Date post: | 19-Jun-2015 |
Category: |
Data & Analytics |
Upload: | koray-atalag |
View: | 370 times |
Download: | 4 times |
Health research, clinical registries, electronic health records
how do they (if at all!) all come together?
Koray Atalag MD, PhD, [email protected]
Vice Chair HL7 New ZealandopenEHR Localisation Program Leader
Health Information Standards Organisation (HISO) Committee MemberNHITB Sector Architects Group Member
AgendaRegistry definedWhat role does EHR play?openEHRNIHI examplesConclusions
Registry definedAn organised system that uses observational study methods to collect uniform data(clinical and other) to evaluate specified outcomes for a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or exposure,and that serves a predetermined scientific, clinical or policy purpose(s).
GliklichR, Dreyer Ne. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide Prepared by Outcome DEcIDECenter[Outcome Science, Inc. dbaOutcome] under Contract No. HHSA290200500351TO1). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2007; Publication No. 07-EHC001-
Clinical Registries Register / Registry Clinical (+quality) / disease / patient / incidence / screening etc.
Repository of individuals with certain conditions/characteristicsEase of access to important infoTrack clinical processes & (risk adjusted) outcomes Longitudinal history of correspondences & interventionsPrompt / feedback to participants and providersData linkages & Reporting
Supporting clinical practice◦ Screening, risk prediction, intervention/recall, safety monitoring
Clinical quality improvement◦ Organisations, clinicians, policy makers
Research & education
Why do we need them?Because we don’t have the mighty EHR!Registries are a ‘quick fix’ to some ‘can’t wait’ type
problems / for ‘quick wins’; capturing◦ observations, diagnoses, procedures, clinical processes and most
importantly outcomesProvide an infrastructure on which intervention studies
can be established with relative ease.Who get’s a registry?
◦ Those with funding of course! Clinical significance / popularity (eg. CVD, diabetes) Well established network/specialised (e.g. Spina Bifida) national/intl policies (MoH / WHO – cancer etc.) leadership / persistence / charisma / luck (GDM?)
Around the world & NZA lot of them!Overarching principles / regulations /
minimal standards Shared resources (hosted by dedicated
organisations / infrastructure)
A growing number of themAll go own ways – (under privacy rules)Hosted/curated by source groups with limited
technical/data management resources
Typical UsesIncidence/prevalence of diseases/conditions in
populations & monitor trends/survival rates over time
safety & quality of products and treatments
clinical and/or cost effectiveness of treatment (including drugs, devices and procedures) across a population
provide denominator & vehicle for interventional studies
and sometimes decision support too!
Electronic Health Records (EHR)All directly recorded or derived information
about an individual within healthcare context in electronic form
It is called many names – EHR, EMR, PHR, CPR, EPR, CBPR, AMR, EHCR, ...
Different perceptions: function, purpose, disease, place etc.
Ref: Ed Hammond
What does the EHR Contain?
DATA
Person-centredComprehensiveLongitudinalOrganizedHigh data integrityTimelyStructuredSemantically coherentShareableTrustable and accountableSecure and private
Ref: Ed Hammond
What does the EHR Provide?
Information for
Direct patient careEffective decision supportPrevention of medical errorsImproved quality of careBetter clinical communicationEnabling shared careEvidence based careCost effective careWorkflow managementBio-surveillanceResearchEpidemiologyBilling/reimbursement/health policy/planning
Ref: Ed Hammond
referral
orderresult
discharge
referral
order result
referral
orderresult
| Chest infection | GP review| GP visit | Back to foot clinic
Main GP
Foot ulcer foot clinic (hospital)
Hospital1
Diabetolog
See specialist
LABImaging
| Imaging| Renal function test
| Stroke – hospital
Hospital2
GP2
See other GP on holiday | CT scan
Therapist
| Rehabilitation
Fragmented / non-interoperable data
discharge
referral
Where’s EHR?
© Thomas Beale
How should EHR Work?
referralhospital
Diabetol.
Main GP
DI & path
hospital2
GP2
Soc. worker
discharge
referral
order
order result
discharge referral
orderresult
referral
result
EHR VISIBILITY
S h a r e d C a r e, L o n g i t u d i n a l, p a t i e n t – c e n t r e d EHR
The Patient© Thomas Beale
Barriers to EHR AdoptionLarge initial investment, unfit funding modelsPoor user acceptance (workload?)Privacy concernsLack of solid evidence?Fear & reluctance for the unknownPolitical/societal ignoranceMedico-legal issuesRisky business (for vendors/purchasers)Lack of common information / processes....Interoperability
Types of Interoperability Technical Interoperability: systems can send and receive data successfully.
(ISO: Functional/Data Interoperability)
Semantic Interoperability: information sent and received between systems is unaltered in its meaning. It is understood in exactly the same way by both the sender and receiver.
Process Interoperability: the degree to which the integrity of workflow processes can bemaintained between systems. (This includes maintaining/conveying information such as user roles between systems)
(HL7 Inc.)
If the Banks Can Do It, Why Can’t Health?Clinical data is wicked:
◦ Size (breadth, depth) and complexity◦ >300,000 concepts, 1.4m relationships in SNOMED◦ Variability of practice◦ Diversity in concepts and language◦ Conflicting evidence◦ Longevity◦ Links to others (e.g. family)◦ Peculiarities in privacy and security◦ Medico-legal issuesIt IS critical…
Can Clinicians Agree on Single Definitions of Concepts?
“What is a heart attack?”- 5 clinicians: ~2-3 answers – probably more!
“What is an issue vs. problem vs. diagnosis?”- No consensus for conceptual definition for years!
BUTThere is generally agreement on the structure and attributes of information
to be captured
Problem/Diagnosis name Status Date of initial onset Age at initial onset Severity Clinical description Date clinically recognised
Anatomical location Aetiology Occurrences Exacerbations Related problems Date of Resolution Age at resolution
Diagnostic criteria
Acknowledgement: Sam Heard
Interoperability Standards• Lower/Technical levelPhysical & Data
Standards
• Syntax & SemanticsTerminology Standards
• Sharing & WorkflowMessaging Standards
• Structure & ProcessingContent Standards
SNOMEDICDGALENLOINCATC
UN/EDIFACTHL7 v2 & v3
HL7 (CDA, CCR)openEHRISO/CEN 13606
TCP/IP, HTML, XMLWebservices, SOACORBA, SSL
Why bother?(with a standard structured Medication model)
“If you think about the seemingly simple concept of communicating the timing of a medication, it readily becomes apparent that it is more complex than most expect…”
“Most systems can cater for recording ‘1 tablet 3 times a day after meals’, but not many of the rest of the following examples, ...yet these represent the way clinicians need to prescribe for patients...”
Dr. Sam Heard
Example: Medication timing
Acknowledgement: Sam Heard
Medication timing – and more!!
Acknowledgement: Sam Heard
Medication timing cont.
Acknowledgement: Sam Heard
Medication timing – cont.
Acknowledgement: Sam Heard
Medication timing – even more!
Acknowledgement: Sam Heard
Open source specs & software for representing health information and person-centric records◦ Based on 18+ years of international implementation experience
including Good European Health Record Project◦ Superset of ISO/CEN 13606 EHR standard
Not-for-profit organisation - established in 2001 www.openEHR.org
Extensively used in research Separation of clinical
and technical worldsBig international community
Logical building blocks of EHR
Compositions
EHR
Folders
Sections
Clusters
Elements
Data values
Entries
Patterns in Health Information
Actions
Published evidence base
Personal knowledge
Evaluation
Observations
Subject
InstructionsInvestigator’s agents(e.g. Nurses, technicians, other physicians or automated devices)
Clinician measurable or observable
clinically interpreted findings
order or initiation of a workflow process
Recording data for each activity
Administrative Entry
Acknowledgement: openEHR
Example Model:Blood Pressure Measurement
Archetype Editor
It’s REFERENCE LIBRARY (of reusable clinical information models)
Data & meta-data definitions (data dictionary) Relationships & clinical terminology
Usage of the Content Model
What about secondary use?Interoperability for clinical information
systems – great◦But what about population health & research?
Research data also sits in silos – mostly C Drives or even worse in memory sticks!
Difficult to reuse beyond specific research purpose – clinical context usually lost
No rigour in handling and sharing of data
Exploiting the Content Model for Secondary Use Atalag K. Using a single content model for eHealth interoperability and secondary use. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;193:282–96
Single Content Model
CDA
FHIR
HL7 v2/3
EHR Extract
UML
XSD/XMI
Mindmap
PAYLOAD
System A
Data Source A
MapTo
Content Model
System B
Data Source B
Native openEHR Repository
Secondary Use
MapTo
Content Model
Automated Transforms
No Mapping
Shared Health Information Platform (SHIP)
Gestational Diabetes Registry Development
in CMDHB
Dr. Koray Atalag MD, PhD, FACHI (National Institute for Health Innovation)
Dr. Carl Eagleton MBChB, FRACP (Counties Manukau District Health Board)
Karen Pickering (Diabetes Projects Trust)
Aims 100% successful screening of women for type 2
diabetes (T2DM) within 3 months after a pregnancy with GDM
Annual screening of all women for new onset T2DM
Early warning to healthcare providers (GPs, Maori/Pacific Health, others) about GDM history in subsequent pregnancies
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)GDM is characterised by glucose intolerance with
onset or first recognition during pregnancy & is identified by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)
A repeat OGTT performed 6 weeks post-partum checks for resolution ◦ If normal, an annual fasting glucose or glycosylated
haemoglobin (HbA1c) screening test is recommended for T2DM, according to New Zealand (NZ) guidelines.
Opportunities & Motivation for the Registry
Long term consequences can be prevented by regular screening for early detection of T2DM or high CVD risk◦ CMDHB found 20% of women with a history of GDM were not
follow-up tested in a 4 year period; (37% for 2 year period)◦ Sending out reminders improve adherence / better compliance with
screening recommendations
Risk of developing T2DM can be substantially reduced by early identification of women at high risk + targeted lifestyle & pharmacological interventions
Registry can also be used to drive clinical quality improvement and enhance patient safety ◦ by identifying variations in processes and clinical outcomes.
Main ConsiderationsPrivacy / Confidentiality
◦ Privacy Act 1993 and Health Information Privacy Code 1994 (“HIPC”)◦ Recent changes to offshore hosting◦ Connected Health secure network
Security / Recovery / Availability◦ Univ. of Auckland’s secure IT infrastructure
IT standards & components◦ W3C, Microsoft Net, SQL Server, Angular JS◦ HISO Interoperability Reference Architecture◦ openEHR
Existing systems◦ CMDHB: Maternity CIS & others◦ Regional/National: MoH datamart? VDR, PMS, Shared Care etc.
GDM Registry PathwayEntr
y
• Referral from primary care with a diagnosis of GDM
Education
• Attendance at Group Session• Registry information supplied
Consent
• Attendance at DiP Clinic• Consent obtained and entry into the registry
Postpartum
• 6 week OGTT request or 3 month HbA1c• GP & Patient advised of results
Annual
• Annual HbA1c with copy to primary care• GP & Patient advised of results
Next time
• Positive pregnancy test detected in Testsafe• Requesting healthcare provider advised of Diabetes history by the Registry
Regi
stry
Dire
cted
Golden principle: Minimal data entry, Maximal reuse!
Technical DevelopmentUsed an international (and HISO) standard:
◦ Consistent dataset◦ Interoperability / integration◦ Manage change over time
Used a Web-based data set development tool to review & finalise
Automatically converted dataset into “software code” [domain objects]
Built on NIHI’s clinical data repository framework
The Dataset
The Registry SystemThree main parts (exc. System admin)
◦ Demographics◦ Clinical view + entry◦ Intervention
Role based access: clinical and/or adminEntry status:
◦ Temporary: record still being populated (import/data entry), not included in actions
◦ Active: records visible to all & complete◦ Inactive: only admin can see, suspended/opt-out
Enter a new participant Activate Enter / Update clinical data Interventions preview
(ANZACS-QI) New Zealand Acute Coronary Syndrome Quality Improvement and Interventional Cardiology Registry
EHR Providing a Canonical Representationso we know what kind of info goes into which bucket!
Dem
ogra
phic
s
Clin
ical
Enc
ount
er
Vita
l Sig
ns
Med
icati
ons
Dia
gnos
es
Dia
gnos
tic T
ests
Inte
rven
tions
Fam
ily H
isto
ry
Past
His
tory
Phys
ical
Exa
m
Gen
etics
Life
Sty
le
etc.
etc
. etc
.
Subject A
Subject B
Person-Centric Record Organisation
NZ AddressEthicity1,2.Whanau
USAddressStateNext of kin
GP visitFlu-likePHO enrolm.
Hospital adm.DiabetesPriv insurance
BP 130/90HR 90T: 38.5 C
BP 120/70 (24 hour avg)HR 70T: 37 C
Rx ADispenseAdminister
Rx BDispenseAdminister
Dx 1Dx 2etc.
Diabetes Dx-Type-Severity-Course etc.
Routine BloodUrineX-Ray
Specific blood testUrine cultureGenomic assayRetinography
Rx
Fluid TxInsuline injInfection TxPsychologic
N/A
Pedigree
N/A
Chronic
Routine
DetailedFoot and eyes
N/A N/A
DNA Seq.Assays
Low sugarExercise
Shared Archetypes
Each finding usually depends on other – clinical context matters!
Bottom lineWe may not have EHR now....but
by using openEHR to represent our clinical information we are leveraging some of the benefits of EHR today, including◦ Expressivity, clinical context, meta-data support◦ Interoperability◦ Semantic querying (easy + fast)◦ Tooling and international content◦ Standards compliance
and future-proofing registry data!