+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Goals and Objectives

Goals and Objectives

Date post: 22-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: yoshi
View: 79 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
State Strategies to Preserve Access to Mental Health Medications: A Conversation with Local Mental Health Leaders May 2009. Goals and Objectives. Educate members and affiliates about current research and data on access to medications - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
24
State Strategies to Preserve Access to Mental Health Medications: A Conversation with Local Mental Health Leaders May 2009
Transcript
Page 1: Goals and Objectives

State Strategies to Preserve Access to Mental Health Medications:

A Conversation with Local Mental Health Leaders

May 2009

Page 2: Goals and Objectives

Goals and Objectives

Educate members and affiliates about current research and data on access to medications

Offer venue for colleague-to-colleague interactions for affiliates and members to share strategies and lessons learned

Provide members and affiliates tools and resources to assist in advocacy efforts

Facilitate a unified voice for improved access to mental health medications

Page 3: Goals and Objectives

Offerings…

Local leaders from Mental Health America, NAMI, and the National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare discuss state-level efforts on medication access issues– May 8: Mike Hammond, Association of Community Mental

Health Centers of Kansas, shares the power of the Kansas Mental Health Coalition’s unified message and efforts

– May 15: Betsy Johnson, NAMI Ohio, talks about Ohio’s multi-faceted efforts to preserve access for vulnerable individuals in a challenging environment

– May 29: Steve McCaffrey, MHA of Indiana, illustrates how Indiana’s Mental Health Medicaid Quality Advisory Committee keeps the focus on quality and safety

Page 4: Goals and Objectives

Why Access to Mental Health Medications Is Important

Page 5: Goals and Objectives

People who live with mental illness are uniquely vulnerable

Mental illness strikes throughout the lifespan, with onset often early in life– Half of all lifetime cases of mental illness occur by age 14;

three-quarters by age 242

– One in ten youth in America have a serious mental or emotional disorder3

– One in seventeen adults (about 10 million Americans) live with a serious mental illness, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or major depression4

Unlike heart disease or most cancers, young people with mental illness experience disability in the prime of life,

when they would normally be the most productive.1

Page 6: Goals and Objectives

People who live with mental illness are uniquely vulnerable

Treatment works and recovery is possible, yet there are long delays—often years—before people get help5 – Fewer than one-third of adults and half of children with a

diagnosable mental disorder receive any level of treatment in any one year6

– There is an average delay of 8.5 years between onset of symptoms and the beginning of treatment for people living with schizophrenia7

– The median delay across disorders is nearly a decade8

When treatment is delayed, conditions may become more severe and more resistant to treatment9

Page 7: Goals and Objectives

People who live with mental illness are uniquely vulnerable

Mental illness often co-occurs with other health conditions, complicating treatment and raising overall medical costs10

– Over one in five adults with serious mental illness have a co-occurring substance use disorder11

– Persons with substance use disorders are roughly twice as likely to have a mood or anxiety disorder12

– Adults with common medical conditions have high rates of depression and anxiety. Depression impairs self-care and adherence to treatments for chronic health conditions13

– Individuals with diabetes and co-morbid depression (nearly one in every three) have healthcare costs that are 4.5 times higher than those without14

Page 8: Goals and Objectives

People who live with mental illness are uniquely vulnerable

Many individuals on Medicaid have mental illness and Medicaid is a leading funder of mental health services

Individuals may experience significant functional impairment as a result of their mental illness or co-occurring disorders– Impaired insight into treatment needs (due to disorganized

thinking, paranoia, depression)– Challenges in navigating the healthcare system– Reduced social and financial supports

People with serious mental illness die an average of 25 years earlier than other Americans, largely of treatable health conditions.15

Page 9: Goals and Objectives

Why Access to Mental Health Medications Is Important:

People who live with mental illness are uniquely vulnerable

Page 10: Goals and Objectives

Mental health medications are unique and play an important role in recovery

Along with an array of rehabilitative services, mental health medications are an important tool for recovery for many

Several different classes of medications are used to treat mental illnesses:

– stimulant and non-stimulant medications – anti-anxiety medications – mood stabilizers and anticonvulsants – antidepressants– antipsychotics

Page 11: Goals and Objectives

Mental health medications are unique and play an important role in recovery

Mental health medications—even those within the same “class”—often have biochemical differences that result in significant variation in side effects, drug interactions, and effectiveness for every individual

Individualized Therapy

ImprovedTolerability

Treatment Continuity

Improved Consumer Outcomes

– About one in three with depression will improve after treatment with an SSRI antidepressant; others will get better with a different medication or by adding another medication16

– Treatment of any individual with an antipsychotic requires balancing benefits and risks; there is no best medication or dose for all patients17

Page 12: Goals and Objectives

Mental health medications are unique and play an important role in recovery

12

“A medication that works well for one person with schizophrenia often doesn’t work well for another.” 18

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH 2008 FACT SHEET

“… it is our opinion that the new generation of antipsychotic medications (except clozapine) need to be made available as first-line treatment…” 19

AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION (APA)

“Given significant individual variability in response, ultimately all marketed antipsychotic medications should be available to patients who require treatment with them.” 20

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM DIRECTORS (NASMHPD)

The Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured recommends “exemptions from restrictions for all psychotherapeutic and anticonvulsive medications.”21

"Access to treatment, including medication, has been the cornerstone of my recovery. Limiting access limits my possibilities."

 SHERRI WALTON, SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA

Page 13: Goals and Objectives

Why Access to Mental Health Medications Is Important: People who live with mental illness are uniquely

vulnerable Mental health medications are unique and play an

important role in recovery

Page 14: Goals and Objectives

Lack of access to treatment is costly

Failure to respond to or tolerate a mental health medication—or discontinuation—may lead to costly and devastating relapses

A psychotic, manic, or depressive episode may result in lasting cognitive impairment, emergency department visits, hospitalization—even incarceration or suicide – One out of every five community hospital stays involves a

principal or secondary diagnosis of mental illness22

– About 20-25% of jail and prison inmates and youth involved with juvenile justice have a serious mental illness23, 24

– Among individuals with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, nearly one in ten die by suicide25

Page 15: Goals and Objectives

Lack of access to treatment is costly

Restricting access to mental health medications has unintended consequences and high costs– In a 2007 study of Medicare Part D recipients with mental

illness, over half had problems accessing medications:26

31% could not access needed medication refills22% had medically necessary medications stopped or interrupted18% had stable medication regiments changed

– The consequences:27

22% suffered an increase in suicidal thoughts or behaviors20% required an emergency room visit11% required hospitalization3.1% became homeless

Page 16: Goals and Objectives

Lack of access to treatment is costly

– In 2003, Maine instituted a prior authorization and step therapy policy for atypical antipsychotics28

Persons affected by prior authorization requirements had a 29 percent greater risk of treatment discontinuity

Medication gaps and discontinuations are strong predictors of negative outcomes, like hospitalization and psychotic episodes

In March 2004, the policy was suspended citing adverse events

The Maine study researchers conclude that “Observed increases in treatment discontinuities without cost savings suggest that atypical antipsychotics should be

exempt from prior authorization for patients with severe mental illness.” 29

Page 17: Goals and Objectives

Lack of access to treatment is costly

– Implementation of co-pays decreases use of needed medications and shifts costs Medicaid co-payment policies decreased drug utilization by

17%; antipsychotic use by 15.2%30 (figure 1)

In the Oregon Health Plan, co-pays for prescriptions reduced pharmacy expenditures, but resulted in cost shifts (increased inpatient care), not cost savings31

Implementation of Copay Policy

Page 18: Goals and Objectives

Why Access to Mental Health Medications Is Important:

People who live with mental illness are uniquely vulnerable

Mental health medications are unique and play an important role in recovery

Lack of access to treatment is costly

Page 19: Goals and Objectives

Cutting costs at the expense of vulnerable individuals

States aim to cut Medicaid pharmacy costs by limiting access to mental health medications– Repeal of statutory exemptions of mental health

medications from preferred drug lists– Budget line items adding mental health medications to

preferred drug lists– Executive orders to create preferred drug lists and impose

prior authorization requirements– Revisiting “handshake” agreements to preserve access– Imposing co-pays or additional prior authorization

requirements– Limiting number of covered prescriptions

Page 20: Goals and Objectives

Citations 1-91. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health. Mental Illness

Exacts Heavy Toll, Beginning in Youth. Press Release, June 6, 2005. Available at http://www.nimh.nih.gov/science-news/2005/mental-illness-exacts-heavy-toll-beginning-in-youth.shtml.

2. Ibid.3. Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General, 1999.4. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health. The Numbers

Count: Mental Disorders in America. 2008. Available at http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/the-numbers-count-mental-disorders-in-america/index.shtml.

5. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health. Mental Illness Exacts Heavy Toll, Beginning in Youth. Press Release, June 6, 2005. Available at http://www.nimh.nih.gov/science-news/2005/mental-illness-exacts-heavy-toll-beginning-in-youth.shtml.

6. Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General, 1999.7. Schizophrenia: Public Attitudes, Personal Needs, Views from People Living with

Schizophrenia, Caregivers, and the General, Public Analysis and Recommendations, June 10, 2008. Available at http://www.nami.org/sstemplate.cfm?section=SchizophreniaSurvey.

8. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health. Mental Illness Exacts Heavy Toll, Beginning in Youth. Press Release, June 6, 2005. Available at http://www.nimh.nih.gov/science-news/2005/mental-illness-exacts-heavy-toll-beginning-in-youth.shtml.

9. Ibid.

Page 21: Goals and Objectives

Citations 10-1710. Statistical Brief #62, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). November 2008.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Accessible at www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb62.jsp.

11. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance-Use Conditions. Quality Chasm Series, The National Academies Press, 2006. Accessible at http://www.iom.edu/?id=30858.

12. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse. Comorbidity: Addiction and Other Mental Illnesses. Research Report Series, December 2008. NIH Pub. No. 08-5771.

13. New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America. Final Report. DHHS Pub. No. SMA-03-3832. Rockville, MD: 2003, p.21.

14. National Business Group on Health, Center for Prevention and Health Services, An Employer’s Guide to Behavioral Health Services, 2005, p.27.

15. Parks, Joe, MD, et al., National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) Medical Directors Council. Morbidity and Mortality in People with Serious Mental Illness. October 2006.

16. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health. Questions And Answers About The NIMH Sequenced Treatment Alternatives To Relieve Depression (STAR*D) Study—All Medication Levels. November 2006. Accessible at http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/trials/practical/stard/allmedicationlevels.shtml.

17. Parks J, et al. Principles of antipsychotic prescribing for policy makers, circa 2008. Translating knowledge to promote individualized treatment. Available at http://www.nasmhpd.org/publicationsmeddir.cfm.

Page 22: Goals and Objectives

Citations 18-2518. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health. Ethnicity predicts how gene variations affect response to schizophrenia medications. Science Update, January 2, 2008. Available at http://www.nimh.nih.gov/science-news/2008/ethnicity-predicts-how-gene-variations-affect-response-to-schizophrenia-medications.shtml. 19. American Psychiatric Association. Atypical antipsychotics position statement. Available at http://www.psych.org/Departments/EDU/Library/APAOfficialDocumentsandRelated/PositionStatements/200007.aspx?css=print. 20. Parks J, et al. Principles of antipsychotic prescribing for policy makers, circa 2008. Translating knowledge to promote individualized treatment. Available at http://www.nasmhpd.org/publicationsmeddir.cfm. 21. Kaiser Family Foundation, Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. Model Prescription Drug Prior Authorization Process for State Medicaid Programs. April 21, 2003. Publ. No. 4104. 22. Statistical Brief #62, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). November 2008.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Accessible at www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb62.jsp.

23. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Mental Health Problems of Prison and Jail Inmates. September 2006. NCJ 213600. Accessible at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/mhppji.htm.

24. National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice. Blueprint for Change: A Comprehensive Model for the Identification and Treatment of Youth with Mental Health Needs in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System. 2007. Accessible at http://www.ncmhjj.com/Blueprint/default.shtml.

25. Kim, Sanghyeon, et al. Suicide candidate genes associated with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: An exploratory gene expression profiling analysis of post-mortem prefrontal cortex, BMC Genomics 2007, 8:413. Available from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/8/413.

Page 23: Goals and Objectives

Citations 26-3126. West, Joyce C., et al. Medication Access and Continuity: The Experiences of Dual-

Eligible Psychiatric Patients During the First 4 Months of the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit. Am J Psychiatry; 2007;164(5):789-796.

27. Ibid.28. Soumerai, Stephen B., et al. Use Of Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs For Schizophrenia In

Maine Medicaid Following A Policy Change. Health Affairs. 2008;(April):W185-W195.29. Ibid.30. Hartung D.M., et al. Medical Care. 2008;46(6):565-572.31. Neal, Wallace T., et al. How Effective Are Copayments in Reducing Expenditures for

Low-Income Adult Medicaid Beneficiaries? Experience from the Oregon Health Plan. Health Services Research, Volume 43 Issue 2, pp. 515-530, January 31, 2008. Accessible at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119390808/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0.

Page 24: Goals and Objectives

For more information, please contact us:Sarah Steverman

[email protected]

Hazel Moran, Mental Health America [email protected]

Angela Kimball, NAMI [email protected]

Laura Galbreath, The National [email protected]


Recommended