+ All Categories
Home > Data & Analytics > Giovanna Colombo, Italy A NILDE survey on international ILL exchanges: results and consideration

Giovanna Colombo, Italy A NILDE survey on international ILL exchanges: results and consideration

Date post: 22-Jan-2018
Category:
Upload: ctles
View: 105 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
25
Elena Bernardini University of Milan Giovanna Colombo University of Insubria Carmen Lomba University of Cantabria, Spain Silvana Mangiaracina CNR Bologna Fulvia Merlini IRCCS Burlo Garofolo Trieste Emanuela Secinaro INRIM Torino A NILDE survey on international ILL exchanges: results and considerations
Transcript

ElenaBernardiniUniversityofMilanGiovannaColomboUniversityofInsubriaCarmenLombaUniversityofCantabria,SpainSilvanaMangiaracinaCNRBolognaFulviaMerliniIRCCSBurloGarofoloTriesteEmanuelaSecinaroINRIMTorino

ANILDEsurveyoninternationalILLexchanges:resultsandconsiderations

NILDEItaliannetworkandsoftware

forresourcesharingo  ILLandDDsupplywebbasedsystem

o  1000librarycommunity,200.000requests/year

o  Samevisionandruleso  Freeofchargecooperation

2

Intro

94%

5%

1%

NILDElibrariesbycountry

Italy

Spain

Allothers(GRE,CHE,SWE,BRA,LUX,HRV)

3

NILDEInternationalILLrequesttrendo  Openingtoworldlibraries(since2011)o  Softwarewithmultilingualuserinterfaceo  IncreaseinILLexchangeddocuments2011-2016especiallybetweenlibrariesinItalyandSpain

Intro

4

From1858to2002

After2002 Now

INTERLIBRARYLOAN

RESOURCESHARING

RETHINKINGRESOURCESHARING

Intro

“NILDEwithoutborders”surveyNILDEgrows,worldoflibrarieschanges,differentvisionaboutILLexchanges

Needtounderstandmoreinadditiontoquantitativestatistics

ILLSurvey?Whynot?

“NILDEwithoutborders”survey

PURPOSE: investigate current resource sharing practicesand interlibrary loanprocedures/policiesnotonly inNILDElibraries network but also in external NILDE libraries inEuropean-Mediterraneancontext.

AIMS: collect feedback/results forpromoting internationalcooperationandexpandingNILDEservices.

BACKGROUND:lookatpreviousanglo-americaninternationalALA-RUSA-STARS2007,2011,2015ILLsurveysandcasestudies

5

Intro

SurveyMETHOD1TARGET✔NILDElibraries(includingSpanishREBIUNandotherforeignlibraries)mailinglist

✔OtherlibrariesoutsideNILDEnetworkItalian(AIB,Gidif,SiDocumenta),spanish(GTBIB,BIB-MED)mailinglistsandEuropeanlibrariesandlibrarynationalassociationscontacts

6

Method

NILDERECIPIENTS Non-NILDERECIPIENTSNILDE,REBIUNandotherassociated,foreignlibraries

AIB,Gidif,SiDocumenta,SpanishGTBIBandBIB-MED,otherlibrariescontactsandlibrarynationalassociationsmailinglists

SurveyMETHOD2

SOFTWARE opensourceweb-surveyapplicationmadeavailableandhostedbyUniversityofCantabria,Spainwww.LimeSurvey.org/

SURVEYLAYOUTAnonymousmultilingualquestionnaire(Italian,Spanish,English),total23questions(onlyafewrequired)andafinalenquiryforadditionalcomments

SURVEYDISTRIBUTIONInvitationswithwebsurveylinkdistributedviaemailmessagetoallmailinglistson19June2017tofillinuntil18thJuly2017.

7

Method

SurveyparticipationSurveyopened801timeswith401completedsurveys.Uncompleted:surveybreakoff,differentbrowserslayout,respondents’levelsofcomputerandwebuse,technicalfailures(undelivered)

8

Results

69%

11%

12%

5%3%

Librarycategories

University

PublicResearchInstitution

PublicInstitution

PrivatenoprofitInstitution

Other

69%Universityrepresentedthemostcommontypeoflibraryresponding

77%NILDEassociatedlibraries

Surveycountryrepresentation

9

Results

31253

2

1

2

and1Cyprus1Argentina

10

Results

Volumeofinternationallendingrequestsappearshigherthanborrowing

SurveyinternationalILLrequests

Yes70%

No30%

Lending

Yes63%

No37%

Borrowing

Doesyourlibrarysend/receiveinternationalILL-DDrequests?

11

250

150

79 71

25 16 13 6 5 4 2 20

50

100

150

200

250

300

EU Center&SouthAmerica

NorthAmerica

ExtraEU Oceania Russia Asia Africa China MiddleEast

India Other

WhichgeographicareasdoesyourlibraryreceiveinternationalILL-DDrequestsfrom?

232

8464

4729

12 10 6 4 3 2 10

50

100

150

200

250

EU NorthAmerica

ExtraEU Center&SouthAmerica

Oceania Russia Asia MiddleEast

China Africa India Other

WhichgeographicareasdoesyourlibrarysendinternationalILL-DDrequeststo?

Lending&borrowingtopcountries

Results

EuropeandAmerica(North,CentralandSouth)

Returnablesrequests

12

Results

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

0 1-20 20-50 50-150 150-300 >300%ofrespo

nses

Numberofrequestsin2016

InternationalILLrequests(books)receivedin2016

Lending

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

0 1-20 20-50 50-150 150-300 >300

%ofrespo

nses

Numberofrequestsin2016

InternationalILLrequests(books)sentin2016

Borrowing

13

Non-returnablesrequests

Themostrespondentshavefewerthan20internationalILLborrowingandlendingrequests

Results

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

0 <20 20-50 50-100 150-300 >300

%ofrespo

nses

Numberofrequestsin2016

Internationallendingrequestsreceived(copies)in2016

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

0 <20 20-50 50-100 150-300 >300

%ofrespo

nses

Numberofrequestsin2016

Internationalborrowingrequestssent(copies)in2016

Lending Borrowing

14

Typeofpayment

IFLAvouchersarethemostpopularkindofpaymentrequestedbylendingandborrowinglibrariesOther •  Creditcard

•  OCLCIFM•  DepositAccount

Results

47%

53%

DoesyourlibraryrequireafeeforinternationalILL-DDservice?

yesNo

0% 10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%

IFLAVoucher

Banktransfer

Internationalpostalorder

Other

Paymentacceptedbyyourlibrary(L)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

IFLAVoucher

Banktransfer

Other

Paymentrequiredtoyourlibrary(B)

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

Documentunavailable,lost

Copyright/embargo

Wrongbibliographicalreferences

borrowedbook

Other

MaincausesofnotsuccessfulprocessingofinternationalILL

15

•  feeandpaymentobstacles•  ILLservicenotprovided•  Nofailedrequest

SurveyRESULTSUnfulfilledinternationalinterlibrary

exchangescauses

16

WouldyourlibraryagreetofreeILLexchangewithforeignlibraries,askingforacompensationattheendoftheyearafteraspecifiedmaximumnumberofdocumentssupplied?

SurveyRESULTS

Availabilitytofreecooperation

Resourcesharingandfreeofchargecooperationattitude

88%

12%

Yes

No

Commentsandsuggestionsthe most tell us about ILL difficulties, ILL delivery andprocedures, catalogueholdings visibility, copyright andDDclauses,systemsinteroperability:MylibrarycannotimplementaninternationalILLservicebecauseofinsufficientstaffandorganization”DeliveryandILLreceptionstimeisconditionedbypostandcustomoffice”Respondentsask:ElectronicIFLAvouchers-Simplifythetransitfromcustoms(US,butalsoSwitzerland)-Allowingdifferentpaymentoptions-Publishersagreementsclausesallowingdocumentdelivery

17

Results

Commentsnegativeperceptionso  Nonsignificantprogressinresourcesharingofreturnableitems✔visiblebutundeliverable✔fearofloss✔limitede-lending(i.e.e-bookslicensingrestrictions)

Commentspositiveperceptionso  increasingexchangesofnonreturnableitems(articles)o  successfulexperienceso  innovativesolutionsproposed✔e-lendingsolutionssoftwareorpublisheragreements✔Localconsortiaorcooperationnetworksoflibraries

18

Conclusions

Conclusions1

o  NILDEwidelydisseminatedinITALYo  Availabilityoffreecooperation(88%yes,12%no)o  NeedstoextendinterlibrarycooperationHighernumberofinternationalILLtransactionsbetweenneighboringgeographiccountries(mainlyITALY,SPAIN,thenotherEUcountries)

o  Internationallendingandborrowingcommonobstacles✔returnablespayment,shippingcosts✔copyrightconcernfornon-returnables

19

Conclusions

Conclusions2

Suggestionsaboutinterlibrarycooperationandresourcesharing:✔freeservicefornon-returnablesdocument(scannedanddigitizeddocumentshavenoshippingcosts)✔ collaborative collection development to fight lack offundsandfinancialcrisis✔ simplifypaymentmethod (adoptionofelectronic IFLAvouchers…)

20

Conclusions

Similaritieswithotherinternationalsurveys(ALA-RUSA-STARSsurveys)andcasestudies•  CountriesofILLexchanges:Themajorityofinternational

borrowingandlendingcountriesareinNorthAmericaandinEurope.

•  Materialsdifficulttoobtain:olderandrare,thesisandlocaldissertations,e-books.

•  Barriers/obstacles:shippingcosts,uncertaintyaboutlicensingande-lending

•  Paymentmethod:IFLAvouchers

21

Conclusions

Differenceswithotherinternationalsurveys(ALA-RUSA-STARSsurveys)andcasestudies•  LowervolumeofinternationalILLrequests:Themostrespondentshavefewerthan20internationalILLrequestsper year borrowing and lending returnables and non-returnables(othersurveysfewerthan100)

•  ILLRequestprocessingsystem:NILDE(othersurveysOCLC)

22

Conclusions

ResourceSharingisnotonlyabout"papers"butalsoabout"people"

ElenaBernardini GiovannaColombo

CarmenLomba SilvanaMangiaracina

FulviaMerlini EmanuelaSecinaro

23

Conclusions

NILDEInternationalizationWorkingGroup

24

ColomboGiovanna(CBNNILDE-UniversityofInsubria)DeFilippisPatrizia(CBNNILDE–UniversityofCampania)MaimoneAnsaldoPattiLoriana(CBNNILDE–UniversityofMessina)MangiaracinaSilvana(CBNNILDE–CNRLibraryBologna)SecinaroEmanuela(CBNNILDE-I.N.RI.MTorino)TugnoliAlessandro(CBNNILDE-CNRLibraryBologna)BaePeter(PrincetonUniversity,USA)BernardiniElena(UniversityofMilan)ÇelikbaşSema(IstanbulTechnicalUniversity)ChiandoniMarco(UniversityofTrieste)LombaCarmen(UniversityofCantabria,Spain)MainardiAndrea(UniversityofPavia)MulondoAllan(MaxPlanckInstituteLuxembourgforProceduralLaw)ReuspiFranco(UniversityofGenoa)

Thankyouforyourattention!

Anyquestion?Contactinfo:[email protected](onbehalfofNILDEInternationalizationWorkingGroup)

25

Conclusions


Recommended