+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Impact of climate change on water resources in pilot...

Impact of climate change on water resources in pilot...

Date post: 22-Oct-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
18
Impact of climate change on water resources in pilot basins in Serbia - results of the join RHMSS/NVE project - Mirjam Vujadinovic and Ingjerd Haddeland Part I : Regional climate models results www.hidmet.rs www.seevccc.rs www.nve.com Regional Workshop on Hydrological Forecasting and Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources
Transcript
  • Impact of climate change on water resources in pilot basins in Serbia

    - results of the join RHMSS/NVE project -

    Mirjam Vujadinovic and Ingjerd Haddeland

    Part I : Regional climate models results

    www.hidmet.rs www.seevccc.rs www.nve.com

    Regional Workshop on Hydrological Forecasting and Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources

  • Impact of climate change on water resources in pilot basins in Serbia

    - results of the join RHMSS/NVE project -

    Ingjerd Haddeland Hege Hisdal

    Elin Langsholt Deborah Lawrence

    Wong Wai Kwok

    Mihailo Andjelic Dejan Vladikovic

    Slavimir Stevanovic

    Marija Ivkovic Goran Pejanovic

    Mirjam Vujadinovic

    www.hidmet.rs www.seevccc.rs www.nve.com

    Regional Workshop on Hydrological Forecasting and Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources

  • Background & Motivation •  NVE and RHMSS have been project partners since 2005 in the field of hydrology, hydrological forecasting and water resources in Serbia, with financial support provided by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

    •  Projects implemented through this partnership assisted RHMSS in acquiring modern technology and know how in such important areas as: hydrometry and stream measurements, optimization of hydrological network, introduction of a versatile hydrological information management system (WISKI 7), introduction of HBV rainfall-runoff model for operational hydrological forecasting and simulation in small catchments, study of climate change impact on river flow in two catchments in Serbia.

    •  Climate change is expected to have serious effect on water resources management in the South-East Europe. However, until now there was no water resources climate change impact studies in Serbia.

    •  Two pilot catchments with sufficient hydrological and climatological data were selected for the study: Toplica and Kolubara.

    •  Temperature and precipitation output from 6 regional climate models and 3 time slices were used: 1961-1990 (past climate, control period), 2001-2030 (near future), 2071-2100 (far future).

    •  Bias corrected timeseries were used as an input for HBV model runs.

    Regional Workshop on Hydrological Forecasting and Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources

  • Pilot basin: Toplica

    basin size: 2231 km2

    topography: mainly bellow 800 masl with mountain peaks over 2000 masl

    vegetation: fields & crops bellow 800 masl, forest above 800 masl

    water regime: mixed snow & rain generated runoff

    13

    Figure 2.9: Field and forest distribution in the Toplica catchment.

    Figure 2.10: Location of three hydrometeorological stations in the Toplica catchment used in the study.

    hydorolgical station: Doljevac climatological stations: Kursumlija and Nis

  • Pilot basin: Kolubara topography: mainly bellow 400 masl with low (up to 1000 masl) and medium-high mountains (up to 1500 masl) in the most upstream part of the basin

    vegetation: crops and meadows bellow 400 masl, orchards and forest above 600 masl

    water regime: mixed rain and snow generated runoff

    location: 19°37’ – 20°11’ E 44°05’ – 44°22’ N

    9

    Historical climate and stream flow data for the period January 1985 - January 2010 have been used. There is only one climate station in the catchment (Valjevo, Figure 2.4) that has a time series long enough for this study. Four months of missing climate data in 1988, 1989 and 1990 at the Valjevo station ( located at 174 masl) were reconstructed by using observed data from the nearby RC Valjevo station ( located at 388 masl), as these two stations have a high correlation in both the precipitation and temperature data series.

    Figure 2.4: Location of the three hydrometeorological stations in the Kolubara catchment used in the study.

    The city of Valjevo has a moderate continental climate with certain peculiarities reflected in elements of sub-humid and micro-thermal climates. Precipitation is relatively evenly distributed over the seasons with an average annual precipitation of 765 mm and a maximum average monthly precipitation in June (Figure 2.5). Average temperature is close to zero in December and January and reaches 22-23 °C during the summer months. The area of Valjevo has on average 32 days of snow per year, whereas the snow cover lasts on average 43 days. Snowfall is normally seen in the catchment in December and January.

    The Kolubara River and its tributaries have a mixed rainfall-snowmelt water regime. The highest runoff occurs in the period March-April, followed by moderate runoff in June and July. The driest months are August and September (Figure 2.6). An important feature of the stream flow regime is a very pronounced flow fluctuation resulting in a pronounced difference between minimum and maximum monthly mean discharge values. The hydrological station Slovac has five months of missing water level and discharge data in the period 2005 – 2006. The average discharge at Slovac in the observation period is 8.35 m3/s, corresponding to 266 mm/year of runoff, and the average yearly maximum discharge is 119 m3/s. Mean annual runoff is about 38 % of mean annual precipitation.

    hydorolgical station: Slovac climatological station: Valjevo

    basin size: 991 km2

  • Climate modeling

    Regional Workshop on Hydrological Forecasting and Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources

  • Regional climate modeling benefits

    Mean 2m temperature for winter season, time slice 1961-1990

    Regional dynamical downscaling provides more detailed information on present climate and projected future climate changes

    OBSE

    RVAT

    IONS

     RE

    GION

    AL M

    ODEL

     

    GLOB

    AL M

    ODEL

     

    Regional Workshop on Hydrological Forecasting and Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources

  • GCM/RCM simulations

    horizontal resolution: 0.25° (~30km)

    domain: Europe, Euro-Mediterranean

    time slices: 1961-1990, 2001-2030, 2071-2100 (or 2069-2098)

    6 GMC/RCM simulations: 4 from ENSEMBLES project: http://ensemblesrt3.dmi.dk/ 2 from SEEVCC & Belgrade Univ.: http://www.seevccc.rs/?p=18

    IPCC/SRES scenario: A1B daily output: 2 m temperature, precipitation

    GCM   RCM   Ins)tu)on   Project  

    ECHAM4   RCM-‐SEEVCCC   UB&SEEVCCC   SINTA  

    ECHAM5   RCM-‐SEEVCCC   UB&SEEVCCC   Min.  of  Science  of  R.  Serbia,  43007  

    ECHAM5   HIRHAM5   DMI   ENSEMBLES  

    ECHAM5   RegCM3   ICTP   ENSEMBLES  

    HadCM3Q0   HadRM3Q0   Hadley  Centre   ENSEMBLES  

    HadCM3Q0   CLM   ETHZ   ENSEMBLES  

    Regional Workshop on Hydrological Forecasting and Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources

  • Statistical BIAS correction  

    2mTemp. difference between simulation and observations (summer 1981-2000)

    Image from CLAVIER-WP1: Climate

    Summer Drying Problem (CLAVIER project): “The most severe systematic error relevant for the CLAVIER domain is known as the Summer Drying Problem and is characterized by the too dry and too warm simulation of climate over Central and Eastern Europe during summer [Hagemann et al. 2004, Jacob et al., 2008]. It is typical for many regional and also some global climate models.”

    Climate change impact studies require a statistical BIAS correction of model’s output.

    Correction functions are made for daily 2m temperature and daily precipitation for each station and each month for period 1961-1990.

    Idea: model results and observations from the same 30-years long period should have the same PDF.

    Daily 2m temperature during one month: Normal distribution Daily precipitation during one month: Bernoulli- Gamma distribution,

    special attention to number of dry days

    Regional Workshop on Hydrological Forecasting and Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources

  • model produces more drizzle

    model underestimates high precipitation

    Statistical BIAS correction: simple “how to”

    Regional Workshop on Hydrological Forecasting and Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources

  • Statistical BIAS correction: verification example

    monthly 2m temperature   monthly acc. precipitation  

    Regional Workshop on Hydrological Forecasting and Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources

  • Projections: temperature  

    54

    Figure A.11: Distribution of monthly average temperatures at Niš for the three periods 1961-1990, 2001-2030, and 2069-2098 for all six projections, following bias correction.

  • Projections: temperature

    53

    Figure A.10: Distribution of monthly average temperatures at Kuršumlija for the three periods 1961-1990, 2001-2030, and 2069-2098 for all six projections, following bias correction.

  • Projections: temperature

    55

    Figure A.12: Distribution of monthly average temperatures at Valjevo for the three periods 1961-1990, 2001-2030, and 2069-2098 for all six projections, following bias correction.

  • Projected changes: precipitation  

    57

    Figure A.14: Distribution of monthly precipitation at Niš for the three periods 1961-1990, 2001-2030, and 2069-2098 for all six projections, following bias correction.

  • Projections: precipitation

    56

    Figure A.13: Distribution of monthly precipitation at Kuršumlija for the three periods 1961-1990, 2001-2030, and 2069-2098 for all six projections, following bias correction.

  • Projections: precipitation

    58

    Figure A.15: Distribution of monthly precipitation at Valjevo for the three periods 1961-1990, 2001-2030, and 2069-2098 for all six projections, following bias correction.

  • 2m temperature change [2071-2100]-[1961-1990]

    acc. precipitation change [2071-2100]-[1961-1990]  

    Projected changes - seasonal  

    29

    Figure 4.8: Distribution of monthly total precipitation values at Valjevo for the three periods 1961-1990, 2001 - 2030, and 2071 – 2100 for the ech-ebupom projection, following bias correction of daily values on a monthly basis.

    Table 4.3: Projected changes in average precipitation during the summer vs. winter half-year periods for each RCM projection at each of the three climate stations. The values given are for the change between the control period (1961-1990) and the future period (2069-2098 or 2071-2100).

    28

    Table 4.2: Projected changes in average temperature during the summer vs. winter half-year periods for each RCM projection at each of the three climate stations. The values given are for the change between the control period (1961-1990) and the future period (2069-2098 or 2071-2100).

    4.2.4 Projected changes in precipitation Projected changes in monthly precipitation can also be interpreted from the RCMs by comparing bias-corrected values for three periods: 1961-1990, 2001-2030 and 2069-2098 (or 2071-2100 for the two RCM-SEEVCCC runs). These are illustrated on a monthly basis for the bias corrected RCM data for Valjevo for the ech-ebupom projection in Figure 4.8. There is large variability in monthly precipitation both in the current and in the two future periods. This projection seems to indicate, however, a decrease in the median values for total monthly precipitation during the period May – October by the end of the 21st century. Changes during winter months are generally minimal, relative to the variability in individual months. Plots showing a similar comparison for the control and future periods for all of the projections for the three climate stations can be found in the Appendix (Fig. A13 – A15). Amongst these projections, the two RCMs based on the Hadley GCM (had-clm and had-hadrm) indicate notable decreases in monthly precipitation during the summer months at all three climate stations. Otherwise, changes are small relative to the overall variability in individual months. A summary of the projected changes in seasonal precipitation is given in Table 4.3 below and highlights the differences between the large decreases projected by the Hadley-driven RCMs and the smaller changes projected by other RCMs.


Recommended