+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Heat Shock Protein 1

Heat Shock Protein 1

Date post: 03-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: pritamustika
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 18

Transcript
  • 8/12/2019 Heat Shock Protein 1

    1/18

    Review ArticleHeat Shock Protein 72 Expressing Stress inSepsis: Unbridgeable Gap between Animal and HumanStudiesA Hypothetical Comparative Study

    George Briassoulis,1 Efrossini Briassouli,2 Diana-Michaela Fitrolaki,1 Ioanna Plati,3

    Kleovoulos Apostolou,4 Theonymfi Tavladaki,1 and Anna-Maria Spanaki1

    Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital, School of Health Sciences, University of Crete,Voutes Area, Heraklion, Crete, Greece

    st Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Laiko, University General Hospital, University of Athens, Agiou Toma, Athens, Greece

    Department of Clinical Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Voutes Area, Heraklion, Crete, Greece National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, First Critical Care Department, Evaggelismos Hospital,

    Ipsilantou , , Athens, Greece

    Correspondence should be addressed to George Briassoulis; [email protected]

    Received April ; Accepted October ; Published January

    Academic Editor: Wolgang Neuhoer

    Copyright George Briassoulis et al. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution

    License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properlycited.

    Heat shock protein (Hsp) exhibits a protective roleduring timeso increasedrisk o pathogenic challengeand/or tissue damage.Te aim o the study was to ascertain Hsp protective effect differences between animal and human studies in sepsis using ahypothetical comparative study model. Forty-one in vivo (.%), in vitro (.%), or combined (.%) animal and in vivo ()or in vitro () human Hsp studies ( < 0.0001) were enrolled in the analysis. O the human studies, % showed a protectiveHsp effect compared to .% protection shown in septic animal studies ( < 0.0001). Only human studies reported Hsp-associated mortality (.%) or inection (.%) or reported results (.%) to be nonprotective ( < 0.001). In animal models,any Hsp induction method tried increased intracellular Hsp (%), compared to .% o human studies ( < 0.02), reducedproinammatory cytokines (/), and enhanced survival (/). Animal studies show a clear Hsp protective effect in sepsis.Human studies are inconclusive, showing either protection or a possible relation to mortality and inections. Tis might be dueto the act that using evermore puried target cell populations in animal models, a lot o clinical inormation regarding the netresponse that occurs in sepsis is missing.

    1. Introduction

    Sepsis is an inammation-induced syndrome resulting roma complex interaction between host and inectious agents. Itis considered severe when associated with acute organ dys-unction, which accounts or the main cause underlyingsepsis-induced death. Despite increasing evidence in sup-port o antioxidant [], anti-inammatory [], or immune-enhancing [] therapies in sepsis, recent studies ailed toestablish a correlation between antiseptic pathway-based

    therapies and improvement o sepsis [] or septic shock []or among immune-competent patients [].

    Rapid expression o the survival gene heat shock protein (Hsp) was shown to be critical or mounting cytoprotec-tion against severe cellular stress, like elevated temperature[]. Intracellular Hsps are upregulated in cells subjected tostressul stimuli, including inammation and oxidative stressexerting a protective effect against hypoxia, excess oxygenradicals, endotoxin, inections, and ever []. Recent stud-ies imply that different biological disease processes and/or

    Hindawi Publishing CorporationBioMed Research InternationalVolume 2014, Article ID 101023, 17 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/101023

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/101023http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/101023
  • 8/12/2019 Heat Shock Protein 1

    2/18

    BioMed Research International

    simple interventions may interere with high temperaturestress, leading to different clinical outcome in patients withand without sepsis []. In septic patients, administration oantipyretics independently associated with -day mortality,without association o ever with mortality []. Importantly,ever control using external cooling was sae and decreased

    vasopressor requirements and early mortality in septic shock[].Inducible Hsp is also ound extracellularly where

    it exhibits a protective role by acilitating immunologicalresponses during times o increased risk o pathogenic chal-lenge and/or tissue damage []. Experimental data provideimportantinsights intothe anti-inammatory mechanismsostress proteins protection and may lead to the development oa novel strategy or treatment o inectious and inammatorydisorders []. However, although overexpression o stressproteins signals danger to inammatory cells and aids inimmune surveillance by transporting intracellular peptidesto immune cells [], it has also been linked to a deleteriousrole in some diseases []. In addition, serum Hsp levelswere shown to be modulated according to the patient oxidantstatus whereas increased serum Hsp was associated withmortality in sepsis [].

    Te purpose o this basic research-related review incritical care is to document the available evidence on therole o Hsp in sepsis, reporting both the state o theart and the uture research directions. It might be thatpotential therapeutic use o stress proteins in prevention ocommon stress-related diseases involves achieving optimalbalance between protective and immunogenic effects o thesemolecules []. In this review, we will attempt to classiyexperimental and clinical studies on Hsp in sepsis and tocompare their results on inammation, organ unction, andoutcome; we will also briey discuss the mechanisms on howstress proteins might exert their protective or negative rolein the disease development and highlight the potential clinictranslation in the research eld.

    2. Materials and Methods

    Human or animal in vivo or in vitro studies examining thebenecial effect o intra- or extracellular Hsp expression insepsis were included in this study. Te PRISMA [] searchmethod or identication o studies consisted o searches oPubMed database ( to September ) and a manual

    review o reerence lists using the search term: Hsp or .Te search output was limited with the search lter or anyo: sepsis; severe sepsis; bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS);endotoxin. Reerences in selected studies were examinedalso. Te title and abstract o all studies identied by theabove search strategy were screened, and the ull text orall potentially relevant studies published in English wasobtained. Te ull text o any potentially relevant studies wasassessed by ve authors (DMF, EB, IP, AK, and ). Te sameauthors extracted data rom the published studies.

    .. Statistical Analysis. Proportions o methods used and

    results ndings were compared by the 2 test. A two-sided

    alpha o . was used or statistical signicance. Te resultswere analyzed using SPSS sofware (version ., SPSS,Chicago, IL, USA).

    3. Results

    Our search identied PubMed titles and abstracts.Afer excluding duplicates, studies with no original data, ordata insufficient to evaluate or those whose outcome wasischemia/reperusion injury or others, articles were nallyincluded or analysis. Te aim o this minireview was notto examine the quality o studies, but to describe inductionmethods and to compare in vivo and in vitro methods andresults regarding a potential protective role or Hsp inhuman and animal sepsis.

    .. Animals. Forty-one in vivo (, .%), in vitro (,.%), or combined (, .%) animal studies ullling theresearch criteria regarding the role o Hsp in sepsis were

    enrolled in analysis (ables (a), (b), and (c)). In only studies transgenic animals (Hsp/ (.%), overexpressingthe human Hspab gene (.%)) were used (.%), all inmice ( < 0.03). Hsp induction methods used in ratsdiffered rom those used in mice ( < 0.0001). Hspinduction was attempted most ofen using heat shock (rats, .%; mice , .%), glutamine (Gln) (rats , .%; mice, %; sheep , %), or combined Gln with additionalinducer (rats , .%; mice , .%). In rats Hsp wasinduced through adenoviral vector Hsp (AdHSP) (, .%o studies in rats) or various recombinant Hsp (rHsp)preparations (, .%) compared to mice studies whereAdHSP, bovine rHsp preconditioning, or overexpressed

    Hsp within the intestinal epithelium was used (.%).Hsp gene-transected models (, .%) or cecal ligationand puncture (CLP) with LPS or injection o microorganisms(, .%) were used only in mice studies.

    In more than hal o the studies induction was attemptedin a pretreatment mode (, .% or mice; , .% orrats induction afer LPS injection or CLP), ollowed by aconcomitant mode in rats (, %) or a posttreatment onein mice (, %). Te different time intervals used beore orafer experimental sepsis, most ofen - hours, did not differamong groups. Preventive effect was achieved by most induc-tion methods used in mice or rats (/, .%), irrespectiveo the challengeperiod or timing used (Figures(a)and(b)).

    wo studies, one carried out in sheep and one in rats,were inconclusive. In all septic animal models, any Hspinduction method tried increased intracellular Hsp (/,%), reduced proinammatory cytokines (/ studiesinvolving cytokine measurements), organ damage (/),clinical deterioration (/), and enhanced survival (/).

    .. Patients. Only human in vivo () and in vitro ()Hsp studies were identied (ables(a) and(b)): humanperipheral blood mononuclear cells (hPBMC) studies,.%; polymorphonuclear leukocytes (hPMNL) studies,.%; lymphocytes (hPBLC) study, .%; in vivo (childrenor adults serum levels) studies, .%. O those, hPBMC

  • 8/12/2019 Heat Shock Protein 1

    3/18

    BioMed Research International

    T:(a)Resultsoanimalinvivostudiesexaminingthepreventiveroleointra-

    orextracellularHsp(Hsp)expression

    andHsp(Hsp)expressioninexperim

    entalsepsisorsepsis-

    relatedpathophysiology.(

    b)Resultsoan

    imalinvitrostudiesexaminingthepreventiveroleointracellularHsp(Hsp)expressioninexperimentalsepsisorsepsis-relatedpathophysiology.

    (c)ResultsogeneticanimalstudiesexaminingthepreventiveroleointracellularHsp(Hsp)expressioninexperimenta

    lsepsisorsepsis-relatedpathophysiology.

    (a)

    Invivo

    Induction

    Organsst

    udied

    Expressionin

    cells/Hsp

    challenge

    Extracellular

    Hsplevels

    Inhibitors

    Functional

    Pathways

    Interleukins

    Organ

    damage

    Survival

    CLPsepsis

    rats[,]

    LPS-treated

    rats[]

    LPS-treated

    mice[]

    Heatstress

    Lungs()

    Heart()

    Splenocytes()

    Rostral

    Ventrolateral

    medulla(

    )

    Mitochon

    drial

    unction()

    Brain()

    Induced()

    Hsp

    inhibitors

    (KNKor

    pithrin-m)

    abrogatedthe

    abilityothe

    thermal

    treatmentto

    enhanceTNF-

    ()

    Alleviated

    hypotension,

    bradycardia,

    sympathetic

    vasomotor

    activity()EEG

    andepileptic

    spikes

    attenuated()

    Suppre

    ssediNOS

    mRNA

    NF-B

    activation,I

    Bkinase

    activation,I

    B

    degrad

    ation()

    Preven

    ted

    downregulationo

    Grp,preserved

    cytoch

    romec

    oxidase()enhanced

    phosphorylationo

    IKK,IkB,N

    F-B

    nuclear

    translo

    cation,

    bindingtothe

    TNF-promoter()

    Cytokines

    declined()

    HMGB

    inhibited()

    enhanced

    LPS-induced

    TNF-

    production()

    Reduced

    ()

    Prevented

    sepsis-

    associated

    encepha

    lopa-

    thy()

    Enhanced()

    LPS-treated

    mice[,]

    rats[]

    sheep[]

    CLPsepsis

    rats[,]

    CPLsepsis

    mice[,]

    Glutamine

    Heart()

    Lungs()

    Liver()

    Aorta()

    Kidneys(

    )

    Brain()

    Blood()

    Multipleorgans

    ()

    Induced()

    Bloodsamples:

    increasedHsp

    onlyafercoad-

    ministrationo

    Glnand

    ciprooxacin

    []

    Quercetin

    blocked

    Gln-mediated

    enhancemento

    Hspand

    HSF--p

    expressionsand

    survivalbenet

    ()

    LDdoseoP.

    aeruginosaand

    ciprooxacinin

    combinations

    ()

    Prevented

    ARDS()

    arterial

    pressure,

    cardiac

    contractility

    restoredinthe

    Glnthaninthe

    LPSshock()

    Quercetin

    preventedGln

    protection()

    Nodifferencein

    hemodynamic

    parameters()

    Inhibitedactivation,

    translo

    cationo

    NF-B

    tothe

    nucleu

    sdegradation

    oIKBalpha,

    phosphorylationo

    pMAPK,E

    RK,

    increasedMKP-()

    lungH

    MGB-

    expressionNF-B

    DNA-binding

    activitysuppressed

    ()Red

    uced

    peroxide

    biosynthesis()

    Attenuated

    TNF-alpha(),

    IL-.I

    L-,

    MDA,H

    MGB-,

    apoptosis()

    increasedIL-

    ()

    Reduced

    ()

    Enhanced()

  • 8/12/2019 Heat Shock Protein 1

    4/18

    BioMed Research International

    (a)Continued.

    Invivo

    Induction

    Organsst

    udied

    Expressionin

    cells/Hsp

    challenge

    Extracellular

    Hsplevels

    Inhibitors

    Functional

    Pathways

    Interleukins

    Organ

    damage

    Survival

    LPS-treated

    ratsbovineor

    Advirusor

    rHsp[]

    CLPsepsis

    ratsand

    tracheas

    AdHSP[]

    Exogenous

    rHsp

    AdTrackor

    Advirus

    Liver()

    Peritonea

    l

    macrophages

    ()

    MLE-c

    ells()

    Myocardium()

    Lungs()

    Induced()

    Normalized

    hemostasis()

    hemodynamics

    ()

    Biochemical

    parameters()

    Inhibited

    LPS-in

    duced

    decreaseNO

    expressionin

    macrophages,

    norma

    lized

    neutro

    philapoptosis

    ()inhibitedIB

    degrad

    ationand

    NF-B

    ,pnuclear

    translo

    cation()

    apopto

    ticcellular

    pathwayscaspases,

    ,()

    Modied

    myeloidcells

    responsetoLPS

    ()prevented

    LPS-induced

    increasein

    TNF-andIL-

    ()Reduced

    ICAM-,

    attenuated

    cardiac

    dysunction()

    Attenuated

    cardiac

    dysunction

    ()reduced

    alveolar

    cell

    apoptosis()

    Enhanced()

    (b)

    Invitro

    Induction

    Organsstudied

    Intracellular

    Hspexpression

    Inhibitors

    Pathways

    Interleukins

    Organdamage

    Survival

    Murine

    macrophage-

    likeRAW

    .cells

    []

    Heatshocked

    Macrophages()

    CellsromHS

    overexpressed

    Hsp()

    Inhibited

    phosphorylationo

    p,J

    NK,

    ERK/MAPK,IB

    degradation,

    NF-Bpnuclear

    translocation()

    HSinhibited

    HMGB-

    induced

    cytokines

    TNF-and

    IL-

    ()

    Enhanced()

    CLP-treated

    murine

    peritoneal

    macrophage

    cellline

    RAW.

    []Neonatal

    ratcardiomy-

    ocytes[]

    IEC-rat

    intestinal

    epithelial

    cells[]

    Glutamine

    Peritoneal

    ma

    crophages()

    Cardiomyocytes

    ()Int

    estinal

    epithelialcells()

    IncreasedHsp

    expression()

    Gln

    protection

    mimickedby

    PUGNA,

    banishedby

    alloxan()

    DFMO

    ornithine

    decarboxy-

    laseinhibitor

    ()

    ReducedLDH,

    increased

    O-ClcNAc,HSF-,

    transcription

    activity()

    increasedHSF

    bindingtoHSE()

    Invitro

    TNF-dose-

    time-Gln.

    DependentIn

    vivolower

    intracellular

    TNF-level

    Attenuated

    LPS-induced

    cardiomyocyte

    damage()

    Enhanced()

  • 8/12/2019 Heat Shock Protein 1

    5/18

    BioMed Research International

    (b)Continued.

    Invitro

    Induction

    Organsstudied

    Intracellular

    Hspexpression

    Inhibitors

    Pathways

    Interleukins

    Organdamage

    Survival

    LPS-treated

    rats[]

    LPS

    stimulation-

    mouse

    macrophage-

    likecellline

    (RAW.

    cells)[,]

    Transected

    withHsp

    plasmidor

    HS

    Myocardium()

    Macrophages()

    Hspplasmidor

    HSinduced

    Hsp()

    iNOSmRNA

    completely

    abolishedbyHS-

    Hsptransected

    cells()

    HSinhibited

    LPS-induced

    NF-BandHSF-

    activity()

    increasesboth

    cellularSKmRNA

    andproteinlevels

    ()

    Enhanced()

    CLPrats,

    murinelung

    epithelial-

    cellsin

    culture[]

    Murine

    macrophage-

    likeRAW

    .cells

    []

    Exogenous

    Hsp

    Lungs()

    Macrophages()

    Overexpression

    oHspin

    RAW/Hspcells

    ()

    Limitednuclear

    translocationo

    NF-B,

    phosphorylationo

    IkappaBalpha()

    Inhibitionothe

    MAPkinases(p,

    JNK,andERK)()

    Inhibitiono

    theNF-B-

    HMGB-

    induced

    releaseo

    TNF-,I

    L-

    ()

    LimitedNF-B

    activation()

    Enhanced()

    CLP-treated

    mice[]

    Arsenite

    (Positive

    control)

    Lungs()

    Induced-

    Inhibitors

    blockedHsp

    expression,(

    )

    Anti-human

    Hsp()

    Pretreatmentwith

    neutralizing

    antibodiesto

    Hspdiminished

    neutrophilkilling

    ()

    Survivorshigher

    oTcells()

    Enhanced()

    (c)

    KOanimals

    Induction

    Organsstudied

    IntracellularHsp

    expression

    Pathways

    Interleukins

    Organdamage

    Survival

    CLPsepsis

    Hsp.

    //KO

    mice[]

    Glutamine

    Lungs()

    Hsp.

    //mice

    didnotincrease

    Hsp()

    Hsp.

    /((/))

    miceincreasedNF-B

    binding/activation()

    IncreasedTN

    F-,

    IL-inKO()

    Increasedlunginjury

    inKO()

    DecreasedinKO()

    CLPsepsis,

    injectiono

    microorganisms

    Hsp/KO

    mice[]

    Imipenem/

    cilastatin

    Gut()

    Lungs()

    Hsp/micedid

    notincreaseHsp

    ()

    Increasedapoptosis

    andinammation

    Hsp/increased

    TNF-,I

    L-,I

    L-,

    IL-b

    KO-increasedgut

    epithelialapoptosis,

    pulmonary

    inammation()

    D

    ecreasedinKOage

    dependent()

  • 8/12/2019 Heat Shock Protein 1

    6/18

    BioMed Research International

    (c)Continued.

    KOanimals

    Induction

    Organsstudied

    IntracellularHsp

    expression

    Pathways

    Interleukins

    Organdamage

    Survival

    LPS-treatedmice

    Hsp/or

    overexpressed

    Hsp[]

    LPS

    Intestinal

    epithelium()

    Pharmacologic

    Hsp

    upregulation

    HspreducedTLR

    signalingin

    enterocytes()

    Hspreversed

    TLR-cytok

    ines,

    enterocyteapoptosis

    ()

    Preventedandtreated

    experimentalNEC()

    LPS-treatedmice

    overexpressing

    thehuman

    Hspabgene[]

    LPS

    Heart()

    Overexpressiono

    HSPAB

    Preventeddecrement

    intheactivationo

    PIK/proteinkinaseB

    signalingin

    myocardium()

    Decreasedth

    e

    expressiono

    VCAM-/ICAM-()

    Decreasedleucocyte

    inltrationin

    myocardium()

    Attenuatedcardiac

    dysunction()

    :numberostudies;PBMC:peripheralbloo

    dmononuclearcells;LPS:bacteriallipopolysaccharide;CLP:cecalligationandpuncture;TNF

    -:tumornecrosisactor-alpha;AdHSP:adenoviralvectorHsp;Gln:

    glutamine;HS:heatstress;Hspgene:Hspgene-transectedmodels;HSF:HSactor;HSE

    :heatshockelement;IKK:IBkinase;IkB:IkappaBalpha.

  • 8/12/2019 Heat Shock Protein 1

    7/18

    BioMed Research International

    Treatment time related to LPS/CLP

    Both Con Post Pre

    AdVhsp

    CLP+

    ExofHsp

    Gln

    Gln+

    HS

    Hspgene

    Animal iHsp72induction studies

    InconclusiveProtective

    (a)

    LPS/CLP iHsp72 interval (min)

    0 10 30 60 120

    AdVhsp

    CLP+

    ExofHsp

    Gln

    Gln+

    HS

    Hspgene

    Animal iHsp72induction studies

    InconclusiveProtective

    (b)

    F : (a) Preventive effect was achieved by all induction methods used irrespective o the challenge period or (b) time lapse betweenthe sepsis insult and the Hsp induction: LPS, bacterial lipopolysaccharide; CLP, caecal ligation and puncture; iHsp, inducible heat shockprotein ; Pre, pre-treatment; Post, posttreatment; both, trials with pre- and postexperiments; Con, concomitant; AdHSP, adenoviral vectorHsp; exogHsp, exogenous Hsp preparations; Gln, glutamine; +, additional challenge; HS, heat stress; Hspgene, Hsp gene-transectedmodels.

    were used in only studies with septic patients but in withhealthy volunteers. Heat stress (HS) or acclimation was usedin studies (.%), Gln administration in in associationwith LPS (.%), recombinant human Hsp in (.%),and either inhibitor or agonist in (.%). In studies nochallenge or only LPS (.%) was used. In only out o (.%) studies in septic patients induction Hsp methodswere attempted compared to % in the studies with healthy() or ARDS () patients ( < 0.006). Protection markersstudied were apoptosis ( studies, .%), HS ( studies,.%), oxidative damage, hospital inections, hemodynamicinstability, and ARDS ( study each, .%).

    Intracellular Hsp was induced in in vitro studies(.%, in healthy, in septic) and inhibited in (.%, in

    septic, in ARDS patients). O the studies in septic patients,intracellular Hsp was increased in (%), inhibited in (%), and not measured in . With the exception o sodiumarsenite, neither Gln nor HS were tested in these studies.Extracellular Hsp, measured in in vitro and in in vivostudies, was shown to increase in sepsis, especially in septicshock or in those who died (.% o human studies).

    Increased intracellular Hsp was protective in hal othe human studies (%); regarding the positive (HS, Gln,exogenous Hsp) in vitro induction Hsp human studies (.%) were protective (Figure (a)) and inconclusive(.%) or nonprotective (.%). O the induction methodsused, protection offered HS (/, %), glutamine (/, %),

    rHsp and sodium arsenite (/, % each) (Figure (b)).Incontrast, o the in vivo (serum Hsp measurements), in

    vitro endotoxin induced (LPS or CLP), and Hsp inhibitorhuman studies, none was shown to be associated with a betteroutcome ( < 0.02); studies were associated with mortality(%) and with inection (%) or were inconclusive (%).Septic patients studies were positive or protection in only out o (.%) compared to out o (.%) in healthy and% in ARDS patients ( < 0.06).

    .. Human Compared to Animal Studies. Out o a total o enrolled studies, only in vivo human studies (.%) havebeen reported on the role o Hsp in sepsis compared to

    mice (.%) and rat (.%) in vivo studies ( < 0.0001);in contrast human (.%) studies have been reportedin vitro compared to only in rats (.%) and in mice(.%); mice (.%) and rat (.%) combined in vitro-in vivo studies have also been reported. O the humanstudies, % showed a protective Hsp effect comparedto .% protection shown in animal studies (Figure (a)).When restricted to the septic patients studies, however, only out o (.%) demonstrated an Hsp protective effectcompared to .% protection shown in animal studies (


Recommended