PAPER www.rsc.org/materials | Journal of Materials Chemistry
Dow
nloa
ded
by G
eorg
e M
ason
Uni
vers
ity o
n 07
Mar
ch 2
013
Publ
ishe
d on
17
Mar
ch 2
009
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/B82
1327
EView Article Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue
Formation of air-stable copper–silver core–shell nanoparticles for inkjetprinting†
Michael Grouchko, Alexander Kamyshny and Shlomo Magdassi*
Received 27th November 2008, Accepted 4th February 2009
First published as an Advance Article on the web 17th March 2009
DOI: 10.1039/b821327e
Copper nanoparticles can be utilized as a low-cost replacement for silver and gold nanoparticles which
are currently used in inkjet printing of conductive patterns. However, the main obstacle for using
copper nanoparticles is their spontaneous oxidation at ambient conditions. Here we describe the
synthesis of nonoxidizable copper nanoparticles by coating them with a silver shell, and inkjet printing
of these particles. The formation of these core–shell nanoparticles is driven by a transmetalation
reaction on the surface of copper nanoparticles, where the copper atoms present on the particles’
surface are used as the reducing agent for the silver. This process results in formation of solely
copper–silver core–shell nanoparticles, with no individual silver particles. It was found that coating 40
nm copper nanoparticles with a 2 nm layer of silver prevents oxidation of the copper core and preserves
its metallic characteristic. Characterization of these nanoparticles by HR-TEM, SEM, EDS, XRD,
spectrophotometry and XPS confirm the core–shell structure and their stability to oxidation. Inkjet
printing of concentrated aqueous dispersions of these copper–silver nanoparticles was done on various
substrates, and it was found that conductive and decorative patterns with metallic appearance, stable to
oxidation (up to 150 �C) are formed.
1. Introduction
The unique properties of metallic nanoparticles (NPs) pave the
way to new applications and possibilities of making new
products such as electronic, optical, and magnetic devices,1–4
nanoelectromechanical systems,5 conductive coatings and
pigments for inkjet inks,6 energy conversion and photothermal
devices,7 catalysts,8 biosensors, biolabels and drug delivery
systems.9 The most widely studied are nanoparticles of noble
metals such as Au, Ag and Pt.10,11 The main difficulty in utili-
zation of non-noble metals such as Co, Ni, Fe and Cu arises from
their tendency toward oxidation at ambient conditions, partic-
ularly as their size gets smaller.12,13
The use of silver NPs in conductive inks and its direct imaging
by inkjet printing technology14 has been known for years.
However, the very high cost of silver limits the wide industrial
applications as conductive, and obviously decorative metallic
inks. Since copper is much cheaper than silver but possesses
a very high conductivity (only 6% less than that of Ag) and
mirror-like appearance, Cu NPs can be considered as a replace-
ment for silver NPs. The main challenge in production and
utilization of Cu NPs is prevention of their spontaneous oxida-
tion in air. A well-known approach to overcome the oxidation
problem is based on the protection of NPs with a nonoxidizable
shell formed by ligands,15 polymers16 or silica.17,18 The main
disadvantage of this approach is the formation of a nonmetallic
coating. It was reported that successive reduction of a thin
Casali Institute for Applied Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, The HebrewUniversity of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel. E-mail: [email protected]
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: XPS spectrum.See DOI: 10.1039/b821327e
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
nonoxidizable metal layer over the preformed core2,19–21 can
protect it from oxidation, while leaving most of the core proper-
ties unchanged. Such a process may lead to undesirable formation
of individual particles of the second metal, in addition to forma-
tion of a shell around the preformed NPs.22 To overcome this
drawback, a selective reduction method, which should take place
only at the surface of the core particle, is required. We present here
the formation of copper–silver core–shell (CucoreAgshell) NPs
with a tunable silver shell by the transmetalation method,23–25
i.e. reduction of silver ions on the surface of preformed Cu NPs,
while the copper is the reducer. By this method, the obtained
CucoreAgshell NPs have the optical and electric properties of both
metals, while the oxidation of the copper core is prevented.
Evaluation of the CucoreAgshell NPs stability and the use of
aqueous dispersions of these nanoparticles as conductive and
decorative inks for printing metallic patterns, which are stable to
oxidation on various substrates, are presented as well.
2. Result and discussion
2.1 Synthesis and characterization
To achieve the core–shell structure, we used a two-step process as
schematically presented in Fig. 1. At the first step aqueous
dispersion of Cu NPs is prepared by reduction of Cu(NO3)2 with
an excess of hydrazine hydrate in the presence of polyacrylic acid
sodium salt as a polymeric stabilizer, as we reported previously.26
The large excess of hydrazine prevents oxidation of the Cu NPs
in the aqueous dispersion, but only if it is kept in closed vials.
Exposure of such dispersion to air leads to immediate oxidation27
with a color change from red to bluish green.
At the second step a silver salt is added, and by trans-
metalation reaction the reduction of silver ions by the copper
J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 3057–3062 | 3057
Fig. 1 Schematic illustration of a single Cu NP synthesis and the formation of a silver shell by the transmetalation reaction. The surface copper atoms
serve as reducing agents for the silver ions.
Dow
nloa
ded
by G
eorg
e M
ason
Uni
vers
ity o
n 07
Mar
ch 2
013
Publ
ishe
d on
17
Mar
ch 2
009
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/B82
1327
E
View Article Online
metal takes place directly on the surface of CuNPs (Ag to Cu
atomic ratio of 0.12), thus leading to a shell of silver on the
copper core.
A problem which arises at the second step (due to the hydr-
azine excess) is the reduction of silver ions to silver NPs in the
solution, and therefore the result is a mixture of Ag and Cu NPs,
with some CucoreAgshell NPs. The difference in standard redox
potentials of silver (Ag+ + e�/ Ag, E0¼ 0.799 V) and hydrazine
(N2H4 + 4OH�/ N2 + 4H2O + 4e�, E0¼�1.16 V) is about 1.96
V; that is, much higher than the corresponding difference of
redox potential of silver and copper (0.46 V). In order to prevent
the reduction of silver ions in solution to form free silver NPs, the
hydrazine concentration must be reduced to zero. This was
achieved by the addition of acetaldehyde (C2H4O + N2H4 /
C2H6N2 + H2O) prior to the addition of silver nitrate.
The obtained dispersions of CucoreAgshell NPs are character-
ized by an orange–reddish color which, in contrast to the
uncoated Cu NPs, remains unchanged in an open vial. After
drying the dispersion and exposure to air, the color of the powder
also does not change.
As seen from the redox reaction stoichiometry (Fig. 1), each
copper atom should reduce two silver ions, thus the obtained
core–shell nanoparticles should have a similar, slightly larger,
particle size compared to the original Cu NPs. As follows from
high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HR-TEM)
images and dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements
(Fig. 2), the size distribution of the obtained CucoreAgshell NPs is
indeed similar to that of the Cu NPs without coating. According
to DLS, the average size of CucoreAgshell NPs and Cu NPs is
about 34 and 32 nm, respectively.
Characterization of core–shell structures by TEM is reported
in many researches.21,28 However, in the case of thin shells (<2
nm), the differences between the core and the shell cannot be
revealed by TEM only (Fig. 2b, inset). XRD pattern, absorption
spectra and EDS data in scanning transmission electron
microscopy (STEM) mode are presented in Fig. 3. The results
confirm a core–shell structure as follows: (a) the XRD pattern of
the powder (Fig. 3a) indicates the presence of both copper and
silver, with fcc crystal structures (not their alloy); (b) the surface
plasmon spectra (Fig. 3b) of the uncoated Cu NPs (solid line) is
characterized by the 570 nm copper plasmon peak only; after the
addition of increasing amounts of silver nitrate (at Ag to Cu
atomic ratio of 0.02 to 1.0, dotted lines to dashed line), a silver
shell formation is accompanied by the appearance and growth of
the 410 nm silver plasmon peak; (c) EDS analysis in STEM mode
by scanning an individual CucoreAgshell NP (at Ag to Cu atomic
ratio of 0.12) along its diameter (Fig. 3c), indicates the presence of
3058 | J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 3057–3062
the two metals in a single particle: a typical silver profile shows
a slightly higher intensity at the edges than at the center, while the
same scan for copper shows a complementary profile with higher
intensity at the center (Fig. 3d). Calculation of the expected shell
thickness for a 40 nm CucoreAgshell NP, based on the reagents
concentrations (assuming the complete reduction of the Cu and
Ag) gives a thickness of 1 to 2 nm, which are equivalent to 4 to 8
atomic layers of metallic silver. However, evaluation of the shell
thickness of such NPs (analysis of 10 NPs) according to the
differences in EDS profiles of silver and copper (Fig. 3d) leads to
a thickness of 2 to 5 nm (the difference between the two evalua-
tions may be explained by the non-uniform coverage of the silver
shell as appeared from the EDS profile of silver, Fig. 3d, yellow).
The XPS pattern (see ESI) of these NPs is characterized by the
peaks characteristic of both metals, and does not show any
indications for the presence of copper oxides. From these results,
it can be concluded that the Cu NPs are indeed coated by a thin
layer of silver. Since this layer should provide protection of
the copper against oxidation, the following experiment was
performed in order to verify this assumption. The changes in
XPS spectrum of a dried powder of the CucoreAgshell NPs were
monitored, while gradually etching the surface layer (with an
ionized argon beam) followed by exposure to oxygen. The XPS
peaks of 2p Cu are shown in Fig. 3e. The solid line spectrum is
characteristic of unoxidized copper, in spite of exposure of the
NPs to air. After etching, a drastic increase in the intensity of
copper bands is observed due to removal of the silver shell
(Fig. 3e, dashed line). After this stage, the sample was exposed to
air: as shown in Fig. 3e (dotted line), the intensity of metallic
copper peaks decreases, and new peaks of CuO appear.29
These results clearly indicate that the Cu NPs are indeed
protected from oxidation in both aqueous dispersion and in
powder form (at ambient conditions).
2.2 Inkjet printing
As stated earlier, Cu NPs are very attractive for obtaining
conductive and decorative patterns due to the high conductivity,
metallic appearance and lower price compared to silver. Since the
oxidation was prevented, these particles were further evaluated in
inkjet printing.
The inkjet ink formulation contained aqueous (25 wt% metal)
dispersion of CucoreAgshell (at Ag to Cu atomic ratio of 0.12) NPs
and a wetting agent, as described in the Experimental section.
The ink, which has a viscosity of 1.9 cP and surface tension of
23.9 mN m�1 was printed with a single nozzle MicroFab printer
and also with a Lexmark office printer. A drop of ink jetted from
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
Fig. 2 TEM and HR-TEM images of (a) the uncoated Cu NPs, (b) with
CucoreAgshell NPs, and (c) their particle size distribution according to
DLS (dotted line—Cu NPs, solid line—CucoreAgshell NPs).
Dow
nloa
ded
by G
eorg
e M
ason
Uni
vers
ity o
n 07
Mar
ch 2
013
Publ
ishe
d on
17
Mar
ch 2
009
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/B82
1327
E
View Article Online
a 60 mm print-head orifice of the MicroFab printer is shown in
Fig. 4a. An optical image of a printed 300 mm wide line is shown
in Fig. 4b. HR-SEM cross-section image of this line (Fig. 4c)
reveals that the printed line (400 nm thickness) is composed of
closely packed nanoparticles. An example of an RFID antenna
printed by a Lexmark office printer on an inkjet paper is
presented in Fig. 4d.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
2.2.1 Decorative inkjet printing. In order to evaluate the
applicability of the CucoreAgshell dispersion as decorative metallic
ink for inkjet printing, a 5 wt% dispersion was printed on glass
slides and on inkjet photo paper. An example of a pattern with
metallic brightness and mirror-like reflection is presented in
Fig. 5. The gloss values measured with the use of a glossy meter
were found to be 111 � 6 on glass and on inkjet photo paper,
quite close to the glossiness of a mirror, 124 � 4.
2.2.2 Conductive inkjet printing. Printed patterns composed
of metallic NPs are usually sintered at elevated temperatures in
order to decrease their resistivity. It was found that heating these
patterns in air to 150 �C did not cause any change in color.
Heating above that temperature resulted in color changes that, as
revealed by XRD analysis, are the result of CuO and Cu2O
formation. The copper oxide formation upon heating, based on
XRD analysis, is shown in Fig. 6a. At temperatures up to 150 �C
no oxide was detected, which can be explained by the protective
action of a silver shell. However, at 200 �C, about 30 wt% of the
copper was oxidized and up to 54 wt% at 400 �C. Further
analysis of the XRD results (by Shearer equation) reveals that at
these conditions the copper oxidation is accompanied by growth
of silver crystallites. Up to 150 �C, the size of the silver crystallites
does not change, but starts to increase at higher temperatures.
The resistivity of these patterns after heating to this tempera-
ture range, was found to be greater than 3.0 � 104 mUcm. Such
high resistivity (more than five orders greater than bulk copper)
is probably due to the oxide formation. In order to examine this
assumption, the printed pattern’s resistivity was measured after
heating under N2. It was found that conductive patterns could be
obtained and the resistivity decreased with the increasing
temperature (Fig. 6b). The resistivity after heating at 300 �C was
11 mUcm, which is only 7 times greater than that of bulk copper
(the resistivity measured after heating at 225 �C and lower
temperatures was above the upper threshold of the ohmmeter).
XRD analysis of the printed patterns which were heated under
N2 (at 300 �C) showed an increase in the size of the Ag crystallites
(similar to that presented in Fig. 6a), but copper oxides were not
detected. The absence of copper oxides indicates that the high
resistivity of the pattern below 225 �C is not due to copper
oxidation, but rather the inherent property of the Cu NPs pattern
(for example, the presence of the insulating organic stabilizer
between the NPs).
The heating process was followed by observing the printed
patterns by HR-SEM (Fig. 7).
As can be seen, at room temperature and after heating to
200 �C (under N2) the particles have irregular morphology with
numerous corners. However, after heating to 250 �C, the particle
surface becomes smoother, and at 275 �C sintering of the parti-
cles while forming continuous interconnections occurs. The sin-
tering process is accompanied by the appearance of new, smaller
NPs, which grow upon further heating to 300 �C, and according
to EDS analysis are Ag NPs. Such growth of Ag NPs correlates
well with the silver crystals size increase as revealed from the
XRD analyses. As illustrated in Fig. 8, during heating the silver
shell transforms into small particles, which are attached to the
copper core surface; at 250 �C, the Cu NPs are no longer coated
by a silver shell. Therefore, if exposed to oxygen at this elevated
temperature they can undergo oxidation, as was indeed found
J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 3057–3062 | 3059
Fig. 3 (a) XRD pattern of a dried dispersion of CucoreAgshell NPs at room temperature with characteristic d-spacings of copper (2.089, 1.809 and 1.279 �A)
and silver (2.355, 1.444 and 1.231 �A). (b) Absorption spectra of diluted dispersions of CucoreAgshell NPs at increasing silver to copper atomic ratio (0, solid
line, 0.02 to 1.0, dotted lines to dashed line). (c) STEM image of a 40 nm particle. (d) Copper and silver elemental profile along the particle diameter according
to EDS analysis. (e) XPS analysis of a dried CucoreAgshell NPs powder (solid line), after Ar etching (dashed line) and after exposure to air (dotted line).
Fig. 4 Printing of a 25 wt% dispersion of CucoreAgshell NPs. A drop jetted
from a 60 mm print head orifice of MicroFab (a), a 300 mm wide pattern
obtained from the jetting along a line on a glass slide (b) and a HR-SEM
image of the pattern cross-section (c). An antenna printed using the same
dispersion with the use of a Lexmark office printer on an ink-jet paper (d).
Fig. 5 Decorative printing of a 5 wt% dispersion of CucoreAgshell NPs
with the use of a Lexmark office printer on an inkjet photo paper.
3060 | J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 3057–3062
Dow
nloa
ded
by G
eorg
e M
ason
Uni
vers
ity o
n 07
Mar
ch 2
013
Publ
ishe
d on
17
Mar
ch 2
009
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/B82
1327
E
View Article Online
while heating in air. However, it was found that after cooling to
room temperature, the patterns are stable to oxidation, and no
oxides were found (according to repeated XRD analysis) even
after several months.
2.3 Conclusions
We have developed a simple and effective transmetalation
approach for the synthesis of 10–50 nm CucoreAgshell NPs with
tunable shell thicknesses. These nanoparticles are characterized
by optical and conductivity properties of both metals, and by the
chemical stability of the silver shell. These particles can be
printed by an office inkjet printer and yield a conductive and
decorative patterns. Heating these particles to 200 �C causes the
destruction of the silver shell, thus causing exposure of the
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
Fig. 6 (a) The silver crystallite size (open circles) and the copper oxides
(CuO and Cu2O) percentage in heated patterns (filled circles) as a func-
tion of temperature. (b) The resistivity calculated for printed patterns (on
glass) heated under N2 as a function of temperature.
Fig. 8 Schematic illustration of the growing silver crystallites forming
the shell.
Dow
nloa
ded
by G
eorg
e M
ason
Uni
vers
ity o
n 07
Mar
ch 2
013
Publ
ishe
d on
17
Mar
ch 2
009
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/B82
1327
E
View Article Online
copper core to the atmosphere, followed by oxidation. Further
research will focus on preventing the destruction of the shell
upon heating. According to our knowledge, there is no
commercial decorative metallic inkjet ink in the market, due to
the high cost of silver and gold, and the spontaneous oxidation of
Fig. 7 HR-SEM images of the printed pattern
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
cheaper metals. We believe that such CucoreAgshell inks can serve
as low-price metallic inks.
3. Experimental
3.1 Synthesis
Cu NPs were synthesized by the reduction of copper nitrate with
an excess of hydrazine hydrate in the presence of polyacrylic
acid sodium salt as described previously.26 For synthesis of
CucoreAgshell NPs, 100 ml of the obtained dispersion of Cu NPs
was diluted with 1000 ml of triple distilled water followed by
dropwise addition of 1.0 ml acetaldehyde. After 5 min of stirring,
0 to 29.4 ml of 1 wt% silver nitrate was added while stirring.
3.2 Characterization methods
TEM, HR-TEM and STEM images were obtained with a Tecnai
F20 G2 transmission electron microscope operating at 200 kV for
samples prepared on a carbon-coated nickel grid. HR-SEM
characterization was performed on Sirion (FEI) scanning elec-
tron microscope. X-Ray diffractograms (XRD) were obtained
for the dried samples using the D8 Advance (Bruker AXS)
diffractometer. The UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded
with the use of Cary 100 Bio (Varian) spectrophotometer. DLS
particle size analyses were performed using Zetasizer nano-SZ
(Malvern Instruments). XPS spectra were obtained with Axis
Ultra (Kratos Analytical) X-ray photoelectron spectrometer.
s heated under N2 at various temperatures.
J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 3057–3062 | 3061
Dow
nloa
ded
by G
eorg
e M
ason
Uni
vers
ity o
n 07
Mar
ch 2
013
Publ
ishe
d on
17
Mar
ch 2
009
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/B82
1327
E
View Article Online
The gloss measurements were taken in the use of micro-TRI-
gloss m (Gardner) glossy meter at the position of 85�.
3.3 Ink formulation
For preparation of conductive inks, the dispersion of
CucoreAgshell NPs was washed and concentrated by a precipita-
tion–centrifugation–decantation process. More specifically,
as-synthesized CucoreAgshell NPs dispersion was acidified to pH
2.9 by a dropwise addition of 6.5% nitric acid while stirring. Then
the dispersion was centrifuged for two minutes at 800 g and
decanted. The obtained precipitate was redispersed by adjusting
the pH to 9 with 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol. This precipita-
tion–centrifugation–decantation process was repeated three
times. The concentration of metal in the obtained formulation
was adjusted to 25 wt% by the addition of a precise amount of
triple distilled water. BYK 348 at a concentration of 0.1 wt% was
added as a wetting agent. The obtained formulation was treated
in an ultrasonic bath (Branson 1510) for 10 min. Surface tension
and viscosity of the ink formulation were measured with the use
of FTA 125 (First Ten Angstroms) tensiometer and Brookfield
(LVDV-II+) viscometer, respectively. For the decorative ink
formulation, the same procedure was carried out, except that the
metal concentration was adjusted to 5 wt %.
Inkjet printing. The obtained ink was printed on glass slides
using a JetDrive III controller (MicroFab) with a 60 mm orifice
print head with the following pulse shape: Rise: 5 ms, Dwell: 20
ms, Fall: 5ms, Echo: 50 ms, Final rise: 5 ms, and voltage between
100 and �100 V at a frequency of 60 Hz. The same ink was also
printed with a commercial Lexmark Z615 office printer on Plus
Glossy (Canon) inkjet photo paper.
The resistivity of printed patterns was calculated by measuring
the printed line resistance by a four-probe milliohm meter
(EXTECH) and measuring the thickness profile by HR-SEM.
Acknowledgements
This project was supported by the European Community Sixth
Framework Program through a STREP grant to the SELECT-
NANO Consortium, Contract No.516922.03/25/2005.
3062 | J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 3057–3062
4. References
1 A. N. Shipway, E. Katz and I. Willner, ChemPhysChem, 2000, 1, 18.2 G. Schmid, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2001, 3, 737.3 G. Schmid, in Nanoscale Materials in Chemistry (Ed: K. J. Klabunde),
John Wiley & Sons, New York 2001, Ch. 2.4 U. Simon, in Nanoparticles: From Theory to Applications (Ed: G.
Schmid), Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA, Weinheim, 2004,Ch. 5.
5 C. P. Poole, F. J. Owens, Introduction to Nanotechnology, John Wiley& Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2003, 332.
6 A. Kamyshny, M. Ben-Moshe, S. Aviezer and S. Magdassi,Micromol. Rapid Commun., 2005, 26, 281.
7 A. O. Govorov and H. H. Richardson, Nano. Today, 2007, February,30.
8 A. Kamyshny, S. Magdassi, in Colloid Stability: The Role of SurfaceForces, Part I (Ed: T. F. Tadros), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2007, Ch. 9.
9 C. M. Niemeyer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 4128.10 J. P. Wilcoxon and B. L. Abrams, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2006, 35, 1162.11 S. Eustis and M. A. El-Sayed, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2006, 35, 209.12 S. Gangopadhyay, G. C. Hadjipanayis, B. Dale, C. M. Sorenson,
K. J. Klabunde, V. Papaefthymiou and A. Kostikas, Phys. Rev. B,1992, 45, 9778.
13 R. Seshadri, R. Sen, G. N. Subbanna, K. R. Kannan andC. N. R. Rao, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1994, 231, 308.
14 K. J. Lee, B. H. Jun, T. H. Kim and J. Joung, Nanotech., 2006, 17,2424.
15 P. Kanninen, C. Johans, J. Merta and K. Kontturi, J. Coll. Inter. Sci.,2008, 318, 88.
16 N. Shpaisman and S. Margel, Chem. Mater., 2006, 18, 396.17 W. Fu, H. Yang, L. Chang, M. Li, H. Bala, Q. Yu and G. Zou,
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 2005, 262, 71.18 M. Aslam, S. Li and V. P. Dravid, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2007, 90, 950.19 Y. Chen, F. Yang, Y. Dai, W. Wang and S. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. C,
2008, 112, 1645.20 T. Bala, S. D. Bhame, P. A. Joy, B. L. V. Prasad and M. Sastry,
J. Mater. Chem., 2004, 14, 2941.21 M. Cazayous, C. Langlois, T. Oikawa, C. Ricolleau and A. Sacuto,
Phys. Rev. B, 2006, 73, 113402.22 S. Mandal and K. M. Krishman, J. Mater. Chem., 2007, 17, 372.23 J. Park and J. Cheon, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 5743.24 W. Lee, M. G. Kim, J. Choi, J. Park, S. J. Ko, S. J. Oh and J. Cheon,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 16090.25 X. Ni, J. Zhang, Y. Zhang and H. Zheng, J. Coll. Inter. Sci., 2007,
307, 554.26 M. Grouchko, A. Kamyshny, K. Ben-Ami and S. Magdassi, J. Nano.
Res., 2009, 11, 713.27 X. Xia, C. Xie, S. Cai, Z. Yang and X. Yang, Corros. Sci., 2006, 48,
3924.28 N. S. Sobal, M. Hilgendorff, H. Mohwald and M. Giersig, Nano Lett.,
2002, 2, 621.29 J. F. Watts, J. Wolstenholme, An introduction to Surface Analysis by
XPS and AES, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, England, 2003.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009