+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Front Matter

Front Matter

Date post: 12-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: lamdiep
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
5
Front Matter Source: Litigation, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Winter 1975) Published by: American Bar Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29758171 . Accessed: 10/06/2014 21:53 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. . American Bar Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Litigation. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 91.229.229.89 on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:53:10 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Transcript
Page 1: Front Matter

Front MatterSource: Litigation, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Winter 1975)Published by: American Bar AssociationStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29758171 .

Accessed: 10/06/2014 21:53

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

.

American Bar Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Litigation.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 91.229.229.89 on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:53:10 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 2: Front Matter

The Journal Of The Section Of Litigation American Bar Association

itigation

^^^^^^^^^ I 1 k. I ?* til' .?.Y-**? Vol. 1 No. 1 Winter 1975

, t ? J . . . J 4 ft 4?

MORALITY AND MANNERS AT THE BAR

LAWYERS AND ACCOUNTANTS ON TRIAL

Problems Of Professional Liability

This content downloaded from 91.229.229.89 on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:53:10 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 3: Front Matter

T* iHe of Contents

Opening Statement 1 William Emerson Wright All About Litigation 2 The Editor

Trial Balloon 3 Joseph A. Ball

From the Bench 5 Irving R. Kaufman

MORALITY AND MANNERS AT THE BAR

The Necessity for Civility 8 Warren E. Burger Judicial Intimidation 11 Leon Jaworski

Civility in the Courtroom 14 Paul R. Connolly

Managing Unruly Trials 18 Robert C. O'Hara

Disqualification of the Trial Judge 22 Ernest J. Getto

Perjury: The Lawyer's Trilemma 26 Monroe H. Freedman

LAWYERS AND ACCOUNTANTS ON TRIAL

Problems of Professional Responsibility 32 Ray Garrett, Jr.

Accountants: A Flexible Standard 35 A. A. Sommer, Jr.

Accountants' Civil Liability 40 CarlD. Liggio A Standard for Professional Liability 44 John G. Wigmore

Professional Liability Insurance Claims 47 Richard H. Murray

Litigator's Bookshelf 53 Michael E. Tigar Trial Notebook 55 James W.McElhaney

Legal Lore 57

Advance Sheet 59 Steven M. Urn in

The cover of this premiere issue of Litigation contains a reproduction of an original woodcut print, titled "Overruled," by Pat Golden. Ms. Golden, who works out of a studio in her home at 4800 Grantham Avenue, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20015, specializes in woodcuts. Besides "Overruled," her portfolio contains several other prints on the theme of litigation.

This content downloaded from 91.229.229.89 on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:53:10 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 4: Front Matter

Morality and Manners at the Bar The trauma of Watergate has triggered a plethora of ethical soul-searching by the legal profession. The several articles that constitute this theme?"Morality and Manners at the Bar"?pose ethical questions, but

they are questions that litigators were required to confront long before technology provided us with the means for recording voices surreptitiously on magnetic tape. Indeed, the tone for the ethical dialogue which these articles encompass was set by Chief Justice Burger in a speech in 1971?a time when Watergate was nothing

more than the name of an apartment-office building complex in Washington. That speech by Chief Justice

Burger is reprinted here as a backdrop for the articles which follow it.

The articles selected for this theme consider from various perspectives some problems that arise from the

attorney-judge relationship in the courtroom and the

obligations imposed on the actors in the courtroom drama when we seek to adjudicate legal rights through the adversary system. Leon Jaworski and Paul Connolly,

in their articles, join the dialogue begun by Chief Justice

Burger. Mr. Jaworski warns of the threat to an advocate's independence posed by overbearing and

intimidating judges. Mr. Connolly reminds us of the fine line that exists between good manners and questionable judicial conduct at trial.

Judge Robert C. O'Hara's article is a lengthy analysis of a recent and important report on disruptive courtroom behavior. Ernest J. Getto examines the remedy of

peremptory disqualification of trial judges. Finally, Dean Monroe H. Freedman considers the trilemma faced by an attorney whose client intends to take the stand and give perjured testimony.

These articles do not purport to exhaust the complex problems inherent in attorney-judge relationships in the courtroom. But this first issue of Litigation is an

appropriate forum for initiating a dialogue on that

subject, and we hope the dialogue will continue in future issues of this journal.

RonaldL. Ginns, Associate Editor

7

This content downloaded from 91.229.229.89 on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:53:10 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 5: Front Matter

MINIM

mnA

WIN

Lawyers~~NO anmconanso ra

The first major activity of the Section of Litigation was a National Institute held in Montreal, Canada, on May 30 and 31, 1974. The title of this theme-"Lawyers and Accountants on Trial: Professional Liability"-has been borrowed from the literature announcing that Institute.

The Institute, through a series of panel discussions and workshops featuring a mock trial, explored the many ramifications of securities fraud suits filed recently with accountants and lawyers as defendants. In

particular, the Institute explored the legal bases for

asserting liability against lawyers and accountants in such litigation, the implication of such litigation for

professional liability insurance coverage, and the many unique procedural problems encountered in the trial of such cases. The attendance at the Institute and the reaction of those in attendance show dramatically that the subject matter selected for the Section's first major activity was both timely and of broad concern within the

legal profession. Although a full transcript of the Montreal Institute is

being prepared and will be made available, the editors of this journal believe that further dissemination of the views expressed at the Institute is warranted. For that reason, we have collected under this theme five

representative presentations that were made in Montreal. All five presentations have been adapted from the official transcript to make them more appropriate for

the written-rather than spoken-word.

Chairman Ray Garrett, Jr., of the Securities and

Exchange Commission has adapted his informal luncheon remarks for the article entitled "Problems of Professional Responsibility." In that article, Mr. Garrett discusses the difficulties created for the SEC in

attempting to define the scope of the responsibility to be

imposed upon lawyers and accountants in securities fraud matters.

SEC Commissioner A. A. Sommer, Jr. and Carl D.

Liggio, in their articles, focus on the problems of accountants' liability. Mr. Sommer describes the SEC's effort to adopt a flexible approach to that issue, while

Mr. Liggio raises some provocative questions concerning the consequences of the new threat of liability being asserted against the accounting profession.

John G. Wigmore's article focuses on the efforts of the courts to reconcile common law fraud concepts with the

goals of the federal securities legislation. Finally, Richard H. Murray's article analyzes the impact of the new wave of securities fraud suits on professional liability insurance policies.

The editors believe that the subject matter of this theme warrants continuing examination and we hope to

publish additional materials related to this theme in future issues.

31

This content downloaded from 91.229.229.89 on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:53:10 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions


Recommended