Jairo Ferino Sanchez, A094 216 521 (BIA July 11, 2014)

8/12/2019 Jairo Ferino Sanchez, A094 216 521 (BIA July 11, 2014)

1/20

Sweeney, Maureen A., EsquieUnversit of aland Immgaton Clnc500 W Baltimoe Steet, Sute 360Baltmore, MD 2 201

Name: SANCHEZ, JAR FRN

US Dpartmn Jic

Executive Oce r Immigration Revew

Board of Immigaton AppealsOce of he Cerk

5107 Leesburg Pik, Sute 2Fa Chc Vrgn 53

OHS/ICE ce o Chief Consel - BAL31 Hopkins Plaza, Room 1600Baltmore, D 21201

A 094-216-521

Date of ths notce 7/11/2014

Enclosed s a copy of the Board' decison and orde n he above-reenced case.

Encose

P Mb:y R

Sncee,

D cDonna CaChef Clek

Lulsege k

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished

Cite as: Jairo Ferino Sanchez, A094 216 521 (BIA July 11, 2014)


2/20

. l

..'pm of uExecutve Oce r Imiaon Reew

Decsion of he Bod of ton Appels

Fs Church, Vgn 20530

ile A94 16 51 Baltmore, MD

Inre: JAIROFENO SANCHEZ

N OVAL PROCEEDINGS

APEAL

Date

ON BEHA O SPONDNT Maureen A Seeey, Esuire

CHARGE:

j 1 ! 204

otice Sec. 1(a)(6)(A)(i), I& Act 8 S.C 8(a)(6)(A)(i)] Present ithout being admitted or proled

APPICATION Motion to suppress

The responet, a atve ad citize of eco, has appeale the Immgratio Judge'seby 1, 3, decsio deyg his motio to suppress d teminate proceedigs, dorderig h removed to Mexico. The Immaton Judge granted the resodent the privilegeof volunty depre under sectio 4B(b) of the mmigratio and Nationalty Act 8 US.C.

9c(b) The record il e remande.

e Board revews Immiation Judge's ndings of ct, cluding dgs as to thecredibilty of testioy, der the cley eroneous stdd 8 CF.R 3()3)() seeTuron v. Holder 667 F3d 53 (4th Cir 1) The Boar revews uestios oflaw, screton,an judgment d all other issues n appeals om decisios of Imiation Judges de ovo.8 C.R 13(d)(3)().

We coclude that the record is not aeuate r appellate revew, as the decision does otly adress certain pects o e respondet's claims See Maer of Barcens, 9 I&NDec. 69 (BIA 988). or instce, he respondent suitted a moto to suppress and

terminate proceedings to e Imiation Judge rguing that all evidece deived om or aresult of the Mld Traspoaon Auos lal s cad seze of him o May 9,

8 (incluig evidece obtaned by the DHS n the we of th ulawl seze) shoul besuppressed because ths unawl sech an seiure egregious and volated otios ofnde iess (Eh 3) C I Lopz-no 68 U. 3 (98); oMater of Grci 7 I&N ec. 319 ( 198) (respodet made prima cie showng thatamissios ivoluntily given) and Mater of Toro 7 I&N Dec 34 (BIA 198) (holdgmner of acug evdece so egregous to rely o it oud oend h edmetdametal iess requremets) c atter of andol 17 I&N Dec 7 (IA 979) Themmiation Juge obseved that there as conctg evidece w respect to hether henl a op of e respoent was n violatio of Mlad law or the MaylandTrsportation Authority's Drectves Maual (IJ at 7-9) The Imato Jdge declied toassess the validity of te afc stop by the Mrylnd Trsporatio Authority because e



3/20

09 216 52

mgration Juge conclue that is stop as relate to the -23 obtane om thesusequent imiation authorties' questioning of the resonent (whch the mmiation Jugeeteine as acquire n a maer consistent ith the cent statutes a reglaions notin violation o te responent's rghs (J. at 1213, 15 Exh 2 See Mter of ERMF dASM 25 &N Dec. 580 (B 201; ee o Mtter of erveTorre 2 &N Dec. 351

(BA 1996. Hoever the sseqent immigaton qestong ows rect om heresonent's ni sto an aes. Therere, he va o the tac so b he MlTransoraton uthor mst be assesse. See Uited Se OcrTorre 507 F.3 224(4h Cir. 2007; ee o Uied Stte Nvrro Di 420 F.3 58 ( ir. 2005; ee oopehe hcro 383 F.3 650 (7th ir 2004; ee o ied Se v. mro

27 .3 420 (9th ir. 994.

Gven e Boars lte ctning ncion, we wil rema this case to e iationJuge to make the necessa cal nns n the rst nstace. See ter of Exi 18 &NDec. 276, 278 (BA 1982; ee o Mter of SH 23 N Dec 462, 65 (B 2002(remanng o e gaion Jge noting the lack o cal nngs an legal alss; ee

o Mtter of Fedoreko 9 & Dec. 57, 7 (B 984 (noting hat "[t]he Boar s anapellate o whose cion is to revie, not create, a recor; 8 C.FR. 1003((3((lmting the Bo's ct-nng ahort an statng he Boar ma rem the proceeing to

the migation Jge where her ct-ning s neee.

ccoringl, e llowng orer ll be entere.

ORDER: he recor is reae to the mmigraton Juge r er roceeingsconsstent w ths orer.



4/20

l

E AE EPARME OF JCEEXETVE OFFCE FOR MMGRAO REVW

NTE TAE MMGRAO CORBATMORE MARYLA

ie A09216521 Febrar 2 201

the Matter o

JARO FERNO ANCEZ

REPOND

)

)

REMOVA PROCENG(MOO O PPRE)

CHARG mmigrato ad Natioaity ct ectio 22a6A( as oe hos peset i the ited tates thout havg bee admied oparoed ho arrved i ths cotry at ay te or pace other thaas desigated by the Attorey Geeral.

APPCATON Motio to sppess; votary depare

ON BEHALF OF RPONEN: MARTA RANEZ ARAJO

ON BEHALF OF H: JEFR PATK

ORL DECSON OF THE MMGTON JUDG

The espodet is aro Fero ache He has bee placed i reoval

oceedgs by the odgg o a Notce to Apear dated May 22 2009 The otce to

Appea s a a o ts recod as Eibit dcates that the espodet s ot a

ctze or atoa o te ted ates bt a atve ad ctze o Meco Eht ]

The Notce to Apear dcates te respodet arrived the ted tates at or ear a

ow ocato o r abot a ow date ad that he was o the adtted or



5/20

paled aer ispecio by a Immigrao Oicer Exhibi 1. is aeged, as e i

he oice o Appear ha he respode is removabe rom he ied aes der

eco 22a)(6)A)i), as oe ho is a aie prese i he ied aes iho

beg adied or paroled or who arrved i he ied aes a ay ie or pace ohe

ha as desiged by he Aorey Geeral Ehibi ]

Te espode appeared bere he migraio Co hrogh couse

ad deed al!egaos oe hrog ur coaied he chargig docme, ad

deed ha e respode s removable as charged Te respode aleges ha he

was sbjeced o a egregous violaio o his Foh Amedme righs ad herere,

has iled a oo o sppress ay evidece oeed i hese proceedgs by e

epame o omelad ecry.

The Co oes ha is e brde o e epame o omead

ecriy o esabls he respodes removabily by evdece ha s cear ad

covcg evidece as s se h a INA ecio 20(c). ee also, Woodb v. I

85 . 276 (1966) a eo o esabsh he respodes removabliy he

epame o omelad ecry has oered docmes a xibi 2A hrogh . As

oed, hoever he espode opposes he admissio o said docmeaio o he

grods ha his Fih Amedme de process righs have bee vioaed based o he

epame o oead ecrys egregos vioaio o he Foh Amedme

seach ad sere provisios o he ed aes Cosiio

The espode has sbmed a oio o sppress ad ermiaepceeds whh s a pa o hs record as Ehbi . sad oio he respode

oves he Co o sppress ad ede al evidece pysia ad esmoy obaied

or derived rom rogh, or as a res o Maryad Trasporao Aoriys ulal

search ad seie o he resode o ay 29 2009 (icdg evdece obaied by

A092652 2 Febar 21 20


6/20

OHS nthe wake of the unau sezure)because hs unau searchand seizurewas

egregiousand volatednoions ofundamental fairness." The respondentctes INS v.

Lop z-M ndoza,468US 1032(1984). Respondenthrough counsel argueshat the

Maryand TaspoationAthotysoces' actons consttuted egregos volation of

the FouhAmendmentbecause heocer "lacked and knew, or shoud have nown

they lacked any authority o detainthe respondent nder sate and federal law" andha

as a result all evdence oered by OHS should be suppressed as the "fruitof the

osoos tree" he resodet though couse as submed a memoradum o aw

so o the resodet's motio to suress whch has bee gve ul weight ad

cosderatio b he our his ou otes tha awers argumet i ad o itse is

sice to esabsh a rma acie case o elgbi r sresso ad that the

aasis o wheher or ot a motio to suress shoud be grated s acdrve

aasis based o acts oered arsig rom the crcmstaces that ed to the aeged

aw search ad seize that sgicat regard resodet has sbmed a

stateme rom himse as we as oher dviduas who were reset wth hm at he

tme o the arrest o Ma 22 200 [s hbits A through . Addiioay the

esodet ad other wtesses have ested beore hs Co

addio o hs wre staemet the resode has descrbed how o

Ma 22 2009 he was traveig o da Aveue ad aer a ed tha receved a

ca the ca iormed resodet the red had bee aresed ad eeded a rde

Resode was i a vehce oerated b oe r Badio who had bee ulled over bhe olice o Boeig Hghwa i Bamoe he wrte saeme he esode

descibes how he had bee raelg wth his red veio ava ad hs brother

etk achez Balimore whe Juvetio receved a hoe ca ad tha aer the

hg the hoe Jeto od el that thei ed Abero Bado had bee

A0-26-52 ebrar 2 20


7/20

aesed by e poce ad ta e polce eeded e oer o te ca ta Bao as

drivig to come o pick te vece p Respodet epos tat e old Jveo tat

e od go t m so at e old be abe o dve te ote ca b bee ey

) got o te plae wee Mr Badllo ad ee sopped ey ad caged paes teele so ta te respodet wold be drg te car Te respode repos ta

oce ey arved at te place ere te police ad stopped Bado tey paked abot

0 eet ro o Badilo at wc tme tey saw o poce cars paked ed Badllo,

ad ey sa o polce ocers stadg eaby Tey descrbed e polce oces

ioms ad ee de te mpresso tat e oces ee state oopers At a

me te oicers ee takg to M Badillo. Meaile e espodet aied sde

te a e e ege as g, at c te oe o te oe came ove o e

passeger sde o e ar ad, accordig to e respodet p s ads o te

passeger sde door" Additoaly Mr acez epos tat te st g te ocer

said as "weer e ee legal or lega." He described ta te oicer gave a

odesedg smle e tey qeed as o y te oer as askg te abot

tei stats bt ta e oer coed o ask em abo ter mgrao stas

Mr. acez desces o, e cose o e excage e oicer's voce got lode

ad oder, ad at te ocer seemed to be "getig very impaiet He descbes

beg sared ad evos to e pot ta e et pessed ad mdated by e

oe ad tat e aly aseed e poe ocer's qesos Lae e respode

was told to tr o te ege o te ar ad to t s keys over to te oce aoad to wc e resodet oled Te oer later asked detato

ad ater ad te respode ad te oes o et ro te veces oe y oe Te

ocer also asked s rom te dvdals Te respodet testied bee te

Co tat o traic olatos were issed" Later e respodet ad oers ere

A094-2652 4 ebay 21, 20


8/20

1,

aken o he poice saion hee her handcus ere reoved ad he esponde and

hs rends ere paced in a cel he responden has esed beoe his Cou and has

indicaed in his ren saeen ha a no ie ee hey eve od hy hey ad been

arresed The responde ested that he as ever red o any ghs o sence

the rgh o an aoey or tha ayhing sad coud be used agans h in cou hie

he cusody o he poce oices

Accordng to the respodents tesony a poce ocer ate cae and

ased the esponden and he others aed o "a graon or hey

aned o be aken to he gration Oicer he responden saes ha e and his

ends said ha hey aed o a r graon Ocers o sho up. he oce

ater eurned ad od the respoden and he ohers tha he od have o ake he o

the igraton Oice. Addoay a panish-speakng oice old the respondent

and the others a he gration ad Cstos Enorcemen did ot coe ha hey

oud be eleased bac a he place here hey had been orgnay pced up.

Hoever te esponden as ranspoed o he igraion and Custos ecehe poice handcus ere reoved ad graion and Cusos Eoceen oicers

placed handcus o the responden and hs riends. Responde and hs reds had

bee a he poice saio or abo a hour and a hal p o hee hours pror o beng

turned over o he auhores a CE.

Accodg o he respodes esony personne a CE ere a e

upset e te respodent and hs reds arrived hey had indeed shu don all he

opters n preparaton or a long eeend accordng to te respondent ad he

respodent ad hs rends ere questoed oe by oe. he respoden sates tha he

had "doe nothng rog" Addtonay he has tesied beore hs Cou ha he as

never tod at e had a rgt to consel that he as handced ad sen o a deteno

A094-26-52 5 Febrary 2 20


9/20

cente i Pensylvana and that he had also been tanspoed as a aay as exas

here he as held "sx to seven days s Ehibt C]

On css-examinaton the espondent as uee as to hether or no

e ad a vad aylad dvers cese to hich he ndcated that he dd ad that he

ad it r abot to years" prior to the date o the arest He as also qeried about

hat docmentato he used n order to obta the dives licese and the esondent

voed is h Amedment ad de process rights. Additoaly hen ased abot a

ecan passpo the respondet voed the h Amendmet to the nited tates

Constitton e testied to havng completed hgh school as hs gade eve.

Addtonay he testied o coss-examiato that he as bo Jana o 1981

When ased here he as bo the espodent indcated that he ou no aser

that queston on the gounds that t mght see to incrinate him agan nvong he

h Amendmet o the ted tates Constttio. he same was the resondets

response he ased by the eamet o omeland ecty hat he told the police

oces hen he as ased hee he s rom The esondet states that he anseredthe oce oices questios because the ocer as angy ad because he and hs

reds dd not o hat the oce old do they di o ase the estions pt to

them he respondent ivoed the Fh Amedmet to the United tates Constution

he he as ased hee he as bor ad/or here hs paens ee bo

In addton o the respodents testimoy the Cou has head testimoy

om Oce Peter Acer ho has provded bacgod o hs sece th the arylad

rasa Athrt He idated he had been a olice oce th the ayand

raspoato Athority r soe 1 years ad that he had made a lttle over some

000 stops i the corse o the year recedng hs tesmoy e testied as el that

he had trag mag arrests constttioal la at the poce academy and that he

A09-216-521 6 ebrary 21 201


10/20

ad also dergoe occasioa rereshe over he period o ime. e esied as el

that he kos te pcess r makig arress ad the arres process der Marylad

a ad e descrbed that process bere the Cou Addoay he described te

process o "deaer" hch oter poice ad athorties assis e epamet o

Hoead Secrty as "oside agecy" He recoted avg reveed he cide

repo regardig he May 22 2009 arrest o the respode ad his rieds ad

described the step by step assesset o that repor. e described tat te ocers dd

deed approach the Acra hc ad bee drive by the respodet ad his reds

ad tha the oicer deed tapped o the do ad hat he ido as eveally

opeed ad he sates that he ased abot idividas Immgrao stas erei. e

described the codc o other oicers o the scee as e ad spoe o o a

Oicer Rivera was here o traslate o the respode ad hs reds a tod tha

hey (te poice) wold cotact E ad that i CE did o coe e respode ad hs

reds old be rered to te ste where they ad bee detaed. e descrbes te

respodet ad hs rieds avg bee seated o e grod ext to oe aother a thete o ther ares. O css-exaao he dcaed hat there ere o Mrada

ags give ecase o Mrada wargs are give to people "ho are o der

arrest e staed tha Mr Sacez as ever ased abot his Imgrato stats

Whe qered abot hether or ot he spoe to the respode or ay o his rieds

a itmidag maer he coceded tha he spoke ih a athoritatve toe bt that

speaig with a atoriave toe is cosstet ith the crcmstaces.

e o as eard tesio ro Major Stard ONel ral

hese proceedgs as wel. Major rali s he exective drector o Law Eorceet

Agast Prohbio e estied bere the co he testied tat he as pa o he

Marylad State Poce ro Septeer o 976 til eceber o 1999. He had raied

A094-26-52 7 Ferary 2 20


11/20

and ueed oce a tate trooe and he wa t ca beeen two to thee

year rom 99 to 984 e tate he wa rooted to copoa peng ome

ve tope, an that he ha taned neay tate troe Addtonay, t was

eony a eany ha been raned on how to conduct aret nder Maand

law a reat to the Foh Aendment and the Fh Aendment o the Unted State

onttuton regadng earch and ee and robable cae and that he ha over 46

hor o tanng oer a erod o one week on the e o "reaonabe con an

obab caeu It wa onon that there ou neer hae been etenton o

thoe reondent and h rend n the econd ca becae thee wa no reaonabe

con that a cme ha been coed or wa beng come e concluded

that Ocer Acke aret o the eondent wa baed oey on Ocer Acer

aement o the reponent mgraton tatu, whee cleay ee thee wa no

oaton o Maryand aw or ucon o oaton o Maryand aw e oncuded that

te Maryland olce ocer hod learly know and undertan that they do not hae

athorty to enrce ederal mgraton aw e note a we that thee nvdua

ho know tat thee t be a warant o oca etane a eera agency o

Maryland olce authorte to ake an aret under edea enrcement aw Uon h

reew o the reco, he concude that there wa no ch warant on Mr Sanche e

tate a wel, that Oce Acker houd hae known that h acton wee legal by

e o h tranng On cexamnaton he concede tat he a no knowege o

NA Secton 287g jont oeraton e tate that he ad no knowledge o thatroon o t law at t t o te reondent and h rend arret

e earent o omelad Secrty called a t wtne Sher

Mchael ew Ser Mcae ew a teted tat he belee that Oce Acker

conduct wa orrect a to bot toed ele It wa h onon tat Maryland

A94-26-52 8 Febrary 2 2


12/20

oce o\ce ae emoweed o hod nddua un feea auhoe ae

oeon of he ae oe e oned ha he Maryand Tanoaon

Auhoiy ecie Manua wa "no oaed" e eed a wel ha he connue

o egage rac o an ha he crreny aend Fouh Amendmen udate and

eak a eamen of omelad Secury ecuriy functon and he emai a

cefed incor o dae

Thoughou hee roceedng hae had an oouny o obee he

reondent emeano a we a he demeano of al wtnee caed in hee

roceedng The ou ha ao had an oouny o reew he wren ubmion

n h ecod een f no eccaly refeenced in hi decon The ou ha a we

had an oouny o conder he written cong by each e The reonden

aeng agan ha a edence oeed by he eamen o omeand Secury

houd be reclude om he edence for reaon et oh in he moion o ue

a well a e eament o omeland Securty wien bmion in which it ae

hat "he eonden conenon ha Marylan Tanoaon Auhoiy oce ofcer

ioaed he Ffh Amendmen rgh o due ce i whou mer Temony wa

gen a he hearng by Oce Acker who aed h alid egmae reaon for

oing he na ehcle a wel a hi addonal queionng of he aenge n he

econd ehicle and ae a wel ha "here i no edence in he ecor o reach

he concluon ha he eonden conuona gh were oaed by he nal

rac o and queong

A Immirato dge may recee ito edence any oa or wrten

aemen tha material ad reea to any ue in he cae and ha ha been

reiouly made by he reodent or by any other eon durng an eigao

examinaon heang or tral See 8 FR 247a The ou not boun by the

A94-2652 9 Februa 2 23


13/20

gd fedea es of evence andevdenay deenaos ae e o b ue

rocess consdeaos See Anm vukas y, 535 F3d 243 (4t C. 2008}. As a

geneal propostio, evdeces amssbe f t s bae ad fundaetay fa. See

ae o Vas z 9 &N Dec. 377 BA 196)

oton o sress ms b ade wtng and b accomad by a

dealed aidat ha expans te rasos wy th vdnce n question sould be

sppessd. See attr of Wong 3 l&N Dec 820 (BIA 97) In te sant cas

rsonent has nded made hs oon o sss in wtng and has subed

etaed adavts n suppo tereof. Te ay seekng to sppess evdence nay

bars he bn o of and mst estabsh a a face case of llegaty. Se Maer

o Tang 13 & Dec. 69 BA 171 ). n orde o estabs a prma faci cas of

elgibiy fo a moton o supess pay us oe specfc etad statems

based on ersona knowledge y allegtons cot be geral, concsory, o

based solely o conses statements See for xmp , Mae of Bac nas 19 &N

Dec. 609 BA 988) Oly when the esonden coes fad wh pof sabsnga pa fac case for supesson wl he Deamen of oean Secy be cae

on o assue the buden of jsing te mane n wc obaned h evdece

e Bac as, supa.

te insta case he espondent has testfid cby ers o wat

haeed o ta rafc sop on ay 22, 2009 He has descrbed he crcmstacs

ha led to hm bg o t scn to assst fris i ong a ehcle fro th s

g rd o cl tt th ws a fend i ed. Ths o s

rsaded, based o the tstmoy o the resoden and o te ocers that hae

ested n hes rocdgs hat th rsoden ad hs freds were teatd pry

mch the maner s te esodnt as dscbed bere te Cour, at hey

A04-26-52 10 Febray 21 203


14/20

wee ee aot wo tey ae wee tey ae fo and asked o podue

dentaton Howee I am not pesaded on ts ecod tat te espondent was so

ntated and fghened a e gae p nfoaton egadng hs gaon staus

to athotes ot of that fea and ntmdaton am no esuaded on ts ecod that

the espondent o hs fends wee pessued o ompeed nto gng nomaton to te

polce athotes Howee t s clea that te oce plaed te espondent an hs

fends n detenton and hed the fo a sgncant peod tme po to tunng tem oe

to mmgaton and Cstoms Enceent oces

The excusonay ule podes tat edene n a na poeedng

obtaned as a est of nlawl waantless aests s sppessbe f he lnk beween

the edence an the nawl acton s not oo atenuated See fo xapl Wong

Sn Unted Stat s 371 US 471 (1963) And any sateents obaned as a est of

cstodal nteogaton wee a defeda as not been gen s o e anda

wanngs cannot typcaly be sed n a cmnal tal See Manda Aizona 384 US

436 (1966)As a geneal e t "exsonay e" does not apy n l

depoaton poceedngs See f xal S Lop z-M ndoa 468 S 1032

(198); see also Mae of Sandova 17 & Dec 70 (BIA 1979) The ne Saes

Speme Cou howee appeas to ae le oen the qeson o e sse of

spesson of edence ta mgt be waanted based on egegos olatons of e

o Amendment o othe lbees tha mght ansgess noons of fndamenta

aness and whee sc docmena edene wod ndene the pobate ale

of edence oeed n e cl deoato and/o emoal poeedngs It may

neeheless be sbject o sppesson See S Lop z-M ndoza, 468 S 1051

(984} The Boad of Immgaton Apeas as hed at cases ay ase whee the

A094216521 11 ebua 2 2013


15/20

manne o acson o e eece s so egegous ha o y o he eece o

olae he ue rocess cause of he Fh Amedmen an hee e eece sou

heefoe e excle See aer of To 7 &N Dec. 34 {BA 18 oeer he

ren s o h rsoden o esash prma face case efore he Depamen of

omea Secry l e caled uo o asse he urd of jusyg he maer

c oane he eece. See ar of Brgos 15 & Dec 278 BIA 175

er o Wog 13 &N Dec 8 {BA 17 an afa s smed sch ha he

acs alged, f e cou spo a ass r excug he edence eson, he

he cams mus aso e suoed y esmoy aer of Barc nas & Dec 6

BIA 18 he sa case as oe y he Co he resonen has pesee a

e saeme and has esf hese poceedgs

Ee here sae o loca la enrcee has oaned eece

oao o he orh Amedme, ha eece o geeray e exclded from

feda c roceegs See US Jas 428 US 433 176 Fedea ocas l

o e he resonse for edece oaed hrough an aul seach o seure fhey o hae a had , or ee f he sae ocas ho conduced he search

he oer he edence o feea ocas See Lusg Une Sa s 338 US 74

14

INA Seco 287g rodes for a procede here o operaons ake

ace ad he seco akes cear ha he es a esoses are of ocers

egaged o oeraos rsa o NA Secon 287g I he sa cas,

hoeer here as o jo oerao wee he aya Trasoao Ahoy

ad he mmgrao ad Csos rceme The facs are no dse as o ho

he esoe and hs fres ee encouere y ahores of he ayla

Trasoao Ahory The facs are o sue eher as o he maer hch

A4-2652 2 Feruay 1 213


16/20

e esponen and s ens ee eeae ue oe o e iaion an

Csos nen n e insn as in lig of e fa ee as no on

opeaon bewee e Mayand ansoaon Ahoy an e iaon an

Csos nfen is Cou is wio aoy o assess he od of e

Mayand ansoaion Auhoiy oies v f s Co e o aai a

onu as violav of he esponen's fnaena igs h Cou s no peaded

o is od h ws s aion bewen e MA ad CE a hs Co an

ipose a enaly in is sppession n e san ase appeas a

Maylan Tansoaion Ahois afe avng qeed e esponen and is

fiens e f a peo o i and din a espondens sod be

uned ove o igaon an Csos nfoen. Tey w no poe o do

so by igaon an Cusos Enfoeen ey ose sa sone o un

esondens ove on hei belef h e spoen nd is iends wee in e

Un Sas in volaion of e aw. We e Cou is no pleased e anne in

wi ha was andle is Co is no in any posiion ake aio as o e onof e alan anspoaion Aoies ng on auoiy ousie of any auoy

esed by e igaon and Naionaly A fo o u a oin opeaon i

iaion and Cusos Enfn Co ho ay s n he anne

in wi e esponden and is fiens we eaed by igaion and Cusos

nfeen one e esponen and e oes e e ove o CE appeas

a one e espoden and oes wee ned ove o C C oes pepa

igaion oes asd on hi isssio w e esponden an s iends

n e os of a ieiew igo and Csos Eneen paed a

2 Ro of Depoabl Aien [xii 2A ey also aqied e doen

efd o as "sondns exia dve's lise" ey aqied xian

A094-26-52 Fbay 2, 20


17/20

passpo in he espondens nae and a docuet eeed as espondets pa

ecaon cefcae o exco" Exhbis 3A though D].

In a decison ate -R--F- and A-S-- he Boad o Imigaon

Appeas decided on August 11 1 that uni an aen who s aesed whou a

waan s paced in a poceedings by he iling o a Notce to Apea, the

egulaions at 8 C. FR. 87.3(c) egadng the pesenaon o ights he esponden

does not eque he Immigation Oices to adse he aen that he o she has a ght to

counsel tha any sateents ade dung nteogaon can subsequenty be used

agans he alen See ae E-R--F- and A-S-M- 5 &N Dec. 589 BIA 01

In he nstat case, the docuena eidence oeed by he Depaen

o Hoeland Secuity was acqed om the espondens in he cuse o cusoda

examinaon o he espodens ae tey had been uned oe by he ayland

ansoaton Authoiy poice oices. The 13 oeed a Exb A ees o oe

Jaio Feino Sanche whch is he sae ae se h n the tce o Appea he

imaio in the -13 aso ctans the sae ale ube conaned n he Notce toAppea The 3 contains infoaion whch woud esablish, adissbe that he

esponden s not m he Unied Saes but s o Mexico The Depaet o

Homeand Secuty indcaes as wel, tha i has a copy o he espondens excan

passpo sbed o NA by espndent 1 I woud ind i he instant case ha the

-13, Recod o Deoabe Aen, is uy admssbe hese poceedngs and ha t

was acquied om the esondent n the couse o a custoda nestigato nto he

espondents status As to exhbts B C and D oeed at Gop Exhibi , he Cu wl

ind hat those docments ae no admssbe ot because o the manne in which they

wee acquied bt becase o thei lack o obatie ae n he undamena issue

beoe the Cou as o he espndens aeage and e, ace ad manne o e

A094165 1 Febuay 1 13


18/20

no he Ued Saes.

su I w nd on hs record ha he respoden has no been

subeced o egregous Fouh Aenden oaos o such an exe ha s

fraon gen o IC shod be suressed de o he Ffh Aendme of he

Conso of h Uned Saes as s se beng ndaeay nfar Qe he

conrary he nfrmaon was acqred n a maer conssen wh curen sae and

reguaons and s y adsse The Cor w heefore deny he respodes

moo o suppress

As oted by he Cou he -23 oered hese proceedngs ree o he

ary amed n he Noce o Apear The aen ube n he 23 s he sae ae

umber on he Notce to Appear The -23 herefre refers o he pay aed n he

NT A nfoaon conaned n he 23 esabsh ha he responden s fro exco

he Cor w fnd therefore hat he responden s no a Uned aes cten as s se

forh n he Noce o Appear heefore aegaon oe ad wo ae bee esabsed

by edence ha s cear ad concng Inoraon he 23 esabsh ha herespode eneed he ned Sates a or near an uknown ocaon hg Aoa

on or abo Febuay 2000 who nsecon Theree he Cou w fnd a

aegaons hree and for n he Noce o Apear hae been susaned The Co w

d ha he resondens emoaby uder INA Seco 22a)6)A)) as oe who s

presen n he Uned Saes wo hang been aded or paroed or who arred

he Uned Saes a any me or pace oher han as desgnaed by he Aoey

Genera ha b susand by dnc ha s cear and concg as requred

nder Secon 240c) of h Igraon and aonay Ac See aso Woodby NS

385 US 276 966) [decded n he conex of deoraon proceengs

he responden has ad a reqes or the rege of ouary

A094-26-52 5 ebruary 2 203


19/20

deae e has esfed ha e has sce fus o pay s deae fo he

Ued aes ad ha he as he aoae ave docue ad a he has o

ee covced of ay ca oeses a wo ake h sauoly ebe fo

voay deae The Co wl d heee a e espode s ebe

voay eae ad e Co wl a a led of elef he execse o

dsceo a peod o 45 days l 8, 203, wh a aeae ode of

eova fo he Ued aes o Mexco

ORDER

I I ORDERED ha esode's oo o spess be ad he sae s

heeby deed;

I I FURER ORDERED ha esode's eqes voay

deae e gaed ho A 8, 202, ovded ha esoe oss a voay

deae od e amo of $500 w fve sess days of oday's dae wh a

aeae ode of eova fom he Ued aes o Mexco.

signature

0942652

Peae ee the nextpage for eectnic

PIIP . WIIAMSao Jue

6 Febay 2 203


20/20

I C

/Isl

Imigraton Judge PHILLIP T. WLAMS

wllaph n ay 8, 2013 a 8:41 P GT

Date post:	03-Jun-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	immigrant-refugee-appellate-center-llc
View:	215 times
Download:	0 times

Jairo Ferino Sanchez, A094 216 521 (BIA July 11, 2014)

Documents