+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Individual Subsystem Testing Report

Individual Subsystem Testing Report

Date post: 17-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: base
View: 38 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Individual Subsystem Testing Report. Zero Tilt Frostburg State University Kaetie Combs, Francisco Diaz , Sean Hughes, Jared Hughes, Andrew Huntley, Subhasis Ghosh, Mayowa Ogundipe, Derek Val-Addo, Michael Stevenson, Shaun O’Donnell, Ian Cuddahee, Michael Young, David Wall February 13 2012. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
24
RockSat-C 2012 ISTR Individual Subsystem Testing Report Zero Tilt Frostburg State University Kaetie Combs, Francisco Diaz , Sean Hughes, Jared Hughes, Andrew Huntley, Subhasis Ghosh, Mayowa Ogundipe, Derek Val-Addo, Michael Stevenson, Shaun O’Donnell, Ian Cuddahee, Michael Young, David Wall February 13 2012 1
Transcript
Page 1: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Individual Subsystem Testing Report

Zero TiltFrostburg State University

Kaetie Combs, Francisco Diaz , Sean Hughes, Jared Hughes, Andrew Huntley, Subhasis Ghosh, Mayowa Ogundipe, Derek Val-Addo, Michael Stevenson, Shaun O’Donnell, Ian

Cuddahee, Michael Young, David Wall

February 13 2012

1

Page 2: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Mission Overview

• Mission Statement: Zero Tilt’s goal is to provide, for the first time, a stable environment throughout the flight of a Sounding Rocket via two concurrent objectives:

– Tilt correction system– Despun platform system

2

whs.mil

Page 3: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Mission Objectives

• We plan to:

– Counteract the platform spin– Orient the platform parallel to the earth’s surface at all

times

• We expect to prove that it is possible to correct spin, tilt, and determine the altitude based upon a level reference.

• This could benefit any scientific experiment that requires stabilization

3

Page 4: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Mission Objectives: Theory and Concepts

• The underlying theory and concepts:

– negative feedback control systems– concepts of torque and centripetal

force – Micro electromechanical systems

(MEMS)– Real-Time Systems Theory (for multi-

tasking

4

Page 5: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Mission Overview: Mission Requirements

• Mission Objectives:– Counter the spin of the rocket during flight.– Keep a level surface to earth using our

conceptual design.– Prove successful by using the stored gyroscope

output and the feedback from various motors.• Minimum success criteria

– Our main goals as the Zero Tilt team is to receive results indicating that we achieved zero tilt for the flight of a sounding rocket.

5

Page 6: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Functional Block Diagrams

6

shoponline2011.com

Zero Tilt System

Tilt System

Despun System

Power System

Page 7: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Power Subsystem (Despun)

7

Power Supply: 9 volt Lithiums24 Volt Total

De-spin Motor

Voltage Regulator

5 to 3 volts

Flash Memory

Atmega 32 Processor

Voltage Regulator

24 to 5 Volts

High G Accelerometer High G

Accelerometer

Page 8: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Power Subsystem (Tilt)

8

Power Supply: 9 volt Lithiums24 Volt Total

Spin Motor

Voltage Regulator

24 to 6 volts

Flash Memory

Atmega 32 Processor

Gyroscope

Low GAccelerometer

Voltage Regulator

24 to 3 volts

Tilt Motor

Voltage Regulator

24 to 5 volts

Page 9: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Despun System

9

Flash Memory

Atmega 32 Processor

High G Accelerometer

High G Accelerometer

Motorcontroller/Driver

Despun Motor

Page 10: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Tilt System

10

Flash Memory

Atmega 32 Processor

Low-G Accelerometer

Spin Motor

Tilt Motor

Gyroscope

Page 11: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Changes from CDR

• Decided to consider a new servo motor that has lower power requirements, a faster response time, and more torque.

• We are running power wires from slip ring directly onto board due to our decision to limit our turn radius on the tilt platform.

• Due to Servo Considerations some minor design changes are being made for placement on Tilt platform.

11

Page 12: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Program Management and Team Updates

12

Pictured from left to right: Mayowa Ogundipe, Subhasis Ghosh, Jared Hughes, Ian Cuddahee, Sean HughesDerek Val-Addo, Andrew Huntley, Kaetie Combs, Michael Stevenson, Francisco Diaz, Michael Young, Dr. Mohammed Eltayeb, Shaun O’Donnell, David Wall

Page 13: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Schedule Update

• We are on schedule electrically and are waiting on the fabrication of mechanical parts to finish testing.

• We have shifted the completion of the mechanical tests later because of machining time.

• We are focusing our efforts on completing the electrical elements so that we know they will be reliable on the mechanical layout.

• Our main concern is completing our mechanical fabrication so we can finish testing.

13

Page 14: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Subsystem Overview

• Subsystems

– Electrical

• Discussion by Mayowa Ogundipe, and Derek Val-Addo

– Power

• Discussion by Andrew Huntley, Jared Hughes, and Sean Hughes

– Mechanical

• Discussion by Shaun O’Donnell, and David Wall

14

nisd.net

Page 15: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Electrical Subsystem Update

• Status– What is complete/what has been tested?– What has not yet been checked out?

15

Page 16: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Electrical Subsystem Update (Continued)

16

Page 17: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Electrical Subsystem Update

• What were the results?

– We were able to collect gyroscope and accelerometer data. (dps for gyroscope, and voltage for the accelerometer)

– We were able to convert dps to degrees for the Gyroscope and voltage to g’s for the accelerometer.

– We were able to program the servo motor to react to changes in degree measure read from the gyroscope, either positive or negative.

17lochnessproject.org

Page 18: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Power Subsystem Update

• Status– What is complete/what has been tested?– What has not yet been checked out?

18

Page 19: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Power Subsystem Update

19

Power Requirements

Device

maximum Current drawn(mA) Operating Voltage(V)

Max Operating Voltage number

Total Current drawn(mA/H)

Maximum power dissapation(W)

Atmega 32 1.1 2.7-5.5 5.5 2 2.2 0.0121

High-G Accelerometer ADXL278 2.9 5(+-5%) 5 2 5.8 0.029

Low-G Accelerometer ADXL203 1.1 5 5 1 1.1 0.0055

Motor Controller TB6585FG 14 4.7 4.7 1 14 0.0658

Voltage Regulator MAX3379 0.3 1.2-5.5 5.5 7 2.1 0.01155

Gyroscope L3G3200D 6.1 2.4-3.6 3.6 1 6.1 0.02196

Flash memory AT26DF161A 5 2.7-3.6 3.6 2 10 0.036

Motor 2 HS145CR 150 4.8-6 6 1 150 0.9

Motor 0 3268...BX4 SC 2000 24 24 1 2000 48

Motor 1 HS-5245MG 230 4.8-6 6 1 230 1.38

Total 2421.3 50.46191

Current provided Weight Voltage Total Batteries

Lithuim Batteries 2700-3400mA/hr 15 1.5 16

Alkaline 1800-2600mA/hr 23 1.5 16

ENERGIZER LA522

1000 mA Continous

Current 33.9 grams 9 6

Page 20: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Mechanical Subsystem Update

• Status– What is complete/what has been tested?– What has not yet been checked out?

20

Page 21: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Mechanical Subsystem Update

21

• Discussion of current mechanical objectives including machining schedule, tilt platform construction, and slip ring mounting

Page 22: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Plan for Subsystem Integration

22

Page 23: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Lessons Learned

• Subsystem testing requires rigid time restraints and an understanding of the time required to complete tasks. Taking into account setbacks and off-ramps. Designing a system would benefit also from an understand as to how it will be constructed. Engineering tasks are best approached by assigning specific tasks and deadlines to groups so that any dependencies can be accounted for.

• If we started this project over we would ensure more carefully that the pieces selected could perform their designated tasks. We would also assign more ambitious deadlines and complete dependent items in a more time efficient manner.

• So far, by designating tasks we have been able to work ahead in certain areas and share discoveries with the entire team. We have class discussions and demonstrations that function as learning tools for all of us.

23http://sparetimeuniversity.com/?page_id=153

Page 24: Individual Subsystem Testing Report

RockSat-C 2012

ISTR

Conclusions

In conclusion we hope to get up to speed with our mechanical subsystem. We intend to continue work with the electrical system and iron out Flash memory requirements and PCB board layouts so they will be ready for the Systems Integration Testing. We need to more extensively test power and ensure that our new selected batteries can supply the current and voltage needed.

24


Recommended