EUEC 2015, San Diego, CA Wind Engineering and Air Quality Consultants IMPLICATIONS OF ACCURATE SOURCE CHARACTERIZATION ON PERMITTING FOR THE 1-HR AND 24-HR NAAQS Ron Petersen, PhD, CCM CPP, Inc. 1415 Blue Spruce Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 [email protected]om Cell: 970 690 1344
Transcript
1. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants IMPLICATIONS OF ACCURATE SOURCE CHARACTERIZATION ON
PERMITTING FOR THE 1-HR AND 24-HR NAAQS Ron Petersen, PhD, CCM CPP,
Inc. 1415 Blue Spruce Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525
[email protected] Cell: 970 690 1344
2. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants Outline What is source characterization? The forgotten
but important factor building dimensions Where BPIP inputs are a
problems Example applications of AERMOD with better inputs (EBD)
Impact of better inputs (i.e., accurate source
characterization)
3. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants Source Characterization 2013 EPA Draft SO2 NAAQS
Designations Modeling Technical Assistance Document Common
considerations Stack height and location, stack parameters,
emission rates, in-stack ratios, urban versus rural, etc. Often
Overlooked (2 to 8 Reduction in Predicted Design Value) If stack
locations and building information are not accurate, downwash will
not be accurately accounted for in AERMOD. Building dimension
inputs are critical!!!
4. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants Building Dimension Inputs & BPIP BPIP uses building
footprints and tier heights Combines buildings All structures
become one single rectangular solid for each wind direction and
each source BPIP dimensions may not characterize the source and may
give the wrong answer. BPIP Input
5. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants AERMODs Building Downwash Algorithm Used EPA wind
tunnel data base and past literature Developed analytical equations
for cavity height, reattachment, streamline angle, wind speed and
turbulence
6. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants AERMODs Building Downwash Algorithm Only valid for
certain building sizes W/H 1 to 4 L/H = 0 to 4 Assumes all
buildings are solid and rectangular
7. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants Building Dimension Inputs AERMOD Needs to Work The
building shape and position that match the theory in AERMOD. BPIP
will often not do this. Streamline figures from: Snyder, W.H. and
R.E. Lawson, Jr.: Wind Tunnel Measurements of Flow Fields in the
Vicinity of Buildings; 8th Joint Conference on Appl. of Air Poll.
Met. With A&WMA; AMS, Boston, MA, 1994; pp. 244-250
8. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants Example BPIP Problems PW facility (blue), BPIP building
dimensions (red) for stack S-344 (red) and envelope of the building
cavity calculated by PRIME (yellow) for a) a wind direction of 90
degrees; and b) a wind direction of 140 degrees. ) BPIP Building
Dimensions: H = 17 m L/H = 53 W/H = 34 BPIP Building Dimensions: H
= 17 m L/H = 23 W/H = 63 a) b) BPIP Building Dimensions: H = 17 m
L/H = 23 W/H = 63 BPIP Input in RED Site Plan and BPIP Result
9. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants Solution - Use EBD in Place of BPIP Dimensions
Equivalent Building Dimensions (EBDs) are the dimensions that are
input into AERMOD in place of BPIP dimensions to more accurately
predict building wake effects Determined using wind tunnel modeling
9
10. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants Current Regulatory Status of EBD October 24, 2011 Model
Clearinghouse Review of EBD for AERMOD .. any EBD studies being
considered should be discussed with the appropriate reviewing
authority as early in the process as possible and that the Model
Clearinghouse should also be engaged as early as possible. . these
wind tunnel EBD studies are classified as source characterization
studies. Roger Brode and George Bridgers, EPA Model Clearinghouse,
receptive for those cases where AERMOD with BPIP inputs is not
working 2013 EPA R/S/L Modelers Workshop.
11. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants Basic Wind Tunnel Modeling Methodology Obtain
source/site data Construct scale model 3D Printing Install model in
wind tunnel and measure Cmax versus X
12. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants Measure Ground-level Concentrations Tracer from stack
Max ground-level concentrations measured versus x
13. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants Measure Ground-level Concentrations Data taken until
good fit and max obtained Automated Max GL Concentration
Mapper
14. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants EBD Used to Reduce Predicted AQ Impacts on Residential
Tower downwind of Mirant Power Station, Alexandria, VA Residential
Tower
15. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants Find EBD that gives same Max GL Concentration Profile
as with Site Structures = - Input EBD Into AERMOD for wind
directions of concern - AERMOD predicted impacts decreased by more
than a factor of two. Mirant Power Station Approved Study, Region 3
Wind Tunnel Testing Conducted with Site Structures and with
EBD
16. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants AECOM (David Shea) Conducted Field Study That Validated
use of EBD see AWMA 2007 papers
17. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants Example Application Very wide/narrow building Stack
height: 47 m Building height: 31 m Property line in Red Emission
rate: 1 g/s AERMOD RESULTS Five years of met data
18. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants Maximum Hourly Impact at Fenceline
22. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants AERMOD Results With Wind Tunnel EBD Very wide/narrow
building Stack height: 47 m Building height: 31 m Property line in
Red Emission rate: 1 g/s AERMOD RESULTS Five years of met data
AERMOD Building Dimension Inputs 1-hour 24-hour annual BPIP 15.19
8.20 0.89 Wind Tunnel EBD 3.99 1.88 0.18 Reduction Factor 3.80 4.37
4.93 AERMOD Maximum predicted
23. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants Stack at Industrial Facility Stack height = 27 m Q = 1
g/s Building height = 17 m Building width and/or length > 200 m
5 years of meteorological data AERMOD RESULTS SHORT LARGE BUILDING
Building Input 1-hr 3-hr 24-hr annual BPIP 129.1 101.7 38.2 4.0
Wind Tunnel EBD 27.3 17.8 7.9 0.5 Reduction Factor 4.7 5.7 4.8 7.9
Maximum concentration (ug/m3 )
24. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants BPIP Max = 38.2 ug/m3 EBD Max = 8.1ug/m3 AERMOD
Contours: 24-hr max
25. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants Stack height: 45 m Structure height: 61 m Emission
rate: 1 g/s Five years of met data Stack AERMOD Results Lattice
Structure Building Input 1-hour 24-hour annual BPIP 23.21 5.51 0.37
Wind Tunnel EBD 7.72 2.36 0.11 Reduction Factor 3.01 2.33 3.51
Maximum Concentration Results
26. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants FACTOR of 4 to 8 reduction when EBD used Short building
with a large foot print FACTOR of 2 to 4 reduction when EBD used
Hyperbolic cooling towers Typical AERMOD Overprediction Factors
When Using BPIP Inputs
27. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants Typical AERMOD Overprediction Factors When Using BPIP
Inputs FACTOR of 2 to 5 reduction when EBD used Very Wide/Narrow
Buildings FACTOR of 2 to 3.5 reduction when EBD used Lattice
Structures
28. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants Result of Accurate Building Dimension Source
Characterization More accurate concentration estimates Estimates
that are 2 to 8 times lower for appropriate cases Short/wide/long
Streamlined Wide Lattice
29. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants Questions? Ron Petersen, Ph.D., CCM CPP, Inc
[email protected] 970 690 1344
30. EUEC 2015, San Diego, CAWind Engineering and Air Quality
Consultants EBD Background Several studies conducted and approved
using original guidance for ISC applications Amoco Whiting
Refinery, Region 5, 1990 Public Service Electric & Gas, Region
2, 1993 Cape Industries, Region 4, 1993 Cambridge Electric Plant,
Region 1, 1993 District Energy, Region 5, 1993 Hoechst Celanese
Celco Plant, Region 3, 1994 Pleasants Power, Region 3, 2002 Studies
conducted using AERMOD Hawaiian Electric (Approved), Region 9, 1998
Mirant Power Station (Approved), Region 3, 2006 Cheswick Power
Plant (Approved), Region 3, 2006 Alcoa (Not Approved), Region 7,
2010 Chevron (Approved), Region 4, 2012