Christoffer Laustsen
Hyperpolarized 13C MagneticResonance Treatment ResponseMonitoring: A New Paradigm forMultiorgan Metabolic Assessmentof Pharmacological Interventions?Diabetes 2016;65:3529–3531 | DOI: 10.2337/dbi16-0055
Metformin is one of the most used hyperglycemic controltherapeutics in patients with diabetes, although the exactmechanism of action is still not fully understood (1,2).Metformin is the preferred antihyperglycemic drug in pa-tients with type 2 diabetes; its use in patients with type1 diabetes is limited however (3,4). A potential seriousside effect of metformin treatment is lactic acidosis, whichhas reduced the applicability in renal-impaired patients;however, this has been questioned recently (5,6). Thesetogether support further investigations of, first, the exactmechanism of action and, second, the noninvasive methodsfor monitoring the treatment, in particular the organ-specificmodulations imposed by metformin and their complex in-terorgan interactions, which historically have been especiallydifficult to assess.
This is particularly true in diseases where several organsare simultaneously affected, such as the cardio-renal syn-drome, where dysfunction of one organ affects the other andvice versa and where the use of pharmacological inter-ventions in the treatment of one organ can have detri-mental effects on the other and vice versa (7,8). Thus theunderstanding of the organ-specific phenotypic character-istics in diabetes and the therapy-induced alterations isessential in the development of new treatments.
In this issue of Diabetes, the study by Lewis et al. (9)demonstrates that a metformin-induced redox change andfollowing redistribution of the lactate and pyruvate poolsvia lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), which reflect a shift in thecosubstrates [NAD+]:[NADH], products [lactate]:[pyruvate],LDH concentration, and/or activation or inhibition of LDHitself, are directly monitored both acutely and chronically,with similar reprogrammed metabolic patterns.
Interestingly, the study finds an organ-specific meta-bolic pattern with an increased lactate production in theliver compared with the heart and potentially more impor-tant an increased lactate production following acute infu-sion of metformin (45 min prior to the examination),which was sustained during the full chronic period of4 weeks of oral metformin treatment.
The study indicates that metformin reduces the glucogenicpathway (increased lactate pool) and in turn that no aerobicalterations are observed. Thus in spite of the acute andchronic metformin treatment–induced metabolic shift, boththe liver and heart maintain normal oxidative metabolism.The whole-cell [NAD+]:[NADH] do not reflect the altered re-dox state, whereas a tendency to redox alterations was seen inthe mitochondrial [acetoacetate]:[b-hydroxybutyrate] in theliver, similar to what has previously been seen in liver (2).The major finding of Lewis et al. (9) is the [lactate]:[pyruvate]redox dependency on the [1-13C]pyruvate:[1-13C]lactate con-version is already present acutely, and thus it is very likelythat this change will be indicative of the [lactate]:[pyruvate]redox at 4 weeks, allowing for prognostic determination ofthe response to metformin if the redox state is associatedwith the outcome of metformin treatment (Fig. 1).
A potential limitation in the translation of hyper-polarized MR to the clinic is that the metabolic conversionassociated with hyperpolarized MR examinations arelimited to apparent rate constant mapping, and severalfactors determine the accurate rate constant. This can belargely overcome by investigating the same patient severaltimes, thus acting as his or her own control. This isparticularly relevant in monitoring the effects of treat-ments and development of diseases over time (10).
MR Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus,Denmark
Corresponding author: Christoffer Laustsen, [email protected].
© 2016 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article aslong as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and thework is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.
See accompanying article, p. 3544.
Diabetes Volume 65, December 2016 3529
COMMENTARY
http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.2337/dbi16-0055&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2016-11-08mailto:[email protected]://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/licensehttp://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license
The prognostic potential of using hyperpolarized MRto detect organ-specific metabolic fingerprints in relation todiseases, and in particular the acute response to therapeuticinterventions, and coupling them to the outcome of chronictreatment is a tremendous opportunity for researchers andclinicians.
The recent successful translation of hyperpolarized[1-13C]pyruvate MR examinations in prostate cancer patients
(11) has paved the way for the use in other patient groups(12–15), such as patient with diabetes. It is now time toinvestigate the potential for this novel tool to aid in theassessment of diabetes, associated complications, and thetreatment of these.
The hyperpolarized 13C MRI methodology, dynamic nu-clear polarization MRI, increases the signal of an inject-able biomarker substrate, often [1-13C]pyruvate, more than
Figure 1—An altered redox state following acute and chronic metformin treatment is observable with hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate MR,originating from an increased [lactate]:[pyruvate] in both the liver and heart (observable as [1-13C]lactate:[1-13C]pyruvate). Only the chronicmetformin-treated liver showed an altered mitochondrial redox via the [acetoacetate]:[b-hydroxybutyrate]. ACAC, acetoacetate; b-HB,b-hydroxybutyrate.
3530 Commentary Diabetes Volume 65, December 2016
10,000 times (11–14). The inherent low signal originatingfrom the in vivo pool of carbons (approximately 1% of allcarbons are 13C) is almost MRI invisible, and thus the label-ing in a specific molecular position with the nonradioactiveisotope 13C in combination with the increased signal of thebiomarker substrate (.10,000 times) enables the injectionof the biomarker and subsequent monitoring of the dynamicdistribution and following enzymatic fate of the substrate in-side cells into its metabolic derivatives, such as [1-13C]lactate,[1-13C]alanine, and 13CO2/H
13CO32 in real time.This dynamic measurement of the metabolism of 13C-
labeled substrates is inherently radiation free and is con-veniently performed in combination with the standardMRI examination. A limiting factor is the decay of thesignal, which limits the investigations to fast metabolicprocesses (currently less than 2 min). The use of hyper-polarized [1-13C]pyruvate MRI provides an opportunity tocombine the flexibility and safety of MR-based imagingwith an exceptional signal-to-noise ratio. Exploration ofinjectable 13C-labeled substances has only recently en-tered human trials (11).
Acknowledgments. C.L. acknowledges support from Danish ResearchCouncil for Independent Research.Duality of Interest. No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this articlewere reported.
References1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet 1998;352:854–865
2. Madiraju AK, Erion DM, Rahimi Y, et al. Metformin suppresses gluconeogenesis byinhibiting mitochondrial glycerophosphate dehydrogenase. Nature 2014;510:542–5463. Meyer L, Bohme P, Delbachian I, et al. The benefits of metformin therapyduring continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion treatment of type 1 diabeticpatients. Diabetes Care 2002;25:2153–21584. Faichney JD, Tate PW. Metformin in type 1 diabetes: is this a good or badidea? Diabetes Care 2003;26:16555. Nye HJ, Herrington WG. Metformin: the safest hypoglycaemic agent inchronic kidney disease? Nephron Clin Pract 2011;118:c380–c3836. Rocha A, Almeida M, Santos J, Carvalho A. Metformin in patients withchronic kidney disease: strengths and weaknesses. J Nephrol 2013;26:55–607. Anavekar NS, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ, et al. Relation between renaldysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction. N Engl JMed 2004;351:1285–12958. Bongartz LG, Braam B, Gaillard CA, et al. Target organ cross talk in cardiorenalsyndrome: animal models. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2012;303:F1253–F12639. Lewis AJM, Miller JJJ, McCallum C, et al. Assessment of metformin-inducedchanges in cardiac and hepatic redox state using hyperpolarized[1-13C]pyruvate.Diabetes 2016:65:3544–355110. Serrao EM, Kettunen MI, Rodrigues TB, et al. MRI with hyperpolarised[1-13C]pyruvate detects advanced pancreatic preneoplasia prior to invasive dis-ease in a mouse model. Gut 2016;65:465–47511. Nelson SJ, Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, et al. Metabolic imaging of patients withprostate cancer using hyperpolarized [1-¹³C]pyruvate. Sci Transl Med 2013;5:198ra10812. Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, Brindle K, et al. Analysis of cancer metabolismby imaging hyperpolarized nuclei: prospects for translation to clinical research.Neoplasia 2011;13:81–9713. Tyler DJ, Neubauer S. Science to practice: hyperpolarized metabolic MRimaging–the light at the end of the tunnel for clinical (13)C MR spectroscopy?Radiology 2016;278:639–64114. Laustsen C. Hyperpolarized renal magnetic resonance imaging: potentialand pitfalls. Front Physiol 2016;7:7215. Serrao EM, Brindle KM. Potential clinical roles for metabolic imaging withhyperpolarized [1-(13)C]pyruvate. Front Oncol 2016;6:59
diabetes.diabetesjournals.org Laustsen 3531