IMPACT OF AGRICULTURE ON LIVELIHOOD OF THE FARMERS IN A POLDER: A CASE STUDY
Presenter: Swarnali Mahmood
Lecturer, Department of Coastal Studies and Disaster Management, University of Barishal, Barishal, Bangladesh
Co-author: Dr. Abul Fazal M. Saleh
Professor, Institute of Water and Flood Management (IWFM), Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka, Bangladesh
Acknowledgement: IDRC-SAWA Fellowship Project, IWFM, BUET 1 10-Jan-19
Background of the Study
32% of the total land area 28% of the population
Tidal flooding and storm surges
Increasing salinity Scarcity of fresh water
for irrigation in dry season
10-Jan-19 2
Rationale of the Study
Significant information to the
policy and decision makers for the
improvement of the farmers’ livelihood in
the coastal region
Future Implications
Impact of polders on agriculture-based
livelihood have been scarce
Objective:
*To evaluate farmers’ livelihood in a polder
through with-without comparison
Current Study
Assessing the impacts of polders on environmental
and socio-economic characteristics
(Chowdhury et al., 2010; CEGIS, 2015)
Previous Attempts
10-Jan-19 3
4
Methodology
10-Jan-19
Selection of Study Area
Figure: Location of the study area in the south-west region of Bangladesh
Polder 30 Non-polder area: A part of Jalma union Batiaghata Upazila, Khulna, Bangladesh.
5
Methodology
10-Jan-19
Selection of Farmers Rabi/ Dry Season: Major Rabi crop (i.e. Boro rice, mungbean and sesame) producing
farmers
Kharif 2/ Monsoon Season: Aman rice producing farmers
Only land-owners; one Rabi and one Kharif 2 season (2017-18)
Indicator Development 13 indicators following DFID’s sustainable livelihood framework (DFID, 1999)
MCA through FGDs Standardization of the actual values of the selected indicators following UNDP
(2007)
The number of times a particular indicator was cited, was used to generate the weighting system.
6
Methodology
10-Jan-19
Livelihood Assets Selected Indicators
Social assets Access to soil information
Availability of effective extension services
Availability of new varieties in the market
Availability of fertilizer and pesticides in the market
Human assets Training of the farmers
Motivation of the farmers
Natural assets Canal/pond/OFR irrigation water
Rainfall
Financial assets Profit
Yield
Physical assets Access to marketing network
Irrigation water facility (LLP/STW/Drainage sluice)
Amount of irrigation water
7
Methodology
10-Jan-19
Farmers’ Livelihood Security Index (FLSI) By following the equation (Vincent, 2004; Naher et al., 2017): FLSI (%) = {(Ssvi × Wi) + (Hsvi × Wii) + (Nsvi × Wiii) + (Fsvi × Wiv) + (Psvi × Wv)} × 100
Here,
Ssvi = Standardized values of social asset,
Hsvi = Standardized values of human asset,
Nsvi = Standardized values of natural asset,
Fsvi = Standardized values of financial asset,
Psvi = Standardized values of physical asset,
W terms = Weightage applied to each standardized value.
8
Results and Discussion
10-Jan-19
Crop FLSI for Polder 30 (%) FLSI for Non-Polder Area (%)
Boro rice 24 45*
Mungbean 64 55
Sesame 49 41
Aman rice 61 47
Table: Comparison of livelihood security between polder and non-polder areas
The livelihood of Boro rice producing farmers was more secured in the *non-polder area because of availability of more irrigation water through shallow tube-wells.
The livelihoods of mungbean and sesame producing farmers were found to be slightly more secured in the polder than in non-polder area due to lower salinity and better market network through better road communication in the polder.
The livelihood of Aman rice producing farmers was found to be much more secured in the polder than that in the non-polder area mostly due to polder protection against seasonal flooding.
9
Research Experience
10-Jan-19
Experience Polder 30 Non-polder Area
Water availability for irrigation Only surface water Both surface and
groundwater
Salinity (water and soil) Less saline More saline
Drainage Better through
sluice gate operation
No flood protection
Road communication Better
Access to market Better
Access to information More
* Indicates better condition
10
How the Experience would address the problem?
10-Jan-19
• Water availability for crops can be increased through:
• Re-excavation of existing canals
• Construction of more ponds and on-farm reservoirs
Polder area
• Construction of polder is needed:
• To protect the land and crops
• To provide better drainage
• To provide better road communication and market network
Non-polder area
Final Words
11
The polder played a positive role in shaping the farmers’ livelihood by providing better water management and flood protection, particularly for Aman rice.
10-Jan-19
12
References
DFID. 1999. Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheet 1999. Department for International Development, UK.
CEGIS. 2015. Final Report on Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) on Rehabilitation of Polder 30. Center for Environmental and Geographic Information Services (CEGIS), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Chowdhury, A.K.M., Jenkins, S.A.M., and Hossain, M. 2010. Assessing the impact of small scale coastal embankments: A case study of an LGED Polder. In: Hoanh, C.T., Szuster, B., Kam, S.P., Noble, A., and Ismail, A.M. (eds), Tropical deltas and coastal zones community, environment and food production at the land-water interface, Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture Series, CABI Publishing, UK. pp. 421-435.
Naher, T., Saleh, A.F.M., and Khan, M.S.A. 2017. Development of Livelihood Security Index for Farmers in the Coastal Areas of Bangladesh. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Water & Flood Management, ICWFM 2017, 4-6 March 2017, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. 427-436.
UNDP. 2007. Human Development Report 2007/2008: Fighting climate change: human solidarity in a divided world. New York, USA.
Vincent, K. 2004. Creating an index of social vulnerability to climate change for Africa. Tyndall Center for Climate Change Research, Working Paper 56: 41.