+ All Categories
Home > Documents > grad project IEEE paper

grad project IEEE paper

Date post: 27-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: akash-patel
View: 29 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
10
1 Utilization of System Generated LG Fault on Ground Grid Mesh and Analysis of existing GGS using IEEE 80-2000 and Finite Element Method Akash Patel Electrical Engineering California State University Northridge Northridge, USA [email protected] Professor Bruno Osorno Electrical Engineering California State University Northridge Northridge, USA [email protected] Abstractthe 750kv substation is chosen for given particular type of soil to design square ground grid mesh. By using line to ground fault current generated on 750kv substation by ETAP short circuit analysis, ground grid parameters are determined using simple hand calculations and results are verified by modeling same ground grid using ETAP ground grid system. After getting general idea about effect on system generated fault on GGS, system data from existing 50kv Rawat substation is collected to verify all-important parameters are within the limit or not. To evaluate important GGS parameters, mesh analysis is carried out using both IEEE 80-2000 and Finite Element Methods by using ETAP-12 GGS Module. Shortcoming in existing mesh are highlighted by ETAP warning and alert dialog box and remedial actions are suggested to rectify the problems. Increase in fault current by expansion of substation is consider with possible solution and optimization of ground grid mesh is presented based on modern technology. Finally, comparison is done between IEEE 80-2000 and FEM method to design GGS and effect of ground grid area, number of conductors/rods and spacing between conductors is explained by help of several case study results. KeywordsGround Potential Rise, Step Voltage, Touch Voltage, Ground Mesh, Electrical Transient Analysis Program, Ground Grid System Module I. INTRODUCTION Under normal and faulty condition, grounding can carry electrical currents into earth with maintaining operating and equipment limits and protect person from danger of electrical shock. After analyzing effects of electrical current on human body, researchers have developed different IEEE standards for earth resistance measurement, surface gradients, grid conductors continuity, equipment grounding, cable routing, cable sheath grounding, indoor installations, lighting protection, current division, generating station grounding practices, testing and different connections of grounding system. Use of single electrode for grounding is not sufficient for safe grounding. Rather than using single electrode if we use grid, we can represent excellent grounding system. To protect human from surface gradients when high current dissipated into the earth, installation of grid with law resistant is required. Horizontal ground grid can reduce danger of high step and touch voltages on the earth surface by using only, when grid is installed in narrow depth. For many installations where soil resistivity change due to freezing or drying effect and resistivity of lower soil remains constant, ground electrodes are useful to stabilize the performance. So, in case of multilevel soil, rods which are penetrating in low resistivity soil more effectively dissipate fault currents. Installation of rods along grid perimeter in uniform or high-to-low soil conditions can moderate steep rise of surface gradient near peripheral meshes. Sometimes size of substation is large or soil has high resistivity. Rather than using large grounding system, we have to use fraction of the land area for grounding purpose and then all areas can be connected with each other by connecting rods. Computer algorithms are based on modeling the individual components comprising the grounding system, developing set of equations which describe the interconnection of these equipments, determine ground fault current flowing from each component into the earth, calculating the potential at any desired surface point due to all individual components-TAP ground grid module is very useful software for design and implementation of ground grid system and it utilizes Finite Element Method,IEEE 80-1986, IEEE 80-2000, IEEE 665- 1995 methods of computation. Existing 500 kv Rawat substation is design and analyze by ETAP-12 using IEEE 80- 2000 and Finite Element method and new 750 kv substation is designed by using data from IEEE safety guide for substation grounding and short circuit analysis of grid. II. SHORT CIRCUIT ANALYSIS AND GROUND GRID SYSTEM There are 9 buses,3 generators,3 transformers,6 transmission lines and 3 loads are connected as shown in figure 1. After creating line to ground fault on bus 5, E-TAP short circuit analysis generate fault currents and voltages as shown in circuit below.Design of square ground grid represented by green area is possible for 750kv substation at bus 5 by updating fault current value at bus 5 and we can easily verify the results with ETAP software. System data for bus,transmission lines,transformers and generators are presented in Appendix A.
Transcript
Page 1: grad project IEEE paper

1

Utilization of System Generated LG Fault on Ground

Grid Mesh and Analysis of existing GGS using

IEEE 80-2000 and Finite Element Method

Akash Patel

Electrical Engineering

California State University Northridge

Northridge, USA

[email protected]

Professor Bruno Osorno

Electrical Engineering

California State University Northridge

Northridge, USA

[email protected]

Abstract—the 750kv substation is chosen for given particular

type of soil to design square ground grid mesh. By using line to

ground fault current generated on 750kv substation by ETAP

short circuit analysis, ground grid parameters are determined

using simple hand calculations and results are verified by

modeling same ground grid using ETAP ground grid system.

After getting general idea about effect on system generated fault

on GGS, system data from existing 50kv Rawat substation is

collected to verify all-important parameters are within the limit

or not. To evaluate important GGS parameters, mesh analysis is

carried out using both IEEE 80-2000 and Finite Element

Methods by using ETAP-12 GGS Module. Shortcoming in

existing mesh are highlighted by ETAP warning and alert dialog

box and remedial actions are suggested to rectify the problems.

Increase in fault current by expansion of substation is consider

with possible solution and optimization of ground grid mesh is

presented based on modern technology. Finally, comparison is

done between IEEE 80-2000 and FEM method to design GGS

and effect of ground grid area, number of conductors/rods and

spacing between conductors is explained by help of several case

study results.

Keywords— Ground Potential Rise, Step Voltage, Touch

Voltage, Ground Mesh, Electrical Transient Analysis Program,

Ground Grid System Module

I. INTRODUCTION

Under normal and faulty condition, grounding can carry electrical currents into earth with maintaining operating and equipment limits and protect person from danger of electrical shock. After analyzing effects of electrical current on human body, researchers have developed different IEEE standards for earth resistance measurement, surface gradients, grid conductors continuity, equipment grounding, cable routing, cable sheath grounding, indoor installations, lighting protection, current division, generating station grounding practices, testing and different connections of grounding system. Use of single electrode for grounding is not sufficient for safe grounding. Rather than using single electrode if we use grid, we can represent excellent grounding system. To protect human from surface gradients when high current dissipated into the earth, installation of grid with law resistant is required.

Horizontal ground grid can reduce danger of high step and touch voltages on the earth surface by using only, when grid is installed in narrow depth. For many installations where soil resistivity change due to freezing or drying effect and resistivity of lower soil remains constant, ground electrodes are useful to stabilize the performance. So, in case of multilevel soil, rods which are penetrating in low resistivity soil more effectively dissipate fault currents. Installation of rods along grid perimeter in uniform or high-to-low soil conditions can moderate steep rise of surface gradient near peripheral meshes. Sometimes size of substation is large or soil has high resistivity. Rather than using large grounding system, we have to use fraction of the land area for grounding purpose and then all areas can be connected with each other by connecting rods. Computer algorithms are based on modeling the individual components comprising the grounding system, developing set of equations which describe the interconnection of these equipments, determine ground fault current flowing from each component into the earth, calculating the potential at any desired surface point due to all individual components-TAP ground grid module is very useful software for design and implementation of ground grid system and it utilizes Finite Element Method,IEEE 80-1986, IEEE 80-2000, IEEE 665-1995 methods of computation. Existing 500 kv Rawat substation is design and analyze by ETAP-12 using IEEE 80-2000 and Finite Element method and new 750 kv substation is designed by using data from IEEE safety guide for substation grounding and short circuit analysis of grid.

II. SHORT CIRCUIT ANALYSIS AND GROUND GRID SYSTEM

There are 9 buses,3 generators,3 transformers,6 transmission

lines and 3 loads are connected as shown in figure 1. After

creating line to ground fault on bus 5, E-TAP short circuit

analysis generate fault currents and voltages as shown in

circuit below.Design of square ground grid represented by

green area is possible for 750kv substation at bus 5 by

updating fault current value at bus 5 and we can easily verify

the results with ETAP software. System data for

bus,transmission lines,transformers and generators are

presented in Appendix A.

Page 2: grad project IEEE paper

2

Figure 1 [5] developing grounding grid on faulted bus 5

ETAP give short-circuit result as shown in table 3.5. Contribution Line to Ground Fault

From Bus To

Bus

%Voltage At

From

Bus kA

Symm.

rms

ID ID Va Vb Vc Ia 3

Bus5 Total 0 92.91 91.61 10.106 10.106

Bus4 Bus5 0.11 92.91 90.61 5.137 6.252

Bus7 Bus5 0.37 92.87 90.49 4.993 4.004

Table 1 short circuit result

So, 10.106 kA fault current is contribution of Bus 5 to whole

network.By using this fault current value we can design

square grid for Bus 5 by using simple equations as shown

below.data of square grid is presented in Appendix B.

a) Touch and Step criteria:

K= =-0.72

=

b) Determination of grid resistance:

c) Maximum grid current :

d) Ground Potential rise:

GPR=

e) Correction factors:

=1.225.

f) Spacing factors:

g) Mesh voltage:

h) Step voltage:

Result Summary: Calculated Volts Tolerable Volts

Touch 3184.382 V 840.5836 V

Step 1452.7945 V 2696.2398 V

GPR

Table 2 hand calculation result summary

Here the maximum touch voltage exceeds the tolerable limits.

We can verify above result by ETAP. After updating the value

of and X/R from short circuit analysis,we can design

square ground grid by using ETAP as shown in figure 3.7.

Page 3: grad project IEEE paper

3

Figure 2 top view of ETAP square ground grid

The result of ground grid analysis for square grid is shown in

figure 3.

Figure 3 results of ETAP GGS analysis

The value of touch, step voltages, GPR and are similar for

hand calculation as well as ETAP calculation. Even in both

cases calculated touch voltage is higher than tolerable limit.

III. IEEE 80-2000 METHODS CASE STUDIES

By using the same 9 bus power system,designing of 500kv

substation is possible at bus1 by using ETAP IEEE 80-2000

method as shown in figure 4 [5],

Figure 4[5] sample connection diagram for IEEE 80-2000 method grid

design

Actually ground grid system for 500kv substation is already

laid and functioning in Rawat substation,so existing data is

collected to verify whether all important parameters are with

in the described limits or not.The collected data from actual

substation are represented in Appendix C.

a) IEEE 80-2000 Method Case 1:

Initially after specifing surface material,soil resistivity and

depths for various layers in ETAP soil editor and selecting

weight of person, proper IEEE method and details of short

circuit current and fault duration by using ETAP GRD study

case editor and specifying conductor/ rod parameters for grid

and ground grid dimentions by using in ETAP IEEE group

editor with the data given in table 3 ,we can design and

analyze protection scheme for priliminary gound grid mesh by

finding ground potential rise,ground system resistance,touch

and step potentials using IEEE 80-2000 method. Gri

d

Len

gth

(ft)

Numbe

r of

conduct

ors

Rod

Data

Conductor

Size

AWG/kcmil

Depth

ft

ft

ft

In X Directio

n

In Y Direc

tion

Diameter

inch

Length

ft

No

Of

Rods

4/0 0.9

8

472.

44

32

8.08

14 10 0.472 6.56 50

Table 3[4] input ground grid parameters of IEEE 80-2000 method case 1.

The ground grid system is presented by a top view,a soil

view,a 3-D view for graphical arrangement of the conductors

and rods as shown in figures 5,6 and 7.the soil view is used to

edit the soil properties of the surface, top, and lower layers of

soil. The 3-D view is used for the three-dimensional display of

the ground grid which can be rotate or view by any angle. The

Top View is used to edit the ground conductors/rods of a

ground grid.

Figure 5 soil view of GGS case 1.

Figure 6. 3-D view of GGS case 1.

Figure 7 top view of GGS case 1.

Page 4: grad project IEEE paper

4

The result of ground grid analysis case 1 is shown in figure 8.

Figure 8 results of case 1 analysis

As shown in figure 8, ground grid is not functioning properly

due to higher touch voltage and temperature rise than safer

limits. Moreover, either we should have to increase or

decrease area to design proper ground grid.

b)IEEE 80-2000 Method Case 2:

To overcome issue created in case 1, redesign of ground grid

system is possible by changing number of conductors and

number of rods as shown in table 4[4]. Gr

id

Le

ngt

h

(ft)

Number

of

conduct

ors

Rod Data

Conduc

tor Size

AWG/k

cmil

De

pth ft

ft

ft

In X

Direction

In Y

Directio

n

Diameter

inch

Len

gth ft

N

o Of

R

ods

4/0 0.9

8

47

2.44

3

28.

0

8

20 16 0.598 6.5

6

54

Table 4 [4] input ground grid parameters of IEEE 80-2000 method case

2.

3-D View of grid and the results of ground grid analysis case

2 are shown in figure 9 and 10.

Figure 9. 3-D view of GGS case 2.

Figure 10 results of case 2 analysis

So, temperature rise issue can be solved by changing number

of conductors and rods. But, higher touch voltage and grid size

issues are still exist.

c)IEEE 80-2000 Method Case 3:

There is an expansion in actual substation by replacing old

power transformer with new one which increase fault current

from 40 A to 45 A.To fulfill this new requirement,changes are

required in ground grid mesh as shown in table 5[4]. Gri

d

Len

gth

(ft)

Numbe

r

Of

conduc

tors

Rod

Data

Condu

ctor Size

AWG/

kcmil

D

epth

ft

ft

ft

In X

Direction

In Y

Direction

Diamet

er inch

Length

ft

No

Of Ro

ds

4/0 0.

9

8

472.

44

328.

08

22 19 0.634 6.56 65

Table 5[4] input ground grid parameters of IEEE 80-2000 method case 3.

3-D View and the result of ground grid analysis case 3 is

shown in figure 11 and 12.

Figure 11. 3-D view of GGS case 3.

Page 5: grad project IEEE paper

5

Figure 12 results of case 3 analysis

ETAP ground grid analyzer show warning signal related to

size of ground grid area and higher touch voltage than

allowable limit due to larger than 10000 sq.m grid area. So,

for safety purpose we have to minimize the grid area.

d)IEEE 80-2000 Method Case 4:

when ground grid mesh of this substation is designed , very

less methods for designing ground grid are available.In this

case study, new modern analysis and optimization techniques

are applied for ground grid design by using the details

presented in table 6 [4]. Gri

d

Le

ngt

h

(ft)

Numbe

r

Of

conduct

ors

Rod

Data

Con

ductor

Size

AWG/kc

mil

De

pth ft

ft

ft

In X

Direction

In Y

Direction

Diam

eter inch

Le

ngth

ft

No

Of Ro

ds

4/0 2 393.7

272.31

25 23 0.63 6.56

42

Table 6[4] input ground grid parameters of IEEE 80-2000 method case 4.

3-D View and the results of ground grid analysis case 4 is

shown in figure 13 and 14.

Figure 13. 3-D view of GGS case 4.

Figure 14 results of case 4 analysis

By decreasing size of ground grid area and proper utilization

of ground conductors and rods,we can design ground grid

mesh which fullfill all required limits of touch potential,step

potential and temperature.

IV. FEM CASE STUDIES

Using the same data from Appendix C ,we can design ground

grid mesh for 500kv substation at bus 3 by using ETAP FEM.

Figure 15 [5] ground grid representation for FEM.

a)FEM Case 1:

By using ETAP ground grid Finite Element module and input

datas given in table 7[4], design and analyze of priliminary

ground grid design is possible.we can modify each individual

conductor/rod parameter by using FEM group editor and rod

editor. Grid

Lengt

h

(ft)

Numb

er

Of

condu

ctors

Rod

Data

Con

duct

or Size

AW

G/kcmil

Dep

th

ft

ft

ft

In X

Direct

ion

In Y

Directio

n

Diam

eter

inch

Len

gth

ft

No

Of

Rods

4/0 0.9

8

472.4

4

328.08 20 15 0.472 6.56 50

Table 7[4] input ground grid parameters of FEM case 1.

Page 6: grad project IEEE paper

6

Different views of ground grid are shown in figure 16, 17, 18.

Figure 16. 3-D view of GGS case 1.

Figure 17 top view of GGS case 1.

Figure 18 soil view of GGS case 1.

The result of ground grid analysis case 1 is shown in figure

19.

Figure 19 results of case 1 analysis

As shown in figure 19, ground grid is not functioning properly

due to higher touch voltage and temperature rise than safer

limits.3-D Plots are used only with the FEM method, and are

available for Absolute/Step/Touch Voltages. As shown in

figure 20, some voltages are quite high on voltage axies

represented by red colour in step potential profile,while in

case of touch potential as shown in figure 21, most of area is

green which represent that touch voltage is very low.

Figure 20 step potential profile of case 1.

Figure 21 touch potential profile of case 1.

Figure 22.absolute potential profile of case 1.

b)FEM Case 2:

To overcome issue created in case 1, redesign of ground grid

system is possible by changing number of conductors and

number of rods is as shown in table 8.[4]. Grid

Lengt

h

(ft)

Num

ber

Of

condu

ctors

Rod

Data

Conductor

Size

AWG/kc

mil

Depth

ft

ft

ft

In X Direct

ion

In Y Directio

n

Diameter

inch

Leng

th

ft

No Of

Rods

4/0 0.98

472.44

328.08

25 20 0.614 6.6

57

Table 8[4] input ground grid parameters of FEM case 2.

3-D View and The result of ground grid analysis case 2 is

shown in figure 23 and 24.

Page 7: grad project IEEE paper

7

Figure 23. 3-D view of GGS case 2.

The result of ground grid analysis is shown in figure 5.13.

Figure 24.results of case 2 analysis

So, by changing number of conductors and rods, we resolve

temperature rise issue. But, still we need to focus on higher

touch voltage.3-D voltage profiles are shown in figure 25, 25

and 27.

Figure 25.step potential profile of case 2

Figure 26.touch potential profile of case 2

Figure 27.absolute potential profile of case 2

c) FEM Case 3:

There is an expansion in actual substation by replacing old

power transformer with new one which increase fault current

from 40 A to 45 A.To fulfill this new requirements ,

modifications are required in grid configuration as shown in

Table 9.[4].

Gri

d

Len

gth

(ft)

Num

ber

Of

cond

uctor

s

Rod

Dat

a

Co

ndu

ctor

Siz

e

A

W

G/k

cmi

l

De

pth

ft

ft

ft

In X

Direc

tion

In Y

Directio

n

Dia

met

er

inch

Len

gth

ft

N

o

O

f

R

o

ds

4/0 0.9

8

472.

44

328.

08

29 26 0.64

2

6.8

9

6

0 Table 9.[4] input ground grid parameters of FEM case 3.

3-D View and the result of ground grid analysis case 3 is

shown in figure 28 and 29.

Figure 28. 3-D view of GGS case 3.

Page 8: grad project IEEE paper

8

Figure 29.results of case 3 analysis When I analyze the new designed grid after expanding

existing substation, E-TAP ground grid analyzer showing

warning signal related to higher touch voltage than allowable

limit.3-D voltage profiles are shown in figure 30, 31 and 32.

Figure 30.step potential profile of case 3.

Figure 31.touch potential profile of case 3.

Figure 32.absolute potential profile of case 3.

d)FEM Case 4:

when ground grid mesh of this substation is designed , very

less methods for designing ground grid are available.In this

case study,new modern analysis and optimization techniques

are applied for ground grid design by using the details

presented in Table 5.4. [4]. Gri

d

Len

gth

(ft)

Num

ber

Of

cond

uctor

s

Rod

Dat

a

Con

duct

or Size

AW

G/kcmil

Dep

th

ft

ft

ft

In X

Direc

tion

In Y

Directi

on

Dia

mete

r inch

Leng

th

ft

N

o

Of Ro

ds

4/0 1.6

4

393.

7

272.31 26 22 0.47

2

6.56 50

Table 10.[4] input ground grid parameters of FEM case 4.

3-D View and ETAP ground analysis is presented in figure 33

and 34.

Figure 33. 3-D view of GGS case 4.

Figure 34.results of case 4 analysis

3-D view of different potential profiles are shown in figure 35,

36 and 37.

Page 9: grad project IEEE paper

9

Figure 35.step potential profile of case 4.

Figure 36.touch potential profile of case 4.

Figure 37.absolute potential profile of case 4.

By decreasing size of ground grid area and proper utilization

of ground conductors and rods,I design ground grid mesh

which fullfill all required limits of touch potential,step

potential and temperature.

V. CONCLUSION

From the result of ETAP simulation on several case studies, we can derive below aspects, magnitude of touch potential, step potential, absolute potential, and ground resistance decrease with increase in grid area. So, it’s better to use larger grid in the area where land is cheap. Effect of spacing on touch and step potential is opposite. If we reduce the spacing between conductors, mesh potential decrease, while step potential may be increase and effect of mesh potential is severe than step potential. The effect of increasing conductors can be varied for different cases, but mainly installation of horizontal conductors decreases the touch potential. Normally if we install more number of vertical rods, temperature rise, mesh potential,

ground impedance decrease. Simulated results are nearer to actual value by using IEEE 80-2000 and FEM method; in addition results are more accurate than hand calculation ETAP simulate ground grid system within a second, while for FEM method E-TAP took around 5-6 minutes.so, we can do faster calculation by using IEEE 80-2000 method compare to FEM method. Ground grid design using FEM is costlier than IEEE 80-2000 method because greater number of conductors and rods are required in FEM compare to IEEE 80-2000 For the same size grid. Mesh designed by FEM method will be more durable, long lasting and have ability to withstand the excessive fault currents more effectively. In FEM method we can modify the data for individual conductor or rod by conductor/rod editor, while in IEEE 80-2000 method we can’t change data for individual conductor/rod.

VI. BIBLIOGRAPHY

[1] Design analysis and optimization of ground grid mesh of extra high

voltage substation using an intelligent software.

[2] IEEE guide for safety in AC substation grounding.

[3] IEEE guide for measuring earth resistivity, ground impedance and earth

surface potentials of a grounding system.

[4] A comparison of ground grid mesh design and optimization for 500kv

substation using IEEE 80-2000 and finite element methods.

[5] Transient stability analysis of IEEE 9 bus electric power system.

[6] Engineering design and rapid prototyping.

[7] Introduction to finite element modeling.

Page 10: grad project IEEE paper

10

Appendix A. 9 bus system data

2-Winding Transformer Input Data: T/f Rating Phase Shift

ID MVA Prim

kV

Sec kV %Z X/R Type Angle

T1 1000 750 500 10 34.1 Dyn 30

T2 1000 250 750 10 34.1 yNd 30

T3 1000 500 750 10 34.1 yNd -30

Synchronous Generator Input Data: Ra

tin

g

Pos

itie

Impe

dance

Zero

Seq.

Impe

danc

e

ID M

VA

k

V

RP

M

X’/

R

%R %

Xd’

X/R %R0 %

X0

Gen1

772.53

2

500

1800 19 1 28 19 0.368 7

Ge

n2

163

0.8

15

25

0

1800 19 1 28 19 0.368 7

Ge

n3

857

.114

45

0

1800 19 1 28 19 0.368 7

Bus Input Data: Bus Initial Voltage

ID Type Nom kv Base kv %Mag Ang

Bus 1 Swing. 500 500 100 0

Bus 2 Gen. 250 250 100 0

Bus 3 Gen. 500 500 90 60

Bus 4 Load 750 750 100 30

Bus 5 Load 750 750 100 30

Bus 6 Load 750 750 100 30

Bus 7 Load 750 750 100 30

Bus 8 Load 750 750 100 30

Bus 9 Load 750 750 100 30

Line Input Data: Li

ne

Leng

th

Ohms

per

phase

ID Adj(f

t)

R1 X1 Y1 R0 X0 Y0

Lin

e 1

5280 0.00

32197

0.0174

242

0 0.00240

9

0.01647

73

0

Lin

e 2

5280 0.00

7364

0.0321

97

0.000

0001

0.00928

03

0.05113

64

0.0000

001

Line 3

5280 0.002253

8

0.0190909

0 0.0045265

0.1719697

0

Lin

e 4

5280 0.00

18939

0.0304

924

0 0.00378

79

0.01136

36

0

Lin

e 5

5280 0.00

60606

0.0136

364

0.000

0001

0.05909

09

0.02670

46

0.0000

001

Lin

e 6

5280 0.00

0947

0.0136

364

0 0.06174

2

0.00984

85

0.0000

001

Appendix B.

Design data for 750 kv substation: S

r.

N

o.

Description of Parameter Value

1. soil resistivity ( ⍴) 400 Ω m

2. Crushed rock resistivity 2500 Ω m

3. Thickness of crushed rock 0.102 m

4. Available grounding area (A) 70 m*70 m=4900

5. depth of grid burial (h) 0.5 m

6. Total length of buried conductor

( )

2*11*70=1540m

7. Current devision factor( ) 0.6

8. Fault current from E-TAP short

circuit analysis( )

10106 A

In design, D =7 m, =0.5 s, =1.0, n=11, d=0.01 is used.

Appendix C.

Design data for 500 kv substation: Sr.

No.

Description of Parameter Value

1. Level of Voltage 500 KV

2. Maximum Fault Current 40 KA

3. Ground Grid Mesh Area 144 x 100 m2

4. Ground Grid Horizontal Distance 144m

5. Ground Grid Mesh Vertical

Distance

100m

6. Horizontally Installed Conductors 14

7. Vertically Installed Conductors 10

8. Conductors Size 4/0

9. Conductors Type Copper Annealed Soft Drawn

10. Maximum Temperature of

Conductors

40 °C

11. Rods Installed in Vertical Direction 50

12. Rod Diameter of Vertical Rods 1.2 centimeter

13. Rod Steel Rod Copper Clad

14. Duration of Fault 1 second

15. Temperature Outside -5 – 50 °C

16. Temperature of Rod 40 °C

17. X/Rratio Reactance over Resistance 50

18. Person Weight 50 kg

19. Soil Type at Surface Gravel

20. Resistivity 9976 Ω.m

21. Height 0.2m

22. Top Soil Moist Layer

23. Resistivity 130 Ω.m

24. Height 2m

25. Soil Bottom Layer Type Moist Soil

26. Soil Bottom Layer Resistivity 200 Ω.m

27. Soil Bottom Layer Height Infinity

28. Level of Fault in Relation to Earth Sr

60

29. Increase in Fault Level Cp 100


Recommended