evidence of derangement. The pulse is the pulse of excitementwithout power. ’
The value of these signs, the author stated, was often not suffi-ciently estimated until it was too late to repair the cerebral mischiefdone. Dr. Winslow then pointed out the treatment of incipientinsanity. He stated that no specific plan of treatment could bepursued which would be applicable to every case. The medical
practitioner must be guided in his treatment by the circum-stances connected with each case brought under his considera-tion. As a general rule, he deprecated bleeding in the early oradvanced stages of insanity ; there were, however, cases in whichconsiderable vascular action was going on in the brain, and forthe removal of which it was necessary to abstract blood both
locally and generally. Dr. Winslow also spoke of the exhibitionof morphia, purgatives, counter-irritants, and the application ofcold in the treatment of insanity, and pointed out the states ofbrain in which they were admissible.
Mr. HEADLAND complained that the paper had failed in eluci-dating any new point connected with the subject discussed. Heshewed that cause and effect had frequently been confounded,and referred to cases in which insanity existed without any ap-preciable physical change. He considered that the pathologicalcondition was often the effect and not the cause of the mentaldisease. He had little expectation of insanity being either cured.or prevented by physical remedies, but trusted that moral treat-ment and training might be of service in effecting, to some iextent, its eradication. Altering the habits of the people wouldtend greatly to this desirable end. He shewed the difficultyof preventing the accomplishment of suicide where insanity onthat point existed, although it was easy enough to detect itspresence.
_ Mr. DENDY referred many states of mental aberration to a
want of balance in the circulation of the brain, principally inrespect to venous congestion.
The discussion was adjourned.
.Blogzda.7f, Febmaarf J 0, 1845.
A COMMUNICATION was read from Mr. Curtis, in reference tothe valerianate of zinc, in which it was stated that he hadadministered this medicine with great advantage in a variety of ’;cases of tinnitus aurium, nervous deafness, amaurosis, and muscsevolitante’. The dose was a grain. He intr< duced the medicineto the Society with the view of iuducing the members to try it incases of nervous debility; and as, at present, it was not easily pro-curable in London, he had placed some of the medicine in thehands of the President, to supply any gentleman who would wishto give it a trial. This remedy had the advantage of havingmineral and vegetable properties.
Mr. HIRD had employed this medicine in two cases of hystericalneuralgia. In one case it was of advantage.A MEMBER had also used the valerianate of zinc in a case of
brain afiection closely resembling delirium tremens. It was ofmuch benefit.The discussion of Dr. F. WINSLOw’s paper was then resumed.Dr. CosTELLO was astonished at the opinions expressed, at the
last meeting, by Mr. Headland, as they were perfectly opposed topathology.
Mr. HEADLAND explained, that in the absence of paralysis orother manifest physical disease, in a great majority of cases ofinsanity, there would be no appreciable change in the bra;n afterdeath. There was no relation whatever between the amount ofphysical disease and the mental aberration. He referred to a casepublished in THE LANCET some years since, in which there wascomplete destruction of a great portion of both hemispheres ofthe brain, and yet mind remained perfect to the last.
Mr. DENDY drew an analogy between simple concussion andincipient insanity, in which recovery took place, one from amoral, the other from a physical influence.
Dr. CnowNE considered that every mental disease had a
physical origin. In all cases of insanity there would be a phy-sical change, though it might not be always appreciable. Thebrain might be temporarily affected by some change in the cir-culation, independent of organic changes, as spasm and diarrhoeamight exist ithout physical lesion.
Dr. AnsoN shewed that disorder of function of the brainmight exist without appreciable organic change. Yet whodoubted its presence any more than they did the presence oforganic change in the kidney (though not to be detected) incertain disorders of function of that organ?
Dr. CLUTTERBUCK regarded insanity as not a disease per se,but merely a symptom of disordered function of the brain. Ifwe admitted-and, he thought, it could not be reasonablydoubted-that the brain was the orgap through which the mindwas manifested, it followed that every disordered condition of
the mind was dependent on some disordered condition of thebrain ; not always, it was true, obvious or appreciable, but still,it was clear that the br4in.wm not in a sound state of health.Not always to the extent of disorganization, for it was knownthat insanity often left the patient for a time, and then recurred,from causes not very obvious. The brain was often founddiseased in cases of insanity, but we wanted proof that thosechanges were always the cause of the insanity. Authors ofeminence, however, had asserted that they had always found thebrain diseased in cases of insanity ; Sutherland and Haslam wereof this number; and Mr. Lawrence, out of seventy-two cases,had found the brain diseased in all, a structural change existingin each case. These facts did not prove that the structuraldisease was the cause of the symptoms, but it shewed that iuinsanity the brain was not sound. That these conditions werenot the proximate cause of the insane phenomena, however, was’proved, for they existed independent of insanity. We foundopacity of the membranes, increased vascularity, bloody points,induration, softening, and serous effusions of the brain, in casesin which insanity did not exist. Changes, however, might’exist beyond what we were at present enabled to discover.What then caused this state of brain? He believed that it wasalways the result of inflammation which had existed at someperiod or other. He thought this, because inflammation was’the great disorganizing process ; and if disorganized, therefore,the brain must, at one time, have been inflamed. The dis-organization was the result, in some way, of inflammation. Wemight often trace insanity in its early stages to the influence of’extreme mental emotion, the effects of alcohol, or of local in-juries, the insanity subsiding on the subsidence of thesecauses, so that we had cause and effect at once before us. Hecomplained that the term incubation was not expressive of themanner in which insanity progressed in its early stages. Con-firmed insanity was incurable, as the brain had become per-’manently affected. The time for treatment was in the early*stage ; subdue the inflammation then, and you subdued thesymptom, and the brain regained its natural condition.
Dr. WIGAN agreed with Dr. Clutterbuck, except as to in-flammation being the first cause in all cases. He briefly referredto his opinions on the duality of the brain and mind.
Dr. CosTELLO agreed in the main with Dr. Clutterbuck; butbelieved that the changes of the brain connected with insanitymight be dependent on other causes than inflammation. Thusthere was a peculiar shining appearance of the white portion ofthe brain, not the result of inflammation, frequently found incases of insanity. He ailuded to the state of irritation, the-result of long suckling, of softening of isolated portions of brain,’in which the vessels were impervious to injection, as being often’passed over in examinations of the brain of lunatics.
Mr. HEADLAND replied. He shewed that no observationswhich had been made affected the position with which he hadstarted. He shewed, from reference to statistical facts, that’insanity bore a ratio to the state of mental and physical destitu-tion which prevailed, and he particularly directed attention to the:prevalence of insanity in Wales. He shewed the little benefitlikely to result from merely physical agents in the preventionof this disease, and trusted for the alleviation of mankind fromthis distressing malady to increased physical comforts, and im-proved mental and moral training.
HOSPITAL REPORTS.
COLCHESTER HOSPITAL.
STRICTURE AND ULCERATION OF THE (ESOPHAGUS, WITH OSSI-FICATION OF THE TRACHEA AND HYPERTROPHY OF THE*
HEART.
H- was admitted into the hospital, under Dr. E. Williams, inJanuary, 1839, complaining of his rejecting food immediatelyafter swallowing it, accompanied with pain at the pit of thestomach. On the 5th of February he was found in articulomortis, the eyes remarkably protuberant, with subsultus, or
spasmodic twitchings. "
The oesophagus was contracted, about four inches above thecardiac orifice. The mucous membrane was ulcerated, and veryadherent to the bifurcation of the trachea and to the arch of theaorta, and separated but by the intervention of the cellular mem-brane.
In the laryngeal region the cartilages of the trachea were ossi,fied, and apparently seemed to press on the oesophagus.The lungs were healthy but excessively engorged, the cells
being tinged with a frothy, sanguineous fluid ; externally, thpresented the natural violet hue.
248The stomach had a tumour on the external surface of the
lesser curvature, about the size of a walnut, but not connectedwith the interior.The left ventricle was greatly thickened, the left auricle being
dilated. The right auricle and ventricle presented nothing re-mark able. The septum ventriculorum unnaturally thickened. iThe valves healthy.
ON THE TREATMENT OF FISTULA.To the Editor of THE LANCET.
SiR,—The last number of your valuable journal contains abrief report of some cases of fistula treated by ligature. It isnot my intention to enter upon the comparative merits of thisplan with those of the operation by incision, although the in-applicability and insufficiency, as well as in many cases the pro-tracted pain and hazard which accompany the former, must havebeen observed by every practical surgeon, neither do I wish todisparage the ingenious method by which the general use of (asI-think) a deservedly obsolete practice is sought to be revived.My purpose in addressing you is to dissent from the opinionthat the operation by incision is attended with any unusualdanger, more especially hsemorrhage. The extensive experienceof nearly twenty years, enables me conscientiously, and unre-servedly, to affirm the reverse is the fact; in proof of which it ismerely necessary to mention, that in two hundred and forty-eighteases, selected promiscuously, which were operated upon at theFistula Infirmary in the manner I have for some years adopted,no fatal haemorrhage occurred; and further, out of that largenumber, in twenty instances only was there any bleeding requir-ing attention. Many of these operations were witnessed by pro-fessional friends, who concurred in expressing their approbationof the simpliciti-, efficacy, and safety of the plan. Before con-
eluding, 1 would add, that if the division of vessels of any size isrequisite, (by no means a common occurrence,) no serious con-sequence can eu:<t!e if the simplest precaution be observed.Respectfully requesting the insertion of these few remarks, Ibeg to subscribe, your obedient servant,
FREDERICK SALMON.Old Broad-street, Feb. 25, 1844.
FREDERICK SALMON.
MR. LUKE’S TREATMENT OF FISTULA IN ANO.To the Editor.-SIR: Allow me, through the medium of THE
LANCET, to ask Mr. Luke for a little more detailed account of thecases of fistula in ano treated by him, by means of the ligature, asdescribed last week, at page 221. For although the treatmentseems in the cases reported to have been most successful, and pro-bably would generally be so in cases where a small and singlejpnus existed at either side of the gut, yet I should scarcelyexpect such a result where there had existed a large abscess,occasioning considerable loss of substance, with a large cavity,and perhaps two, three, or more sinuses leading in different direc-tions from it: cases by no means theoretical or imaginary, butvhich must have often come under the notice of surgeons ofMr. Luke’s experience, and even of those whose experience ismuch less.-I am, Sir, your obedient servant,
H. BURFORD 1B -ITAN, M. R. C. S.Duchess-street, Portland-place, Feb. 25, 1845.
H. BURFORD NORMAN, M.R.C.S.
THE LIBRARY AT THE ST. GEORGE’S HOSPITALSCHOOL.
To the Editor of THE LANCET.
SIR,—Knowing the readiness and ability with which you haveso often advocated the rights of medical students, I venture toaddress to you a few lines on the inconvenience to which themembers of the St. George’s Hospital library are put, by itsclosure now, in the middle of the session, as it is pretended forthe purpose of encasing the books, and examining the catalogue toascertain how many are missing. It is now nearly three weekssince we have been excluded from the use either of the books orroom; nor is there as yet any notice as to when we may expectto regain it. And instead of the librarian and council workingdoubly hard in order that it may be re-opened as soon as pos-sible, the librarian only attends there now till four o’clock, or afew minutes after, daily, and does not come in the evening fromsix to eight, as was usual when it was open for our use. Theconsequence of this is, that much valuable time is lost betweenthe lectures, and the pupils must now either buy the books theyrequire, thus being put unnecessarily to great expense, or else beat a stand still and idle for want of them.
I remain, Sir, yours truly, ONE OF THE MEMBERS.Feb.i, 1845.
JAMES ROBERTSON.
A DISCIPLE OF MESMER.
R-, an agricultural labourer, complains of being totallyunable to extend his toes, or flex his foot on the leg, and ofnumbness of the skin of the inferior third of the front of the legand back of the foot. The muscles of the antero-exterior part of theleg feel flabby, and are somewhat wasted. The account he givesis, that last Michaelmas, whilst thrashing with a hand-machine,the handle thereof caught his smock-frock and whirled him heelsoverhead; and falling with his leg bent beneath him he feltgreat pain and was unable to stand, &c. Thereupon his employersent for a disciple of Mesmer in the village, who declared his legto be broken, and applied to a notorious bonesetter at Wis-beach. The bonesetter backed the assertion of the mesmerizer(par nobile fratrum), and R.’s leg was " splintered up " for someweeks, and the bonesetter’s certificate obtained. But from theexamination and inquiries I have made, my decided opinion isthat no fracture has existed at all. I believe the accident con-sists of an injury to the peroneal nerve which my readers willremember supplies the tibialis anticus, extensor communis digi-torum, extensor pollicis proprius, extensor brevis digitorum, andby its museulo-cutaneons branch, the lower antero-exterior partof the skin of the leg and the back of the foot; in fact, all theparts are paralyzed. JAMES ROBERTSON.Upwell, Cambridgeshire, Feb. l5th, 1845.
UNION OF THE METROPOLITAN ASSOCIATIONS.To the Editor of THE LANCET.
SIR,-If you think proper, I shall feel obliged by your insertingin THE LANCET the following letter, which I addressed yester-day to Mr. Harding, of South Molton, honorary secretary forSouth Devon, in reply to his circular; and remain, Sir, your,obedient servant,
Honiton, Feb. 16, 1845. J. C. JERRARD.
" Honiton, Feb. 15, 1845.
Dear Sir,-In reply to the circular which I received yesterday,I beg to state that I shall have much pleasure in seeing my nameenrolled among the general practitioners, for the purpose ofobtaining a charter of incorporation. I shall not, however, sendmy name for enrolment till I see the two metropolitan associationsunited-namely, the Association of General Practitioners inMedicine and Surgery,’ and the Medical Protection Assembly.’
" As soon as I see this very desirable step taken, and theirobject publicly and specifically announced, I shall send you myname for enrolment, together with a subscription of two guineas,or more.
11 I fear we are all too late. The metropolitan associationsought to have joined forces long ago. Hoping that my examplemay be adopted by others, I remain, dear Sir, yours faithfully,
" J. C. JERRARD." To J. N. Harding, Esq., South Molton, North Devon."
** Mr. Jerrard has, in all probability, overlooked the resolu-tion which was lately adopted (Feb 10th) at the Medical Protec-tion Assembly, on the motion of Mr. Wakley, and which isprinted at page 191 of the present volume of THE LANCET. Theresolution is as follows: °‘ That the general practitioners belong-ing to this Assembly be earnestly advised to enrol their namesforthwith in the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GENERAL PRAC-TITIONERS, with a view to obtain from parliament a full recog-nition of the principle of representation in the government of themembers of the medical profession of the United Kingdom ofGreat Britain and Ireland."
THE PREPARATION OF SODA.To the Editor of THE LANCET.
SIR,—In the number of THE LANCET for Jan. 18, of the pre-sent year, is an account of a new process for preparinghydriodic acid, by Mr. R. Phillips, jun., extracted from thePlaarmceceutical Journal.
If I rightly understand Mr. Phillips, he states his process tohave been suggested by one described in Dr. Kane’s work,and which, in fact, was first proposed by me at the meeting ofthe British Association in Glasgow, and of which process I
published a short account in the Philosophical Magazine, forJuly, 1841.
My process is for preparing both hydrobromic and hydriodieacids. Either the bromide or iodide of barium, in solution,being decomposed by dilute sulphuric acid; so that, by usinggiven weights, a given amount of either of the hydracids maybe obtained.
J. C. JERRARD.
"J. C. JERRARD.