IMPRINT Developers Workshop IMPRINT Developers Workshop Dec 6 AgendaDec 6 Agenda

• 0830-0845 Welcome and Introductions – John Lockett• 0845-1000 - IMPRINT Pro Brief, Demo and Discussion – John Lockett and Sue Archer • 1000-1015 - BREAK • IMPRINT Related Tools and Programs Beyond the US Army

– 1015-1045 - Air Force, CART Office – Bryan Brett – 1045-1115 - Nuclear Regulatory Commission – Autumn Szabo – 1115-1145 – Navy, SEAPRINT – Jennifer Narkevicius– 1145-1215 - Discussion of IMPRINT ideas from other services and agencies

• 1215-1330 - LUNCH • Performance Effects

– 1330-1350 - Training Effects Research – AFRL, Mesa rep (Dee Andrews, Pat Fitzgerald)– 1350-1400 - Training Knowledge and Skills for the Networked Battlefield MURI (Bill Raymond) – 1400-1430 - Thermal and Vibration – Jim Szalma– 1430-1445 - BREAK – 1445-1515 - Fatigue Modeling - Steve Hursh – 1515-1545 – Advances to the Workload Algorithms (FY04 and FY05 efforts) – Raja Parasuraman– 1545-1615 – Discussion of new performance effect ideas for FY06 and beyond

• Usability Assessment– 1615-1645 – IMPRINT Pro Usability Study Results – Raja Parasuraman – 1645-1700 – Discussion of Usability Study and implications for the future

IMPRINT Developers Workshop IMPRINT Developers Workshop Dec 7 AgendaDec 7 Agenda

• 0830-0845 Coffee• Extending IMPRINT’s Capabilities

– 0845-0930 - Recommendations for New Reports – Michelle Zeisset, Charneta Samms

– 0930-1000 - Integration with Other Simulations – Randy Washington

– 1000-1015 - BREAK

– 1015-1045 - ACT-R Integration – Christian Lebiere, Rick Archer

– 1045-1115 - System of Systems Modeling – Nils Lavine

– 1115-1145 - UoE Manpower Estimation – Jana Polzin

– 1145-1300 – Working Lunch and continued discussion of ideas for further extension of IMPRINT Capabilities

• Related Topics – 1300-1330 – Crew Station Design Tool

– 1330-1400- Miscellaneous (UML, IUSS, CASHE, Documentation, Web Site) – Sue Archer

– 1400-1430- Discussion of Future Ideas and Wrap Up - All

AdministrativeAdministrative

• Lunch tomorrow

• Collection of presentations

Workshop GoalsWorkshop Goals

• The purpose of the workshop is to share project progress and to generate ideas for future development.  

• This is NOT a user’s meeting; but rather, it is an opportunity to discuss the current status and future plans for the IMPRINT Tool and supporting research.

Tool DevelopmentTool Development

Challenges

Evolving analysis demands Support System of Systems Analyses Support analysis of joint operations Represent human behavior in network simulation Consider alternative maintenance concepts

(e.g. increased crew maintenance) Decrease barriers to usage

Bi-modal set of users User interface too broad and deep with addition

of new features Encourage valid analyses Information assurance constraints (i.e. security) Maintain platform compatibility

Package more human factors R&D results

Human figure mod. & sim. Jack, UNIPORT, ODT, TESF

Task and Workload Analysis HARDMAN III, Crewcut, JASS, WinCrew, IMPRINT

Maintenance and logistics MANCAP, KBLPS, IMPRINT System of systems modeling

1980’s 1990’s 2000 20051970’s

NASA Pla

id

AFRL DEPTH

HARDMAN

Soldier Centered Design ToolsSoldier Centered Design Tools

MIST &

HARDMAN II

AFRL CART

NASA MID

AS

Information flow C3Trace

TAWL TO

SS

ARI SRL & HEL

HOS IV

ACT-R

MATREX

OneS

AF OTB

IUSS

ARL HRED

Concept Paper~Air Force~

IMPRINT:Evolution & IMPRINT:Evolution &

IMPRINT: IMPRINT: HistoryHistory

MPT data provided- Paper & pencil -

Navy HARDMAN(Hardware vs. Manpower)

Automated process- Mini-computer -

Army HARDMAN II

MPT link to performance- Personal computer -

Army HARDMAN III

IMPRINT & WinCrewIntegrated analysis environment- Windows -

Goal Oriented Behaviors & HLA Compliance

IMPRINT 6

System of Systems32 bit, C++

IMPRINT 7

1970’s

1980’s

1990’s

2000+

Tri-ServiceC#, .NET environment

IMPRINT Pro

“Standard”

IMPRINT Development, FY 05IMPRINT Development, FY 05

• All modules

• Hierarchical menus

• DoD emphasis (thru AFRL CART and Navy SEAPRINT)

• Merged VACP, Goal and Advanced workload and network modules

• Crew Chief maintenance & animation

• New Graphical User Interface

•.NET Framework

• Sophisticated users – links to other sims

• VACP and Maintenance modules (no Goal or Advanced modules)

• Crew Chief maintenance

• Hierarchical (but fewer) menus

• User with little programming expertise

• No capability to link to external simulations

“Pro”

“Ver 7”

IMPRINT 5.13a - pre Oct 02• VACP, Performance Moderators, Maintenance • WinCrew advanced workload modeling• VGA GUI, 16 bit, Borland C++, Crystal Reports v5

IMPRINT 6.40c - released Oct 02• goal oriented behavior & HLA compatibility from CART• VACP, Performance Moderators, Maintenance• VGA GUI, 16 bit, Borland C++, Crystal Reports v5

IMPRINT DevelopmentIMPRINT Development

IMPRINT DevelopmentIMPRINT Development

• Upgraded assumed resolution from VGA to SVGA• 32 bit, Microsoft C++, Crystal Reports v7• Added hierarchical navigation tree to GUI• Updated personnel projection database (fr.1996 to 2002)• Interface to add customized stressors• Dynamic stressors through calls to external modules• Enhanced maintenance model (flexibility LSA imports)• Dynamically subscribe and unsubscribe entities to server• Ability to synch to real time simulations• Review input parameters and GUI (e.g. distributions)• Review output, reports, and analysis aids• New training materials (tutorial) and workshop structure• Webpage updated with more applications references and training material

IMPRINT 7.12w – released Feb 04

Enhanced IMPRINT maintenance modeling Improved the fidelity of modeling direct support maintenance Increased capacity to model maintenance of complex systems (more

components, systems, tasks) and more of those systems with longer scenarios

integrated transition between operator and maintainer analyses such that maintainability variables will directly impact operational system effectiveness.

Developed concepts and prototypes for IMPRINT ver. 8 (two products, Standard and Pro)

Investigated the validity and robustness of dynamic human task scheduling constructs such as the WinCrew strategies, information processing/process control theory (IP/PCT), and goal oriented behavior modeling.

Mapped IMPRINT taxons to skills and abilities in SkillsNET objects (thru Navy’s SEAPRINT program)

IMPRINT: DevelopmentIMPRINT: Development

Develop specifications and beta versions for IMPRINT Standard and Pro Links with other tools and simulations

Automate links between IMPRINT and UML development applications. Develop links and file format compatibility between IMPRINT and Army Evaluation Center (AEC) maintenance analysis tools such as COMPASS and SESAME. Test case = Sentinel forward area air surveillance system

Tool Development,Tool Development, FY 04FY 04

Links with other tools and simulations Update the Command, Control, and Communications Human Performance Model (C3HPM) for inclusion in MATREX V0.5 Support development of the core MATREX Network Centric Warfare Simulation Environment (NSE) and FY05 MATREX Network Fires Thread. Develop architectural specification for a system of systems level network of integrated IMPRINT models to simulate a combined arms mission.

Tool Development,Tool Development, FY 04FY 04

Develop IMPRINT models to represent Military Intelligence operators in Battle Lab Simulations at the Ft. Huachuca Battle Command Battle Lab.

Develop an interactive, constructive model of system capability as a function of Global Command and Control System (GCCS) operator effectiveness. (with SPAWAR)

Extend output report and analysis aid enhancements to IMPRINT Pro

IMPRINT Development,IMPRINT Development, FY 04FY 04

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

5% 10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

105%

110%

115%

120%

125%

130%

135%

140%

145%

150%

155%

160%

165%

170%

175%

180%

185%

190%

195%

200%

>200

%

Workload Level

Es

tim

ated

% o

f M

issio

n

ESTIMATED EXPECTED PERCENT OF MISSION DRIVER

IS IN OVERLOAD CONDITION

21.05%

78.95%

overloaded

NOT overloaded

Percent Mission Time at Workload Level iMultiple Run Scenario

(Driver)

Codify literature on vibration and thermal environment stress effects

- Enter into Matrix developed by UCF under the OPUS MURI

- Conduct meta analysis to inform development of new stressor performance moderators in IMPRINT.

- Extend to vigilance, training, time, team in FY05

IMPRINT Development, FY 04IMPRINT Development, FY 04

Updating IMPRINT StressorsUpdating IMPRINT Stressors

Options for Incorporating Changes to Performance Shaping Functions

A. Change default algorithm in IMPRINT source code– Requires new release

B. Input new algorithm using “custom stressor” feature– No change to source code– User defined models only

C. Use IMPRINT variables, beginning and ending effects– No change to source code– User defined models only– Greater user skill required

D. External Model Calls to more complex models– User defined models only– Greater user skill required

static

dynamic

IMPRINT Development, FY 05IMPRINT Development, FY 05

Improve training performance moderators through collaboration with AFRL, Mesa

base on a richer empirical database beyond frequency and recency of practice to content and media type

Link to existing fatigue model such as SAFTE to consider: circadian rhythms cumulative effects interaction between physical and mental fatigue

Establish a link from IWARS to IMPRINT Validation studies Usability studies Links to perceptual and biomechanical models Update dynamic workload management strategies Optimize cost and mission readiness based on non-mission capable supply NMCS and non-mission capable maintenance NMCM variables. (with AEC) Add visualization tool to IMPRINT maintenance model

DemonstrationsDemonstrations

Miscellaneous

• UML project – to investigate the potential for interchanging information between ARL’s IMPRINT tool and UML 2.0

• Outcome –– Detailed report (Steve Carson)– Primary challenge is community and culture change

<<operatorTask>>

Removal of Lower Air Baffle

timeStandard = (0:10:0) accuracyStandard = 10 accuracyMeasure = “Percent Steps Correct” criterion = 0.93

meanTime = (0:8:30) timeStandard Deviation = 1.0 timeDistribution = Normal meanAccuracy = 10 accuracyStandardDeviation = 1.0

Miscellaneous, Continued

• IUSS / IWARS – Implementation as micromodels

• CASHE – Primary benefit is on-line documentaton

• Database – MySQL to MSDE– Issues with security and distribution of engien– Challenges for upgrade path

• Documentation – Three volumes• Web Site

http://www.arl.army.mil/ARL-Directorates/HRED/imb/

imprint/Imprint7.htm