COMMUNICATION www.rsc.org/materials | Journal of Materials Chemistry
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Mas
sach
uset
ts -
Am
hers
t on
14 O
ctob
er 2
012
Publ
ishe
d on
30
July
200
9 on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9105
12C
View Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue
In vivo multiple color lymphatic imaging using upconverting nanocrystals†
Hisataka Kobayashi,*a Nobuyuki Kosaka,a Mikako Ogawa,a Nicole Y. Morgan,b Paul D. Smith,b
Christopher B. Murray,c Xingchen Ye,c Josh Collins,c G. Ajith Kumar,d Howard Belld and Peter L. Choykea
Received 28th May 2009, Accepted 21st July 2009
First published as an Advance Article on the web 30th July 2009
DOI: 10.1039/b910512c
Upconverting nanocrystals are unique nano-sized particles that emit
light at shorter wavelengths (visible and near infrared) after exci-
tation in the near infrared that dramatically reduces background
autofluorescence in in vivo two color lymphatic imaging for depicting
the lymphatic channels and nodes.
In vivo fluorescence imaging has become an important technique in
biomedical imaging1 because of its high sensitivity, low cost and
feasibility for clinical translation. However, normal tissue auto-
fluorescence interferes with conventional in vivo fluorescence imaging
by lowering the target to background ratio. Currently, there are two
strategies for overcoming autofluorescence: employing ultrabright
fluorophores such as quantum dots2,3 or fluorescent proteins,4 or
acquiring spectral images and then post-processing the imaging data
to remove the background signal.5 Ultrabright fluorophores mostly
consist of solid state quantum dots, which contain cadmium and
selenium and are therefore potentially toxic. Spectral imaging is
relatively slow; the acoustoptic tunable filters used in commercial
systems have switching times of approximately 100 ms, leading to
a minimum time of several seconds to acquire a full image cube. Real
time post-processing of the data for the spectral unmixing is also
problematic.
Upconverting nanocrystals (UCNPs) represent a new strategy for
eliminating background signal. They are excited by infrared or NIR
light yet emit in the visible-NIR. As a result, there is minimal
excitation of autofluorophores, and no spectral overlap between the
upconverter emission and any autofluorescent background, effec-
tively eliminating background signal6 (Fig. 1). This enables near real-
time luminescence imaging with high target to background ratios but
without complex and time consuming image processing. Moreover,
by changing the composition of the doping metals within UCNPs, it
is possible to alter their emission wavelength.7 Although these
materials have been known for nearly 20 years, only recently have
they been grown as nanocrystals in small sizes suitable for in vivo
imaging.8,9 In this study, we demonstrate the feasibility of using
UCNPs for in vivo lymphatic imaging, which is a promising clinical
application of nano-materials, using two UCNPs with different
emission spectra.
aMolecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, NationalCancer Institute, NIH, Bldg. 10, Room 1B40, MSC 1088, Bethesda, MD20892-1088, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, NIH,Bethesda, MD 20892, USAcUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USAdSunstone BioSciences, Inc., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Fig. S1–S3. SeeDOI: 10.1039/b910512c
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
Two upconverting NaYF4 nanocrystals doped with rare earth
activating pairs, Yb, Tm, or Yb, Er were synthesized for near-
infrared (800 nm) and green (540 nm) emissions, respectively, Both
nanocrystals, approximately 50 nm in diameter, �20 nm core
measured by DLS (Delsa� Nano C system, Beckman Coulter,
Fullerton, CA) and 10–15 nm thick surface PEG coatings, were
employed for all in vivo experiments (see ESI Fig. S1†). The following
chemicals were used as received without any further purification:
Na(CF3COO) (GFS Chemical, Inc., Powell, OH), Y(CF3COO)3
(GFS Chemical, Inc.), Yb(CF3COO)3 (GFS Chemical, Inc.),
Tm(CF3COO)3 (GFS Chemical, Inc.), Er(CF3COO)3 (GFS Chem-
ical, Inc.), oleic acid (technical grade, 90%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louise,
MO) and 1-octadecene (ODE, Sigma-Aldrich, technical grade, 90%).
The synthesis was based on the methods reported by Mai et al. and
Shan et al.10,11 The methods reported by Mai and Shan have been
modified slightly to increase heating efficiency and to obtain higher
heating temperatures as close to the boiling point of oleic acid as
possible. These modifications allow for a single step method by which
pure b phase nanocrystals can be achieved. The ability to obtain
b phase nanocrystals will ensure that we are utilizing nanocrystals
with the highest quantum efficiency thus giving the greatest signal to
Fig. 1 Near infrared excitation does not produce autofluorescence from
the mouse abdomen. (a) A scheme of the excitation/emission profiles of
quantum dots and UPNCs. (b) A comparison of autofluorescence
emission spectra from the mouse abdomen excited with 468 nm blue (blue
line) and 980 nm near infrared (red line). Near infrared light produces no
detectable background from the body in the visible or near infrared
ranges. (c) A scheme of the in vitro and in vivo macroscopic/animal
imaging set-up.
J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 6481–6484 | 6481
Fig. 2 Luminescence signals from two different upconverting nano-
crystals can be resolved with both spectral and single shot imaging. (a)
Luminescence images of two different UPNCs (UC-NIR and UC-green)
obtained with either spectral or single shot imaging at the respective
emission peaks (550 nm for green and 800 nm for NIR) are shown. The
two UPNCs can be distinguished even without spectral analysis. (b) The
emission spectra of the two UPNCs (UC-NIR and UC-green) ranging
from 500 nm to 900 nm detected with the Maestro In Vivo Imaging
System under excitation with 980 nm light. (c) TEM images of two
upconverting nanocrystals. UC-Green: NaYF4:Yb/Er (left) and UC-
NIR: NaYF4:Yb/Tm (right) nanocrystals show that cores of both
particles are �20 nm in diameter.
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Mas
sach
uset
ts -
Am
hers
t on
14 O
ctob
er 2
012
Publ
ishe
d on
30
July
200
9 on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9105
12C
View Online
noise ratio. Additionally, it is widely accepted in the community of
upconverting nanophosphors that the hexagonal NaYF4 (b phase) is
the most efficient host for green and blue up-conversion, which shows
visible emission upon infrared excitation (980 nm) when doped with
Yb3+/Er3+ or Yb3+/Tm3+.
One pot synthesis can produce purely b phase NaYF4, as can be
seen from the Table S2 of the Mai et al. paper. More importantly, we
demonstrate the XRD pattern of our as-synthesized nanocrystals
after the incorporation of dopants Yb3+/Er3+ (ESI Fig. S2b†), to be
consistent with Fig. 11a of the Mai et al. paper.
Briefly, for UC-green, 1.8 mmol Na(CF3COO), 1 mmol
Y(CF3COO)3, 0.18 mmol Yb(CF3COO)3 and 0.02 mmol
Er(CF3COO)3 (for UC-NIR, 0.2 mmol Yb(CF3COO)3 and
0.0025 mmol Tm(CF3COO)3 were used) were loaded to a 50 mL
reaction flask. After adding 20 mmol oleic acid and 20 mmol
1-octadecene (ODE), the mixture was heated to 110 �C under
vacuum for 30 minutes to remove oxygen and moisture, forming
a transparent solution. The solution was then heated up to 330 �C
and kept at 330 �C for 30 minutes under N2 atmosphere. After
cooling to room temperature, ethanol was added to the crude
solution to precipitate nanoparticles and remove reaction by-prod-
ucts. The as-prepared nanocrystals were washed several times with
ethanol before being redispersed in hexane.
Surface modification of doped b-NaYF4 nanocrystals was per-
formed as shown below. 15 mL hexane solution of nanocrystals was
mixed with 15 mL of 0.5 M aqueous hexadecyltrimethylammonium
bromide (CTAB) solution and the resulting solution was stirred
vigorously for 12 h at 45 �C. The mixture was then heated up to 70 �C
to evaporate the hexane. The nanocrystals were further washed with
ethanol twice before being redispersed in 10 mL water. Then, we
added a PBS solution of PL-PEG (Avanti Polar Lipids, 1.5 mg ml�1)
to the aqueous nanocrystal solution and sonicated them for 1 h. The
coated nanocrystals were then centrifuged at 7500 rpm for 5 minutes
to remove any agglomerated nanocrystals, ensuring a monodisperse
solution. The as-synthesized samples are hydrophobic. After surface
modification of the UCNP to render them hydrophilic, they are
stable in PBS buffer for up to 2 weeks, mainly due to the high ionic
strength of the buffer solution. As stated, both nanocrystal prepa-
rations using CTAB and PEG have exhibited excellent short-term
stability for up to 2 weeks, retaining their optical properties while still
resisting agglomeration and settling. The stability of the nanocrystals
for longer durations does reduce but only minimally and without
affecting the upconversion processes. Some aggregation will occur
after long-term storage but the nanocrystals can easily be re-dispersed
by sonication for 3 minutes.
For analyzing structural characterization of NaYF4 nanocrystals,
TEM images were taken on a JEM-1400 Transmission Electron
Microscope (JEOL Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 120 kV. Powder
X-ray diffraction (XRD) of the nanocrystals were recorded on
Rigaku Smartlab system (Rigaku America, Woodlands, TX) at
a scanning rate of 0.2� min�1 using Cu Ka radiation (l ¼ 1.5406 A)
(ESI Fig. S2b†).
Both UCNPs can be excited with a 980 nm laser. One particle,
NaYF4; + Yb and Tm (UC-NIR), has two narrow emission peaks at
470 nm and 800 nm (ESI Fig. S2a†).7 Another particle, NaYF4; + Yb
and Er (UC-Green), has two narrow emission peaks at 550 and 670
nm (Fig. 2b, also see ESI Fig. S2b†). Both UC-NIR and UC-Green
could be detected both with spectral imaging and directly with single-
shot imaging at the respective peak emission wavelengths using an
6482 | J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 6481–6484
in vivo spectral imaging system (Maestro In Vivo Imaging System,
CRI Inc., Woburn, MA, USA) (Fig. 2a).
All in vivo procedures were approved by the National Cancer
Institute Animal Care and Use Committee. Initially, the auto-
fluorescence emission spectral profile of the mouse abdomen was
determined with blue light and NIR excitation. Blue light resulted in
a broad and high amplitude autofluorescence spectrum which
extended up to 750 nm. NIR light at 980 nm, in contrast, produced
no detectable background in the spectral window of interest (Fig. 1b).
Since both UC-NIR and UC-Green are excited at 980 nm, in theory,
there should be no contribution from the tissue background at their
emission peaks (Fig. 2b).
To perform in vivo luminescence lymphatic imaging, animals were
placed in the supine position whilst under pentobarbital anesthesia.
Lymphatic imaging was performed 5 to 30 min after injection of 200
mg of either UC-NIR or UC-Green (n¼ 4 in each group) or quantum
dot 545 (Invitrogen, Co., Carlsbad, CA) as a control. Additionally,
UC-NIR and UC-Green (200 mg each) were serially injected in
another group of mice within a 30 min interval to achieve 2-color
lymphatic imaging in different lymphatic drainage basins. The
nanocrystals were injected intradermally into the lower lip with the
expected drainage pattern to nodes within the neck. Spectral and
single shot, real time luminescence imaging was performed with
a 980 nm diode laser excitation (continuous wave, power density:
250 mW cm�2, BWF-5A, B&W TEK Inc., Newark, DE) (Fig. 1c).
The injection sites were masked with a non-fluorescent black tape.
After obtaining in vivo images, the draining lymph nodes were
removed and evaluated ex vivo with spectral luminescence imaging.
For the in vivo spectral imaging (Maestro), the tunable filter was
automatically stepped in 10 nm increments from 500 to 950 nm.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Mas
sach
uset
ts -
Am
hers
t on
14 O
ctob
er 2
012
Publ
ishe
d on
30
July
200
9 on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9105
12C
View Online
Collected images were analyzed by the Maestro software (Nuance
Ver 2.4, CRi), which uses spectral un-mixing algorithms based on
user-selected regions of interest to separate the autofluorescent
background from the signal of interest. Single shot luminescence
images were obtained at the peak emission for each upconverting
nanocrystal.
Injections with UC-NIR clearly depicted the draining lymph nodes
both in vivo and in situ during surgery in all 4 mice. Due to the
minimal background, single shot luminescence images obtained at
800 nm were comparable to images obtained with the spectral camera
(Maestro) using the unmixing algorithm to remove autofluorescence
and requiring approximately 30 seconds for acquisition (Fig. 3a). In
contrast, injections with UC-Green enabled visualization of the
draining lymph nodes only when the skin was removed during
surgery because of poor tissue penetration of green light (Fig. 3b).
Serial injections of both nanocrystals revealed enhancement of the
same draining lymph nodes at two wavelengths, however, the
UC-NIR, which was injected earlier, moved further than the UC-
Green which was injected later (Fig. 4). As before only the UC-NIR
was visible before surgery but both agents could be used to visualize
the draining node during surgery and ex vivo after the overlying tissue
was removed (Fig. 4).
Current in vivo fluorescence imaging results in excitation of
autofluorescence and this background signal must be overcome
before the target is detected. Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) has
the advantage of not requiring excitation light, and therefore has
greatly reduced autofluorescence signal. However, BLI requires
the transfection of an enzyme produced by another species such as
luciferase, which is normally produced by the firefly.12 The light
Fig. 3 Luminescence lymphatic imaging with upconverting nanocrystals ca
depicted the draining lymph nodes during in vivo and in situ imaging in all 4 mice
at 800 nm were comparable to the spectrally unmixed images which were post pr
to depict the draining lymph nodes only in situ during surgery probably becau
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
emitted during BLI is weak and so far the emission wavelength is
limited to spectral regions with poor tissue penetration, necessi-
tating long exposure times and obscuring deep objects.13 Trans-
lation of BLI to humans is very unlikely. In contrast, the UC-NIR
can be effectively excited with a 980 nm near infrared laser, which
is well above the excitation wavelengths of endogenous fluo-
rophores. Moreover, its emission at 800 nm allows optimal tissue
penetration.9 Unlike BLI, translation of UCNPs to humans is
feasible although extensive toxicity testing must be completed.
Another technology, which can obtain an emission light of shorter
wavelength than the excitation light, is the two-photon imaging.
However, conventional two-photon imaging is not technically
easy to apply to macroscopic in vivo imaging because the emission
light is in the blue or green range that cannot penetrate well in the
tissue. Therefore, almost all in vivo two-photon imaging has been
performed on the exposed surface of the living animal with
a microscope or an optical fiber.14 As our data show, imaging with
UC-NIR depicts the lymphatics with no background signal during
in vivo, in situ (during surgery) and ex vivo imaging without the
need for post processing. Results from Shan and Collins et al.11
indicate very limited to no toxicity of carboxyl and amino func-
tionalized nanocrystals when incubated up to 9 days with human
osteosarcoma cells. There was a slight concentration effect
observed when we compared nanocrystal concentrations of
0.25 mg/ml and 0.0625 mg/ml, 93% and 96.3% survival was
observed. This minimal difference suggests that the observed
concentration effects are negligible under the assay conditions.
Upconverting nanocrystals can be designed to emit various colors
of light with a single excitation similar to quantum dots. Therefore,
n be obtained with both spectral and single shot imaging. The NC-NIR
. Due to the minimal background, single shot luminescence images obtained
ocessed to remove autofluorescence (a). In contrast, the NC-green was able
se of poor penetration of green emission light through tissue (b).
J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 6481–6484 | 6483
Fig. 4 Two color lymphatic imaging with serial injection of two upconverting nanocrystals. With serial injection of NC-NIR and NC-green,
enhancement at both wavelengths was seen within the draining node. The NC-NIR, which was injected earlier, moved further than the green particle,
which was injected 30 min later. Images were obtained 5 min after injection of the NC-green nanocrystal.
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Mas
sach
uset
ts -
Am
hers
t on
14 O
ctob
er 2
012
Publ
ishe
d on
30
July
200
9 on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9105
12C
View Online
luminescence imaging using UCNPs could permit multi-color imaging
as shown in Fig. 4 with the advantage over quantum dots of not
producing interfering background autofluorescence (ESI Fig. S3†).
This dramatic reduction in background should permit the use of lower
doses of contrast agents, somewhat mitigating toxicity concerns.
Despite recent reductions in the size of UCNPs, their current size
(�20 nm for core;�50 nm with coating) is still larger than the 10–20
nm size that is optimal for in vivo imaging.3,15 Therefore, in their
current form, UCNPs have suboptimal uptake by the lymphatics.
However, smaller and brighter nanocrystals are under development
and could be ideally suited to lymphatic imaging in comparison to
existing agents.16
In conclusion, we demonstrate that lymphatic imaging with
UCNPs is feasible and results in images without autofluorescence.
This enables the direct, real time capture of lymphatic images without
extensive post processing of the images. Upconverting nanocrystals
have the potential to be a robust component nanostructure for
developing future molecular imaging probes.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of
the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, and
supported by the Ben Franklin Technology Development Authority
through the Ben Franklin Technology Partners of Southeastern
Pennsylvania and The Nanotechnology Institute.
6484 | J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 6481–6484
Notes and references
1 R. Weissleder and M. J. Pittet, Nature, 2008, 452, 580–589.2 S. Kim, Y. T. Lim, E. G. Soltesz, A. M. De Grand, J. Lee,
A. Nakayama, J. A. Parker, T. Mihaljevic, R. G. Laurence,D. M. Dor, L. H. Cohn, M. G. Bawendi and J. V. Frangioni, Nat.Biotechnol., 2004, 22, 93–97.
3 H. Kobayashi, Y. Hama, Y. Koyama, T. Barrett, C. A. Regino,Y. Urano and P. L. Choyke, Nano Lett., 2007, 7, 1711–1716.
4 R. M. Hoffman, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2005, 5, 796–806.5 R. M. Levenson and J. R. Mansfield, Cytometry A, 2006, 69, 748–758.6 H. J. Zijlmans, J. Bonnet, J. Burton, K. Kardos, T. Vail,
R. S. Niedbala and H. J. Tanke, Anal Biochem., 1999, 267, 30–36.7 F. Wang and X. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 5642–5643.8 D. K. Chatterjee, A. J. Rufaihah and Y. Zhang, Biomaterials, 2008,
29, 937–943.9 M. Nyk, R. Kumar, T. Y. Ohulchanskyy, E. J. Bergey and
P. N. Prasad, Nano Lett., 2008, 8, 3834–3838.10 H. X. Mai, Y. W. Zhang, R. Si, Z. G. Yan, L. D. Sun, L. P. You and
C. H. Yan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 6426–6436.11 J. Shan, J. Chen, J. Meng, J. Collins, W. Soboyejo, J. S. Friedberg and
Y. Ju, J. Appl. Phys., 2008, 104, 094308–094307.12 C. S. Levin, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging, 2005, 32(Suppl. 2),
S325–345.13 C. P. Klerk, R. M. Overmeer, T. M. Niers, H. H. Versteeg,
D. J. Richel, T. Buckle, C. J. Van Noorden and O. van Tellingen,Biotechniques, 2007, 43(7–13), 30.
14 O. Garaschuk, R. I. Milos and A. Konnerth, Nat. Protoc., 2006, 1,380–386.
15 H. Kobayashi and M. W. Brechbiel, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 2005, 57,2271–2286.
16 T. Barrett, P. L. Choyke and H. Kobayashi, Contrast Media Mol.Imaging, 2006, 1, 230–245.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009