HOW TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT COULD TRANSFORM
URBAN SPACE- QUITO AND BOGOTA CASE
Vanessa Velasco, Urban [email protected]
1. How TOD supports urban transformation
• Key aspects for implementing TOD in LAC
• Urban Transformation trougth TOD in LAC
2. Developing TOD. Quito-Bogota case
• Quito Metro Project
• Bogota BRT Metro Project
4
En
ab
ling
Fa
cto
rs
Ph
ys
ica
l a
nd
Te
ch
nic
al A
sp
ec
t
Social Aspect
Institutional Categories Infrastructure Categories
For TOD implementation, it is necessary to engage different stakeholders
using physical and technical instruments, social agreements and enabling
factors
TOD HAS A KEY ROLE IN URBAN TRANSFORMATION
Source: Gerard Ollivier, World Bank TOD-COP 2018
There is an unbalance in LAC countries related to scoping, planning, and
financing tools for implementing TOD
KEY ASPECTS FOR IMPLEMENTING TOD IN LAC CITIES
Source: Author, 2018
Country Scoping Planning Financing Implementation
Argentina Macro-Micro level National-Subnational planning-implementation
LVC, Municipal Finance Tools
Subnational and National Leadership, IA
Bolivia Macro-Micro level National- planning Municipal Finance National leadership
Brazil Macro-Micro level Municipal-National planning-implementation
LVC, urban development, municipal finance
SPV, Local Political Leadership, IA
Colombia Macro-Micro level Municipal-National planning-implementation
LVC, urban development, municipal finance
SPV, IA, National political leadership
Ecuador Macro-Micro level National-Municipal planning- implementation
Urban development, municipal finance
Local and National Political Leadership
Peru Macro-Micro level National-Subnational planning-implementation
LVC, Municipal Finance Tools
National Leadership, IA
Mexico Macro-Micro level National-Subnational planning-implementation
LVC, Municipal Finance Tools
National - subnational leadership, IA
Uruguay Macro-Micro level National- planning Municipal Finance National leadership
Paraguay Macro-Micro level National- planning Municipal Finance National leadership
Costa Rica
Macro-Micro level National- planning Municipal Finance National leadership
6
Regulatory framework for TOD implementation in LAC include: urban
regulations, institutional framework and municipal finance tools
TOD HAS A KEY ROLE IN URBAN TRANSFORMATION
Source: Autor, based on Gerard Ollivier, World Bank TOD-COP 2018
National and Municipal Regulations in LAC
Land Use Planning Municipal FinanceInstitutional
Strategic urban projects and densification could give additional land value
Sustainable urban projects
Economic growth of cities1) Instruments for financing the
future urban development trough capture the potential value of the land
a. Additional development rightsb. Impact Feesc. Tax Increment Financing-TIFd. Betterment and leviese. Public and private join mechanism
Highest land value could finance urban development
How to finance urban development?
Strategic public investment ( infrastructure + transport + land use accessibility and ) creates land value
Financing of urban infrastructure
Instruments for financing future urban development in LAC are relatively
new and main destination is urban infrastructure
KEY ASPECTS FOR IMPLEMENTING TOD IN LAC CITIES
Strategic urban projects and densification
Sustainable urban projects
Economic growth of cities
Financing of urban infrastructure
Highest land value could finance urban development
How to finance urban
development?
Strategic public investment= infrastructure + transport + land use
2) Instruments to capture the value of the land after urban development -EX-POST infrastructure investmentsa. Property taxb. Plusvalee capture
Instruments for financing future urban development in LAC have as main
destination, affordable housing and urban infrastructure (road system and
public space)
KEY ASPECTS FOR IMPLEMENTING TOD IN LAC CITIES
Strategic urban projects and densification
Sustainable urban projects
Economic growth of citiesHighest land value could
finance urban development
How to finance urban development?
Strategic public investment= infrastructure + transport + land use
3) Urban operation including multiple land value capture instruments –LVC-1. Urban Operation (PP, operaciones interlagadas)2. Land readjustment
Financing of urban infrastructure
KEY ASPECTS FOR IMPLEMENTING TOD IN LAC CITIES
Instruments that finance urban operations as TOD in LAC are relatively
new and requires updating the urban legal framework
QUITO TOD METRO PROJECT
Selection of the TOD areas and definition of a bussines model for the stations
+
=
+
Level of CDB, intermodal condition,
and passengers transit, determine
the value of stations to develop a
TOD
QUITO TOD METRO PROJECT
=
Mix land use, public space
accessibility and ecosystems
values, determine the urban
value of the stations to
develop TOD
+
+
Selection of the TOD areas and definition of a bussines model for the stations
QUITO TOD METRO PROJECT
Selection of the TOD areas and definition of a bussines model for the stations
Accessibility, transit values and urban development conditions area used
for the TOD stations definition
+
QUITO TOD METRO PROJECT
Selection of the TOD areas and definition of a bussines moder for the stations
Create a transport and urban system to implementa TOD stations system
in the Metro of Quito
QUITO TOD METRO PROJECT
Selection of the TOD areas and definition of a bussines model for the stations
Selection of strategic plots inside the
TOD areas supports the definition of
clear business models
QUITO TOD METRO PROJECT
Selection of the TOD areas and definition of a bussines model for the stations
Business models include cost and
benefit analysis and the legal
updating recommendations for their
implementation
BRT Station, PP. PEDREGAL, Bogota
BOGOTA-BUS RAPID TRANSPORT SYSTEM CASE
SCOPE OF THE PROJECT
Conditions Objectives
• 6,5 hectares
– 1 UAU
• 50% of
current
activities are
commerce,
local service,
• 20%
educational
services and
30%
residential
area
• Completion Date 2018 – 2 phase plan
• 115,0000m2 of mix use development,
20,000m2 of retail, and 85,000m2 of
commerce offices, affordable housing
obligation was transfer to Metrovivienda land
bank
• 3 hectares of open spaces including 2 BRT
stations, an underground transport public
depot, and urban infrastructure
• Private developer joint with TRANSMILENIO
• 2 BRT STATION, 1 public depot, and
transport connection infrastructure “anillo
vial” are 100% cost financed by utilities of
urban development
• Land acquisition was made by the private
owner before/after PP approval
Integrated project’s scope: urban transformation including economic
development, and transport public facilities and urban infrastructure
Readjusted Land
Retail
• Private Urban Development
Corportation: planning, land
acquisition, real estature e
development
• Transport Corporation: BRT
operation, and transport
infrastruct
Transport Infrastructure and public facilities cost paid by
urban development
Real Estate BusineesLine
(re)development/Land acquisition
Offices
Offices / Hotel Stations
secures highuser demand
ALDEA PROYECTOS -TRANSMILENIO
(TM)
Source: Author based on ALDEA,2018.
Key aspects include: a non effective IA between private developer and
TM/IDU, technical and political disagreements that changes the project in long term perspective.
Transport Depot
BOGOTA-BUS RAPID TRANSPORT SYSTEM CASE
BRT Station, PP. PEDREGAL, Bogota
BOGOTA-BUS RAPID TRANSPORT SYSTEM CASE
Methodology for implementing a TOD approach to the development of BUS DEPOTS/TERMINALS for the BRT
From the 95 original plots, select
the plots for the location of TOD in
the surrounding area of the
public depots/terminals of the BRT
system.
Taking in consideration the role of
Transmilenio as a transport
corporation and ERU as an urban
development corporation .
BOGOTA-BUS RAPID TRANSPORT SYSTEM CASE
Methodology for implementing a TOD approach to the development of BUS DEPOTS/TERMINALS for the BRT
Polígono n
Polígono 2Polígono 1
The list of feasible parks is
obtained
Operational and land screening
(TIER I – TIERII)
Financial and management analysis of each park regardless of
previous rating
Analysis of the use of each park to ensure that
its area of influence is TOD focused
Final selection of management and financing
tools
Final selection of parks and determination of operational benefit
vs cost vs TOD
Prioritization based on
operational needs (TIERS l- ll-lll)
Process flow for TOD pre-feasibility of public depots and terminals
BOGOTA-BUS RAPID TRANSPORT SYSTEM CASE
Components for the definition of TOD Typologies
Cost Management Zonal Impact
Type of Depot(underground, ground level,
above ground)
Ownership/Management(own land, lease, purchase)
Urban development(current development, future
development, no development)
Function of the Depot(terminal, terminal/depot,
depot)
Operation and Transit
Urbanand Land
Different levels of investment are required
for each type of construction
Form of ownership and type of management
have an impact on investments, as well as
on the flow of such investments over time
Each type of development requires a
different level of investment
Each type of construction requires different time periods for execution
and management
Form of ownership and type of management
determine, to a greater or lesser extent, efforts
made in the areas of negotiations and legal
management
Each type of development involves different levels of legal and commercial
management
Each type of construction generates a different
impact, in terms of land use and other uses
Form of ownership determines the different
types of real-estate development or development for
dedicated use
Each type of development has a
different impact in terms of land use and other
uses
Land Use(With or without
construction)Extent of land use has an
impact on level of investment needed
Level of land use implies differing levels of legal
management and different time periods for
execution
Implies possible changes in urban zonal layout and
could have significant impact on the community
BOGOTA-BUS RAPID TRANSPORT SYSTEM CASE
Classification of TOD Variables
Type of Depot(underground, ground level,
above ground)
Ownership/Management(own land, lease, purchase)
Urban Development(current development,
future development, no development)
Function of the Depot(terminal, terminal/park, park)
Land Use(With or without
construction)
Operation and Transit Urban and Land Legal
• Influence - Routes
• PIR Influence
• Accessibility
• Services
• Capacity
• Future use in transit
plan
• Topography
• Available area
• Urban capacity
• Environmental
impact
• Current and future
land use
• Partial plans
• Environmental
impact
• Current and future
land use
• Partial plans
• Market potential
• Impact on
surrounding areas
• Number of lots and
owners in each park
• Limitations on
ownership rights
• Description of owners
and immovable
property in the park.
Op
era
tio
n a
nd
Tra
nsi
tU
rban
an
d L
and
BOGOTA-BUS RAPID TRANSPORT SYSTEM CASE
TOD Typologies and their variables
TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE/
DEPOTS
COMPLEMENTARY
URBAN DEVELOPMENTS
PUBLIC FACILITIES
AND PUBLIC SPACE
SOCIAL
MANAGMENT
LAND
TYPOLOGY 1
TYPOLOGY 2
TYPOLOGY 3
TYPOLOGY 4
TYPOLOGY 5
Bus Depot/ Terminal/
Underground/high cost
Bus Depot/ Terminal
/Underground/high cost
Bus Depot/ Terminal
/Underground/high cost
Depot/ Ground Level
/low cost
Depot/ Ground Level
/low cost
Commerce development/
High Cost/
Commerce development/
High Cost/High Income
Underground/high cost
Commerce development/
High Cost/High Income
Public facilities /
Middle Cost
Public facilities /
Middle Cost/
cost
High Cost
High Cost
Middle Cost
High Cost
High Cost
High Cost
High Cost High Cost