Local Food and Farm Plan Amendment 2010 Iowa Legislative Session
LOCAL FOOD AND FARM PLAN.
To the extent
feasible, the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture
established pursuant to section 266.39 shall prepare a local
food and farm plan
containing policy and funding
recommendations for supporting and expanding local food
systems and for assessing and overcoming obstacles
necessary to increase locally grown food production.
The
Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture shall submit the
plan to the general assembly by January 10, 2011.
The plan
shall include recommendations for short‐term and long‐term
solutions, including but not limited to the enactment of
legislation.
Leopold Center Timeline for Developing the Iowa Local
Food and Farm Plan
Research Iowa’s local
food infrastructureReview other state's
reports on local foodDevelop feedback
processes
Inform stakeholders
about the AmendmentBegin analyzing
preliminary data from
various sources
June –
September 2010June 24th Food and Farm Plan
Working Session
Individual feedback
and meetingsLocal listening
sessionsConduct online survey
Analyze, synthesize,
develop first draft
Take key strategies and develop
“actionable”
recommendationsDevelop complete draft of reportDue diligence on recommendations
October – November 2010
October 11 Working Session Goals
1.
Review summary of feedback on obstacles and
strategies
2.
Share key issues identified and work teams
3.
Take key issues and accompanying strategies and
develop “actionable”
recommendations for use in the
Iowa Local Food and Farm Plan
‐
is it feasible for the Iowa legislature to use recommendation as
a base for bill or amendment?
4.
Identify additional data need to complete
recommendations, and share ideas on generating
funds needed to implement recommendations
Decatur
Clayton
Adams LucasClarke
Ringgold
Mahaska
DavisAppanooseWayne
Marion
Delaware
Taylor
Washington
Henry
Allamakee
Poweshiek
Keokuk
Union
Warren
JeffersonMontgomery
Iowa
Plymouth
Mills
Calhoun
Winneshiek
Dubuque
Cherokee
Guthrie
Marshall
Page Van Buren
Monroe
Adair
Lyon
Wapello
Butler
Jones
Kossuth
Benton
Louisa
Jackson
Tama
Emmet
Greene
Harrison
Grundy
Jasper
Bremer
O'Brien
Lee
Story
Ida
Carroll
Fayette
Fremont
Buena Vista
Howard
Webster
Muscatine
Hardin
Audubon
Sioux
Cedar
Humboldt
Black Hawk
Wright
Worth
Chickasaw
Madison
Osceola
Johnson
Pottawattamie
Boone
HamiltonSac
Floyd
Monona
Pocahontas
Linn
Woodbury
Shelby
Des Moines
Winnebago
Franklin
Dickinson
Buchanan
Clay
Crawford
Cerro Gordo
Scott
Clinton
Mitchell
Dallas
Palo Alto
Polk
Hancock
Cass
0%
<1%
1 – 1.9%
2 – 4.9%
5 – 6.9%
7 ‐
10%
County of Residence (Percent of Total Survey and Listening Session Respondents)
Iowa Local Food & Farm Plan ‐
2010
RacePercent of Respondents
(Survey and Listening
Session)
White Only 97.4
Multiple Races 1.1
Hispanic Only 0.6
Asian Only 0.3
Native Hawaiian Only 0.3
African American or Black Only 0.2
American Indian or Alaskan
Native Only
0.2
Gender
Percent of
Respondents
(Survey and
Listening Session)
Male 49.8
Female 50.2
Iowa Local Food & Farm Plan ‐
2010
*Responses do not total 100% because respondents
could choose more than one occupation.
Iowa Local Food & Farm Plan ‐
2010
*Responses do not total 100% because
respondents could choose up to two sectors.
Iowa Local Food & Farm Plan ‐
2010
Decatur
Clayton
Adams LucasClarke
Ringgold
Mahaska
DavisAppanooseWayne
Marion
Delaware
Taylor
Washington
Henry
Allamakee
Poweshiek
Keokuk
Union
Warren
JeffersonMontgomery
Iowa
Plymouth
Mills
Calhoun
Winneshiek
Dubuque
Cherokee
Guthrie
Marshall
Page Van Buren
Monroe
Adair
Lyon
Wapello
Butler
Jones
Kossuth
Benton
Louisa
Jackson
Tama
Emmet
Greene
Harrison
Grundy
Jasper
Bremer
O'Brien
Lee
Story
Ida
Carroll
Fayette
Fremont
Buena Vista
Howard
Webster
Muscatine
Hardin
Audubon
Sioux
Cedar
Humboldt
Black Hawk
Wright
Worth
Chickasaw
Madison
Osceola
Johnson
Pottawattamie
Boone
HamiltonSac
Floyd
Monona
Pocahontas
Linn
Woodbury
Shelby
Des Moines
Winnebago
Franklin
Dickinson
Buchanan
Clay
Crawford
Cerro Gordo
Scott
Clinton
Mitchell
Dallas
Palo Alto
Polk
Hancock
Cass
Iowa Local Food & Farm Plan ‐
2010
Decatur
Clayton
Adams Lucas
AppanooseWayne
Delaware
Taylor
Henry
Allamakee
Montgomery
Plymouth
Mills
Calhoun
Winneshiek
Dubuque
Cherokee
Guthrie
Page Van Buren
Monroe
Adair
Lyon
Butler
Kossuth
Emmet
Greene
Harrison
Grundy
Jasper
Bremer
O'Brien
Lee
Ida
Carroll
Fayette
Fremont
Buena Vista
Howard
WebsterHardin
Audubon
Sioux
Humboldt
Black Hawk
Wright
Worth
Chickasaw
Osceola
Pottawattamie
HamiltonSac
Floyd
Monona
Pocahontas
Woodbury
Shelby
Des Moines
Winnebago
Franklin
Dickinson
Buchanan
Clay
Crawford
Cerro Gordo
Mitchell
Palo Alto
Polk
Hancock
Cass
Percent of Total Regional Expertise(Survey and Listening Session Respondents)
Sector Identified by Listening Sessions asNeeding the Most Attention
Sector Identified by Listening Session as Needing the Most
Attention
Aggregate score where (3=1st priority 2=2nd priority 1=3rd priority)
Percent of Listening Sessions Choosing the
Sector
Percent of Regions
Choosing the Sector
Crop production 9 30.8% 50.0% Livestock production 0 0.0% 0.0% Processing 5 15.4% 25.0% Aggregation and distribution 12 53.8% 87.5% Marketing and market venues 18 53.8% 62.5% Food safety, regulations, and
policy 3 7.7% 12.5% Financial assistance 12 46.2% 50.0% Beginning and underserved
farmers 4 23.1% 37.5% Planning 4 23.1% 25.0% Consumers 13 46.2% 62.5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Crop productionLivestock production
ProcessingAggregation and distributionMarketing and market venues
Food safety and policyFinancial assistance
Beginning and underservedPlanning
Consumers
Percent of listening sessions choosing the sector Percent of regions choosing the sector
*Responses do not total 100% because
respondents could choose up to two obstacles.
Iowa Local Food & Farm Plan ‐
2010
*Responses do not total 100% because
respondents could choose up to two obstacles.
Iowa Local Food & Farm Plan ‐
2010
*Responses do not total 100% because
respondents could choose up to two obstacles.
Iowa Local Food & Farm Plan ‐
2010
*Responses do not total 100% because
respondents could choose up to two obstacles.
Iowa Local Food & Farm Plan ‐
2010
*Responses do not total 100% because
respondents could choose up to two obstacles.
Iowa Local Food & Farm Plan ‐
2010
*Responses do not total 100% because
respondents could choose up to two obstacles.
Iowa Local Food & Farm Plan ‐
2010
*Responses do not total 100% because
respondents could choose up to two obstacles.
Iowa Local Food & Farm Plan ‐
2010
*Responses do not total 100% because
respondents could choose up to two obstacles.
Iowa Local Food & Farm Plan ‐
2010
*Responses do not total 100% because
respondents could choose up to two obstacles.
Iowa Local Food & Farm Plan ‐
2010
*Responses do not total 100% because
respondents could choose up to two obstacles.
Iowa Local Food & Farm Plan ‐
2010
Arriving at key issues
• Synthesizing and categorizing feedback – June 24th
meeting
– Listening sessions– Surveys– One on one or group conversations
Issue 1Farmers, processors, and food entrepreneurs need access to affordable loans to start and grow businesses.
Farmers, processors, and food entrepreneurs need incentives (such as tax
credits, tax rebates, grants, and equipment
cost‐share programs) to supply markets.
Issue 2
Existing and beginning farmers need access to land and water to
initiate or expand operations.
Issue 3
Farmers, processors, and food entrepreneurs need affordable and comprehensive insurance products to minimize risks in crop production, liability, and health.
Issue 4
Existing and beginning farmers, processors, and food entrepreneurs need education and technical assistance to develop profitable enterprises.
Issue 5
Small- and mid-sized farmers need customized environmental and food safety regulations to be profitable, protect natural resources, and ensure food safety.
Issue 6
Iowa needs investment in aggregation, distribution, storage, and processing facilities
(such as cold storage, packinghouses, and distribution
warehouses) to reach existing and new markets with high
quality local food products.
Issue 8
More coordination and data collection on the state of local foods is needed within and across organizations. Agencies supplying technical assistance, financial assistance, and regulatory oversight to local food producers, processors, and entrepreneurs need to be better coordinated.
Issue 11
Iowa needs innovative and creative ways beyond tax instruments and funding reallocation to pay for programs and assistance to build a strong local food business sector.
Issue 12
Developing draft recommendations
• Review ground rules
• Review issue, potential strategies, example recommendations
and checklist
• Using existing strategies as base, identify “Actionable”
recommendations
• Discuss and prioritize “Actionable”
recommendations
• Identify info (data) needed to complete each
recommendation
• Identify resources (if needed) to support recommendation
• Report back to large group