratory species in
your country? (Please list.)
None.
1a If more than one government department is involved, describe the interaction/relationship between these government
departments:
N/A
2 List the main non-governmental organizations actively involved in initiatives for the conservation of migratory species in
your country, and describe their involvement:
Czech Society for Ornithology (CSO)
Czech Bat Conservation Trust (CBCT)
3 Describe any involvement of the private sector in the conservation of migratory species in your country:
None.
4 Note any interactions between these sectors in the conservation of migratory species in your country:
N/A
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 4
II. Appendix I species
1. BIRDS
1.1 General questions on Appendix I bird species
1 Identify the Ministry, agency/department, or organisation responsible for leading actions relating to Appendix I bird
species: #
Ministry of Environment, Czech Society for Ornithology
2 Is the taking of all Appendix I bird species prohibited by the national implementing Yes No
legislation cited in Table I(a) (General Information)?
If other legislation is relevant, please provide details: #
2a If the taking of Appendix I bird species is prohibited by law, have any exceptions Yes No
been granted to the prohibition?
If Yes, please provide details (Include the date on which the exception was notified to the CMS Secretariat pursuant to
CMS Article III(7)): #
3 Identify any obstacles to migration that exist in relation to Appendix I bird species: #
None.
3a What actions are being undertaken to overcome these obstacles? #
N/A
3b What assistance, if any, does your country require in order to overcome these obstacles? #
N/A
4 What actions have been taken to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endanger
bird species, including strictly controlling the introduction of, or controlling or eliminating, already introduced exotic
species (Article III(4)(c))? #
National programme “Free Wings”, prepared by the Czech Society for Ornithology (in the frame of the Eurogroup
against Bird Crime), concentrates on all illegal human activities negatively influencing bird populations (e.g. birds of
prey, hunting, robberies on nests, trade, etc.).
4a Describe any factors that may limit action being taken in this regard: #
None.
4b What assistance, if any, does your country require to overcome these factors? #
None.
1.2 Questions on specific Appendix I bird species
The following section contains a table for each Appendix I bird species for which your country is considered to be a Range
State. Please complete each table as appropriate, providing information in summary form. Where appropriate, please
cross-reference to information already provided in national reports that have been submitted under other conventions
(e.g. Convention on Biological Diversity, Ramsar Convention, CITES). (Attach annexes as necessary.)
Species Haliaeetus albicilla – Common Name(s) White-tailed Eagle
1 Is your country a Range State for this species? Yes No
2 Please provide published distribution reference: # Hudec et al. 1995, Hudec & Stastny 2005
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 5
3 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known): #
The Czech Republic hosts breeding populations. Increasing population – regularly breeding (32-35 breeding pairs in
2005), regularly wintering (80-100 individuals).
4
Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in the
reporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available.)
Research #
Monitoring
Regular monitoring of the breeding population in all breeding localities.#
Species protection
Protected by national legislation as critically endangered.
Species restoration
Habitat protection #
Majority of nests in protected areas. If not, temporary legislative protection for a given nest in a given breeding season
could be secured.
Habitat restoration #
Other #
5 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?#
6 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species: #
See ad 4.
Species Aquila heliaca – Common Name(s) Imperial Eagle
1 Is your country a Range State for this species? Yes No
2 Please provide published distribution reference: # Hudec et al. 1995, Hudec & Stastny 2005
3 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known): #
The Czech Republic hosts breeding populations. Rarely breeding (2-3 pairs in 2002-2005), regularly migrating.
4
Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in the
reporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available.)
Research #
Monitoring #
Regular monitoring of all breeding pairs.
Species protection
Not protected by national legislation (new breeding species for the country) but taken as a protected one. An amendment
to the respective Regulation (No. 395/1992) under preparation to give the species legislative protection (in a category
“critically endangered”).
Species restoration
Habitat protection #
All nests in protected areas.
Habitat restoration #
Other #
5 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?#
6 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species: #
See ad 4.
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 6
Species Aquila clanga – Common Name(s) Greater Spotted Eagle
1 Is your country a Range State for this species? Yes No
2 Please provide published distribution reference: # Hudec et al. 1995, Hudec & Stastny 2005
3 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known): #
The Czech Republic hosts migrating populations only. Rarely and irregularly migrating.
4
Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in the
reporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available.)
Research #
Monitoring #
Species protection
Not protected by national legislation (non-breeding species) but hunting prohibited.
Species restoration
Habitat protection #
Habitat restoration #
Other #
5 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?#
No specific activity prepared for this very rare species.
6 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species: #
See ad 5.
Species Branta ruficollis – Common Name(s) Red-breasted Goose
1 Is your country a Range State for this species? Yes No
2 Please provide published distribution reference: # Hudec 1994, Hudec et al. 1995
3 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known): #
The Czech Republic hosts migrating populations only. Rarely and irregularly migrating.
4
Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in the
reporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available.)
Research #
Monitoring
Covered by regular national waterbird census.#
Species protection
Not protected by national legislation (non-breeding species) but hunting prohibited.
Species restoration
Habitat protection #
Habitat restoration #
Other #
5 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?#
6 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species: #
See ad 4.
Species Anser erythropus – Common Name(s) Lesser White-fronted Goose
1 Is your country a Range State for this species? Yes No
2 Please provide published distribution reference: # Hudec 1994, Hudec et al. 1995
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 7
3 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known): #
The Czech Republic hosts migrating populations only. Rarely but regularly migrating.
4
Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in the
reporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available.)
Research #
Monitoring #
Covered by regular national waterbird census.#
Species protection
Not protected by national legislation (non-breeding species) but hunting prohibited.
Species restoration
Habitat protection #
Habitat restoration #
Other
5 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?#
6 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species: #
See ad 4.
Species Aythya nyroca – Common Name(s) Ferruginous Pochard, Ferruginous Duck
1 Is your country a Range State for this species? Yes No
2 Please provide published distribution reference: # Hudec 1994, Hudec et al. 1995
3 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known): #
No breeding confirmed since 1988. Very rare but nearly regular occurrence in a breeding season (1-2 pairs); regularly
wintering (5-10 observations each winter).
4
Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in the
reporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available.)
Research #
Monitoring #
Covered by regular national waterbird census.
Species protection
Protected by national legislation as critically endangered.
Species restoration
Habitat protection #
The most important and potential breeding sites are designated as wetlands of international importance (Ramsar sites) and
most of them are protected by national legislation.
Habitat restoration #
Other #
5 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?#
6 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species: #
See ad 4.
Species Otis tarda – Common Name(s) Great Bustard
1 Is your country a Range State for this species? Yes No
2 Please provide published distribution reference: # Hudec et al. 1995, Hudec & Stastny 2005
3 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known): #
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 8
No breeding confirmed since 1996. Regularly wintering (1-3 individuals in 2002-04, 1 male in 2005).
4
Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in the
reporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available.)
Research #
Monitoring #
Regular monitoring of the only suitable locality.
Species protection
Protected by national legislation as critically endangered.
Species restoration
Habitat protection #
In 2001 a temporarily protected area established at the former breeding site in southern Moravia, near the Czech-Austrian
border, for the next ten years. Management plan for the site prepared, a person financially supported who is responsible
for regular controls of the site in both breeding and winter seasons. Continuing informal co-operation with Austrian
ornithologists aimed at protection of the species (future existence of the Czech population depends on vitality of the
neighbouring population in Austria).
Habitat restoration
Former field military airport (ca 75 ha) in the locality of interest restored – changed to grassy habitat managed
in “bustard-friendly” way.#
Other #
5 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?#
6 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species: #
See ad 4.
Species Acrocephalus paludicola – Common Name(s) Aquatic Warbler
1 Is your country a Range State for this species? Yes No
2 Please provide published distribution reference: # Hudec 1983, Hudec et al. 1995
3 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known): #
The Czech Republic hosts migrating populations only. Rarely but regularly migrating.
4
Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in the
reporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available.)
Research #
Monitoring
Covered by two regular national schemes (waterbird census, Breeding Bird Census Programme).#
Species protection
Not protected by national legislation (non-breeding species).
Species restoration
Habitat protection #
The most important and potential breeding sites are designated as wetlands of international importance (Ramsar sites) and
most of them are protected by national legislation.
Habitat restoration #
Other #
5 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?#
6 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species: #
See ad 4.
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 9
Miscellaneous information or comments on Appendix I birds in general: None
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 10
2. MARINE MAMMALS
2.1 General questions on Appendix I marine mammals
1 Identify the Ministry, agency/department, or organisation responsible for leading actions relating to Appendix I listed
marine mammals: #
N/A
2 Is the taking of all Appendix I marine mammals prohibited by the national Yes No
implementing legislation cited in Table I(a) (General Information)?
If other legislation is relevant, please provide details: #
2a If the taking of Appendix I marine mammals is prohibited by law, have any exceptions Yes No
been granted to the prohibition?
If Yes, please provide details (Include the date on which the exception was notified to the CMS Secretariat pursuant to
CMS Article III(7)):
3 Identify any obstacles to migration that exist in relation to Appendix I marine mammals: #
3a What actions are being undertaken to overcome these obstacles? #
3b What assistance, if any, does your country require in order to overcome these obstacles? #
4 What actions have been taken to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endanger
species of marine mammal, including strictly controlling the introduction of, or controlling or eliminating, already
introduced exotic species (Article III(4)(c))? #
4a Describe any factors that may limit action being taken in this regard: #
4b What assistance, if any, does your country require to overcome these factors? #
2.2 Questions on specific Appendix I marine mammals
If you have information indicating that your country should be considered a Range State for any marine mammal species
that is listed in CMS Appendix I, please complete a table (provided below) for each species.
Species name, Common name(s):
1 Please provide published distribution reference:
2 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known):
3
Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in the
reporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available):
Research
Monitoring
Species protection
Species restoration
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 11
Habitat protection
Habitat restoration
Other
4 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?
5 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species:
Miscellaneous information or comments on Appendix I marine mammals in general:
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 12
3 MARINE TURTLES
3.1 General questions on Appendix I marine turtles
1 Identify the Ministry, agency/department, or organisation responsible for leading actions relating to Appendix I listed
marine turtles: #
N/A
2 Is the taking of all Appendix I marine turtles prohibited by the national implementing Yes No
legislation cited in Table I(a) (General Information)?
If other legislation is relevant, please provide details: #
2a If the taking of Appendix I marine turtles is prohibited by law, have any exceptions Yes No
been granted to the prohibition?
If Yes, please provide details (Include the date on which the exception was notified to the CMS Secretariat pursuant to
CMS Article III(7)):
3 Identify any obstacles to migration that exist in relation to Appendix I marine turtles: #
3a What actions are being undertaken to overcome these obstacles? #
3b What assistance, if any, does your country require in order to overcome these obstacles? #
4 What actions have been taken to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endanger
species of marine turtles, including strictly controlling the introduction of, or controlling or eliminating, already
introduced exotic species (Article III(4)(c))? #
4a Describe any factors that may limit action being taken in this regard: #
4b What assistance, if any, does your country require to overcome these factors? #
3.2 Questions on specific Appendix I marine turtles
If you have information indicating that your country should be considered a Range State for any marine turtle species
that is listed in CMS Appendix I, please complete a table (provided below) for each species.
Species name, Common name(s):
1 Please provide published distribution reference:
2 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known):
3
Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in the
reporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available):
Research
Monitoring
Species protection
Species restoration
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 13
Habitat protection
Habitat restoration
Other
4 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?
5 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species?
Miscellaneous information or comments on Appendix I marine turtles in general:
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 14
4 TERRESTRIAL MAMMALS (OTHER THAN BATS)
4.1 General questions on Appendix I terrestrial mammals (other than bats)
1 Identify the Ministry, agency/department, or organisation responsible for leading actions relating to Appendix I listed
terrestrial mammals (other than bats): #
N/A
2 Is the taking of all Appendix I terrestrial mammals (other than bats) prohibited by Yes No
the national implementing legislation cited in Table I(a) (General Information)?
If other legislation is relevant, please provide details: #
2a If the taking of Appendix I terrestrial mammals (other than bats) is prohibited by Yes No
law, have any exceptions been granted to the prohibition?
If Yes, please provide details (Include the date on which the exception was notified to the CMS Secretariat pursuant to
CMS Article III(7)): #
3 Identify any obstacles to migration that exist in relation to Appendix I terrestrial mammals (other than bats): #
3a What actions are being undertaken to overcome these obstacles? #
3b What assistance, if any, does your country require in order to overcome these obstacles? #
4 What actions have been taken to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endanger
species of terrestrial mammal (other than bats), including strictly controlling the introduction of, or controlling or
eliminating, already introduced exotic species (Article III(4)(c))? #
4a Describe any factors which limit action being taken in this regard: #
4b What assistance, if any, does your country require to overcome these factors? #
4.2 Questions on specific Appendix I terrestrial mammals (other than bats)
If you have information indicating that your country should be considered a Range State for any terrestrial mammal
species (other than bats) that is listed in CMS Appendix I, please complete a table (provided below) for each species.
Species name, Common name(s):
1 Please provide published distribution reference:
2 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known):
3
Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in the
reporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available):
Research
Monitoring
Species protection
Species restoration
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 15
Habitat protection
Habitat restoration
Other
4 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?
5 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species:
Miscellaneous information or comments on Appendix I terrestrial mammals (other than bats) in general:
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 16
5 BATS
5.1 General questions on Appendix I bats
1 Identify the Ministry, agency/department, or organisation responsible for leading actions relating to Appendix I listed
bats: #
N/A
2 Is the taking of all Appendix I bats prohibited by the national implementing Yes No
Legislation cited in Table I(a) (General Information)?
If other legislation is relevant, please provide details: #
2a If the taking of Appendix I bats is prohibited by law, have any exceptions Yes No
been granted to the prohibition?
If Yes, please provide details (Include the date on which the exception was notified to the CMS Secretariat pursuant to
CMS Article III(7)):
3 Identify any obstacles to migration that exist in relation to Appendix I bats: #
3a What actions are being undertaken to overcome these obstacles? #
3b What assistance, if any, does your country require in order to overcome these obstacles? #
4 What actions have been taken to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endanger
species of bats, including strictly controlling the introduction of, or controlling or eliminating, already introduced exotic
species (Article III(4)(c))? #
4a Describe any factors that may limit action being taken in this regard: #
4b What assistance, if any, does your country require to overcome these factors? #
5.2 Questions on specific Appendix I bat species
If you have information indicating that your country should be considered a Range State for any bat species that is listed
in CMS Appendix I, please complete a table (provided below) for each species.
Species name, Common name(s):
1 Please provide published distribution reference:
2 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known):
3
Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in the
reporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available):
Research
Monitoring
Species protection
Species restoration
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 17
Habitat protection
Habitat restoration
Other
4 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?
5 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species?
Miscellaneous information or comments on Appendix I bats in general:
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 18
6 OTHER TAXA
6.1 General questions on Appendix I species belonging to other taxa
1 Identify the Ministry, agency/department, or organisation responsible for leading actions relating to Appendix I listed
species belonging to taxa not included in sections 1-5 above: #
N/A
2 Is the taking of all Appendix I species belonging to taxa not included in Yes No
sections 1-5 above, prohibited by the national legislation listed as being
implementing legislation in Table I(a) (General Information)?
If other legislation is relevant, please provide details: #
2a If the taking of Appendix I species belonging to taxa not included in Yes No
sections 1-5 above is prohibited by law, have any exceptions been
granted to the prohibition?
If Yes, please provide details (Include the date on which the exception was notified to the CMS Secretariat pursuant to
CMS Article III(7)):
3 Identify any obstacles to migration that exist in relation to Appendix I species belonging to taxa not included in sections
1-5 above: #
3a What actions are being undertaken to overcome these obstacles? #
3b What assistance, if any, does your country require in order to overcome these obstacles? #
4 What actions have been taken to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endanger
species belonging to taxa not included in section 1-5 above, including strictly controlling the introduction of, or
controlling or eliminating, already introduced exotic species (Article III(4)(c))? #
4a Describe any factors that may limit action being taken in this regard: #
4b What assistance, if any, does your country require to overcome these factors? #
6.2 Questions on specific Appendix I species belonging to other taxa
If you have information indicating that your country should be considered a Range State for any Appendix I listed species
that belongs to taxa not included in sections 1-5 above, please complete a table (provided below) for each species.
Species name, Common name(s): N/A
1 Please provide published distribution reference:
2 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known):
3
Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in the
reporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available):
Research
Monitoring
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 19
Species protection
Species restoration
Habitat protection
Habitat restoration
Other
4 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?
5 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species?
Miscellaneous information or comments on Appendix I species that belong to taxa not included in sections 1-5 above:
7 LISTING OF OTHER ENDANGERED MIGRATORY SPECIES IN APPENDIX I
1 Is your country a Range State for any other endangered migratory species Yes No
not currently listed in Appendix I?
If Yes, please provide details:
1a Is your country taking any steps to propose listing any of these species? Yes No
If Yes, please provide details:
1b What assistance, if any, does your country require to initiate the listing of these species?
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 20
III. Appendix II Species
1. INFORMATION ON APPENDIX II SPECIES
Information pertaining to the conservation of Appendix II species that are the object of CMS Agreements will have been
provided in periodic Party reports to those instruments. It will suffice therefore to reference (below), and preferably
append, a copy of the latest report that has been submitted to the secretariat each of the Agreement/MoUs to which your
country is a Party.
GREAT BUSTARD MoU (2001)
Date of last report: N/A Period covered:
EUROBATS (1994)
Date of last report: June 2003 /
/ updated 15 April 2005
Period covered: December 1999 – June 2003
July 2003 – March 2005
AEWA (1999)
Date of last report: N/A Period covered:
2. QUESTIONS ON CMS AGREEMENTS
2.1 Questions on the development of new CMS Agreements relating to birds
1 In the current reporting period, has your country initiated the development of any Yes No
CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, to address the
conservation needs of Appendix II bird species?
If Yes, what is the current state of development? #
2 In the current reporting period, has your country participated in the development Yes No
of any CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, which address
the conservation needs of Appendix II bird species?
If Yes, please provide details: #
3 If your country has initiated or is participating in the development of an Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding,
what assistance, if any, does your country require in order to initiate or participate in the instrument’s development?#
4 Is the development of any CMS Agreement for birds, including Memoranda of Yes No
Understanding, planned by your country in the foreseeable future?
If Yes, please provide details: #
2.2 Questions on the development of new CMS Agreements relating to marine
mammals
1 In the current reporting period, has your country initiated the development of any Yes No
CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, to address the
conservation needs of Appendix II marine mammal species?
If Yes, what is the current state of development? #
2 In the current reporting period, has your country participated in the development Yes No
of any CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, which address
the conservation needs of Appendix II marine mammal species?
If Yes, please provide details: #
3 If your country has initiated or is participating in the development of an Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding,
what assistance, if any, does your country require in order to initiate or participate in the instrument’s development?#
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 21
4 Is the development of any CMS Agreement for marine mammals, including Yes No
Memoranda of Understanding, planned by your country in the foreseeable future?
If Yes, please provide details: #
2.3 Questions on the development of new CMS Agreements relating to marine turtles
1 In the current reporting period, has your country initiated the development of any Yes No
CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, to address the
conservation needs of Appendix II marine turtles?
If Yes, what is the current state of development? #
2 In the current reporting period, has your country participated in the development Yes No
of any CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, which address
the conservation needs of Appendix II marine turtles?
If Yes, please provide details: #
3 If your country has initiated or is participating in the development of an Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding,
what assistance, if any, does your country require in order to initiate or participate in the instrument’s development?#
4 Is the development of any CMS Agreement for marine turtles, including Yes No
Memoranda of Understanding, planned by your country in the foreseeable future?
If Yes, please provide details: #
2.4 Questions on the development of new CMS Agreements relating to terrestrial
mammals (other than bats)
1 In the current reporting period, has your country initiated the development of any Yes No
CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, to address the conservation
needs of Appendix II terrestrial mammal species (other than bats)?
If Yes, what is the current state of development? #
2 In the current reporting period, has your country participated in the development Yes No
of any CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, which address
the conservation needs of Appendix II terrestrial mammal species (other than bats)?
If Yes, please provide details: #
3 If your country has initiated or is participating in the development of an Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding,
what assistance, if any, does your country require in order to initiate or participate in the instrument’s development?#
4 Is the development of any CMS Agreement for terrestrial mammals (other than bats), Yes No
including Memoranda of Understanding, planned by your country in the foreseeable future?
If Yes, please provide details: #
2.5 Questions on the development of new CMS Agreements relating to bats
1 In the current reporting period, has your country initiated the development of any Yes No
CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, to address the
conservation needs of Appendix II bat species?
If Yes, what is the current state of development? #
2 In the current reporting period, has your country participated in the development Yes No
of any CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, which address
the conservation needs of Appendix II bat species?
If Yes, please provide details: #
3 If your country has initiated or is participating in the development of an Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding,
what assistance, if any, does your country require in order to initiate or participate in the instrument’s development?#
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 22
4 Is the development of any CMS Agreement for bats, including Memoranda of Yes No
Understanding, planned by your country in the future?
If Yes, please provide details: #
2.6 Questions on the development of new CMS Agreements relating to other taxa
1 In the current reporting period, has your country initiated the development of any Yes No
CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, to address the
conservation needs of Appendix II species belonging to taxa not
included in sections 1-6 above?
If Yes, what is the current state of development? #
2 In the current reporting period, has your country participated in the development Yes No
of any CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, which address
the conservation needs of species belonging to taxa not included in sections 1-6 above?
If Yes, please provide details: #
3 If your country has initiated or is participating in the development of an Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding,
what assistance, if any, does your country require in order to initiate or participate in the instrument’s development?#
4 Is the development of any CMS Agreement for other taxa, including Memoranda of Yes No
Understanding, planned by your country in the foreseeable future?
If Yes, please provide details: #
3. LISTING OF MIGRATORY SPECIES IN APPENDIX II
1 Is your country a Range State for any migratory species that has an unfavourable Yes No
conservation status, but is not currently listed in Appendix II and could benefit
from the conclusion of an Agreement for its conservation?
If Yes, please provide details:
1a Is your country taking any steps to propose the listing of this/these species in Appendix II? Yes No
If Yes, please provide details:
1b What assistance, if any, does your country require to initiate the listing of this/these species?
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 23
IV. National and Regional Priorities
1 What priority does your country assign to the conservation and, Low Medium High
where applicable, sustainable use of migratory species in
comparison to other biodiversity-related issues?
2 Are migratory species and their habitats addressed by your country’s national Yes No
biodiversity strategy or action plan?
If Yes, please indicate and briefly describe the extent to which it addresses the following issues:
Conservation, sustainable use and/or restoration of migratory species
Conservation, sustainable use and/or restoration of the habitats of migratory species, including protected areas
Actions to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endanger migratory
species (e.g. alien invasive species or by-catch)
Minimising or eliminating barriers or obstacles to migration
Research and monitoring of migratory species
Transboundary co-operation
3 Does the conservation of migratory species currently feature in any other national Yes No
or regional policies/plans (apart from CMS Agreements)
If Yes, please provide details:
3a Do these policies/plans cover the following areas (if Yes, please provide details):
Yes No
Exploitation of natural resources (e.g. fisheries, hunting, etc.)
Economic development
Land-use planning
Pollution control
Designation and development of protected areas
Development of ecological networks
Planning of powerlines
Planning of fences
Planning of dams
Other
V. Protected Areas
1 Are migratory species taken into account in the selection, establishment and Yes No
management of protected areas in your country?
If Yes, please provide details:
Special Protected Areas (SPA), proposed according to the European Council Directive on the Conservation of the Wild
Birds 79/409/EC, cover important breeding grounds and important sites of concentration of migrating and wintering
birds (for species listed in the Annex I of the Birds Directive).
At present 41 SPAs have been proposed (total area 7022 km2), 38 of them already declared as SPAs by individual
decrees of the Government of the Czech Republic.
Potential Sites of Community Importance (pSCI), proposed according to the European Council Directive on the
Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora 92/40/EEC, cover not only important habitat types but
also localities of important plant and animal species (listed in the Annex II and IV of the Habitats Directive), incl. bats.
At present 863 pSCIs have been listed in the Decree of the Government of the Czech Republic No. 132/2005 (incl.
several tens of roost and hibernation localities of bats), prepared to go through a standard evaluation process now and to
be declared as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC).
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 24
1a Do these protected areas cover the following areas? (If Yes, please provide details and include the amount of protected
areas coverage and the number of protected areas):
Yes No
Terrestrial
Aquatic
Marine
1b Identify the agency, department or organization responsible for leading on this action in your country:
Ministry of Environment and its Agency of Nature and Landscape Conservation
VI. Policies on Satellite Telemetry
1 In the current reporting period, has your country undertaken Yes No
conservation/research projects that use satellite telemetry?
If Yes, please provide details (Indicate inter alia the scientific justification for the research, describe briefly the measures
taken to ensure that risks to the welfare of individual animals and – in the case of severely depleted populations – to the
species are minimised, and summarise the results obtained):
Long-term scientific and educational project on telemetry of Ciconia nigra in Europe, Africa and Asia has been
continuing (see http://www.rozhlas.cz/odysea/angl for the Odyssey). Two more species included (Ciconia ciconia and
Grus grus).
2 Are any future conservation/research projects planned that will use Yes No
satellite telemetry?
If Yes, please provide details (including the expected timeframe for these projects): #
If No, please explain any impediments or requirements in this regard: #
VII. Membership
1 Have actions been taken by your country to encourage non-Parties Yes No
to join CMS and its related Agreements?
If Yes, please provide details. (In particular, describe actions taken to recruit the non-Parties that have been identified by
the Standing Committee as high priorities for recruitment.)
1a Identify the agency, department or organization responsible for leading on this action in your country:
VIII. Global and National Importance of CMS
1 Have actions been taken by your country to increase national, regional Yes No
and/or global awareness of the relevance of CMS and its global importance
in the context of biodiversity conservation?
If Yes, please provide details:
National level only:
A working group on international biodiversity conventions has been established under the Ministry of Environment,
consisting of people responsible for individual convention and agreements (CBD, CITES, Ramsar, CMS and Bern).
A home-page providing information on international conventions in nature conservation has been prepared
(http://www.env.cz/AIS/web.nsf/pages/umluvy_op).
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 25
A working group for the EUROBATS in the Czech Republic was established under the Ministry of Environment in 2004.
Several popular and information materials published (by the Czech Society for Ornithology and the Czech Bat
Conservation Trust), devoted to conservation of migratory species of birds and bats.
2 Identify the agency, department or organization responsible for leading on this action in your country:
Ministry of Environment and its Agency of Nature and Landscape Conservation
IX. Mobilization of Resources
1 Has your country made financial resources available for conservation activities having Yes No
direct benefits for migratory species in your country?
If Yes, please provide details (Indicate the migratory species that have benefited from these activities):
A new fund for implementation of international conventions established by the Ministry of Environment since 2004,
financially supporting specific projects on migratory species: (1) regular International Waterbirds Census, (2) preparation
of an atlas of bird migration/flyways in the Czech Republic and (3) bat detectoring (of forest species especially) in 2004,
the latter two projects continue to be supported in 2005.
2 Has your country made voluntary contributions to the CMS Trust Fund to support Yes No
requests from developing countries and countries with economies in transition?
If Yes, please provide details:
3 Has your country made other voluntary financial contributions to support Yes No
conservation activities having direct benefits for migratory species in other
countries (particularly developing countries)?
If Yes, please provide details (Indicate the migratory species that have benefited from these activities):
4 Has your country provided technical and/or scientific assistance to Yes No
developing countries to facilitate initiatives for the benefit of migratory
species?
If Yes, please provide details (Indicate the migratory species that have benefited from these activities):
5 Has your country received financial assistance/support from the CMS Trust Yes No
Fund, via the CMS Secretariat, for national conservation activities having
direct benefits for migratory species in your country?
If Yes, please provide details (Indicate the migratory species that have benefited from these activities):
6 Has your country received financial assistance/support from sources other Yes No
than the CMS Secretariat for conservation activities having direct benefit for
migratory species in your country?
If Yes, please provide details (Indicate the migratory species that have benefited from these activities):
X. Implementation of COP Resolutions and Recommendations
Please summarize the measures undertaken by your country to implement the substantive, operational Resolutions and
Recommendations adopted by the Conference of the Parties, where these have not been mentioned elsewhere in this
report, giving particular emphasis to those identified below (as appropriate).
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 26
Resolutions
Resolution 6.2 – By-catch, and Recommendation 7.2 – Implementation of Resolution 6.2 on By-catch: N/A
Resolution 6.3 – Southern Hemisphere Albatross Conservation: N/A
Resolution 7.2 – Impact Assessment and Migratory Species: Impact assessment is a legislatively binding procedure
(Act No. 114/1992: see Chapter Ia) to assess all activities with an important impact on Natura 2000 sites (European
ecological network combining SPAs and SACs: see Chapter V).
Resolution 7.3 – Oil Pollution and Migratory Species: No progress.
Resolution 7.4 – Electrocution of Migratory Birds: Protection of birds against electrocution is covered by the Czech National
Council Act No. 114/1992 on Nature and Landscape Protection, in wording of 13 amendments (2004), in its § 5a
(protection of wild birds), para (6).
Resolution 7.5 – Wind Turbines and Migratory Species: Methodic instructions prepared by the Ministry of Environment
(2004) to standardize legislative procedures of competent authorities when evaluating wind turbine projects. Areas suitable
for wind farms and without any important conflicts with nature conservation recommended (based on overlaps of different
categories of protected areas, SPAs, pSCIs, systems of ecological stability and migratory routes of large birds, esp. storks).
More detailed base material of important migratory areas and corridors under preparation (Czech Society for Ornithology
began to evaluate ringing data and prepare an atlas of bird migration in the Czech Republic).
Resolution 7.9 – Cooperation with Other Bodies and Processes: Regular cooperation and coordinated activities of people
responsible for the CBD and the CMS in the Czech Republic (see Chapter VIII).
Participation of respective specialists from the Czech Republic in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.
Resolution 7.15 – Future Action on the Antarctic Minke, Bryde’s and Pygmy Right Whales under the Convention on
Migratory Species: N/A
Recommendations
Recommendation 7.5 – Range State Agreement for Dugong (Dugong dugon) Conservation: N/A
Recommendation 7.6 – Improving the Conservation Status of the Leatherback Turtle (Dermochelys coriacea): N/A
Recommendation 7.7 – America Pacific Flyway Programme: N/A
Other resolutions/recommendations
Resolution 7.1 – Concerted Actions for Appendix I Species: Otis tarda, Anser erythropus, Acrocephalus paludicola,
Aythya nyroca (see Chapter II/1.2)
Recommendation 7.1 – Cooperative Actions for Appendix II Species: Crex crex, Coturnix coturnix
Atlas/grid mapping of breeding birds, incl. both the species mentioned, in the Czech Republic in 2001-2003 finished,
providing updated information on distribution, population numbers and trends of all bird species (already the third bird atlas
in preparation after the 1973-77 and 1985-89 ones).
Regular annual national mapping of Crex crex provides actual information on population trends (stable population
of 1500-1700 calling males).
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 27
National agro-environment scheme, prepared by the Czech Society for Ornithology (CSO) and using Crex crex as a flagship
species to suggest and implement suitable management of wet and montane meadows, has been adopted. Since 2004 local
farmers, willing to keep conditions of “corncrake-friendly” management, are offered financial support by the Ministry of
Agriculture.
National monitoring plan, prepared for Crex crex and for management of corncrake localities (esp. in SPAs) by the CSO
again, is coming in action (2005). It covers also Coturnix coturnix.
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 28
Annex: Questions on specific Appendix II species
The tables below contain the list of all species listed in Appendix II. Boxes have been checked to indicate
the species for which your country is considered to be a Range State. Please amend the boxes where
appropriate. (If you wish to provide further information on any of these species, please attach as an
annex.) Please also provide published distribution references where available.
Species Range
State
Not a
Range State
Extinct No
information
available
Published distribution reference
CHIROPTERA
Rhinolophus ferrumequinum
(only European populations)
journal Vespertilio 2/1997 to 8/2004
(covering all 24 bat species in the
Czech Republic)
Rhinolophus hipposideros
(only European populations)
Rhinolophus euryale
(only European populations)
Rhinolophus mehelyi
(only European populations)
Rhinolophus blasii
(only European populations)
Myotis bechsteini
(only European populations)
Myotis blythi
(only European populations)
Myotis brandtii
(only European populations)
Myotis capaccinii
(only European populations)
Myotis dasycneme
(only European populations)
Myotis daubentoni
(only European populations)
Myotis emarginatus
(only European populations)
Myotis myotis
(only European populations)
Myotis mystacinus
(only European populations)
Myotis nattereri
(only European populations)
Pipistrellus kuhli
(only European populations)
Pipistrellus nathusii
(only European populations)
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 29
Species Range
State
Not a
Range State
Extinct No
information
available
Published distribution reference
Pipistrellus pipistrellus
(only European populations)
Pipistrellus pygmaeus
(only European populations)
Pipistrellus savii
(only European populations)
Nyctalus lasiopterus
(only European populations)
Nyctalus leisleri
(only European populations)
Nyctalus noctula
(only European populations)
Eptesicus nilssonii
(only European populations)
Eptesicus serotinus
(only European populations)
Vespertilio murinus
(only European populations)
Barbastella barbastellus
(only European populations)
Plecotus auritus
(only European populations)
Plecotus austriacus
(only European populations)
Miniopterus schreibersii
(only European populations)
Tadarida teniotis
CETACEA
Physeter macrocephalus
Platanista gangetica
gangetica
Pontoporia blainvillei
Inia geoffrensis
Delphinapterus leucas
Monodon monoceros
Phocoena phocoena
(North and Baltic Sea populations)
Phocoena phocoena
(western North Atlantic population)
Phocoena phocoena
(Black Sea population)
Neophocaena phocaenoides
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 30
Species Range
State
Not a
Range State
Extinct No
information
available
Published distribution reference
Phocoenoides dalli
Phocoena spinipinnis
Phocoena dioptrica
Sousa chinensis
Sousa teuszii
Sotalia fluviatilis
Lagenorhynchus albirostris
(only North and Baltic Sea
populations)
Lagenorhynchus acutus
(only North and Baltic Sea
populations)
Lagenorhynchus australis
Lagenorhynchus obscurus
Grampus griseus
(only North and Baltic Sea
populations)
Tursiops aduncus
(Arafura/Timor Sea populations)
Tursiops truncatus
(North and Baltic Sea populations)
Tursiops truncatus
(western Mediterranean
population)
Tursiops truncatus
(Black Sea population)
Stenella attenuata
(eastern tropical Pacific population)
Stenella attenuata
(Southeast Asian populations)
Stenella longirostris
(eastern tropical Pacific
populations)
Stenella longirostris
(Southeast Asian populations)
Stenella coeruleoalba
(eastern tropical Pacific population)
Stenella coeruleoalba
(western Mediterranean
population)
Delphinus delphis
(North and Baltic Sea populations)
Delphinus delphis
(western Mediterranean
population)
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 31
Species Range
State
Not a
Range State
Extinct No
information
available
Published distribution reference
Delphinus delphis
(Black Sea population)
Delphinus delphis
(eastern tropical Pacific population)
Lagenodelphis hosei
(Southeast Asian populations)
Orcaella brevirostris
Cephalorhynchus
commersonii
(South American population)
Cephalorhynchus eutropia
Cephalorhynchus heavisidii
Orcinus orca
Globicephala melas
(only North and Baltic Sea
populations)
Berardius bairdii
Hyperoodon ampullatus
Balaenoptera bonaerensis
Balaenoptera edeni
Balaenoptera borealis
Balaenoptera physalus
Caperea marginata
CARNIVORA
Arctocephalus australis
Otaria flavescens
Phoca vitulina
(only Baltic and Wadden Sea
populations)
Halichoerus grypus
(only Baltic Sea populations)
Monachus monachus
PROBOSCIDEA
Loxodonta africana
SIRENIA
Trichechus manatus
(populations between Honduras
and Panama)
Trichechus senegalensis
Trichechus inunguis
Dugong dugon
PERISSODACTYLA
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 32
Species Range
State
Not a
Range State
Extinct No
information
available
Published distribution reference
Equus hemionus
(includes Equus hemionus, Equus
onager and Equus kiang)
ARTIODACTYLA
Vicugna vicugna
Oryx dammah
Gazella gazella
(only Asian populations)
Gazella subgutturosa
Procapra gutturosa
Saiga tatarica tatarica
GAVIIFORMES
Gavia stellata
(Western Palearctic populations)
Hudec 1994, Hudec et al. 1995
(covering Gavii- to Anseriformes)
Gavia arctica arctica
Gavia arctica suschkini
Gavia immer immer
(Northwest European population)
Gavia adamsii
(Western Palearctic population)
PODICIPEDIFORMES
Podiceps grisegena
grisegena
Podiceps auritus
(Western Palearctic populations)
PELECANIFORMES
Phalacrocorax nigrogularis
Phalacrocorax pygmeus
Pelecanus onocrotalus
(Western Palearctic populations)
Pelecanus crispus
CICONIIFORMES
Botaurus stellaris stellaris
(Western Palearctic populations)
Ixobrychus minutus minutus
(Western Palearctic populations)
Ixobrychus sturmii
Ardeola rufiventris
Ardeola idae
Egretta vinaceigula
Casmerodius albus albus
(Western Palearctic populations)
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 33
Species Range
State
Not a
Range State
Extinct No
information
available
Published distribution reference
Ardea purpurea purpurea
(populations breeding in the
Western Palearctic)
Mycteria ibis
Ciconia nigra
Ciconia episcopus
microscelis
Ciconia ciconia
Plegadis falcinellus
Geronticus eremita
Threskiornis aethiopicus
aethiopicus
Platalea alba
(excluding Malagasy population)
Platalea leucorodia
Phoenicopterus ruber
Phoenicopterus minor
ANSERIFORMES
Dendrocygna bicolor
Dendrocygna viduata
Thalassornis leuconotus
Oxyura leucocephala
Cygnus olor
Cygnus cygnus
Cygnus columbianus
Anser brachyrhynchus
Anser fabalis
Anser albifrons
Anser erythropus
Anser anser
Branta leucopsis
Branta bernicla
Branta ruficollis
Alopochen aegyptiacus
Tadorna ferruginea
Tadorna cana
Tadorna tadorna
Plectropterus gambensis
Sarkidiornis melanotos
Nettapus auritus
Anas penelope
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 34
Species Range
State
Not a
Range State
Extinct No
information
available
Published distribution reference
Anas strepera
Anas crecca
Anas capensis
Anas platyrhynchos
Anas undulata
Anas acuta
Anas erythrorhyncha
Anas hottentota
Anas querquedula
Anas clypeata
Marmaronetta
angustirostris
Netta rufina
Netta erythrophthalma
Aythya ferina
Aythya nyroca
Aythya fuligula
Aythya marila
Somateria mollissima
Somateria spectabilis
Polysticta stelleri
Clangula hyemalis
Melanitta nigra
Melanitta fusca
Bucephala clangula
Mergellus albellus
Mergus serrator
Mergus merganser
FALCONIFORMES
Pandion haliaetus Hudec et al. 1995, Hudec & Stastny
2005
(covering Falconi- to
Coraciiformes)
GALLIFORMES
Coturnix coturnix coturnix
SPHENISCIFORMES
Spheniscus demersus
PROCELLARIIFORMES
Diomedea exulans
Diomedea epomophora
Diomedea irrorata
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 35
Species Range
State
Not a
Range State
Extinct No
information
available
Published distribution reference
Diomedea nigripes
Diomedea immutabilis
Diomedea melanophris
Diomedea bulleri
Diomedea cauta
Diomedea chlororhynchos
Diomedea chrysostoma
Phoebetria fusca
Phoebetria palpebrata
Macronectes giganteus
Macronectes halli
Procellaria cinerea
Procellaria aequinoctialis
Procellaria aequinoctialis
conspicillata
Procellaria parkinsoni
Procellaria westlandica
GRUIFORMES
Porzana porzana
(populations breeding in the
Western Palearctic)
Porzana parva parva
Porzana pusilla intermedia
Fulica atra atra
(Mediterranean and Black Sea
populations)
Aenigmatolimnas
marginalis
Sarothrura boehmi
Sarothrura ayresi
Crex crex
Grus leucogeranus
Grus virgo (Syn.
Anthropoides virgo)
Grus paradisea
Grus carunculatus
Grus grus
Chlamydotis undulata
(only Asian populations)
Otis tarda
CHARADRIIFORMES
Himantopus himantopus
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 36
Species Range
State
Not a
Range State
Extinct No
information
available
Published distribution reference
Recurvirostra avosetta
Dromas ardeola
Burhinus oedicnemus
Glareola pratincola
Glareola nordmanni
Pluvialis apricaria
Pluvialis squatarola
Charadrius hiaticula
Charadrius dubius
Charadrius pecuarius
Charadrius tricollaris
Charadrius forbesi
Charadrius pallidus
Charadrius alexandrinus
Charadrius marginatus
Charadrius mongulus
Charadrius leschenaultii
Charadrius asiaticus
Eudromias morinellus
Vanellus vanellus
Vanellus spinosus
Vanellus albiceps
Vanellus senegallus
Vanellus lugubris
Vanellus melanopterus
Vanellus coronatus
Vanellus superciliosus
Vanellus gregarius (Syn
Chettusia gregaria)
Vanellus leucurus
Gallinago media
Gallinago gallinago
Lymnocryptes minimus
Limosa limosa
Limosa lapponica
Numenius phaeopus
Numenius tenuirostris
Numenius arquata
Tringa erythropus
Tringa totanus
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 37
Species Range
State
Not a
Range State
Extinct No
information
available
Published distribution reference
Tringa stagnatilis
Tringa nebularia
Tringa ochropus
Tringa glareola
Tringa cinerea
Tringa hypoleucos
Arenaria interpres
Calidris tenuirostris
Calidris canutus
Calidris alba
Calidris minuta
Calidris temminckii
Calidris maritima
Calidris alpina
Calidris ferruginea
Limicola falcinellus
Philomachus pugnax
Phalaropus lobatus
Phalaropus fulicaria
Larus hemprichii
Larus leucophthalmus
Larus ichthyaetus
(West Eurasian and African
population)
Larus melanocephalus
Larus genei
Larus audouinii
Larus armenicus
Sterna nilotica nilotica
(West Eurasian and African
populations)
Sterna caspia
(West Eurasian and African
populations)
Sterna maxima albidorsalis
Sterna bergii
(African and Southwest Asian
populations)
Sterna bengalensis
(African and Southwest Asian
populations)
Sterna sandvicensis
sandvicensis
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 38
Species Range
State
Not a
Range State
Extinct No
information
available
Published distribution reference
Sterna dougallii
(Atlantic population)
Sterna hirundo hirundo
(populations breeding in the
Western Palearctic)
Sterna paradisaea
(Atlantic populations)
Sterna albifrons
Sterna saundersi
Sterna balaenarum
Sterna repressa
Chlidonias niger niger
Chlidonias leucopterus
(West Eurasian and African
population)
COLUMBIFORMES
Streptopelia turtur turtur
CORACIIFORMES
Merops apiaster
Coracias garrulus
PSITTACIFORMES
Amazona tucumana
PASSERIFORMES
Hirundo atrocaerulea
Pseudocolopteryx
dinellianus
Polystictus pectoralis
pectoralis
Sporophila ruficollis
Acrocephalus paludicola Hudec 1983, Hudec et al. 1995
TESTUDINATA
Chelonia depressa
Chelonia mydas
Caretta caretta
Eretmochelys imbricata
Lepidochelys kempii
Lepidochelys olivacea
Dermochelys coriacea
Podocnemis expansa
CROCODYLIA
Crocodylus porosus
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 39
Species Range
State
Not a
Range State
Extinct No
information
available
Published distribution reference
ACIPENSERIFORMES
Huso huso
Huso dauricus
Acipenser baerii baicalensis
Acipenser fulvescens
Acipenser gueldenstaedtii
Acipenser medirostris
Acipenser mikadoi
Acipenser naccarii
Acipenser nudiventris
Acipenser persicus
Acipenser ruthenus
(Danube population)
Acipenser schrenckii
Acipenser sinensis
Acipenser stellatus
Acipenser sturio
Pseudoscaphirhynchus
kaufmanni
Pseudoscaphirhynchus
hermanni
Pseudoscaphirhynchus
fedtschenkoi
Psephurus gladius
ORECTOLOBIFORMES
Rhincodon typus
LAMNIFORMES
Carcharodon carcharias
LEPIDOPTERA
Danaus plexippus
All species of each of the Families below are listed in Appendix II. If your country is a Range State for
any of the species in these Families, please enter the species name in the first column, under the relevant
Family heading. Please indicate (with a ‘X’) whether your country is a Range State or the species is
extinct and, where appropriate, please provide published distribution references. (Space is provided for
ten species in each Family. If additional lines are required, please attach the information as an annex.)
Species Range
State
Extinct Published distribution reference
Order FALCONIFORMES, Family Cathartidae
Range
State
Extinct
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 40
Order FALCONIFORMES, Family Accipitridae
Pernis apivorus Range
State
Extinct Hudec et al. 1995, Hudec & Stastny 2005
(covering all Falconiformes)
Milvus migrans Range
State
Extinct
Milvus milvus Range
State
Extinct
Haliaeetus albicilla Range
State
Extinct
Circus aeruginosus Range
State
Extinct
Circus cyaneus Range
State
Extinct
Circus pygargus Range
State
Extinct
Accipiter gentilis Range
State
Extinct
Accipiter nisus Range
State
Extinct
Buteo buteo Range
State
Extinct
Buteo lagopus Range
State
Extinct
Aquila pomarina Range
State
Extinct
Aquila clanga Range
State
Extinct
Aquila heliaca Range
State
Extinct
Aquila chrysaetos Range
State
Extinct
Order FALCONIFORMES, Family Falconidae
Falco naumanni Range
State
Extinct
Falco tinnunculus Range
State
Extinct
Falco vespertinus Range
State
Extinct
Falco columbarius Range
State
Extinct
Falco subbuteo Range
State
Extinct
Falco cherrug Range
State
Extinct
Falco peregrinus Range
State
Extinct
Order PASSERIFORMES, Family Muscicapidae
(sensu lato, incl. Sylviinae and Muscicapinae)
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 41
Locustella naevia Range
State
Extinct Hudec 1983, Hudec et al. 1995
(covering all Passeriformes)
Locustella fluviatilis Range
State
Extinct
Locustella luscinioides Range
State
Extinct
Acrocephalus melanopogon Range
State
Extinct
Acrocephalus schoenobaenus Range
State
Extinct
Acrocephalus palustris Range
State
Extinct
Acrocephalus scirpaceus Range
State
Extinct
Acrocephalus arundinaceus Range
State
Extinct
Hippolais icterina Range
State
Extinct
Sylvia nisoria Range
State
Extinct
Sylvia curruca Range
State
Extinct
Sylvia communis Range
State
Extinct
Sylvia borin Range
State
Extinct
Sylvia atricapilla Range
State
Extinct
Phylloscopus trochiloides Range
State
Extinct
Phylloscopus sibilatrix Range
State
Extinct
Phylloscopus collybita Range
State
Extinct
Phylloscopus trochilus Range
State
Extinct
Regulus regulus Range
State
Extinct
Regulus ignicapillus Range
State
Extinct
Muscicapa striata Range
State
Extinct
Ficedula parva Range
State
Extinct
Ficedula albicollis Range
State
Extinct
Ficedula hypoleuca Range
State
Extinct
Czech Republic, CMS Report, 2005 42
References
(see Chapter II/1.2 and Annex)
Hudec K. (ed.) 1983: Fauna of Czechoslovakia. Birds III. Academia Publ., Prague.
Hudec K. (ed.) 1994: Fauna of the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. Birds I (rev. ed.). Academia Publ.,
Prague.
Hudec K. & Stastny K. (eds.) 2005: Fauna of the Czech Republic. Birds II (rev. ed.). Academia Publ., Prague.
Hudec K., Chytil J., Stastny K. & Bejcek V. 1995: The Birds of the Czech Republic. Sylvia 31: 97-149.