From My Heart Part 2

7/31/2019 From My Heart Part 2

1/28

From My Heart Part 2

Of course the following words are from my heart.Times passes. I do have faith and hope in my life. Wave after wave of human emotions come about

in our lives. People constantly say to find balance. To find joy is hard to do sometimes, but I do

cherish the times in my life when I have joy. Joy can be complex like traveling into various

destinations or fulfilling a necessary assignment in my life. Joy can be as simple as communicating

with a blue collar worker, giving greetings, and repenting. Joy is a precious attribute of human

existence. I do believe in a world that can be better than our present conditions. We still have

injustice, false stereotypes promoted in society, and a nefarious culture. Yet, Almighty God wouldn't

want us to possess permanent sadness or harsh apathy. God would want us to fight. Fighting for

truth and doing constructive acts that can benefit humanity in general. Regardless of the drone

attacks done by those done in our name, I will oppose it. Regardless of the denial of basic humanrights of some folks (which violates the principle of equality), I will disagree with that reality. I do

believe in doing my part in ending white supremacy once and for all. I am a black man, so by nature

I will promote blackness. White supremacy is coming to an end now in our time indeed. The Bush

tax cuts should expire in 2013 indeed. Life can be wonderful, so we should continue to do what is

right and call for righteousness, mercy, and justice for all of mankind. During the course of my life, I

learned great life lessons from my relatives, teachers, friends, and colleagues. Now, I do accept the

dogma that peace is superior to war mongering and even an annual minimum income is so much


2/28

thorough (as part of a comprehensive solution to handle our economic plight) than the status quo. I

embrace more comprehensive solutions in my life. I support the interest of poor people. I reject

U.S. imperialism. I abhor the present prison industrial complex with its mass incarceration of even

innocent human beings.

New challenges come about, but we have to live in reality not in an Alice in Wonderland illusionary

situation. Still, I believe that improvements can come about. I reject apathy completely as some

(even some of the older folks embrace apathy, while other older individuals have hope for the

future). Individuals wake up all of the time. People, who you think are your enemies, can come

around and become your allies or friends. Its also important for us to oppose NATOs war

mongering agenda. NATO is hugely influential where I am from in Hampton Roads, Virginia, but Ihave to do what is right. What is right is to publicly expose and oppose the nefarious military

industrial complex. NATOs war crimes in Southeastern Europe and Africa ought to be exposed

indeed by authentic, dedicated activities. In 1999, NATO bombed innocent civilian targets in

Belgrade inside of Serbia. These actions culminated in the 78 day bombing campaign of Yugoslavia.

NATO bombed Libya for six months. Libya isnt a true success story, because clan battles continue in

Libya. Puppet, reactionary leaders control Libya and crimes against people contribute to occur in

Libya (like war crimes). The Chicago summit coming soon is about some wanting NATO to expand its

reach into more nations for possible military acts (under the dubious guises of humanitarianism

and keeping the world safe for democracy). Rick Rozoff believes that NATO wants drone

technology in order for NATO to militarily intervene in Syria and Mali.

You always have certain people that reactionaries love to hear from. They or the reactionaries love

Allen West, Ron Christie, Clarence Thomas, and people like that. Yet, I am not going out like that. I

will embrace my forward thinking. I'm thinking forward. Some of the Republican base thrives on

hatred, bigotry, and paranoia about the debt in the world. For example, there are Klansmen types,

those that believe that President Barack Obama is a Muslim (or a Communist, an illegal immigrant,

and a Kenyan anticolonialist, which are false slanders), and rallies where there are racist

vituperation or anti-poor scapegoating. As a thinking black man, I don't need that in my life. I refuse


3/28

to accept the Republican agenda in its totality. I don't accept the Tea Party notion that the private

sector alone or laissez faire capitalism is the magical bullet to solve poverty. I believe that the

government and the private sector all have a vital role in improving our standard of living,

decreasing the unemployment rate, and creating jobs for all Americans that desire work plainly

speaking. I am not going to vote for my rights to be relinquished. Our ancestors worked too hard for

a two party system to violate our liberties. The Republican Party isn't my alternative (since some ofthem want to attack workers' rights, slash Medicare, slash Social security, and get rid of a lot of the

social safety net). With the errors of LBJ (especially with his error of continuing the war in Vietnam

that delayed a negotiated settlement among all factions), he was right to have his War on Poverty.

His programs reduced the poverty rate by 50% from 1960 to 1970. If LBJ keep his focus on real

social reforms, the poverty rate could be as low as 3-4%. Dr. Martin Luther King once has a cordial

relationship with Lyndon Johnson until Dr. King spoke out publicly against the Vietnam War.

Reactionaries forget that you need economic justice and real democratic reforms in order for

society to grow. The corporate elite will fund both parties no doubt, yet they are more receptive to

agree with Republicans on financial issues (because most Republicans don't demand that the elite

will pay its fair share of taxes). This doesn't mean that I'm some Democrat. I'm not. I am an

Independent. I don't hate the rich. I just strongly abhor the agenda of the plutocracy. We have tofight vigorously against racial hatred, xenophobia, religious bigotry, and misogyny. Although, many

people from across the political spectrum agree on common solutions. We agree with the

investigation and auditing of the Federal Reserve. Many of us from across the political spectrum

don't like the banker bailouts. We agree with the Fourth Amendment, therefore we disagree with

the domestic spying measures of the FISA Act (or the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) & the

Patriot Act. Many of us don't agree with SOPA, PIPA, NDAA, the AUMF, and the Expatriation Act. We

love to oppose the agenda of the military industrial complex. Therefore, we should be thankful of

that. I dont desire the corporate attack on public education either. Continuation of fighting against

tyranny is always my goal in my life (along with other goals).

Many people are learning about JP Morgan Chase. The President's administration has supportedJamie Dimon and JP Morgan Chase for years. It's found that the President's financial disclosure

forms prove that he has a "JPMorgan Chase Private Client Asset Management" checking account

with a million dollar in it. Although, I do have faith and hope that the brother President Barack

Obama (who is a very intelligent man) would wake up more about these issues. Wall Street publicly

funds both the Republicans and the Democrats. Yes, the Rockefeller Foundation aided Mises and

the Austrian economic movement. The President went on "The View" to praise JP Morgan Chase

boss Jamie Dimon. He called Dimon as one of the smartest bankers in America. Dimon lost over two

billion dollars in speculative derivatives trade. He's one of the men involved in the culture that

caused the recession and the destruction of much of the economy in the first place. Dimon is a

member of the CFR, he's a Trilateral Commission member, and he's at the top (Class A) of the

Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Wall Street considers him to be a golden boy. He could havebeen the next Secretary of the Treasury. Jamie Dimon is of the establishment. Timothy Geithner is

the present Secretary of the Treasury (he was the President of the Federal Reserve Bank of NY.

Geithner worked for Kissinger and Associates and he was a senior person of the CFR). Timothy

Geithner ran microfinance schemes for the CIA's Ford Foundation. JP Morgan is the largest

derivatives dealer in the world making it a key player in our economic complications. This same

bank was involved in the subprime lending problems causing great harm to millions of Americans'

living standard. Fitch recorded information about this issue. They found that JP Morgan Chase, Bank


4/28

of America, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, and Morgan Stanley together hold 80% of the countrys

derivatives risk, and 96% of the exposure to credit derivatives. JP Morgan invented credit default

swaps, the bankster sledgehammer taking down the U.S. economy. Many Americans despite what

some say know a lot of the economic system. The elite have many exclusive private schools

teaching them the lies of social Darwinism, globalism, and the scapegoating of the poor. We have

miseducation in many schools too. The establishment's corporate media have shown deceptionbefore as well. The economic system today is meant to pirate the wealth and labor from the people

in order to empower the monopolists (of the elite). Even people embracing the overreliance of

technology (though technology is good when utilized in the right way) have caused some people to

lack intellectual curiosity or independent thinking. We the people have to be producers of wealth

too not just consumers. It seems like Henry George is right to promote the dignity of labor. So, both

parties are hypocritical to spread anti-Wall Street rhetoric when vulture capitalism from the big

bankers fund both parties.

The conflict in Syria has been fully exposed as an exercise of Western/NATO agents funding

terrorists in order for the present Syrian government to be overthrown (which partition could be a

possibility if the Syrian government is defeated). Now, the rebels in Syria are using Facebook as an

means to post the names, phone numbers, and residential addresses of pro-Assad government

supporters. The terrorist want opposition member to find and execute them. Its very hypocritical

for Anderson Cooper and others to support the rebels when they are the one using social media as

an excuse to attempt to execute people violently. If similar actions were happening in America, the

feds would be in action to arrest those who organized such a heinous plot (and rightfully so). The

Facebook monitors are nowhere to be found when al-Qaeda operatives in Syria are issuing death

threats and calling for cold blooded murder. Its not a secret that the opposition in Syria is being

backed with arms and logistics from the U.S. State Department. This opposition is in violation of the

UN brokered ceasefire agreement. The West is using regional proxies like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, etc.

to promote the status quo. The NSA and the CIA is trying to set up a spying grid in Facebook. The

Free Syria Army is backed by Washington. Social networks like Facebook and Twitter helped topromote the Arabic Spring in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, and in Syria. Egypt is now a military dictatorship

after the dictator Mubarak was ousted. The Muslim Brotherhood could control Egypt after the

elections in Egypt. Libya is ruled by a pro-oil puppet in the midst of civil conflict still in 2012.

THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 2012: PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA VS. MITT ROMNEY

Our country has been through a lot of changes. A Presidential election will come in November of

2012. We have 2 major choices of President Barack and Mitt Romney. We have the right to vote for

a third party candidate as well. If the President is reelected, some changes will occur. The

Democrats will control at least one chamber of Congress. There might be some economic

improvements or continued economic stagnation. The erosions of our civil liberties will continue

since the White House isn't going to rescind the Patriot Act, the NDAA, etc. We still have high

unemployment, high poverty, and economic inequality. If Mitt Romney is elected President, the


5/28

reactionary Republicans could dominate either the House or the Senate. The agenda of the 1% will

take precedent over the agenda of the 99%. That is why it's silly for the Tea Party crowd to call

President Barack Obama a socialist extremist when he is at best a center-left political leader. Paul

Krugman, the liberal Nobel Prize-winning economist and New York Times columnist, recently

described Obama, whom he supports, as having ruled like "a moderate Republican circa 1992."

Viewing the ultra-conservatives, African American professor and left intellectual Cornell Westdetected "creeping fascism." Economic inequality is facilitated by the two party system. This system

is funded by big money and the political elite have no vested interests in having true democratic

election reform. That is why the masses of people are opposing and protesting the inequality of

opportunity, the class war waged by the wealthy, the wars, NATO, and other issues. Even some

unions are protesting against the nefarious policies of Wall Street. It is not just to see thirty years of

wage stagnation. The events in Wisconsin and the Occupy Wall Street movement prove that real

people want to deal with the excesses of capitalism in the U.S. society. There were 15,000 people

demonstrating against NATO in Chicago during May of 2012. Some hope that these occurrences can

allow a bigger movement for social change to occur. Mitt Romney is running on the position that

the economic crisis is entirely the President's fault. This is inaccurate, because our Great Recession's

origin came from the Bush Jr. & Clinton administrations (plus even before their eras).

The previous Presidential administrations followed the policies of millionaire tax cuts (except for

Clinton), war spending, and huge deficits of Bush Jr. The Clinton administration followed the

deregulation of banking and Wall Street causing the winner takes all economic system. Romney's

nonsensical economic speech in Iowa May 15 was an epic self-exposure. While promising to cut

social spending, increase the war budget and not raise taxes, he declared: President Obama is an

old-school liberal whose first instinct is to see free enterprise as the villain and government as the

hero.... America counted on President Obama to rescue the economy, tame the deficit and help

create jobs. Instead, he bailed out the public sector, gave billions of dollars to the companies of his

friends and added almost as much debt as all the prior presidents combined. Romney forgot to

mention that the debt only gone up by about half under President Obama. The President is barely aliberal on economic and foreign policy issues. The President supports free enterprise capitalism.

Mitt Romney disagrees with the President on healthcare and the Afghan war when both men are

nearly identical ideologically on both issues. The President's healthcare plan is based on the

program Romney implemented as governor of Massachusetts. Both men agreed with smart growth

or the Sustainable Communities plan. If Barack Obama is re-elected, the status quo will continue

(there could be radical improvements since we dont know the future). If Mitt Romney is President,

austerity and war mongering will be on steroids. Frankly, political parties can't make progressive

change. It is dedicated efforts of individuals, collective people, and organized mass movements that

ended the Vietnam War, ended Jim Crow, created an eight hour work day, and allowed women the

democratic right to vote. In the final analysis, its our responsibility to help out society. The

President can only do so much and our issues are bigger than the President.


6/28

MEMORIAL DAY 2012

Memorial Day is today. A lot of thoughts wrap around my head on this day. A lot of individuals supportwar and others hate war. War is a very destructive endeavor. At times, many folks forget about thecomplex nature of war. Even great and sincere anti-war activists sometimes omit tidbits about thecomplicated nature about how wars come about. For example, anyone can say that I oppose war, but weshould also know about the social, political, and economic origins of various wars (so we don't repeat thesame conscious less errors of the past). Physical wounds are not just experienced by both sides duringthe course of war. There were emotional or psychological wounds experienced by the soldiers, thecivilians, and all participants within the realm of war. These wounds persist today in 2012. Some of thevictims of war don't have adequate justice or real social care. This reality is exemplified in the millions ofvictims and civilians who died during human history. Also, numerous soldiers were unfairly treated whenthey came home from Vietnam. For example, a lot of younger kids don't realize that Vietnam troops wereassaulted, cursed at, thrown objects at, and spat upon by people in America when they've arrived home

from Vietnam. That was wrong, because whatever your view of the Vietnam War (I don't agree with theVietnam War. There were many cases where the war either couldn't transpire or apeaceful negotiated settlement among all parties could exist. Although, the enemies of truth preventeda peace settlement from happening during the late 1960's), all people should be treated with dignity andrespect. In fact, tons of the homeless once were Vietnam War G.I.s. Some war veterans struggle toreceive labor or other economic opportunities. So, it is our responsibility to not worship war nor worshipjingoistic patriotism. It is our responsibility to promote policies that can advance peace in the world,oppose torture, oppose imperialism, and give soldiers opportunities to live their own lives once they comeinto America from the various theaters of war. Any life lost including soldiers should receive sympathy byus, because a life lost is a tragic situation. Families suffer and we have to execute compassion toward


7/28

human beings. Likewise, the civilian victims of war ought to have compensation and real respect too. Warcrimes done in our name are blatantly immoral. The victims of the war crimes (from the Belgiumextermination of over 1 million black Congolese via the wicked King Leopold II, the Mai Lai massacre, andthe firebombing of Dresden) by the Western imperialism are found in Africa, Asia, the Americas, Australia,and even in Europe ironically enough. I pull the cards of my enemy all day and everyday. I can't stop,because I won't stop. During this day, we shouldn't sugarcoat our fundamental thinking. We ought to goout and speak the truth in season and out of season. One of my many experiences is that I see someof the older generation (not all of them) expressing apathy. The good news is that the vast majority ofolder human beings reject the concept of apathy completely. I am young, so I refuse to express apathy.

I have hunger for hope. Hope is a basic tenet of not only faith. Hope is a tenet that all of humanity shouldadhere to. It took hope to advance the reforms of civil rights, environmental protection, and to stridently &effectively make numerous positive acts in the world society. Hope isn't about bashing men or bashingwomen (or damning nice people or any individual with a non-conformist social disposition). It's about all ofus showing the tolerance of all human beings, believing in the unity of the human family, and the judgingof people based on their character (not on their skin color, not on their personality, not on theirphysical appearance, not on their gender, not on their economic status, and not on their backgroundgiven to them at birth). I am tired of bigotry and you are too. That is why my eyes are open. Hope meansthat we can finally end the archaic anti-poor, anti-middle class economic philosophy whose hero isAyn Rand not Dr. Martin Luther King. Hope is basic and it is about having faith in God not faith in the

status quo or doubt. This Memorial Day represents to me about hope for the future. I know that the futurewill be better. If we can end Jim Crow and we can end various forms of discrimination among folks of allbackgrounds, then we can create a better, tranquil society. Internet freedom is great to advance. Variousblogs and sites are under attack by various functions. It is great to witness a variety of human thought andhuman thinking. A continuation of activism and a firm adherence to social justice are greatprescriptions for having victories. Yet, I will not beg another man for my freedom. I will embrace myfreedom. You know what that means. I don't have to spell it out. Freedom should be free, but that isn'talways the case. I am a believer in justice and I am an non-believer in oppression. My freedom is given tome by no one, but my God at conception and especially after birth. I have to be controversial since that ismy job. See, I will always make it plain, make it real, make it raw, and make it true on the real. I amyoung, black, and gifted.

THE POOR AND GREED

In our generation, more people are rejecting false views. David Ricardo (1772-1823) is wrong to say that:"...Anyone who lacks independent wealth has no claim to even the smallest portion of food..." It is just toview humans as not some number on a spreadsheet or stock market portfolio. Man is not something to beplaced in economic trivialities (or allowed to starved to death via austerity), but man is valuable. Man isdynamic and economic revolutionary tenets should be all about social justice. People who need servicesdeserve grants, Medicaid coverage, Social Security, and Medicare. We should reject corporate greed.Charity is a virtue. Man's obligation is not totally to himself. Man was created to serve God, his creation,and all human beings in the right fashion. Self-sacrifice is one of the greatest actions that an individual

can execute. Self-sacrifice can include many things. So, the trash of materialism, bigotry, anarcho-capitalism, and obsession with pop culture comes from a supremacist system of faux religion (as opposedto true, natural spirituality). The corrupt system is found in mainstream unfettered capitalism. Unfetteredcapitalism lies all of the time. Also, the elites hate the poor. You can just look at recent history to see that.For example, the government watched and did little in the beginning of the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.Thousands of people died in New Orleans and in the Gulf Coast region as result of the destructive forceof the hurricane. The government in many cases taxes the poor to give money to the rich. This allowscorporations to slash jobs and benefits. Today, we have billions of dollars spent on militarism, whilepoverty grows in America. The Drug Revolution (aided by the rich Foundations and the CIA in itsleadership) and the dialectic of the War on Drugs (aided by rich Foundations and the CIA. Gary Webb


8/28

has proven this truth) were funded by the establishment to harm the poor, especially in the Blackcommunity. One Contra was CIA agent Adoflo Calefro (he is a supporter of the mainstream Evangelicalcommunity) were created to stifle progress and prevent a real revolutionary change in America. TwoNicaraguan contras, Danielo Blandn and Norwin Meneses, met with Col. Enrique Bermdez inHonduras. Meneses met with Calefro and Meneses was a huge drug smuggler according to Gary Webb.The modern day War on Drugs caused many of the poor to live in the ghettos suffering drug addictionand the prison industrial complex. Crack cocaine has been marketed to the poor in order for revolution tobe stifled. Webb's research reveals that the Contra networks were involved in the distribution of cocaine.AND IT REVEALS THAT THIS CONTRA-COCAINE NETWORK DELIBERATELY CHOSE TO TARGETBLACK COMMUNITIES (INCLUDING ALL COMMUNITIES) WITH THEIR DRUGS. The reactionariestoday blame the victims for the conditions of the poor instead of the chess players in the top that createdthe conditions where poverty flourishes in the first place. Back in the day, cocaine, LSD, and heroine wereconfined mostly to the rich, the hippies, the Beatniks, etc. because these were very expensive. Today,these drugs affect everybody of any socioeconomic & ethnic backgrounds. I am not saying that peopleshould be sentenced to life in prison for non-violent drug possession. I oppose that idea. I mean thatalternatives ought to exist to handle drug addiction among nonviolent sufferers of drug addiction. That iswhy Jesus so many years ago warned us not to love money. He condemned many of the actions of therich and powerful. Therefore, spiritually we ought to respect justice not greed.

Webster Tarpley vs. Ron Paul

What do I think about the Webster Tarpley vs. Ron Paul ideological dispute? I presented my

views about Ron Paul before. Geolibertarian said it best and his views sum up my views on this

debate. I think that Webster is correct with to criticize Austrian School economics as it can lead

into austerity and liquidationism. Although, Tarpley is wrong on the drug war and his near

worship of nuclear power. I believe that Ron Paul is right on many issues like foreign policy,

civil liberties, and national sovereignty, but he's dead wrong on economic issues. Webster

Tarpley is very much accurate in criticizing the laissez faire, social Darwinist economic

movement of the reactionaries. Tarpley has an interesting view of the some of the elites turning

on President Barack Obama because of the President wanting austerity more gradually (whileMitt Romney wants it as soon as possible. The elite may want the radical austerity plans to

occur ASAP). Even Bill Clinton criticizes those who talk about Romney being an asset tripper, a

corporate banking puppet, and a hedge fund leader. Time will tell who will win the 2012

election. One thing is true. Both men are funded by the same ruling class of super-rich elites (or

the 1%). The Supreme Court will decide on the health care reform law on Thursday of this

week. I do agree with Tarpley that healthcare is a human right. Americans have the right to

receive healthcare period. Human life is more important than corporate profits. It's obvious that

Rand Paul sold out. He made a pilgrimage to the offices of the Weekly Standard (which is neo-

con central). Rand is open to agreeing with a Western attack on Iran as he worked with William

Kristol and other neo-cons. Rand Paul will support economic warfare or anti-human sanctionsagainst Iran. Rand Paul supports Mitt Romney, which is a definite betrayal of even the

conservative movement (that Rand claims to love so much.

Mitt Romney agrees with the American Empire overseas funded by our taxpayer dollars and

domestic warfare against our civil liberties at home). One funny comment that Alex Jones made

was that Masons are a diverse group and some are good and some are bad. The reality is that

Freemasonry is wrong spiritually and morally since their oaths are unscriptural and death


9/28

ridden, many of their rituals are secret, and many of them do acts behind the scenes that are

filled with hypocrisy (I know private sources that tell stories about the looseness of Freemasons

in real life). Masonic sources encourage lying and the embrace of the occult. Jones is dead

wrong on the Masonry issue. Jones says that he doesn't endorse the Masons, but some Masons

must be praised by us. No one said that all Masons are devil worshipers, but all Masons are

deluded. I will never ally or compromise with death-oath filled secret societies period. Tarpleyis right to say that the phrase of "states rights" has been a reactionary slogan to restrict human

rights during Jim Crow and other times of human history. To expose states rights as the agenda

of neo-Confederates who violated human liberties has nothing to do with wanting some Soviet-

style system in America at all. The global elite want austerity period. They want us dependent

on corporate power and we should be independent of that. We should control the government

in helping society not the oligarchs. So, trillions of dollars shouldn't be given to the war

machine. Money should be given to help the poor and suffering in America.

THE 2012 WISCONSIN RECALL ELECTION

In Wisconsin, the recall election is over. Wisconsin is a special place, because it's home to

numerous freedom loving movements. Scott Walker will continue to be the Governor of

Wisconsin. He captured 53.1 percent of the total vote. The Republicans spent more moneythan the Democrats did. Barrett was defeated. The Democrats won a recall election in the

Wisconsin senate. The reactionaries have won their election victory in terms of the

governorship. Walker believes in the same dogma of laissez faire economic fundamentalism

that doesn't work to end poverty at all. He believes in the immoral war on terror as well.

Some people say that Scott Walker believes in the culture of life. I believe in the culture of

life, but a culture of life doesn't relate to austerity at all. Austerity can harm human life as it


10/28

will cause more people to suffer poverty, more people to experience a lack of services, and

even more folks to experience to a lack of firefighters. This doesn't mean that the Democrats

are perfect or divine either. They are just as much in the pocket of Wall Street as the

Republicans are. The only difference is that some of the Republicans want to overtly

promote tyranny, while some Democrats want tyranny via stealth. It's hypocritical for the

White House to condemn Bain Capital, but refuse to tell the public how their campaign and

administration are filled with links to JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs. They even criticized

South Carolina's Congressman Jim Clyburn for accurately describing Bain Capital's

technique as raping companies to enrich their partners. The Democrats are more slick in

trying to portray themselves as the "good guy" when they are the Good cop to the

Republicans Bad cop. The role of the Democratic establishment is to try to make deluded

liberals or progressives to ally with the criminal policies of empire abroad and oppression

at home (under the guises of humanitarianism, tolerance, hope, and change). So, both

parties want us to support the sick idea of killing mostly people of color overseas and

defend the right of quasi-austerity policies at home. The Republicans overtly show these

policies as a means to appeal to their reactionary, intolerant base of supporters. As for the

recall election, the affair is interesting. The Democrat Tom Barrett is the mayor of

Milwaukee. Scott Walker won heavily Republican areas like the western suburbs of

Milwaukee. Ironically, the Democratic Party supported the cuts in wages and benefits for

state and local government in Wisconsin. They only oppose Walker's excluding unions

from dealing with how cuts would come about. Scott Walker is a reactionary Republican.

People like him support the interests of corporate profiteers, they are contemptuous of

social justice or the common good, and they agree with the agenda of the rich plutocracy.

Scott Walker is the type of a man that's brainwashed by his political overseers. Some

Republicans today have a history of bullying, insulting and racist name calling among someof their members. That is why I could never support a party that agrees with the agenda

from the PNAC document or the ideologies of George W. Bush. I just can't do it. We have to

keep our eyes wide open not make our eyes become shut to nepotism.


11/28

*In my life, I deduce information. I make commentaries about various issues. Several experiences in

my life and the heroes of the past plus present give me vigor and inspiration to carry on. Victory is

ever close if we continue to promote real solutions that battle against poverty and real injustices in

the world. I can't discount the great influence of labor in the parameters of world society. Labor isone key institution. With labor, we in the USA have a minimum wage, health benefits, a cleaner air,

collective bargaining, and other tangible godsends. Yet, we still have a long way to go in order for us

to see a quality filled society. Millions of people are on food stamps and millions of people suffer

harsh poverty (when there are record profits earned by the super wealthy). We are already in a

new phase of human history. We discuss issues not only of race and nation-states. We are

discussing about economic issues and specialized social issues. Also, we are dealing with complex

ethical and technological subjects from stem cell research to transhumanism. It's much easier to

integrate lunch counters than it is to radically change the economic system in America (where the

poor will receive fair wages and true justice). It's an uncontestable fact that laissez faire capitalism

was one huge instrument of continuing the international slave trade for centuries. This doesn't

mean that I am a Communist. Communism omits the important nature of the individual whilesometimes capitalism forgets the social & collective nature of human existence. Communism also

violates basic, fundamental individual freedoms. I wouldnt prefer to live under the rule of a

Communist country, yet as Dr. Martin Luther King eloquently mentioned decades ago, its better to

live in peaceful coexistence than mutual annihilation.

Far too often, heroes are slandered as communists when they even offer quaint criticism of

mainstream capitalism. The neo-conservative Cliff Cincaid (I call him by name) is notorious in

slandering people as communists and socialists if a person doesn't agree with his narrow minded

views. The deceiver Cincaid was once a member of the Council on National Policy (or a group filled

with Knights of Malta, elitists, and other shady characters who try to infiltrate sincere

conservatives). Cincaid needs to realize that we live in the twenty-first century not the eighteenthcentury. Cincaid (who took money from Richard Mellon Scaife) supports the war on terror and the

evil Patriot Act. Cliff even demonizes real sincere anti-war conservatives. Sincere anti-war people

exist from across the political spectrum. Cliff lied and said that the anti-war movement in essence is

communist totally in its orientation. It's time to look beyond the Left/Right Paradigm. As Matthew

7:20 says: "...Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them..."The truth is that it's pro-God to

advocate public resources to assist the poor and suffering in the world society. I don't believe that

the Lord would want to be silent when homelessness is abundant, when the state is depriving


12/28

citizens of real equality, and unjust wars are transparent plus real. I oppose the proposed billions of

dollars in cuts to Pell Grants (these grants can help so much of the poor to have a great education

inside of the college arena). The Lord God would want us to repent and seek out for justice

including tolerance for all people in the face of the Earth point blank period. Our issues are not just

national. They are international as well. For we are linked socially to all people irrespective of our

creed, nationality, ethnicity, gender, disability, or any other background. We have the resources tosolve our problems. The deal is that these resources have been too centralized under the super

elite. That is why it is imperative to create programs to make a more equitable tax system, to create

more small businesses, and improve our environment in general. Short term and long term goals of

economic growth & social/political growth are precise ways where all people can benefit in this

ever changing society. Even with my errors, I will never quit. I will keep moving forward and

promote progressive solutions.

By Timothy


13/28

Appendix A: Great Debates

These debates are debates I had with a pro-Republican person. You can agree with me or not. I

presented this information since it shows the public the mentality of some people that believe in

some post-racial society. It shows the public about the Republican mindset or the Republican

thinking on various political issues. It offers a glimpse into my thinking and the thinking of pro-Tea

Party individuals. These words are more controversial. I like debates, so its great and a pleasure for

me to prevent information to the people.

Enjoy.

-By Timothy


14/28

Hi TruthSeeker24

I say that Ali's militant "black" identifying jugmentalism back then is what informs the the style of

modern Liberal African American "agenda" politics today and their rhetoric. Ali was how he was

because he was mad about how he was treated by "White" people who believed in this notion of"whiteness" and about how they used it to insult and belittle him as inferior. Yet he needed to see

that this white/black excuse for division and hating him was only a blood poisoned scapegoat being

used by those PEOPLE to do so back then, it was being done by PEOPLE who chose to do so not

inherently "white" people. Sure, they were white skinned while on mass doing it, and those people

even fervently believed in that shit notion enough to segregatedly kill African Americans over it, but

they were just PEOPLE using a false notion of "Color" as a excuse to hurt others really.

Now the problem is that a 95% African American voting block that leans all Democrat speak

themselves from the same false "color" perception of men like Ali about where racism comes from.

The general appetite within Liberal African American democrats to "teach" on race issues and judge

others supposed vast racial sins through their own personal racialized prism, comes from a similar

false perception of "color" that they hold true to in similarity with the racists who enslaved them

back in the past, and now Liberal African Americans use the "color" perception as a solidarity

platform themselves. That solidarity with "blackness" may have seemed necessary to fight the fight

for civil rights, but it has left Civil Rights African Americans as a group identifying by "color" today.

They act judgemental from a podium because of it and self segregate from other people with it.

That racially charged/identifying podium of privilege, is from where insincere men like Obama

speak when they want to pretend that they want to have a "new" dialog on race issues. Yet it is the

same podium from which all the other "color" based judgments of others by Liberal African

Americans comes from everyday. People like myself who are constantly judged and under attack

for our every word by Liberal activist African American people of that privileged podium and who

see their few Black conservative friends called "uncle toms" from it by them are not impressed tobelieve anything that these racialized Liberals say.

As I said in a letter before, there was no "new dialog" on race as Obama promised, just insulting

"cowards on race" comments and "uncle tom" rhetoric from the left. At the same time, Black

Panther intimidation got a free pass, and then they have the gall to wonder why those "Whites"

who are always called "privileged racist conservative white people" hate them back in return for it.

Well Liberal activist African Americans are in general now far too Racialized and judgmental to have

any real true "new" dialogs or discussions about race issues with people like myself. All they breed

is division with their insults at us and our Conservative "black" suffering brethren these days.

Sincerely,

CyberSpaceman81


15/28

My Response:

This is an interesting discussion and here are my views. Muhammad Ali had imperfections like all

human beings possess or acquire. No human being is perfect. Yet, Ali's views on many issues are100 percent accurate in my opinion. You obviously disagree. Now, Muhammad Ali is right to

promote black families, black communities, and black culture. You equate a man or a woman

strongly promoting black culture as judging in an evil fashion. I don't. A real black man isn't judging

unfairly all people when he stands up for an ideal. He is acting as a rational and firm minded human

being that isn't afraid the status quo. The status quo desires stagnation and self-hatred among black

people, but the truth is that God wants black people to realize their full potential and love the

legacy of their black ancestors. The black ancestors were warriors and carrying forward with that

warrior ethos of strength, determination, and progress are frontiers of stable living not chaos.

Muhammad Ali was right to expose the evils of white racism. Muhammad Ali even in the 1960's said

that he didn't hate people, because they were white. He hated oppression and discrimination

against his people. Racism isn't limited among some white people, but the system of whitesupremacy existed back then and today (under more sophisticated means). White terrorists (not all

white people) harming black people back then used issues of race and class as a disgusting excuse in

order to basically harming people. I don't consider them or prejudice people normal people in my

eyes. They are degenerates. "Whiteness" to Ali refers to larger white society or white culture. You

of course deny the concept of culture, but I believe in the existence of culture in the realm of

human history.


16/28

Now, the percentage of black people voting for a political party of the Democrats exists for

numerous reasons. You don't like it, but what is the alternative? I don't agree with the Democrats

on every issue. On the other hand, the Republicans have shown us what they stand for. They stand

for austerity, war mongering, xenophobia (even Jeb Bush called some Republicans out on their

xenophobia), the violations of our civil liberties, near theocratic policies, and the use of race-

baiting/anti-poor rhetoric. I wish for more African Americans to be politically Independent (which is

purposely not a part of the Democratic/Republican corporate system), but I do understand why 95

% of black Americans vote Democratic when most Republicans desire to crush our effective social

safety net. The lesson of reality is for people to teach of racism and promote solutions. Judging

racial sins using accurate sources of history isn't about judging something with a false prism. That is

using a crystal clear mirror that is a part of history, reality, and a sense of justice. Color (in terms of

melanin levels) is real. Melanin levels that are diversely arranged in human beings is a scientific fact,

while the usage of "race" is a social construct. People have used and exploited people of color for

centuries. That is also real, so people have the right to talk about these issues. You wish to not

discuss about these issues in an accurate fashion since you want all people to accept your

conservative establishment views. Black solidarity has nothing to do with racism. Black solidarity is

about promoting bounds of unity (among black men and black women), building black culture, and

believing in justice. You ignore this goal. Black solidarity was necessary during the 1960's as it is now

in 2012 (because of the problems in the black community. Black Unity is one solution out of many

to help my black people). Identifying myself by color, culture, or my ethnicity is my right. It's part of

the First Amendment. Judging evil is right. Judging oppression as wrong is fine with me.

See being judgmental against evil is very much human. Human beings have the right to discern right

from wrong. To promote Black Power isn't about forced self-segregation or bigotry. It's about doing

the same thing that the Irish, the Indians, the Asians, the Hispanics, and other people have beendoing in America for a long time. When the Asians and the Hispanics do this (or promote cultural

growth along ethnic lines), there is no outright or massive condemnation. It is only when we blacks

do it, then we're falsely called the racists. Sorry, it's a new day and colorblindness is fantasy (as

exposed by the author & Sister Michelle Alexander). No real discerning man or woman conceives

every black conservative as an Uncle Tom. That's silliness. We just feel that if a black person hates

their own people and promotes corporate interests that damage their own people, then he or she is

an Uncle Tom. It's a simple and quaint definition (without complication). I have said that the liberal

establishment isn't perfect, but there is no way that I will worship at the altar of Ayn Rand or Milton

Freidman. It isn't going to happen, no doubt.


17/28

There have been dialogues on race for years. Some progress has been made, but we have a long

way to go. See, a true dialogue means that both sides will agree on many things. Yet, both sides

don't have to agree on every point in the exact same fashion. You want black people to agree with

your standard on every issue, but black people have every right to not agree with you in a peaceful

fashion. Our civil rights are being violated, so we have the right to fight for more tranquility. The

President Barack Obama talked about race and he didn't damn anyone as an Uncle Tom in his

dialogue (during his 2008 Presidential campaign). Black Panther intimidation? The New Black

Panthers in that voting location didn't kill anyone, they exposed white supremacy (which they have

every right to do and they are accurate on that point) and they didn't harm anyone physically. The

only thing that they did wrong was carrying weapons that could intimidate people. Most of the

Dade County, FL police department blocking voters in 2000 to elect Bush is a thousand times worse

than 2 New Black Panther members with nightsticks in Philadelphia during 2008. Also, police

brutality against a 6 year old black girl gets a free pass in Detroit. Oscar Grant's murder gets a free

pass. The NYC's evil frisk and search policy against innocent minorities gets a free pass. The

bombing of the black community in Tulsa, Oklahoma in 1921 by you know who got a free pass too.

Also, other instruments of evil gets a free pass like the brutality against black Libyans by terrorists.

Our black people suffered no free passes in terms of oppression. We are oppressed and we have

every justification to make our grievances known and to create solutions to help our own interests.

I know many privileged white conservative racists hate black people. Thank you for admitting to

that. You are honest. We blacks don't hate you reactionaries. We disagree with you. Many liberals

and people from across the political spectrum desire dialogue with each other. Race dialogues have

existed for years, so to assume that race dialogues don't exist is false. You just want the dialogue to

be one sided in your favor. Justice means all sides will benefit not just conservatives. No real scholar

insults you or black conservatives. Real people don't advocate the demonization of any man who is

conservative, but a real people advocate adequate critiques of any political philosophy. All humans

are created equal, but all human beings have the right to work for community development. Blackpeople have a right to love their families, their communities, and their people without malice or

bigotry toward non-blacks. That is not a sin. That's the Lord's Truth.

By Timothy

___________________

Hi TruthSeeker24

Republicans stand for non over emotionalized maturity, this xenophobia, austerity crap is just a

liberal contrive of Conservatism actual positions. They believe in families that have expectations

other than lax culture that accepts and seeks to mitigate the growth in youth promiscuity and


18/28

uncommited adult relationships. They believe in a nation that was founded of rugged individual

personal pursuing freedom and not vast culture of sharing all of their labors and hard work with

everybody under the sun at others people enjoyable whim. They believe that a patriot expects his

nation to be sovereign and it borders as well, not just have millions come whenever they please

and use the services of our citizenship without expectations of legal immigration. They believe that

empowering the ease of the average citizen to start their OWN money generating capitalist

enterprise however small is in keeping with this nations founding under personal pursuitism and

CAPITALISM. They believe that one should be "equal" enough to face mainly just the obstacles of

the natural world, competition, and the limits of their amassed skills and education without things

like racism being a factor hindering them. Yet they don't believe that the world was made to make

everyone have the same amount of stuff through collectivism, and that those who naturally can't

achieve a certain level prosperity for themselves through their own efforts don't deserve that level

till their own effort allow.

They believe that those like Liberals who fail the intercity with their Liberal teachers union lead

Public School high drop out rates and "Empower" only to government provided things are

destroying the personal pursuing independence of the people in this nation, and are failing even to

give them the empowered ability to achieve even a basic level of prosperity of THEMSELVES with agood basic education skill base. Those consumed with arguments of supposed continuing "vast

racism" that is leading their disadvantage are off point and objective. We need to worry more

about why the Fredrick Douglass types who freed HIMSELF and taught HIMSELF to read with NO

education has been lost in African American America now. Those who call themselves "Friends" of

African American intercity empowerment can't even produce a decent primary school education to

give them, and they all but ignore the cancer of single parenthood and other issues adding to more

criminality and hopelessness.

Well I say that is UNACCEPTABLE while pushing more entitlements and collectivism on them, it is

robbing them of their hope and sacred fire to achieve as an individual like their ancestors had. The"Mitt Romney" types of the republican party aren't the majority, they are big monied people who

some I am sure have interest only to protect their fortune. The majority of Republicans are just

middle class people who want their nation to be one free individuals who are able to sweat and toil

for their OWN middle class level of prosperity and keep it, without being called "privileged" for it

and being force by their neighbors to spend it all collectively on every new thing that people

outside of their own home decide. Those who constantly from the Liberal now grown ethnocentric

minority movement left of today shout with racialism about the white middle classes supposed

"privilege" and judge everything they say and do as the most racist thing ever are presuming to a

self righteous power they don't have right to as a equally fallible human.

These self segregating people have grown so consumed with racial color and the politics of

disadvantage to see that it is mainly now reversible natural obstacles that are holding them back.

The stored legacy of achievements of individual African Americans of past rougher days is

immeasurable, and their achievements and fire for personal actions back then are more

understandable now by those of conservative independent fire of spirit who remember their

immigrant European ancestors struggles to reach the middle class and who want to be a nation of

THAT and not collectivism. i am one who is interested in the "School Choice" movement, to me it

seems more important that intercity kids get a good education that can serve them to start being

personally actional and generative adults rather than to get into taking from government. their are


19/28

Liberal Democrats and Conservatives doing big things in this arena, yet much of the Democratic

establishment in love with the teachers unions hate on them.

This "School Choice" is a place where intercity minorities could see a growth in personal skill to do

as individuals, yet I fear the majority of the Left wants continue to play racial disadvantage politics

with the middle class more than they want to empower people bipartisanly to independent ability

through things like school choice and community based personal small business starter trainingprograms. That would just be too independent and capitalist to do for Democrats I guess. I am

attaching a vid of the Democrat party people fighting for "school choice" who show a kindred

bipartisan spirit with those fighting for it on the Conservative side. I hope it shows you a better way

for us all to work toward something truly empowering for less fortunate rather than playing agenda

politics and continuing a entitlement culture.

Sincerely,

CyberSpaceman81

_____

My Response:

Republicans stand for many things and principles. One of them isn't the love of the social safety net

despite their hypocrisy on this issue. No political party is god neither perfect, therefore I possess the

reasonable justification to be an Independent from a political standpoint. Being emotional for

justice is fine. Being timid in the face of oppression is asinine and seriously cowardly in my opinion.

Many Republicans advocate xenophobia and austerity evils. That's a fact. For example, Paul Ryan

and Ron Paul desire at least 1 trillion dollar cuts in the government (which can damage the

economy literally and it's austerity). Also, Republican Tom Tancredo blatantly advocates restrictions

on legal immigration in harsh xenophobic terminology. These characterizations of some Republicans

advocating extremism isn't a part of liberal contrivance, but cold facts. People from across the

spectrum disagree with youth sexual promiscuity and uncommitted adult relationships inside of a

lax culture. I just feel that people should not be placed into prison (as theocrats advocate) for

premarital sex and various adult relationships. There are means to fight against these problems like

sexual education, communication, dialogue, and promoting a culture that abhors materialism and

yes austerity. In American culture, shared sacrifice is part and parcel of our ethos. For example,

centuries ago, the American Revolutionaries sacrificed their wealth to defeat British colonialists.

Even during the Great Depression, communities sacrificed their labor and time to assist the poor

and struggling. The same things existed during WWII. Now, the Constitution in Article I, Section 8

gives the government the power to tax citizens (therefore, the usage of taxes to help society is

perfectly legal). I believe in national sovereignty, so you have no qualms from me about a nation

having the right to be sovereign in their territorial integrity. Yet, when people talk about

comprehensive immigration reform, we are not saying people should run from foreign countries

into America precipitously. That means that we should protect our borders and promote a

rational solution to the immigrants already here in America. You can't immediately deport

millions of people without causes riots or chaos, so a comprehensive approach is far better in

solving immigration complications.


20/28

You feel that the private arena can only empower the individual. In 2012, I am seeing that it can be

both the private and the public sector working in one nation that can empower individuals. You

mention the words personal pursuit. So often, the words of personal pursuit have been exploited as

a cover to advance greed, materialism, and other facets of negligent behavior in our financial

sphere. Therefore, the markets should have reasonable regulations in order for the market to not

act unfettered. Unfettered capitalism is a detriment to human progress, while controlled capitalism

or even a mixed economy has worked in the United States during the span of short centuries. Now,

the weakness of your argument of bootstraps 101 is that not all human beings travel in the same

road at approximately the same time. For example, the rich man and a pauper are in 2 different

lanes in the track. The rich person has many advantages; therefore programs were created to assist

the poor person in the race of life. Therefore, it's fine for you (if you want) to promote your own

individual endeavor without government assistance. Yet, you should not restrict some

governmental assistance from those that legitimately need it. Human life will not be perfect and

obstacles are abundant. That's true, but imperfections in life require corrections. These corrections

involve funds, fair taxation, legitimate laws, and other policies that can make America a better

nation. A man can make great contributions via his own efforts, but no man can make it on their

own. All men were assisted one way or another in their lives journeys.

You made words about public education. There are huge problems in the public educational system

that is multifaceted. There is corporate influence in education that causes problems. There is a

sense of cultural and discipline problems in the classroom as well. Yet, the government is by and for

the people. So, the people are the government and the government is going to be run by either evil

people or righteous people. So, the public school system ought to have strong reforms without the

total annihilation of it. I have no issues with homeschooling or private schools as long as they aren't

paid by taxpayer dollars (because many of these schools express views that some people disagreewith. Many vouchers are religious schools funded by taxpayer dollars as well). I don't like many high

dropout rates from high school either. One solution is public school is a back to basics philosophy

(that deals with teaching students phonics, promoting more reading, developing intellectualism and

following the model from Finland). Like Finland, teachers should be highly trained in education and

behavior management. Sometimes, it isn't even the teacher's fault since some teachers have

trouble with children with complex behavioral problems (and their dependence on anti-depression

drugs). Other solutions to the public education problem are to have teachers have flexibility in

testing students, and the promotion of stronger cooperation among all parties (in Finland, there

Finland offers all pupils free school meals, easy access to health care, psychological counseling, and

individualized student guidance). As for teacher unions, there should be unions. Without unions,

you wouldn't have a minimum wage, child labor could be legal, pollution would be harsher, andother evil conditions would remain in America. We should thank unions. Teachers unions should be

reformed and not abolished. The scapegoating of teacher unions for all educational problems is silly

when our problems are more complex than that. Not all teachers are to be blamed for this.

Replacing qualified teachers with temps is extremely damaging to our system of education.


21/28

Private education has just as much a valid historical link to American history as Public education.

Some of our greatest leaders including African Americans were an educational product of public

education. Racism and socioeconomic problems pay a huge role in educational problems despite

your denials. The reason is that some minorities are suspended (not because of rude behavior), but

because of cultural differences. Privatizing all public education benefits the corporate elite not the

people. A real solution involves accountability, flexibility, and the strengthening of public schools.

Frederick Douglas may have taught himself how to read (which we all should thank and be glad

about), but the government was necessary to allow people to escape out of the Great Depression.

Also, the civil rights activists forced the government to pass meaningful legislation in order to give

people their God-given rights. Hence, individuals and the public can make masterful improvements

in society. You just felt the individuals can do it alone. I believe that both individuals and the public

can make a better world. There are many public education schools and plenty of great African

Americans making it in life, thank you very much. Single parenthood exists across ethnicities and

backgrounds, so single parenthood is not monolithic. Not all single parents are drug dealers or living

in a degenerate lifestyle, so that stereotyping is a mirage of deception. The social safety net isn't anentitlement, because people earned to receive them via work (like Social Security, Medicare, and

Medicaid). Most white people in America have these items not black people, so race baiting is silly

here. Also, these services aren't gotten by theft. They are gotten by real labor and real work. Taxes

are found in the Constitution as well. Unregulated capitalism has been a force that contributed to

the Maafa and some of the corrupt policies found inside of factories during the 19th century. I

worship God not capitalism. Capitalism like any economic philosophy acquires imperfections and

some pitfalls. You don't expose the record income inequality and the crimes of the super rich since

it ends your promotion of corporate wealth centralization. The Mitt Romney types (for better or for

worst) run your party of Republicans. Republicans mostly are middle class, yet some of the middle

class have forgotten about the poor. When some of the middle class are suffering poverty now,

then some of them realized that you can't forget the interests of the poor. America isn't just for the

middle class. America is for the poor too and if we want meaningful solutions here, then we have to

advocate strong, effective policies to assist the poor in a militant way. Again, Taxation isn't about

forcing your neighbor to steal your wealth. It's about fulfilling Congress' right to fund our roads,

bridges, infrastructure, health, and other vital services in this country. The term collectivism is used

by some conservatives in order to scare people into feeling that there are no other alternatives to

free market capitalism (when there are like a mixed economy). Now, black people loving their

people, loving their families, and wanting more black children isn't about racism. It's about truth.

Also, real black people don't call all words from white people as racism, but expose some racist

whites' comments that harm black people. See, you want to deny white racism. The Republican

establishment and the Democratic establishment are run by the same people.


22/28

Forming black communities is fine and this isn't bigotry. If a black person wants to live with his own

people voluntarily, that is his or her right. Being appreciative of melanin is a blessing. There is a

politics of disadvantage of the super rich having huge advantages over the rest of us. The great

accomplishments of African Americans in yesteryear dont justify massive globalization, unjust wars,

and other nefarious policies in the 21st century at all. Also, tons of European immigrants live in

separate enclaves to this day culturally and socially. You can't refute these points at all. School

choice is school choice. School choice that's real has nothing to do with arbitrarily cutting teachers

or illegally privatizing all public schools. That isn't school choice, but it's harming the public school

choice. Many Democrats and Republicans are united to promote privatization as both parties in

their leadership are nearly the same. Sorry, yet changes in public schools can enrich the lives ofAfrican Americans. Also, middle class human beings aren't monolithic. Numerous middle class

individuals want the 1% to end their economic crimes, they want the poor to have justice, and they

promote love without theocracy. The Bush tax cuts for the rich can't massively benefit our economy

& other archaic economic plans are futile too. Small businesses and private charities are fine. Yet,

charities alone can never end poverty. Small businesses alone can never end poverty. Only, the

combination of public sector and private sector solutions can end poverty. Your denial of the power

of the public sector to humanly help another human being is telling on your personal premise as it

relates to politics. Using the government to help the less fortunate is legal and it is no vice. The

entitlement culture spin has been used by Republicans as an excuse to try to crush the social Safety

net. Social Security (with a surplus in the trillions of dollars) and Medicare aren't entitlements. They

are effective programs that people earned by their own labor in order to enrich their own standardof living. Now, you want all black Americans to be Republicans, yet you won't have your wish. The

reason is that black people collectively I might add reject the racist statements made by numerous

Republican candidates. We reject austerity and colorblindness. We also reject the hatred of black

culture. We black people will forever love and promote black culture, black fashion, black families,

and black Power. Collectivism relates to community and community work is a very pristine portion


23/28

of black African history. The respect of the community and the respect of elders are part of black

ARFIKAN culture. It is what is as they say.

By Timothy

_______________

Hi Timothy

This "Social Safety net" idea is a fantasy made to pacify those Liberals and others who have hadtheir Social Security money spent away by Liberal/all government far before they ever have seen a

dime of it. If one is an adult they should be expected to know how to set some of their OWN money

aside in personal savings for later. Yet Social Security was NOT made as a government "hands off"

savings program for the Liberal idiots out their who can't save by budgeting day to day personally

and need to have the government do so for them. It was set up instead to be used as a short term

loan system for the government to use "the peoples" money before they would need it for their

retirement and then the government pretended that they would have the money paid back into the

accounts by the time the payers in finally needed it for retirement. Now there is nothing but a lot of

"I owe you" tickets from the government in social security accounts. Even the rest of the little

money left in there that is not enough to cover everyone, is being devalued by monetizing the new

debt that Obama is taking on by printing more money. When there are more dollar bills beingmade, then they each become a percentage less valuable as a consequence, That means every

dollar in your social security account goes down in value and your once 10,000 dollars in there is

only worth something else now. something like say 7,000 dollars. This is the consequence of letting

the government debt spend and monetize our currency into less value. If the government had had

to keep their hands off of using Social Security savings to spend, then the money would all still be in

there in personal accounts for those people now. If the government was expected to run on a

budget and not take on extra debt to spend.on entitlements, wars, and projects.

Then they wouldn't have to monetize that debt and lower the value of the cash sitting in those

social security accounts that should have been hands off from the start. The government could

have done this, but as no surprise to me didn't. Now the vast "Baby Boomer" population is coming

into the use of Social Security and the money they paid in has either already been spent bygovernment or has been devalued by them. This means we need to find a new away to foot the bill,

and that way as Liberals are displaying is just more debt. Government spending took the original

money out of the accounts and spent it, Government debt spending loans after that made for

monetized currency devaluation of what was left, and now with only "I owe you" tickets left in the

accounts the government wants to borrow more debt to pay for the Baby Boomers retirements

now.


24/28

Well that idea will just indenture into debt servitude the smaller populated generations of younger

people here. They will have to service this debt for generations in order to borrow enough to pay

for the baby boomers retirements now. WHERE THE HELL IS THE ORIGINAL MONEY PAID

IN?!!! Yet you talk so reverently of the "Helpful" government and how well it spends your money.Well I say that it is moronic to think that those who have spent and also devalued your savings

deserve to hold on to your money. If people had had that money saved somewhere themselves

then they could have kept it unspent, and if the government tried to monetize and devalue to take

on more debt. Then you would have had that money with YOU to transfer over to a better currency

over seas before it ever devalued. That is how a free and independent mature adult manages their

money and stays prosperous. Not like Liberals who let government think and spend for them.

Such personally responsible fiscal choices aren't some secret formula or "way of cheating" by only

people with more money than others. They are just personal actions that could be taken by anyone

of any means to be secure themselves. Yet you seem to want the government to look after you still.Well no wonder you complain about the successful beating you, it's because they don't put their

money in the hands of those who who would be irresponsible with it like government loving

Liberals like you do. I would tell you to get more of YOUR OWN money back from government, but I

fear it would fall on deaf ears. LOL I love how Liberals hate on the successful for beating them with

individualism and then go off to seek government and not their own individualism. Sure, don't do

the fiscally responsible things that you can do personally that can make you as successful as those

richer than you, instead entrust your money to the government. That is the Liberal way of thinking,

and it gets it's ass beat by individualism time and time again.

Sincerely,

Brendan

My Response:

The reactionaries are slick in our generation, but real human beings are wiser than the lies from thestatus quo. Now, the social safety net isnt a fantasy. The Social Safety net is a reality. All human

beings need assistance and the social safety net was created in America to not only help Americans.

It was used to maintain social prosperity and prevent the oligarchy from having too much extreme

power over the populace. Now, the corporate elitists are angry at the social safety net since it strips

away a lot of their power. That is why they use Foundations (including puppets like Peter Peterson)

to advocate the elimination of the social safety net, especially Social Security. Social Security

presently has trillions of dollars in a surplus. Some of the money has been spent heavily during the


25/28

Bush administration years. Bush isnt a far left liberal man at all. Stolen wealth from the Social

Security trust fund occurs from time to time. Still, future generations can witness a dime of Social

Security via wise policies and economic preservation without austerity & unjust wars. Some adults

can survive with a job and set their own money alone. Yet, some adults are extremely poor and

some are living in extreme circumstances. These incidents permit some public services. Now, Social

Security once again is earned not gotten for free, so it isnt some entitlement. Some reactionariesdont know what a real entitlement. If you earn a benefit via work, it is no shame. Intelligent men

from across the political spectrum lost funds and even went into poverty not because of ignorance

or laziness, but by corporate corruption, unfair firing, and other things Some of the causes on why

some folks experience new found poverty are not the fault of some people. Social Security is an

effective program with tons of benefits to people. The problem is that the Big Money Fat Cats and

their Congressional lackeys in 2010 cut payroll contributions to Social Security from 6.2% to 4.2%,

representing a loss to the Social Security Fund of $140 billion the first year! Forty-two percent of

American senior citizens are kept from living in poverty by their Social Security payments. Nearly

one in five Americans receives Social Security benefits and ninety-five percent of Americans have

the Social Security benefit protection program. The poverty rate of the elderly was 35% as late as

1959. Now it's about 10%, because of the reliable Social Security program they have paid into. TheSocial Security Administration is an independent federal agency with its own revenue stream and

depository fund: IT IS NOT A PART OF THE FEDERAL BUDGET! On March 31, 1995, the Social Security

Administration was officially designatedas an independent agency. The Federal Old-Age and

Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund was established on January 1, 1940 as a separate account in

the United States Treasury. This Social Security trust fund system is one of the few programs set up

by the federal government that continues to operate successfully. To take a sample year, in 2002,

the SSS received $627 billion in checks, $453.8 billion in taxes, and an additional $49 billion in

interest. Instead of red ink, Social Security made almost $102 billion in profit, to add to the trillions

it has in surplus from previous years. Now, printing more money is fine if it is debt free. Debt filled

money has been a problem, so populists want the government to cut money from the military

industrial complex and spend money in our infrastructure. The government should keep their handsof Social Security. On the other hand, I am more concerned about peoples lives than budgetary

deficits. We can grow the economy and handle the debt and deficit long term. Revenues coming

from economic growth can assist our deficit and debt long term including other policies. I talk of

helpful government since on many occasions throughout human history government can be helpful.

Government has been corrupted when there are corporate influence, and the existence of

oligarchy. Evil government can transpire when even undisciplined, corrupt human beings control

the power base of the government.


26/28

Other people have talked about responsible fiscal choices all of the time. Yet, true fiscal growth

doesnt involve more massive tax cuts for the super rich when they dont need them. The extremely

wealthy receive record profits and there is record economic inequality in the world thats

undeniable. Now, some have called for infrastructure development. Some want the private andpublic sectors to have investments to grow state of the art transport, energy, and water system. A

real pro-growth tax policy is necessary to give incentives to companies that grow jobs here in

America, get rid of corporate welfare, make higher tax brackets for billionaires, and end the war on

terror (that drains our economy in an oppressive fashion). There ought to be more of a resurrection

of manufacturing and technological jobs in America. That is why I agree with a lot of the economic

agenda from the 99 percent, not the 1 percent. The promotion of workers rights, strong financial

reform, and efforts to preserve the social safety net is purely essential in prodigiously maintaining

the essence of the American dream. Extreme privatization has caused tons of complications from

the prison industrial complex to the commonly known corporate scandals. Also, helping your

neighbor isnt cheating, its a commandment. See, some view helping your neighbor as embracing

hatred of success or hatred of the rich (some even falsely call folks socialist if they want the

government to help their neighbors). I dont hate the rich and I dont hate success, yet even Jesus

Christ (that some Republicans claim to love so much) exposed greed.

He said that the rich will have a harder time going into Heaven than the poor. We know the reason

about why that is. I dont want the government to dictate every aspect of my life. I want the

government to constitutionally protect the borders, protect my life, protect my property, and

promote the general welfare of society. Therefore, the general welfare includes things like


27/28

infrastructure, Social Security, and more social services to those that need it. I dont need welfare,

so I dont utilize it. Others need it and its their right to use it. Rugged individualism was heavily

responsible for the Maafa and extermination of the vast majority of Native Americans. This rugged

individualism is a lie anyway since the Homestead Act was about federal dollars funding Western

settlers in a multitude of ways. Not all liberals hate so-called successful people. People from across

the political spectrum hate corruption, hate greed, hate tax cuts for the very rich, and hate anarchaic economic system of Austrian Economics. People have the right to seek individualism and

receive no governmental help. Other people have the right to get governmental help if they need it.

There is nothing wrong with individual liberty and individual initiative. Although, there is something

wrong with denying individual people their general welfare though.

The reality is that markets should be transparent. Rockefeller Foundation types perverted economic

freedom into Austrian economics (or monetarism that is related to monopolistic capitalism). The

Milton Freidman gang at the University of Chicago with agents like Lew Rockwell continues on with

their propaganda. Ludwig von Mises, Murray Rothbard, and Ayn Rands views have been

discredited, because selflessness (not selfishness) is needed to improve the conditions of humanity.Ironically, Lew Rockwell or the founder of the Ludwig von Mises Institute claimed that the Spanish

Jesuits (associated with the University of Salamanca as the founders of modern free-market

thinking. Ignatius Loyola was the founder of the Jesuits and he was a student at Salamanca (he was

linked to the mystical Alumbrados group, which was a precursor to the Bavarian Illuminati). Even

Carl Menger or the founder of the Austrian School was strongly influenced by the Salamancan

Jesuits as he quoted them in his book entitled, Principles of Economics. The House of Habsburg,

one of the most powerful Black Nobility families, was closely associated with Austrian economists.

Carl Menger was the personal tutor of Archduke Rudolf von Habsburg and accompanied him in his

travels for three years. Even libertarian Presidential candidate Ron Paul is sponsored by business

magnate Peter Thiel. Peter Thield is a member of the steering committee of the Bilderberg Group.

So, the establishment just loves anarcho-capitalism. History and reality prove it. Now, libertarianism

is right to emphasize individual freedom, but it fails to recognize many of the imperfections of

human nature. Humans are social beings, not just individually working human beings. For life is

social and individual, not just individual. Self interest is promoted in libertarianism, but not social

justice. You have to have social justice to have true freedom among everybody irrespective of race,

gender, socioeconomic factor, background, creed, etc. Usury is even condemned in the Bible, the

Koran, the Torah, etc. Austrians blame everything on the state, but they ignore money power or

corporate corruption. We can live without libertarianism and communism. We can live with a mixed

economy. Getting back money from the government via legitimate means is one thing, but

eliminating all money from helping those less fortunate is evil in my opinion. I am not a liberal,

regardless of what some say. I am an Independent. I love fair government. I dont love tyrannical

government. No real man is jealous of so-called successful people or rich. Real people are just

knowledgeable that just because you have a lot of popularity, riches, and so-called prosperity

doesnt mean that youre righteous.


28/28

By Timothy

Date post:	05-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	timothy
View:	222 times
Download:	0 times

From My Heart Part 2

Documents