+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Date post: 21-Dec-2015
Category:
View: 214 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
29
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope
Transcript
Page 1: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Intellectual Property

Boston College Law School

March 9, 2009

Software - Intro, Scope

Page 2: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Software & Hardware

Hardware

OS

ApplicationApplicationApplicationApplicationApplicationApplicationApplication

E.g. Windows, Mac OS, PS2 OS

E.g. Dell PC, Macintosh,PS2

E.g. MS Word, Netscape Navigator, PS2 Game, etc.

Page 3: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Software Creation

• Typical steps– (1) Requirements analysis– (2) Architecting / high-level design– (3) User interface design– (4) Writing code– (5) Validation and maintenance

Page 4: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Software Creation

} Var {for variable function …} num, count, primes, …. Begin {of program} {*****initialize var … num :=2;{the prime num … count :=0;{number of pri … times :=0;{number of col … {*****ask user how many … write (‘How many prime … read (primes); writeln; writeln; {carriage returns} writeln;

Compile

Source Code

11101001 01111001 0010110010010000 10010000 1100110110101011 01000011 0110111101110000 01111001 0110010001010010 01001100 0100000101101110 01100011 0000001000000100 00000000 1011001111101001 01111001 0010110010010000 10010000 1100110110101011 01000011 0110111101110000 01111001 0110010001010010 01001100 0100000101101110 01100011 0000001000000100 00000000 1011001111101001 01111001 0010110010010000 10010000 1100110110101011 01000011 0110111101110000 01111001 01100100

Object Code

Page 5: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Network Effects

Page 6: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Network Effects• Definition: where value of a product to one

consumer depends on number of other consumers using it

• Examples– Actual networks: e.g. telephone, fax machines,

instant messaging, etc.– Standards: e.g. QWERTY keyboard, MP3, etc.– Compatible products: e.g. VCRs, DVD, computer

operating systems, etc.

Page 7: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Costs and Benefits

• Benefits– Competing standards can be inefficient– Lower training costs, portability– Wider selection in complementary markets

• Costs– Lock in to suboptimal standard– Issues of market power where standard owned

Page 8: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Competing Strategies

MAI

MAI OS

MAIApps

OS

HardwareApple

Apple OS

3d PartiesApple 3d Parties3d Parties3d Parties3d Parties3d Parties

3d Parties

Microsoft

3d PartiesMicrosoft 3d Parties3d Parties3d Parties3d Parties3d Parties

3d Parties3d Parties3d Parties3d Parties3d Parties3d Parties

Page 9: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Copyright Protection

• CONTU Recommendations 1978

• 17 U.S.C. § 101. Definitions– “Literary works” are works … expressed in words,

numbers, or other verbal or numerical symbols or indicia ….

• 17 U.S.C. § 102. Subject Matter– “(b) In no case does copyright protection … extend

to any idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, ….”

Page 10: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Issues

• Copyrightability– Object Code– Source Code– Non-Literal Structures– Functional Elements– Screen Displays– User Interfaces

Page 11: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Apple v. Franklin

} Var {for variable function …} num, count, primes, …. Begin {of program} {*****initialize var … num :=2;{the prime num … count :=0;{number of pri … times :=0;{number of col … {*****ask user how many … write (‘How many prime … read (primes); writeln; writeln; {carriage returns} writeln;

Compile

Source Code

11101001 01111001 0010110010010000 10010000 1100110110101011 01000011 0110111101110000 01111001 0110010001010010 01001100 0100000101101110 01100011 0000001000000100 00000000 1011001111101001 01111001 0010110010010000 10010000 1100110110101011 01000011 0110111101110000 01111001 0110010001010010 01001100 0100000101101110 01100011 0000001000000100 00000000 1011001111101001 01111001 0010110010010000 10010000 1100110110101011 01000011 0110111101110000 01111001 01100100

Object Code

Page 12: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Whelan v. Jaslow• Dentalab v. Dentcom

– Different object code and source code– Similarities in non-literal elements

• File structures (how data stored)

• Screen outputs (how results displayed)

• Five subroutines– Order entry– Invoicing– Accounts receivable– End of day procedure– End of month procedure

Page 13: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Whelan v. Jaslow

• Standard for idea/expression:– “the purpose or function of a utilitarian work

would be the work’s idea, and everything that is not necessary to that purpose or function would be part of the expression of that idea.”

• Idea = purpose or function

• Expression = everything not necessary to purpose

Page 14: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Whelan v. Jaslow

Main Purpose

Program Structure

Modules, Data

Source Code

Object Code

No Protection

Protected UnlessNecessary

Page 15: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Computer Assoc. v. Altai

IBM 370

CA-Adapter

CA-Scheduler Zeke

Oscar 3.4

CMS MVS VSE

Oscar 3.5

Page 16: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Abstraction

Main Purpose

Program Structure

Modules, Data

Source Code

Object Code

Page 17: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Filtration

Main Purpose

Program Structure

Modules, Data

Source Code

Object Code

- Ideas- Dictated by efficiency- Dictated by external factors- Public domain

Page 18: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Comparison

Main Purpose

Program Structure

Modules, Data

Source Code

Object Code

Page 19: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Computer Assoc. v. Altai

Not copied

Not Protected

CA-Scheduler

Dictated by OS or apps

P.D. or functional

Flows from purpose

Main Purpose

Parameter Lists, Macros

Source Code, Object Code

Oscar 3.5

General Outline

Services Required

Page 20: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Altai Test v. Whelan Test

Object Code

Purpose

Altai

Modules, Data

Source Code

Program Structure

Whelan

Page 21: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Hypothetical

• Facts– You are general counsel to software company

– Developing an application

– Have obtained source code of competing product

– Would like to save time by copying as much as possible

• Question– What, if anything, can we copy?

– Giving advice to company’s software engineers

Page 22: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Issues

• Copyrightability– Object Code– Source Code– Non-Literal Structures– Functional Elements– Screen Displays– User Interfaces

Page 23: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Lotus v. Borland

Global Insert Delete Column-Width Erase Titles Window

A B C D E F G H I J K

123456789

Worksheet Range Copy Move File Print Graph Data Quit

Page 24: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Lotus v. Borland

• Possible Grounds for Decision– Not Protectible

• Method of operation - no protection at all (majority)

– Protectible but No Liability• Merger - expressive elements merged with method

• Fair Use (Boudin)

– Protectible and Liability• Copied expressive elements (district court)

Page 25: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Apple Desktop?

Page 26: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Data East v. Epyx

Data East: Karate Champ

Epyx: World Karate Champ

Page 27: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Level of Protection

Page 28: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Apple v. Microsoft

Windows 3.0(1990)

Mac OS(1987)

Page 29: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 9, 2009 Software - Intro, Scope.

Administrative

• Next Class– Finish V – Software

• Skip V.D – Sui Generis

• Read In Re Bilski from handouts page on website

• Class cancellations– Wednesday, March 11– Monday, March 16


Recommended