+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Houska NAEAA 2016

Houska NAEAA 2016

Date post: 13-Apr-2017
Category:
Upload: jeremy-houska
View: 68 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
20
BEST PRACTICES & CURRENT TRENDS IN STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT JEREMY ASHTON HOUSKA, PH.D. DIRECTOR OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH & ASSESSMENT ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF PSYCHOLOGY CENTENARY UNIVERSITY
Transcript
Page 1: Houska NAEAA 2016

BEST PRACTICES & CURRENT TRENDS

IN STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT

JEREMY ASHTON HOUSKA, PH.D.DIRECTOR OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH & ASSESSMENT

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF PSYCHOLOGY

CENTENARY UNIVERSITY

Page 2: Houska NAEAA 2016
Page 3: Houska NAEAA 2016

Trends in Higher Education

Page 4: Houska NAEAA 2016

Trends in Higher Education

Page 5: Houska NAEAA 2016

Trends in Higher Education

National Survey of Student Engagement. (2009). Assessment for improvement: Tracking

student engagement over time—Annual results 2009. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University

Center for Postsecondary Research.

Page 6: Houska NAEAA 2016

Today’s Agenda

Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes:

3 Best Practices

Highlights

Point to Resources

Questions and Discussion

Sharing of Best Practices

Resources

Continuing the Discussion

Page 7: Houska NAEAA 2016

Cycle of SLO Assessment

Gather

Evidence of Learning

Establish/

Revise

SLOs

Take Action!*

Mission,

Educational

Objectives

Interpret

that

Evidence

Provide

Learning

Opportunities

*See Banta and Blaich (2011) Closing the Loop

See Jackson and Johnson

(2007)

C-RAC (2003) Principles for Good Practice

Page 8: Houska NAEAA 2016

SLO Assessment : Peer Review of SoTL

External Validation!

See Camfield (2012) Peer Review as a Tool for External Validation of Programs

MSCHE (2011) Handbook for Periodic Review Reports

Page 9: Houska NAEAA 2016
Page 10: Houska NAEAA 2016

Best Practice #1

Write SLOs as Performance Measures (Mager, 1997)

(APA 2002, 2013): overarching goals, foundational/ baccalaureate indicators

Measurable & Memorable

Page 11: Houska NAEAA 2016
Page 12: Houska NAEAA 2016

Best Practice #2

Utilize Multiple Assessment Tools …

At Multiple Points in Time

Every assessment method has its flaws

Direct Measures; Indirect Measures (see Allen, 2004)

Course-Based Assessment of Student Learning

(Stassen et al. 2001) ; Campus-Wide (standardized)

Assessments

Page 13: Houska NAEAA 2016

Indirect measures of student learning can complement direct

performance measures

Student Assessment of Learning Gains (see Seymour et al. , 2000;

SALGSITE.org)

Ancillary learning outcomes

Page 14: Houska NAEAA 2016

Triangulation of Data (see Nelson, 2010… but heed Mathison, 1988)

Page 15: Houska NAEAA 2016
Page 16: Houska NAEAA 2016

Best Practice #3

Construct Analytic Rubrics to Serve Multiple

Purposes

Grading, Assessment, Descriptive Feedback to Students

for Learning

(See Gibbs & Simpson, 2005; Hattie & Timperly, 2007; Jessop & Maleckar,

2016; Wormeli, 2006 on feedback conditions and learning)

Externally validated rubrics (see AAC&U Value Rubrics)

Take advantage of course management systems

Page 17: Houska NAEAA 2016

Richman and Ariovich (2013, NILOA) All-In-One: Combining Grading, Course, Program, and

General Education Outcomes Assessment.

GRADESPROGRAM, GEs

ASSESSMENT OF

Page 18: Houska NAEAA 2016

(Office of Institutional Assessment and Studies, University of Virginia)

Page 19: Houska NAEAA 2016

Final Thought

“… the most important outcome of assessment is not

gathering high-quality data, generating reports, or

stimulating conversation among colleagues. That outcome

is instead demonstrably improving student learning by

assessing it and using the findings to revise problems

accordingly” (Banta & Blaich, 2011, p. 27).

See also Porter’s (2012)

Assessment as a Subversive Activity

Page 20: Houska NAEAA 2016

Today’s References & Resources

http://bit.ly/2kgtETe

[email protected]


Recommended