+ All Categories
Home > Documents > History of Microsoft - Trinity College, Dublin · Pink Group Microsoft, and how it's “monopoly”...

History of Microsoft - Trinity College, Dublin · Pink Group Microsoft, and how it's “monopoly”...

Date post: 02-Sep-2019
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
5
3/9/2009 1 MICROSOFT Speakers: Robert Eastman Augustine Vettikka Mark O'Meara Padraig Redmond Questioners: David Ruane Patryk Szafranski Dennis Theurer Cyril O'Floinn Ming Chung Poon Speakers: Robert Eastman Augustine Vettikka Mark O'Meara Padraig Redmond Questioners: David Ruane Patryk Szafranski Dennis Theurer Cyril O'Floinn Ming Chung Poon Pink Group Microsoft, and how it's “monopoly” has had an adverse effect on society Robert Eastman Introduction •History of Microsoft •History of Microsoft Microsoft's Monopoly Microsoft's Monopoly Competitors Today Competitors Today Future of the Monopoly Future of the Monopoly Robert Eastman History of Microsoft Robert Eastman In the Beginning Microsoft was founded in 1975 by Bill Gates and Paul Allen In 1980,IBM approaches them to make a BASIC interpreter for the upcoming IBM-PC. IBM is working with another company, Digital Research, to make the operating system for the IBM-PC Robert Eastman The Big Breakthrough IBM’s negotiations with Digital Research falls through. The same contract is awarded to Microsoft. Microsoft purchases the rights to Q-DOS for $50,000. This is later repackaged as MS-DOS. Gates insists that IBM let Microsoft keep the copyright on the operating system. Clones of the IBM-PC begin to appear. Microsoft gets MS-DOS onto many of these clones. Robert Eastman
Transcript
Page 1: History of Microsoft - Trinity College, Dublin · Pink Group Microsoft, and how it's “monopoly” has had an adverse effect on society Robert Eastman Introduction •History of

3/9/2009

1

MICROSOFT

Speakers:

Robert EastmanAugustine Vettikka

Mark O'MearaPadraig Redmond

Questioners:David Ruane

Patryk Szafranski

Dennis TheurerCyril O'Floinn

Ming Chung Poon

Speakers:

Robert EastmanAugustine Vettikka

Mark O'MearaPadraig Redmond

Questioners:David Ruane

Patryk Szafranski

Dennis TheurerCyril O'Floinn

Ming Chung Poon

Pink Group

Microsoft, and how it's “monopoly” has had an adverse

effect on society

Robert Eastman

Introduction

•History of Microsoft•History of Microsoft

•Microsoft's Monopoly•Microsoft's Monopoly

•Competitors Today•Competitors Today

•Future of the Monopoly•Future of the Monopoly

Robert Eastman

History of Microsoft

Robert Eastman

In the Beginning

•Microsoft was founded in 1975by Bill Gates and Paul Allen

•In 1980,IBM approaches themto make a BASIC interpreter for the upcoming IBM-PC.

•IBM is working with another company, Digital Research, to make the operating system for the IBM-PC

Robert Eastman

The Big Breakthrough

•IBM’s negotiations with Digital Research falls through.•The same contract is awarded to Microsoft.

•Microsoft purchases the rights to Q-DOS for $50,000. This is later repackaged as MS-DOS.

•Gates insists that IBM let Microsoft keep the copyright on the operating system.

•Clones of the IBM-PC begin to appear.

•Microsoft gets MS-DOS onto many of these clones.

Robert Eastman

Page 2: History of Microsoft - Trinity College, Dublin · Pink Group Microsoft, and how it's “monopoly” has had an adverse effect on society Robert Eastman Introduction •History of

3/9/2009

2

Domination of the corporate market

•In 1989 they release Microsoft Office.

•In 1995, Microsoft released Windows 95

•More than a 40 million copies were sold in the first year after its release.

•Microsoft release their first web browser,Internet Explorer.

•Microsoft Network (MSN) is released as a directcompetitor to AOL.

Robert Eastman

•Internet Explorer 4.0 is released on Windows and Mac O/S.

•Microsoft taken to court by the US Justice Courtand asked to stop bundling Internet Explorer with Windows

•In 2000, judgement passed in US federal court calling Microsoft an “abusive monopoly.”

•In 2004, the European Union, brings MSto court for abusing its current dominance with the Windows Operating System.

Source: http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/news/2008/06/gates_monopolyRobert Eastman

Augustine VettikkaDemerits of a monopoly

�Aerlingus €300 ireland To U.K.

�Along came competitors and now tickets are only €1.

�Automotive industry – Nissan had buy 1 get 1 free car offer.

�Electrical products – TV...

�They do not benefit society.

�Reduces innovative, high quality products and services.

Microsoft monopoly demerits� Ms monopoly is no exception.

�Lack of innovation. “Embrace & extend”.

�Overpriced due to less competition.

�Reduced quality products and services.

�Illegal business practices.

�Lack of innovation.

MS overpriced products�MS office home and

student - $149.95.

�MS office ultimate -$679.95.

� iWork ‘09 - $79 .

� iWork Family pack -$99.

Page 3: History of Microsoft - Trinity College, Dublin · Pink Group Microsoft, and how it's “monopoly” has had an adverse effect on society Robert Eastman Introduction •History of

3/9/2009

3

Leopard:

Vista:

Reduced quality products

Illegal business practices� E.U Vs Microsoft – ’93 – OS, media player .

“The European Commission has fined US computer giant Microsoft for defying sanctions imposed on it for anti-competitive behaviour.” – $ 1.4 bn.[1]

� U.S Vs Microsoft- ‘98 – OS, IE.

“Anti-competitive licensing

practices”-$794 mn.[1]

[1]http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7266629.stmhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_Microsoft_antitrust_case &http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft

Lack of innovation Monopoly Effect on society?

�Our needs aren’t met but their policies are imposed.

�Manipulates technology and law for selfish motives.

�Demolishes innovation and competition.

�Lowers user expectation.

�Less competitors leading to reduced quality products and

services.

Mark O'Meara

Page 4: History of Microsoft - Trinity College, Dublin · Pink Group Microsoft, and how it's “monopoly” has had an adverse effect on society Robert Eastman Introduction •History of

3/9/2009

4

Google Vs Microsoft

• E-Mail: Vs

• Word Processing: Vs

• Web Browser: Vs

E-Mail Storage (MB)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Before Gmail 1st April, 2004

Hotmail

Gmail

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Before Gmail 1st April, 2004

Hotmail

Gmail

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Before Gmail

Hotmail

Gmail

Google Docs Vs Office

Google V Internet Explorer

May 2003

January 2009

http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp

Google Apps

� Compares the savings you can make using Google Apps compared to Microsoft.

http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/business/messaging_value.html

Future of the Monopoly: Alternative Software

Pádraig Redmond

Page 5: History of Microsoft - Trinity College, Dublin · Pink Group Microsoft, and how it's “monopoly” has had an adverse effect on society Robert Eastman Introduction •History of

3/9/2009

5

Can the Monopoly Survive?

• Microsoft have consistently let their customers down

• Vista’s legacy will be hard to live down

• Microsoft’s future largely depends on Windows 7

What are the Alternatives?

Cloud Computing:Open Source:

Open SourceAdvantages:

• Recession friendly•Much more safe and secure• Can be modified by anyone to suit their specific needs

� Has become more user-friendly

Disadvantages:

•Having to adapt to unfamiliar layouts• Compatibility issues (Internet Browsers)

Cloud ComputingA future without Operating Systems:

• Relies heavily on the internet• Users access applications online instead of having them stored locally

Microsoft initially ignored this new technology, but has since announced Windows Azure

With Google being one of the biggest leaders in this field, Microsoft will for once have to compete instead of destroy

Conclusion

We believe that the Microsoft monopoly has just about run it’s course

Their only real option for competing in the future will be to drastically up their standards

A future without Microsoft would only benefit the advancement of technology and IT


Recommended