+ All Categories
Home > Documents > How to Grade for Learning - Schedschd.ws/hosted_files/tonkainstitute2014/5c/Intro to SBR 2014.pdfIn...

How to Grade for Learning - Schedschd.ws/hosted_files/tonkainstitute2014/5c/Intro to SBR 2014.pdfIn...

Date post: 31-Mar-2018
Category:
Upload: buituyen
View: 217 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
17
How to Grade for Learning 1 © Ken OConnor, 2014 1 4 Designing Standards-Based Report Cards Minnetonka, June 26 th , 2014 Presented by Ken OConnor Assess for Success Consulting [email protected] 416 267 4234 © Ken OConnor, 2014 2 4 What is Standards-Based Reporting? Standards-based reporting is designed to accurately portray student proficiency/mastery and to present a “picture” of the child as a learner. In SBR grades are based on standards not assessment methods, levels of proficiency not points, and they are not contaminated by non-achievement factors. © Ken OConnor, 2014 3 4 What is a standards-based system? In a standards-based system, teachers report what students know and are able to do in relation to the Colorado and District Standards. The system includes: The improvement of student achievement of required learning outcomes in all content areas, The mastery of defined learning outcomes instead of the accumulation of points, The reporting of student achievement toward meeting learning outcomes at a given time by analyzing recent trend information based on various forms of evidence, A record keeping system that provides teachers with information that allows them to adjust learning practices to meet the needs of students, and A system that encourages student reflection and responsibility. Source: Adams12 Five Star Schools, CO
Transcript

How to Grade for Learning

1

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

1

4

Designing Standards-Based Report Cards

Minnetonka, June 26th, 2014

Presented by

Ken O’Connor Assess for Success Consulting

[email protected] 416 267 4234

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

2

4

What is Standards-Based Reporting? Standards-based reporting is designed to accurately portray student proficiency/mastery and to present a “picture” of the child as a learner. In SBR grades are based on •  standards not assessment methods, •  levels of proficiency not points, and they are •  not contaminated by non-achievement factors.

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

3

4

What is a standards-based system? In a standards-based system, teachers report what students know and are able to do in relation to the Colorado and District Standards. The system includes: •  The improvement of student achievement of required learning

outcomes in all content areas, •  The mastery of defined learning outcomes instead of the

accumulation of points, •  The reporting of student achievement toward meeting learning

outcomes at a given time by analyzing recent trend information based on various forms of evidence,

•  A record keeping system that provides teachers with information that allows them to adjust learning practices to meet the needs of students, and

•  A system that encourages student reflection and responsibility. Source: Adams12 Five Star Schools, CO

How to Grade for Learning

2

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

4

4

Why Standards-Based Reporting? 1. Mandate 2. Supports learning 3. Improves communication 4. Consistency/Fairness

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

5

4

Essential Pre-Conditions for SBR

1.  Recognition of need for true standards- based system and/or dissatisfaction with traditional grading/reporting.

2.  Consensus on purpose of report cards and grades.

3. Discussion of underpinning issues: - fairness, motivation, professional judgment

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

6

4

Typical Traditional Report Card

English B Good work Mathematics C Needs improvement Science B Pleasure to have in class Social Studies A Excellent Physical Education A Keep up the great work Art D More effort needed Music F Come in for extra help

How to Grade for Learning

3

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

7

4

The purpose of this report card is to communicate with parents and students about the achievement or progress toward established learning goals for each quarter. Grades reflect how well students have met these goals in each class, indicating areas of strength and areas where additional time and effort are needed. Medford (OR) School District

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

8

4

Example of Purpose Statement

“Dear Parent or Guardian,

This progress report is one component of communicating with you about your child’s progress in school. Through this report system along with parent teacher conferences, work samples and formal evaluations, we believe you will have a good understanding of your child’s progress in school.

This progress report key reflects how your child is performing relative to end of year grade level standards. At the beginning of the year, most students are developing a level of understanding relative to these standards. As the year progresses, most students will make progress toward mastering these outcomes.

The teaching staff and administration believe teachers and parents must work together to ensure students achieve their full potential. We hope that this report will encourage you to discuss questions and concerns you might have about your child’s progress in school.

We look forward to our continued partnership with parents in providing the very best education for your child.”

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

9

4

“Fair does not mean equal; yet, when it comes to grading, we insist that it does.”

Patterson, William “Breaking Out of Our Boxes,” Kappan, April 2003, 572

Underpinning Issue #1: FAIRNESS

How to Grade for Learning

4

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

10

4

Underpinning Issue #1: FAIRNESS What does FAIR mean ?

“All students are given an equal opportunity to demonstrate what they know and can do as part of the assessment process. Adaptations to assessment materials and procedures are available for students including but not restricted to students with learning disabilities, to allow them to demonstrate their knowledge and skills, provided that the adaptations do not jeopardize the integrity or content of the assessment.”

Adapted from Manitoba Education and Training at http://www.edu.gov.mb.ca/metks4/curricul/assess/aepolprod/purpos~2.html

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

11

4

Underpinning Issue #2: MOTIVATION

“Drive” by Daniel Pink

Motivation 1.0 - the ancient drive to survive Motivation 2.0 - rewarding good work with pay, benefits and promotions - centres on "Type X behaviour” where people are motivated mostly by external rewards.

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

12

4

Pink believes it is time for a "full scale upgrade" to Motivation 3.0 - intrinsic rewards that play to the intrinsic satisfaction of the activity. Motivation 3.0 is based on what Pink calls "Type I behavior," where the main motivators are the freedom to do what you want, the opportunity to take a challenge and fulfillment by the purpose of the undertaking. Source- review by Richard Eisenberg in USA Today, January 25, 2010

Underpinning Issue #2: MOTIVATION

How to Grade for Learning

5

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

13

4

“All kids start out as curious self-directed Type I’s. But many of them end up as disengaged, compliant Type X’s. . . . If we want to equip young people for the new world of work - and more important, if we want them to lead satisfying lives - we need to break Motivation 2.0’s grip on education and parenting. . . . Unfortunately, as with business, there is a mismatch between what science knows and what schools do. . . We’re bribing students into compliance instead of challenging them into engagement.” Daniel Pink, 2009, Drive, Riverhead Books, New York, 174

Underpinning Issue #2: MOTIVATION

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

14

4

According to Pink the keys to Motivation 3.0 are

Autonomy

Mastery

Purpose

Underpinning Issue #2: MOTIVATION

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

15

4

Underpinning Issue #2: MOTIVATION !

“Don’t use grades punitively… Without exception, experts in the area of student grading recommend that grades not be used in a punitive sense. When a teacher uses grades as punishment for student behaviors, the teacher establishes an adversarial relationship in which grades are no longer meaningful to students as indicators of their accomplishments. The punitive use of grades only increases the likelihood that students will lose respect for the evaluation system; consequently the appeal to students of subverting such a system will be heightened.”!

Source: Cizek, G. J. 2003.Detecting and Preventing Cheating; Promoting Integrity in Assessment, Corwin, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2003, 100 in O’Connor, K.,

A Repair Kit for Grading, Pearson ATI. 2011. 43

How to Grade for Learning

6

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

16

4

Underpinning Issue #3: OBJECTIVITY AND PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT

Traditional view

Objective good!

Subjective bad!!

Strive to be objective!

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

17

4

Underpinning Issue #3: OBJECTIVITY AND PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT

“All scoring by human judges, including assigning points and taking them off math

homework is subjective. The question is not whether it is subjective, but whether it is defensible and credible. The AP and IB

programs (are) credible and defensible, yet subjective. I wish we could stop using that word as a pejorative! So-called objective

scoring is still subjective test writing.” Grant Wiggins, January 19, 2000 answering a question on chatserver.ascd.org

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

18

4

“I define professional judgment as “decisions made by educators, in light of experience, and with reference to shared public standards and established policies and guidelines.” Cooper, D. 2011. Redefining Fair. Solution Tree, Bloomington, IN. 13

Underpinning Issue #3: OBJECTIVITY AND PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT

How to Grade for Learning

7

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

19

4

Essential Components of SBR Grades based on: 1.  Content standards (what) 2.  Performance standards based on proficiency levels NOT % or bell curve. 3.  Achievement only; behaviors reported separately 4.  Summative assessments (clear purpose) 5.  Multiple opportunities to demonstrate proficiency with emphasis on more recent achievement 6. Quality standards-based assessments

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

20

4

1. Content Standards •  How many •  Level of specificity - strand or benchmark •  Grade level specific or several grades •  Parent friendly or state language •  ‘Grades’ for standards with or without subject grade

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

21

4

85

How to Grade for Learning

8

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

22

4

Common Core Math Grade 5!!

Student:

ACHIEVEMENT EVIDENCE

Strands

Assessments

Sum

mar

y

10/1 Test

10/15 PA

11/7 PA

11/18 PA

12/8 PA

12/17 Test

Strengths, Areas for Improvement/

Observations

Operations and Algebraic Thinking (3)

3 (17/20)

3 3 3 3

(17/20) 3

Number and Operations in Base Ten (7)

1 NA

Number and Operations – Fractions (7)

2 (15/20)

4 2 2 2

(15/20) 2

Measurement and Data (5)

4 (19/20)

4 4 1 4 (19/20)

4

Geometry (4) 1 2 3 4 4 (20/20)

4

Comments:

! 25

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

23

4

!"#$%&'""("%)*"+"($,'-%./011*%234562347%.$,(8,'8#69,#"8%:";1'$%<,'8%!"#$%&"'()*%+',,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,'

!"#$%&'()$'*#+%'!%%,)-'.%//01&'2+3'*#+%'!%%,)-'4#+,&'563'*#+%'!%%,)-'70/3&'8$"'*#+%'!%%,)'

Grade Level: Third Grade

Teacher’s Name: ___________________________________

Family Involvement 1 2 3 4 Days Absent

Number of Tardies

Homework Assignments Missing

1. Comments:

'''''

2. Comments:

'''''

3. Comments:

'''''

4. Comments:

'''''

'Academic Performance Indicators for Content Areas Exceeds Standard + Meets Standard = Progressing Toward Standard ^ Not Yet Making Sufficient Progress - Not Assessed This Marking Period n

'Reading 3D Benchmarks by Grade

BOY MOY EOY Kindergarten RB C D (6)

1st Grade D G J (18) 2nd Grade J L M (28) 3rd Grade M O P (38) 4th Grade P R S (44) 5th Grade S T U (50)

'Reading Level 1 2 3 4 Current Instructional Reading Level

1. Comments:

'''''

2. Comments:

'''''

3. Comments:

'''''

4. Comments:

'''''

'3rd Grade Common Core English Language Arts

Reading Informational & Literary Text

1 2 3 4

Key Ideas & Details

Craft & Structure

Integration of Knowledge & Ideas

Range of Reading & Level of Text Complexity

Reading Foundational Skills 1 2 3 4 Print Concepts

Phonological Awareness

Phonics & Word Recognition

Fluency

Writing 1 2 3 4 Text Types & Purposes

Production & Distribution of Writing

Research to Build and Present Knowledge

Range of Writing

Speaking & Listening 1 2 3 4 Comprehension & Collaboration

Presentation of Knowledge & Ideas

Language 1 2 3 4 Conventions of Standard English

Knowledge of Language

Vocabulary Acquisition and Use

1. Comments:

'''''

2. Comments:

'''''

3. Comments:

'''''

4. Comments:

'''''

'3rd Grade Common Core Mathematics

Operations & Algebraic Thinking 1 2 3 4 Represent & Solve Problems Involving Multiplication & Division

Understand Properties of Multiplication & the Relationship Between Multiplication & Division

Multiply & Divide within 100

Solve Problems Involving the Four Operations, & Identify & Explain Patterns in Arithmetic

Number & Operations in Base Ten 1 2 3 4 Use Place Value Understanding & Properties of Operations to Perform Multi-Digit Arithmetic

Number & Operations – Fractions 1 2 3 4 Develop Understanding of Fractions as Numbers

Measurement & Data 1 2 3 4 Solve Problems Involving Measurement & Estimation of Intervals of Time, Liquid, Volumes, & Masses of Objects

Represent & Interpret Data Geometric Measurement: Understand Concepts of Area & Relate Area to Multiplication & to Addition

Geometric Measurement: Recognize Perimeter as an Attribute of Plane Figures & Distinguish Between Linear & Area Measures

Geometry 1 2 3 4 Reason with Shapes & Their Attributes

1. Comments:

2. Comments:

3. Comments:

4. Comments:

'' '

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

24

4

!"#$%&'""("%)*"+"($,'-%./011*%234562347%.$,(8,'8#69,#"8%:";1'$%<,'8%!"#$%&"'()*%+',,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,'

!"#$%&'()$'*#+%'!%%,)-'.%//01&'2+3'*#+%'!%%,)-'4#+,&'563'*#+%'!%%,)-'70/3&'8$"'*#+%'!%%,)'

Grade Level: Third Grade

Teacher’s Name: ___________________________________

Family Involvement 1 2 3 4 Days Absent

Number of Tardies

Homework Assignments Missing

1. Comments:

'''''

2. Comments:

'''''

3. Comments:

'''''

4. Comments:

'''''

'Academic Performance Indicators for Content Areas Exceeds Standard + Meets Standard = Progressing Toward Standard ^ Not Yet Making Sufficient Progress - Not Assessed This Marking Period n

'Reading 3D Benchmarks by Grade

BOY MOY EOY Kindergarten RB C D (6)

1st Grade D G J (18) 2nd Grade J L M (28) 3rd Grade M O P (38) 4th Grade P R S (44) 5th Grade S T U (50)

'Reading Level 1 2 3 4 Current Instructional Reading Level

1. Comments:

'''''

2. Comments:

'''''

3. Comments:

'''''

4. Comments:

'''''

'3rd Grade Common Core English Language Arts

Reading Informational & Literary Text

1 2 3 4

Key Ideas & Details

Craft & Structure

Integration of Knowledge & Ideas

Range of Reading & Level of Text Complexity

Reading Foundational Skills 1 2 3 4 Print Concepts

Phonological Awareness

Phonics & Word Recognition

Fluency

Writing 1 2 3 4 Text Types & Purposes

Production & Distribution of Writing

Research to Build and Present Knowledge

Range of Writing

Speaking & Listening 1 2 3 4 Comprehension & Collaboration

Presentation of Knowledge & Ideas

Language 1 2 3 4 Conventions of Standard English

Knowledge of Language

Vocabulary Acquisition and Use

1. Comments:

'''''

2. Comments:

'''''

3. Comments:

'''''

4. Comments:

'''''

'3rd Grade Common Core Mathematics

Operations & Algebraic Thinking 1 2 3 4 Represent & Solve Problems Involving Multiplication & Division

Understand Properties of Multiplication & the Relationship Between Multiplication & Division

Multiply & Divide within 100

Solve Problems Involving the Four Operations, & Identify & Explain Patterns in Arithmetic

Number & Operations in Base Ten 1 2 3 4 Use Place Value Understanding & Properties of Operations to Perform Multi-Digit Arithmetic

Number & Operations – Fractions 1 2 3 4 Develop Understanding of Fractions as Numbers

Measurement & Data 1 2 3 4 Solve Problems Involving Measurement & Estimation of Intervals of Time, Liquid, Volumes, & Masses of Objects

Represent & Interpret Data Geometric Measurement: Understand Concepts of Area & Relate Area to Multiplication & to Addition

Geometric Measurement: Recognize Perimeter as an Attribute of Plane Figures & Distinguish Between Linear & Area Measures

Geometry 1 2 3 4 Reason with Shapes & Their Attributes

1. Comments:

2. Comments:

3. Comments:

4. Comments:

'' '

How to Grade for Learning

9

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

25

4

Sample Student

20

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

26

4

HS Mockup-2 EMA 2/14/2013

Student Name ID Grade Counselor Term Period End Date School Year April May 111111 10 Staci Fischer 4 June 7, 2013 2012-2013

Period / Term(s) Course Teacher Term 1 1234 English 4 Davis 1 2 3 4

Overall Grades B B B B

Achievement Standards

Reading Informational Text MAS MAS MAS MAS Reading Literary Text MTS MTS MTS MTS Writing MTS MTS MTS ADV Language MAS MAS MAS MAS Speaking and Listening MTS MTS MTS MTS

CRL Standards

Independence & Initiative M M M M Work Completion & Work Habits NI M NI M Cooperation & Participation M M M M Absences 4/M 2/M 12/NI 1M

2 1234 Anatomy / Phys Warren 1 2 3 4 Overall Grades C C B C

Achievement Standards

Organization of Living Systems BEG BEG ADV ADV Matter and Energy ADV BEG ADV BEG Interdependence BEG BEG BEG ADV Scientific Writing ADV MTS MTS MTS Reading Scientific Texts MTS MTS MTS MTS Scientific Writing APP APP ADV APP

CRL Standards

Independence & Initiative M M M M Work Completion & Work Habits NI M NI M Cooperation & Participation M M M M Absences 4/M 2/M 12/NI 1M

3 1234 Weller 1 2 3 4 Overall Grades A B A B

Achievement Standards

Vocal Performance MAS MAS MAS MAS Music Reading MTS MTS MTS MTS Musical Concept Analysis ADV ADV ADV ADV

CRL Standards

Independence & Initiative M M M M Work Completion & Work Habits NI M NI M Cooperation & Participation M M M M Absences 4/M 2/M 12/NI 1M

4 1234 Spanish 2 Wallace 1 2 3 4 Overall Grades A B A B

Achievement Standards

Communication MAS MAS MAS MAS Knowledge of Culture & Viewpoints MTS MTS MTS MTS Language (Vocab, Conjugation, etc.) MTS MTS MTS ADV

CRL Standards

Independence & Initiative M M M M Work Completion & Work Habits NI M NI M Cooperation & Participation M M M M Absences 4/M 2/M 12/NI 1M

Period / Term(s) Course Teacher Term

5 1 Basic Compt 2 Mr. Richmond 1 2 3 4 Overall Grades A A

Achievement Standards

Typing MAS MAS Application Management MTS MTS Basic Skills MTS MTS

CRL Standards

Independence & Initiative M M Work Completion & Work Habits NI M Cooperation & Participation M M Absences 4/M 2/M

5 24 Algebra Intermed Reed 1 2 3 4 Overall Grades A A

Achievement Standards

Number and Quantity MTS MTS Interpreting and Building Functions MAS MAS The Real Number System MTS MTS Linear, Quadratic, & Exponential Models MTS MTS Statistics and Probability ADV ADV

CRL Standards

Independence & Initiative M M Work Completion & Work Habits M M Cooperation & Participation M M Absences 2/M 1M

5 4 Auto Service 1 Veverka 1 2 3 4 Overall Grades B

Achievement Standards

Mechanics MAS Functional Skills MTS

CRL Standards

Independence & Initiative M Work Completion & Work Habits NI Cooperation & Participation M Absences 12/NI

6 13 Algebra Intermed Reed 1 2 3 4 Overall Grades C C

Achievement Standards

Number and Quantity MTS MTS Interpreting and Building Functions MAS MAS The Real Number System MTS MTS Linear, Quadratic, & Exponential Models MTS MTS Statistics and Probability ADV ADV

CRL Standards

Independence & Initiative M M Work Completion & Work Habits M M Cooperation & Participation M M Absences 2/M 1M

SOUTH MEDFORD HIGH SCHOOL 1551 CUNNINGHAM AVE MEDFORD OR 97501

TO THE PARENT / GAURDIAN OF:

APRIL MAY 123 MAIN STREET MEDFORD OR 97501

Grade Report Medford School District 549C

Medford, Oregon

The purpose of this report card is to communicate with parents and students about the achievement or progress toward established learning goals. Grades reflect how well students have met these goals in each class, indicating areas of strength and areas where additional time and effort are required.

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

27

4

HS Mockup-2 EMA 2/14/2013

Student Name ID Grade Counselor Term Period End Date School Year April May 111111 10 Staci Fischer 4 June 7, 2013 2012-2013

Period / Term(s) Course Teacher Term 1 1234 English 4 Davis 1 2 3 4

Overall Grades B B B B

Achievement Standards

Reading Informational Text MAS MAS MAS MAS Reading Literary Text MTS MTS MTS MTS Writing MTS MTS MTS ADV Language MAS MAS MAS MAS Speaking and Listening MTS MTS MTS MTS

CRL Standards

Independence & Initiative M M M M Work Completion & Work Habits NI M NI M Cooperation & Participation M M M M Absences 4/M 2/M 12/NI 1M

2 1234 Anatomy / Phys Warren 1 2 3 4 Overall Grades C C B C

Achievement Standards

Organization of Living Systems BEG BEG ADV ADV Matter and Energy ADV BEG ADV BEG Interdependence BEG BEG BEG ADV Scientific Writing ADV MTS MTS MTS Reading Scientific Texts MTS MTS MTS MTS Scientific Writing APP APP ADV APP

CRL Standards

Independence & Initiative M M M M Work Completion & Work Habits NI M NI M Cooperation & Participation M M M M Absences 4/M 2/M 12/NI 1M

3 1234 Weller 1 2 3 4 Overall Grades A B A B

Achievement Standards

Vocal Performance MAS MAS MAS MAS Music Reading MTS MTS MTS MTS Musical Concept Analysis ADV ADV ADV ADV

CRL Standards

Independence & Initiative M M M M Work Completion & Work Habits NI M NI M Cooperation & Participation M M M M Absences 4/M 2/M 12/NI 1M

4 1234 Spanish 2 Wallace 1 2 3 4 Overall Grades A B A B

Achievement Standards

Communication MAS MAS MAS MAS Knowledge of Culture & Viewpoints MTS MTS MTS MTS Language (Vocab, Conjugation, etc.) MTS MTS MTS ADV

CRL Standards

Independence & Initiative M M M M Work Completion & Work Habits NI M NI M Cooperation & Participation M M M M Absences 4/M 2/M 12/NI 1M

Period / Term(s) Course Teacher Term

5 1 Basic Compt 2 Mr. Richmond 1 2 3 4 Overall Grades A A

Achievement Standards

Typing MAS MAS Application Management MTS MTS Basic Skills MTS MTS

CRL Standards

Independence & Initiative M M Work Completion & Work Habits NI M Cooperation & Participation M M Absences 4/M 2/M

5 24 Algebra Intermed Reed 1 2 3 4 Overall Grades A A

Achievement Standards

Number and Quantity MTS MTS Interpreting and Building Functions MAS MAS The Real Number System MTS MTS Linear, Quadratic, & Exponential Models MTS MTS Statistics and Probability ADV ADV

CRL Standards

Independence & Initiative M M Work Completion & Work Habits M M Cooperation & Participation M M Absences 2/M 1M

5 4 Auto Service 1 Veverka 1 2 3 4 Overall Grades B

Achievement Standards

Mechanics MAS Functional Skills MTS

CRL Standards

Independence & Initiative M Work Completion & Work Habits NI Cooperation & Participation M Absences 12/NI

6 13 Algebra Intermed Reed 1 2 3 4 Overall Grades C C

Achievement Standards

Number and Quantity MTS MTS Interpreting and Building Functions MAS MAS The Real Number System MTS MTS Linear, Quadratic, & Exponential Models MTS MTS Statistics and Probability ADV ADV

CRL Standards

Independence & Initiative M M Work Completion & Work Habits M M Cooperation & Participation M M Absences 2/M 1M

SOUTH MEDFORD HIGH SCHOOL 1551 CUNNINGHAM AVE MEDFORD OR 97501

TO THE PARENT / GAURDIAN OF:

APRIL MAY 123 MAIN STREET MEDFORD OR 97501

Grade Report Medford School District 549C

Medford, Oregon

The purpose of this report card is to communicate with parents and students about the achievement or progress toward established learning goals. Grades reflect how well students have met these goals in each class, indicating areas of strength and areas where additional time and effort are required.

How to Grade for Learning

10

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

28

4

2. Performance Standards •  number of levels - 2 to 101, proficiency or numbers •  labels - words or symbols or both •  descriptors - clarity, richness - problem words - exceeds, all - progression between levels - consistency within a level •  achievement, growth or progress •  links to letter grades, grading scale •  when - at time of report or year end standards

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

29

4

O’Connor, K., How to Grade for Learning, Third Edition, Corwin, 2009, 75 O’Connor, K. How to Grade for Learning: Linking Grades to Standards,Third Edition, Corwin, 2009. 75

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

30

4

How to Grade for Learning

11

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

31

4

13-05-29 11:26 AMHealth and Science School

Page 2 of 2http://www.beaverton.k12.or.us/health_and_sciences/hs2academic.html

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

32

4

3. Work Habits/Behavior •  Title/ sub titles (not ‘effort’ - please!) •  How many? •  What? •  Description/explanation •  Performance standards - quality, frequency •  Who reports - overall or by subject?

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

33

4

O’Connor, K. How to Grade for Learning. Third Edition. Corwin. 2009, 40

How to Grade for Learning

12

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

34

4

Fix #1

O’Connor, K. A Repair Kit for Grading. Second Edition. Pearson ATI, 2011. 19

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

35

4

Summative - Assessment/evaluation designed to provide information to be used in making judgment about a student’s achievement at the end of a sequence of instruction, e.g. final drafts/attempts, tests, exams, assignments, projects, performances.

Formative - Assessment designed to provide direction for improvement and/or adjustment to a program for individual students or for a whole class, e.g. observation, quizzes, homework, instructional questions, initial drafts/attempts.

Diagnostic - assessment which takes place prior to instruction; designed to determine a student's attitude, skills or knowledge in order to identify student needs.

4. Purposes for Assessment

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

36

4

“The ongoing interplay between assessment and instruction, so common in the arts and athletics, is also evident in classrooms using practices such as non-graded quizzes and practice tests, the writing process, formative performance tasks, review of drafts and peer response groups. The teachers in such classrooms recognize that ongoing assessments provide feedback that enhances instruction and guides student revision.” McTighe, J., “What Happens Between Assessments,” Educational Leadership, Dec. ‘96-Jan. ‘97, 11

How to Grade for Learning

13

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

37

4

O’Connor, K., A Repair Kit for Grading, Pearson ATI, 2011, 123

5. Multiple opportunities/More recent Summative Assessment Scores for Grade 7 Persuasive Writing

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

38

4

Source: Jan Chappuis and Pearson ATI, Portland, OR

6. Standards-based Assessments

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

39

4

Source: Jan Chappuis and Pearson ATI, Portland, OR

How to Grade for Learning

14

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

40

4

Source: Jan Chappuis and Pearson ATI, Portland, OR

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

41

4

Things to Do/Checklist •  Communicate •  Survey current practices •  Communicate •  Discuss survey results, identify strengths, weaknesses •  Decide priorities •  Communicate •  Commit to grades on achievement only - behaviors separate, no penalties, summative only, no homework •  Identify (power) standards •  Communicate •  Decide on performance standards •  Communicate •  Design report card as part of a communication system •  Communicate

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

42

4

Guidelines for Standards – basedExpanded Format Report Cards

1. Part of an overall communication system that includes formal and informal opportunities to communicate student achievement, progress and behaviors (postcards, phone calls, conferences, etc.)2. Focus on primary purpose – communication about achievement of specific standards.

3. Separate achievement from behavior/work ethic/habits of mind.4. De-emphasize overall subject grades; emphasize achievement of specific

standards/benchmarks.5. Clearly describe the performance standards appropriate for each characteristic

(achievement of standards, progress, work habits, etc.)6. Distinguish clearly between achievement, growth, and progress.7. Understandable by students and parents:

- language readily understood;a. - format and design that enhances comprehension ( one page, two

sides, ‘clean’).8. Easy for teachers to use:

a. electronic template with pop-up menusb. easy to duplicate (8.5x11 or 11x14)c. flexible enough to meet diverse needs;d. readily available, preferably cross platform software.

9. Frequent enough to provide timely information but not so frequent thatreporting overburdens teachers – not more than 3 times per year

10. Information on lates/tardies and absences for school and each class.11. Opportunities for parents, students, and teachers to be involved:

- comments focused on strengths and areas for improvement;- student self assessment/reflection;- parental action and responses; and

- next steps for parents, teachers, and students

How to Grade for Learning

15

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

43

4

1.  Part of an overall communication system that includes formal and informal opportunities to communicate student achievement, progress and behaviors (postcards, phone calls, conferences, etc).

9

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

44

4

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

45

4

How to Grade for Learning

16

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

46

4

Communication System •  System? •  Coherent •  Informative •  Feasible •  • 

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

47

4

7.  Understandable by students and parents: - language readily understood; - format and design that enhances comprehension (ideally one page, two sides, ‘clean’). 8. Easy for teachers to use: - electronic template with pop-up menus; - flexible enough to meet diverse needs; 9.  Frequent enough to provide timely information but not so frequent that reporting overwhelms parents and overburdens teachers (not more than 3 times per year).

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

48

4

10. Information on lates/tardies and absences for school and each class. 11. Opportunities for parents, students, and teachers to be involved: - comments focused on strengths and areas for improvement; - student self assessment/reflection; - parental action and response; - next steps for parents, teachers, and students.

How to Grade for Learning

17

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

49

4

Source: Quakertown Community School District, PA

© Ken O’Connor, 2014

50

4

MB


Recommended