+ All Categories
Home > Documents > GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

Date post: 23-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: lang
View: 40 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence. Why the Dog Didn’t Bite (and the Cold War Stayed Cold). Balance of power? Or “balance of terror?”. A Puzzle for Realists. Classical realism: Superpower Behavior Ideological moderation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
22
GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence
Transcript
Page 1: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

GO131:International Relations

Professor Walter HatchColby College

Nuclear Deterrence

Page 2: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

Why the Dog Didn’t Bite(and the Cold War Stayed Cold)

Balance of power?

Or “balance of terror?”

Page 3: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

A Puzzle for Realists

Classical realism: Superpower BehaviorIdeological moderation

Fear of escalation

Neo-realism: Structure of the SystemThe stability of bipolarity

Communication to overcome PD

Page 4: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

Balance of Terror

Page 5: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

Deterrence

Defined: The threat to punish another actor if it takes a particular negative action (such as attacking one’s own state or one’s allies)

One conditon: The threat must be credible.

Page 6: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

Mutually Assured Destruction(MAD)

Page 7: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

Nuclear Technology

Atomic bomb (1945): Fission

Hydrogen bomb (1952): Fusion

Technological “advances”

Page 8: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

Delivery Systems (I)

Page 9: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

Delivery Systems (II)

Page 10: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

Delivery Systems (III)

Page 11: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

Scared Straight

Page 12: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

U.S.– Soviet Arms Control

Limited Test Ban Treaty (1963)

ABM Treaty (1972)

SALT (1972 and 1979)

START (1991)

Page 13: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

Global Arms Control

Page 14: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

Proliferation

NPT (1968)By then, France, UK and China also had joined nuclear club.

In spite of NPT, the technology spreadIndia and Pakistan never signed. Declared nuclear powers in 1970s.

Israel never signed. It is undeclared nuclear power, but probably has a hundred warheads

Iraq’s nuclear program was dismantled in 1990s.

Page 15: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

North Korea

Near war in ’94 over plutonium production

Pulled out of NPT in ‘03 after conflict over uranium enrichment

6-8 nukes

Planning a test

Page 16: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

Iran

Signed NPTBut enriching uraniumFor civilian or military purposes?Israel should be “wiped off the map…”

Page 17: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

India’s Special Status

100 nukes?US cooperationWhy not Pakistan?

Page 18: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

Proliferation for Profit

Pakistan –> Iran, Libya, North Korea

China –> Iran

Dr. A. Q. Khan

Page 19: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

Testing

CTBT (1996)Won’t take effect until signed and ratified by 44 statesIndia and Pakistan refused to sign; conducted their own tests in late 1990s

• An attempt to divide world into “nuclear haves” and “nuclear have-nots?”

U.S. Senate voted in 1999 against ratificationBush administration opposes it

Page 20: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

Nuclear Hypocrisy

Page 21: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

US Response

We’re taking action …

Real threat:Rogue states

Non-state actors

Page 22: GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence

Chemical and Biological Weapons


Recommended