+ All Categories
Home > Healthcare > G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

Date post: 19-Jul-2015
Category:
Upload: bcpsqc
View: 451 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
28
Transcript
Page 1: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John
Page 2: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

The Supine Crucifixion

It can be life

changing but

now she has

an ally.

The term used by some

orthopods to describe the

frail patient experience of

waiting for hip fracture

repair.

Page 3: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

DeliriumUTICardiacElectrolyte ImbalancesAnemiaStrokeWound InfectionPressure SoresUrinary Retention

PneumoniaDeep Vein ThrombosisDislocationPulmonary EmbolismAspirationGI BleedFixation breakdownIleusDeath

It’s Complicated

Page 4: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

Provincial co-leads for the Hip Fracture

Redesign Project, Dr. Pierre Guy and Dr.

Kenneth Hughes have spearheaded a

provincial effort to improve hip fracture care.

The Royal Jubilee Hospital is a pilot site in the

effort to improve hip fracture care. Dr. Patrick

McAllister is Surgeon Lead. John Kristiansen is

QuaIity Improvement Lead.

BACKGROUND

Page 5: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

Standards of Care • Surgery within 36 hours• Joint orthopaedic and geriatric care• Assessment protocols• Pre and post-operative cognition• Secondary fracture prevention• Falls and rehabilitation assessment• Data submitted to National Audit

Research

Page 6: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

Over a 2 year period:• 15% reduction in mortality• 5% reduction in hospital stay= 60,000 bed

days• 12% more osteoporosis treatment• Cost of care reduced by $23,300,000

Result of UK Initiative

Page 7: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

According to the last 5 months (100 patients) of data collection on hip fracture patients in RJH:She has a 66% chance of getting some complication.She has a 34% chance of getting a UTI.She has a 30% chance of getting delirium.She has a 14% chance of a cardiac complication.

Who’s

Rattling

The

Cage?

Page 8: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

Ensure OrthopodAssesses Patient

in 2 Hours

Improve Patient Flow and Bed

Access

Reduce ER to OR

Time

Reduce Time For Medical Consult

Medical doctors educated re delay reversal anticoag

pathway

Ortho Dr to ensure patient placed on OR slate as soon as deemed appropriate

Make Hip # the priority Examine the process for getting patient on OR slate

Examine the difference in OR slate process for

weekends

Dedicated # hip ward and subacute rehabHOW

Key DriversChange Concepts

HOWHOW

WHYWHYWHY

Diagnostics in Emergency?

Critical: Ensure adequate OR Capacity and

Access

Consider fracture slate Sunday am

Hospitalist assesses in ER and

Co-Manages.

Increase Hospitalist

Participation

Clinical Order sets to increase efficiency

Increase Awareness of 48

hour limit

Page 9: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

Two OrthopodsAssessing

an ECG

Page 10: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

Increase hospitalist care and patient co-management of hip fracture patients by 60% within 4 months 1 year. The rate is currently 40%. Goal rate is 64%.

What We Are Aiming For

Orthopaedic and hospitalist leads engage their peers in changing how w2e deliver care

Page 11: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

May June July August September October

Medical Consult on Admission

BASE LINE DATA 2013

Page 12: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

November December January February March April

Medical Consult on Admission

Resistance 2013-2014

Page 13: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

Patient Complications

Keeping things in

Balance

Picking up the pieces

Or

Page 14: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

Medical Co-ManagementHospitalists engaged to provide medical co-management with surgeon because patients could be followed throughout stay.

Multiple issues brought inconsistent levels of participation.

The variance of participation made the case for co-management more powerful. Beta test. Was it an obstacle or securement of the initiative.

Page 15: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

Something happened… Data regarding early hospitalist consults was compiled, getting larger and difficult to ignore.

DATA

Page 16: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Medical Consult on Admission

Pt With Any Complications

One Goes Down,The Other Goes Up.Negative Correlation.

Page 17: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

Think about it now…What is truly profound is the effect of the unseen filter which should seriously dampen this negative correlation in the previous slide.

Consults for hospitalists are requested by the orthopedic surgeon due to perceived medical issues and risks.

That means that the sample of patients in a specific month will have less consultations if they are perceived as low risk and more consultations if they are perceived as at greater risk.

Why then would complication percentages decline when the monthly sample is perceived as at greater risk by the orthopedic surgeon and increases in complication percentages when perceived at lower risk?

Worthy of note and truly profound is how great the negative correlation would be in the absence of the orthopedic selection of consultable patients.

Page 18: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Delirium Admit consults

2013-2014 Delirium relative to consult on admit

One Goes Down,The Other Goes Up.Negative Correlation.

Page 19: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Medical Consult on Admission Cardiac Complications2014

Page 20: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

UTI

UTI

UTIs as a percentage of the Monthly Total

Patients

Silver Alloy Catheter Intro.

Page 21: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

UTI rates received a downward push relative to hospitalist consults but still seemed a bit unstable. The drive to remove urinary catheters early and the use of silver alloy catheters has helped to augment UTI reduction.

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45% UTI Rate 2014

UTI Rate 2014

Page 22: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

05

1015202530

Jan

uar

y

Feb

ruar

y

Mar

ch

Ap

ril

May

Jun

e

July

Au

gust

Sep

tem

ber

Oct

ob

er

No

vem

be

r

Average Length of Stay

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%Ja

nu

ary

Feb

ruar

y

Mar

ch

Ap

ril

May

Jun

e

July

Au

gust

Sep

tem

ber

Oct

ob

er

No

vem

be

r

Dec

emb

er

Medical Consult on Admission

One Goes Down,The Other Goes Up.Negative Correlation.

2014

Page 23: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

Average length of stay October/2013 –March/2014 = 23.8 daysAverage length of stay April/2014 –September/2014 = 18.8 days5 less bed days per hip fracture patient.Conservatively stated at 25 patients per month, bed days saved per year = 1500 bed days. How much is a bed day?

Outcome Measure

Page 24: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100% Medical Consult on Admission

Rate Over Last 8 Months = 74%

Outcome Measure

Page 25: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

Balancing Measure• Geriatrics consults dropped as recorded during the same 4

month intervals in 2012, 2013, and 2014 .• The floor GP on rehab had a huge reduction in patient load

due to hospitalist increased involvement.• Staff nurses noted that medical aid and issue resolution was

quick and effective.• Hospitalists were likely on the unit and able to support

during times of acute emergency.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

2012 4 months 2013 4 months 2014 4 months

Geriatrics Sept. - Dec.

Page 26: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

According to the last 4 months of data collection on hip fracture patients in RJH:She has a 66% 48% chance of getting some complication.She has a 34% 12.5% chance of getting a UTI.She has a 30% 19% chance of getting delirium.She has a 14% 2.5% chance of a cardiac complication.Crossed out number from one year ago. Same interval.

Percentages derived from data collected in the last 4 months .Aug 1 2014-Nov. 30 2014

Page 27: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

We know we are making a difference. Thanks in part to the elephant in the room.

Page 28: G7.Co-management of Hip Fracture Patients - Kristiansen, John

Contact Information

• John Kristiansen

• VIHA Surgical Services + NSQIP

QI Consultant

• (250) 727-4000 ext. 15569

• (250) 686-8681 Mobile

[email protected]

• N542 Victoria General Hospital


Recommended