Interviews to Explore How to Tackle Employability Barriers for BTEC Level 2 Media Learners
Tunmise Oluwakayode
19 June 2013
Abstract
This summary presents the main findings from research undertaken on interviews to tackle employability
barriers for BTEC Level 2 Media Learners. The research adopted a qualitative approach of interviews with
seven learners; three of them currently in education, two on an apprenticeship scheme and two in
employment. It includes a review of the relevant literature; description and methodology; summary of
findings; discussion and conclusion.
Three learners interviewed had traditional college characteristics but came from non-traditional
backgrounds. They were 2 males and a female; aged 19, 22 and 16 respectively; black and 2 white; single;
childless; and their highest entry qualification was three GCSEs at D or above including English. They were
mainly non-traditional students whereby neither parent had a college education qualification but had some
exposure to college education because another close relative held a BTEC qualification.
There were two males; black; aged 17 and 21; single; childless; major drivers for entering into
apprenticeship scheme were financial issues and laziness. The other two learners, 18 year old white female
learner and the 20 year old black male, were from disadvantaged backgrounds; faced with poor social
conditions because of parental ill health. They were studying Creative Media Production BTEC Diploma
Level 2 and IT BTEC Diploma Level 2 on full time basis and aim for a profitable employment after the end of
their courses.
Features of development: the findings of the literature review
The findings of the literature reviews a worrying mismatch between the skills employers need and the skills
the next generation of employees are focusing on due to inadequate career advice currently available to the
young learners.
Working Brief, a quarterly magazine of Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion (CESI) (Tony
Wilson, 2011), reiterates that the system for young people needs urgent fundamental reform due to high
unemployment level that has never been at any time since the 1980s.
The implications of the changes to the apprenticeship programme set out in the Education and Skills Growth
Review (BIS, 2011) for different equality groups varied and the findings of this assessment considered only
the nature of impacts rather than the quantitative effects on apprenticeship numbers.
Features of development: the research findings
Barriers depriving the young learners on BTEC Level 2 Media courses from obtaining and sustaining a
profitable employment can be social, economic or educational. Social barriers include (i) travel costs and
availability; (ii) equality and diversity; (iii) disadvantaged background. The only economic problem
discussed in this paper is finances. Educational barriers include (i) apprenticeship; (ii) poor
motivation; (iii) deficient employability skills and (iv) inferior personal branding.
Discussion and conclusions
The paper suggests a few characteristics of good practice in relation to the role of learners; parents,
guardian and teachers; FE institutions and employers in eliminating these barriers. These include
developing young people’s personal branding tactics; parental ‘responsibility’ for the young learner’s
personal branding and the need for employability skills, emotional intelligence and personal branding tactics
to be taught in BTEC level 2 media courses.
This paper, through conclusions drawn from a literature review, summary of interview findings and personal
experience, highlights and suggests ways to tackle employment barriers facing young learners on BTEC
Level 2 Media courses.
1 Introduction
This is a report on the findings of research undertaken during a pilot CPD programme, the Oxford
Practitioner Research programme, to explore how to tackle employability barriers facing young learners on
BTEC Media Level 2 and suggest ways to tackle such barriers.
The research was carried out between September 2012 and March 2013 during the Oxford Practitioner
Research programme, a pilot CPD programme organised by IfL and Skope (University of Oxford). The
evidence drawn together from these strands of work provides a cross-sectional picture of the
perspectives and experiences of learners, through apprenticeship employment, and education.
The overall aim of the paper is to identify employability barriers facing learners who are currently studying
BTEC level 2 Media courses. As learners on BTEC courses often aim at securing employment, it is
important to explore good practice for teachers preparing learners for future employment.
There are two major objectives of the paper:
To examine the choice-making and experience of BTEC level 2 Media learners in education,
employment and apprenticeship;
To describe of the scale, scope and types of barriers facing them due to their area, gender and
family background.
To address and achieve these goals, a range of research activities was undertaken. Each of these
methodological strands is described in the project and in the appendix of the summary of findings.
There is ample literature regarding identification of employment barriers for BTEC level 2 Media learners but
very few really suggest ways to tackle them. The numbers of published academic research and evaluation
studies to tackle these barriers are equally scarce. The literature review is organised into themes according
to the barriers identified.
Employability barriers facing young learners cannot be tackled until they are clearly identified. Most often,
learners from disadvantaged background experience financial difficulties similar to those from low waged
families or low waged areas. This is usually costs of equipment, books, protective clothing or examination
fees.
Financial problems birth the cost of transport which is needed to access employment and learning
opportunities. Previous research, for example the evaluation of the New Deal for Young People, has
identified transport as being particularly problematic for young jobseekers (Bryson, A et al, 2000). For
young learners, particularly those who live across the counties, access to training and employment could be
an issue.
Travel costs and availability are identical obstacles to learner’s employment, training and apprenticeship and
are felt to different extents according to individual, household and area. Learners are more likely to rely on
the public transport system. Employment search can still be hindered by recruitment practices of some
employers who are reluctant to hire those living further away, though some learners are willing to travel long
distance.
Financial problems breed poor motivation and inadequate professional career guidance. Learners with poor
motivation or those who are yet to discover their skills may choose the wrong career. This means that they
will probably settle in a deprived neighbourhood and become victims of postcode discrimination.
Unfortunately, discrimination results into stress, low self-esteem, poor grade and depression.
2 Literature Review
Drawing on the evidence of the literature review, the high level of young people’s unemployment is a cause
for concern for the nation. The evidence in this review is dependent on official sources, including research,
evaluation and analyses carried out by, and for, sector bodies and representative organisations.
According to a report published by the Commission for Rural Communities (CRC), learners living in the
countryside face a "number of rural barriers" including access to transport, careers advice, training support
and youth services (CRC, 2012, Pg.6). Latest figures from the Official of National Statistics show that a
staggering 45% of those young learners aged between 16 and 24 in rural areas, were either unemployed -
103,904 (11%), or economically inactive - 316,910 (34%) (Philip Case, 2012).
In the study carried out by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD), the Government is
urged to improve the information made available to young learners as part of their education. It stated that
the career advice currently available to the young people was inadequate, leading to a skills "mismatch' and
a failure to prepare them for the jobs market. There is a worrying mismatch between the skills employers
need and the skills the next generation of workers are focusing on (CIPD, 2013).
The department of Business, Innovation and Skill (BIS) carried out an Equality Impact Assessment of
changes to the apprenticeship programme set out in the Education and Skills Growth Review. The
implications of these changes for different equality groups varied and the findings of this assessment
considered only the nature of impacts rather than the quantitative effects on apprenticeship numbers. The
assessment found that prioritising efforts from older to younger age groups could reduce the proportion of
women apprentices from ethnic minority groups as both groups make up greater shares of older apprentices
than younger ones (BIS, 2011, p9).
A study from Nominet Trust charity revealed that most young learner’s chances of finding a job depend on
where they were born or live. This is like postcode discrimination and it exposes 'huge inequalities' in life
chances for these young people. It showed that young people in Erdington, Birmingham, were more than
three times as likely to be unemployed as those in South Kensington, London. The inequalities between
young learners' life chances now depend on where they are born and inequalities are currently growing
(Nominet Trust, 2012).
Shaks Ghosh, Chief Executive of the Private Equity Foundation, suggested that we carry out the following to
enable young learner find a way through the seemingly impenetrable obstacles and achieve what other
learners, born into different circumstances, take for granted:
Foster better links to employment – make it easier for employers to engage with young people.
Support a case-management approach for those most at risk – this will help them to navigate the
variety of support services they need.
Improve information on local provision – create clear measures of success locally
(Shaks Ghosh, 2011).
In the report released by Touchstone Extras, the introduction of a new Youth Credit, which would integrate
all financial support available for young people into one payment, building on the strongest elements of both
JSA and Education Maintenance Allowances (EMAs) is option to tackle employability barriers facing the
young learners (TU Congress, 2013). It further advised that the employers should be incentivised to
structure employment patterns to enable young people to combine learning and work (TU Congress, 2013).
3 Methodology
Methodology simply means the technique used to obtain information and materials used in any research.
Opie (2004, p15) puts it in a more academic way - the theory of getting knowledge, methods or procedures
by which data will provide the evidence basis for the construction of knowledge about whatever it is that is
being researched.
For reasons of clarity and consistency, qualitative research was adopted in this report as it provides the
best explanation of “what is going on”. The learners interviewed attended various colleges but were
members of an active Youth community in Greater London.
3.1 Methods
Data was mainly through semi-structured and informal interviews with seven young learners; 5 males
and 2 females:
two males (19 & 22 year olds) and one 16yr old female in education;
one 20yr old male and one 18 year old female in employment
two 17 year & 21 year old males in apprenticeship
The seven learners interviewed were asked whether they were in education, employment or training. Three
(45%) of them confirmed that they were in education; two (27.5%) were in employment and the other two
(27.5%) were on an apprenticeship.
The validity of the analysis has been justified through the validity of each data source. My qualitative
instrument, the interview questions (appendix A) consisted of one closed and six open questions. They
significantly described the information and learners’ observation with the context of the variable under as
well as the interactions of the different variables in the context. The seven questions were limited to a page,
considering the amount of time the learners would take to respond to the interview effectively. They were
well-planned to generate information quickly. They began with closed question to avoid time wasting or
make learners lose interest in the interview. Open questions followed as the learners’ interest have been
assessed and they are ready to give detailed feedback information.
Learners were not intimidated to answer questions which will create embarrassment or subject them to any
pressure. As a result, it encourages learners to provide honest and accurate responses. This negates the
opinion that the validity and reliability of qualitative data (face to face interview) is often difficult to ascertain
because of the delivery, intonation and interpretation. It is not the case in this study because the questions
were relevant; directly related to the purpose of the study and have a good probability of yielding the kind of
data desired.
The individual interview was recorded with a digital voice recorder on different days in a restaurant; it lasted
for 20 minutes for each learner. The interpretation of the learners’ responses were properly recorded and
documented in form of detailed notes and electronic recordings. The information is reported accurately and
completely with adequate corrections as per individual comments.
In this study, the research tool is the qualitative data sources due to the need for evidence and validation;
and the data analysis is solely on personal interpretation and understanding of the learners’ responses.
4. Research Ethics
Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research, 2011 (BERA) were adhered to when addressing ethics
throughout this research. The aims and objectives of the research were not concealed from the learners
who participated in the interview process. An early decision was taken to guarantee their anonymity after
they have formally agreed verbally and in writing to take part. The same guarantee was extended to
confidentiality in the use and reporting of individual interviews. Their involvement is highly appreciated. They
were duly informed about their right to withdraw from the research for any or no reason, and at any time.
The interviewees were treated fairly, sensitively, with dignity, and within an ethic of respect and freedom
from prejudice regardless of age, gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity, class, nationality, cultural identity,
partnership status, faith, disability, political belief or any other significant difference (BERA, 2011). The
questions asked were not detrimental to them in any way neither did it cause them any distress, discomfort
or emotional harm. There was no breech of their confidentiality and anonymity.
5. Data Collection
The questions started with a closed question followed by open questions asking for detailed information
which all of them supplied but three of them do not want their ‘strong’ feedbacks to be divulged in the
research. Data was generated through interactions between learners and the researcher as they articulate
things, reflect on, or refine their views. Data analysis addressed each learner’s reflections and experiences
about barriers to education, employment and apprentices.
The
interview transcript was handed to each learner to read and approve and for further discussion or feedback
before the research data was analysed. Nicole et al (2004 p9) points out its importance, stating ‘feedback
as dialogue means that the student not only receives initial feedback information but also has the
opportunity to engage the teacher in discussion about that feedback.’
Seven learners interviewed were asked whether they were in education, employment or training.
Questions 5-7 are to provoke general comments from the interviewees.
The responses to the questions asked are represented below:
1. Are you in education, employment or training?
2. What do you feel have been the main reasons for being in education?
Female – 16 year old Previous advertising experience really helped; as I know what I wa
now
Male - 19 year old I had to find a college course, as there were no jobs
Male - 22 year old A work placement gave me the drive to go back to studying
3. What do you feel have been the main reasons for being in employment?
Female – 18 year old I had to leave college because I was wayward; moved with wrong f
Male - 20 year old I didn’t do as well as I hoped in my GCSE’s and so couldn’t take up
college place.
4. What do you feel have been the main reasons for being in apprenticeship?
Male - 17 year old I want to earn some money. I am worried that if I go back into educ
may waste more time and it may not lead to a job.
Male - 21 year old In between school and college; had a period when I was not at all m
– laziness really.
5. Which people, groups or organisations have you found most helpful when trying to access
education, employment or training and why?
Female – 16 year old My previous experience in advertising acquired my involvement with
community projects.
Male - 17 year old Parents/Family
Female - 18 year old Friends, good friends – talked me into seeking employment as IT he
assistant in a Video production company.
Male - 19 year old FE College – through the advice given at the opening day
Male - 20 year old Self-motivation really; I didn’t want to end up on the streets
Male - 21 year old My passion for cars and 3D modelling. Watched a video clip about
apprenticeship. Searched the apprenticeship website and discovered
could get my hands on 3D modelling through Nissan apprenticeship
Male - 22 year old My teacher. He gave invaluable support during my course and arran
tailored-made work placement for me.
6. Who and what has not been so helpful? Why?
Female – 16 year old Careers advice at school didn’t really help or motivate me
Male - 17 year old Had to travel long distance to the apprenticeship centre
Female - 18 year old My poor attendance at college and the hike in transport fare due to t
distance to my place of employment
Male - 19 year old My parents almost discouraged me; they expected me to carry on jo
searching since there are too many unemployed ‘graduates of FE an
Male - 20 year old I blame myself for not achieving good grades at my GCSE. I don’t w
comment further.
Male - 21 year old Friends - I was distracted by friends who had no direction themselve
were negative about my plans.
Male - 22 year old Lack of self-confidence due to unstable family backgrounds
7. Have you got any comment?
Female – 16 year old I need to improve my improve confidence skill as I will eventually like
a model
Male - 17 year old The rising transport costs to and from the apprenticeship centre is dr
my wages and I just cannot save.
Female - 18 year old Employers should not discrimination regarding where applicants live
should give everyone equal chance
Male - 19 year old Can the government, college and the society please do more for peo
from disadvantaged background?
6 Analysis
A total of seven responses represented 100% of those interviewed. Responses were received from three
learners in education (45%); two in employment (27.5%) and two in apprenticeship (27.5%). All responses
indicated that learners are actively interested in employment now or at the end of their courses.
Perspectives of colleges through learners: the interview findings
The 22 year old male learner saw college as an alternative route to fruitless job search. The 16 year old
female learner was happy that she was on a path to her future ambition whilst a work placement gave the
19 year old learner the drive to go back to studying. The learners attended their local FE colleges, as they
would find it difficult to travel long distance due to financial, social and other reasons.
Perspectives of apprenticeship through learners: the interview findings
The learners were two males; black; aged 17 and 21; single; childless; major drivers for entering into
apprenticeship scheme were financial issues and laziness. One of the learners was worried that returning
to education may be time a wasting effort due to the national high unemployment rate. The other learner
admitted to becoming lazy during a phase of his life when he was not motivated. They are on a 3year
Nissan Apprentice training programme and found it quite challenging but rewarding as both have decided to
pursue a career in Clay Modelling having learnt about 2D and 3D build which offered the best of both worlds
– theory and practise. Though they are learning, getting paid and really enjoying the scheme, they are being
confronted daily by social deprivation and poverty facing the young people because of rural isolation and
poor transport.
Perspectives of employment through learners: the interview findings
The 18 year old white female learner regretted being wayward and had to leave the college but later
secured a job as IT help desk assistant in a Video production company, earning slightly above the minimum
wage. The 20 year old black male could not take up his college place for level 2 so he opted for
employment. He is presently working as Games sales assistant with a national retail store. The learners
were from disadvantaged backgrounds with poor social conditions.
Over a half of the learners had clear ideas about their long-term career plans and their future.
Overall, their responses highlighted some barriers facing: job availability, skills, transport available,
background and financial status.
7 Research Findings
Barriers depriving the young learners on BTEC Level 2 Media courses from obtaining and sustaining a
profitable employment are social, economic and educational. Social barriers include (i) travel costs and
availability; (ii) equality and diversity; (iii) disadvantaged background. The only economic problem
discussed in this paper is finances. Educational barriers include (i) apprenticeship; (ii)
poor motivation; (iii) deficient employability skills and (iv) inferior personal branding.
7.1 Social Barriers
7.1.1 Travel costs and availability
Transport helps the labour market to function efficiently; it links workers with their workplaces. It
influences where people choose to work and live, how many hours to work and the wage they can accept.
For those without access to affordable and appropriate sources of transport, employment opportunities are
often more limited. Transport barriers hinder job search and impact upon a young person’s ability to sustain
employment.
Public transport costs in the UK have risen considerably in the past few decades, and are very expensive.
Profits in the UK bus industry rose in 2009/10 for the third year running, according to new analysis published
by The TAS Partnership (The TAS Partnership 2011). Since January 2013, tube travellers and London bus
passengers faced yet an above-inflation fare rises by an average of 4.2% (The Guardian, 2012). Not only
that, the charges for “Barclays Cycle Hire” scheme has doubled, with daily hire going up from £1 to £2,
weekly access rising from £5 to £10 and yearly membership going up from £45 to £90 (The Guardian,
2012). These fare rises over the years have prevented some young people from going to college and / or
taking up suitable jobs offered to them.
The relative cost of travel obviously varies considerably according to where people live, the distance of
travel, the timing of payment, the length of season ticket and whether a return is purchased. Costs within
areas (i.e.in centres or peripheries) vary widely, and crossing fare boundaries can be especially problematic
if young jobseekers must travel further afield to access job opportunities. One jobseeker interviewed paid
£5.90 from his home in Bolton to attend interview in Wigan (both towns are within the Greater Manchester),
a considerable sum particularly for those with limited income. Another young unemployed from Cheshunt
has to attend an induction programme for an apprenticeship scheme in Slough; a four hour return journey.
The transport cost from Cheshunt station to Slough costs £18.50. Since the creative industry is at the
outskirt of town, this young man will either walk 29minutes to the employer site or take a taxi. This is very
off-putting as he does not want to lose this offer after being unemployed for over two years since leaving
college. When he starts, he will earn £300 p.w. on the scheme but majority of his wages will be siphoned by
transport costs.
Working hours influence the extent to which transport is a barrier to youth employment. Where services run
only during daytime hours, it is difficult for those working off peak, irregular, split shifts or anti-social hours
that relies on public transport. One of the learners interviewed had concerns about using public transport
due to his personal safety and transport reliability when he needed to access services at night in a remote
location. He works split shift hours and it is difficult for him as services are not frequent enough.
The length of time it takes to reach employment centres varies significantly by location and accessibility
barriers can be most acute for those living in remote areas. Unfortunately, the young learner from Cheshunt
also lives in side-line area where services run hourly, apart from having to travel daily to his employer in the
outskirt of Slough.
7.1.2 Equality and Diversity Barriers
Young learners from underrepresented groups often face a range of subtle forms of discrimination in
accessing and participating in employment. Providing opportunities for young people from a range of
backgrounds to enter the industries is vital to keeping the sector vibrant and fresh. They can also
experience discrimination because of their race, disability, age, religion or belief, sexual orientation or for a
combination of any of these reasons.
7.1.2.1 Postcode discrimination
The North East, Scotland and Yorkshire and the Humber have all had risen in youth unemployment that are
twice as large as those in London and the South East, due to postcode discrimination (Huffpost Students,
2012). In September 2007, 5.1% of 16-to-24-year-olds in the region were claiming jobseekers' allowance.
By July 2012 this had risen to 8.6% - an increase of 3.5 percentage points (Huffpost Students, 2012). At the
other end of the scale, London had seen an increase of 1.4 percentage points and in the South East
there had been a rise of 1.6 percentage points (Huffpost Students, 2012).
Sometimes employers do not consider applicants from neighbourhoods with poor reputations, which might
partly explain neighbourhood variation in employment rates. Personal experience showed that perceptions
of such 'postcode discrimination' were widespread among the public and some labour market
intermediaries. I posted five marked applications with fictional names (two from neighbourhoods with poor
reputations and three from a neighbourhood with an affluence reputation) to each of 5 jobs. In all cases, the
employer showed a preference for the applications posted from an affluence neighbourhood. They only
consider one candidate from neighbourhoods with poor reputations. Some employer’s selection’s tactics is
indirectly encouraging young people to falsify information to obtain a more craved for job or apprenticeship.
7.1.2.2 Gender Discrimination
Young people may find themselves being treated unfairly because of their gender, whether they are new
employees, part-time workers or learners in further education or apprentices. Gender discrimination can
destroy confidence and prevent individuals fulfilling their potential in employment, education or training. In
serious cases it can drive a young person from their job or studies.
The discrimination could be direct or indirect. Direct gender discrimination occurs when someone in
education or at work is treated less favourably than someone of the opposite sex in similar circumstances in
relation to recruitment, pay, promotion, dismissal, pregnancy or a request to change working hours.
Practical example of direct gender discrimination would be if the manager of a car manufacturing company
refuses to accept young women as apprentice designers.
Indirect gender discrimination happens where the same policy or practice is applied to everyone but is more
likely to put women at a disadvantage. This means that some treatment at work may be unlawful even if
everyone is treated in the same way. It is against the law unless the employer can provide a good business
reason for the practice that is not related to gender. An example of indirect sex discrimination would be
where a modelling agency imposed a height requirement of 5’10” as a requirement for employing a female
model. As women’s heights are averagely shorter than men, fewer women than men would be able to meet
this requirement. The modelling agency would not be able to justify imposing this restriction and should set
the height in proportion to both genders.
7.1.3 Disadvantaged Background
Learners from the UK’s poorest backgrounds face a considerable educational disadvantage and eventually
could be employment disadvantaged. For the majority, unemployment tends to have a significant
adverse effect on their physical and mental health.
From personal experience, most unemployed learners from disadvantaged background found college boring
and irrelevant. At home, parental and siblings attitudes may not encourage aspiration and academic
achievement. Some (in immigrant families) may be willing to help but may not have the language skills to
support learners at home. Some parents who have been on state support all their lives may not encourage
their children to pursue a profitable employment. All these issues have negative effects, directly and
indirectly, on young people’s suitability for employment.
In addition, there are issues of disengagement which was also associated with a range of other factors such
as ill health, unstable family backgrounds and poor social conditions. Learners who had experienced such
battle with significant barriers to re-engagement; including poor attainment, lack of self-confidence,
unsupportive home and local infrastructure and in some cases personal difficulties such as mental health
problems or other learning disabilities.
7.2 Economic Barriers
7.2.1 Financial Problems
Raising the aspirations of young people requires a general approach to the family as a whole rather than
focusing on the young learner in isolation. However, the family may be unable to play that role effectively if it
is struggling financially. Unlike five years ago, college is becoming increasingly expensive. Between tuition
fees (for those over 19 years old), the need for technology – laptop is now an essential gadget for young
people - and books, they see their bank accounts dwindle very quickly. Textbooks are very expensive.
Those who purchase new or used textbooks may try to sell their books back at the end of the session; the
return is a mere fraction of the initial cost.
The 'extras' that make a real difference to the young people’s future has been hit in the latest round of
further education cuts. Unfortunately, all Further Education Students are required to pay an Extra Curricular
Activities Fee which contributes towards the wide range of field trips, off-site projects and other activities
which are offered to learners and enrich their programmes of study. The scrap of EMA and the cut in
entitlement funding, as reported by the Young People's Learning Agency (YPLA) (Andrew Mourant, 2011),
has left many college leaders to wonder how they would fund work experience and volunteering
programmes that make all the difference in getting young people into work.
Learner's workload can total over 40 hours of classes, homework, study and other responsibilities. Striking a
balance between part-time or full-time job to support themselves and college can be difficult. An imbalance
between college and work might ruin the learning experience and become a barrier to accessing valuable
employment in the future.
7.3 Educational Barriers
7.3.1 Barriers facing Apprenticeships
Apprenticeship offers young people the opportunity to learn on-the-job with the employer, developing
knowledge and skills and gaining qualifications. It covers more than 250 skills and industries across 1,400
job roles, over an extensive range of skill levels (Apprenticeships, 2013a) - from craft occupations or trades
to those seeking a professional license to practice in a regulated profession.
Rural labour markets are characterised by low skilled and insecure employment and limited opportunities for
young people to undergo training or to upgrade their skills since much rural employment is concentrated in
small firms. Young people in more remote rural areas often had access to a limited range of professionals,
usually known to them and their families, which acted as a significant barrier to seeking advice due to
confidentiality.
One of the reasons employers give for unsuccessful apprenticeship is that recruits often do not have the
"soft skills", such as enthusiasm or motivation, or the workplace experience needed for on-the-job training.
Another related barrier to employment through apprenticeship is the recruitment practices of some
employers. Though young people may be willing to travel long distances to access employment, some
employers restricts their recruitment (typically within a 5 mile radius) due to the perception that candidates
who need to travel longer distances and/or who are reliant on public transport will be unreliable employees.
Discreetly, they expressed a preference for people living nearby, especially for jobs with non-standard
hours.
The size of the employer could prove a barrier to apprenticeship. The larger the company, the more likely
they are to invest in training and more likely to take on apprentices. Poor trading conditions will also limit
the capacity of employers to provide suitable training and apprenticeships.
The participation of ethnic minority groups in apprenticeship is also not reflective of the distribution of such
groups in the general population. Fuller and Davey discovered that the share of apprentices who were non-
white was higher in female-dominated sectors such as early years care, health and social care and business
administration and the participation of individuals from Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) groups was
much lower in male-dominated frameworks such as construction, plumbing and engineering (Davey &
Fuller, 2010). In 2003/04, non-white apprentices accounted for 4 per cent of apprenticeship starts, but this
had improved to 9 per cent in 2008/09 (Davey & Fuller, 2010).
Fuller and Davey also considered participation of people with disabilities and found that the share of
apprenticeship starts accounted for by people with disabilities decreased from 10 per cent in 2003/04 to 10
per cent in 2008/09 (Davey & Fuller, 2010). It should be noted, however, that these figures can be affected
by variations in the definition and recording of disabilities (especially learning difficulties) in the data.
7.3.2 Poor Motivation
Motivation is the reason for which a learner wants to study and the efforts he puts in to achieve it. There are
two groups of learners that are especially challenging to deal with in the college classroom setting. The first
group is unmotivated learners who simply seem to lack any drive or passion for learning and education. The
second group represents under-motivated students; those with minimal drive for learning; they want to learn,
but lack the deep passion to create the kind of enthusiasm that highly motivated learners seem to possess.
Dealing with unmotivated and under-motivated students in the college classroom can be very challenging
and frustrating (D. A. McFarlane, 2010).
Whichever group a learner fits in, he must understand that they have the will power to change their
expectations and the value placed on a task before they can achieve any goal.
The motivational level of some of those interviewed for this research was about 15% until a change revived
it. They gave the following reasons for poor motivation:
Long-term family problems
Low self-appreciation
Emotional Struggles
Lack of self-discipline
Fear about what ‘friends’ might think, say or do
Negative attitudes to college, causing poor attendance
Involvement with wrong social group / gang culture
Habitual or Learned laziness from friends
As a result, learners:
Do something for the wrong reasons
Procrastinate
Has poor finishing
Has no confidence to face new challenges
Has no objectives or goals, or ambitions
7.3.3 Deficient Employability skills
While there are variations in the classification of employability, there is a broad understanding of what
qualities, characteristics, skills and knowledge constitute employability for learners. Employers expect them
to have practical and discipline competences gained from their courses. They are also required to
demonstrate a range of broader skills and attributes including team-working, communication, leadership,
critical thinking and problem solving (Edge/SCRE Centre, 2011). In addition to these skills,
employers also highlighted the need for particular attitudes and outlooks including motivation, tenacity, and
commitment. Overall, this is in line with the UKCES (2009) findings.
The barriers caused by deficient employability could be traced to misplaced priority of many course
providers who focused on the achievement of qualifications and did not extend to training that led to job
specific skills. They were not offering jobseekers challenging enough courses that were likely to increase
their chances of sustained employment (FE Week, July 2012).
Four out of the seven learners interviewed admitted they lack some employability skills, including
transferable skills which were deemed particularly relevant in day to day living and especially in the job
market. These were:
Team working
Problem solving
Self-management
Knowledge of the business
Literacy and numeracy relevant to the post
Good interpersonal and communication skills
Ability to use own initiative but also to follow instructions
Leadership skills where necessary
7.3.4 Inferior Personal Branding
The world of work has been changing rapidly during the past decade due to increased globalization, the
proliferation of online social media and technological advances. To enable the young learner to compete for
the best in the job market, he must know how to brand himself professionally. Personal branding is the art
of presenting oneself, philosophy and message as clearly as possible using a variety of media. It involves
managing your reputation, style, look, attitude and skill set the same way that a marketing team would run
the brand for a bag of Doritos or bottle of shampoo (Colin Wright, 2010, Pg. 6).
Personal branding is what you have left behind after a brief or short encounter with people. Basically, it is
what they say about you when you are ‘out of the room’. Analysis from the result of learners interviewed
revealed that a staggering five out of seven lack the resilient specialised personal brand essential in today's
job market. Disadvantaged family backgrounds, financial issues, lack of parental role model were among the
cause of their inferiority branding complex.
8 Discussion and Conclusion
Transport barriers hinder job search and impact upon a young person’s ability to sustain employment. Since
barriers typically affects learners in low skilled and low waged families, the government should consider
freezing fare increase for at least five years in the light of the tough current economic situation facing those
from poor family. The £1,500 Apprenticeship Grant for Employers of 16-24 year olds (age 16-24) to March
2014 (Apprenticeships, 2013b) could be increased to £1,800 to match the high cost of training the
apprentice and the current economy.
Sometimes employability skills may be difficult to teach through traditional teaching and learning practices in
which the learner tends to be a more or less passive recipient. Employability skills will be more effective if
taught as the practice of small and medium-sized businesses (SME); the entrepreneurship education.
Entrepreneurship education enables learners to acquire a broad set of competencies which can bring
greater individual, social and economic benefits since the competences acquired lend themselves to
application in every aspect of their lives (Bruxelles 2011, Pg.2). Entrepreneurship in this sense
refers to an individual's ability to display finesse in creativity, innovation, showing initiative and risk-taking, as
well as the ability to plan and manage projects in order to achieve objectives. This supports everyone in
day-to-day life at home and in society, makes employees more aware of the context of their work and better
able to seize opportunities, and provides a foundation for entrepreneurs establishing a social or commercial
activity (Bruxelles 2011, Pg. 3).
According to the result of the interview analysis, some of the learners had behavioural issues which were
the genesis of one of them especially moving with inappropriate friends. Teachers can adapt Emotional
intelligence into employability skills’ unit. Emotional intelligence is the ability to recognize emotions,
understand and realize how individual emotions affect other people. It involves managing emotions
especially destructive emotions that can disrupt personal or other people’s lives. People with high emotional
intelligence are high achievers on their team; they are usually successful in most things they do. They go
through life much more easily than people who are easily angered or upset because they make others feel
good (Mind Tools, 2013).
There is an imperial need for parents of learners in the Further education colleges to become prime
‘personal branding strategist’. Parents lacking in such areas could be invited for short practical sessions on
how branding can eliminate the boredom in their personality and create a vivid way for others to generate
interest in them. Personal branding, if taught with employability skills in the colleges, will enhance the
learner’s self-awareness; clarify and enable them to reach their goals; make them to be resilient despite
challenges and downturns; it will help bring out their uniqueness. Learners need to know how to construct
deeply in their ‘self’, like that of a building and bring out various talents. They need to identify the values of
these talents as well as the directions where the talents will be useful or promote their lives. Once these are
identified, it will enable people to understand who they are and what they do within seconds of meeting,
reading or hearing about them (John Purkiss, 2012).
Lecturers and trainers in FE should emphasise more about where young people’s academic choices could
lead to, and what sort of career they want rather than encouraging them to achieve a grade. Work
experience needs to be taken more seriously as a genuine opportunity to test the water in a career of
interest, not just another box to be ticked.
In conclusion, some barriers facing the young learners on BTEC level 2 Media courses, has been fully
explored through in this research. Overall this research has established that employability barriers facing
these learners can be tackled through recommendations of those things the teachers can do differently in
their practice to effect such change. In teaching there is content that has to be covered and in research
there are findings that need to be made. The findings made during this research boost the author’s
confidence to research further on core issues affecting FE and to monitor the impact the recommendations
made in this paper will have on learner’s employability.
9 APPENDIX
Summary of Interview Findings
Age
16
female
17
male
18
female
19
male
20
male
21
male
22
male
education apprenticeship employment education employment apprenticeship education
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Gender
Male Female
5 2
Yes No
7 0
Questions
Are you in education, employment or training?
Yes (2 male & 1 female in education)
Yes (1 male & 1 female in employment)
Yes (2 male & no female in apprenticeship)
What do you feel have been the main reasons for being in education?
17 yrs – Female – I had to find a college course, as there were no jobs.
A work placement gave me the drive to go back to studying; I know what I want to do now.
What do you feel have been the main reasons for being in employment?
18 yrs – Female – I had to leave college because I failed my online test (beautician).
17 yrs – Male – I didn’t do as well as I hoped in my GCSE’s and so couldn’t take up my college
place.
What do you feel have been the main reasons for being in apprenticeship?
I want to earn some money. I am worried that if I go back into education I may waste more time and
it may not lead to a job.
17 yrs – Male – In between school & college had a period when I was not at all motivated – laziness
really.
Which people, groups or organisations have you found most helpful when trying to access education,
employment or training and why?
Trade School.
Parents/Family.
Tutors.
Friends.
Connections.
FE College.
Who has not been so helpful and why?
School – completely unhelpful.
Jobcentre.
I was distracted by friends who had no direction themselves and were negative about my plans.
Careers advice at school didn’t really help or motivate me.
Gangs/other kids.
General comments
The hike in transport costs to and from my employer is draining my wages and I just cannot save.
10 Bibliography
Andrew Mourant, (2011) FE colleges hit by more cuts [Online],
Available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/feb/28/ (accessed on 10th January 2013)
Apprenticeships, (2013a) New film inspires young talent to pursue an Apprenticeship in the creative sector
[Online], Available at http://www.apprenticeships.org.uk/News-Media/Latest-News/Article229.aspx
Apprenticeships, (2013b) Employers Get Apprenticeship Boost [Online],
Available at http://www.apprenticeships.org.uk/News-Media/Latest-News/Article226.aspx
BERA, (2011) Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research [Online],
Available at http://www.bera.ac.uk/system/.../BERA-Ethical-Guidelines-2011.pdf
Bruxelles, (2011) Entrepreneurship Education: Enabling Teachers as a Critical Success Factor. A report on
Teacher Education and Training to prepare teachers for the challenge of entrepreneurship
Education, European Commission, DG Enterprise and Industry.
[Online], Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/promoting-
entrepreneurship/files/education/teacher_education_for_entrepreneurship_final_report_en.pdf (accessed on
27th June 2013).
Bryson, A et al (2000) New Deal for Young People: national survey of participants, Employment Service
Research Report 44.
CIPD, (2013) Poor careers advice is leading to skills mismatch [Online],
Available at http://www.cipd.co.uk/pressoffice/press-releases/poor-careers-advice-leading-skills-mismatch-
230113.aspx (accessed on 20th January 2013)
Colin Wright, (2010) Personal Branding: E-Book, Exile Lifestyle
[Online], Available at http://exilelifestyle.com/books/
Colin Wright, (2013) Building a Successful Personal Brand: The 5 Strategies you Need to Know [Online],
Available at http://passivepanda.com/personal-brand (assessed on 25th June 2013).
CRC, (2012) Commission for Rural Communities: Tackling Rural Disadvantage: Barriers to education,
employment and training for young people in rural areas.
[Online], Available at http://www.defra.gov.uk/crc/files/Barriers-to-education-employment-and-training-for-
young-people-in-rural-areas.pdf
Davey, G., & A. Fuller, (2010) Hybrid Qualifications – Increasing the Value of
Vocational Education and Training in the Context of Lifelong Learning. Country Report: England,
Southampton: University of Southampton
Department for Business Innovation & Skills, (2011) Changes to the Apprenticeship Programme. Equality
Impact Assessment, London [Online], Available at
http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/further-education-skills/docs/e/12-577-equalityimpact-assessment-
changes-Apprenticeship-programme.pdf (accessed on 20th December 2012).
Donovan A. McFarlane, (2010) Teaching Unmotivated and Under-motivated College Students: Problems,
Challenges, and Considerations, College Quarterly, (A Journal of Research and Discussion for College
Educators Across Canada) Summer 2010 - Volume 13 Number 3 (accessed on-line on 26th June 2013)
FE Week, July 12, (2012) Ofsted slams FE for failing to address the unemployment problem –
[Online], Available at http://feweek.co.uk/2012/07/12/ofsted-slams-fe-for-failing-to-address-the-
unemployment-problem/ (accessed on 26th June 2013).
Huffpost Students (2012) School Leavers Facing Rising Youth Unemployment Rates In Postcode Lottery
Battle [Online],
Available at http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/08/21/young-people-job-hunting-postcode-
lottery_n_1815797.html (accessed 28th January 2013)
John Purkiss, (2012) How to Build your personal Brand
[Online], Available at http://careers.guardian.co.uk/build-personal-brand, Tuesday 25 September 2012,
(assessed on 26th June 2013).
Kevin Lowden, Stuart Hall, Dr Dely Elliot and Jon Lewin, (2011) Employers’ perceptions of the employability
skills of new graduates, Edge/SCRE Centre
Mind Tools: Essential Tools for an Excellent Career, 2013
[Online], Available at http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newCDV_59.htm (accessed on 27th June
2013).
Nicol D. et al, (2004) Enhancing student learning through effective formative feedback, The Higher
Education Academy Generic Centre [Online], Available at
http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/resources/database/id353_senlef_guide.pdf (accessed on
15th December 2012)
Nominet Trust (2012) Nominet Trust highlights the broken link between qualifications and employment.
[Online], Available at http://www.nominettrust.org.uk/news-events/news/nominet-trust-highlights-broken-link-
between-qualifications-and-employment
Opie, C. (2004) Doing Educational Research: a guide for first time researchers. London: Sage Publications
Philip Case, (2012) Rural youth suffering in the recession: Farmer’s Apprentice;
[Online], Available at http://www.fwi.co.uk/articles/09/07/2012/133823/rural-youth-suffering-in-the-
recession.htm#.Uc17D_mkqk0 Monday 09 July 2012 10:25 (accessed on 16th March 2013).
Shaks Ghosh, (2011): Youth disengagement: the biggest issue of our time? Working Brief
The TAS Partnership, (2011) Bus Industry Profits continue to recover online available at
http://www.tas.uk.net/content/index.php/comment/tas-blog/view/614-bus-industry-profits-continue-to-recover
(accessed on 28th June 2013).
The Guardian, (2012) London tube and bus fares to rise from January.
[Online], Available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/nov/07/london-tube-bus-fares-rise
(Accessed on 25th February 2013).
Tony Wilson, (2011) Youth unemployment: one million reasons to act: Working Brief. [Online],
Available at http://www.cesi.org.uk/.../youth-unemployment-million-reasons-act
TU Congress, (2013) TOUCHSTONE EXTRAS, Generation lost: Youth unemployment and the youth labour
market [Online], Available at
http:www.tuc.org.uk/economy/tuc-20703-f0.cfm
UKCES, (2009) Employee Demand for Skills: A Review of Evidence & Policy – Executive Summary