+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Humidification Dehumidification (HDH) Spray Column Direct ...

Humidification Dehumidification (HDH) Spray Column Direct ...

Date post: 30-Dec-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 6 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
www.postersession.com Fig. (6) The variation of optimal productivity with humid air and spray water mass fluxes at different inlet humid air temperature. Conclusions 1-The productivity at the maximum profit is increased to be about 4.5, 5.2 and 5.6 times with increasing the humid air mass fluxes from 1 to 7 Kg/m 2 s and spray water mass flux from 2.5 to 22.5 Kg/m 2 s at the humid air temperature 30, 40,and 50 o C respectively. 2- A case study of a contiguous cogeneration electricity and water in power plants, shows that the optimal water production by HDH is feasible, where the water productivity can reach more than 15 m 3 /day.m 2 . Large scale of HDH can be feasible to be constructed contiguously with NPP. 3- The design curves describing the process are obtained together with a formula for the optimal productivity in terms of humid air and sprayed water fluxes at different humid air temperatures is also obtained. Case Study Results 0 10 20 5 15 25 Spray water mass flux,L;(Kg/m 2 S). 0 4 8 12 16 2 6 10 14 Productivity,(m 3 /m 2 day). Η=10m,∆Τ=10 o C Ta=30 o C, Ta=40 o C, Ta=50 o C, 0 2 4 6 8 1 3 5 7 Humid air mass flux,G;(Kg/m 2 S). 0 4 8 12 16 2 6 10 14 Productivity ,(m 3 /m 2 day). HumidificationDehumidification (HDH) Spray Column Direct Contact Condenser Part I: Countercurrent Flow Aly Karameldin, Loula Shouman and Dalia Fadel Reactor Department, Nuclear Research Center, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority Abstract Humidification-dehumidification (HDH) is a low grade energy desalination technology. The waste heat from power plant (such NPP) can be used as heat source to preheat water (in evaporator) and air (in condenser). Hot humid air and cooled spray water in counter current flow with direct contact is theoretically analyzing in the present work. Direct contact spray condenser is studied to provide the effect of various parameters on its performance. A computer program describing the theoretical model is designed to solve a one-dimensional differential equations by using Rung-Kutta method. The program predicts the droplet radius, velocity and temperature, besides, the humidity and temperature of air. The results show that, the length of column has great effect on the performance of spray condenser. At column height of 0.762, 2, 5, 10, and 20 m the humidity of the output air decreases by 50, 72, 89, 97, and 99% respectively. The condensate increases about 35% when the length increase from 5 to 10 m at ΔT=15 o C while increase only 18% at ΔT=30 o C. Also, it is found that, at ΔT=25 o C the condensate decrease from H=10 To 5m about 31% and increases from 10 to 20m about32%. While these results for ΔT=15 o C are 32% from H=10 To 5m and 36% from 10 to 20m.The increase of both water and air mass fluxes increases the condensate mass flow rate. A case study of a contiguous cogeneration electricity and water in nuclear power plants (NPP), shows that the optimal productivity by HDH is feasible and can reach more than 15 m 3 /day.m 2 , enabling a total productivity that varied from 120,000 to 300,000 m 3 /day. The design curves describing the process are obtained together with a formula for the optimal productivity in terms of humid air and sprayed water fluxes at different humid air temperatures is also obtained. Fig.(1)Nuclear power plant. Fig.(2) Flow diagram of HDH unit Fig.(3) Variation of the condensate flow rate with the humid air and the spray water mass fluxes at different humid air and droplet temperature. 0 10 20 30 40 50 5 15 25 35 45 Spray water mass flux ;L,(Kg/m 2 S). 0 4 8 12 16 20 2 6 10 14 18 Productivity returns,($/day). 0 4 8 12 16 20 2 6 10 14 18 Spray water Pumping Cost ,($/day). Η=10m,Ta=40 o C,∆Τ=10 o C Product Price at G=1 Product Price at G=2 Product Price at G=3 Product Price at G=4 Product Price at G=5 Product Price at G=6 Product Price at G=7 Cond. Pumping Cost Fig.(4) Effect of spray water mass fluxes on Product returns and pumping costs at different humid air mass fluxes. 0 5 10 15 20 25 2.5 7.5 12.5 17.5 22.5 Spray water mass flux ;L,(Kg/m 2 S). 1 2 3 4 5 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 Max. net Profit ,($/day). 2 4 6 8 1 3 5 7 Humid air mass flux ;G,(Kg/m 2 S). 2 4 6 8 1 3 5 7 9 Productivity ,(m 3 /m 2 day). Η=10m,Ta=40 o C,∆Τ=10 o C Max. Profit Productivity Fig.(5) Variation of the max profit and productivity with the humid air and the spray water mass fluxes. 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 Spray water mass flux, L, (Kg/m 2 .s) 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 Condensate mass flux,m . cond ,(Kg/m 2 s) H= 10m,T a =40 o C,T d =25 o C G=0.25 Kg/m 2 .sec G=0.5 G=0.75 G=1 G=1.25 G=1.5 G=1.75 G=2 G=2 .5 G=3 G=3.5 0 1 2 3 4 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 Humid air mass flux, G, (Kg/m 2 .s) 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 Condensate mass flux,m . cond ,(Kg/m 2 s) H= 10m,T a =40 o C,T d =25 o C L=1.25 Kg/m 2 .sec L=1.5 L=1.75 L=2 L=5 L=7 L=10 L=20 L=50 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 Spray water mass flux, L, (Kg/m 2 .s) 0 1 2 3 4 5 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 Humid air mass flux, G, (Kg/m 2 .s) T a =60 o C,T d =45 o C 1b 2b 1a 2a T a =60 o C,T d =45 o C Theoretical model A one-dimensional, quasi-steady mathematical model for a falling droplet in the direct contact condenser (without packing) is presented based on the conservation principles. The following physical assumptions are taken to simplify the model: 1. Droplets are of spherical shape and a uniform droplet distribution. •No droplet interactions with one another in the axial or transverse direction. •An average droplet temperature is considered for the quasi-steady state calculations on the droplet side •Empirical correlations are used for the heat and mass transfer coefficient calculations. The conservation equations for mass, momentum, and energy of a moving droplet are used to induced the following: (a)Variation of droplet size-mass transfer (b) Droplet velocity - momentum transfer (c) Droplet temperature - energy transfer (d) Air temperature variation- energy transfer (e) Mass of condensed vapor
Transcript
Page 1: Humidification Dehumidification (HDH) Spray Column Direct ...

www.

post

erse

ssio

n.co

m www.postersession.com

Fig. (6) The variation of optimal productivity with humid air and spray water mass fluxes at different inlet humid air temperature.

Conclusions1-The productivity at the maximum profit is increased to be about 4.5, 5.2 and 5.6 times with increasing the humid air mass fluxes from 1 to 7 Kg/m2s and spray water mass flux from 2.5 to 22.5 Kg/m2s at the humid air temperature 30, 40,and 50 oC respectively.2- A case study of a contiguous cogeneration electricity and water in power plants, shows that the optimal water production by HDH is feasible, where the water productivity can reach more than 15 m3/day.m2. Large scale of HDH can be feasible to be constructed contiguously with NPP.3- The design curves describing the process are obtained together with a formula for the optimal productivity in terms of humid air and sprayed water fluxes at different humid air temperatures is also obtained.

Case Study Results

0 10 205 15 25Spray water mass flux,L;(Kg/m2 S).

0

4

8

12

16

2

6

10

14

Prod

uctiv

ity,(m

3 /m2 d

ay).

Η=10m,∆Τ=10oCTa=30oC, Ta=40oC,Ta=50oC,

0 2 4 6 81 3 5 7Humid air mass flux,G;(Kg/m2 S).

0

4

8

12

16

2

6

10

14

Prod

uctiv

ity ,(

m3 /m

2 da

y).

Humidification–Dehumidification (HDH) Spray Column Direct

Contact CondenserPart I: Countercurrent FlowAly Karameldin, Loula Shouman

and Dalia FadelReactor Department,

Nuclear Research Center, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority

Abstract Humidification-dehumidification (HDH) is a low grade energy desalination technology. The waste heat from power plant (such NPP) can be used as heat source to preheat water (in evaporator) and air (in condenser). Hot humid air and cooled spray water in counter current flow with direct contact is theoretically analyzing in the present work. Direct contact spray condenser is studied to provide the effect of various parameters on its performance. A computer program describing the theoretical model is designed to solve a one-dimensional differential equations by using Rung-Kutta method. The program predicts the droplet radius, velocity and temperature, besides, the humidity and temperature of air. The results show that, the length of column has great effect on the performance of spray condenser. At column height of 0.762, 2, 5, 10, and 20 m the humidity of the output air decreases by 50, 72, 89, 97, and 99% respectively. The condensate increases about 35% when the length increase from 5 to 10 m at ΔT=15oC while increase only 18% at ΔT=30oC. Also, it is found that, at ΔT=25oC the condensate decrease from H=10 To 5m about 31% and increases from 10 to 20m about32%. While these results for ΔT=15oC are 32% from H=10 To 5m and 36% from 10 to 20m.The increase of both water and air mass fluxes increases the condensate mass flow rate. A case study of a contiguous cogeneration electricity and water in nuclear power plants (NPP), shows that the optimal productivity by HDH is feasible and can reach more than 15 m3/day.m2, enabling a total productivity that varied from 120,000 to 300,000 m3/day. The design curves describing the process are obtained together with a formula for the optimal productivity in terms of humid air and sprayed water fluxes at different humid air temperatures is also obtained.

Fig.(1)Nuclear power plant.

Fig.(2) Flow diagram of HDH unit

Fig.(3) Variation of the condensate flow rate with the humid air and the spray water mass fluxes at different humid air and droplet temperature.

0 10 20 30 40 505 15 25 35 45Spray water mass flux ;L,(Kg/m2 S).

0

4

8

12

16

20

2

6

10

14

18

Prod

uctiv

ity re

turn

s,($

/day

).

0

4

8

12

16

20

2

6

10

14

18

Spra

y w

ater

Pum

ping

Cos

t ,($

/day

).

Η=10m,Ta=40oC,∆Τ=10oCProduct Price at G=1Product Price at G=2Product Price at G=3Product Price at G=4Product Price at G=5Product Price at G=6Product Price at G=7Cond. Pumping Cost

Fig.(4) Effect of spray water mass fluxes on Product returns and pumping costs at

different humid air mass fluxes.

0 5 10 15 20 252.5 7.5 12.5 17.5 22.5Spray water mass flux ;L,(Kg/m2 S).

1

2

3

4

5

0.5

1.5

2.5

3.5

4.5

5.5

Max

. net

Pro

fit ,

($/d

ay).

2 4 6 81 3 5 7Humid air mass flux ;G,(Kg/m2 S).

2

4

6

8

1

3

5

7

9

Pro

duct

ivit

y ,(

m3 /

m2

day)

.Η=10m,Ta=40oC,∆Τ=10oC Max. Profit Productivity

Fig.(5) Variation of the max profit and productivity with the humid air and the

spray water mass fluxes.

1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 21.3 1.5 1.7 1.9Spray water mass flux, L, (Kg/m2.s)

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.01

0.03

0.05

0.07

0.09

Cond

ensate

mass

flux,m

. cond,(K

g/m2 s)

H= 10m,Ta=40oC,Td=25oC

G=0.25 Kg/m2.secG=0.5 G=0.75 G=1 G=1.25 G=1.5 G=1.75 G=2 G=2 .5G=3 G=3.5

0 1 2 3 40.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5Humid air mass flux, G, (Kg/m2.s)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.05

0.15

0.25

0.35

Cond

ensate

mass

flux,m

. cond,(

Kg/m

2 s)

H= 10m,Ta=40oC,Td=25oC

L=1.25 Kg/m2.secL=1.5 L=1.75L=2 L=5L=7L=10L=20L=50

1.4 1.6 1.8 21.3 1.5 1.7 1.9Spray water mass flux, L, (Kg/m2.s)

0 1 2 3 4 50.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5Humid air mass flux, G, (Kg/m2.s)

Ta=60oC,Td=45oC

1b

2b

1a

2a

Ta=60oC,Td=45oC

Theoretical modelA one-dimensional, quasi-steady mathematical model for a falling droplet in the direct contact condenser (without packing) is presented based on the conservation principles. The following physical assumptions are taken to simplify the model:1. Droplets are of spherical shape and a uniform droplet distribution.•No droplet interactions with one another in the axial or transverse direction.•An average droplet temperature is considered for the quasi-steady state calculations on the droplet side•Empirical correlations are used for the heat and mass transfer coefficient calculations.The conservation equations for mass, momentum, and energy of a moving droplet are used to induced the following:(a)Variation of droplet size-mass transfer(b) Droplet velocity - momentum transfer(c) Droplet temperature - energy transfer(d) Air temperature variation- energy transfer(e) Mass of condensed vapor

Recommended