Info
rmat
ion
Pro
pri
etar
y to
In
form
atio
n P
rop
riet
ary
to
Reversing Turbomachine to Enable Laughlin-Brayton Cyclefor Thermally-Pumped Electrical Energy Storage
Brayton Energy, LLCMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Gas Turbine Lab
Exploring new aero-mechanical regimes toward
turbomachinery efficiency improvement for a novel
Brayton cycle energy storage
Project Vision
Info
rmat
ion
Pro
pri
etar
y to
In
form
atio
n P
rop
riet
ary
to
1
2
3
4
5
5
6
6
8
7
100 m
168 m
Malta, Laughlin BatteryPumped thermal-electric storage
Generation Cycle Schematic p
100 MW, 1GWh
Generation Cycle Schematic p
Cold Hexane-68oC
Hot Salt565oC
BEARINGSALT C.C.G.C.
RECUP
CSHX
HSHX
2
GOOGLE-X
Laughlin’s Invention* The Ideal Reversible Brayton Cycle:- Charging as a Brayton cycle heat
pump - Generation is a gas turbine engine
* Robert Laughlin is a Stanford professor and Nobel Laureate in Physics
Brayton’s Solution: An ideal turbomachine should surpass state-of-the-art gas turbine efficiencies due to the elimination of the normal design constraints; high temperatures, blade cooling, size, weight, stage-count and with tightened tip clearance.
Approach: Develop a single turbomachine which operates as both generator and heat pump. Other innovations to be developed include a novel mag-bearing rotor design, and compact heat exchanger integration. The resulting round trip efficiency to be improved from nominally 54% to 63%.
Technical Challenges and Risks:• The Round-Trip- Efficiency (RTE) is extremely sensitive to
turbomachinery component efficiencies. 1 point of turbine & compressor efficiency equates to 2.6 points of RTE.
• Past embodiments of this cycle have committed to separate Brayton heat pump and Brayton generator turbomachines. This results in unacceptable compromises:
1. Excessive cost 2. High losses due to valves and piping3. Poor transient response to loads 4. Reduced reliability
Reversible Counter-Rotating Turbomachine to Enable Brayton-Laughlin CycleObjective: Develop the Perfect Reversible Gas Turbine Engine.
Principal Investigators: Jim Kesseli (Brayton Energy) , Choon Tan (MIT)
US Department or Energy / ARPAe Award (2019-2021)
Robert LaughlinInventor, Noble Laureate
Info
rmat
ion
Pro
pri
etar
y to
In
form
atio
n P
rop
riet
ary
to
1
2
3
4
5
5
6
6
8
9
7
56 m 52 m
1
2
3
4
5
5
6
6
8
7
100 m
168 m
Malta, Laughlin Battery(Background work by Brayton for Google-X)
10 MW, 100MWh
100 MW, 1GWh
3 bar Pressure, Non-Reversible
3
Brayton was hired by Google-X to design the Laughlin Battery• Detailed turbomachinery trade studies,
analysis, design, and cost modeling • Heat exchanger designs, cost modeling and
testing • System modeling and full system integration
Info
rmat
ion
Pro
pri
etar
y to
In
form
atio
n P
rop
riet
ary
to
Google-X 1.6 MW “Conventional” Twin Machine Designed by Brayton
• Aero reviewed by four prominent teams: Final Detailed Design • PCA• Turbo Solutions • Brayton & ConceptNREC• MIT Gas Turbine Lab
• Thermal-structural • Rotor system
• Full rotor dynamic and structural design • Mag bearings complications
Alternator – a second generation product • with our sponsored structural design by OEM• Housing and Cooling – thru PDR• Brayton purchases only magnet sleeve and wound
stator. Add shaft & housing
Power electronics- a second gen product • highly customized – needs re-quote
Conclusion: Could not make cost target ($500/kW, $50/kWh) or round trip efficiency target
Info
rmat
ion
Pro
pri
etar
y to
In
form
atio
n P
rop
riet
ary
to
The Concept: Pumped Thermal Electric Energy Storage
1. In generation mode, convert stored thermal energy to electricity. In charging mode, restore thermal reservoirs by motored heat-pump
2. Reversing turbomachine; acts as a gas turbine genset and a Brayton-cycle heat pump.
4
Brg
1
2
Motor-
Gen.Brg
QH,GEN
QC,GEN
Cold Sto.Cold Sto
TESHot TES
3
52
6
6
QREJ
5a
REVERSIBLE
Gas Turbine Generator & Brayton Heat Pump
Info
rmat
ion
Pro
pri
etar
y to
In
form
atio
n P
rop
riet
ary
to
ARPAe DAYS Project Objectives
• Develop single turbomachine to function as heat pump and gas turbine. To achieve this, the flow direction through the machine must reverse between generation and charging modes.
• >93% polytropic efficiency for turbine and compressor
• Risks• Many conventional empirical design tools are not calibrated for the unconventional aerodynamic principles
employed in the proposed design. • Optimize for compressor
• Targets: Validate novel aerodynamic and mechanical design principles: 1. Design a full-scale energy storage plant – sufficient to defend performance, cost, and life targets
• Test and refine the aerodynamic principles with CFD
2. Sub scale similitude testing to validate design efficiency
6
Info
rmat
ion
Pro
pri
etar
y to
In
form
atio
n P
rop
riet
ary
to
7
Reversing Turbomachine to Enable Laughlin-Brayton Cycle for Thermally-Pumped Electrical Energy Storage
50 MW-e65% Round Trip Efficiency
Compressor Compressor
Turbine
Turbine
Blade Direction
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1 10 100C
ost
$/k
Wh
Hours
Advances in Aerodynamic Efficiency for
Turbomachines
Info
rmat
ion
Pro
pri
etar
y to
In
form
atio
n P
rop
riet
ary
to
DAYS CONCEPT: A single, dual purpose turbomachine
Benefits:
1. Halves the cost of a major cost driver – the gas turbine motor-generator
2. Eliminates complexity, cost, and pressure losses associated with piping and valves, otherwise required.
8
Challenges:1. Optimize the turbomachine for ultra
high efficiency in dual modes2. Achieve compressor and turbine
polytropic efficiency over 93%
Baseline pumped thermal electric storage requires two separate turbomachines machines
Info
rmat
ion
Pro
pri
etar
y to
In
form
atio
n P
rop
riet
ary
to
The Team
• Prime: Brayton Energy, LLC • Engineering staff of 45 specializing in turbomachinery design, gas turbines, and
advanced energy systems • James Kesseli, PI, Thomas Wolf, Aero lead, Josh Antrim, Mechanical Lead
9
‣ Sub-recipient: Gas Turbine Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology– Dr. Edward Greitzer, HN Salter Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics
– Dr. Choon Tan, Senior Research Engineer
– Joseph Chiapperi, Grad Student
‣ Advisor: Dr. Robert Laughlin, Stanford Professor, Anne and Robert Bass Professor of Humanities and Science and
Nobel Laureate in Physics
Info
rmat
ion
Pro
pri
etar
y to
In
form
atio
n P
rop
riet
ary
to
Exploring new directions in Turbomachinery aerodynamics.
Approach: • Counter-rotating axial compressor
and turbine. • Elimination of conventional stators
and associated losses.• Optimized blade shapes to
minimize compromises associated with reversing flow.
Design of a high efficiency, economical solution for the Laughlin-Brayton Battery
• Combine the Brayton cycle heat pump and the gas turbine generator into a single turbomachine –reducing cost and improving efficiency.
Info
rmat
ion
Pro
pri
etar
y to
In
form
atio
n P
rop
riet
ary
to
11
50 MW Machine
• Curved diffuser/inlets at all locations, AR = 3:1
• Cold machine 9 stage flow path incorporated
• Waukesha active magnetic bearings
Info
rmat
ion
Pro
pri
etar
y to
In
form
atio
n P
rop
riet
ary
to
12
Performance @ Tamb = 288K
hgen COPchg hoverall
56.1% 1.17 65.7%
parameters for 50MWe system
gen charge
mGAS 336.9 kg/s 220.2 kg/s
Generation Charge QH 89.1 MW 58.5 MW
QC 15.3 MW 10.0 MW
QREJ 22.2 MW -
turbomachinery & bearings
gen charge
PRcomp 3.00 2.46
ERturb 2.82 2.34
HX performance (prescribed) HX performance (calculated) gen Dp/p (prescribed) chg Dp/p (calculated) hpoly ,comp 92.3% 92.3%
(TS - TG)GEN,HS 15.0K (T5 - T2)GEN 11.0K HX duct net hpoly ,turb 87.8% 86.8%
(TG - TS)CHG,HS 15.0K (T6 - T1)CHG 10.2K HX,HS (6-3) 0.75% 0.35% HX,HS (2-6) 1.07% ML1 302.7 kW 343.7 kW
(TG - THEX)GEN,CS 2.5K (T3 - T5)CHG 11.3K HX,CS (5a-1) 0.75% 0.35% HX,CS (4-5) 1.01% ML2 151.6 kW 161.1 kW
(THEX - TG)CHG,CS 2.5K erecup,gen 98.1% rcp,cold (2-6) 1.00% 0.70% rcp,cold (5-1) 1.56%
(T4 - T6)GEN 10.0K erecup,chg 98.3% rcp,hot (4-5) 1.00% 0.70% rcp,hot (6-3) 1.65% electrical losses
(T5a - Tamb)GEN 4.0K heat rej (5-5a) gen / motor effy 98.0%
DtCHG / DtGEN 1.52 power conversion effy 100.0%
0.50%
CMP = compressor, TRB = turbineML = mechanical loss (bearings)CS = cold s torage, HS = hot storageG = gas , S = sand, HEX = hexane
4
TRBCMP ML1
1
2
GENERATOR ML2
QH,GEN
QC,GEN
TH_CSTC_CS
TH_HSTC_HS
3
52
6
6
4
TRBCMP ML1
1
2 3
MOTOR ML2
QH,CHG
QC,CHG
TC_CSTH_CS
TC_HSTH_HS
QREJ53
6
6
867K 1100
244K 290K
867K1100
244K290K
247K
347K 1085K
862K 872K
1115
242K
347K
852K
852K
287K
882K
882K
298K
298K
5a
292 358K
Exercise of Laughlin system model with projected efficiency levels applied for cold turbomachinery components, and for the hot compressor. For the hot turbine, an additional efficiency point has been added reflecting earlier CFD analysis and recognizing that incidence errors for this component will be lower.
Info
rmat
ion
Pro
pri
etar
y to
In
form
atio
n P
rop
riet
ary
to
Results of Detailed Design Review at MIT, January 30, 2020
13Insert Presentation NameMay 12, 2021
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1 10 100
Co
st $
/kW
h
Hours
Cost TargetsGoal Status
Power <$500/kWe <$329 /kWeEnergy <$50/kWh <$43/kWh
Life (MTBO) > 100,000 hrsO&M < 0.005 $/kWh
Reference Design • 50 MW-e generation • 500 kWh• 65% RTE
Info
rmat
ion
Pro
pri
etar
y to
In
form
atio
n P
rop
riet
ary
to
Technology-to-Market
1. Goal: Acquire funding for 10 MW Demonstration Project
2. Status: Performing model validation testing
3. Critical Milestone: Complete testing in 2021
4. Next Steps: Seeking inputs from prospective demo sites 1. Preparing cost to manufacture full scale turbomachine
2. Seeking a partner for the thermal storage, either molten salt or Brayton particle system
ARO Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
Manufacturing processes
Fabrication
Test program
2022 2023
Contact Jim Kesseli at [email protected]