22/02/2018
1
How about Inequality (Ginis and Lorenz):World and Brazil?
* 7.2
Recap: Gini Index and Lorenz Curve
2
Graph from the Lorenz Curve L(P)
22/02/2018
2
Lorenz curves 1988 and 2011 - Global
3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
There is not Lorenz dominance of 2011 wrt 1988
1988 2011 perfect equality
2011
Source: Milanovic
Lorenz curves 2008 and 2011 - Global
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
There is Lorenz dominance of 2011 wrt 2008
2008 2011 perfect equality
2011
Source: Milanovic
22/02/2018
3
Generalized Lorenz curves 1988 and 2008 - Global
5Source: Milanovic
There is generalized Lorenz dominance of 2008 wrt 1988
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Ave
rage
cu
mu
lati
ve p
er c
ap
ita
inco
me
Cumulative percentage of people
2008
1988
Generalized Lorenz Curve L(μ,P) = μ L(P)
1.7 Percentage of National Population in the Global Top 1% (2008)
Source: Milanovic (2016), Chapter 1
2 2 2 2 2 2
3 3
5
6
7 7
9 9
12
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
CYP DEU IRL KOR NLD TWN FRA NOR GBR JPN CAN LUX CHE SGP USA
Countries with more than 1% of their population in top global percentile (above $PPP 72,000 per capita in 2008 prices)
22/02/2018
4
Branko Milanovic
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050
Global Gini 1820-2011
B-M series
L-M and M series
With full adjustment (allocation to the top 10% + Pareto) Gini decline almost vanishes
Branko Milanovic
Survey data only
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
1988 1993 1998 2003 2008
Global Gini
Top-heavy allocation of the gap + Pareto adjustment
Summary_data.xls
22/02/2018
5
Inequality Across Nations - Unweighted
Overall Inequality
.45
.55
.65
.75
Gin
i Co
effi
cien
t
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010year
China Effect ChIndia Effect
Source: Milanovic (2011)
Inequality Across Nations – Weighted by Population
Evolution of World Income InequalityDifferent Concepts
Three concepts of inter-national income inequality, 1952-2013
Source: Milanovic (2016), Chapter 1
22/02/2018
6
Source: Milanovic (2011) and Neri (2011)
Brazil is a small World
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990
2013
2000
2001Year
Gin
iCo
effi
cien
t
.75
.65
.55
.45
0.535
0.5810.589
0.607
0.5144
0.539
0.594
China Effect ChIndia Effect
Inequality Across Nations
Falling in Brazil but still the 18th highest in
155 countries
Brazilian Per capita GDP PPP has grown 3.5% agains 3.6% of the world between 2002 e 2012
Gini Coefficients for Selected Countries
Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Income Distribution Database.
22/02/2018
7
Ginis in 1988 and 2011 (population-weighted countries)
twoway (scatter gini gini_88 if bin_year==2011 & keep==1 & mysample==1 & group==1 [w=totpop], text(50 55 "MEX") text(57 60 "BRA") text(42 34 "USA") text(23 30 "IND-R") text(46 36 "NGA") text(39 24 "CHN-U") text(45 30 "CHN-R") ylabel(20(10)60)) (function y=x, range(20 60) legend(off) ytitle(Gini in 2011) xtitle(Gini in 1988))Using final11\combine88_11.dta
Branko Milanovic
MEX
BRA
USA
IND-R
NGA
CHN-U
CHN-R
20
30
40
50
60
Gin
i in
201
1
20 30 40 50 60Gini in 1988
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1000 10000 100000
Gin
i of
dis
po
sab
le p
er c
apit
a in
com
e
GDP per capita (in 1990 international dollars; Maddison)
Kuznets relationship for the UK, 1688-2010
1867
1978
196
1993
168
2010
1913
22/02/2018
8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1000 10000 100000
Gin
i of
dis
po
sab
le p
er c
apit
a in
com
e
GDP per capita (in 1990 international dollars; Maddison)
Kuznets relationship for the United States, 1774-2013
1860
1929
2013
194
1979
1774
1933
Branko Milanovic
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
Urb
an G
ini
Year
Urban Gini in China: 1981-2014 (based on official household surveys)
22/02/2018
9
Where are now China and the US?
China 2013United States 2013
GDP per capita
Gini First Kuznets wave Second Kuznets wave
0,6
22
7
0,5
88
4
0,6
35
1
0,5
81
80
,60
37
0,6
00
20
,60
18
0,5
95
2
0,5
53
5
0,5
34
4
0,5
15
10
,51
44
0,50
0,52
0,54
0,56
0,58
0,60
0,62
0,64
0,66
19
76
19
78
19
80
19
82
19
84
19
86
19
88
19
90
19
92
19
94
19
96
19
98
20
00
20
02
20
04
20
06
20
08
20
10
20
12
20
14GINI HOUSEHOLD PER CAPITA INCOME – ALL SOURCES
Source FGV Social from PNAD/IBGE microdata
22/02/2018
10
GINI - EARNINGS INEQUALITY
Source FGV Social from PME/IBGE microdata per capita labour 15 to 60 years
0,54
0,56
0,58
0,6
0,62
0,64d
ez/0
2
mai
/03
ou
t/0
3
mar
/04
ago
/04
jan
/05
jun
/05
no
v/0
5
abr/
06
set/
06
fev/
07
jul/
07
dez
/07
mai
/08
ou
t/0
8
mar
/09
ago
/09
jan
/10
jun
/10
no
v/1
0
abr/
11
set/
11
fev/
12
jul/
12
dez
/12
mai
/13
ou
t/1
3
mar
/14
ago
/14
jan
/15
jun
/15
no
v/1
5
Lorenz Dominance
Source FGV Social from PNAD/IBGE microdata
22/02/2018
11
Inequality by Municipalities Gini Index of Per Capita Incomeby Municipality - 2000
Source: Demographic Census/IBGE microdata
2000
2010
Inequality by Municipalities Gini Index of Per Capita Incomeby Municipality - 2000
Source: Demographic Census/IBGE microdata
Inequality fell in 80% of the 5500 BrazilianMunicipalities
Inequality fell in 83% of LatinAmerica countries and 40% of World Countries
22/02/2018
12
0.535
Inequality of Per Capita Income (Gini)
Source: CPS;FGV from PNAD, PME and Census / IBGE microdata and Langoni (1973)
0.581
0.589
0.607
0.592
0.560
0.543
0.523
1960 1970 1979 1990 2001 2007 2009 2013
Year
Ineq
ual
ity
(Gin
i)
0,5
0,48
0,52
0,54
0,56
0,58
6
62
Long Run & Regional Perspective Latin America Latina last 3 Decades
Kuznets curves orKuznets Waves?Milanovic (2016)
Cornia (2014) on CEDLAS & CEPAL
A Visão da Nova Década - Desigualdade da Renda Per Capita