Interactive Teaching in Languages with Technologies Shona Whyte, Université Nice Sophia Antipolis, France

Ton Koenraad, TELL Consult, Netherlands

Before we begin: quick survey (fill out now)

goo.gl/forms/E3XZsRyS61O2vlgF2

goo.gl/forms/E3XZsRyS61O2vlgF2

Presentation outline

1.  Interactive technologies

•  IWB resources + examples

2.  From technology to teaching

•  task-based language teachin g

3.  Interactive teaching

•  Mobile technologies

•  Video communication

iTILT (Interactive Technology in Language Teaching)

                                                      EACEA Lifelong Learning: 511751-LLP-1-2010-1-BE-KA2-KA2MP January 2011 - April l 2013 Consortium of 7 European universities and institutes (Antwerp, Barcelona, Bilkent, Cardiff, Heidelberg, Nice & Utrecht) Teaching foreign languages with interactive whiteboards workshops on the IWB for language teaching •  edited volume on classroom CALL: Cutrim Schmid & Whyte (2014).

Teaching languages with technology. Bloomsbury. •  research monograph on

Implementing and Researching Technological Innovation in Language Teaching: Whyte, 2015, Palgrave

the iTILT story … 2010

•  integration of new technology: IWB (2010)

•  support for teacher integration of IWB in language education

•  document and research the process: classroom video clips, participant feedback

•  creation of teacher education resource: website with handbook, practice reports, partner selection

interactive technologies (IWB) learning to teach languages with the IWB

Resources for IWB-mediated language teaching

http://www.itilt.eu/itilt-training-handbook

http://www.itilt.eu/quick-search

Video examples =>

Library: partner clip selection

http://www.itilt.eu/node/649

Videos 1, 2 & 7

Watch and analyse: videos

¤  Example 1 - Magic schoolbag - http://itilt.eu/iwb-practice?id=441

¤  Example 2 - Listening for error correction http://itilt.eu/iwb-practice?id=401

¤  Example 7 - Drag and drop for split headlines http://itilt.eu/iwb-practice?id=298

¤  What interactivity does the technology provide that is otherwise more difficult or impossible?

¤  Who contributed to the teaching/learning materials? Who is controlling the technology, teacher or learners?

¤  What can we conclude about language learning opportunities in this clip?

Watch and analyse: responses

¤  Example 1 - Magic schoolbag First name A through H https://padlet.com/whyshona/4cmus08qo08w

¤  Example 2 - Listening for error correction First name I through P https://padlet.com/whyshona/umbsj1melskp

¤  Example 7 - Drag and drop for split headlines First name Q through Z https://padlet.com/whyshona/ya314jnlb23f

¤  What interactivity does the technology provide that is otherwise more difficult or impossible?

¤  Who contributed to the teaching/learning materials? Who is controlling the technology, teacher or learners?

¤  What can we conclude about language learning opportunities in this clip?

¤  Look at 2 minutes of all 3 clips, post on your assigned padlet, read other responses

IWB-mediated language teaching Bloomsbury, 2014

Cutrim Schmid & Whyte

-  edited volume

-  introduction to CLT and TBLT in technology-mediated language teaching

-  action research by iTILT partners

Reviews of book

Task-based language teaching in technology-mediated language teaching

interactive teaching different technologies

                                                      Erasmus+ 2014-1-UK01-KA200-001821 (Sept 2014 -August 2017) Consortium of 6 European universities and institutes (Belgium, France, Germany, Netherlands, Turkey, Wales) Interactive language teaching with technologies. iTILT 2 website Interaction in language teaching with technologies, Nice workshop, January 2016

iTILT (Interactive Teaching in Languages with Technology)

iTILT 2: interactive TEACHING in languages with technology

1.  Video exchange

2.  Video report

3.  Live videocommunication

TBLT? •  meaning not form •  information gap •  own resources •  outcome

Primary video exchange project

Clip 1

https://vimeo.com/192448361

iTILT2_2016

TBLT?

•  meaning not form

•  information gap

•  own resources

•  outcome

Video report

Clip 2

https://vimeo.com/192120415

iTILT2_2016

TBLT?

•  meaning not form

•  information gap

•  own resources

•  outcome

Live communication

Clip 3

https://vimeo.com/192124239

iTILT2_2016

TBLT?

•  meaning not form

•  information gap

•  own resources

•  outcome

collaboration for interactive teaching

•  materials design criteria wp.me/p28EmH-e

•  Palgrave-Macmillan 2015 Implementing and researching technological innovation in language teaching

•  communities of practice in CALL teacher education

wp.me/p28EmH-7s

Workshop summary

First iTILT Project: interactive TECHNOLOGIES (IWB)

IWB materials

Practice examples

Technology training

Second iTILT Project: interactive TEACHING & TBLT

Mobile technologies

Videoconferencing

Pedagogical development

http://www.itilt2.eu