+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

Date post: 14-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: nika
View: 40 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment. Data Priorities and Recommendations Karla Poplawski , Eleanor Setton , Perry Hystad , Roz Cheasley , Alejandro Cervantes- Larios , Alison Palmer May 29, 2014 Public Health 2014, Toronto, ON. Overview. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
17
Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment Data Priorities and Recommendations Karla Poplawski, Eleanor Setton, Perry Hystad, Roz Cheasley, Alejandro Cervantes-Larios, Alison Palmer May 29, 2014 Public Health 2014, Toronto, ON
Transcript
Page 1: Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

Data Priorities and Recommendations

Karla Poplawski, Eleanor Setton, Perry Hystad, Roz Cheasley, Alejandro Cervantes-Larios, Alison Palmer

May 29, 2014Public Health 2014, Toronto, ON

Page 2: Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

• Introduction to environmental approach and risk indicators;

• Overview data priority assessment framework and results;

• Discuss high data priorities and recommendations.

Overview

Page 3: Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

• Indicators of exposure – Lifetime Excess Cancer Risk• 33 known or suspected carcinogens• 5 environmental pathways:

Outdoor Air, Indoor Air, Indoor DustDrinking Water, Food & Beverages

CAREX Environmental Approach

Page 4: Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

Indicator: Potential Lifetime Excess Cancer RiskHow many extra cancers in a population of 1 million people compared to a population that is not exposed

National average and maximum risk, based on actual measured data for each substance & exposure pathway (circa 2006)

CAREX Environmental Approach

Page 5: Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

Data Priority Assessment

Page 6: Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

Data Priority Assessment

Page 7: Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

• Treated Water

Local government jurisdiction, lack of standard substances tested, differences in analytical methods, no national database

• Privately Sourced (wells or surface water)

Sent by individuals for lab testing, results may not be reported to local jurisdictions

Drinking Water Data

Page 8: Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

Improve access to data on measured levels in treated and privately sourced drinking water:

• Treated Water

Synthesis measured levels of standard list of substances into publicly available national (or provincial) database or reports

• Privately Sourced (wells or surface water)

Anonymize lab results and publicize to increase understanding of exposure levels of those not served by municipal systems

Drinking Water Recommendations

Page 9: Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

• Lack of standardization in food lists between studies

Canada & US do not collect measured levels in conjunction with amount consumed, studies on each component do not use comparable food lists

Food & Beverages Data

Page 10: Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

Enhance integration of existing data collection efforts (to include dietary intake and analysis of foods eaten) for a standard set of substances

Food & Beverages Recommendations

Page 11: Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

• Diesel Engine Exhaust

Coarse estimate, potentially high number of Canadians exposed

• Asbestos

Rarely measured in Canada, US data suggests detectable and higher in urban areas

Outdoor Air Data

Page 12: Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

• Diesel Engine Exhaust

Refine estimates with traffic data, targeted monitoring

• Asbestos

National survey in urban areas, target areas known to be influenced

Outdoor Air Recommendations

Page 13: Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

• Diesel Engine Exhaust

No information available, estimates assume infiltration indoors

• Asbestos

Rarely measured in Canada, US data show increased risk

Indoor Air Data

Page 14: Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

• Diesel Engine Exhaust

Improve outdoor estimates and residential proximity analyses, collect information in effectiveness of filters in housing types

• Asbestos

Monitoring study of buildings known to be contaminated, those remediated, and newer buildings, also indoor & outdoor urban/rural homes, and near contaminated sites

Indoor Air Recommendations

Page 15: Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

• Lack of concentration and use frequency for consumer products

No system in place to allow ongoing and comprehensive exposure surveillance for standard set of substances & products

Consumer Products Data

Page 16: Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

Establish reporting system for substances in consumer products, i.e. require manufacturers to report concentration levels in products, explore ways to work with retailers/market survey companies to track frequency of use statistics

Consumer Products Recommendations

Page 17: Indicators of Exposure to Known and Suspected Carcinogens in the Environment

• Priorities based on judgment of CAREX staff, and apply nationally. Different priorities may exist regionally or locally, depending on sources or data not available to CAREX.

• Substances identified as “not priority” for data collection may be priorities for exposure reduction.

• Recommendations are suggestions; feasibility of implementation has not been assessed.

Conclusions


Recommended