Date post: | 06-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | thalia-sanders |
View: | 247 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 34
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
1/34
Chapter 19
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
2/34
Describe and identify information relevant tobusiness decisions
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
3/34
Define business goals
Identify alternative courses ofaction
Gather and analyze relevantinformation
Compare alternatives
Choose best alternative
Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 3
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
4/34
Expected future dataDiffers among alternativesRelevant costs
4Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
5/34
Do not affect decisionSunk costs
5Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
6/34
Managers need to consider qualitative factors indecision-making
Use same guidelines as relevant costs
Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 6
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
7/34
Incremental analysis
7Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
8/34
Make special order and pricing decisions
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
9/34
Is there excesscapacity?
Will the reducedprice cover the
incrementalcosts?
Will special
order affectsales in thelong-run?
Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 9
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
10/34
Is there excesscapacity?
?
Considerfurther
?
Reject thespecial order
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
11/34
Does reducedprice cover
variablecosts?
? Considerfixed costs
? Reject the
special order
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
12/3412
Will regular
customers findout and demanda lower price?
Will special ordercustomer
demand lowerprice on a
regular basis?
Will special orderstart a price war
withcompetitors?
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
13/34
Expected increase inrevenues
50,000 packs x .37 $18,500
Expected increase invariable costs
50,000 packs x .32 16,000
Expected increase inoperating income
$ 2,500
Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 13
ACCEPT
If $5,800 of costs will be incurred,then Active-Cardz should decline.
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
14/34
What is our
target profit?
How much willcustomers
pay?
Are we aprice-taker ora price-setter?
Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 14
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
15/34
Price-takers Price-setters
Product lacksuniquenessIntense competition
Pricing approachemphasizes targetpricing
Product is moreuniqueLess competitionPricing approachemphasizes cost-pluspricing
Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 15
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
16/34
Revenue at market priceLess: Desired profitEquals Target full cost
Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 16
Includes productand period costs
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
17/34
Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 17
Full costPlus: Desired profitEquals Cost-plus price
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
18/34
DECISION RULE:How to Approach
Pricing?
Is company aprice-taker for the
product?
?
Is company aprice-setter for
the product?
?
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
19/34
Make dropping a product and product-mixdecisions
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
20/34
Does the productprovide a positive
contributionmargin?
Will fixed costscontinue?
Can any fixedcosts be avoided
if we drop theproduct?
Will the sales ofother products be
affected?
What could wedo with the freed
capacity?
20Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
21/34
Two keys Focus on relevant revenues, costs and profits Use a contribution margin approachFocus now on a decrease in volume
21Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
22/34
Product has a negative contribution marginUnavoidable fixed costs are irrelevantAvoidable, direct fixed costs are relevant
Copyright (c) 2009 Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 22
8/2/2019 Hho8e Ch19 Stud
23/34
DECISION RULE:Drop a product,
department, or territory?
Are lost revenues >cost savings?
?
Are lost revenues