FSR 2009 V 54 N 1

New infra-red film that could change the waywe see crop circles 2

More tall humanoids had appeared in aBritish crop circle a week earlier 3

Editorial: What are these tall humanoidsdoing in our British Crop Circles 5

A newly uncovered alien abduction incidentfrom Poland, 1976. Omega 7

Tank/tube experiences by Helmut Lammer Ph.D. 8

UFOs and antigravity by John Duffield 9

No Name No Pack Drill. Russell Kellett 12

UFO Engineering according to Hill 15

What is the Tilting Secret of the UFO's?Kenneth John Parsons. BEAMS UK 17

My Chequered Past: Descriptions of the shadowpeople. Russell Kellett 18

Mass Contacts A new book On the Friendshipcase and giant humanoids by Italian ufologistStefano Breccia 21

An interview with Stefano Brecciaauthor of Mass Contacts 22

Extraordinary photography taken over late1950s Italy 23

A case with resonance to the theme of the CTRs? 24

Italian Contactee photos published in 1957by Alberto Perago & Bruno Ghibaudi 25

An important letter taken from the FSR archive April1968 27

Caught in the act! July 14th

2009. The arrival of a luminous

UFO and a giant humanoid

figure prior to the creation of

a British crop circle.

A new infra-red film that could change the way

we see crop circlesNew surveillance footage from researcher Winston Keech taken at nightin East Field, Alton Barnes, Wiltshire has revealed an extraordinaryunexpected scene. The incident began in East Field Alton Barnes at12.24am on 14th July 2009. A bright flash captured clearly on infra-redfilm, when slowed down, shows two distinct aerial sphere UFOsentering the perimeter of the field. At the very moment of their arrival agiant flash explodes for fractions of a second revealing thesimultaneous arrival of two self contained beams of light. A very largehumanoid figure flashes white in the field, one that towers over the crop.

The overall bulk of the figure could be compared to the size and bulk ofvery large upright fridge freezer, perhaps 9 foot tall by comparison toheights of known structures such as the height of the crop line itself andthe height of the human hoaxers who arrive just after.

There are two of these tall humanoid figures that appear to floatintelligently among the tramlines and hold a very specific position in thefield where the basket crop circle (seen left) is imminent. These figuresremain on film floating about the field until they depart in another flashat 1.44am. The crucial images are only captured on Winstons highpower infra-red surveillance equipment. Other high resolution camerasoperating simultaneously only capture the 4 human hoaxers operatingin the empty field. This absence on normal high intensity film defines

the tall humanoids as physically different in nature, out of phase with everything else captured in the one hour twenty minute filmsequence. Perhaps they are total net absorbers of visible light without reflection, appearing jet black in normal light, though illuminatedon infra-red.

To merely call these tall humanoids observers, may underestimate their role as upon their arrival at 12.24am the extraordinarypeculiarity of this unique film becomes apparent. Four crop circle hoaxers are seen to proceed across the field to a place exactly wherethese figures are standing before commencing their work; it is as if they are being mind controlled to perform their actions. Thehoaxers are observed by the figures throughout, the tall figures floating around the formation and hoaxers to gain new vantage points.At certain points they stand right next to the hoaxers who seem completely oblivious to their presence. This surveillance film of cropcircle formation by proxy will be shown at our October conference, on the 29th and 30th of October at the Spa complex inScarborough.

Commentary by FSR: What an important shock this film is for all concerned. Winstons surveillance findings reveal the infamous cropcircle hoaxers at work; Winstons hi-tech approach to surveillance is perhaps unique in that it captures an act of hoaxing unbeknownto the hoaxers. We see their actual rate of work, which is laboured due to the complexity of a main three man team, involved in criss-

crossing the wheat implicit in this basket weave crop circle design. It looksas if their slow work rate suggests the ability to create the vastly large andhighly complex formations is beyond them, (as are thermic soildehydration, carbonisation and magnetite particles, and the exponentialoutward distribution of blown stalk nodes that accompany genuine circles).

It now appears that it was the hoaxers on this occasion that were the merepawns of a far greater deception. Human tools used by intelligent tallhumanoids originating from just outside the visible physical realm, in theultra far-red spectrum. For many years this journal has consistentlystated that we are highly vulnerable to mental manipulation by theintelligences behind the UFO phenomenon and that these beings areright here cloaked outside our visual spectrum. If the hoaxers wereindeed under direct mental influence in creating and placing a crop circleby proxy, then it is an unequivocal statement for us to pay attention. Wemust consider what this act of apparent mind control means: they canpatently induce any mental decision process by our brains.

Winston has noted that there was very high humidity both on the night of14th July 2009 (and also on 7th July 2007) when he filmed the formation of

the 777 crop circle, a design of many hundreds of feet in diameter. Were the water droplets on both occasions making it easier for aform of high frequency radar beam to teleport information into our space from somewhere else? When the 777 was filmed onsurveillance footage by Winston it appeared to have been laid down directly into the field in a period of twenty minutes, accompaniedby a flash at the start of the sequence. So perhaps these two films show both sides of the crop circle origin using both direct and indirectmeans, in this case by human proxy, to make the circles. So where does this new surveillance film leave the crop circle researchcommunity? Crop circle researchers like our selves are wrestling with media credibility and a tiny under-resourced research community.Showing a formation is the work of hoaxers apparently influenced by alien humanoids is going to cause major upset. Having listenedto researchers, many have trouble accepting the lifting of the lid on the mystery by Winstons camera technology. It does not fit thepopular vision that the architect of a cosmic plan for humanity could be created by alien technology rather than mother nature ormanifested by spirit. It goes against the popular view of a divine message among crop circle enthusiasts. What if there is in fact anothermore subtle, secretive crop circle arena: an elaborately laid test-bed for human discovery of alien processes, to lure us ever closer tothe alien space they occupy and for the few among us who seek this knowledge: to approach them?

East Field July 15th 2009 courtesy of silent circle

Winston Keech (left) Russell Kellett (centre) and presenterDanny Dyer (right) from a forthcoming BBC Documentary

scheduled for autumn 2009.

More tall humanoids had appeared in a

British crop circle a week earlierTaken from http://thetruthhides.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized

On July 7th 2009 at approximately 5.00am a Wiltshire Police Sergeant was driving in his private car towards Marlborough on theA4 highway and about to pass Silbury Hill on his left. He looked to his right and witnessed three exceptionally tall beingsinspecting the new crop circle which appeared there on the 5th July. He stopped his vehicle and watched them for severalminutes because they stood out as odd.

At first he thought they were forensic officers as they were dressed in white coveralls. He stopped his car and approached thefield. The figures were all over 6ft and had Blonde hair. They seemed to be inspecting the crop. When he got to the edge of thefield he heard what he believed to be a sound not dissimilar to static electricity. This crackling noise seemed to be runningthrough the field and the crop was moving gently, close to where the noise was moving. He felt the hair on his arms and backof his neck raise up. He shouted to the figures from a distance of about 400 yards who at first ignored him, not glancing at him.When he tried to enter the field they looked up and began running. He said They ran faster than any man I have ever seen. Imno slouch but they were moving so fast. I looked away for a second and when I looked back they were gone. I then got scared.The noise was still around, but I got an uneasy feeling and headed for the car. For the rest of the day I had a pounding headacheI couldnt shift.

Flying Saucer Review - Spring 2009 3

ESTABLISHED

1955

Flying Saucer Review. Library of Congress copyright.FSR Publications Ltd, 1981.

Contributions appearing in this magazine do not necessarilyreflect its policy and are published without prejudice.

HOW TO REACH US AT FSR:-

FSR Publications Ltd,

PO Box 585, Rickmansworth WD3 1YJ, UK

or email:

[email protected]

www.fsr.org.uk

Volume 54 - No. 1 Spring 2009

One of Winstons giant humanoids is illuminated by a flash travelling from just in front of it, then moving toward the camera.East Field is an extremely large expanse of space so something has to literally be towering over or indeed levitating above the

crop to stand out and to be so brightly illuminated by the flash at such a distance.

Further comments by the original investigator.

The beings sounded not too dissimilar to beings ArthurShuttlewood encountered in Warminster, and the presence ofthe static electricity running along the ground wasdocumented in these encounters too.

Having driven the route with the officer several times, severalthings became apparent: When we arrived at the locationwhere he parked his car (side of the road) he pointed to wherethe beings were, according to the officer one was very near thebrow of the hill, one was a few yards further down in a differenttramline, and one was about halfway down the slight hill. So Iasked the $64,000,000 question about the fact that theformation couldnt be seen from the road. His response wasthat he knew prior to the experience there was a formationsomewhere over there (he had heard this discussed) and heknew they had been in it. He knew they were inspecting thecrop. When questioned how he knew he said that you knowwhat day of the week it is, but no-one has told you, you haventseen a calendar, you just know. Did he have some psychicawareness? Was something communicated to him? This is aman who views the world in the black and white of the letter ofthe law, this is a man whose testimony can imprison someone,in my humble opinion he is not taken to flights of fancy with

metaphysical concepts. I am reminded of Mike Boothsexperience of seeing some objects working on creating acircle in a field and the psychic element of that experience. Ithink his original statement of figures in the formation was ageneralization based on his knowledge and what we havelearned later. I also think that if his motive was to create a storyhe wouldnt have fallen for this basic error, his story wouldhave knitted together better.

We moved on to the figures running away at speed. If two ofthem were so close to the brow of the hill, how much runningwould he actually see? One of them would have disappearedinstantly as they were near the brow of the hill. He says thatthey moved very fast, as if you were watching a video or DVDin fast forward mode. This would have been noticeable for thebeing farthest from the hill brow. As we spoke I watched thehairs on the officers arms raise as he relived the experience inhis mind. When I asked whether they ran away out of sight ordisappeared he was adamant they disappeared. He claimedhe glanced away for a second and his claims that the beingthat was the furthest away was not near enough the brow ofthe hill for him to run out of view despite his rapid movement.Again, there is a deep knowing they disappeared. As westood by the side of the road he became very nervous of thepeople gathering at the busy Silbury Hill car park, I believe thisexperience has left a mark deeper than he realizes.

After showing me where he tried to enter the field we drove tohis home. We drove the route, and relived the experienceseveral times. The last three times I timed the route, and askedhim about how long each stage of the experience lasted, andfor the three journeys I timed we have a five minutediscrepancy. Now, even allowing for a busier road (it wasMarlborough Jazz festival last weekend) and how quiet itwould have been the morning of the experience, the timingsdo not add up and I believe wehave five minutes missing time.

As a clinical hypnotherapist I havedone quite a bit of work withexperiencers over the years so Ihave got quite adept at spottingmissing time. His wife also verifiesthe time of his arrival home on thatday, and it tallies with my belief

Silent Circle 2009

Nicky Young photography / Silent Circle 2009

4 Flying Saucer Review - Spring 2009

http://www.silentcircle.co.uk


there is at least five minutes missing time. At the moment theofficer does not wish to explore this missing time.

After the experience the officer suffered what he calledpoltergeist experiences. Several electrical items began tomalfunction and there were strange knocks at the front door.When the officer answered the door there would be no-onethere. The officer felt he had brought something home withhim, several days after the experience he said that he had felta presence within his home. Sometimes, when walking outto the kitchen, he said he saw in his minds eye a briefflash of a towering black figure (approx 8ft) standingbefore him. These types of events are quite common withexperiencers.

A few days after the experience the officer felt there werepieces of the experience coming to mind that he was not atfirst aware of. He came to believe that the beings wereidentical, in a clone-like manner but also sharedintelligence, almost in a hive-like mentality. He alsobelieves that these beings were not responsible for this orany crop circle. He also went on to state that he shouldnthave seen what he had seen, and believes this wascommunicated to him at the time. He doesnt know wherethis information came from and these concepts andthoughts are outside his usual frame of reference.

I am quite convinced that the officer had an experience thatday, and one that we have not fully explored as I think with theunusual movement of the beings, the missing time and thepoltergeist type experiences after the event, just to name a few,there is too much additional information to say this issomething in nothing. I do not believe the officer has theknowledge to create this story to the detail he has. A cursoryglance on his bookcase in his living room and his study revealno books that would suggest a knowledge or belief in UFOs,parapsychology or the paranormal. His cursory interest in cropcircles comes from an experience his daughter had and howcrop circles affect policing in the Wiltshire area (increasedtraffic, irate farmers, reports of damage to crops etc).

Through the original release of this information several peoplehave come forward to claim similar experiences within thesame area over the last few years. Most of these stories haveexcellent leads to follow up on. I believe that this area aroundSilbury is especially important, just as much now as it was forthe original builders, and I believe we will see more of thesetypes of incidents in the future. The officer is planning to use apolice sketch artist from another police authority to produceimages from the experience.

Editorial: What are these tall humanoids doingin our British Crop Circles?

The word humanoid was allegedly coined by FSR editorsBowen and Creighton right at the beginning, of the saucer erawhen these reports were first coming in. Firstly, to understandthe humanoid perspective, one must shift to a decisiveposition to make any sense of the presence of tall blondeextra-dimensional people in our British fields and in ourhomes. Witnesses have encountered humanoids repeatedlyhere in the UK since the 1950s, most are too fearful to comeforward. There is still a conservative element among UFOresearchers that displays a superior attitude that the very ideaof human looking aliens being taken seriously is absurd. Toignore such strong eyewitness statements is to be blind to newinclusive working models that may seek to explain thehumanoids.

Here is a recent email to FSR:

I have just read some of the articles in your FSR pages andthose of contact. I just wondered about my own experiencewhich took place towards the beginning of 2009.

I was asleep in my bedroom, when for some unknown reasonI was to find myself suddenly and startlingly awake.

This all took place in the hours of darkness. As I came into theconscious state, there standing at the bottom of my bed, weretwo, human like figures. I would estimate their heightsomewhere around at least 6 feet, both were identicallydressed in seemed in a one piece long flowing robes, colourseemed something like Oatmeal with maybe small dots all overthe material. Their hair seemed also identical, long and fair, orblond, it was hard to say in the gloom the only light comingfrom the outside of my bedroom windows.

Then it seemed I realised what had awoken me, it was theireyes, very dark (Black) and I felt boring right into me. I gavewhat I will call a loud reflex shout, and at that point the twofigures just disappeared either into thin air or through the wall.My wife heard me shout, I told her what I had just awoken to.

My first sighting of a Flying Saucer was in broad daylight in theearly 1950's but we have seen other objects over the years. Ioften wondered as I looked up at this silver circular flyingobject, did anyone on board look down at me? Who knows?Well that is my story, I have no idea who or what those twobeings were, or what dimension they may have visited from.

FSR 50/4 featured acontact case fromJuly 1994 at thesame point ofobservation asWinston Keechsinfra-red footage inEast Field. Six tallblonde cloneswearing nuns cowlsinteracted with afemale witness onthat occasion aftershe observed themswaying as ifdancing information in thefield. When askedwhat they weredoing they statedthat they weredowsing andfeeling the energyunder their feet.

A selection of the most pertinent descriptive details include:the medieval pageboy hair styling, the near identical faces withblue eyes, the large robust facial anatomy and deep set eyes,the pallid complexion with blonde hair, and the characteristicDutch-German accents. The beings proceeded to disappearbehind the witness two at a time, as she watched them fromher car wing mirror.

What limits the written word is the absence of direct contactwith the experience by even the learned reader, in the case ofthe humanoid encounter, an alien person seen in plain visionis all that is needed to be wholly aware of what is, rather thanendless circular debates of what cannot be. The fiction forcountless Britons is to have no concept at all that encountershappen, to be ignorant that people are reporting tall uprightmen and women like us and far less of these small alien greys.If FSR has a key function it is to break with the perceivedwisdom, if what is perceived to be true is found to be weak anddoes not account for the reported core evidence.

The key question in July 2009 is why these particularhumanoids were seen in British crop circles? If we look at thepolicemens story he observed an electrostatic environment

The July 1994 figure

crackling over the crop circle as the alien figures stood in theday old formation. There was also a characteristic rising andfalling to the crop formation, described on other occasions bywitnesses as a kind of breathing movement. As if an energyfield was actively emerging from the earth beneath the crop.Were these humanoids involved in monitoring or creating aspecific electrostatic process, in effect energising a cropcircle? Winston Keechs covert humanoid films suggest thatthese humanoids will quite readily adapt man-made circles fortheir own agenda. Perhaps they can electro-statically imprintprograms into an existing circle in order to radiate a specificenergy for a specific purpose.

When we consider the purpose of their clandestine actions, wemight consider the human effect of what a crop circle visit cando to someone. Overall most visitors merely have their worldview and curiosity briefly peaked by a crop circle visit, yet ifone listens to certain crop circle visitors and compare theirstories to abductees, and or UFO witnesses a striking similarityemerges. Some among these people have sudden dramaticperceptual changes in their lives, radical change in their lifepriorities, in how they feel and how they live. Their stories arelike listening to spiritual conversion experiences, where theyreturn home from the circle they immediately change their job;

they may even leave their spouse and unexplainably re-editeverything they hold dear. If a crop circle can have an effect ofthis magnitude, to switch on, convert and overwrite onesfundamental perspective, splitting open the identity in this wayis a powerful mind altering tool, acting in a way we do not yetgrasp.

Are those who become activated intended to go and seek analien communication as in Close Encounters of the ThirdKind? Are they especially receptive or susceptible to thisconversion process? Those who undergo this effect are oftenhighly educated with established careers; these are nothippies or people who willingly opt out of society. The cropcircle appears to filter out a small section of its visitors who arein effect the crop circle contactees. Is this conversion anextension of a historic grand program: Warminster in the1960s and 1970s; Adamskis book Flying Saucers haveLanded both had just the same mass catalytic effect. If we seethe product of these blonde humanoid spacemen in theseaccounts, old and new, it is to collude with an inspired sectorof our society to seek to open up to a cosmic paradigmchange. Is this an experiment, a crude dress rehearsal toswitch on and convert humanity to become seekers; is this atechnology capable of bewitching us as a race?


This superb image was captured in Stewarttown Ontario Canada in 2003. The cloaked figure was unseen. The circle formationitself was an accurate star map of the Pleiades star system.

A newly uncovered alien abduction incident

in Poland, 1976. Omega. Summer 2009.Deep in the Australian central outback, Yan recounted anincident that occurred back in Kielce, Poland in the summer of1976. It was his one and only event, he has not experiencedanything else to this date. In the days leading up to the event,nothing unusual happened; it was like any other day,

according to Yan. To begin the events, Yan went to bed asusual in his first floor apartment. During the early hours of themorning Yan made a visit to the bathroom. What happened toYan next would defy human logic.


Omega: I would like to take you back to the event which occurred in theearly hours of the night, in the summer of 1976.

Yan: I awoke during the night to go to the bathroom, when I was aboutto return to the bedroom, I noticed a very bright light streaming throughthe window. It illuminated the whole room.

Omega: What colour was this light, were you afraid?

Yan: No, I wasn't afraid at all. The light was a very bright, white light. Itwas almost too bright to look at.

Omega: Where was the light emanating from did you see anything else?

Yan: From the bright light I noticed a being coming through the light.

Omega: Was the being human like?

Yan: Not really. The being had short, stumpy arms to the elbow, then verylong, thin for arms. The hand almost reached the floor. This part of thearm was very long and spindly. The entity had one eye. Here is a strangething about his eye, when the being was conveying telepathic thoughtsto me; I noticed there seemed to be two smaller pupils inside the oneeye. These pupils seemed to move independently within the main eye.

Omega: Did you notice if the being had fingers and if so, how many?

Yan: The entity had three fingers and one thumb. The middle finger wasvery long, but the other two digits either side were slightly shorter. The

body of the being was covered in small bumps, very similar to a frog skin. The head of the entity was quite large but it had noneck. One thing I noticed was it seemed to have a brain or a bulbous part of the cranium, at the back of his head. This seemedto radiate much energy, I could see around the head as if the air was electrically charged.

Omega: What colour was this being?

Yan: I have to say that the entity seemed to have scales or bumps all over it's body, each scale seemed to be metallic. Thewhole body seemed to be reflecting bluish light, very similar to Mother of Pearl. The colour changed slightly.

Omega: What were your feelings at this point?

Yan: I had a very strong feeling of euphoria; I seemed to have a telepathic voice in my head saying (in Polish) "Stay calmdon'tbe afraid." At no time did I experience any angst.

Omega: Was there any type of odour accompanying the event?

Yan: Yes, there was a very strong smell of vanilla, very thick but very pleasant.

Omega: Can you explain what the entities actions were at that time?

Yan: The 'being' put his hand up with palm facing me. At no time did he touch me but his palm was very close to my skin. It wasat this time I could hear a hissing sound, very similar to wasps. The being seemed to be inspecting me. I felt that his handseemed to have x-ray abilities.

Omega: Did the being stay in your room or did he leave?

Yan: What happened next was very strange. Myself and the being started to levitate. We were heading for the closed window; Ithought I would have to open the window at this time, as we were very close. Instead, we flew through the closed window withease.

Omega: Did you levitate up and into a craft?

Yan: No, it was not a craft per se, but a large box of some kind. The box was as large as a bus. We seemed to fly through thewalls of the black box. Now, here is another strange thing which I have tried to work out for quite some time, it is the dimensions


of the ship, but to this day can not figure it out. When we werein the box, the inside seemed huge, far larger than the outsideof the object. Inside there were about twenty or so of thesebeings. They looked the same as the entity who accompaniedme, but their sizes were slightly different. They all were aboutthe same height, about four feet, but some were a little wider,others were slightly thinner.

Omega: Were you able to hear any sound in the box?

Yan: There was the same sound of a wasp, being given by allof the entities. It became very loud. At this time, they all cameclose to me and stood around in a semi circle. All of the beingsheld their right hand palm facing me, they came very close.Some had their hand near my feet, other palms near myhands, heart and head. They seemed to be checking out myinsides. This seemed to be an x-ray of some kind.

Omega: Were you able to breathe their atmosphere?

Yan: Yes, the air seemed to be thick moisture of some kind. Ihad the distinct impression that the beings were able toabsorb the thick atmosphere through their skin, as a type ofnutrient for them. I thought that maybe I might drown in thisthick fluid and would not be able to breathe but no, I couldbreathe quite well. Every time they came close to me I feltwarm. To this day I have an itching sensation under my skin,where they held their palm close to me. It feels like electricityor ants crawling under my skin.

Omega: How long were you in the box and how did you returnto your bedroom?

Yan: I could have been in the ship for about 2 hours, but, hereis another strange thing time seemed to stand still, I had no

idea of time, it seemed not to exist. The same entity which wasresponsible for my abduction, took me back to my room. Wewere gliding through the walls of the box, then through thewalls of my bedroom. I then went to sleep.

Omega: How did you sleep?

Yan: I had a very fitful sleep, I am now had a feeling that I hada brain storm. Flashing images filled my brain, as if everythingI had seen during my life was being replayed. I felt that theyopened my brain. I didn't receive anything from them but Ithink they came to analyze me. The only thing they told mewas to keep calm, everything would be alright, be happy.

Post-script: Even today, more than thirty years after theincident, Yan is still troubled by headaches, fitful sleep and stillexperiences itching sensations under his skin on a daily basis.In spite of this, Yan has a very positive outlook of his closeencounter, and says he would willingly go through theexperience again if the chance came to do so. Of special notein this case are two important points:

1. The auditory buzzing and itching of the skin that resemblesthe microwave mental communication theory of Spanishresearcher Joaquim Fernandes featured in our last issue53.4.

2. The description of a breathable fluid environment inside thecraft.

The late U.S. UFO researcher Carla Turner features animportant discussion by an Austrian scientist and MUFONmember Helmut Lammer from 1995 on her web sitehttp://www.karlaturner.org. An extract is featured here:

Tank/tube experiencesby Helmut Lammer Ph.D.:

An extract taken from looking behind the alien/military abduction agenda.

Dan Wright, head of the MUFON Abduction TranscriptionProject, reviewed his records concerning tube or tankexperiences of alleged alien abductees. He found severalcases in his files in which the abductee saw a tube duringher/his experience, but did not identify anything or anyoneinside it. In 4 cases abductees described large clear tubes andrecalled either being placed inside it or seeing someone elseinside. Two of these 4 abductees saw an alien creature in thetube. Dan Wright's files reveal 3 cases in which the abducteewas in a tank filled with liquid and in two cases the victim wasforced to breathe the liquid! None of the abductees whoplaced in a tube or tank reported any unusual mind set likeAndree (out of body experience, remote viewing, or the like)during their time in these containers. ''Two'' of seven tank casesreported military involvement, but not on the same night as thetube or tank episode.

MILAB victim Lisa (pseudonym) had similar tank experienceslike Dan Wright's alien abductees. She was kidnapped andbrought to a military underground facility, where she sawnaked humans floating in tubes. Lisa for instance claims thatshe was forced by humans into some type of pool filled with agolden yellow bubbly fluid, while other humans looked at her.Lisa has traumatic recollections that her kidnappers tried tomake her and other victims able to breath in the liquid. In twoof the before mentioned cases the abductee was forced tobreath the liquid like Lisa. The hypnosis transcripts reveal thatthe liquid breathing experiences were traumatic for theabductees. Both abductees where totally immersed in theliquid and both reported that they could breath the fluid.

Alien abductees, such as Betty Andreason report sometimesthat they were put inside a tube filled with liquid for thecompensation of large gravity forces during high UFOacceleration periods. One abductee of Dan Wright's files

describes such an experience inside such a tube:

''it's like water in there, it's like being in a swimming pool, onlyI can see through the sides...it feels like we are moving. Whereare we going? Whoa, thats fast. Feels like we are moving fast.Oh! And one's standing outside. He's telling me, ''Thats whywe had to put you in here, because we are moving too fast.''Acceleration. Something about gravity forces being too much.''

It is interesting to note that under hypnosis this abducteereported how the abductors put something in her nose beforethey put her in the tube. This means that this abductee was notforced to breathe the liquid. Recent scientific studies of visualand photographic sightings of UFOs carrying out ''impossible''high speed manoeuvres by Dr. Bruce Maccabee wouldsupport such gravity force compensation tube experiences ifthe abductee was indeed in a real UFO. Dr. Bruce Maccabeestated in his article ''Acceleration'', that an UFOnaut orabductee inside a UFO accelerating at 500 g's would bepushed by the walls of the craft with a force that would makehim seem weigh almost 500 times his weight on Earth. Thebody of an abductee might be crushed at that acceleration,and the skin might be pulled off the bones, unless the humanwas suspended in a liquid and the lungs and other bodycavities were filled with liquid!

FSR Comment: The long standing question of whether thereare lethal effects of extreme acceleration on board UFOs isscientifically tackled in this issue by science author JohnDuffield. Duffield has written a very enjoyable and accessiblebook on Einsteins theories and more called RELATIVITY+,The Theory of Everything. As with the vital work of IgorWitkowski in recent issues, FSR will continue to publish rationalscientific reasoning on the flying saucer. A simplifiedexplanation follows the article.


When I see apicture ofMandelbrot cropcircles, my eyesroll. When I seesomebody toutingsome UFO hub-cap home movie,I sigh. And when Ihear peopletalking aboutabductions andimplants and leylines, I have to sayI groan. The

reason is there's tons of chaff out there, and it buries thegolden nuggets, and gives UFOs a bad name. Let's get onething clear: UFOs exist. There are objects in our skies that areunidentified, and they are flying. Some might turn out to bebirds, others might be planes. Some will be balloons, ormeteors, or the planet Venus. But not all. When an airline pilotsays he was buzzed by something that turned on a sixpence,I take it seriously. I remain alert to reports that involve rapidacceleration, particularly from multiple impartial witnesses. Ihave a special reason for this. Eleven years ago in July 1998,I was enjoying a last cigarette at the back of the house. It wasa clear night, and the stars were burning bright. I noticed onestar that appeared to be moving, very slowly, from north tosouth. At first I wondered if it was a satellite, but then I decidedit was an aircraft. As I watched, I was a little surprised to seeanother star moving from the south towards it. They didn'tmeet; instead when they were a thumbnail apart they changeddirection instantly. Suddenly the first star was tracking east, theother one west. It wasn't much to look at, but I felt a shiver asI said to myself: planes don't do that. I ran for my camera andtook a series of pictures, but they came out black, so I have noevidence. When I've told people about it, all too often theresponse is an indulgent smile. But I know what I saw, andever since then, I've been curious about how an object in thesky can defy the laws of physics. But that was then, this is now,and now I know how they do it.

Imagine you're in a spacecraft travelling at a constant velocity.You'd be floating around pushing yourself off the walls, doingsomersaults and playing games with globules of water. Nowimagine that I magic up a planet beneath you, and you startfalling towards it. You're still weightless, you don't feel the forceof gravity, and you wouldn't notice any change in directionunless you looked out of the window. In a way you're notreally accelerating - the principle of equivalence comparesacceleration with the force you feel when you're standingon the ground, not with the free-fall situation. You continueto fall in an arc towards the planet, then with a snap of myfingers I make the planet go away, and you continue travellingin a new direction. We can repeat this scenario with a smallerdenser planet that provides a more intense gravitational field,so tightening the curve, but at no point will you be thrownaround like in a swerving car. You don't feel a thing, becauseyou're in free-fall all the time. When we replace the planetwith an artificially-generated gravitational field, you end up

making sharp turns without being mashed against the insideof your spaceship. Thus you defy inertia. If we employ anartificially-generated gravitational field in opposition to theEarth's, you defy gravity too.

It's important to appreciate here that when Einstein came upwith general relativity in 1916, he was talking about theequations of motion, not curved space-time. Curved space-time was popularised by Robert H. Dicke in the sixties, and it'sthe effect, not the cause. To understand this, think in terms ofa boating lake, where I've previously dumped a truckload ofgelatine powder all down the left hand side. You wind up aclockwork boat and send it beetling up the lake, and younotice it veers over to the left. That's because there's aviscosity gradient from left to right. The boat represents aphoton, and the path of the boat represents curved space-time. But the cause of that curved path, is a gradient in space.It's actually a gradient in vacuum impedance Z0 = (0/e0)wherein the speed of light is c = (1/e00).

The speed of light varies, andthat's why light curves and whythings fall down. If you've everheard of pair productionyou'll know that a photon canbe employed to make anelectron and a positron. Theelectron exhibits spin andangular momentum, and youcan think of it as a clockworkboat with the rudder jammedhard over. Wind it up and set it

down on the boating lake, and it goes round and round incircles. But whenever it's heading up or down the lake, it'sveering slightly over to the left because of the viscositygradient. Hence it works its way over to the left-hand side. Itreally is like this, and surprisingly, it goes all the way back toNewton. If you've got a copy of Opticks, check out queries 20and 21, and what you read is this:

"Doth not this aethereal medium in passing out of water, glass,crystal, and other compact and dense bodies in empty spaces,grow denser and denser by degrees, and by that means refractthe rays of light not in a point, but by bending them gradually incurve lines? Is not this medium much rarer within the densebodies of the Sun, stars, planets and comets, than in the emptycelestial space between them? And in passing from them togreat distances, doth it not grow denser and denserperpetually, and thereby cause the gravity of those great bodiestowards one another, and of their parts towards the bodies;every body endeavouring to go from the denser parts of themedium towards the rarer?"

He got the energy density back to front, but it's close enough,and in query 30 you can even read him anticipating pairproduction with "Are not gross bodies and light convertible intoone another?" Even more surprising is the fact that Einsteintalked about the variable speed of light. See chapter 22 ofRelativity: The Special and General Theory. What you read isthis:

"In the second place our result shows that, according to thegeneral theory of relativity, the law of the constancy of thevelocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of the twofundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity andto which we have already frequently referred, cannot claim anyunlimited validity. A curvature of rays of light can only take placewhen the velocity of propagation of light varies with position.

UFOs and antigravityby John Duffield


Now we might think that as a consequence of this, the specialtheory of relativity and with it the whole theory of relativity wouldbe laid in the dust. But in reality this is not the case. We canonly conclude that the special theory of relativity cannot claiman unlimited domain of validity; its results hold only so long aswe are able to disregard the influences of gravitational fields onthe phenomena (e.g. of light)".

Einstein didn't actually use the word velocity. He spokeGerman, and the word he used was geschwindigkeit. It meansboth speed and velocity, and since the postulate of specialrelativity was the constant speed of light, this is Einsteintelling us the speed of light varies, and that's why thingsfall down. UFOs don't fall down, and they aren't riding onreaction thrust like a rocket, or winging it on deflected airflowlike an aircraft. Instead they're using antigravity. They cangenerate a gravitational field and use it to turn corners andoppose the earth's gravitational field. It might sound likescience fiction, but it's simple. It's like there's a little man inyour clockwork boat throwing jello bombs into the water tomake the boat veer to the right. You've even seen a form ofantigravity already. It's called diamagnetic levitation. Thepyrolytic carbon floating above the magnets isn't a magnet,and it doesn't fall down:

Note however thatthis operates via the" h e l i c o p t e r "principle, which is alittle clunky. There'sa far more elegant"dirigible" principlewhich gets rightdown to thefundamentals ofelectrodynamics. Itgoes back toMaxwell andFaraday, but there'sa nice clue inM i n k o w s k i ' swrench. Take a lookat his Space andTime paper, and twopages from the end,there's this:

"Then in the description of the field produced by the electronwe see that the separation of the field into electric andmagnetic force is a relative one with regard to the underlyingtime axis; the most perspicuous way of describing the twoforces together is on a certain analogy with the wrench inmechanics, though the analogy is not complete".

This analogy issaying an electricfield is a "twistfield", and if youmove through it orit moves throughyou, you see amagnetic field,which is a "turnfield". This is whywe havegenerators anddynamos, and theright-hand rule:

To understand this, think of a single electron. It exhibits aspherical electric field. Now think of a string of electronsarranged in a vertical line. The electric field is more cylindrical.Now move down the line of electrons, and you see this electric

field as a magnetic field. It's the same when the electrons movepast you as per the current going up the wire. For some realhands-on intuitive grasp, find a drill-bit or a reamer whichexhibits a twist. Grip it in your right hand, put your left thumbon the bottom of it, and push. It turns. The electric field doesn'tcreate the magnetic field, it's the same thing. That's why it's theelectromagnetic field. People say it's fundamental, but it isn'tfundamental enough, because you create electrons with theirelectromagnetic field via pair production. You started with aphoton, and to get right down to the true fundamentals wehave to look at a photon more closely. It exhibits a sinusoidalelectromagnetic field variation like this:

Whilst the positive and negative fieldvariation means there's no charge, itdoes tell us that there's current goingfirst one way then the other. It'salternating current, which is why

impedance Z0 = (0/e0) applies. Since we're talking abouttwist and turn, and since the photon conveys energy, andsince the dimensionality of energy is pressure x volume, thephoton's sinusoidal field-variation is giving us the shape of apressure pulse propagating through space at c:

It's essentially a space warp, akin to a lemon, in that the twistrises to a maximum a quarter-way along its length, and thengoes to zero at the midpoint, then to a maximum the other way,and finally back to zero. The pressure "conditions" thesurrounding space, which you can see better in the cubic-lattice drawing below:

The electromagnetic field is where the squares are twisted outof true, and the gravitational field is the surrounding pressuregradient. The pressure alters permittivity e0 which is"twistability", and also the permeability 0, the reciprocal ofwhich is "turnability". In essence it makes space stronger. Atthe fundamental level, gravity is the result of a gradient invacuum impedance Z0 = (0/e0) wherein the speed of lightc = (10/e0) is subject to a similar gradient. Gravity doesn'tcause the gravitational time dilation that reduces the non-localspeed of light. That's back to front - we use the motion of lightto calibrate our clocks. It's the gradient in the speed of light

Images by Splarka, seehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamagnetism

Image by Rnkv2, \

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-hand_rule

Image by Heron reproduced under the terms of the GNU FDL,see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light


that causes gravity. And it's energy that causes thegradient in the speed of light.

It's a little like the rubber-sheet analogy. Get rid of the bowlingball and tie a knot in the rubber sheet instead. The knotrepresents the matter/energy of a planet, and surrounding it isa tension gradient. Now turn the rubber sheet into a rubberblock, and flip things around so it's under pressure rather thantension. The planet is creating a pressure gradient in thesurrounding space. As an aside, there's also a gradient in therelative strength of electromagnetic force versus the strongforce, as demonstrated by the fact that the fine structureconstant a = e/2e0hc is a "running" constant, meaning gravityis itself an exhibition of the unification of the forces.

So how do we actually make a pressure gradient? It's actuallyvery simple, we do it every day. Radio engineers know allabout it. It's the "near field", the region close to a transmitter.It's what's called an evanescent wave. It's a standing wave,like a bow wave on a boat or a bridge pier. There's even one inyour kitchen, in your microwave cooker. But that's too small,and is merely a by-product. Instead of throwing out a signaland dissipating most of the power in an outgoing pressurepulse, we want to keep it there and pump it up. Whilst themagnetron in your microwave is like blowing a whistle, whatwe want to do is blow up a balloon. That's why it's akin to adirigible. We need to pump up the pressure and let thegradient counteract the earth's gravitational field. We needradio wavelengths for this, because the near-field region istypically half a wavelength in extent. And we need somepower. We're probably talking big current and big voltage, so Idon't feel like messing around in my garage. To get the ballrolling we lean a short-wave HRS antenna on its side, we set ahosepipe flowing and watch the arc of water. Once we've gotsomething basic going, we then figure out how to handle it sowe can do a fast inflation then swing round the gradient to turnon a sixpence. There's doubtless lessons already learned fromradar here. Magnetrons are used in radar, along withconsiderable computing power. We need to turn thatcomputing power around to set the pulse location andintensity instead of decoding a signal. Then we ramp things upa little. Think medium wave. Think long wave.

Of course, there is no free lunch. Think back to that circlingclockwork boat working its way over to the left-hand-side ofthe lake. Only half the cycle is heading up or down the lake,which is why light is deflected twice as much as matter. Butmore to the point, once it's over on the left hand side, the boatis circling slower. Some of the circling motion was converted

into lateral motion, and in similar vein the kinetic energy of afalling body comes from the body itself. Neglecting airresistance, the body will hit the earth at 11 km/s. That's a lot ofkinetic energy, and it's been bled out of the body by virtue ofthe reducing c. Assuming the body survives the impact andcools down, its total energy is now less than it was in freespace. And if we use antigravity to lift that body, we aren'tputting any energy back. Lift it too far, too fast, and everyatom of that body is going to go cold. We're talking deepcold here, limb-shattering cold. So we'll have to take care.But it won't get in our way, not now we know how simple it allis. Not now we can see what was always there in specialrelativity: electrons are made of light, along with protons, andour rods and clocks. We are made of light. That's why wealways measure the speed of light to be the same, and why wecan never go faster than light. That won't get in our way either,because of the time dilation, so the road lies open. A coldwind's been blowing, but now the future is bright. Doesanybody know anybody with a few radio and radar engineerson the staff? And who's up for a trip to Mars? After that wewon't be reaching for Mars any more. I look up to the night skyand feel another shiver: we'll be reaching for the stars.

A summary of Johns theory in laymans terms:

If you are walking in the snow, and the snow is deepertowards your left hand side, then there will be more dragon your left foot. (If you haven't walked in snow, imaginewalking in wet mud instead). This means your left foot willbe inclined to take slightly shorter steps because of theextra drag of the snow. So you will tend to veer to the left,towards where the snow is deeper.

That is similar to how gravity works in three dimensions.Gravity in space is like the depth of snow over a field, thedrag depends on the depth of the snow. If the depth ofsnow varies from one side to the other side of the field,then the drag will be different. This difference in drag iscalled a "viscosity gradient".

UFO's operate by manipulating this "viscosity gradient" inspace. It's similar to someone throwing extra snow in frontof them, more towards one side of their path, to alter theirspeed and direction.

Gravity is normally thought of as curved space-time, but itscaused by a gradient in space, which in turn is caused by thecentral matter-energy of a planet. We can counter this gradientusing a magnetic field to keep a frog suspended in the air. Itscalled diamagnetic levitation and it works like a helicopter.Diamagnetic levitation is like a corkscrew, but think in terms ofa corkscrew motion rather than a force. Think of a wirecorkscrew, akin to a helical spring, and a small ring, Assumingno friction, that ring will slide round and round and down likea helter-skelter. Now rotate the corkscrew and the ring goesround and round but not down. The corkscrew is going upinstead

However a better way to counter the gradient is to use theevanescent wave which surrounds a radio transmitter. Thisworks like a dirigible balloon. The point is that you dont wantany radio output. Ideally we want a way to create theevanescent wave without radiating any power. By doing so ina controlled fashion you can defy gravity and inertia, but if youclimb too fast you go too cold because you arent adding anyenergy to the system.

John Duffield is the author of RELATIVITY+, The Theory ofEverything, available at Amazon.co.uk and Waterstone's.

John Duffield creates vortices in a pool to illustrate electronspin and positron interactions might appear in matter-anti-

matter annihilation reactions.

I grew up around Loran Radar Stations, and from what I knowabout 'free electric current' it does produce density that isdefinitely noticeable in many different ways. We would jokinglyplay catch with volcanic rocks close to the radar stations justbecause it altered the physics of how the rocks flew, not bymuch, but strangely enough to have fun as a kid.

Kodiak Island is full of volcanic or porous rock materials, whichmakes them prone to electromagnetic influence I guess, andlighter than normal rocks, which seems to help. We just likedlobbing them up into the air and watching them fall. They justtumbled wrong. Not a suspension, not a push, just... slightlyoff... different. You would see them go up and come down alljust the same, but their behaviour for doing so was likewatching a professional tumbler jump and have their inner ear

flood mid jump and use their training to keep their fall stable,though it now lacked all signs of grace. That's the best way Ican think of to describe it".

LORAN (LOng RAnge Navigation) is a terrestrial radionavigation system using low frequency radio transmitters thatuses multiple transmitters (multilateration) to determinelocation and/or speed of the receiver. The current version ofLORAN in common use is LORAN-C, which operates in the lowfrequency portion of the EM spectrum from 90 to 110 kHz.Many nations are users of the system, including the UnitedStates, Japan, and several European countries. Russia uses anearly identical system in the same frequency range, calledCHAYKA. LORAN use is in steep decline, with GPS being theprimary replacement.


A possible clue for a "near field" in the region

close to a transmitter evanescent wave.A chance conversation about radar by John revealed the following important description from a witness:

Where are the unopened opened UK files? After an announcement in December 2007 of a three yearrolling program for the staged release of the BritishGovernments official UFO files, May and October 2008, Marchand August 2009 saw in the first two phases of this release.Even the most gullible of ufologists understood that theseboring dusty old files, bursting with insignificance, did notrepresent the cases of consequence.

Russell Kellett now presents an important new and alternativeUK file for those of us in the British public who have thematurity to acknowledge the alien threat is real, as illustratedin this new case from the 1955. NATO and Soviet strategic air

command potentially set the full weight of their air forces oncollision course as both mistook a UFO wing flying acrossCentral Europe from East to West as warplanes. This couldhave gone all the way to triggering a nuclear exchange, andsurely the UFO pilots knew that overflying this part of Europeat the height of the cold war was a high risk manoeuvredangerous to world peace. As you will read, these UFO pilotsalso understood when it was time to jump away when a wingof US Sabre fighters intercepted them and were then orderedto challenge and fire. You wont find UFO files like these beingreleased any time soon from the M.O.D.

Where are the missing 10,000 files?Gordon Creighton wrote in FSR 28.5 (1983) under the heading"White Wash and Blather Department" The Daily Mail(05/03/82) report on The Earl of Clancarty (Former FSR EditorBrinsley le Poer Trench) asked a question in the house ofLords the previous day, "How many reports of UFOs havebeen received by the MOD during the last 4 years, 1978-1981and what action has been taken about them?" Lord Hill Norton,a former Chief of Britain's Defence Staff, proceeded to drawattention to the extraordinary fact that the whole of theministry's records of UFO sightings for all the years prior to1962 have been destroyed because someone had decidedthat they were of no interest!" The minister Lord Long repliedthat all UFO reports received since 1967 were being preservedat present. Prior to 1967, said Lord Long, the five yeardestruction rule had been generally applied.

Creighton continues, all this is extremely interesting, for ithappens that way back in 1956, Mr David Wightman, then

editor of the now defunct UFO research magazine Uranus, inthe company of Mr John Pitt, a professional journalist who hadpreviously served in British Military Intelligence, were granteda two-hour interview with a senior official of the British AirMinistry for the purpose of discussing the matter of UFOs. Thisappeared in Uranus Vol.2, No. 6 and Vol.3 No.3, also FSRVol.2, No.5 (September 1956).

The most important thingthat Messrs Wightman and Pittdiscovered in their interview at the Air Ministry was that thelatter had, in early 1956, 10,000 UFO reports on file for theperiod 1947-1956. This is almost as many as the U.S. Air Forcewere to claim to have on file (13,134) twelve years later (1968)at the time of the Condon Report! And we are now asked tobelieve that those 10,000 UFO reports 'contained nothing ofinterest,' and had all been destroyed by 1962! Let us say itplainly, here and now. We don't believe a word of it, and onlyimbeciles would believe it.

No Name No Pack Drill. Russell Kellett."A soldier whose kit on parade was unsatisfactory would havehis name taken by the NCO on the orders of the inspectingofficer (see Wilfred Owen's poem Inspection), and would beput on a charge before his company commander. The resultingpenalty would, at one time, probably have included a period ofdrill in full kit ("pack drill"). A good parade was one duringwhich no one's kit was below standard, so no names were

taken, so no pack drill would ensue. Hence the expressionimplying that the fewer names named the better.

Monday 17th August had seen the release of more olddocuments from the M.O.D.s U.F.O. department which hadmade its way into the media from news papers to television &radio, not forgetting the new media of the internet web-sites. Itwas during this period I received a phone call from a man I call


From 1953 to 1955 I was working on radar at Bawdsey inSuffolk, at that time the most advanced in Europe. Mostly I waswith a team working on American FP53 (Fixed Pulse SearchMark 3). It was long range radar penetrating 2000 miles intoRussia. Unfortunately because of the curvature of the Earthand radio waves only travel in straight lines we could onlyreach Moscow and then only if the aircraft were above20.000ft.

Our orders were not to chart local domestic flights orcommercial airlines, only those which might pose a threat toEngland, this was when the cold war was at its height andRussia was being very belligerent. It was very interesting tosee all the traffic in and out of Moscow airport. At times therewere unexplained responses at the very edge of our range.Always the objects were in pairs, travelling at high speed.When I enquired about them, I was told they were nothing butelectrical interference caused by atmospheric pressure (as if!)and that they were not to be plotted so we ignored them, butstill kept an eye on them!

We were on 24 hour alert and our crew worked 4hour shifts.One night in the spring of 1955, we were working midnight till4am when we detected two aircraft leaving Moscow andheading toward London. We thought they were the newIlyushin bombers the Russians had.

We passed on the information to the operations room in thenew complex 200 feet below the cliff top. We were told to seewhat they would do next. They continued on the same course,thats when we started to get worried! The C.O. was arousedand agreed it could be something serious, so he contactedfighter command at Eleven Group HQ. They again checkedwith us and we confirmed that the planes were still coming at300mph at 30,000 feet. Fighter command alerted London wholiaised with Washington. Then they both rang the hot line toMoscow requesting that they recalled their planes who by thenwere approaching Poland.

The Russians denied they were theirs. In fact they thought theywere ours! They had already scrambled a squadron to shootthem down when the planes turned toward London. By then,they were over Germany, still on course. We had airfield radaron our bases in Germany and they also started tracking theplanes but only for a short while as their range was only about50 miles, just enough for ground control at the airports.

I cannot vouch for the reaction of the three governments as allwe got was coming down the grapevine from HQ. When theplanes crossed the German coastline, we requested a flight offighters to intercept. At that time the Spitfire had been phasedout and replaced with Meteors which were faster but still nomatch for the approaching planes. A request was urgently put

to the Americans and they consented to send a flight of SuperSabres.

All this took time. They were now crossing our coast so ourlong range radar was useless so close to home. So we had toresume our watch over Russia. The FP53 control room wassituated on the cliff top as the contractors hadnt finishedlaying the cables to enable us to work underground within themain complex.

Those of us who had free time went down to the ops room inthe complex to watch on another type of radar: GCI mark 7(Ground control interception) which was used to practice dog-fights between the American and British fighters and bombers.This time it was for real and the Type 7 operators took overfrom our FP53. They diverted the American planes to wherethe enemy planes were now circling London until the Sabresown nose radar could make contact.

When that happened, they waited for orders, which were tochallenge them. If there was no response, they were to openfire. By then the U.S. pilots were close enough to make visualcontact. Suddenly we were deafened by all their voicesshouting in amazement. They are not planes, they are roundflat discs! You can imagine the reaction in the ops room whenwe heard the radios screaming these words!

The UFOs ignored the challenge but before the U.S. planescould open fire the UFOs took off vertically at a speed wecouldnt calculate as they were too fast for our equipment. Thenearest calculation we managed was 20,000 mph. That wasthe end of the matter, or so we thought!

At 4am our shift finished and we signed off and went to bed,too excited to really sleep, but eventually we did. We wereawakened early next morning to a terrific hullabaloo all overthe camp. After all the excitement of the previous night wewere terrified the UFOs had landed. The camp was sealed offand full of white helmeted armed US air police, our servicepolice and special branch etc. etc. The perimeter fence waspatrolled 24/7 by armed U.S. police. No-one was allowed in orout. The ferry to Felixstowe was held on the far side of the RiverDeben. We were completely sealed in. Telephones were all cutoff. We were ordered not to talk about this to anyone not evenamongst ourselves or try to communicate to the outside world.

The camp was sealed off for 2 weeks. We had to sign a set ofspecial documents, oath of allegiance, official secrets and alsothe U.S. equivalent forms and ordered never to reveal whathappened. Even telling us we all had been confused andnothing extraordinary had taken place! If that were true: why allthe panic? Every document and tape of the event wasconfiscated until there was not a shred of evidence left aboutthe incident. The official line was mass hysteria. Trainedpilots, air force personnel, computers, radio and radar dontget hysterical.

Comment by FSR: In recent years we have repeatedly read thefollowing statement used by the Ministry of Defence to assurethe public they are fulfilling their duty to protect British subjects:

The Ministry of Defence does not attempt to identify suchaircraft unless it sees evidence to suggest that UK airspace hasbeen compromised by hostile or unauthorized air activity.

Think about this case, it was 1955 and two unidentifiedpotentially hostile aircraft were seen taking off on radar from

The 1955 Ilyushin bomber was in fact a premature failed jetdesign only used for Soviet propaganda purposes

Mr B, it is my policy for the last twenty years to protect theidentity of witnesses, hence, the name of this article. It wasbecause of this anonymity that inspired Mr B to contact me.His remarkable insiders story of what happened when flying

saucers crossed Europe in 1955 was given to me because hewanted to readdress the balance of those who have chosen tomisinform the media about the grave truth of the matter.

MR Bs Story.


Moscow, travelling at high altitude across the main cities ofcentral Europe before finishing up circling London. Thishappened at the height of the cold war, the possibility thatnuclear weapons were on board these two unknowns musthave been apparent to everybody at the time.

Lets put 1955 in context, FSR 53.1 features Art Campbellsassessment of a spring 1955 nuclear crisis over Taiwanbetween America and the combined forces of the USSR and

red China. This may have led to President Eisenhowerschoice words about nuclear weapons, These things can beused on strictly military purposes. I see no reason whythey shouldnt be used just exactly as you would use abullet. Now consider this new case in that unprecedenteddangerous context. If the flying saucers had triggeredsufficient panic to scramble a pre-emptive nuclear strike forcefrom both sides sent to do the unthinkable, then more andmore fatal decisions could have cascaded from this oneincursion, the result, a sudden dangerous massing of bomberaircraft picked up on radar.

An epilogue for this case would be the agreement signed in1971 between the USSR and the USA to put systems in placeto prevent a nuclear exchange triggered by UFOs amongother causes, Where this case leaves assurances that we dontneed to identify such aircraft unless there is evidence UKairspace has been compromised by hostile or unauthorized airactivity, we leave to our readers to decide. We are now in thestealth age, the divergence between a radar invisible militaryaircraft and a UFO is minimal, a chance incursion couldconceivably trigger a new nuclear exchange when the world isnext faced by the inevitable crisis between the super-powers.

An additional case from 1957. A complete write up of this case by British researcher David Cayton

can be found on Colin Andrewss web site: http://www.colinandrews.net/UFO-MiltonTorres.html

A much publicised case recovered from 2008 documentsfeatured in enquires with the M.O.D. during the first release ofBritish UFO documents is the Milton Torres UFO intercept ofMay 20th 1957.

U.S. fighter pilot Milton Torres accidentally bumped into BritishUFO researcher Harry Harris in 1988 and was responsible forthe release of the story. Again the case involved a US Sabreaircraft being guided over the same radar installations at

32,000 ft altitude.

This 1957 case involved radar contact without visualidentification of a very large airliner sized unknown craft. Thiswas tracked as a near stationary object over East Anglia byboth ground based and airborne radar. The pilot, Torres, wasordered to lock on and launch his entire rocket salvo. At thatpoint, before he could act, the object moved rapidly out ofrange speeding away at least Mach 10 off the Suffolk coastand out to sea. British researcher David Cayton has calculatedthat the UFO must have instantly accelerated by up to7,500mph. Torres was debriefed by an officer from off thebase, and ordered that the whole event was to remainclassified as a National Security matter.

As a footnote, one could be suspicious that this is a grown upcase deliberately left in the British UFO files. This one seriouscase exists in isolation because Torres had unexpectedlyshared his UFO interception story with a UFO researcher. Thereal story of UFO action over British skies and intruders on oursoil is a desperate tale of a steep learning curve that took placewith inevitable losses. The UFO story can only be our own if wethe ordinary citizens abandoned by government gather ourown independent data by our own institution.

US Sabre fighter

Another radar case, a gigantic UFO passed

over Britain at midnight during a cold war

exercise, operation Bulldog in August 1949.FSR Vol. 37, No.4 featured a complete report by anotherradar operator, described an excercise "Operation Bulldog"a 15 day excercise where U.S. combat planes based inEurope and aircraft taken from Benelux countries were tosimulate an attack on Britain. Flying in from airfields inHolland, France, Belgium and Germany, they were to"attack" London and other targets in Southern England

while the defenders of Britain were to be RAF FighterCommand. Britain's radar defence chain ran from Land'sEnd along the South Coast and then up the East Coast tothe North of Scotland from sea-level up to 100,000 ft.

In 1948, the worsening international situation led the AirMinistry to decide upon urgent action to improve the UnitedKingdom's radar defences. Following a period of intensive


technical and operational study, in 1949 the Air Ministrydecided to construct a new chain of radar stations in the UK.This was a far reaching plan designed to make use of the latesttechnology available, and to secure maximum freedom fromenemy attack by relocating most of large number of mobileradar convoys for tactical use. The rebuilding of the radardefences of the UK was given the codeword ROTOR, and thesupply of the mobile radar convoys was covered by thecodeword `VAST'. The ROTOR programme called for nearly30 GCI stations, over half of which were built in R3(underground) and R6 (above ground) two level bunkers,together with CEW and CHEL stations located in single storeybunkers designated the R1 and R2 respectively. Plotinformation from the new radar chain was voice-told to five R4three level underground Sector Operations Centres.

The witness wasas a RadarOperator AC1,stationed at RAFSandwich, inKent. All theofficers and staffare named in thearticle in FSR37.4. This was aGround ControlI n t e r c e p t i o n

Station used for verbally directing fighter aircraft onto targetsby means of radar guidance and radio transmission. It had 2radars a Type 14 and a Type 7 each revolving 4 sweeps perminute and out of synch with each other, in this way, it waspossible to secure 8 plots per minute on flying targets.

Halfway through the August exercise the witness and hiscolleague were on duty at midnight. An object was spottedtravelling parallel to the South coast traveling from West toEast. When it arrived at a position off the "heel" of Kent, itabruptly turned northwards, it approached the estuary of theRiver Thames, it was pased on to Martlesham Radar Stationnear Ipswhich Suffolk. Shotly after the Sandwhich station lostcontact with the object. It was the Radar Operators job toassess the speed of the object from the times and distancesplotted while spped could be read from the type 14 Radardesigned to read the altitude of aircraft within its range. Thisobject was travelling at an airspeed of nearly 3000 miles perhour at 50,000 feet (The air speed record at the time was606.36 m.p.h. the largest aircraft at the time was the USAFSuperfortress which travelled at 360 m.p.h.). Experiencedradar personnel present at the station compared it's size to theecho of a large passenger ship, in the range of 15,00 or 20,000tons. Word filtered down from Bampton Radar Station inYorkshire, the object suddenly increased speed and headingstraight upwards vanished off screen at about 10,000 ft.

The epilogue of this case was the duty watch book vanishedand was replaced, the witness and his colleague were read theOfficial Secrets Act and ordered not to mention the nightoccurences to anyone.

Comment by FSR: The last paragraphs of the article mentionsOperation Bulldog was devised to to raise Britain's defences tothe highest level of efficiency to prevent possible nuclearattack. This object may have conveyed a message to remindthe participants that they were being observed. FSR 51.1described an account in a letter to FSR in 1994 of a Germanwitness, a chemist, who saw a massive flaming Adamski cigarover Hamburg on the first night of the raid in July 1943. In hiswords "That big fellow was having a grandstand view of all thatwas going on below." These huge flying objects when theycome into the open do so for a statement, the strongestmessage may be to remind us that we do not observe thisworld in isolation, they too have ops rooms and monitoringstations, moving over our skies.

UFO Engineering according to Hill http://www.ufodna.com/articles/articles/hill.html

FSR Commentary: A lot of big questions on flying saucers featured in this issue were answered by Paul R Hill, one of the originalparticipants of the flying saucer age a man who had to hold his tongue for forty years because of his sensitive defence researchcareer. This man would have demolished Donald Menzels illusion of competent testimony for the Condon Committee.

The question of lethal G Force acting on UFO occupants, the 90 degree turns and the active tilting mechanism that steers thesaucer and prevents drag and negative lift. Even the gamma and X-ray emanations that follow Alan Wattss ideas of the GammaGun and electron-positron pair production in FSR 53.3. The source of the UFO hum, the super cooling of air around the saucer,the wobbling motion to transition to a hover, the falling-leaf motion used to descend, the terrain-following over obstacles; its allhere. Paul R Hill released the information in a book published in 1995 at the end of his life. This is accessible UFO physics for usall to understand.

Unconventional Flying Objects, by Paul Hill, Hampton Roads Publ. Co., Charlottesville, VA, 1995

(ISBN 1-57174-027-9)

Paul R Hill was a leading engineer andmanager at the NACA (later NASA) Langley,Virginia research centre. He was a leader indeveloping solid rockets and wind tunnels totest high-speed aircraft, missiles andspacecraft. He needed no study of hundreds ofcases, photographs, or other evidence to

convince him of the reality of UFO's. He had seen them with hisown eyes. This led him to produce a complete engineeringexplanation of the UFO phenomenon using known physics. Hefound there was no need for recourse to other dimensions,faster-than-light-travel, or mystical explanations.

Hill witnessed a quartet of UFO's manoeuvre in the sky in1952. His trained eye, having observed dozens of rocketPaul R Hill


launches and aircraft flight tests, could judge the velocity andG-capabilities of the objects. He had been involved in virtuallyevery highly-classified high-performance rocket and aircraftprogram in the United States. He knew immediately what hesaw could not be of earthly construction

However his supervisor, Bob Gilruth (Director of NASAHouston during the Apollo moon landing project), enforced anofficial policy that UFO's did not exist. NACA/NASA resourcescould not be spent investigating them. The best that Hill couldmanage was to be NASA's informal clearing house for UFOsightings. He also managed to instigate NASA projects onhovering platforms that allowed him to study the performanceof UFO-type systems. Hill saw another UFO, this time a classic'mother ship', in 1962. He used his comprehensive knowledgeof physics and aerodynamics to analyze the flying saucer froman engineer's point of view. Four years after his retirement fromNASA in 1970, he began a meticulous final engineeringanalysis of the UFO. This was only published post-humously in1995.

The scientist analyzed every physically possible method ofUFO propulsion and compared them with the observedperformance. This included the behaviour in flight andhovering, the glow seen around and below the objects, andthe reported physical effects. He went through the entireelectromagnetic spectrum and the all known families ofsubatomic particles. Among the non-starters were impulsepower, magnetic fields, electrical fields, neutrino and photonpropulsion. In the end he was able to rule out all possibilitiesexcept one.

The only possibility fitting observations was a form of gravityfield. This UFO field could be focused to provide a repellingforce counter to the earth's gravity. A field with the samecharacteristics would neatly move molecules of air out of theway well before they encountered a moving UFO. It wouldprotect any occupants from G forces, but would even leavea residual fraction of the G-forces to give them a 'feel' fortheir craft's manoeuvres. Hill postulated a subatomic particle,the uon, as the quantum expression of the UFO field. Thismight or might not be the poorly understood graviton and anti-graviton postulated by physicists.

Hill compared his analysis to that of the atom envisioned byErnest Rutherford in 1911. Rutherford, using Newtonianphysics, was able to describe an atom consisting of protonsand neutrons in a nucleus with electrons spinning in orbitsaround it. Later 20th Century Einsteinian and quantummechanics would show Rutherford's model to be simplisticand the atomic reality to be much more complex. But the pointwas that Rutherford could make a correct first approximationof the atomic structure using the physics he knew. Similarly,Hill believed he could mathematically describe the UFO fieldwithout necessarily knowing the future physics that wouldprovide the complete understanding (and allow earthlings toconstruct such a device). Hill's analysis completely describedthe commonly-described characteristics of the UFO:

UFO's can only be propelled by an engine that produces astatic field that repels all mass. This field follows theinverse-square law of gravity or photon fields, and isfocused to provide propulsive force. Hill showed thatusing this field the amount of energy to move a UFO to anyparticular position above a gravitational source (such asthe earth) is only equal to energy required to lift it to thatheight - a very small value.

This field has an electromagnetic component orexpression in the range between x-rays and gamma rays.This explains the radiation effects described in manycases on those who get to close to hovering UFO's, whileat the same time is consistent with the lack of residual

radioactivity at UFO landing sites. It is also the preciseenergy wavelength that creates the glow which surroundsUFO's when in operation. This is a result of excitation of airmolecules, and shifts from dull red through orange, yellow,and then to intense welding-arc white as theelectromagnetic component shifts from soft x-rays up tothe lower portion of the gamma-ray spectrum. The plasmagenerated by this wavelength of radiation is coldconsistent with the lack of intense heat reported in UFOclose encounters.

The nature of the UFO field means that saucers have tomanoeuvre in the manner described in the sightings butquite different from that of lifting, thrust-driven aircraft.Saucers tilt in the direction of the force to be applied toaccelerate or decelerate. In cruise, the slight saucer tilt isopposite that of a wing producing lift. This slight tilt isnecessary to overcome both air drag and the negative lifta saucer creates:

Hill experimented with circular flying platforms for NASA inthe 1960's. These used air to provide hovering thrust ratherthan a UFO field. However they proved the optimum controlmanoeuvres near the earth were the same as reported forUFO's - the wobbling motion to transition to a hover, thefalling-leaf motion to descend, the terrain-following overobstacles, and the direct vertical ascent to depart.

Suddenly UFO reports that seemed odd or indicated thatUFO's had control difficulties were completely explicable. TheOffice of Naval Research developed an operational version.Hill showed that the UFO's he and others had observed andcould easily accelerate or decelerate at over 100 G's. Thismeant that reported 'instantaneous' changes of directionand 90 degree turns by flying saucers were no such thing.It was quite possible for a UFO to brake to a complete stop,and then accelerate again to the same speed in anydirection, in under one second. This would appear as an'instantaneous' manoeuvre to the human eye but in factviolate no laws of physics or inertia.

Hill studied in detail the necessary arrangement of fieldgenerators within spherical and elliptical objects necessary toproduce the necessary propulsive force, as well as make theG-forces imperceptible to the occupants and exert thenecessary force to move air away from the moving saucer.Aerodynamics was Hill's specialty and he provided themathematics that showed why saucers produce no sonicboom, and can move within the atmosphere at thousands ofmiles per hour with little friction and no perceptible noise. Infact, he showed the induced pressure drop of the UFO fieldwould cool rather than heat the saucer while moving withinthe atmosphere at tremendous speed. This explained whysaucers, unlike the space shuttle or high-speed aircraft,were not red hot when landing after high speed runs.

Investigating long-range manoeuvres using the UFO field neara planet, Hill determined the optimum trajectory was high-speed and followed a ballistic path. This was consistent withreports that UFO's would depart near-vertically at tremendousacceleration and speed at the end of a sighting.

After noticing over the years how most photographs of disc-type UFO's are captured on film looking angled or tilted(think back to the Rex Heflin pictures, George Adamski'sand now, even Bob Schindler's). Well, today, for the very firsttime something clicked in my mind and I dug out my oldangle square and dusted it off, and began measuring theexact degree of tilt about this latest Racton object whichinvestigator Bob Schindler both witnessed and recordedwith his camera.

I make it a tilt of 105 degrees.Next, I began checking thedegree of tilt on other unidentifieds in UFO pictures and wasastonished by their similarity. Now isn't that intriguing?Especially around the 90 degree angle. Bob's most recentobject is only 15 degrees off that figure of "90 degreesrotation" There are many other images he and fellow UFOhunters have photographed which are even closer to thesaid 90 degrees, with many an exact match.

What could it be? Are they cutting the Earths energy field ata specific angle? Are they attempting to create a 90 degreeperpendicular spin away from the Earths field to leavenormal space and enter some other state?

Commentary by FSR: How many times does a simpleobservation lead to asking a perilously big question on ourunderstanding of UFOs behaviour? Ken is right: there mustbe a correlation for this peculiar tilting secret of flying discs,in addition: why do most cylinder UFOs travel at a 45 degreetilt? H.E. Puthoff of the Institute for Advanced Studies atAustin put forward the following ideas on this matter usingthe work of Paul R Hill in a paper called A Synopsis ofUnconventional Flying Objects. (JSE Review).


The UFO static field would be cyclic in nature, and thiswould produce a mathematically definable movement ofair molecules when a UFO was hovering. Hill determinedthat this cyclic air movement, and its vibration effects onobjects near a UFO, was the source of the sound heardwhen UFO's were hovering The UFO 'hum' was not thesounds of machinery within the UFO but rather the effectof the field on the environment.

Finally, Hill studied interstellar travel by UFO's. This wouldinvolve a close approach to a massive nearby gravitationalobject (e.g. the sun of a solar system) to obtain maximumutilization of the UFO gravity drive. He calculated thatassuming an approach within 23 million miles of the Earth'ssun, and using an initial acceleration of 1000 G's, a UFO couldreach 70% of the velocity of light by the time it reached theorbit of Pluto. By that time the gravity-repulsive UFO drivewould be nearly ineffective. Further acceleration to near-lightspeed using impulse power would however be relatively easywith advanced technology. Thanks to relativistic effects, theoccupants would experience only a few months of travel timewhen travelling between solar systems.

Of course, decades of time would have passed on earth andtheir home planet during the travel period. Hill imagined that

the large cylindrical 'mother ships' might be the actual home ofthe extraterrestrials. A little reflection shows that such a shipwould be the focus of their lives and the location of theirfriends and families, if such existed in their culture. So it wouldbe irrelevant in their way of existence if everyone they hadknown back at the home planet, if they had one, had aged anddied while they were away. A human equivalent would bewhen earthlings move permanently in space rather than timefrom one state or country to another. Those left behind are aclosed chapter of a life once known. For star-hoppingextraterrestrials, 'you can never go back' would have a tougherphysical reality than for humans.

Hill produced a complete explanation of the UFOphenomenon using known physics. There was no need forrecourse to other dimensions, faster-than-light-travel, ormystical explanations. The diversity of UFO types andoccupants reported convinced the engineer that theyrepresented visitors from a large number of worlds. Heassessed their behaviour as being that of scientists on studymissions, taking environmental samples, even abductinghumans and animals for tests, but avoiding contact andinteraction with humans.

What is the Tilting Secret of the UFO's?Kenneth John Parsons. BEAMS UK.

An extract from A Synopsis of Unconventional Flying Objects. (JSE Review).

Dr. Puthoff is currently the Director of theInstitute for Advanced Studies in Austin, Texas,The Institute is a private think tank established in1985 to explore advanced concepts in forefrontscientific areas. Its activities range fromtheoretical studies to publication in professionaljournals of such fundamental topics as

gravitation, inertia, energy and cosmology. Dr. Puthoff isconsidered one of the premier theoretical physicists in the fieldof vacuum zero point energy and has published several of theseminal papers in the area. A graduate of Stanford University,he has been a Research Associate and Lecturer there in theDepartment of Electrical Engineering.

One of the most consistently-observed characteristics of UFODr Puthoff


flight is a ubiquitous pattern in which they tilt to perform allmanoeuvres. Specifically, they sit level to hover, tilt forward tomove forward, tilt backward to stop, bank to turn, and descendby "falling-leaf" or "silver- dollar-wobble" motions. Detailedanalysis by Hill shows that such motion is inconsistent withaerodynamic requirements, but totally consistent with someform of repulsive force-field propulsion. Not satisfied withpaper analyses alone, Hill arranged to have various forms ofjet-supported and rotor-supported circular flying platformsbuilt and tested. Hill himself acted as test pilot in early,originally-classified, versions, and found the above motionsthe most economical for control purposes.

In an effort to examine the force-field propulsion hypothesisyet further, Hill analyzed a number of cases involving near-fieldinteractions with an apparent craft in which some form of forcewas in evidence. These include examples in which a person orvehicle was affected, tree branches were parted or broken,roof tiles were dislodged, objects were deflected, and groundor water were disturbed. Under close analysis the subtleties ofthese interactions combine to point unequivocally to arepulsive force field surrounding the craft, while discriminatingagainst propulsion mechanisms involving jet action, pureelectric or magnetic effects, or the emission of energeticparticles or radiation (although the latter may accompany thepropulsive mechanism as a secondary effect). Further detailedinvestigation indicates that the particular form of force fieldpropulsion that satisfies observational constraints is what Hilllabels a directed acceleration field; that is, a field that is, ingeneral, gravitational-like in nature, and, in particular, gravity-cancelling. Such a field acts on all masses in its sphere ofinfluence as does a gravitational field. Corollary to thisconclusion is that observed accelerations ~100 g's relative tothe environment could be sustained without on-board high-gforces.

One of the consequences of the above identification of fieldpropulsion type by Hill is his conclusion, supported by detailed

calculation, computer simulation and wind-tunnel studies, thatsupersonic flight through the atmosphere without sonicbooms is easily engineered. Manipulation of the acceleration-type force field would, even at supersonic speeds, result in aconstant-pressure, compression-free zone without shockwavein which the vehicle is surrounded by a subsonic flow-patternof streamlines, and subsonic velocity ratios. An additionalbenefit of such field control is that drops of moisture, rain,dust, insects, or other low-velocity ob

Date post:	09-Nov-2015
Category:	Documents
Upload:	edicioneshalbrane
View:	25 times
Download:	2 times

FSR 2009 V 54 N 1

Documents