+ All Categories
Home > Documents > How does the nature of African government limit development? Politics of Development in Africa.

How does the nature of African government limit development? Politics of Development in Africa.

Date post: 30-Mar-2015
Category:
Upload: landen-steel
View: 214 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
14
How does the nature of African government limit development? Politics of Development in Africa
Transcript
Page 1: How does the nature of African government limit development? Politics of Development in Africa.

How does the nature of African government limit development?

Politics of Development in Africa

Page 2: How does the nature of African government limit development? Politics of Development in Africa.

Issues

• You should familiarise yourself with the following areas and be able to analyse the effect they have on a country’s development– Political instability– Domestic policies– Poor governance– Kleptocracy and corruption

Page 3: How does the nature of African government limit development? Politics of Development in Africa.

Political instability

• In recent history many African countries have experienced drastic political changes

• Most African colonies only became independent around 1960 and have struggled to achieve healthy democracy

• From 1954-2005 there were 186 military coups and 15 African presidents were assassinated

Page 4: How does the nature of African government limit development? Politics of Development in Africa.

What is a military coup?

• A military coup, or coup d’etat, is when the military uses force to get rid of the government

• Often, the military go on to take control of the country, leading to a military regime

Page 5: How does the nature of African government limit development? Politics of Development in Africa.

• Political Situation in the Central African Republic since Independence

– 1960-1962 Restricted Democratic Practice– 1962-1966 One Party State (MESAN)– 1966-1976 Military Regime & One Party State – 1976-1979 One Party State (MESAN)– 1979-1980 Transitional Period– 1980-1981 One Party State (UDC)– 1981         Restricted Democratic Practice– 1981-1987 Military Regime– 1987-1991 One Party State (RDC)– 1991-1993 Multiparty Transition– 1993-2003 Democracy– 2003-2005 Military Regime– 2005-        Democracy

Page 6: How does the nature of African government limit development? Politics of Development in Africa.

Political instability hinders development

• Why?– Leaders focus on simply holding onto power– Expensive projects which would lead to long

term development (e.g. developing roads, telecommunications, health and education) are neglected

Page 7: How does the nature of African government limit development? Politics of Development in Africa.

However…

• Stable government is not always good for development– Robert Mugabe has

been president of Zimbabwe since 1980 but the country is experiencing major problems

Page 8: How does the nature of African government limit development? Politics of Development in Africa.

Domestic policies

• Many African governments are poor at creating and implementing policies for development– Many spend more on military than on

essential services • E.g. Eritrea spend 19% of GDP on

military but only 4% on education)– Tariffs and minimum prices which

prevent them increasing their share of international trade

• Cotton trade has frozen in Malawi due to high minimum prices imposed by the government

Eritrea

Life Expectancy: 53.73 male, 58.71 female

Infant mortality: 44.34 deaths/1000 live births

Where is Eritrea?

Page 9: How does the nature of African government limit development? Politics of Development in Africa.

Poor governance

• This is a factor in a lot of Africa’s problems• Features of bad governments:

– ‘amateur’ politicians in place who got their jobs through nepotism and/or military coups

• 32 African countries experienced military rule during the 20th century – soldiers are not trained politicians

– Police cannot be trusted– Taxes are not collected effectively– Government cannot be counted on to deliver key

services– Human rights are abused

Page 10: How does the nature of African government limit development? Politics of Development in Africa.

Kleptocracy

• Many African states are kleptocracies– A kleptocracy is a system in which leaders

use their power to benefit themselves – Stealing public funds and/or aid money,

accepting bribes or getting advantages in business

• Those who go along with the system get to share the rewards, while those who speak out suffer

Page 11: How does the nature of African government limit development? Politics of Development in Africa.

How big is the problem?

• Of course, not all African politicians are corrupt

• However, late Nigerian Dictator Sani Abacha stole between $1 billion and $3 billion in the space of 5 years

• All this corruption diverts money away from aid projects and essential services

• Corruption in the Niger Delta

Page 12: How does the nature of African government limit development? Politics of Development in Africa.

Addicted to aidA percentage of AID given to African countries is stolen by corrupt officials.The Ugandan Health Minister is suspected of stealing $1 million of AID money that was intended to fund development projects

Page 13: How does the nature of African government limit development? Politics of Development in Africa.

Remember…• not all African

governments are inept and dishonest

• The Mo Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in African Leadership is awarded to leaders for not being corrupt– 2007 winner: Joaquim

Chissano (former president of Mozambique)

– 2008 winner: Festus Mogae, President of Botswana

Chissano received the Mo Ibrahim Prize from UN

Secretary General Kofi Annan

Analysis: Despite its good leadership, Botswana is still a struggling country with an average life expectancy of 35 years and the second highest HIV/AIDS infection rate in the world

Page 14: How does the nature of African government limit development? Politics of Development in Africa.

Case study: good domestic policy Uganda: The Poverty Eradication Action Plan

• Aim: to reduce poverty• Features:

– modernisation of agriculture– expansion and diversification of exports– reducing corruption– improving electric power supplies

• Successes: 6% economic growth rate• Challenges: many Ugandans still feel that

they are becoming poorer


Recommended