R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 1
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
The contributor is familiar with IEEE patent policy, as outlined in Section 6.3 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual<http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3> and in Understanding Patent Issues During IEEE Standards Development<http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/guide.html>.
Patent Policy
The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.20.
Release
This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE 802.20 Working Group. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Notice
To discus and Adopt MBTDD 625kHz MC Mode for Draft Specifications of IEEE802.20 MBWAPurpose
This document presents the Technology Performance and Evaluation Criteria Report 2 of the Technology Proposal MBTDD 625k-MC for IEEE 802. 20 MBWA
Abstract
MBWA Call for ProposalRe:
Voice: +1-408-952-4701Fax: +1-408-954-8709Email: [email protected]
Voice: +81-45-943-6130Fax: +81-45-943-6175Email: [email protected]
Voice: +81-45-943-6102Fax: +81-45-943-6175Email: [email protected]
Radhakrishna CanchiKTRC, 2480 N. First Street #280 San Jose, CA 95131
Kazuhiro MurakamiKYOCERA,2-1-1 Kagahara, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama, KANAGAWA 224-8502, JAPAN
Minako KitharaKYOCERA,2-1-1 Kagahara, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama, KANAGAWA 224-8502, JAPAN
Source(s)
2006-JAN-13Date Submitted
MBTDD 625k-MC Mode (BEST-WINE) Performance Report 2 PresentationTitle
IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access <http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/20/>
Project
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
MBTDD 625kMBTDD 625k--MC Mode MC Mode (BEST(BEST--WINE: WINE: BBroadband Mobilroadband MobilEESSpapaTTial ial WWireless ireless IInternterNNet Accet AccEEss )ss )Performance Report 2 PresentationPerformance Report 2 Presentation
IEEE 802.20 Plenary MeetingHawaii
January 16-19, 2006
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 3
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Outline of PresentationOutline of Presentation
§§ System ModelSystem Model§§ Link level Simulation Link level Simulation §§ System Level SimulationSystem Level Simulation§§ Traffic Traffic
§§ Traffic Calibration Traffic Calibration §§ Traffic Mix and Channel MixTraffic Mix and Channel Mix§§ Traffic Mix and Channel MixTraffic Mix and Channel Mix
§§ MobilityMobility--Handover PerformanceHandover Performance§§ Overhead ChannelsOverhead Channels§§ Practical System resultsPractical System results
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 4
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
System ModelSystem Model
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 5
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
PHY and MAC Layer informationPHY and MAC Layer information
§ Channel Configuration
SpecificationTDD
TDMA ・SDMA625 kHz
5 ms2usec
Uplink Time Slot slots 3Length 545 usPayload 182 symbols
Downlink Time Slot slots 3Length 1090 usPayload 494 symbols
500 ksps
Items
Symbol rate
Frame LenghtCarrier space
Mutiple AccessDuplexing
symbol duration
2.5MHz
frequency
625kHz
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 6
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Link Level simulation Link Level simulation
§ Modulation Coding ClassDown Link(Kbps) Up Link(Kbps)
ModClass Modulation Method Data Rate
/Slot Data Rate
/Carrier Data Rate
/Slot Data Rate
/Carrier
0 BPSK 35 106 6 19 1 BPSK 50 149 13 38 2 QPSK 82 245 26 77 3 QPSK 126 379 43 130 4 8PSK 162 485 58 173 5 8PSK 198 595 72 216 6 12QAM 262 787 98 293 7 16QAM 307 922 115 346 8 24QAM 354 1061 133 398 9 32QAM 378 1133 142 427
10 64QAM 498 1493 190 571
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 7
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Basic PHY layer (link level) informationBasic PHY layer (link level) information
• Link Level simulation Parameters§ TDD /TDMA system with 3 timeslot structure§ BS antenna number 12antennas § UT antenna numbers§ Antennas used for transmission :1§ Antennas used of receiving: 4
§ Adaptive Array Antenna Algorithm : MMSE
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 8
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Pedestrian A Pedestrian A –– 3km/hr (Uplink)3km/hr (Uplink)
UplinkPedestrian-A-3km /h
0.01
0.1
1
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30SINR[dB]
FER
3km/h mod103km/h mod93km/h mod83km/h mod73km/h mod63km/h mod53km/h mod43km/h mod33km/h mod23km/h mod13km/h mod0
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 9
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Pedestrian A Pedestrian A –– 3km/hr (Uplink)3km/hr (Uplink)
UplinkPedestrian-A-3km /h
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30SINR[dB]
Thr
ough
put[
kbps
]
3km /h m od103km /h m od93km /h m od83km /h m od73km /h m od63km /h m od53km /h m od43km /h m od33km /h m od23km /h m od13km /h m od0
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 10
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Pedestrian A Pedestrian A –– 3km/hr (Downlink)3km/hr (Downlink)
DownlinkPedestrian-A-3km /h
0.01
0.1
1
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
SINR[dB]
FER
3km/h mod103km/h mod93km/h mod83km/h mod73km/h mod63km/h mod53km/h mod43km/h mod33km/h mod23km/h mod13km/h mod0
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 11
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Pedestrian A Pedestrian A –– 3km/hr (Downlink)3km/hr (Downlink)
DownlinkPedestrian-A-3km /h
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30SINR[dB]
Thr
ough
put[
kbps
]
3km/h mod103km/h mod93km/h mod83km/h mod73km/h mod63km/h mod53km/h mod43km/h mod33km/h mod23km/h mod13km/h mod0
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 12
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Vehicular B Vehicular B –– 120km/hr (Uplink)120km/hr (Uplink)
Uplink FERVehicular-B-120km/h
0.01
0.1
1
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
SINR[dB]
FER
120km/h mod10120km/h mod9120km/h mod8120km/h mod7120km/h mod6120km/h mod5120km/h mod4120km/h mod3120km/h mod2120km/h mod1120km/h mod0
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 13
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Vehicular B Vehicular B –– 120km/hr (Uplink)120km/hr (Uplink)
UplinkVehicular-B-120km/h
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
SINR[dB]
Trou
gthp
ut[k
bps]
120km/h mod10120km/h mod9120km/h mod8120km/h mod7120km/h mod6120km/h mod5120km/h mod4120km/h mod3120km/h mod2120km/h mod1120km/h mod0
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 14
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Vehicular B Vehicular B –– 120km/hr (Downlink)120km/hr (Downlink)
DownlinkVehicular-B-120km/h
0.01
0.1
1
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
SINR[dB]
FER
120km/h mod10120km/h mod9120km/h mod8120km/h mod7120km/h mod6120km/h mod5120km/h mod4120km/h mod3120km/h mod2120km/h mod1120km/h mod0
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 15
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Vehicular B Vehicular B –– 120km/hr (Downlink)120km/hr (Downlink)
DownlinkVehicular-B-120km/h
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
SINR[dB]
Thro
ughp
ut[k
bps]
120km/h mod10120km/h mod9120km/h mod8120km/h mod7120km/h mod6120km/h mod5120km/h mod4120km/h mod3120km/h mod2120km/h mod1120km/h mod0
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 16
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Vehicular B Vehicular B –– 250km/hr (Uplink)250km/hr (Uplink)
Uplink FERVehicular-B-250km/h
0.01
0.1
1
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
SINR[dB]
FER
250km/h mod10250km/h mod9250km/h mod8250km/h mod7250km/h mod6250km/h mod5250km/h mod4250km/h mod3250km/h mod2250km/h mod1250km/h mod0
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 17
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Vehicular B Vehicular B –– 250km/hr (Uplink)250km/hr (Uplink)
UplinkVehicular-B-250km/h
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
SINR[dB]
Thro
ughp
ut[k
bps]
250km/h mod10250km/h mod9250km/h mod8250km/h mod7250km/h mod6250km/h mod5250km/h mod4250km/h mod3250km/h mod2250km/h mod1250km/h mod0
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 18
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Vehicular B Vehicular B –– 250km/hr (Downlink)250km/hr (Downlink)
Downlink FERVehicular-B-250km/h
0.01
0.1
1
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
SINR[dB]
FER
250km/h mod10250km/h mod9250km/h mod8250km/h mod7250km/h mod6250km/h mod5250km/h mod4250km/h mod3250km/h mod2250km/h mod1250km/h mod0
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 19
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Vehicular B Vehicular B –– 250km/hr (Downlink)250km/hr (Downlink)
DownlinkVehicular-B-250km/h
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30SINR[dB]
Thr
ough
put[
kbps
]
250km/h mod10250km/h mod9250km/h mod8250km/h mod7250km/h mod6250km/h mod5250km/h mod4250km/h mod3250km/h mod2250km/h mod1250km/h mod0
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
System Level SimulationsSystem Level Simulations
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Traffic Performance in System Level Traffic Performance in System Level SimulationSimulation
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 22
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Traffic Model Calibration Traffic Model Calibration -- HTTPHTTP
Size (bytes)Size (bytes)
cdf
cdf
Main File Object SizeMain File Object Size
Size (bytes)Size (bytes)
cdf
cdf
Embedded Object SizeEmbedded Object Size
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 23
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Traffic Model Calibration Traffic Model Calibration -- HTTPHTTP
Number of embedded objectsNumber of embedded objects
cdf
cdf
Embedded objects per pageEmbedded objects per page
Time (seconds)Time (seconds)
cdf
cdf
Reading timeReading time
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 24
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Traffic Model Calibration Traffic Model Calibration -- FTPFTP
Size (bytes)Size (bytes)
cdf
cdf
File sizeFile size
Time (seconds)Time (seconds)
cdf
cdf
Reading timeReading time
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 25
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Traffic Model Calibration Traffic Model Calibration -- NRTVNRTV
Packet size (bytes)Packet size (bytes)
cdf
cdf
File sizeFile size
Time (msec)Time (msec)
cdf
cdf
Interarrival timeInterarrival time
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 26
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Traffic Model Calibration Traffic Model Calibration -- NRTVNRTV
Delay (msec)Delay (msec)
cdf
cdf
Domestic Network delayDomestic Network delay
Delay (msec)Delay (msec)
cdf
cdf
International Network delayInternational Network delay
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 27
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Traffic Model Calibration Traffic Model Calibration -- HTTPHTTP
Size (bytes)Size (bytes)
cdf
cdf
Main File Object SizeMain File Object Size
Size (bytes)Size (bytes)
cdf
cdf
Embedded Object SizeEmbedded Object Size
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 28
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Traffic Model Calibration Traffic Model Calibration -- HTTPHTTP
Number of embedded objectsNumber of embedded objects
cdf
cdf
Embedded objects per pageEmbedded objects per page
Time (seconds)Time (seconds)
cdf
cdf
Reading timeReading time
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 29
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Traffic Model Calibration Traffic Model Calibration -- FTPFTP
Size (bytes)Size (bytes)
cdf
cdf
File sizeFile size
Time (seconds)Time (seconds)
cdf
cdf
Reading timeReading time
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 30
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Traffic Model Calibration Traffic Model Calibration -- NRTVNRTV
Packet size (bytes)Packet size (bytes)
cdf
cdf
File sizeFile size
Time (msec)Time (msec)
cdf
cdf
Interarrival timeInterarrival time
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 31
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Traffic Model Calibration Traffic Model Calibration -- NRTVNRTV
Delay (msec)Delay (msec)
cdf
cdf
Domestic Network delayDomestic Network delay
Delay (msec)Delay (msec)
cdf
cdf
International Network delayInternational Network delay
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 32
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
VoIP Performance VoIP Performance –– Delay vs. RDelay vs. R--valuevalue
Delay vs. R Value
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 200 400 600 800
Delay [ms]
R V
alue
UplinkDownlink
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 33
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
FTP PerformanceFTP Performance
Number of users
Tot
al D
ownl
ink
Thr
ough
put i
n kb
ps
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
0.25
0
0.5
0.75
1.0
1.25×104
FTP Traffic Scenario (3 traffic spatial channels per conventional channel)
Number of users
Tot
al D
ownl
ink
Thr
ough
put i
n kb
ps
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
0.25
0
0.5
0.75
1.0
1.25×104
Number of users
Tot
al D
ownl
ink
Thr
ough
put i
n kb
ps
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
0.25
0
0.5
0.75
1.0
1.25×104
FTP Traffic Scenario (3 traffic spatial channels per conventional channel)
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 34
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
FTPFTP--HTTP PerformanceHTTP Performance
Number of FTP users
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Tot
al D
ownl
ink
Thr
ough
put i
n kb
ps
0.25
0
0.5
0.75
1.0
1.25×104
Mixed Traffic (FTP and HTTP) Scenario – (3 traffic spatial channels per conventional channel)
Number of FTP users
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Tot
al D
ownl
ink
Thr
ough
put i
n kb
ps
0.25
0
0.5
0.75
1.0
1.25×104
Number of FTP users
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Tot
al D
ownl
ink
Thr
ough
put i
n kb
ps
0.25
0
0.5
0.75
1.0
1.25×104
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Tot
al D
ownl
ink
Thr
ough
put i
n kb
ps
0.25
0
0.5
0.75
1.0
1.25×104
Mixed Traffic (FTP and HTTP) Scenario – (3 traffic spatial channels per conventional channel)
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 35
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
TCPTCP--HTTP Uplink PerformanceHTTP Uplink Performance
Number of users
Rel
ativ
e U
plin
k T
CP
Segm
ent D
elay
in m
illis
econ
ds
0
5
10
15
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
HTTP scenario—(3 traffic spatial channels per conventional channel)
Number of users
Rel
ativ
e U
plin
k T
CP
Segm
ent D
elay
in m
illis
econ
ds
0
5
10
15
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
HTTP scenario—(3 traffic spatial channels per conventional channel)
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 36
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
TCPTCP--HTTP Downlink PerformanceHTTP Downlink PerformanceR
elat
ive
Dow
nlin
k T
CP
Segm
ent D
elay
in m
illis
econ
ds
Number of users
5
0
10
15
20
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
25
30
35
HTTP scenario—(3 traffic spatial channels per conventional channel)
Rel
ativ
e D
ownl
ink
TC
P Se
gmen
t Del
ay in
mill
isec
onds
Rel
ativ
e D
ownl
ink
TC
P Se
gmen
t Del
ay in
mill
isec
onds
Number of users
5
0
10
15
20
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
25
30
35
HTTP scenario—(3 traffic spatial channels per conventional channel)
Number of users
5
0
10
15
20
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
25
30
35
HTTP scenario—(3 traffic spatial channels per conventional channel)
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 37
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
VoIP Performance VoIP Performance –– RR--value vs. Packet loss value vs. Packet loss
Packet loss vs. R Value
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00
Packet loss [%]
R V
alue
UplinkDownlink
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 38
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
HTTP and VoIP usersHTTP and VoIP users
Data rate of HTTP usersData rate of HTTP users
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 39
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
HTTP and VoIP usersHTTP and VoIP users
Uplink R values as a function of number of HTTP users(24 voice users)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
32 48 64 80 96 112 128 144 160 176 192 208 224 240 256
HTTP users
R v
alue
10 percentile
median90 percentile
Downlink R values as a function of number of HTTP users(24 voice users)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
32 48 64 80 96 112 128 144 160 176 192 208 224 240 256
HTTP users
R v
alue
10 percentile
median
90 percentile
Voice quality with varying HTTP usersVoice quality with varying HTTP users
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 40
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Traffic MixTraffic Mix
Traffic Category Application Percentage ( % )
Best Effort FTP 30
Interactive Web browsing 30
Streaming Video streaming 30
Real-time VoIP 10
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 41
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
System Level Simulation ParametersSystem Level Simulation Parameters
2.5MHz (4 carriers)(1 carrier= 625kHz)
Simulation bandwidth
3dBUT body loss
3dBBS cable loss
15°CTemperature
10dBUT NF
5dBBS NF
0dBiUT antenna gain
17dBiBS antenna gain
27dBmmax Tx power at UT
39dBm/12antmax Tx power at BS
19BS with 3sector eachLayout
0.5 λAntenna separation
4Number of antennasUT antenna
0.5 λAntenna separation
12Number of antennasBS antenna
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 42
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Channel MixChannel MixSuburban macro channel mix
0.0
0.08
0.12
0.20
0.00.08
0.120.08
0.12
0.20Probability
250
120
303250
12030120
303User speed (km/h)
IVIIIIIIChannel PDP Models
Urban micro channel mix
000.14
0.29
000.1400.140.29Probability
250
120303250
12030120
303User speed (km/h)
IVIIIIIIChannel PDP Models
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 43
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Mobility ModelMobility Model--Handoff performanceHandoff performance
-- One mobile moving in a straight line from a location close to onOne mobile moving in a straight line from a location close to one e BS to a location close to destination BSBS to a location close to destination BS
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 44
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Handoff distance and Handoff delayHandoff distance and Handoff delay
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
3km/hr 30km/hr 120km/hr
velocity
dist
ance
from
han
dove
r sta
rt p
ositi
on [m
]
10%
50%
90%
No. of users with handover performed
Handover Delay
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Delay(ms)
cdf(
%)
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 45
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Overhead channelsOverhead channels--Paging ChannelPaging Channel
Implied Burst Diversity Burst
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 46
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Overhead channelsOverhead channels--Paging ChannelPaging Channel
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 47
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
AppendixAppendix
Practical System Results
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 48
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Total Throughput : 21.011MbpsUsers : 21Average data rate : 1Mbps/user
1Mbps
UT scans BS every 10s
10min
Practical System Results Practical System Results --YokohamaYokohama
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 49
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
54Km/h
87Km/h1Mbps
1Mbps
Practical System Results Practical System Results --YokohamaYokohama
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 50
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
48Km/h
1Mbps
Practical System Results Practical System Results --YokohamaYokohama
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 51
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Practical System Results Practical System Results --YokohamaYokohama
§ Ftp: Data of 100Mbyte was continuously downloaded.§ Video: 5 mins of content requiring a data rate more than 450kbps was
repeated viewed using real player. § HTTP: 22 pages were viewed repeatedly. Each page was viewed for
6secs after being displayed.
Carrier: Carrier: 4 (with 3 spatial channels)4 (with 3 spatial channels)BS:BS: 1 (2.5MHz)1 (2.5MHz)UT:UT: 34 34 èè FTPFTP 10 users10 users
Video StreamingVideo Streaming 10 users10 usersHTTPHTTP 10 users10 usersVoIPVoIP 4 users4 users
Traffic MixTraffic Mix
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERASlide 52
IEEE C802.20-06/02
Submission
Practical System Results Practical System Results --YokohamaYokohama
sec
Throughput [bytes/sec]
FTP Video StreamWeb BrowsingVoIP Stream
Traffic MixTraffic Mix