+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Issues for a possibe sector test

Issues for a possibe sector test

Date post: 22-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: ulani
View: 44 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Issues for a possibe sector test. Mike Lamont. Possible scenario. Mid July: All sector colds (with 78/81 in shadow of UX85 intervention) End July – week 31: DSO tests, close ring – one week Early August Injection test Weekend (Friday evening to Monday morning) 2/3 August? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
19
Issues for a possibe sector test Mike Lamont
Transcript
Page 1: Issues for a possibe sector test

Issues for a possibe sector test

Mike Lamont

Page 2: Issues for a possibe sector test

LHC injection test? 2

Possible scenario Mid July:

All sector colds (with 78/81 in shadow of UX85 intervention) End July – week 31:

DSO tests, close ring – one week Early August

Injection test Weekend (Friday evening to Monday morning) 2/3 August? ~ 4 weeks before full commissioning

Day after test Radiation survey, establish supervised areas

11-07-2008

Page 3: Issues for a possibe sector test

LHC injection test? 311-07-2008

Option 3 – Injection point 2 – B1 Need partial 1-2, complete 2-3 Dump on collimators in IR3

scheme sketched by Stefano

Given cryo interventions in 78 and 81 – we go for option 3.(Option 1: from 8 to IR7, Option 2: from 8 to dump in 6)

Page 4: Issues for a possibe sector test

LHC injection test? 411-07-2008

Option 3 – pro & cons

Minimal requirements on Cryogenics & HWC Less area classified by RP Less impact on other systems

BI, LBDS

Only one sector test - less systems tested BI, LBDS, collimators missed

BI configuration not perfect Rely on in situ instrumentation Not ideal – no BCT – some implications for measurements

Page 5: Issues for a possibe sector test

LHC injection test? 5

Stopping the beam in IR3

11-07-2008

Page 6: Issues for a possibe sector test

LHC injection test? 611-07-2008

Beam Stopper

Page 7: Issues for a possibe sector test

LHC injection test? 711-07-2008

Proposed TestsPriority Duration Intensity # shots Intensity Comments

h p+ p+

1 End TI2, Injection Steering, commission BDI, timing

1 6 5E+09 100 5.0E+11 TDI in, protecting Alice

2 Trajectory acquisition commissioning, trajectory correction, threading, energy

1 12 5E+09 200 1.0E+12 To IR3 collimators

3 Linear Optics from kick/trajectory, coupling, BPM polarity checks, corrector polarity

1 6 1E+10 200 2.0E+12

4 Check BLM system 1 5E+09 Parasitic

5 Aperture limits, acceptance 1 6 5E+09 200 1.0E+12 Pi bumps, BLMs, BCT

6 Momentum aperture 1 2 5E+09 100 5.0E+11 Move energy of SPS beam

9 Effects of magnetic cycle, variations during decay, reproducibility 1 6 5E+09 150 7.5E+11 10 short pre-cycles

TOTAL 38 950 5.3E+12 On to TCPDAYS 2 5.0E+11 On to TDI 

Page 8: Issues for a possibe sector test

LHC injection test? 8

Tests Pilot Beam for the most part:

single bunch of 5 - 10 x 109 protons Total intensity:

~ 1013 protons Gives a first good look at:

Full injection set-up Instrumentation Aperture Field quality, polarities

11-07-2008

Page 9: Issues for a possibe sector test

LHC injection test? 9

Radiation Protection - Summary• Areas affected by the Sector Test will be Prohibited Radiation Areas

during the test.

• Alice - final shielding has to be in place.

• All areas in the LHC tunnel affected by the Sector Test will be classified as Radiation Area (Personal Dosimeter required) after the

test.

• Areas showing dose rates above 15 uSv/h will be classified as Controlled Radiation Areas (additional operational dosimeter, job and

dose planning)

• Material leaving the radiation zones have to be controlled and classified by RP

• No significant water and air activation is expected after the Sector Test

Helmut Vincke

11-07-2008

Page 10: Issues for a possibe sector test

LHC injection test? 1011-07-2008

Monitoring Radiation monitoring

RAMSES operational ALICE: 4-5 monitors planned under RAMSES

Beam Loss Monitors Sensitive to losses at 1% level with pilot bunch intensity

Beam Intensities Beam extracted, injected (and to dump) to be logged

RPG survey after the event and perhaps during the test to ensure that activation remains low. Careful survey afterwards planned after the test near the

injection dump and dump itself.

Page 11: Issues for a possibe sector test

LHC injection test? 11

Cryogenics 1/2 For sector 23 presently under powering tests, the cryo

concerns are for Q6_R2 and DFBX under consolidations, the rest is working fine

For sector 12 under LHe filling, major progress were made recently with cooling and filling DFB's and stand-alone magnets, DFBX to be consolidated

Lionel will be able to confirm the situation with at least one level gauge and few thermometers not yet in service, but with possibility to increase priority if required.

11-07-2008

Serge Claudet

Page 12: Issues for a possibe sector test

LHC injection test? 12

Cryogenics 2/2 We should be able to progress with boil-offs and various

required assessments for cryo start/maintain MS_2L end of next week at best (end wk 29). We will know more about that in the coming days when we will have seen our ability to control LHe levels.

Feel free to see what could be organised, and we will make sure we follow this during the summer period.

Our concerns would be about access conditions after this possible injection test, with HWC to be completed.

11-07-2008

Page 13: Issues for a possibe sector test

LHC injection test? 13

Access – DSO tests Goal

Nominal system deployed and tested before end July Plan evening shifts for one week in July

2 points an evening test doors [350] – sample or all by-pass safety elements to avoid hitting them too often, check

receipt of signals etc. by-pass BIW

Plus one weekend of test Resources required

Personnel for test, documentation etc.

11-07-2008

Ghislain RoyLots of questions: work very much in progress

Page 14: Issues for a possibe sector test

LHC injection test? 14

DSO – Injection Test

Close whole ring Test all doors in 2 & 3 against injection chain Qualify rest of ring against injection chain Condem main power supplies down-stream (block

beam) Potentially interesting option acting as useful milestone Leverage tests performed for TI2 test

11-07-2008

Is a reduced set of DSO tests a possiblity for an injection test?

Page 15: Issues for a possibe sector test

LHC injection test? 15

Other systems - briefly

11-07-2008

Injection elements: septa, kickers Commissioned. Check RF timing

Collimators Lock in – no others need

TDI Bake-out and to be hardware commissionined

Machine Protection See following slidesBeam Instrumentation:

BPMs BLMs BTV FBCT [ TI2]

• 2-3 fully kitted out• Sum signal?

Controls/Software Tests in progress!

Vacuum • 2-3 Ok next week• LSS2 should be OK• LSS3 OK next week • Sector 12…. check

ALICE Vacuum, Injection inhibit, communication

Page 16: Issues for a possibe sector test

LHC injection test? 1611-07-2008

Injectors

Page 17: Issues for a possibe sector test

LHC injection test? 17

SPS Extraction & TI2 Line :

Line to TI2 TED OK – ½ hour to re-check should be fine. End of line setup should be fast: only 1 BPM per plane (+

injection area screens) – not much to steer (+ few degrees of freedom!!)

Interlocks: All tested up to TI2 TED. PCs and FMCMs after TED to be tested, not critical. Maskable! Master BIC:

Test of Probe Beam Flag with SPS beam (3rd week of July). Mandatory!

LHC Safe Beam Flag must be set (forced?) to TRUE for the test.

Test of full master logic only be done with TI2 TED out of beam IR2 closed.

11-07-2008

Jorg Wenninger

Page 18: Issues for a possibe sector test

LHC injection test? 18

Injection Protection & BIC Vacuum (last TI2 valve): Mandatory. Operator switch: Mandatory. ALICE injection inhibit: Mandatory. ALICE ZDC: Mandatory. Collimators: Nice to have.

Maskable - so not a problem ! FMCM MSI & Sum Fault MSI:

PC must work of course, but interlock must not be tested before (requires IR2 closed). Test is quick in any case

  All other inputs: Not activated.

11-07-2008

Page 19: Issues for a possibe sector test

LHC injection test? 19

Ring Protection BIS

Keep BIC loops are they are. Activate only required user inputs.

Vacuum: Mandatory. WIC: Mandatory. PIC: Mandatory.

Requires ad-hoc PIC config BIC + tests. BLMs:

Connect if possible, else only observation. Unmaskable! Collimators: Nice to have. Maskable! FMCMs (IR3): Not needed. Maskable! BTVs:

Expected to be ready. Must be masked if we use them!

11-07-2008


Recommended