+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA...

Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA...

Date post: 05-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: hatu
View: 230 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
224
Report of the Committee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems (AUT-AAC) Technical Correlating Committee John G. O'Neill, CJmir Gage-Babcock & Assoc. Inc., VA [SE] Milosh T. Puchovsky, Secretary Nat'l Fire Protection Ass~n., MA (Nonvoting) Jose 1L Baz, Int'l Engineered Systems, LTD, Inc., FL [M] Rep. NFPA Latin American Section Kerry M. Bell, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., IL [RT] Eric H. Cote, RolfJensen & Assoc., Inc,, MA [SE] Russell P. Fleming, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn., NY [M] Joseph B. Hankins, Jr., Factory Mutual Research Corp., MA[I] Roland j. Huggins, American Fire Sprinkler Assn., Inc., TX JIM] Sultan M. Javeri, Protection Int'l, Ltd, France [I] Andrew Kim, Nat'l Research Council of Canada, ON, Canada [RT] Gerald R. Kirby, Marriott Int'l, Inc., DC [U] Rep. American Hotel & Motel Assn. B. J. Lukes, Grinnell Fire Protection System Co. Ltd/Tyco, Carmda IM] Rep. Canadian Automatic Sprinkler Assn. Joseph W. Noble, Clark County Fire Dept., NV [E] Donald R. Oliver, Wilson Fire/Rescue Services, NC [E] Rep. Int'l Assn. of Fire Chiefs James Retzloff, The Viking Corp., MI [M] Chester W. Schirmer, Schirmer Engr Corp., NC~ [SE] ~ohn Nigel Stephens, Loss Prevention Council, England [l] Lynn K. Underwood, Wansau HPR Engr, WI [1] John J. Walsh, UAJoint Apprenticeship Committee Local 669, MD [L] Rep. United Assn. of Journeymen/Apprentices of Plumbing/Pipe Fitting Alternates Donald "Don" D. Becker, Midland Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc., MO JIM] (Alt. to R.j. Huggins) Raymond A. Grill, RolfJensen & Assoc., Inc., VA [SEI (Alt. to E. H. Cote) Kenneth E. Isman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn., NY [M] (Alt. to R. P. Fleming) George E. Laverick, l.Irnderwriters Laboratories Inc., IL [RT] (Alt. to IC M. Bell) Donato A. Pirro E., Electro Sistemas De Panama, S.A., Panama [M] (Alt. to J. R. Baz) William E. Wilcox, Factory Mutual Research Corp., MA [I] (Alt. to J. B. Hankins, Jr.) Nonvoting Edward K. Budnick, Hughes Assoc., Inc., MD [SE] Rolf H. Jenson, Belleair, FL [SE] (Member Emeritus) William E, Koffei, Jr., Koffei Assoc. Inc., MD [SE] Kenneth W. Linder, HSB Industrial Risk Insurers, CT [I] Christopher T. Lummus, Insurance Services Office, Inc., TX [I] Daniel Madrzykowskl, U.S. Nat'l Inst. of Standards & Technology, MD [RT] Peter Papavasiliou, Engr Professionals, LTD, IL [SE] J. William Sheppard, General Motors Corp., MI [U] Committee Scope: Pending Technical Committee on Hanging and Bracing of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems (AUT-HBS) J. William Sheppard, Chair Ger eral Motors Corp., MI [U] Rep. NFPA Industrial Fire Protection Section David S. Mowrer, Secretary HSB Professional Loss Control, TN [I] ames B. Biggins, J&H Marsh & McLennan, IL [I] chard W. Bonds, Ductile Iron Pipe Research Assn., AL [M] Antonio C. M. Braga, Factory Mutual Research Corp., CA [I] Samuel S. Dannaway, S. S. Dannaway Assoc., Inc~, HI [SE] Russell P. Fleming, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn., NY [M] Thomas J. Forsythe, Gage-Babcock & Assoc., CA [SE] Luke Hilton, Wausau HPR Engr, FL [I] Rep. The Alliance of American Insurers Terry Hoist, Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Co., GA [M] Rep. Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. Kralg Kirschner, AFCON, CA [M] Rep. American Fire Sprinkler Assn., Inc. Wayne M. Martin, Wayne Martin & Assoc. (WMA), (~ [SE] Emil W. Misichko, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., IL [RT] Donald C~ Moeller, RolfJensen & Assoc., Inc., CA [SE] Randy Nelson, VFS Fire Protection Services, CA JIM] Rep. American Fire Sprinkler Assn., Inc. Janak B. Patel, Bechtel Savannah River Co., GA [U] RohertJ. Pearce, Jr., HSB Industrial Risk Insurers, CA [I] MichaelA. Rothmier, UAJoint Apprenticeship Committee Local 669, CO [L] Rep. United Assn. of Journeymen/Apprentlces of Plumbing/Pipe Fitting James Tauby, Mason Industries, Inc., NY [M] Jack Thacker, Allan Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of Southern California, CA [IM] Rep. Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn.. Alternates Sheldon Dacus, Security Fire Protection Go, TN [IM] (Alt. to J. Thacker) Daniel C. Duggan, Loos & Go. Inc., MO [M] (/kit. to K. Kirschner) David M. Cough, HSB Industrial Risk Insurers, CT [I] (Alt. to R.J. Pearce, Jr.) Tom Hiaton, Smith Fire Systems, Inc., WA [IM] (AlL to IL Nelson) George E. Laverick, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., IL [RT] (AIt. to E. W. Misichko) B.J. Lukes, Grinneli Fire Protection System Co. Ltd/Tyco, Canada [M] (AlL to T. Hoist) Allyn J. Vaughn, RolfJensen & Assoc., Inc., NV [SE] (Alt. to D. C. Moeller) George Von Gnatensky, Tolco, Inc., CA [M] (Alt. to R. P. Fleming) John J. Walsh, UA Joint Apprenticeship Committee Lo&M tiff9, MD [LI (/kit. to M. A. Rothmier) William E. Wilcox, Factory Mutual Research Corp., MA [I] (Alt. To A. C. M. Braga) Committee Scope: Pending Technieal Committee on Residential Sprinkler Systems (AUT-RSS) Daniel Madrzykowski, Chair U.S. Nat'l Inst. of Standards & Technology, MD [RT] George W. Baker, Mashpee Fire & Rescue Dept., MA[E] Rep. Int'l Assn. of Fire Chiefs Frederick J. Bean, Advanced Automatic Sprinkler, Inc., CA [IM] Frederick C. Bradley, Gage-Babcock & Assoc. Inc., GA [SE] Lawrence Brown, Nat'l Assn. of Home Builders, DC [U] Edward K. Budaick, Hughes Assoc., Inc., MD [SE] Brian Hoening, Globe Fire Sprinkler Corp., M1 [M] Rep. Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. Kenneth E. lsman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkltr Assn., NY [M] Hslang-Cheng Kung, Factory Mutual Research Corp., MA [I] George E. Laverick, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., IL [RT] Tom Lawrence, Srnith Fire Sprinkler Co., Inc., FL [IM] Rep. American Fire Sprinkler Assn., Inc. John C. Livingston, Jr., Livingston Fire Protection, Inc., MD JIM] Rep. Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. 553
Transcript
Page 1: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

Report of the Committee o n

Automatic Sprinkler Systems (AUT-AAC)

Technical Correlating Committee

John G. O'Neill, CJmir Gage-Babcock & Assoc. Inc., VA [SE]

Milosh T. Puchovsky, Secretary Nat'l Fire Protection Ass~n., MA

(Nonvoting)

Jose 1L Baz, Int'l Engineered Systems, LTD, Inc., FL [M] Rep. NFPA Latin American Section

Kerry M. Bell, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., IL [RT] Eric H. Cote, RolfJensen & Assoc., Inc,, MA [SE] Russell P. Fleming, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn., NY [M] Joseph B. Hankins, Jr., Factory Mutual Research Corp., MA[I] Roland j . Huggins, American Fire Sprinkler Assn., Inc., TX JIM] Sultan M. Javeri, Protection Int'l, Ltd, France [I] Andrew Kim, Nat'l Research Council of Canada, ON, Canada

[RT] Gerald R. Kirby, Marriott Int'l, Inc., DC [U]

Rep. American Hotel & Motel Assn. B. J. Lukes, Grinnell Fire Protection System Co. Ltd/Tyco,

Carmda IM] Rep. Canadian Automatic Sprinkler Assn.

Joseph W. Noble, Clark County Fire Dept., NV [E] Donald R. Oliver, Wilson Fire/Rescue Services, NC [E]

Rep. Int'l Assn. of Fire Chiefs James Retzloff, The Viking Corp., MI [M] Chester W. Schirmer, Schirmer Engr Corp., NC~ [SE] ~ohn Nigel Stephens, Loss Prevention Council, England [l] Lynn K. Underwood, Wansau HPR Engr, WI [1] John J. Walsh, UAJoint Apprenticeship Committee Local 669,

MD [L] Rep. United Assn. of Journeymen/Apprentices of Plumbing/Pipe

Fitting

Alternates

Donald "Don" D. Becker, Midland Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc., MO JIM] (Alt. to R.j. Huggins)

Raymond A. Grill, RolfJensen & Assoc., Inc., VA [SEI (Alt. to E. H. Cote)

Kenneth E. Isman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn., NY [M] (Alt. to R. P. Fleming)

George E. Laverick, l.Irnderwriters Laboratories Inc., IL [RT] (Alt. to IC M. Bell)

Donato A. Pirro E., Electro Sistemas De Panama, S.A., Panama [M] (Alt. to J. R. Baz)

William E. Wilcox, Factory Mutual Research Corp., MA [I] (Alt. to J. B. Hankins, Jr.)

Nonvoting

Edward K. Budnick, Hughes Assoc., Inc., MD [SE] Rolf H. Jenson, Belleair, FL [SE]

(Member Emeritus) William E, Koffei, Jr., Koffei Assoc. Inc., MD [SE] Kenneth W. Linder, HSB Industrial Risk Insurers, CT [I] Christopher T. Lummus, Insurance Services Office, Inc., TX [I] Daniel Madrzykowskl, U.S. Nat'l Inst. of Standards &

Technology, MD [RT] Peter Papavasiliou, Engr Professionals, LTD, IL [SE] J. William Sheppard, General Motors Corp., MI [U]

Committee Scope: Pending

Technical Committee on

Hanging and Bracing of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems (AUT-HBS)

J. William Sheppard, Chair Ger eral Motors Corp., MI [U]

Rep. NFPA Industrial Fire Protection Section

David S. Mowrer, Secretary HSB Professional Loss Control, TN [I]

ames B. Biggins, J&H Marsh & McLennan, IL [I] chard W. Bonds, Ductile Iron Pipe Research Assn., AL [M]

Antonio C. M. Braga, Factory Mutual Research Corp., CA [I] Samuel S. Dannaway, S. S. Dannaway Assoc., Inc~, HI [SE] Russell P. Fleming, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn., NY [M] Thomas J. Forsythe, Gage-Babcock & Assoc., CA [SE] Luke Hilton, Wausau HPR Engr, FL [I]

Rep. The Alliance of American Insurers Terry Hoist, Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Co., GA [M]

Rep. Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. Kralg Kirschner, AFCON, CA [M]

Rep. American Fire Sprinkler Assn., Inc. Wayne M. Martin, Wayne Martin & Assoc. (WMA), ( ~ [SE] Emil W. Misichko, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., IL [RT] Donald C~ Moeller, RolfJensen & Assoc., Inc., CA [SE] Randy Nelson, VFS Fire Protection Services, CA JIM]

Rep. American Fire Sprinkler Assn., Inc. Janak B. Patel, Bechtel Savannah River Co., GA [U] RohertJ. Pearce, Jr., HSB Industrial Risk Insurers, CA [I] MichaelA. Rothmier, UAJoint Apprenticeship Committee

Local 669, CO [L] Rep. United Assn. of Journeymen/Apprentlces of Plumbing/Pipe Fitting

James Tauby, Mason Industries, Inc., NY [M] Jack Thacker, Allan Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of Southern

California, CA [IM] Rep. Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn..

Alternates

Sheldon Dacus, Security Fire Protection Go, TN [IM] (Alt. to J. Thacker)

Daniel C. Duggan, Loos & Go. Inc., MO [M] (/kit. to K. Kirschner)

David M. Cough, HSB Industrial Risk Insurers, CT [I] (Alt. to R.J. Pearce, Jr.)

Tom Hiaton, Smith Fire Systems, Inc., WA [IM] (AlL to IL Nelson)

George E. Laverick, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., IL [RT] (AIt. to E. W. Misichko)

B.J. Lukes, Grinneli Fire Protection System Co. Ltd/Tyco, Canada [M] (AlL to T. Hoist)

Allyn J. Vaughn, RolfJensen & Assoc., Inc., NV [SE] (Alt. to D. C. Moeller)

George Von Gnatensky, Tolco, Inc., CA [M] (Alt. to R. P. Fleming)

John J. Walsh, UA Joint Apprenticeship Committee Lo&M tiff9, MD [LI (/kit. to M. A. Rothmier)

William E. Wilcox, Factory Mutual Research Corp., MA [I] (Alt. To A. C. M. Braga)

Committee Scope: Pending

Technieal Committee on

Residential Sprinkler Systems (AUT-RSS)

Daniel Madrzykowski, Chair U.S. Nat'l Inst. of Standards & Technology, MD [RT]

George W. Baker, Mashpee Fire & Rescue Dept., MA[E] Rep. Int'l Assn. of Fire Chiefs

Frederick J. Bean, Advanced Automatic Sprinkler, Inc., CA [IM] Frederick C. Bradley, Gage-Babcock & Assoc. Inc., GA [SE] Lawrence Brown, Nat'l Assn. of Home Builders, DC [U] Edward K. Budaick, Hughes Assoc., Inc., MD [SE] Brian Hoening, Globe Fire Sprinkler Corp., M1 [M]

Rep. Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. Kenneth E. lsman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkltr Assn., NY [M] Hslang-Cheng Kung, Factory Mutual Research Corp., MA [I] George E. Laverick, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., IL [RT] Tom Lawrence, Srnith Fire Sprinkler Co., Inc., FL [IM]

Rep. American Fire Sprinkler Assn., Inc. John C. Livingston, Jr., Livingston Fire Protection, Inc., MD JIM]

Rep. Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn.

553

Page 2: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

Raymond H. Lower, C,'igna Loss Control Services, WA [I] Rep. American Insurance Services Group, Inc.

M. L. "Larry" Maruskln, Federal Emergency Mgmt. Agency, MD [(:1

Michael Nelson, RolfJensen & Assoc., NY [SE] Ronald G. Nickson, Nat'l Multi Housing Council, DC [U] MauriceM. Pilette, Mech:mical Designs Ltd., MA [SE] Chester W. Schirmer, Schirmer Engr Corp., NC [SE] Sandra Stanek, Rural Metro Fire Dept., AZ [E] Donald Townley, B. F. (;oodrich, OH [M]

Rep. Committee for Fires:fie Dwellings John J. Walsh, l TA Joint Apprenticeship Committee Loc,'d 669,

Mr) [L] Rep. lhfite& Assn. of Journeymen/Apprentices of Plumbing/Pipe

Fitting Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM]

Rep. ,Mnerican Fire Sprinkler Assn., Inc.

Alternates

Carl F. Baldassarra, Schinner Engr Corp., IL [SE] (/kit. to C. W. Schirmer)

Phillip A. Brown, American Fire Sprinkler Assn., Inc., TX [IM] (Alt. to S.J. Weigand)

William M. Carey, llnderwriters Laboratories Inc.. IL [RT] (Alt. to G. E. Laverick)

Thomas Deegan, Viking Corp., MI [M] (/kit. to B. Hoening)

Gary L. Johnson, B. F. Goodrich, OH [M] (Alt. to D. Townley)

John C. McDonald, Virginia Sprinkler Co., Inc., VA [IM] (Air. to T. Lawrence)

Michael A. Rothmier, UAJoint Apprenticeship Committee Loc;d 669, MD [L] (Alt. toJ. J. Walsh)

Harry Shaw, Harry Shaw & Assoc. Inc., MD [E] (Alt. to G. W. Baker)

George Stanley, Wigiuton FireSprinklers, FL [IM] (Alt. to J. Livingston)

David W. Stroup, U.S. Nat'l Inst. of Standar&s and Technology, MD [RT] (Alt. to 13. Madrzykowski)

Richard E. Thonnings, American Insurance Services Group, Inc., NY [ll (Air_ to R. H. Lower)

Randolph W. Tucker, RolfJensen & Assoc., Inc., TX [SE] (Alt. to M. Nelson)

Terry L. Victor, Tyco Int'l, Ltd., MD [M] (Alt. to ~ E. Isman)

Bennie Vincent, Factory Mutual Research Corp., MA [I] (Alt. to H. Kung)

Joseph Wiehagen, Nat'l Assn. of Home Builders, MD [IJ] (Alt. to L. Brown)

Nonvoting

Rohit Khanna, I LS. Consumer Product Safety Commission, MD [C]

Committee Scqpe: Pending

Technical Committee on

Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (AUT-SSD)

Edward K. Budnick, Chair Hughes Assoc., Inc., MD [SE]

Kerry M. Bell, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., IL [RT] Robert B. Combs, J&H Marsh & McLennan, WA If] Russell P. Fleming, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn., NY [M] James G. Gallup, RoffJensen & Assoc., Inc., FL [SE] James Golinveaux, Central Sprinkler Corp., PA[M]

Rep. Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. Joseph B. Hankins, Jr., Factory Mutual Research Corp., MA [I] Stephen R. Hoover, Kemper Nat'l Insurance Cos., IL [I] Roland J. Huggins, American Fire Sprinkler Assn., Inc., TX [IM] Sultan M. Javeri, Protection lnt'l, Ltd, Frm]ce [I] Larry Keeping, Vipond Fire Protection, Inc., ON, Canada JIM]

Rep. Canadian Automatic Sprinkler Assn.

Andrew Kim, Nat'l Research Council of Canada, ()N, Canada [RT] Jerom6 P. Merkel, United Sprinkler, Inc., MN [IM] Andy Miller, Hallmark Cards Inc., MO [IJ]

Rep. NFPA Industrial Fire Protection Section Azarang Mirkhah, Las Vegas Fire Dept., NV [E] Gene V. Paolucci, Yasuda Fire & Marine Insurance Co. of

America, NY [I] Rep. American Insurance Services (;roup, Inc.

Paul E. Rousseau, HFP Corp., MA [IM] Rep. Americ~m Fire Sprinkler P~ssn., Inc.

Chester W. Schirmer, Schirmer Engr Corp., NC [SE] Todd E. Schumann, HSB Industrial Risk Insurers, |L [I] Peter A. Smith, Int'l Paper Go., TN Ill] Sandra Stanek, Rural Metro Fire Dept., AZ [E] David W. Strnup, 1 LS. Nat'l Inst. of Standards and Technology,

MD [RT] Jack Thacker, Allan Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of Southern

(~.lifornia, (2A [IM] Rep. Nat'l Fire Sprinkler A.ssn.

William J. Tomes, Tomes, VanRickley & Assoc., (;A [U] Rep. The Home Depot

Alternates

Carl F. Baldassarra, Schirmer Engr Corp., IL [SE] (Alt. to C. W. Schirmer)

William M. Carey, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., IL [RT] (Alt. to K. M. Bell)

John August Denhardt, Strickl,'uid Fire Protection, Inc., MD [IM] (/kit. to P. E. Rousseau)

David Dixon, Security Fire Protection, TN [IM] (Alt. to J. Thacker)

Michael L. Edwards, RolfJensen & Assoc., Inc., VA [SE] (Alt. to J. G. Ga[lpup)

J. Grayson Gilbert, HSB Industrkd Risk Insurers, (;A [I] (Alt. to T. E. Schum:mn)

Christopher M. Goddard, Zenec~a Inc., DE [U] (Alt. to A. Miller)

Daniel Madrzykowski, U.S. Nat'l Inst. of St~mdards & Technology, MD [RT] (Alt. to D. W. Stroup)

Thomas Multer, Reliable Automatic Sprinkler G'o, GA [M] (Alt. to R. P. Fleming)

Allan M. Neilsen, City of Henderson Fire Dept., NV [E] (/kit. to A. MirkhalQ

Donald B. Pounder, Grinnell Corp./Tyco, RI [M] (Alt. toJ. Golinveaux)

William P. Thomas, Jr., Kemper Nat'l Insurance Cos., IL Ill (/kit. to S. R. Hoover)

Richard E. Thonnings, American Insurance Services Group, Inc., NY[I] (Alt. to G. V. Paolucci)

Tom Vincent, Life Safety Systems. ()N, Canada [IM]' (Alt. to L. Keeping)

William E. Wilcox, Factory Mutual Research Corp., MA Ill (Alt. to J. B. Hankins, Jr.)

Nonvoting

Barry M. Lee, Tyco lnt'l, Australia [M]

Committee Scope: Pending

Technical Committee on

Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (AUT-SSI) "

Kenneth W. Linder, (:hair HSB Industrial Risk Insurers, C'T [I]

Phillip A. Brown, American Fire Sprinkler Assn., Inc., TX [IM] Edward K. Budnick, Hughes Assoc., Inc., MD [SE] Robert E. Duke, Fire Control Inc., IL [IM] Ralph Gerdes, Ralph Gerdes Consultants, LLC. IN [SE]

Rep. Aznerican Inst. of Architects Christopher M. Goddard, Zeneca Inc., DE [I l]

Rep. NFPA Industrial Fire Protection Section Kenneth E. Isman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn., NY [M] Eiwin G. Joyce, Kentucky Div. of Bldg. Code Enforcement,

KY [El

554

Page 3: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

Larry Keeping, Vipond Fire Protection, Inc., ON, Canada [IM] Rep. Canadian Automatic Sprinkler Assn.

George E. Laverick, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., IL [RT] Ausmus S. Marburger, Fire Protection Industries, Inc., PA [IM]

Rep. Nat'l Fire Sprinkler ,~sn. Maurice Marvi, Insurance Services Office, NY [I] Rodney A. McPhee, Canadian Wood Council, ON, Canada [U] Francis J. Mikloucich, Eastman Kodak Co., NY [U] Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E]

Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice Section David S. Mowrer, HSB Professional Loss Control, TN [I] Joseph W. Noble, Clark County Fire Dept., NV [E] Chester W. Schirmer, St hirmer Engr Corp., NC [SE] Gerald R. Schultz, Gage-Babcock & Assoc. Inc., IL [SE] Mahendra "Kumar" H. Sheth, B.I.C. Design Co., MO [IM]

Rep. American Fire Sprinkler Assn., Inc. Sandra Stanek, Rural Metro Fire Dept., AZ [E] Craig R. Stnder, RolfJensen & Assoc., Inc., IL [SE] William L. Testa, Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Co. Inc./Tyco,

RI [M] Rep. Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn.

John J. Walsh, UA Joint Apprenticeship Committee Local 669, MD [L] Rep. United Assn. of Journeymen/Apprentices of Plumbing/Pipe Fitting

William E. Wilcox, Factory Mutual Research Corp., MA[I]

Alternates

Michael A. Amar, Gage-Babcock & Assoc., Inc., CA [SE] (Alt. to G. R. Schultz)

Daniel L. Arnold, RolfJensen & Assoc., Inc., GA [SE] (Air. to C. R. Studer)

Harold R. Bahadori, Hughes Assoc., Inc., FL [SE] (Ah. to E. K. BudnickJ

Carl F. Baldassarra, Schirmer Engr Corp., IL [SE] (Ah. to C. W. Schirmer)

Kerry M. Bell, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., IL [RT] (Ah. to G. E. Laverick)

Antonio C. M. Braga, Factor), Mutual Research Corp., CA [I] (Alt. to W. E. Wilcox)

Robert G. Caputo, Consolidated Fireprotection, Inc., CA [IM] (/kit. to P. A. Brown)

Herbert N. Davidson, Liberty Mutual Group, MA [I] (Ah. to L. K. Underwood)

James Golinveaux, Cer~tl~l Sprinkler Corp.. PA[M] (Air. to IL E. Isman)

Peter J. McWilliams, Ee~tman Kodak Co., NY [U] (AIt. to F.J. Mikloucich)

Michael F. Meehan, Virginia Sprinkler Co., Inc., VA [IM] (Alt. to M. H. Sheth)

Thomas H. Miller, Varley-Campbell & Assoc., Inc./Village of Glen Ellyn, IL [SE] (Alt. to E. S. Mower)

Richard Oliver, Oliver Sprinkler Co., Inc., PA [IM] (Alt. to A. S. Marburger)

Robert J. Pearce, Jr., HSB Industrial Risk Insurers, CA [I] (Alt. to K. W. Linder)

Michael A. Rothmier, UA Joint Apprenticeship Committee Local 669, MD [L] (Alt. toJ. J. Walsb)

Peter Thomas, The Viking Corp., MI [M] (Alt. to W. L. Testa)

Lynn K. Underwood, Wausau HPR Engr, WI[I] (AIt. to G. R. Myers)

Tom Vincent, Life Safety Systems, ON, Canada [IM] (Ah. to L. Keeping)

Nonvoting

Barry M. Lee, Tyco Int'l, Australia [M]

Staff Liaison: Miiosh T. Puchovsky

Committee Scope: Pending

7"he,w li.sts represent the membership at the time em'h Committee was balloted on the text t~" this edition. Since that time, changes in the membership mt 9, have occurred. A key to class!fication.s is fmmd at the

front ~" this book.

This portion of the Technical Committee Report of the Automatic Sprinkler Systems Committee is presented for adoption in 3 parts.

The Report was prepared by the: • Technical Correlating Committee on Automatic Sprinkler

Systems (AUT-AAC) • Technical Committee on Hanging and Bracing of Water-Based

Fire Protection Systems (AUT-HBS) • Technical Committee on Residential Sprinkler Systems (AUT-

RSS) • Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria

(AUT-SSD) • Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria

(AUT-SSI)

Part I of this Report was prepared by the Automatic Sprinkler Systems Committee, and documents its action on the comments received on its Report on Proposals on NFPA 13-1996, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, as published in tile Report on Proposals for the 1999 Spring (May) Meeting.

Part I of this Report on Comments has been submitted to letter ballot of the individual Technical Committees. The results of the balloting, after circulation of any negative votes, can be found in the report.

In addition, pertaining to the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (AUT-SSD), Mr. Miller abstained fi-om voting as he was not at the meeting, and Mr. Fleming and MR'. Keeping provided the following remarks regarding the report:

Fleming: "It was voted to change the metric equivalents of all design densities to ram/rain, which is the same as L /min /m ~. The enUy in Table A-7-3.3.1 should read:

gpm/ft -° mm/min 41

Last two sentences of 6-4.6.3 should be at the end of 6-4.6.1 instead and rephrased as follows: 'Wire used for restraint of branch lines shall be located within 2 ft (610 mm) of a hanger, and the hanger closest to a wire restraint shall be of a type that resists upward movement of the branch line,'

In the new Figure A~o-l.l, the label 'Retrofit wraparotmd U-hook devices' should be changed to 'Clip-on wraparound U-hook devices' since the word retrofit could imply it is not to be used on new installations."

Keeping: "I agree with Mr. Fleming, the committee voted to change the metric equivalents for all densities to ram/rain."

Part I of this Report on Comments which includes Technical Correlating Committee Comments 13-20a (Log #CC504), 13-83a (Log #CC500), 13-134a (Log #CC501), 13-167a (Log #CC502), and 13-225a (Log #CC503) has also been submitted to letter ballot of the Technical Correlating Committee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems, which consists of 18 voting members; of whom 17 voted affirmatively, with the exception of Mr.Oliver who did not return his ballot, and Mr. Schirmer who voted negatively on Comment 13-19a (Log #CC200).

Mr. Schirmer voted negatively on Comment 13-19a (Log #CC200 with the following remarks:

"I agree with the comment itself and have voted affirmatively on it as a member of the Discharge Committee. I am voting negatively here as the timing of this ballot violates due process as well as common sense. This was sent (if mailed immediately after typing) on February 22. Received Februat~¢ 26. Due March 4. This is ridiculous. Note the transmittal letter required retur~ by February 26. The ballot indicates March 4."

555

Page 4: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

Mr. Huggins voted affirmatively with the following remarks on C o m m e n t 13-167a (Log #CC502):

"The requ i rement for QR heads througl~out the c o m p a r t m e n t was supposed to be added to Chapter 5 as part o f installation requirements . It does not belong unde r 7-2.3.2.4."

Mr. Noble voted affirmatively with the following remarks on C o m m e n t 13-167a (Log #CC502):

" C o m m e n t 13-167a (Log # CC502) [7-2.3.2.4] conta ins what I believe are typographical errors. T he second sen tence within the second paragraph should read ' T he m a x i m u m ceil ing he igh t ' no t 'a m a x i m m n ceiling height . ' Also, the except ion should read 'Where circumstances. . . ' no t 'The re c i rcumstances ' . "

Part II o f this Report on C o m m e n t s was prepared by the Technical Commi t t ee on Resident ial Sprinkler Systems, and d o c u m e n t s its action on the c o m m e n t s received on its Repor t on Proposals on NFPA 13D-1996, S tandard for the Instal lat ion o f Sprinkler Systems in One- and Two-Family Dwellings and Manufactured H o m e s , as publ ished in tire Report on Proposals for the 1999 Annual Meeting.

Par t II of this Report on C o m m e n t s has been submi t ted to letter" ballot o f the Technical Commi t t ee on Resident ial Sprinkler Systems, which consists of 19 voting members . The results o f tire balloting, after circulation of any negative votes, can be found in the report.

Par t II of this Report on C o m m e n t s has also been submi t ted to letter ballot of the Technical Correlating Committee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems, which consists o f 18 voting members ; o f whom 14 voted affirmatively with the exception of Mr. Oliver who did no t return his ballot, and 3 who voted negatively after circulat ion o f negative ballots (Messrs. Fleming, Stephens , and Walsh).

Mr. F leming voted negatively stating: "There are two issues which have resulted in my negative ballot.

In C o m m e n t 13D-5 (Log #CC1), the commi t tee proposes , for the first time, to allow any and all types o f piping to be connec t ed to a spr inkler system. To allow non-listed non-metall ic pipe m e a n s there will be no restrictions on thermal protect ion for d rops to p l u m b i n g fixtures. This can easily compromi se the spr inkler protect ion.

"The Technical Correlat ing Commi t tee has also failed to address tire issues raised in C o m m e n t 13D-10 (Log #10) regarding the need for a system flow alarm. The Technical Correlat ing Commi t tee admits a conflict with NFPA 72 but has chosen to appoin t a liaison to work on this p rob l em rather than resolve it prior to issuance of a new edition of NFPA 13D."

Mr'. S tephens voted negatively stating: "I considered it necessary to vote negatively as I do not cons ider

that one issue has not been satisfactorily resolved. C o m m e n t 13D- 5 (Log #CC1) allows p ip ing to p l u m b i n g fixtures to comply with local p l u m b i n g and heal th authori ty requ i rements and does not r-equire this piping to be listed. Where the integrity o f tire sprinkler system is d e p e n d e n t on the domest ic water p lumbing systems, then the domest ic water p lumb ing should either" be of equivalent pressure s t rength and fire resistance or manda to ly measures should be imposed to prevent water flow into tire domest ic water system upon operat ion of a sprinkler."

Mr. Walsh voted negatively stating: "I concur with the posit ions taken by Mr. Fleming and Mr.

S tephens on C o m m e n t 13D-5 (Log #CC1)."

Par t III of this Report on C o m m e n t s was prepared by the Technical Commi t t ee on Resident ial Sprinkler Systems, and d o c u m e n t s its action on the c o m m e n t s received on its Report on Proposals on NFPA 13R-1996, S tandard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in Residential Occupanc ies up to and Including Four Stories in Height , as publ ished in the Report on Proposals for the 1999 Annua l Meeting.

Part II1 o f this Report on C o m m e n t s has been submi t ted to letter ballot of the Techmca l Commi t t e e on Residential Sprinkler Systems, which consists o f 19 voting members . The results o f the balloting, after circulation o f any negative votes, can be found in the report.

Par t III o f this Report on C o m m e n t s has also been submit ted to letter ballot o f the Technical Correlat ing Commi t t ee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems, which consists o f 18 voting members ; o f whom 17 voted affirmatively with the except ion of Mr. Oliver who did not re turn his ballot.

5 5 6

Page 5: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

(Log #184) Committee: AI IT,SSI

13- 1 - (Entire Docnment): Reject SUBMITTER: Thomas It. Miller, Varley-C,'unpbell & Assoc., lnc. / ( ; len Ellyn Vol Fire Co. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-2 RECOMMENDATION: Delay or reconsider the incorporation of NFPA Standard No. 24 into NFPA Standard No. 13. Remove all tell :~ssociated wifll tile combination effort. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Not all buildings or properties that have a need for underg round :[]re protection vcater mains are equipped with automatic sprinkler systems. There is a need for NFPA Standard No. 24 ~ts a stand alone document for use on tllese properties. Presently, tile wording from NFPA Standard No. 24 is being force fit into this expanded document. Some of the material presently in NFPA 24 is ,rot being incorporated because it .hviously does not belorg. ()tber material is awkward and is being forced into where it does not belong. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Committee believes that the underground main is an integral part of tile sprinkler systeul akM its install,ttion should bt included in NFPA 13. Additionally, wllere mldergrourid mains will be installed for pri~tte fire service purposes, tills will be ad:lressed by NFPA 14, Standard for tl~e Installation of Standpipe and Hose Systems. NFPA 14 is currently under revision and its s lope will be expanded to include tiffs informatiou. NUMBER OF C O M M r [ T E E MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATWE: 26

(Log #185) Committee: A11T,SSI

l:g 2 - (Entire Docuuler~t): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Thomas H. Miller, Varley-Campbell & Assoc., h l r . / ( ; l en Ellyn Vol Fire Co. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1.9-1 RECOMMENDATION: Retain the nominal orifice size inh,rmation fi~r this standard cycle to help with tile transition to ,rely listing tile nominal K-thctors. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Tiffs will help the users make die transition from one orifice size identification method to another. (kmlplete tile proposed action at tile next edition of tile standard. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept ill Principle. Add appet)dix material to TaMe 3-2.3.1 of the Preprint to read as f,)lh,ws:

Nominal K-factor Nominal Orifice Size

1.4 1/4 (6.4 ram) 1.9 5 /16 (8.0 ram) 2)'I 3 /8 (9.5 mm) 4.2 7/16 (11.0 mm) 5.6 1/2 (12.7 nun) ,%0 17/32 (13.5 toni)

11.2 5 /8 (15.9 ram) 1.t.0 3 /4 (19.0 ram) lfi.8 19.6

25.2 28.O

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: There is no transition. Maliutaclurers will only identity sprinkler size according to nominal K-factor. Additionally, all references to orifice sizes in the standaM wilt be replaced with nominal K-factor. The appeiMix taMe wzts added :is an aid to tile user of tile standard. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #193) Conunittee: AI JT-SSI

13- 3 - ([(:llaptt'r 1]): Reiect SUBMITTER: Richard E. Thonnings, anlerican Insurance .Sm'vices (;rmlp, Inc. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1:?,-2 RECOMMENDATION: Delete all references Io fire service mains :uld associated material from NFPA 24.

S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Material on pri~tte fire service mains does not belong in a sprinkler installation standard. For new sprinkler installations, the underg round is typically installed by different people than the sprinkler piping, l ag ree with Mr. Keeping's comment about the need for maintaining NFPA 24. NFPA 24 should be maintained and if that is the case, then there is no need to clutter up NFPA 13.

It is not practical for me or tile public to call out each specific reference to NFPA 24 material in tile proposed new Chapter 1 of NFPA 13. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See (',onmfittee Acfioi1 and Statement on C.omment 13-1 (Log #184). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #( ;(.;429 ) Committee: AI ITd,;SI

1 N 4 - ([Entire Document]) : Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Comnfittee on Sprinkler System Inst,'dlation Criteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-2 RECOMMENDATION: Add tl~e following to the "Notice" at the front of tile stan&trd:

i "An ,x, following dae numbe r or letter designating a paragTaph indicates text copied from other NFPA documents using NFPA's Extract Policy Tiffs text s being extracted to provide information necessary for the design and installation of automatic sprinkler systems for the benefit of tile users of this document. It is riot

' in tended for these sections to provkle complete information regarding all aspects of fire protection addressed by tllese documer~ts. Appendix f) identifies NFPA docunlenrs from which

rinkler system irfformation was extracted." B S T A N T I A T I O N : This note addresses tile C, ommittee's intent

concerning the sprinkler system information extracted fl'om oilier NFPA documents . COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE.: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #194) (5-mlmittee: AIJT-SSI

1.9, - 5 - ([1-1 Scope]): Reject SUBMITTER: Richard E. Thonnings, Aineriran hlsuranre Services Group, Inc. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: IN2 RECOMMENDATION: The scope of NFPA 13 shouM be cllanged to exclude design of automatic fire sprinkler systems. All design-related material should be contained in a separate document. NFPA 13 should limit its scope to installation. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Installation and design are two distinct areas and deserve separate docnlnents. Also, tile amount of material now contained in the "partially revised" NFPA 13 is so large that it will become cumbersome to use. Tile evohition of performance-based standards also makes it ad~rmtage,,us to place design topics in a document separate fl'om installation requirements. Two individual docmnents will make it easier to use and update in the fiuure.

h is not practic&l for me or the public to call out eacll specific reference to design-related material in tile proposed new Chapter 1 of NFPA 13. NFPA h:Ls sadly chosen an awkward change process for tile 1~333c~ edition of NFPA 13 which seems designed to hinder substantial public input. The proposed 1999 edit i .n is obviously more tll;m a "partial revision." COMMITTEE ACTION: Reiect. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: NFI'A 13 ll:Ls always addressed sprinkler system design for Light hazard, ordinary hazard, .uld extra l/az:trd occupancies. Tile [,roposed changes expand tile scope to include tile design for other applicati,ms -I sprinkler systems. Tile (;omufittee also believes that separating tile design and instMl,ttion requirenlents would confuse tile end user. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

557

Page 6: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

(Log #25) Gommittee: AI IT-SSI

13- 6 - (1-4.1 Listed): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlat ing Connni t tee orJ Autonladc Sprinkler Systenrs COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-6 RECOMMENDATION: The T e d m i c a l Correlat ing Gommit tee does not agree with the action taken by the Technical Commi t tee ~lll Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC). The T(;C directs that die action on this proposal be reject and that tile new appendix language proposed by the TCSSIG not be added. SUBSTANTIATION: The T(X.; does not believe that the term "ck~ssified" meets tile in tent of "listed." Additionally, tile TCG llOtt.s that the defini t ion of the te rm "listed" a long with the appendix material is tile responsibility of the Standards Gonncil, is lmbl ished in NFPA's Regulat ions, and is not subject to m.difi<~ticm by a TC or TK;G. However, tile TGC does agree with tile intent of I 'roposal 124-6 (Log #1 66) as submit ted. The "I'C(; will therefore send notice to tile Standm'ds ( 'ounci l re< uest in~ that the defini t ion of "listed" be revised to read as fol ows: 'Listed. Equipment , materials, or services inc luded in a list pu ld ished hy an organizat ion acceptable to the authori ty having.jurisdiction and conce rned with tile e~duat ion of products ~,t- services that main ta ins periodic inspect ion of product ion of listed eqn ipn len t or materials or periodic evahmtion of services and whose listing states ei ther that the equ ipment , material, or service meets identif ied s tandards Milch address reliable operatim~ and pe r fo rmance or i n t ended f lmct ion or has been tested and found suitable for a specified purpose.

This is a direction f rom tile Automat ic Sprinklers Technical I;m'relating Gommit tee in accordance with 3-4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulat ions ( ;overning Commi t tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

1. Add a new first sen tence to Section A-I-4.1, Listed, to read ,as folh,ws:

"Evaluation of the product or service should address reliable olmrat ion and pe r fo rmance ibr tile in t ended flmction."

2. Revise the last sen tence of Section A-I-4.1, Listed, to read as foil ows:

"Tile Authori ty Having Jurisdict ion shou ld utilize the system eml~loyed by the listing organizat ion to identify a listed p roduc t or device." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This act ion more clearly indicates the ( . ; .mmittee 's in tent concern ing tile r equ i r emen t for listing sprinkler system components . It is also no ted that at i tsJuly 1998 mee t ing the Council considered the request of the TCC on Anlonlatic Sprinkler Systems dlat the definit ion of "Listed" be revised, and w~ted, on r e c o m m e n d a t i o n of the User Friendly Tztsk (.r~mp, w~t to approve this reques t but to advise tile C.ommittee that it couM address its concerns regard ing the technical issue o ther than hy revising the defini t ion of "lAsted," as it d eems appropriate. The G'ommittee may, for ex.'unple, consider specifying that the listing be for the specific env i ronmen t in which tile product is to be nsed. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #119) Gommittee: AI.IT.SS I

1.'4- 7 - (1-4.2 Miscellaneous Storage): Accept SUBMITTER: Robert A. Williams, MS State Rating Bureau COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a RECOMMENDATION: I3e|ete last s en tence in definition: "Prelect!v:: c:'itcri", for :::i~cc!!az:ec'.:~ ~tcrxge :.re ::'it!:'n t!Ye cccFe

SUBSTANTIATION: This sen tence is no longer necessary since all sprinkler r eqn i r emen t s are in the proposed s tandard. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 96

(L-g #120) ( ;ommittee: AI ~T.SSI

13- 8 - (1-4.2 Miscellaneous Storage): Reject SUBMITTER: Robert A. Williams, MS State Rating Bureau COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a RECOMMENDATION: Move definit ion from Paragraph 1-4.2 to Paragraph 1-4.8. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This paragraph wouht be ea.sier fcmnd unde r t h e g e n e r a [ storage definitions. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Due to the scope of tile p roposed changes to the s tandard, tile Commi t tee believes tllat leaving the defini t ion ill Section 1-4.2 would minimize confilsion at this time. Additionally, tile t e rm miscel laneous storage is i n t ended to remain separate f rom larger scale storage such as descr ibed in Sections 7- 3, 7-4, 7-5, 7-6, and 7-7. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATWE: 26

(Log #iX;I) ( ' ,onnnittee: AI JT.SSI

1.3- 9 - (1-4.2 Sprinkler System): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commi t tee on Sprinkler System lnst:dlation Criteria COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-2 RECOMMENDATION: Move tile Note to Appendix A and delete the words "and u n d e r g r o n n d piping." S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is an editorial change. Additionally, u n d e r g r o u n d piping installation will now be addressed hy NFPA 13. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATWE: 26

(Log #26) ( ' , .nmlit tee: AI W-SSI

13- 10 - (1-4.2 Working Pressure): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Gorrelat ing t ;ommit tee on Automat ic

rinkler Systems MMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-8

I RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlat ing ( :ommit tee directs dial tile te rm "System Working Pressure" be used in place of "Working Pressure." S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This r e c o m m e n d a t i o n is being made to more clearly indicate that this pressure pertains to the sprinkler system when installed. The term is not in t ended to be used ;m criteria for evaluating individual system componen t s . A similar r e c o m m e n d a t i o n is also being made for Proposals 13D-5 an d 13R-1.

This is a direction from die Automat ic Sprinklers Technic~d Correlat ing Conmli t tee in accord~mce with 3-4.2 an d '.?,-4.3 of tile Regulat ions Governing ( ;ommit tee Prqiects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept.

I Editorially confi rm dmt the term "system working pressure" is used consistently t h r o n g h o u t the documen t . NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATWE: 26

(Log #CC2) Commit tee : AI JT~qSI

13- 11 - (1-4.3 Preaction Sprinkler System): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Gommit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-2

I RECOMMENDATION: Move the following text :Ls revised from the defini t ion and place it in Appendix A:

558

Page 7: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

"'Actnating means of tile valve are described in 4-3.2.1. Actnatiott of d~e de*ec'tion system a_~L~d sprinklers jn tile case of double- inter locked systems opens a ~tlve that pernfits water to flow into the sprinkler piping system and to be d ischarged f iom any sprinklers that are open." S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is an editorial change which moves advisola/ information to the append ix and het ter describes the means of actuat ion for different types of pre-action systems. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITI'EE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #108) Commit tee: AI IT,SSI

1:4- 12 - (1-4.5.1 and 5-2.1.3, Exception (New)): Accept in Principle in Part SUBMITTER: William E. Wilcox, Factory Mutual Research Corp. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-10, 13-196 RECOMMENDATION: Either add to 1-4.5.1:

"The sensitivity of a concealed sprinkler shall he based on the sensitivity of tile entire sl_,rinkler assembly as c o m p a r e d to a n exposed thermal e lemenl at ceiling level not on the sensitivity of the thermal e l ement alor, e."

( )r: Add a new Exception u, 5-2.1.3 (7-2.1.4): "Starldard response flush, recessed, or concealed sprinklers

located within 3 1 /2 in. of lhe ceiling can be considered the equivalent of qnick-resp(,nse sl)rinklers." S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Concealed sprinklers with non-quick response cover plates do no t meet the requi rements for defini t ion of quick response. Either the sprinklers should be required to meet L~R criteria, or an ,:xception shou ld be made to allow existing concealed sprinklers to be used.

Note: S u p p o r t i n g ntatt:rial awdlable for review at NFPA H eadq uarters . COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle in Part.

See C o n n n e n t 13-243 (Log #172) regarding the submit ter ' s concern ahout the sensilivity of concealed sprinklers. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Commit tee Action :rod Sta tement for Cont inent 13-243 (Log #172). AdditionMly, with regard to the p roposed l an~ lage for Section 7-2.1.4 of tl~e Preprint, the Technical Comnfi t tee does not believe tha t all sumdard response sprinklers located within 3 1/2 inches of the ceiling are equivalent to all quick response sprinklers. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #22) Committee: A! ~T-SSI

13- 13 - ( 1-4.5. I Very Extra Large ()rifice (VELO) Sprinkler) : Reiect SUBMITTER: (;ary W. Ponte, The Reliable Automat ic Sprinkler (;o., Inc. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: N / A RECOMMENDATION: Add a new defini t ion to read ,as Follows:

Very Extra Large ()rifice (VELO) Sprinkler. See NFPA 13, Stan~Jard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems. SUBSTANTIATION: A VELO Sprinkler can control fires at lower ~qmrating pressures than existing sprinklers allowed unde r tiffs s t a n d a r d ; which is a n improved me/horl of fire protectiotJ. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reiect. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Tiffs comnlet l t was originally submit ted :Ls a pul)lic proposal to the 1996 edition of NFPA 231F :Ls 231F-2 ( L - g #2) in the A99 Report on Proposals. However, due to tl~e res t ructnre of NFPA 13 and NFPA 231F, this propos:tl was als- reicerred to tile Automat ic Sprinkler Systems t 'roject and addressed ,u~ a i}ul}lic c,}n'm/ent to NFPA 13. The Teclmical { ; .mmi t tee w~ted to reject tiffs c o m m e n t because this s p r i n k l e r is c , ,nsidered .t type of slway sprinkler. Additionally, it is p rnposed that spritJkler orifice si~es be i den t i f ed acc~rditJg to dteir zJomil~al K t'a,-t.r. [Sce (;<unmellt 13-2 (Log #185) and Prop.sa l 13-24 (Log #63).1 NUMBER OF COMMI'FI'EE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #130) Commit tee : AUT~SSI

13- 14 - (1-4.5.2 Extended Coverage Sprinkler) : Accept SUBMITTER: Kenne th E. Isman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1.3-10 RECOMMENDATION: Revise the definit ion of Ex tended (;overage Sprinkler to, "A type of spray sprinkler with m a x i m u m coverage areas as s p e c i f e d in Section 5-8 and 5-9 of this s tandard." S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : To harmonize the defini t ion of st, 'mdard spray spr inkler with ex tended cove~ge sprinklers. The reference to Chapter 4 in the ex tended coverage sprinklers definit ion is clearly wrong . COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #204) Comnfit tee: AI ~T~SSI

13- 15 - ( 1-4.5.2 ~nick-Response Extended Coverage Sprinkler) : Accept SUBMITTER: Mark Fessenden, Central Sprinkler Co. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-2 RECOMMENDATION: Revise text as follows:

Quick-Response Extended Coverage Sprinkler. A type of qnick- response sprinkler tha t meets the criteria of 1-4.5.1 (a) 1 an d complies with the ex tended protect ion areas def ined in Chapler 4 5. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : The ex tended protect ion area criteria is now found in Chapter 5. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log # 129) Connni t tee: AI TT~SSI

13- 16 - (1-4.5.3 Standard Spray Sprinkler): Accept SUBMITTER: Kenne th E. I sman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1.'5-10 RECOMMENDATION: Do two things to the definit ion of S tandard Spray Sprinkler:

1, C, hange the ternt "control-mode" to "spray." 2. Move the defini t ion to 1-4.5.2.

S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : 1. The spray sprinkler is already def ined :ts a control -mode sprinkler. It is impor tan t t , get the word "spray" in the defini t ion of "standard s[~ray sprinkler" to clarit}z that the "standard spray" is a subset of 'spray sprinklers." ()dlerwise, sprinklers with different spray pat terns such as conventional sprinklers and large drop sprinklers will be confitsed with the s tandard spray sprinkler.

2. The s tandard spray sprinkler has no th ing to do with the orientat ion of tile sprinkler (new Section 1-4.5.3). This defini t ion belongs in new Section 1-4.5.2 with o ther types of sprinklers. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #CCI 1) Comlnit tee: A! JT~SSI

13- 17 - (1-4.5.4 Dry Sprinkler): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Connni t tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1~-2 RECOMMENDATION: Move the tbllowing text as revised from tile definitiotJ and place it it, the appendix:

" I )~ sprinklers are in t ended to ex tend into an unhea ted area front a wet pipe s~stem or ~ . . . . . . . s r . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . . . . . / to be used on a dry pipe s ~ t e m :~" °~ . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . :+:~.. ,,

559

Page 8: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

SUBSTANTIATION: This action editorial ly moves advisory iuh,rmati~m into the appendix. Tim change to the language Iecognizes that not all dry sprinklers are pe nde n t sprinklers. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

rM:FI~MAT[VE: 26

(Log #223) Commit tee: AT TT~SSI

13- IS - (1-4.6 ()bstrm-ted Const ruc t ion) : Reject SUBMITTER: RolandJ . Hnggins, AFSA COMMENT ON PROPOSAL N O : 13-11 RECOMMENDATION: Revise text as follows:

( ) b s t r l l c t e d c o n s t r n c t i o n . ( ] o n s t r u c t i o r l w h e r e b e a m s , t rnsses , or other members impede heat flow or water dis t r ibut ion in a manner that materially :fftects the ability of spr inklers to control or suppress a fire. ( )bs t ruc ted const ruct ion h`as solid s tructural members which are t ight to tile ceilin~ and ex tend bewmd 4 in. t rom the ceiling. SUBSTANTIATION: As the original proposal indicated, there iS llO g l l i i l ; l l l l ' e (Ill "when s t r n c l n r a l m e n / b e ~ should be i l , n s i d e r e d as o [ ) s t r n c t e d c o n s t r n c t i o n . T h e C o n n l l i t t e e ,St:ttelnent indicates the concern is addressed by A-1-4.6, wlfich is izJcorrect. The only reference to this issue is in Beam and ( ; i rder ( 'anlstruction, wlfich states, "beafns of 4 in. or greater u , m i n a I thicktmss." Thickness applies to any d imens ion so ,toes u . t specify the depth. Wood Joists have a nominal dep th ,,f 14 in., but no min imum. Bar Joists identif ies a m a x i m u m det,th of Dnn ill., but `as ident i f ied in Figure A-1-4.6 (b)( i) this is flw width of tile chord, not the dep th down from the ceiling. Wood Truss also misuses the term dep th when identifying the ,-h,wd dimension. The Commit tee should clearly identify at what dep th (dis tance down fi'om the ceil ing) structural i l l e ln ] ) e r s I J e c o l n e o b s t r u c t e d c o n s t r n c t i o n . COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Tecimical Commit tee believes ~hat the current defirfition is adequate and that the submit ter ' s concern is addressed by append ix material . The Technical ( ' , ~ ln l l l i t t e e a l s o n o t e s t h a t o b s t r u c t e d c o n s t r u c t i o n is n o t necessarily [infited to solkl n]embers. Structural members not i n , r e than 70 percent open could also be considered obst ructed c o n s t l ' n e t io l ] . NUMBER OF C O M M I T r E E MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #11) C, ommit tee: AI TT~SSI

1:4- 19 - ( 1-4.10 Bundled Tires, Miscel laneous Tire Storage,): Accept SUBMITTER: Todd E. Sclmmann, HSB Industrial Risk Insurers COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-2 RECOMMENDATION: Revise Section 1-4.10, rul)ber tire definit ions, to read `as follows:

1. u ..... ~,~.~ T:~... Banded Tires. A sto~tge me thod in which a number of tires are s t rapped together .

2. Revise the "Miscellaneous Tire Storage" defini t ions "c" and "d" as f , ltows:

(c) I)ouble-row or multi-row fixed or pomtble rack storage on- side, or on-tread up to 5 ft (1.5 m) high.

(d) Single-row fixed or portable rack storage on-side, or in- tread, up to 12 ft (3.7 m) lfigh.

3. Revise A-l-4.10 for "Miscellaneous Tire Storage" :Ls follows: A-1.4.10* (23 ID-A-1-2) Miscel laneous Tire Storage. The

l imitatious on the type and size of storage are in t ended to identify those si tuations where tire s torage is present in l imi ted quant i t ies and incidental to the main use of the building. ( )ccupancies such

`as aircr:fft hangars, au tomobi le dealers, repai r garages, retail storage facilities, autonaotive and truck a.ssembly plants, and mobi le home `assembly plants are types of facilities where nfiscellaneous storage could be present. TEe fire p:'~;=~:c:i;':;

.",Jr.::::. :1 It)l spri::k!e:" deniS:: der:sit!es "t ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . m...i b7 NFP.\ l:Z,, ' " 1. l .i,,~ *1..~ l * . o + . , l l ~ , + ; , , . - , , , 4 " k % . . . l . . I , l , . . . ~ 2 , , , . * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l . . . . . . . . . . . [ * } ; : - ( } v i { i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . ] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l . . . . . . i ~2

this ........ ~""'~ ..... ~ ............. " ~'" :he ::c~q:c :~f NFPA l:a.. 4. Revise tile caption to Figure A-I-4.10.1 (e) as follows:

Figure A-1-4.10.1(e) 1231D-1-3(e)] Palletized portable tire rack on-side storage arrangement banded or unbanded buad!cd ,~r

::n~ : :ad!cd.

5. Revise the caption to Figure A-l-4.10.1 (l) ,as follows:

Figure A-1-4.10.1(f) [231D-l-3(f) l On-f loor storage; on-tread, normally banded, . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

25 ft {7.7 --~ Lllj.

6. Revise the i l lustration shown in Figure A-I-4.10.1 (g) to delete the tire labels and add second bracket to bot tom of tire rack. Revised i l lustration should be ,as follows:

560

Page 9: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 ~ A99 ROC

% d % ,9 I

Figure A-I-4.10(g)* [ 231D-l-3(g) ] Typical laced tire storage.

S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Revisions are he ing made to make NFPA 13-1999 consistent with NFPA 231D-1998. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMIT'fEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #C(:200) Commit tee: AUT-SSD

13- 19a-( [2-1 .3 .1] ): Accept SUBMITTER: T e d m i c a l Commi t tee on Sprinkler System Discharge (;riteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-13 RECOMMENDATION: Revise the end of Section 2-1.3.1 of the Pre I t int s that it reads as follows:

"...with high rates of heat rele,'~e but with little or no combust iMe or f l ammahle liquids." SUBSTANTIATION: It was not the Commit tee ' s in ten t to complete ly onfit the inclusion of l imited a m o u n t s of combust ib le . r f lamnlable liquids in Extra Hazard Group 1 occupancies. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMI'ITEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23 COMMENT ON AFFIRMATIVE:

S(',HI IMANN: A te rm such iLs "little" is always open to interpretat ion.

(Log #224) Coimnittee: At IT-SSD

13- 20 - (2-1.3.1 and 2-1.3.2): Reject SUBMITTER: James M. Feld, Sacramento Building Dept. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1.3-9' RECOMMENDATION: Revise the definit ion of Extra Hazard ( ; roups 1 a n d 2 a.s follows:

2-1.3.1" Extra Hazard ( ; roup 1. ( )ccnpancies or port ions of o ther ,ccui)ancies as describt~d in Table 7-2.3.2.~ or where th.__£ quanti ty and combustibil i ty of contents is very h igh and dust, lint, . r other materials are present, in t roducing the probability of rapidly developing fires with h igh rates of heat rele,'~se. Materials involving f l ammahle or combust ib le liquids would typically be excluded.

2-1.3.2" Extra Hazarci Group 2. Includes occupancies or port ions of o ther occupancies :ts descr ibed in TaMe 7-~.3.2.2 or extra hazard ( ( ; ronp 1) occupancies with modera te or substantial

a m o u n t s of f la lnmahle or combustit)le liquids or where shielding of combust ibles is extensive. SUBSTANTIATION: Table 7-2.3.2.2 classifies certain a r r angemen t s of commodi t ies ,as extra hazard g roup 1 or 2. This needs to he inc luded in tile defirfitions of extra hazard groups 1 and 2. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The definit ion of extra hazard occupancies is i n t ended to encompass a broad range of hazards and the Tecimical (3onlmittee believes that re ferenc ing TaMe 7- 2.3.2.2 would irmppropriately limit the scope of extra hazard occu=cul)ancies. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #C(2504) Commit tee : AITT-AA(',

13- 20a - ([2-1.3.2]): Accept SUBMITTER: T e d m i c a l Correlat ing Commi t tee on Automat ic ,~ftrinkler Systems

MMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-13 I RECOMMENDATION: Revise Section 2-1.3.2 as follows:

"Extra Hazard (Group 2). Includes extra hazard (group 1) occupancies with modera t e to substantial a m o u n t s of f lammahle or combust ib le liquids, or occupanc ies where shielding of combust ib les is extensive." SUBSTANTIATION: This c o m m e n t wits p romp ted by action taken by the Technical Comnfi t tee on Motion Picture and Television Industry on a p roposed code change submi t ted by the Technical Correlat ing G'ommittee on Automat ic Sprinkler Systems regarding NFPA 140. The change r e c o m m e n d e d by tills c o m m e n t correc~ an error and clarifies that any occupancies conta in ing modera te to substantial a m o u n t s of comhnst ib le or f lammable liquids, and any occupancies where sh ie ld ing of combust ihles is extensive, such ;Ls those that could be found in sound stages or modu la r bui ld ing assembly facilities, are to be cons ide red extra hazard group 2 occupancies. The condk ions for dassifving an occupancy ~s extra hazard g roup 2 ,are not in t ended to apply only to occupancies already classified:Ls extra hazard group 1. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept.

Pie:me refer to f ront mat ter for Tedmica l Correlat ing Commit tee ballot results.

(Log #24) C, ommit tee: AI JT,SSI)

13- 21 - ([2-2.5 and %5.4 th rough 7-5.4.3] ( ' ,hapters 1 and 5 ): Accept in Principle

] TCC NOTE: The TCC directs that item 9 of the Committee ] Action which revises Section 7-5.4.1.3.2 not be accepted. This is a ] correlation issue. Requirements pertaining to the orifice size of I ceiling sprinklers are to be addressed by Section 5-4.1.2. Also, see ] Committee Action and Statement to Comment 13-59 (Log #201).

SUBMITTER: Technical Correla t ing Committee- on Autonlat ic Oorinkler Systems

MMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-4 RECOMMENDATION: The Teclmicld Correlat ing Commit tee notes dlat die Standareks Council has ass igned responsibility for those por t ions of NFPA 231F pert~dning to sprinkler systems to file sprinkler project, and that while this proposal r e c o m m e n d s that tills informat ion be extracted us ing NFPA's Extract Policy, the TCC, directs dlat the informat ion in these proposals be incorpora ted into the 1999 edit ion of NFPA 13. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is a direction fi 'om tile Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlat ing C, ommi t tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulat ions ( ;overning Comnti t tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Delete the extracted text indicators and revise Section 7-5.4 in the Preprint its follows:

1. Delete 7-5.4.1. 2. Delete 7-5.4.1.1. 3. (;reate a new 7-5.4.1 entit led "( 'eneral ." 4. R e n u m b e r existing Sections 7-5.4.1.1.1 t l l rough 7-5.4.1.1.6 :Ls 7-

5.4.1.1 t h rough 7-5.4.1.6. 5. Add a new Section 7-5.4.2 enti t led "Protection Criteria." 6. Add a new Section 7-5.4.2.1 to read:

561

Page 10: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

"Roll paper storage shall t)e protected by spray sprinklers in accordatu;e with %5.4.2.2, large drop sprinklers in accordance with 7-5.4.2.3, or ESFR sprinklers in accorcktnce with 7-5.4.2.4."

7. R e n u m b e r 7-5.4.1.3 as 7-5.4.2.2. 8. R e n u m b e r 7-5.4.1.2.1 a n d 7-5.4.1.2.2 as 7-5.4.2.2.1 and 7-

5.4.2.2.2. 9. Revise Section 7-5.4.1.3.2 to read ,'ts follows: "17/32 inch orifice sprinklers shall be used for new sprinkler

system inslMlations. Exception: The use of 5 / 8 inch orifice or larger orifice spray

sprinklers shall he permi t ted where listed for such use." 10. Delete Secti~m 7-5.4.1.3.4 in its entirety. 11. R e n u m b e r 7-5.4.1.3.1 th rough 7-5.4.1.3.8 ,'~ 7-5.4.2.2.3

t h r . u g h 7-5.4.2.2.10. 12. R e n u m b e r 7-5.4.1.4 and 7-5.4.1.5 :ts 7-5.4.2.3 and 7-5.4.2.4

respectively and delete tile phra.se "in accordance with NFPA 13" in both sections.

13. Revise Figure 7-5.4.1.5 zts indicated in Comnlen t 13-55 (Log #127a).

14. Move 7-5.4.1.6 to become Appendix Section A-7-5.4.2. 12. R e n u m b e r %5.4.2 and its subsect ions in tile Preprint :~s 7-

5.4.3 and its subsect ions accordingly. 13. Remmd~er 7-5.4.3 as 7-5.4.4 and revise to read as indicated in

( ; , ,mment l ;~182 (Log #49). 14. Also see C o m m e n t 1%161 (Log #CC201) ,').s Chal>ter 7 is

being r enumbered . COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This action meets d~e intent of the submi t te r and reorganizes the r equ i rements for sprinkler pr .~ect ion of roll paper storage so that they can be applied ,as in tended by tile Technical Commit tee . I tem 9 allows for existing technoh:)gy. Item I0 w:ts neede(l ~ts this section conflicts with odler r equ i rements of the s tandard. Certain sprinklers which are ,wceptable for use in protect ing roll paper are listed with operat ing

essures less than 15 psi. MBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24

VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION: AFFIRMATWE: 23

COMMENT ON AFFIRMATIVE: KEEPING: The new s tandard ks supposed to refer to sprinklers

by their nomina l K-factors, however tile sections referenced above reference "17/32 inch orifice" and "5 /8 inch orifice or larger..." sprinklers. These should be changed to "nominal K-8.0" a n d "Hominal K-I 1.2 or larger..." respectively.

(Log #195) Commit tee: AI.IT~SS I

1.3- 22 - ( [Chapter 3]): Reject SUBMITTER: Richard E. T honn i ngs , /Xanerican Insurance Services Group, Inc. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-16 RECOMMENDATION: Delete ,all references to fire service m~dns and ;tssociated materi;d f rom NFPA 24. SUBSTANTIATION: Material on private fire service m~dns does trot belong in a sprinkler inst:dlation s tandard. For new sprinkler installations, the n n d e r g r o u n d is typically installed by different people than dae sprinkler piping. I agree with Mr. Keeping's c o m m e n t abon t tile need for ma in ta in ing NFPA 24. NFPA 24 should be m:dntained, :rod if flaat is the case, t hen the re is no need to clutter up NFPA 13.

It is no t practical to require the public to call out each specific reference to NFPA 24 material in the p roposed new Chapter 3 of NFPA 13. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Commi t tee Action and S ta tement on C o m m e n t 13-1 (Log#184) . NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #C(;424) ( ;ommittee: AI.JT~SS I

1% 93 - ({(:hapter 3]): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commi t tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1%16 RECOMMENDATION: 1. In Section 3-2.4.2(b), Exception, revise the te rm "small orifice outside sprinklers" with "outside sprinklers with K-factors less than 5.6."

2. In Section 3-9.2 of the Preprint add the phrase "plugs or caps" Mter tile term "listed" in the second line. SUBSTANTIATION: These are considered editorial changes. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATWE: 26

(Log #171) Commit tee: AUT~qSI

13- 24- (:3-2.2): Accept SUBMITTER: Russell P. F leming COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-24

I RECOMMENDATION: Add a sen tence to %2.2 to read: "This rule shall become effective on January 1, 2001."

SUBSTANTIATION: Sprinkler manufac tu re r s will need t ime to organize their product line with model identifiers a n d to ge t this informat ion into their publ ished literature. Effective ckttes have been used in o ther NFPA d o c u m e n t s for similar reasons. This c o m m e n t w~s developed by the U L / F M / N F S A Standards Review Commit tee . COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #133) Commit tee : AI ]T,SSI

13- 25 - (Table 3-2.3.1): Accept SUBMITTER: Kenne th E. l sman , Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-24

I RECOMMENDATION: Delete the last coh lmn in Table 3-2.3.1 marked, "Nominal K-Factor Marked on Frame." SUBSTANTIATION: This irfformation is no longer n eed ed due to tile Sprinkler Identification Number . Sprinkler manufac turers have agreed to the Sprinkler Identification N u m b e r with die assumpt ion that r e d n n d a n t irfformation can be removed from the Oorinkler.

MMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #186) Commit tee : AI IT,SSI

13- 26 - (Tahle 3-2.3.1): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Thom;L~ H. Miller, Varley-Campbell & Assoc., Inc . /Glen Ellyn Vol Fire Co. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1%16 RECOMMENDATION: Cont inue to include the informat ion on the nomina l orifice sizes for the s tandard cycle. SUBSTANTIATIONf This informat ion will he lp in the transit ion to only publ i sh ing file nominal orifice sizes in the next edit ion of the s tandard. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Gommit tee Action and S~t tement to C o m m e n t 15-2 (Log #185). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATWE: 26

562

Page 11: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

(Log #134) G'ommittee: AUT~SSI

1% 27- (3-2.3.2, 3-2.4.2, 3-2.4.3): Acc%~t SUBMITTER: Kenneth E. Isman, Nat l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-1ti RECOMMENDATION: Change all of the sprinkler orifice sizes in inches to nominal K-factor orifice sizes. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Tills was agreed to in Proposal 1%94 (Log #63), but not carried througll the report. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #227) ( ' o m m i t t e e : AI/T-SSI

1% 28- (3-2.4): Reject TCC NOTE: The TCC agrees with the action taken by the TC on

this comment bqt notes that more data needs to be deve loped concerning the i ~ u e of sprinkler performance and ceiling heights. This issue has been assigned to a task group for consideration during the next revision cycle o f NFPA 13. SUBI~)flTTER: Matthew q'. (;ust~ffson, Severna Park, MD COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-1 RECOMMENDATION: Add new 3-2.4 to read as follows:

3-2.4 Sprinklers shall not be installed abow: heights tested during sprinkler listing or approval tests.

Exception: Where permit ted or required by die Authority Having Jurisdiction.

A-3-2.4 Tile Authority HavingJnrisdiction should be i n v o l v e d in decisions to uses sprinklers at heights exceeding those where the performance of dm sprinklers has been proven by tests and can be predicted with confidence. Sprinklers installed where tile height froln tile hazard to die sprinkler exceed heights actually tested by the listing lahoratories or the sprinkler manufacturer may have unpredic ted performance. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This change would clarify that tile instaUed height of tile sprinkler is :ul important installation parameter. While the standard addresses sprinkler spacing in detail, it is silent on height limitations. This change would indicate to file reader that there are importm3t perform:race issues coupled with die installed heights of sprinklers. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Testing is not intended to identify mz~imnnl ceiling heights at which sprinklers can be installed unless spedfically indicated by tile listing (ESFR, large drop) . Data and other field expt ' r ience indicate that certain sprinklers perform adequately beyond the ceiling heights at which they were tested in tile laboratory. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #177) " C o m m i t t e e : AUT~SSI

1% ~9 - ([3-2,5.1] 2-2.4.1 Exceptions No. 2 and 3): Reject SUBMITTER: Richard E. Thonnings , Americ,'m Insurance Services (;roup, Inc. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-22 RECOMMENDATION: Reconsider rejection of Proposal 13-22 (Log #52) and accept. If tile C, ommit tee sustains its initial rejection, it should clarify what type of substantiation it neecLs in order to accept this type of proposal. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : The rejection of Proposal 13-22 (Log #52) is not consistent with the (',ontmittee Action on Proposal 13-24 (L-g #153). Tile Committee Statement implied that its rt~iection of Prop,,sal 13-22 was ba.sed on lack of documenta t ion of a pr,.,blem. However, it Accepted in Principle Proposed 13-94 for mandat ing marking of sprinklers. 7 b e Commit tee apparently believed the substantiatiori of Proposal 1 3-94 whidl indic~tted that identifying sprinklers dur ing replacement is a problem.

Furthermore, once tile new marking system of Proposal 13-24 is in place, such identification ;ts proposed (in 13-22) will be in place unless manufacturers decide to place such markings on the thernlal element. If that is done, it will defeat the intent of both Pr, qu~sals 13-22 and 1%24.

COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTF.£ STATEMENT: The submitter has not provided adequate technical data substantiating that significant nmnbers of sprinklers are being replaced with sprinklers of incorrect temperature ratings. The correct sprinkler temperature rating is a t rac t ion of the building and environment, not file sprinkler itself. The correct temperature sprinkler to be nsed should be readily apparent widmut looking to tile previous installed sprinkler. The issue regarding the marking of sprinklers to identify different orifice sizes, deflector characteristics, and therm~d sensitivity is a different issue pertaining to both new installations and replacement. The correct orifice size or deflector to install will not necessarily be apparent from the building or environment. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #187) Committee: AUT~SI

1% 30 -" ([3-2.5.1] 2-2.4.1 Exceptions No. 2 and 3): Reject SUBMITTER: Thomas H. Miller, Varley-Campbell & Assoc., Inc . /Glen Ellyn Vol Fire Co. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1%22 RECOMMENDATION: The wording in tile propos:d should be reconsidered for incorporat ion. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : It can be very difficult to identify tile temperature rating of a specific sprinkler head once it has operated. Not all people responding to return the system to operating condit ion will recognize the importance of replacing the head with one of the same temperature rating. Having a recognizable temperature indicating means will help in this recognit ion. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Gommittee Action on ( ;omment 13-29 (Log #177). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #178) Committee: AI IT~SSI

1% 31 - ([3-2.5.2] 2-2.4.2): Reject SUBMITTER: Richard E. Thonnings, American Insurance Services (;roup, Inc. CO MMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 1%23 RECOMMENDATION: Accept a revised Proposal 1%23 (Log #52) [added to part (b) as below and npdated Section numbers to Report on Proposals Preprint]. If tile Comntittee suslzains its rejection, it should darify what type of substantiation it needs in order to accept this type of proposal.

3-2.5.2 The standard temperature rating of bulb-type sprinklers shall be identified by:

(a/ color coded liouid in accor&ance with Table 3-2.5.[: and ( b ] a pe rmanen t identification mark or code on the snrinkler in

accordance with Section %2.2. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Tlle rejection of Proposal 13-23 (Log #51) is not consistent with tile Commit tee Action on Proposal 13-24 (Log #63). The Commit tee S t a t e m e n t implied that its rejection of Proposal 13-23 was based on lack of documenta t ion of a problem. However, it Accepted in Principle Proposal 13-24 for mandating marking of sprinklers. The Coinmittee apparently believed the substantiation of Proposal 13-24 which indicated that identifying sprinklers during replacement is a prohleul.

Fnrthermore, once the new marking system of Proposal 13-24 is in place, such identification as proposed (in 1%23) will be in place unless mamffacturers decide to place such markings on tile thermal element. If that is done, it will defeat the intent of both Proposals 13-22 and 13-24. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See (',ommittee Action to ( ' omment 13-29 (Log #177). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VO TE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATWE: 26

563

Page 12: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

(Log #9) C, onuninee : AI rT4,;Sl

13- 32 - ([%2.8.4 New] 9-2.8.4): Reject SUBMITTER: Blase McDougal l , Western Hose Hand l ing Equipment Co. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-95 RECOMMENDATION: Add tile foH,~wing text:

T lnee pr, ,per types . f sl)rinkler stoppers, tllat cor respond t - tile type or types of sprinklers in the properly, shall be kept in tile sprinkler cabinet for fire ctepartnlent use. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Tile purpose of requir ing three proper types of sprinkler s toppers in every sprinkler cat)inca is to reduce all(t prevent alnnecessary and sonletimes extrenlc sprinkler system water damage to a strllCtHl'e al]d its c(intenls. Tile purpose is also t,, rrdtn-e fire depa r t men t liability in s i tuat ions where a small fire has been ex t inguished hv the sprinkler system. Sprinkler s toppers can be installed by life personnel f reeing t hem for o ther emergency responses while technically qualif ied sprinkler ind~.lstry p e r s . n n e l can properly restore tile sprinkler system, including feplacillg opened sprinkler heads, reset t ing the clapper ~tlve, dra in ing and testing the s}~tem.

"l"he c~st of requi r ing tllree sprinkler s toppers be kept in every sprinkler cabinet is minimal when compared to tile mil l ions of d~ilars tha'~ cmiM he s;wed ~wer a period of t ime. After all, "proper type . f spr inkler s topper" in m a n y c:tses where tyffical Ul,,'ight o'r p e n d e n t type of spriilkler heads are concernet t woulcl generally I~e a wooden wedge. Where recessed, sidewall, or eollcealed 1leads are conce rned there are nniversal style s toppers availaMe (see copy provided) at a cost of about thirty five dollars.

The Commit tee ' s concern that the possibility of a s topper being used mid not renloved seems like a valid reason for rejection of this p r . tmsa l until you look at tile fact that in file State of Hawaii lhe r equ i r emen t of three sprinkler s toppers be kept in every sprinkler caMnet has been ill effect for over twelve years and there has never been a single incidence of violation of this code. (See taxed copy of code at tached.) This in format ion was obta ined tronl a t e lephone conversat ion with Chief Charles Wlt~s|nan of fire [,revention office of tile Honolu lu Fire Depar tment .

Note: Suppor t ing nlaterial available for review at NFPA H eadq uarters . COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The possiMlity of the s topper being left in place instead of replacing die ac tuated sprinkler is too great inld COllld lead to a p ro longed and unnecessary i mpa i rmen t of tile svste|n. Tile Technic~d Connni t tee prefers that operated sprir |klers be replaced with s~oare sprinklers, which is wily tile sprinkler cabinet is requirea . NUMBER O~ COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATWE: 26

(Log #7) Commit tee: AI IT~SSI

13- 33 - (3-3.4): Reject SUBMITTER: J. William Sheppa rd , General Motors (;orp. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-18 RECOMMENDATION: Reinstate phrase at end of first senterace in 3-3.4 as follows: "...lined, :uld additiotlMly, steel pipe shall be coated and wraoned ira accordance with the nrovisions of AWWA l:~amphlet (5-203 to inhibi t corrosive effects." S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : As long as steel p iping is pro tec ted in ;tccordarlce with AWWA C 2 0 3 a n d the steel p iping is des igned ira accordance with A,STM A-795, it~ use shou ld not be prohibi ted whether or no t tile piping is listed. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Commi t t ee Action on C o m m e n t 1 3-38 (Log #14). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO-VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 24 NEGATIVE: 2

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: (;{)DDARD: These c o m m e n t s [13-33 (Log #7), 13-36 (Log #5),

and 13-45 (Log #4)] are related to the inst~dlation of steel pipe for u n d e r g r o u n d systems. While it is no t a r e c o m m e n d e d practice dne to tile corrosion potential, this type of pipe is installed and

used in certain applications. For tile Conuni t tee to remove applicable portiorls of the s tandard deal ing with proper installation techniques is no t correct. Tile AWWA permits this installation when certain criteria :ire met. NFPA 13 s lnmld pernlit it as well.

SCHIRMER: Change to negative. 1 agree with Mr. ( ;oddard 's statenlent.

(Log #CC412) Commit tee: AI 7TJ,;.SI

13- 34 - ([3-3.5]): Accel,t SUBMITTER: Technical ( ;omnli t tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-16 RECOMMENDATION: Add an Exception to Section 3-3.5 of the Pre ) l int to read ,as follows:

Exception: Pipe or tube listed for light hazard occupancies shall be permi t ted to be installed in ordinary hazard rooms of otherwise light hazard occupancies where tile room does n , t exceed 41)¢) sq ft." S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This act ion more clearly indicates tile Conuni t tee 's in tent conce rn ing the installation of plastic pipe ill these spaces. It is no t tile Commit tee ' s in tent to prohibi t tile use of plastic pipe in small rooms such as closets and mechanica l rooms in otherwise l ight hazard occupancies. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 25 NEGATIVE: 1

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: SCHULTZ: Tile Commi t tee response is correct. It has never

been tile in tent of the s tandm'd to prohibi t tile use of plastic pipe in small rooms such its closets and mechanica l rooms. A 400 sq ft room canno t be considered small. This area will be covered by at least four (4) s tandard spray sprinklers (400 l-[ 130) and, as such, the r equ i r emen t luL~ been greatly relaxed by the in t roduct ion of tile square footage. I would s trongly urge end ing tile sen tence at light hazard occupancies, e l iminat ing "where the room does not extend 400 square feet."

(Log #165) C, onnnit tee: AI IT,qSI

13- 35 - (3-4, 3-5.6, 3-6.7): Reject SUBMITTER: Kenne th E. l sman , Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-16 RECO MMENDATION: Put all of the u n d e r g r o u n d pipe rules in one section or chapter . SUBSTANTIATION: Makes it easier for o ther NFPA standards to reference these requirements . COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Acceptance of this proposal would set a p recedent a~ainst tile cur ren t format and layout of NFPA 13, and a change at tiffs t ime would r e suh in the f ractur ing of tile s tandard. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 24 NEGATIVE: 2

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: ISMAN: (')ur negative bMIot is based on tile fact that it would be

m u c h more "laser friendly" to include all of the requ i rements for u n d e r g r o u n d pipe in one section. Tile NFPA h~Ls already established a p receden t for this with the requ i rements for mar ine systems.

MARBURf;ER: I believe tile submit ter ' s reques t for all u n d e r g r o u n d requ i rements to be in one section or chapter is appropriate . U n d e r g r o n n d should be treated differently f rom the balance of the sprinkler system, regarding format , because it may be appropr ia te to reference only die u n d e r g r m m d port ions of 13 in o ther s tandards, when address ing such issues ,as private fire service mains and hose systems.

564

Page 13: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

(Log #5) (',onnnittee: At TT-SSI

13- 36 - (3-4.1): Reject SUBMITTER: J. William Sheppa rd , General M o t , r s Corp. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-16 RECOMMENDATION: Delete second sen tence of 3-4.1 (24-7-1.1) :LS sllown ill Preel)rint, page 1172, ROP. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Steel piping can be successfiflly used d e p e n d i n g npon soil condi t ions and if properly coa ted /wrapped . See AWWA (;-200 and (;-203 which are referenced in NFPA 24, Chapter 10 (1995 edition) COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Commit tee Action and Sta tement on C o m m e n t 1"4-38 (Log #14). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 24 NEGATIVE: 2

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: (;()DDARD: See mY Explanat ion el Negative Vote on ( ,onn//ent

13-3?, (Lc,g #7). S(;HIRMER: ( :hange to negative. 1 agree with Mr. ( ;oddard 's

s t a t e n l e D t .

(Log #131) Commit tee: AI IT-SSI

13- 37 - (3-4.1 Exception (New)): Accept in Pr indp le SUBMITTER: Kenne th FL Ism:m, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-18 RECOMMENDATION: Add an Exception to 3-4.1 to state:

Exception: Intern:ally galvanized steel pipe shall be permi t ted for the [:fit m between the check valve and the outside hose coupl ing for tile fire de l , a r tmen t connect ion. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : There llas been rio evMencc d/at this long accepted practice of allowing steel (iz:~ternally gMvanized) to serce tile fire del~artment cormect ion is problematic . COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

I evise the proposed except ion to read as follows: "Excepfiorl: Where extt rnall v coated and wrapped. ;.till] internally

galv:mized, steel pipe shall be permi t ted for tire pipe between the check valve and the outside bose coupl ing for the fire d e p a r u n e n t cotnlect ion." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Tile Commit tee considers die fire departnlerl t connect ion an auxiliary water snpply for the sprinkler system. The action of the ( ;ommit tee indic~ttes that where steel fill m is used u n d e r g r o n n d fi)r ronnec t ing tile fire deparmlen t (onnec t ion to tile sprinkler system, outside protection of the steel pipe is required. Also see ( ;onnnit tee S ta tement for ( ' o n n n e n t 13- 38 (Log #14). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 2tl VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFI FUMATIVE: 26 COMMENT ON AFFIRMATIVE:

M()D, rER: Tile ( ' ,ommittee's comnlen t that tile fire depa r t men t tl~tntel'tioll shonld be cons idered an auxiliary water snpplv is eII-{HIeOIIS, t:Sl)eciallv in ,:lie case of c o m b i n a t i o n -

sp r ink le r / s l andp ipe s~ t t n/s where fire app:u-atus punlps ;ire required t~ supply operat ing pressures necess:n T for in te r i . r fire fi~htiug ,q ,erat i .ns .

(Log # 14) Committee: A! IT.qSI

1?,- 3S - (?,-4.1. ?,-4.4): R,<iect SUBMITTER: David L. Blomquist , Cllevron Corp. (CRTC) COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-18 RECOMMENDATION: Revise as follows:

3-4.1 * (24-7.1.1) Pipirig shall be listed for fire protect ion service and comply with or exceed AWWA standards, where applicable. Steel p iping shall ~ e be allowed for u.~c u::lc.~.: if ~[-ecifica!!y listed for u t | d¢ rg round service in private fire service main applications or pr~tected I~y coatir~g an.t double wrapping, cathodic protect ion or o ther at)t:,roved means. :13.-1,q)

3-4.4* (24-7.2) Cc.atk;g a:id Lining of Bnried Pipe. All ferrous metal pipe shall be l ined arid, additionally, steel pipe sh~ l be coated and wrapped. For bur ied pipe, galvanizing, internally or externally does riot mee t the requ i rements of this section. IJnlined steel pipe sllall be permi t ted u n d e r g r o u n d if it is increased in d iameter by one pipe size to aceommo(kt te increased flow restriction due to sc;tlin~. (1%18)

f ( ;F . l . . . . . ; r . . I~a* . . . . . . . . * l . a e l . ~ l . . ~ l . . . . . . .4 *l . . . . . *~ ;A . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . l l . , - -

for t!"c fire ~Icpartmcn: canncctie.n. ( 1B-I 8) S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Piping and fittings that comply witb A.STM and ANSI s tandards exceed AWWA standards and is being used successfully, in many calves for 20 to 40 years in fire water service botb above and u n d e r g r o u n d . ( ;eat ing and double wrapping or c r i b . d i e protect ion have long been successlully used where a ) p r o )riate. There is no basis for the Comnfit tee 's s ta tement that

(;a ~tnizing, coatiug or wrap[firlg of steel pipe are Imt considered effective..." Such a s ta tenlent is no t true. Also, un l ined steel pipe is colnlnon iu industry and any possible flow restriction result ing from internal scaling is a c r o m m o d a t e d by us ing oversized pipe. There are h u n d r e d s of s ~ t e m s ntilizing n n l i n e d s t e e l pipirig that is externally protected and in certain soils, unpro tec ted , with great reliability. The unsubs tan t i a ted position of tbe Connni t tee on this issue is b u r d e n s o m e and will be chal lenged. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: I':t~t exper ience and loss ~Lata indicates flint there is a higb poterJtial for tile failure of buried steel pipe even when tile pipe is coated and wrapped a n d / o r internally galvanized. Tile integrity of tbe protect ion provided by coating and wrapping a n d / o r galw.mizing can be easily compromised in u n d e r g r o n n d applicat ions and in some cases lead to an accelerated rate of corrosion of tile pipe. Also see Conlmit tee Action on C o m m e n t 13-37 (Log #131). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #13) ( ;onunit tee: AI ;T~SSI

13- 39 - ([Table 3-5.2] Table 2-4.2): Reject TCC NOTE: The TCC a~'ees with the action taken by the TC

but notes additional technical issues need to be resolved concerning 3 / 4 inch insert fittings. Where insert fittings are used to connect the last sprinkler on a branch line, the 3 / 4 inch fitting can reduce the pressure available at the sprinkler and this needs to be accounted for. Additionally, current hydranlic calculation procedures do not consider friction losses through straight through fittings. This may not be appropriate w6ere 's,/4 inch insert fittings are used. A change in the hydraulic calculation procedures may also be required. More data needs to be deve loped in regard to these issues. The TCC further notes that the standard does not prohibit these types of devices for being considered for listing. SUBMITTER: Fmnz P. H~tse, Franz P. Ha~tse & A.sst,c. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-33 RECOMMENDATION: This w;Ls . r iginal Pr. l .~sal 13-33 (Log #129) and rejected. Rejection W:LS becanse of lack el sufficient suppor t ing teclmic.al docnment : t t ion. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Since then, both FM and IlL have done tesL~ whicll "ire f l , r thcoming to tile Comntit tee. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This cotnnn:nt :uhh-esses I s o l n p o l l o n l s l i l t i t a r e I ' e ( l l l i l - e d [ o l i e l i s t e d b u t w h i c h a l e n o t .

Adding infornmtion ~tl such him-listed colnlnllletlts intl~ tile s tandard is no t appropriate . No suppor t ing material w:Ls submi t ted with this comment . NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 25 NEGATIVE: 1

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: SCHIRMER: Change to negative. Supp . r t i t ig material was

provided to tile Colnmit tee dur ing tile mee t ing Oil public Colnnlents. The vohllne . f Wnlk tu I,e dOlle by tile ('.Olllnlittee at tile mee t ing prec luded sutficieut study to ieach clniclnsions. The intent .rod sense of 2-4.2 of tile pre~.ent s tandard is t . allow listing

565

Page 14: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

t~rganizatil,ns t¢) investigate fittings other than those included in Table 2-4.1 as well as Table 2-4.2. Tile later table was tnifol ' tnl lately no t included in the text of 2-4.2. 2-4.2 w:Ls originally wri t ten t~ ellCOlll';tge I]eW t e c h n o l o g y al ld aw)id tile circlnllStaflce where a listitlg agem~y would not ev'alnate a [,roduct because it w;cs not yet included in tile standard.

I agree with Mr. I~nng's commems ,,n 13R-9 (Log #10) and 13[)-9 (L ,g #13). Tile 11L Fact Finding Report is dated 9 /16/96, h:ts been known to exist since that date, and hz~s previously reportedly I}ecIJ distrihuted t{} NFPA for distribution to the Committee.

(Log #15) Conmfittee: AI IT,SSI

13- 40- ([3-6.2.1] 2-5.2.1): Accept SUBMITTERa J o h n J . Walsh, l lnited Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1,'a,-34

I RECOMMENDAT1ON: Revise :Ls follows: Welding methods that comply with the applicable requirements

of AWS B2.1, Specification for Qualification of Welding Procedures and Welders for Pipe and Tubing, are acceptable Ineans of joining fire protection piping. SUBSTANTIATION: AWS B2.1 is a very inclusive document. We must insure that the skills required are applicable for sprinkler system welding, which is the service piping level. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #135) (.;ommittee: AI ~T,SSI

1%41- (3-6.2.8.1): Accept TCC NOTE: The TCC directs that the following exception be

added to Section 3-6.2.8.1: "Exception: Welding procedures qualified under standards recognized by previous editions of this standard shall be .permitted to be continued in use." This action corrects an ommslon that would have disqualified previous welding standards that while no longer in print are still considered acceptable. SUBMITTER: Kenneth E. lsn~an, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1.~g34 RECOMMENDATION: Delete "level TBD" fi-om tim end of the se l l tence . SUBSTANTIATION: There are no separate levels in AWS B2.1. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #16) Committee: AI IT~SSI

13- 42 - ([3-0.2,8.1] 2-5.2.8.1 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: J o h n J . W,dsb, I hlited Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-34 RECOMMENDATION: Revise the end of the last sentence to read:

"%ball meet or exceed fl~e requirements of/Mnerican Welding Society Standard AWS B2.1 applicable to service piping. SUBSTANTIATION: AWS B2.1 is a very inclusive document. We tnust insure that the skills required are applicable for sprinkler system welding, which is the service piping level. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Committee Action on Comment 1 '.4-41 (Log #135). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #20) Committee: AI ~T-SSI

13- 43 - (3-6.3.3): l~eject SUBMITTER: Robert G. Caputo, kanerican Fife Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 17.16 RECOMMENDATION: Add new text to read as fl)lMws:

Listed flexible couplings shall he visually identifiable and differentiated from nonflexible couplings by cme of tile following Ineth ods:

a. a cas t ing h ie or pint le . b. listed flexible c(,uplings (only} shall t)e painted red in color.

SUBSTANTIATION: The standarcl identifies specific locations where flexible couplings are required in areas subject to damage tYom earthquakes and requires additional braces where flexible conplings are used on cross mains. The flexible couplings are critic~d to s~tem integrity in earthquake areas. (;urrently, there is no way fiJr the installer or inspectors (AHJ) t . visually verity which couplings are used. The option of color code is similar to sprinkler head temperature identification. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reiect. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Tlle Committee is ot the opinion that the model numl)er on tile coupling suflY:iently identifies a coupling :ts either flexible of rigid. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 24 NEGATIVE: 2

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: CAPI IT(): I disagree with tile Committee Statement that the

model number on the coupling sufficiently identifies a coupling as either flexible or rigid to an inspector, when file coupling is installed 20 ft or 30 ft in the air.

The standard identifies locations where high temperature or other than normal temperature rated sprinklers mnst be installed for proper protection and those sprinklers are clearly identifiable to inspectors by a color code.

Similarly, file standard identifies critical locations where flexible couplings are required. We nmst require those couplings to be eztsily identifiable if we expect them to be installed in fl]eir required locations. Inspectors cannot be expected to use lift equipment or ladders and flasldights to verily this critical element of the installation.

MOWER: I agree with tile submitter's substantiation. In buildings such as strip malls and large spee. warehouses, occupancies 0lay be covered by more than one system. A fire occurring in the area between the two systems becomes a tactical nightmare for responding fire departn)ents who must determine which system to supply, or worse, to have to supply both systems independently.

(Log #124) Comnlittee: A17T~%SI

13- 44 - ([3-6.6 Exception (new)] 2-5.6 Exception (New)): Reject SUBMITTER: Les E,~ster, (;rinnell, Allied Tube & Conduit COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1336 RECOMMENDATION: Revise proposal to read as follows and accept:

Exception: "Raised lips at the end of listed and approved threaded lightwall pipe which do not exceed .050 inch (1.27 ram) shall not be considered as burrs or fins and shall be permitted." SUBSTANTIATION: 1. The Conmlittee Statement does not detail "the quality assurance measures in installation" with which tile committee is concerned. However, conversations in various arenas have unearthed what some of the issues may be.

2. The term burrs and fins in 2-5.6 provides fi)r a wide interpretation by the AHJ's. When lightwall pipe is threaded a small lip sometimes remains, instead of burrs and firm, which one may envision :LS a section of steel that may break off or impede flow in some way. This is merely a slight lip and dislodgement or flow impediment is not an issue and will never occur.

3. If there is a concern tiffs lip could cause worker injury, tile record supports this ~s unwarranted. As noted in the proposal, installations having these lips have been made without injuries. Some have beet] disassembled and rehandled due to the AHJ i t J t e rp re ta t ion it was a "bl l r r or fin" tha t nlay canse a flow loss. C.erminly worker sgffety is important but historical use does not suppor t tiffs ~ts a problem.

566

Page 15: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

4. The .050 inch (1.27 ram) lip height lilnit clarifies the i)rol),)sal and is not new material. This height ~LS supported I)y d()cnnlentatioil submitted with the original [)r() )osal. This Factory Mutual testing showing r~,o friction loss from the lip h:ts teen avaikd)le to the public for review as noted in the R()P.

5. It is n()t necessary to have fiirther data fi'om a lal) regarding tile fact the lip causes n,, friction loss, z~ this has I)een provided as sut)stantiatiorJ for the pr,~posal, thus it is now suggested that [)()rti,)n ()f the prol',osa[ be delete<t.

ti. Tile ('~olnnlittee expressed no con t r l )ve rsy over tl/e Far-tory Mutual report, an(I no c,~ncern regarding friction loss. Tiffs is the l,rimm'y safety (;()il(;eril r,:lated to this pro[)osa[,

The Committee is urged to reconsider, and accept this i)r,)p(,sal }>:L~e~t ,)ll the suggested io')prc)ved language. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The submitter h;Ls provided no snbstazttiati(m to reverse a long term installation practice of

rU.Viclingfor a clean internal bore of threaded piping. MBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 96

VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION: AFFIRMATIVE: 24 NE(;ATIVE: 1 ABSTENTI()N: 1

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: M(;PHEE: h seems to me that tile support ing data would suggest

that the effect of the internal "raised lip" as experienced with the lightwall pipe has insigntficant effect on tile performance of tile system and experience has not shown it to be a safety hazard. ('xmsequently, l have to disagree widl the Committee Action. EXPLANATION OF ABSTENTION:

TESTA: I prefer to abstain knowing the Comnlittee rejected this item by a IO to 8 vote.

Fact: The (;ommittee :-eviewed test data and Factory Mutnal Report imlicatirig no friction loss for raised lip tip to 0.050 inches.

The submitter h,as advised the writer they will submit and process request for l IL listing and FM approval. Necessm-y action to offset ( ' , O l n l l l i t t e e vote.

(Log #4) Conmfittee: AIJT~SSI

13- 45 - (3-6.7): Reject SUBMITTER: J. William Sheppard, General Motors Corp. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-18 RECOMMENDATION: Reinstate second sentence of 3-6.7 al)l)earing on [)age 1174 of tile R()P as follows: ",Steel pipe joints shall be field coated and wrapped ,after ,assembly." SUBSTANTIATION: As long as steel joints are protected in accordance with AWWA G-203 ,and d~e steel joints are designed in accordance with ASTM A-795, the use of these joints should not be prohibited. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Comnrittee Action on Conmrent 13-38 (Log #14). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 24 NEGATIVE: 2

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: (;()DDARD: See my Explanation of Negative Vote on Comment

13-33 (Log #7). S(;HIRMER: ('Amnge to negative. I agree with Mr. (;oddard's

staten/ent,

(Log #89) Committee: A11T~SSI

13- 46- (3-9.1): Reject SUBMITTER: William J. Boswell, Wausau HPR Engr COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1.%43 RECOMMENDATION: Accept t ex t `as proposed in R()P A99 Proposal 1 3-43 (Log #2 I) :

Any sprinkler system that Ires more than one fire del)a~tment cor l r lec t ion for A buihting sb:dl be so arranged that tile entire huihting can be supl)lied from any single fire deparnnent COil n e c t i n r l .

SUBSTANTIATION: The Conunittee rejected tiffs proposal on tile grounds flirt this practice is not currently reqnired and that tile required practice of labeling FDC's would be adequate. [)tiring a tire emergency, tile determination of which FDC is connected to which sprinkler system should not be a concerri. Tile implementation of the proposal above will eliminate any guess work and will facilitate ease of use by the fire departmenC COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Technical (:ommittee does not believe that this sbonld be a nmndatory requirement `as it is an impractical apprnacll to an issue that should be resolved through proper pre-fire planning. Additionally, Section 5-15.2.3.4 of the Preprint requires apl:)ropriate signage. Also see action on ( ' o m m e m 13-103 (Log #CC415). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 25 NEGATIVE: 1

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: J()YCE: I am in agreement with file submitter `as our state

building code has had this requirement for die last 18 years ~md have not had any problems with all fire depar tment connections feeding all sprinkler or standpipe systems in a building or structure. Due to the possible overlap of sprinkler systenxs operating at one time, the fire deparnnent may not be able to determine which F.D.C. to supply. Therefore, I do not see this ,as an impractical approach, nor do I see dfis `as a preplanning isstle ,as sprinkler systems lrray be installed without any type of outside alarm device being required.

(Log #88) Committee: At IT,SSI

13- 47 - ([3-10.1] 2-9.1): Reject SUBMITTER: Bernard Cain, Project Fire Engr Ltd. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-46 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Proposed new wording to be added to Paragraph 2-9.1 after "flow begins," a new paragraph to read:

"This may involve a device that simulates orie fire sprinkler head in operation without draining water off the system." SUBSTANTIATION: None given. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The current wording of tile standard does not prohibit the procedure proposed by the submitter. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #138) Conunittee: AUT,SSI

1.3- 48 - (4-2.3.1 Exception No. 2): Reiect SUBMITTER: Kenneth E. lsman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler P~sn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-50 RECOMMENDATION: Acid a new Exception to 4-2.3.1 .LS follows:

"Tile piping volume and the time to deliver water to tile inspector's test connection shall not be limited where tests or calculations show that water will be delivered to open sprinklers before 80 percent of file sprinklers in tile design area have opened." SUBSTANTIATION: A performance-b`ased alternative is needed for the 750 gal limit and the 60 second exception to this rule. Both of these requirements are arbitrary. Methods will exist in the near future to allow tiffs type of calculation to be done with adequate accliracy. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Committee is n . t aware of any models or methodologies that would allow the calculations referred to by the submitter to be conducted with a sufficient degree of accuracy. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATWE: 24 NEGATIVE: 2

567

Page 16: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N ~ A 13 1 A 9 9 R O C

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: ISMAN: We believe dlat it is high t ime die NFPA stated the

performarlce necess~wy for gett ing water to a fire d l rougb a dry- pipe system. Me:ksuring 60 second water delivery to the inspector 's test or even tim volume of file system, ,as NFPA 13 currently requires, is measur ing the wrong ~triables. Tile impor tan t th ing to krmw is lmw many sprinklers will be open when the water arrives. We can calculate this. We shou ld allow this performance-b; tsed opt ion.

SCHIRMER: Change to negative. I agree with Mr. Isman 's s t a t e r n e r l t .

(Log #179) Commit tee: AIJT~SS I

13- 49 - ([4-2.3.l a n d 4-2.3.2] 3-2.3.1 and 3-2.3.2): Reject SUBMITTER: William N. Brooks, Eichlea Engineers Inc. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-50 RECOMMENDATION: Reject C, ommi t t ee Action. Accept Proposal 13-50 (Log#160) . S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : T h e Commit tee ' s substant ia t ion fails to consider the points made in the proposal, focusing only on a reference to trip t imes and delivery times. If delivery t ime is the critic:d factor, what is this time? Is it 1 minu te (for nong r idded systems over 750 gallons)? Is it 3 minu tes (NFPA 13 Handbook ,

~ age 139)? ()r, is there no limit (,as long as system size is less than 50 gallons)? Wha t if a g r idded system less fllan 750 gallons could

p roduce pe r fo rmance comparable to a non-gr idded system less than 750 gMlons? In o ther words, what if the gr idded system could deliver water in 3 minutes? It seems this would be comparable in per formance , especi:dly in view of the Handbook connnentary .

The proposal notes the lack of a design basis for existing requi rements , conflicts in existing requi rements , and conflict ing informat ion provided in the cur ren t NFPA 13 Handbook. None of these issues were addressed by the commit tee .

This proposal establishes a m a x i m u m trip t ime and a m a x i m u m delivery time. Both of these are necessary to use a pe r fo rmance m e t h o d for design. By a d d i n g p e r f o r m a n c e language, certain - prohib i ted systems, such as gr idded systems, could be used. The Commi t tee shou ld be obligated to def ine tim requi red per fo rmance of dry pipe systems, and state this perform:race clearly in NFPA 13. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Technical Conmti t tee agrees that more specific pe r fo rmance criteria shou ld be provided. However, the cu r r en t state of tec lmology does not allow this criteria to be developed appropriately. Additionally, the r equ i rements of the s tandard :Ls it current ly exists provide adequate protection. The Technical Commi t t ee f i l r ther notes that a limit is

~ aced on the size of dry pipe systems. UMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26

VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION: AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #8) Commit tee : AI IT-SSI

13- 50 - ([4-2.3.1 and 4-2.4.1] 3-2.3.1 and 3-2.4.1): Reject SUBMITTER: Vincent Esposito, Naval Facilities Engr C o m m a n d COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-50 RECOMMENDATION." Delete cur ren t Paragraphs 3-2.3.1 and 3- 2.4.1 and add the following new text:

"3-2.3.1. Dry pipe s ~ t e m s shall be des igned such tha t delivery t ime of water to the system test cormectiorJ shall be m)t more than 2 minutes , start ing at die norlnal air pressure on the system and at the t ime of fully o p e n e d itrspection test connectiotl .

Exception: Where the authori ty having jur isdic t ion de te rmines that a faster delivery tinle is requi red or a slower delivery t ime is acceptable based on tile hazard.

A-3-2.3.1. F:Lster delivery t imes may be needed where life safety is a l~ tc . to 1".

S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : I agree with the Commit tee ' s s ta tement tliat delivery time is the critical factor. The piping volume of the system is i r re le~mt ~ long as water can reach the open sprinkler head in .m acceptable an toun t of t ime. An acceptal)le delivery t ime will

d e p e n d on die specific si tuation and shou ld be de t e rm in ed by the author i ty having jurisdict ion. A delivery t ime of over 2 minutes may be acceptable for single story business occupancies , bu t fztster delivery t imes may be necessary for life s:ffety, or protection of f lanunable liquids, or in higb ceiling a r e ~ where sprinkler activation t imes may already be delayed. NFPA 13 shou ld not require quick-opening devices but ra ther provide criteria if they are insudled. NFPA 13 currently reqnires a quick-opening device on a 600 gallon dry pipe system with a delivery t ime of 65 seconds but does not require one on a 400 gallon dry pipe system with a delivery t imes of 8 minutes; this seems to contradict the Comlrdttee 's su t t emen t tha t delivery t ime is the critical factor. Please note that the proposed append ix item is taken from page 140 of the 1996 Automat ic Sprinkler Systems Handbook. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: No data has been submit ted snbst :mtiat ing file 2 miml te t ime limit. Additionally, the Commi t t ee believes d~e cur ren t requ i rements are adequate . NUMBER O17 COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VO TE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26 CO MMENT O N AFFIRMATIVE: JOYCE: While I agree in principle wifl~ the Commi t tee Action, I

feel that a set t ime for water delivery :is a r equ i r emen t for the quick open ing device is required. The present r equ i rements date back to the days of pipe schedule systems. Having a r equ i r emen t set on w, lume and a t ime limit r equ i r emen t that is only required if you exceed a certain vo lume is not very practical in this day of having per fo rmance type codes.

(Log #95) Commit tee : AUT~SS I

13- 51 - (4-2.4.1): Reject SUBMITI'ER: Elwin (;. Joyce, Ky Division of Building Code Enforcement COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 1.3-51 RECOMMENDATION: Revise :Ls follows:

Dry pipe valves sh:dl be provided with a listed quick-opening device w!=crc ~ t c : n ~.'pacL*y c×cccda 509 ga! (IE9~l) when tile system (regardless of capacity) can no t deliver water to the insoector 's test connec t ion within 60 seconds.

Delete exception. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : I am resubmi t t ing my original proposal which the Task ( ; roup b : d accepted before the fifll Commit tee rejected it for not having any data to suppor t the proposM. 1 have provided an example of die p rob lem showing a system not requi r ing a Q.O.D. (less than 500 gal) no t mee t ing . the 60 second t ime linfit. The requ i rements of this section date back to the days when all systems were pipe scheduled, no t hydraulically calculated. The poin t is that this sect ion needs to have a set t ime limit; s o m e t h i n g flint the code officials and file des igners can work with (60 seconds, 90 seconds, 2 minutes , etc.). Also, the except ion needs to be removed :is it is used to require d m 60 seconds presently by many code ot2]ci:ds (note: our bui lding code manda tes 60 seconds) . The except ion appears to conflict with the rest of d m section in that in one place the code says if you are less than 500 gal. you don ' t need to worry, but if you are 750 gal., then you have to deliver water in 1 mim~te to the inspector 's test connec t ion .

Note: Suppor t ing material available fi:w review at NFPA Headquar te r s . COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Commi t tee Actioti and Sta tement on CommerJt 13-49 (Log #179). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 25 NEGATIVE: 1

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: J()YCE: I am voting negative for the reasons stated in my

commen t s to 13-50 (Log #8).

Page 17: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 -- A99 ROC

(Log # 114) Committee: AI IT~SSI

13- 52 - (Tat:,le 4-5.2.2): Accept SUBMITTER: Robert A. Willimns, MS State Rating Bureau COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a

I RECOMMENDATION: CJlange table references for glycerine and pr(wylene glycol to 4-5.2.1. SUBSTANTIATION: Editorial. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 V O T E ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in t ' r inciple in Part. 1. Do not reject the exception ;ts indicated by the submitter.

I 2. Add a second exception to read ;Ls follows. "Exception No. 2: Where a compressor /dryer package is listed

for tile application using an ambient air supl)lY." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: 1. The Committee believes that ni trogen is a viable option.

2. The Committee believes dlat the revised wording more Ou~O~Eriately addresses die col~.cerns expressed by tile submitter.

R OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 V O T E ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #220) Committee: AI.IT~SS l

13- 53 - (4-8.2.4): Accept in Principle in Part SUBMITTER: R.A. Pridham, Ceneral Air Products Inc. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-1 RECOMMENDATION: [)elete the following exception:

....... v ........ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :,.,.,. ~An . . . . cor.;i.~rec=ed :z~.troge:: ."~ f rom o)'!!::c!er, ~, !~ ,.:~ed i:~ Hct: c;'." cc:,%~;rcss-c~ ::it.

Revise wording of A-4..q..2.4 to read as follows: Exception: Where an :q)proved compre&sor/dryer package is

used. SUBSTANTIATION: q he current exception introduces ;in alternative sohit ion whi~ h seems on die face to be simple, however, the installatioi~ requirements of and ongoing maintenance to such alternatives (Nitrogen) are deceptively complicated and costly.

An FM approved compressor /dryer system is available which simplifies installation and minimizes/e l iminates the exposure to ice formation. A technical repor t is a~dlable showing the practically of using such a specifically designed package which has heen tested and approved for tbe application.

100

10

_--, 1

0.1

,<

8 o,o

0.001

0 . 0 ~ 1

0.01

. . . . . . . . I i " 1 . . . . . . I . . . . .

~ystem ~olume = 1000 ga/

5 s d m

#

Leak rate -- 10 sefrn

f ~ • • • Intaki from freezer • " , " "

no d ~ r orine~'eetiu~ ~ , , • • #

o j,

- : ' : . _ .

1 sefrn

, , .,,,1

0.1 1

Intake from ambient

-25 F cltyer edt dew- point 1 scfm leak rate system dry- out = i .6 days

~II = f = . l l , • , •

10 100 1000

Time (daTs)

Figure 3. ,System Ice Accumulat ion

(Log #139) Connllittee: AI.IT~SSI

13- 54- (Figure 4-8.2.7): Accept iri Principle SUBMITTER: Kemietb E. Isman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-55 RECOMMENDATION: Revise Figure 4-8.2.7 to show tile two e:Lsily remowable pieces of pipe :Ls those on either side of the freezer wall, not tile piece of pipe penetrat ing the w:dl.

H e a t e d a r e a Two easily r e m o v e d - ~ - 30 in. Refrigerated s p a c e

sections of p i s e . ~ , ~ ] (762~mm)

Normally o p e n control VA. Check

Check VA. wP/s=-in. (2.4 ram) hole in c l a p p e r - -

Dry /p reac t ion VA.

Main ~ control VA.

W a t e r supply J

Air compressor and tank . - - . *

Freezer air intake

Q Air pressure ( ~ ) Air pressure Air supply source Water supply source

1. Check valve with =,~in. (2.4-mm) hole in clapper not required if prime water not used.

2. Supply air to be connection to top or side of system pipe.

3. Each removable air line shall be a minimum of 1 in. (25 ram) diameter a n d minimum of 6 ft (1.9 m) long.

Figure 4-8.2.7

SUBSTANTIATION: There is no good re,'~son why the removable iece of pipe needs to be the one that penetrates tile fi-eezer wall. emoving the pipes on both sides and being able to see through

will de termine if there is an ice blockage. Physic,'dly removing the pipe d~at penetrates the freezer wall leads to damage to tile freezer and eventual cold air leakage. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Accept the submitter 's recomnlended revision to Figure 4-8.2.7. A/so, editoriMly revise Figure A-4-8.2.4 as follows:

5"9

Page 18: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

Heated area Refrigerated space

Two easily removed ' -~ 30 in. A

control VA. ~ u - ~

Check VA. wl ~ in. (2.4 mm) hole ~, in clapper

Dry/preaction VA.-----~ ~

Ma~trol VA. ~ ' ' = ~

Water supply

Pressure regulator

Air dryer ~

Check VA.

I.,

s-. ,

t ,D

Two easily removed air supply lines

Coalescer filter ~, I ~ J

Air compressor . ~ [ ~ Freezer air intake and tank

Air pressure ( ' ~ Air pressure Air supply source ~ Water supply source

1. If pressure gauge P1 and P2 do not indicate equal pressures, it could mean the air line is blocked or the air supply is malfunctioning.

2. Air dryer and coalescer filter not required when system piping capacity is less than 250 gal.

Figure A4-8.2.4 Refrigerator area sprinkler systems to minimize the chances o f developing ice plugs

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This is an editorial change. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #127a) Committee: AI IT-SSI

1"4- 55 - ([Chapter 5]): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Donald B. Pounder, Grinnell C, orp. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a RECOMMENDATION: Revise NFPA 13 to incorporate the requirements for ESFR sprinklers having a nominal K-factor of 25.

Revise text as follows: 5-11.4.2 (13-4-11.4.2) Deflector ()rientation. IJeflectors of

sprinklers shall be aligned parallel to ceiling or roofs. Penclent sprinklers shall be positioned so that deflectors are a maximum 14 in. (360 ram) for sprinklers havin~ a nominal K-factor of 13.5 - 14.5 or 18 in. (460 mm~ for snrinklers bavin~ a nominal K-factor of 24.2 - 26.2 and a minimum of 6 in. (150 mmi below the ceiling. SUBSTANTIATION: This ( :omment is a result of Comment 1 3- 160 (Log #127) which w:Ls submitted to the Technical Committee ~tl Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria. Section 5-11.4.2 of the Preprint pertains to installation requirements and is more approlwiately addressed by the TechnicM ( 'ommittee on Sprinkler ,System Installation Criteria. Therefore, Comment 13-160 (Log #127) was split into two comments with the installation requirements for the K-25 sprinkler addressed here.

1. Approved ESFR sprinklers having a nominal K-factor of 25.2 have been a~tilable for almost a year. There has been considerable interest in these sprinklers and dleir use should be detailed in this standard.

2. By incorporating information on ESFR sprinklers having 26 K-factors now, the need to issue a TIA will be avoided. This is an important change which should be incorporated in-cycle.

3. An extensive series of fire tests h,'~s been conducted at I Inderwriters Laboratories using the Grinnell Model ESFR-25 sprinkler to establish the minimum design pressures fiJr the commodities for which this sprinkler will be Listed. A copy of their report is attached. It is noted th.tt in a comparative test of ESFR sprinklers having a nominal K-factor of 14.0 and those having a nominal K-lictor of 25.2, the higher K-factor sprinklers demonstrated superior performance. It is also tinted that the pressures which are proposed are intended to provide tl~e santo or slightly higher densities fi)r ESFR's having K-t, tctors of 25 as compared to ESFR's having K-factors of 14.

4. The wording of Section 7-6.5.2 (13-5.3.5.2) h:Lq been changed to delete reference to the appendix Table A-7.6.5 since information in that table has already been included in tile non-

~ )pendix tables dealing with ESFR sprinklers. OMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. Accept the submitter 's proposed Section 5-11.4.2 with the

following revisions: 5-1 1.4.2 Deflector ()rientation. Deflectors of sprinklers shall be

aligned par:did to ceiling or roo£s. Pendent sprinklers shall be

~ ositioned so that deflectors are a m,tximum 14 in. (360 ram) elow the ceiling for sprinklers having a nominal K-factor of 14. or

18 in. (460 ram) below the ceiling tbr sprinklers having a nominal K-factor of 25.2 and a minimum of 6 in. (150 ram) below the ceiling. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The changes made by tile G'ommittee are considered editorial in nature. Sprinklers will now be identified according to nominal K-factors and a K-/actor range will no longer be referenced in the standard. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #141) (;ommittee: AIIT-SSI

13- 56- (5-3.1.1): Accept SUBMITTER: Kenneth E. Isman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1:',-63

[ RECOMMENDATION: Move the new second sentence to 5-3.1.1 to its own Section 5-3.1.4. SUBSTANTIATION: The issue of installing sprinklers prior to fittings being placed has nothing to do with the listing of the sprinkler or the exception that allows odler uses of sprinklers. This is a sepa~tte issue that deserves its own section. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 21i VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #115) (:ommittee: ATIT-SSI

13- 57 - (Table 5-3.1.3.2(a) ): Accept SUBMITTER: Robert A. Williams, MS State Rating Bureau COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a RECOMMENDATION: Reference under l .(b) shouM read: Figure 5-3.1.3.2. SUBSTANTIATION: Editorial. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

570

Page 19: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N ~ A 13 I A 9 9 R O C

(Log #212) Cnlmnit tee: AI TT~SSI

13- 58 - (5-4.1.2): Accept SUBMITTER: James ¢;olinveaux, Central S[,rinkler Co. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-5(i

I RECOMMENDATION: Delete. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : See p roposed new text. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Also see ( : o m m e n t 13-59 (Log #2Ol). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 2(i

(Log #201) Comnffttee: AI IT~SSI

13- 59 - (5-4.1.2 (New)): TCC NOTE: The TCC agrees with the action of Accept in

Principle for this comment, but directs that the last sentence of Section 5-4.1.2 as indicated in the Committee Action be revised to read: "For required densities greater than 0.34 g p m / s q ft, standard response spray sprinklers with a K-factor of 11 or larger which are listed for storage anollcatlons shall be used." This action corrects an o m i ~ i o n ~ ' t h e TCC bel ieves that a distinction needs to be made between those K-11 sprinklers intended for s torage applications and those that are not.

Overall acceptance of this comment requires changes to the action recommended for Comments 13-21 (Log #24), 13-17g (Log #168), and 1"~181 (Log #12). SUBMITTER: James ( ;ol inveaux. CentrM SpriiJkler Co. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1%56 RECOMMENDATION: Add new Section 5-4.1.2 to read:

5-4.1.2 Storage Applic~ttions. For requi red densit ies o f . 34 or less, 17/32 in. or larger ~pray sprinklers shall be used. For requi red densit ies of .35 or greater, 5 / 8 in. or larger spray sprinklers shall be used. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : With the advancemen t of tecl'mology and cur ren t issues su r ro tmd i ug high initial opera t ing pressures of 1 /2 in. and 17/32 in. sprinklers, 1 /2 in. sprinklers shou ld not be used for s torage and 17/32 in. sprinklers shou ld be limited. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Revise Section 5-4.1.2 to read as follows: "5-4.1.2. Storage. For general storage, rack storage, rubber tire

storage, roll paper storage, and baled cotton storage being p r . t e c t ed wifll spray sprinklers with required densities of 0.34 gl:,m/sq ft or less, s t andard response sprinklers with a nomin~d K- factor of 8 or larger shall be used. For required densities greater than 0.34 g p m / s q It, s tandard response spray sprinklers with a K- factor of 11 or larger shall be used.

Exception No. 1: For ,tensities of 0.20 g p m / s q ft or less, s t andard response sprinklers with a K-~tctor of 5.6 shall be permit ted.

Exception No. 2: For modif icat ions to existing systems, sprinklers with K-factors of 8 or less shall be permit ted.

Except ion No. 3: The use of quick resporise spray sprinklers shall be pe rmi t t ed when listed for such use. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: These changes meet die submit ter ' s in tent and more appropriately reflect the suppor t ing data which indicates tha t where h igher discharge densities are necessary the h igher pressures required to acbieve these densit ies with 1/2 inch or 17/32 inch orifice sprinklers can cause a mist ing effect of the

~ ,rinkler discbxrge and severely limit system performance . UMBER OF COMMITrEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26

VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION: AFFIRMATIVE: 24 NEGATIVE: 2

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: ISMAN: We are conce rned tha t tire Commit tee h:ts omit ted the

requirement that sprinklers in t ended for s torage applicat ions be listed for storage applic~ttions. We have had the problem in the past that sprinklers with orifice sizes greater than K=8.0 h:we got ten listed when there w ~ a problem us ing t hem for storage appli~Tltions. Special listing procedures were necessary for these big orifice sprinklers that were requi red by the storage s tandards (NFPA 231 and 231C). While some of the listing labs migh t subject big orifice sprinklers to these special tests in order to allow them to be listed at all, there is no manda t e f rom NFPA 13 to dd suclL and o ther labs may not follow the procedure ant icipated by

the Commit tee . It is impor tan t for the Conmfit tee to make it clear to die ktbs what t rey want :Ls part of the listing process. By el iminat ing this requ i rement , we have mudd ied the water, not made it clear.

TESTA: W h e n C o m m e n t 1%59 (Log #201) w`as first in t roduced at the R()C meet ing , considerable coIwersation took j)lace. To limit conversatiorL I `asked the Chair to appoin t a special task force to convene to establish p roper verbiage and submi t a written repor t for this impor tan t rule change.

A few hours later the spokesperson read the above. My first c o m m e n t w`as, "Does any firm o ther dmn Central have large K- factor spray sprinklers? The reply was "many." As a result. I was in agreement .

As of today, November 30, upon review of IJL Fire Protection Equ ipmen t Directory 1998. indicates six (6) manufac tu re r s have l is tedK-I 1 spray sprinklers, arid one manufac tu re r has a listed K-14 and one h:L~ a listed K-I 7.

My negative ballot mus t be processed knowing a "Restraint of Trade" exists; therefore, I s trongly r e c o m m e n d ( ; ommeu t 1%15 (Log #201) be re tu rned to Comini t tee for inclusion in die next NFPA 13 Standard change schedu led for the year 2001 or later. COMMENT ON AFFIRMATIVE:

KEEPIN(;: The Commi t t ee Action makes references to "K-factor of 8 or larger..." and "K-factor of 1 l or larger...". These references should be changed to "K-factor of 8.0 or larger..." and "K-factor of 11.2 or larger...", to express the K-factors in the proper form.

SCHIRMER: Add comment . I agree with Mr. Isman's s ta te lnent accomDanying his negative t~allot. After the word "shall be used" (two ptaces) insert the phr`ase "which are listed for s t - rage applicat ions."

(Log #(;C400) Commit tee : AUT,~;SI

13- 60 - (5-4.1.2 ,and 5-4.1.3): TCC NOTE: The TCC directs that Section 5-3.1.3.4 be editorially

revised to read as follows: "The minimum temperature rating of ceiling sprinklers in general storage, rack storage, rubber tire storage, roll paper storage, and baled cotton storage applications shall have a t c m p c ~ : u r c r=t 'ag o f be 150 degrees ~'." SUBMITTER: Technical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler S ~ t e m Inst~dlation Criteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-56 RECOMMENDATION: Add a new Section 5-3.1.3.4 to read ,as follows:

"5-3.1.3.4 The m i n i m u m tempera tu re rating of ceiling sprinklers in general storage, rack storage, rubher fire storage, roll paper storage, and baled cotton storage apt)lications shall have a t empera tu re rat ing of 150 degrees F.' S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Tiffs is an editorial revision tha t makes NFPA 13 consis tent with the previous storage documents . COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATWE: 26 COMMENT O N AFFIRMATIVE:

S(;HIRMER: Editorially change "shall have a t empera ture rating o._f 150" to "shall be 150" for cktrity.

(Log #211 ) Commit tee : AI JT~SSI

13- 61 - (5-4.1.3): Accept SUBMITTER: James Gol inveaux, Cen t r~ Sprinkler Co. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1%5(5

I RECOMMENDATION: Delete. SUBSTANTIATION: See proposed new text. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Also see C o m m e n t 13-59 (Log #2O 1 ). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

571

Page 20: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

(Log #142) Committee: AUT~SSI

13- 62 - (54.5.4): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Kenne th E. Isman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-70 RECOMMENDATION: Revise new Section 5-4.5.4 to read:

"Residential sprinklers installed in confo rmance with this s tandard shall follow the sprinkler obstruct ion rules of Section 5- 8.5 or 5-9.5 as appropr ia te for their instMlation position (upright , penden t , or sidewall) or the manufac tu re r ' s installation instructions, whichever is more str ingent ." S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This c o m m e n t does two things, it recognizes sidewall residential sprinklers (which the Repor t on Proposals did no t do) and also references the reader back to the manufac ture r ' s literature, which is more s t r ingent fl~an d~e EG rules. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. Revise d~e submit ter ' s p roposed new section to read:

"Residential sprinklers installed in conformance with dfis s tandard sball follow the sprinkler obstruct ion rules of Section 5- 8.5 or 5-9.5 ,as appropr ia te for dleir installation posit ion (upright , penden t , or sidewall) ~ and the obstruct ion criteria specif ied in the manufac tu re r ' s installation instruct ions w!~ic!~cvcr ~.~ n'c:rc

C O ~ + T E E STATEMENT: Tllese ~lre editorial cl, al[~ges dl~.t more clearly address the concerns expressed by the submi t te r and the in tent of die ( ' ommi t t ee conce rn ing the obstruct ion rules for residential sprinklers. NUMBER OF C O M M I T r E E MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26 COMMENT ON AFFIRMATIVE:

KEEPING: f )ur ing the 1996 rewrite of Chapter 4, ( the new C, hap te r 5), it w~,~s dec ided to write a sepm'ate section for the obstruct ion rules for each type of sprinkler. I am voting ;fffirmatively here because I believe tbe rules for obstruct ions to residential sprinklers must be addressed; however, to p lunk them in witl/ ex tended coverage sprinklers is no t a good practice. The obstruct ion rules for residential sprinklers shou ld be written into a separate, residential section.

(Log #CC420) Commit tee: AI.IT,SS 1

13- 6 3 - ([5-4.6.3.1]): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commi t tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1.9,-56 RECOMMENDATION: Delete Section 5-4.6.3.1 of the Prepr int in its entirety. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is duplicate informat ion which is more ;q)propriately addressed in Section 5-4.6.3 of the Preprint. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #96) Commit tee: AI IT-SSI

13- 64 - (Figure 5-5.5.1.1): Accept SUBMITTER: Elwin G. Joyce, Ky Division of Building (',ode Enforcement COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-123

I RECOMMEN]DATION: Relocate Figure 5-5.5.1.1 to appendix as reference material. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : I am address ing my original proposal in inanner since tiffs f igure is tide basis for the tables addressed in Sections 5-7.5.2.3 and 5-9.5.2.3. This figure applies only to s tandard upr igh t and p e n d e n t sprinklers and does not reflect die actual coverage pat terns of sidew,all (which projects water out in a 180 degree pat tern from a wall 12 to 94 feet) and ex tended coverage (which projects water out to a radius of 10 feet for 360 degree coverage) sprinklers. This figure, if I r e m e m b e r correctly, is the one genera ted f rom fide test done in the late 1970's on

hospital rooms and only included two or three tests run with sidewall sprinklers. Also, I do not believe any ex tended coverage

rinklers were tested ,as dais w,a.s before alley came out. MMITTEE ACTION: Accept.

I Editorially revise the title of the figure to read: "Obstruct ions to Sprinkler Discharge Pattern Deve lopment for

S tandard Upright or Penden t Spray Sprinklers." NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #143) Commit tee : AI.IT~SS I

13- 65 - (5-5.5.2): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Kenne th E. I sman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-75 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Put Section 5-5.5.2 in the correct order and revise 5-5.5.2.2 to retain the Performance-B,~sed language while leaving the specific r equ i rements to the sections for each specific spr inkler as follows:

5-5.5.2.2 Sprinklers shall be posi t ioned so d~at they are located sufficiently away f rom obstruct ions such ,as truss webs and chords, pipe, columns, and fixtures to be able to spray a r o u n d die obstruct ions. M i n i m u m distances mad speci,al except ions of Sections 5-6 darough 5-11 shall be followed for each different type of sprinkler.

Also el iminate the three cur ren t Except ions to 5-5.5.2.2. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Many of file except ions to the 3x and 4x rule in Sections 5-6 t h rough 5-11 canno t be used because they are less s t r ingent fl~an Section 5-5. This was not the in tent of writing these sections. Section 5-5 shou ld be a gener;d use section dlat explains the in tent of the rest o f Chapter 5 (5-6 th rough 5-11). COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

[ 1. Revise Section 5-5.5.2.2 to read as follows: ] "Sprinklers sh,all be posi t ioned in accordance with the m i n i m u m I distances a n d special except ions of Sections 5-6 th rough 5-11 so ] that they are located sufficiently away f r o m o b s t r u c t i o n s such ~s I truss webs arid chords, pipes, columns, and fixtures." ] 2. Eliminate the three cur ren t except ions to Section 5-5.5.2.2. [ 3. Editorially relocate Section 5-5.5.2 to its proper position.

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This language more clearly expresses file in tent of the existing r equ i r emen t and the submitter. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #144) Commit tee : AI IT-SSI

13- 66 - (5-5.5.3.1): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Kenne th E. Isman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler A.~sn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-78 RECO MMENDATION: Either insert dae open grate f looring text in Sections 5-6, 5-7, 5-8, 5-9, 5-10, a n d 5-11 or delete the duplicate wording f rom dlose sections. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Tltis language relates to where sprinklers are requi red and is probably only n e e d e d in 5-5. However, similar wording current ly appears in these o ther sections :Ls well. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

1. Insert tile phrase "open grate f loor ing ' in Sections 5-6.5.3.1, 5- 7.5.3.1, 5-8.5.3.1, and 5-9.5.3.1 so it reads ,as follows:

"Sprinklers shall be installed u n d e r f ixed obstrnct ions over 4 1"t ( l .2m) wide such ,as ducts, decks, t h e n grate flooring, cutt ing tables, and overhead doors."

2. Retain Exception No. 1 to these sections. 3. See C o m m e n t 13-68 (Log #CC,401) regarding Exception No. 2

for Sections 5-6.5.3.1 and 5-8.5.3.1. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Tiffs is an editorial change as Sections 5-10 and 5-11 do not cont~dn a similar requi rement . NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

5 7 2

Page 21: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

(Log #145) Committee: AI.IT~SS l

13- 67- (5-5.5.3.1 Exception No. 2): Reject SUBMITTER: Kennedi E. Isman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-80 RECOMMENDATION: Either insert the non-combustible conce:ded space text in Sections 5-7, 5-9, 5-10, and 5-11 or delete the duplicate material f rom 5-6 and 5-8. SUBSTANTIATION: This was placed in the general Section (5-5) and the sections on st,andard upr ight and penden t sprinklers (5-6 and 5-8). This material relates to ~where sprinklers are required and is ,applicable to all types of sprinklers. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Commit tee Recommendat ion ,and Subst,antiation to C o m m e n t 13-68 (Log#CC401). NUMBE~ OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

composite wood joist, regardless of the depdl of file joist. Clarification needs to be made to establish that the maximum deflector distance of 22 in. below the deck cannot be exceeded. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. in Principle.

1. Revise the exception by adding the term "only" between file word deck and where so that the phrase reads "...below the ce i l ing / roof deck only wbere joist channels..."

2. Also revise 300 ft to 300 sq ft. COMMITrEE STATEMENT: 1. The intent of tiffs requi rement is to pe rmi t sprinklers to be located under composite wood joists only where the joist channels are fire s topped to an area not exceeding 300 sq ft. The maximum distance between the sprinkler ,arid the ceiling is not to exceed 92 inches ,and tbe maximum distance between the sprinkler and die bot tom of the joist is not to exceed 6 inches. The revised wording clarifies this intent.

2. Editorial change. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION: .AFFIRMATIVE: 26

( Log #CC401 ) Committee: AI.IT~SS I

13- 68 - (5-5.5.3.1, 5-6.5.3.1 ,and 5-8.5.3.1): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-80

[ RECOMMENDATION: Delete Exception No. 2 to dlese sections. SUBSTANTIATION: The Commit tee intends fllat these spaces be sprinklered. The Committee is concerned dmt maintaining these spaces as inaccessible :rod free of combustibles will be difficult. Additionally, the proposed exception is subje& to a high degree of interpretat ion and will cause difficulty wit1 application ,and enforcement . COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #CC417) Committee: AUT-,SS I

13- 69 - ([Table 5-6.2(c)]): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-99 RECOMMENDATION: In the second c o l u m n o f Table 5-6.2(c) which addresses pipe schedule systems, add the phrase "(In buildings with storage bays 25 ft wide, 12 ft 6 in. shall be permit ted)" ,after die number 12 under the column he,'~ting enti t led "Spacing (max)." SUBSTANTIATION: This is an editorial change as dais information should have appeared in tile Preprint. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITrEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #230) Committee: AUT~SSI

13- 70 - ([5-6.4.1.2 Exception No. 3] 4-6.4.1.2 Exception No. 3): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Phitlip A. Brown, American Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-101 RECOMMENDATION: Revise text as follows:

Exception No. 3: Snrinkler deflectors shall be permit ted to be 1 in. to 6 in. below composi te wood joists to a maximum distance of 22 in. below fl~e ce i l in~/ro6f deck where jois t channels are fire- s topped to file dill dep th of file joists with material equivalent to the web construction so flaat individual channel ,areas do not exceed 300 ft. SUBSTANTIATION: Current wording of Exception No. 3 has been in terpre ted ~ allowing sprinklers to be posit ioned below

(Log #109) Committee: AI_IT~$S I

13- 71 - ([5-7.2.2] 4-7.3.1.1 Exception No. 3 and 4-7): Reject SUBMITTER= Gary& Andress, Wausau HPR Engineering COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-112 RECOMMENDATION: Revise Table 4-7.2 (new TaMe 5-7.2). Change the Maximum room width (L) from 14 ft to 12 ft, for Light Hazard, Noncombust ib le or Limited-Gombustible Finish. This revision would also change die Maximum protected area from 196 it2 to 168 ft 2 in the same column.

This revision will also re~]uire revising die last sentence of Paragraph 4-7.2.2 (new 5-/.2.2) to read:

"In ,any case, tile maximum area of coverage-of a sprinkler shall not exceed 168 ft2. '' SUBSTANTIATION: In the original design of sidewall sprinklers, wetting of file opposite wall was not considered. This concern did not come about until tile listings of ex tended coverage sidewalls were introduced. Mamffacturers suggested that the standard sidewalls would not even wet an opposite wall at 12 ft.. Therefore, the 14 ft maximum room width is excessive. Water distribution tests and the Committee Sta tement for Proposal 13-112 (Log #80) supports dais by saying dlat the water distribution tests only collect data within 12 ft of the wall. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Commit tee Action and Statement to Comment 13-72 (Log #173). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 96

(Log #173) Committee: AUT~SSI

13- 72 - ([5-7.2.2] Table 4-7.2, 4-7.2.2): Reject SUBMITTER: Gary S. Andress, Wausau HPR Engineering COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-112 RECOMMENDATION: Revise Table 4-7.2 (new Table 5-7.2). Change tile Maximum room width (L) from 14 ft to 12 ft, for Light Hazard, Noncombust ib le or Limited-Combustible Finish. This revision would also change die Maximum protected area f rom 196 It2 to 168 ft2 in the same column.

This revision will also require revising tile last sentence of Paragraph 4-7.2.2 (new 5-7.2.2) to read:

"In ,any case, tile maximum area of coverage of a sprinkler shall not exceed 168 ft2." SUBSTANTIATION: In the original design of sidewall sprinklers, wetting of the opposi te wall was not considered. This concern did not come about until the listings of ex tended coverage sidewalls were intrOduced. Manufacturers suggested that tbe standard sidewalls would not even wet an opposite wall at 12 ft. Therefore, the 14 ft maximum room widtil is excessive. Water distribution tests and the Committee Sta tement for Proposal 13-112 (Log #80) supports dais by saying dlat the water distribution tests only collect data widfin 12 ft of the wall.

5 7 3

Page 22: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Commi t t ee has reviewed associated test da ta and believes tha t the 14 ft m a x i m u m spacing d imens ion is acceptable. Additionally, the re has been no loss da ta or otiler exper ience indicat ing utffavorable results with s t andard sidewall sprinklers installed with spacings up to 14 ft. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERSELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log # 18) Commit tee : AUT~SSI

13- 73 - ([5-7.4.1.1] 4-7.4.1.1 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: J o h n J . Walsh, Uni ted Assn. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-113 RECOMMENDATION: (A) Base sentence , delete (vertical type).

(B) Delete Exception No. 2. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : (A) Mr. Isman 's original proposal was c o r r e c t .

(B) I 'm no t aware of :my s tandard spray sidewall sprinklers listed for less than 4 inches f rom the ceiling, nor should there be in light of NFPA's long s tand ing 4 inch limitation. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

I Accept i tems (A) and (B) ,as indicated by the submit ter . Also add the te rm "and l imited combust ible" to Except ion No. 1 so that it reads "...below combust ib le and l imited combust ib le ceilings..." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: T he term "limited combust ible" was to have been added by Proposed 13-113 (Log #81) but w,as no t inc luded in the Preprint_ NUMBER OF C O M M I T r E E MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #215) Commit tee: AI IT,SSI

15- 74 - (Table 5-9.2.2): Accept SUBMITTER: Ben Figueiredo, Central Sprinkler Co. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a RECOMMENDATION: Switch tile words "spacing" a n d "area" unde r the "light bazard" beading in Table :~-9.2... S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : The 400 square ft. refers to "protection area," while the 28 ft refers to m a x i m u m "spacing." COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #208) Gommittee: AI TT~SSI

I?,- 75 - (5-9.4.2.1 Exception (New)): Accept SUBMITTER: Kevin Maughan , Central Sprinkler ( ; , . COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-56

I RECOMMENDATION: Add an Exception: "Unless soecifically listed for o ther ceilin~ configurations."

S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : There has been testing done, and listings achieved for sidewall sprinklers be ing located a long file s loping wall of a s loped ceiling room. This would include some of die new sloped ceiling listings for residential sprinklers tha t at least two manufac tu re r s have achieved. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Al though the snbmit ter ' s substant ia t ion refers to residential sprinklers, tile Commi t tee is aware of e x t e n d e d coverage sprinklers tha t mee t this condit ion. N U M B E R OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #CC410) Commit tee : AUT~SS I

13- 76 - ([5-10.5.2.~, 5-10.5.3.2] 4-10.5.2.2, 4-10.5.3.2 ): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria CO MMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-56 RECOMMENDATION: 1. Revise Section 5-10.5.2.2 of tile Prepr in t to read ,as follows:

"For obst ruct ions 8 incites or less in width, sprinkler sh:dl be posi t ioned such that they are located at l e~ t a distance three t imes

: greater tban die m a x i m u m d imens ion of tile obstruct ion ...... : . . . . . . ¢ on :~.~,.... t,~,,~ ~.~.~ f rom tile sprinkler (e.g., webs ,and chord members , pipe, columns, a n d fixtures). Sprinklers shall be posi t ioned in accordance with Figure 5-10.5.2.2 where obstruct ions are present.

Exception: Sprinklers posi t ioned with respect to obstruct ions in accordance with 5-10.5. 1.2."

2. In Section 5-10.5.3.2 delete the phr,a~e "of tile in termedia te level /rack storage type or otherwise..." S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : 1. This change more clearly indic:ttes tile Commit tee ' s in tent concerraing obstruct ions to tile discharge from large drop sprinklers.

2. It is the Commit tee ' s in tent flint large drop sprinklers be installed u n d e r n e a t h open grat ings and appropriately shielded f rom overhead sprinkler discharge. Additionally, there are no i r r termediate / rack storage type large drop sprinklers avzdlable. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VO TE O N C O M I ~ T T E E ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #GC403) (gommittee: AUT~SS I

13- 77 - (Table 5-11.2.2): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical G'ommittee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-56 RECOMMENDATION: In Table 5-11.2.2 replace the table headings "ESFR Sprinkler up to 30 ft in height" with "( :e i l ing/roof heights up to 30 ft" and replace table headin~ "ESFR Sprinkler up to 40 ft" widl "Cei l ing / roof beigbts over 30 ft. ' S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : These are cons idered editorial changes. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VO TE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #94) C, onmaittee: AI IT-SSI

1"~- 78 - ([5-11.4.1.1] 4-11.4.1.1): Reject SUBMITTER: Peter Thomas , The Viking Corp. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-145 RECO MMENDATION: Revise text ,as follows:

4-11.4.1.1 P.e.~i;~n.~c Sprinklers shall be posi t ioned so that deflectors are a m a x i m u m 14 ira. (356 nun) and a min imun l 6 ira. (152 ram) below the ceiling. ,i . .~:-, . . . . . . . . ,., . . . . . ,._,, , . . . . . . . . : , ........

~-:':~'~ With obst ructed constrnct ion, tile b~mcb lines shall be

[ to be installed across the beams, but sprinklers shall be cated in the bays and not unde r the beams.

S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Full scale fire testing shows upr igh t ESFR sprinklers may be installed unde r tile same criteria :us p en d en t ESFR sprinklers.

Note: Suppor t ing material is available for review at NFPA Headquar te r s . COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: It is unc lear fi 'om tile suppor t ing materi:d submi t t ed daat upriglat ESFR sprinklers will per form satisfactorily when installed with their deflectors loc~tted a dis tance between 6 inches to 14 inches below die ceiling. The Connni t tee believes that die suppor t ing material indicates dlat upr igh t ESFR sprinklers can be pos i t ioned with their deflectors between 3 inches to 7 irrches below the ceiling. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

574

Page 23: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 -- A99 ROC (Log #228)

Commit tee : AIJT~SS I 13- 79- (.5-11.5): Accept in Principle " S U B M r r r E R : Robert E. Duke, Fire Control , Inc. C O M M E N T ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-141, 13-150 RECOMMENDATION: Replace 5-I 1.5 t h rough 5-I 1.5.3 with the following:

4-11.5 Obst ruct ions to Sprinkler Discharge (Early Suppress ion Fast Response Sprinklers)

4-11.51 Obst ruct ions at or near the ceiling. Sprinklers shall be a r ranged to comply with Table 5-11.5.1 a n d

Figure 5-11.5.1 (Previous 4-11.5.1.2) for obst ruct ions at the ceiling such as bearm, dnc ts lights, and top chords of t russed and bar joists.

Exception: Sprinklers shall be permi t ted to be spaced on opposi te sides of obst ruct ions provided the dis tance f rom the center i ine on the obstruct ions to the sprinklers does no t exceed one-half the ,allowable dis tance between sprinklers.

Table 5-11.5.1 Positioning of Sprinklers to Avoid Obstructions to Discharge (ESFR Sprinkler)

Maximum Allowable Distance of Deflector

Distance from Sprinkler above Bottom of to Side of Obstruction ~a) Obstruction /in') ~b) Less than 1 ft 0 1 ft to less than 1 ft 6 in. ln/~ 1 ft 6 in. to less than 2 ft 3 2 ft to less than 2 ft 6 in. 5~/~ 2 ft 6 in. to less than 3 ft ~ 8 3 ft to less d lan 3 ft 6 in. 10 3 ft 6 in. to less than 4 ft 12 4 ft to less than 4 ft 6 in. 15 4 ft 6 in. to less than 5 ft 18 5 ft to less than 5 ft 6 in. 22 5 ft 6 in. to less than 6 ft 26 6 f t 31

For SI IJnits: 1 in. = 25.4 mm; 1 ft = 0.3048 m. '

Ceiling

Y

a ~l Obslruction

Figure 5-11.5.1 Positioning of sprinklers to avoid obstructions to discharge (ESFR sprinkler).

4-11.5.2 Isolated obst ruct ions below tile elevation of sprinklers. Sprinklers shall be installed below isolated non con t inuous obstruct ions which restrict only one spr inkler a n d ,are located below the elevation of sprinklers such ,as l ight f ixtures an d un i t heaters.

Except ion No. 1: Where obst ruct ions are 2 ft or less in width and sprinkler is located horizontally 12 in. or grea ter f rom the nearest edge of the obstruction.

Except ion No. 2: Where sprinklers are pos i t ioned widl respect to bo t tom of obst ruct ions in accordance with 4-11.5.1

4-11.5.3 Con t inuous obs t ruct ions below the sprinklers. Sprinklers shall be a r r anged to comply with Table 4-11.51. for

horizontal obst ruct ions entirely below the elevation of sprinklers witich restrict spr inkler d ischarge pat tern for two or more adjacent sprinklers such as ducts, lights, pil~es a n d conveyors.

Except ion No. 1: If Obstruction ts 2 in. or less in width an d is loca ted a m i n i m u m of 24 in. below the elevation of the sprinkler deflector or is p6s i t ioned a m i n i m u m of 12 in. horizontal ly f rom the sprinkler.

Except ion No. 2: If obstruct ion is 12 in. or less in width and located a m i n i m u m of 12 in. horizonuMly f rom the sprinkler.

Except ion No. 3: If obstruct ion is 24 in. or less in width and Ioca t eda m i n i m u m of 24 in. horizontally f rom the sprinkler.

5-11.5.3.1 Upr igh t sprinklers shall . . . . be installed on s r ings a r ranged so tha t tha t the deflector" ts a m t m m u m of ~Pm. above the top o f the sprinkler pipe.

5-11.5.3.2 ESFR sprinklers shall be posi t ioned a m i n i m u m of 12 in. horizontally f rom the neares t edge of any bo t tom chord of a bar jois t or open truss. It is pe rmi t t ed to deviate f rom the m a x i m u m sprinkler spacing to e l iminate obstruct ions created by steel trusses ,and bar joists by moving a single sprinkler a m a x i m u m of 1 ft f rom is s p a c i n g p a t t e r n provided coverage for tha t sprinkler does no t exceed 110sq ft a n d average spacing for the moved sprinkler an d the adjacent sprinklers on the same line pipe does no t exceed 100 sq ft. This does no t allow adjacent sprinklers on a Fine pipe to be moved f rom the spac ing pattern. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Proposals do not adequate ly ,address conflicts a n d confus ion in this section. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

[ 1. Accept tile submit ter ' s r e c o m m e n d a t i o n to revise Section 5- I 11.5 with the following changes: [ ~11 .5 Obst ruc t ions to Sprinkler Discharge (Early Suppress ion [ Fast Response Sprinklers). [ ~-11.5.1 Obst ruct ions at or near the ceiling. [ Sprinklers shall be a r ranged to comply with Table 5-I 1.5.1 and ] Figure 5-11.5.1 for obst ruct ions at the ceiling such as beams, ducts,

lights, and top chords of trusses a n d ha t joists. Except ion: Sprinklers shall be permi t ted to be spaced on

opposi te sides of obst ruct ions provided the dis tance f rom the center l ine on die obstruct ion~ to the sprinklers does no t exceed one-hal f the allowable dis tance between sprinklers.

Table 5-11.5.1.2 (13-4-11.5.1.2) Posi t ioning of Sprinklers to Avoid Obstructions to Discharge (ESFR

Sprinkler)

Distance from Sprinkler to Side of Obstruction (a)

Maximum Allowable Distance of Deflector

above Bottom of Obstruction (in.) (b)

Less than I ft 0 1 f t t o less than 1 ft 6 in. lX/~ 1 ft 6 in. to less than 2 ft 3 2 ft to less t han 2 ft fi in. 5 ~/~ 2 f t 6 in. to less than 3 f t 8 3 ft to less than 3 ft 6 in. 10 3 ft 6 in. to less than 4 f t 12 4 ft to less than 4 ft 6 in. 15 4 f t fi in. to less than 5 ft 18 5 ft to less than 5 ft 6 in. 22 5 ft 6 in. to less than 6 ft 26 6 ft 31

For SI Units: 1 in. = 25.4 mm; 1 ft = 0.3048 m.

575

Page 24: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

Ceiling

V

a

Obstruction

"1

Figure 5-11.5.1 Positioning of sprinklers to avoid obstructions to discharge (ESFR sprinkler).

5-11.5.2" Isolated obstructions below file elevation of sprinklers. Sprinklers shall be installed below isolated non continuous obstrtictions which restrict only one sprinkler and are located 13elow tile elevation of sprinklers sucb as light fixtures and unit heaters-

Exception No. 1: Where obstructionz arc is 2 ft or less in width and sprinkler is located borizontally 12 in. or greater f rom the nearest edge of tile obstrtiction.

Exception No. 2: Where sprinklers ,are positioned with respect to bot tom of obstructions in accordance widl 5-11.5.1.

Exception No. 3: If obstruction is 2 in. or less in width and is located a min imnm of 24 in. below the elevation of the sprinkler deflector or is positioned a minimum of 12 in. horizontally from tile sprinkler.

5-11.5.3 C, ont inuous obstructions below die sprinklers. Sprinklel.'s shMl be arranged to comply with Table 5_-11.5.1 for

horizor:al obstructions entirely below tile elevation of sprinklers which restrict sprinkler discharge pattern for two or more adjacent sprinklel.'s such as ducts, lights, pipes ~md conveyors.

Exception No. 1: If obstruction is 2 in. or less in width and is located a min imum of 24 in. below the elevation of die sprinkler (lefle{~tor or is positioned a min imum of 12 in. horizontally f rom tile spririkler.

Exce }tion No. 2: If obstruction is 12 in. or less in width :rod located a ntirtimmn of 12 in. horizontally from die sprinkler.

Exception No. 3: If obstruction is 24 in. or less in widdl and located a min imum of 24 in. horizontally from die spriukler.

.5-11.5.3.1 1Jpright sprinklers sh:dl be installed on springs arrailged so that the deflector is a minimum of 7 in. above tile top , f tbe slwinkler pipe.

r. r. , 9 ,2-11.,}.3._ ESFR sprinklers sh:dl be positioned a minimum of 12 iti. horizontally from the nearest edge of ,any bottom chord of a bar Ioist (til~ o )eli truss. It :.z pcrn-~tted to ~e-'P.tc from ~A;c. ;;;z':.-::.;nu.m.

. . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . /5 . . . . . . . ~ . . . . I " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * ~ . ~ v - , ,

: . : : . " :~:~d ! l(; ~q f: ::r:{! :::'er::ge cF~.s~.r:g for "J:e mc;'cd :prL"2:!er .".::1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t " . . . . . . 8 l " . . . . . . . . .

"2. Retnlnlher Sec, tiorl 5-11.5.3.2 it3 the Preprint appropriately and revise tl) read ax follows: "(13-4-11.5.3.2) Sprinklers installed under open gratings shall be .,~" ,t.., : ............. ~: ..... t ...... t :.....i ................... , ...... :~ shielded l'r,,m tile {lis(:harge of overhead sprinklers."

B. Add a new Section A-5-11.5.2 to read as follows: "Isolated obstructiotis that block adjacent sprinklers in a similar

nlainier should be treated as a cont inuous obstruction." 4. Add the following ~s arl exception to Sections 5-11.3.1 and 5-

11.2.2:

"It shall be permitted to deviate from tile maximum sprinkler spacing to eliminate obstructions created by trusses and bar joists by moving a sprinkler ,along a branch line a maximum of 1 ft f rom its allowable spacing provided coverage for that sprinkler does not exceed 110 sq ft ,and average spacing for the moved sprinkler and dae adjacent sprinklers on the same line pipe does not exceed 100 sq ft. Adjacent branch lines shall maintain the same pattern. In no instance shall sprinkler spacing exceed 12 ft."

5. Add a figure to Sections A-5-11.3.1 and A-5-11.2.2 as follows:

v

_ 6 1 t

1 0 - 0

t O - O

10..0

6 i t . I 6 f t

11-0

11~ o in:-'

| i -o

11..0

6 f t

v 1 4

l'- v 9 . 4

9 - C

6 f t

w

O f t

I0-0

I f t a m ~

10-0

1 0 - 0

_ 6 1 t

v

I'- A v 1 0 0

~" 10-0

_ 6 I l L

A v

10-0

* - 3 in.

i0 -0

-7 l o f t Oin

IO~ Oin

,o.o

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: 1. Tile changes to tile subntitter's

~ roposed language are considered editorial, Also see item four elow. 2. The Committee added appendix language to more clearly

indicate their intent with regard to isolated obstructions. 3. Tile renmnber ing is considered an editorial change. Tile

section was revised to indicate file committee's intent tbat sprinklers installed nnderneath open grate flooring are to be ESFR sprinklers that ,are shielded from overhead discharge. The use of other types of sprinklers is not permitted.

4. Tile Committee believes that die wording proposed by the snbmitter for Section 5-11.5.3.2 is more appropriately located as an exception for the requirements concerning sprinkler spacing and area of coverage.

5. Appendix materkd was added to more dearly indicate the new exceptions. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 25 NEGATIVE: 1

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: KEEPING: Tile Committee Action ,as printed bere strikes out the

second sentence in Section 5-11.5.3.2. This action is contrary to my notes. I was under the understanding that this text v~,Ls to be included. In fact, 1 have no memory of any discussion on this matter. I believe dae Committee's wishes <'ire not properly documented here ,and dlat die text should be returned. COMMENT ON AFFIRMATIVE:

LINDER: The Committee Action in Item 4 is incomplete. Tile exception should read: "It shall be permitted to deviate from the maximum sprinkler spacing to eliminate obstructions created by trusses and bar joists by moving a sprinkler along the branch line a maximum of 1 ft f rom its allowable spacing provided coverage for d3at sprinkler does not exceed 110 sq ft ~md the average spacing for the moved sprinkler and tile adjacent sprinkler do not exceed 100 sq ft. Adjacent branch lines sh~dl m~dntain the same 13attern. In no case shall the distance between sprinklers exceed 12 ft."

WALSH: The exceptions to 5-11.3.1 and 5-11.2.2 are incomplete. My notes show tbat the following should be added:

"Sprinkler does not exceed 110 sq ft and average spacing fi�r tile moved sprinkler and the adjacent sprinklers on the s:une line pipe does riot exceed 100 sq ft. Adjacent brmach lines shall mairltairi tile same pat tern. In no instance shall 12 ft be exceeded."

In 5-11.5.3.1 die word "springs" should be "sprigs."

576

Page 25: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

(Log #CC12) Commit tee : AI.IT~SS I

1% 80- (5-11.5.3.2): Accept SUBMITTER: Techni,:al Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-56

] RECOMMENDATION: Delete Figure 5-11.5.3.2 in the Preprint. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This figa~re has no relevance to the installation requ i rements for ESFR sprinklers. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #CC402) Commit tee: A! IT,SSI

1% 81- (5-11 .7) : Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1%56 RECOMMENDATION: Delete this section without any subst i tut ion. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This informat ion is current ly addressed by Sections 5-11.3.1 a n d 5-11.3.4 in the Preprint. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF C O M M I T r E E MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #162) Commit tee: AI IT~SSI

1% 82 - (5-12.2.1): Accept SUBMITTER: Kenne th E. I sman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1%56 RECOMMENDATION: Revise the nomina l orifice sizes f rom inches to K-factors. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Consis tent with odler act ions taken in the Report on Proposals to el iminate nomina l orifice sizes in inches. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept.

I COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Make this a global change t h r o u g h o u t the documen t . NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #149) Commit tee: AI.IT~SSI

1% 83 - (5-13.1.1 Exception No. 11): Accept SUBMITTER: Kenne th E. lsmma, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1%155 RECOMMENDATION: Add die p h r ~ e "or widrin" so that it reads:

"Sprinklers shall no t be requi red in tile space below insulat ion which is [aid directly on top of or within the ceilingjoist~ in an otherwise spr inklered attic." S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Tile insulat ion should not have to be on top of the ceiling joists to qualify for this exception. The concept is ~llid for spaces where the insulat ion is within combust ible ceiling joists and there is ml oflmrwise noncombus t ib le space between the insulat ion and the ceiling. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #C(2500) Commit tee : AI IT-AAC

1% 8 3 a - ([5-13.1.1 Exception No. 12]): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Correla t ing Commi t t ee on Automat ic Sprinkler Systenls COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1%160 RECOMMENDATION: Add a new second sen tence to Exception No. 12 of Section 5-13.1.1 of die Prepr int as follows:

"Such pipe cha.ses shall contain no sources of ignit ion, piping shall be non-combust ib le , and pipe penetrat iot ls at each floor shall be properly sealed." S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : The TCC believes that this commerl t correct.s a correlat ion issue and better qtmlifles the condi t ions unde r whicll die except ion is valid. This c o m m e n t suppor ts the premise d la t sprinklers can only be omit ted in concealed spaces where it is absolutely impractical to install sprinklers such as identif ied by Exceptions 1, 2, mad 3 or where combust ibles or ignition sources will no t be p resen t in d-re coricealed space. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept.

Please refer to f ront mat ter for Teclmical ( ;orrelating Colnmit tee ballot results.

(Log #166) Gommit tee: AUT-SSI

13- 8 4 - (5-13.4 (New) and A-5.13.4 Exception No. 2 ['art (b)) : Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Kenned i E. I sman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-154 RECOMMENDATION: Add a new except ion and an appendix note to 5-13.4 ~s follows:

"Exception No. 2: [)raft s tops and closely spaced sprinklers are not requi red for convenience openings that mee t all of the following criteria:

a) Such openings shall connec t a m a x i m u m of two :u[jacent stories (pierce one floor only), and

b) Such open ings shall be separated f rom unpro tec t ed vertical openings serving odler floors by a barrier with a fire resistance rating equal to tha t requi red for enclosure of floor openings by NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, and

c) Such openings shall be separate f rom corridors, and d) Such openings shall no t serve a.s a requi red m e a n s of egress,

alf l iougb they can serve as a requi red means of escape." "A-5-13.4, Exception No. 2, part b) Section 6-2.4.4 of the 1997

Life Safety ( 'ode requires a two h o u r separa t ion for enclosures connec t ing four stories or more in new construct ion, a one l lour separat ion for o ther enclosures in new construct ion, and a 30 minu te separat ion for existing buildings. Special rules for residential construct ion exist in chapters 16-20." S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : These open ings are becoming popular in residential construct ion. A large a p a r t m e n t bui lding or c o n d o m i n i u m is built wifll each dwelling un i t having two floors. Tile small staircase leading to the bed rooms on tile second floor. (within the dwelling unit) shou ld not be requi red to have draft stops and closely spaced sprinklers. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

I Accept the submit ter ' s p roposed language for the exception and I append ix material with the following revision: I Add "within individual dwelling units" so tile except ion reads: ] "Dr:fit s tops and closely spaced sprinklers are no t requi red for ] convenience openings within individual dwelling uni ts that meet I "'"' The r emainder of tim exception and appenciix language to ] remain a,s submit ted .

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Technical Commi t tee agrees with the submit ter ' s substant ia t ion that closely spaced sprinklers and draft stops a r o u n d convenience openings are not nece,~sary within dwelling units only. Tile submit ter ' s l anguage was revised to reflect this. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

5 7 7

Page 26: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

(Log #CC405) Committee: AI 7T~SSI

13- 85 - (5-13.6.1): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Committee on Sprinkler System h)stallati on C'riteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13.164 RECOMMENDATION: 1. Delete the proposed second sentence to Section 5-13.6.1.

2. Add a new second paragraph to Section A-5-13.6.1 to read as follows:

"The National Elevator (;ode (ASME AI 7.1) allows tile sprinklers within 2 ft of the bottom of the [)it to be exempted fi-om the special arraugements of inhibiting watecflow until elevator recall h~rs occurred." SUBSTANTIATION: These changes more appropriately reflect the ar rangement |~ernfitted by the current edition of ASME Al 7.1. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #220) Committee: AI TT~SSI

13. 86 - ([5-13.8.1 ] 4-13.7.1 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Phillip A. Brown, Aaneric;m Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-165 RECOMMENDATION: Revise text to read as follows:

4-13.7.1 Sprinklers shMI be instxdled under roofs or canopies over are~Ls where combustible are stored or handled.

Exception: Sprinklers are pernfitted to be omitted where construction is noncombust ible or limited combustible and al'e~LS under roofs or canupies are not used for storage or handling of combustibles. . • not exceeding., that, of light_ hazard,, OCCUpancy. SUBSTANTIATION: The term "not used for storage or handling" has led to interpretations dlat nodfing can be under the roof or canopy. This would inclu}te items such as newspaper dispensing machines, artificial plants, tables, etc. A clarification is needed to quantify "storage or handling." COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Revise Section 5-13.8 in the Preprint to read as follows: "5-13.8 Exterior Roofs or Canopies. 5-13.8.1 Sprinklers shall be installed under exterior root,s or

canopies exceeding 4 ft (1.2m) in width. Exception: Sprinklers are permitted to be omitted where the

canopy or roof is of noncombust ible or limited combustible construction.

5-13.8.2" Sprinklers shall be installed under roofs or cauopies over are:ts where combustibles are stored or handled.

A-5-13.8.2 Short term transient storage such ~s delivered packages, and the presence of planters, newspaper machines, etc. should not be considered storage or handling of combustibles," COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Technical Committee has revised these paragraplls to better describe where sprinklers are required under exterior c~tnopies. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #218) Committee: A! IT~SSI

1% 87- ([5-13.9.1] 4-13.8.1): Accept SUBMITTER: Phillip A. Brown, ?uneric=m Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-168 RECOMMENDATION: Add a new sentence at tile end of 4-13.8.1 to read as follows:

"The ,trea occupied by a noncombustible dill height s h , w e r / h a t h t u b enclosure shall not he required to be added to the floor area when determining the area of the bad, room." SUBSTANTIATION: This should be added to NFPA 13 in order t , provide a consistent approach with NFPA 13R which tout;tins the p r . p . s e d seuteuce in 2-6, Exception No. 1. This is not an

issue of b e i u g a separate compartment , but tile same logical approach should apply to both standards. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept.

This section has been renumbered as 5-13.9.1. NUMBER' OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #167) Committee: AI.IT~q;S I

13- 88- (5-13.19.1 Exception No. 3 (New)): Reject SUBMITTER: Kenneth E. Ismma, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13.170 RECOMMENDATION: Accept Proposal 13.170 (Log #119) ;ts written in this r enumbered section. SUBSTANTIATION: Return bends for ESFR sprinklers are impossible to install due to their requirement to be within 14 in. of the ceiling. Tile large orifice will allow any sediment to clear once tile sprinkler h~Ls opened. The screens and strainers required will not allow larger obstructions into tile piping. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Technic=d Committee is concerned that sediment will accmnulate on the mp of the sprinkler over time and negatively impact sprinkler performance. The Tedmical Committee also notes that no new support ing material or data has been submitted. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23 NEGATIVE: 3

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: (;ERDES: I agree with p roponent that obstruction is unlikely

based on orifice size, screens and strainers. Return bends for ESFR sprinklers are unnecessary.

ISMAN: Our negative ballot is based on the knowledge that a fire pump taking suction from a pond or reservoir is already required to have two screens and a filter over the pump intake to protect it from getting objects into the pipe. This is better protection than many public water mains. FM has allowed these installations without return bends. FM knows more about ESFR sprinklers than anybody. Why should we be more stringent than FM?

SCHIRMER: Change to negative. I agree with Mr. Isman's statement.

(Log #110) Committee: AI ~T~SSI

13- 89 - (5-14.1.1.13): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Gary S. Andress, Wausau HPR Engineering COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13.56 RECOMMENDATION: Revise text to read .as follows:

5-14.1.1.13 .When using pressure regallating devices for sprinkler control valves, provide a drain outlet connection a n d / o r riser sized to allow flowing the regallating device at tile sprinkler s~tem demand. SUBSTANTIATION: Currendy NFPA 25 requires that these valves be "full flow tested" every "5 years," with results "compared to previous test results." Currently, NFPA 13 and 25 .tssumes that tile acceptance or previous 5 year results are always available, and NEPA 13 does not provide for a relatively easy alternative in the very possible event that they are not. This can easily be accomplished at the time of insudlation by including a c~tpped outlet downstream of the control valve. In high rise structures where these valves are typically used, a drain riser is included, and may be sized for this discharge, instead of d)e mininnun size needed for inspector's testing and draining. This minor accouunockttion will allow authorities having jurisdiction to witness satisfactory flow testing of these valves at sprinkler demand flow rates (including different demand flow rates than those used to set the valve for the original installation) many years later without requiring significant modific=ttion to file system. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Add a new Section 5-14.1.2.5 to read: "Means shall be provided downstream of all pressure reducing

valves for flow tests at sprinkler system demand."

578

Page 27: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This revised language more appropriately addresses the submitter's concern and clarifies the Committee's intent. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 ' VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #174) Committee: AUT~SSI

13- 90 - (5-14.1.1.13): Accept in Principle SUBMITTERa Gary S. Andress, Wansau HPR Engineering

' COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-56 RECOMMENDATION: Revise text to read as follows:

5-14.1.1.13 When using pressure regallating devices for sprinkler control valves, provide a drain outlet connection and /o r riser sized to .allow flowing the regulating device at the sprinkler system demand. SUBSTANTIATION: Currently, NFPA 25 requires that tilese valves be "full flow tested" every "5 years," with results "compared to previous test results." Currently, NFPA 13 and 25 assumes that the acceptance or previous 5 year results are always available, and NFPA 13 does not provide for a relatively easy alternative in the very possible event that they ,are no t This can easily be accomplished at file time of installation by including a capped outlet downstream of the control valve. In high rise structures where these w, dves are typically used, a drain riser is included, and may be sized for tltis discharge, instead of the minimum size needed for inspector's testing ,and draining. This minor accommodation will allow authorities having jurisdiction to witness satisfactory flow testing of these valves at sprinkler demand flow rates (including different demand flow rates than those used to set the valve for the original installation) many years later without requiringsignificant modification to the system. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Committee Action and Statement to Comment 13-89 (Log #110). NUMBER OF COMMI'ITEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #188) Committee: AUT~SSI

13- 91 - ([5-14.1.3.1] 3-3): Reject SUBMITTER: Thomas H. Miller, Varley-Campbell & Assoc., Inc./Glen Ellyn Vol Fire Co. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-60 RECOMMENDATION: The text presently in NFPA No. 24 shotfld remain. SUBSTANTIATION: This is another example of the attempt to force fit two documents together. Outside PIVs can be very vahmble in controlling supplies to automatic sprinkler systems. The control valves at the base of a riser may be inaccessible under some fire conditions and underground valves may take considerable effort to reach them. In addition, quick action through PIVs can divert water supplies to viable sprinkler systems under trying conditions. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Technical Committee does not believe that PIV's shonld be mandatory for connections from the private fire service main to the building. Section 5-14.1.1.1 of the Preprint currently requires control valves on all sources of water supply. Additionally, appendix material concerning PIV's has been added in Section A-5-14.1.3. The Technical Committee also notes that where private fire service mains will be used to support manual fire fighting operations, the installation of such systems will be addressed by NFPA 14, Standard for the Installation of Standpipe and Hose Systems. Also see Committee Action on Comment 13-233 (Log #CC408). NUMBER OF COMMITrEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #116) Committee: AIJT~SSI

13- 92- (5-14.1.4,2): Accept SUBMrrrER: Robert A. Williams, MS State Rating Bureau COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a

[ RECOMMENDATION: Reference to Figure A-2-6(b) should read: Figure A-5-15.2(b). SUBSTANTIATION: Editorial. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #CC4 ! 6) Committee: AUT~SS I

13- 93 - ([5.14.3.2.3, 5-14.3.2.5]): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-56

J RECOMMENDATION: Replace the language of.Section 5-14.3.2.3 in the Preprint with tilat of Section 5-14.3.2.5and delete Section 5- 14.3.2.5 without replacement. SUBSTANTIATION: Both sections contain duplicate information. The language from NFPA 24 was used a.s it provides more detail. COMMITr£E ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMIT!T.E MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #151) Committee: AUT,SSI

13- 94- (5-14.3.9.6): Accept in Principle SUBMI'I'rRR: Kenneth E. lsman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-172a RECOMMENDATION: Delete just the words, "or suspected." SUBSTANTIATION: Too difficult to enforce. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. COMMrFrEE STATEMENT: See Committee Action on Comment 13-96 (Log #CCA09). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITI'EE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #214) Committee: AUT~SSI

13- 95 - (5-14.3.2.6): Reject SUBMITr£R: J im Brunetti, Central Sprinkler Co. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-172a RECOMMENDATION: Revise text:

5-14.3.2.6 In areas with water supplies known or suspected to !==vc contributed-to corrosion, deposit build-up or microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) of metallic sprinkler system piping, system comnonents and water supplies shall be tested and appropriately treated. P~c= tc fi!l!~g ~.r ".c=~=g ~.f mc'..~l'c F'p'r.g z)=tc..~. (13-172a) SUBSTANTIATION: M1C is only one form of corrosion that can take place in all steel or mixed metal systems. All internal corrosion must be addressed forf i re sprinkler systems. Other types of corrosion include, but are not limited to tuberculation, dezincification, galvanic corrosion, under deposit corrosion build- up or deposition, acidic and alkaline corrosion. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Technical Committee wishes to focus only on MIC where it has been identified as aproblem. Treatments for dais condit ionare readily available. It is not the intent of the Committee to require testing for all water supply conditions that could result in corrosion or deposit buildup during the life of the system. Such an evaluation is subject to a high degree of subjectivity and would be difficult to enforce.

579

Page 28: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N ~ A 13 1 A 9 9 R O C

Additionally, t r ea tments for ,all such condi t ions du r ing system installation are no t readily available. Compl iance with NFPA 25 will ensure that the effects of corrosion a n d deposi t bui ldup will be minimized du r ing the life of the system. Also see Commi t t ee Action on C o m m e n t 13-96 (Log #CC409). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 25 NEGATIVE: 1

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: CAPUT(.): I agree with the Commi t t ee S ta tement that

compl iance with NFPA 25 will ensure the effects of corrosion, etc. Unfortunately, NFPA 25 has not been adop ted in ,all areas ( inchlding the State of C;difornia) a n d as such, I believe this issue shou ld be c o m m e n t e d on in NFPA 13.

affecting system componen t s? Does chlor ine or some o ther chemical in sn f f iden t quant i ty to kill MIC cause damage to valve seats, spr inkler componen t s , gaskets, etc.? We have recently identif ied hydrocarbons as affecting certain c o m p o n e n t s an d here we are advising users to add chemicals to the supply. In addit ion, ~ t h o u g h it may be possible to initially t reat a supply when filling, how can a water supply be t reated when testing? Each t ime we flow an inspector 's test connect ion , new potentially MIC, laden water is in t roduced. How does the owner ensure that t reated water is used when flowing. The annua l inspector 's test connect ion? Will a p ropor t ioner type device be used to inject the necessary chemical in the proper percentage? Is this device 11L listed for its i n t ended use?

Al though I agree, some th ing needs to be done . I believe that placing this in the s tandard at this t ime may present addit ional unan t i c ipa ted problems. Addit ional t ime is r equ i red to fidly develop appropr ia te solutions.

(Log #CC409) Commit tee : AUT~SSI

13- 9 6 - ([5-14.3.2.6]): I TCC NOTE: The TCC directs that the phrase "prior to filling or

testln, g of.metall ic piping systems". . be retalned. . . ThLs acuon corrects a confhct with the TC's substantmuon. The

TCC agrees with the TC that Microbiologically In f luenced Corrosm" n (MIC) only af fec ts metallic p iping sys tems and this action reflects this. The TCC also agrees that MIC is not a one time event as indicated in the substantiation. However , because NFPA 13 applies to the installation of new systems or modifications to ex i s t i ngsys t ems , once the system is in service NFPA 25 is applicable. There fore , the TCC bel ieves that the water supply s h o u l d b e treated prior to filling the system. SUBMITTER: Teclmical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-172a RECOMMENDATION: 1. Relocate Section 5-14.3.2.6 of the Prepr in t as 9-1.3 of the Preprint , r e n u m b e r the existing sections accordingly mad revise to read:

"In areas with water suppl ies known cr = u ~ c z t c ~ to have con t r ibu ted to microbiologically in f luenced corrosion (MIC) of spr inkler system piping, water supplies shall be tested a n d appropriately t reated v . . . . . . . . . . . . . e, . . . . . . . . . ~, . . . . . . . . . . . r ' v ' - - e ,

o ! . . . . . . . .

2. R e n u m b e r existing Section 8-3 of the Prepr int ,as Section 8-2 a n d r e n u m b e r exist ing Section 8-2 as 8-3.

3. Add a new Section 8-2.1 enti t led 'Water Supply Capacity Informat ion" ,and use the cu r ren t text of Section 8-3 in the Preprint s tar t ing with '"]'he following informat ion shall be ..."

4. Add a new Section 8-2.2 ent i t led '~Water Supply T r e a t m e n t Informat ion" to read ,as follows:

"The following in format ion shall be inc luded where requi red by Section %1.3:

(a) Type of condi t ion that requires t rea tment . (b) Type of t r ea tmen t n e e d e d to address the problem. (c) Details of t r ea tmen t plan."

S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : 1. This r e q u i r e m e n t was relocated as the Technical C, ommi t t ee believes the r e q u i r e m e n t per ta ins to water supply concerns a n d no t to the installation of system piping. The phrase "prior to filling or test ing of met,allic p iping systems" was removed as the t r ea tmen t of MIC is no t necessarily a discrete one t ime event and MIC has been known only to effect metallic p iping systems. The te rm "suspected" was removed as it is difficult to verify and enforce.

2,3,and 4. I t i s the in tent of the Technical C, ommi t tee that any informat ion conce rn ing the t r ea tmen t of MIC be documen ted . COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 25 NEGATIVE: 1

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: SC, HI~LTZ: The C, ommi t t ee has p roposed requ i rements for MIt,'

wi thout sufficient informat ion be ing provided to the users. Yes, MIC' is a p rob lem in certain areas, bu t there is still discussion on how to test and treat a supply. I have heard that the in t roduct ion of chlor ine into the water supply in sufficient quanti t ies will kill the majority of MIC,. Certain types of MIC will no t respond to chlor ine and require d i f ferent chemical t rea tment . Has UL investigated the possibility of chlor ine or some o ther chemicals

(Log #128) Commit tee : AIJT~SSI

13- 9 7 - ([5-14.3.2.6] 4-14.4.2.5): Reject SUBMITTER: Myron Shenkiryk, Herc Products Inc. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-172a RECO MMENDATION: Add the following text:

ff tubercles or nodules ,are identif ied in die existin~ n in in¢ svstem, nrior to fil l inu with t reated water the tubercles an d nodules mus t b e removed f rom the o in inu surface. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : ff tubercles or nodules exist, filling the system with t reated water will no t ,affect the bacteria living u n d e r n e a t h the protective tubercles or nodules. Therefore , they mus t be removed.

Note: Suppor t ing material available for review at NFPA H eadquar te r s . COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This c o m m e n t addresses existing systems wlfich are outside the scope of NFPA t3. Th e issues raised by this c o m m e n t shou ld be submi t ted to NFPA 25, St~mdard for the Inspection, Testing, a n d Maintenasace of Water-Based Fire Protect ion Systems. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VO TE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #197) Commit tee : AI.IT,SSI

13- 98 - (5-14.4, 5-16, etc.): Reject SUBMITTER: Richard E. Thonn ings , Amer ican Insurance Services Group, Inc. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-56 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Delete all references to fire service mains and ,associated material f rom NFPA 24. This material shou ld remain in NFPA 24. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Materi,al on private fire service re:fins does not be long in a spr inkler installation s tandard . For new sprinkler installations, the u n d e r g r o u n d is typically installed by different people than the sprinkler piping. I agree with Mr. Keeping's c o m m e n t abou t the need for main ta in ing NFPA 24. NFPA 24 shou ld be mainta ined, and if tha t is the case, then there is no need to clutter up NFPA 13.

It is no t practical to require tile public to call out each specific referenci~ to NFPA 24 materi,al in the p roposed new Chapter 5 of NFPA 13. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Commit tee believes that the u n d e r g r o u n d main connec t ing the sprinkler system with its water supply is ,an integral part of the sprinkler system and its installation shou ld be inc luded in NFPA 13. Additionally, where u n d e r g r o u n d mains will be installed for private fire service purposes , this will be addressed by NFPA 14, S tandard for the Installation of Standpipe and Hose Systems. NFPA 14 is current ly u n d e r revision and its scope will be e x p a n d e d to include this informat ion. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VO TE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

580

Page 29: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

~ A 13 i A99 R O C

(Log #CC413) (;ommittee: AI IT,SSI

13- 99 - ([5-14.4.2]): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation C, riteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-56

I RECOMMENDATION: In Section 5-14.4.2.1 of die Preprint, delete the phrase "to die satisfaTction of the autlmrity having jurisdict ion." SUBSTANTIATION: This phrase is unnecessary ,as tile requirements of NFPA 13 are to be enforced by tile autlmrity having jurisdiction. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #117) Committee: AUT,SSI

13- 102- (5-14.4.3.3): Accept SUBMITTER: Robert A. Williams, MS State Rating Bureau COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a

I RECOMMENDATION: Ch,'mge reference at end of paragraph from 7-1.2 to 3-4.9. SUBSTANTIATION: 7-1.2 is now 3-4.2 in the 13 Preprint. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #118) Committee: AIJT~SS I

13- 100- (5-14.4.3.1 Exception): Accept SUBMITTER: Robert A. WiUiams, MS State Rating Bureau COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a

I RECOMMENDATION: Change reference f rom 3-5.2 to 3-4.2. SUBSTANTIATION: Paragraph 3-4.2 seems to be tile more tgpoPrO P riate-

MMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #CC415) Committee: AI.IT~SSI

13- 103- ([5-15.2,1}): Accept SUBMITTEI~ Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-56

I RECOMMENDATION: Do not institute tile changes proposed by the ROP. Section 5-15.9.1 will now read as follows:

"A fire depa r tmen t connect ion shall be provided as described in tiffs section. (See Figure 5-15.2.1.)" SUBSTANTIATION: This comment is a result of action taken on Comment 1 3-46 (Log #89). COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMI'FFEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #CG411) Committee: AUT~SSI

13- 101 - ([5-14.4.3.1]): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-56 RECOMMENDATION: Add new Exception No. 2 ,and 3 to Section 5-14.4.3.1 to read as follows:

"Exception No. 2: Fire service mains shall be permit ted to enter tile building adjacent to the foundation.

Exce. ption No . :.3" Where ,adjacent, structnres, or . . . . physical condit ions make it impractical to locate risers immediately reside an exterior wall, such risers shall be permit ted to be located ,as close ,'~ practical to exterior walls to minimize unde rg ronnd piping under tlae building." SUBSTANTIATION: These exceptions were added to provide more inforrnation on locating unde rg round fire service mains near building walls ,and foundations. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 25 NEGATIVE: 1

EXPLANATION OF NEGAT~E: CAPIJTO: I disagree witll tlae inclusion of Exception No. 3 due

to die ambiguous wording, ",as close ,as practical." This will lead to contractors installing unde rg round pipe to risers located in interior rooms widlin buildings, witllout a requi rement to provide inspection t rench plates. The practice of installing underg round mains below building floors is ill-advised and should not be permit ted by tltis standard. COMMENT ON AFFIRMATIVE:

SCHULTZ: I agree with what is being written but I tlaink the wording is not clear. The use of tile term "adjacent to tile foundat ion" needs clarification. I would r ecommend that Exception No. 2 be rewritten:

"Exception No. 2: Fire service mains s/tall be permit ted to run underneadl a footing or penetrate a foundat ion wall if the main rises immediately inside the building close to the exterior wall."

(Log #CC414) Committee: AI.IT,SS I

13- 104- ([5-15.2.3.5, ~15.2.3.8]): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-56

I RECOMMENDATION: Replace the first paragraph in Section ,5- 15.2.3.5 in tile Prepr int widl tllat f rom Section 5-15.2.3.8 ,and delete Section 5-15.2.3.8 in its entirety. SUBSTANTIATION: These two sections conta ined duplicate information. The requi rement from NFPA 24 was preserved ,as it

rovides more specific information. OMMITTEE ACTION: Accept.

NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #CC13) Committee: AI.IT~SSI

13- 105 - ([Figure 5-15.4.1] Figure 4-15.4.1): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-56

I RECOMMENDATION: Move Figure 5-15.4.1 in the Preprint to the appendix. SUBSTANTIATION: This figure provides advisory information tlaat should be located in tlae appendix. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

581

Page 30: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

(Log #CC406) Commit tee : AUT~SS I

13- 106- ([5-15.5]): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-56 RECOMMENDATION: 1. Revise S e c t o n 5-15.5 to read ,as follows:

5-15.5 Hose Connec t ions 5-15.5.1 One- a n d One-Hal f Inch Hose Connect ions . 5-15.5.1.1"(231-5-3.1, 231G-5-5, 231[)-4-4.1, 231E-4-4, 23117-.5-4.1)

Where requi red by Sections 7-3, 7-4, 7-5, 7-6, a n d 7-7, smzdl (1 1 /2 in.) hose lines shall be available to reach ,all por t ions of tile storage area. The hose connec t ions shall no t be requi red to meet the r equ i rements of Class II hose systems def ined by NFPA 14, Stmadard f o r the Installation of S tandpipe and Hose Systems. Hose connect ions shall be suppl ied f rom one of the following:

(a) ()utside hydrants (b) A separate piping system for small hose stations (c) Valved hose connec t ions on sprinkler risers where such

connect ions are ma de ups t r eam of all sprinkler control ~tlves (d) Adjacent spr inkler systems (e I In rack s torage areas, the ceiling sprinkler system in the same

area (,as long as in-rack sprinklers :ire provided in tile same area and are separately control led) .

A-5-15.5.1.1 (231E-4-4) In areas used to store haled cotton, due considerat ion to access aisle conf igura t ion shon ld be given wifla m a x i m u m hose lengths not exceeding 100ft. Additiomdly, in these are`as, where a separate piping system is used to supply hose lines it shou ld be in accord, 'mce with NFPA 14.

5-15.5.1.2" (13-4-13.20) [use cur rent text f rom 5-13.22 in the i ' repr int and carry the associated append ix material] .

5-15.5.2 (1%4-13.21) [use cur ren t text f rom 5-13.23 in the I ' repr int and carry the ,associated append ix material] . S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : These changes :ire editorial in na ture `as they consolidate a n d centralize existing requ i rements concern ing hose connect ions . Also see C o m m e n t 13-159 (Log #48). COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #140) Commit tee : AI IT~SSI

13- 107- (5-16): Accept SUBMITTER: Kenne th E. Ismml, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. C O M M E N T O N PROPOSAL NO: 1"?-56

I RECOMMENDATION: Delete all of Section 5-16. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Requi rements for fire hydrants do not t ,elong in a fire sprinkler s tandard. Take for example Section 5- 16.2.1, which requires hydrant.s and fire flow. It is our unde r s t and ing that Iris h`as been `assigned hy the Standards Council to the NFPA Commi t t ee on Standpipes. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: NFPA 14, S tandard for the Installation of S tandpipe and Hose Systems, will m}w address lifts informat ion. NFPA 14 is u n d e r revision and will have its scope e x p a n d e d to include this in lbrmat ion. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #170) Commit tee : AUT~SS I

1:?- 108 - (5-16 to 5-35 and 7-5.5 to 7-5.34): Accept in Principle in P : t r t

SUBMITTER: Kenne th E. I sman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-56, 13-81 to13-97b, 13-212 to 13-241 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Delete the unnecessary sections of extracted material i n c l u d i n g the following:

v. " V . , ) r . ~ v . ~ ) ¢ 9 c} 9 V. 9 v . V~ .}-llJ, .}-_0.3.2, :}-,7.2.1, 5-27 . . . . . '.}-,8.3, :}-35.3, 5-35.6, 7-5.24.3, 7- 5.30.21.

Also, replace "heads" wid] "sprinklers" in 5-17.5.4 an d d l roughou t the documen t .

In addit ion, rel~lace orifice sizes with nonfinal K-factors in 5- 25.2.3 ,and elsewhere to fit the style of NFPA 13. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : These i tems are no t related to installation or d ischarge criteria for sprinkler s~stems m~d shou ld t~ot be used ,as part of dae extractions. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle in Part.

See C o m m e n t 13-107 (Log #140) conce rn ing Section 5-16. See C o m m e n t 13-115 (Log #31) conce rn ing Section 5-20.5.2. See C o m m e n t 1 3-125 (Log #38) conce rn ing Sections 5-27.2.1 arid

5-27.2.2. See C o m m e n t 13-133 (Log #46) conce rn ing Sections 5-35.5 and-5-

35.6. See C o m m e n t 13-213 (Log #70) conce rn ing Section 7-5.24.3. See C o m m e n t 13-219 (Log #76) conce rn ing Section 7-5.30.21. Accept the snbmit ter ' s r e c o m m e n d e d action to repktce the term

"heads" widl "sprinklers" and to replace sprinkler orifice sizes with nomina l K-factors d l r o n g h o n t d]e s tandard. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The individual c o m m e n t s re ferenced address die submit ter ' s concerns. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VO TE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #19) Commit tee : AUT~SS I

13- 109- (5-16.3.3): Reject SUBMITTER: J o h n J . Walsh, Uni ted Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1:?-61 RECO MMENDATION: (A) Place a period ,after the word grade.

(B) Add an except ion to read: Exception: When located in a hose house, the center of a hose

out let shall be not less than 12 inch (305 ram) above the floor. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Editorial to clarify the Commit tee ' s intent. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Informat ion on fire hydr:mts will be moved to NFPA 14, S tandard for the Installation of Standpipe and Hose Systems. Also see C o m m e n t 13-107 (Log #140). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 2{; VO TE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #28) Commit tee : A[ IT~SSI

13- 110 - ([5-17] Chapter 4 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlat ing Commi t t ee ou Automat ic

rinkler Systems MMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-81

RECOMMENDATIO N: The Technical Correla t ing C{mmlittee reviewed all proposals f rom tile Teclmical (£;ommittee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (T(:SSIC) and TC ou Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that c~dl for the extraction of spr inkler system informat ion f rom other NFPA d o c u m e n t s into NFPA 13 us ing NFPA's Extract Policy. The TC, C directs that the TCSSIC arid TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 th rough 13-97h an d 13-212 dwough 1 :?-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropria te , necessary, and complete , and that it does not contain unenforceab le language. Where material is being extracted from a r e c o m m e n d e d practice or a guide, the TGC directs that it be Ioc~tted in the append ix of NFPA 13. Additionally, informat ion shou ld be consol idated where possihle. The T(;C also indicated that tile option of re ferenc ing tile informat ion radmr than extracting it shou ld no t be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal , a public c o m m e n t f rom the TC, C will automatically be snbmit ted .

While this r e c o m m e n d a t i o n applies to all proposals tha t call for extraction, the TCC specifically identif ied Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFt'A 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requir ing special at tent ion.

582

Page 31: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from die Automatic Sprinklers Technical Gorrelating Committee in accordazice with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of die Regulations Governing Committee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Revise section 5-17 to read as follows: 5-17 (NFPA 42), Storage of Pyroxylin Plastic. (13-81)

5-17.1 (42-1-.3) See NgPA 42 for applicable terms not defined in Chapter 1.

5-17.2 x (42-3-4.3) Where sprinkler systems ,are provided folm Isolated Storage Buildings per NFPA 42, Section 3-4.3, sprinklers shall be spaced so that there is one sprinkler per 32 sq ft.

5-17.3 x (42-3-4.4) Sprinklers in Isolated Storage Buildings used for storage of loose scl:tp of pyroxylin plastic shall be instalied in tile ratio of one sprinkler for each 1,000 lb of storage.

Exception: The ratio in 5-17.3 need not apply if die scrap of pyroxylin plastic is in t;tnks or other receptacles kept filledwith water.

5-17.4 x (42-4-2.10) -a kd)incta hc!.~!ing c;;'cr .~f 50 ! ! ; of p;.':-c:xy!in

i d" , ;";d 'c-d h~:r; two or mere c o m p a r t m e n t , Where cabinets are required to he sprinklered, they shall have at least one automatic sprinkler iu each coml,artment.

5-17..~* x Vat,hs (;ontaining Pyroxylin Plasdc.

r. ~,7 r. , . . . t , , , n .3 .3.7) Shcl:"ng --"~ ..... ~.0 : . . . . . . ~.o o~..,~ ~.. -c

t'z:c:.J~%te z!~stri!3:zt'~c.:; of ; ; .%tot froT, i a:ltcmatJc c.pr'~nk!erg. S[~e|;'es shall be ca::.-.tr::cted v:'d: a I ~n. apace 5etween alatc not/c.~c, than 1 / 2 ::or greater titan 2 4-u. ;vldc and al~a!! !)e per:ratted to !)c made

3rz?.'.c!ed te cli;'~de raeka k;tc aectiona. Means alzal./:'Se prc:':.c!ed to ..... t-" the st?el: c.r cc.::a~:~cra cn car!" a~de of ZllCll pardtic.na I in. ........ # \ ..... +I ........ .1,i ..... D..ol ...... *..~.*~.I ~ A .l ..... l.~ll ..~

*I ..... ~ ac+ I...I ......... .'~.l.l .... ]..g1..~.~... Itff~,~.%.l .l...ll .... * I .... , ...... I ~...

~ l " " . . n . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t ' I " " & . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

" i l ............... & . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , ....................... l .................. U : . . . . . . . A K I t ' / K 1 1 . , \ . . . . A ~ ' : . . . . . A K I ~ " ] K | [ k \ 1

5-17,5.2 x (42-4-4.1) Vauhs shall be equipped with automatic sprinklers, with a ratio of one sprinkler to each 834 Ib of pyroxylin }kcstic, or one sprinkk r to each 125 cu f t of tot;d vault space.

5-17.5.3 x (42-4-4.2) A vanlt that is divided into two or more sections s h a l l have at l e2k~t one automatic sprinkler in each section.

r. ~'7 r. ~ x (~.2 A 1..3) el . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ r._,a~-..~...u ~ . . . . . . . . . . :a...~ . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l . . . . . . . . . .

facilPaXc ~o':'crat';cn of ;-=inkJcra ~,r , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . .4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . :~

~1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :

a-17.a.av" v. ~. x (42-4-4.5) Sprinkler systems for ~tults shall be equipped with a 1-in. drip line with a ] / 2 in. outlet valve.

5-17.6 x T.te-Box Storeroom for Pyroxylin Plastic.

~ I~/I'. I . . I A C ~ A ~ 7 Q \ l ~ . - I . . . . *I .... I . . l l ~ . . - - . - . ~ . * l . o o * l ~ . . - , A ; .... e .......... \ ....... / ...................................................

;'a:;rt: tl:a:: (5 ix:..;"~e ~ or .a .ccpcr tl?:z:? o n e tctc l - s x of ('.[:ms A :::a:erlal ~;:" t;;'c ta,*c E~x-ea af C!;'ma E materia!z. T!-e d';c:a::ce I...+ ....... oi...I ..... I.-.II ] .... + I~..o* 9 ;.-. ..... ÷ ~ +I ..... +l.a Aa..*l. ~.F *I.~

*..+.. ] ........ ~2].~I ...... I...I] | ...... ..~* .... *..~I ~4: ~].., . . . . , . . . . . o :..

w M c , :;'~t!: at !-east I i:~. c c i ' a : a t : . o : ~ , a:x! a!'a!! ! r e p c r : : = : . t : e d tc !;-c :::a.'!e cf h'e.n pipe, r2:!s, c! 'anneE, ::ng]es, er : ' : c a ' . ! e n e!a*~. A':!e ........... ,- . . . , ...... , ~g! .'t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ft s!:a!! !~c pra;~,~e?.. Hc ~t of raekz .s not ta be

" I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5-17.11.2" x (42-4-7.9) Sprinkler protection shall be provided for tile tote-box storeroom, shall consist ing of one sprinkler in the center of the aisle immediately in front of fl~e dividing partition between each pair of sections, with proper baffles between heads. [See Figure A-5-17.6.2 (a) (40E-4-7(b).l

5-17.7 *x Finished Stock Storeroom for Pyroxylin Pk~tic.

5 17.7.1 x ( t2 4 8.5) Slatted :hc:;'ez aha!! not cxcce;! g ft deep with ;'ert;.ca! ~-2-~.f2:'.: at !e~t e-'ery Aft ~ac.L~ ."~d d':%:.cn: s ! z v2 ! ~ e

i J . . . . . . . . . . ! ~ . . u . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , v , " / . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " Z T ' d L ' Z 7 2

~ n r ~ l . I a e A o R ~ o t ~ r e

5-17.7.2 x (42-4-8.7) In the center of the aisle opposite each section automatic sprinklers shall be installed with proper h:fffles between sprinklers.

5-17.7..3 x (4~ 4-9) Special Rooms for Stock in Shippirlg Cases.

5-17.7.3 x (42-4-9.4) The special room shall be protected by antomafic sprinklers, with at least one sprinkler for each 64 sq ft

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This meets the intent of submitter concerning die installation criteria extracted from NFPA 42. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #148) Committee: AI JT~SSI

13- 111 - (5-17 and %5.6): Accept SUBMITTER: Kenneth E. Isman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-81, 13-21.3

I RECOMMENDATION: Correct tile reference for Pyroxylin Plastic. O n e p r o p o s a l references NFPA 42 while the other references NFPA 40E. SUBSTANTIATION: Only one can be correct. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept.

] The correct reference is NFPA 42. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATWE: 26

(Log #146) Committee: AI.IT~SSI

13- 112- (5-17 through 5-35): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Kenneth E. Isman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-81 - 13-97h RECOMMENDATION: Revise tile order of the extracted material in alphabetical order by material covered. SUBSTANTIATION: The users need an easier way to find if there is specific design criteria for specific hazards. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

I Rearrange tile material that is extracted from other NFPA I documents so that it will be presented in numerical order I according to the NFPA document number .

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Editorial change. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATWE: 26

(Log #29) Conunittee: AUT~SSI

13- 113 - ([5-18] Chapter 4 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Committee on Automatic

rinkl er Systems MMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-82

RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Comnfittee reviewed all propos~ds f rom the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Griteria (TCSSIC) and TC on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (T(~SSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system information from other NFPA docnments into NFPA 1,3 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TGC directs dlat tile TGSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 1%97b and

583

Page 32: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

13-212 th rough 13-243 to ensure dlat the extracted material is appropria te , necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. ~Aqiere materiztl is being extr.tcted fl'om a r e t :ommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be hwated in tile append ix of NFPA 13. Additionally, inl2wmation shouh:t be consol idated where possible. T h e TCC also indicated that tile ol , t i .n of ret 'erencing tile informat ion r:tther than exn-acting it shou ld not be overlooked. In prepar ing :t T(; note to this proposal, a public c o m m e n t f rom the TG(] will automatical ly be submit ted.

While this r e c o m m e n d a t i o n applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TC(" specifically identified proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-817 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 1:892 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFt 'A 36), 13~17 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86(i), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) ,Ls requi r ing

~ ) e ci,'d a t tent ion. U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is a direction front the Automat ic

Sprinklers Technical Correla t ing Cmnmi t t ee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 34.3 of the Regulat ions Governing Conmfit tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Nc~ specific act ion required. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: U p o n review of the informat ion, the Technical Gommit tee believes tile language ext~tcted f rom NFPA 51 con re rn ing sprinkler system installation criteria is comple te and requires no fi tr ther change. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #30) Commit tee : AI IT,SSI

13- 114 - ([5-19] Chapter 4 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlat ing Commi t t ee on Automat ic .~Porinkler Systems

MMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-83 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : The Technical Gorrelat ing Commi t t ee reviewed all p roposa ls f rom tile Technical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System hastallation Criteria (TGSSIC) and TC on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (T(NSDC) timt call for the extract ion of sprinkler system informat ion f rom o ther NFPA d o c u m e n t s into NFPA 13 us ing NFPA's Extract Policy. T he TGC directs that the TGSSIC and TG'SSD(I review Proposals 13-81 th rough 13-97b and 13-212 t h rough 13-243 to ensure tiaat the extracted material is appropria te , necessary and complete, and dmt it does not contain unenforceab le language. Where material is being extracted f rom a r e c o m m e n d e d practice or a guide, the T(:C directs that it be located in tile append ix of NFPA 13. Additionally, informat ion shmfld be consol idated where possible. T he TCC, also indicated that the opt ion of re ferenc ing the informat ion rattler than exn-acfing it shou ld no t be overlooked. In prepar ing a TG note to this proposal, a public c o m m e n t f rom the TCC will automatical ly be submit ted .

While tills r e c o m m e n d a t i o n applies to all proposals that call for extraction, tile TCC specifically identif ied proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 1300 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), mad 13-97a (NFPA 101) ,as requi r ing special a t tent ion. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is a direction from die Automat ic Sprinklers Teclmical Correla t ing Commi t t ee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of die Regulat ions Governing Gommit tee Prqjects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Revise Section 5-19 to read as follows: 5-19 (NFPA 75) Electronic Compute r Systems. (13-83) 5-19.1 x (75 6-1.3) Where sprinkler systems are provided per

NFPA 7,5, t!~c.~c .~pr~;:!qc:" .%~te:.'q.s prcte:; t lng cc.mputcr are;m dmy shall be valved separately f rmn other sprinkler systems. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Tiffs meets the in tent of tim submi t te r conce rn ing installation criteria extracted f rom NFPA 75. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26 COMMENT ON AFFIRMATIVE:

KEEPING: There is a typographical error in the Commi t t ee Action. Tile word "aprinkler" should be changed to "sprinkler."

(t.og #31 ) Comnlit tee: AI IT-SSI

12~ 115 - ([5-20] ( ;hapter 4 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Teclmical Correlat ing Commit tee on Automat ic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-84 RECOMMENDATION: Tile Teclmical Correlat ing Commit tee reviewed all proposals f rom the Teclmical Commi t tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and TC on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) tha t call for tile extraction of sprinkler system informat ion f rom other NFPA doc u m en t s into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TC, C directs that die TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 th rough 13-971) and 13-212 t h rough 1 ~243 to ensure tha t tile extracted material is appropria te , necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceab le language. Where material is being extracted from a r e c o m m e n d e d practice or a guide, tbe TCC directs that it be located in tile append ix of NFPA 13. Additionally, irfformation shou ld be consol idated where possible. The TCC also indicated tilat tile option of re ferenc ing the informat ion radmr than extract ing it shou ld not be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal , a public c o m m e n t f rom the T(;C will automatically be submit ted.

While this r e c o m m e n d a t i o n applies to ,all propos~ds that call for extraction, tile TCG specifically identif ied proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 1.%89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requi r ing speci;d at tent ion, S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is a direct ion f rom the Automat ic Sprinklers Technical Correla t ing Commi t tee in accordance with 3-4.2 and 3-4.3 of tile Regulat ions Governing Conuni t tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Revise Section 5-20 to read ,as follows:

5-20 (NFPA 82) Incinerators, Systems and E q u i p m e n t (13-84)

5-20.1 Wb.ere sprinkler systems are provided per NFPA 82, tile following r':!c= sball apply.

5-20.2 See NFPA 82 for applicable te r rm no t def ined in NFPA 13.

5-20.3 x (82-3-2.5) Chute Automat ic Sprinklers.

5-20.3.1" x (82-3-2.5.1") Gravity Chute. Gravity ch u t e s sp r in k l e r s shall be located ~ha!! !m prc tcc tc~ i:;tcrna![ 7 !~)' :=,:tz;:nat-c :pr 'nk!cra. Thiz rcqt:irca a q 'xlnk!er at or above die top service open ing of d~e chute, and, in addition, a sprinkler shall be installed witilin die chute at al ternate floor levels in buildings over two stories in he igh t with a manda to ry sprinkler located at tile lowest service level.

5-20.3.2 (82-3-2.5.2) Chute Sprinkler Protection. Automat ic sprinklers installed in gravity chute service open ings shall be recessed out of the chute ,area t i l rough which tile material travels.

5-20.4 (82-.3-3.4) Automat ic Sprinklers, Full Pneumat ic Systems. Full pneumat ic- type risers :!:cA! 5c prc, tcctc~ intcrnal!y !~y a::tcmat:.c aprin!:lera. A - ~ - : " " t ~ sprinklers shall be required at or o ~ . . . . . . . .

above tile top loading station and at ,alternate floor levels in buildings over two stories in height , with a manda to ry sprinkler located at the lowest loading station. Sprinklers shall be recessed out of tile station area t h rough wlfich tile material travels.

5-20.5 x (82-5-3) C, ommercia l - lndust r ia l Compactors .

5-20.5.1 x (82-5-3.1) All chute-fed compactors shall have an au tomat ic special fine water spray spr inkler with a m i n i m u m 1/2- in. (13-ram) orifice installed in the boppe r of tile compactor . This spr inkler shall be art ordinary t empera tu re rated sprinkler. The sprinklers sball be suppl ied by a m i n i m u m 1-in. (25.4-mm) ferrous p ip ing or 3/4-in. (19-ram) copper tubing line f rom the domest ic cold water supply. The sprinkler shall provide a suitable

584

Page 33: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A99 ROC

spray into tile hopper . A cycling (on-off), self-actuating, snap- action, beat-actuated sprinkler shall be permit ted to be used, or the sprinkler shall be permit ted to be controlled by a temperature sensor operat ing a solenoid valve. Sprinkler water piping shall be protected from freezing in ontdoor installations.

access ~ . ; ) ~ r t2 ~2e co:2~:.:~ers t!2.".t ~:~ be e~e.~.ed "-'-'~t.l~.c:rt

v . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/~ In. \ . . . . . . . . . . . / . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . / 9 . . . . . . ~ ~ ' I " ' t " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

C O M M I T T E E STATEMENT: Th is meets d~e i n t en t o f the subnf i t te r c o n c e r n i n g ins ta l la t ion c r i te r ia ex t rac ted f r o m NF~z'A 82, N U M B E R OF C O M M I T T E E MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #32) Committee: AUT~SSI

13- 116 - ([5-21] Chapter 4 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Commit tee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-85 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Committee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and TC on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) t a r t call for the extraction of sprinkler system information f rom other NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that tile T(~SIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 thrnngh 1 3-243 to ensure dlat the extracted material is appropriate, necess,'u-y and complete, and dmt it does not contain unenforceable langamge. Where material is being extracted from a r ecommended pracdce or a guide, d ie TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should he consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated dtat tire option of refer encing the information rather than exn-acting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to tiffs proposal, a public commen t from the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendat ion applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 1%90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 1%92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 1%97a (NFPA 101) ,as reqniring special at tention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from dae Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Commit tee in accordance wid/ 34.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations C, ovhrning Committee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

[ Delete Section 5-21: I ~ d o t ~ , r u D A n n \ t ' l . . . . h E l . . . . . 1 ~ . , ~ 1 ~ l ~ l . . . . I~. . . . . l l C / O K \

~i;:'ink!e:" hcad.~ ~ha!! Lc zufficicnt tc, pra;'idc rc;;z~nah!y "::~ifc,:-m

; e L ' ; .

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Technical Committee believes that dtis information is already adequately addressed by NFPA 13. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #181a) Committee: AIJT~SSI

13- 117 - (5-21): Accept SUBMITTER: Stephen Reimers, Reimers Systems Inc. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-85 RECOMMENDATION: NFPA 99 information should be referenced and not extracted. The references to 99 should also be general, not paragraph specific, e.g., "sprinkler systems in hyperbaric chambers shall conform to the requirements of NFPA 99, Chapter 19." SUBSTANTIATION: Extracting only bits and pieces of NFPA sprinkler requirements is confilsiug and will lead to errors ,'rod conflicts when NFPA 99 requirements change. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Technical Committee believes the sprinkler system installation criteria from NFPA 99 is adequately addressed by the current requirements of NFPA 13.

Also see Comments 13-116 (Log #32), 13-196 (Log #58), ,and 13- 180 (Log #181) concerning sprinkler system discharge criteria from NFPA 99. ]This comment was initially submit ted ,as part of Comment 13-180 (Log #181). Since dae comment contained information dlat needed to be addressed by two separate Committees, the comment was split in two.] NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 25 NEGATIVE: 1

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: KEEPIN(;: There is a conflict in die Comnfittee Actions of the

Discharge Commit tee and the Installation Committee on this matter. The Discharge Commit tee chose to extract the discharge related portions of NFPA 99, whereas here tire Installation Committee is accepting tire submitter 's proposal to only reference NFPA 99.

I believe dais matter needs to be addressed by die Technical Correlating Committee to bring these opposing actions into line.

(Log #33) Committee: AI.TT~SSI

1% 118- ([5-22] Chapter 4 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Committee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-86 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Committee reviewed all proposals from file Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TGSSIC) and TC on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) dlat call for die extraction of sprinkler system information from other NFPA documenc~ into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The T('A: directs that tile T(ISSIC ,and T C S S D C review Proposals 13-81 through 1%97b and 13-212 through 1%243 to ensure dlat the extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable langalage. Where material is being extracted from a r ecommended practice or a guide, tire TCC directs flint it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated whereposs ib le . The TCC also indicated d~at the option of referencing file i n fo rma t io n rafl~er than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to dfis proposal, a public comment f rom the TCC will automatically be snbmitted.

While this r ecommenda t ion applies to all proposals that call for extraction, tile TCC specifically identified proposals 13-8:) (NFI A 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 1%92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Antomatic Sprinklers Techrtical Correlating Commit tee in accordance with % 4.2 and %4.3 of the Regulations ( ;oveming Committee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Copy the following figalres from NFPA 214 into Section A-5-22.3, A-5-22.4, A-5-22.5, and 5-22.6.1 using NFPA's Extract Policy:

585

Page 34: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

inspector's test valve accessible from grade or building roof N,~

Heat detector over sprinkler over fan drive motor

IH , . . . , . IIII II

! _ _ l f i B mR i r _ o,

I -~----" 1 ,

14111 i~ll ½ in. (12.7 ram) pilot line

Plan

to deluge valve

Figure A-~22.3(a) [214-A-3-2.4.1(a)] Typical deluge fire protection arrangement for counterflow towers.

A

Heat detector

sprinkJer

- Heat detector over fan drive motor

g

~(( ( ( ( ( ( (~: ((<((((((<<< i K(((((<<<(~ I .>>>)>>))>)>: i ~>)>)>>))>);; ~>>))))>)~

detector

I I It rJl I I /

- - ~ Building roof

Section A-A

Area beneath tower to effectively screened

See Section 2-5

Figure A-5-22.3(b) [ 214-A-3-2.4.1 (b) ] Typical deluge fire protection arrangement for counterflow towers.

586

Page 35: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

'f dry-pipe valve ts used, heat detectors will be eliminated

~ D e l u g e or pe v a ~

From .--/"~= " ~ adequate I 1½in. (12.7 mm)J I I I

' pilot main I [ I supply (deluge system I

only) Spnnkler over fan drive motor- A ~ Heat detector over fan

drive motor

i - t==#, F I I

I•spector's test valve accessible from grade or building roof

-- Sprinkler

" H e a t detector

Figure A-5-22.3(c) [ 214-A-3-2.4.1 (c) 1 Typical deluge or dry pipe fire protection arrangement for counterflow towers.

Heat detector over fan drive motor SF

Fan Fan motor

Heat ~ " ' " " ' ' i detector .I,

\ / F i l I , ~

ht

X Air / \ Air i n l e t / ' N ~ q ~ inlet

1 [ Concrete basin

Section A-A

Figure A-5-22.3(d) 1214-A-3-2.4.1 (d)] Typical deluge or dry pipe fire protection arrangement for counterflow towers.

587

Page 36: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

D m

G

O I

A ' !

Joist channels - =

o

Deluge valve ~ OS.&Y. I I

Fro!la~ate ~- Valve h°use supply

Inspector's lest valve accessible----.-~ from grade or building reel

(- _[J

° ~ = = I ~ I

° ~

i i / tl

Key • Open sprinkler • Heat detector

Plan

I[" Open cooling tower nozzle

I I n

,,ll ~ . . . ~ - - over

• IL...-----''~ fan drive motor I [ ] ,,]I

• ~ ~ sprinkler over • ~ Irive motor

I

Deluge - ~

,o:vc0 I v a l v o i ~

Figure A-5-22.4(a) [214-A-3-2.4.2(a)] Typical deluge fire protection arrangement for cro~sflow towers.

Heat detector- Open upright

Fan

Special cooling tower nozzles

Flow control live . ' - " ~ . 1 .~.

Air inlet == "~~~ i /

Concrete sin ,,

Ih ",.

reducer

\ ~'= == : == ",, I . / - - Dist, b~in

'~ D. ~ r,,,J •

~ Partitio i ; ~

' ' )

' ~ 4Air inlet

/ \ Walkwa) Access doors

Section A-A

Figure A-~-22.4(b) [214-A-3-2.4.2(b)] Typical deluge fire protection arrangement for crossflow towers.

5 8 8

Page 37: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 m A99 ROC

A /

Open sprinkler over--] fan drive motor 1

/ Heat detector over---- t fan drive motor |

Open sprinkler

Heat detector

I I

I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ Open cooling Deluge valve - - ~ L tower nozzle

Indicating valve "-'.LT I A Plan Valve house

From adequate =" supply

Nolo: Where air seal boards prevent installation of coo~ing lower nozzles on drill eliminator side of fill, this nozzle location should be used.

Figure A-5-22.4(c) [214-A-3-2.4.2(c)1 Typical deluge fire protection arrangement for crossflow towers.

Heat detector over fan drive motor - ~ ~ . ~ . upen uprig hl Open sprinkler .~,,.,,,..q~ | Heat sprinkler |

/ detector ~ | Special cooling Fan m o t o r ~ / \ ~ tower nozzles

Fl°w contr°l valve ~ - - i " T ~ - ~ ' ]T . . . . "~- . . . . ~1"~-- ~ ' ~ ' ~ /

" ~ 1 ~ . . . . . . . . . g g . . . . . . 1----

II Air inlet Drift eliminators

Air in let

Section A-A

Note: Where air seal boards prevent installation of cooling lower nozzles on drift eliminator side ol fill. this nozzle location should be used.

Figure ~,-5-22.4(d) |214-A-3-2.4.2(d)] Typical deluge fire protection arrangement for crossflow towers.

589

Page 38: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

, N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

At

Inspector's test valve accessible from grade or building roof

- - Heat detector over fan drive motor

- Open sprinkler over fan drive motor

Deluge valve

Indicating I I v've r I l l ' - --Va,ve,oose

From adequate supply

Key • Open sprinkler o Heat detector ~, Open directional spray nozzle

Deluge 3 ~

v a l v ~ . l ~

Figure A-5-22.5(a) [214-A-3-2.4.3(a)] Typical deluge fire protection arrangement for cross[low towers with completely enclosed distribution basins.

Heat detector- Open u

Fan Directional spray nozzles

Flow control-,~ j [=] , , . , valve I T=I~I II~. g ~ - u =~ I

Corru

,<

, ~ -- Drift eliminators --

Air in[et ~ ~

oo retebas,

' \ / \ Walkway

sprinkler

Air seal

[F£'¥F n¥ ' l Li

Access door

Section A-A

Dletely enclosed distribution basin

Air inlet .I

Figure A-5-22,5(b) [214-A-3-2.4.3(b)] Typical deluge fire protection arrangement for crossflow towers with completely enclosed distribution basins, ~

590

Page 39: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

column

- Fire protection discharge device

Basin covers

Fill sheets

Wire hangers

o/

Cooling tower target nozzle (typ.)

Figure A-5-22.6.1 1214-A-3-2.4.51 Typical deluge fire protection arrangement for crossflow towers with covers complete ly enclosing distribution basins.

A-5-22.5 (214-A-3-2.4.3) Location of the nozzle relative to surfaces to be protected shall he de t e rmi ned by the particular nozzle's discharge char tcteristics. Care shou ld also be taken in the selection of nozzles to ,~btain waterways not easily obstructed by debris, sediment , sand, etc., in the water. Refer to Figures A-5- 22.5(a) and (b). COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This meets the subnti t ter 's in tent conce rn ing the installation criteria in NFPA 214. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #34) Commit tee: A11T~SSI

13- 119 - ([5-23] Chapter 4 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Teclmical Correlat ing C, ommi t tee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-87 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlat ing Commi t tee reviewed all propos~ds f rom the Teclmical Commi t tee on Sprinkler System Installation Crileria (TCSSIC) and TC on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system informat ion f rom other NFPA d o c u m e n t s into NFPA 17, using- NFPA's Extract Policy. T he TCC directs that the T(',SSIC and TCSSDC leview Proposals 13-81 th rough 13-97h and 13-212 througll 13-243 to ensure timt the extracted material is appropriate , necessary and complete, and that it does no t contain uuenforceab le language. Where material is being extracted from a rec~mmlended practice or a guide, the TCC, directs that it be located in the append ix of NFPA 1"~,. Additionally, informat ion should be consol idated where possible. T he TC(" also indicated that tile option of refel encing the informat ion rather th,m extractilJg it shou ld nor be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal, a puMic o m n n e n t f rom the TC(', will automatical ly be submit ted.

While this r ecominenda t ion applies to all propos,'ds that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C,), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requir ing special at tent ion. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlat ing Comntir tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulat ions (.;overning Commi t tee I'r~jects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

[ No specific act ion required. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Upon review of the informat ion, the Technical Commit tee believes the language extracted fi 'om NFPA 307 concern ing sprinkler system installation criteria is complete and requires no fu r ther change. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #35) Commit tee : AI tT-SSI

13- 120 - (I5-24] Chapter 4 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlat ing ( ;ommit tee on Automat ic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-88 RECO MMENDATION: TILe Technical Correla t ing ( 'ommit tee reviewed all proposals f rom the Technical ( ;ommit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TGSSIC) and Tt: on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (T(NSDC) dmt cMI for the extraction of sprinkler system informat ion f rom other NFPA d o c m n e n t s into NFPA 13 ns ing NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 th rough 1"~-97b and 13-212 rhrongb 1 3-943 to ensure that the extracted materi:d is appropriate , necessary and complete, and tha t it does not contain unenforceab le language. Where material is being extracted f rom a r e c o m m e n d e d practice or a guide, the TC(; directs flint it be

501

Page 40: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

located in the append ix of NFPA 13. Additionally, informat ion shou ld be consol idated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the informat ion rather than extracting it shou ld not be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to dds proposal, a public c o m m e n t f rom the T(:(" will aut<nnatically b e s u l H n i t t e d .

While this r e c o m n l e n d a t i o n applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TC(; specifically identif ied proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA "412), 13-97 (NFPA 86(:), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) :t~ r e q u M n g

~ )ecial at tent ion. U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is a direct ion ti 'om the Antomat ic

Sprinklers Technical Correlat ing Commi t t ee in accordance with 9,_ 4.2 am:l 3-4.3 of the Regnlat ions ( ' ;overning C'ommittee Projects, COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Add the f , llowing ~Ls Section 5-24.3 and 5-24.4 a n d r e n u m b e r tbe remain ing sections accordingly:

5-24 (NFPA 318) Cleanrooms. (13-88) 5-24.1 Where sprinkler systems are provided per NFPA 318, dte

following shall also apply. 5-24.2 ,gee NFPA 318 t\~r applicable terms not def ined in NFPA

13. 5-~4.3 (318-2-1.1.1) Cleanrooms. Wet pipe antomat ic sprinkler

pr,~tection shall be provided t h r o n g h o u t facilities conta in in~ cleanroonts and clean zones.

5-~4.4 (318-~-1.2.2]* Quick response sprinklers shall be ntilized tot sprinkler installations witllin down-tlow ai rs t reams Jlq c]eanrooms and clean zottes.

5-24.5* (318-2-1.2.6.1) Sprinklers installed in ductwork shall be spaced a m a x i m m n of 20 ft (6.1 m) apart lmrizontally ,and 12 ft (3.7 m) apar t vertically.

5-24.6 (318-2-1.2.6.2) A separate indic~tdng control waive sh:dl be provided for sprinklers installed in ductwork.

5-24.7 (318-2-1.2.6.5) The sprinklers shall be accessible for periodic inspect ion arad main tenance . COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This meets the submit ter ' s in ten t conce rn ing the installation criteria f ound in NFPA 318. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #36) Commit tee : AUT,SS I

1"~- 121 - ([5-25] Chapter 4 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correla t ing Commi t t ee on Automat ic

rinkler Systems MMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-89

RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correla t ing Commi t t ee reviewed all proposals f rom the Technical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (T(ISSIC) and TC on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) timt call for the extract ion of sprinkler system informat ion f rom other NFPA d o c u m e n t s into' NFPA 13 us ing NFPA's Extract Policy. T he TCC directs that the T(NSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 th rough 13-97b and 1°,-212 th rough 1 3-243 to ensure that the ext~tcted material is appropria te , necessary zmd complete, and that it does no t contain unenforceab le langnage. Where material is being extracted f rom a r e c o m m e n d e d practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the append ix of NFPA 13. Additionally, informat ion shou ld be consol idated where possible. T he TCC also indicated d~at the opt ion of re ferenc ing the informat ion rather than extractirig it shou ld not be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal, a public c o n n n e n t front the TCC will automatical ly be submit ted.

While this r e c o m m e n d a t i o n applies to all proposals tha t call for extraction, the TCC specifically identif ied proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFt 'A 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 17,-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requi r ing

~ )ecial attentions. UBSTANTIATION: This is a direct ion f rom the Automat ic

Sprinklers Technica l Corre la t ing Commi t t ee in accordance with 3- 4.2 arid 3~t.3 of die Regaflations Governing Commi t t ee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Revise sect ion 5-25 as follows: 5-25 (NFPA 409) Aircr~fft Hangars. (13-89)

5 25.2 ',"rm:i:: " A: ...... c. t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r~ . . . . . . f f lK e l 1 [ A g l C I A O ' 2 \ C ~ o l . , I . I . . . . . - . ¢ . ~ i . . . . . I . . , l l l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; $ ' . . . M ['~1 '2

c) [ i t ] ,a47 t | ~ o , . t . , . , A . , v - . - |

5 25.2.2 (4OQ A 2.~) ~,n . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ............ , ....... :-~-:;ull in

sprh:Mer systems, ::ddit!or:a! si.'r]nl:lers slxzll be F.rv:'i:!ed to e::s:::'~

. . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . 6) ..,r,..Akl . . . . nl:::ll !m;'c a t:~:ni::al " " : " : - ' " size "" G' 1~, t" ¢? . . . . . . \ ~ 1 ~ ' / ' 2 0 i~ , \ . . . . . . . . . . . . / "

5 25.2A ,..mr, A o ,7) c~:..,., . . . . ,...,, , ....... :: .......................... : ..... ,-

~or .~ to ~75°F (I~2?C to '" ° ' . . . . . . . . . 9 C), "5-25. See NEPA 409 for sorinkler system installation criteria

per ta in ing to tbe protect ion of aircr:fft han~,trs._." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See substant iat ion to ( ; omment 13- 122 (Log #86a). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #86a) ( ;ommit tee: A11T,SSI

13- 122 - (5-25): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Commi t t ee on Airport Facilities COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-225 RECOMMENDATION: Delete Section 5-25. SUBSTANTIATION: The incorpora t ion of excerpts fi 'om NFPA 409 is incomple te and may be nfisleading. In reality, NFPA 409 integrates several i n t e rdependen t fire protect ion approaches . In addit ion, any one of these approaches may itself have complex condit ions that govern the specific me thod of applicat ion of tha t approach. The sprinkler systems dtat are requi red by NFPA 409 are good examples of complex approaches that have requ i rements tha t vary according to occupancy, size, and o ther provided fire protect ion systems. T h e proposed excerpts provided in NFPA 13 describe only one of several condi t ions for the installation of sprinkler systems. The excerpts do not reflect the wide variations tha t NFPA 409 requires, front closed sprinkler systems to fo~mt water de luge sprinkler systems. The system requi red may vary based on condi t ion ,and size of housed aircraft, hanga r size, or the presence of supp lementa l u n d e r wing fire protect ion systems.

If the objectives of excerpt ing are to be pursued, the Airport Facilities Commit tee suggests a correlat ing task g roup be fo rmed to ensure the appropr ia te requ i rements of NFPA 409 are excerpted into NFPA 13. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Commi t tee Action on (,'oMlnent 13-121 (Log #36). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #37) Commit tee : AUT~SSI

13- 123 - ([5-261 Chapter 4 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: TechnicM Correlat ing Commi t t ee on Automat ic

Oori nkl er Systelns MMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-90

RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlat ing Commit tee reviewed all proposals f rom the Technical Commi t tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) a n d TC on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) tha t call for the extract ion of spr inkler system informat ion f rom o ther NFPA d o c u m e n t s into NFPA 13 us ing NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TGSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 darough 13-97b an d 13-212 th rough 1 3-243 to ensure that the exu'acted material is appropria te , necessary and complete, and tha t it does not contain nnenforceab le language. Where material is being extracted f rom a r e c o m m e n d e d practice or a guide, the TCC directs dtat it be loc~ated in the append ix of NFPA 13. Additionally, informat ion shou ld be consol idated where possible. The TCC also indicated tha t the opt ion of referencing the informat ion rad~er than

592

Page 41: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

extract ing it shou ld no t be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal, a puhlic c o m m e n t f rom the TCC will antomatical ly be snbmit ted .

While this r e c o m m e n d a t i o n applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the T(;C specifically identif ied propos~ds 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) ,as requi r ing

)e cial a t tent ion. B S T A N T I A T I O N : q'his is a direction from the Automat ic

Sprinklers Technical Correlat ing Conuni t tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulat ions Governing f :ommit tee Projectm COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Commi t tee Action on C o m m e n t 1 3-124 (Log #189). NUMBER OF C O M M I T r E E MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #189) Comnfittee: AI.IT~SSI

1% 124- ([5-26] Chapter 4): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: T h o m a s H. Miller, Varley-Campbell & Assoc., Inc . /Glen Ellyn Vol Fire Co. C O M M E N T O N P R O P O S A L NO: 13-90 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : The transfer of dais inadequate protec t ion criteria shou ld no t be a~Jtomatically inc luded in this edit ion of die s tandard. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : T he National Fire Protect ion Research Foundat ion is current ly working on a project to unde r s t and the hazards ,and in!prove the protect ion criteria for oxidizers. Either delay die incorpora t ion or place a note in d~e d o c u m e n t advising of the limits of riffs criteria and tlae work in progress. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

1. Do no t extract the in tbrmat ion but instead reference NFPA 430, (.;ode for the Storage of Liquid m)d Solid Oxidizers, m~ follows:

5-26* Liquid and Solid ()xidizers. See NFPA 430. 9. Add an append ix r~ote to Section 5-26 to read ms follows: "A-5-26. At the t ime of the publicat ion of tiffs s t :mdard, file

Technical Commi t t ee is aware of ongo i ng research conce rn ing the sprinkler protect ion of solid oxidizers. This research is being coriducted by the National Fire Protect ion Research Foundat ion." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The submi t te r did no t r e c o m m e n d specific action. The aclJon taken by the Commi t tee addresses die su bmit ter ' s concern . NUMBER OF C O M M I T r E E MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 V O T E ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #38) Commit tee : AI.IT~SSI

1.'~ 125 - ([5-27] Chapter 4 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlat ing Commi t tee on Antomat ic

rinkler Systems MMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-91

R E C O M M E N D A T I O N . The Technical Correlat ing Commi t tee reviewed all proposals f rom tl~e Technical Commi t tee on Sprinkler Systent Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and TC on Sprinkler System Ifischarge Criteria (TCSSDC) dtat call for the extraction of spr inkler system informat ion f rom other NFPA d o c u m e n t s into NFPA 13 us ing NFPA's Extract Policy. T he TCC directs that the T(:SSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 th rough 13-97h and 13-212 th rough 1%243 to ensure flaat the extracted material is appropriate , necessary t nd complete, and dtat it does not conudn unenforcea lde language. Where ntaterial is being extracted f rom a r e c o m m e n d e d FWactice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the append ix of NFPA 13. AdditionMly, informat ion shou ld be consolidated where possible. T he TCC also indicated that the option of re ferenc ing the informat ion rather than exu-acting it shou ld not be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal, a public c o m m e n t front the TCC will automatical ly he suhmit ted .

While this r e c o m m e n d a t i o n applies to all proposals dlat call for extraction, tile TCC specifically identif ied proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36)+ 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), arid 13-97a (NFPA 101) as reqnir ing

~ )ecial at tention• UBSTANT1AT1ON: This is a direct ion f rom the Automat ic

Sprinklers Teehnical Correlat ing Commi t t ee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of d m Regulat ions Governing Conmfi t tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Revise Section 5-27 to read ,as follows:

5-27 x (NFPA 804) Advanced Light Water Reactor Electric Genera t ing Plants.

5-27.1 See NFPA 804 for applicable te rms not def ined in Chapter I.

5-27.2 x (804-7-4) Yard Mains, Hydrants, and Building Standpipes.

5 27.2.1 x (°04 7 *..I) Thc u~dcrgr.vu.qd ;.~,rd .qrc m,~k~ !cc F zl=all

E: E: 22:: .~ S U.Y L #.y22. 'L7: L 2" ~2".2"L Z Z T " - G Z ; :~ . 'Z 7 "..'Z; ?" Z'Y.- ......

5-27.2.2 x (804-7-4.2) Approved visually indicat ing sectional control valves such ,as post-indicator valves shall be provided to isolate p o r d o n s of d)e main for ma in t enance or repair widmut s imul taneously s h u t d n g off dae supply to botll pr imary a n d backup fire suppress ion systems•

5-27.2.3 x (804-7-4.3) V^~-'c: ~ba!! ~c :r:~m!!cd tc perm:.t i:,ck:t',~:-: c f .v, u tg~c !:;.'a-,;'a~W. fr::: : +A:c .q:'c :::a':: fc:- ~.:a ' : tc~a,:cc c:" ; 'eFa'r

5-27.2.4 x (804-7-4.4) A c o m m o n yard fire main loop may serve . mult i -uni t nuc lear power plant sites if it is eross-connected between units. Sectional control valves shall pernii t ma in ta in ing i n d e p e n d e n c e of the individual loop a r o u n d each nnit. For such installations, c o m m o n water supplies shall also be permi t ted to be utilized. For mult iple-reactor sites with widely separa ted plants [approach ing 1 mi. (1.6 km) or more] , separate yard fire main loops shall be used.

r. o,v o ~ . , ronA 7 ~ 5) "+"'+~:++ . . . . . . . ' ' . . . . : ...... ' " : . . . . . " " " ~"

0 . . + ~ . . . . . . . + p . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . ~ 0 . o ~ . . . . . . . . . . . 7 . . . . . . . .

loc,~++-cm H)'dr::m~ :e:.tb. "md:.-~.du.-2 l-e:e gv.te vz!,.,e: ~l:::!! be re+tall . . . . vt" . . . . . . . . . . . 7 . . . . ; . . . . . ~ . . . . . + "-v . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . .

~ n A ~ + l . + e ~ , , ~ ; l l ~ . , . . . . : . . . . . . * o l . ~ l l I ~ . . . . . . &.l-:l .+ . + . , + . . . . I + ~ ¢ . , ~ + . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; + ' I " " P " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

merc ~w.~: lOOO f: :~n~ ~x g d

equ ipment , st:c!: az hcsc &'=."tz or tr~.:cl-s, sli::ll bc porto. t ied :.~+ !]ct: • . ~ I . . . . . . . I I H . . . . . . . . . ; ~ I ~ A . . . . I . m ~ l . + . l . . . . . . . i . . . . . . . . . t o l . . . l l k . .

o f I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t" . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l " ' l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

• " o . . . . . . I l i a I ~ . . + I ..... I . . . . ! ; O ' d g e g . eq:::'.?.le:=t t o tlze eq'::iz:zze~t .--+vv . . . . . . ; . . . . . . . . . . . .

5 27.2.5x(80 ~. 7 A ,~x w, . . . . . . a . . . . . . . . : , . , . . . . : . , . + , . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . , . . . . , RP. A a n + + + ..... +0 +h~ll I.+ ~+~..;.-I+.+.I ~.. ~II I..,A++,..,++ I ..... ~ , , ~ 1 ; .... ....... l ...................... P" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ! ......... ' ............. t ..... ~ o ,

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l ........... -l"'l: ........

5-27,2,7 x (804-7-4,7) ,Sprinkler systems and manual hose station s tandpipes shall have connect ions to the plant u n d e r g r o u n d water main so daat a single active failnre or a crack in a modera te-energy line can be isolated so ,as no t to impair both the primary mad backup fire suppression systems. Alternatively, headem fed from each end are permi t ted inside buildings to supply bodt sprinkler and s tandpipe systems, provided steel piping arid fittings meet ing the requ i rements of ANSI B31.1, (?;ode for Power Piping, :ire used for the headers (up to ,and inc luding die first ~llve) supplying dte sprinkler systems where such headers are part of the seismically analyzed hose s tandpipe system. Where provided, such headers are cons idered an extension of die yard main system. Each sprinkler and sumdp ipe system shall be equ ipped with an outside screw and yoke (OS&Y) gate valve or o ther approved shotof f valve.

5 9 3

Page 42: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N ~ A 13 1 A 9 9 R O C

5-27.3 x (804-8-4.2.2.2) (:able Concentrat ions . T he location of sprinklers or spray nozzles shall consider cable tray a r r a n g e m e n t s ;tnd possible tr,-msient combust ib les to ensure adequa te water cover:tge for arezks d]at could present exposure fire hazards to the cahle raceways.

5-27.4 x (804-8-4.2.2.3) Tnrbine Building. Deln~e sprinkler systems or de luge spray systems shall be zoltecl to l imi t the area of protect ion to that which the dra inage system can hand le with any two ac!jacem s ~ t e m s actuated. The systems shall be hydraulically des igned with each zone calculated with die largest adjacent zone flowing. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The TechnicM Commit tee believes this action meets the snbmit ter ' s in tent conce rn ing the installation criteria extracted f rom NFPA 804. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

I . . . . . t r . . . . . . . + ~ . ; ^ . . t " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ t " . . . . . I . I - . , , : l . l : . - , ~ T I . . . . . . . . I . . , l l

"£2.7]~LZ~AT./:'ZY?72:2Y.TZ;:;77,ZI~;. ;ZT/Z£'LS.:..'2" ~./;,";J ;';',.';':..,

K dO c2 , l . . / o r t c2 1 i K \ A . . . . . : . . . . ~ r~ * ;~ . - . ~ , l IS ' : . . . . L / . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - * ; . . . .

. . . . . . . . +1 . . . . . . I - I . . 11 k . . . . . : g ' : . .A (C '~ ' ~T "~DA I~ lXQ ~%- , . , . 1 . . . . | ¢ ~ e

Screw TP,:'e::d~ :'.r:d C.2c!'.e~ for F:,re Hcse Ccrmect]o::~.)

c!eF:-rune:=tc c!!ffer, :-d:'.~terc she!! be Fro'.'!c!e'~l'::t t!:~ hyd:'a::ts.

5-28.3.5 x (803-12-3) The fire main system piping shall not serve service water system funct ions. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Technical Commit tee helieves this action meets the submit ter ' s in tent conce rn ing the install,ttiou criteria extracted f rom NFPA 803. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #39) Commit tee: AI ~T-SSI

13- 126 - ([5-28] (',halJter 4 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correla t ing Commi t tee on Automat ic .~)ri nkl er Systems

OMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-92 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlat ing Commi t t ee reviewed all proposals f rom the Technical Commi t tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and TC on Sprinkler System 1)ischarge (:riteria (TCSSI-)C) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system informat ion f rom other NFPA d o c u m e n t s into NFPA 13 us ing NFPA's Extract Policy. T h e TCC directs tha t the T( ;.';St(: and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 t h rough 13-97h and 13-212 th rough 1%243 to ensnre t i n t the extracted material is apl)ropriate, necessary and complete, and that it does trot contain unenforceab le language. Where materiM is being extracted f rom a r e c o m m e n d e d practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be Im~ated in the append ix of N F P A 13. Additionally, informat ion sbonld be consol idated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the opt ion of re ferenc ing the informat ion rad]er than extracting it s hou ld not be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal, a public c o m m e n t f rom the T( 'C will automatical ly be sul)mitted.

While this r e c o m m e n d a t i o n applies to all proposals tha t call for extraction, the TCC specifically identif ied proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) ,as requi r ing

~ ecial a t tent ion. UBSTAaNTIATION: This is a direct ion f rom die Automat ic

Sl>rinklers Technical Correla t ing Comnri t tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 a n d 3-4.3 of die Regulat ions Governing Commi t tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Revise Section 5-28 to read as follows:

5-'28 x (NFPA 803) Light Water Nuclear Power Plants. (13-92)

5-28.1 See NFPA 803 for applical~le terms not def ined in ( ' ,hapter 1.

K 9 9 >_8._ x (803-10-2.2) Each sprinkler system sh:dl have an i n d e p e n d e n t connec t ion to the plant yard main ,and be equ ipped with art a p p r o v e d indicat ing ty)e control or shut-off valve. Multiple sprinkler and s tandpipe systems shall be suppl ied by interior headers or fire protect ion loops. W h e n provided, snch headers or loops are considered an extens ion of the yard main system and shall be provided with at least two connect ions to the yard main. The a r r a n g e m e n t shall be suppl ied a n d valved so tha t uo single i m p a i r m e n t c~m ;fffect sprinkler and hose protect ion at the same time.

K O~2 ~ . . ¢ o t ~ ' / t , I . . . . * - - 1 1 ) V - - . - ~ I k , f ~ ; . . . . . I L I , ,A . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . K . . . . . . . . . . . . . l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7~ . . . . . . . . .

K c I Q "2 1 ~ / Q f t ° A 1 I ~ ) ~ . . 1 - ' 6 " ~ . ~ 1 ~ , * 1 . - , . 1 . *~ . , * . . . . . I . . . . . I ~ - , 11 I ~ ; ~ * - . I I =A

K 0~ / 9. ¢) 1 . [ ¢~£ t "2 1 I A ) A O , . ¢ ~ . 1 6 = ~ * . . . . . . I - . - . - ~ f I ~ . . t | . . . . . ~o oh . , l l I - . ~

..... ], t...:t.~: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .~ t . . . . . . . . . ~":~'" ~rotcct](;:; ate;! to ~zrovide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 . . . . . . . . . 1.. *i.- ~

(Log #40) Commit tee : AI 1T4gSI

1-9, - 127 - ([5-29] Chapter 4 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technic:d Correla t ing Commi t tee on Automat ic ScPorinkler Systems

MMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-93 RECO MMENDATION: Tile Technical Correlat ing Conmdt tee reviewed all j ffoposals f rom the Technical Commi t tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and TC on Spriukler System Discharge Criteria (TC.SSDC) tha t call for the extract ion of spr inkler system informat ion f rom o ther NFPA d o c u m e n t s into NFPA 13 us ing NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC ;rod TGSSDC review Proposals 13-81 th rough 13-97t) and 13-212 t h rough 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropria te , necessary and complete, and tha t it does not contain unenforceab le language. Where material is being extracted f rom a r e c o m m e n d e d practice or a guide, the TG'C directs that it he located in the append ix of NFPA 13. Additionally, informat ion shou ld be consol idated where possible. T h e TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the informat ion radler than extract ing it shou ld not be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal , a pnblic c o m m e n t f rom the TCC will automatic~tlly be submit ted .

While this r e c o m m e n d a t i o n applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identif ied proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), a n d 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requi r ing

ecial a t tent ion. B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is a direction f rom the Automat ic

Sprinklers Technical Correla t ing Commi t t ee in accordance with ?, 4.2 and %4.3 of the Regulat ions Governing Commi t t ee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

[ Move Section 5-29 to the appendix as A-5-29. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Technical Commi t tee believes that this act ion meets the in tent of the submi t te r concern ing the installation criteria extracted f rom NFPA 851. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VO TE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #41 ) Commit tee : A: ]T~SSI

1.3- 128 - ([5-30] Chapter 4 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlat ing Commi t tee on Automat ic

Oori nld er Systems MMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1.3-94

RECOMMENDATIO N: The Technical Correlat ing Commit tee reviewed :dl proposals f rom die Tecllnical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TGSSIC) and TC on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) tha t call for tile extraction of sprinkler system informat ion f rom o ther NFPA d o c u m e n t s into

594

Page 43: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 --A99 R O C

NFPA 13 us ing NFPA's Exmtc t Policy. Tile TCC, directs that the TCSSIC and T( ;SSI-)C review Propos:ds 13-81 th rough 1 3-97b and 13-212 t h rough 1%243 to ensure that the extr:tcted material is appropriate , necessary and complete, and dmt it does no t contain unenforceab le langamge. Where material is being extracted f rom a r e c o m m e n d e d practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the append ix of NFPA 13. Additionally, informat ion shou ld be consol idated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the opt ion of referencir~g the informat ion rather diem extracting it shou ld no t be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal, a pnblic o ) m m e n t f rom the TCC will antonlatically be submit ted.

While this r ecommen&t t ion applies to all proposals tha t call for extraction, the T(',C specifically identif ied proposals 1%85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requi r ing

~ :,ecial .tttentiorL U B S T A N T I A T I O N : ~Ihis is a direction f rom file Automat ic

Sprinklers Tecbnical Correlat ing Commi t t ee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of tire Reg3dations Governing Commi t tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Delete Section 5-30. Mow: remain ing text to the appendix as Section A-5-30. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The T e d m i c a l Commi t tee believes tllat dais act ion meets the in tent of d~e snbmit ter concern ing the installation criteria extracted f rom NFPA 850. Informat ion on hydrants will no t be addressed by NFPA 13. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #42) Commit tee: AI ¿T~SSI

13- 129 - ([5-31] Chapter" 4 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Teclmical Correlat ing Commi t tee on Automat ic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-95 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Tile Technic~d Correlat ing Commi t tee reviewed all proposals f rom the Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler ,5;ystem Installation Criteria (T(~SSIC) and TC on Sprinkler System I)isc.harge Criteria (TCSql-)C) tllat call for the extraction of sprinkler system informat ion f rom other NFPA d o c u m e n t s into NFPA 13 us ing NFPA's Extract Policy. T he TCC directs that the TCSSI(; and TCSSf)C review Proposals 13-81 th rough 13-97b and 1%212 th rough 1%243 to ensure fllat the extracted material is appropr ia te , necessary arid complete, and fllat it does no t contain unenforceab le I:mguage. Where material is being extracted f rom a r e c o m m e n d e d practice or a guide, tile TCC directs that it be Ioc~tted in the append ix of NFPA 13. Additionally, informat ion should be consol idated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the informat ion rather than extr:tcting it shou ld no t be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal, a public ~ o m m e n t f rom the TCC will automatic~dly be submit ted .

While this r e c o m m e n d a t i o n applies to all proposals tha t call for extraction, the TCC specifically identif ied proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99). 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 1%90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA ~04), 1%92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA :~12), 1%97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) :Ls requir ing special a t tent ion. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is a direction from tire Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlat ing C.ommittee in accordance with % 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulat ions ( ;overning Connni t tee Prqjects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

No specific act ion requi, 'ed. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: l l pon review of tile information, tile Technical Commi t t ee helieves the language extracted from NFPA 33 conce rn ing sprinkler system installation criteria is complete and requires no f l m h e r change. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #43) Commit tee : AI IT~SSI

13- 130 - ([5-32] Chapter 4 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correla t ing Commi t tee on Automat ic Sprinkler Systerrm CO MMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-96 RECOMMENDATIO N: The Technical Correlat ing ( ' .ommittee reviewed all proposals f rom the Technical Commi t tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (T(_~SSIC) and TC on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) tha t call for the extraction of sprinkler system informat ion f rom other NFPA d o c u m e n t s into NFPA 13 us ing NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that tire TCSSIC and T(ISSDC review ProposMs 13-81 th rough 1%97b and 13-212 th rough 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropria te , necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted f rom a r e c o m m e n d e d practice or a guide, the TCC directs fllat it be located in tile append ix o f NFPA 13. Additionally, information shou ld be consol idated where possible. The T(;C' also indicated that tile option of referencing the informat ion rather than extracting it shou ld not be overlooked. In prep;Lring a TC note to dfis proposal, a public c o m m e n t f rom tire TC(: will automatic. 'dly be submit ted.

While this recommenda t ion applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identif ied proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 1%86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 1%92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-.07 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requi r ing special a t tent ion. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is a direction f rom the Automat ic Sprinklers Technical Correlat ing Commi t tee in accordance with .'3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulat ions Governing Commi t tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

I Delete Section 5-32. I . . . . . ( . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,

- " ~ - ' - ~ \ . . . . . . . . I A . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

l v:ithln f~.brlc t)'pc dust collector hz~u~i::gm COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This informat ion f rom NFPA 36 does no t include sprinkler system installation criteria. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #44) Commit tee : AI IT~SSI

13- 131 - ([5-33] Chapter 4 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlat ing Commi t tee on Automat ic

rinkler Systems MMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-97

RECOMMENDATION: The Technica l Correlat ing Commit tee reviewed all proposals f rom tile Technical (3ommittee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (T(~SSIC) and TC on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCkSSDC) tha t call for the extraction of sprinkler system inl 'ormation f rom other NFPA d o c u m e n t s into NFPA 13 us ing NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the T(.kSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 th rough 1 3-97b and 13-212 th rough 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropria te , necessary and complete, and tha t it does no t contain unenforceab le language. Where material is being extracted f rom a r e c o m m e n d e d practice or a guide, tile TCG directs that it be located in tile append ix of NFPA 13. Additionally, informat ion sl)onld be consol idated where possible. The TCC also indicated that tile option of referencing tile informat ion rather than extracting it shon ld not be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal, a public c o m m e n t f rom the T(;C will automatically be submit ted.

While this r e c o m m e n d a t i o n applies to all proposals that call for extraction, tl~e TCC specifically identif ied proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 1",-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 1% 91 (NFPA 804), 1~92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 1307 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), a n d 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requir ing

ecial at tent ion. B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is a direct ion from the Automat ic

Sprinklers Technic:d Correlat ing Conmdt tee in accordance with % 4.2 and %4.3 of tile Regulat ions Governing ( ' ommi t t ee Projects.

595

Page 44: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 1 A99 R O C

COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. Delete Section 5-33.

.............................. UI ....................................... t''-"

!:~;sv m:'.! ::t;zz!es s!:::!! be re."..di!y v.:v.i!::b!e. [;:.'e regard s!::'2! b e ~; ..... +~ *I ......... :+., ~¢ ^..:.+: .... I ..... I..,A~... tO ......... .I.~+ ~,

..~.~.! .................. ! ,o ............

COMMITTEE ST~('i(EMENT: The irfformation extracted f rom NFPA 312 does no t inc lnde sprinkler system installation criteria. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #45) Commit tee : AUT~SS I

13- 132 - ([5-34] Chapter 4 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correla t ing Commi t tee on Antomat ic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-97a RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correla t ing Commi t tee reviewed all propos:ds f rom the Technical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TGSSIC) and TC on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TGSSDC) flint call for the extract ion of spr inkler system informat ion f rom other NFPA d o c u m e n t s into NFPA 13 us ing NFPA's Extract Policy. T he TGC directs that the T('SSIG and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 th rough 13-97b and 1 3-212 th rough 1 3-243 to ensnre fl]at the extracted material is appropria te , necessary and complete, and flint it does no t contain unenforceab le language. Where material is being extracted from a r e c o m m e n d e d practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the append ix of NFPA 13. Additionally, informat ion should be consol idated where possible. T he TCC also indicated that the option of re ferenc ing the informat ion rather than extract ing it sbou ld not be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal, a puhlic c o m m e n t f rom tile TCG will automatical ly be submit ted.

While this r e c o m m e n d a t i o n applies to all proposals tha t c~dl for extraction, the TCC specifically identif ied proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86G), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) ,as requi r ing special a t tent ion. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is a direction from file Automat ic Sprinklers Technical Corre la t ing Commi t t ee in accorekmce wida 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of file Regaflations Governing Commi t t ee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Revise Section 5-34 to read as follows: 5-34 x (NFPA 86C) Industri:d Fnrnaces Using a Special

Processing Atmosphere . (13-97a) 5-34.1 See NFPA 86C for applicable terms not def ined in

Chapter 1. 5-34.2 x [86G-18-1.2(a)] Where sprinkler systems are provided

I I ;er NFPA 86C, Section 18-1.2(b), ~::w.matic s[3r:.m-.cr V . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i7" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

sprinklers shall be of extra lfigh temperature rating [325°F to 650~'F (163o(:: to 343°C,)] to avoid p remature operat ion f rom localized fl,-~sbing. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This meets the submit ter ' s in tent conce rn ing the sprinkler system installation criteria extracted f rom NFPA 86(;. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 V O T E ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #46) Commit tee: AUT~SS l

13- 133 - ([5-35] Chapter 4 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technic, 'd Correla t ing Commi t t ee on Automat ic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-97b RECOMMENDATION: The T e c h n i c ~ Correlat ing ( :ommit tee reviewed all propos,'ds f rom the Technic, 'd Commi t tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and TC on Sprinkler System Discharge ( 'r i teria (TCSSDG') tha t call for the extraction of sprinkler system irfformation f rom other NFPA do cn m en t s into NFPA 13 us ing NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC ,and TGSSDC review Propos,-'ds 13-81 th rough 1 3-97b and 13-212 th rough 13-243 to ensure dmt dae extracted material is appropria te , necessary and complete, and d]at it does not contzdn un-erfforceable language. Where material is be ing extracted f rom a r e c o m m e n d e d practice or a guide, the TGC directs dial it be located in the append ix of NFPA 13. Additionally, informat ion shou ld be consol idated whereposs ib le . The TCC also indicated tbat the option of re ferenc ing the informat ion radler than extracting it shou ld not be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal, a puhlic c o m m e n t f rom the TC(; will automatic~dly be submit ted .

While tiffs r e c o m m e n d a t i o n applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically i den t i f ed propos~ds 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requir ing special a t tent ion. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is 'a direction from the Automat ic Sprinklers Technical Correlat ing Commi t tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulat ions Governing Commi t tee Projeces. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

I Move ~dl of Section 5-35 into a new Appendix D entit led "Sprinkler System hfformat ion f rom NFPA 101." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Becanse NFPA 101 addresses life s,'ffety only, some informat ion conce rn ing sprinkler systems in NFPA 101 differs f rom that of NFPA 13. For instance, NFPA 101 allows for partial sprinkler coverage in some cases an d requires different waterflow and system alarm ar rangements . Since NFPA 13 addresses fire szffety goals in addi t ion to life s~ffety such ,as property protection, the Technical Commi t t ee did not wish to copy this informat ion into fide body of NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. However, the Teclmicat Commi t tee is inc luding this informat ion in an appendix for the benefi t of the users of NFPA 13. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATWE: 26

(Log #(7;(i;421 ) Commit tee : AUT~SS I

13- 134 - ([5-36 new]): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commi t tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO" 13-56 RECOMMENDATION: Copy the following spr inkler system installation criteria f rom NFPA 40 us ing NFPA's extract policy an d r e n u m b e r accordingly:

3-1.4 In are,'~s or rooms where nitrate film is handled , tile a rea that is protected per sprinkler head shall no t exceed 64 ft 2 (6 m 2) with sprinklers :md branch lines not being over 8 ft (2.4 m) apart.

4-2.5 Cabinet Protection.

~ 1 ,I'd 4-2.5.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

~ta~.d==d ro"~)] ~f.~:='~ber~a~,~nets are reQni t o~e snrinklered, they shall be provided with at least one automat ic sprinkler head .

4-2.5.2 Where cans are s tored on more than one shelf, as shown in Figaire 4-2 ,and as descr ibed in 4-2.6.1 or 4-2.6.2, one sprinkler head sl*dl be provided for each shelf.

4-3 Vaults O the r than Extended Term Storage Vmllts. 4-3.6.1 Sprinkler protect ion utilizing regular automat ic sprinklers

or open sprinklers sball be calculated on the b,'tsis of one sprinkler for each 62.5 ft 3 (1.8 m 3) of the interior vault volume.

4-3.6.2 Tile m i n i m u m n u m b e r of sprinklers for a s tandard 750-ft 3 (21-m 3) vault shall be no t less than 12.

4-5. Ex tended Term Storage Vaults.

596

Page 45: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

4-5.5.1 Sprinklers shall be provided in a ratio of one bead for each 62.5 ft 3 (1.8 m 3) of ~tult volume.

Exception: Sprinkler systems in existing ex tended term storage vauhs that were in compl iance with tile provisions of this s tandard at the t ime of installation shall be permi t ted to be con t inued in nse.

4-5.5.2 The m i n i m u m n u m b e r of spr inklers !:ell.am ~ for a 1000-ft 3

(28-m 3) w,,mlt shall be 15 sprin~ders. Exception: Sprinkler systems in existing ex tended term storage

vaults d~at were in compl iance with the provisions of this s tandard at tbe t ime of installation shall be permi t ted to be c o n f n u e d in use.

4-5.5.3 Directional sprinkler beads that will provide coverage into the face of the shelves sh~dl be provided.

7-2 Motion Picture Fihn Laboratories. 7-2.5.2 In all c,-,ses, sprinklers sh,'dl be a r ranged so tllat no t more

than two mach ine s are pro tec ted by any one sprinkler !:cad. SUBSTANTIATION: This c o m m e n t is a result of a Standards Council directive to centralize sprinkler system informat ion f rom other NFPA documen t s . Informat ion f rom NFPA 40 was omi t ted d u r i n g t h e ROP stage of tile process and is being inc luded here. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITI'EE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 20

( Log #CC501 ) Commit tee : AUT-AAC

13- 134a - ([5-37 (New)]) : Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Correla t ing Commi t tee on Automat ic

rinkler Systems MMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-56

RECOMMENDATION: Utilizing NFPA's extract policy, copy tile sprinkler system installation criteria f rom NFPA 432, (lode for the Storage of Organ ic Peroxide Formulations, 1997 edition, its Section 5-37 iLs follows:

"5-37 ()rganic Peroxide Formulat ions. 5-37.1 See NFPA 432 for applicable terms not def ined in Chapter

1. 5-37.2 Where automat ic sprinkler protect ion is provided for (;lass

I organic peroxide formula t ions in quanti t ies exceeding 2000 Ib (907 kg), it shall be a deluge system." SUBSTANTIATION: This c o m m e n t corrects asa omission made du r ing tlae ROP stage :t~ sprinkler system informat ion f rom other NFPA codes and s tandards was to be ei ther copied or re ferenced into NFPA 13. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept.

Please refer to f ront mat ter for Technical Correlat ing Commit tee halloa results.

(Log #191) Commit tee : AUT-HBS

13- 135 - ( [Chapter 6]): Reject SUBMITTER: T h o m a s H. Miller, Varley-Campbell & Assoc., Inc . /Glen Ellyn Vol Fire Co. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-244 RECOMMENDATION: Delay or reconsider the incorpora t ion of NFPA 24 into NFPA 13. Remove all text ,associated witta the combina t ion effort. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Not all bui ldings or propert ies that have a need for u n d e r g r o u n d | i re protect ion water mains are equ ipped with au tomat ic sprinkler systems. There is a need for NFPA 24 its a s tand a lone d o c u m e n t for use on these properties. Presently, the wording f rom NFPA 24 is being force fit into tiffs expanded document - Some of the material presently in NFPA 24 is not I)eing incorpora ted hecause it olwiously does not belong. Odler material is awkward and is being forced into where it does not belo tag. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: T he Technical Commi t tee believes that private fire service mains are a critical part of a sprinkler system its they connec t the system with the water supply and that they shou ld be addressed I W NFPA 13. Additionally, where private fire mains will he nsed for manua l fire f ighting, this application will be addressed by NFPA 14, which will have its scope expanded . NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20

VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION: AFFIRMATIVE: 18 NEGATIVE: 1 NOT RETURNED: 1 Patel

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: BONDS: NFPA 24 should remain in print, fllerefore el iminat ing

tile need to incorporate sections of that d o c u m e n t into NFPA 13. The absorpt ion of NFPA 24 into NFPA 13 w~s tile result of Standards Council directive; however, private fire service mains are an entity ,all in dmmselves and shou ld be :addressed independen t ly of sprinkler systems and s tandpipes.

(Log #27) Commit tee : A! IT-HBS

13- 136 - ( [Chapter 6] 2-6, 4-14.4.2, 4-14.4.3): Accept SUBMITTER: Technica l Correlat ing Commi t tee on Automat ic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-37 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correla t ing Commi t t ee agrees with the action of die Tecbnic;d Commi t tee on H,'mging ,and Bracing of Water-Based Fire Protect ion Systems (TCH&B) but r e c o m m e n d s that tile following be added ,as part of file Substant ia t ion for the proposal because the proposed changes are more than editorial:

%Vith regard to h imging provisions, die criteria for hangers in concrete have been reorganized. The s t a t emen t that rod size is measu red at the root d iameter of the th read has been el iminated based o n recogni t ion of s tandard industry practice. Tile s t a tement that drive screws are permi t ted only in conjunc t ion with U-hook hangers has been changed to also permi t their use a.s part of a listed hange r assembly hav ing two points of a t tachment , which is cons idered eqnivalent. Coach screw rods have been added alongside lag screws in the r equ i r emen t s for m i n i m u m plank and beam thickness based on file equivalent na ture of their a t tachment . A general s t a t ement has been added to require trapeze hangers where needed to trimsfer loads to appropr ia te structural members . The h lmging criteria for nonmeud l i c pipe has been made m o re gener ic ,anticipating new types of special listed pipe. The criteria for lengdl of u n s u p p o r t e d a rmorers has been changed to reference "cumulative horizontal length" to clarify that it is no t abe ne t distance to the sprinkler in the plan view that is of consequence , bu t rather the total pipe length in the event of a swing joint . Sprig- nps and drops have been added to the u n s u p p o r t e d a rmorer criteria b ~ e d on the fact that the st~mdard does not cnrrently differentiate between these assemblies and sprinklers a t tached directly to the armorer . Tile basic criteria for hang ing of cross mains has been expmaded to apply to idl m,'-dns. A maximuul distance to hange r of 24 inches f rom tim centerl ine has been establ ished for risers or riser sections when they ,-ire provided with suppor t f rom horizont~d connect ions , such as the main at the top of the riser. This is cons idered a reasonable limit based on the need to prevent excessive m o m e n t s on tile horizontal pipin!~ and its fittings. The criteria for risers in high bays and vertical Shrifts have been clarified to not more than 25 ft between points of suppor t .

Widl regard to ear thquake protect ion provisions, criteria h~s been added to address the location of flexible couplings on risers in multi-story bui ldings where the piping serving the sprinkler system on each floor is no t near the ceiling. The proposal calls for the uppe r flexible coupl ing to be widfin 24 inches of the ceiling, bu t provides that an addit ional flexible coupl ing be provided on the vertical por t ion of the tie-in piping if the tie-in piping is below such point. This a r r a n g e m e n t is expected to permi t the riser assembly and vertical tie-in p ip ing to move as a uni t to accommo&t te expected story drift. The r equ i r emen t for flexible coupl ings near bui ld ing ~expansion jo in t s has been clarified with a 24-inch m a x i m u m distance, replacing the fo rmer "at or near" reference. A dist inction h,~s been made between requ i rements for "bracing" versus requ i rements for "restraint," which is considered a lesser degree of effort toward ho ld ing tile p iping in place. Where II-hooks are used to provide restrifint, dae r equ i r emen t h:ts been added dmt the legs be bent out at least 30 degrees f rom vertical, to match the criteria when such han~,ers are used its braces. Tile r equ i r emen t dmt swv, ty bracing be 'concentric" has been deleted based on the fact that brace a t t achmen t c o m p o n e n t s are required to be listed for dleir i n t ended use. A new rule hits been added that a longitudinal brace be no more than 40 ft f rom tile end of a run of main. Tiffs r equ i r emen t is needed in addi t ion to the 80 l'l m a x i m u m spacing to properly locate the bracing."

5 9 7

Page 46: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

Ill p repar ing a TCC note to Otis proposal a public c o m m e n t f rom tile T(;(.; will automatical ly I)e submit ted.

The T(;(; also notes that task g roups of the TCH&B Commi t t ee are currently address ing Section 6-2.2.3.4 on u n s u p p o r t e d arulovers and Section 6-3 on the restraint of undergronr ld piping its indicated in fire Preprint, so public commen t s on these two sections are also being solicited. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is a direction from file Automat ic Sprinklers Technical Correla t ing Commi t t ee in accordance witir 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of dre Regulat ions Governing Commi t tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept.

No specific act ion required. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 N()T RETI IRNED: 1 Patel

(Log #229) Commit tee : AI IT-HBS

13- 137- ([6-1.1.1] 2-6.1.1 Exception No. 2): Accept in Principle in Part SUBMITTER: R o h m d J . Huggins, Americ~m Fire Sprinkler A~sn. COMMENT ON P R O P O S A L N O : 1.3-39 RECOMMENDATION: Add text as follows:

Exception No. 2: Bolts, 1 l-I)olts, a n d screws need not he listed. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Since tlaese componen t s are no t current ly listed, even t hough they attach to the s tructure, tire criteria should clearly reflect their listing is no t required. T he C'oinmittee Sta tement on file initial proposal indicated fire s t andard ;dready adequate ly addresses the issue. Tire s t andard addresses these devices in only two ways: They are to be listed or certified by a P.E. Nei ther criteria is cnrrent ly be ing met. Unless the C, ommi t t ee interlds for this to be the case, (which is no t warranted) this issue needs to he clarified. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle in Part.

1. Add it new Exception No. 2 to Section 6-1.1.1 to read as foil ows:

"Fasteners ,~s specifically identif ied in 6-1.5 need not be listed." 2. R e n u m b e r Sections 6-1.4.5 t h rough 6-1.4.5.8 its 6-1.5 t h rough

6-1.5.8 accordingly and ret ide Section 6-1.4.5 as "Screws and Bolts." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: T he proposed except ion was revised to more clearly indicate die Teclmical Commit tee ' s in tent that s tandard f:~steners as specifically identif ied in NFPA 13 are no t cons idered to be part of the hange r assembly requi r ing listing. ()flier fiLstener itssemblies not specifically identif ied in NFPA 13 are requi red to be listed. I~-bohs ,as r e c o m m e n d e d by the submi t te r where no t inchlded in the except ion ,as the Tecbnicid ( ; . m m i t t e e believes that 1 l-bolts are cons idered a urild steel banger fo rmed f rom rods and this is cnrrent ly addressed by the s tandard. Tile r e n n m b e r i n g of Section 6-1.4.5 is an editorial change. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 N()T RETIIRNED: 1 Patel

(Log #17) Commit tee : A1JT-HBS

13- 138- ([6-1.1.2] 2-6.1.2): Reject SUBMITTERz J o h n J. W:dsh, Uni ted P~ssn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-38 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Replace tlre word "system" wit1 the word "steel" in Except ion No. 2. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Curren t wording would allow soft materials sucb a.s copper and p l~ t ic to be suppor t ed by structural m e m b e r s w i th .u t considera t ion of possible vibration and resul t ing friction. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reiect. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Technical (?,ommittee is no t aware of any data that suppor ts the r e c o m m e n d a t i o n that possible vibration and friction would weakenp la s t i c and copper pipe. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS E L I G I B L E T O VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETI)'RNED: 1 Patel

(Log #90) Commit tee : AI.JT-HBS

1~ 139 - (6-1.1.4): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Will iamJ. Boswell, Wansau HPR Engr COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1%37 RECO MMENDATION: Add the following to 6-1.1.4:

"Nuts and washers shall be sized c o m m e n s u r a t e with the d imneter of the hole in tile pipe or angle iron." S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Trapeze hange r assemblies us ing nuts and washers th readed onto banger rods inserted th rough holes drilled in the angle iron or pipe to suppor t the trapeze is a c o m m . n practice. This shou ld be specifically addressed, or material

eCifications shou ld be deteruf ined. MMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

I Add tile following as the I:tst two sentences for Section 6-1.1.4: "Holes for bolts sball no t exceed 1 /16 inch greater than the

d imneter of the bolt. Bolts shall be provided with a flat w:,mher and [lilt." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This action specifies tire tolerances tire Technical Commi t t ee believes are acceptable to ensure proper

r formance of the banger . BER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 20

VO TE ON COMMITTEE ACTION: AFFIRMATIVE: 19 N()T RETIIRNED: 1 Patel

(Log #91) Commit tee : AI3T-HBS

1~ 140 - (6-2.1.3): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Will iamJ. Boswell, Wausau HPR Engr COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1,3-37 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Revise ,~s follows:

6-2.1.3" System piping shall be substantially suppor ted f rom bui lding s t r u c t u r a l c o n l p o n e n t s (see 6-1.1). The m e t h o d used to attach tile hange r to tile s tructure and tile load placed on the hange r should take into accoun t an}, limits imposed by the s tructure. For system mains h u n g to a single beam, joist, or pnrlin, provide the c~dculations requi red in 6-1.1 to prove the s t ructure capable of suppor t ing the arr~mgement. Design manual informat ion for p re -eng ineered s t ructures or odm r speciahy cons t ruc t ion material manufac tu re r s may be consul ted, if appropria te .

Cont inue the exception. Add to the appendix: A-6-2.1.3 System mains h u n g to a single beam, truss, or purlin

may ,affect tile structural integrity of the bui ld ing by in t roducing excessive loads not ant ic ipated in the bui ld ing design. Also, special condi t ions such as collateral and concen t ra ted load limits, type or me thod of a t t achmen t to the structural componenLs, or location of a t t a c h m e n t to the s tructural c o m p o n e n t s may need to be observed when hang ing system piping in pre -engineered metal bui ldings or bui ldings us ing o ther specialty structural componen t s such i~s composi te wood joists or combina t ion wood and tubular metal joists . S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : As is, 6-2.1.3 conflicts with 6-1.1, i tem b, which states tha t the points of a t t achmen t mus t be capable of suppor t ing the system (6-2.1.3 states that the a t t a ch m en t points mus t suppor t tire weight of the water filled pipe plus 250 pounds) . Further , the s tandard main ta ins that tile points of a t t achmen t mus t be substantial, bnt does no t have langnage to reinforce that dfis may need to be specifically addressed by the person responsible for the layout. Usually, the bui lding specification process is far ahead of tile process of de t e rmin ing the details of the layout, which is at the discretion of the person responsible for tile layout. Large d iameter p iping installations often are employed to accommoda te weak water supplies, and are c o m m o n i , applicat ions of l a rge~rop or ESFR sprinklers, and will be incre;Lsingly so in applicat ions us ing sprinklers with K factors of 25.

An example follows that demons t ra te s hange r and loading limit[tin[is for a c o m m o n pre-engineered building:

Put ESFR system wit[ 2 1/2-inch schednle 10 transfer lines, 6-inch near re;fins, and 4-inch far mains in a Butler M a n n f a c t u r i n g Company design bui ld ing us ing stan&ard Landma rk Truss Pnr l ins requires tha t t ransfer line hangers , us ing top beam clamps mus t not be installed more than 8 ft 6 in. on center. If that limit is exceeded, tile himgers shou ld be U-bolts installed over tile top or bo t tom chord of the purlin located only at the wet)-to-chord intersection. Furdler, if the near and far mains are to be h u n g to a single truss purlin, a special truss purl in des igned for addit ional

598

Page 47: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

live load is required. If trapeze hangers using to/) beam clamps are used, the far main ltmager spacing shonld not exceed 8 ft 6 in. on center and the near main sjgacing should not exceed 4 ft 4 in. on center, unless the previous W described I J-bolt hanger is used. For referenee, NFPA 13 states that the maximum distance between hangers for all of the piping described in this example is 15 ft 0 iu. • '111 c e n t e r .

COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. Add all the materkd proposed by the submitter to a new Section

A-6-2.1.3 with the following changes: " A - I ' 1 - 9 | 3 ( i ¢) I 'A~ ~ . . . . . . . . . h i " ; . . . . . I . . . l l I . . . . . t . . . . . . . +;-,11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I

I . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . 7 . . . . . . . V ' Y ' " 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . )" " " l ' t . . . . . . . . ".-. . . . . [ . , . I I . l l . . . . t . . . . . . . . . . . . a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *o / . . . . . #i 1 i x I I .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . s ..................... 1 . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . z. T h e m e t h c d

used to attac[t the haager to the strueture and the load placed on the hanger shonld take into account any limits imposed by the s t r l l c t t n - e , Ft;;" a)'::tc:n mah:a hm~g tc a ~:~.~l.. !.'earn, jclat, ar i:;::;'li:;, pr:;;'i:Ic :!~c c;:lc::]:::~a:;,~ raq::!rcd in '5 1. l ::; i-;ra-'c ,*lYe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [..td~ ,.*" ........... ; . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I)esign nlanual

informatiou for [we-engineered structures or other specialty coustruction material n.anufacturers :nay sbould he consulted, if appropriate.

( ; : ; : ~ t i : ~ U C t / ; U U X C t ' i ) t i t ; n v , ' t , l , ] t . . +I . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ; . . ,

• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1"1 . . . . . . . . . . . . A 6 "2. 1.2 ~, gysteln nlains hung to a single beam, truss, or purlirl

m,tv ;d'fect the structura ' integrity of the building by introducing cxccssive loads not antici t~ated in the bnilding design. Also, special c~mditious such as collateral and concentrated load limits, type or method ot attachlnent to the structural coral)orients, or Iocatiotl of a t t a c h l l l e n t :o tile s t r u c t u r a l c o l n p o n e n L s i]lay rleed to be obsecved when hanging systent piping in pre-engiueered metal buildings or buildings using other specialty structural components such a,s composite woo, t joists or combination wood and tubular nwt,t[ joists." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The calculations required by Section 6-1.1 of the Preywint are intended for hangers and not to lilt" structural elements to which the hangers are attached, The Technical (]onunittee believes the remaining informatiou prolmsed by the sulmfiIIcl is advisory and should be retained in t lw al)pendix, NUMBER OF COMMITFEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AI:FIRMAT1VE: 19 Nt)T RETI ~RNEI): 1 Patel

COMMENT ON AFFIRMATIVE; FLEMIN(;: In new A-6-2.1.3, I;Lst line, replace "material

infl.illlt:~.ctln'els" with "n~aterials." If "nlanufacturers" is to be itl~ luded il should be the tirsl w . rd in the sentence.

(Log #206) (;ommittce: At 1T-HBS

13- 141 - (6-2.3.3): Aco'pt SUBMITTER: Mark Fessenden, Central Sprirtkler Co. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-37 RECOMMENDATION: Revise text :Is follows:

"The m J s u p p o r t c d l eng th b e t w e e n the e n d spr ink l e r and the I:cst hallger on the line shall not be greater dhtn 36 in. (!}.91 ! ......

(_a.,t nun) pipe or 48 in. ~)t.2L :n:::) ( .~, m) (.0.0l 4 l/k) for 1 in. ,)r. 1 "~9 for 1-1,/4 iu. (31.8 ram) pipe, and 60 in. (!.52 ...... ...... / x (1.59 m) ~11I . . . "

SUBSTANTIATION: These metric etlui~,~deuts are in meters and nol nfil]imeters. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITrEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 N()T RETIJRNED: I Patel

(Log #150) (hmunittee: AI 7T-HBS

17;- 142- (6-2.3.4Exception): Accept SUBMITTER: Kermeth E. lsman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-171a RECOMMENDATION: Delete rite first sentence of the second par,tgraph of the exception. Move the lzLst sentence to tile first paragral,h of the exception. The exception now reads:

Exception: Where the maximum pressure at fl3e sprinkler exceeds 100 psi (6.9 bar) and a branch line above a ceiling supplies sprinklers in a pendent position below the ceiling, the cumulative horizontal length of an unsnppor ted armorer to a sprinkler, or sprinkler drop shall not exceed 12 in. (305 ram) for steel pipe and 6 in. (152 mm) for copper tnbe. The hanger closest to the sprinkler shall be of a type that prevents upward movement of the piping. SUBSTANTIATION: The reference to the base Paragraph 6-9.3.4 is no longer needed due to the actions of Proposal 13-171a (Log #CP97). This now needs to be cleaned t@. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: l0 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETI~RNED: 1 P;ttel

(Log #182) (]ommittee: AIIT-HBS

13- 143 - (6-2.3.4.1 (New)): Reject SUBMITTER: Thom,~sJ. Forsythe, (;age-Babcock & Assoc., Inc. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1.9,-37 RECOMMENDATION: Insert a new section following 6-2.3.4 as it appears in the 1999 Edition Preprint included ;~s part of the 1999 Spring Association Teclmical Meeting Report on Proposals to read as follows:

6-2.3.4.1 Armorers of any length connected to sprig-ups, to sprinkler dro )s, or to sprig-ups and sprinkler drops where the total cumulative length of piping measu red f rom the ~ranch ine fitting to the sprinkler(s) is 12 ft or longer shall be provided with an additional hanger. SUBSTANTIATION: The Standard includes requirements for support ing armorers exceeding 24 in. in length. The Standard does riot address shorter armorers which supply excessively long sprig-ups or sprinkler drops. The Standard does, however, include requirements f i)r tile protection of piping against d:unage where sut~iect to earthquakes including the installation of sway bracing f'Or main and branch line piping. Further, requiremems exist to [,rhyMe restraint against lateral movement for sprinkler sprig-ups 4 ft or longer. Currently, no provision exists to prevent movement of branch line couplings or t)rzmch line fittings connected to a rmore r / sp r ig -up /d rop assemblies having weights sufficient to induce rotation in the branch line fitting or coupling. This recommendat ion provides for resistance to movement in b r a n c h lines caused by the weight of piping attached to armorers where the cumulative lengdl of piping is excessive. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: No data has been submitted indicating a prohlem where drops have beeu attacbel[ to arlnovers less than 24 inches in length for steel pipe and less than 12 inches for copperp ipe . NUMBER O F COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE; 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATWE: 18 NE(;ATIVE: 1 NOT RETIIRNED: 1 Patti

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: PEAR(;E: This comment should have been accepted. Problems

with armorers and sprinkler drops were the [wimary failure experienced by our clients in the Northridge earthquake. The additional restraint provided by the hanger will also hel l, prevent tim shearing of sprinkler heads (which w:es the second most c o m m o n failure in Northridge earthquake), While heads may not seem ;Ls important ~s maintaining the integrity of the piping, it h:ts some hidden dangers. Even if one head ,,pens the sprinkler system will be shut down. With the turmoil ~ffter the earthquake, you don't know if a system will be un'ned on ;Ls fast as you would like.

People a r e c o n c e r n e d about their h o l n e a n d I ; t n l i l y a n d m a y leave this site with the valve impaired. There is also tile p,)ssibility of the shortage of sprinkler heads and sprinkler contractors to make tile repairs.

The Mexico City e a r t h q u a k e showed ntore fires in tile da)~ following the earthqnake rather than dnring die <lay of die earthquake. This is most likely due to gas and electric services being restored. Either the flleI source a n d / o r file ignition source wzLs restored resulting in a fire. With the sprinkler system turned off, the sprinkler system is no more valuable dlan a s'~tem down with m:}ior main faihn-es.

599

Page 48: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 1 A 9 9 R O C

(Log #207) Comnfit tee: AI.IT-HBS

13- 144- (6-2.4.1): Accept SUBMITTER: Kevin Maugh:m, Central Sprinkler Co. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-37

I RECOMMENDATION: Revise text to read: "Hangers for m~dns shall be in accordance with Ta,~!'.: 6 2.'2

Section 6-2.2 or between..." S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : By referencing Secdon 6-2.2, this would allow for the inclusion of Exception No. 2 with regard to modif ied hanger spacings per individnat listings. By only re ferenc ing the Table 6-2.2, it may be in te rpre ted that individual listed spacings would not apply to mains. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 N()T RETI TRNED: 1 Patel

(Log #209) ( 'ommit tee : AI~T-HBS

13- 145 - (6-2.5.4): Accept SUBMITTER: Ben Figueiredo, Centred Sprinkler Co. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-37

I RECOMMENDATION: Spelling: bza~;.' to b,__~. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N " Typographical . COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RET!]RNED: 1 Patel

(Log #122) C, ommit tee : AI/T-HBS

13- 146 - (6-3): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: James B. Biggins, J&H Marsh & M cL ennan C O M M E N T O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-37 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Revise wording developed as a result of a mee t ing of a T:~k Group of the Technical Commi t t ee on Hang ing and Bracing of Sprinkler Piping.

6-3 (24-8-6) Re.~trak~k~g Restraint of Fire Mains. (13-37) 6-3.1" (24-8-6.1) All tees, plugs, ~-'tps, bends, reducers , valves,

and hydrant branches shall be restrained against m o v e m e n t b_.,2 ntilizin~ thrust blocl~s or res t ra ined jo in t systems. Con t inuous weMed steel 9ipe and piping with fi~sed jo in ts shall no t require :tdditional res t ra ining.

6-3.'2* (24-8-6.2) Methods of Restraining Fire Mains. 6-3.2.1 (24-8-6.2.2) T h rus t Blocks. T h r u s t Blocl~s shall be

cot~sidered satisfactory where soil is suitable for their use. 6-3.2.1.1 The thrus t blocks shall be of a concrete mix not leaner

t l l a l | ( ) t i e part ce hen! , two and one-half parts sand, and five parts S t ( l l l e .

6-3.~.I.~ Thrust blocks slml] be placed between undisturbed earth am] the f i t t ing t¢~ be restrained, and sh:dl be of such bearing to ensure aclecmate resistance to tile thrtlst to be erlcounterect.

6-3.~.1.3 Whenever possible, thrust blocks shall be placed so that the ioints will be accessible for repair.

6-3.2.2 Restra ined Jo in t Systems. Fire mains utilizing restrained ]hint systems shall include locking mechanica l or mlsh on joints , mech.mical ioints ntilizing set screw retainer glar~gs, bolted f lange ioiuts, heat fused or welded Joints. pipe clamps and tie rods, or o ther approved me t hods or devices. P~pc ~ . . . . . . . . . . ~ ": . . . . . ~"

. . . . . . . . it . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

"-~.'~,'..';:^~.~" ~ ' L ' ~ d~.'LT:. ~2 .~3- ,2L~:2Cv, , . ] ' . vZ ,~ . '~ ~'" 6-3.2,2.1 (24-8-6.2.3) Sizing ~ Clamps, Rods, Bolts, and Wa.shers. 6-3.2.2.1.I~a+ ( ' l~nps shall be I / 2 in. x 2 in. (12.7 mm x 50.8 ram) for pipe 4 in. to 6 ira.; 5 /8 in. x 2 1/2 in. (15.9 mm x 63.5 ram) for pipe 8 in. to I0 in.; 5 /8 in. x 3 in. (15.9 mm x 76.2 ram) for pipe 12 in. BoLt holes shall be 1/16 in. ( I .6 ram) diameter larger than bolts.

0-3.2.2.2~o)- Min imum rod size shall be 5 /8 in. (15.9 ram) diameter. Table 6-3.2.2.2 gives numbers of ~trious diameter rods required for a given pipe size. When using bolt ing rods, the diameter of mechanical jo in t bolts limits tlae size of rods to 3 /4 in. (19.] mm). Threaded sectjor~s of rods shall not be formed or bent. When using clamps, rods shall be used in pairs, two to a clam W.

Exception: Assemblies in which a restraint is made by m ean s of two clamps canted on the barrel of the pipe shall be permi t ted to use one rod per c lamp if approved for the specific installation by the authori ty having jur isdict ion.

W h e n using combina t ions of rods greater in n u m b e r t lmn two, the rods shall be symmetrical ly spaced.

Table ~ ~.2.2 6-3.2.2.2 (24-8-6.2.3) Rod Number i Diameter Combinations

Nomina l Pipe Size 5 / 8 in. 3 / 4 in. 7 / 8 in. 1 in.

inches (15.9 ram) (19.1 ram) (22.2 ram) (25.4 m) 4 2 - ~

6 2 - - - 8 3 2 - - 10 4 3 2 - 12 6 4 3 2 14 8 5 4 3 16 10 7 5 4

Table has been derived us ing pressure of 225 psi (15.5 bars) and design stress of 25,000 psi (172.4 MPa).

6-3.2.2.3{-e-)- Clamp bolts shall be 5 / 8 in. (15.9 m m ) diameter for pipe 4 in., 6 in., and 8 in . ; .3 /4 in. (19.1 ram) d iameter for pipe 10 in.; and 7 /8 in. (22.2 ram) d iameter for pipe 12 in.

6-3.~.~.4 (d) W,~shers can be cast i ron or steel, r o u n d or square. Dimens ions for cast-iron washers shall be 5 / 8 in. x 3 in. (15.9 m m x 76.2 ram) for pipe 4 in., 6 in., 8 in., and 10 in.; and 3 / 4 in. x 3 1 /2 in. (19.1 m m x 88.9 ram) for pipe 12 in. Dimensions for steel w~she~ shall he 1 /2 in. x 3 in. (12.7 m m x 76.2 mm ) for pipe 4 in., 6 in., 8 in., and 10 in.; and 1/2 in. x 3 1 /2 in. (12.7 nnn x 88.9 ram) for 12 in. Holes shall be 1 /8 in. (3.2 ram) larger thau rods.

6-3.2.3 (24-8-6.2.4) Sizes of Restraint Straps for Tees. Straps shall he 5 / 8 in. (15.9 mm) thick and 2 1 /2 in. (63.5 m m ) wide for pipe 4 in., 6 in., 8 in., :u]d 10 in.; 5 / 8 in. (15.9 mm) thick and 3 in. (76.2 ram) wide for ~ipe 12 in. Rod boles sh:d[ be 1/16 in. (1.6 mm) larger than rocLs. Dimens ions in inches (ram) ]'or straps are suitable ei ther for mechanicM or push-on jo in t tee fittiugs.

A ~ ~,

• c B

Rod hole

I I I I

Figure 6-3.2.3 Restraint straps for tees.

Table 6-3.2.3 (24-8-6.2.4) Restraint Straps for Tees

Nomlna l A B C D Pipe Size

in. in. m m in. m m in. m m in. m m 4 12 1/2 318 10 1/8 257 2 1/2 64 1 3 /4 44 6 14 1/2 368 12 1/8 308 3 9 / 1 6 90 2 13/16 71 8 16 3 / 4 425 14 3 /8 365 4 21/32 118 3 29/32 (.~) 10 19 1/16 484 16 11/16 424 5 3 /4 146 5 127 12 22 5 /16 567 19 3 /16 487 6 3 / 4 171 5 7 /8 149

6 0 0

Page 49: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 - - A 9 9 R O C

6-3.2.4 (24-8-6.2.5) Sizes of Plug Strap for Bell End of Pipe. Strap shall be 3 /4 in, (19.1 mm) thick, 2 1 / 2 i n . (63.5 ram) wide. Strap length is the same ,as dimension. A for tee straps given in Figure 6- 3.2.3; distance between centers of rod boles is the same as dimension B for tee straps.

~^~.CZ$" .2"L%Y7 . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-3.2.6* (24-8-6.2.7) Material used for clamps, rods, rod

couplings or turnbuckles, bolts, washers, restraint straps, and plug stral)s sball be of material having physical and chemical characteristics such that its deteriorat ion under stress can be predicted with reliability.

6-3.2.7* (24-8-6.2.8) After installation, rods, nuts, bolts, wasliers, clamps, and other restraining devices, except thrust blocks, shall be cleaned and tboroughly coated with a bituminous or other acceptable corrosion-retarding material.

6-3.2.8 (24-8-6.3.9) On steep grades, mains shall be properly res t ra ined to l?revent slipping. The pipe shall be restrained at die bottom of a hdl ,and at any turns (lateral or vertical). The restraining shall be done either to natural rock or by means of suitable piers built-on ll~e downhill side of . the bell. Bell ends shall be installed facing uphill. Straiglit runs on lfilis shall be rest[ained ~o doe te orn]in ed,by tl) e design e n gi'f~eer: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ZL~'~;. ~ ~Z'L=L 7--7.?P.ZZZ'=-_.ZY"22".,".F.~,'~.Z"~".'..'Z.P.'Z~ZT_Z'27~^ 7."_ =..~\ ;;'SL'.'.~ .L" .Y.".. "7~'2;2t'o'~L "=:,Z 2."7: Y 7. YY. Z:o'.: _'~ _"_"_ Y~' ,'Z. "- . . . . . . I ~1 . . . . . k l ~ . l . . . I . - - I I k . . . . I ~__~1 ~1 . - -~ ~1 . . . ' ~ l - - + . . . . I I I k . .

A-6-3.1 (24-A-8-6.1) It is a fundamental design princinle of fluid mech;mics that dynamic and static nressures, acting at changes in size or direction of a nine. nroduce unbalancd darust forces-at . bends, tees. wves. deadends, reducers, offsets, etc. This nrocedure includes consideration of later,al soil pressure and nine/soi l friction, variables that can be reliably cletermined usin~ nresent-dav soils en~r leer ing knolwed~e. Refer to (13-4.1~ for a i i s t o f references for use in calciflatin~ and determinin~ Joint restraint

Except for the case of welded jo ints and approved special restrained joints, such ,as provided by approved mechanical jo in t retainer glands or locked meclianical and push-on joints, the usual joints for underg round pipe are expected to be iaeld in place by the soil in whicli die pipe is buried. Gasketed push-on and mechanical joints witliout special locking devices-have limited ability to resist separation dlie to movement of die pipe.

Ad'o-3,2 (24-A-8-6.2) Resistance i~ orovided by transferrin~ the thrust force to the soil throulth the I~'tr~er bearing area of tile block ;~nch that the resultant pressnre a trainst-the soil does not exceed file horizontal bearin~ stren~th of the soil. Desilm of thrust blocks consists o f de terminin~ the a-ovronriate bearimt a rea of the block for a narticular set of conditions. T h e narameters inx/olved in the design include Dine size. desitrn pressure, an~le of the bend (or coniilrurafion oi ~ tile fittinv inYvoheedL and the horizontal bearimt strenaxh of the soil.

.,.'L'°-.';Y-'L'S"'L'7..L-L_~S:'E"_..vL'ysLc'2ZLZLU.~T:~:;Z2"~L =2 .:'.L . . . . .

d . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . u d - .

, " _ . _ ~ / S y s t e m r i s e r

- aOna~t~r °Ta~eg e "

and spigot pipe

_ ~ "Rods

Figure A-6-3.2(b) Typical connect ion to a fire protection system riser.

Table A-6-3.2 (24-A-8-6.2) "Thrust at Fittings at 100 PSI Water Prissure for Ductile Iron and PVC Pipe

' I Total Pounds

Nom Pipe Dia. In. Dead End 90 ° Bend 45 ° Bend 4 1,1810 2,559 1,3,85 706 6 3.739 5,288 2,862 1,459 8 • 6,433 9,097 4.923 2,510 l0 9,677 13,685 7,406 3.776 12 13,685 10,353" 10,474 5,340 14 / 18,$85 26,001 14,072 7,174 16 23,779 33,628 18,199 9,278 18 29,865 42,235 2"2,858 11,653 .90 36,644 51,822 28,046 14,298

/- 24 52,279 73,934 40,01 $ 29,398' 30 80,425 113,738 61,554 31 ,$80 36 115,209 16~,93] 88,177 44,952 42 155,528 219,950 119,036 60,684 48 202,683 286,637 155,127 79,083

H " I I i "r , , r , ,

22 1 / 2 ° Bend 11 1/4 ° Bend ~ 5 L ~ 733

1,261 1,897 865 2,683 3,604 1.644 4,661 2.126 5,855 2.67o 7,183 3272 10,249 4.675 15,7~ ~ , 5 8 5 LQ=!~ 3 0 A 8 0 39,733 r~0rtO0

NOTE: To de te rmine thrust at pressure other than 100 psi, multiply the thrust obtained in the table by the ratio of the pressure to 100. For example, die thrust on a 12 in., 90 ° bend at 125 psi is 19,353 x 125/100 - 24,191 pounds.

601

Page 50: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

A-6-3.2.7 (24-A-8-6.2.8) Examples of materials and the standards covering these materials are:

(at) Clanlps. Steel (see Note). (b) Rods. Steel (see Note). (c) Bolts. Steel (ASTM A307, Standard'Speeific~ttion for Carbon

Steel Bolts aod Studs). (d) Washers. Steel (see Note 1). Crust iron (Class A cast iron as

defined by ASTM A126, Standard Specification for Gray Iron Ca.sting for Valves, Flanges and Pipe Fittings).

(el Anchor Straps and Plug Straps. Steel (See Note). (t) Rod (:ouplings or Turnbuckles. Malleable iron (ASTM

A197, Stand/u'd Specification for Cupola Malleable h'on). NC)TE: Steel of modified range merctlant quality :ts defined in

I LS. Federal Standard No. 66(;, Standard for Steel Chemical (:olnposition and Harden Ability, April 18, 1967, change notice No. 2, April 16, 1970, :ts promulgated by tile I1.S. Federal ( ;overnment (;eneml Services Adminisn'ation.

Tim alcove-listed materials do not preclude file use of other materials that wilt also satisfy file requirements of this section.

A-6-3.2.9 (24-A-8-6.2.1) (;oncrete thrust blocks are one of the I I I l ) S [ c o n l l n o n n l e t l / o d s o f restraint now i l l [ l s e , provided stable s,,il conditions prevail and space requirements perntit placement. Successful bh,cking is delmndent upon t~tCtOrS such as location, .tv,dlalfility and placement ot concrete, and possibility of ilislgllliance by future excavations.

Tln'ust Mocks are generally categorized into two groups: bearing and gravity tdocks. l'igure A-6-?,.2.9(:t) depicts :t typical {roaring thrust block on a lloriz(mtal betul.

O , . o : . . . . . . . . . . ; . . . . . . . . . :•l.•rl !)), trprlc.ferriilg .t.- .1 ...... + c ........ +~ d . . . . . . ;I ................... I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . o + d . . . . . 11 A . . . . . . . + . . . . . . AI * 1 . ~ I . ~ , ~ : . . . . +~,1 g . . ~ : . , ~

strc:;g-d~ of tl~c ~:~il. D::~ig;; :;f thr':~: b!c;ck~ ::'c;;~i~*~ c:f dett, r:ifinil;g ,*l;c .~i::[3ro[;r;ate . ......... ~, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l:naicular :;ct <:t candkka:a . The i::ara:n<:.*era i;~l,rO];tCd i;~ tl~e Z!Z'aig:; include pil;c :;iZc, dc:;ign i:;rcaau:'c, angle of t!~e b'cnd ~...

::,*:'~':;F_.4r!-~ ~;f tlvc qoH. Tile tollowing are general criteri;t fur bearing bh.:k clesign.

1. Bearing surface should, where possible, be placed against undisturbed soil• Where it is not possible, tile fill between tile bearing surface and undistrubed soil must be compacted to at le;Lst 90 percent Standard Proctor density•

2. Block height (11) should be equal to or less than one-half the total depth to the bottom of the block, (H t), but not less than tim pipe diameter (D).

3. Bluck height (it) should be chosen such that tile calculated block width (b) wtries between one and two times the height.

Tim required block area is

At, = (b)(b) = T (S0 /S , ,

Then, for a horizontal bend,

h = 2(Sf)(P)(A)sin((4/e)(h ) (Sb)

where Sf is a safety factor (usually 1.5 for thrust block design). A similar approach may be used to design bearing blocks to resist tile tllrust forces at tees, dead ends, etc. Typical w,,dues for conservative horizontal bearing strengfl~s of w, trious soil types are listed in TaMe A-6-3.2.9.

In lieu of tile ~dues for soil I,earing strength shown in Table A-6- 3.2.9, a designer miglit choose to use calculated Rankine pztssive twessure ( P ) or other determination of soil bearing strengtll

• p . .

[)ased on actual soil propemes.

Table A-6-3.2.9 (24-A-8-6.2.1) Horizontal Bearing Strengths

*Bearing Strength Soil Sh(lb/~t~) Muck 0 Soft Clay 1,000 Silt 1,500 Sandy Silt 3,000 Sand 4,(X)0 Sandy (?,lay 6,000 Hard Cla}, 9,00t)

Sb 4"7 Bearing pressure

S b ,,D

I '"u_ ",y',

' ........ "%gl I Sb

Figure A-6-3.2.9(a) Bearing thrust block.

602

Page 51: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

*Although die above bearing strength values have been used succe~fully in the design of thrust blocks and are considered to be conservative, flleir accuracy is totally d e p e n d e n t on accurate soil identification and evaluation. The ultimate responsibility for sblecting the proper bearing strength o f a particular soil type must rest with the design engineer.

(;~wity thrust blocks may be used to resist thrus t at vertical down bends. In a gravity thrust block, the weight of the block is the force providing equilibrium with the thrust force. The design

~ roblem is then to calculate the requirec[ volume of the thrust lock of a known density. The vertical componen t of the thrust

force in Figure A-6.3.2.9(b) is bal,'mced by the weight of the block.

Ty T

Sb

Figure A-6-3.2.9(b) Gravity thrust block.

It c:m bo e~ily be sh(,wn that Ty = PA sin 0. The required volume of the block is

Vg =~SfPA sin O / W m

where W m = density of the block material. In a case such ms the one shown, the horizontal componen t of thrust force

T x =PA (1 - cos 0)

must be resisted by the bearing of the right side of the block against die soil. Analysis of dais ,aspect will follow the same principles :m the above section on bearing blocks. (15-295, 15-298, 13-297) SUBSTANTIATION: 1. Editorial revisions to Section 6-3 for restraint of tmderground piping.

2. Added data for 5 1 /8 ° bends to Table A-6-3.2, needed information.

3. Deleted pipe sizes greater dlan 48 in. f rom Table A-6-3.2, sizes not readily available or used. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Accept the submitter 's proposed language with the following changes:

6-3 (24-8-6) P.c~dz. '~gJ_q.jl~Restcaint ~fJ~9.~ Fire Mains. {4ao -~ 6-3.1 C.,en eral 6-3.1.1" (24-8-6.1) All tees, plugs, caps, bends, reducers, valves,

,and hydrant branches shall be restrained against movement by utilizing thrust blocks in accordance with 6-3.2.2 or restrained jo in t systems in accordance with 6-3.2.3. Cc.~'2~:=z::z :'.'c!~c~ :=cc~ F!F=

Piping withTused or welded joints and piping Joined in accordance with 3-6 shall no t require additional restraining.

6-3.1.2 ~ (24-8-6.3.9) On steep ~rades. mains shall be nrooerlv restrained to nrevent sliDoin~. The nine sl~all be l'¢st~'ained at the bot tom of a h i l l a n d a t any turns (lateral or vertical), The restrainin~ shall be done e i ther to natural rock or

v

by means of suitable niers built on the downhill side of the bell. Bell ends shall be installed facin~ unhill. Straight runs on bills shall be restrained ,as de t e rmined by the design engineer .

6-3.2_*.4 (24-8-6.2.2) Thrust Blocks. Thrust Blocks shall be considered satisfactory where soil is suitable for flleir use.

6-3.2.1.4 The thrnst blocks shall be of a concrete mix not leaner than one part cement, two and one-half parts sand, and five parts stone.

6-3.2.-4-.2 Thrust blocks shall be placed between un~tisturbed earfla and the fitting to be restrained, ,and shah be of such bearing to ensure had.equate resistance to the thrust to be encountered.

6-3.2.-1-.3 Whenever possible, thrust blocks shall be placed so that the joints will be accessible for repair.

6-3.3-Lt~ Restrained Jo in t systems. Fire mains utilizing restrained jo in t systems shall include locking mechanical or push on joints, mechanical joints utilizing set screw retainer glangs, bolted flange joints, heat filsed or welded joints, pipe clamps and tie rods, or other approved methods or devices.

6-3.3.1 (24-8-6.2.3) Sizing Clamps, Rods, Bolts, ,and W~he r s .

~ Clamps shall be 1 /2 in. x 2 in. (12.7 m m x 50.8 mm) for pipe 4 in. to 6in . ; 5 /8 in. x 2 1/2 in. (15..9 mm x 63.5 mm) for pipe 8 in. to 10 in.; 5 /8 in. x 3 in. (15.9 mm x 76.2 mm) for pipe 12 in. Bolt holes shall be 1 /16 in. (1.6 ram) diameter larger than bolts.

~ Minimum rod size shall be 5/8 in. (15.9 mm) diameter. Table ~ ~ gives numbers of various diameter ~'ods required for a given -pipe size. When using bolting rods, d~ie d iameter of mechanical jo in t bolts limits the size of rods to 3 /4 in. (19.1 mm). Threaded sections of rods shall not be formed or bent. When us!ng clamps, rods shall be used in pairs, ~ao to a clamp.

Exception: Assemblies in wlfich a restraint, is made by means, of two clamps canted on the barrel-of the ptpe shall be permit ted to use one rod per clamp if approved for the specific installation by the authority having jurisdicd on.

When using combinations of rods grea ter in number than two, the rods shall be symmetrically spaced.

Table ~ 2 ~ (24-8-6.2.3) Rod N u m b e r - - Diameter Combinat ions

Nomina l ' -~

Pipe Size 5 / 8 in. $ / 4 ha. 7 / 8 in. 1 in. inches (15.9 ram) (19.1 m m ) (22.2 mm) (25.4 m)

4 2 - - - 6 2 - - - 8 3 2 - - 10 4 3 2 - 12 6 4 3 2 14 8 5 4 3 16 10 7 5 4

Table has been derived using pressure of 225 psi (15.5 bars) and design stress of 25,000 psi (17~.4 MPa).

~ Clamp bolts shall be 5 / 8 in. (15.9 ram) diameter for pipe 4 in., 6 in., and 8 in.; 3 / 4 in. (19.1 ram) diameter for pipe 10 in.; and 7 /8 in. (22.2 ram) diameter for pipe 12 in .

6.ao~L~+ ~ Washers can be cast iron or steel, round or square. Dimensions for cast-iron washers shall be 5 /8 in. x 3 in. (15.9 m m x 76.2 mm) for pipe 4 in., 6 in., 8 in., and 10 in.; ,and 3 /4 in. x 3 1/2 in. (19.1 mm x 88.9 ram) for pipe 12 in. Dimensions for steel washers shall be l/2_in, x 3 in. (12.7 mm x 76.2 ram) for pipe 4 in., 6 in., 8 in., and 10 in.; and 1/2 in. x 3 1/2 in. (12.7 mm x 88.9 mm) for 12 in. Holes shall be 1 /8 in. (3.2 mm) larger than rod~

6-$.$.2 (24-8-6.2.4) Sizes of Restraint Straps for Tees. Straps shall be 5 /8 in. (15.9 mm) thick and 2 1/2 in. (63.5 mm) wide for pipe 4 in., 6 in., 8 in., and 10 in.; 5 /8 in. (15.9 mm) thick and 3 in. (76.2 mm) wide for pipe 12 in. Rod holes shall be 1/16 in. (1.6 mm) larger than rods. Dimens ions in inches (mm) for straps are suitable either for mechanical or push-on jo in t tee fittings. Figure 6-3.3.2 and Table 6-3.3.2 shall be used in sizing the estraint straps.

i . A _1

Rod h o l e ~ Rod hole

Figure ~ ~ . 2 Restraint straps for tees.

603

Page 52: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

Table 6 - ~ % g ~ (24-8-6.2.4) Restraint Straps for Tees

N o m i n a l Pipe Size

in. in. mm 4 1 2 1 / 2 318 6 14 1 /2 368 8 16 3 / 4 425 10 19 1/16 484 12 22 5/16 567 19 3/16

A B .C D

in. mm in. m m in. mm 10 1/8 257 2 1/2 64 1 3 /4 44 121/8 .308 3 9 / 1 6 90 2 13/16 71 14 3 /8 365 4 21/32 118 3 29/32 ~3

16 11/16 424 5 3 /4 146 5 127 487 6 3 /4 171 5 7/8 149

~ ~ (24-8-6.2.5) Sizes of Plug Strap for Bell End of Pipe. Strap shall be 3 /4 in. (19.1 mm) thick, 2 1/2 in. (63.5 mm) wide. Strap length is dae same as dimension. A for tee straps given in Figure 6-3.2.3; distance between centers of rod holes is the same ~Ls dimension B for tee straps.

~ (24-8-6.2.7) Material used for clamps, rods, rod couplings or turnbuckles, bolts, washers, restraint straps, and ping straps shall b e of material having physical and chemical characteristics such that its deteriorat ion under stress can be predicted with reliability.

6-3.3.5__~* (24-8-6.2.8) After installation, rods, nuts, bolts, w:,Lshers, clamps, and other restraining devices, c~:ccpt d~rust

shall be cleaned ~md tborougifly coated with a bi tuminons or other acceptable corrosion-retarding material.

A-6-3.1 (24-A-8-6.1) It is a funcktmental design principle of fluid mechanics that dynamic and static pressures, acting at changes in size or direction of a pipe, produce nnbalancd thrust forces at bends, tees, wyes, deadends, reducers, offsets, etc. T b i s p r o c e d u r e includes consideration of lateral soil pressnre and pipe/soi l friction, variables flint can be reliably de te rmined using present-day soils engineer ing knolwedge. Refer to (13-4.1) for a list of references for use in c,'dculating ,and determining joint restraint systems.

Except for the case of welded jo ints ,and approved special restrained joints, such :as provided by approved mechanical jo in t retainer glands or locked mechanical ,and push-on joints, tbe usual

joints for underg round pipe are expected to be beld in place by the soil in which the pipe is buried. Gasketed pusla-on and mechanical joints without special locking devices have limited ability to resist separation due to movement of the pipe.

A-6-3.2 (24-A-8-6.2, 24-A-8-6.2.1) Concrete thrust blocks are one of the most common methods of restraint now in use, provided stable soil conditions prew, til and space requirements permit placement. Successf i f l t l ( cking is d e p e n d e n t upon factors snch as location, availability and placement of concrete, and possibility of distrubance by fimlre excavations.

Resistance is provided by transferring the thrust force to the soil through the larger bearing area of the block such that the resultant pressure against file soil does not exceed the horizontal bearing

strength of the soil. Design of thrust blocks consists of de termining the appropriate bearing area of the block for a particular set of conditions. The parameters involved in the desigu include pipe size, design pressure, angle of the b e n d (or confignration of the f i tdng involved), :rod the horizont:d I)earing strengda of the soil.

Table A-6-3.~ gives the rlominal thrnst at fittinEs for various sizes of ductile iron mad PVC piping.

Figure A-6-3.g(a) shows an examole of how thrust forces act or! a piping bend.

Fi~Jre A-6-3.~(b~ shows all example of a typical connect ion to a fire orotection system riser.

P_A " - ' - ~

V ~(I x

T x = PA (1 - COS 0) Ty 2- PA SIN 0

T = 2 PA SIN 0 Ty T

I A = (90 -_0) I

2 y

Figure A-6-3.2(a) [Figure 24-A-8-6.2(a)] Thrust forces acting on a bend.

Table A-6-3.2 (24-A-8-6.2) Thrust at Fittings at 100 PSI'Water Pressure for Ductile Iron and PVC Pipe

Total Pounds Nora Pipe Dia. In.

4 1,810 6 3,739 8 6,4?,3 1o 9,677 12 13,685 14 18,?,85 16 23,779 18 29,865 20 36,644 24 52,279 30 80,425 36 115,209 42 155,528 48 202,683

Dead End 90" Bend 45 ° Bend 22 1/2 ° Bend 11 1/4 ~ Bend ' 5 1/8 ~ Bend 2,559 1,385 706 355 162 5,288 2,862 1,459 733 334 9,097 4,923 2,510 1,261 575 13,685 7,406 3.776 1,897 865 19,353 10,474 5,340 2,683 1,224 26,001 14,072 7,174 3,604 1,644 3:",, 628 18,1 t~) 9,278 4,661 2,126 42,235 22,858 11,653 5,855 2,670 51,822 28,046 14,298 7,183 3,277 73,934 40,013 90,398 10,249 4,675 113,738 61,554 31,380 15,766 7,191 162,931 88,177 44,952 22,585 10,302 219,950 119,036 60,684 30,489 13,907 286,637 155,127 79,083 39,733 18,124

NOTE: To de termine thrust at of the pressure to 100. For example, the thrust on a 12

pressure other than 100 psi, multiply tile thrust ol)tained in the table by the ratio

in., 90 ° bend at 185 psi is 19,353 X 125/100 = 24,191 pounds.

604

Page 53: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 - - A 9 9 R O C

- 7"P'./'~

~ / i ~

• ~ i / ~

f / / J

f f / . ¢

~ ' J / /

Fire service ¢ ' ! "

m a i n ~ ~,/ . .~ ~ ' / / /

~ ' - / / /

i ~ System riser ~ P Cast iron flange ~ ,~"and spigot piece

C ' " ~ C a s t iron bell ,~r, and spigot pipe

Rods

Figure A-6-3.2(b) [Figure 24-A-8-6.2(b)l Typical connect ion to a fire protect ion system riser.

Thrus t blocks are ~enerallv categorized into two gronps: bear ing and gravity blQ¢~5.

v

Figure A-6-3.2.-O4-ah- (c/ shown below deoicts a t ~ i c a l bcarinl~ thrus t block on a horizontal bend,

The following are general criteria for bear ing block ~iesign. 1. Bearinlt surface should, where t)ossible, be placeO atralnst

undisturbeclsoi l . Where it is no t oossible, the fill between the bearinff surface and uudis t rubed soil must be compacted to at least 90 oercen t S tandard Proctor density.

2. Block he igh t (hi should be emml to or less than one-balf tile total den tb to "die bot tom of die block. (H tL but no t [e~s t i l th the oioe di~'uneter ([)1.

3. Block he igh t (hi should be chosen such t[l~t tll~ calculated block width (13i varies between one and two time~ the height

The requi red block area is

Then. for a horizontal bend.

b = 2(Sf)(P)(Ab)sin(f~)/2)/(h) (Sb)

wbere S, is a safety factor (usually 1.5 for dlrust block design), A similar a.Dproacb may be used to design bear ing blocks to resist tile thn l s t forces at tees, dead ends. etc. Typic~ d values for conserw, ttive horizontal bear ing stren~dls of various soil types are listed in Table A-6-3.2,~-(b)

In lieu of the values for soil bear inv s t rength Show~ in Table A-6- 3.2.-~ (b/ . a designer might choose to use c~cu la ted Rankine passi~,¢ pressure (P _/ or o ther de te rmina t ion of soil bear ing s t r e n ~ h b,'tsed on ,~ctual soil properfifs .

Table A-6-3.2~ fbl (24-A-8-6.2.11 Horizontal

* Bearin~r Strength

Muck 0 ~ 1.o00

Sandv Clay 6,000 9000

Undisturbed soil

Sb

Bearing pressure ., Sb

£

Sb

'lltll

"rl

IIl _ "ill

',lJ \

Fia'ure A-6-3.2~-a-~- (cl Bearing thrust block.

605

Page 54: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

*Mdlough the above bear ing strengfll wdues have been used successfully in die design of ti-lrnst blocks and are co~sidered to be conservative, their accuracy is totally d e o e n d e n t on accurate soil iderltification arid ¢w,,duation. T he ul t imate resoonsibilitv for selecting the Droner bear ing s t rength of a nart icular soil rvoe mus t 'rest with the design engineer .

(;rarity thrus t blocks may be used to resist thrust at vertical clown bends. In a gravity th rus t block, die weight of the block is the

v

force providing euui l ibr ium with die th rus t force. T he design nroMem is then to calculate the reoni red volume of the thrust block of a known density. T he vertical c o m o o n e n t of the thrus t force in Figure A-6-3.2.-O44~ (d) is ba lanced bv the weight of the block.

The above-listed materials do no t preclude the use of other mater ia ls tha t will ,also satisfy the requ i rements of this section. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Changes are considered editorial in na tnre ,as they reorganize file i lfformation presen ted by the submit ter . NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETIIRNED: 1 Patel

COMMENT ON AFFIRMATIVE: BONDS: On page 5, file eqnation: Ty = PA s inQ should read Ty

= PA sinQ. FLEMING: In 6-3.1.1 reference shou ld be to 6-3.2 mM 6-3.3, not

6-3.2.2 and 6-3.2.3. All symbols for the ,-angle in A-6-3.2 shon ld be the same.

T•T x Honzontal

Sb

Figure A-6-3.2-,#4b-)- (d) Gravity thrust block,

It carl be easily be shown fllat T y = PA sin 0. T he requi red

volfime of the block is

Vg = Sf PA sin 0 / W m

~ = densi ty of the block materiM. In a case such ,as tile olle slaown, the borizootal q o m p o n e n t of th rus t force

T x = P A ( 1 - cos0)

mus t be resisted bv the bear ing of the r ight s ide of the block against the soil. Ana l~ i s of this aspect will follow the same orincioles `as the above section on bear ing blocks. (13-~95 13-~96,

~ A - 6 - 3 . 3 . 5 (24-A-8-6.2.8) Examples of materials a n d the stanGards covering these materkds are:

Ca) Clamps. Steel (see Note). (b) Rods. Steel (see Note). (c) Bolts. Steel (A~STM A307, StanGard Specilication for Carbon

Steel Bolts and Studs). (d) Washers. Steel (see Note 1). C ~ t iron (Class A cast iron `as

def ined by ASTM A126, Stancku'd Specific~ttion for (;ray Iron C`asting for Valves, Flanges and Pipe Fittings).

(e) Anchor Straps and Plug Straps. Steel (See Note). (O Rod Coupl ings or Turnbuckles . Malleable iron (ASTM

A197, StandardSpecif iczt t ion for Cupola Malleable Iron). NOTE: Steel of modif ied r:mge m e r c h a n t quality ,as def ined in

ILS. Federal S tandard No. 66C, St, 'mdard for Steel (;hemic~d (',onq:~osition and Harden Ability, April 18, 1967, change notice No. 2, April 16, 1970, ,as p romulga t ed by the I.LS. Federal ( ; ove rnmen t General Services Adminis t ra t ion.

(Log #196) Commit tee : A1 IT-HBS

13- 147- (6-3): Reject SUBMITTER: Richard E. Thonn ings , Amer ican Insurance Services Group, Inc. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-37 RECOMMENDATION: Delete all references to fire service mains and associated material f rom NFPA 24. This material should remain in NFPA 24. SUBSTANTIATION: Material on private fire service mains does not be long in a sprinkler installation s tandard. For uew sprinkler installations, tile u n d e r g r o u n d is typically installed by different people than die sprinkler piping. I a g r e e with Mr. Keeping's c o m m e n t abou t the need for main ta in ing NFPA 24. NFPA 24 should be ma in ta ined a n d if that is the case, t hen there is no need to clutter up NFPA 13.

It is no t practical to require the public to call out each specific reference to NFPA 24 material in the p roposed new Chapter 6 of NFPA 13. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Commi t tee Action and Sta tement on C o m m e n t 13-135 (Log #191). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 18 NEGATIVE: 1 Nt )T RETIJRNED: 1 Patel

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: BONI-)S: NFPA 24 should remain in print; therefore, e l iminat ing

the need to incorporate sections of that d o c u m e n t into NFPA 13. The absorpt ion of NFPA 24 into NFPA 13 w`as the result of S tandards Council directive; bowever, private fire service mains are an entity all in themselves and shou ld be addressed i n d e p e n d e n d y of sprinkler systems and standpipes.

( Log #(;(;305) Commit tee : AI JT-HBS

13- 147a - (6-4.1(c)): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical C, ommi t tee on Hang ing and Bracing of Water Based Fire Protection Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-37 RECOMMENDATION: Revise Section 6-4.1(c) of the Preprint to read ,as follows:

"()n one- both sides of concrete or masom-y walls within ~ 1 it of the wall surface."

SUBSTANTIATION: These cbanges make the requ i rements conce rn ing flexible coupl ings and clearance consistent. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATWE: 11 NOT RETIIRNED: 9 Biggins, Bonds, Braga, Forsythe, Misichko,

Moeller, Mowrer, Rothmier . and Tauby

606

Page 55: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

(Log #106) • Committee: AUT-HBS

13- 148- ([6-4.5.1] 4-14.4:3.5.1): Reject SUBMITIT_~ Daniel C. Duggan, Fire Sprinkler Design COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: i3-i77 ' - RECOMMENDATION: Accept proposal 13-177 (Log #42) which would insert the words "when required by 4-14.4.3.5.4" to 4- 14.4.3.5.1." SUBSTANTIATION: The Committee Statement justifying the rejection of this proposal is inaccurate. 4-14.4.3.5.4 does indicate all of the conditions under which seismic bracing is needed to protect against verdcal motion. 4-14.4,3.5.4 indicates the conditions under which "braces shall be arrange d to resist the net vertical reaction produced by the horizontal load." The wording of this proposal should be accepted for the following reasons:

1. The upward verdcal reacdon to the horizontal load is the only upward motion considered by NFPA 13.

2. No other Upward vertical motion is considered by any other building code o r standard.

3. No proposal has been submitted to NFPA for consideration of any other source of upward vertical modon.

4. Acceptance of this wording Would define the minimum requirement for compliance with this aspect of 4-14.4.3.5.1 of NFPA 13 and would be consistent with the g0al of providing a standardized design approach for users of NTPA 13.

5. Acceptance of th~s wording would not preclude any authority having jurisdiction from requiring something else. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. • ' COMMrlq'EE STATEMENT: The Technical Committee stands by its position that Section 64.5.4 of the Preprint is not intended to identify all the conditions under which sway braces ai-e required to sPrevent vertical motion of system piping from seismic loads.

ection 64.5.4 of the Preprint addresses only specific arrangements of brace angles and horizontal force factors and is not intended to

eclude the application of other force factors and brace angles. BER OF COMMiTtEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20

VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION: AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETURNED: 1 Patel

(Log #152) Committee: AUT-HBS

13- 149 - (6-4.5.3): Accept in Principle SUBMITrER: Kenneth E. Isman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-t79 RECOMMENDATION: Delete the last sentence in the new Section 64.5.3 and return to the language of the previous edition (Section 4-14.4.3.5.3). SUBSTANTIATION: The last sentence, as proposed by the Report on Proposals, makes no sense. It is requiring a restrained load to be added to the longitudinal brace load. There is also no information olt how to handle loads at o ther spacing, only 30 ft. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

[ Replace the',iast sentence in Section 64.5.3 of the Preprint with I the following: ] "For longitudinal braces, t he load shall include all mains within ] the zone of influence of the brace."

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This:action more dearly indicates the intent of the Committee and addresses the concerns raised by the submitter. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETURNED: 1 Patel

COMM~q'EE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS EZiGmLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE Ac'rION:~

AFFIRMATIVE: 11 NOT RETURNRD: 9 Biggins, Bonds, Braga, Forsythe, Misichko,

Moeller, Mowrer, Rothmier, and Tauby

(Log #105) Committee: AUT-HBS

13- 150- (Table 6-4.5.3): Accept SUBMrrTER: Daniel (3-. Duggan, Fire Sprinkler Design COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: t3-178

I RECOMMENDATION: Delete the'Assigned Load Table: Table 6- 4.5.3 (4-14.4.3.5.3). SUBSTANTIATION: The Assigned Load Table should be eliminated-for the following reasons:

1. It is always incorrect. 2. The justification for lowering the loads and maintaining the

Assigned Load Table in I tem 2 o f the Committee Statement is inaccurate. Branch lines 2 1/2 in. and larger are not required by NFPA 13 to be braced.

3. T h e existence of the Assigned Load Table influences users of NFPA 13 toincorrecdy conclude that the listed sway brace components are capable of supporting the loads in the Assigned Load Table.

4. Arbitrarily reducing the assigned loads would inadvertently invite under designed braces. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept.

Acceptance of this comment requires the following edRorial revisions so that reference to Table 6-4.5.3 of the Preprint is removed:

1. Delete Exception No. 1 to 6-4.5.3 in its entirety. 2. Renumber Exception No. 2 as Exception No. 1 to 6-4.5.3 and

revise as follows: "Where the use of other horizontal force factors is required or

permitted by the authority having jurisdiction, they shall take precedence."

3. Delete Exceptions No. 3 and No. 4 to 6-4.5.3 in their entirety. 4. Delete Figures A-6.4.5(a) and A-6-4.5(b) in the Preprint.

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: These exceptions and figures were deleted as they refer to Table 6-4.5.3 which is proposed for deletion. Exception No. 3 was deleted as it is addressed by Section 6-4.5.10 of the Preprint. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 18 NEGATIVE: 1 NOT RETURNED: 1 Patel

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: MARTIN: The action of the Committee to eliminate~the assigned

load Table 6-4.5.3 is regrettable. I agree with the submttter that the assigned loads as reflected in

ihe table a re high, but to eliminate the table in its entirety removes an option the designer and authority having jurisdlction previously had. The effect of this action requires thedes igner to determine horizontal loads without giving the user of the standard sufficient guidance on how to do so.

Perhaps moving the table to the appendix would be less dramatic allowing for complete elimination in a future revision cycle. COMMENT ON AFFIRMATIVE:

FLEMING: In new Exception No. 1 to 6-4.5.3, the words "required or permitted" may produce enforceability problems. Perhaps "specified" would be better.

i

(Log #CC300) Committee: AUT-HBS

13- 149a- (6-4.5.3): Accept SUBMITrER: Technical Committee o n Hanging and Bracing of Water Based Fire Protection Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-178

I RECOMMENDATION: Revise the first sentence of Section 6-4.5.3 to read as follows: •

"Horizontal loads for braces shall be determined by analysis, based on a horizontal force of F p . - - 0 . 5 W p _ ~ p _ is the

~ tal force factor and Wp. i~ the weight of the watei" filled

SUBSTANTIATION: This information was omitted when the Technical Committee revised this section during the ROP stage.

(Log #104) COmmittee: AUT-HBS

13- 151- ([6-4.5,3] 4.1~4.3.5.3 Exception No. 1): Reject S U B M I t , " Daniel C. Duggan, Fire Sprinkler Design COMMENT ON PROPOSALNO: 13-179 RECOMMENDATION: Insert wording:

"... all branch lines, unless the' branch lines are laterally restrained or laterally braced, and mains within the zone of influence..." SUBSTANTIATION: This is a clerical corre~zti0n of the wording, which was inadvertendy left out' of the written wording of the Committee Action on this proposals when it was balloted. Omission of this wording would result in the opposite meaning of thatwhich the Committee intended and it would make no sense.

607

Page 56: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITI'EE STATEMENT: The action proposed by the submitter is moot due to the action taken on Comment 13-149 (Log #152). NUMBER OF COMMrITEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETURNED: 1 Patel

COMMENT ON AFFIRMATIVE: FLEMING: In new Table 64.5.7 an additional line is needed to

match wording of 6-4.5.5:

90 degrees from vertical Listed load rating

Also, wording should state "loads provided in Table 64.5.5 or" not "of."

(Log #100) Committee: AUT-HBS

13- 152- ([64.5.5] 4-14.4.3.5.5): Reject • SUBMITTER: Daniel C. Duggan, Fire Sprinkler Design COMMENT ON PROPOSALNO: 13-37 RECOMMENDATION: Retain the wording:

"...For tension only braces, *och as prestretched color coded aircraft cable...." SUBSTANTIATION: Deletion of this wording was not in response to a proposal that was submitted. "It wasproposed by a Committee member during the development of Committee Proposal 13-37 (Log #CP7). An attempt was made to remove this wording by errata to the 1996 edition under the guise that it was redundant. The wording was not removed by errata because it is not repeated elsewhere in the standard and therefore not redundant; and furthermore, the wording was the result of a properly submitted proposal, subjected to public review and comment, and voted on at the Annual Meeting'by the full NFPA membership. The only risk in retaining this wording is that the users of NFPA 13 would know exactly what is meant by "tension only bracing." Deletion of this phrase is a solution to a problem that does not exist. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. C O M M ~ STATEMENT: The Technical Committee believes that the material proposed by the submitter is supplemental information and that it should be addressed in the appendix of NFPA 13. See Committee Action and Statement on Comments 13- 268 (Log #99) and 13-267 (Log #101). NUMBER OF COMMITrEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETURNED: 1 Patel

(Log #CC302) Committee: AUT-HBS

13- 153 - (6-4.5.5 and 6-4.5.7): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Committee on Hanging and Bracing of Water Based Fire Protection Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-37 RECOMMENDATION: 1. Revise the second to the last sentence in Section 6-4.5.5 in the Preprint to read as follows:

"The loads determined in 6-4.5.3 shall not exceed the lesser of the maximum allowable loads provided in Table 6-4.5.5 of the ummffacturer's certified maximum allowable loads for 30-44, 45-59, 60 .-908_.~q, and 90degree brace angles."

2. Revise the first sentence of Section 6-4.5.7 in the Preprint as follows:

"6-4.5.7 ([3-4-14.4.3.5.7) Sway bracing assemblies shall be listed for a maximum ~ load rati_.~."

3. Revise Table 6-4.5.7 of the Preprint to read as follows:

Table 6-4.5.7 (13-4-14,4.3.5.7) Allowable Horizontal Load on Brace Assemblies Based on the Weakest Component of

the Brace Assembly

Brace Angle 30-44 degrees fi'om vertical

45-59 degrees fi'om vertical

60-89 degrees fi'om vertical

Allowable horizontal load Listed load rating divided by 2.000 Listed load rating divided by 1.414 Listed load rating divided by 1.155

SUBSTANTIATION: These changes make the table consistent with the ranges of angles perntitted by the standard and correlate with the listed load ratings. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETURNED: 1 Patel

(Log #CC303) Committee: AUT-HBS

13- 153a- (64.5.6): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Committee on Hanging and Bracing of Water Based Fire Protection Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-37 RECOMMENDATION: Add a new Exception No. 2 to read as follows:

"Other fastening methods are acceptable for use if certified by a registered professional engineer to support the loads determined in accordance with the above criteria. Calculations shall be sPermitted where required by the Authority Having Jurisdiction."

UBSTANTIATION: This allows the use of fastening methods other than those specified in NFPA 13 to be used to fasten sway braces provided other the methods have been evaluated by registered professional engineer. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 11 NOT RETURNED: 9 Biggins, Bonds, Braga, Forsythe, Misichko,

Moeller, Mowrer, Rothmier, and Tauby

(Log #103) Committee: AUT-HBS

13- 154- ([64.5.10] 4-14.4.3.5.10): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Daniel C. Duggan, Fire Sprinkler Design COMMENT O N PROPOSALNO: 13-183, 13-189 RECOMMENDATION: Retain the original wording of this paragraph:

"... shall be provided on all feed mains, all cross mains, and branch lines with a diameter of 2 1/2 in. and larger." SUBSTANTIATION: The wording of this paragraph, prior to the 1996 change cycle, read "all feed and cross mains." In the 1996 change cycle the wording requiring lateral bracing of 2 1/2 in. and larger branch lines was moved from the "Exception" under "Sway bracing is n~)t required for branch lines" to the paragraph regarding lateral bracing of feed and cross mains, This was done, ostensibly, because 2 1/2 in. and larger branch lines should be laterally braced in the same manner as mains. Thus, the exception under the branch line paragraph was deleted and the wording about 2 1/2 in. branch lines was added to 4-14.4.3.5.10. This action actually weakened the requirement for lateral bracing of 2 1/2 in. branch lines by maki'ng it subject to the exceptions under the feed and cross main paragraph.

For many years feed and cross mains have been required by NFPA 13 to be laterally braced regardless of pipe size. Neither of the above referenced proposals propose that this be changed. Rather, these proposals suggest wording changes intended to clarify whether 2 iu. and smaller hose connection piping or standpipe piping should be treated as main piping or branch line piping.

PresenOy, the lateral sway bracing requirements of 4-14.4.3.510 apply to:-

1. All feed mains (regardless of pipe size) 2. All cross mains (regardless of pipe size) 3. All branch lines (2 1/2 in. and larger pipe size) Since changing the requirements to apply to only 2 1/2 in. and

larger feed and cross mains was not the subject of the substantiation for either of these proposals, the model codes do not include exceptions from sway bracing based on small pipe sizes and the fact that this action would dramatically weaken the requirements of NFPA 13, the present wording of 4-14.4.3.5.10 should not be changed. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

1. Revise the wording proposed by the snbmitter to Section 6- 4.5.10 of the Preprint so that it reads as follows:

"...shall be provided on all feed and cross mains regardless of size and all branch lines and other ninin~ with a diameter of 2 1/2 inches and larger." . . v . •

608

Page 57: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 1 3 - A99 ROC

2. Renumber Sections 6-4.5.10, 6-4.5.8i and 6-4.5.9 of the Preprint as Sections 6-4.5.3, 6-4.5.4, and 6-4.5.5 respectively, and

• renumber the remaining sections accordingly. COMMN'TEE S T A ~ : Thence changes make this sectio n consistent with other requirements in NFPA 13 for seismic bracing. The renumbering is an editorial change which better organizes the information. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETURNED: 1 Patel

(Log #102) Committee: AUT-HBS

13- 155 - ([6-4.5.13 and A-6-4.5.13] 4-14.4.3.5.13 and A-4- 14.4.3.5.13): Accept in Principle in Part SUBMITIT.,R: Daniel C. Duggan, Fire Sprinkler Design COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-188 RECOMMENDATION: Delete all references in 4-14.4.3.5.13 a n d A-4-14~4.3.5.13, including detail~, of #12 440 lb wire restraints. SUBSTANTIATION: All references to #12 440 Ib wire restraints should be purged from NFPA 13 for the following reasons:

1. The strength of the connection details is unknown for the #12 440 lh wire.

2. All four of the manufacturers of listed sway brace assemblies and devices manufacture cost effective, readily available, listed sway brace assemblies.and devices fo r2 in. and smaller piping, making the acceptance of unlisted assemblies and devices unnecessary..

3. Inclusion of#12 440 Ib wire as an acceptable "restraint" causes a confusing distinction to be drawn (only in NFPA 13) between the terms "restraint" and "brace," which is not defined anywhere in NFPA 13. Without #12 440 lb wire, there would be no need to draw such a distinction. COMMITI'F.~ ACTION: Accept in Principle in Part.

Renumber Section 6-4-5.13 as 6-4.6 and i'evise to read as follows: "6-4.6* (13-4-14.4.3.5.13) Restraint of Branch Lines. A-6-4.6 (A-13-4-14.4.3.5.13) (Use text from A-6-4.5.13 in the

Preprint). 6-4.6.1 (13-4-14.4.3.5.13, Exceptions 1 and 2) Restraint is

considered a lesser degree of resisting loads than bracing and shall. i be provided by .use of a listed sway brace assembly, a wraparound U-hook satisfying the requirements of 6-4.5, Exception Number 3, No. 12, 440-1b (200 kg) wire installed at least 45 de~rees from the vertical plane and anchored on both sides of the pipe, or by other approved means.

6-4.6.9 (13-4-14.4.3.5.13, Exception 1) The end sprinkler on a line shall be restrained against excessive vertical a n d lateral movement.

6~4.6.3" (13-4-14.4.3.5.13, Exceptions 1 and 2) Where upward or lateral movement would result in an impact agaimt the building structure, equipment, or finish materials, branch lines shall be restrained at intervals not exceeding 30 ft (gm). Wire used for restraint shall be located within 2 ft (610 mm) of a hanger. The hahger closest to a wire restraint shall be of a type that resists upward mov/~ment of a branch line.

A-6-4.6.3 (13-A-4-14.4.3.5.13, Exception No. 2) (Use text from A- 6-4.5,13.2 of the Preprint). '

6-4.6.4* (13-4-14,4.3.5.14) Sprig-ups 4 ft (1.2m) or longer shall be restrained against lateral movement.

A-6-4.6.4 (13-A-4-14.4.3.5.14) Such restraint can be provided by using the restraining wire discussed in 6-4.6.1." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The material was not deleted 'as

roPosed by the submitter as no data was submited indicating the ilure of these restraints. The changes made by the Technical

Committee are inteded to clarify the distinction between bracing and restraint. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITIT~E ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETURNED: 1 Patcl

COMMENT ON AFFIRMATIVE= FLEMING: In new 6-4.6.1 the reference to "6-4.5 Exception

Number 3" should be changed tO "Exception 3 of 6-4.5.3" to avoid confusion with the reference that follows. Based on above changes, it is now Exception 3 of 6-4.5.8. [See Comment 13-150 (Log #105).]

(Log #183) Committee: AUT-HBS

13- i 5 6 - (6-4.5.13.4 (New)): Hold SUBMI'I 'IT~: Thomas J. Forsythe, Gage-Babcock & Assoc., Inc. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-37 RECOMMENDATION: Insert a new section following 6-4.5.13.3 as it appears in the 1999 Edition Preprint included as part of the t999 Spring Association Technical Meeting Report on Proposals to read as follows:

6-4.5.13.4 Drops 8 ft or longer which directly supply sprinklers in a pendent position below the ceiling shall be restrained against lateral movement. SUBSTANTIATION: The Standard includes requirements for the protection of piping against damage where subject to earthquakes including the installation Of flexible pipe couplings for "mare" pip!ng, the provision of seismic separation assemblies where pipmg crosses building seismic separation joints, provision of " clearance where piping passes through holes in structural features, and installation of sway bracing. Further, requirements exist to provide restraint against upward or lateral movement for branch lines and sprinHer sprig-ups 4 ft or longer. Currently, no • provision exists to prevent movement of longer sprinkler drops, which are known to move in response to seismic events. This recommendation provides for restraint against lateral movement of sprinkler drops 8 ft or longer which supply sprinklers in a pendent position below a ceiling. Such restraint should be required to avoid damage to the ceiling/structure due to seismically-induced movement~ More importantly, such restraint should be required to prevent damage to system components such as the sprinkler or the branch line fitting, to limit the potential for system failure during a seismic event. COMMITTEE ACTION: Hold. COMM1TFEE STATEMENT: This comment introduces material that cannot be properly addressed during the t ime frame for

~ rocessing the report. It also introduces material that would not ave had sufficient time for public review. A task group has been

appointed to address this topic during the next revision cycle. NUMBER OF COMMIT! 'EE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 18 NEGATIVE: 1 - NOT RETURNED: 1 Patel

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: PEARCE: My comment on negative ballot on Comment 13-143

(Log #182) aim applies to this log. Unrestrained heads through hung ceilings was the major cause of the shearing heads for our clients,

(Log #1) Committee: AUT-HBS

13- 157- ([6-4.5.14] 4-14.4.3.5.16): Accept in Principle SUBMrITER: .PatdckJ. Waish, CT State Fire Marshal's Office COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-191 RECOMMENDATION: Relocate requirement for retaining straps on Gtype clamps used toat tach hangers to 'new Section 6-4.1.1. SUBSTANTIATION: While we agree with the submitter, this section should be relocated. As currentl~ located, it appears that the requirement for retaining-straps on t3-type clamps applies only where sway bracing is required. For example, if branch lines do not require sway bracing, it may appear that retaining straps for the C-type clamps on thesebranch lines are not required.

Since the requirement for retaining straps on all C-type clamps is intended to he applicable whenever protection for pipmg against damage from earthquake is required, it should be located up with the general requirements. COMMrI ' rF~ ~xC'rlON: Accept in Principle.

1. Add a new Section 6-4.7 entitled "Hangers and Fasteners Subject to Earthquakes."

2. Renumber Sections 6-4.5.14, 6-4.5.15, and 6-4.5.16 of the Preprint as 6-4.7.1, 6-4.7.2, and 6-4.7.2respectively.

3. Relocate Section 6-1.3.2 in the Preprint and the associated except ion to a new Section 6-4.7.4. Renumber Sections 6-1.3.3, 6- 1.3.4, arid 6-1.3.5 in the Preprint accordingly.

4. Add a second exception to Section 6-1.1 of the Preprint to read as follows:

"In areas subject to earthquake, hangers shall also meet the requirements of 6-4.7.

6O9

Page 58: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 1 3 - A99 ROC

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This action more appropriate ly addresses the submit ter ' s concern and bet ter identifies the Commit tee ' s intent conce rn ing the r equ i rements for hangers where subject to forces f rom ear thquakes . NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETURNED: 1 Patel

(Log #198) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 158 - ( [Chapte r 7]): Reject SUBMITTER: Richard E. T honn i ngs , Amer ican Insu rance Services Group, Inc. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a RECOMMENDATION: Delete this chap te r and establish a new docuq~ent to cover "Design of Sprinkler Systems." SUBSTANTIATION: Installation and design are two-distinct areas and deserve separate documents . Also, the a m o u n t o f material now conta ined in the "partially revised" NFPA 13 is so large that it will become c u m b e r s o m e to use. T he evolution o f per formance-based s tandards also makes it advan tageous to place design topics in a d o c u m e n t separate from installation requi rements . Two individual d o c u m e n t s will make it easier to use and update in the fiiture.

It is no t practical for the public to call ou t each specific reference to design-related material in the proposed new edi t ion of NFPA 13. NFPA has sadly chosen an awkward cfiange process for the 1999 edit ion of NFPA 13 which seems des igned to h inde r substantial public input. The proposed 1999 edi t ion is obviously more than a "partial revision." COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject.

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: NFPA 13 has traditionally addressed both design and installation requ i rements o f sprinkler systems which are both highly related. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #48) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 159- ( [Chap te r 7] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Corre la t ing Commi t t ee on Automat ic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a RECOMMENDATION: The Technic]hi Correlat ing Commi t t ee noted that m u c h of the informat ion per ta in ing to large drop sprinklers in Section 7-6.4 and early suppress ion fast response sprinklers in Section 7-6.5 is repetitive. The TCC directs the Technical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) to consolidate this material. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direct ion from the Automat ic Sprinklers Technica l Correla t ing Commi t tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulat ions Governing Commi t tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

1. Revise Section 7-6.4 and the accompanying appendix material to read as follows:

7-6.4 (13-5-3.4) Large-DropSprinklers . 7-6.4.1 (13-5-3.4.1) Large-drop sprinklers shall be permi t ted to

protect ordinary hazard, storage o f class I t h rough IV commodi t i e s , nlastic commodi t i e s , miscel laneous storage, and o the r storage as specified in Sections 7-5. 7-6 and 7-8 or by o the r NFPA standards.

7-6.4.1.1 (231-8-1.1) Protection of palletized and solid piled s,torage of Class I to IV. u n e x p a n d e d plastic and expanded plastic commodi t i e s shall be in accordance with Table 7-6.4.1.1.

Table 7 - 6 A ~ 7-fi.4.1.1 (231-Table 8-1) La:'gc ~ , v t.r~-A- ~rc-":-'a^--~" ~,--r'n'~ D . . . . . . . . . . a ~,T,,~k~-- ^ r r~^.:g n ~cp--'-'"~--,,..~,~ .,~D^q":-̂ '4~ . . . . . . . C~, Var~c,;:~ Hazm-d~ fe r Large r~_̂ _~.~v ~ve~":-I"'̂ ~ . . . . . . . . . Large Droo. Sprinkler Design_ Criteria for Palletized and Solid Piled Storage

Commodity

Class

Maximum Storage Height

Confi~wation ft m

Palletized I, II, or III 25 7.6 35 10.7

Palletized IV 20 6.1 30 9.1

Palletized 20 6.1 30 9.1

Palletized

Car toned or exposed

unexpanded plastics

Car toned or exposed

expanded plastics

Idle wood pallets

I, II, or III

Palletized

Solid Pile

Solid Pile Car toned or exposed

unexpanded plastics

Note: NA - - Not Allowed.

18 5.5 26 7.9

20 6.1 30 9.1

20 6.1 30 9.1

Solid Pile IV 20 6.1 30 9.1

20 6.1 30 9.1

Number of Design Sprinklers by Minimum Operating

Maximum Pressure Building [psi (bar)] Hose Stream Height Type (See 8-2.4) Demand

of ft m System 25 (1.7) 50 (3.4) 75 (5.2)

Wet 15 15 15 Dl)' 25 25 25

Wet 20 15 15 Dly NA NA NA

Wet 25 15 15 Dry NA NA NA

NA 15 15 NA NA NA

15 15 15 25 25 25

15 15 15 25 25 25

NA 15 15 NA NA NA

NA 15 15 NA NA NA

Wet Dry

Wet Dry

Wet Dry

Wet Dry

Wet Dry

Water Supply

Duration

~pm L/min hr

500 1900 2

500 1900 2

500 1900 2

500 1900 2

500 1900 1 1/2

500 1900 1 1/2

5 ~ 1900 1 1 /2

500 1900 1 1/2

6 1 0

Page 59: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - - A 9 9 R O C

7-6.4.1.2 (231G-9-1.1) Protection o f Sin~le.D0uble and Multiole row rack storage without'solid shelves for Class I to IV. unexnanded olasti¢ ¢omm0dities shall be in accordpn¢¢ with Table 7-6A:1:2.

Commodity Class

I, II

1, II

I, [I, III

I, II, III

IV

IV

Canoned or exposed

unexpanded plastics

IV

Canoned or exposed

unexpanded plastics

IV

Cantoned or exposed

unexpanded plastics

IV-

car toned or exposed

unexpanded plastics

.N.~ to: .x;A

Table g : K A ~ 0 ~ (231G9-1.1, 231C-9-1.4) mid Midtlple-Row Racks "

Maximum MaximUm C ~ /

Storage Height Heil~ht .

ft m ft m

25' 7.6

30 9.1

20 6.1

25 7.6

20 6.1

6.1 25

20 6.1

20 6.1

25 7

25 7.6

20 6.1

25 7.6

25 7.6

30

35

Type of

, Syaem

9.1 ~ Wet Dry

10.7 Wet

Dry

30 9.1 Wet i Dry

35 10.7 Wet

SO 9.1

80 9.1

30 9.1

25. 7.6

35 10.7

30 9.1

25 7.6

9.1

r ~ L . . . . . . . .

Dr'

Wet " Dry

Wet

Dry

Wet Dry

Large-Dro p Sprinkler Design Criteria for Single-, Double-,

Number of Design Sprinklers by Minimum Operating Pressure [psi (bar)]

25 (i.7) 50 (3.4) 75 (5.2)

20 20 2O 30 30 3 0

20 plus one 29 plus one level of in-rack level of in-rack

sprinklers sprinklers 30 plus one 30 plus one

level of in-rack level of in-rack sprinklers sprinklers

.15 15 25 25

20 plus one level of in-rack

sprinklers 30 plus one

level of in-rack sprinklers

15 25

15 plus one 15 plus one 15 plus one level of in-rack level of in-rack level of in-rack

5prinklers sprinklers sprinklers plus one 25pl[ts one 25plus one

level of in-rack level of in-rack level of in-rack sprinklers sprinklers sprinklers

NA 20 15 NA NA NA

NA '20 plus one 15 plus one level of in-rack level of in-rack

sprinklers sprinklers NA NA NA

Wet Dry

Wet

Wet Dry

Hose Stream Demand

Water Supply

Duration

gal/ rain L/ ra in (hrg

| a

500 1900 1 1/2

500 [ 1900 1 1/2

5o0 ' 1[,~o l 11/2

50O I900

• , i

500 1900

500 ~ 19oo

500" 1900

5O0 1900

NA 30. 20 500 1900 NA NA NA

! ! L

NA 15 15 500 1900 NA NA NA |

"NA 30 plus one 20plus one 500 1900 level of in-rack level of in-rack

sprinklers sprinklers

NA 15 plus one 15 plus one NA level of in-rack level of in-rack

sprinklers sprinklers NA NA

Wet NA 15 15 Dry NA NA NA

Wet NA 15 plus one 15 plus one level of in-rack level bf in-rack

sprinklers sprinklers

500 1900

500 1900

500 1900

36-0 9.1 D W NA NA NA

1 i / 2

I I /2

J2

2

611

Page 60: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 --A99 ROC

.7-g,4A4;M- 7-6.4.1.2.1 (231C-9-1.5) Fqr rack storage, a m i n i m u m of 6-in. (152.4-mm) longi tudinal flue spaces shall be ma in ta ined in addi t ion to transverse flue spaces.

7-6,4.1.2,2 (231C-9-1.9) Where in-rack sorinklers are reouired bv Table 7-6.4.1.2, in-rack spr inkler spacing, design Dressure. and hydraulic calculat ion criteria shall be in accordance with the r equ i rements of Section 7-4 ~s applicable for the commodi ty .

7-6.4.2 (13-5-3.4.2, 231-8-2) N u m h c r o f Dc~!gr. Spri:'k!cr~. Protection Criteria.

7-6.4.2.1 (13-5-3.4.2.1, ~ ) Protect ion shall be provided as specified in Tables -7-6A~ 7-6A.1 1, 7-6A=40 7-6.4.1.2. Section 7-6. Section 7-8 o r appropr ia te NFPA s tandards in terms of m i n i m u m opera t ing pressure and the n u m b e r of sprinklers to be inc luded in the design area.

7-6.4.2.2 (13-5-3.4.2.2) The m i n i m u m n u m b e r o f des ign : sprinklers for ordinary hazard and miscel laneous storage in accordance with this s tandard shall be 15 for wet pipe and preact ion systems and 25 for doub le interlock preact ion systems and dry pipe systems. For o the r s torage configurat ions, the n u m b e r of design sprinklers shall be in accordance with 6. Section 7-8 or thc appropria te o the r NFPA stor-ag~ s tandards .

7-6.4.3 (13-5-3.4.3) Large-drop sprinkler systems shall be des igned such that the m i n i m u m opera t ing pressure is no t less than 25 psi (170 kPa).

7-6.4.4 (13-5-3.4.4) For design purposes , 95 psi (650 kPa) shall be the m a x i m u m discharge pressure at the hydratdically most remote sprinkler.

7-6.4.5 (13-5-3.4.5) The design area shall be a rec tangular area having a d imens ion parallel to the branch lines at least 1.2 t imes the square root o f the area protected by the n u m b e r of sprinklers to be included in the design area. Any fractional spr inkler shall be included in the design area.

7-6.4.6 (13-5-3.4.6) The nomina l d iamete r o f b ranch line pipes ( inc luding riser nipples) shall be not less than 1 1 / 4 in. (33 m m ) no r greater than 2 in. (51 mm) .

Exeeptio, No. 1: Starter pieces .shall be permitted to be- 2 I / 2 in. (64 lnJ 'n) .

Exception No. 2: Where braaeh, lines are h n ~ r than 2 in. (51 ram), the sprinkler .shall be supplied hy a rL~m nipple to elm,ate the .~prinkler 13 in. (330 ram) for 2 1 /2 -in. (64-ram) pipe and 15 ~n. (380 mm) fi~r 3- in. (76-ram) pipe. These dimensions me measmed from the centre'line of the pipe to the deflector. In lie~u of this, sp-inkle~x may be o[fiet hmizontally a minimum of 12 in. (305 ram).

7-6.4.7 (13-5-3.4.7, 231-8-2.2. 231-8-2.3) Hose s t ream d e m a n d and water supply dura t ion requ i rements shall be in accordance with those for extra hazard occnpancies in Table 7-2.3 or Table 7- 6.4.1.1 and Table 7-6.4.1.2, whichever applies.

76 .1 .8 ~o~, o ~ ~) t . . . . n . . . . . . . :..,., . . . . t . . n ~. ...... : , , d c~.. use with the baza:'d~ !i~*.ed -n Table 7 5A.S.

7 6.1.9 t o ~ ~ o) D . . . . . . :~.. P.-:,~.:~ 7 6.4.9.1 ~23! 8 2.D c-.-:..H . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . ,~ ,~^.., . . . . . -~.--~

' 7 ~. A f~ q / O ~ 1 o O O'1 A . ~ 1 - - : . . . . . C ZnC I - - . . O l / o l o l . . l l I . ~

. ~ l . l - - M , ~ * l . . . . . 1 - 1 , 1 ~ . - A . . . . . I C . . . . . . . I . : . . ~ A I . . . . . . . . . l . - - . . 1 1 i ~ . _

~trea:l; d e m a n d . 7--6.1.9.3 ~oa, o o a, ur . . . . . n ...... : ^ _ .~ ._ . ,.~ :~n: . . . . .~ . . . . . . . . / ...... supp[;,' ~ .................. as ..........

in Table 7 6.!.8. 7-6.4.8 (231-8-2.4, ~ ) Where large drop

sprinklers are installed unde r open wood jo is t construct ion, their m i n i m u m opera t ing pressure shall be 50 psi (3.4 bar).

F.xception: gq~m~, each ioi.st eha ,ne l q[ @en, wood joist con.sh'uction is fully .[he .stopped to its lull depth at inte|t,aL~ not exceeding 20.f l (6.1 m), the lower p~es.s,m.s specified in Table 7-6.4.1.2 .shall be permitted to be u.sed.

7-6.4.9 (231-8-2.6, 231C-9-1.7) For the purpose o f us ing TaMe 7 6.'!.8 Table 7-6.4.1.1 and Table 7-6.4.1.2, preact ion systems ',hall be classified as dry pipe systems.

Exeepliou: Wllme it (au be demonstrated that the detection system (tctivatin~ the hmaetiou .sv,s'tem will catt.se waler to be at the sh~inklers when th~ opeTate, p'~eai'tion .syste.~ shall be permitted to be treated as wet-bige .s~stem.s.

~ a I/3 /O~lP(l I I ~, Large a -~p °p - : " " ' . . . . '-~" '-- permit ted

~'~h;' ,'~'?';?# L": ....................................... " ....... ~ ' .........

t..~...,.,: .... H , . . .t. :~:.., .a ......... t J _, .... wccdjci.:" c:;::s;:'::c'ic::, i.; . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J . . . . . . . ' " ~ . . . . . . . . . "J vF~ ' " ' ~:..,.. c . . . . . :,.. r . . . a . . • , , , , - , : . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . ~:..g on r, (6. I

~ ' ' ' ' : ' , ~ ' ' " ~ t ; ; [ ; [ T M l ; ; "~0 , t . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " ' " . t "

m), the !c..~:;::" p:~=.~::=== ~/;c'c~.d in T:'h& 7 6 .4 .10 d~;!l 5:: p'~:'v:i';ed tc

7-6 4 10 (231C-9-1.3) Building steel shall not require special protec t ion where Table 7 £ . ! . !0 Table 7-6.4.1.1 and Table 7-6.4 1.2 is applied.

,7,~ . . . . n ~n~.~a ~-~-~t°~lr" n . . . . ~ A) P r o t e c t i o n r e q u i r e m e n t ; a re ba~ed o n

systems=. Ex;';.~;tion: P,7;;:;'c it car; !;;: d;:rr;c::strated that the detection s)'st;:m

w / ; c ' ; ; , i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . 2; . . . . . . . . . . I , . . . t,., p ; : r : ; ; i t t c . ' ! , to. bc t;~cc,,tc,'!, c,,;

, ~ ~ ~ , ~ ( , d , , - , :,9) "~"~"° :~ " ~ ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :-~" b)" . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . t" . . . . . . . . . . v . . . . . o, . . . . e~" "i ~ : ' c c ' c ' u ; c , a n d

hydraul ic ca!c'alafio= c r i t e r i a ~ha!! bc i a a c c c r d a n c e ;-: i th t h e

g " : . . . . . . . . ~ r ' ~ " F . . . . ~ ^ " Q ^ " " P P ' : " " " ' - • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~, m o v e d to S e c t i o n ? -6 .4 .1 .2 .2 )

RELOCATE APPENDIX ITEMS ACCORDINGLY DELETE TABLE A-7-6.4

Also see C o m m e n t 13-161 (Log #CC201) as Chapte r 7 is being r e n u m b e r e d .

2. Revise Section 7-6.5 and the accompanying appendix material to read as follows:

7-6.5* (13--'5-3.5, 231-9. 231C,-10) Early Suppress ion Fast-Response (ESFR) Sprinklers.

7-6.5.1 (13-5-3.5.1, (231-9.1,231C-10.1) ESFR sprinklers shall be permi t ted to protect ordinary hazard, s torage o f class I t h rough IV commodi t i e s , olastic commodi t ies , miscel laneous storage, and o the r storage as specified in Sections 7-5, 7-6 and 7.8 or by o ther NFPA standards.

7-6,5.1,1" (231-9-1,1) Protection of nalletized and solid nile storaffe o f class I to W. car toned or unca r toned n n e x n a n d e d olastic, ca r toned e x n a n d e d olastic and idle wood or nlastic nallets shall be in accordance with Table 7-6.5.1.1 shown on the foilowin~ p.ag~

7-6.5,1,2 (231-10-1.1) Protection of Single. Double and Muhinle- Row rack storaffe of class I to IV. car toned or unca r toned l . lnexpanded plastic, ca r toned e x n a n d e d Plastic and idle wood or nlastic pallets shall be in accordance with Table 7-6.5.1.2.

Exception: ESFR .br°leeli°n as defined .~hall not at.#dy to the Iblhm,ing: a. Rack stm'a~'e invoh,inF .solid .shelves b. [~lck slora~e involvinL~ combustible, ohen-lob ¢'artott.s or containers

7-6.5.1.2.1 (231C-10-2.5) Where reouired bv Table 7- (shown on pages following ) one level of 17/32-in. orifice,

quick response, ordinary t empera tu re in-rack sprinklers shall be installed at the tier level closest to bnt not exceeding 1/2 of the m a x i m u m storage height . In-rack snr inkler hvdraulic design criteria shall he the most hydraulically remote eight heads at 50 psi

In-rack sprinklers shall he located at the intersection of the longi tudinal and transverse flue space. Horizontal spacing shall no t be permit ted to exceed 5-ft inter~als.

7-6.5.1.2.2 (231C-10-4.1) Where ESFR sprinklers are installed, see 7-4.1.3 regarding special rules for longitudinal flue spaces in double row racks.

~-6= .,~-_2-- ~ (13-5-3 .5 .2 ) ~ d ~ , r s - a r c s u i m b ] c f o r u = e

witb44w hazards ]ist,-~-i~p-T~bJc A 7 6.5 and shall be pe:'mitted to be u~cd in o the r ~pecific hazard classifications a: 'd corfigu:'r, tio:-s only wbe:" p:'oven b;.' large ~cale or o t l 'c r ~vitahle fire te~fing. ~CVD ..... :..L~ .... ~:o*~n f o ~ ' - i ~ building~ . . . . . an c. (9.1 - '~ shall h c u~ed o : q y in huilding~ up to ~0 ft (9.! n ' ) high. ESFR sp:- ink lc : - ; ': . . . . ' ~" . . . . . . . . :.. ~ . . . : ln : . .g . ~.;p tO, "19 f t (~o o ~.~ ,.:-~,.. l.~11

~n3~ [ i o o -.~ , t ~ . . . . w , , . ESFR s p r i n k l e r s sha l l be p e r m i t t e d to be nsed in

o t h e r spec i f i c h a z a r d c l ass i f i ca t i ons a n d c o n f i ~ n r a l l o n s o n l y w h e n proven by large scale or o the r suitable fire testing.

7-6."5.2* (231-9-1, 231-9-2, 231C-10-2, 231C-10-3) General. Protection criteria.

7-6.5.2.1 (13-5-3.5.1.1, 13-5-3.5.3) ESFR sprinkler systems shall be des igned such that the m i n i m u m opera t ing pressure is not less than that indicated in Table ~ 7-6.5.1.1 Table 7-6.5.1.2 Section 7-6. or Section 7-8 for type o f storage, commodi ty , storage height , and bui lding height involved.

6 1 2

Page 61: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 1 A 9 9 R O C

Table 7~;~.6,4-7-6.5.1.1 (Table 231-9-1.1,231-9-2.2. 231-9-2.3, 13-5-3.5.5) ESFR S p - a ~ c r Data ESFR Protect ion of Palletized and Solid Pile Storage

Type of Storage

Palletized and solid pile storage

(no open-top COlltalners or solid shelves)

C o m m o d i t y

1. Car toned u n e x p a n d e d plastic

! 2. Car toned expanded plastic

3. Uncar toned unexpanded plastic

4. Class I, Class II, Class III, or Class IV commodi t ies , encapsula ted or unencapsu la ted

5. Idle wood or _plast ic pallets

1. Car toned or nncar toned n n e x p a n d e d plastic

2. Class I, Class II, Class III, or Class IV commodi t ies , encapsulated or tmencapsnla ted

3. Idle wood or _plastic pallets i

1. Car toned or tmcar toned a n e x p a n d e d plastic

2. Class I, Class II, Class III, or Class IV corn modit ies , encapsula ted or .Jnencapsulated

I. Car toned . lnexpanded plastic

2. Class I, Class II, Class III, or Class IV , 'ommodi t ies , encapsnla ted or unencapsu la ted

Maximum Height of

Storage

ft m

25 7.6

35 10.7

35 10.7

20 6.1

M a x i m u m C e i l i n g / R o o f

Height of Bui lding

fi m

30 9.1

40 1'2.2

45 13.7

25 7.6

N o m i n a l K-Factor

13.5 - 14.5

13.5 - 14.5

13.5 - 14.5

11.0 - 1t.5

Sprinkler Design

Pressure

psi bar

50 3.4

75 5.2

90 27.4

50 3.4

H o s e Stream

D e m a n d

250 (946 L/ ra in )

(946 L / m i n )

(946 L/ ra in)

(946 L/ ra in )

Dura t ion

1 In

1 h r

1 hr

1 hr

613

Page 62: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

Table ~ ~ (Table 231C-10-1.1, ~31C-10-3.1. 231C-10-3.2.13-5-3.5.5) lZ~,h, ~ . . . . . . . . : ^ - ~ + v . . . . . . . /welrv~ e-.~'~l,1^, r~ ,~ ESFR Protection of Rack Storage without Solid Shelves

Type of Storage* Commodi ty 1. Cartoned unexpanded plastic 2. Cartoned expanded plastic 3. Exposed unexpanded plastic 4. Classes I, II, III, and IV commodities, encapsulated or unencapsula ted 5. Idle wood and plastic pallets 1. Cartoned or exposed unexpanded plastic 2. Classes I, II, III, and IV commodities, encapsulated or unencapsula ted 3. Idle wood and plastic pallets 1. Cartoned or exposed unexpanded plastic 2. Classes I, II, III, and IV commodities, encapsulated or unencapsula ted

*No open-top containers

Single-row rack storage, double-row rack storage, multiple-row rack storage

Maximum Height of

Storage

ft m 25 7.6

35 10.7

6-_1-

20 6.1

35 10.7

40 12.2

Maximum Ceiling/

Roof Height of Building

ft m 30 9.1

40 12.2

25 7.6

45 13.7

45 13.7

N ominal K-Factor

13.5 - 14.5

11.0 ! ! .5

11.0 - 11.5

13.5-14.5

13.5-14.5

Sprinkler Design

Pressure

psi bar 50 3.4

~ l l l m

5O &4-

50 8.4

90 27.4

90 27.4

In-Rack Sprinkler

Requirements No

No

N_9_o

No

Yes

Hose s~eam

Demand 50Z~g~_

(946 L/ra in)

(946 L /min )

50D_O_gp_m (946 L /min)

1 h____xr

1 h__.X

1 hr

Z

>

I

Page 63: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

7-grgA-7-6.5.2.2 (13-5-3.5.4, 231-9-2.1,231C-10-2.1 ) The design area shall consist of the most hydraulically demanding area of 12 sprinklers, consisting of 4 sprinklers on each of 3 branch lines. Design shall include a minimum of 960 sq ft (89 m 2 ).

• ~ . 3 . ~ x . . . . . . . . ; . . . . . . . . . . I ' V ' 7 ducat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(Added hose stream demand and duration to Table 7-6.5.1.1 and Table 7-6.5.1.2.)

7-6.5.2.3 C!31-9-1.2, 231C-10.1.2) Maxinmm building height shall be measu-ed to the underside of the roof deck or ceiling.

~ (':31-9-2.4) ESFR sprinklers shall be limited to wet-pipe systems.

, ~ , o . , x . o . o . 1 ~ 1 " 1 . . . . . .

hyd;-aulicall/demanding . . . . . c l o .-.: . . , . , . . . . . . . . . :o.;-~ - co ..... sprinklcr~ on each of 'J'rcc bra:'c. L" !ine~. The design ~hal! h:c!':de a rob;imam of 950 ft 2 (89.2 m 2).

f 250 gp /nA~ L/rain) oL.~,,

5 o ~ e ~t:'eam~. (Added hose stream demand and duration to Table 7- 6.5.1.1 amt Table 7-6.5.1.2 .)

(Added duration to Table 7-6.5.1.1 and Table 7-6.5.1.2.) ~ (231C-10-1.1) General. Early suppression fast

response (ESFR) spri,&lers ~ ' " " ~ . . . . . . . ;,,~,* c . . . . i . . . . . . . . . . :^.. of rack ~to:-age in acc~o~tance ;vith Table 7 5.5.8 and shall be nsed only in buildings equal to, or less than, the height of the building for which they have been listed.

P fi ............................... . . . . . / . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

, ; . . . . . I . . . . . . . . l i d . L . . I . . . . . ! . P , : ' ch .; "cn' :k;" . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~, .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. R a , " k . ; /mak~ : i;;vc, h4~ , ....... i . . . . . . : , , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : ....... 75.5.8.1 (2~IC 1O 1.2-)- Maximum b':ilding height ~hafl 5e

mca;nred :o the undo "sidle of :.he roof deck or ceiling. '7~r .n ( 2 3 1 C m 2 ) r~. . ;-H-.-c . . . . . . . r~_o;~_ 7 5 . 5 . 9 . 1 " ( 2 3 1 C ! 0 '.!.4~.', E S F R ~ p r : , : ' , k l c r ~y ' ~ : . cm~ ~ h a f l b c ~ c = , i g n e d

to provide the mh ' imum operating pre~':: 'e, in accordance w i t h

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . ~'~:-~'" a n d building . . . . s . , ~

.......: ..... "'-'~u, "^ . . . . . ,~._~ ..~° most__iD.draulicall;, remote =pri:'k!er~ ba~ed o:"

. . . . . . . . b . . . . . ~ p r i n L 1 e r ~ - . e n ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-6:g~0 ~oqnP la ~ ~ /a t c r r~ . . . . . .~ 76.5.10.1 ~ , ~ , c - ; a ~ ,~ ^ -.:~; . . . . . . . cor.,~ ~ ( ! r L / ~ ) o t . ~ .

I . . . . I A - - A * ~ , i . -

ho;e ;t:'eams. (Added hose stream demand and duration to Table 7- 6.5.1.1 and Table 7-6.5./.2.)

7 6.5.!0.2 (22!C !0 ~.2-) Water ~upp!y dnrat 'cn ~ha!! b e at !east ! hoew. (Added hose stream demand and duration to Table 7-6.5.1.1 and Table 7-6.5.1.2.)

7.5.5.11 ~231C 1O I) Other Reqt:irement~.

N T 1 2 D A O q l ' ~ , - . . . . - A ; , . ~ "

DELETE TABLE A-7-6.5 A-7-6.5 (231-A-9-1, 231C-A-10-1, 13-A-5-3.5.1.1) ESFRsprinklers

are designed to respond quickly to growing fires and deliver heavy discharge to suppress fires rather than to control them. ESFR sprinklers should not t,e relied on to provide suppression if they are used oulside the design parameters.

While these sprinklers are intended primarily for use in high-pile storage situations, this section permits their use and extension into adjacent portions of an occupancy that might have a lesser classification.

A-7-6.5.1,1 (231-A-9-1.3) Storage in single-sto[y or multistory buildings can be permitted, provided the maximum cei l ing/ roof height as specified in Table 9-1.1 is satisfied for each storage area.

A-7-6.5.2 (231-A-9-2, 231C-A-10-3) Design parameters were determined from a series of full-scale fire tests that were conducted as a joint effort between Factor), Mutual Research Corporation and the National Fire Protection Research Foundation. (Copies of the test reports are available fi'om the NFPRF.)

Also refer to Comment 13-160 (Log #127) for additional revisiolls to the ESFR discharge criteria. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This meets the intent of the submitter by consolidating the dischalge criteria for large drop and ESFR sprinklers. This action also updates the discharge criteria as found in the 1998 editions of NFPA 231 and NFPA 231C. Also see Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23 COMMENT ON AFFIRMATIVE:

KEEPING: In the Committee Action, a new Table 7-6.5.1.2 is being created by revising Table 9-1.1 from the 1998 edition of NFPA ~31. This is the correct reference; however, on the artwork that illustrates this new table, it has mistakenly been marked as Table 7-6.5.6.1. Care must be taken to insure that this typographical error does not end tip on the final draft of the standard.

SCHUMANN: Retain names for Tables 7-6.4.1.1, 7-6.4.1.2, 7- 6.5.6.1, and 7-6.5.1.2. Also, include a configuration column for Table 7-6.4.1.2 if the title of the table does not indicate that it is for rack storage configurations.

(Log #127) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 160- ([Chapter 7] Chapter 5): Accept in Principle SUBMITrER: Donald B. Pounder, Grinnell Corp. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a RECOMMENDATION: Revise NFPA 13 to incorporate the requirements for ESFR sprinklers having a nominal K-factor of 25.

Revise text as follows: 7-6.5.1.1" ESFR sorinklers shall be designed such that the

minimum oDeratin~ oressure is in accordan¢¢ with Tables 7- 5.4.1.5.7-6.5.6.1.7-6.5.8 or "New Table for Rubber Tire Storage." as aDolicable, or in accordance with the reouirements of other NFPA standards.

7-6.5.2 (13-5-3.5.2) ESFR sorinklers are suitable for use with the hazards listed in this document and o ther NFPA standards and shall be Dermitted to be used in other specific hazard classifications and configurations only when proven by large-scale or other suitable fire testing. ESFR sorinklers shall only be used in buildings un to the bei~bt snecified in their listing.

Revised tables:

ESFR K Factor

11.0--11.5

13.5--14.5

13.5---14.5

24._9-----26.2

24.2--26.2

System Type

Wet

Wet

Wet

Wet

Wet

Table 7-5.4.1.5 x Rolled Paper Storage - - Automatic Sprinkler Design Criteria - - ESFR Sprinklers

Pressure (psi)

(bars)

50 3.4

Building Height

(ft) (m)

25 7.6

maximum height of storage permitted

Closed (ft) (m)

20 6.1

Heavyweight

Standard (ft) (m)

20 6.1

Open (ft) (m)

.'20 6.1

Closed (ft) (m)

20 6.1

Mediumweight

Standard (ft) (m)

20 6.1

Open (ft) (m)

20 6.1

50 3.4 30 9.1 25 7.6 25 7.6 25 7.6 25 7.6 25 7.6 25 7.6

75 5.2 40 12.2 30 9.1 30 9.1 30 9.1 N/A N/A N / A

15 1.0 30 9.1 25 7.6 25 7.6 25 7.6 25 7.6 25 7.6 25 7.6

25 1.7 40 12.2 30 9.1 30 9.1 30 9.1 N /A N/A N/A

Tissue

All

Arrays

N/A

N/A

N / A

N / A

N / A

615

Page 64: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

Table 7-6.5.6.1 (231-9-1) Palletized/Solid Pile Storage - - ESFR Sprinkler Data

Type of Storage Pallelized and solid pile stoJa~e 01o open-top contamels ov solid shelves)

Commodity 1. Cartoned unexpanded plastic; 2. Cartoned expanded plastic; 3. Uncar toned unexpanded plastic; 4. Class I, II, II, or IV commodit ies

encapsulated or tmencapsnlated; 5. Idle wood or plastic pallets 1. Cartoned or tmcartoned,

tmexpanded plastic; 2. Class I, II, III, or IV

commodities, encapsulated or unencapsulated;

3. Idle wood o1" plastic pallets 1. C a r t o o e d or u n c a r t o n e d ,

unexpanded plastic; 2. Class I, II, III, or IV

comnaodities, encapsulated or unencapsulated

Maximum Maximum Roof/Ceiling Height of Height of

Storage Building ft (m) ft (m)

Nominal K factor

25 (7.6)

35 (10.7)

35 (10.7)

Sprinkler Design Pressure psi (bars)

30 (9.1) 13.5-14.5 50 (3.4)

40 (12.2) 13.5-14.5 75 (5.2)

45 (13.7) 13.5-14.5 90 (27.4)

1. Cartoned unexpanded plastic 2. Class I, II, II1, or IV

commodities, encapsulated or u nencapsulated

25 (7.6) 30 (9.1) 24.2-26.2 15 (1.0)

30 (9.1) 35 (10.7) 24.2-26.2 20 (1.4)

35 (10.7) 40 (12.2) 24.2-26.2 25 (1.7)

40 (12.2) 45 (13.7) 24.2-26.2 40 (2.8)

Table 7-6.5.8 (231C- 10-1) Rack Storage i Early Suppression Fast Response (ESFR) Sprinkler Data

T~,pe of Storage Single-, double-, and multiple-row rack storage (No open- top containers or solid shelves)

Commodit 7 Cartoned unexpanded plastic; car toned expanded plastic; uncar toned unexpanded plastic; Class I, If, III, or IV commodit ies , encapsulated or unencapsulated; idle wood and plastic pallets

Maximum Roof/Ceiling Sprinkler Height of Height of Design In-Rack Storage • Building Nominal Pressure Sprinkler

ft(m) ft(m) K factor psi (bars) Requirement 25 (7.6) 30 (9.1) 13.5-14.5 50 (3.4) No

Cartoned or uncar toned, unexpanded plastic; Class I, II, III, or IV commodit ies , encapsulated or nnencapsulated; idle wood and plastic pallets Car toned or uncar toned, unexpanded plastic; Class I, II, III, or IV commodit ies , encapsulated or unencapsulated

35 (10.7) 40 (12.2) 13.5-14.5 75 (5.2)

20 (6.1) 25 (7.6) 11.0-11.5 50 (3.4) 35 (10.7) 45 (13.7) 13.5-14.5 90 (27.4)

40 (12.2) 45 (13.7) 13.5-14.5 90 (27.4)

No

No No

Yes Cartoned, unexpanded plastic; Class I, II, III, or IV commodi t ies , encapsulated or unencapsulated

25 (7.6) 30 (9.1) 24.2-26.2 15 (1.0)

30 (9.1) 35 (10.7) 24.2-26.2 20 (1.4)

35 (10.7) 40 (12.2) 24.2-26.2 25 (1.7)

40 (12.2) 45 (13.7) 24.2-26.2 40 (2.8)

No

No

No

No

616

Page 65: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

N e w Table: Rubber Tire Storage - - ESFR Sprinklers - - N o m i n a l K-Factor 24 .2-26 .2 P i l i n g M e l h o d

Rubber tire s torage on-side or on- t read in palletized por table racks, open por table racks or fixed racks wi thout solid shelves

Pile M a x i m u m N u m b e r o f Sprinklers Durat ion Hose H e i g h t Bui ld ing He ight and M i n i m u m (hr) D e m a n d

(ft) (ft) Operat ing Pressures (gpm) (See Note 1)

Up to 25 30 12 sprinklers @ 15 psi l 250

Up to 25 35 12 sprinklers @25 psi 1 250

Laced tires in open portable Up to 25 30 20 sprinklers @ 25 psi 3 500 steel racks (See FigL.re 1-3(g).) (See Note 2 and 3)

Note 1: Sprinkler opera t ing pressures and n u m b e r of sprinklers in the design are based on tests in which the c learance was 5 ft to 7 ft be tween the spr inkler def lec tor attd the max i mu m he igh t o f storage. The authori ty having jur isdic t ion sttall be consul ted where c learances exceed 7 ft.

Note 2: Where used in this appl icat ion, ESFR pro tec t ion is expec ted to control ra ther than to suppress the fire. Note 3: The desiga area shall consist o f the most hydraulically d e m a n d i n g area of 20 sprinklers, consis t ing of 5

sprinklers on each of 4: b ranch lines. The design shall include a m i n i mu m opera t ing area of 1600 f(2.

SUBSTANTIATION: 1. Approved ESFR sprinklers having a nominal K-factor of 25.2 have been available for almost a year. There has been considerable interest in these sprinklers and their use should be detailed in this standard.

2. By incorporating ,nfi~rlnation on ESFR sprinklers having 26 K- factors now, the need to issue a TL& will be avoided. This is an important change whi,:h should be incorporated in-cycle.

3. An extensive series of fire tests has been conducted at Underwriters Laboratc,rics using the Grinnell Model ESFR-25 sprinkler to estahlish the minimum design pressures for the commodities for whicl, this sprinkler will be Listed. A copy of their report is attachec,. It is noted that in a comparative test of ESFR sprinklers having a nominal K-factor of 14.0 arid those having

a nominal K-factor of 25.2. the higher K-factor sprinklers demonstrated superior petforinance. It is also noted that the pressures which are proposed are intended to provide the same or slightly higher densities for ESFR's having K-factors of 25 as colnpared to ESFR's having K-factors of 14.

4. The wording of Section 7-6.5.2 (13-5.3.5.2) has been changed to delete reference to the appendix Table A-7.6.5 since information in that table has already been included in the non- appendix tables dealing with ESFR sprinklers. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Do not accept the revisions to Sections 7-6.5.1.1 and %6.5.2 as proposed by fl~e submitter. Revise file submitter's tables as follows:

Table 7-5.4.1.5 x Rolled Paper Storage - - Automatic Sprinkler Design Criteria - - ESFR Sprinklers (maximum height of storage permitted)

ESFR K System Factor Type

Pregsure (psi)

(bars)

11.0--11.5 Wet 50 3."1

13.5--14.5 Wet 50 3.4

13,5--14.5 Wet 75 5.2

24.2--26.2 Wet t-,5 4=0

20 1.,t

24.2--26.2 Wet ~ 47-

40 2.8

Building lteight

(ft) On)

25 7.6

30 9.1

40 1 "2,2

30 9.1

40 12.2

Closed (ft) (m)

20 6. l

25 7.6

30 9. I

25 7.6

Heaw/weight

Standard (ft) (m)

20 6.1

25 7.6

30 9,1

25 7.6

Open fit) (m)

20

25

30

25

Closed (ft) (m)

Mediumweight

Standard fit) (m)

N/A

21)

25

Open (ft) (m)

6.1 20 6.1

7.6 25 7.6

N / A

Tissue

30 9.1 30 9.1

25 7.6

30

6.1 20 6.1

7.6 25 7.6

9,1 N/A

7.6 25 7.6

9.1 N/A N/A

All Arrays

N/A

N ,/A

N/A

25 7.6 N/A

N/A N,/A

617

Page 66: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

Table 7-6.5.6.1 (231-9-1) Pallet ized/Solid Pile Storage - - ESFR Sprinkler Data

Type of Storage Commodity

Maximum Maximum Height of Roof/Ceiling

Storage Height of ft (m) Building

ft (m)

Nominal K factor

Sprinkler Design

Pressure psi (bars)

Palletized and solid pile storage (no open-top containers or solid shelves)

1. Cartoned unexpauded plastic:

2. Cartoned expanded plastic; 3. Uncar toned nnexpanded

plastic; 4. Class 1, II, II, or IV

commodit ies encapsulated or nnencapsulated:

5. Idle wood or plastic pallets

25 (7.6) 30 (9.1) 13.5-14.5 50 (~3.4)

1. Cartoned oI uncarloued, unexpauded plastic;

2. Class I, II, III, or 1V connnodities, encapsulated or unencapsulated;

3. Idle wood or plastic pallets

35 (10.7) 40 (12.2) 13.5-14.5 75 (5.2)

1. Cartoned or uncartoned, unexpanded plastic;

2. Class I, II, III, or I V commodities, encapsulated or unencapsulated

35 (10.7) 45 (13.7) 13.5-14.5 90 (27.4)

I. Cartoned unexpanded plastic

2. Class I, II, III, or IV commodities, encapsulated

or unencapsulated

25 ~7.6~

25 (7.6) 30 (9.1)

30 (9.1) 35 (10.7)

35 (10.7) 40 (12.2)

40 (12.2) 45 (13.7)

11.0- 11.5

24.2-26.2

24.2-26.2

24.2-26.2

24.2-26.2 4o-+2¢8~

618

Page 67: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

Table 7-6.5.8 (231C-10-1) Rack Storage - - Early Suppression Fast Response (ESFR) Sprinkler Data

Type of Storage

Single-, double-, and mult iple-row rack s t o r a g e ( N o open-top conta iners or solid shelves)

Commodity Car toned u n e x p a n d e d plastic; car toned expanded 25 (7.6) plastic; unca r toned u n e x p a n d e d plastic; Class I, II, III, or IV commodi t ies , encapsula ted or unencapsu la ted ; idle wood and plastic pallets Car toned o|- uncar toned , u n e x p a n d e d p l a s t i c ; Class I, II, III, or IV commodi t ies , encapsula ted or tmencapsnla ted ; idle wood and plastic pallets g0-(gd-)- Car toned o1" uncar toned , | ,mexpanded plastic; Class I, II, III, ol- IV commodi t ies , encapsula led or unencapsu la led

Maximum Roof/Ceiling Sprinkler Height of Height of Design In-Rack

Storage Building Nominal Pressure Sprinkler ft(m) ft(m) K factor psi (bars) Requirement

30 (9.1) 13.5-14.5 50 (3.4) No

35 (10.7) 40 (12.2) 13.5-14.5 75 (5.2) No

g S - ( g ~ ~ g 0 - - ( g ~ N o

35 (10.7) 45 (13.7) 13.5-14.5 90 (27.4) No

40 (12.2) 45 (13.7) 13.5-14.5 90 (27.4) Yes C a r t o n e d ,

u n e x p a n d e d plastic; Class I, I[, HI, or IV commodi t i e s , encapsula ted or u nencapsula ted

2o {6A~ ~ i l .O- I l& ~ No

25 (7.6) 30 (9.1) 24.2-26.2 ~ No

30 (9.1) 35 (10.7) 24.2-26.2 g 0 - ( 4 e ~ No

35 (10.7) 40 (12.2) 24.2-26.2 'dt~+t-.~ No

40 (12.21 45 (13.7) 24.2-26.2 40--(-2-=8}- No

N e w T a b l e : R u b b e r T i r e S t e r a g e ~ ¢ ~ ¢ ~ . - . ~ . , ~ ~ . r - ~ : - ~ , ~z v . . . . . 24 2 26 .2

P 4 1 i n g - M ~ h o d

o n t r e a d in p a ! ! e f i : - ~ ~ a M e - ~ • I X . . . . . . . . . . . *, ........ --S{ .............

N u m b e r o f Sprk=!dero ° PAle Maximum and-Minimum

........ & .... & . . . . IV ...... & . . . . . . . . . D ' - r a t i o n

L4p-to-2~ .-30 i,) . . . . . ; . . H . . . . ca, t r . ~,.; 4-

L a c e d ' ; . . . . . . . . o in o p e : M ~ , ~ 4 e U f . - m - ~ ~ .m.~ ~,- ..... . . . . . . . . . , . i . . ~ . . . . . @ ~..'~" p~i ~ r ~ 6

. ~ , - . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . - ' . . I , 1 ~ , - o ; , . t | , ~ A ~ . . ; . . . . . - ~ I . . . . . . . . t . . . . t e ~ ; [ . g ; . . . . . i . ; ~ | , t h e N o t e l : S p : i : : k ! e ~ . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . A n u n - ! ; e : , . r ° v " L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

j u d s d ~ ~ 4 4 ~ o ~ s u l t e d w ! : e : e c l e a : - a a e e s + ~ o e ~ - d - ? 4 ~ .

Note o... u.~. ............. ..... -:se-d ~," .h;o ....... -v, -''~''uv'',1;~'; .... ~...L" ~p~D p:o.-'--tion is expec'.ed to .~,,.,-,~ ""~, ~,,,., ...... ,,,.,,,~ ........ ... su pp:-e:;~ tl',e fi:-~.

No.*e 3: T h e des ig -n -a rea ~ol-~n . . . . . ~ , . ~ . o . : . . . . ~ . f .,,.'1-~ m o s t hyd:-aulica!!y ~.,.,.,~,,.,,,.1;'-g . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . ~.c on.~ ot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ;,.t.i . . . . , c~ : :~ is t ing of 5 s t ~ i n k 4 ~ , - o n m ~ 4 ~ - o f ~ h l ines. T h e d e s i ~ n d ~ d e - a ~ n i n i ~ ~ : a ~ ' ~ t ~

6 1 9

Page 68: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

Table 7-5.2.1.1(c) [Table 231D 4-1.2(¢H ESFR Sprinklers for Protection 9f Rubber Tires (See Note 2)

Piling Method

Ruhber tire slorage on- side or on-tread in palletized portable racks, open portable racks, or fixed racks without solid sheh'es

Rubber tire storage on- side in palletized portable racks, open portable racks or fixed racks without solid shelves

Laced tires in oDen Dortable steel racks (See Fieure 1-4.10.1)

Pil__e

to 25

U__p_to 25

Building

30

Nomi na l K-factor

B

24.2 - 26.9

m l ~ l l

. i , ' IU | | n i ; l i l l

S0rinklers

(See Note 4)

12 (See Note 4)

12 (See Note 4)

12 (See Note 4)

2O (See Notes 5

an~6~

r J i l ~ l l U l I~1

Pressure

(See Note 3) 5O

20

75

Itl

75

! . I I I i ~ [ I O m

hikO H o s e

Demand

25__0o

500

Notes." 1. For $I units, 1 ft = 0,:~048 m; 1 sq ft = 0.0929 sq m: 1 psi = 6.895 kPa: 1 gpm = 3.785 L/In in 2. Wet systems only. 3. Sprinkler operating pressures and number of sprinklers in tile design are based on tests in which the clearance was

ft to 7 ft between the sprinkler deflector and the maximum height of storage. 4. The shape of the design area shall be in accordance with Section 7-6.5.4. 5. Where u~ed in this application. ESFR protection is expected to control rather than to suppress the fire. 6. The design area shall consist of the most hydraulically demanding area of 20 sprinklers, consisting of 5 sprinklers

on each of 4 branch lines. The design shall include a minimum operating area of 1600 sq ft.

Refer to Comment 13-55 (Log #127a) for installation requirements concerning the K-25 ESFR sprinkler in Chapter 5. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The revisions made by the Technical Committee reflect the current approval and installation of these types of sprinklers. The Technical Committee notes that while these sprinklers are not permit ted to be installed as ESFR sprinklers at the lower pressures specified by the submitter, they are permitted at these lower pressures pet" Section 4-4.9 of the 1996 edition of NFPA 13 for Special Sprinklers. Due to the emergence of this relatively new technology, the Technical Committee has agreed to further study this matter. Tables 7-6.5.6.1 and 7-6.5.8 were further revised to correct information concerning the K-11 ESFR sprinkler. See Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 22 ABSTENTION: 1

COMMENT O N AFFIRMATIVE: HOOVER: I am voting affirmatively but with a comment on the

two new entries in Table 7-5.2.1.1(c): Under "up to 25" in a "30" foot building there is an entry for 12

sprinklers (K=24.2-26.2) at 20 psi; and under "up to 25" in a "35" foot building there is an enttw for 12 sprinklers (K=24.2-26.2) at 30 psi.

As far as I can tell by reading the UL test report, this sprinkler has never heen tested in this configuration with ruhber tires as the commodity either on-side or on-tread. As I remember, this comment was still being discussed as Todd and I had to leave to catch a plane to Chicago. With our desire to have proof before we place anything in the standard, I'm surprised that this comment was accepted.

The Tire Committee made this mistake previously. Tile), accepted ELO hardware based on tests run with commodities other than tires. However, when the chance came to test the ELO versus tires, the committee found that the ceiling steel temperatures could not be controlled. A fluke? Maybe! But, to be on the safeside, the Tire Committee relegated the ELO to being no better than 17/32" sprinklers in order to keep it in the Rubber Tire Standard. Could a similar problem occur with this ESFR sprinkler? One assumes not, but until tires are the test commodity, we really don' t know.

This occurrence may point out a potential problem with NFPA 13 taking over the sprinkler portions of other standards. The Tire Committee would not have accepted this c o m m e n t and would have asked the manufacturer to run tests with tires. Or, at least there would have been a great deal of discussion before they were convinced. The Sprinkler Committee, on the other hand, did accept it without ure tests. Will we, the Sprinkler Committee, accept hardware, or a remote area design, or a presstrre requirement in the future without appropriate testing where the Tire, Roll Paper, Hanger, or other committee would ask for- further testing because they have more experience with their unique commodity or occupancy? I fear we will.

As I said, I was not able to stay for- the whole discussion and maybe the Sprinkler Committee did discuss this issue thoroughly and completely. I do not intend to impugn the committee's integrity, but I still d o t h i n k there is a concern to be raised.

KEEPING: The new standard is supposed to refer to sprinklers bv their nominal K-factors. Therefore, rather than referring to the ESFR sprinklers with K's of "I 1.0-11.5," "13.5-14.5," and 24.2-26.2," these devices shonld be consistently referred to as "11.2," "14.0," and "25.2.

6 2 0

Page 69: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

EXPLANATION OF ABSTENTION: BELL: Sprinklers having a nominal K-factor o f 25 have

successfully completed a series of large-scale fire tests at pressures less than those proposed for Chapter 7. It may be premature to only specify these higher pressures as part of this Standard.

(Log #CC201) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 161 - ([Chapter 7] Chapter 5 ): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a

i RECOMMENDATION: Revise chapter 7 o f the Preprint as i follows:

7-1 (13-5.1) General. 7-1.1 (Renumber exi,,ting text o f Section 7-1 as 7-1.1 and revise

the Exception to read: "Special design approaches as oermit ted in Section 7-9.")

7-1.2 (Renumber ex sting 7-2.1.3 as 7-1.2). 7-2 Occupancy Hazzrd Fire Control Approach. 7-2.1.2 (Add "Section 7-10" after the phrase "Special Occupancy

Hazard" at the end of the section.) 7-2.1.3 (Renumber z s Section 7-1.2). 7-2.1.4 (Renumber ,~s Section 5-3.1.3). 7-2.1.4.1 (Renumber as section 5-3.1.3.1). 7-2.3 Water Demand Requirements - Hydraulic Calculation

Methods. Table 7-2.3 (Renumber references 231C-5-6, 231C-5-6.1,231C-5-

6.2, and 231C-5-7 as 231C-5-7, 231C-5-7.1,231C-5-7.2, and 231C-5-8 respectively).

7-2.3.1.3(c) (Renumber reference 231C-5-3.3 as 231C-5-4.3). 7-2.3.2.1 (Revise to read: "The water supply requirement for

sprinklers only shall be calculated from the area/densi ty curves in Figure 7-2.3.1.2 or from section 7-10 where area/densi ty criteria is ~pe¢ified for soecial occupan(;y hazards. When usinu Figure 7- 2.3.1.2 the calculations shall satisfy any single point on the appropriate area/densi ty curve as follows: ( remainder of section tmchanged) ."

Add an exception to read: "Sorinkler demand for storage Occupancies as de te rmined in '7-3 through 7-8.")

7-2.3.2.2 "For protection of miscellaneous storage, miscel laneous I tire storage, and storage iJp to 12ft (3.6m) in height, the discharge criteria in Table 7-2.3.'..).2 shall be applicable."

7-2.3.2.3 (In the first paragraph revise the reference to read "Section 7-9" rather than "Section 7-5").

7-5 (Revise to read: "Protection of Idle pallets" and use the text o f existing Si~ction 7-5.1).

7-6 [Revise to read: "Protection of Rubber Tire Storage" and use text from existing Section 7-5.2 as modified by Comment 13-181 (Log #12)].

7-7 [Revise to read: 'Protection of Baled Cotton Storage" and use text from existing Section 7-5.3 as modified by Comment 13- 184 (Log #CC202)].

7-8 [Revise to read: 'Protection of Roll Paper Storage" and use text from existing Section 7-5.4 as modified by Comment 13-21 (Log #24) ].

7-9 (Revise to read: 'Special Design Approaches" and use text of existing Section 7-6).

7-10 [Revise to read "Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria for Special Occupancy Halards" and use the text o f Sections 7-5.5 through 7-5.36 as modified by Comments 13-188 through 13-225 (Log #51 through Log ~8'.))].

Restore 30 percent inzrease for dry pipe systems to new 7-5 through 7-8.

Add section stating that: "The following criteria is in tended to apply to buildings with ceiling slopes not exceeding 2 in 12 (16.7%)" to the beginning of 7-3 through 7-8." SUBSTANTIATION: These are considered editorial and organizational changes which allow for the in tended application of Chapter 7 of NFPA 13. See Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end o f this report. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 24

(Log #205) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 162 - (7-2.1.4 Exception No. 1): Accept SUBMITrER: Mark Fessenden, Central Sprinkler Co. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a RECOMMENDATION: Revise Exception No. 1 as follows:

5Residential sprinklers are permit ted in accordance with 44=r3- 5 - 4.~. SUBSTANTIATION:, Residential sprinkler has now been moved to Chapter 5. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #CC407) Committee: AUT-SSI

13- 163 - ([7-2.1.4, 7-2.1.4.1] 5-2.1.3, 5-2.1.3.1): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-198 RECOMMENDATION: Renumber Sections 7-2.1.4 and 7-2.1.4.1 as Sections 5-3.1.3 and 5-3.1.4 in the Preprint. Renumber 5-3.1.3 accordingly. SUBSTANTIATION: The Technical Commit tee believes that this information more appropriately belongs in Chapter 5 rather than Chapter 7. Also see Committee Actions on Comments 13-164 (Log #222) and 13-161 (Log #CC201). See Preprint o f Chapter 7 at the end of this report. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #222) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 164 - (7-2.1.4 and 7-2.1.4.1, 5-2.1.3 and 5-2.1.3.1): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Roland J. Huggins, AFSA COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-198 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Relocate both paragraphs in Section 4-3. SUBSTANTIATION: This information is not a design approach, but an installation requirement. Tile commit tee rejected the initial proposal stating these paragraphs pertain to tile subject of hazard analysis. The requirement to install quick response sprinklers in a light hazard occupancy is not per t inent to the analysis o f the hazard. As defined in 13-5-2.1.2, the hazard analysis reviews the filel load, storage arrangement , etc. After complet ing the analysis, then the need to install QR sprinklers is determined. This is an INSTALLATION issue, the same as allowing intermediate and high temperature sprinklers in ordinany and extra hazard occupancies. We need to be consistent in applying logic when placing criteria. Leaving these paragraphs in the current location simply because we placed them there in 1996 is inappropriate . COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Committee Action and Statement on Comments 13-161 (Log #CC201) and 13-163 (Log #CC407). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

621

Page 70: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

(Log #121) Commit lee : AUT-SSD

13- 165 - (Table 7-2.3.2.2): Reject SUBMITTER: Robert A. Williams, MS State Rating Bureau COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a RECOMMENDATION: Add a note referring to the definit ion of miscel laneous storage: The discharge criteria in this table shall apply to miscel laneous storage as def ined in Paragraph 1-4.2. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : The title o f this table inay be mis leading without this note, since o the r notes refer to the definit ion of miscel laneous tire storage and plastic pallet storage. A note would make tbe table more user friendly. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Technical Commi t t ee does not believe that it is appropr ia te to def ine every term used in the table or its title. These terms ace def ined in Cbapte r 1. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

Wet pipe system Light hazard or ordinary hazard occupancy 20 ft m a x i m u m ceiling height.

The n u m b e r or sprinklers in the design area shaft never be less than five. Where quick response sprinklers are used on a sloped ceiling, a m a x i m u m ceiling he igh t shall be used for de t e rmin ing tim percent reduct ion in design area. Where quick response sprinklers are installed, all sprinklers wilhin a c o m p a r l m e n t shall be of the quick response type,

Exception: Where c i rcumstances require the use of o ther than ordinary t empera tu re rated sprinklers, s tandard resnonse sprinklers shall be permi t ted to be used." SUBSTANTIATION: This c o m m e n t corrects an omission by better identifying the condi t ions unde r which the reduct ion in the system area in operat ion can be made. See Prepr int of Chapter 7 at the end of this report. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept.

Please refer to front mat ter for Technical Correlat ing Commit tee ballot resnhs.

(Log #225) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 166- (Table 7-2.3.2.2): Reject SUBMITTER: James M. Feld, Sacramento Building Dept. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-9 RECOMMENDATION: Revise the title of Table 7-2.3.2.2:

Table 7-2.3.2.2 Discharge Criteria for Miscellaneous Storage and Storage ~ 12 ft (3.7 m) or Less in Height. SUBSTANTIATION: The a r r a n g e m e n t o f the tirol package which prompts the extra hazard classification is i n d e p e n d e n t o f whe ther the commodi ty is "stored" or "displayed." The fire does not know the difference. Any occupancy having Group A plastics s tored or displayed as described in Table 7-2.3.2.2 should be treated as required by the table. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Display o f substantial a m o u n t s of product is to be considered as slorage in terms of sprinklel- protect ion. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #153) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 168 - (7-2.3.2.5): Accept in Principle SUBMITI'ER: Kenne th E. I sman , Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-206 RECOMMENDATION: Revise the end of the sen tence to read:

"...pitch exceed ing a rise o f 2 units in a run o f 12 units." SUBSTANTIATION: The metric conversion is awkward and not needed. Slope should be i n d e p e n d e n t o f the units o f measurement . COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

J evise the end of the sen tence to read: "... pitch exceeding 1 in 6 (rise o f 2 units in a rim of 12 milts, a roof

slope of 16.7 percent) ." Also make this a global change t h roughon t the document .

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This action meets the in tent of the submil ter by def in ing roof slope in a several ways. See Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end of this report NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #155) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 167- (7-2.3.2.4): Reject SUBMITTER: Kenne th E. I sman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-205 RECOMMENDATION: Ill the last sen tence o f 7-2.3.2.4, change "... a m a x i m u m ceiling height shall be used..." to "...the average ceiling height shall be used..." SUBSTANTIATION: No technical basis exists for mak ing the analysis on the basis o f m a x i m u m ceiling height . T he user is penalized for the sloped roof by o the r sections of the s tandard. They s h o u l d n ' t be penalized twice. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Tecbnical Commi t tee st,ands b,v its position staled Proposal 13-205 (Log #123) m the ROP. Where a fire slarts unde r the peak o f the roof, the he ight o f storage and clearance u n d e r the peak dictate appropriate sprinkler protection. Taking tile average ceiling he igh t could result in inadequale protection. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIR~L~.TIVE: 223"t

(Log #CC502) Commit tee : AUT-AAC

13- 167a- ([7-2.3.2.4]): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Correla t ing Commi t tee on Automat ic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a

I RE, COMMENDATION: Revise Section 7-2.3.2.4 of the Prepr in t lo read as follows:

"Where listed quick response sprinklers are used t h roughou t or port ion o f a svstem having lhe same hydraulic desien basis, the

I ,svstemarea. of. po eralion. " t . i s ~ermitted to be reduced without revisin, g | the dens, tv as indicated m Fnguce 7-2.3.2.4 when all of the following | condi t ions are satisfied:

(Log #15.t) Commit tee : A U T S S D

13- 169 - (7-2.3.2.8 and A 7 2.3.2.8): Reject SUBMITrER: Kenne th E. l sman , Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-207 RECOMMENDATION: Accept Proposal 13-207 (Log #1241 as it was submit ted with appropria te changes in Section n u m b e r s 1o Chapter 7. SUBSTANTIATION: Tile ctnnulative approach does trot ahvays resuh in tim most conservative ans3ver. Cons ider the si tuation of a wet pipe spl'inkler system (OH-2 starl ing at 0.19 g p m / s q ft over 2000 sq fi) us ing high t empera tn re sprinklers u n d e r a ceiling with a slope exceeding 2 in 12. The adjus tments that need to he made to the design area are a 25 percent reduct ion and a 30 percent area increase.

If the ad jus tments are made cumulatively tim area comes out to he 1950 sq ft (2000 x 0.75 x 1.31.

If the adjt ls tments are made to the base figures (as we think they should) the area comes out to be 2100 sq ft (2000 + 600 - 500).

The approach that makes tbe most sense is for the adjus tments to he consistent. If high t empera tu re sprinklers are being used, tile ad jus tment should be - -500 sq ti regardless of tire ceiling slope. The penalt ies associated with a sloped ceiling are taken separately. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: While tire Technical Commi t tee agrees that tile cumulat ive approach does not always provide the most conservative result it is consis tent with past practice which has been satisfactot T. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

622

Page 71: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

(Log #47) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 170 - (5-2.3.2,8, A-5-2.3.2.8 [7-2.3.2.8, A-7-2.3.2.8] ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correla t ing Commi t t ee on Automat ic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-207 RECOMMENDATION: While the Technical Corre la t ing Commi t t ee agrees with action taken b~ the Technical Commi t tee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria ',TCSSDC), the TCC does not entirely agree with the Commit tee Statement. The TCC believes that the cnmulative approach does not always -estdt in a more conservative approach. However, the cumulat ive approach provides consis tency with approaches inferred by o ther s tandards. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is a direct ion from the Automat ic Sprinklers Technical Correlat ing Commi t t ee in accordance with 3-4.2 and 3-4.3 o f the Regulat ions Governing Commi t t ee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: A.ccept in Principle. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Commit tee Action and Sta tement on C o m m e n t 13-169 (Log #154). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #156) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 171 - (7-2.3.4.3 Exception): Accept S U B M I T T E R : Kenne th E. Isman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-208 RECOMMENDATION: The Exception to 7-2.3.4.3 in the Preprint belongs to Section 7-2.3.4.2. Please move it back. SUBSTANTIATION: An error was made in p lacement o f the new Section 7-2.3.4.3 in between an existing section and its except ion. COMMrFTEE ACTION: Accept.

See Prepr int of Chapter 7 at the end of this report NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE &CTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #21) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 172 - ([7-3] 5-3.1 Exception): Reject SUBMITTER: Robert E. Duke, Fire Control , Inc. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: N / A RECOMMENDATION: Insert Exception after ...storage in place, as follows:

Exception: Where storage area is less than 10,000 sq ft. SUBSTANTIATION: Smaq individual storage bxiildiugs can be served by normal fire depa , ' tmeut operat ious fi 'om the exterior. Small s torage areas within an o ther occupancy do not warraut a separate piping system to a single hose statiom COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This c o m m e n t was originally submit ted as a public proposal to the 1998 edi t ion o f NFPA 231 as Proposal 231- 3 (Log #3). However, dne to the restructure of NFPA 13 and NFPA 231, the Technical Commil tee on General Storage also referred the proposal to the Sprinkler Project as a public c o m m e n t to NFPA 13, as the proposal migh t impact water supply requ i rements for spr inkler systems. The Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria voted to reject this c o m m e n t as they do not believe it pertains to sprinkler systems. Requ , rements for hose are covered in NFPA 230. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #168) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 173 - (7-3 and 7-4): Accept in Priuciple I TCC NOTE: The TCC directs that Section 7-4.4.1.4 be revised to

read: "Ceiling sprinklers shall have a temperature rating of ordinary, intermediate or high.

Exception: High temperature rated sprinklers shall be used where required by Section 5-3.1.3."

This is a correlation issue. Requirements regarding the orifice size o f ceil ing sprinklers are to be addressed by Section 5-4.1.2. Also, see Committee Action and Statement to Comment 13-59 (Log #201).

SUBMITTER: Kenne th E. I sman , Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. CO MMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a RECOMMENDATION: Update the sprinkler r equ i rements in NFPA 13 to reflect the changes made in the 1998 edit ion o f NFPA 231 and 231C.

Also note that references to "chapters" ill NFPA 231 and 231C should be changed to "sections" in NFPA 13. See new Section 7-3.2.1.1 for example. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : The Report on Proposals o f NFPA 13 was based on the Report on Proposals for NFPA 231 and 231C. A n u m b e r o f significant i tems were changed at the Report on C o m m e n t s stage for NFPA 231 and 231C and should be caugh t up in tile NFPA 13 rewrite as well. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

1. Revise Section 7-3 and the associated append ix i tems as follows: 7-3 Fire Control Approach for the Protection o f Commodi t i e s

Stcred on Flc, c,r that are stored oalletized, solid oiled, in bin boxes, or (13-209a)

7-3.1 General. This section shall apply to a broad range o f combust ibles inc luding plastics that are s tored palle~ized, solid piled, in bin boxes, or in shelves above 12 ft high and us ing s tandard ~pray sorinklers. (13-209a)

7-3.1.2 (231-5-1) Au:c, matJc ~v.,,̂ ,~,c'-~:n'̀ 4~ ~:~'~'"~c . . . . . . . . Min im u m Sy~cm Discharge Reoui remeuts . (13-209a)

7-3.1.2.1 ( ~ 231-5-1.3) The design density shall not be less than 0.15 g p m / f t 2 [0.10 (L/s ) /m' - ' ] , and the desigu area shall not be less than 2000 ft'-' (186 m'-') for wet systems or 2600 ft'-' (242 m'-') for dly systems for any commodi ty , class, or group.

7-3.1.2.2 ( ~ 2 3 1 - 5 - 1 . 3 . 1 ) The sprinkler design density for any given area of opera t ion for a Class III or Class IV commodi ty , calculated in accordance with 7-3.2, shall no t be less than the density for the co r respond ing area o f opera t ion for Ordinary, Hazard Group 2.

7-3.1.2.3 (251 5 1.2.2 231-5-1.3.2) The water supply requi renlents for sprinklers only shall be based on the actual calculated d e m a n d for the hazard in accordance with 7-3.2, 7-3.3, 7-6.4, or 7-6.5, d e p e n d i n g on the type of s~r!nkler selected and the commodi ty being protected.

7-3.1.2.4 (~*-v-a-+~231-5-1.7) In buildings occupied in part for storage, within the scope of this s tandard, the required sprinkler protect ion shall ex tend 15 ft (4.6 m) beyond the per imeter of the storage area.

1 I . . . . . . . t . , . / t ' ; . . . . . . . . . . i : . . . . . . . . . . , . , . . . t ; . . . . r , ' ~ . . . . . . : . . . . . H r t . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . .~ / ; y ~ ! t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J ' "

i 1 , - t ; . . . . . . . t ; . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . 17 . . . . t . . . . . . . . 1 " 1 . . . . 2 1 ; . . . . F s l , . . ~ J ¢ 9 ; . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Exce#tm,: 771i~ lequi~eme, t shall not appl3' whel? wparaled by # barrier #artitio, that i~ calmble qf preventin[, heat hom a [itv in the Mora:~e areq .fi'om .fi¢.si,g .s]~rink&r~ i , the non.~torap'e area.

7-3.2 Water D e m a n d Requi rements of Class I t h rough IV Requi rements .

7-3.2.1" (231-6-1) General. V¢2 t) | I I ' C I Q 1 ~ I ~) c - ~ , , t , t . . . . . . . ~,c-~ , , nr . . . . . "~ : ' :~°of thc

c ^ , ^ . . , : . . . . . . . ~. . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `4 b ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . : - - ' - ' . . . . . ~ - ~ " ~ - ~ 4 n -

~-~ i ! ig, ~

(c) ..... ,, .................................... v .... v ...............

7-3.2.1.1 (231-6-1.1) Protection fqr Class 1 thrqpgb Class IV commodi t ies in the followin~ conf igurat ions shall be orovided in accordauce with this fhapter :

(a) Nouencaosu la ted commodi t ies that are solid pile. oalletized, or bill box storage UD to 30 ft (9.1 m] in he ight

(b) Nonencaosu la ted commodi t ies on she l f s toraee n o to 15 ft (4.6 m) in height

(c)* Encaosulated commodi t ies that are solid nile. nalletized, bin box. or shelf storage np I:0 15 ft (4.6 m) in he igh t

. ~ . ~ H I . . . . . . . . : * * ~ ' ~ t o ~.C. i n ~ , c c o r . t ] a r l c c . . . : . t . . 1 . ~ ~ . ~ ; g i . . ~,~j'd.7.t:~,Cr:'. o f Z : " : ' : . _ : ' ; , ~ :2 ; , " , ; ' , ' , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6 2 3

Page 72: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

%3.2.1.2 (231-6-1.2) Bin box and shelf storage that is over 12 fl (3.7 m) but not in excess of the he igh t limits of 6-1.1 and that is provided with walkways at vertical intela'als of not over 12 ft (3.7 m) shall be protected with aulomat ic sprinklers unde r the walkway(s) Protection shall he as fol lows:

(a) Ceiling design density shall he hased on the total height of storage within the building.

(hi Automat ic sprinklers unden" walkways shall be des igned to maintain a min imunl discharge pressure of 15 psi (0.72 kPa) for tile most hydraulically d e m a n d i n g six sprinklens on each level. Walkway sprinklei demand shall not he required to be added to the ceiling sprinkler demand . Sprinklers unde r walkways shall not be spaced more than 8 ft (2.4 m) apart horizontally.

7-3.2.2 (231-6-2) Protection Criteria. 7-3.2.2.1 (231-6-2.1) The water supply shall he capable of providing

the sprinkler system d e m a n d determine~l in accordance with 7-3.2.2.3, including tile hose stre4un d e m a n d of 7-3.2.2.4 lot the durat ion vequiren~ents of 7-3.2.2.5.

7-3.2.2.2 (213-6-2.2) The area and density for the hydraulically remote area shall be de t e rmined as specified in 7-2-3.2.2 for storage unde r 12 ft and 7-3.2.2.2.1 th rough 7-3.2.2.2.6 for storage over 12 ft.

7-3.2.2.2.1 (2"~1-6-2.2.2) Where nsiilg ordinary t empera tu re - r a t ed sprinklers, a single point shall be selected fi-om tile appropr ia te commodi ty cm've on Figure 7-S.2.2.2.1.

0

_.e

m 2 ft 2

550 6 0 0 0 : I' I I ] I I I I ~ , l l l l l l l

500 I\1 I I I I I I " k l l J l l l

IM I I 1 1 1 450 5 0 0 0 - % I k I I

I i ~ O I

400 ~ [ I IX~O' I l l l l ~ . l

4000- ~ ~,,0 I I I I N, I 350 , ~ 1 I I I I NI

\ J~ool I I I I'i~

300 3000 ~'~,~_~ l IXl I l l l 250 ]~.x~#' i I I%1 I I I

] '~", '1~11 I IN . I I I J I ' l l "1%] I I I "~1 I

200 2000 I I 1%,1 ~ I I I P'~

gpm/f t 2 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3

L/sec/m 2 0 . 0 7 5 0.1 0.125 0.15 0.175 0.2

S p r i n k l e r d e n s i t y

I

%

" * , ~ [

0.35 0.4

0.225 0.25

Figure 7-3.2.2.2.1 (231-6-2.2.2) Sprinkler system design curves, 20-ft (6. l-m) high storage - - ordinary temperature-rated sprinklers.

7-3.2.2.2.2 (231-6-2.2.3) Where us ing high t empera tu re - ra t ed sprinklers, a single point shall be selected from the appropr ia te commodi ty cm've on Figure 7-3.2.2.2.2.

m 2 ft 2

~ 375 4 0 0 0 ~

~ 280 3000

190 2000 ~ gpm/ft 2 0.1 0,15 0.2 0.25 0.30

L/sec/m 2 0.197 0.102 0.136 0.170 0.197

Spr ink ler dens i ty

Figure 7-3.2.2.2.2 (231-6-2.2.3) Sprinkler system design curves, 20-ft (6.l-m) high storage - - high temperature-rated sprinklers.

7-3.2.2.2.3 (231-6-2.2.4) Tile densit ies selected in accordance with 7- 3.2.2.2.1 or 7-3.2.2.2.2 shall be modif ied in accordance with F igme 7- 3.2.2.2.3 without revising the design area.

250 . . . .

_>,

c

o e - O )

O

n

200

150

100

50

.j,, F I

d I 1

]

0 . . . . i i i i

ft 10 15 20 25

m 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5

Storage height

i _ _

m

i m

m

I - , /

: m

30

9.0

Figure 7-3.2.2.2.3 (231-6-2.2.4) Ceiling sprinkler density. vs. storage height.

7-3.2.2.2.4 (231-6-2.2.5) Where dny-pipe systems are used, the areas of operat ion indicated in the design ctuwes shall be increased by SO ) e r c e n t .

~ , 2 o o o 7 . / O q l ~ o o t z ~ I7 . . . . . . , ~ 1 i . ; . . i . . . . . . . . . . . i ~ . ~ . , . i

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .~:..~ ,e. ~" (!.5 ---~ "'.~ ~hcl;'e; ;';fih ; face . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e, .v :q. ,~ ;q ,.,, . . . . . a:'ea of . . . . t:~..; . . . . t .~, ~.o pe,-::':.tte~ to v.~ . - a . . . . "* b)' 50 pcrccnt , p:c-ide.~! d ~ m i - n i m ~ e m e - m s of 7 ~.I th rough 7 ~3.1.2.'! a ; ' ~

7-3.2.2.2.5 (231-6-2.2.6) In the case of metal bin boxes with lace areas not exceeding 16 ft'-' (1.5 in'-') and metal Closed shelves with face areas not exceeding 16 ft'-' ( 1.5 m'-'), the area of application shall he permit ted to be reduced by 50 percent , providc~ the m i n i m u m requi rements o f G ~ 7-3.1 th rough 7-3.1.2.4 are met.

' O 9 7-3 . . . . . 2.6 (231-6-2.2.7) The final area and density shall not be less than the m i n i m u m specified in 7-3.1.2.

7-3.2.2.3 (231-6-2.3) Given the area and density de t e rmined in accordance with 7-3.2.2.2, the fire sprinkler system shall be hydraulically calculated.

7 ~.2.2A (2~! 5. 2.6) High ~. ,v , . .~ ,~ . , ~ . . . . . . . :^'" .~:^"~,., S;,'~:em~. Where a high

vequh'ed f~:- Cla'~ I th rough Cla~ p r commodit ie~ ~hall be-per+n~ted

~- F i t l i t I T / . ' l / . . . ~ -

7-3.2.2.4 (231-5-2) High Expansion Foam, 7-3.2.2.4.1 (231-5-2.1) High expansion foam systems that are

installed in addit ion to automatic sprinklers shall be installed in accordance: with NFPA 1 IA. Standmd.fin" Medium- and lliffh-l':~pan.~ion l"oam S)'.ffem.~.

Exceptim/: 77ti.~ leqai~emenl .d/all not apply where modified h~ the

7-3.2.2.4.2 (231-5-2.21 High-expansion foam used to protect tile idle pallet Shah have a m a x i m u m fill t ime of 4 minut¢~,

7-3.2.2.4.3 (231-5-2.31 High-expansion foam systems shall be automatic in operat ion.

624

Page 73: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 1 A 9 9 R o e

7:3.2.2.4.4 (231-5-2.4) Det__ectors for h igh ,expans ion foam systems shall be listed and shall be installed at no more than one-hal f the listed snacin~.

7-3.2.2.4.5 (231-5-2.5) Detection systems, concent ra te o u m p s generators , and o ther sys ten~components that are essential to the 0perat on of the system shall have an approved s tandby power source.

7-3 2 2 4 6 (231-5-2.6) A reduct ion in ceiling density to one-hal f that required for Class I th rough Class IV commodi t ies , idle pallets, or plastics (us ing the secondm~L_demand point) shall be permi t ted without revising the design a_D:a, but the density shall be no less than 0 15 gpm/ft'- ' I(6.1 L / m i n ) / m _ ~ .

7-3.3 Water D e m a n d Requi rements for Plastic and Rubber Commodi t i e s

7-3.3.1" (231-7-1) General. See Appendix C. 7-3.3.1.1" (231-7-1.1) Plastics stored up to 25 ft (7.62 m) in he ight

)rotected by spray sprinkle s shall be in accordance with this chapier . The decision t ree (F igure 7-3.3.1.1) shown below shall be used to de te rmine the protect ion in each specific situation. 7-3.3.1.2 * (231-7-1.2) Factors affecting protect ion requ i rements such as c l o sed /open array clearance between storage and sprinklers, and s t ah le /uns tab le piles, shall be applicable only to s torage of Group A plasucs . . . . . . . . . . . . ; . . . . . . . . ~md ;n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .~ . . . . . . . . c, , ,ppen , . t~

. . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . ] 'h is decision tree also shall be used to 1 . . . . . . . u v H , . . . [ . H . H , . i , ~ . .

de te rmine protection for commodi t ies that are not wholly Group A plastics but contain such qrant i t ies and a r r angemen t s of the same that they are d e e m e d more hazardous than Class 1V commodi t ies .

7-3.3.1.3 (2"~1-7-1.3) Group B plastics and free-flowing Group A ~lastics shall be protected in the same m a n n e r as a Class IV commodity. See 7-3.2 for protect ion of these stora_ge commodi t ies with Sln'ay sprinklers.

7-3.3.1.4 (231-7-1.4) Group C plastics shall be protected in the same m a n n e r as a Class IIl commodi ty . See 7-3.2 for protect ion o f these storage commodi t ies with spray sprinklers.

7-3.3.2 (231-7-2) Protection Criteria. 7-3.3.2.1' (231-7-2.1) The design o f the sprinkler system shall be

based on those condi t ions that routinely or periodically exist in a bui lding lhal create the greatest water demand . These condi t ions include the following:

(a) Pile he ight (b) Clearance (c) Pile stability (d) Array Where the distance between roof /ce i l ing height and top of storage

exceeds 20 ft (6.1 m), protection shall be provided for the storage beight that would result in a 20-ft (6.l-m) distance between tile roof /ce i l ing height and top of storage.

7-3.3.2.2* (231-7-2 2) Design areas and densities for tile appronria te storage confieurat ion shall be selected fc" *~" . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; . . . . . . . . . . 2

. . . . . . . l'l'" ~l . . . . . . . . . . ' = 8 ~

con.qgL::atiof from Table 7-3.3.2.2. The co lumns A, B, C, D, and E cor respond to the protection required by the decision tree (Figure 7- 3.3.1.1).

7-3.3.2.2.1 (231-7-2.2.1) For Table 7-3.3.2.2, the design areas are a m i n i m u m of 2500 ft'-' (232 m'-').

Excep/mn No. 1: Whele Table 7-3.3.2.2 allows det*.dties am/ areas t . be ~e/e(led Ht actmdam'e wzlh 7-2.3, .~ ()t~linaty l l a z m d (,roap 2 , c t apattctes, mty a~ea/detrd(~ pore that can,e shall be acceptable.

I':xce/,hon No. 2: Far clo.~ed arrays, the mva ~hall be permitted to be *~'daced to 2000 [l 2 (186 m :).

Plastics

I Group A (See Note) Group B

I Class IV

I I Expanded Nonexpanded

I t I I I

I Group C Class Ill

I Free-flowing

Class IV

Stable Cartoned Exposed Unstable I Table 7"3"3"2'2

Column A

1 I I I Unstable Stable Unstable Solid Unit Load

Table 7-3.3.2.2 Table 7-3.3.2.2 Table 7-3.3.2.2 Table 7-3.3.2,2 Column D Column B Column C Column A

I I Stable Cartoned Exposed

Table 7-3.3.2 2 Table 7-3.3.2.2 Table 7-3.3.2.2 Column E Column C Column E

NOTE: Cartons that contain Group A plastic material shall be permitted to be treated as Class IV commodiites under the following conditions:

(a) there shall be multiple layers of corrugation or equivalent outer material that'would significantly delay fire involvement of the Group A plastic, and

(b) the amount and arrangement of Group A plastic material within an ordinary carton would not be expected to significantly increase the fire hazard.

Figure 7-3,3,1,1 (231-7-1.1) Decision Tree

6 2 5

Page 74: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

Table 7-3.3.2.2 (231-7-2.2) Design Densities for Plastic and Rubber Commodit ies SprinMer Sy~tem~

Storage Height

in ft [m]

5 [1.521

12 I3.661

i5 [4.5]

20 [6.1]

25 [7.62]

Roof /Ce i l ing Height

in ft [m]

up t(~ 25 [7.62] up to 15 [,t.57] >15 to 20 [4.57 to 6.1] >2t) to 32 [6.1 Io 9.75] up to 20 [6. l] >20 to 25 [6.1 to 7.62] >25 Io 35 [7.62 to 10.67] up to 25 [7.62] >25 to 30 [7.62 to 9.1,t] >30 to 35 [9.14 to 10.t;7] up to 30 [9.14] >30 to 35 [9.14 to 10.67]

A

O I I-2 0.2 [o.14] 0.3 [0.20] 0.4 [0.27]

0.25 [0.17] 0.,t [0.27]

0.45 [0.31[ 0.3 [0.20]

0.45 [o.31] 0.6 [0.41 ] 0.,t [0.27] 0.6 [0..111

B

OH-2 Ett-2

0.6 [0.-t I ] 0.8 [0.54] 0.5 [0.3 t] 0.8 [0.5-t] 0.9 10.611 0.6 [0.41] 0.9 [0.61] 1.2 [0.82]

0.75 [0.51] 1.2 [0.~21

C

01 t -2 0.3 [0.20] 0.5 [0.3-t] 0.6 [0AI] 0..t [0.27] 0.6 [0.41] 0.7 10.48]

0.45 [/).31] 0.7 [0.48]

0.85 [0.581 0.55 [0.37] 0.85 [0.5~]

0 H - 2 EH-I EH-2

0.45 tO.31] 0.3 [0.20]

0.45 [0.31] 0.55 [0.371 0.35 [0.24] 0.55 [0.37] 0.7 [0.48]

0.45 [0.31] 0.7 [/I.48]

Otf-2 EH-2 Et1-2

0.7 [0.48] 0.45 [0.31] 0.7 [o.48]

0.85 [0,581 0.55 [0,37] 0.85 [0.58] 1.1 [0.75] 0.7 [o.48] 1.1 [0.751

NOTES I. Min imum clearance between sprinkler deflector and top of storage shall be main ta ined as required. (ROP 231-29) '2. C~dnnm designat ions cor respond to lhe conf igurat ion of plastics ~torage as follows: A: (1) Nonexpanded , unstable (2) Ncmexpanded, stable, s~flid unit load B: Expanded, exposed, stable C: (1) Expanded , exposed, unstahle

(2) Nonexpanded , stable, car toned D: Expanded, car toned, unstal)le E: (1) Expanded, car toned, stable

(2) Nonexpanded , stable, exposed 3.

OH-2 - Densily required for Ordinal 7 Hazard Group 2 occupancies . EH-I = Density required for Extra Hazard Grou-p 1 occupancies . EH-2 = Density required for Extra Hazard Group 2 occupancies .

'4. Hose s t reams shall be provided in accordance with Table 7-2.3.1.

7-3.3.2.2.2 (231-7-2.2.2) Interpolat ion of densities between storage heights shall be permit ted. Densities shall be based upon the 2500 ft'-' (232 m ~) design area except a~ permit ted for c~o~ed a;';'ay~. The "up to" in the table is in tended to aid in the interpolat ion o f densit ies between storage heights. Interpolat ion o f ce i l i ng / roo f heights shall not be permit ted.

7-3.3.2.3* (231-7-2.5) Where d~y-pipe systems are used for Group A plastics, the opera t ing area shall be increased by 30 percen t without revising the density.

7-3.3.2.4 (231-5-2.6) High Expansion Foam Systems. Where high expans ion foam is used a reduct ion in ceiling density to one-hal f that required for plastics shall be permit ted withont revising the design area, but shall be not less than 0.15 gpm/ft '- ' [0.10 (L/s ) /m ' - ' ] .

A-7-3.2.1 (231-A-6.1) The following p rocedure should be followed in de t e rmin ing the proper density and area as specified in ~ 7 - 3.2__2:

(a) De te rmine the commodit, , r class. (b) Select the densilv and area of application from Figure @ 7 -

3.2,').2 1 ~ 6 - 2 ~ 7-3.2.2.2.2. {C) Adjust the required density for storage height in accordance

with Figure @ 7-3.2.2.2.3. (d} Increase the opera t ing area by 30 percent in accordance with 6-

7-3,2.2,2.4 where a dly-pipe system is nsed. (¢) $1atis(y t,h¢ m i n i m u m densities and areas as indicated in ~ 7.=

3.1.2,1 ~and ~ 7-3.1.2.2

Storage I gree t ing cards in boxes in cartons on pallets Height - - 22 ft (6.7 m) Clearance - - 6 ft 11.8 m) Sprinklers I ordinai7 temper~1,ur¢ System type - - dr3,

1. Classification - - Class Ill 2. Selection o f dens i ty /a rea 1 0.225 g p m / f t ~ over 3000 ft'-' [(9.2

L/min)/m='] from Figure 6-2.2.2. 3. Adjus tment for he ight o f storage ns ing Figure 6-2.2.4 - - 1.15 x

0.225 = 0.259 gpm/ft '- ' [(10.553 L / m i n ) / m 2 ] : rounded up to 0.26 gp. m / f l 2 [110.6 L/min) / tn ' - ' l

4. Adjus tment of area of operat ion for dl 7 system - - 1.3 x 3000 ft'-' = 3900 fi'-' (363 m'-')

5. Confi rmat ion that m i n i m u m densities and areas have been achieved

~ 7-3.1.2.1. the m i n i m u m design density fQr ~a dry sprinkler system is 0.15 gpm/f(- ' f(6.1 L /min ) /m ' - ' ov¢r 249 m'-'] [satisfied in A- 61<-)-2A-7-3.2.1(e)2] for Cla$~ Ill,

Paragraph ~ 7-3.1.2.2 refers to Ord ina D, Hazard Gronp 2 m K T E ' D A I t ] { . ' s ~ . , . I . . , . l I ~ . , - t l . . ~ I ~ , l . , l l . , I ; . . . . ( ~ 2 a . . . . ; . , I . L ~ . ( - ' . . . - 1 . . . . . . Tile

co r respond ing m i n i m u m density at 3000 ft'-' (279 m'-'] i~ 0,17 gpm/ft '- ' 116.9 E / m i n ) / m ' - ' l (satisfied): 3000 ft'-' x 1.3 = 3900 ft'-' (363 m'-'), 0.17 ~tmWft'-' over 3900 ft'-' l(6.9 L/min}/m' - ' over 363 m'-'],

The design density and area o f application egnals 0.26 gpm/ft=' over 3900 ft'-' [110.6 L/ ra in) /m' - ' ov¢r 363 m '-'],

A-7-3.2.1.1(c) [231-A-6-1.1(c)] Full-scale tests show no appreciable difference in the n u m b e r of sprinkler heads that open for ei ther nonencapsu la led or encapsulated products up to 15 ft (4.6 m) high. Test data is no t available for encapsulated products stored h igher dmn 15 ft (4.6 m). However, in rack storage tests involving encapsulated s torage 20 ft (6 m) high, increased protection was needed over thin for nonencapsu la t ed storage.

The protect ion specified in Chapte r 6 contempla tes a m a x i m u m of 10-ft (3-m) clearances from top of storage to sprinkler deflectors for

r, s torage heights of 1:) ft (4.6,m) and higher. A-7-3.3.1 (231-A-7-1, 231-Appendix B) The densities and area of

applicat ion have been developed from fire test data. Most of lhese tests were conduc ted with JT/s,,-in. (13.5-mm) orifice sprinklers and 80- It-' or 100-ft-' (7.4-ft-' or 9.3-m-~) - sprinkler spacing. These and o the r tests have indicated that, with densities o f 0.40 g p m / f t 2 [0.27 (L/s) /m' - ' ] and higher, better results are obta ined with 17/.~,~-in. (13.5-ram) orifice

f ) ) ~ ) . . - . and 70- t- to 100-ft- (7 .4-m-to 9.3-m-) sprinkler spacing than where us ing 1/,_,-in. (12.7-ram) orifice sprinklers at 50-f(-' (4.6-m'-') spacing. A discharge pressure o f 100 psi (689 kPa) was used as a ' s tar t ing poin t on one of the fire tests. It was successful, bu t has a 1 ~/,-ft (0.5-m) clearance between the top of storage and ceiling sprinklers. A clearance of 10 ft (3.0 m) could have produced a different result due to the tendency of the h igher pressure to atomize the water and the greater distance that the fine water droplets had to travel to the bu rn ing tirol.

Table A-7-3.3.1 explains and provides an example of the m e th o d and ) rocedure to follow in using this s tandard to de te rmine proper )rotection for Group A plastics.

626

Page 75: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

Table A-7-3.3.1 Metric Conversion Factors for Examples To convert from to Multipl}z b~' feet (ft) meter (m) 0.3048

square feet (ft 2) m e t e r / s q u a r e (m 2) 0.0920 g a l / m i n (gpln) l i t e r / second (L/s) 0.0631

gal per m i n / f t 2 liter per s e c o n d / m 2 0.679

(,gpm / ft 2) [ '~ L / s ) / m 2]

Example 1. Storage is expanded-cartoned-stable, 15 ft (4.57 m) high in a 20-ft (6. l-m) building.

9 Atlswer I. C o h m m E - - :lesign dens i ty= 0.45 g p m / f t - [0.31

9 ( L / s ) / m ' ) ].

Examph, 2. Storage is nonexpanded-uns tab le , 15 ft (4.57 m) high in a 20-ft (6. l-m) building.

An.~wel 2. Cohnnn A - - design density is listed as 0.25 g p m / f t 2 [0.17 9

( L / s ) / m - l [ , however, it i.; a~so possible that the storage can be 12 ft (3.66 m) in this 20-ft (6.l-m) building, which would require 0.3 [0.2

c) ( L / s ) / m - ) ]. Unless the owner can guaran tee that the storage will 9 ahvavs be 15 ft (4.57 m), the design density = 0.3 g p m / f t ' .

l",xample 3. Storage is a nonexpanded-s table 15-ft (4.57-m) fixed- he igh t uni t load, one high, in an 18-ft (5.5-m) building.

Anm,e~ 3. Column A - - design density is 0.25 g p m / f t 2. Note that 9 9

this does not go up to 0.3 g p m / f i " [0.2 ( L / s ) / m - [ like the previous example because of the use of a fixed-height unit load. It will never be 12 fi (3.66 m) . It will ahvays be 15 ft (4.57 m) or nothing.

l'.'xample 4. Storage is expanded-exposed-uns table , 20-ft (6. l-m) high in a 27-ft (8.2-m) building.

A,.~wel 4. C o h m m C - - , t e s i g n dens i ty= 0.7 g p m / f t 2 [0.48 9

( L / s ) / m ' ] . Note that o ther lower storage heights should also be checked, but they reveal the salne, or lower, densit ies (0.7 and 0.6)

[0..t8 ( L / s ) / m 2 and 0.41 (I . /s) /qn 2] so the design density remains at

0.7 g p m / f t 2 [0A8 ( L / s ) / m 2 I. l'xatttple 5. Expanded-caltoned-unstable, 17 ft (5.2 m) high in 32-ft 9.75-m ) building. Arl~wel 5. Co lumn D - - 15-ft (4.57 m) storage in a 32-ft (9.75-m)

c) I)uilding would be 0.55 g p m / f t - [0.37 ( L / s ) / m 2 ] . 20-ft (6.l-m)

storage in a 32-f1 (9.75-m) bui lding would be 0.70 gp in / f t 2 [0.48

( L / s ) / m 2]. Interpolat ior for 17-ft (5.2-m) storage is as follows:

0 .7- 0.55 = 0.15 0 .15 / (20 - 15) = 0.03 0.03 x (17- 15) = 0.06 0.55 + 0.06 = 0.61

Design dens i ty= 0.61 g l , m / f t - [0.41 ( L / s ) / m 2 ]

F, xample 6. Storage is expanded-exposed-stal)le, 22-ft (6.71-m) stol age in 23.5-ft (7.16-m) building.

c) ..lll.'~l¢,e! (3~. C o l n l n n B - - . ~ ] o u l d interpolate b e t w e e n 0 . 6 g p m / f t -

~) 9 ¢) [0.-tl ( L / s ) / m ' ] and 0.75 g p m / f t " [0.51 ( l , / s ) / m - ] , however, this would be a moot point since the density fol 15-ft (4.57-m) storage in

c) 0 this 23.5-ft (7.16-m) bnildi ig would be 0.8 g p m / f t " [0.54 ( L / s ) / m - ] . Unless the owner can g u a H m e e 22-ft (6.71-m) storage, the design

dens i ty= 0.8 g p m / f t - [0.54 (L , / s ) /m 2]. If the owner can, in some way accepmlfle to the authorit} ha~ing.iurisdiction guaran tee 22-f1 (6.71-1hi

storage, the interpolat ion would yield a design density of 0.66 g p m / f t 2 o

[0.45 ( L / s ) / m " ] . Exam[de 7. Storage is no ,expanded-s tab le -exposed , 13.5 ft (4.1 m)

high ill a 15-ft (4.57-m) tmilding.

Arl~wel 7. Cohlmn E - - t2-ft (3.66-1n) storage in a 15-ft (4.57-m)

bui ld ing would be EH-2 ((1.4 g p m / f t 2 over 2500 ft 2) [0.27 ( L / s ) / m 2 9

over 230 m - ] . 15-ft (4.57-m) storage in ~ 15-ft (4.57-m) bui lding would be 0.45

o ,) g p m / f t - [0.31 ( L / s ) / m - ] . Interpolat ion for 13.5-ft (4.1 m) storage is as follows:

0.45 - 0.4 = 0.05 0 .05 / (15 - 12) = 0.017 0.017 x (13.5 - 12) = 0.026

0.4 + 0.026 = 0.426 9

Design density = 0.426 g p m / f t - [0.29 ( L / s ) / m 2]

A-7-3.3.1.1 (231-A-7-1.1) Two direct compar isons between ordinaD,- temperature- and h igh- tempera ture- ra ted sprinklers are possible:

(a) With n o n e x p a n d e d polyethylene l-gal (3.8-L) bottles in corrugated cartons, a 3-ft (0.9-m) clearance, and the same density, approximately the same nu inber of sprinklers operated (9 at high tempera ture versus 7 at o rd inmy temperature ).

(b) With exposed, expanded polystyrene meat trays, a 9.5-fi ( l .9-m) clearance, and tile same density, three times as many ordinaly- temperature-ra ted sprinklers operated as did higb- temperatnre-ra ted sprinklers (11 at lfigh tempera tnre "Cel-sns 33 at ordinary tempera tnre ).

The car toned plastics requ i rements o f this s tandard are based to a great ex ten t on test work that used a specific commodi ty - - 16-oz (0.473-L) poh'sp;rene plastic jars indixidually separated by ihin carton stock within ;{ large corrugated carton [3 t/,_, f(-' (0.32 m 2)']. [See l')¢uw A-7-3.3. l . l (a) . /

E x p o s e d - - p last ics

Figure A-7-3.3.1.1 (a) [231-A-7-1.1(a) ] Corrugated carton containing individually separated plastic jars.

Other Group A plastic commodi t ies can be ar ranged in car tons so that they are separated I)y multiple thicknesses of carton material. In s u c h arrangenlents , less plastic b e c o m e s involved ill tile f i r e at a m one time. This could resuh in a less vigorous fire that can be control led by Class IV commodi ty protection.

O the r si tuations exist in which the plastics c o m p o n e n t is su r ro u n d ed by several layers of less hazardotls material and is therefore temporarily protected or insulated fl'om a fire involving adjacent plastic products . Such condi t ions also could produce a less vigorous fire and be successflflly handled b,, (':lass IV protection. [See I"~,~,~ule ,'1- 7-3. 3. I. I(b).[

Smal l of pla., small ~

Figure A-7-3.3.1.1(b) [231-A-7-1.1(b)] Corrugated carton containing plastic pieces individually separated by carton material.

6 2 7

Page 76: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

The decision to prolect as a Class IV commodity, howexer, shonld he nlade only hased on experieuced jndgnlent and only with an understanding of the consequences of nnderprotecting the storage segnient.

A-7-3.3.1.2 (231-A-7-1.2) Tl lere are few slorage facilitit 's hi whicl i Iht' couun(iditY mix oi storage ar langentent rentains constant, and <t deqi~iiei' shouid I)( J aware that lhe h|irodu< l ion o f d i f fere| i l malei iais Call change i )rotecl ion requirenleuis considerably, l)esign shonld he l/,l~ed on highei densilies and areas o[ + apphcat ion, and the ~.ariotlS i t+dilctiolts allowed shonid I)e appl ied cautiously. For exahiat ion o f exis l ing silllation~, howeter, the allowances ('all I)e qui te heltYt]il.

A-7-3.3.2,1 (231-A-7-2.1) An evahlai ion fol each f ield si lnatioi i ~li<mht he made Io de lern ih ie Ihe worst al ipl icahle height-clearance le la l ions] i ip l] ial can be expected lo appear hi a pa i l i cn lar case. File lesls have shown lhal c<m~iderahiygreater deniands occnr where < ]earanre is 10 ft (3.0 In) {IS conipared to 3 fi (03,) Ill), and whc're a pile is qahte as compaled to an unstable pile. Since a svslein is des|Riled t7~1 a pariicuhn cleaiai|ce, the syslem could be inadequate whel| signit]ral|t areas (It; not have piling to lhe design heighi and la lgerc lea lancesexki he twee | | s tockandspHnkle r s . This can also he IIne vdlere Ihe packaging or arrangement is changed so thai slable filing is (Teated where unstahle piling exisled. Recognition of lhese

contlitn;ns is es~eniial io avoid installation o f p r o t e c t i o n that is i l l a d e q l l a t e ( ) r h e r o i n e s inadequate because of c h a n g e s .

No tesis wele conducted sim||lating a peaked roof configmation. Itox~mel, ii is expected lhat d|e pri | | t iples of Section 7-3 sill[ apply. "I he worst applical)le height-clearance relationship that can be expecled to occtn" should lye fonnd, and protection shonld be designed for it. If storage is all ai the same height, the worsi height- clearance relationshily creating the greatest water demand would o c t | n nllder lhe peak. It" commodities are stored higher under the ~eak, the various height-clearance relationships should he tried and

lhe one creating the greates{ water den |and used for designing ) l ( ) i c c t i o I l ,

A-7-3.3.2.2 (231-A-7-2.2) Test data is noi available for all combinations of commodities, storage heights, and clearances. Some

! of die protection criteria in this siandard are based on extiapolations of iesl dala for other commodities and storage configurations, as well ,|s available loss data.

F~l exanlple, their is yen,' limited test data for storage of expanded plastks higher lhan 20 ft (6 m). The protection criteria in this standard fol expanded plastics higher than 20 ft (6 in) are extlapolated fi-ony tesi data for expanded plastics storage 20 ft (6 m) and less in height and test data for nnexpanded plastics above 20 ft (6 I n ) ,

Further exantples can be found in the protection criteria for clearances | |p to 15 fi (4.6 m). Test data is lin|ited for clearances greater than 10 ft (3.0 m). It should be asst |med that, if protection is adequate tbr a given storage height it| a bt|ilding of a given height, the same protection will protect storage of any lesser height in the same building. For exantple, protection adequate for 20-ft (6.l-m) storage in a 30-ft (10-n|) building [10-ft (3.0-m) clearance] would also protect 15-fl (4.6-n|) storage in a 30-ft (10-m) building [15-ft (4.6-m) clearance]. Therefore, the protection criteria in Table 7-2.2 for 15-ft (4.6-m) clearance are based on the protection c|-iteria for sto|age 5 fl ( 1.5 m) higher than the indicated height with 10-ft (3.0-m) clearance.

Table 7-2.2 is based on tests that were conducted p|'imarily with high- ten|pelat |ne-rated, 17/3_,-in. (13.5-nlm) orifice sprinklels. Other tests have demonstrated that whe |e sprinklers are used with orifices greater than ~r/:~_, in. (13.5 ram), ordinary temperature sprinklers are acceptable.

,-\-7-3.3.2.3 (231-A-7-2.5) Wet systems are recommended for storage occnpancies. D| 'ppipe systems should he permitted only where it is nnlYractical to provide heat.

2. Revise Section 7-4 and the associated appendix items as follows: 7-4]" Fire Control Approach for the Protection of Commodities

Stored on Racks. 7-.t.1 Protection Criteria - General. 7-4.1.1 (231C-1-1) This section shall apply to storage of materials

representing the broad range of combustibles stored in |'acks | |sing standard spray sprinklers.

7-4.1.2_* Sprinkle|- protection criteria for the storage of materials on ~acks shall he in accordance with Section 7-4.1 and either 7-4.2 for sumtge up to 25 ft, 7-,I.3 for storage over 25 It, or 7-4.4 for plastics storage as app|-opriate.

l"x<qmo,.'*_ (231C-6-10) Ptotertio, or|term, . f i , G r o u p A p/a.~tic~ a~ indicated , t Se(ti(m 7-4.4 shall be permiued Jo~ the p|otection tf[" the same ~tmage heq,,ht and coqfiguration o f Clas.~ I, If, I l l and I V commodittes.

7-4.1.2.1"t" (231C-C-3-3) Sprinkler protection criteria is based on the assu|ni)tion that roof vents and draft curtains are |tot being used.

7-4.1.3 (231C-4-3) Flue Space.

" "~ ?3 c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a ~-~,., .~:..~ o,~ r, (7.5 ..... /-4.1...lJ- ( . . IC-4-3.1) . . . . . . ~," "l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . s . . . . '"~ I . . . 1 : . , , I . I . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . b ; . . I . . . . . . . - ~ 1 . . . . . ;*1 . . . . ~ . . ~ I ~ A .1 .~1 . . . . .

l o a d s . . . . . ~ ~ . . - , . ~ ; ,, i ..-:g~ . . . . . I . . . 11 I . . . . . . . . : . . . . : . . . . | : . . ~ : . . g l ~ . I , . , , I . 1 . . ~ _

fltt4~;'c:'tical aligm:'c::,' :~hall l~e i-ermil-tcd ;Scc l';'A-t;;r 7 4.1 7 / h Stolage up u, and including 25 ft (7 .6m). In doubl¢-rowand muhiple-low racks wiihont solid shelves, a Ioneitudinal (back to back clearance betweel| [o;|ds) fine space shall nol be requiic(I. Non|inal G-in. (1,t2.4-mm) I|-ansve|'se flue spaces between loads and ai lack unriehts shall be maintained in single-row, douhle-row, and n|ultiple- ow racks. Random variations in the widlh of flue spaces or in theil

~Cl'tical alignmenl shall he Dernfilted (See Fig|ire 44:4-7--1. t.3.1 ).

- - Conventional ,et

C o n , m o d i t y - -

= ~ ~ - Floor ~ l

vi

- - m

Possible transverse flue spaces No longitudinal flue ~ , ~ t ~ _ 7 space is necessary

Rows of storage

........ ~ [ ..... r ~ ] ........ ]-1 ......... r"-'-I ....... ,,r-..... No longitudinal

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (back-to-back clearance) " flue space

Plan view

Figure 7-4.1.3.1 (231C-4-3.1) Typica l d o u b l e - r o w rack with back-to-back loads .

7-4.1.3.2 (231CA-3.2) Storage Height Over 25 ft (7.6 m). Nomina l

...... :--~"~ shall ~ . . . . . : ..... :..^a :.. ~:~g,~ .,^..~-~ ~.~ .....,.:~, . . . . . . ~a~J~...~,,.,,,.,,M ..... :....L ~ in. (152A n-n-) .... s,.~h~-flu, o,,..,+''~'t ...h ....... e,~.,u.d:.,~ in ~c.ubD :'ow racks. Random va:'ia:ic.na ";n the ;;'idt!" of :hc flue c.i i~ d.~: . . . . . . :~ , ~,: . . . . . . . . . . . . ~..,, z. . . . . . . . :.,^.a Nominal 6-in. (142.4- toni) transverse flue spaces between loads and at rack uprights shall

| be maintained in single-row, double-row, and muhir)le-row |,'arks. N o m i n a l 6-in. (152.4-1nm) longitudinal flue spaces shall be provided

in double-row racks. Random variations in th'e width of flue spaces or in their vertical alignment shall be permitted.

7-4.1.4 (231C-5-1) Protection Systems. 7-4.1.4.1" (231C-5-1.1) Sprinkler systems shall be wet pipe ~ . ,, ......... ; . . . . v , , , . , . . . . . |,~ ........ ~:.,.,_: . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . ' , p c c h ; l r c ; : d i ' i ; ; . ;

: : d . ; ' , , , , : t " * . . . . . . . . . # . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . s - , r , ~ ' ~ | k D I

• I ~ , . I I t I . . . . L . . t - , I , , n l . s ~ l I : # . . . . . . C ¢,:¢:, ,,,¢'a,; ,;,~a,~ ,.e- ....... . . . . . . . ; ,,,.a, ~,:¢: j;;;;;, a .... :~#¢':¢;th;~; :{f',~;' /h*'~;.O ":~:;r;'::l g;';;';ra.;¢: i.'; ;tat g:r;;.tc; .'/;c,.:; 6000 fta: ':1

"p,~i , ./...,*. ~,....:.,t.# ................ ~ • ........ ,: ......... , ........ ! ' ; xc~ c, : ; A r c . 2 : W!~c;c l a ; k ~ . . . . . . t " " t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . .

.;,~all De clc.;:;ir:cd ~:'~ a , . , " " 'e ];;P;" .;y.;&'a.';. Exception." In a|eas thal atv .salqecl tt, f reez i ,g o| wbe~" special ¢'o~td|liorr~

exi.~t, rhy-ptpe system.~ aad preaction sys'tem* shall be permitted. 7-4.1.4.2 (231C-5-1.2) Where d|.'y-pipe systems are used, the ceiling

sprinkler areas of operation shall be increased 30 percent over the areas specified by 7-4.2, 7-4.3, and 7-4.4. Densities and areas shall be selected so that the final area of operation after the 30 r)ercent increase is not ~reater than 6000 ft'-' (557.4 m'-').

7-4.1.4.3 (231C-5-1.3) Where preaction systems are used, preaction systems shall be treated as dry-pipe systems.

Exceptioa: This |eq, irement shall aot apply where it ran be demon.~trated IDat tDe delertion system that activates the p|eaction .system cau.w.~ water to be di~cha't,.¢ed ./?ore .~punkletx as quickly as the discharge f rom a wet4fipe ~ y _ ~ l e l # t .

628

Page 77: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A99 ROC

7-4.1.4.4 (231C-5-1.41 Detectors for oreaction systems shall be installed in accordance with (~3-.39-7-4.1 10

"/A I At)* /t)c/1E ~ V. t) c~"t I'n bui!di:=g~ "- . . . . . . ; - " F ;~'~ i:= ~ . . . . . . . . . ~ 1 . o * . . . . . . ~" . . . . . A ; C *k-- . ~ l l ; . . . . . ; - - I . I . . . . . . * - - ~ A ~ . ; . . . . . ; . 1 ~ 1 - -

!5 ft c f the r=ck~ ~ha!! be the ~amc a~ :h=t prc; ided fcr the rack ~tcragc

7-4.1.4.5" (231C-5-2.41 In buildings that are used in part for rack storage of commodities, the design of the ceiling sprinkler system that is within 15 ft (4.6 m) oflh_e racks shall be the same as that provided for the rack storage area.

Exception: Where separated b 3 a barrie~ #artitmn tha! is ralmble of prevenho~r_ heat .Dora a fire i n , h e rock .storage awa from .fu.~in~ spHnkle~.~ in the nonrack .Womffe area.

7-4.1.5 (231C-5-910) Solid and Slatted Shelves. 7-4.1.5.1" (231C~5-9 10.1) Slatted shelves shall be considered

equivalent to solid shelve.,.. Exception: A wet-pipe .sVst,'m that i~ destcned to provicle q minimum of 0.6

t.#~'mlft e de~tsity re,era mini,nu~t¢ a~ea of 2000 fl e or K-14 earh, vuppression fasl 7esbon,s~ (ESFR) .shrink/m o4mratin~r at a min imum of 50 bsi .shall be

"bermitted to protect .si~tele-row a;ul dmtble-row .datted-shel)" racks where all o f the followine rondition.s me met:

(a) Sorinklers shall be 5/8-in. orifice sorav mrinklers with a temnerature ratin~ of ordinary, intermediate, or high and shall be listed for storage occupanci¢~ Or emil be K-14 early snppression fast response (ESFRI.

(b/ The protected commq,;liti¢~ shall be limited to Class I-IV. Grouo B olastics. Grout) C olastics, eartoned (exnanded and t3nexpand¢cl) Gr�up A pietieS; ~nd exnosed (unexnanded/ Grouo A

(c~ Sheh,es shall be slatted usin~ a minimum nominal 2-in. thick hv maximum nominal 6-in. wide slat held in nlace bv snacers that maintain a minimum 2-in. ooenin~ between each" slat.

{d) Where 5/8-in. orifice sprinklers are used. there shall be no ~latted shelf levels in the n~ck above 12 ft. Wire mesh t~reater than 50 oercent onenin~} shall be.p_.crmitted for shelf levels ahove 12 ft.

(e) q'ransverse flue st)aces at least 3 in. wide shall be t)rovided at l¢~t every 1O f~ horizontally=

(t3 Longitndinal fine st)aces at least 6 in. wide shall be nrovided for double row racks.

(~) The aisle widths shall be at least 7.5 ft. (h) The maxim0m roof heigh~ trail be 27 ft. (i~ The maximnm storatre height shall be 20 ft. ( j) Solid plywood or similar materials shall not he t)laced on the

slatted shelves so that the~ block the 2-in. st)aces between slats, nor shall they be placed on the wire mesh shelves. [This section revised by Comment 13-174 (Log #CC'~031.]

7-4.1.5.2~- (231C-5~ 1(I.21 Sprinklers shall be installed at the ceiling and beneath each shelf in siugle-, double-, or multiple-row racks with solid sheh'es that obstruct both lougitudiual and transverse flue spaces. Design criteria for combined ceiling and iu-rack sprinklers shall he used with this storage configuration.

7-4.1.61- (231C-5-1-011) Open Top Combustihle Containers. 7-4.1.7 (231C-54t- 12) Movable Racks. Rack storage in movable

racks shall bepro tec ted it~ the same manner as multiple-row racks. 7-4.1.8 (231C-6-3, 7-3, and 8-1.5.21 ha-rack sprinklers. The number

of sprinklers and the pipe sizing on a line of sprinklers in racks shall be reslricted only by hydr~ ulic calcnlations and not by any piping schedule.

7-4.1.9" (231C-7-9, 8-3.5 . Horizontal Barriers and In-Rack Sprinklers. Horizontal ba Tiers used in conjunction with in-rack sprinklers to impede verti(al fire development shall be constructed of sheet metal, wood, or similar material and shall extend the fldl leugth and width of the rack. Barriers shall be fitted within 2 in. (50.8 mm) horizontally aronnd rack l~prights. ISee Table 7-4.3.1.5.1, Fiffme.s 7- 4.3.1.5.1(a), (.g), am/ (1), a,~d t,'ifflue~ 7-4.3.1 .5 .3(0 and (e).]

7 ~ , ,n (o~,t~r,o,,, ~ " - ~ . r . . . . . . . . : - - w - . . . . t . ~ ; i ; . . ~ S ~ r ; ; i k l e :- r ~ . : . , , " ~ r L . . . . . | . : ~ t . . 9 . X ~ . R l t ~ . C ; " fO?-,i~; 3 ) ' 3 ~ . C : ~ 7 - R r £ " ~ ; s c . A, "~;;

eom/~a~i~,;) wi th ceiling Sl~i~4e~r-the minimu::" ce i l i ng spHrk!e::

. . . . . .~:,:-. c . . . . ~. . . . . . ,.•,.~ . . . . ':--"•' rcmotc 2000 f t ~ z - ) -

v~-"t.q~'ib" (231C-5-91 Hi~h-ExDansion roam• 7-4.1.10.1" (231C-5-9.1"1 Where high-expansion foam systems are

installed, thev shall be in accordance with NFPA 11A. S tandmd hJr Medium- and Ifi~h-Expansion Foam ,~'ystems. and they shpl be atJt0matic in ooeration.

Exceblion: Where modified b~ this ~¢,andard, 7-4.1.10,2 (231C-5-9.2) In-rack sorinklers shall not be reuuired

where hi~h-exoansion foam systems are used in combin0,~ion wiO~ ceilin~ sorinklers.

7-4.1~16,3 t231C-5-9.3) Detector~ for High-Expansion Fo~m Svstems. Detectors shall be listed and shall be installed in one of the followin~ confi~nrations:

(a) At the ceiline onlv where installed at one-half the listed linear soacin~ [e.e., 15 ft x 15 ft (4.6 m x 4.6 m) ratiler than at 30 ft x 30 ft 9.1 m x 9.1 m ) l

Fxceblion: Ceiling detectm:s alone Cttt// v¢Ol be used whm'e the ceilin.z/roof clemwnce I}om the tot~ of the sto~a,-w exreeds 10 fl (3.1 m) m tile height ot" the storaFe ex~'eed.s 2 5 f l ' ( 7 / 6 m}.

(b} At the ceilin~ at the listed st)acin~ and in racks at alternate

(c) Where listed for rack storage in,tallation and ius~lled in accordance with the listin~ to nrovide remonse within I minute after ienition usin~ an i~nition source that is equivalent to that used in a rack storaffe testinff oroffram.

7-4.1.10.4 (231C-5-9.41 Hi~h-Ext)ansion Foam Submereence. 7-4•1.10.4.1 (231C-5-9.4.11 ~Stora~e of Classes I. II. III. and IV

Commodities ut) to and IncludinE ~ fl (7.6 m~ in Height. 7-4.1.10.4.1.1 (231C-5-9.4.1.11" Where hi~h-exnansion foam systems

are used without sorinklers, the maximum submergence time shall be 5 minutes for Class I. II. or III commq(lities and 4 minutes for Class IV commodities.

7-4.1.10.4.1.2 (231C-5-9.4.1.2~ Where high-expansion f�~m systems are used in combination with ceiling sprinklers, the maximum submergence time shall be 7 minutes 1"or Class I. II. or II[ commodities and 5 minutes for Class 1V commodities,

7-4.1.10.4.1.3 (231C-5-9.4.1.31 Hi~h-Exnansion Foam (~ciling Sprinkler Density. Where high-expUlsion foam system~ are nsed in combination with ceilin~ mrinklers, the minimum ceiling ~prinkler design density emil be 0~2 gpm/ft'- ' [(8,~ L/min) /m'- ' l for Class I. II. or III commodities or 0.25 ~t)m/ft'-' [(10.2 L/min)/m'- ' l for (~la~ IV commodities for the most hvdraulicallv remote 2000-ft'-' (186-m'-') oneratin~ area.

"7-4.1.10"~4.2 (231C-5-9.4.21 Storage of Classes I. II. llI, and IV Commodities Qver 25 ft (7.6 m~ in Height,

7-4.1.10.4.2.1 (231C-5-9.4.2.11 Where high-ext)ansion fgam ~ystems are used for storaee over 25 ft (7.6 m) high tm to and includin~ 35 ft (10.7 m) high. they shall he used in cgmbinatiou with ceiling ~;prinklers. The maximum ~ubmergence time for the high-expansion foam shall be 5 minutes for Class I, 1I, or III commodities and 4 minutes for Class IV commodities,

7-4.1.10.,t.2.2 (231C-5-9.4.2.21 Where hieh-ext)ansion fomn is used in comhinatiou with ceilin~ sm-inklers, the minimum ceilin~ sprinkler desi~u density shall be 0.2 ~n~'n/ft'-' [(8.2 L/min)/m'- ' ] for Cqass I. I1. or III commodities and 0.25 _~om/ft'-' [(10.2 L/min)/m'- ' ] for Class IV commodities for the most hvdraulicallv remote 2000-1"(-' (186-m'-') operating area,

7-4.2 Protection Criteria for Class I through IV Commodities Stored r c) up to and Including ,5 fl in Height.

7-4.2.1 In-Rack Sprinklers. 7-4.2.1.1 (231C-6-51 In-Rack Sprinkler Location. 7-4.2.1.1.1"-~ (231C-6-5.11 The elevation of in-rack sprinkler

deflectors with respect to storage shall not be a consideration in single- or douhle-row rack storage up to and including 20 fl (6.1 m) high.

629

Page 78: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

7-4.2.1.1.2" (231C-6-5.2) In single- or double-row racks without solid shelves with storage over 20 ft (6.1 m) high, or in multiple-row racks, or in single- or doub le - row racks with solid sheh'es and storage height up to and including 25 ft (7.6 m), a m i n i m u m o f 6-in. (152.4- ram) vertical clear space shall be maintained between the sprinkler defleclors and the top of a tier of storage. Sprinkler discharge shall nol be ol)strncted by horizontal rack members.

7-4.2.1.1.3 (231C-6-5.3) In-rack sprinkleis at one level only for storage up to and including 25 ft (7.6 m) high shall be located at the first tier level at or above one-half of the storage height.

7-4-2.1.1.4 (231C-6-5.4) In-rack sprinklers at two levels only for storage up to and inchtding 25 ft (7.6 m) high shall be located at the first tim level at or above one-third and two-thirds of the storage height.

7-.t.2.1.2 (231C-6-6) In-Rack Sprinkler Spacing. 7-4.2.1.2. l* (231G6-6.1) Maximum horizontal spacing of sprinklers

in single- or double-vow racks with noneneapsulated storage up to and including 25 fl (7.6 m) in height shall be in accordance with Tahle 7-4.2.1.2.1.

Excel;rich: For encapsulated storage, maximtm~ horizontal spacing shall be 8 ft (2.4.t m).

Table 7-4.2.1.2.1 (P.3!C 5 !2.7.1) (Table 231C-6-6.1}

Commodity Class

Aisle Widths I and II III IV

8fl 12ft 12ft 8fi 4t1 12fl 8f i 8fi ForSl milts: l f l=0.3048 m

7-4.2.1.2.21 (231C-6-6.2) Sprinklers installed in racks shall be spaced without l egar{t to lack Ul)lights. 74.2.1.3j- (23lC-6-7) In-Rack Sprinkler Discharge Pressure. Sprinklers in racks shall discharge at nol less than 15 psi (103.4 kPa) for all classes of commodities.

7-4.2.1.,H- (27,1C4;-8) In-Rack Sprinkler Water Demand. The water demand tbl sprinklers installed in racks shall he hased on simultaneous operation of the most hvd[aulicalh' l-emote sprinklers as tolh)ws:

Height Over 12 ft. up t{}

and incltlding

20 fi

Over 20 fi, up to

and including

22 ft

Table7-4 .2 .1 .5 (231C-6dl ) Sin

Aisles Corn- (ft)

modity Encap- Class sulated

No -t I 8

~k~s 4 8

No II

Yes

No IIl

Yes

No IV

Yes

No I

Yes 4 8

No 4 II 8

Yes

No Ill

xA, s

No W

Yes ,t 8

(a) Six sprinklers where only one level is installed in racks with Class I, II, or Ill comnaodities,

(b) Eight sprinklers where only one level is installed in racks with Class IV commodities.

(c) Ten sprinklers (five on each two top levels) where inore than one level is installed in racks with Class I, II, or III commodities.

(d) Fourteen sprinklers (seven on each two top levels) where more than one level is installed in racks with Class IV commodities.

Exceplwn: Where a .~tma~e *ack, due to tl.~ le,gth, reqt,res h,.v~ t k a , the ,u.mbet of in-trek .qn,lkh,r~ .~peci/ied, only' Iko.w in-u, 'k ~p*tnklet.~ in a smLde rack need to be inchuted , t /he calculation.

7-4.2.1.5 (231C-6-12) In-Rack Splinkler Location - Single and Douhle Row Racks. In single- or double-row racks without solid shelves, in-rack sprinklers shall be installed in accordance with Table 7-4.2.1.5 shown below.

7-4.2.1.6"~ (231C-6-13) In-Rack Sprinkler Location - Multiple Row Rac ks.

7-4.2.1.6.1 (231C-6-13.1) For encapsulated or nonencapsulated sto~age in multiple-row racks no deeper than 16 ft (4.88 m) with aisles 8 fl (2.44 m) or wider, in-rack sprinklers shall be installed in accordance with Table 7-4.2,1.6.1 shown on the following page.

7-4.2.1.6.2 (231C-6-44A- 13.2) For encapsulated or" nonencapsulated storage in multiple-row racks deeper than 16 ft (4.88 m), or with aisles less than 8 ft (2.44 m) wide, in-rack sprinklers shall be installed in accordance with Table 7-4.2.1.6.2 shown on following page.

7-4.2.1.6.3" (231C-6-13.~-3) Maximum horizontal spacing of sprinklers on branch lines, in multiple-row racks with encapsulated ol nonencapsulated storage up to and including 25 fi (7.6 m) in height, shall not exceed 12 ft {3.7 m) for Class I, II, or Ill colnmodities and 8 ft (2.44 m) for Class IV commodiues, with area limitations of 100 ft'-' (9 90 m'-') per sprinkler for Class I, It, or lII commodities and 80 f(-' (:£71ii m'-') per sprinkler for Class IV commodities. The rack plan vie,,, shall be considered in determining the area covered by each sprinkler. The aisles shall not be included in area calculations.

7-4.2.1.6.4 (231C-6-13.g2) Aminimunl of 6 in . (152.4 nnn) shall he maintained between the sprinkler deflector and the top of a tier of storage.

or Double-Row Racks. Storage Height up to and Including 25 ft Without Solid Shelves Ceiling Sprinkler Water Demand

With In-Rack Sprinklers Without In-Rack Sprinklers

Sprinklers Mandatory

In-Rack No

N o

Fig. 7-4.2.2.2.1 (a)

7-4.2.2.2.1(¢')

-t No 7-4.2.2.2.1 (b) 8 4 No 7-4.2.2.2.1 (e) 8 4 No 7-4.2.2.2.1 (c) 8 4 1 level 7-.t.2.2.2.1 (f) 8 -t No 7-4.2.2.2.1 (d) 8 4 l level 7-4.2.2.2.1 (g) 8 4 No 7-4.2.2.2.1 (a) 8

1 level 7-4.2.2.2.1 (e)

No 7-4.'-)'.2.2.1 (h)

Curves C&D A& B

-t 1 lev el 7-4.2.2.2.1 (e) 8 4 No 7-4.2.2.2.1 (c) C&D 8 A&B 4 1 level 7-4.2.2.2.1 (f) C&D 8 A&B -t No 7-4.2.2.2.1 (d) 8

1 level 7-4.2.2.2.1 (g)

C&l) A&B C&D A&B C&D A&B C&D A&B C&D A&B C&D A&B C&D A&B C&D A&B C&D A&B C&D A&B C&D A&B

C&D A&B C&D A&B

Apply Fig.

7-4.2.2.1.3

Yes

No

Fig. 7-4.2.2.2.1 (a)

7-4 .'2.2.2.1 (e }

7-4.2.2.2.1 (b)

7-4.2.2.2.1 (e)

Curves G&H E&F

G& t1 E&F

G&H E&F

G & tt E&F

Apply Fig.

7-4.2.2.1.3

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

7-4.2.2.2.1 (c) G&t t Yes E&F

7-4. "2.'2.2.1 ( d ) Yes G&H E&F

F&H E&G

G&If E&F

G&It E&F

7-4.2.2.2.1 (a)

7-4.2.2.2.1 (h)

7-4.2.2.2.1 (c)

Yes

Yes

Yes

7-4.2.2.2.1 (d) G&H Yes E&F

630

Page 79: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

Over 22 ft, up to

and inc luding

25 ft

No I

Yes

No II

Yes

No III

VeV

No IV

Yes

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

No

1 level

4 No 8 4 1 level 8 4 No 8 4 1 level 8

I level

Table 7-4.2.1.5 (231C-6-11) (Continued) 7-4.2.2.2.1(a) C&D

A&B 7-4.2.2.2.1(e) C&D

A&B 7-4.2.2.2.1(b) C&D

A&B 7-4.2.2.2. | (e) C&D

A&B 7-4.2.2.2.1(c) C&D

A&B 7-4.2.2.2.1(f) C&D

A&B 7-4.2.2.2.1(d) C&D

A&B 7-4.2.2.2.1(g) C&D

A&B

No

7-4.2.2.2.1 (a) F&H Yes E&G

7-4.2.2.2.1 (b)

7-4.2.2.2.1 (c)

G & H E&F

G & H E&F

Y e s

Yes

Height

Over 12 ft up to

and inc luding

15ft

Over 15 ft up to

and inc luding

20 ft

Over 20 ft up to

and inc lud ing

25 ft

For SI units:

Table 7-4.2.1.6.1 (2~G-6-1-~ Table 231C-6-13.1} Multiple-Row Racks. Rack Depth up to and Including 16 ft, Aisles 8 ft or Wider, Stora~{e Height up to 25 ft

Ceiling Sprinkler Water Demand With Without In-Rack S

Com- Sprinklers Apply A~.ply m o d i t y Encap- Mandatory Fig. 1.25 x • Fig. 1.25 x

Class , sulated , In-Racks , Fi~. No . Curves 7-4.1.7.2 Densi ty Fig. No. Curves 7-4.1.7.2 Densit~

I No 7-4.2.1.1 (a) No 7-4.2.1.1 l&,I Yes No No ~ ( a ) Yes 7-4.2.1.1 I&,l Yes

No ~ ( b ) No 7-4.2.1.1 I& l Yes No II i Yes ~ ( b ) C&D Yes 7-4.2.1.1 I& 1 Yes

l m

III , No , No , 7-4.2.1.1 (c) Yes No 7-4.2.1.1 I& l Yes No Yes 1 level 7-4.2.1.1 (c) Yes

l l l

IV No No 7-4.2.1.1 (d) No 7-4.2.1.1 C&D No No ' Yes ' 1 level ' 7-4.2.1.1(d) A&B 1.50x

, density

I No 7-4.2.1.1 (a) No 6-12(a) I&] Yes No , ~es , No ~ ( a ) Yes 7-4.2.1.1 I&] Yes

II No ~ (b) No 7-4.2.1.1 I& I Yes No ~ ( b ) C&D Yes 7-4.2.1.1 l & ] Yes

l l III , No , No , 7-4.2.1.1(c) Yes No 7-4.2.1.1 I&] Yes No

Yes 1 level 7-4.2.1.1 (c) Yes | u ,

IV No 1 Level 7-4.2.1.1 (d) No Yes ' "~2~.2.1.1 (d) A&B 1.50x

, density

No No 7-4.2.1.1 (a) Yes ' 1 level ' 7-4.2.1.1(a)

I

n

II No Yes

l

III No Yes

|

IV No Yes

7-4.2.1.1 (b) 1 level ~ C&D

~ ( c ) ~ ( c )

2 levels 7-4.2.1.1(d) 7-4.2.1.1 (d) A&B

1 ft = 0.30.t8 in

No

N o

Yes No Yes No Yes No

1.50 x density

7-4.2.1.1 I~] Yes No

631

Page 80: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

Hei,~ht

Over 12 ft up to

and including

15ft

Over 15 ft up to

and including

20 ft

Over 20 ft up to

and including

25 ft

For SI units:

Table 7-4.2.1.6.2 (23!C $ l~ . ! Table 231C-6-13.2) Multiple-Row Racks; Rack Depth Over 16 ft or Aisles Narrower than 8 ft, Storage Height up to and Including 25 ft

Corn- i Sprinklers modity Encap- Mandatory

Class sulated In-Racks Fil~. No.

Water Demand With In-Rack Without In-Rack winklers

Apply Apply Fig. 1.25 x Fig.

Curves 7-4.1.7.2 Density Filg. No. Curves 7-4.1.7.2 1.25 x

Density

I No Yes

l II No

| Yes

III No n

Yes l

IV No l

Yes

7-4.2.1.1 (a) No 7-4.2.1.1 (a)

n 7-4.2.1.1 (b)

| 7-4.2.1.1 (b)

No ' 7-4.2.1.1 (c) n

1 level 7-4.2.1.1 (c) n

No 7-4.2.1.1 (d) |

I level 7-4.2.1.1 (d)

C&D Yes

No 7-4.2.1.1 I& l Yes Yes 7-4.2.1.1 i&j No 7-4.2.1.1 l& I Yes Yes 7-4.2.1.1 I& I No 74.2.1.1 I& I Yes Yes No 7-4.2.1.1 C&D No

1.50 x densi~'

N o

Yes No Yes No

No

I No Yes

II No Yes

|

III No Yes

IV No Yes

I No Yes

n

II No Yes

|

III No Yes

u

IV No Yes

1 ft = 0.3048 In

7-4.2.1.1 (a) '--~-4.2.1.1 (a)

~ ( b ) 1 Level

""YW4.2.H (c) ~ ( c ) '-~7~-4.2.1.1 (d) ~ ( d )

7-4.2.1.1 (a) "7Y~'.2.1.1 (a)

1 level ~ ( b ) -WE'.2A.I (b) ~ ( c ) 7-4.2.1.1 (c)

n

2 levels 7-4.2.1.1 (d) 7-4.2.1.1 (d)

C&D

C&D

Yes

No

N o

Yes N o

Yes N o

Yes No

1.50 x density

N o

Yes No Yes No Yes N o

1.50 x density

632

Page 81: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

7-4.2.2t Ceiling Sprinkler Discharge Criteria - Area Density Method 7-4.2.2.1 General. 7-4.2.2.1.1"t (231C-6-91, Ceiling Sprinkler Water Demand . The

design curves in Figures 7-4.2.2.1.1(a) t h rough (g) shall apply to nominal 20 ft (6.1 m) he ight of storage.

E O

o e.~ o

e- "E

O

O

E

Ceiling sprinkler density (L/min)/m 2

4.1 14.3 16.3 18.3 6.1

A B C [ 1 I I | I I I I I~ 60OO I I I I I I t | l I

I I I III I III I sooo H+t-I-t- t I

I I I I i l I1|1 I I I I ' l I I1~1

4000 ~ ~ l l ~ t ~ 111 I I I11 ! ! I I t I I1. I I1.II.

3000 1 1 1 i I 11 ] I1 I I I I I I ~.1 I

1 2000 ~ ~ l J l ~

1000 ~ I 0.1 0.15

8.1 10.2 12.2 I

E G F H I~1 I I I [ IU I I Il l I I | l III I I I I I J I~1~[ [ I l l 1 1.I I~III I II.I I

k l I~I [ I [ I I1.1 1 t l I l l I I I I 111 1 I I ] I I I~1.I 1 I i i I I k I~ ~I I I~I 1. I I~I I 11 . I 11 A I I t I t i l l I A lll l 'I ~I~I I I 11 I I}I, Ik~I I I k l It. 1 I&I~I I I I~I I N, I~.~I

kl I RI I I~I I~,% ,1 I I11 I IN I I~l.l~ tim I M I ~1 II~' &Y, I "~1 I~1,1 I'~ IMM INI I I'%1 I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

0.2 0.25 0.3

1114 i i i l l l l l l I l l l I l l l l r l l I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I i t I I I I I I I l i l l i i i i I I I I I l l l I , , , , I I I I I i t l ' " ' I I I I f i l l I I I I I I I I , , , , I I I I I I I I l l l l I I I I I l l l I 1 1 1 f i l l I I I Y I I I I I l , I I I k l l I I I I l l l I l Y l I I I I I I I I I I ' N I I I I I I I

J I I~ I I I I I I I I I ~ k l l I I I I I I I I ~ L I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I ~ Single p o i n t - ~ I I I I des ignon tyLT I I l l l l l l l l l l l ~ m l

0.35 0.4 0.45

Ceiling sprinkler density (gpm/ft 2)

557

465 .-~

Q. o

372 ~ ¢-

279 ~ o

o

186 ~-

121 93

Curve Legend

A - - Single-or double-row racks with 8-ft (2.44-m) aisles with 286°F (141°C) ceiling sprinklers and 165°F (74°C) in-rack sprinklers.

B - - Single-or double-row racks with 8-ft (2.44-m) aisles with 165°F (74°C) ceiling sprinklers and 165°F (74°C) in-rack sprinklers.

C - - Single-or double-row racks with 4-ft (1.22-m) aisles or multiple-row racks with 286°F (1,41°C) ceiling sprinklers and 165°F (74°C) in-rack sprinklers,

D - - Single-or double-row racks with 4-ft (1.22-m) aisles or multiple-row racks with 165°F (74°C) ceiling sprinklers and 165°F (74°C) in-rack sprinklers.

Curve Legend

E - - Single-or double-row racks with 8-ft (2.44-m) aisles and 286°F (141°C) ceiling sprinklers.

F - - Single-or double-row racks with 8-ft (2.44-m) aisles and 165°F (74°C) ceiling sprinklers.

G - - Single-or double-row racks with 4-ft (1.22-m) aisles and 286°F (141°C) ceiling sprinklers.

H - - Single-or double-row racks with 4-ft (t .22-m) aisles and 165°F (74°C) ceiling sprinklers.

I - - Multiple-row racks with 8-ft (2.44-rn) or wider aisles and 286°F (141 °C) ceiling sprinklers.

J - - Multiple-row racks with 8-ft (2.44-m) or wtder aisles and 165°F (74°C) ceiling sprinklers.

Figure 7-4.2.2.1.1(a) [231C-6-11(a)] Sprinkler system design curves - - 20-ft (6.l-m) high rack s torage - - Class I nonencapsu la t ed commodi t i es - - convent ional pallets.

Ceiling sprinkler density (IJmin)/m 2

4.1 6.1 8.1 10.2 12.2 14.3 16.3 18.3 20.4

6000

E I 0 5 0 0 0 I I I

J l i J t i l l

o I I I I 4000 I J l l

I I I I E I I I I "E ~ I I I 1 ~ 3000 I ~ l l l l l 0 l l i l

l i l i I I I I

2000 I l l l ,~ I I I I I I I I I I I I

Q I I I I 1000 l i ~

E I I E I I E E

A BC[ D E I FG H l i l t I I I I I l l i l l l l l l l 1 Ill I I I I I I I I ! I , I l t l l I I l l I I I I t l l l t l n I I , | l i l t 1 I i l Ril l I II I' I I It*& , l , , , ,1.:11',' I I | l I ! ! I I I 11 I I I I M I I I II I l t l l l l l l | l ~ 1 1 1 1 ~ . 1 1 1 P ' 1 ~ I ~ l l l I , I . . . . . tl I I I

i l l luu i lu k i i i i a i l l I i l 111i I 111 l~i I " ' ~ I I I It1.1 1 ,1 .11) . 11.1 i i k~l 11 I I l l I R f f l I I~ I1~.1 I I I~1 I I l t l l l ~ l I I . . . . . . I~11 I I , E l , ~ l l k i i k i i l l ~ l I I I l l l It*Ill I I I 1 ' [ I I I I ~ l I t I 1 1 I I ~ l IM I IM I I~.~. I I I ' 1 I & N I . . . . . lk ~ 1111~11]~I~ i i ~ i i i ~ , I I I I k l I N N i i K i t I I t I1~1 I I ~ ' ~ ; ; ; - "

, , , , , , , , , l l l r ; , , , , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . . . . . I I I I i l i l l l i l i i i i i ! i , l l

l 0.10

t i l l I I l ' l I t l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l t l d i l l k i l l I~11 I k l l I1~1 I I N I l i l t I I I 1 ~ I I I I ( 1 1 1 ~ N I I I~'N.I I I I I I l l l I I I I I I I I I I I I

0,15

I I I f i r 557 . . . ]11 i i i I l l

I l l 1 1 1 1 1 4 6 5 ' ' " I I I IJl ' "

I I I l l l i 11111 372

1" Single point I I I / design only l l l l l l l i l 1 9 3

0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50

Ceiling sprinkler density (gpm/ft 2)

Curve Legend

A - - Single-or double-row racks with 8-ft (2.44-m) aisles with 286°F (141°C) ceiling sprinklers and

E 165°F (74°C) in-rack sprinklers,

.Co B - - Single-or dofJble-row racks with 8-ft (2.44-m) aisles with 165°F (74°C) o,.

o ceiling sprinklers _~ and 165°F (74°C) -~ in-rack sprinklers. E "~. C - - Single-or double-row racks o~ with 4-ft (1.22-m) aisles or "6 multiple-row racks with

286°F (141°C) ceiling sprinklers and 165°F (74°C)

c in-rack sprinklers. "~ D - - Single-or double-row racks a with 4-ft (122-m) aisles or

multiple-row racks with 165°F (74°C) ceiting sprinklers and 165°F (74°C) in-rack sprinklers.

Curve Legend

E - - Single-or double-row racks with 84t (2.44-m) aisles and 286°F (141°C) ceiling sprinklers.

F - - Single-or double-row racks with 8-ft (2.44-m) aisles and 165°F (74°C) ceiling sprinklers.

G - - Single-or double-row racks with 4-ft (1.22-m) aisles and 286°F (141 °C) ceiling sprinklers.

H - - Single-or double-row racks with 4-ft (1.22-m) aisles and 165°F (74°C) ceiling sprinklers.

I - - Multiple-row racks with 8-ft (2.44-m) or wider aisles and 286°F (141°C) ceiling sprinklers,

J - - Multiple-row racks with 8-ft (2.44-m) or wider aisles and 165°F (74°C) ceiling sprinklers,

Figure 7-4.2.2.1.1 (b) [231C-6-11 (b)] Sprinkler sys tem design curves - - 20-ft (6.1-m) high rack s torage - - Class II nonencapsu la t ed commodi t i e s - - convent ional pallets.

6 3 3

Page 82: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 1 3 - A99 ROC

Ceiling sprinkler density (L/min)/m 2

6.1

6000 1

I I 5000 t I

I I I [ I I

4000 i l i f I I I I I I I I

3000 I I I I 1} I

2000 ~

I I 1000 I I

0,15

8.2 10.2 12.2

A B C D E F II I III llltl I II I II I II I I I III llll I Ill I Ill I III I I I III I Ill I III I Ill III '

I III III I II I II III IIII lllll III I II II I I I I lllll I Ill I Ill I I II II ll~.l III 111111 II It.llIillltl I kll I I Ill 1 I~.I~ I I Ill I Ill I I I III lilll II I Ill II Ill I][11111111%1

I I I I I I~I I llk l 1 I%1 II~ II Ill II III%111]III% IIII llll l~,ll IIMII'

I I I I I%11 li~l I I]II I IIIIII lIN II I%11 I I I I I ~I I I%1~I I I$I

I I I I I I I l l l l ~ l l l l " l I I 1 1 1 I Pl l l l%l 'k l l l l%. I I I I I I I I l I K ' K I I I

I I I I I l l l I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I l t l l l l l

I I I l l l l l l l l l i l l l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l l l l l i l l

i i i

0.20 0.25 0,30

14.3 16.3 18.3 20.4

i i i l | l l l l l l m l l l l l I I I l i l l l l l l l l l l l I I I l l d l l l l l l l l l l ' g g g g ~ g l l g g g g l l l l l l i i l l l i i l U n i l l UBBBBMBBBBBBBBI I A | l i l l l n l n l i l l l I ~ f l l g n i f l l g i i l g g l I I ~ l g | g i l l g U l l g l r l t ' ~ i l i l ~ U n U U l l l I g l x I g i l i ] i i l l g l I l i ~ d l l l i ~ l l l l l l I g i i ~ l l i i g ~ g l i i l i l k O g g l g k I g l ~ I l l i ~ ] i l l I ~ I I E ~ l l l & ~ l l l l l ~ l l l k l l l l ~ C I I I l i ~ l l I ~ l l n i ~ i l l l l ~ ! I I ~ l l l l ~ l l l ~ l i I I l ~ l l l l ~ l l i l l I I I I I I I I I I I I l l i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l U l I I I I I I I I I I I l U l I I I I I I I I I I I I l i i l l l l l l

Ceiling sprinkler density (gprn/ft 2)

~ 557

465

372

"--Single point -design only - ~ 93 C50

Curve Legend

A - - Single-or double-row racks with 8-ft (2.44-m) aisles with 286°F (141°C) ceiling sprinklers and ~ " 165o F (74oc) in-rack sprinklers.

B - - Single-or double-row racks with 8-ft (2.44-m)

i ceiling sprinklers aisles with 165°F (74°C)

and 165°F (74°C) 2 c inlrack sprinklers. ~. C - - Single-or double-row racks

with 4-ft (1.22-m) aisles or "5 multiple-row racks with

286°F (141°C) ceiling sprinklers and 165°F (74°C)

r" in-rack sprinklers. o~ "~ D - - Single-or double-row racks

with 4-ft (1.22-m) aisles or multiple-row racks with 165°F (74°C) ceiling sprinklers and 165°F (74°C) in-rack sprinklers.

Curve Legend

E - - Single-or double-row racks with 8-ft (2.44-m) aisles and 286°F (141 °C) ceiling sprinklers.

F - - Single-or double-row racks with 8-ft (2.44-m) aisles and 165°F (74°C) ceiling sprinklers.

G - - Single-or double-row racks with 4-ft (1.22-m) aisles and 286°F (141 °C) ceiling sprinklers.

H - - Single-or double-row racks with 4-fl (1.22-m) aisles and 165°F (74°C) ceiling sprinklers.

I - - Multiple-row racks with 8-ft (2.44-m) or wider aisles and 286°F (14t°C) ceiling sprinklers.

J - - Multiple-row racks with 8-ft (2.44-m) or wider aisles and 165°F (74°C) ceiling sprinklers.

F i g u r e 7 - 4 . 2 . 2 . 1 . 1 ( c ) [231C~6-11(c ) ] S p r i n k l e r s y s t e m d e s i g n c u r v e s - - 20-f t ( 6 . l - m ) h i g h r a c k s t o r a g e - - C l a s s I I I n o n e n c a p s u l a t e d c o m m o d i t i e s - - c o n v e n t i o n a l p a l l e t s .

8.2 I

A B C 6 0 0 0 I I I f i l l I I I I

&'" 1111111111' I I l I L I I I I I

IIII " ' " ' 5000 l u l l ! lllllilllt

'~ IIII lllllt °

~" l lll I I 4000 l l l l l l i l ;

l l l l l l i l [ IIII llllll

• - I I I I '1111 ~. IIII l i i ~ l m 3000 l i i l f i l l

IIII Ilk IIII llll~ IIII IIII l l l l l l l l

2000 l l l l " ' -~) I I I I i i i i

IIII IIII IIII lllli

1000 IIII lllll

0.20 0.25

Ceiling sprinkler density (L/min)/m 2

10.2 12.2 14.3 16.3 18,3 20.4 22,4 24,5

0.55

I I l l l k l l l l i l l l l l l l l l ~ l l l l l l l l I I I I l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

I I I I I I I M I I I I I I I % l l l l l & l l l l l l l ~11111~1111111

U ~ I I I I I % I I f l I I ~klllll~llllll I ~ l l l l l ~ l l l l l I L & I I I I I I M I I I I I I ~ l l l l l l J I I I I I KN I I I I l & l l l I I l & k l l l l l l ~ l l I I I l ~ & l l l l l l & l ~III l~llll[l&

llllN~illllll &IIIIIIM~dlIIII l&llllll%f~lllll II%11111 ~ ~III III~IIIIII~I IIIIIIIIIII]II IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII. IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 93

i

0.60

D E FG H I I I l l I A I I I I%1 k I I I V I I I I I I $ 1 1

l l l l i I l i l II1%1' tl I I I I I I I$1 I I I% I I I I I I I I 1 , 11111, t l l l l l l l & I I I I ~ & l l l l l l l l l ~ I I I I l%lll'~lll Mill

L l t l l I t l l l ' t i l l M A I I I l l l l ~ 1 1 1 l l ~ l l l l k l l I % 1 1 l~l k l ] l l~l l 11%11 l~ l~ll l l kl l l1~ l l Kl1=l l l IN l l l~l l IN l~i I l I l~ 1111% l l I%11J l l I ' l l l l l ' l l l ~ . i & l l l ~ I I I

~l I I Ol l Y I t l ~ L l l %1 l ll~L Xl l I r N l l~l I II N K I l l I N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 111111111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

i i i

0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50

Ceiling sprinkler density (gpm/~-)

557

g

465 •

c., O

372 ~

279 ~ O

==

186 c .| 13

Curve Legend Curve Legend

A- - Single-or double-row racks E - - Single-or double-row racks with 8-ft (2.44-m) aisles ' with 8-ft (2.44-m) aisles with 286°F (141°C) and 286°F (141°C) ceiling ceiling sprinklers and sprinklers. 165°F (74°C) F - - Single-or double-row racks in-rack sprinklers, with 8-ft (2.44-m) aisles

B - - Single-or double-row and 165°F (74°C) ceiling racks with 8-ft (2.44-m) sprinklers. aisles~th 165°F (74°C) G - - Single-or double-row racks • ceiling sprinklers with 4-ft (1.22-m) aisles and 165°F (74°C) and 286°F (141°C) ceiling in-rack sprinklers, sprinklers.

C - - Single-or double-row racks H - - Single-or double-row racks with 4-ft (1.22-m) aisles or with 4-fl (1.22-m) aisles multiple-row racks with and 165°F (74°C) ceiling 286°F (141°C) ceiling sprinklers, sprinklers and 165°F (74°C) in-rack sprinklers.

D - - Single-or double-row racks with 4-ft (1.22-m) aisles or multiple-row racks with t 65°F (74°C) ceiling sprinklers and t65°F (74°C) in-rack sprinklers.

F i g u r e 7 - 4 .2 .2 .1 .1 ( d ) [ 2 3 1 C - 6 - 1 1 ( d ) ] S p r i n k l e r s y s t e m d e s i g n c u r v e s - - 20- f t ( 6 . l - m ) h i g h r a c k s t o r a g e - - C l a s s I V n o n e n c a p s u l a t e d c o m m o d i t i e s - - c o n v e n t i o n a l p a l l e t s .

6 3 4

Page 83: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 - A99 R O C

6.1

o,, o~ k l~ C

!,ooo% ~ 4000

~ 3000- -

,ooo 0.15

;3.2

0.20

Ceiling sprinkler density (L/min)/m 2

10.2 12.2 14.3 16.3 18.3 20.4

0.25

~ S i r , ~ ~- 557 ~ - 465

? ! e ~ H ~1 ~ poi ?t " ~ 372

- 186

J"~J'JJ 93 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50

Ceiling sprinkler density (gpm/ft 2)

Curve Legend

A - - 8-ft (2.44-m) aisles with 286°F (141 °C) ceiling sprinklers and 165°F (74°C) in-rack sprinklers.

~E B - - 841 (2.44-m) aisles with 165°F (74°C) ceiling

(~ sprinklers and 165°F (74°C) in-rack sprinklers.

~- C - - 4-ft (1.22-m) aisles with O

286°F (141°C) ceiling sprinklers and 165°F (74°C)

~. in-rack sprinklers. D - - 4-ft (122-m) aisles with

165°F (74°C) ceiling sprinklers and 165°F (74°C) in-rack sprinklers.

cl

Curve Legend

E - - 8-ff (2,44-m) aisles with 288°F (141°C) ceiling sprinklers.

F - - 8-ft (2.44-m) aisles with 165°F (74°C) ceiling sprinklers.

G - - 4-ft (1.22-rn) aisles with 286°F (141 °C) ceiling sprinklers.

H - -4- f t (1.22-m) aisles with 165°F (74°C) ceiling sprinklers.

Figure 7-4.2.2.1. l (e) [231 C-6-11 (e) ] Single- o r double - row racks - - 20-ft (6.1 -m) high rack s to rage - - spr ink le r sys tem design curves - - Class I and H encapsu la ted commodi t i e s - - convent ional pallets.

6.1 8.2 t A 6000 I . .~

I . . , I

5000 i i ' ~ : I I . . . i l . . I I : . .

4000 I ' "

I . . , 3000 i . L, I

2000 i . . . . I . . . . I . . I I . : .

1000 I . L. 0.15 0.20

Ceiling sprinkler density (Umin)/m 2

10.2 12.2 14.3 16.3 18.3 20.4

I I I l i I | l i , , , , , l , , l l ] l ] l l l l , , I !11111111111111 I I I I I | 1 ~ I 1111 I I I I I 11 I f I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t I l l l l l l l l l M i l l l l l l l l I I | I l l I l i l l I t l l I I 1 1 1 I l l i l l l l L I l l l l l l l l

~11 Ill ~1 I I I ~ l l l l I I1 I I

\', '. '. :'.'. '. 1 '. : 1 '. '. I I I I~l I~111 I N I I I l l I I I I I I l l l i l l I M I I I L I I I~111 A I N I I 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 I k l l I ~ l l i l I I R . I I I 1 1 1 I1~11 I I M I ~ I t l I I l I I I I I I 11 I I1.1 ~.1 I I I~1 I I I I I I I~1 I I1~ I ~ 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 I I I I~.t I I ~1 I%1 I I I~.1 I I I I I IX I I I ~ t M I I I~.11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I t l l l l l l l l t l l l l l I I I I I I I I l l l l l l l l l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1

0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40

J l i i i I l i l l ] l 557 I I I I I I I I I 1 , 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l l l l l l l l I I I I I I I I I I I 465 I I I I I I I I I I L I I I I I I I I l I I l l I I I I I I I t l l i l I I I I I I I J l l ~ l I I I I I I l i l t L I 372 I I I I l l l l l l l i l l l l l l l l l l I I I I I I I I I 1 " 1 i l l t l l l l l l l I I I I I I I I I 1 ± 1 279 I I I I I I I I I l l I I I I l l l l t l i I I I I I t l l l l l I I I I I I I I I 1 ~ 1 I I I I I I I I I t l 186 I I I I t l l l l l l i I I I I t l I I I I L I i l i l l i l i l i L i I I I I I I I I I I L I I I l [ l l l I I f l 93

0.45 0 . ~

Ceiling sprinkler density (gpm/ft 2)

K" E v E O

(9 {3. O

E "E O. (o

O

0,) ~0 E O)

¢1 r~

Curve Legend Curve Legend

A - - 8-ff (2.44-m) aisles with C - - 4-ft (1.22-m) aisles with 286°F (141 °C) ceiling 288°F (141°C) ceiling sprinklers and sprinklers and 165°F (74°C) 165°F (74°C) in-rack sprinklers, in-rack sprinklers.

B - - 8-ft (2.44-m) aisles with D - - 4-ft (1.22-m) aisles with 165°F (74°C) ceiling 165°F (74°C) ceiling sprinklers and sprinklers and 165°F (74°C) 165°F (74°C) in-rack sprinklers, in-rack sprinklers.

Figure 7-4.2.2.1.1 (f) [23 IC-6-11 (f) ] Single- o r double - row racks - - 20-ft (6. l-m) high rack s to rage - - spr ink le r sys tem des ign curves - - Class I I I encapsu la t ed commodi t i e s - - convent ional pallets.

6 3 5

Page 84: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

6000

sooo

® o. o

4000 .7:

E ~a000 o

t~ e 2000 o l

® r~

1000 0,25

10.2

B C D

i 1111 ] I 11111kl I lllkll I ill llll ~J lll~klll

llll lll~llllllll~ll |III kllllll |IIIII~II I l t l 1111~11~1111111 I l l l k l l l l l l l l l l l l R I / l l l R I I I I | I R I I I ] I I

I l l l l R I l l l l l l k 111 llkll]l~lkll 111,

I I~I II l]kl l~d I I If I l l l l l l ~ t ~ l l [ I

I I I I I I R I I I l l l l l l l l , I I I I l l l l l l l ~ l ~ l l l l

I l l f l ~ l l l k l l i l l l I I I l l l l l l l l l Y l l

I I 1 t l K I I I I I ~ I K I I I 11 II IIlI,I,,IIlKII,

IIIIIII~IIII~!I llll IIIIIII~IIIIN

I I I I l l l l l l l l l l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

III I I I l ] l l l l l l l , l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

0.30 0.35 0,40

Ceiling sprinkler density (L/min)/rn 2

12.2 14 .3 16 .3 18 .3 20.4 22.4 24.5

I I I I I I I I I I I I 557 J i l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I [ l l I I I I I I l r l I I I I I ] 11 I l t i l c I l l l I l l I I I I I l l l l d ~ . g I I I I I l i l I I I I i l l l l ~ [ i l l t i l l I r l l I I I I l l i I I l I I I I F llfl IIII IIII [llll o fllll IIII llri lllllq70 ~III Jill IIII lllll ~'~ N I I l l l l i l [ l l I l l l l I~11 I I I I I I I I I I l i J l .- I1~1 I I l l l l l l l l i l t ] I I N I I i t ] 1 1 1 1 I I I l l 97q I l i ~ I I I l l l l l l I l J l l " ' ~ l ] l l ] I l l l l l l l I l l l l

J i l l ~ I I I I l l l I l l l l • 111 i N I I I I I [ I I I I I I~11 I I l ' ~ J I I I I t l l i l t A ~ I I I I I11111111 I I I I I " ~ I I I I I l l l l l l l l I l l l l -~ I I I I I I I I I l i l l I I I I I ® IIII lllllllll IIIII a IIII I IIII t ] t t 1 9 3 I I I I

0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60

Ceiling sprinkler density (gpm/ft '?')

Curve Legend Curve Legend

A - - 8-ft (2.44-m) aisles with C - - 4-ft [1.22-m) aisles with 286°F (141°C) ceiling 288°F (141°C) ceiling sprinklers and sprinklers and 165°F (74°C) 165°F (74°C) in-rack sprinklers, in-rack sprinklers.

B - - 8-ft (2.44-m) aisles with D - - 4-tt (1.22-m) aisles with 165°F (74°C) ceiling 165°F (74°C) ceiling sprinklers and sprinklers and 165 °F (74°C) 165°F (74°C) in-rack sprinklers, in-rack sprinklers.

Figure 7-4.2.2.1.1 (g) [231C-6-11 (g)] Single- or double-row racks ~ 20-ft (6.l-m) high rack storage - -

7-4.2.2.1.2" (231G6-9.1) The design curves indicate water demands for ordinary temperature and nominal pefatnre rated sprinklers at the ceiling. The ordinary temperature design curves corresponding to ordinary rated temperature sprinklers shall be used for sprinklers with ordinary and intermediate temperature classification. The high temperature design curve corresponding to high temperature rated sprinklers shall be used for sprinklers having high temperature rating.

7-4.2.2.1.3 (231C-6-9.2) For storage height up to and including 25 ft (7.6 m) protected with ceiling sprinklers only and for storage height up to and including 20 ft (6.1 m) protected with ceiling sprinklers and minimum required in-rack sprinklers, densities obtained from design curves shall be adjusted in accordance with Figure 7-4.2.2.1.3.

Height of storage (m) 3.66

,7

0 10 12 15 20 25 30 35 Height of storage (ft)

7-4.2.2.1.4 i231C-6-9.3) For storage height over 20 ft (6.1 m) up to and. including 25 ft (7.6) protected with ceiling sprinklers and minimum required in-rack sprinklers, densities obtained from design ctuwes shall be used. Densities shall not be adjusted ill accordance with Figure 7-4.2.2.1.3.

7-4.2.2.1.5 (231C-6-9.4) For storage height up to and including 20 ft (6.1 m) protected with ceiling sprinklers and with more than one level o f in-rack sprinklers, but not in every tier, densities obtained from design cm'ves and adjusted in accordance with Figure 7-4.2.2.1.3 shall be permitted to be reduced an additional 20 percent. (3~e Table 7-4. 2.2.1.5 ~hown on the following page. )

7-4.2.2.1.6 (231C-6-9.5) For storage height over 20 ft (6.1 m) up to and including 25 ft (7.6 m) protected with ceiling sprinklers and with more than the minimum required level o f in-rack sprinklers, but not in every tier, densities obtained from design curves shall be permit ted to be reduced 20 percent. Densities shall not be adjusted in accordance witb Figure 7-4.2.2.1.3 (See Table 7-4.2.2.1.5.)

7-4.2.2.1.7 (231C-6-9.6) For storage height up to and including 20 ft (6.1 m) protected with ceiling sprinklers and in-rack sprinklers at each tier, densities obtained from design curves and adjnsted in accordance with Figure 7-4.2.2.1.3 shall be permitted to be reduced an additional 40 percent. (.~e Table 7-4. 2.2. l.5).

7-4.2.2.1.8 (231C-6-9.7) For storage height over 20 ft (6.1 m) up to and including 25 ft (7.6 m) protected with ceiling sprinklers and in- rack sprinklers at each tier, densities obtained from design cm-~es shall be permit ted to be reduced 40 percent. Densities shall not be adjusted in accordance with Figure 7-4.2.2.1.3. (See Tablg 7-4. 2.2. I. 5).

7-4.2.2.1.9t (231C-6-9.8) Where clearance fi'om ceiling to top of storage is less than 4 I/,_, ft (1.37 m), the sprinkler operating area indicated in curves E, F, G, and H in Figures 7-4.2.2.1.1(a) through (e) shall be permit ted to be reduced as indicated in Figure 7-4.2.2.1.9 shown on the following page but to not less than 2000 ft" (185.8 m'-'). (See 7-4.2.2.1.10).

7-4,2.2.1.10 (231C-6-9.9) Where clearance fi-om ceiling to top of Class I or lI encapsulated storage is l ~/,_~ ft to 3 ft (0.46 m to 0,9L m), the sprinkler operating area indicated in CUl'Ve F only of Figure 7- 4.2.2.1.1 (e) shall be permitted to be reduced by 50 percent but to not less than 2000 sq fi'-' (185.8 in'-').

7-4.2.2.1.11 (231C-6-9.10/ Where solid, flat-bottom, combustible p;allets are used with storage height up to and including 25 ft ~7.6 m), the densities that are indicated in the design curves shown in Figures 6-t4-7-4.2.2.1.1(a) thl:ough (g). based on qonvenfi0ual pallets, shall be increased 20 percent for the given ~trca. The percentage shall be applied to the density determined in accordance with Figure 6xJ~.- 7 - 4,2.2.1.3. The increase in density shall not apply where in-rack .~12rinklers are installed.

Figure 7-4.2.2.1.3 (231C-6-9.2) Ceiling sprinkler density vs storage height.

6 3 6

Page 85: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

Table 7-4.2.2.1.5 (231C- 6-9.2) Adjustment to Ceil ing Spr inkler Densi ty f o r S torage Heigh t and In-Rack Sprinklers

Storage He ight (ft)

Over 12 ft (3.7 m) through 25 ft (7.6 m)

Over 12 ft (3.7 m) through 20 ft (6.1 m)

Over 20 ft (6.1 m) through 25 ft (7.6 m)

In-Rack Spr ink le rs

N o n e

Min imum requi red More than min imum but not in ever}, t ier In every tier

App ly Fi~. 7-4.2.2.1.3

Yes

• Yes

Min imum requi red No More than min imum but not in No every tier In every tier No

Permitted Ceiling Sprinklers Density Adjustments

N o n e

N o n e Reduce density 20% from that o f m i n i m u m in-rack sprinklers Reduce density 40% from that o f m i n i m u m in-rack sprinklers N o n e Reduce density 20% from that of m i n i m u m in-rack sprinklers Reduce density 40% from that o f m i n i m u m in-rack sprinklers

138

1500

Reduced design area of bprinkler operation (m 2)

186 232 279 325 372 418 . . . . . . 557 : : : : : :

i i i i i i , : : : : : :

* : : : : : 511 t : : : : :

i i i i i i i : : : : : : : : : : :

: : : : : :

! i i i i i : : : : : :

: : : : : :

i ! ! ! ! ! i ! ! ! ! ! I : : : : :

i i i i i i ! ! ! ! ! ! : : : : : :

i i i i i i ! L ! ! ! ! : : : : : :

! ! ? !_~' [ [ I I ' - ~. 232 I I I I ~ 1 I

I I I A ' [ I.i : : : : : :

i i i i i i ~ 186 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500

Rqduced design area of sprinkler operation (ft 2)

g 465 c ._o

418 o

372 ~

325 ,"

279

O

Figure 7-4.2.2.1.9 (231C-6-9.8) Adjustment of design area of sprinkler operation for clearance from top of storage to ceiling.

7-4.2.2.2_* (231C-6-11) Ceiling Sprinkler Water Demand ~ Double- and Single-Row Racks.

7-4.2.2.2.1 (231C-6-11A.) For Class I, II, III, or IV commodities encapsulated or nonencapsulated in single- or double-row racks, ceiling sprinkler water demand in terms of density (gpm/ft ~) [ (L /min ) /m -~ ] and area of sprinkler operation [it ~ (m ~) of ceiling or roof] shall be selected from the curves in Figures 7-4.2.2.1.1(a) through (g) as directed by Table 7-4.2.1.5. The curves in Figures 7- 4.2.2.1.1(a) through (g) also shall apply to portable racks arranged in the same manner as single- or double-row racks or multiple-row racks. The design shall be sufficient to satisfy a single point on the appropriate curve related to the storage configuration and commodity class. It shall not be required to meet all points on the selecte d curve. Figure 7-4.2.2.1.3 shall be used to adjust the density for storage height unless otherwise specified. For SI units: 1 ft = 0.3048 m.

74.2.2.2.2-1- (231C-6-11.-1-]~) Design curves for single- and double- row racks shall be selected to correspond to aisle width. For aisle widths between 4 ft (1.22 m) and 8 ft (2.44 m), a direct linear interpolation between curves shall be made. The density given for 8- ft (2.44-m) wide aisles shall be applied to aisles wider than 8 ft (2.44 m). The density given for 4-ft (1.22-m) wide aisles shall be applied to aisles narrower than 4 ft (1.22 m) down to 31/,., ft (1.07 m). Where aisles are narrower than 3 I/.o ft (1.07 m), racks shall be considered to be multiple-row racks.

7-4.2.3 (231C-6-14) Ceiling Sprinkler Water Demand - Multiple Row Racks.

7-4.2.3.1 (23iC,-6-14A) For nonencapsulated Class I, II, III, or IV commodities, ceiling sprinkler water demand in terms of density ,

[ (g~.m/ft -°) [(L/minT/m -° ] and area of sprinkler operation [ft-' (m'2) of ] ceding or roof] shall be selected from the curves m Figures 7- 1 4.2.2.1.1 (a) through (d). The curves in Figures 7-4.2.2.1.1 (a) ] through (d) also shall apply to portable racks arranged in the same [ manner as single-, double-, or multiple-row racks. The design shall ] be sufficient to satisfy a single point on the appropriate curve related [ to the storage configuration and commodity class. It shall not be I required to meet all points on the selected curve. Figure 7-4.2.2.1.3 I shall be used to adjust density for storage height unless otherwise

specified. (See A-7-4.2.L2.1.) 7-4.2.3.2 (231C-6-14.2) For encapsulated Class I, II, or llI

commodities with storage height up to and including 25 ft (7.6 m) on multiple-row racks, ceiling sprinkler density shall be 25 percent greater than for nonencapsulated commodities on multiple-row racks.

7-4.2.3.3 (231G-6-14.3) For encapsulated Class IV commodities with storage height up to and including 25 ft (7.6 m) on multiple-row racks, ceiling sprinkler density shall be 50 percent greater than for nonencapsulated commodities on double-row racks.

7-4.3 Protection Criteria for Class I through IV Commodities Stored Over 25 ft in Height.

7-4.3.1 General. 7-4.3.1.1 (231G-7-2) In:Rack Sprinkler Spacing. In-rack sprinklers

shall be staggered horizontally and vertically where installed in accordance with Table 7-4.3.1.5.1, Figures 7-4.3.1.5.1 (a) through (j), and Figures 7-4.3.1.5.3(a) through (e).

.F. .2,~"L.? %2 Z.:,.7..,Y'.L.':~& ~'~.v: "2 "~:'..:~.~.~'~'? "% g;,'o;~L~'; k - - * . . . . . . . k . . . . , - - I . 1 ~ - -

7-4.3.1.2 (231C-7-5) In-Rack Sprinkler Location. In smile-row. double-row, or multiple-row racks, a minimum 6 inch (152,4mm) vertical clear space shall be maintained between the sprinkler deflectors and the top of a tier of storage. Face sprinklers in such racks shall be located a minimum of 3 inches (76,$ ram) from rack uprights and no more than 18 inches (460 ram) from the aisle face of

637

Page 86: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

s toraee . L o n u i t u d i n a l f lue in-rack s n r i n k l e r s shal l be loca ted at the in t e r sec t ion with the t ransverse f lue space a n d with the de f l ec to r l oca t ed at o r be low the b o t t o m o f h o r i z o n t a l load b e a m s o r above or be low o t h e r a d j a c e n t h o r i z o n t a l rack m e m b e r s . Sttch in-rack s p r i n k l e r s shal l be a m i n i m n m of 3 i nches radia l ly f rom the s ide o f the rack upr igh t s . [This s e c t i o n r e v i s e d by C o m m e n t 13-175 (Log #221),1

7-4.3.1.3 (231C-7-6) In-Rack S p r i n k l e r Di scha rge . Spr ink le r s in racks shal l d i s cha rge at a ra te n o t less than 30 g p m (113.6 L / m i n ) for all c lasses of c o m m o d i t i e s . (,See C-7-4.2.1.4.)

7-4.3.1.4 (231C-7-7,231C-7-7.1) In-Rack S p r i n k l e r W a t e r D e m a n d . T h e wa te r d e m a n d for s p r i n k l e r s ins ta l l ed in racks sha l l be based on s i m u l t a n e o u s o p e r a t i o n of the m o s t hydrau l i ca l ly r e m o t e s p r i n k l e r s as fo l lows:

(a) Six sp r ink l e r s w h e r e on ly o n e level is ins ta l l ed in racks with Class 1, II, o r I I I c o m m o d i t i e s .

(b) E igh t s p r i n k l e r s w h e r e on ly o n e level is ins ta l l ed in racks wi th Class IV c o m m o d i t i e s .

(c) Ten s p r i n k l e r s (five on e a c h two top levels) w h e r e m o r e t h a n o n e level is ins ta l l ed in racks with Class I, II, o r I l l c o m m o d i t i e s .

(d) F o n r t e e n s p r i n k l e r s (seven o n e a c h two top levels) whe re m o r e than o n e level is ins ta l l ed in racks with Class 1V c o m m o d i t i e s .

7-4.3.1.5 (231C-7-8) In-Rack S p r i n k l e r L o c a t i o n - Double - a n d S ing le -Row Racks.

7-4.3.1.5.1" (231C-7-8.1, 231C-7-8.1.1) In d o u b l e - r o w racks w i t h o n t sol id sheh 'es a n d with a m a x i m u m o f 10 ft (3.1 m) be tween the top o f s to rage a n d the ce i l ing , in-rack s p r i n k l e r s shal l be ins ta l l ed in a c c o r d a n c e with T a b l e 7-4.3.1.5.1 a n d F igures 7-4.3.1.5.1 (a) t h r o u g h (j). T h e h i g h e s t level o f in-rack s p r i n k l e r s shal l be no t m o r e t h a n 10 ft (3.1 in) be low the t op of s torage . (See Section 7-4.1.9.)

7 ~.3 . ! .5 .1 . I ( 2 S ! C 7 8.1.1) W h e r e a s ingle- row rack is m i x e d with doub le - row racks, T a b l e 7-4.3.1.5.1 a n d F igu res 7-4.3.1.5.1 (a) t h r o u g h 7-4.3.1.5.10) shal l be used.

Exception: Figuws 7-4.3.1.5.3(a)through 7-4.3.1.5.3(c)shall be permitted to be reed fin the p)vtection o[ the sing~e-row rark.~.

TaMc 7 4 . 3 . . . . . . ~o~,,,-, ~ ~ ~

~ . o a + t : r Class

T TT O. T IT

r ~ . . k , ^ o . . . . ~ . + , . . . . a+k . . . . e~, . 'a e~.^, . .+, e . . . . . H ' g ~ c r than-25 ft, .A'Z~lc~ I f t ^ - t , n . ~ .

; + ~ 1 . . . . : + + ~ + +-: . . . . . . . . + V e l t ~ . . . . it-" . . . . . I ~ . . . . . . . . . . . .

+I.,. . . . . . + I ^ + i + 1 1 + + . . . . . . ..,i ~ . + . . . .

I + + + + , . . + . r ~ m ~ +

L o n ~ t u d ! r . a ! H u e ~ Fttee -i'~-

r ~ .

" 3 ' ] I c/ 1 ¢. I [ l . ' x

A Q I K I [ A \

MaxL,'nu,.--:

Yes ~ t +

g<~t

k ~ O ~ t ~

7 ~ . 3 . 1 . 5 . 1 ( ~

~ T A ~2 I ~ I [ + \

A " 1 1 U . I t 7 . . . . . . . . . . h)

7 A ~ i ~ l / i \

I P - - ; I I - - + I ~ - - . , , I - - I . I ^ .

g~g5 g:gg

0 A g

g:g0 O,4O

0x30 0A0

t r ade r hcr izcn ta ! -

VcrticM 20 ft Ver t i ca l 20 ft -'; Horizont .a l I0 ft

V e r t i c a l !0 ft o r a t 15 ¢+ o+ or. ¢. N-one H o r i z o n t a l 1O f÷ Ver t i ca l I ~ Ver t ica l ~O ft

H o r i z o n t a l 1O ft Hc.rizcn+~! 5 ft • ~ i + , ~ . + + . + . + * + . . . . . + + . +

u^+: . . . . . , ~ c+ H o r i z o n t a l 5 ~ H m 4 z o n ~ barr ier~ a t 90 ft Ver t ica! in tcn 'a la 2 !inc~ of :p : ' i : :k !er : -under barr ier~ ma'xim-u:n llorizon+m! ~pac ing 19 f t -s tagger-eg

I / + . - * : + , . I I m f * l I . . - + : ~ . ~ l O F f C*

Horizon:a~ I0 fi H o r i z o n t a l I0 ft Ver t ica l 29 ft Ver t ica l 20 ft

H o r i z o n t a ) ~ t

s p a c i n g I 0 f i +ta&gereci-

~ A "1 I ~. l i f t

Igor°m: 4-p~:..:~,. m : . . . . . ) . .pr :~; . i~.- .z:.~.~.+g~ an gp :n (=° . I ) ' "~ :c..,, c.,..,: .... 7.t 7.!.Y).

~ - ~ - ' " ° . . . . . . . . . . l . . . . . (' . . . . .

*C' . . . . . . . . ;o a: . . . . . . ; . . . . . . . . . . . . F ^ r . . . . . . . a n d ce i l ing .

. . . . , . . . . . . . ~..~ : - ~ = = = e ; , o:-, ,,.~,.+= c ! ~ a r a = ~ i, g rea ter ::~an I0 ft (~.05 ~ , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + + pr2g;++ ..... . . . . A . , + + . . . . . . . . . A ~ . I I + ) . [ . . , i + h - - , . * ~ - E ' a c e r l ~ ' - ; + ' l ' l . . . . . l . _ ) l . . ~ + i . . . . ~ L + " : " + A F . . . . . P I - . . I . . . . . . . ++3:+ . . . . . . . ; + + ; , . + ~ ) ~ F . . . . . . . . . I . , . + + ; I . I +

I k

t m z ~ n d F :gur .~.

) + " • " " 4+~4~++ .,..+'1- . . . . . . . . +paced I0 ft ( ~ 0 5 .,,]'~ apa r t vertically+ ~A!I ~;; rack : p r i n k l c r ~pac ing d i m e n s i o n ; a tar t f rom the fie.a:=+

6 3 8

Page 87: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

Table 7-4.3.1.5.1 (Table 231C-7-8.1) Double-Row Racks without Sol id Shelves - - Storage Higher than 25 ft ~7.6 m), A/sles 4 ft (1.~ m) or Wider

Corn- m_0A~

Oass

In-Rack Sprinklers - - Anoroximate

Vertical Spacing at Tier N_~e~_e~

the Vertical Distance and Maximum

Horizontal SDacine ~

Longitudinal

Vertical 20 ft Lfi_,L_w_2 Horizontal 1o f~ (3.1 ml under

barriers

Vertical 20 f~

H0rizonlpl 10 f~ (3.1 m)

Vertical 10 fl

or at 15 and ~!,5 Horizontal 10 ft (3.1 m~

Vertical t0 ft

Horizon~pl 10 ft (3.1 m)

Vertical 20 ft

Horizontal 10 ft (3.1 m)

Vertical 25 ft ~7.6 m)

Horizontal 5 ft (1.5 ml

Non__._.~e

6.1Lfi._l__w2

None

tal 10 ft 1L3_d__w2

20 ft

ta l5 ft

25f t

tal 5 ft £Lfi__m2

Horizontal barriers at 20 ft

Vertical intervals - - 2 lines of sorinklers under barricr~ - - maximum horizontal snacin~ 10 ft (3.1 m) staevered

v V

Fdga~ No.

Maximum

30 ft N____Q

than 25f t

~9.5t

Hi~her than v

25~t

Ye.._~s

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Ceiling Snrinkler Densitv Clearance v " up to 10 ft 4"s'g

Area Temnerature High Temoerature v

m' g p ~ z~ L/rain' gw~£~ L/mi.'

2oo0 186

o.25

0.3

0.3

0.3

o.3

10.2

lO.2

12.2

12.2

12,2

O.35

O.4

0.4

0.4

0.4

O.4

14.__~3

14.3

16.3

16.3

16.3

16.3

6 3 9

Page 88: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 1 3 - A99 ROC

Table 7-4.3.1.5.1 (Table 231C-7-8.1) (contA Double-Row Racks without Solid Shelves Storage Higher than 25 ft (7.6 m L Aisles 4 f t "(1.2 m~ or Wider. Cont/~;/~/

In-Rack Sprinklers ---: AnDroximate

Ceiling Snrinkler Density Cleavdnc¢ uo to I0 ft * ~

~om-

Class

I. IL

IV

Vertical Spacing at Tier Nearest

the Vertical Distance and M a x i m u m

Hor izonta l Soacing ~a's

Longi tudina l F lue ~ Face s.0 No.

Vertical 15 ft ~4.6 m)

Horizontal 10 fi (3.1 m)

Vertical 20 ft

Horizontal 5 ft (1.5 m)

20ft

20ft c6.1 m)

tal 5 ft (1.5 m)

Horizontal barriers at 15 fl (4.6 m) Vertical intmwals - - 2 lines o f spr inkler u n d e r barrier~ - - m a x i m u m horizontal spacing 10 ft (3.1 m) s_aggc.r~

s ~

Area T e m o e r a t u r e High Temoerature

Storage.

Yes

2OO0 186 than 25 ft N_oo (7.6 m~

O.3

O.35

Yes

12.2

14.3

O.4

O.45

O.45

' M i n i m u m in-rack spr inkler discharge, 30 gpm (114 L / m i n ) (see Section ~-67~.3.1.3). '-'Water shields requi red (see Section~ 64 ac:d 7 4 ~ ) . SAil in-rack spr inkler spacing d imens ions start f rom the floor. 4For encapsula ted commodi ty , increase density 25 percent (see ~ 7~ .3 .2 . / ) . 5Clearance is dis tance between top of s torage and ceiling. ,; A~o~ A ~ n ~ * V , n , - 4 3 1 19 See . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-7 . . .5.3. A - 7 - 4 . . . and A-7-4.3.2.1 for protect ion r ecommenda t i ons where clearance is grea ter than

10 ft (3.1 m). 7Install sprinklers at least 3 in. (76.2 ram) from upr ights (see Section ~--57~.3.1.2). ~Face sprinklers shall no t be required for a Class I commodi ty consis t ing o f noncombus t ib le products on wood pallets (without combust ib le

~i' O l l "t A l "t containers) , except for arrays shown in Figures . . . . ,g, ann (j, 7-4.3.1.5.1(g) and 7-4.3.1.5.1(i). ~'In Figures 7 & l ( a ) u.,vue,.." . . . . . t" ~:~u, 7-4.3.1.5.1(a) th rough 7-4.3.1.5.1(i). each square represents a storage cube that measures 4 ft to 5 ft (1.2 m to 1.5 m) on a side. Actual load heights can valy from approximately 18 in. (0.45 m) to 10 ft (3.1 m). Therefore , there can be one load to six or seven loads between in-rack sprinklers that are spaced 10 ft (3.1 m) apart vertically.

N S ~ ~ - Barrier

i--1^1-1

D. QD Elevation

- - q F - [__l

x ~ A x ~ __J k___

LBarriers hown with background

Plan view Note: 1. Symbol X indicates in-rack sprinklers.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5. l (a) [231C-7-8.1 (a)] In-rack sprinkler a r rangement , Class I commodi t ies , s torage height 25 ft to m a x i m u m 30 ft

(7.6 m to 9.1 m).

64O

Page 89: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 --A99 ROC

E] ME]

k

8 A e r 1 x s

S :E]E] OE] O OE]

Elevation Plan view

E

~E]E] f-IF]

Notes: 1. Sprinklers labeled 1 (the selected array from Table 7-10.1) shall be

required where loads labeled A or B represent top of storage. 2. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 2 shall be required where loads labeled C

or D represent top of storage. 3. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 3 shall be required where loads labeled

E or F represent top of storage. 4. For storage higher than represented by loads labeled F, the cycle

defined by Notes 2 and 3 is repeated, with stagger as indicated. 5. Symbol Z~ or X indicates sprinklers on vertical or horizontal stagger.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5.1 (b) [23 i C-7-8.1 (b) ] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, Class I commodities, storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

oE] [8.00. H,I-] l iE] ,D N,E Ix° olo .~ E] 01-1 i,½x O0 Ii~ : El:El OON i OoO

0 0£3 o o Elevation Plan view (A or B)

Notes: 1. Alternate location of in-rack sprinklers. Sprinklers shall be permitted

to be installed above loads A and C or above loads B and D. 2. Symbol A or X indicates sprinklers on vertical or horizontal stagger.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5. l(c) [231C-7-8.1(c)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement , Class I, II, o r III commodities, storage

"height 25 ft to maximum 30 ft (7.6 m to 9.1 m).

F

s

Elevation

Notes: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

E

Plan view

Sprinklers labeled 1 shall be required where loads labeled A represent the top of storage. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 2 shall be required where loads labeled B or C represent top of storage. Sprinklers labeled 1, 2, and 3 shall be required where loads labeled D or E represent top of storage. Sprinklers labeled 1,2, 3, and 4 shall be required where loads labeled F or G represent top of storage. Sprinklers labeled 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 shall be required where loads labeled H represent top of storage. For storage higher than represented by loads labeled H, the cycle defined by Notes 3, 4, and 5 is repeated with stagger as indicated. The indicated face sprinklers shall be permitted to be omitted where commodity consists of unwrapped or unpackaged metal parts on wood pallets. Symbol z~ or X indicates sprinklers on vertical or horizontal stagger.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5.1 (d) [231C7-8.1 (d) ] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, Class I, H, or III commodit ies , storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

641

Page 90: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

fqfq

e

k

8S" e r

1 x s

©S

D[3

A

E

In-rack levels labeled 1 and 2 are shown in this plan view

Elevation Plan view

Notes: 1. Sprinklers labeled 1 (the selected array from Table 7-10.1) shall be

required where loads labeled A or B represent top of storage. 2. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 2 shall be required where loads labeled C

or D represent top of storage. 3. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 3 shall be required where loads labeled E

or F represent top of storage. 4. For storage higher than represented by loads labeled F, the cycle

defined by Notes 2 and 3 is repeated, with stagger as indicated. 5. Symbol A or X indicates sprinklers on vertical or horizontal stagger.

FiCg•lassre 7-4.3.1.5. l (e) [23IC-7-8.1(e)] In-rack spr inkler a r rangement , I, II, or III commodit ies , s torage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

Ix8 D @ C]

S DS r 2 x

e

1Sx ;DD

x x

E

Elevation Plan view

Notes: 1. Sprinklers labeled 1 (the selected array from Table 7-10.1) shall be

required where loads labeled A or B represent top of storage. 2. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 2 shall be required where loads labeled C

or D represent top of storage. 3. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 3 shall be required where loads labeled E

represent top of storage. 4. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 4 shall be required where loads labeled F

or G represent top of storage. 5. For storage higher than represented by loads labeled G, the cycle

defined by Notes 2, 3, and 4 is repeated. 6. Symbol X indicates face and in-rack sprinklers.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5. l ( f ) [231C-7-8.1(f)] In-rack spr inkler arrangement , Class I, lI, o r I l l commodit ies , s torage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

642

Page 91: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

3~----} EEEEE~ Barrier E ~ . , , .

e

rq ' i i i,,'r [~: F-l[] Barrier

rqE] I-1 I-1 [-] r r i e r s ~

background

Elevation Plan view

Notes: 1. Sprinklers labeled 1 (the selected array from Table 7-10,1) shall be

required where loads labeled A or B represent top of storage. 2. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 2 shall be required where loads labeled C

or D represent top of storage. 3. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 3 shall be required where loads labeled E

or F represent top of storage. 4. For storage higher than represented by loads labeled F, the cycle

defined by Notes 2 and 3 is repeated. 5. Symbols O, ,~, and X indicate sprinklers on vertical or horizontal

stagger.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5. l(g) [231C-7-8.1(g)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, Class I, II, or III commodities, storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

88x 0 9 ~ F

xrq k

°rq Ol 1

P

k

f l r - - ~ x [ - ~

iF ] [ - ] rq rq[q

Elevation Plan view

Notes: 1. Sprinklers labeled 1 (the selected array from Table 7-10,1) shall be

required where loads labeled A or B represent top of storage. 2. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 2 shall be required where loads labeled C

or D represent top of storage. 3. Spnnklers labeled 1, 2, and 3 shall be required where loads labeled

E or F represent top of storage. '4. Sprinklers labeled 1, 2, 3, and 4 shall be required where loads

labeled G represent top of storage. 5. Sprinklers labeled 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 shall be required where loads

labeled H represent top of storage. 6. Sprinklers labeled 1,2, 3, 4, and 6 (not 5) shall be required where

loads labeled I or J represent top of Storage. 7. Sprinklers labeled 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7 shall be required where loads

labeled K represent top of storage. 8. Sprinklers labeled 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 shall be required where loads

labeled L represent top of storage. 9. Sprinklers labeled 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 9 shall be required where

loads labeled M or N represent top of storage. 10. For storage higher than represented by loads labeled N, the cycle

defined by Notes 1 through 9 is repeated, with stagger as indicated. In the cycle, loads labeled M are equivalent to leads labeled A.

11. Symbols O, X, and A indicate sprinklers on vertical or horizontal stagger.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5. l(h) [231C-7-8.1(h)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, Class I, lI, IlI, or IV commodities, storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

643

Page 92: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

2Dx i

;r [3 s

E

E £

Elevation Plan view (1 and 3)

Notes: 1. Sprinklers labeled 1 (the selected array from Table 7-10.1) shall be

required where loads labeled A or B represent top of storage. 2. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 2 shall be required where loads labeled C

or D represent top of storage. 3. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 3 shall be required where loads labeled E

or F represent top of storage. 4. For storage higher than represented by loads labeled F, the cycle

defined by Notes 2 and 3 is repeated. 5. Symbol X indicates face and in-rack sprinklers.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5.1 (i) [231 C-7-8.1 (i) ] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, Class I, II, III, or IV commodities, storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

I- Bar"er

E ~ Barrier

[3[3 Elevation

w

I I i I

A I S L

~- Barriers shown with background

Plan view

Notes: 1. Sprinklers labeled 1 (the selected array from Table 7-10.1) shall be

required where loads labeled A or B represent top of storage. 2. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 2 and barrier labeled 1 shall be required

where loads labeled C represent top of storage. 3. Sprinklers and barriers labeled 1 and 3, shall be required where

loads labeled D or E represent top of storage. 4. For storage higher than represented by loads labeled E, the cycle

defined by Notes 2 and 3 is repeated. 5. Symbol t, or X indicates sprinklers on vertical or hodzontat stagger. 6. Symbol O indicates longitudinal flue space sprinklers.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5. I(j) [231C-7-8.1(j)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, Class I, II, III, or IV commodities, storage he,ght over 25 ft (7.6 m).

644

Page 93: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

7-4.3.1.5.2 (231C-7-8.21 In-rack sprinklers for storage h igher than 25 ft (7.6 in) in double-row racks sl/all be spaced horizontally and located in the horizontal space nearest the vertical intervals specified in Table 7-4.5.1.5.1 and Figures 7-4.3.1.5.1(a) through (j).

7-4.3.1.5.3" (231C-7-~,.3) In single-row racks without solid sheh'es with storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m) and a maximum of 10 ft (3.1 m) between the top of storage and the ceiling, sprinklers shall be installed in accordance with Figures 7-4-3.1.5.3 (a) th rough (e).

i In single-row racks, where figures show in-rack sprinklers in transverse flue spaces centered between the rack faces, it shall be permit ted to position these in-rack sprinklers in the transverse flue at any point between the load faces.

E J_ [3

[3 E ] EZ] E ]

E]

[3 Elevation Plan view

Notes: 1. For all storage heights, sprinkl.ers shall be installed in every other

tier and staggered as indicated. 2. Symbol A or X indicates sprinklers on vertical or horizontal Stagger. 3. Each square in the figure represents a storage cube measuring 4 ft

to 5 ft (1.25 m to 1.56 m) on a side.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5.3(at [231C-7-8,3(a)] Class I, II, III, or IV commodities, in-rack spr inkler a r rangement , single-row racks,

storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

S D

U D

S C] D

Elevation Plan view

Notes: 1. Each square in the figure represents a storage cube measuring 4 ft

to 5 ft (1.25 m to 1.56 m) on a side.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5.3(b) [231C-7-8.3(b)] Class I, II, or HI commodities, in-rack sprinkler arrangement, single-row racks,

storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

Notes:

~ Barrier

D

B Barrier

[ ] D

Barrier

D I-3 __~i~.~

Barriers shown with background

Elevation Plan view

1. Each square in the figure represents a storage cube measuring 4 ft to 5 ft (1,25 m to 1.S6 rn) on a side.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5.3(c) [231C-7-8.3(c)] Class I, II, or III commodities, in-rack sprinkler arrangement, single-row racks,

storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

645

Page 94: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

E3 E3

U] Elevat ion Plan v iew

Notes: 1. Each square in the figure represents a storage cube measuring 4 ft

to 5 ft (1.25 m to 1.56 m) on a side.

F i g u r e 7 -4 .3 .1 .5 .3 (d) [ 2 3 1 C - 7 - 8 . 3 ( d ) ] C la s s I, II , l I I , o r IV commodit ies , i n - r a c k s p r i n k l e r a r r a n g e m e n t , s i n g l e - r o w r a c k s ,

s t o r a g e height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

C o m m o d i t y Class

I

I, II. & Ill

I. II, III, & IX'

Encap- sulated

No Yes

No

Yes

No Yes

Approximate Vertical Spacing

(ft)

~ Barrier

D ~ Barrier

EB / - Barrier

C] ~ Barrier

Q C]

Elevat ion

Barriers s~hOwn w i d t h background

Plan v iew

Notes: 1. Each square in the figure represents a storage cube measuring 4 ft

to 5 ft (1.25 m to 1.56m) on a side.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5.3(e) [231C-7-8.3(e)] Class I, II, III, or IV commodit ies , in-rack sprinkler arrangement, single-row racks,

storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

7-4 .3 .1 .5 .4" (231C-7-11) I n -Rack S p r i n k l e r L o c a t i o n - Mul t i p l e R o w Racks . In m u l t i p l e - r o w racks wi th a m a x i m u m o f i 0 ft (3.1 m ) b e t w e e n the t o p o f s t o r a g e a n d t h e ce i l ing , i n - r ack s p r i n k l e r s sha l l be i n s t a l l ed as i n d i c a t e d in F i g u r e s 7 - 4 . 3 . 1 . 5 . 4 ( a ) , (b ) , a n d (c ) . T h e h i g h e s t level o f i n - r a c k s p r i n k l e r s sha l l b e n o t m o r e t h a n 10 ft (3.1 m ) b e l o w m a x i m u m s t o ] a g e h e i g h t f o r Class I, II, o r III c o m m o d i t i e s o r 5 f t (1 .52 m) b e l o w t h e top o f s t o r a g e f o r Class IV c o m m o d i t i e s . (See Table 7 -4 .3 .1 .5 .4 . )

Table 7-4.3.1.5.4 (231C-7-1 l) Multi de-Row Racks, Stora~'e Hei~'hts Over ~'5 ft

Maximum Horizontal

Spacing Across Height

Hue Limit (ft) fit)

In-Rack Sprinklers j'~' a

Maximum Horizontal

Spacing In a Flue

fit)

20 12 10

15 10 10

10 10 10

None

Stagger

Betwee nadjace

lit []ties

Maximum Spacing

f rom Top of Storage to Highest

In-Rack Sprinklers

Fi$. No. fit)

7-4.'~. 1.5.4(a) 10

7-4.3.1.5.4(b) 10

7-4.3.1.5.4(c) 5

Ceiling SprinHers

Density (gpm/f t ~ )

Ceiling Sprinkler Operat ing

Area 165 ° 286 ° (fC) Ratin~ Ratin~

0.25 0.35 0.31 0.44

2000 0,30 0.40

0.37 0.50

0.35 0.45 0.44 0.56

For SI units: 1 ft = 0.3048 m; C = :'/,, (F-32); 1 g p m / f t 2 = 40.746 (L/rain)m- ' NOTES: ~All four rack faces shall be protected by sprinklers located within 18 in. of the faces, as indicated in Figures 7-4.3.1.5.4(a), (b), and (c). It shall not be required for each sprinkler level to protect all faces. ( SeeA-7-4.3. 1.5.4 ) -'All in-rack sprinkler spacing dimensions start fi-om the floor. -~In Figures 7-4.3.1.5.4(a~ through 7-4.3.1.5.4(c/. each sauave ret)resents a storage cube measurin~ 4 ft to 5 ft ( 1.22 m to 1.53 m~ on a side. Actual load heights can rare from approximately 18 in. (0.46 m) uo to 10 ft (3.05 m). Therefore. there could be as few as one load to as mare' as six or seven loads between in- rack sprinklers that are spaced 10 ft (3.05 m) aoar t vevticalh,.

646

Page 95: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

Loading aisle Mx @xD x h A ~. A A

X X X

A ~ A A

× × X

Loading aisle Plan view

Maximum

Maximum 12 ft (3.66 m) between sprinklers

10 ft (3.05 m) i ~ ~1 b e t w e e n s p r i n k l e r s

I- -t D I-] I-] I - -1D D [3 * Maximum 10 ~ (3.05 m)

between sprinklers I - -~ D [ ~ N I ~ ] J--~ [ ~ and top of s~orage

~, z~ 3

/DN~NrNNDD Face sprinklers

@[3NN©F1D X X X 1

I-1 I--] I--1 ½ D I-1D l r-] r-1 I--1 I--1 I-] D 13 ~x,mu~0,t,010~, D E l i I ~ l F--1 r - 1 I---1 { ~ a~nntdwf~::rSprinklers

I-] I-] I--] I--] I--1 [ ] D [ Loading aisle elevation

NOTES: 1. Sprinklers labeled 1 shall be required if loads labeled A represent top

of storage. 2. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 2 shall be required if loads labeled 8 or C

represent top of storage. 3. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 3 shall be required if loads labeled D or E

represent top of storage.

4. For storage higher than represented by loads labeled E, the cycle defined by Notes 2 and 3 is repeated, with stagger as indicated.

5. Symbol z~ or X indicates sprinklers on vertical or horizontal stagger.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5.4(a) [231C-7-1 l ( a ) ] In- rack s p r i n k l e r a r r a n g e m e n t - - m u l t i p l e - r o w racks , Class I c o m m o d i t i e s , s t o r age he igh t o v e r 25 f t (7.6 m) .

647

Page 96: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

&

X &

X

z~__ 4 _ j x

Icq lq

A A I

Face sprinklers .---,

._J

[q [Ix

LJ

Loadin, aisle

X

X

X

Loadin( aisle

Plan view

I- [31i [ ] [3 -q[]

&

--]3 --] j

X -]-~ --]~

2

d

-x- ~ Maximum 10 ft (3.05 m) between sprinklers

Maximum / / - - ~ 10 ft (3.05 m)

between sprinklers

[ ._ ] 1.__~ l CJ [ ] Maximum t0ft(3.05m) . . . . between sprinklers

[ ._ j [._._j [ B I I ~ ,.-.-, and top of ;orage

• ~ & 3

[ ] [3 [~D z~ & 2

-'7 --] r-q n ._J L _ _ I ~

--1 ~ [ 2 @ Maximum15 ,t (a.a7 m) between sprinklers and fleer

2 3[3[? Loading aisle elevation

NOTES: 1. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 2 shall be required if loads labeled A

represent top of storage. 2. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 3 shall be required if loads labeled B or C

represent top of storage.

3. For storage higher than represented by loads labeled C, the cycle defined by Notes 2 and 3 is repeated, with stagger as indicated.

4. Symbol ,~ or X indicates sprinklers on vertical or horizontal stagger.

Figure7-4.3.1.5.4(b) [231C-7-11 (b)] In-rack spr inkler a r rangement - - multiple-row racks, Class I, II, or l l I commodit ies , storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

648

Page 97: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

Loading aisle

"t.._ A ! X I X ~

A A X

X i ~ ,I

A t~ i

X )~ iX _J Loading aisle

Plan view

I"3 Z X

--I ,(

[3 _S A A

7 Face sprinklers [i_] ._.7

"N

[2 ]

A

Maximum 10 ft (3.05 m) between sprinklers

Maximum 10 rt (3.05 m)

i, / ~l between sprinklers r "l

-Tx[-I-xl D I i

Maximum 5 ft (1.52 m) X X - - [ ] [ - - ['--]' D between sprinklers ~ and top of storage

A A [-

3 [ - ] [ 1 1 3 D

_-' -1 u D ,o , ,, o, m, ] " - " ; [ ] [ - - ] [ ~ between sprinklers

., and floor

Loading aisle elevation

NOTES: 1. Sprinklers labeled 1, 2, and 3 shall be required if loads

labeleddA represent top of storage. 2. Sprinklers labeled 1, 2, and 4 shall be required if loads

labeled B, and 4 represent top of storage. 3. For storage higher than represented by loads labeled B,

the cycle defined by Notes 1 and 2 is repeated, with stagger as indicated.

4. Symbol tt or X indicates sprinklers on vertical or horizontal stagger.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5.4(c) [231C-7-11 (c)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, Class I, II, III, or IV commodit ies - - multiple-row racks, storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

7-4.3.1.5.5 (231G-7-12) In-Rack Sprinkler Spacing. Maximum horizontal spacing of sprinklers in multiple-row racks with storage higher than 25 ft (7.6 m) shall be in accordance with Figures 7-4.3.1.5.4(a), (b), and (c).

7-4.3.2 Ceiling Sprinklers for Single and Double Row Racks - Area Density Method

7-4.3.2.1" t (231C-7- 10.1) The water demand for nonencapsulated storage on racks without solid shelves separated )y aisles at least 4 ft (1.22 m) wide and with not more than 10 ft 3.1 m) between the top of storage and the sprinklers shall be

' based on sprinklers in a 2000-ft'-' (185.8-m'-') operat ing area, i discharging a minimum of 0.25 gpm/D- ' [(10.18 L/min)/m'-] for Class I commodities, 0.3 gpm/f( 'z [(12.2 L/min) /m' - ' ] for Class II and III commodities, and 0.35 gpm/ft '- ' [(14.26 L/min) /m' - ' ] for Class IV commodit ies for ordinary tempera ture rated sprinklers or a minimum of 0.35 gpm/ft'- ' [(14.26 L/min) /m' - ' ] for Class I commodities, 0.40 g p m / f t '2 [(16.3 L/miu) /m' - ' ] for Class II aud Ill commodities, and 0.4!5 gpm/ft '- ' [(18.3 L / m i n ) / m '2 ] for Class IV commodit ies for high temperature rated sprinklers. (See Table 7-4.3.1.5.1.)

7-4.3.2.2 (231C-7-10.2) Where storage as described in 7-4.3.2.1 is encapsulated, ceiling :;prinkler density shall be 25 percent greater than for nouencapstdated storage.

7-4.3.3 Ceiling Sprinklers for Multiple Row Racks - Area Density Method

7-4.3.3.1 (231C,-7-13,1) The water demand for nonencapsulated storage on racks without solid shelves separated by aisles at least 4 ft (1.22 m) wide and with not more than 10 ft (3.1 m) between the top of storage and the sprinklers shall be based on sprinklers in a 2000-ft'-' (185.8-m 2) operat ing area for multiple-row racks, discharging a minimum of 0.25 gpm/ft'- ' [(10.19 L / m i n ) / m '2 ] for Class I commodities, 0.3 gpm/ f t~ [ (12 .2 L/min) /m' - ' ] for Class 1I and III commodities, and 0.35 g p m / f t 2 [(14.26 L / m i n ) / m 2 ] for Class IV commodit ies for ordinary temperature rated sprinklers or a minimum of 0.35 gpm/ f t " [(14.26 L / m i n ) / m - ' ] for Class I commodities, 0.40 gpm/ft- ' [(16.8 L /min ) /m- ' ] for Class II and III commodities, and 0.45 gpm/ft '- ' [(18.3 L / m i n ) / m 2 ] for Class IV commodit ies for high temperature rated sprinklers. (See Table 74.3.1.5.4.)

7-4.3.3.2 (231C-7-13.2) Where such storage is encapsulated, ceiling sprinkler density shall be 25 percent greater than for nonencapsula ted storage.

7-4.3.4 (231C-5-89.4.2.2) High Expansion Foam Systems. Where high-expansion foam is used in combination with ceiling sprinklers, the minimum ceiling sprinkler design density shall be 0.2 gpm/f(-' [(8.I5 L /min ) /m ' - ' ] for Class I, II, or llI commodit ies and 0.25 gpm/f t - [(10.2 L/min)/m'-'] for Class 1V commodit ies for the most hydraulically remote 2000-ft" (185.8-m") area.

649

Page 98: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 1 3 - A99 ROC

7-4.4 Protection Criteria for Plastics Commodit ies . 7-4.4.1" (231C-8-1) General. For the storage of Group A

plastics stored 5 ft (1.5 m) or less in height, the sprinkler design criteria for miscellaneous storage specified in 7-3.3.2.2 shall be used.

7-4.4.1.1t (231C-8-1.1) Plastics in corrugated cartons shall be protected in accordance with Figure 7-4.4.1.1. This decision tree also shall be used to de termine protection for commodit ies that are not entirely Group A plastics but contain such quantities and arrangements of Group A plastics that they are deemed more hazardous than Class IV commodit ies .

~ Plastics

Cad!ned I (Outs icJ~e SC~q~

S t ! N / Fr~e-flowing F ~ e 7-4.4.2.3 (a)-(g}. Class IV

Plastics

, I Group A Group B

i Class IV

I I Cartoned, expanded or Exposed, expanded unexpanded, and (outside the scope exposed, unexpanded of Chapter 7)

I [ I

Stable Free-flowing Figures 7-4.4.2.3(a) Class IV through (g), and 7-4.4.4.1

Figure 7-4.4.1.1 (231C-8-1.1) Decision Iree.

I Group C Class III

7-4.4.1.2 (231C-8-1.2) Group B plastics and free-flowing Group A plastics shall be protected the same as Class IV commodities.

7-4.4.1.3 (231C-8-1.3) Group C plastics shall be protected the same as Class III commodities.

7-4.4.1.4t (231C-8-1.4) Ceiling sprinklers shall have an orifice size larger than orifice 1/2 in. and be rated ei ther ordinary, intermediate, or high temperature.

Exertion No. 1: Foc densitie~ of 0.30 gpm/fl ~ [(12.2 L/min)/m~l or less, /2-itt.. (12. 7-mm) orifice s]JT"inklers shall be permitted.

Exception No. 2: High temperature *l~inkle.~ shall be used where requi~ed by 5-3.1.3.

7-4.4.2 In-Rack Sprinklers. 7-4.4.2.1 (231C-8-1.5.~4) In-RackSprinkler Clearance. The

minimum of 6-in. (152.4-mm) vertical clear space shall be maintained between the sprinkler deflectors and the top of a tier o f storage.

7-4.4.2.2 (231C-8-1.5.5) In-Rack Sprinkler Water Demand. The water demand for sprinklers installed in racks shall be based on simultaneous operation of the most hydraulically remote sprinklers as follows:

(a) Eight sprinklers where only one level is installed in racks. (b) Fourteen sprinklers (seven on each top two levels) where

more than one level is installed in racks.

7-4.4.2.3 (231C-8-2.2) In-Rack Sprinklers - Storage Up to and Including 25 ft (7.6 m). In-rack sprinklers shall be installed in accordance with Figures 7-4.4.2.3(b) through (g).

Part a: 5-ft (1 .52-m) to 10-ft (3 .05-m) s torage

, p e r f t x / 2 0 0 0 f t x ~in p e r m x / 1 8 6 r e x )

0 . 4 5 g p m p e r f t x / 2 0 0 0 ftx ( 1 8 . 3 L / ra in p e r mx / 1 8 6 ~

£2] v,eJ W ,9 Plan view

Elevat ion E leva t ion

[Figure revised by 13-176 (Log #203).]

(122 L,l,11m 12~ e,q m / 186 s~ m I S~ ~ . do~4e r~ at~i md~pl~ ~ t~ks (1B 3 L/~n Oot eA Ird 186 ~ ml

I-1,1~ IN, I Z I I ] , I - I -N- I £], [Z] l-1, ~ ] Z ] , [ZZZE~

E ~ N I ] E N l i I 3 [] Elan E E E

Figure 7-4.4.2.3(a) (Figure 231C-8-2 Part a) 5-ft (1.52-m) to 10-ft (3.05-m) storage.

[] DdC> v

3 ~

650

Page 99: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 --A99 ROC

[Figure Revised By 13-177 (LOG #202).]

Pm e" t-=--It (4 ~ST~) ,~or~ reel < S-It (I .S=~I d * 4 ~

(18'$ Ltm~ ~ w~ / lm m~) ~e41 ?,,4.4.3,~ (12"2 L ~ ~I" l'ql 1 1 m n~l) S m 7 4 ~ sm ~ 2 aed 7~.4~s

8, (244 m) ~ ~ sp~klers

~ S I ~ ~ S°S

O Ill[Z] ~ E : ~

Figure 7-4.4.2.3(b) (Figure 231C-8-2 Part b) 15-ft (4.57-m) storage. < 5-ft (1.52-m) clearance.

~rt ©: ts-n (4 ST~ =tor~. 5-ft 11~2~) to 10-ft (].05 m) ¢e~lr~ ¢~mrl~e

See 8-211 and 5 S~O N0te 2 8q (244 m) sp¢¢11

[] o ~ o ~ C E z I ] [] ~ ' ~ E2£ES

o ' o ~ = o ~ 3 = ~ " o . o ~ OEO'INEN3

3 i O ~ I O E E O O i O ' O ~ ~

[Figure Revised By 13-178 (LOG #217).]

Part c: 15-fl (4 .~ ' -m) storage. S-fl (1.52-m) to 10-It (3.05 m) ceil ing clearance

Single- and dou b~e -i'ow racks Single-, double-, and multple-row racks 0 EO gprn per sq fl / 4000 sq ft 0 30 gpm per SOl ft / 2000 sq ft (24 5 L/finn per sq m / 372 sq m) (12.2 L/rain pe~ sq m / 186 sq m)

See 7-4,4.3 4, 7-4.4.3 6. See Note 2 Note 6, and Note 7 8 it {2.44 m) max between sprlnkk~rs

I::I [:I [[] C[I [:I F. ~.~.~,% Plan view Plan view

UI ! I--IUI ~ N N , ~ ~LI'I I I 1 UI~ UII:] ~ U l l : ] ~ I ~ I I I I ]

Elevation view Elevation view

Figure 7-4.4.2.3(c) (~igure 231C-8-2 Part c) 15-ft (4.57-m) storage. 5-ft (1.52-ml to 10-ft (3.05-m) ceiling clearance.

8 N G~.NNn "ssSi

[ ] , O [ ] . ~

i is°sl @ I N

E;I::::E;K:;I [::l°E:l

° i i

[Figure Revised By 13-178 (Log #217).]

Part d: 20-ft (6.10-m) I=t orage, < S-ft (1.52-m) ceil ing claarance

Sin and double-row racks 0 ~ ( ~ m per sq tt / 4000 sq tt (24.5 L/m,n per sq rn / 372 sq m)

Single-. doubt-, and r n u l t ~ o w racks 0.45 gore per sq ft / 2000 sq ft (18 3 L/rain pe¢ sq m / 186 sq m)

See 7-4 4.3.4.7~4.4 3.6. See Note 2 and Note 6.

[ ] O[-1 O Oo[] [ ] [][-1 [ ] [ ] [~ ~ , U T ~ 8 : [ ] U 1

Plan vkMv Plan view

IN,[][:] 8 : ~o[~ O ! D D =[ilE] []=I-]IN []E[][N

Ekwation view Elevation v iew

I I I I I

i 1 1 1 1 1

H - N l i l l l

e e l l l l l

Sing~. do~Jble-, and multiple-row racks O3OO¢ per sq ~/2000 sq ft (I 2.2g~min per sq" m / 186 sq m) See Note 3

8 II (2.44 m) max between spnnklers

N o N ~ D G

'EL No@ [::1I::1 p l a n v ~

~ N o N

Iol ~ " t l I t l ]°l

,,,I I I I I "I u °ks..=

D~D~I[SZS[]~ .I I I I I F - I ~ N u I ' ~ ] E r r r ~ f

E l a v N I o n v i e w

Figure 7-4.4.2.3(d) (Figure 231C-8-2 Part d) 20-ft (6.10-m) storage; < 5-ft (1.52-m) ceiling clearance.

65]

Page 100: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

Pz t l r20 - I t (6 .10 -m)szo rage , S - f t ( 1 . 5 2 ~ l t o l O - f t ( 3 0 5 - m ) c e l h n g C l u r a n c e (Se~NoteS)

045 prn pe~ sq tl / 2 ~ sq fl { 1 8 3 g t , ~ per sq m / 1P,~ N ml Sea Nolo 2

~ o ~

ml+amon

o 3o gpm per sq ~ z o o 3 s~ ~ (1221J~n per sq m, I ~ ~q m)

1~1°C2

, D°[N~ , [Z]'M ~ b

o 3o gFm pet ;q I I / ~000 sq ~ (12 2 L / ~ Der s~ m / 186 $q ~1

S i v a . o n

(l~2~n~et~ml186~m) 5 ~ Nolo 3

[3oD ~ 1~ i22]

Figure 7-4.4.2.3(e) (Figure 231C-8-2 Part e) 20-ft (6.10-m) storage; 5-ft (1.52-m) to 10-ft (3.05-m) ceiling clearance. (See Note 5)

P=rt f : 25*i't 17.62~] storage and < ~-~t (1 52-m) ce l l ~g ¢klMaace ( m Nole 5)

( 1 8 3 ~ n i ~ ~ m~ I I ~ me) S e e N m a e f t 1 2 4 4 m ) ~ x betweenspnflkl~rs "~W NO~4 8 f t { 2 4 4 m ) ~ b e ~ s ~ s

~ IZSolZ] 1-115]

Plan ~ lqan v ~

[] DD N-N ~ [] D~ © N°5

Figure 7-4.4.2.3(f) (Figure 231C-8-2 Part f) 25-ft (7.62-m) storage; < 5-ft (1.52-m) ceiling clearance. (See Note 5)

6.t Where 5/8-in. (15.9-ram) orifice sl~rinklers listed for st0r;age use are installed at the ceiling only. the ceiling sprinkler discharge crileria slmll be nermit ted to be reduced to 0.6 eDm per f(-'/2000 ft 2 (24.5 L/ra in per're'- ' /186 m'-'). ~"

7.+ Where 5/8-in. (15.9-mm) orifice sr)rinklers listed for Storage use are installed at the cei|in~ only and the ceilin~ height in the

discharge criteria shall be nermit ted to be rednced to 0.45 gpm per 1i'-'/200() ft'-' (18.3 L/ra in per m- /186 m-)

8.t Where 5/8-in. (15.9-ram) orifice sprinklers listed for storage use are installed at the ceiling, the in-rack ,sprinklers shall no] be required, r)rovided the ceiling sprinkler discharge cri[¢ria is increased to 0.6 gpm per ft='/2000 f(-' (.'24 L/ ra in per m2/186 m'-') and the ceilin~ hei~hi in the ~rotected area does not exceed 27 f¢

Part g: 25-ft (7.62-m) storage and 5-ft (1.52-m)to 10-ft (3.05-m) ceiling clearance (see Note 5)

0.30 gpm per tt= 12000 II= (12.2 Umin per m 2 / 186 m~

See Note 4 8 ft (2.44 m) max. between sprinklers

; D o N ; I l l ; I-]xD I ° T.Ili I 2 Z I I ~ I . l _ : l : l . l . I

Plan view

[--ID I I I I I A , i-lxl--I, I I I I L I J l

: l - l l - - l i l I i l l l l l i--] i--i i--i I I1 11111

Elevation

Notes to parts a through g: 1. Each square represents a cube measuring 4 It to 5 ft (1.22 m to

1.53 m) on a side. Actual load heights can vary from approximately 18 in. (0.46 m) up to 10 ft (3.05 m). Therefore, there could be as few as one load to as many as six or seven loads that are spaced 10 I1 apart vertically between in-rack sprinklers.

2. Single level of in-rack sprinklers [',~ in. or 1~,~ in. (12.7 mm or 13,5 ram) operating at 15 pet (1.03 bar) minimum] installed on 8 ft to 10 It {2.5 m to 3.12 m) spacings located, as indicated, in the transverse flue spaces.

3, Single level of in-rack sprinklers [17/~ in. (13.5 ram) operating at 15 psi (1.03 bar) minimum or t/~ in. (12.7 ram) operating at 30 psi (2.07 bar) minimum] installed on 4 ft to 5 ft (1.25 m to 1.56 m) spacings located. as indicated, in the longitudinal flue space at the intersection of every transverse flue space.

4. Two levels ~ in-rack sprinklers [t/~ in. or 1T.~ in. (12.7 mm or 13.5 mm) operating at 15 psi (1.03 bar) minimum] installed on 8 ft to 10 ft (2.5 m to 3.12 m) spacings located as indicated and staggered in the transverse flue space.

5. Ceiling-only protection shall not be permitted for this storage configuration.

6. 1" Where %-in. (15.9-mm) orifice sprinklers listed for storage use are installed at the ceiling ordy, the ceiling spdrddar discharge criteria shall be permitted to be reduced to 0.6 gpm per ftz/2000 ft 2 (24.5 IJmin per mZ/186 m2).

7. t Where %-in. (15.9-mm) orifice sprinklers listed for" storage use are installed at the ceiling only and the ceiling height in the protected area does not exceed 22 ft (6.7 m), the ceiling sprinkler discharge criteria shall be permitted to be reduced to 0.45 gpm per f12/2000 it 2 (18.3 L/min per m2/186 mZ).

8. 1" Where %-in. (15.9-mm) orifice sprinklers listed for storage use are installed at the ceiling, the in-rack sprinklers shall not be required, provided Ihe ceiling sprinkler discharge critoria is increased to 0.6 gpm per f12/2000 ft 2 (24 tJmin per m2/186 m~ and the ceiling height in the protected area does not exceed 27 ft (8.2 m).

Figure 7-4.4.2.3(g) (Figure 231C-8-2 Part g) 25-ft (7.62-m) storage; 5-ft (1.52-m) to 10-ft (3.05-m) ceiling clearance. (SeeNote5)

652

Page 101: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 --A99 ROC

7-4.4.2.4 (231C-8-3.2~ In-Rack Sprinkler Location - Storage Over 25 ft (7,6 m) in Height .

7-4.4.2.4.1 (231C-8-3.2.1) In double-row racks without solid shelves and with a m a x i m u m of 10 ft (3,1 m) between the top of storage and the ceiling, in-rack sprinklers shall be installed in accordance with Figures 7-4.4.2.4.1(a) or (b). The h ighes t level of in-rack sprinklers shall be not more than 10 ft (3.1 m) below the top o f storage.

L ,I-I

f°l

Io

OE3

DN' c' F------- 1 F ~ ~ Barrier

3 . ~ . .

S I'---'-I I-"---I uarrier ::: : :~ S L

E ~ ~ o ~ E ~ o ~

- Barriers shown with - background

Elevation Plan view

Notes: 1. Sprinklers and barriers labeled 1 shall be required where loads

labeled A or B represent top of storage. 2. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 2 and barriers labeled 1 shall be required

where loads labeled C represent top of storage. 3. Sprinklers and barriers labeled 1 and 3 shall be required where

loads labeled D or E represent top of storage. 4. For storage higher than represented by loads labeled E, the cycle

defined by Notes 2 and 3 is repeated. 5, Symbol ~ or X indicates face sprinklers on vertical or horizontal

stagger. 6. Symbol O indicates longitudinal flue space sprinklers. 7. Each square represents a.storage cube measuring 4 ft to 5 ft

(1.22 m to 1.53 m) on a side. Actual load heights can vary from approximately 18 in. (0.46 m) up to 10 ft (3.05 m). Therefore, there could be as few as one load to as many as six or seven loads between in-rack sprinklers that are spaced 10 ft (3.05 m) apart vertically.

Figure 7-4.4.2.4.1(a) [Figure 231C-8-3.2.1(a)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, Group A plastic commodities, storage height over 25

ft (7.6 m)

O 0

E]E]: x P 3 [

2 x k

S

E

x

Elevation Plan view

Notes: 1. Sprinklers labeled 1 shall be required where loads labeled A or B

represent top of storage. 2. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 2 shall be required where loads labeled

C represent top of storage. 3. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 3 shall be required where loads labeled D

or E represent top of storage. 4. For storage higher than loads labeled F, the cycle defined by

Notes 2 and 3 is repeated. 5. Symbol X indicates face and in-rack sprinklers. 6. Each square represents a storage cube measuring 4 ft to 5 ft

(1.22 m to 1.53 m) on a side, Actual load heights can vary from approximately 18 in. (0.46 m) up to 10 ft (3.05 m). Therefore, there could be as few as one load to as many as six or seven loads between in-rack sprinklers that are spaced 10 ft (3.05 m) apart vertically.

Figure 7-4.4.2.4.1(b) [Figure 231C-8-3.2.1(h)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, Group A plastic commodities, storage height over 25

ft (7.6 m)

7-4.4.2.4.2 (231C-8-3.2.2) In-rack sprinklers for storage h igher than 25 ft (7.6 m) ill double-row racks shall be spaced horizontally and shall be located in the horizontal space nearest the vertical intervals specified in Figures 7-4.4,2.4.1(a) or (b).

7-4.4.2.4.3 (231C-8-3.2.3) In single-row racks widaout solid shelves with storage he igh t over 25 ft (7.6 m) and a m a x i m u m of 10 ft (3.1 m) between the top of storage and the ceiling, sprinklers shall be installed as indicated in Figures 74.4 .2 .4 .3(a) , (b), or (c).

653

Page 102: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

NOTE:

A

D X

D [3 L~ X

Sx D D

L~ L~

s @ [3 D z~

X

N D /,

] Plan view

D ×

D D

/~ ~ ~ ~ V/ / / / I I I t , \ \V/ /

Elevation

1. Each square represents a storage cube measuring 4 ft to 5 ft (1.22 m to 1.53 m) on a side. Actual load heights can vary from approximately 18 in. (0.46 m) up to 10 ft (3.05 m). Therefore, there could be as few as one load to as many as six or seven loads between in-rack sprinklers that are spaced 10 ft (3.05 m) apart vertically.

Figure 7-4.4.2.4.3(a) [Figure 231C-8-3.2.3(a)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, Group A plastic commodities, single-row racks,

storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

NOTE:

s X

D D X

[3 S X X

S X

D N X

[3 S X X

N D D

] Plan view

X

D D D

At~V// / / I I I~, \ \W/

Elevation

1. Each square represents a storage cube measuring 4 ft to 5 ft (1.22 m to 1.53 m) on a side. Actual load heights can vary from approxiamtely 18 in. (0.46 m) up to 10 ft (3.05 m). Therefore, there could be as. few as one load to as many as six or seven loads between in-rack sprinklers that are spaced 10 ft (3.05 m) apart vertically.

Figure 7-4.4.2.4.$(b) [Figure 231C-8-3.2.3(b)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, Group A plastic commodities, single-row racks,

storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m)

654

Page 103: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 --A99 ROC

[q X

[i]

X

Barriers [----]

X

X

2] AI~IV////IIII~\\V//

Elevation

O X

O O

X

O C]

X

D O

Plan view

NOTE: 1. Each square represents a storage cube measuring 4 ft to 5 ft

(1.22 m to 1.53 m) on a side. Actual load heights can vary from approximately 18 in. (0.46 m) up to 10 ft (3.05 m). Therefore, there could be as few as one load to as many as six or seven loads between in-rack sprinklers that are spaced 10 ft (3.05 m) apart vertically.

Figure 7-4.4.2.4.3(c) [Figure 231C-8-3.2.3(c)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, Group A plastic commodities, single-row racks,

storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

7-4.4.2.4.4 (231C-8-3.2.4) In muhiple-row racks without solid shelves with storage height over 25 ft and a maximum of 10 ft (3 m) between the top of,~torage and the roof~ceiling, in-rack sprinklers shall be installed as indicated in Figures 7-4.4.2.4.4(a) through 7-4.4.2.4.4(f).

Max. 18 in. -~ ~<-~}---Max. 8ff <"~! II I <=''ml

Plan view

Face sprinklers

s k

E (3.05 m) or--] L O m~ ~ O s O 0 ap;rox.

Elevation

Figure 7-4.4.2.4.4(a)_* [Figure 231C-8-3.2.4(a)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, eartoned plastic and uncartoned unexpanded

plastic, multiple-row racks, storage height over 25-ft (7.62-m). The

RE [_Jl II III II IL~

.z_--p._

Plan view

Face spr~klers /\

S k

E E:::~ ;::~ ;=::x : , , : , , :

~ E]E]E] EOEOEO F 0a,,..,

i E]OEJFqOO i E]GG ., ElevaUon

Figure 7-4.4.2.4.4(b)* [Figure 231C-8-3.2.4(b)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, cartoned plastic and uocartoned unexpanded plastic,

multiple-row racks, storage height over 25-ft (7.62-m). The

655

Page 104: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

Max 8 ft (.46Max'm)18 in.-'~ / ~ (2.4-4 Face sprinklers m)

Plan view

F q F q F q © F i r - ] , ,, , Elevation

Figure 7-4.4.2.4.4(c)*_ [Figure 231C-8-3.2.4(c)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, cartoned plastic, uncartoned unexpanded plastic, and uncartoned expanded plastic, multiple-row racks, storage

height over 25-ft (7.62-m). Thc protect ion area pe r ~p-;-Jkler under b---"r'c~ ~ h o " d be ne greater than 59 ft~(~.5~ mr), -.

181n -1~4[- Max 8ft , (2 44 m) Face spnnklers (46m) 1~ .

----- r-]

Plan view

[ ~ [ ' - - - ] [ ~ } r ~ [ ~ ] V - - ] : ~ r ~ B ......

S D S ~ N i ~ F ' ~ [ ~ S -~arrier

l-q N.. . .5]£2IZ:

i N N N NfN NNN %0: Elevation

Figure 7-4.4.2.4.4(d)*_ [Figure 231C-8-3.2.4(d)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, cartoned plastic, uncartoned nnexpanded plastic, and uncartoned expanded plastic, multiple-row racks, storage height over 25-ft (7.62-m). The protect ion area per :p.-- 'c~cr

-andcr barrA:c~ ~hou!d be no greater than 50 f t ~ ~

Max. 18 (2.44 8m~! Face sprinklers

Plan v iew

? s E

Elevat ion

Figure 7-4.4.2.4.4(e)_* [Figure 231C-8-3.2.4(e)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, cartoned plastic, nncartoned unexpanded plastic, and uncartoned expanded plastic, multiple-row racks, storage height over 25-ft (7.62-m). Th~ v . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e~- ~e . . . . . . .

• .:'rider ~----'r'e~ zke-'d5 he no greater th".~'~ 5~ f t ~ - ( - 4 . ~

7-4.4.2.4.5 (231c-8-3.4) In-Rack Sprinkler Discharge Pressure. Sprinklers in racks shall discharge at not less than 30 gpm (113.6 L/ ra in) .

7-4.4.3 (231C-8-2) Ceiling Sprinklers for Single-, Double-, and Mnhiple-Row Racks - Storage Height up to 25 ft - Clearances up to and Including 10 ft (3.1 m ~, - Area Density Method.

7-4.4.3.1 (231C-8-2.1) Ceiling Sprinkler Water Demand. For Group A plastic commodit ies in cartons, encapsulated or nonencapsulated in single-, double-, and multiple-row racks, ceiling, ps rinkler . . . . . water demand in terms of density (gl~m/ft'-') [ ( L / n u n ) / m - ] and area of operat ion [ft" (m-) ] shall be selected from Figure 7-4.4.2.3 (a) through (g). Linear interpolation of design densities and areas of applicatiou shall be permitted between storage heights with the same clearances. No interpolation between clearances shall be permitted.

7-4.4.3.2 (231C-8-2.1.1) Single-, Double-, and Muhiple-Row Racks - .~f+-t~ nAp_LQ 10-ft (1.25-m to 3.l-m) Storage with l:-;L~q~t u~. to 10-ft (0.5-m to 3.l-m) Clearance. The protection strategies utilizing only ceiling sprinklers, as shown in Figure 7-4.4.2.3 (a), shall be acceptable for single- and-, double-row rack storage "vkh A, v. . . . . (1.22 "~,~ ca" ~, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . :~'~ and fo~ multiple-row rack storage. [Section revised by 13-176 (Log #203).]

7-4.4.3.3 (231C-8-2.1.2) Single- and Double-Row Racks - - Greater than 10 ft to 15-ft (4.6-m) Storage with Less than 5-ft (1.25- m) Clearance. The protection strategy utilizing only ceiling sprinklers, as shown in Figure 74.4.2.3 (b) , shall be acceptable only for single- and double-row rack storage " , ~ - ~ 4 - m - } ais les . ~ ¢-~_ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . ~ : : . . . . . f f - ( - 2 4 ~

656

Page 105: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r - , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

of ~.~F!'~z::.',~::.. [Section revised by 13-177 (Log #202).]

(.'~ ml | | -• Max. 8 ft e

I I

~ l e ~ U o n

Figure 7-4.4.2.4.4(f)* [Figure 231C-8-3.2.4(t~] In-rack spr inkler a r rangement , ea r toned plastic, uncartoned unexpanded plastic, and uncartoned expanded plastic, multiple-row recks, s torage he ight over 25-ft (7.62-m). T h e F.":=c:a-~.= :._":-- ~ r .~:L-2;I:,.-

" ' - " - - ' - - - - : . . . . . . . . . . . . ~.-=~:::r ~ : : ~ e f : ~ - ( 4 , ~ - m ~ ) , -

7-4.4.3.4 (23!C-8-2.1.3) Single- and Double-Row P.azk: 15 f:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . , ~ . . . . . . . . . Rack Storage Greater than ~0 ft un to 15 ft with Clearance from 5 ft to 10 ft: and Sin~le- and Double-Row Rack Storage uo to 20 ft With Less Than 5 ft- C l e a ~ n c e . T h e protect ion strategies utilizing only ceiling sprinklers, as shown in Figures 7-4.4.2.3(c) and (d), shall be acceptable only for single- and double-row rack storage (2.{ .,"a) a'~:!e:. In rack 3-.~,'~k!zr pro:.zc'5on ~.%a!! be .'zquL-e~ for a!z!~ 'enz :~a~ o f: (2A ~ ) =:: : ; ~ : ~ . [Section revised by 13-178 ( ,I~g #'217):]

a(~CGT~,~,CC....:.k " . ' ~ o l .. x /k',

7-4.4.3.5 (231C-8-2.1.4) Multiple-Row Racks ~ 15-ft (4.6-m) Storage with Less than 5-ft (1.25-m) Clearance. T h e p r o t e c t i o n strategy utilizing only ceiling sprinklers, as shown in Figure 7- 4.4.2.3(b), sha l l no t be permi t ted for multiple-row rack storage. The density to be used shall be 0.60 g'pm/f(" [(24.5 L /min ) /m ' - ' ] over 2000 ft- (186 m- ). The combina t ion of ceiling and in-rack sprinklers spec i fed in Figure 7-4.4.2.3 Part (b) shall be permit ted as an alternative.

7-4.4.3.6 (231G-8-2.1.5) Multiple-Row Racks ~ 15-ft (4.6-m) Storage with 10-ft (3. l-m) Clearance; 20-ft (6-m) Storage with Less than 5-ft (1.25-m) Clearance. The protection strategies utilizing only ceiling sprinklers, as shown in Figure 7-4.4.2.3 Parts (c) and (d) , shall no t be permit ted for multiple-row rack storage. Only the specified combina t ions of ceiling and in-rack sprinklers shall be used.

7-4.4.4 Ceiling Sprinklers for Single-, Double-, and Multiple-Row Racks ~ Storage Over 25 ft in Height ~ Area Density Method.

7-4.4.4;1 (231G-8-3.1A) Ceiling Sprinkler Water Demand. For . Group A plastic commodi t ies in cartons, encapsulated or nonencapsula ted , ceiling spr inkler water d e m a n d in terms of density (gpm/ft '- ') [ ( L / r a i n ) / m -° ] and area of opera t ion [ft-' (m -~) ] shall be selected from Table 7-4.4.4.1.

Table 7-4.4.4.1 (2MC-8-~.1) Ceiling Spr inkler Discharge Cri ter ia for Single-, Double-, and Multiple.Row Racks with

S t o n ~ e over 25 f t (7.6 m~ in Height . . . .

4~eiling Sprinklers Storage Height above Top Density (gpm/ f t2 ) /Area o f Level In-Rack Sprinklers Applicat ion (ft 2)

5 ft or less 0.30/2000 Over 5 ft up to 10 ft 0.45/2000

For SI units: I ft = 0.3048 m; I gpm = 3.785 L / m i n ; 1 g p m / f t ~ = 40.74 ( L / m i n ) / m 2 NOTE: Provide in-rack spr inkler protect ion pe r Figures 7-4.4.2.4.1(a) and (b) and Figures 7-4.4.2.4.3(a) th rough (c).

7-4.4.4.2 (231C-8-3.1.-1-2) Where a single-row rack is mixed with double-row racks, e i the r Figure 7-4.4.2.3(a) th rough (g) or Figures 7-4.4.2.4.1(a) and (b) shall be used in accordance with the cor responding storage height .

Exc,~ption: Figures 7-4. 4.2. 4.3(a ) through 7-4.4.2.4.3(c) shall be permitted to be used for the protection of the single-row racks.

A-7-4.1.2 (231G-A-4-5) The fire nrotect ion system design should consider the max imum storage height. For new sorinkler

- - v

installations, max imum storage he ight is the usable height itt which commodi t ies can be s tored above (he f loor while the min imum reoui red unobs t ruc ted space below sprinklers is mainta ined, Wl~ere evaluatin~ existin~ situations, max imum storage height is the max imum existln~ storage he igh t if snace between the sorinklers and s torage is eoual to or ~reater than that reouired. "A-7-4.1.2 Excent ion (23iC-A-6-10) Informat ioq for the

orotect ion of Classes I. II. IIl. and IV commodi t ies was ext ranola ted from full-scale fire tests that were per formed at

!different times than the tests that were used to ~levelon the nrotec t ion for olastic commodit ies . It is nossible that. by selecting certain ooints t~rom the curves shown in l~i~ures 7-4.2.2.1.1(a'J" through" (~l (and after aDolvin~ the aonronr ia te modificat lonsl . the nrotec t ion snecified [)v "I-4.2 exceeds the reoui rements of 7-4.4. In such situations, the orotect ion specified for plastics, a l though less than that reouired bv the curves shown in l~k, ures 7- 4.2.2.1.1(a) th rough (~)~ can adeouatelv nrotect-Classes I. II. III. and IV commodi t ies .

This section also allows storage areas that are designed to nrotect r)lastics to store Classes I. II. III. and IV commodi t i e s without a reevaluation of fire orotect ion svstems.

A-7-4AA.1 (231C-.~-5-I.I~ Wet systems are r¢¢ommended for rack storage occuoancies.

D,'¢ systems ~re mermitted only where it is imoractical to orovide heat.

Preact ion systems shovld be considered for rack storage occuoancies tha t are unhea ted , oart iculadv where in-rack sprinklers are installed or for those occupancies tha t are highly suscentible to water damage.

A-7-4.1.4.2 (231C-A-5-2.3") Where high tempera ture rated sprinklers are installed at the ceiling, h ,gh tempera ture rated sprinklers also should ex tend beyond storage in accordance with Table A-7-4.1.4.2.

Table A-7-4.1.4.2 (231C-A-5-2.3)

Distance Beyond Perimeter of Design Area for High High-Hazard Occupancy for

Temperature Rated High Temperature Rated s Sprinklers ( f t~ ) prinklers (m ~) fit) , (m)

2000 185.8 30 9.14 3000 278.7 40 12.2 4000 371.6 45 13.72 5000 464.5 50 15.24 6000 557.4 55 16.76

A-7-4.1.5.1 (231C-A-5-9 10.1) "Slatting of decks or walkways or the use of open grat ing as a shbstitute for automatic sprinkler :hereunder ts not acceptable."

657

Page 106: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

In addit ion, where shelving o f any type is employed, it is for the basic )urpose o f providing an in te rmedia te suppor t between the structural m e m b e r s of the rack. As a result, it becomes a lmost impossible to define and mainta in transverse flue spaces across the rack as required in 7-4-1.3 and illustrated in Figure 7-4.1-3.1.

A-7-4.1.9 (231C-A-7-9 A-8-3.5) Where the ceil ing is more than 10 ft (3.1 m) above the m a x i m u m he igh t of storage, a horizontal barrier should be installed above storage with one line of sprinklers u n d e r the barrier for Class I, II, and Ill commodi t i e s and two lines o f sprinklers u n d e r the barrier for Class IV commodi t ies . In-rack sprinkler arrays shbu ld be installed as indicated in Table 7-4.3.1.51 and Figures 7-4.3.1.5.1(a) t h rough (j).

Barriers should of sufficient s t rength to avoid sagging that irrterferes with loading and un load ing operat ions .

Horizontal barriers are not required to be provided above a Class I o r Class II commodi ty with in-rack spr inkler arrays in accordance with Figures 7-4.3.1.5.1(a) and (b), provided one line o f in-rack sprinklers is installed above the top tier o f storage.

A-7-4.1.10.1 (231C-A-5-9.1~ Detect ion svstems, concen t ra te pumps , generators , and o ther system c o m p o n e n t s that are essential to the operat ion of the system should have an anoroved s tandbv Dower SOUrCe.

A-7-4.1.10.4.1.1 (231C-A-5-9.4.1.1) Where hi~rh-exDansion foam is con temnla t ed as the protect ion media, cons idera t ion should be aired to possible damage to the commodi ty f rom soakina arrd corrosion. Considerat ion also should be aiven to the n rob lems associated with the removal o f the foam a~e r discharge.

A-7-4.~.|.1,1 (231G-A-6-5.1) Where possible, it is r e c o m m e n d e d that in-rack sprinkler deflectors be located at least 6 in. (152.4 mm3 above oallet loads.

A-7-4.1.1.2 (231C-A-6-5.2) Where oossible, it is r e c o m m e n d e d that in-rack snrinklers be located away f rom rack uor iahts .

A-7-4.2.1.2.1 (231C-A-6-6.1) Spacing o f sprinklers on b ranch lines in racks in the various tests demonsu ' a t e s that m a x i m u m spacing as specified is proper .

A-7-4.2.1.6.3 (231C-A-6-13.~) In-rack sprinklers at one level only for storage up to and inc luding 25 ft (7.6 m) in mult iple-row racks should be located at the tier level neares t one-hal f to two-thirds o f the storage height.

A-7-4,2.2.1.1 (231C-A-6-9) Bulkheads are not a subst i tute for sprinklers in racks. Thei r installation does not just ify reduct ion in Oerinkler densit ies o r des ign opera t ing areas as specified in the

sign curves. A-7-4.2.2.2 (231C-A-6-11) Data indicates that the sor inkler

orotec t ion criteria in Table 6-11 is ineffective, by it:self, for rack s torage with solid shelves, if the reortired flue snaces are not mainta ined. Use o f Table 6-11 and the figures it references, alon~ with the addit ional Provisions that are reoui red bv this s tandard , can 3rovide acceotable protection. A-7-4.3.1.5.]~ (231C-A-7-8.1) Where storage tiers are no t the same

size on each side o f the longi tudinal flue, then protect one side o f the flue with the sprinkler at the p roper elevation above the load and the nex t level of sprinklers pro tec t ing the o t he r side o f the flue with that sprinkler at the p roper elevation above tha t load as indicated in Figure A-7-4-3.1.5.1. T he vertical spacing r equ i r emen t s for in-rack sprinklers specified in Tables 7-4-3.1.5.1, 7-4-3.1.5.4 and Section 7-4.4 for plastics should be followed.

f-1

Elevation

Figure A-7-4.3.1.5.1 (231C-A-T-8.]) Placement of in-rack sprinkler where rack levels have varying heights.

A-7-4.3.1.5.3 (231C-A-7-8.3) In single-row racks with m o re than 10 ft (3.1 m) between the top o f storage and the ceiling, a horizontal barrier should be installed above storage with one line o f sprinklers u n d e r the barrier.

A-7-4.3.1.5.4 (231C-A-7-11) In multiple-row racks with more than 10 ft (3.1 m) between the m a x i m u m he igh t of storage and ceiling, a horizontal barrier shonld be installed above storage with a level of sprinklers, spaced as st ipulated for in-rack sprinklers, installed directly benea th the barrier. In-rack sprinl~lers should be installed as indicated in Figures 7-4-3.1.5.4 (a) th rough (c).

Data indicate that the sprinkler nrotect ion criteria in Section 7-11 is ineffective, bv itself, for rack storage with solid sh¢lve~, if 0~e reouired flue suaces are not mainta ined, U~¢ of Table 7-11. alon~ with the addit ional orovisions that are reouired bv this stland~rd, can nrovide acceotable protection.

A-7-4.3.2.1 (23iC-A-7-10.1) Water d e m a n d for storage he igh t over 25 ft (7.6 m) on racks without solid shelves separated by aisles at least 4 ft (1.22 m) wide and with more than 10 ft (3.1 m) between the top o f storage and the sprinklers should be based on sprinklers in a 2000-ft'-' (185.8-m'-') opera t ing area for double-row racks and a 3000-ft" (278.7-m 2) opera t ing area for multiple-row racks d ischarging a m i n i m u m of 0.18 gpm/ft ' - ' [(7.33 L /min ) /m ' - ' ] for" Class I commodi t ies , 0.21 gpm/f t ' - r [ (8 .56 L /min ) /m ' - ' ] for Class II and III commodi t ies , and 0.25 gpm/ft '- ' [(10.19 L / m i n ) / m ' - ' ] for Class IV commodi t ies for ordinary tempera ture rated sprinkle,-s or a m i n i m u m of 0.25 gpm/ft ' - ' [(10.19 L / m i n ) / m - ' ] for Class I commodi t ies , 0.28 g p m / f t 2 [(11.41 L / m i n ) / m ' - ' ] for Class II and III commodi t ies , and 0.32 gpm/fi '- ' [(13.04 L / m i n ) / m ' - ' ] for Class IV commodi t i es for high t empera tu re rated sprinklers. (See A-7-4.1.9 and A-7-4-3.1.5.4.)

Where such storage is encapsula ted , ceiling sprinkler density should be 25 percent greater than for nonencapsu la t ed storage.

Data indicate that the snr inkler nrotect ion criteria in 7-10.1 is ineffective, bv itself, for rack stora'ge with solid shqlv¢~, if the reouired flue snaces, are not main ta ined . Use of 7-10.1. a long with the addit ional orovisions that are reqtfired bv this s tandard, can nrovide acceotable protection,

A-7-4.4.1 (231C-A-8-1) All rack fire tests o fn las t ics were run with an annrox ima te 10-ft (3.1-m) m a x i m u m clearance between tire too

. .

of the storace and the ceiling sprinklers. Within 30-ft (9 . l -m)) high I)uildin~s. ~reater clearances above storage conf igura t ions should be comoensa t ed for by the addit ion o f more in-rack sorinklers o r the orovision o f ~reater areas o f application, or both.

Figure A-7-4.4.2.4.4(a) 1-231C_,-A-8-3.2.4 Figure 8-3.2.4(a)] The orotect ton area oer snrinkler, u n d e r barriers should be no greater than 80 ft-" (7.44 m-°~.

Figure A-7-4.4.2.4.4(b) f231C-A-8-3.2.4 Figure 8-:~,2,4(b)] Th e o ro tecuon area Per sorinkler unde r harriers should be no greater than 80 ft'-' (7.44 m'-')."

Fignre A-7-4.4.2.4A(c] |231C-A-8-3.2.4 Figure 8-3.2.4{c)] The o ro tecuon area per surinkler unde r b,arriers should be no greater than 50 ft'-' (4.65 m e) ."

Figure A-7-4.4.2.4.4(d) [231C-A-8-3.2.4 Figure 8-3,2.4(d)] Th e o ro tecuon area oer sorinkler unde r barriers should be no greater than 50 It'-' (4.65 m'-') ,"

Figure A-7-4.4.2.4.4(e) [231C-A-8-3.2.4 Figure 8-3.2.4(e)] Th e orotect ton area oer snr inkler u n d e r barriers should be no ~reater than 50 ft'-' (4.65 m'-').

Fieure A-7-4.4.2.4.4(D f231C-A-8-3.2.4 Figure 8-3.2.4(f)] The nrotec t ton area t ~ r snrinkler, unde r barriers should be no gre~ter than 50 ft'-' (4.65 m'2).

3. Revise Sections A-2-2, A-2-2.1.1, A-2-2.3, A-2-2.3.1, A-2-2.3.2, A-2-2.3.4 and A-2-2.4.1 as follows:

A-2-2 (231-A-2.1, 231C-A-2.1l Specification o f the type, amoun t , and a r r a n g e m e n t of combust ib les for any commodi ty classification is essentially an a t tempt to def ine the potential fire severity, based on its bu rn ing characteristics, so that the fire can be successfully control led by the prescribed sprinkler pro tec t ion for the commodi ty class. In actual storage situations, however, many storage arrays do not fit precisely into one of the f imdamenta l classifications, therefore, the user needs to make j u d g m e n t s after compa r ing each classification to the existing s torage condi t ions . Storage arrays consist of thousands o f products , which make it impossible to specify all the acceptable variations for any class. As an alternative, the Techmcal Commit tee on Genera Storage has classified a variety o f c o m m o n products in this append ix based on j u d g m e n t , loss exper ience, and fire test results.

658

Page 107: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

Table A-242 provides e~amples of commodities that are outside the scope of this standard.

Table A-2-t-~ 2.3 is an alphabetized list of commodities with corresponding classifications.

o , ~ ^o~ ~ A O ~ ~n . . . . . . . . . A-2- TablesA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ , . . . . . . ~ . ~ , '~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ . i A o l A t

2.3.1 through A-2-2,3.4 and A-2-2.4.1 provide examples of commodities within a s p ~ ~

T a b l e A-2--t 2.2 E x a m p l e s o f C o m m o d i t i e s Outs ide the S c o p e o f N F P A 231C

Boxes, Crates - - Empty, wood, slatted*

Lighters (butane) - - Loose in large containers (Level 3 aerosol)

*Should be treated as idle pallets.

A-242.1.1 (231-A-2-1.1.1, 2:~1C-A-2-1.1,1) Commodity classification is governed by the types and amounts of materials (e.g., metal, paper, wood, plastics) that are part of a product and its primary packaging. However, in a storage or warehouse situation, classification is also affected by such factors as the primary storage or shipping container material, the amount of air space, and the location c,f the more hazardous materials within the container. For example, a Group.A plastic product enclosed in a five-sided o1" six-sided metal container can be considered Class II; while a ceramic product heavily wrapped in tissue paper and ~laced in a corrugated carton can be considered Class II1. A-24-_9.3 See Table A - ~ 4 2 _ . 3 .

T a b l e A-2-1- 2 . 3 A l p h a b e t i z e d L i s t i n g o f C o n u n o d i t y C l a s s e s

C o m m o d i t y C o m m o d i t y

C l a s s

Aerosols Ca r toned or u n c a t t o n e d - Level I

Alcohol ic Beverages C a r t o n e d or u n c a r t o n e d - Up to 20 percent, a lcohol in

metal , glass, o r ce ramic c o n t a i n e r s Class I - Up to 20 p e r c e m alcohol in

wood con ta ine r s Class II A m m u n i t i o n

Small arms, s h o t g u n - Packaged, c a r t o n e d

Appl iances , Major (e.g., stoves, refr igerators)

- No t packaged, no apprec i ab le plastic ex te r io r t r im Class I

- Cor ruga ted , ca r roned , no apprec i ab le plastic t r im) Class II

Baked Goods Cookies, cakes, pies - Frozen, packaged in ca r tons t - Packaged in carLons

Bat ter ies Dry cells (non l i th~um or s imilar

exotic metals) - Packaged in ca r tons Class I - Blister-packed in ca r tons Class II A u t o m o b i l e - Filled -~ Class I Truck o r larger - Empty or filled'-'

Beans Dr ied - Packaged, c a r t o n e d

Class III

Class W

Class II Class III

G r o u p A plastics

Class III

T a b l e A-2-t- 2.3 A l p h a b e t i z e d Lis t ing o f

C o m m o d i t y C l a s s e s , Continued

C o m m o d i t y C o m m o d i t y Class Bottles, Ja rs

Empty, c a r t o n e d - Glass - Plastic PET (polye thy lene

t e r e p h t h a l a t e ) Filled n o n c o m b u s t i b l e powders - Plastic PET - Glass, c a r t o n e d - Plastic, c a r t o n e d

[less than 1 gal (3.8 L)] - Plastic, u n c a r t o n e d ( o t h e r than

PET), any size - Plastic, c a r t o n e d or exposed

[g rea te r than 1 gal (3.8 L)] - Plastic, solid plastic crates - Plastic, o p e n plastic crates Filled n o n c o m b u s t i b l e l iquids - Glass, c a r t o n e d - Plastic, c a r t o n e d [less than 5

gal (18.9 L)] - Plastic, o p e n o r solid plastic

crates 3 - Plastic, PET

Boxes, Crates - Empty wood, solid walls - Empty wood, s la t ted 4

B r e a d W r a p p e d , c a r t o n e d

But t e r W h i p p e d sp read

Cand l e s Packaged, c a r t o n e d - Trea t as e x p a n d e d plastic

Candy Packaged, c a r t o n e d

C a n n e d Foods In o rd ina ry car tons

Cans Metal - Empty

C a r p e t Tiles C a r t o n e d

Car tons C o r r u g a t e d - U n a s s e m b l e d (nea t piles) - Partially assembled Wax coated, s ingle walled

C e m e n t Bagged

Cereals Packaged, c a r t o n e d

Charcoal Bagged - S t a n d a r d

Cheese - Packaged, c a r t oned - Wheels , c a r t o n e d

Chewing G u m Packaged, c a r t o n e d

Choco la te Packaged, c a r t o n e d

Class I Class IV

Class II Class I

Class IV

G r o u p A plastics

G r o u p A plastics G r o u p A plastics G r o u p A plastics

Class I Class I

G r o u p A plastics Class I

Class II Ou t s ide o f scope

Class III

Class l II

G r o u p A plastics

Class III

Class I

Class I

G r o u p A plastics

Class III Class IV G r o u p A plastics

Class I

Class III

Class III

Class III Class III

Class III

Class III

659

Page 108: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

T a b l e A - 2 - 1 - 2 . 3 A l p h a b e t i z e d L i s t i n g o f

C o m m o d i t y C l a s s e s , Continued

C o m m o d i t y C o m m o d i t y C l a s s

- Natural fiber, viscose Class III - Synthetic" Class IV

Cocoa Produc t s Packaged, c a r t o n e d Class III

Coffee - Canned , c a r t o n e d Class I - Packaged, c a r t o n e d Class III

Coffee Beans Bagged Class III

Cot ton - Packaged, c a r t o n e d Class III

Diapers - C o t t o n , l inen Class III - Disposable with plastics a n d

nonwoven fabric (in car tons) Class IV - Disposable with plastics a n d

nonwoven fabric ( u n c a r t o n e d ) , plastic wrapped G r o u p A plastics

Dr ied Foods Packaged, c a r t o n e d Class III

Ferti l izers Bagged - P h o s p h a t e s Class I - Nitrates Class II

Fiberglass Insu la t ion - Paper -backed rolls, bagged or Class IV

u n b a g g e d File Cabine ts

Metal - C a r d b o a r d box or s h r o u d Class I

Fish or Fish P roduc t s Frozen - Nonwaxed, nonp las t i c Class I

packag ing - Waxed-pape r con ta ine r s , Class II

c a r t o n e d - Boxed or ba r re l ed Class II - Plastic trays, c a r t o n e d Class III C a n n e d - C a r t o n e d Class I

Frozen Foods Nonwaxed , nonp las t i c Class I

packag ing - Waxed-pape r con ta ine r s , Class II

ca r toned - Plastic trays Class III

Frui t Fresh - Nonplas t ic trays or c o n t a i n e r s Class I - With wood spacers Class I

Fu rn i t u r e Wood - No plastic cover ings o r foam

plastic c u s h i o n i n g Class III - With plastic cover ings Class IV - With foam plastic c u s h i o n i n g G r o u p A plastics

Grains - Packaged in ca r tons - Barley Class III - Rice Class III - Oats Class III

T a b l e A - 2 - 1 - 2 . 3 A l p h a b e t i z e d L i s t i n g o f

C o m m o d i t y C l a s s e s , Continued

C o m m o d i t y C o m m o d i t y C l a s s

Ice Cream Class I L e a t h e r Goods Class III

Baled Class II Light Fixtures

Nonplas t ic - C a r t o n e d Class II

L ighte rs Bu tane - Blister-packed, c a r t o n e d - Loose in large con ta ine r s

(Level 3 aerosol) L iquor

100 p r o o f or less; 1 gal (3.8 L) or less, c a r t o n e d

- Glass (pal le t ized) '~ Class IV - Plastic bot t les Class IV

Marble Artificial sinks, c o n n t e r t o p s - Car toned , c ra ted Class lI

M a r g a r i n e - U p to 50 p e r c e n t oil (in p a p e r

or plastic con ta ine r s ) - Between 50 p e r c e n t a n d 80

p e r c e n t oil (in any packag ing) Ma tches

Packaged, c a r t o n e d - Pape r - Wood

Mat t resses - S t anda rd (box spr ing) - Foam (in f in i shed form)

Meat , Mea t P roduc t s - Bulk - Canned , c a r t o n e d - Frozen, nonwaxed , nonp las t i c

con ta ine r s - Frozen, waxed-paper c o n t a i n e r s - Frozen, e x p a n d e d plastic trays

Metal Desks Wi th plastic tops a n d t r im

Milk - N o n w a x e d - p a p e r con ta ine r s - Waxed-pape r c o n t a i n e r s - Plastic con ta ine r s - Conta ine r s in plastic crates

Motor s - Electric Class I

Nail Polish - 1-oz to 2-oz (29.6-ml to

59.1-ml) glass, c a r t o n e d - 1-oz to 2-oz (29.6-ml to 59.1-ml)

plastic bottles, c a r t o n e d Nuts

- Caramel , c a r t o n e d - Packaged, c a r t o n e d - Bagged

G r o u p A plastics

Out s ide o f scope

Class 1II

G r o u p A plastics

Class IV G r o u p A plastics

Class III G r o u p A plastics

Class I Class I Class I

Class II Class I1

Class I

Class I Class I Class I G r o u p A plastics

Class IV

G r o u p A plastics

Class I Class III Class III

Paints Fr ic t ion- top cans, c a r t o n e d

660

Page 109: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

T a b l e A - 2 - 1 - 2 . 3 A l p h a b e t i z e d L i s t i n g o f

C o m m o d i t y C l a s s e s , Continued

C o m m o d i t y C o m m o d i t y C l a s s

- W a t e r - b a s e d (latex) Class I - Oil-based Class IV

Paper Products - Books, magazines, .'~tationery,

plastic-coated paper ~ o d containers, newspa,)ers, cardboard games, or car toned tissue products

- Tissue Products, uncar toned and plastic wrapped

Paper, Rolled In racks or on side - Medium or heavyweight Class III In racks - Lightweight Class IV

Paper , Waxed Packaged in cartons Class IV

Pharmaceut icals Pills, powders - Glass bottles, ca r toqed Class II - Plastic bottles, car toned Class IV Nonf lammable liquids - Glass bottles, ca r toaed Class II

Pho tograph ic Film - Motion picture or bulk rolls in

polycarbonate, polyethylene, or metal cans; polyethylene bagged in cardboard boxes Class II

- 35-ram in metal film cartridges in polyethylene cans in cardboard boxes Class III

- Paper, in sheets, bagged in polyethylene, in cardboard boxes Class III

- Rolls in polycarbonate plastic cassettes, bulk wrapped in cardboard boxes Class IV

Plastic Containers (e~.cept PET) - Noncombust ib le liquids or

semiliquids in plastic containers of less |ban 5 gal Class I (18.9 L) capacity

- Noncombust ib le liquids o r semil iquids (such as ketchup) in plastic containers with nominal wall thicl..ness of 1 /4 in. (6.4 mm) or less and larger than 5 gal (18.9 L~ capacity Class II

- Noncombust ib le liquids or semiliquids (such as ketchup) in plastic containers wkh nominal wall thickness greater than 1 /4 in. (6.4 ram) and larger than 5 gal (18.9 L) capacity

Polyure thane Car toned or uncart.3ned expanded

Poultry Products - Canned, car toned - Frozen, nonwaxed, nonplastic

containers - Frozen (on paper or expanded

plastic trays) Class II

Class IV

Group A plastics

Group A plastics

Group A plastics

Class I Class I

T a b l e A - 2 - ¥ 2 . 3 A l p h a b e t i z e d L i s t i n g o f

C o m m o d i t y C l a s s e s , Continued

C o m m o d i t y C o m m o d i t y C l a s s

Powders (ordinary combustibles - - f lee flowing) In paper bags (e.g., flour, sugar) Class II

PVA (polyvinyl alcohol) Resins Bagged Class IV

PVC (polyvinyl chlor ide) - Flexible (e.g., cable jackets,

plasticized sheets) Class III - Rigid (e.g., pipe, pipe fittings) Class III - Bagged resins Class IIl

Rags Baled - Natural f b e r s Class III - Synthetic fibers Class IV

Rubbe r - Natural, blocks in cartons Class IV - Synthetic Group A plastics

Salt - Bagged Class I - Packaged, car toned Class II

Shingles - Asphalt-coated fiberglass Class III - Asphal t - impregnated felt Class IV

Shock Absorbers - Metal dust cover Class II - Plastic dust cover Class III

Signatures Books, magazines - Solid array on pallet Class II

Skis - Wood Class III - Foam core Class IV

Stuffed Toys Foam or synthetic Group A plastics

Syrup - D r u m m e d (metal containers) Class I - Barreled, wood Class II

Text i les Natural t iber c lothing or textile

products Class III Synthetics (except rayon and

nylon) - - 50 /50 blend or less - Thread, yarn on wood or paper

spools Class III - Fabrics Class III - Thread, yarn on plastic spools Class IV - Baled fiber Group A plastics Synthetics (except rayon and nylon) - - greater than 50 /50 blend - Thread, yarn on wood or paper Class IV

spools - Fabrics Class IV - Baled fiber Group A plastics - Thread , yarn on plastic spooks Group A plastics Rayon and Nylon - Baled fiber Class IV - Tbread, yarn on wood or paper Class IV

spools - Fabrics Class IV - Thread, yarn on plastic spools Group A plastics

661

Page 110: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

T a b l e A - 2 - 1 - 2 . 3 A l p h a b e t i z e d L i s t i n g o f

C o m m o d i t y C l a s s e s , Continued

C o m m o d i t y C o m m o d i t y C l a s s

Tobacco Products In paperboard cartons

Transformers Dry and oil filled

Vinyl-Coated Fabric Car toned

Vinyl Floor Coverings - Tiles in cartons - Rolled

Wax-Coated Paper Cups, plates - Boxed or packaged inside

cartons (emphasis on packaging) - Loose inside large cartons

Wax Paraffin, blocks, car toned

Wire - Bare wire on metal spools on

wood skids - Bare wire on wood or

cardboard spooks on wood skids - Bare wire on metal, wood, or

cardboard spools in cardboard boxes on wood skids

- Single- or mtfltiple-layer PVC- covered wire on metal spools on wood skids

- Insulated (PVC) cable on large wood or metal spools on wood skids

- Bare wire on plastic spools in cardboard boxes on wood skids

- Single- or multiple-layer PVC- covered wire on plastic spools in cardboard boxes on wood skids

- Single, multiple, or power cables (PVC) on large plastic spools

- Bulk storage of empty plastic spools

Wood Products - Solid piles - - lumber, plywood,

par t ic leboa,d , pressboard (smooth ends and edges)

- Spools (empty) - Toothpicks, clothespins,

hangers in cartons - Doors, windows, wood

cabinets, and furni ture - Patterns

Class III

Class I

Group A plastics

Class IV Group A plastics

Class IV Group A plastics

Group .A plastics

Class I

Class II

Class II

Class II

Class II

Class IV

Class IV

Class IV

Group A plastics

Class II Class III

Class III

Class III Class IV

tThe p roduc t is p resumed to be in a plastic-coated package in a cor rugated carton. If packaged in a metal foil, it can be considered Class I. 'Most batteries have a polypropylene case and, if s tored empty, should be t reated as a Group A plastic. Truck batteries, even where filled, should be considered a Group A plastic because of their thicker walls. 3As the openings in plastic crates become larger, the p roduc t behaves more like a Class III commodity . Conversely, as the openings become smaller, the product behaves more like a plastic.

'These items sbould be treated as idle pallets. "'Tests clearly indicate that a synthetic o r synthetic blend is cons idered greater than Class III. ' ;Where l iquor is s tored in glass conta iners in racks, it should be considered a Class III commodity; where it is palletized, it should be cons idered a Class IV commodity .

A-242.3.1 (231-A-2-1.3.1, 231C-A-2-1.3.1) See Table A-242.3.1.

T a b l e A-2-t- 2.3.1 (231-A-2-1.3.1,231C-A-2-1.3.1) E x a m p l e s o f C l a s s I C o m m o d i t i e s

Alcohol ic Beverages Car toned or uncar toned - Up to 20 percent alcohol in metal, glass, or ceramic

containers Appliances, Major (e.g., stoves, refrigerators)

- Not packaged, no appreciable plastic exter ior trim Batteries

DIT cells (nonl i th ium or similar exotic metals) - Packaged in cartons

Au tomob i l e - Fil led-

Bottles, Jars Empty, car toned - Glass Filled noncombust ib le liquids - Glass, car toned - Plastic, car toned [less than 5 gal (18.9 L)] - Plastic, PET Filled noncombust ib le powders - Glass, car toned

Canned Foods In ordinary cartons

Cans Metal - Empty

Cemen t Bagged

Coffee - Canned, car toned

Fertilizers Bagged - Phosphates

File Cabinets Metal - Cardboard box or shroud

Fish or Fish Products Frozen - Nonwaxed, nonplast ic packaging Canned - Car toned

Frozen Foods - Nonwaxed, nonplast ic packaging

Fruit Fresh - Nonplast ic trays or conta iners - With wood spacers

Ice Cream Meat, Meat Products

- Bulk - Canned, car toned - Frozen, nonwaxed, nonplastic containers

Metal Desks With plastic tops and trim

662

Page 111: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

T a b l e A-2-1- 2.3.1 (231-A-2-1.3.1,231C-A-2-1.3.1) E x a m p l e s o f C l a s s I C o m m o d i t i e s

Milk - Nonwaxed-paper containers - Waxed-paper containers - Plastic containers

Motors Electric

Nuts Canned, car toned

Paints Friction-top cans, car toned - Water-based (latex)

Plastic Containers - Noncombust ib le liquids or semil iquids in plastic

containers less than 5 gal (18.9 L) capacity

Poultry Products - Canned, car toned - Frozen, nonwaxed, nonplastic containers

Salt Bagged

Syrup - D r u m m e d (metal containers)

Transformers Dr}' and oil filled

Wi re Bare wire on metal spools on wood skids

*Most batteries have .a polypropylene case and, if s tored empty, should be treated as a Group A plastic. Truck batteries, even where filled, should be cons idered a Group A plastic because of their thicker walls.

A-2-1-2.3.2 (231-A-2-1 3.2, 231C-A-2-1.3.2) See Table A-242.3.2.

T a b l e A-2-1- 2 . 3 . 2 E x a m p l e s o f C l a s s I I C o m m o d i t i e s

Alcoholic Beverages - Up to 20 percent alcohol in wood containers

Appliances, Major (e.g., stoves) - Corrugated, car toned (no appreciable plastic trim)

Baked Goods Cookies, cakes, pies - Frozen, packaged in cartons*

Batteries Dry cells (nonl i th ium or similar exotic metals) in blister

pack in cartons Bottles, Jars

Filled noncombust ib le powders - Plastic PET

Boxes, Crates - Empty, wood, sobd walls

Fertilizers Bagged - Nitrates

Fish or Fish Product~ Frozen - Waxed-paper co t tainers, car toned - Boxed or barreled

Frozen Foods - Waxed-paper containers, ca r toned

Leather Hides Baled

T a b l e A - 2 - t - 2 . 3 . 2 E x a m p l e s o f C l a s s I I C o m m o d i t i e s

Light Fixtures Non plastic - Car toned

Marble Artificial sinks, counter tops - Car toned, crated

Me~tt, Meat Products - Frozen, waxed-paper containers - Frozen, expanded plastic trays

Pharmaceut icals Pills, powders - Glass bottles, car toned Nonf lammable liquids - Glass bottles, car toned

Photographic Film - Motion picture or bulk rolls in polycarbonate,

polyethylene, or metal cans; polyethylene bagged in cardboard boxes

Plastic Containers Noncombus t ib le liquids or semiliquids (such as

ketchup) in plastic containers with nominal wall thickness of 1 /4 in. (6.4 ram) or less and larger than 5 gal (18.9 L) capacity

Poultry Products Frozen (on paper" o r expanded plastic trays)

Powders (ordinary combustibles - - free flowing) In paper" bags (e.g., flour, sugar)

Salt Packaged, car toned

Shock Absorbers Metal dust cover

Signatures Books, magazines - Solid array on pallet

Syrup Barreled, wood

Wire - Bare wire on wood or cardboard spools on wood skids - Bare wire on metal, wood, or cardboard spools in

cardboard boxes on wood skids - Single-layer or multiple-layer PVC-covered wire on

metal spools on wood skids - Insulated (PVC) cable on large wood or metal spools

on wood skids ~ ' o o d Products

Solid piles - Lumber , plywood, part icleboard, pressboard (smooth

ends and edges) *The product is in a plastic-coated package in a cor rugated carton. If packaged in a metal foil, it can be considered Class I.

663

Page 112: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

A-242.3.3 (231-A-2-1.3.3, 231C-A-2-1.3.3) See Table A-242.3.3.

T a b l e A - 2 - t - 2 . 3 . 3 E x a m p l e s o f C l a s s I I I C o m m o d i t i e s

Aerosols Cartoned or uncartoned - Level 1

Baked Goods Cookies, cakes, pies - Packaged in cartons

Beans Dried - Packaged, cartoned

Bread Wrapped, cartoned

Butter Whipped spread

Candy Packaged, cartoned

Cartons Corrugated .- Unassembled (neat piles)

Cereals Packaged, cartoned

Charcoal Bagged - Standard

Cheese - Packaged, cartoned - Wheels, cartoned

Chewing Gum Packaged, cartoned

Chocolate Packaged cartoned

Cloth Cartoned and not cartoned - Natural fiber, viscose

Cocoa Products PaCkaged, cartoned

Coffee Packaged, cartoned

Coffee Beans Bagged

Cotton Packaged, cartoned

Diapers Cotton, linen

Dried Foods Packaged, cartoned

Fish or Fish Products Frozen - Plastic trays, cartoned

Frozen Foods Plastic trays

Furniture Wood - No plastic coverings or foam plastic cushioning

Grains - - Packaged in cartons - Barley - Rice - Oats

Margarine Up to 50 percent oil (in paper or plastic containers)

T a b l e A - 2 - t - 2 . 3 . 3 E x a m p l e s o f C l a s s I I I

C o m m o d i t i e s , Continued

Mattresses Standard (box spring)

Nuts - Packaged, cartoned - Bagged

Paper Products Books, magazines, stationery, plastic-coated paper food

containers, newspapers, cardboard games, cartoned tissue products Paper, Rolled

In racks or on side - Medium or heavyweight

Photographic Film - 35-mm in metal film cartridges in polyethylene cans in

cardboard boxes - Paper, in sheets, bagged in polyethylene, in cardboard

boxes PVC (polyvinyl chloride)

-Flexible (e.g., cable jackets, plasticized sheets) - Rigid (e.g., pipe, pipe fittings) - Bagged resins

Rags Baled - Natural fibers

Shingles Asphalt-coated fiberglass

Shock Absorbers Plastic dust cover

Skis Wood

Textiles Natural fiber clothing or textile products Synthetics (except rayon and nylon) - - 50/50 blend or

less - Thread, yarn on wood or paper spools - Fabrics

Tobacco Products In paperboard cartons

Wood Products - Spools (empty) - Toothpicks, clothespins, hangers in cartons - Doors, windows, wood cabinets, furniture

A-242.3.4 (231-A-2-1.3.4, 231C-A-2-1.3.4) See Table A-242.3.4.

T a b l e A - 2 - t - 2 . 3 . 4 E x a m p l e s o f C l a s s I V C o m m o d i t i e s i

Ammuni t ion Small arms, shotgun - Packaged, cartoned

Bottles, Jars Empty, cartoned - Plastic PET (polyethylene terephthalate) Filled noncombustible powders - Plastic, cartoned [less than 1 gal (3,8 L)]

Cartons Corrugated - Partially assembled

Cloth Cartoned and non cartoned - Synthetic j

664

Page 113: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

T a b l e A - 2 - t - 2 . 3 . 4 E x a m p l e s o f C l a s s I V

C o m m o d i t i e s , Continued

Diapers - Disposable with plastics and nonwoven fabric

(in cartons) Fiberglass Insula t ion

- Paper-backed rolls, bagged or unbagged Furni ture

Wood - With plastic coverings

Liquor 100 proof or less, one gal (3.8 L) or less, ca t toned - Glass (palletized) '-' - Plastic bottles

Matches Packaged, car toned - Paper

Nail Polish - 1-oz to 2-oz (29.6-ml to 59.1-ml) glass, car toned

Paints Friction-top cans, car toned - Oil based

Paper, Rolled In racks - Lightweight

Paper, Waxed Packaged in cartons

Pharmaceuticals Pills, powders - Plastic bottles, car toned

Photographic Film - Rolls in polycarbonate plastic cassettes, bulk wrapped

in cardboard boxes PVA (polyvinyl alcohol) Resins

Bagged Rags

Baled - Synthetic fibers

Rubbe r Natural, blocks in cat ions

Shingles Asphal t - impregnated felt

Skis Foam Core

Textiles Synthetics (except rayon and nylon) w 50/50 b lend

or less - Thread, yarn on tglastic spools Synthetics (except rayon and nylon) - - greater than

50/50 b lend - Thread, yarn on wood or paper spools - Fabrics Rayon and nylon - Baled fiber - Thread, yarn on wood or paper spools - Fabrics

Vinyl Floor Coverings Tiles in cartons

Wax-Coated Paper Cups, plates - Boxed or packaged inside cartons (emphasis on

packaging) Wire

- Bare wire on plastic spools in cardboard boxes on wood skids

T a b l e A - 2 - t - 2 . 3 . 4 E x a m p l e s o f C l a s s I V

C o m m o d i t i e s , Continued

- Single-layer or multiple-layer PVC-covered wire on plastic spools

in cardboard boxes on wood skids - Single, multiple, or power cables (PVC) on large

plastic spools Wood Products

Patterns

JTests clearly indicate that a synthetic or synthetic blend is considered greater than Class III. '-'Where liquor is stored in glass containers in racks, it should be considered a Class III commodity; where it is palletized, it should be considered a Class IV commodity.

A-242.4.1 (231-A-2-1.4.1, 231G-A-2-1.4.1) See Table A-2--t-2.4.1.

T a b l e A - 2 - t - 2 . 4 . 1 E x a m p l e s o f G r o u p A

P l a s t i c C o m m o d i t i e s

Batteries Truck or larger - Empty or filled *

Bottles, Jars Empty, car toned - Plastic (other than PET), any size Filled noncombus t ib le liquids - Plastic, open or solid plastic crates 2 Filled noncombus t ib le powders - Plastic, car toned or uncar toned [greater than 1 gal

(3.8 L)] - Plastic, solid plastic crates - Plastic, open plastic crates

Candles Packaged, car toned - Treat as expanded plastic

Carpet Tiles Car toned

Cartons Wax coated, single walled

Diapers Disposable with plastics and nonwoven fabric

(uncar toned) , plastic wrapped Furni ture

Wood - With foam plastic cushioning

Lighters Butane - Blister-packed, car toned

Margar ine Between 50 percent and 80 percent oil (in any

packaging) Matches

Packaged, car toned - Wood

Mattresses Foam (in finished form)

Milk Containers in plastic crates

Nail Polish 1-oz to 2-oz (29.6-ml to 59.1-ml) plastic bottles, car toned

Paper Products Tissue products, uncar toned and plastic wrapped

665

Page 114: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 --A99 ROC

T a b l e A - 2 4 $ . 4 . 1 E x a m p l e s o f G r o u p A

P l a s t i c C o m m o d i t i e s , Continued

Plast ic C o n t a i n e r s - C o m h u s t i b l e or n o n c o m b u s t i b l e so l ids in plast ic

c o n t a i n e r s a n d e m p t y plast ic c o n t a i n e r s

- N o n c o m b u s t i b l e l iqu ids o r s e m i l i q u i d s ( such as k e t c h u p ) in plast ic c o n t a i n e r s wi th n o m i n a l wall t h i ckness g r e a t e r t h a n 1 / 4 in. (6.4 ram) a n d l a rge r t han 5 gal (18.9 L) capac i ty

Polyuref l~ane C a r t o n e d o r n n c a r t o n e d e x p a n d e d

R u b b e r Syn the t i c

S t u f f e d Toys F o a m o r syn the t i c

T e x t i l e s Syn the t i c s ( e x c e p t rayon a n d ny lon) - - 5 0 / 5 0 b l e n d o r

less - Ba led f ibe r Syn the t i c s ( e x c e p t rayon a n d ny lon ) - - g r e a t e r t h a n

5 0 / 5 0 b l e n d - Baled f ibe r - T h r e a d , yarn o n plast ic spoo l s Rayon a n d nylon - T h r e a d , yarn on plast ic spoo l s

Viny l -Coa ted Fabr ic C a r t o n e d

Vinyl F loo r Cove r ings Ro l l ed

W a x - C o a t e d P a p e r Cups , p la tes - L o o s e ins ide large c a r t o n s

W a x Paraff in , blocks, c a r t o n e d

Wi re Bulk s t o r a g e o f e m p t y plas t ic s p o o l s

~Most ba t t e r i e s have a p o l y p r o p y l e n e case a n d , if s t o r e d e m p t y , s h o u l d be t r e a t e d as a G r o u p A plast ic . T r u c k ba t te r ies , even w h e r e fi l led, s h o u l d be c o n s i d e r e d a G r o u p A plast ic b e c a u s e o f t h e i r t h i c k e t walls. "A.s t he o p e n i n g s in plast ic c r a t e s b e c o m e la rger , t h e p r o d n c t b e h a v e s m o r e like a Class III c o m m o d i t y . Converse ly , as the o p e n i n g s b e c o m e sma l l e , , t h e p r o d u c t b e h a v e s m o r e like a plast ic .

4. Add a new Section C-7+4.4.2.3 as follows: C-74.4.2.3 Notes 6, 7, and 8 to Figures 7-4.4.2.3(a) throueh (g)

[231C-B-8-2.1 Notes 6, 7, and 8 to Figures 8-2A(a) tht 'ough (g)]. The protection of Group A Plastics by extra-large-orifice (ELO) sprinklers designed to provide 0.60 gpm per ft'-'/20O0 It'-' or 0.45 gpm per ft'-'/2000 fie without the installation of in-rack sprinklers was developed from full-scale testing conducted with various double-row rack storage arrangements of a cartoned Group A unexpauded plastic commodity at the Facto D' M[utual Research Corporation (FMRC) lest facility. The results o f this test program arc docnmented in the Factoly Mutual Research Corporation (FMRC) Technical Repro t, FMRC J.I. 0Xl R0.RR, "Large-Scale Fire Tests o f Rack Stoled ( ; roup A Plastics in Retail Operat ion Scenarios Protected by Extra Large Orifice (ELO) Sprinklers." ]'Iris test Inogram was initiated to address the tire protection issues presented by warelmuse-tvpe retail stores with regard to the display and storage of Group A plastic commodit ies including bttt, not limited to, ABS piping; PVC hose and hose racks; tool boxes; polypmpylene uash and storage containers; and patio finniture. "l'ests l and '2 of this series included protection of tire Group A plastic comnlodity stored to -'20 ft (6.1 m) under a 27-t"I (8.2-rn) ceiling by a design density of 0.60 gpm per ft" (24.5 L / m i n / m ~)

utilizing ELO sprinklers. The results of the testing program clearly demonstrate the acceptable performance of sprinkler systems that protect storage configurations involving Group A plastics up to 20 ft (6.1 m) in height under a 27-ft (8.2-m) ceiling where using ELO sprinklers to deliver a design density of 0.60 gpm pe r ft -+ (24.5 I . /min/tn '- ' ) , and Group A plastics up to 14 ft (4 .3m) in height under a 22-ft (6.7-m) ceiling where using ELO sprinklers to deliver a design density of 0.45 gpm per ft 2 (18.3 L / ra in /m2) . The tabulation of the per t inent tests shown in Table B - 8 4 ~ C-7-4.4.2.3 demonsu'ates acceptable performance. Table is shown on the next page.

Also see C ommen t 13-161 (Log #CC201) as Chapter 7 is being renumbered . C O M M I T r E E S T A T E M E N T : This meets the intent of the snbmit ter by udpat ing the sprinkler system discharge criteria for general storage and rack storage applications as indicated in the 1998 editions of NFPA 231 and NFPA 231C. See Preprint o f Chapter 7 at the end of this report. N U M B E R O F C O M M I T T E E MEMBERS E L I G I B L E T O V O T E : 24 V O T E O N C O M M I T T E E A C T I O N :

AFFIRMATIVE: 23 C O M M E N T O N AFFIRMATIVE:

SCHUMANN: In 7-3.2.1.2, the reference to 6-1.1 must be changed to 7-3.2.1.1. See Attachment #1.

In Note 1 for Figures 7-4.3.1.5.1(b), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), and (j), the reference should be changed to Table 7-4.3.1.5.1.

In Figures 7-4.4.2.4.4(a) through (f), the blocks iu the multirow racks should he shown pushed together with no longitudinal fines. This is how multirow racks are illustrated for Class I through IV commodi t ies .

(Log #CC203) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 174- ([74.1.5.1]): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria C O M M E N T O N P R O P O S A L NO: 13-209a R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Revise Section 7-4.1.5.1 in the Preprint to read as follows:

"7-4.1.5.1" (231C-5-10.1) Slatted shelves shall be considered equivalent to solid shelves.

Exception: A wet-pipe system that is designed to provide a minimum of 0.6 g p m / f t 2 density over- a minimum area of 2000 ft 2 or K-14 e+arly snppression fast resnonse (ESFR) s~)rinklers ormrating at a minimum of 50 mi shall be permit ted to protect single-row and double-row slatted-shelf racks where all o f the following condit ions are met:

(a) Sprinklers shall be 5/8-in. orifice spray sprinklers with a temperature rating of ordinary, intermediate, or high and shall be listed, for storage occupancies or shall be K-14 early suppression fast resnonse (ESFRL

I (b) The protected commodit ies shall be limited to Class I-IV, Group B plastics, Group C plastics, car toned (expanded and unexpanded) Group A plastics, and exposed (unexpanded) Group A plastics.

(c) Shelves shall he slatted using a minimum nominal 2-in. thick by maximum nominal 6-in. wide slat held in place by spacers that maintain a minimum 2-in. opening between each slat.

(d) Where 5/8-in. orifice sprinklers are used, there shall be no slatted shelf levels in the rack above 12 ft. Wire mesh (greater than 50 percent opening) shall be permitted for shelf levels above 12 ft.

(e) Transverse flue spaces at least 3 in. wide shall be provided at least evmy 10 ft horizontally.

(f) Longitudinal flue spaces at least 6 in. wide shall be provided for double row racks.

(g) The aisle widths shall be at least 7.5 ft. (h) The maximmn roof height shall he 27 ft. (i) The maxinmm storage height shall he 20 ft. (j) Solid plywood or silnilar materials shall not be placed on the

slatted shelves so that they block the 2-in. spaces hetween slats, nor shall they be placed on the wire mesh shelves."

666

Page 115: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

Table B - 8 ~ . t - ~ Summary of Test Results for Plastic Commodities Using 5/8-in. (15.9-mm) Orifice Sprinklers

Date of Test Test Parameters 8/20/93 8/25/93 9 /2 /93 10/7/93 2/17/94 2/25/94 4/27/94

Type of Shelving Slatted Slatted Slatted Slatted Slatted Slatted Wire wood wood wood wood wood wood mesh

Other c o n d i t i o n s ~ i n c l u s i o n s . . . . Draft curtains Dra f t curtains Storage height (ft-in.) 1%11 19-11 15-4 154 19-11 19-11 13-11 Number of tiers 6 L 61 5 ~ 5'-' C 6'-' 3 Clearance to 6-10/6-3 6-10/6-3 11-5/10-10 11-5/10-10 6-10/6-3 6-10/6-3 8-4/7-9 ceiling/sprinklers (ft-n. Longitudiual/transvelse titles 6/6 to 71/2 6/6 to 7 1/2 6/6 to 7 6/6 to 7 1/2 6/6 to 7 1/2 6/6 to 7 1/2 6/3 :t

(in.) Aisle width (ft) 7 1/2 7 1/2 7 1/2 7 1/2 7 1/2 7 1/2 7 1/2 Ignition centered below 2 2 1 1 2 2 1

(number of sprinkh.q's) Sprinkler" orifice size ~in) 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 Sprinkler temperature rating 165 286 286 165 165 286 286

(°F) Sprinkler RTI (ft-sec) 1/2 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Sprinkler spacing (ft r. ft) 8 x 10 8 x 10 8 x 10 8 x 10 8 x 10 8 x 10 10 x 10 Sprinkler identification ELO-231 ELO-231 ELO-231 ELO-231 ELO-231 ELO-231 ELO-231 Cot~stant water p r e s s n r e 19 19 19 19 19 19 15.5

(psi) Minimum density (gpm/ff- ' ) 0.6 0.6 0,6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.45

Test Results First sprinkler operation 2:03 2:25 1:12 0:44 1:25 0:52 0:49

(min:sec) Last sprinkler operation 2:12 15:19 6:34 7:34 15:54 14:08 10:58

(rain:see) Total sprinklers opened 4 9 7 13 35 18 12 Total sprinkler discharge 205 450 363 613 1651 945 600 (gpm) Average discharge per 51 50 52 47 47 52 50

sprinkler (gpm) Peak/max. l-rain average gas 1107/566 1412/868 965/308 662/184 1575/883 1162/767 1464/895

temperature (°F) Peak/max. l-rain average 185/172 197/196 233/232 146/145 226/225 255/254 502/500

steel temperature ('F) Peak/max. l-min average 27/15 25/18 18/15 '~ 14/101 26/23 20/18 t 33/20

plume velocity (ft/sec) Peak/max. l-min heat flux 0.6/0.5 2.0/1.9 2.8/2.5 1.1/0.8 1.0/0.9 4.8/3.0 1.6/1.4

(Btu/fte/sec) Aisle jump, east/west target None 8:24/None 5:35/10:10 None None "/8:18 r'/None

ignition (min:sec) Equivalent number of pallet 3 9 6 5 12 13 12

loads consumed Test duration (rain) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

Results acceptable Yes Yes Yes Yes No '~ No r Yes Note: For Sl units, 1 ft =' 0.305 m; 1 i n . = 2 5 . 4 m m ; ° F = (1.8x°C) +32;°C= (°F-32)/1.8; 1 psi = 0.069 bar; 1 gpm =3.8L/rain; 1 ft/sec = 0.31 m/sec: 1 gpm/ft'-' = 40.8 (L/min)/m'-' IMain (ignition) racks divided into 5 or 6 tiers; bottom tiers each approximately 2 ft (0.6 m) high and upper tiers each about 5 ft (1.5 m) high; wood shelving below commodity at second through fifth tiers.

Main (ignit ion) racks divided into 5 or 6 tiers; bo t tom tiers each approximate ly 2 ft (0.6 m) high and u p p e r tiers each about 5 ft (1.5 m) high; wood shelving below commodi ty at second th rough fifth tiers; wire mesh shelving below commodi ty at sixth tier or below fifth (top) tier commodi ty . ~Transverse flues spaced 8 ft (2.4 m) apar t [versus 3 1 /2 ft (1.1 m) apar t in all ot t ter tests]. 4Instrumentat ion located 5 ft (1.5 m) nor th of ignition. 5Minor surface damage to cartons. ~High water dem and . 'Excessive fire spread; marginally high water d e m a n d .

667

Page 116: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

SUBSTANTIATION: The inclusion of Exception No. 1 corrects this material to agree with the 1998 edition of NFPA 231C.

Inclusion of ESFR sprinklers in the exception as noted and the revision to allow the use o f slatted shelves above 12 ft in height where ESFR sprinklers are used in item (d) is based upon UL Report R18711 97NK 41803 dated May 4, 1998.

These tests involved nominal 19 ft high storage of Group A plastics in cartons on double-row racks protected by ESER sprinklers operating at 50 psi. Test 1 provided nominal 6 in. u'ansverse flues at rack uprights while test 2 provided 3 in. transverse flues at rack uprights. Two sprinklers operated in test 1 with damage confined to one rack bay up 7 ft above ttle floor. Ill test 2 with 3 in. transverse flues, two ESFR sprinklers operated. Damage was again confined to one rack bay up 7 ft above the floor with minor damage above 7 ft and into tile first boxes in adjacent rack bays in the south segment of the double row rack.

Note: Support ing material available for review at NFPA Headquarters . COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept.

See Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 21 NEGATIVE: 2

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: FLEMING: I am hereby changing my vote on Comments 13-174

(Log #CC203) and 13-181 (Log #12) to negative, in agreement with the hallot statements of bit'. Hankins.

The discussion of slatted and solid sheh'es in Comment 13-174 additionally caused us to take a look at how the standard will address solid shelves, and we ale. concerned that there is a significant conflict within tile document that needs resolution by the Technical Correlating Committee.

Tile definition of "solid shelving" in Section 14.9 states that it is any shelving that obstructs water penetration through tile racks. Figure A-1-4.9(c) shows double-row racks with shelves. The figure includes some transverse and longitudinal fines. Yet, Section 7- ,t. 1.5.2 states that sprinklers are needed at evely level of rack storage where tile shelves obstruct both the longitudinal and transverse flues. This is being misinterpreted by some to indicate that solid shelving essentially does not exist unless both longitudinal and transverse fines are blocked, and that blocking one set of flues is not a problem.

The Committee has failed to address the situation in which the transverse or longitudinal titles are blocked.

The Committee should consider one of two possible solutions: 1. State the intent of the Committee in an Appendix Note to 7-

4.1.5.2: "For protection of single-, double-, or multiple-row racks with

solid shelves that do not obstruct both the longitudinal and transverse flue spaces, the protection outlined in this standard for racks without solid shelves should be utilized, but with the addition of one or more levels of in-rack sprinklers. In-rack sprinklers are not required at every level unless both longitudinal and transverse flues are blocked."

2. Provide some specific criteria in new Sections 7-4.1.5.3 and 7- 4.1.5.4 for tile condition in which one set of fines is blocked:

"7-4.1.5.3 For protection of storage where the transverse flue spaces are obstructed and the longitudinal flue spaces are not obstructed, in-rack sprinklers shall be installed in the longitudinal fines at evmw other tier of storage."

"7-4.1.4.3 For protection of rack storage where tile transverse flue spaces are not obstructed and the longitudinal flue spaces are obstructed, in-rack sprinklers shall be installed in the transverse flue spaces at eveo, other tier of storage."

HANKINS: As currently written, 7-4.1.1(c) would pernfit KI4 ESFRs ~o protect cartoned expanded and exposed unexpanded plastic in slatted-shelf racks. The testing used to substantiate this application involved cartoned nnexpanded plastic. The application should be limited to only the tested commodity. COMMENT ON AFFIRMATIVE:

KEEPING: Tile new standard is supposed to refer to sprinklers hy their nominal K-factors, however, the Committee Action still makes reference to "5/8-in. orifice sprinklers." This reference should be changed to "K-I 1.2 sprinklers." Further, reference is also made to "K-14," whereas the proper form should be "K-14.0."

(Log #221) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 175- (74.3.1.2): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Robert G. Caputo, AFSA COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a RECOMMENDATION: Delete the following text:

Longitudi: 'al fiuc in rack apAn!-!era :ha!! hc l,~cated at the

in :-ack 3p:'ink!cr~ ahalI b c a minimum of ~ :n. f:'e,m rack upr:ghts. SUBSTANTIATION: Normal rack construction consists of a single upright with horizontal load beams directly attached to either side. Paragraph 7-4.3.1.,'2 compels the sprinkler to be located at an intersection which does not exist unless there are four uprights at the intersection. In addition, the pipe hanger must be attached to the single upright where the fitting would be located if the sprinkler was located per 7-4.3.1.2. If the longitudinal flue is 6 in. wide, the 3 in. rule cannot be accomplished. Needs guidance or clarity. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. Revise Section 7-4.3.1.2 of the Preprint to read as follows:

"7-4.3.1.2 (231C 7-5) In single-row, double-row, or multiple-row racks, a minimum 6 inch (152.4mm) vertical cleat" space shall be

I maintained between the sprinkler deflectors and the top of a tier of storage. Face sprinklers in such racks shall be located a minimum of 3 inches (76.2 ram) from rack uprights and no more than 18 inches (460 ram) from the aisle face of storage. Longitudinal flue in-rack sprinklers shall be located at the intersection with the transverse flue space and with the deflector located at or below the bottom of horizQntal load beams or above or below other adjacent horizontal rack members. Such in-rack sprinklers shall be a minimum of 3 inches radially: from the side of the rack uprights." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This action addresses the concerns expressed by the submitter and more clearly defines the Committee's intent regarding the position of in-rack sprinklers. See Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23 COMMENT O N AFFIRMATIVE:

SCHUMANN: Was it the Committee's intent to eliminate the requirement that at least 50 percent of tim sprinkler shall be located within the plan view area of the transverse or longitudinal flue space, as appropriate?

668

Page 117: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

(Log #203) 13- 176 - (7-4.4.3.2): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: James Golinveaux, Central Sprinkler Co. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a RECOMMENDATION: 1. Revise title "single, double, and muhiple-row racks g4~:-to- u )M229_ 10 ft storage with 4-4¢g~ u~_.k9_ 10 ft clearance".

2. Delete the last sentence. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : 1. Editorial/clarify intent.

2. ~l'he density reqmrements for Group A plastic do not require aisle limitations. Rack definitions of single, double or multiple handle this. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. 1. Accept the submitter 's first item.

2. Do not accept the submitter 's second item but instead revise Section 7-4.4.3.2 to read as follows:

"7-4.4.3.3 (231C-8-2...1) The protection strategies utilizing only ceiling sprinklers, as ~,hown in Figure 7-4.4.2.3(a), shall be acceptable for single- "and-, double- row rack storage ;;~,th ~ft (1.22m) ,st greater ai:les-and ~ multiple-row rack storage.

3. Revise Figure 7-4.~.2.3(a) so that it includes multiple-row racks as follows:

S~ ~w,~le ~w ~ rrd~ row ra~ Sidle ~, ~lerow ~ atCe~ r~s O.~gpmpe~fll~OOsqfl O.45gpmp~sqfll~sqfl (122 ~pers~ m/186s~m) (18.3 LJmi~per sq t~ 186~q m) < 541 (1 ,~)~g dearan(:e 541 to 10~ (1,5-m Io 3,1.rn)~

f] fin fTT]

S Planview

S @N1NY

S SE Planview

@iS@i iK

Figure 7-4.4.2.3(a)

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: These changes address the submitter 's concerns, more clearly identify the Committee 's intent, and make the require ments and the figures consistent. See Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMrrTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #2O2) Committee: AUT-SSD

1,3- 177 - (7-4.4.3.3): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: James Golinveaux, Central Sprinkler Co. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : 1. Revise title "Single and Double Row Racks Gre;ater Th~an 10 ft tp 15 ft Storage with Less than 5 ft Clearance.

2. Delete the last two sentences. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : 1. Clarify intent.

2. There should be no restrictions for Group A plastic based on aisle widths. Testing did not show this to be a factor. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. 1. Accept the first item proposed by the st, bmitter.

2. Accept the second item proposed by the submitter. 3. In the remaining sentence, delete the phrase "with 8 ft (2.4 m)

aisles." 4. Revise Figure 7-4.4.2.3(b) to read as follows:

Partb:15.fl(4,57.m) s~eand<5.it(1,~2.m)~ance

~74.4L3 ~Nole2~d74.415

DAD[]

~tanview ~nv~

Elevation view Eleva~on~ EIMton~

Figure 7-4.4.2.3(b)

5. Revise Section 7-4.4.3.5 to read as follows: "Where using the protection strategy utilizing only ceiling

sprinklers, as shown in Figure 7-4.4.2.3(b), 5kall no~ be pe:'m.,itted for multiple-row rack storage, the density to be used shaft be 0.60 g p m / s q ft over 2000 sq ft. The combination of ceiling and in-rack sprinklers specified in Figure 7-4.4.2,3(b) shall be pecmilted as an alternative."

669

Page 118: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 m A 9 9 R O C

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: T he addit ional changes serve to fiPtrovide bet[er correlation between the requ i rements and the

gures. See Prepr int of Chapte r 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23 COMMENT ON AFFIRMATIVE:

KEEPING: Two Proposal 13-177's were included in my ballot package, Log #200 and Log #202. I voted affirmatively for the Commit tee Action on Log #202. a I s believe that the o ther Proposal 13-177 (Log #200) is a misprint ,

it apepars to be identical to Proposal 13-179 (Log #200).

(Log #217) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 178 - (7-4.4.3.4): Accept in Principle in Part SUBMITTER: James Gol inveaux, Central Sprinkler Co. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-1 RECOMMENDATION: A. Revise title "Single and Double Row Racks Greater T h a n 10 fl Up to 15 ft Storage With A Clearance 5 ft to l0 it: Up To 20 ft Storage With Less T h a n 5 ft Clearance.

B. Delete fi 'om first paragraph "shall be acceptable only for single..." to end o f paragraph. SUBSTANTIATION: A. Clarify intent.

B. See my c o m m e n t on 7-4.4.3.3. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle in Part. 1. Revise the title o f Section 7-4.4.3.4 to read: "Single- and Double-Row Rack Storage greater than 10 ft up to 15 ft with clearance from 5 ft to 10 ft; and Single- and Double-Row Rack Storage up to 20 ft with less than 5 ft clearance."

2. Do not accept the submit ter ' s second item. 3. In the first sentence of Section 7-4.4.3.4, delete the phrase

"with 8 ft (2.4m) aisles." Also delete the second sen tence of Section 7-4.4.3.4 which begins: "In-rack spr inkler protection.. ."

4. Revise Figures 7-4.4.2.3(c) and 7-4.4.2.3(d) as follows:

Part c: 15-ft (4.57.m) storage. 5-f1(1,52-m) to lO-ft (3,05 m) ceiling clearance

Single- and double-row racks 0.60 gpm per sq ft / 4000 sq ft (24.5 L/m~n per sq m / 372 sq m)

See 7-4.4.3.4, 7-4.4.3.6, Note 6, and Note 7.

I-1, [3 N SS

[] SKI Plan view

Single-, double-, and multiple-row racks 0.30 gpm per sq fl / 2000 sq fl (12.2 L/rnln per sq m / 186 sq m)

SeeNote 2 8 ft (2.44 m) max between sprinklers

IN© r,~;~;[;j Plan view

Elevation view Elevation view

Figure 7-4.4.2.3(c)

Part d: 20-ft (6.10-m) storage, < 5-ft (1.S2-m) ceiling dearance

Single- and doubie-row racks 0.60 gprn per sq fl / 4000 sq ft (24.5 ffrnin per sq m / 372 sq rn)

See 7-4.4.3.4, 7-4.4.3.6, and Note 6.

D DD DD

N,NS N!DN S'NS

Plan view

Sangle-, double-, and multiple-row racks 0.45 gpm per sq ft / 2000 sq fl (18.3 Umin per sq m / t86 sq m)

See Note 2 8 ft (2.44 m) max behveen spnnklers

C]£] .L:l:l:l:J Plan view

N SN S,NS NiDS N'SN

N NS NNN

N'NN'NNN' Elevation view Elevation view

Single-, double-, and multiple-row racks 0.30 gpm per sq ff / 2000 sq ft (122 L./min per sq m / 186 sq m)

See Note 3 8 ft (2.44 m) max between sprinklers

RS

I--1o1-1,' ,,oa, ~ E e

So@ 215

Plan view

m

Elevation view

Figures 7-4.4.2.3(d)

670

Page 119: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: No data has been submi t ted suppor t ing the submit ter ' s I tem B. The changes that were made address the concerns expressed by the submi t te r and better coordinate the requireraents with the figures. See Prepr int o f Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE A C T I O N :

AFFIRMATIVE: 23 COMMENT O N AFFIRMATIVE:

KEEPING: Two Proposal 13-178's were included in my ballot package, Log #217 and Log #181. I vote affirmatively for tire Commit tee Action on Log #217.

I believe that the o ther Proposal 13-178 (Log #181) is a misprint , as it appears to be ider tical to Proposal 13-180 (Log #181).

(Log #200) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 179 - (7-5): Accept SUBMITTER: Je s seJ . Beitel, General Electric Plastics COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a RECOMMENDATION: Item 1 - Revise Section 7-5.1.1.1, Exception, to read: "Indoor.. .with 4 - 4 d ~ ~ . "

Item 2 - Revise Section 7-5.1.2.1, Except ion No. 2, to read: "lndoor.. .with 7-5.1.-1-.i.2."

Item 3 - Revise Section 7-5.1.2.1, Except ion No. 4, to read: "Indoor...with 7-5.1.4-.1.2." SUBSTANTIATION: I feel that these are editorial corrections. In Item 1, the old n u m b e r f rom NFPA 231 was carried over. In I tems 2 and 3, an extra n u m b e r was inserted. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. See Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #181) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 180- (7-5.1.2): Reject SUBMITrER: S tephen Reimers , Reimers Systems Inc. C O M M E N T O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-219 RECOMMENDATION: NFPA 99 informat ion should be referenced and not extracted. T he references to 99 should also be general , no t paragraph specific, e.g., "sprinkler systems in hyperbaric chambers shall conform to the r equ i rements o f NFPA 99, Chapter 19." SUBSTANTIATION: Extracting only bits and pieces of NFPA sprinkler requi rements is confus ing and will lead to errors and conflicts when NFPA 99 requ i rements change . COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: T he Technical Commi t t ee believes that specific spr inkler system discharge criteria informat ion from NFPA 99 conce rn ing hyperbaric chambe r s should be easily identified by the users of NFPA 13 and therefore this informat ion should be copied into NFPA 13 us ing NFPA's extract policy. In addit ion to the specifi( r equ i rements of NFPA 99 o the r requi rments f rom NFPA 13 are also applicable.

Also see Commit tee Action on C o m m e n t s 13-196 (Log #58) and 13-117 (Log #181a) co.acerning spr inkler system installation criteria from NFPA 99. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

, (Log #12) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 181 - (7-5.2): TCC NOTE: T h e TCC directs that Section 7-5.2.1.1 in the

C o m m i t t e e Act ion be rev ised to read: "Spr ink ler d i scharge a n d area o f app l i ca t ion shah be in a c c o r d a n c e wi th T a b l e 7-5.2.1.1(a) f o r s tandard spray spr inklers . See Sec t ion 5-4.1.2 f o r appropr ia te or i f i ce s izes. For large drop and ESFR sprinklers re fer to Tables 7- 5.2.1.1(b) and (c) respect ively ." Also revise the title o f Table 7- 5.2.1.1 (a) to read "Protec t ion Criter ia f o r R u b b e r Tire Storage us ing s tandard spray spr inklers ." This change addresses a corre la t ion i ssue and is a resul t o f C o m m e n t 13-59 (Log #201) wh ich centralizes orif ice size r equ i r emen t s in Section 5-4.1.2. SUBMITTER: Todd E. S chumann , HSB Industr ial Risk Insurers COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-251 RECOMMENDATION: Revise text as follows:

7-5.2 Storage of Rubber Tires. 13-210) 7-5.2.1 Ceiling Systems.

7-5.2.1.1 *~ (231D4-1.2) Sprinkler discharge dcn~i:ic; and area; c f

"I4C'~:2"S.L°2T- ~ L"~22~.E2 "g'Z 2, h ";'? L /YFd ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

b;,' :-he l~;-cken line. Read acre,;; the graph at a ::c, ragc he igh t c,f 14_ ft (I.~ ~'~ un:_i! the ate, rage ~'~:-~'" : . . . . . . . . . . . u . . . . . . . . . ,~:o, . .

~ C n A ~ - - ~ / f , ' ~ r I Q Q / l / ~ ; . . \ / _ . ' , I .

;;': . . . . . . . . . . ~ . ~ m ) fo . . . . g'; ~ m l ' ~ ' a ' n ' c ~l"'~]klers" 4-4=g*-7-5.2.1.1" (231D-4-1.2) Sprinkler discharge and area o f

applicat ion shall be in accordance with Table 7-5.2.1.1(a) 4 -4=g(~ for 1 /2 in. (12.7ram), 17/32-in. (13.5-ram), 5/8-in (15.9-ram) and 0.70-in. (17.8-ram) sprinklers. For lar~e-dror) and ESFR sprinklers refer to Tables 7-5.2.1.1(b) and (c) A. ".-,--~1 n:~,~ ,,..~"'~ (C), respectively.

20

A

£ :Z .m

15 o ) . . . . . . . .

o C 9

/ 'or,,/ < 5

5000

~ r - - - -

/ . /

, /

/ /

40O0 / t

t

m

300o / , ~- / ! High temp. o ~ i sprinklers

f t i / , I

/ , / 2000

I

I

0 0.3 0.4 0.5

/

I I 1 I

I

I I

I

I i i I I

IOrdinary temp. u sprinklers / I

Sprinkler density (gpm/ft 2)

FIGURE 7-5.2.1.1

/ /

J

/

/ /

/ /

/

/

0.6

The graph in Figure .! !.2 is used as follows: (a) Note the examr)le indicated by the brqken line. (b) Read across the graph to the storage height of 14 ft (4.3 m)

nntil the storage height intersects tile storage height c~lrve ilt a sprinkler density of 0.45 gpm/ft ' - ' [ (18 ,3L/min) m='].

(c) Read down until the sprinkler density intersects the sprinkler opera t ing area curves at 3200 ft'-' (297 m 2) for qrdinai , 'y-temperamre s~)rinklers, and 200 f(-' (186 m=') for h igh- tempera tu re ,prinklers,

Figure 7-5.2.1.1 ~ . . ~ S t ) r i n k l e r system design cm-¢es for i)alletized nortable rack storage and fixed rack storage with pallets over 5 ft to 20 ft (1.5 m to 6 m) in height.

671

Page 120: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

D e l e t e T a b l e 7-5.2.1.1 *~ D i s c h a r g e C r i t e r i a f o r (;he S t o r a g e o f R u b b e r T i r e s T a b l e 7 -5 .2 .1 .1 (a ) [ 2 3 1 D - T a b l e 4 -1 .2 (a )1 S p r i n k l e r s 1 / 2 in. (12 ,7 mm~ 1 7 / 3 2 in. (13.5 r a m ) . 5 / 8 in. ( 1 5 . 9 r a m ) a n d 0 .70 in. (17 .8 m m ) Size O r i f i c e s

Piling Method

(1) On-floor storase (a) P~ramid piles on-side

(b) Other ar rangements such that no horizontal channels are

formed (.see Note 3) (c) Tires on-tread

(2) Palletized portable rack storage

(a) On-side or on-tread

]Piling Height fit)

Up to 5 Over 5 to 12

Over 12 to 18

Up to 5 Over 5 to 12

U p t o 5

Over 5 to 20

Over 20 to 30

Areas o f Application fit =) (See Note 2.)

Ordinar~ Temp. 200O 2500

Not allowed

200O 2500 2000

3000

Sprinkler Discharge Density (See Note 2.) (~m/ft l)

0.19 0.30 0.60

0.19 0.30 0.19

See Figure

0.30 plus hiA'h--expan sion foam 0.60 and

0.90 (see Note 4);, or 0.75 with 1-hr fire-resis tire

rat ing of roof and ceiling assembly

0.19

0.60 0.60 and

0.90 (see Note 4); or 0.30 plus hi~h--expan sion foam

0.19

(b) On-side 20 to 25 Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed

:3) Open portable rack storage, U p t o 5 2OO0

H i ~ Temp. 20OO

on-side or on-tread

(4) Single-, doable-, and multi. row fixed rack storage on

pallets, on-side or on-tread

2500 2500

2000 2500 2000

30OO 5OOO 3OOO 40OO

2OOO

Over 5 to 12 5000 3000 Over 12 to 20 Not allowed 5000

Not allowed 3000 3OOO 3OOO

Up to 5 2OOO

Not allowed

5000 Not allowed

Over 20 to 30 (5) Single-. double-, and inulti- Up to 5 row fixed rack storage without :)allets or shelves, on-side or o i l

tread Over 5 to 12

Over 12 to 20

Over 5 to 20 See Figure 4--1-~ ~ ; or

0.40 plus one level in-rack 3000 sprinklers; or

0.30 plus hi~h-.expan sion foam 3000 0.30 plus hish--expan sion foam

0.19 2000

0.60 0.60 and

0.90 (.see Note 4); or 0.40 plus one level in-rack

sprinklers; or 0.30 plus hish-expan sion foam

2OOO

3OOO

3OOO 3OOO 2OOO

3O0O 5000

Not allowed 3000 3OO0 3OOO

3OOO 3O0O Over 20 to 30 0.30 plus hi gh-expan sion foam Not allowed 3000

Notes: 1. For SI untts, I ft = 0.3048 ill; 1 f t"= 0.0929 m2; 1 g p m / f t ~ = 40.746 ( L / r a i n ) / m z 2. Sl~linkler discharge densities and areas of application are based on a maximum clearance of 10 ft between sprinkler deflectors and the maximum

available height of storage. Tile maximum clearance is noted f rom actual testing and is not a definitive measurement . The authority having jurisdiction shall use the approl~r ia te judgnlent where this distance is modified.

3.* Laced tires on-floor, vertical stacking on-side (typical trnck tires), and off-road tires. 4. Water SUllply shall f i i l f i l l I)oth requirements,

672

Page 121: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

T a b l e ~ ) 7-5.2.1.I(b) [231d-Table 4-1.2(b)1 Large-Drop Sprinklers (See Note 2.) ~

Piling Method

+Rubber tire s torage on-side o r on-tread in pal letized

portable racks, or open portable racks, or fixed

racks without solid shelves

Pile Height O~t) Number of Sprinklers and M a x i m u m Dura t ion (hr) Minimum Operating Building Height

Pressures (See Note 3.) (ft) Up to 25 15 Sprinklers @ 75 psi 32 3

(See Note 4.)

Notes:

Hose Demand (gpm)

500

1. For SI units, l fl =0.3048 m; 1 ft'-' = 0.0929 m'-', 1 psi = 6.895 kPa; 1 gpm = 3.785 L / m i n 2. Wet systems only. 3. Sprinkler opera t ing pressures and n u m b e r o f sprinklers in the design are based on tests in which the clearance was 5 ft to 7

ft between the sprinkler def lector and the m a x i m u m he igh t o f storage. The authori ty having jur isdic t ion shall be consul ted where clearances exceed 7 ft.

4. The design area shall consist o f the mos t hydraulically d e m a n d i n g area of 15 sprinklers, consis t ing o f 5 sprinklers on each of 3 branch lines. The design shall inc lude a m i n i m u m opera t ing area of 1200 ft a m a x i m u m opera t ing area of 1500 ft 2 and shall utilize a h igh- tempera ture- ra ted sprinkler.

Table ~ ) 7-5.2.1.1(c) f2311)-Table 4-1.2(e)] ESFR Sprinklers (see Note 2),2 Nominal K Factor 13.5-14.5

Piling Method

Rubber tire s torage on-side o r on-tread in pallettzed porto ble racks, open portable racks, or

fixed racks without solid shelves

Laced tires in open portable steel racks [See P~g~re 1-3(g).1

Pile Height fit)

Up to 25

Up to 25

Up to 25

Maximum Number of Sprinklers Duration (hr) Building Height and Minimum

fit) Operating Pressures (See Note 3.)

30 12 sprinklers @ 50 psi 1 (,See Note 4.)

g035 12 sprinklers @ 75 psi 1 (See Note 4.)

30 20 sprinklers @ 75 psi 3 (See Notes 5 and 6.)

Notes:

Hose Demand (gpm)

250

250

5OO

1. For SI units, 1 ft =0.3048 m; 1 ft 2 = 0,0929 m-', 1 psi = 6.895 kPa; 1 gpm = 3.785 L / m i n 2. Wet systems only. 3. Sprinkler opera t ing pressures and n u m b e r o f sprinklers in the design are based on tests in which the clearance was 5 ft to 7 ft

between the spr inkter def lector and the m a x i m u m he igh t o f storage. The authori ty having jur isdict ion shall be consul ted where clearances exceed 7 ft.

4. The shape of the design area shall be in accordance with t~t~a,,..,. +~,+ ~ Sta:;da:'d fs:" t!;c !:;~ta!L';ti~;, "J~f "-v'"'--"c"'u +.L~_. "~"-"~'c" . . . . . . . 7-6.5.4. 5. Where used in this application, ESFR protect ion is expected to control ra ther than to supress the fire. 6. The design area sha l / cons i s t o f the most hydraulically d e m a n d i n g area of 20 sprinklers, consist ing o f 5 sprinklers on each o f 4

b ranch lines. The design shall include a m i n i m u m opera t ing area of 1600ft.

7-ra~2~t~ " 12~!D 1 !.~.1) Fc.r the ~=::-p¢.:c ~f ~c!cc::ag +v . . . . . . . .

° " 1 ~ ' ~ + ' ~ ~ + " ° ' + 7 , . . . . . x . . . . . . . . 1 ~ . . . . . . / / , , " i v X ~ . . . . . / . . . . . . . .

,~ . . . . . . : . . . . A:,+~, . . . . prc++urc a+e~ at :kc ca!cu!atier. : tarr ing

~/-r~9~'~ 7-5.2.1.2 ( 2 3 1 ~ 4 - 1 . 3 ) In bui ldings used in Dart for tit,: storage, for the nurDoses o f this s tandard , the reoui red . sn r ink le r~ro tec t ion shal l ex tend 15 ft (4.6 m) beyond the per imeter o f the tire storage area.

~ " 7-5.2.1.3 (231D-4-2.1) W here h igh exoans ion foam systems are installed in accordance with NFPA l lA . a reduct ion in

. . . . k . * - - , . + ~ A . 1 ^ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . C ~ .?.f "+ t . . . . A :;.. t+no ----~ T . . . . L . . . . ~ m x + + + . . H . , I .

.--.+--l.l . . . . | . ~ | l h - - | ~ . ~ ÷ - - . , , ] ]I . . . . ~J' f * / / ~ ~ ~ g . . . . . . I . . . . . + o k + + . . L ~+ . v , , , ! + ~ , , ~ , , w .

~ ' + 7-5.2.2.2 ( 2 3 1 D ~ 4-1.4.2~ The maximum horizontal soaein+ of sorinklers in racks shall be 8 ft (2A m).

- -

~ " 7-5.2.2.3 (231D-4-1-,4.-44-1.4.3) Sprinklers in racks shall discharge at no t less than 30 osi (207 kPa).

~ + 7-5.2.2.4 ( 2 3 1 D ~ 4 - 1 . 4 . 4 ) Water demland fgr sprinklers installed in racks shall be based on s imul taneous onera t ion of the most hvdraulicallv remote 12 sprinklers where only one level i~ installed in racks.

6 7 3

Page 122: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 1 3 - A99 ROC

7-5.2.3 ~ [231D-4~3) Water Supplies.

7-5.2.3.1 ~ (231D-4-3.1) The rate o f water supply shall be sufficient to provide the required sprinkler discharge density over the ~ n i r e d area o f applicat ion plus provision for genera t ion o f high- expansion foam and in-rack sprinklers where used.

7-5.2.3.2* (231D4-3.2) Total water supplies shall inc lude provision for not less than 750 gpm (2,835 L / ra in ) for hose s t reams in addition to that required for antomat ic sprinklers and foam systems. Water supplies shall be capable of supplying the d e m a n d for sprinkler systems and hose s t reams for not less than 3 hours.

Exception No. #1." Fol on:[loor storage up to attd inrl.uding 5 f l (1.5 m) in hei,d/t~. . ho,~e .$tream "tequiremenls .shall be permitted If be 250 ~q~m. (946 l , /mt , ) with a water supply duratio, £[ *tot less than 2 Imms. Exception ~%~. #2: For ESIq{ arm Imge-drop ,~pmtkle, .~y,~tems approved .fitr tubber tile storage refe* to Table* 44--2- 7-5.2. I. I(b) and (c),fi, r duration amt ho.w demand.

7-5.2.3.3 *~ (251D..4-3.3) Where dL'y pipe systems are used, the area of spr inkler applicat ion shall be increased by not less than 30 p_cn'cent.

7-5.2.4 ~ ( 2 3 1 ~ 3-3.3) Miscellaneous Tire Storage, Miscellaneous tire storage shall be protected in accordance with 7- 2,3~

~ (2~1D ~ "I.I) .x.'I~.~ueJ In~idc Protec t ' ca . Whc: 'e au tcn-a t ' c ~:~" . . . . . . . . . . :^" is . . . . . :a~.a .__~,i k^.~ [I I / 2 in. ( ~ tara., v} ~hall be p:'o;Sded tc reach an;,' por t ,on of the ate, rage a:-ea. Sma!!-

' " ' ; " Z L " L Z ? [ i . ~ ~: ~: . . . . . . * --~. 4" . . . . . n k . . . . + . . ; .....

A-7-5.2.1.1 [231D-A-4.1.2} The protect ion criteria in Tables 7- 5.2.1.1(a), (b), and (c)

A ' r = o ~ , ~ o ~ r , A A ~ or r',~+.~:.? . . . . .+ . . . . . . . . cappl ica t ion i+~ Table 7-4.2.1.1 have been developed from fire test data. Protection requ i rements for o ther stocage m e t h o d s are beyond the scope o f this s tandard at the p resen t time. From r e e e m fire testing with densit ies o f 0.45 g p m / f t " [ 1 8 . 3 L / r a i n ) / m "] and higher, there have been indications that large orifice sprinklers at greater than 50-ft'-' (4.6-m'-') spacing produce bet ter resuhs than the 1/._,-in. (12.7-mm) orifice sprinklers at 50-f(-' (4.6-m'-') spacing.

] 'able 4-1.2 Tables 7-5.2.1.1(a) and (b) are is- based on opera t ion of s tandard sprinklers. Use of "qnick respouse" or o ther special sprinklers should be based on appropr ia te tests as approved by the author i ty having jur isdict ion.

The cur ren t changes to Table 7-5.2.1.1 Tables 7-5.2.1.1(a}. (b), and (c) represent test results from rnbber tire fire tests pe r fo rmed at the Factmy Mutnal Research Center .

Storage heights and configurat ions, or both, [e.g., laced tire+, au tomated material hand l ing systems above 30 ft (9.1 m), etc--=.] beyond those indicated in the table have not had sufficient test data developed to establish r e c o m m e n d e d criteria. Detailed eng inee r ing leviews of the protect ion should be conduc ted and approved by tile authori ty having jurisdict ion. (48,-gt4~

A-7-5.2.1.1 Table 7-5.2,1.1(a} Note 3 ($31D-A-4-1.2 Note 3 ~:0 Table 4-1.2.) Laced tires are not st, f r e d to a significant he ight by this me thod due to the damage inflicted on the tire (i.e.. bead).

A-7-5.~.3.3 (231D-A-4-3.3) Wet systems are r e c o m m e n d e d felt- tire storage occupancies . D D" systems may be permi t ted only where it is impracticable to provide heat. {4g--2-40)- S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Revisions are being made to NFPA 13-1999 for consistency wid~ NFPA 231D-1998. 7-5.2.5 removed - r e d u n d a n t with NFPA 230. Plus editorial changes .

COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. Revise informat ion c o n c e r n i n g rubber tire storage as follows:

7-5.2 Storage of Rubber Tires. (13-210) 7-5.2.1 Ceiling Systems. 7-5.2.1.1" (231D-4-1.2) Sprinkler discharge and area o f

applicat ion shall be in accordance with Table 7-5.2.1.1(a) for t / '2 in. (12.7min), 17/32-in. (13.5-ram). 5/8-in. (15.9-ram), and 0.70- in. (17.8-ram) sprinklers. For large-drop and ESFR sprinklers refer to Tables 7-5.2.1.1(b) and (c) respectively.

2o / I /

/ ' /

/ g

(D

o i f )

15

I0

500(

/ ,,,,,-

J I

/ ;,,r"

I

I

I

I

+ I

I i i

/

4=:

(1) t~

0

C "E_

400C

3000

200C

0 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Sprinkler density (gpm/ft 2)

Figure 7-5.2.1.1 (231D-Fig. 4-1.2) Sprinkler system design curves for palletized portable rack storage and f ixed rack storage with

pallets over 5 ft to 20 ft (1.5 m to 6 m) in height.

The graph in Figure 7-5.2.1.1 is used as follows: (a) Note tile exalnple indicated by tile broken line. (b) Read across tile graph to tile storage height of 14 fi (4.3 m)

until Ihe storage height intersects tile storage height ctnxe at a sprinkler density of 0.45 gpm/ft ' - ' [ (18.3L/rain) m~].

(c) Read down until the s tninkler densip¢ intersects the sprinkler opera t ing area era'yes at 3200 fl e (297 m'-') f<~>r ordit~arv-temperature sprinklers, and 200 f(-' (186 m'-') for I l igl>temperann-e'sprinklers.

6 7 4

Page 123: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 ~ A 9 9 R O C

Table 7-5.2.1.1(a) [231D-Table 4-1.2(a)] Sprinklers I / 2 in. (12.7 ram) 17/32 in. (13.5 mm), 5/8 in. (15.9ram) and 0.70 in. (17.8 mm) Size Orifices

PBing Method

(1) On-floor storage (a) Pyramid piles on-side

(b) Other arrangements such :hat no horizontal channels are

formed (~ee Note 3,

(2) On-floor storage

Piling Height fit)

Up to 5 Over 5 to 12 Over 12to 18

Up to 5

Areas of Appllcation (ft ~) (,See Note 2.)

Ordinary Temp. 2000 2500

Not allowed

2000

High Temp. 2000 2500 2500

2000 (a) Tires on-tlead Over5 to 12 0.50 2500 2500

(3) Palletized portable rack Up to 5 0.19 2000 2000 storage

(a) On-side or on-tread Over 5 to 20 Over 20 to 30

Up to 5

Over 5 to 20

20 to 25

U p t o 5

Over 5 to 12 Over 12 to 20

Sprinkler Discharge Density (See Note 2.)

(F~pm/ft ~ ) 0.19 0.30 0.60

0.19

See Fi~'ure-7-5.2.1.1 0.30 plus hi~h-expansion foam

0.19

See Figure 7-5.2.1.1 0.60 and

0.90 (see Note 4); or 0.75 with l-hr fire-resistive rating

of roof and ceilin~ assembl~, 0.19

0.60 0.60 and

0.90 (see Note 4); or 0.30 plus hi~gh-expansion foam

0.19

See Figure 7-5.2.1.1; or 0.40 plus one level in-rack

sprinklers; or 0.30 plus high-expansion foam 0.30 ]flus hi:~h--expansion foam

0.19

I 0.60 I

0.60 and 0.90 (see Note 4); or

0.40 plus one level in-rack sprinklers; or

0.30 plus hi,h-expansion foam

(4) Palletized Portable rack storage

(a) On-side

(5) Open portable rack storage, on-side or on-tread

(6) Single-, double-, and multi- row fixed rack storage on pallets, on-side or on-tread

(7) Single-, double-, and tahiti row fixed rack storage without

pallets or shelves, on-side or on-tread

U p t o 5

3000 2000

3000 2000

Not allowed 5000 Not allowed 3000 Not allowed 4000

2000 2000

5000

Over 5 to 20

Over 20 to 30 U p t o 5

Over 5 to 12 Over 12 to 20

3000 Not allowed 5000 Not allowed 3000

3000 3000 2000 2000

3OOO 3OOO

3OOO 3OOO Not allowed 3000

2000 2000

5OOO 3OOO N o t allowed 5000 Not allowed 3000

:3OOO 3OO0

3000 3000 Over 20 to 30 , 0.30 plus hi~h-expansion foam , Not allowed 3000

Notes: 1. For SI units, 1 ft = 0.3048 m; 1 ft ~ = 0.0929 m='; 1 gpm/f t ~ = 40.746 (L/ ra in) / m=' 2. Sprinkler discharge densities and areas of application are based on a maximum clearance of 10 ft between sprinkler deflectors and the

maxinmm available height of storage. The maximum clearance is noted from actual testing and is not a definitive measurement. Thc author~:y

3.* Laced tires on-floor, vertical stacking on-side (typical truck tires), and off-road tires. 4. Water supply shdl fulfi l l both requirements.

675

Page 124: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

Table 7-5.2.1.1(b) [231d-Table 4-1.2(b)] Large -Drop Spr ink lers (See Note 2.)

Piling Method

Rubber tire storage on-side~ or on-tread in palletized portable racks, or open portable racks, or fixed

racks without solid shelves

Pile Height Oct)

Up to 25

Number of Sprinklers and Minimum Operating

Pressures (See Note 3.)

15 Sprinklers @ 75 psi (See Note 4. )

M a x i m u m B u i l d i n g H e i g h t

fit)

32

D u r a t i o n (hr) H o s e D e m a n d (gpm)

500

Notes: 1. For Sl units, 1 ft :0.3048 m; l f(-' = 0.0929 m 2, l psi = 6.895 kPa; 1 gpm = 3.785 L/rain 2. Wet systems only. 3. Sprinkler operating pressures and number of sprinklers in the design are based on tests in which the clearance was 5 ft to

7 ft between the sprinkler deflector and the maximum height of storage. The authority ha; ' ingj-a~dic: ian aha]! 'ac ccnaulted-

4. The design area shall consist of the most hydraulically demanding area of 15 sprinklers, consisting of 5 sprinklers on each of 3 branch lines. Tim design shall include a miifimmn operating area of 1200 ft a maximum operating area of 1500 ft'-' and shall utilize a high-temperature-rated sprinkler.

.r .r . ,~ ,~ = o t z , ' . ' , ro~,r~ -v~. ,~ , , o , ^ ~ vc~t~ e~. . : - , . ,~-~ (:ca Prate 2), ~r.--:..-~ v v . . . . . ~ ~ ,A r. IRE.VISED BY C O M M E N T 13- XX (LOG #127)]

~ : t : - - Metk~d

. . . . . . . . . . . palletize e

f i xed :'ac!',~ -.dthc,'at aolid ,~he!;'e=

. . . . I , ~ I ~ ' . , . , L ' ; . . . . . . . I ~ / , . ~ 1

igkt ~r.~ P'!e He ~../ M a x ' m u m

fro

g~

gO

Number e f Spr';a~cra , DuratL'~n (Lr) a n d Mini..-rmm

(Scc Ne.ec ?.) 12 aprink!e:'~ @ 50 pai 4-

,c.... ~r . . . . . . ! )

: c , . , . ~,r~,,. 4.) ~0 aprink!era @ 75 pal

(&';" Note.; 5 and 6. )

gS0

4- -2*5O

g *500

, v^.. eT .... :,o , a =O.~NMS_mfq~_ 0.9929 ma,--l-psi-~&.895 ~.D~. , gpm = ~.7.q5 L/rain 2. We: aya:ema anly. '3. Sprinkler aperating i"-eaaurez a:~d :-'am'oer of apri;;kler:; in the dcaign arc baaed on teata in ;;l=ic.t.. t!'e clearance ;-;aa 5 ft to 7 ft

~ e sp;'ink!cr deficctm- and :he maximum height of storage. The authority havingj-:riadictic.n ahall kC consulted ;vh,-we clearances exceed 7 ft.

4. The s!:ape of the- des ign . . . . . . t._l~ i.~ : . . . . . . . . a . . . . . . . . :,~. ~,r~'r,A ,a t.,.....*.....l r... ,... I...,..n..,; ...... r c,..:..m..., c.., ...... "7 r.. ~.., g=&gtm~'e uacd in t ~ S F R protection ia expected tc~ control rather than to auprcaa t h e n c e . c. TL. . . .~ :g . . . . . . . aha!! . . . . . ;.. ~c., . . . . . . . . ,..,a ...... ~;o.n., ~ . . . . . . . .4; . . . . . . . . . c on sprink!e:'a, ce.naiating af 5 apri:=klc;-s an each of 4

branch linca. The deaign ~hall inch:de a minimum cpc: 'at irg a:-ca c.f l,qOOft=

7-5.2.1.2 (231D-4-1.3) In buildings used in part for tire storage, for tim purposes of this standard, the required sprinkler protection shall extend 15 ff (4.6 m) beyond the perimeter of the tire storage a r e a .

7-5.2.1.3 (231D-4-2.1) Where high expansion foam systems are installed in accordance with NFPA I IA, a reduction in sprinkler discharge density to one-half the density specified in Table 7- 5.2.1.1(a) or 0.24 g p m / s q ft (9.78 L / m i n / s q m), whichever is higher, shall be allowed.

7-5.2.2 (231D-4-1.4) In-rack S p r i n k l e r Sys tem R e q u i r e m e n t s .

7-5.2.2.1 (231D-4-1.4.1) In-rack sprinklers, where provided, shall be installed in accordance with 7-4, except as modified by 7-5.2.2.2 through 7-5.2.2.4.

7-5.2.2.2 (231D4-1.4.2) The inaximum horizontal spacing of sprinklers in racks shall be 8 ft (2.4 m).

7-5.2.2.3 (231D-4-1.4.$) Sprinklers in racks shall discharge at not less than 30 psi (207 kPa).

7-5.2,2.4 (231D-4-1.4.4) Water demand for sprinklers installed in racks shall be based on s imuhaneous operation of the most hydraulically remote 12 sprinklers where only one level is installed in racks.

I 7 -5 .2 .3 (231D-4-3) Water S u p p l i e s .

7-5.2.3.1 (231D-4-3.1) Tile rate of water supply shall be sufficient to )rovide the required sprinkler discharge density over the required

area of application plus provision for generation of high-expansion foam and in-rack sprinklers where used.

7-5.2.3.2 (231D-4-3.2) Total water supplies shall include provision for not less than 750 gpni (2,835 L/rain) for hose streams, in addition to that required for automatic sprinklers and foam systelns. Water supplies shall be capable of supplying the demand for sprinkle]" systems and hose streams for not less than 3 hours.

676

Page 125: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

Excep/iorl No. #I: l'br ,mfloor storage up to and including 5,fi (1.5 m) in heiLdlt, ho.~e stream requilvments shall be permitted to be 250 gpm (946 L/mM), with a water su]qd~ duration of not less than 2 hom:~. Exceplio~t No. #2: l 'br 1"S],7/a~ld large-drop sp~ttkl~r .sy.slems :J/:pmved fro rubber til~" .~torage mfe~ to Table's 7-5.2.1. l(b) attd (c) [~r d'uralio, and hose demand. "

7-5.2.3.3" (231D-4-3.3} Where dry. pipe systems are used, the area of sprinkler application s ta l l be increased by not les~ than 30

7-5.2.4 (231D-3-3.3) Miscel laneous Ti re Storage. Miscel laneous tire storage shall be protected in accordance with 7-2.3.

I

'7-5.2.5 (231D-4-4,1)-Manua! v- . :a~ b . . . . . . : ^ - For first aid fire f ight ing and mop up operat ions , small hose [1 1 /2 ind (38 m m ) l shall be provided in accordance with Section 5-15.5. [SEE COMMENT 13-182 (Log 049)1

A-7-5.2.1.1 (231D-A-,LI.2) The protect ion criteria in Tables 7- 5.2.1.1(a), (b), and (,:) have been developed from fire test data. Protection requi rements for other- s torage me t hods are beyond the scope of this s tandard at t h e p r e s e n t time. From recent fire testing witl'l densities o f 0.45 g p m / f t -~ [18.3L/ra in) /m'- ' ] and higher, t h e r ( have been indications that large orifice sprinklers at greater than 50-ft'-' (4.6-rn'-') spacing produce better results than the I/,2-in. (12.7- ram) orifice sprinklers at 50-ft ~ (4.6-m'-') spacing.

Tables 7-5.2.1.1(a) and (b) are based on opera t ion o f s tandard sprinklers. Use of "qaick response" or o the r special sprinklers should be based on appropr ia te tests as approved by the authori ty having jurisdict ion.

The cur ren t changes to Tables 7-5.2.1.1(a), (b), and (c) represent test results from rubber tire fire tests pe r fo rmed at the Factory Mutual Researcit Center .

Storage heights and configurat ions, or both, [e.g., au tomated material hand l ing systems above 30 ft (9.1 m) ] beyond those indicated in the table have not had sufficient test data developed to establish r e c o m m e n d e d criteria. Detailed eng inee r ing reviews of the protect ion should be conduc ted and approved by the authori ty having jur isdict ion.

A-7-5.2.1.1 Table 7-5.2.1.1(a) Note 3 (231D-A-4-1.2 Note 3 to Table 4-1.2.) Laced tires are not s tored to a significant he igh t by this me thod dne to the damage inflicted on the tire (i.e., bead) .

A-7-5,2.3.3 (231D-A-4-3.3) Wet systems are r e c o m m e n d e d for tire storage occupancies . I)~-,¢ systems may be permi t ted only where it is impracticable to provide heat. COMMITTEE STATFMENT: This meets the in tent o f the submit ter and updates the informat ion conce rn ing rubber tires to that pr inted in the 1998 edit ion of NFPA 231D. See Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 21" NEGATIVE: 2

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: FLEMING: See my Explanation of Negative Vote on C o m m e n t

13-174 (Log #CC203) HANKINS: Table 7-5.2.1(c.) permits storage of tires on side and

on tread up to 25 ft in a 35-ft bui lding to be protected by ESFR sprinklers. The test used to suppor t this opt ion was done with on- side storage, which is significantly less cha l lenging to ESFR sprinklers than on-tread storage. It is my clear recollection that it was agreed by the Commi t tee that ESFR sprinkler protect ion in buildings h igher than 30 ft would be limited to on-side storage only. The talkie does not reflect this agreement . COMMENT O N AFFIRMATIVE:

SCHUIVL~_NN: U n d e r the title of Figure 7-5.2.1.1, there are instruct ions on how t~ use the table. These instruct ions should be located between the table and its title.

Table 7-5.2.1.1(a) needs to be revised as follows: U n d e r i tem (4) Palletized portable rack storage;

Second column, r~move "Up to 5" and "Over 5 to 20." Third co lumn remow_ ~ "0.19" and "(See Figure 7-5.2.1.1)" Fourth co lumn remove "2000" and; Fifth co lumn remove "2000".

U n d e r item (6) Single-, double- and multi-row fixed rack storage on pallets, on-side or on-tread;

Add a line to the table in the third co l umn following the first instance of the words "0.30 plus h igh-expans ion foam."

Conce rn ing Mr. Hankin ' s negative vote, I do not wish to change my vote on this c o m m e n t but offer some explanat ion. It is true that the ESFR protect ion table included with this co m m en t , in the material sent out for ballot, does not reflect the Commit tee ' s action. The correct table, revised in accordance with the Commit tee ' s action, can be found with the material for C o m m e n t 13-160 (Log #127). Please see Table 7-5.2.1.1(c) as shown on page 3 o f Commi t t ee Action.

(Log #49) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 182 - ([7-5.2 th rough 7-5.2.5 and 7-6.8.1] Chapter" 5): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Corre la t ing Commi t t ee on Automat ic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-210 RECOMMENDATION: The Technica l Correlat ing Commi t t ee noted that informat ion per ta in ing to small hose connec t ions in Proposals 13-4 (Log #CP39), 13-209a (Log #CP30), 13-210 (Log #CP37), and 13-211 (Log #CP38) is either" repetitive or contradictory, The TCC directs the Technical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) to coordinate the requ i rements for small hose stations in these proposals. In p repar ing a TCC note to this proposal, a public c o m m e n t from the TCC will automatically be submit ted . SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direct ion from the Automat ic Sprinklers Technical Correla t ing Commi t t ee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulat ions Governing Commi t t ee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. 1. Add new sections 7-3.1.1 and 7-4.1.5 to read as follows:

"For first aid fire f ight ing and m o p up operat ions, small hose [1 1/2 ind (38 m m ) ] shall be provided in accordance with Section 5- 15.5.

Exception: Hose connec t ions shall no t be required for the protect ion o f Class I, II, III, and IV commodi t ies s tored 12 ft or. less in height."

2. Revise Sections 7-5.2.5, 7-5.3.3, and 7-5.4.3 o f the Prepr int to read as follows:

"For first aid fire f ight ing and m o p up operat ions, small hose [1 1/2 ind (38 m m ) ] shall be provided in accordance with Section 5- 15.5."

3. Revise the first sen tence of Section 7-2.3.1.3(d) o f the Preprint to read as follows:

"Where inside hose stations are p lanned or are requi red b y ~-h e~ ~ , a total water "

4. Revise the first sen tence o f Section 7-2.3.1.3(e) o f the Preprint to read as follows:

"When hose valves for fire depa r tmen t use are a t tached to wet pipe sprinkler system risers in accordance with ~ ~ , the water ..." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This action consolidates the requ i rements for hose stations in s torage facilities protected with sprinkler systems. AJso see Commi t t ee C o m m e n t 13-106 (Log #CC406) which was acted upon by the Technical Commi t t ee on Installation Criteria. See Prepr int of Chapte r 7 at tbe end o f this report. NUMBER OF COMMrVFEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #147) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 183 - (7-5.2 th rough 7-5.36): Accept in Principle SUBMITI'ER: Kenne th E. I sman , Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-210- 13-243 RECOMMENDATION: Revise the order of the extracted material in alphabetical o rder by material covered. SUBSTANTIATION: The users need an easier way to find if there is specific design criteria for specific hazards. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

I R e m n n b e r material according to the NFPA d o c u m e n t n u m b er . COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Meets the in tent of the snbmit ter . See Preprint o f Chapter 7 at the end o f this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

6 7 7

Page 126: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ .4,99 R O C

(Log #CC202) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 184- ([7-5.3]): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-211 RECOMMENDATION: Revise section 7-5.3 in the Prepr int as follows:

1. Remove the extracted text marks f rom this section. 2. Replace the terms "should" and "may" t h roughou t Section 7-

5.3 with the term "shall." 3. In Section 7-5.3.1.3, move the last sen tence which begins "This

unt ie red design density ..." to the appendix . 4. Delete Section 7-5.3.2.3 in its entirety. 5. Revise Section 7-5.3.3 as indicated in C o m m e n t 13-182 (Log.

#49). 6. Also see C o m m e n t 13-161 (Log #CC201) as Chapter" 7 is being

r e n u m b e r e d . S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This c o m m e n t is a result o f act ion taken by the Standards Council which assigned responsibili ty for spr inkler system informat ion in NFPA 231E to the Sprinkler Project. The informat ion which now resides in NFPA 13 has been revised to more clearly indicate how to properly design and install a sprinkler system for the protect ion o f baled cot ton storage where such a sprinkler system is required by o ther regulat ions. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept.

See Preprint o f Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #50) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 185- ([7-5.3 t h rough 7-5.3.3.1] Chap te r 5): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Corre la t ing Commi t t ee on Automat ic Sprinkler Systems C O M M E N T O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-210 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T he Technical Corre la t ing Commi t t ee notes that the Standards Counci l has ass igned responsibility for those port ions o f NFPA 231D per ta in ing to sprinkler systems to the

~spr ink le r project, and that while this proposal r e c o m m e n d s that this informat ion be extracted us ing NFPA's Extract Policy, the TCC directs that the informat ion in this proposal be incorpora ted into the 1999 edit ion of NFPA 13. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is a direct ion from the Automat ic Spr inklers .Technical Corre la t ing Commi t t ee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 o f the Regulat ions Govern ing Commi t t ee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

I See Commi t t ee Action on C o m m e n t 13-181 (Log #12). COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Tbis meets the in ten t o f the sublni t ter and updates the informat ion c o n c e r n i n g rubber tires to that pr inted in the 1998 edit ion of NFPA 231D. NUMBER OF C O M M r r r E E MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #199) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 186 - (7-5.4 t h rough 7-5.4.3): Reject SUBMITTER: Richard E. T h o n n i n g s , Amer ican Insurance Sere'ices Group, Inc. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13q R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : All design-related material shonld be conta ined in a separate d o c u m e n t or revert back to NFPA 231F. NFPA 13 should limit its scope to installation. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Installation and design are two distinct areas and dese~v,e separate documen t s . Also, the a m o u n t of material Jmw conta ined in the "partially revised" NFPA 13 is so large that it will become c u m b e r s o m e to use. T he evolution of pcrfm mauce-based s tandards also makes it advan tageous to place design topics in a d o c u m e n t separate fl-om installation requi rements . Two individual d o c u m e n t s will make it easier" to use arr¢l ulxlate in the futnre.

It is n o t p t a c t i c a l for the public to carl ou t each specific reference to design-lelaled material in the p roposed new Chapte r 1 o f NFPA 13. NFPA has sadh' chosen an awkward change process for the 1999 e d m o n of NE['A 13 which seems des igned to h inder

substantial public input. The proposed 1999 edi t ion is obviously more than a "partial revision." COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: NFPA 13 has traditionally addressed both design and installat ion r equ i r emen t s of sprinkler systems which are both highly related. The inclusion o f sprinkler system discharge criteria for the protect ion o f roll paper from NFPA 231F into NFPA 13 consolidates and bet ter coordiantes such infornmtion. N U M B E R OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #23) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 187 - ([7-5.4.1.3.2] 5-1.3~2 Exception No. 1 and 2): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Gary W. Ponte, The Reliable Automat ic Sprinkler" Co., Inc. COMMENT O N P R o P o s A L NO: N / A R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Revise and add a new Except ion to read as follows:

Exception o.Ng.~. 1: The use of extra large.orifice sprinklers shall be permit ted where listed for such use and where installed at a m i n i m u m opera t ing pressure o f 10 psi xc69-k-P-a-) ~ .

Exceotion No. 2: The use of very extra large orifice sprinklers shall be oermi t ted where listed for such use ~.nd where installed at a m i n i m u m opera t ing pressure of 7 psi (0.5 bar), S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : A VELO Sprinkler can control fires at lower opera t ing pressures than exist ing sprinklers allowed u n d e r this s tandard; which is an improved m e t h o d of fire protect ion. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This c o m m e n t was originally submi t ted as a public proposal to the 1996 edit ion o f NFPA 231F as Proposal 231F-3 (Log #1). However, due to the res t ructure of NFPA 13 and NFPA 231F, this proposal was also referred to the Sprinkler Project as a public c o m m e n t to NFPA 13.

See Commi t t ee Action on C o m m e n t 13-21 (Log #24), Item 9. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #51) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 188 - ([7-5.5] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correla t ing Commi t t ee on Automat ic Sprinkler Systems CO MMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-212 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : The Technical Correlat ing Commi t t ee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction o f sprinkler system informat ion fi'om o ther NFPA d o c u m e n t s into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through,13-97b and 13-212 th rough 13-243 to ensure that tire extracted material is appropriate , necessary and complete , and that it does not contain unenforceah le language. Where material is being extracted fi'om a r e c o m m e n d e d practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the append ix o f NFPA 13. Additionally, informat ion should be consol idated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the opt ion o f referencing the informat ion ra ther than extract ing it should trot be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal, a public c o m m e n t from the TCC will automatical ly be submit ted .

While this r ecomlnenda t ion applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requi r ing special at tent ion. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is a direction from the Automat ic Sprinklers Technica l Correlat ing Commi t tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulat ions Governing Commi t tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. No specific act ion required. COMMrlq'EE STATEMENT: Upon review of the informat ion, the Technical Commi t tee believes the language extracted from NFPA

678

Page 127: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N ~ A 13 1 A 9 9 R O C

40 concerning sprinkler system discharge criteria is complete and requires no further change. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #52) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 189- ([7-5.6] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Techn,~cal Correlating Committee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-213 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Committee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Cmeria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system information fi'om other NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-21.2 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessmy and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a recommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public comment fi'om the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendation applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214'~, 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 363, 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction fi'om the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Committee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Committee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. Editorially revise the nfference from NFPA 40E in the Preprint to NFPA 42. No fin'ther action required. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Upon review of the information, the Technical Committee believes the language exuacted from NFPA 42 concerning sprinkler system discharge criteria is complete and requires no filrther change. See Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #53) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 190- ([7-5.7] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Committee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-214 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Committee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sl)rinkler system information from other NFPA docnments into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the qCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-9713 and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is m~propriate, necessa~)' and complete, and that it does not contain un.:ntbrceable language, Where material is being extracted fi'om a recommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located m the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, informat.on should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicate:l that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In I)reparing a TC note to this proposal,a public c o n n n e l l t from the TCC will antomaticall) be subnlitted.

While this recommendation applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA

312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Committee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Committee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

I ln Section 7-5.7.4 add "in detached storage" after the phrase "exceeding 2000 lb (908 kg)" and delete the term "open head." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This meets the intent of the submitter. See Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log#54) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 191 - ([7-5.8] Chapter 5): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Committee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-215 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Committee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system information from other NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-9713 and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a recommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public comment from the TCC will automatically be submitted."

While this recommendation applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Committee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Committee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. No action required. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Upon review of the information, the Technical Committee believes the language extracted fiom NFPA 45 concerning sprinkler system discharge criteria is complete and requires no fin'ther change. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #55) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 192- ([7-5.9] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Committee on Atitomatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 1q-216 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Committee reviewed all proposals fi-om the Technical Conunittee oil Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Connnittee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) tliat call for the extraction of sprinkler system information from other NFPA docmnents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extlacted nlaterial is appropriate, necessary' and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceahle language. Where material is being extracted froin a recolnmended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In

679

Page 128: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public comment from the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendation applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction fi'om the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Committee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Committee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. No action required. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Upon review of the information, the Technical Committee believes the language extracted from NFPA 51 concerning sprinkler system discharge criteria is complete and requires no fiu-ther change. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #56) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 193- ([7-5.10] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Committee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-217 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Committee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system information fi'om other NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a recommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information ratber than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public comment from the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendation applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction fi'om the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Committee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Committee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. No specific action required. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Upon review of the information, the Technical Committee believes the language extracted from NFPA 51A concerning sprinkler system discharge criteria is complete and r-equires no fin-ther change. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #57) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 194- ([7-5.11] Chapter 5): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Tecbnical Correlating Committee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-218 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Committee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical (Jommittee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the exlraction of sprinkler system infor~nation from other NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 tbrough 13-243 to ensure that tbe extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete, and that

it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a recommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing tire information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public comment fi'om tire TCC will aulomatically be submitted.

While this recommerrdation applies to all proposals that call for" extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction fi'om the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Committee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Committee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept ill Principle. Delete the phrase "or Light Hazard occupancies" in Sections 7- 5.11.3 and 7-5.11.4. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The text of NFPA 55 gives the user of the document the choice of using either sprinkler discharge densities for either Ordinal-/Hazard Group 1 .°ccu~ancies or light hazard occupancies. Based upon the hazards xdentxfied, the Techuical Committee believes that the discharge densities for Light Hazard occupancies should not be used unless more specific guidance is given. The Technical Committee on Discharge Criteria will also be submitting a proposal for" NFPA 55 in this regard. See Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end of tiffs report. NUMBER OF COMMITI'EEMEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #125) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 195- ([7-5.12] 5-21): Reject SUBMITTER: Wilbur T. Workman, Engineered Medical Systems, Inc. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-85 RECOMMENDATION: Delete proposed 7-5.12.2, 7-5.12.3, 7- 5.12.4, 7-5.12.5, and 7-5.12.6. Add new 7-5.12.2 which reads as follows:

See NFPA 99, Chaoter 19 - Hyperbaric Facilities for specific snrinkler reunirements for Class A hyperbaric chambers. SUBSTANTIATION: The Technical Correlating Committee is commended for its recognition of the unique requirements set forth fox- the design and performance criteria fox- sprinkler systems in Class A hyperbaric chambers per NFPA 99, Chapter 19. NFPA has just completed its review cycle for the 1999 edition which will be submitted for adoption at the November 1998 meeting. Proposal 13-85 (Log #CP80) proposes to extract material from tire 1996 edition, which is different fl-om the text proposed for the 1999 edition. Extraction of material from another text makes it difficult to insure continuity across the two documents. Invoking the requirement by reference relieves the burden of insuring document consistency and minimizes the chance for misinterpretation by various Authorities Having Jurisdiction. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Committee Action and Statement on Comment 13-180 (Log #181). Also see Committee Action on Comment 13-196 (Log #58). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIR~L~.TIVE: 23

(Log #58) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 196- ([7-5.12] Chapter 5): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Cur-relating Committee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-219 RECOMMENDATION: Tile Technical Correlating Committee reviewed all proposals fi-om tire Tectmical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for tile extraction of sprinkler system information from other NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policv. The TCC directs that the q'CSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81

680

Page 129: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessm 7 and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a r ecommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the opt ion of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public comment from the TCC will automatical[) be submitted.

While this recommendat ion applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804/, 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Commit tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Committee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. 1. In Section 7-5.12.1 replace the term "addressed" with the term "defined."

2. Revise 7-5.12.3 to read as follows: "Water shall be delivered from the sprinklers as specified in 7-

5.12.6 within 3 second:; of activation of any affiliated deluge control ."

3. Add the following note to Section 7-5.12.4: "Note: Some chamber configurations, such as small-diameter

horizontal cylinders, might have avmy tiny 'floor,' or even no floor at all. For horizontal cylinder chambers and spherical chambers, 'floor level' shall be taken to mean the level at 1/4 diameter below the chamber centerl ine or actual 'floor level,' whichever gives the larger floor area." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This meets the intent o f the sublnitter concerning ~he extracted material from NFPA 99. Item number 2 reflects changes made as a result of a Tentative Interim Amendmen t to NFPA 99. See Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITI'EE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #126) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 197 - (7-5.12.3): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Wilbur T. Workman, Engineered Medical Systems, Inc. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-85 RECOMMENDATION: Revise proposed 7-5.12.3 (99-19-2.5.2.2) to read: "Water shall he delivered from the sprinkler heads as specified in 19-2.5.2.3 within seconds of activation of any affiliated deluge control." SUBSTANTIATION: The wording of this section has been r ecommended for change in the proposed 1999 edit ion of NFPA 99, Chapter 19 - Hyperbaric Facilities. This change brings the text into agreement. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. COMMITrEE STATEMENT: See Committee Action and Statement on Comment 13-196 (Log #58). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #59) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 198- ([7-5.13] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Commit tee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-220 RECOMMENDATION': The Technical Correlating Commit tee reviewed all proposals fi-om the Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and tile Technical Committee on Spriukler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for tile extraction of sprinkler system information from o ther NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the q-CSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete, and that

it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a r ecommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal, a public comment from the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendat ion applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Autdmatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Commit tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Commit tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

No action required. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Upon review of the information, the Technical Commit tee believes the language extracted from NFPA 130 concern ing sprinkler system discharge criteria is complete and requires no filrther change. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIR~L~.TIVE: 23

(Log #60) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 199- ([7-5.14] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Commit tee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-221 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Commit tee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for tile extraction of sprinkler system information from other NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessa, 7 and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a recommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public comment from the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendat ion applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Commit tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations GOverning Commit tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. No action required. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Upon review of the information, the Technical Committee believes the langt,age extracted from NFPA 150 concerning sprinkler system discharge criteria is complete and requires no fiwther change. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #61 ) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 200 - ([7-5.15] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Commit tee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-222 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Committee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Committee oll Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that

681

Page 130: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

call for the extraction of sprinkler system informat ion from o the r NFPA d o c u m e n t s into NFPA 13 us ing NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 th rough 13-971) and 13-212 th rough 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropria te , necessary and complete , and that it does not contain unenforceab le language. Wllere material is being extracted from a r e c o m m e n d e d practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix o f NFPA 13. Additionally, informat ion should be cousol idated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the opt ion o f referencing the informat ion ra ther than extract ing it should not be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal, a public c o m m e n t from the TCC will automatically be submit ted .

While this r ecommenda t ion applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 1~86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requi t ing special at tention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direct ion fi'om the Automat ic Sprinklers Technical Correla t ing Commi t t ee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 o f the Regulat ions Governing Commi t tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. 1. Extract the following informat ion fi'om NFPA 214 as new Section 7-5.15.3.2 and r e n u m b e r remain ing sections accordingly:

"7-5.15.3.2 (214-3-2.4.2.3) Crossflow towers with a fill area longer than the m a x i n m m allowable for d ischarge device being used shall have discharge devices placed on both sides o f the fill area in each

joist channel . The pressure at each discharge device shall be adeqt, mte to provide protect ion for half o f the length of the fill area.

2. In Section 7-5.15.4 add "in crossflow towers" after the phrase "Discharge outlets" in the first line. In the last sen tence revise the reference from NFPA 215 to NFPA 214.

3. In Section 7-5.15.5 add "in crossflow towers" after the phrase "For deluge systems" in the first line.

4. In Section 7-5.15.6 add "in crossfiow towers" after the phrase "On film-filled" in the first line.

5. In Section 7-5.15.8.4 revise references 7-15.8.1, 7-15.8.2, and 7- 15.8.3 to 7-5.15.8.1, 7-5.15.8.2, and 7-5.15.8.3 respectively.

6. Delete Section A-7-5.15.4 and Figures A-7-5.15.4(a) and A-7- 5.15.4(b)

7. Delete Section A-7-5-15.6 and Figure A-7-5-15.6. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: I tems 1 th rough 4 are editorial changes that mee t the submit ter ' s in tent conce rn ing NFPA 214. I tems 5 and 6 address informat ion that does not pertain to sprinkler system discharge criteria. See Prepr int of Chapte r 7 at the end o f this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #113) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 201 - (7-5.15.8.4): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Robert A. Will iams, MS State Rating Bureau COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a RECOMMENDATION: C hange paragraph references to 7- 5.15.8.1, 7-5.15.8.2, and 7-5.15.8.3. SUBSTANTIATION: Editorial. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. COMMI'I"rEE STATEMENT: See Commi t t ee Action and Sta tement on C o m m e n t 13-200 (Log #61). NUMBER OF COMMrVrEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #62) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 202 - ([7-5.16] Chapte r 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Corre la t ing Commi t t ee on Automat ic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-223 RECOMMENDATION: T he Technica l Corre la t ing Commi t t ee reviewed all proposals f rom the Technica l Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Commi t tee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extract ion o f sprinkler system informat ion from o ther

NFPA d o c u m e n t s into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 th rough 13-97b and 13-212 th rough 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate , necessary and complete , and that it does not conta in unenforoeable language. Where material is being ext iacted from a r e c o m m e n d e d practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix o f NFPA 13. Additionally, in format ion should be consol idated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the opt ion o f referencing the informat ion ra ther than extracting it should not be overlooked. In p repar ing a TC note to this proposal, a public c o m m e n t from the TCC will automatical ly be submit ted.

While this r e commenda t i on applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requi r ing special a t tent ion. S UBS TANTIATION: This is a direction from the Automat ic Sprinklers Technica l Correlat ing Commi t tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 o f the Regulat ions Governing Commi t tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. 1. In Section 7-5.16.2 add "Piers and Whal~'es" as the title.

2. In Section 7-5.16.3 add "Terminals" as the title. 3. Revise 7-5.16.4 to read as follows: "If the m a x i m u m storage height that the bui lding will permi t

exceeds 3.7 m (12ft), the sprinkler system shall be des igned for the requ i rements for ~hall be fe, llc, wcd for pre, tectia:~ o f Class IV commodi t i es piled to the m a x i m u m he igh t permi t ted by bui lding cons t ruc t ion . See section 7-3."

4. Revise section 7-5.16.5 as follows: "If racks or shelving are present or likely to he present , the

:-eq~:i:'eme:::a 3ha!l 5e f~l!e.;;'ed fe.r pre.tcc:ic.,~ e . f the sprinkler system shall be des igned for the rc~quirements for Class IV commodi t ies . Protect ion in warehouses for the long-term storage o f specific commodi t i e s shall be des igned for the specific use. See sections 7-4 and 7-3,"

Exception to remain. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: These are editorial changes that mee t the in tent o f the submi t te r conce rn ing NFPA 307. See Prepr int of Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #63) Commit tee : AUT-SSD

13- 203 - ([7-5.17] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correla t ing Commi t t ee on Automat ic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-224 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlat ing Commi t t ee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction o f sprinkler system informat ion from o the r NFPA d o c u m e n t s into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. Th e TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 th rough 13-97b and 13-212 th rough 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropria te , necessary and complete, and that it does not conta in unenforceab le language. Where material is being extracted from a r e c o m m e n d e d practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the append ix o f NFPA 13. Additionally, in format ion should be consol idated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the opt ion o f referencing the informat ion ra ther than extract ing it should not be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal, a public c o m m e n t from the TCC will automatical ly be submit ted.

While this r e commenda t i on applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identif ied Proposals 13-8o (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requi r ing special a t tent ion. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Antomat ic Sprinklers Technica l Correlat ing Commi t tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulat ions Governing Commi t t ee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

1. Delete section 7-5.17.2. 2. Delete section 7-5.17.4.

682

Page 131: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This information fiom NFPA 318 is being deleted as it does not pertain to discharge criteria. S e e Comment 13-203 (Log #63). See Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITFEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITI'EE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #86) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 204- (7-5.18): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Committee on Airport Facilities COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-225 RECOMMENDATION: Delete Section 7-5.18. SUBSTANTIATION: The incorporat ion of excerpts from NFPA 409 is incomplete and may be misleading. In reality, NFPA 409 integrates several in te rdependent fire protect ion approaches. In addition, any one of these approaches may itself have complex conditions that govern the specific method of application of that approach. The sprinkler systems that are required by NFPA 409 are good examples of complex approaches that have requiremems that van y according to occupancy, size, and o ther provided fire protection systems. The proposed excerpts provided in NFPA 13 describe only one of several conditions for the installation of sprinkler systems. The excerpts do not reflect the wide variations that NFPA 409 requires, fi-oin closed sprinkler systems to foam water deluge sprinkler systems. The system required may vary based on condition and size of housed aircraft, hangar size, or the presence of supplemental under wing fire protection systems,

If the objectives o f excerpt ing are to be pursued, the Airport Facilities Commit tee suggests a correlating task group be formed to ensure the appropriate requirements of NFPA 409 are excerpted into NFPA 13. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. 1. Delete Sections 7-5.18.1 through 7-5.18.3.4 in their entirety without replacement.

2. Revise Section 7-5.18 to read as follows: "(NFPA 409) Aircratt Hangars. See NFPA 409, Standard on

Aircraft Hangars, for sprinkler system discharge criteda pertaining to the protection of aircraft hangars." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This action meets the intent of the snbmitter. See Preprint o f Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITrE E ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #64) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 205 - ([7-5.18} Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Committee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13~225 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Commit tee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Committee on Sprinkter System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system information from o ther NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and t3-212 through 13.243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessmy and complete, and that it does not contain tmenforceable language. Where material is being extracted fi-om a recommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, infovma ion should be consolidated where possible. The TCC aiso indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note Io this proposal, a puhlic comment fi-om the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this reconnnendat ion applies to all proposals that call fox extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), t3-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86~'2). and 13.97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention.

S UBS TANTIATION: This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Commit tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Commit tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Commit tee Action and Statement for Comment 13-204 (Log #86) pertaining to material extracted from NFPA 409. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #87) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 206- (7-5.19): Reject SUBMITTER: Technical Committee on Airport Facilities COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-226 RECOMMENDATION: Delete Section 7-5.19. SUBSTANTIATION: The incorporation of excerpts from NFPA 423 is incomplete and may be misleading. NFPA 423 identifies special conditions that must be taken into account for adequate protection. Special piping and valve arrangements contained in NFPA 423 have not been excerpted into NFPA 13. The proposed excerpts provided in NFPA 13 describe only one of several conditions for the installation of sprinkler systems. The excerpts do not reflect the wide variation of applications that NFPA 423 requires from closed sprinkler systems to foam water deluge sprinkler systems.

If the objectives of excerpting are to be pursued, the Airport Facilities Committee suggests a correlating task group be formed to ensure the appropriate requirements of NFPA 423 are excerpted into NFPA 13. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Technical Committee believes the material extracted fi'om NFPA 423 concerning sprinkler system discharge criteria is adequate. Section 7-5.19 is not intended to cover piping and valve arrangements. Also see Comment 13-207 (Log #65). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #65) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 207- ([7-5.19] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTE~R: Technical Correlating Commit tee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-226 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical CorJ-elating Committee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call fox" the extraction of sprinkler system information from other NFPA docmnents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Prop.osals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted fi'om a recommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that tl~e option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public comment from the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendat ion applies to all proposals flint call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 1q-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA .t09), 1'.",-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA

-312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Cot relaling Committee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations C, ovevning Committee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. No action required. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Upon rexiew of the infonmation, the Technical Committee believes the language extracted from NFPA

683

Page 132: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

423 concerning sprinkler system discharge criteria is complete and requires no fur ther change. NUMBER OF COMMrITEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #190) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 208- (7-5.20): Reject SUBMITTER: Thomas H. Miller, Varley-Campbell & Assoc., Inc . /Glen Ellyn Vol Fire Co. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-227 RECOMMENDATION: The transfer o f the inadequate protect ion criteria should not be automatically included in this edi t ion of the standard. SUBSTANTIATION: See Comment on Proposal 13-90 (Log #CP85). COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: No data has been submit ted support ing the submitter 's concern. NUMBER OF COMMITrEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log#66) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 209 - ([7-5.20] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Commit tee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-227 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlat ing Commit tee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system information from o the r NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete , and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a r ecommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consol idated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option o f referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In

~ reparing a TC note to this proposal, a public c o m m e n t from the CC will automatically be submitted. While this recommendat ion applies to all proposals that call for

extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requir ing special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Commit tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 34.3 of the Regulations Governing Commit tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. 1. In Section 7-5.20.6.2 replace the term "heads" with "sprinklers."

2. Editorially revise the terms "Class I, Class II, and Class III as Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3 th roughout Section 7-5.20. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: These are editorial changes concerning the extracted material from NFPA 430. See Prepr in t o f Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log#67) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 210 - ([7-5.21] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlat ing Commit tee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-228 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Commit tee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical

Commit tee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system information from other NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a recommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in tile appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal, a public commen t from the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendat ion applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Commit tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Commit tee Projects. COMMrrTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

I 1. In Section 7-5.21.6.2 delete the first sentence which begins "If shaft driven..."

2. In Section 7-5.21.7 delete the first sentence which begins "Standby emergency diesel ..."

3. In Section 7-5.21.8 delete the first sentence which begins "Rooms hous ing diesel driven fire ..."

4. In Section 7-5.21.9 delete the first sentence which begins "Oil fired boilers or boilers..." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This information from NFPA 804 does not pertain to sprinkler system discharge criteria. See Preprint o f Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #68) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 211 - ([7-5.22] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Commit tee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-229 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Commit tee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the 'Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction o f sprinkler system information from other NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a r ecommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the apperidix o f NFPA 13. Additionally, information s h o u l d b e consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public commen t from the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendat ion applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Commit tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Commit tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. 1. In Section 7-5.22.2 move both notes to the appendix.

2. Add the following as a new section: "A-7-5.22.2 (803-A-11-2) Twelve-inch diameter cement- l ined pipe

is r ecommended . Main sizes should be designed to encompass any anticipated expansion.

The underground main should be arranged such that any one break will qot put both a fixed water extinguishing system and hose lines protecting the same area out o f service."

684

Page 133: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

COMMrlq'EE STATEMENT: This action meets the intent of the submitter concerning material extracted from NFPA 803.

See Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end of this report. N U M B E R OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #69) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 212- ([7-5.23] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Committee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-230 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : The Technical Correlating Committee reviewed all proposals, from the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system information from other NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. Tire TCC directs that the "FCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a recommended practice or aguide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public comment from the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendation applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring

cial attention. S T A N T I A T I O N : "/'his is a direction from the Automatic

Sprinklers Technical Correlating Committee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Committee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. 1. Move all of Section 7-5.23 into the appendix as section A-7-5.23.

2. In Section 7-5.233 revise the last parenthetical phrase to read "(see 3-5.3 of NFPA 803)."

3. In Section 7-5.23.5 delete the first sentence which begins "Where protection is required by..."

4. In Section 7-5.23 6 delete the first sentence which begins "Emergency geuerators located..."

5. In Section 7-5.23 7 delete the last sentence which begins "Where the hazard is not ..."

6. In Section 7-5.23 8 delete the first sentence which begins "Hydraulic control sy,,¢tems..." and delete the last sentence which begins "Where the hazard is not ..."

7. In Section 7-5.23 9 delete the first sentence which begins "Rooms housing diesel..." and delete the last sentence which begins " For automatic foam water..." Also delete the phrase "and water spray protection" from the remaining sentence. COMMITTEE STATtLMENT: Items 1 and 2 are considered editorial changes. Items 3 through 7 address extracted information fiom NFPA 851 that does not pertain to sprinkler system discharge criteria. See Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end of this report. N U M B E R OF COMMITI'EE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #70) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 213- ([7-5.24] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Committee on Automatic

aorinkler Systems MMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-231

R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : The Technical Correlating Committee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system information from other NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81

through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a recommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information shouldbe consolidated where possible, The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public comment from the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendation applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Committee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Committee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. 1. Move all information in Section 7-5.24 into the appendix.

2. In Section 7-5,24.21(a)2 revise the end of the last sentence to read "... according to 3-1.31 of NFPA 850."

3. In Section 7-5.24.3 revise the reference in the third line from 4- 2.1 to 7-5.24.2.1.

4. In Section 7-5.24.4 delete the last sentence which begins "If water spray systems..."

5. In Section 7-5.24.7 delete the phrase "and water spray systems" in the second sentence.

6. In Section 7-5.24.9 delete the first sentence which begins "Protection in dust collectors..."

7. In Section 7-5.24.10 delete the first sentence which begins 'q'rfi.nsformer rectifier..."

8. In Section 7-5.24.10(a) delete "or automatic water spray" from the first sentence and delete the second sentence which begins "Fire protection water spray..."

9. Delete Section 7-5.24.10(b) in its entirety. 10. In Section 7-5.24.15 delete "and water spray protection" from

the first sentence. 11. In Section %5.24.16 delete "and water spray protection" from

the first sentence. 12. In Section 7-5.24.18.1 delete "or spray nozzles" from the first

sentence. 13. In Section 7-5.24.19.1 delete "or spray nozzles" from the first

sentence. 14. In Section 7-5.24.19.6 delete the last sentence which begins

"Water spray protection ..." 15. Revise the title of Section 7-5.24.21 to read "Rubber Tire

Fuel." 16. In Section 7-5.24.21.1 delete "or spray nozzles" from the first

s e n t e n c e . COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Items l through 3 are editorial changes. The remaining items address information extracted from NFPA 850 that do not pertain to sprinkler system discharge criteria. See Preprint o f Chapter 7 at the end of this report. N U M B E R OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #71 ) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 214- ([7-5.25] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMrrrER: Technical Correlating Committee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems CO MMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-232 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : The Technical Correlating Committee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system information from other NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a recommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information shouldbe consolidated where possible, The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the

685

Page 134: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N ~ A 13 1 A 9 9 R O C

irrformation rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public comment fi'om the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendat ion applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Commit tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 arrd 34.3 of the Regulations Governing Committee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. 1. In Section 7-5.25.2 delete the exception.

I 2. Combine both sentences ira Section 7-5.25.4 so the section begins "For spray application areas..." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: These are editorial changes which meet the intent o f the submitter concerning material on discharge criteria extracted from NFPA 33. See Preprint o f Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #72) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 215- ([7-5.26] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Committee on Automatic

rin kler Systems MMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-233

RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Committee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system information from o ther NFPA documents into NFPA 13 usiug NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a recommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal, a public commen t from the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendat ion applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13- 91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 1"01) as requiring special attention. S UBS TANTIATION: This is a direction from tire Automatic Sprinkler's Technical Correlating Committee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Commit tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

I No action required. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Upon review o f the information, the Technical Commit tee believes the language extracted from NFPA 36 concern ing sprinkler system discharge criteria is complete and requires no fur ther change. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

686

Page 135: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 1 3 - A99 ROC

(Log #73) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 216 - ([7-5.27] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Committee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems C O M M E N T O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-234 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Committee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction ot sprinkler system information from other NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is ap~,ropriate, necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a recommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the optiov of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public comment from the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendation applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), ~3-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 1%91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C). and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: "Ibis is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Committee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Committee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

No action required. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Upon review of the information, the Technical Committee believes the language extracted from NFPA 59 concerning sprinkler system discharge criteria is comple£e and requires no further change. N U M B E R OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #74) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 217 - ([7-5.28] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Committee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-235 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : The Technical Correlating Committee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system information from other NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is bein extracted from a recommended practice or a uide the TCC dire~s that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 1~. Additionally information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not t,e overlooked. In preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public comment fi'om the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendation applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13-91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFP~. 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NF:PA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: Trfis is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Col relating Committee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Committee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

No action required.

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Upon review of the information, the Technical Committee believes the language extracted from NFPA 59A concerning sprinkler system discharge criteria is complete and requires no further change. N U M B E R OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VO TE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #75) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 218- ([7-5.29] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMrTI'ER: Technical Correlating Committee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems CO MMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-236 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : The Technical Correlating Committee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system information from other NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a recommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public comment from the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendation applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13-91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Committee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Committee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

No action required. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Upon review of the information, the Technical Committee believes the language extracted from NFPA 96 concerning sprinkler system discharge criteria is complete and requires no further change. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #76) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 219 - ([7-5.30] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Committee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems CO MMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-237 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : The Technical Correlating Committee reviewed all proposals fi-om the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system information from other NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure fhat the extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted fi-om a recommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public commenl fi'om the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendation applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13-91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention.

687

Page 136: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 m A 9 9 R O C

SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Commit tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Committee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. Delete Section 7-5.30 in its entirety without replacement. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The information in Section 7-5.30 which was extracted from NFPA 120 does not pertain to sprinkler system discharge criteria. See Preprint o f Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #77) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 220 - ([7-5.31] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Commit tee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-238 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Commit tee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system information from o ther NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a r ecommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix o f NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public commen t from the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendat ion applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13-91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Commit tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Commit tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. •

I Delete Section 7-5.31 in its entirety without replacement. C O M M r r r E E STATEMENT: The information in Section 7-5.31 which was extracted from NFPA 312 does not pertain to sprinkler system discharge criteria. See Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #78) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 221 - ([7-5.32] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Commit tee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-239 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Commit tee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Committee ou Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system information from o the r NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted fi~om a r e c o m m e n d e d practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it sbould not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public c o m m e n t from the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendat ion applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13-91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Commit tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Commit tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

I Delete Section 7-5.32 in its ent,rety. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The information in Section 7-5.32 which was extracted from NFPA 410 does not pertain to sprinkler system discharge criteria. See Preprint o f Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #79) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 222- ([7-5.33] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Commit tee on Antomatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-240 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Commit tee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system information from o ther NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a r ecommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC uote to this proposal, a public comment from the TCC will atttomatically be submitted.

While this recommendat ion applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13-91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Commit tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Commit tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

I Delete Section 7-5.33.2.3 in its entirety. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This information which was extracted fi'om NFPA 415 does not pertain to sprinkler system discharge criteria. See Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end of this report. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #80) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 223 - ([7-5.34] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Commit tee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-241 RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Correlating Commit tee reviewed all proposals from the Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Dischalge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system information from o ther NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessary and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a r ecommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally,

6 8 8

Page 137: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public commen t from the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendat ion applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13-91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFI'A 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Commit tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Commit tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

1. Editorially revise the reference from NFPA 909 in the Preprint to NFPA 912.

2. Move all of Section 7-5.34 into the appendix. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: This meets the snbmitter 's intent concerning the sprinkle," system discharge criteria extracted from NFPA 912. See Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end of this I'epon t. NUMBER OF COMMITrEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #81) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 224- ([7-5.35] Chaple t 5 ): Accept ira Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Commit tee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-242 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : The Tecbnical Correlating Commi t tee reviewed all proposals f iom the Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Committee on Sprinklel System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction o f sprinkler system information fl-om other NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. Tile TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b arrd 13-21~ through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessaly and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a r ecommended practice of a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additiorrally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In preparing a TC note to this proposal, a public comment fi'om the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendat ion applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13-91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Commit tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regtdations Governing Commit tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

No action required. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Upon review of the information, ttle Technical Committee believes the referencing of NFPA 30 for sprinkler system discharge criteria pertaining to flammable and combustible liqtfids is appropriate and no fur ther change is required. NUMBER OF C O M M r l T E E MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #82) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 225 - ([7-5.36] Chapter 5 ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Commit tee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-243 RECOMMENDATION: The Tecbnical Correlating Committee reviewed all proposals fiom the Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria (TCSSIC) and the Technical Committee on Sprinklel System Discharge Criteria (TCSSDC) that call for the extraction of sprinkler system information fi'om o ther

NFPA documents into NFPA 13 using NFPA's Extract Policy. The TCC directs that the TCSSIC and TCSSDC review Proposals 13-81 through 13-97b and 13-212 through 13-243 to ensure that the extracted material is appropriate, necessat 7 and complete, and that it does not contain unenforceable language. Where material is being extracted from a r ecommended practice or a guide, the TCC directs that it be located in the appendix of NFPA 13. Additionally, information should be consolidated where possible. The TCC also indicated that the option of referencing the information rather than extracting it should not be overlooked. In prepar ing a TC note to this proposal, a public comment from the TCC will automatically be submitted.

While this recommendat ion applies to all proposals that call for extraction, the TCC specifically identified Proposals 13-85 (NFPA 99), 13-86 (NFPA 214), 13-89 (NFPA 409), 13-90 (NFPA 430), 13-91 (NFPA 804), 13-92 (NFPA 803), 13-96 (NFPA 36), 13-97 (NFPA 312), 13-97 (NFPA 86C), and 13-97a (NFPA 101) as requiring special attention. SUBSTANTIATION: This is a direction from the Automatic Sprinklers Technical Correlating Commit tee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 of the Regulations Governing Commit tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

No action reqllired. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Upon review of the information, the Technical Committee believes the referencing of NFPA 30B for sprinkler system discharge criteria pertaining to aerosol products is appropriate and no further change is required. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 23

(Log #CC503) Committee: AUT-AAC

13- 225a - ([7-5.37]): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Correlating Commit tee on Automatic Sprinkler Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-209a RECOMMENDATION: Utilizing NFPA's extract policy, copy the sprinkler system dischmge criteria from NFPA 432, Code for the Storage of Organic Peroxide Formulations, 1997 edition, as Section 7-5.37.as follows:

"7-5.37 Organic Peroxide Formulations. 7-5.37.1 See NFPA 432 for applicable terms not defined in

Chapter 1. 7-5.37.2 Automatic sprinkler systems for the protection o f storage

of organic peroxide formulations shall provide the following discharge densities:

Class I - 0.50 gpm/ sq ft (20.4 m m / m i n ) Class II - 0.40 gpm/ sq ft (16.3 m m / m i n ) Class I I I - 0.30 gpm/ sq ft (12.2 m m / m i n ) Class IV - 0.25 gpm/ sq ft (10.2 m m / m i n ) 7-5.37.32 The system shall be designed to provide the required

density over a 3000 sq ft (280 sq m) area for areas protected by a wet pipe sprinkler system or 3900 sq ft (360 sq m) for areas protected by a dly pipe sprinkler system. The entire area of any building of'less than 3000 sq ft (280 sq m) shall be ilsed as the 'area

o f application." SUBSTANTIATION: This comment corrects an omission made during the ROP stage as sprinkler system information from o ther NFPA codes and standards was to be ei ther copied or referenced into NFPA 13. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept.

See Preprint of Chapter 7 at the end of this report. Please refer to front matter for Technical Correlating Committee

ballot resuhs.

(Log #CCI6) Committee: AUT-SSI

13- 226- (8-1.1.1): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Committee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-244

I RECOMMENDATION: In Section 8-1.1.1 (s) remove tile note and add the text from the note to the main requi rement as a second sentence. SUBSTANTIATION: This is an editorial change that moves the note into the main requirement. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

689

Page 138: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

(Log #83) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 227 - ([8-4.3.5 (New)] 6-4.3.5): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Corre la t ing Commi t t ee on Automat ic Sprin kler Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-248 RECOMMENDATION: While the Technical Correla t ing Commit tee agrees with the action taken by tire T echn i ca l Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria, it does not agree with the last sentence o f the Commi t tee S ta temeut to the proposal because it is not accurate. The TCC directs that tire last sentence of the substant iat ion be removed. SUBSTANTIATION: Tbis is a direct ion fi'om the Automat ic Sprinklers Technical Correla t ing Commi t t ee in accordance with 3- 4.2 and 3-4.3 o f the Regulat ions Governing Commi t tee Projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. No action required. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #180) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 228 - ([8-4.3.5 (New)] 6-4.3.5): Reject SUBMITTER: William N. Bi-ooks, Eichlea Engineers Inc. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-248 RECOMMENDATION: Reject Commi t t ee Action. Accept Proposal 13-248 (Log #159). SUBSTANTIATION: The Commit tee ' s substant ia t ion corrtains the reason for the proposal. Tha t is, paddle type water flow devices are tested with substantially lower velocities than will occur du r ing a design flow condit ion. It's interest ing how the commi t tee creates a circular substant ia t ion for an issue which hasn ' t been presented before.

1. There is no limit on system velocity, and the .Committee does not wish to establish one.

2. Vane type flow switches a te tested at approximately 18 f t / sec max, yet there are no restrictions off their installation.

3. The commi t tee does not feel it would be a p rob lem until the fire opens more sprinklers. It would seem that the Commi t t ee should be conce rned about all flows, up to and irrcluding a "supply" flow, in order to assure the integrity o f system c o m p o n e n t s .

4. System velocities can increase dramatically if available pressure is high and piping sizes are reduced in o rder to use up all o f the available pressure.

This is a benign proposal, and one which will require flow switches to be installed on appropr ia te sized piping. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Commi t t ee believes that this is an issue for the listing agencies and that the listing agencies should de te rmine the proper applicat ion o f these devices. Identif ied field problems should be submi t ted to the listing laboratories and the Commit tee . The Commi t tee also notes that these types of switches can become damaged for reasons o the r than high water velocities. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #CC418) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 229 - ([8-4.4.4]): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-244 RECOMMENDATION: Revise Except ion No. 2 to Section 8-4.4.4 of the Prepr in t to read as follows:

"Where ~pr~ay sprinklers and large drop sprinklers are provided above and below obstruct ions such as wide ducts or tables, the water supply for one of the levels o f sprinklers shall be permi t ted to be omi t ted from tire hydraulic ceil ing design calculations within the area o f application. Where ESFR sorinklefs are installed above and below obstcuctions, the discharge for up to 2 sprinklers from one o f the levels shall be included with those o f the o the r level in the hydraulic calculation." SUBSTANTIATION: This action is a result of C o m m e n t 13-79 (Log #228) which revised the obstruct ion rules for ESFR sprinklers and deleted the r e qu i r emen t in Exception No. 2 to Section 5-

11.5.3.1 which required addit ional sprinklers located below obstruct ions to be added to the water d e m a n d . This type of r equ i r emen t is more appropriately located in Chapte r 8. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #92) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 230 - (9-1.2 th rough 9-1.2.1, and 9-1.3.3 th rough 9-1.3.5): Accept in Principle in Pact SUBMITTER: William J. Boswell, Wausau HPR Engr COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-251 RECOMMENDATION: Restore the text that has beeu deleted in the "Preprint" o f the above referenced sections. SUBSTANTIATION: Restoration of the text to its format prior to the "Prepriut" will allow for much needed guidance for the Authori ty Having Jurisdict ion and water purveyors. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Pfiuciple in Part.

1. Do not reinstate Section 9-1.2 (24-2-1) as noted in the Preprint. 2. Delete Section 9-1.2 (24-2-2.1) in the Prepriut. 3. Reinstate Section 9-1.2.1 (13-7-1.1) in the Pfeprint as follows: "Capacity. Water supplies shall be capable of providing the

required flow and pressure for the required durat ion as specified in Chapte r 7,- Design Approaches ."

4. Do not reinstate Section 9-1.3.3 (24-2-2.2) in tire Prepfint . 5. Do not reinstate Section 9-1.3.4 (24-2-2.3) in the Preprint. 6. Do not reinstate Section 9-1.3.5 (24-2-2.4) of the Preprint. 7. Editorially r e n u m b e r Section 9-1.4 (24-2-2.5) in the Preprint as

Section 9-1.5. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: 1. The types of acceptable water supplies are addressed by Section 9-2 of the Preprint .

2. The types of acceptable water supplies is addressed by Section 9-2. The necessary capacity o f the water supply is addressed by Section 9-1.2.1 o f the Preprint which is being reinstated.

3. The term "reliable" was removed as it is difficult to verify arrd enforce.

4. This informat ion is addressed by Section 9-2.1 of the Preprint. 5. This section places a limitation on the size o f public water

mains which is outside the scope of the s tandard. 6. This informat ion is addressed by Section 9-1.4 of the Preprint .

NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #157) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 231 - (9-1.2.1, 9-2.4, and 9-2.5): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Kenne th E. I sman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-251 RECOMMENDATION: Put back the sections on capacity (9- 1.2.1), gravity tanks (9-2.4), and rivers and lakes (9-2.5). SUBSTANTIATION: The capacity requ i rements are important . The water supply mus t be sufficient for the d e m a n d of the system.

Gravity tanks are a viable source o f water supply and should not be e l iminated from the s tandard. While rivers and lakes are not common ly used as water supplies, gu idance is needed to keep the spfinklec system fnnct ional if they are. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

1. See item 3 of C o m m e n t 13-230 (Log #92) conce rn ing Section 9-1.2.1.

2. Reinstate Sections 9-2.4 and 9-2.5 of the Preprint as suggested by the submitter .

3. Editorially change the reference in Section 9-2.3.2 from 7-1.1 to 9-1.2.1. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The submit ter ' s p roposed r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s were accepted. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

6 9 0

Page 139: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

(Log #CC422) C o m m i t t e e : AUT-SSI

13- 232 - ([9-1.3.1]): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-251 RECOMMENDATION: Relocate Section 9-1.3.1 in the Preprint as Section 9-1.2.3. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This r equ i r emen t addresses the sizing o f the water supply piping a n t ~ is more appropriate ly located in section 9- 1.2. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #CC408) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 233 - ([9-1.6]): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-251 RECOMMENDATION: Delete Section 9-1.6 in its entirety without replacement . S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This c o m m e n t is a result o f action taken on C o m m e n t 13-91 (Log #~88). COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #136) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 234 - (Figure 10-1(aJ): Accept SUBMITTER: Kenne th E, I sman , Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn, COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-34

I RECOMMENDATION: In tile Welding section o f Figure 10-1 (a) (the Aboveground Certificate), revise the reference from AWS 10.9 Level AR-3 to AWS B2.1. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : To make the test certificate conform to the requ i rements of new Chapte r 3. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept.

] This correct ion needs to be made in two places. NUMBER OF COMMIT'rEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #158) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 235- (10-2.1): Accept SUBMITTER: Kenne th E. I sman , Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-255 RECOMMENDATION: Revise the beg inn ing o f the section to read:

"Fi,e service mains (from tile water supply to the system riser) and lead-in connect ions ." S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : To clarify that the cross mains and bulk mains in the bui lding are not required to meet this requi rement . COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMI'JTrEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #159) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 236- (10-2.2.1 Exception ): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Kenneth E. I sman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-257 RECOMMENDATION: Revise Exception No. 3 to read:

"Modifications affecting 20 or fewer sprinklers shall not require testing in excess of normal static pressnre."

Add a new Exception No. 4 to read: "Where an addit ion ol modif icat ion is made to an existing system

affecting more than 20 Sl)linklers, the new port ion shall be isolated and tested at not less than 50 psi (3.4 bar) in excess of no lmal static pressure for 2 hours."

S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This c o m m e n t is being made for a n u m b e r o f reasons. Tile first is to br ing N F P A 13 into a g r e e m e n t with NFPA 25. Section 2-4.3 o f NFPA 25 requires a hydrostatic test when t'epairs o r r ep lacement affected more than 20 sprinklers. NFPA 1 3 n e e d s to give gnidance on how to do this test.

A n o t h e r reason for this c o m m e n t is that the hydrostatic test o f 200 psi is too m u c h for many existing systems. We risk doing more ha rm than good with the test. Fifty psi in excess of normal system pressure shonld be plenty for an exist ing system.

Tile third reason is to clarify wha t was m e a n t by the C o m m i t t e e in the exist ing Exception No. 3 as to the phrase, "such as relocated drops." It is ou r opinion that this was in tended to apply to any small port ion of a sprinkler system, but Authori t ies Having Jurisdict ion are i n t e r p r e t i n g it as o n l y small vertical por t ions since the only example is vertical. Our new Exception No. 3 defines small and does away with amb iguous examples . COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

I 1. In Exception No. 1 revise the term "working pressures" to "system working pressures" in the first line and revise the term "normal working pressure" to "system working pressure" in the last line.

2. R e n u m b e r existing Exception No, 3 as Exception No. 5 and revise the term "normal working pressure" to read "system working pressure."

3. Add a new Exception No. 3 to read: "Modifications affecting 20 or f ewer spr inklers shall no t require

testing in excess o f system working pressure." 4. Add a new Exception No. 4 to read: "Where addit ion or modif icat ion is made to an existing system

affecting more than 20 sprinklers, the new port ion shall be isolated and tested at not less than 200 psi for 2 hours."

5. Delete existing Sections 10-2.2.1.1 and 10-2.2.1.2 o f the Preprint and add a new Exception No. 6 to Section 10-2.2.1 to read as follows:

"In buried pipe, leakage shall be permit ted. The a m o u n t of leakage at the jo ints shall not exceed two quar ts per hour (1.89 L / h ) per 100 gaskets or jo ints irrespective of pipe diameter . Tile a m o u n t o f allowable leakage specified in 10-2.8.2.3.2 shall be permit ted to be increased by one fluid ounce per inch valve d iameter per hou r ( 3 0 m l / 2 5 m m / h ) for each metal seated valve isolating the test section. If d D' barrel hydrants are tested with the main valve open. so the hydrants are under .pressure , an addit ional five ounces per minu te (150 m l / m i n ) leakage is permit ted for each hydranc The a m o u n t of leakage in buried piping shall be measured at the specified test pressnre by p u m p i n g fi'om a calibrated container ," COMMITTEE STATEMENT: 1 and 2. These are editorial changes .

3 and 4. These actions more appropriately address the submit ter ' s concerns ,

5. This action corrects an existing conflict in tile Preprint . NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 25 NEGATIVE: 1

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: BAHADORI: Add the following to Except ion No. 4: "or 50 psi in excess of working pressure if working pressure is over

150 psi." The r equ i r emen t for testing 50 psi in excess of working pressure if

working pressure is over 150 psi, is only in Exce )tion No. 1. If left in this manne r , it could be cons t rned that when add t o n s are made to systems with working pressures in excess of 150 psi, tlae max i l num testing pressure is 200 psi.

(Log #CC423) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 237 - ([10-6]): Acce~t SUBMITTER: Tec mica[ Commi t t ee oil Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 1"~-255

I RECOMMENDATION: Move the text of Section 10-6 in the Preprint to Section 10-3. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Both these sections address circulating closed loop systems and shouh l be consolidated. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

691

Page 140: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

(Log #160) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 238 - (11-4.10 and A-11-4.10): Accept S U B M ~ : Kenne th E. I sman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-263 RECOMMENDATION: Move the new text f rom 11-4.10 and A-11- 4.10 to modify existing 11-2•4.1• S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Proposed language on corrosion protect ion was added to the section on heat-sensitive piping materials. We believe that the original submi t te r wanted it in old Section 9-2.4.1 which is now 11-2.4.1• COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept.

I Relocate Section 11-4.10 and the associated append ix to 11-2.4.1. N U M B E R OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMM IT T E E ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

( L o g # I l l ) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 239- (11-7.3): Reject SUBMITTER: Gary S. Andress , Wausau HPR Engineei ' ing COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-268 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Revise text as follows: "Fire pump. Refer to NFPA 20, Standard for the Installation o f Centrifugal Fire Pumps," and delete 11-7•3.1 th rough 11-7.3.6. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : The proposed text was in t roduced at the reques t o f the U.S. Coast Guard. They did not "want to tackle" the ent ire NFPA 20 d o c u m e n t at this time, so only the pr in ted paragraphs were included. Unfortunately, there are (and con t inue to be more) moored casinos, etc. that have fire p u m p installations that need parts of NFPA 20 that are not included here. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: No informat ion on the fire p u m p s for mar ine applicat ions current ly exists in NFPA 20. Once NFPA 20 develops such informat ion, it will be referenced by NFPA 13. NUMBER OF C O M M I T r E E MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #175) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 240- (11-7.3): Reject SUBMITTER: Gary S. Andress , Wausau HPR Eng inee r ing C O M M E N T O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-268 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Revise text as follows:

"Fire pump . Refer to NFPA 20, S tandard for the Installation o f Centr ifugal Fire Pumps," and delete 11-7.3.1 t h rough 11-7.3.6. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : The proposed text was in t roduced at the reques t o f the US Coast Guard. They did not "want to tackle" the ent i re NFPA 20 d o c u m e n t at this time, so only the pr in ted paragraphs were included. Unfor tunately , there are (and con t inue to be more) moored casinos, etc. that have fire p u m p installations that need parts o f NFPA 20 that are not inc luded here. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See C o m m e n t 13-239 (Log #111). N U M B E R OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

( L o g #6) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 241 - ( [Chapte r 13] Chapte r 11 ): Accept SUBMITTER: J. William S heppa rd , General Motors Corp. C O M M E N T O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-275

I RECOMMENDATION: Include all AWWA references f rom Chap te r 10, NFPA 24, 1995 edition. SUBSTANTIATION: T he references are key for u n d e r g r o u n d rules for laying pipe. Omiss ion is editorial• COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. N U M B E R OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #161) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 242 - (13-1.1 and 13-1.2): Accept SUBMITTER: Kenne th E. I sman , Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-275 RECOMMENDATION: Delete NFPA 24, 231, and 231C from 13- 1.1.

Delete NFPA 231,231C, 231D, 231E, and 231F from 13-1.2• Cons ider me rg ing 13-1.1 and 13-1.2 into one comprehens ive list of

the o the r NFPA s tandards with extracted installation and design requ i rements referenced in NFPA 13. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : The s tandards r e c o m m e n d e d for delet ion from the list won' t exist when NFPA 13-1999 is adopted.

Why call ou t the s tandards with extracted design criteria in Section 13-1.2 while ignor ing the s tandards with extracted installation criteria? COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. N U M B E R OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #172) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 243 - (A-1-4.5.1): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Russell P. F leming C O M M E N T O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-2 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Delete the cu r ren t last sentence o f A-l- 4.5.1 and provide a new paragraph as follows:

"It should be recognized that the term 'fast response ' (like the te rm 'quick response ' used to def ine a part icular type of sprinkler) refers to the thermal sensitivity within the opera t ing e lement o f a sprinkler , no t the time of operat ion in a part icular installation. The re are many o ther factors, such as ceiling height , spacing, amb ien t room tempera ture , and dis tance below ceiling, that affect the t ime of response o f sprinklers. In most fire scenarios, sprinkler activation t imes will be shortest where the thermal e lements are located 1 to 3 in. below the ceiling. For purposes o f sprinkler pe r fo rmance model ing , it is r e c o m m e n d e d tha t concealed sprinklers be considered equivalent to penden t sprinklers installed 12 in. below ceilings, and that recessed sprinklers be considered equivalent to p e n d e n t sprinklers ins ta l l ed8 in. below the ceiling." S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Users of this s tandard should be aware that installation factors, inc lud ing recessed m o u n t i n g and concealed cover plates, affect the t ime of sprinkler response. This c o m m e n t was developed by the U L / F M / N F S A Standards Review Commit tee . COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Accept the submit ter ' s r e commenda t i on with the following revisions:

1. Delete the cu r ren t last sen tence o f the first oara~ranh of A-I- . v .

4.5.1. 2. Provide a new last paragraph as r e c o m m e n d e d by the

submi t t e r with the following changes: "It should be recognized that the term "fast response" (like the

term "quick response" used to define a particular type o f sprinkler) refers to the thermal sensitivity within the opera t ing e lement o f a sprinkler , no t the time o f operat ion in a part icular installation. The re are many o the r factors, such as ceiling height , spacing, amb ien t room tempera ture , and distance below ceiling, that affect the t ime of response o f sprinklers. In most fire scenarios, sprinkler activation t imes will be shortest where the thermal e lements are located 1 to 3 In. below the ce lhng . . . . l.~.t, . . . . . . . t" . . . . . . . . performance modcl'~ng, it ia rccommcndc~ that concealed ;iz~nk!cr; hc cc.n~idere~ cqul;a!cnt tc ~cndent ; p r } n k l c ; - ; in~m!!ed

"fast resDonse" snr inkler is expected to operate quicker than a "s tandard resoonse" snr inkler in the same installation orientat ion. For modelin~r nurDoses, concealed sprinklers can be cons idered eauiva lent t o o e n d e n t snrinklers having" a similar thermal resnonse sensitivity installed 12 inches below smoo th unobs t ruc ted ceiiin~s and recessed sorinklers can he cons idered eauivalent to p e n d e n ( sprinklers havin~ a similar thermal resoonse sensitivity installed 8 inches below smoo th unobs tn l c t ed ceilings." C O M M I T r E E STATEMENT: This act ion addresses the issues raised by the submi t te r and more appropriately expresses the Commit tee ' s in tent conce rn ing this matter . N U M B E R OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

692

Page 141: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 1 3 - A99 ROC

(Log #123) Committee: AUT-SSD

13- 244 - (A-2-1.2.2 and A-2-1.3.1 ): Reject SUBMITTER: Donald P. Bliss, NH Div. o f Fire Safety COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-279 RECOMMENDATION: Revise Appendix A-2-1.2.2: Ordinary Hazard Occnpancies (Group 2) include having occupancies having condit ions similar to: Mercantile, o ther than sales of furniture with foam plastic cushioning.

Revise Appendix A-2-1.3.1: Extra Hazard Occupancies (Group 1) include occupancies having condit ions similar to: Mercantile occupancies involving the sale of furniture with foam olastic cushioning. SUBSTANTIATION: Table A-2-2.3 classifies furniture with foam plastic cushioning as G~oup A plastic, which requires Extra Hazard

• T i (Group 1) or Extra Hazard (Group 2) sprinkler protecuon, h s comment , if accepted, will make the classification of mercantile occupancies involving the sale of furniture with foam plastic cushioning consistent ~ith the classification for storage occupancies involving furniture with foam plastic cushioning•

Polyurethane foam, which is the cushioning material for upholstered furniture, ignites readily, and produces extreme heat and toxic gases. Uphols tered fllrniture sales areas are usually quite congested with a high fire load. Once ignited, upholstered furniture in a mercantile sales floor area will spread rapidly. The rapid fire spread and high heat product ion has the potential for overwhelming an Ordinary Hazard (Group 2) sprinkler system design. In addition, the large volume of thick, black, toxic smoke will quickly obscure the means of egress for building occupants and creates a serious hazard for responding firefighters. By classifying upholstered furniture mercanti le occupancies as Extra Hazai'd (Group 1), a greater volume of water will be applied to control both the fire spread and the smoke propagation. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The standard currently permits the use of upholstered furmture in light hazard and ordinary hazard occupancies . NUMBER OF COMMrVrEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 24 VOTE ON C O M M r I ~ E ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 24

(Log #132) Committee: AUT-SSI

13- 245 - (A-3-2.2): Accept S U B M r r r E R : Kenneth E. Isman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-24 RECOMMENDATION: The last paragraph in A-3-2.2 should be revised to read:

"Sprinkler manufacturers have identified their manufacturer designations for the listing organizations. Each change in orifice size, response characteristics, o r deflector (distribution) characteristics results in a new model number . The model numbers do not identify specific characteristics o f sprinklers, but can be referenced in the database information compiled by the listing organizations. At the plan review stage, the model number should be checked against such a data base or the manufacturers literature to ensure that sprinklers are being used properly and within the limitations o f their listings. Field inspections can include spot checks to ensure that the model numbers on the plans are those actually installed." SUBSTANTIATION: As currently in the Preprint, the last sentence is not a comph;te sentence. My notes show that the following paragraph was accepted at the Report on Proposals meeting. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITrEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITFEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #CC425) Committee: AUT-SSI

13- 246- ([A-3-4.1]): Accept SUBMITrER: Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-280 RECOMMENDATION: Add the following to Section A-3-4.1 of the Preprint:

"Copper tubing (Type K) conforming with Table 3-3.1 with brazed joints conforming to 3-6.4 is acceptable for underg round service." SUBSTANTIATION: This information was previously addressed by Formal Interpretat ion 76-10 and is now being included in the standard. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #CC428) Committee: AUT-SSI

13- 247 - ([A-3-5.3]): Accept SUBMITrER: Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-280 RECOMMENDATION: Add the following to Section A-3-5.3 in the Preprint:

"The rupture strength of cast iron fittings 2-inch in size and smaller and malleable iron fittings 6-inches in size and smaller is sufficient to provide an adequate factor o f safety." SUBSTANTIATION: This information was previously addressed by a Formal Interpretat ion and is now being mcluded in the standard. COMMITI'EE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #CC426) Committee: AUT-SSI

13- 248 - ([A-3-10.3.1]): Accept SUBMrr'rER: Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-280 RECOMMENDATION: Add the following as the second paragraph to Section A-3-10.3.1 of the Preprint:

"Outside alarms can be omit ted where the sprinkler system is used as part o f a central station, auxiliary, remote station, or proprietary signaling fire alarm system utilizing listed audible inside alarm devices." SUBSTANTIATION: This information was previously addressed by Formal Interpretat ion 85-4 and is now being included in the standard. COMMrrTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #CC427) Committee: AUT-SSI

13- 249 - ([A-4-3.2.3]): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commit tee on Sprinkler System Installation Criteria COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-280 RECOMMENDATION: Add the following to Section A43 .2 .3 in the Preprint:

"Supervision, electrical or mechanical, as used in this section refers to constant moni tor ing of piping and detection equipment to ensure the integrity of the system." SUBSTANTIATION: This information was previously addressed by Formal Interpretat ion 83-14B and is now being included in the standard. COMMrI ' I 'EE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #163) Committee: AUT-SSI

13- 250 - (A-4-5.3.2 (New)): Accept in Principle SUBMITrER: Kenneth E. Isman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-291 RECOMMENDATION: Insert a new appendix note as follows:

693

Page 142: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ .4.99 R O C

"A-4-5.3.2 The expans ion charnber needs to be prepressurized to be of any value. T he following formula can be used to size the expansion c h a m b e r and de te rmine the pressure for precharging. This formula assmnes that an air pocket will be left at the end o f the antifi 'eeze port ion of the system after filling. Tiffs air pocket will act like a cushion as pressures change with t empera ture . Do not use this formula if yore- p rocedures call for allowing the air to escape while filling the system with antifreeze.

Pmax + 14.7

(Pc + 14.7)(TH + 460)(Vc + ~ ] ~+,~.,)

[(Vs+Vc}_[(Vs+Vc}_(Pc+14"7"l(Vc+ 14"TVs ]]d~l(w~+460) - [- - 1Pn+14.7~, Pc+la.7)JdH]

Where:

P,,~. = Max imum pressure that the system will reach on the warmest day

I[ = Precharged pressure o f expans ion chamber in psi "1' n = Highest expected ambien t t empera tu re in °F Tt. = Lowest expected amb i en t t empera ture (filling temp.) in °F V = Volume of expans ion c h a m b e r in gal lons V, = Volume of antifi 'eeze system in gallons P,, = Max imnm filling pressure of system in psi tit. = density o f antifreeze at the low tempera ture ¢1 n = density o f the antifreeze at the high t empera tu re

In o rde r to get the best use o f the formula, a s sume a precharge pressure for the tank and a vo lume of the tank. Calculate the m a x i m u m pressure. If the pressure is reasonable (within the limits o f the system componen t s ) , use that size tank and that pressure. If the pressure calculated is not reasonable, then pick a larger tank or a h igher precharge pressure and run the calculation again." SUBSTANTIATION: Users need guidance on how to properly size the tank and what pressure to precharge it to. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Commi t tee Action and Sta tement to C o m m e n t 13-2.51 (Log #107). The m e t h o d presented by this c o m m e n t is ano t he r acceptable m e t h o d for sizing expans ion chamber s . NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #107) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 251 - ([A-4-5.3.2] A-3-5.3.2): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Greg Cagle, Midland Automat ic Sprinkler Co., Inc. COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-291 RECOMMENDATION: The proposed formula for sizing expans ion chambe r s should be adopted . SUBSTANTIATION: The Commi t t ee stated, "Submitter is encouraged to submi t addit ional information." I have provided addit ional technical informat ion in suppor t o f the proposed form u la.

While it would be desirable to have a s impler formula for sizing expans ion chambers , this is probably not possible. The reason is that any o f the following factors can affect the m i n i m u m required size by literally a factor of 10 or more:

• Capacity of the system. • T e m p e r a t u r e range in the area where the antifreeze system is

installed. • T e m p e r a t u r e range in the area where the expans ion c h a m b e r is

installed. • Water supply static presstn'e. • Level o f precharge pressurization on tim expans ion chamber . Accounting for these factors is therefore very important. This is

the reason for the level of complexi ty of the proposed sizing formula .

These factors are of seconda D' importance, but do nonethe less have some effect on the result:

• Type o f antifi-eeze used. • Antifreeze concentra t ion. These do not appear in tlae formula directly, but are necessa D' ira

order to de te rmine D E and D H, wlfich in turn de te rmine AL, the ~oltune by which the antifreeze solution expands across the tempera ture range.

Lastly, the original proposal did not men t ion this, but it might be worthwhile to cons ider requi r ing an informative placard similar to the hydraulic placard to be placed at the antifreeze control riser stating the capacity o f the system, type o f antifreeze and concent ra t ion needed , and the expans ion chamb e r size and pressure rat ing calculated for the system.

Note: Suppor t ing material available for review at NFPA Headqua r t e r s . COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

1. In Section 4-5.3.2 add the term "listed" to the second sen tence so it reads as follows:

"A listed expans ion chamber . . . " 2. Add append ix material to read as follows: "A-4-5.3.2. O n e me thod for sizing the c h a m b e r is as follows.

O the r me thods also exist."

NOTATION:

VEC = M i n i m u m requi red volume (gal) o f expans ion c h a m b e r

l~, = Air volume (gal) in expans ion c h a m b e r at pre-charge (before installat ion)

V / = Air volume (gal) in expans ion c h a m b e r at normal static pressure

V., = Air volume (gal) in expans ion c h a m b e r at post-expansion pressure (antifreeze at high tempera ture)

Po = Pre-charge pressure (PSIA) on expans ion c h a m b e r before installat ion

1"~ = Static pressure (PSIA) on water (supply) side o f backflow preventer

Pz = M a x i m u m allowable working pressure (PSIA) for antifreeze system

7". = Tempera tu r e (°R) of air in expans ion c h a m b e r at p re-chmge

7" l = Tempera tu r e (°R) of air in expans ion c h a m b e r when antif ieeze system piping is at lowest expected tempera ture

"/'2 = T e m p e r a t u r e (°R) of air in expans ion c h a m b e r when antifreeze system piping is at h ighest expected tempera ture

A L = Change in antifreeze solution volume (gad due to thermal expans ion

=Sv.tOL l/ ( D H )

where:

S v = Volume (gal) o f antifreeze system, not inc luding the

expans ion c h a m b e r

Dr. = Density ( g m / m l ) o f antifreeze solution at lowest expected t empera tu re

D u = Density ( g m / m l ) o f antifreeze solution at h ighes t expected t empera tu re

GIVEN INFORMATION:

(1) P0 "V0 Pl "Vl P2 "V2

TO T~ T2

This is one formula t ion of tile ideal gas law from basic ch em i su T. The a m o u n t of air in the expans ion c h a m b e r will not change over time. The pressure, tempera ture , and volume of the air at different t imes will be related in accordance with this formula.

( 2 ) V 2 = V i - A L

694

Page 143: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

The antifreeze in the sys. tern is essentially incompressible, so the air volume in the expansion chamber will decrease by the same amount the antifreeze expands.

(3) We are assuming there is no trapped air in the system piping, so the only air in the system is in the expansion chamber. This is a conservative assumption, since more air is better. In reality, there will be at least some trapped air. Only the air in the expansion chamber, though, can be relied upon to be there when needed.

(4) VEC : V 0

Atpre-charge, the chamber will be completely full of air.

Pl "To *P2 * ALe TI VEC =

P0 * TI * (P2 *TI - PI "T2)

COMMITrEE STATEMENT: This more appropriately addresses the submitter's concern. NUMBER OF COMMrIWEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #216)", Committee: AUT-SSI

13- 252 - (A-4-8.2.4): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: R.A. Pridham, General Air Products Inc. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-1 RECOMMENDATION: A-4-8.2.4 Wording recommended:

A higher degree of preventing ice blocks can be achieved by lowering the dewpoint of the input air supply to the dry pipe system which is exposed to the lower temperatures of refrigerated space areas. The dewpoint (at final operating pressure) of the feed air supply, should be no greater than 20°Fbeiow the (sensible) temperature at which the refrigerated space is maintained. Packages used to supply the air to the refrigerated space piping systems should be FM approved. Using an approved compressor/dryer package the intake air does not need to be taken from the freezer room thus eliminating the negative mechanical consequences on the compressors a n d reducing installation cost. Properly designed systems produce the low dewpoints required without drawing air from the refrigerated spaces. The simplified mechanical arrangement of the approved compressor/dryer packages eliminate the need for various interpretations of specifications and trials of untested designs.

100

10

i 1 0.1

_8 o.o

0.001

0.0001 0.01

. . . . . ~ ' i ' t " " 1 . . . . . . l . . . . " :

System ~olume = 1000 gel

5 s d m

Intake from free~r , . . no dryer or ineffecti~e - - "

dr~r ~ i " " " ~

" " " " " intake from ambient -"-" " " -25 F dryer exit dew. point _ ~ 1 scfm leek tats

system dry-out ,, 1.6 days

I . . . . I . , I . . . . . . . I . . . . .

0.1 1 10 100 1000

"rime (aays)

FIGURE 3

SUBSTANTIATION: The current piping arrangement shown in "Figure A-4.8.2.4 Refrigerator area sprinkler systems to minimize' the chances o f developing ice plugs." is confusing and ambiguous leading to significant misinterpretation of the equipment and installation leading to misapplication of product and exposure of facility owners to ice plug formation.

An FM approved compressor/dryer system is available which simplifies and rectifies the errors in application and minimizes/eliminates the exposure to ice formation. A technical report is available showing the practicality of using such a specifically designed package which has been tested and approved for the application. COMMIIWEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. COMMrVI'EE STATEMENT: See Committee Action and Statement on Comment 15-53 (Log #226). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #2a) Committee: AUT-SSI

13- 253- (A-5-6.5.2.3): Accept SUBMITTER: Jane E. Helfant, Tana-Tex, Inc. COMMENT O N P ROP O SAL NO: 13-111 RECOMMENDATION: Revise text as follows:

A-5-6.5.2.3 The distances given in Table 4-6.5.4 were determined through tests in which privacy curtains with either a solid fabric or close mesh (1 /4 in. (6.4 ram)) top panel were installed. For broader-mesh top panels, e.g., 1 / 2 in. (13 ram) measured on the dia~onal, the obstruction of the sprinkler sprayis not likely to be severe and the authority having jurisdiction may not need to apply the requirements in 4-6.5.4. SUBSTANTIATION: At times there are questions in health care institution installations by fire protection and health care personnel on the 1/2 in. measurement. The broader meshes for privacy curtains vary in size for the 1/2 in. measurement and are subject to a variety of interpretations. In previous contact with the NFPA organization, we have been told and supported in writing that the "1/2 in. measurement is measured on the diagonal." See submitted copies of letters. In addition, I have submitted the NISTIR 5240 Report "Measurement of Room Conditions and Response of Sprinklers and Smoke Detectors During a Simulated Two-Bed Hospital Patient Room Fire" by Kathy A. Nortarianni P.E., Fire Protection Engineer, NIST, Bldg. & Fire Research Laboratory, Bldg. 224, Room A345, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (301) 975-6883.

Note: Supporting material available for review at NFPA Headquarters. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #2) Committee: AUT-SSI

13- 254 - (A-5-6.5.2.3.1 (New)): Accept SUBMITTF~: Jane E. Helfant, Tana-Tex, Inc. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-111

I RECOMMENDATION: Add text as follows: A-5-6.5.2.3.1 1/2 in. (13 ram) measured on .the diagonal.

SUBSTANTIATION: At times there are questions in health care institution installations by fire protection and health care personnel on the 1/2 in. measurement. The broader meshes for privacy curtains vary in size for the 1/2 in. measurement and are subject to a variety of interpretations. Inprevious contact with the NFPA organization, we have been to ldand supported in writing that the "1/2 in. measurement is measured on the diagonal." See submitted copies of letters. In addition, I have submitted the NISTIR 5240 Rep?rt "Measurement of Room Conditions and Response of Sprinklers and Smoke Detectors During a Simulated Two-Bed Hospital Patient Room Fire" by Kathy A. Nortarianni P.E., Fire Protection Engineer, NIST, Bldg. & Fire Research Laboratory, Bldg. 224, Room A345, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (301) 975-6883.

Note: Supporting material available for review at NFPA Headquarters. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. N U M B E R OF COMMITrF~ MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

695

Page 144: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

(Log #227b) Committee: AUT-SSI

13- 255- (A-5-13.4): Reject SUBMITTER: Matthew T. Gustafson, Severna Park, MD C O M M E N T O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-1 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Provide the following additional text:

A-5-13.4 The provisions of this section o f this standard should not necessarily be construed as a substitute for fire resistance rated building construction. Instead, when o ther standards governing building construct ion allow a stair, escalator or similar vertical opening, the provisions of this section ensure that the automatic sprinkler system will operate properly and will not be adversely affected by the vertical open ing in the ceiling. In some cases, the protection o f vertical openings with sprinklers as described in this section will provide a level o f safety equivalent o r superior to the required fire resistance rating o f the affected port ion of the building. This de terminat ion should be made by building or life safety codes• S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This clarifies the purpose of this section. In addition, if accepted or modified, it will clarify the extent to which the commit tee believes that sprinklers arranged as described in this section are a substitute for fire resistance rated construction. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The intent o f the water curtain is to limit fire spread from floor to floor and to prevent unnecessary activation of sprinklers on the floor above. N U M B E R OF C O M M I T r E E MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #219) Committee: AUT-SSI

13- 256- ([A-5-13.9.1] A-4-13.8.1 ): Accept. SUBMITTER: Phillip A. Brown, American Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-168 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Add text to read as follows:

A-4-13.8.1 Fiberglass units are not considered noncombust ib le unless indicated as such by testing. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Fiberglass is typically a combustible product. This issue needs to be clarified. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept.

I Add the text to Section A-5-13.9.1 of the Preprint to read as follows:

"Fiberglass units are only considered noncombust ib le where indicated as such by testing." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: These are editorial changes. N U M B E R OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #93) Committee: AUT-SSI

13- 257 - (A-5-13.12): Reject SUBMITTER: William J. Boswell, Wausau HPR Engr COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-169 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Revise proposed second paragraph to read:

The preferred a r rangement for piping is outside the oven with sprmkler.(_O. . . . . u . . . . . . . . . . . . . . n ippled down in the pendant position bv inverted U-bends. formin~ a tran which remains fidl 9f water and orevents the steam from heatin~ the snrinklers. The sprinkler temperature rating should be at ' ieast ... exceed 12 ft (3.7 m) Sorinklers mav be located in 10-12 in. domed recesses if space

S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Provides additional guidance for installers. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: No data has been submitted

~l~ dng the a r rangement suggested by the submitter. FAR OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26

V O T E O N COMMITTEE ACTION: AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #137) Committee: AUT-SSI

13- 258- (A-5-15.2.3.5): Accept SUBMrrTER: Kenneth E. Isman, Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 1345

I RECOMMENDATION: Delete the proposed appendix note A-5- 15.2.3.5 dealing with FDC's and hydrants.

S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This appendix note implies that sprinkler systems designers and installers are responsible for providing hydrants on approved water supplies. In .rural.communities, this is not the pracuee. Even in urban communmes , It ~s frequently up to somebody else to de termine the adequacy of the hydrants for fire flow. Lastly, the 100 ft distance is much shorter titan the ideal used in many municipalities in locating their hydrants close to buildings. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. N U M B E R OF COMMITI'EE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26 C O M M E N T O N AFFIRMATIVE:

MOWER: See my commen t on ROC 13-259 (Log #213).

(Log #213) Committee: AUT-SSI

1% 259- (A-5-15.2.3.5): Reject SUBMITTER: J. Michael Thompson , Gage-Babcock & Assoc., Inc. C O M M E N T O N P ROP O SAL NO: 1345 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Revise proposed text to read:

"Fire depa r tmen t connect ions should be located within 100 ft of point o f fire depa r tmen t pumper access." S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : Proposed text, al though in the appendix, will be mandatory in many jurisdictions, and will add unnecessary costs for the installation and maintenance of sprinkler systems, since free standing fire depa r tmen t connect ions with associated underground piping will be required in most installations. Revised wording should address the concern that locations of a fire depar tment connect ion may cause excessively long lengths of hose from the pumper to the connection. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Commit tee Action and Statement on C ommen t 1%258 (Log #137). N U M B E R OF COMMrI'TEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VO TE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 25 NEGATIVE: 1

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: MOWER: Fire depa r tmen t connect ions should be located within

100 feet of fire depar tment access roads in o rde r to avoid the necessity of hand laying excessive amounts of hose. Laying more than 100 feet o f hose by hand would cause unreasonable delays in supplying water to the FDC. This recommendat ion represents an acceptable compromise to placing hydrants within 100 feet of the fire depar tment connect ion, which is not always possible.

(Log #231 ) Committee: AUT-SSI

13- 260- (A-5-15.2.3.5): Accept SUBMITTER: William E. Koffel, Koffel Assoc., Inc. CO MMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-45

J RECOMMENDATION: Delete the proposed appendix note. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : I agree with the negative ballots. Requiring the fire depar tment connect ion to be within 100 ft, or even suggesting such a requi rement in the appendix, is overly restrictive. This will require far more private fire hydrants with no technical justification. My fire se~wice experience clearly demonstrates that distances of 500 ft to 600 ft are adequate. C O M M r r T E E ACTION: Accept. C O M M r I ' r E E STATEMENT: Also see Commit tee Action and Statement on C ommen t 13-258 (Log #137). N U M B E R OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 25 NEGATIVE: 1

EXPLANATION OF NEGATIVE: MOWER: See my Explanation of Negative Vote on Comment 13-

259 (Log #213).

(Log #3) Committee: AUT-SSI

13- 261 - (A-5-16.3.3 and Figure): Reject SUBMrYrER: J. William Sheppard , General Motors Corp. CO MMENT O N P ROP O SAL NO: 1%57, 13-61 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Figure A-5-16.3.3 should be revised to indicate that the Hydrant Connect ion Valve is " ~ " In addit ion, A-5-16.3.3 should contain a second sentence as follows: "A valve may be installed in the hydrant connect ion as indicated in Figure A-5-16.3.3."

696

Page 145: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 1 3 - A99 ROC

SUBSTANTIATION: Guard posts can protect hydrants in traffic areas. The use o f sectional control valves in the yard mains permi t the repair of hydram:s us ing acceptable i mpa i rmen t procedures . Curb box valves are costly, no t supervised, and will require ma in tenance . The valve is not cost effective for the value received. COMMITTEE, ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: Informat ion on fire hydlan ts is being deleted from NFPA 13 as it will now be addressed by NFPA 14, Standard for the Installation of Standpipe and Hose Systems. The informat ion presented by this c o m m e n t should be submi t ted to NFPA 14. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 2f

(Log #CC306) Commit tee : AUT-HBS

13- 262 - (Figure A-6-1.1): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commi t t ee on H a n g i n g and Bracing o f Water Based Fire Protection Systems C O M M E N T ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-28a RECOMMENDATIO N: follows:

Revise Figure A-6-1.1 in the Prepr int as

A d j u s t a b l e C lev i s h a n g e r Sp l i t r ing R i s e r c l a m p SWlVet n n g

C e l h n g f l a n g e s S i d e b e a m a t t a c h e m e n t s

I I

C t y p e c l a m p s

P ipe c l a m p

Eye le t Of fset eye le t

[

l

© L l n i v e r s a l b e a m c l a m p s

Io } P e t a l n e r s t rap

Togg le nu t U-bo l t U - h o o k

E y e rod

~ r l ~ i i i ~ i i l "Ilu/a/////I//H/#/H/#/HI/////HH//tA

Al l t h read rod

I

W i d e m o u t h P u d l n S tee l M a l e a b l e b e a m c l a m p c l a m p c - c l a m p I ron c - c l a m p

C o n c r e t e i n s e r t s

I

W r a p a r o u n d S h o r t W o o d u - h o o k s t rap b e a m c l a m p

R o d c o u p l i n g

E x p a n s i o n s h i e l d s

r i

W e d g e a n c h o r D r o p i n

P o w e r d r i v e n s t u d s

I I

C o n c r e t e S tee l

Lag sc rew Dr i ve sc rew W o o d screw

Figure A-6-1.1

SUBSTANTIATION: This change updates the figure so that it includes cu r r en t types o f hangers used. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 20 VOTE O N COMMITT E E ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETURNED: ] Patel

6 9 7

Page 146: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

(Log #CC307) Committee: AUT-HBS

13- 263 - (Figure A-6-2.3.3(c) ): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Committee on Hanging and Bracing of Water Based Fire Protection Systems COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-28a RECOMMENDATION: Revise Figure A-6-2.3.3(c) in the Preprint as follows:

(Pipe tight to structure)

U-hook

"D" dim.

• Wrap-around U-hook

Short strap

Clevis hanger

Pipe "D" size dim.

1 in. 1A, in.

1V+ in. Vsin.

11h in. ~.,~ in.

2 in. 'V4 in.

2+h in. ~A in.

Adjustable swivel Adjustable swivel ring - rod tight ring with surge

to pipe suppressor

Retro - - fit wraparound U-hook devices

Figure A-6-2.3.3(c)

SUBSTANTIATION: This change updates the figure so that it includes current types of hangers in use. COMMITrEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETURNED: 1 Patel

698

Page 147: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

(Log #CC30I ) Commit tee : AUT-HBS

13- 264 - (Figure A-6-7.3.4(a) and A~o-2.3.4(b)): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commi t t ee on Hang i ng and Bracing of Water Based Fire Protection Systems COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-28a

'RECOMMENDATION: Revise the figures as follows:

Without support: 24 in. (610 ram) max for steel pipe 12 in. (305 mm) max for copper tube

Armover lo sprinkler

Branch line or cross main

Figures A-6-2.3.4 (a)

Without support: ! 12 in. (305 mm) max for steel pipe 6 in. (152 mm) max for copper tube

f-

A r m o r e r to pendent sprinkler

Branch line or cross main

Note: The pendent sprinkler may be installed either directly in the fitting at the end of the armover or in a fitting at the bottom of a drop nipple.

Figures A-6-2.3.4(b)

SUBSTANTIATION: These are editorial changes that more clearly indicate the length o f armorers . COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF C O M M I T r E E MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETURNED: I Patel

699

Page 148: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

(Log #97) Commit tee: AUT-HBS

13- 265 - (Figure A-6-4.5): Reject SUBMITTER: Daniel C. Duggan, Fire Sprinkler Design COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-289 RECOMMENDATION: Add the following example form for calculations for tension only bracing:

(See Tension Only Bracing form on the following page.) SUBSTANTIATION: The form in Figure A-6-4.5 Artwork (Log #157) is inappropriate for tension only bracing. There is no length limitation for tension only bracing. The diameter of the brace, least radius of gyration and l / r ratio does not apply to tension only bracing. Listed load carrying capacities for tension only braces are based on the brace assembly and not the individual brace components . This form is appropriate for the calculations for tension only bracing and should be included in the Appendix with the form for calculations for t ens ion /compress ion bracing. COMMrrTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMrrrEE STATEMENT: The existing forms can be used for all types of seismic bracing. NUMBER OF COMMrI'rEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETURNED: 1 Patel

(Log #98) Commit tee: AUT-HBS

13- 266 - (Figure A-64.5): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Daniel C. Duggan, Fire Sprinkler Design COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-289, 13-299 RECOMMENDATION: In the area on the form for "Seismic Brace Attachments" do the following:

1. Incorporate the UL terminology of "Structure At tachment Fitting" and "Sway Brace Fitting."

2. Create spaces for the UL "Load Rating" for these two devices. 3. Create spaces for the allowable horizontal load on these

de~4ces at 30 °, 45 ° and 60 °, when the UL Load Rating is adjusted for the brace angle in accordance with 4-14.4.3.5.7 and Table 4- 14.4.3.5.7. SUBSTANTIATION: The artwork for this folm does not provide for indicating listed load carrying capacity of the sway brace fittings. NFPA 13 now requires that these load canying capacities be considered in the load c a n t i n g capacity of sway brace assemblies. This example form should include provision fox- this information. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

I Revise the Figures A-6-4.5(c) and A-6-4.5(d) as shown on the following pages. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: These changes meet the intent o f the submitter and make the figures consistent with the requirements of the standard. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETURNED: 1 Patel

(Log #101) Commit tee: AUT-HBS

13- 267 - ([A-6-4.5.2(b)] A-4-14.4.3.5.2(b)): Accept SUBMITTER: Daniel C. Duggan, Fire Sprinkler Design COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-289 RECOMMENDATION: Retain the wording:

(b) Prestretching to eliminate pe rmanen t construction stretch and to obtain a verifiable modulus of elasticity. SUBSTANTIATION: Deletion of this wording was not in response to a proposal that was submitted. It was proposed by a Committee Member during the development of Commit tee Proposal 13-289 (Log #CP8). This wording was the result o f a properly submitted proposal, subjected to Public Review and Comment , and voted on at the Annual Meeting by the full NFPA Membership. It is consistent with tile AISI Standards included in the Specialty Listing Criteria for Tension Only Bracing. Prestretching of the cable is required by the Building Code Standards for structural applications of steel cables. Prestretching addresses two issues. One is to eliminate pe rmanen t elongation of the cable each time it is loaded by eliminating pe rmanen t construction stretch and the o the r is to establish a verifiable modulus of elasticity. This requi rement specifically addresses the structu,~al integrity of the cable. Prestretching is required by the referenced Standards. Deletion of this wording would be

irresponsible and would be a solution to a problem that does not exist. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITrEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETURNED: 1 Patel

(Log #99) Committee: AUT-HBS

13- 268 - ([A-6-4.5.2(c)] A-4-14.4.3.5.2 Exception): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Daniel C. Duggan, Fire Sprinkler Design COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-289 RECOMMENDATION: Retain old wording and revise new wording:

(c) Color coding or o ther cont inuous marking of each different size cable for field verification. SUBSTANTIATION: Deletion of the word "color" was not in response to a proposM that was submitted. It was proposed by a Committee Member during the deve lopment of Commit tee Proposal 13-289 (Log #CP8). The use of the words "Color Coding" was the result o f a properly submit ted proposal, subjected to public review and comment , and voted on at the Annual Meeting by the full NFPA. Membership. The. color, codin, g selves two. purposes. One Js to make it possible to dnstmguish the dnfferent sizes of cable in the field the o ther is to indicate that the cable is the special cable product that has been listed. The listed product must be prestretched to obtain a verifiable modulus of elasticity, as required by the specialty listing criteria. There is no o ther practical way to make these distinctions in the field and the only currently listed tension only bracing cable is color coded.

Deletion of this wording would be an open invitation to use unlisted materials and would be a solution to a problem that does not exist.

Adding the words "other continuous" before the word "marking" would provide for some other marking system, should another system be needed by some other entity. It should be noted, however, that cable can come in ten or twenty thousand foot spools. In order for any given section of cable from such spools to be marked for field identification, it would have to be continuous. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle.

Accept the submitters proposed text with the following change: "(c) Color coding on- other continuou~ ~ marking of each

different size cable for field verification." COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The wording proposed by the submitter is considered to be too restrictive. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETURNED: 1 Patel

(Log #85) Committee: AUT-HBS

13- 269 - (A-64.5(c) and (d)): Accept SUBMrI'I 'ER: Mark Brown, Allied Fire Protection COMMENT ON PROPOSAL NO: 13-299

I RECOMMENDATION: Delete the following text: XAr~:--I,,b..~ cf fi:ting; add .~1 ~ izc:,ccn: " 1 ,o .... l--k. of W-.~. g'ill~.l ..l . . . . A ~.**i~o

SUBSTANTIATION: These forms imply the weight of fittings are to be included when doing seismic bracing calculations. Section 6- 4.5 has no requirements. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept.

] Also see Commit tee Action on Comment 13-266 (Log #98). NUMBER OF COMMrI'TEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETURNED: 1 Patel

700

Page 149: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

The siesmic bracing on this drawing is designed in accordance with the

SYMBO ON

PLAN

TENSION ONLY BRACING

, ~ .~o ~ c o . ~ , ~ , ~ . ~ L O w , ~ L E I ~ O ~ O ~ , . L LOADS ~, ,cd lo th,- - ~ , c . . ~ b . ~ on ~ ~ w ° . . ~ , c oa~ [ etmer me xastener to the structural clement to which the brace is attached or the brace itself. Allowable loads used for the

t u ~ n e ~ are based on NFPA 13 according to the brace angle and the method of attachment. Allowable loads for the braces are based on the'~ uloma~ b ~ s t r e ~ ~llh a safety fa~..r of 1.~ for earthquake loading..This allowable load is themct adjusted to show the maxu~um auowaole nor~o.mm maa when appued to the brace at the angles indicated. The maximum load then allowed to be applied to the brace andoits fasteners m equal to the i~.ommended mextmum allowable horizontal load multiplied by 2.0 for a 30 ° brace angle by t . ~ t q k lOT a ~ D r l c c ~ ] ~ . l e I n d b v 1 . 1 5 6 f t~r a Kfl o h ~ e ~ a n ~ l * LP*F l ~ l ~ t A l ~ . t ] ~ L ~$~l~[It ~q

RECOMMENDED LBS

ALLOWABLE HORIZONTAL .

LOAD

QTY STRUCTURAL PIPE

ELEMENT CLAMPS ATTACHED TO

k.mt

I

Page 150: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 1 3 - A99 ROC

S e i s m i c Brac ing C a l c u l a t i o n s S h e e t o f _ _

Project:

Address:

Contractor:

Address:

Telephone:

Fax:

Brace Information

Length of brace:

Diameter o f brace:

Type of brace:

Angle of brace:

Least radius of gyration:*

L/R value:*

Maximum horizontal load: (Table 6-4.5.5)

Fastener Information

Orientation of connecting surface: (Figure 6-4.5.6)

Fastener: (Figure 6-4,5.6)

Type:

Diameter:

Length (in wood):

Maximum load:

Seismic Brace Attachments

Structure attachment fitting or tension only bracing system:

Make:_ _ Model:

Listed load rating: _ _ Adjusted load rating per 6-4.5.7: _ _

Sway brace (pipe attachment) fitting:

Make: Model:

Listed load rating: _ _ Adjusted load rating per 6-4.5.7: _ _

S e i s m i c B r a c e A s s e m b l y D e t a i l (Provide detail on plans)

Brace identification no. (to be used on plans)

[ ] Lateral brace

Sprinkler System Load Calculation

I [ ] Longitudinal brace

Diameter Type Length (ft) Total (ft) Y= Weight per ft ½ Total Weight

Ib/ft Ib

Ib/ft Ib

Ib/ft Ib

Ib/ft Ib

Ib/ft Ib

Ib/ft Ib

t Total ½ weight of water filled pipe Ib

* Excludes tension only bracing systems

Figure A-6-.4.5(c)

702

Page 151: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 1 3 - A99 ROC

Seismic Bracing Calculations Sheet of

Project: Acme Warehouse

Address: 321 First Street

Any City, Any State

Contractor:

Address:

Telephone:

Fax:

Sm,th Sprinkler Company

123 Main Street

Any City, Any State

(555) 555-1234

(555) 555-4321

Brace Informat ion

Length of brace:

Diameter of brace:

Type of brace:

Ang e of brace:

Lea~;t radius of gyration:"

L/R value'*

Maximum horizontal load: (Tab,e 6-4,5 5)

8 f t 81n.

Schedule 40

30 ° _ 45 °

Seismic Brace At tachments

Fastener Informat ion

Orientation of connecting surface: "D" (Figure 6-4.5.6)

Fastener (Figure 6-4.5 6)

Type Th rou~J h bolt

Diameter: 5/8 in.

LenGth (m wood): 4 in

Maximum load. 491 Ib

Structure attachment fitting or tension only bracing system:

Make: Acme Model: 123 1 in. Listed load reting: _ _ Adjusted load rating per 6-4 5.7: _ _

Sway brace (pipe attachment) fitting:

Make. Acme Model: 521 0.42

Listed load rating: _ _ Adjusted load rating per 6-4.5.7: _ _ 200

1767 Ib Seismic Brace Assembly Detail (Provide detail on plans)

/ 5/8 ~n x 6 in. through bolt - - W w/nut and washer

1 / 2 ~ m:~ ~ ~ Acme 123 _ _ - - beam depth

Ac 7 321 - - - - - ~

(Bt rabce ide~l ioliCpl'i°nn)n ° SB-1 I l t l ~ l ~ " ~

[ ] Lateral brace I [ ] Longitudinal brace

Sprinkler System Load Calculat ion

Diameter Type Length (ft)

1in. Sch40 15 f t + 25 f t + 8 f t + 2 2 f t

1-1/4 in. Sch 40 25 f t + 33 f t + 18 f~

1-1/2 in. Sch 40 8 P~ + 8 Pc + 10 f t + 10 Pc

2 in. Sch 40 20 Pc

4 in. Sch 10 20 f t

Total (ft)

70 f t

76 f t

36 f t

20 PC

Z \ x Weight per ft

1.O3 Ib/ft

1.47 Ib/ft

1.81 Ib/ft

2.57 Ib/ft

Zkx Total Weight

72.1 Ib

20 f t 5 .89 Ib/ft

111.7 Ib

65.2 Ib

51.4

117,8

Ib/ft Ib

Total Z \x weight of water filled pip{ 418.2 Ib

* Excludes tension only bracing systems

Figure A - 6 - 4 . 5 ( d )

703

Page 152: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

(Log #84) Commit tee : AUT-HBS

13- 270 - (A-6-4.5(d)): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Mark Brown, Allied Fire Protection COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-299 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Revise text to read as follows:

~z -XWeigh t per ft 1/2 Weight per ft LZva~ Total Weight 1/2 Total Weight Total ~ weight of water filled pipe Total 1/2 weight o f water filled pipe

S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This is a typographical error. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Commi t t ee Action on C o m m e n t 13-266 (Log #98). N U M B E R OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETURNED: 1 Patel

(Log #169) Commit tee : AUT-HBS

13- 271 - (Figure AdS-4.5(d)): Accept in Principle SUBMITTER: Kenne th E. I sman , Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. C O M M E N T O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-299 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Delete the row "Weight of fittings - add 15%" fi-om the bot tom of Figure A-6-4.5(d). S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : The s tandard does trot call for a 15% overage to account for fittings. To include it in (he figure for the append ix would be misleading. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Principle. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: See Commi t t ee Action on C o m m e n t 13-266 (Log #98). N U M B E R OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 20 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 19 NOT RETURNED: 1 Patel

(Log #CC304) Commit tee : AUT-HBS

13- 271a - (A-6-4.5.3): Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commi t t ee on Hang i ng and Bracing of Water Based Fire Protection Systems C O M M E N T O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-28a

I RECOMMENDATION: Make the following revisions to Section A- 6-4.5.3 of the Preprint:

I. Delete Ilte seventh, e ighth, and n in th paragraphs. The seventh paragvalfll begins with "Listed devices permitt ing.. ."

"2. Delete the first sen tence o f the tenth paragraph which reads " S o m e - a ~ ! j n ~ m e ~ a n 4 ~ c i~rc,;'ided ia a pipe b:'ace by u~c ~,f a !eft-

3. Add "For the four-way bracing at the top o f the riser, half the weight o f the riser should be assigned to both tire lateral and hmgi tudina l loads as they are separately considered" as tire last SCllleln c Io Sectiott (c)3 in tire eleventh paragraph.

• I. I)elew Figm-es A-6-4.5.3(e), A-6-4.5.3(f), and A-6-4.5.3(g) Wil]lOIIl replacelnent. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : These sections o f the append ix conflict with the l e q u i ] e m e m s of tire s tandard. Addit ional informat ion was I u ovided for sizing four-way braces at the top o f risers. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS EI,.IGIBLE TO VOTE: 20 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 1 l NOT RETURNED: 9 Biggins, Bonds, Braga, Forsythe, Misichko,

Moellel, Mowrer, Rothmier , and Tauby

(Log #CC419) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 272 - ([FigureA-8-1.1]) : Accept SUBMITTER: Technical Commi t t ee on Sprinkler System Installation (h ileria CO MMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 1%304

I RECOMMENDATION: Add informat ion indicat ing that the sprinkler used has a nomina l K-factor o f 5.6. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This informat ion has been omit ted from tire figure and needs to be included. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. NUMBER OF COMMrYPEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VOTE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #10) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

1% 273 - (A-8-4.1): Accept in Part SUBMITTER: Harold S. Wass, Lake Wylie, SC CO MMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-305 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Delete proposed addit ion to A-8-4.1 in its entirety. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : 1. I believe tire thrus t of the Commi t t ee S ta tement on Proposal 1%250 (Log #161) is also applicable here. "These do not have a g r e e m e n t amongs t the eng inee r ing co m m u n i ty ... such limitations, if any, are best left up to the (AHJ's)."

2. While I favor remain ing silent on the issue at this time, if the Commi t t ee chooses to come out against a l imitation on flow velocity I believe the last sen tence should be removed. "Accuracy" (my dict ionary offers defini t ions such as "precision" and "exactness") is no t an appropr ia te word when discussing Hazen- Williams since, at best, it yields only a reasonable approx imat ion of the friction loss. Further , the reference to 32 f t / sec is supef l lnous and could raise ques t ions in a user 's mind about lower velocities and the unqual i f ied "velocities beyond" seems refutable.

3. If retained, should this merely apply to addit ions to exist ing systems? Why not make it a new 8-4.4.9?

4. Is there an implied corrflict with NFPA 750? COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept in Part.

1. Delete only the last two sentences of Section A-8-4.1. 2. Editorially, conf i rm the metric units in Figure A-8-2.4.

COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The intent o f the Commi t tee was trot to restrict water velocities. The submi t te r is correct in ques t ion ing the rational provided in the last two sentences. Also see C o m m e n t 13-274 (Log #164). NUMBER OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VO TE O N COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #164) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 274- (A-8-4.1): Accept SUBMITTER: Kenne th E. l sman , Nat'l Fire Sprinkler Assn. C O M M E N T O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-305 RECOMMENDATION: Delete tbe last two sentences of A-8-4.1 regarding the Darcy-Weisbach equat ion and the 32 ft per second. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : It is true that the Commi t tee has not seen fit to restrict the velocities because they tetrd to be self regulating. Higher velocities mean greater friction loss. COMMITTEE ACTION: Accept. N U M B E R OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VO TE O N COMMrI'rEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

(Log #112) Commit tee : AUT-SSI

13- 275 - (A-9-1.3.2 and A-9-.1.3.4): Accept in Part SUBMITTER: Gal T S. Andress , Wausau HPR Engineer ing CO MMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-251 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : Reinstate the deleted text in A-9-1.3.2 (24- 7-6.2) and A-9-1.3.4 (24-A-2-2.3) and r e n u m b e r as A-9-1.2.2.

A-9-1.2.2 The size o f the private fire service mains supplying fire protect ion systems should be approved by the authori ty having jur isdict ion, due considera t ion be ing given to the construct ion and occupancy of the plant, to the fire flow and pressure o f water required, and to the adequacy of the supply.

Dead end mains should be avoided, if possible, by a r rang ing for mains suppl ied from both directions. When fire service mains are connec t ed to dead end public mains, each si tuation should be examined to de te rmine if it is practical to request the water utility to loop the mains in o rder to obtain a more reliable supply. S U B S T A N T I A T I O N : This text provides the authori ty having jur isdic t ion and the water purveyor with guidance. COMMrrI 'EE ACTION: Accept in Part.

1. Do not reinstate Section A-9-1.3.2 in the Preprint . 2. Reinstate A-9-1.3.4 as the third paragraph of Section A-9-2.1 of

the Preprint. COMMI'rFEE STATEMENT: The size of the private fire service mains is addressed by Section 9-1.2.2. N U M B E R OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE T O VOTE: 26 VO TE O N COMMITI'EE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

704

Page 153: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

(Log #227a) Committee: AUT-SSI

13- 276 - (A-9-2.3.3): Reject SUBMITTER: Matthew T. Gustafson, Severna Park, MD COMMENT O N PROPOSAL NO: 13-1 RECOMMENDATION: Delete the current text and replace with the following:

The pressure tank should be adequate to supply the most hydraulically demanding demand areas of the sprinkler system. Where a standing charge of air or nitrogen is maintained in the tank to push the water out, the following formula should be used: P I V 1 = P2V2 where P 1 = the pressure of the initial charge of air, V 1 is the volume of the initial charge of air, P2 is the pressure of the charge of air when the tank is empty and V 2 is the volume of the tank. P2 should equal or exceed the highest sprinkler system demand calculated back to the connection to the pressure tank. If the air or nitrogen is supplied fi'om a separate tank, calculations or a discharge test may be needed to show that an adequate supply is available. SUBSTANTIATION: The current text assumes that the sprinkler system demand is entirely a fimction of the elevation of the highest branch line. COMMITTEE ACTION: Reject. COMMITTEE STATEMENT: The Technical Committee believes that this formula adectuately addresses all the situations that may be present in the use of z,. pressure tank. NUMBER OF COMMI'Iq'EE MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: 26 VOTE ON COMMITTEE ACTION:

AFFIRMATIVE: 26

705

Page 154: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

The following draft of NFPA 13, Chapter 7, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 1999, incorporates the Committee Actions on the Public and Committee Comments which make up the Report on Comments and which appear on the preceding pages. The draft is presented only as an aid to the reviewer.

Chapter 7 Des ign Approaches

7-1 (13-5-1) Gene ra l .

7-1.1 Wate r d e m a n d r e q u i r e m e n t s sha l l be d e t e r m i n e d f r o m the o c c u p a n c y h a z a r d f i re con t ro l a p p r o a c h of Sec t ion 7-2. ( R O C 13- 161)

Exception: Special design approaches as permitted in Section 7-9. ( R O C 13-161)

7-1.2 For b u i l d i n g s wi th two or m o r e a d j a c e n t o c c u p a n c i e s t b a t a re no t physic~ally s e p a r a t e d by a ba r r i e r or pa r t i t i on c a p a b l e of d e l a y i n g h e a t f r o m a f ire in o n e a r e a f r o m fus ing sp r ink l e r s in t i le a d j a c e n t area, the r e q u i r e d s p r i n k l e r p r o t e c t i o n for the m o r e d e m a n d i n g o c c u p a n c y shal l e x t e n d 14 ft b e y o n d its p e r i m e t e r . (ROC 13-161)

7-2 (13-5-2) Occupancy Hazard Fire Control Approach.

7-2.1 (13-5-2.1) Occupancy Classifications.

7-2.1.1 (13-5-2.1.1) O c c u p a n c y classific~ttions for th is s t a n d a r d re la te to s p r i n k l e r i n s t a l l a t ions a n d t h e i r wa te r s u p p l i e s only. T h e y shal l no t be u s e d as a g e n e r a l c lass i f ica t ion of o c c u p a n c y hazards ,

7-2.1.2 (13-5-2.1.2) t ) c c u p a n c i e s or p o r t i o n s of o c c u p a n c i e s shal l he c lass i f ied a c c o r d i n g to the q u a n t i t y a n d c o m b u s t i b i l i t y of

Exception No 1: The pipe schedule method shall be permitted for use in systems exceeding 5,000 f t 2 (465m ~ ) where the flows required in Table 7- 2.2 are available at a minimum residual pressure of 50 psi (3.4 bar) at the highest elevation of sprinkler.

Exception No. 2: The pipe schedule method shall be p,wraitted for additions or modifications to existing extra hazard pipe schedule systems.

Table 7-2.2 (13-5-2.2) Water Supply Requirements for Pipe Schedule Sprinkler S~'stems

Acceptable Flow at Minimum Base of Riser Residual (Including Hose Duration

Occupancy Pressure Stream Allowance) in Classification Required (13-200) Minutes

Light Haza rd 15 psi 5 0 0 - - 7 5 0 g p m 30----60 O r d i n a r y 20 psi 850---1500 g p m 60 90 H a z a r d For SI Units : 1 g p m = 3 .785L / r a in ; 1 psi = 0.0689 bar.

7-2.2.2 (13-5-2.2.2) The lower d u r a t i o n value of Tab le 7-2.2 shal l he a c c e p t a b l e on ly w h e r e r e m o t e s t a t ion or cen t ra l s t a t ion wate r f low a l a r m service is p rov ided . ..::~::..

..::~.::i:i::.::.. 7-2.2.3* (13-5-2.2.3) The residxl~]" pr~:~ure r e q u i r e m e n t of T a b l e 7- 2.2 shal l be m e t a t the e l e ~ : ~ i . ' . ~ , t he h i g h e s t sp r ink le r . (,See the

Exceptions to 7-2.2.1 )...::iii::ii:.':i~ii!ii::i:: "%!i!~i~ .... "-::::::::::..

7-2.2.4 (13-5-2.2.4) T[-l~::|~:..wer"flow f i ~ i ~ i ~ f Tat)[e 7-2.2 shal l be p e r m i t t e d on ly w h e r e the"B~, i l d i n g is . .~V"noncombust ible c o n s t r u c t i o n or L~,l~:.~..O....~enti,'~!~...reas of':{]re a re l im i t ed hy b u i l d i n g s ize o r c o m p a ~ : : ~ i : a ~ a t n o o p e n a r e a s e x c e e d 3 0 0 0 sq ft (279 m ~) .~6r Lig'l~:.Hazarc{"/3:i~'sff()00 sq ft (372 rn ~) for O r d i n a r y H a z a r d . . . . i% .... "::ii!i ....

':':" "::ii::i::i::ii::.. "::ii::.. ..:.. 7-2.3 .~.~..-.5-2.3"i!i::~ter D ~ a n d R e q u i r e m e n t s - - Hydraulic C a l . ~ [ ~ ! Met~ . . . : : : . ""

..:-..-:: . . . . :-i-.?i: .- -.::..::.;-;-...:;::-- content.s, t he e x p e c t e d ra tes of b e a t re lease , t he to ta l p o t e n t i a l for e n e r g y re lease , the heights, of .st°ckpiles. ., a n d t i le presence., o f ..::::.'~i~k~.~ 1 t ; * ~ . ;* '~:~t ' i :~ . . . . . . . ).:.~::"eneral . f ] a l n l n a l l e. a n d c o t n b u s t l b , e h q u ds,, US n ~ t b e d e f i n i t i o n s ":" •.:.:•:.:::..•.:::•::::::.:•::....:....•..•••.::::::•••:•:••...::::::::::::::::::::•:•.

Out t n e d n 1 4 ( tss f i ca t lons are ,as fol lows * ~ er su 1 u e m e n t s : ;" ' - . "i " " " " ' : .... ii::ii:iii::::::iiii::::::~-2.g!~::~ii~i::." (13"-~ .3 .1 .1) T h e m ' n i m u m wat pp y req ir ~'~"li"h' --azarLl l" ......':ii:: . . . . ::~r...... a l ~ a # : . ' t i c a l l y ....... d e s i g n e d o c c u p a n c y h a z a r d f i re con t ro l sprinkler" . . . . . . . . . . . . ,~, ..::iiiiiiiiiii::. :System sl}~'I be d e t e r m i n e d by a d d i n g t he hose s t r e a m d e m a n d ~Jr~t n tr ra t z a r o ~t FOU )s 1 a n o ) e ~ Y : " " t ' • - -:::-" "slliliiii::, ..::ii::i-ro m T~/~]e 7-2 3 1 1 to the wa te r s u n n l v for s n r i n k l e r s d e t e r m i n d r~xtra H a z a r d ( ( , r o u p s 1 a n d 2) .:::, "::iiii:::i::" . 9 , -. • • • v . v , v . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ::~:iSi:i::, "-:::::~:. in 7-, .3.1.2. T lus s u p p l y shal l be a v a d a b l e for the m m u m n n S e Cl t] () u ) a n t ~t tz t r a ,~ectlon / to l~Ol,~ I.* 1Ol , [' ~" : ": [ • " -Y : .: t, - ) • ~ - - )..::i!::"'""':::: .... "-iii~i::ii:~..the.:ttion spec i f i ed irYTab e 7 -9 3 1 1 as shown on dxe fo l lowing

..::i::" . "::i:i::::::.:-. -~-" . . . . . . . .... ~-"i'i %. !i.-];mge. 7-X.1.3 was m o v e d to 7-1.2. ( R O C 13-161) ..::i:::i:i:i:!::.. ;i!i!i!::.. "!:: . . . . . . . .

:':" "::i:i:i:i::-...::;:;:::::i:i::.. :.:.:.:.. 7-2.1.4" (13-~2.1 .3) will be m o v e d to 5-3.1.5. (RO.G..::.l.:~16i':ii::::iiiiiiiiiiii:iii:.. ":" .i!ii? :::i!:" Exception No. 1: An allowance for inside and outside hose shall not be

":':':':':':':':':':': . . . . :!!!i~!!i::.....::ii::" required where tanks suppl~ sprinklers only.

7-9.1.4.1 (1"~-5-2.1.'~.1) will b e m o v e d to 5-3 1 ~.~"(ROi~" 13-161i':%iii "ii::" Exception No. 2: Where pumps taking suction from a private fire service .:~iiii:~:ii::::!::!::::ii ........ iiii::iiiii::i::~i~:i::.:. "::ii:: ..:~i~ .... rru~in sapp b sprinklers only, the pump need not be sized to accommodate

7-2.2 (1.9,-~2.2) W a t e r D e m a n d Requirem..e.....n...t.:.s " : : ~ ! ~ S c ' [ { ~ e inside and outside hose. Such hose allowance shall be considered in M e t h o d . ================================ "::i~:~!!!~::.. evaluatin E the available water supplies.

.... ¢ . . . . . . . . :#::: .... i:iiiii::!i:: ..::i!!: 7-2.2.1 (1 3-5-2.2.1) Tab le 7-2.2 sha..[...[:!~::!...u...sed..#" d e t e r , ~ : i " n g d~ e m i n i m u m wa te r s u p p l y r e q u i r e m e f i t s f ' ~ : : : : ~ h t a n d (3 rd ina ry H a z a r d O c c u p a n c i e s p r o t e c t e d by syste~i::..~jtb p i p e s ized a c c o r d i n g to dae p ipe s c h e d u l e s of 8-5. t ' r ~ . r : ~ : a n d flow r e q u i r e m e n t s for E x t r a H a z a r d ()ccupancieg.:.:i~all be b a s e d on t he h y d r a u l i c c a l c u l a t i o n m e t h o d s of 7-2.3. Th@:"pipe s c h e d u l e m e d l o d shal l be p e r m i t t e d on ly for new ins ta l l a t ions of 5 ,000 ft ~ (465 m) or less or for a d d i t i o n s or m o d i f i c a t i o n s to ex i s t i ng p ipe s c h e d u l e sys tems s ized a c c o r d i n g to the p i p e s c h e d u l e s of Sec t ion 8-5. T a b l e 7-2.2 shal l be u s e d in d e t e r m i n i n g the m i n i m u m wa te r supp ly r e q u i r e l l - t e n t s .

7 0 6

Page 155: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A99 ROC

Table 7-2.3.1.11 ~ (13-5-2.3; 231-6-2.4.6-2.5, 7-2.3, 7-2.4; 23105-7, 5-7.1, 5-7.2, 5-8) Hose Stream Demand and Water Suppl), Duration Requirements (ROC 13-161)

Total Occupancy Combined

or Inside and Commodity Inside Hose Outside Hose Duration in

Classification (~pm) (gpm) Minutes Light Haza rd O, 50, or 100 100 ~ t ) r d i n a r y H a z a r d 0, 50, or 100 250 ( ~ - - 9 0 Ex t r a I l a z a r d 0, 50, or 100 500 90 - -120 Rack S':orage, Class 1, 11, lII 0, 50, or 100 250 90

C o m m o d i t i e s u p to 12 ft in he igh t

Rack S torage , Class IV 0, 50, or 100 250 90 c o m m o d i t i e s up to 10 ft in he ight

Rack Storage , Class IV O, 50, or 100 500 .90 c o m m o d i t i e s up to 12 ft in he igh t

Rack Storage , Class I, II a n d 111 0, 50, or 100 500 90 c o m m o d i t i e s over 12 ft,

Rack S to rage Class IV 0, 50, or 100 500 120 c o m m o d i t i e s over 12 fi in h e i g h t a n d [_,lastic c o m m o d i t i e s

Gener,.,I S to r age Glass I, II, I l l O, 50, or 100 500 90 ..::i!::ii:.. =====================

c o m m o d i t i e s over 12 ft up to 20 ..::i:: . . . . :':::: fl ..::ii!i!ii~!::..

( ; en stg Class IV c o m m o d i t i e s O, 50, or IO0 500 120 .:i{iiiii::""::!#{{i{!iiiii .... over ! 2 up to 20ft

( ; en stg Class I, II a n d 111 O, 50, or 100 500 12~iiiiiii~." "::i?. "-::ii::!i!i!}~::.::!.:ii :. c o m m o d i t i e s over 20 ft up to 30

( ; en stg Class IV c o m m o d i t i e s O, 50, or 100 500 .... i~i::::ililili::::~::~i~i~!~!i!:!:!:!::::::i;:.::!i!::~!~ .... over :~0 ft up to 30 ft ":" ====================================================

( ; en s tg g r o u p A pl~stics _< 5 ft O, 50, ,w 100 250 .... #:::i!i. !:" " .... :. " ........... ( ; en stg g r o u p A plas t ics over 5 ft O, 50, or lOO 500 ============================== 120:iiiii::....:..

up to 2(1 It. ( ;en stg g r o u p A ph'~tics over 20 f t 0, 50, or 100 500..::::~?'-}ii::~!~ii:':. ":::'i::-iii~:.lS0...-:i::"

up to 25 ft .... !i# ......... :::!ii ~ :~iii.-i:?::

Fo," SI lh , i t s : 1 g p m = 3 .7SSL/min . #i¢iii::::iiii:::i:'-:...::ifl-;i:iii::ii{::iiiiii;:::!i~:::: . : i - - ' - ::.:: .#i ....

7-2.3.1.2 (13-5-2.3.1.2) T h e water s u p p l y for sp r ink l e r s on ly shal l be ...... i:iiii::i::i:::i:i .... "::?'iiiiiii::::i i .... "":::-:-- d e t e r m i n e d e t h e r t ' r o q / t h e a r e a / d e n s i t y curves of F igure 7-2.3.1.2 .::.::.'i .......... ii::ii:: :: i" . ..... n a c c o r d a n c e with th,e m e t h o d of 7-2.3.2 or be based u p o n the ..::iiiiiii::::.. ):!::!# .... iii::!::!::::::¢:"

r o o m des gn m e t h o d in a c c o r d a n c e wi th 7-2.3.3, a t the discretid~:~"::iii-iii'-::-. ,::#::' 4!i::" :- ":'..-%-i?" of the d e s i g n e r . For speckd a reas u n d e r c o n s i d e r a t i o n , :L~ ":':':" . : : : : : : : : : : : : : . " - : : : : : : : : : : . .

, . : . : . : . :+ .

d e s c r i b e d in 7-2.3.4, s e p a r a t e h y d r a u l i c ca l cu la t ions shal l ..~" ........... :::: . . . . ::i~iiiii!!i.:::fi:. r e q u i r e d in a d d i t i o n To f l lose r e q u i r e d by 7-2.3.2 or 7-2:.~ig - : i : : . . . . : . : . : . . - ....

. . . . ....

. . : , : . : . : . : . : . : - : - : - : - "

.................. D ~ , (Uma~ 500~_ 0 ¢ 1 61 ..:#~::::::::ii::::i::i::i~. 81 '::~i~::::::::~:: ..::#:: 10 2 122

• . . : :

1 5 0 0 ~ 0.05 0.10 0.15 0 20 0.25 0 30

Density, gprn/ft 2

14.3 16 3 465

372 e~

O

c 279 ~.

*6

232

186

139 0 35 0 40

Figure 7-2.3.1.2 (13-5-2.3) Area/density curves.

7 0 7

Page 156: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

7-2.3.1.3 (13-5-2.3.1.3) Regardless of which of the two methods is used, the following restrictions applyz.

(a) For areas of sprinkler operation less than 1500 sq ft (139 m e) used for Light and Ordinary Hazard Occupancies, the density for 1500 sq ft (139 m e) shall be used. For areas of sprinkler ope~,'ation less than 2500 sq ft (232 m e) for Extra Hazard Occupancies, the density for 2500 sq ft (232 m 2) shall be used.

(b)* For buildings having unspr inklered combustible concealed spaces (as described in 5-13.1.1 and 5-13.6), the minimum area of sprinkler operation shall be 3000 sq ft (279 mZ).

Exception No. 1: Combustible concealed spaces filled entirel~ with noncombustible insulation.

Exception No. 1: Where the combined sprinkler ~stemn demand and hose stream allowance of Table 7-2.3 exceeds the requirements of NFPA 14, Standard for the Installation of Standpipe and Hose S~stems, this higher demand shall be used.

Exception No. 2: For partiall 3 sprinklered buildings, the sprinkler demand, not including hose stream allowance, as indicated in Table 7- 2.3 shall be added to the requirenwnts given in NFPA 14, Standard for the Installation of Standpipe and Hose S~stems.

(f) Water allowance for outside hose shall be added to the sprinkler and inside hose requi rement at the connect ion to the city water main, or a yard hydrant, whichever is closer to the system riser.

Exception No. 2*: Light or Ordina~ Hazard Occupancies where noncombustible or limited combustible c~'ilings are directly attached to the bouom o f solid wood joists so as to create enclosed joist spaces 160 cuf f (4.8 m ~) or less in volume.

Exception No. 3*: Concealed spaces where the exposed surfaces have a flanw spread rating of 25 or less and the materials have been demonstrated to not propagate fire in the form in which th~ are installed in the space.

(c) 113-5-2.3.1.3(c), 231C-5-4.31 Water demand of sprinklers installed in racks or water curtains shall be added to the ceiling sprinkler water d e m a n d at the point of connection. Demands shall be balanced to the higber pressure. (See Chapter 8.)

Water dem,'md of sprinklers installed in concealed spaces or under obstructions such as ducts and cutting tables need not be added to ceiling demand. (ROC 13-161)

(d) Where inside bose stations are [)lanned or are required, a total water allowance of 50 gpm (189 L /min ) for a single hose

(g) The lower durat ion values in Table %2.3 shall be permit ted where remote station or central station waterflow alarm service is provided.

(h) Where pumps, gravity tanks, or pressure tanks supply sprinklers only, requirements for inside and outside hose need not be considered in de te rmin ing the size of such pumps or tanks.

7-2.3.1.4 (13-5-2.3.1.4) Total syste...~::.water supply requirements shall be de te rmined in accordance ~il~i::.:~. hydraulic calculation procedures of Section 8-4..,,.....2;~ii~ii:-.::..:::::::.::: "

72.3. (1 5-232

7-2.3.2.1 (13-5-2.3.2. l f ' ~ , w , a t e r sup'~i~i~quirement for sprinklers only shall be calculated frd:i~..:the are~.'~lensity curves in Figure 7- 2.3.1.2 or from ~ ? . : . l . . - 9 . . : . ~ r e area/densi ty criteria is specified for special o c . . ~ : ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ a e n using Figure 7-2.3.1.2, the ca lcula t ion~hal l s~t..~y any single point on due appropriate a r ea / de .p~~.'.-:.:-g4~rve ,~'t'~.l.lows: (ROC 13-161 )

station installation or 100 gpm (378 L/rain) for a multiple hose (a).:.-i-~.~{)t H~.g...Areaj~'t)ensity Curve 1 station installation shall be added to the sprinkler requirements. .{:.~')"'"~nary I-t"~..d:" (Group 1) Area/Densi ty Curve 2 The water allowance shall be added in 50~gpm (189-L/min) ..~..:.:.~) O .r~]nary .Ha~'~l (Group 2) Area/Densi ty Curve 3 increments beginning at the most remote hose station, with eacb -:ii'::"%~}.... ~ . ~ " ( G r o u p 1) Area/Densi ty Curve 4 increment added at the pressure required by the sprinkler system .... :::-: :!:i::.:.. (~:'%-~-'. x t ra ' f '~ l :~d (Group 2) Area/Densi ty Curve 5. design at dlat point. (ROC 13-182)

.... !i!ii!:. . . . . . :iiiiiitt is r~'~i~cessary to meet all points on the selected curve. (e) When hose wdves for fire depar tment use are attached to v¢~:~ii~i~i~i::-. 2i! !" .-.-:i! !::"

pipe sprinkler system risers in accordance with 5-15.5.2, the ~ e r ~'%iiii~i~!¢::"Exception- Sprinkler demand for storage occupancies as determined in 7- supply shall no t be required to be added to s tandpipe de .n3~.."~!!...~.. "%'::.:-!~.::..3 th. rough 7-8. (ROC 13-161) deteruf ined f rom NFPA 14, Standard for the Installation of:.'~fan..d.pf[Je x:~!!i!~i::.::~!i::" and Hose S~stems. (ROC 13-182) ..:ii::::. "::i!!i:. % .ii~:"~.3.2.2 (13-1.4.7.4.2, 13-5-2.3.2.2; 231C-6-1,231-6-2.2.1 ) For

'::!i::'":~!i::::::i':. :iii::!i!!!::!ii:. ::::ii~: ":"protection of miscellaneous storage, miscellaneous tire storage, ........ '::ii::::::::::ii:. " y::" and storage up to 12 ft (3.6 m) in heir!It, the discharge criteria in

..::ii:ii:i:':i'::iiii'::i~: "::ii::iii::ii:: . . . . . . ¢ .... Table 7-2.3.2.2 sball be applicable: (KOC 13-161) . : :~: :-" ~:: : :- ' : :5 :::::::::::::::::::::::

. . . .~. . .

....

: : : : : : : : : : . .

.... ii::iii::.!:::#..:. .Y

7 0 8

Page 157: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

Table 7-2.3.2.2 (Tablesl3-1-4.7.4.2, 5-2.3.2.2) Discharge Criter ia for Miscel laneous Storage a n d Storage 12 ft (3.7 m) or Less in H e ~ h t I Commodi ty Classes I th rough IV

C o m m o d i t y C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P a i l e t i z e d a n d Bin B o x I O H- 1 II up to 8 ft (2.4 m) ()H-1 II over 8 ft (2.4 m) up to 12 ft (3.6 m) OH-2 III OH-2 IV up to 10 ft (3 m) OH-2 IV over 10 ft (3 m) to 12 ft (3.6 m) OH-2 Group A Plastics Stored on Racks

Storage M a x i u m m ¢ ;artoned Height Building Height Solid Expanded

13p to 5 fi No limit OH-2 OH-2 Over 5 to 10 ft 15 ft EH-1 EH-1 ()ver 5 to 10 ft 20f t EH-2 EH-2

()vet 10 to 12 ft 17ft EH-2 ~ EH-2 z ()ver 10 t o 12 ft No Limit ()H-2 ()H-2

+1 level +1 level in-rack in-rack

Rack OH-1 OH-I

OH-2 OH-2 OH-2 EH-1

Solid O H-2 EH-2 EH-2

E H-2 ~ ()H-2

+1 level in-rack

Exposed Expanded

OH-2 EH-2 O H-2

+l level in-rack E H-2 ~ O H-2

+1 level in-rack

Group A Plastics Solid Pi led , Pa l l e t i zed , B in-Box or S h e l f Storage Storage M a x i m u m Car toned Height Building Height Solid

1Jp to 5 ft No limit OH-2 ()vet 5 to 10 ft 15 ft EH-I ()ver 5 to 10 ft 20f t EH-2 ( )ver 5 to 8 ft No Limit

()vet 10 to 12 ft 17ft EH-2 Over 10 to 12 ft 27f t EH-2

Miscel laneous Tire Slorage s Piling Methods On floor, on side ()n floor, on t read o~ side Single, douMe, or multi-row racks Single row rack, portable Single row rack, fixed

R o l l e d P a p e r S t o r e d on End Heavy and m e d i u m weight ()n floor, o n t read o~ side Tissue

Exposed ..::!ii::.. Expanded Solid . : : i ~ $ de d

OH-2 OH-2 ......,' i i :: ::. OH-2 ..::#" %~I~?-.E H -2 EH-1 EH-2 "-i'" "--'.:-'-i ....

EH-2 EH-2 ~iiii "-':'-v:'::, :,:#: i, ~ :::. EH-2 EH-2 ""::~ ~ *::":-.--, E H:2~-iii-::" E H - 2 .......... ':--_:, .:i"::

.... #ii?iiii~iiiiiii'"i":"i~:A~~Ji":: Occupancy Group H e i g h t o f S t o r a g e ..::!:... -.::!.!iiii!iiiiiiiii::.. -.-.,~.:..-.:~::::::?. 5 ft to 12 ft ..::!!!~:" E H- 1

":':':':':':" O H -2 To 5 ft -.U::::::::::::::::::::?::: To 5 ft .... ":i:i:'::.. ":!iiiii# !i:" OH-2

5 ft to 12 ~g-.;:.;-':':-.;:~:~::, "::i:-::iiii:.:ji:-i:_:.. E H- 1 5 ft to .1...~f{'"~!i~ "-::?ii:i~i:::i!'i i:?i:: EH-1 or OH-2 plus

. . : : : : : : : : . . - ~ .

Height-:~"i~.r~}i%::{:'.:::::,.i:!~.:.... "::':'iii':is" Occupancy Group ..... ~:~.. 8 i~i~iii~. "~:W~i -~:' O H - 2

¢ ~ ~ i N ~ . t o i'~i~.-: . . . . . ~ H - I EH-I ..::#" To':~.~ ft .... "--'i'i)i ''~

Idle Pallet Storage 4 .:#~.'.~ght...~ StoragdU Occupancy G r o u p Single row rack, fixed - ~-~.~-~ wooden- ()H-2

..::¢:::~:.:~i:i3.:::.. T8!i~i::~ pl.astic OH-2 For SI units: 1 ft = 0.3048 in. ....:¢:: . "~ '::~iiii~::-i::.::¢:: ~The design of the sprinkler system shall be based on ti~i[.con~ttion~:lhat ~ 1 routinely or periodically exist in the bui lding cre-ttin. • g the greatest• water, demand, ., inc luding pil eh e'::':'][~i ~ ' ; ~ g .:~!......:.d--:~'i~. ...... : ":::" ~For rack storage, OH-2 + 1 Level m rack shall als.o...,b..e p e ~ . e d . :.-..-'~!Y SThe discharge criter:a for the s torage in this ta..~. ~ : ~ 1 onl~:i~ly. :¢~"misceltaneous tire storage as def ined in 1-4.10. 4 • . . . . . . " "" ":" 2.r.'~;& 7 . . . . . . The discharge criteria tor pallets shall apply...~j'|y to ~ storag~:~.~wooden pallets s tored up to 6 It (1.8 m) m he igh t or plasuc pallets up to 4 ft (1.2 m) in he igh t with n o . u . ~ : , 4 s ~ : . . o f ~..9~:~en pallets or two stacks of plastic pallets separated f rom other stacks hy at least an Sift (2.7-m) aisle. (Fo.rOlei"g~!~i '~"~'6~ies exceeding these limits see 7-5.1).

..:.::i!~:!-::":-::::-'- %~i:.-.-.. " ..s.-:-- -:-~--- ":":iiii:.ii!.:i:~:!.ii-":

4::'%ii::i:~::...:4 ~: ...--U '"::~...:.:C

.... i!iii~i!i~ ~ . . . . . . . 7-2.3.2.3 (13-N2.3.2.3) The densities and ar :~ i~ ' rovided in Figure 7- 2.3.1.2 are for use only with spray sprinkler~ii::For use wifll o ther types of sprinklers, see Section 7-9. ( R O e 13-161)

Exception No. I *: Qui&-response sprinklers shall not be permitted for use with area/der~sity Curves 4 and 5 (Extra Hazard).

Exception No. 2: SidewaU spray sprinklers shall be permitted for use with Area/DensiOo Curve 1 (Light Hazard)and. i f spedfically listed, with Area/Densi~ Curves 2 or 3 (Ordina~ Hazard).

Exception No. 3: For o:tended coverage sprinklers, the minimum design area shall be that corresponding to the maximum densi~_ for the hazard in Figure 7-2. 3 or the area protected by 5 sprinklers, whichever is greater. Extended coverage sprinklers shall be listed with and designed for the minimum flow corresponding to the densi~_ for the smallest area of operation for the hazard as specified in Figure 7-2.3.

2.3.2.4 when all of die following condi t ions are ~ttisfied: (ROC 13- 167a)

Wet pipe system Light hazard or ordinary hazard occupancy 20-foot (9.0-m) m a x i m u m ceiling height .

Tile n u m b e r of sprinklers in the design area shall never be less titan five. Where quick response sprinklers are used on a s loped ceiling, a m a x i m u m ceiling he igh t shall be used for de t e rmin ing the percen t reduct ion in design area where quick response sprinklers are installed, all sprinklers within a c o m p a r t m e n t shall be of the quick response type. (ROC 13-167a)

Exception: Where circumstances require the use of other than ordina~ temperature rated sprinklers, standard response sprinklers shall be permitted to be used. (ROC 13-167a)

7-2.3.2.4 (13-5-2.3.2.41 Where listed quick-response sprinklers are used t h r o u g h o u t a system or port ion of a system having d~e same hydraulic design b~is , the system area of operat ion is permi t ted to be reduced without revising the densi ty as indicated in Figure 7-

7 0 9

Page 158: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 ~ A 9 9 R O C

40

t~ c- c~ 30

23 o t- ._o 20 "G

-o

E P

10 £1_

I I I 10 20

Ceiling height, ft

y = =~_~x + Note: 55

For ceiling height >_ 10 ft and < 20 ft, y = - ~ + 55;

For ceiling height < 10 ft, y = 40;

For ceiling height > 20, y = O.

For SI units: 1 ft = 0.31 m.

30

Figure 7-2.3.2.4 (1.9,-5-2.3.2.4)

7-2.3.3.2 (13-5-2.3.3.2) If the room is smaller daan d~e smallest area shown in dae applicable curve in Figure 7-2.3, the provisions of 7- 2.3.1.3(a) shall apply.

7-2.3.3.3 (13-5-2.3.3.3) Min imum protect ion of openings shall be :~ follows:

(a) Light Hazard - - au tomat ic or self-closing doors.

Exception: Where openings are not protected, calculations shall inchtde the sprinklers in the room plus two sprinklers in the communicating space nearest each such unprotected opening unless the communicating space has onl'~ one sprinkler, in which case calculations shall be extend~l to the operation of that sprinkler. The selection of the room and communicating space sprinklers to be calculated shall be that which produces the greatest t£~draulic demand.

(b) ( ) rdinary and Extra Hazard - - automat ic or self-closing doors with appropr ia te fire-resistance ratings for tile enclosnre.

7-2.3.4 (13-5-2.3.4) Special Design Methods .

7-2.3.4.1 (13-5-2.3.4.1) Where the design area consists of a bui lding service chute suppl ied by a separate riser, the max imunl n u m b e r of sprinklers that needs to be calcul.~.e.d is 3.

..::#.:4~iiii~::. 7-2.3.4.2 (13-5-2.3.4.2) W h e r ~ . . r o o ' ~ a design m e d m d is used, and the area u n d e r considerati~iff ig'::~iii~orridor protected by one row of sprinklers tile maximun.~ :~be '~ ' i~ i :~pr ink le rs that needs to be calculated is 5. (, e,e 7-2g~.1).'::!i: "::illl!i'-'.:::....:::. -::'::"":'::~::-. "%':'::':3::!::"

Exce lion" Where the area u}~:'.o~, conside~:~'ion is a corridor protected by ] o . . x . , . - . a

single row of sp~,:.)..~.:.:,.h..'.g'..!~O~..enings are not protected, the design area shall incldZg'e "~ii'fiff~f~;i~J.i['~.iii..~..e corridor to a maximum of 7. (ROC 1 3-1 ..7....~-~" .... ~i!:

.... iii:~:ii::i::i::ii .... ":il .... 7-2.3.4.3 "Wl{:~::.an are~::i~:b be protected by a single line of spri~-l~.~.*.~., the "@~gn ar .~ shall inchlde all sprinklers on tile lille u p:::~{~"~::'-'~t x i m n ~:: .~. - 7¢:" (13-208)

...-:iiif ::::::::i: . 7.!i!i !:" • :-~:'t~iii~gi~:;¢~r..fi~X~proach for the P~otec t io . o f Commodi t i e s that

.... ::.:_-.-i-.?::::are'::~.ed [ J i i t~zed , solid piled, in bin boxes or in shelves.

"::::: "::~i3.1 ~ 1 . This section shall apply to a broad rangt:' of .::~i~" . . 7-2.3.2.5 (13-5-2.3.2.5) The system area of operat ion shall be .:~-:-:i#~!~i{~ii: . . . . . i-:~'ombusfi.~l'es, inchlding pla.stics that are s tored palletized, solid iucl-e:L~ed by 30 percent wi thout revising the densi ty when th~i::::::ii::. ":-iiiiiii?:'i!;"" piled, in"bin boxes or in shelves above 12 ft h igh and us ing

......... "::'i?ii-::. s tandard spray sprinklers. t ,41.wing types of sprinklers are used on s o[Jed, ceiling.s w.iSfi%"'::::--..:... , . ":--:-:-:-..::::::::::..:::::.. [,itch exceeding 1 in 6 (rise of 2 units in a run of 12 nnil~:"a ro.'.~f ":~-~!:!J~ 1 ! ..:::.:.:.:. .::.:::.. "::: . . . . :.-I-_ . . . . For first aid fire f ight ing and mop up operations, small sh, 1 . . . . 1 16.7%): ( R O e 1"¢-168) :ii::"::ii::::{{ii::::ii::. :::::::::::::::::::::::::: :iiiiiii.:: ":%ose [1 1 /2 in. (38 ram)] shall be provided it, accordarlce with 5- ..:.:.:.:.:::.. . . . . . .

- sl,ray sprinklers, inchlding ex tended coverage . ~ l e r s " | ~ in ,::iil ::i!i .... 15.5. (ROC 13-182) : tccordance with 4-4.3 Except ion No. 3 and qni.~':'lv~:, i" ":" nse "::iii~i~ii::......::#:"

,:.:- ~ .................. Exception: Hose connections shall not be required fl~r the protection of sprinklers.

~ar~, d rop sl, rh,k~e,s. ..:::*~'~:-.:-~.. "%.iiiiii::. ============================= ..::ii::""" "'::iii:.:i'ii~. "::::::::::'-

7-2.3.2.6 (13-5-2.3.2.6) For dry pipe ~ ' t e m s ~ l dol~:~i:'$~:terlock p,'eactiot, systems, tile area of s p r i ~ | ~ ! : : g p ~ t i o n sh .~'~::"be incre:Lsed by 31") percent without revisid:~i::i0,$ig density.

.... ~iiiii::::~ ....... 7-2.3.2.7 (13-5-2.3.2.7) Where higil tempet,'fi.~.'j~iiR]grinklers are used t,~r Extra Hazard ()ccopancies, tile a rea of }~'~inkler operat ion shall be permi t ted to be reduced by 25 percen t w~dmut revising the density, but uot to less than 2000 sq ft (186 lnZ).

7-2.3.2.8* Where nnlltiple ad jus tments to die area of opel,'ation are required to be made in accordance with 7-2.3.2.4, 7-2.3.2.5, 7- "2.%2.6, or 7-2.3.2.7, these ad jus tments shall be c o m p o u n d e d based . t l the area of operat ion originally sleected f rom Fi~lre 7-2.3. If the hui ld ing h:L~ unsp r ink le red combust ib le concea led spaces, the rules qff 7-2.3.1.3 shall be applied ,after all o ther modif icat ions have ] ~t~ell in~llte.

7-2.'),.3 (13-5-2.3.3) Room Design Method.

7-2..'),.2),. 1 * ( 13-5-2.3.3.1 ) The water supply requ i rements for sprinklers ~mly shall be b,~sed upon the room that creates die greatest de lnand. Tile density selected shall be that f rom Figure 7- 2.?, correspondi l lg to tile room size. To utilize this me thod , all r , - m s shall be mlc[osed with wails having a fire-resistance rat ing t'qual to tim water supply dura t ion indicated in Table 7-2.3.

Class L IL IlL and IV commodities stored 12 f l or less in height. (ROC 13-182)

7-3.1.2 (231-5-1) Min imum System Discharge Requ i rements .

7-3.1.2.1 (231-5-1.3) Tile des ign density shaft no t be less than 0.15 2 2 ~ p m / f t [0.10 ( L / s ) / m ], and the design area shall no t be less than

2000 ft 2 (186 m z) for wet systems or 2600 ft ~ (242 m ~) for dry systems for any commodity, class, or group. (ROC 13-173)

7-3.1.2.2 (231-5-1.3.1) Tile sprinkler design densi ty for any giveu area of opera t ion for a (?,lass III or CI,xss W commodity , calculated in accordance with 7-3.2, shaU not be less th,'m the density for tile co r respond ing area of operat ion for Ordinary Hazard Group 2. (ROC 13-173)

7-3.1.2.3 (231-5-1.3.2) The water supply requ i rements for sprinklers only shall be based on the actual calculated d e m a n d for the hazard in accordance with 7-3.2, 7-3.3, 7-6.4, or 7-6.5, d e p e n d i n g on the type of sprinkler selected a n d the commodi ty be ing protected.

7-3.1.2.4 (231-5-1.7) In buildings occupied in part for storage, within the scope of this s tandard, the requi red sprinkler protect ion shall ex tend 15 ft (4.6 m) beyond file per imeter of tile storage area.

Exception: This requirem*nt shall not apply where separated b~ a barrier partition that is capable of preventing heat from a fire in the storage area from fusing sprinklers in the nonstorage area. (ROC 13- 173)

7 1 0

Page 159: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 - - A 9 9 R O C

7-3.1.3 Ti le sp r ink le r sys tem cri ter ia spec i f ied in Sec t ion 7-3 is i n t e n d e d to app ly to bu i ld ings with ce i l ing s lopes no t e x c e e d i n g 2 in 12 (16.7%). ( R O C 13-161)

7-3.2 W a t e r D e m a n d R e q u i r e m e n t s o f Class I t h r o u g h IV R e q u i r e m e n t s .

7 - 3 . 2 . 1 " ( 2 3 1 - 6 - 1 ) G e n e r a l . ( R O C 13-173)

7-3.2.1.1 (231-6-1.1) P ro tec t ion for Class l t h r o u g h Class IV c o m m o d i t i e s in the fo l lowing c o n f i g u r a t i o n s shall be p rov ided in a c c o r d a n c e with this chap te r : ( R O C 13-173)

(a) N o n e n c a p s u l a t e d c o m m o d i t i e s t h a t a re sol id pile, pal let ized, or b in box s t o r a g e u p to 30 ft (9.1 m ) in h e i g h t

(b) N o n e n c a p s u l a t e d c o m m o d i t i e s o n sh e l f s to rage u p to 15 ft (4.6 m) in h e i g h t

( c )* E n c a p s u l a t e d c o m m o d i t i e s t h a t are sol id pile, pal le t ized, bin box, or she l f s to rage up to 15 ft (4.6 m) in h e i g h t

7-3.2.1.2 (231-6-1.2) Bit) box a n d sh e l f s to rage t ha t is over 12 ft (3.7 m) bu t no t in exces~ of t h e h e i g h t l imits of 7-3.2.1.1 a n d tha t is p rov ided with walkways at vertic~d intervals of n o t over 12-ft (3.7-m) shall be p r o t e c t e d with a u t o m a t i c sp r ink le r s u n d e r file walkway(s) . P ro tec t ion shall be ~Ls follows: ( R O C 13-173)

(a) Cei l ing de s ign detJsity shall be b ~ e d on the total h e i g h t of s to rage wi thin the bui ld ing . ( R O C 13-173)

(b) A u t o m a t i c sp r ink le r s u n d e r walkways shall be d e s i g n e d to m a i n t a i n a m i n i m u m dischm-ge p re s su re of 15 psi (0.72 kPa) for d ie u los t hydra td ica l ly d e m a n d i n g size sp r ink le r s on each level. Walkway sp r ink l e r d e m a n d shall no t be r e q u i r e d to be a d d e d to dae ce i l ing sp r ink l e r d e m a n d . Spr ink le r s u n d e r wMkways shall no t be s l)aced m o r e t h a n 8 ft (2.4 m) apa r t horizontal ly . ( R O C 13-173)

7-3.2.2 (2"~,1-6-2) P ro tec t ion Criteria.

7-3.2.2.1 (231-6-2.1) T h e water supp ly shal l be capab le of p rov id ing the sp r ink le r .,;ystem d e m a n d d e t e r m i n e d in a c c o r d a n c e with 7-3.2.2.3, i n c l u d i n g the h ose s t r e a m d e m a n d of 7-3.2.2.4 for tile d u r a t i o n r e q u i r e m e n t s of 7-3.2.2.5. .-"#:'f~!i!!!::..

... "~ "::'-i'ii':::i::" • :4:%ii:::.-:~.g "%:::;-:: 7-3.2.2.2 (213-6-2.2) T h e a r ea a n d dens i ty for d ie hydraul ica l ly ..::::.- ,:.:.:.~

re n o t e a rea shall be d e t e r m i n e d as spec i f ied in 7-2-3.2.2 for s tora~::" "!!~!.. • . :.:.:-. :.:,1-, u n d e r 1"~ ft a n d 7-3.2.2.2.1 d l r o u g h 7-3.2 2.2.6 for s to rage over 1 ~:'.~ii:::. :!:.-':'~ • " -.:::::. ..: :-" u7 (13-209a) • "-:::::..::: o

..::H.-::i .... '::!~i~ ~::~::::. .-:.-::" "" ""::::-.. "::i:i:i:i::-. Ct....

7-3.2.2.2.1 (2316222, lereus,,gordinarytempe a - t spr inklers , a s ingle po in t shall be se l ec ted f r o m the ~t "~ r i x ~ : . . ::::ii: 50

• !:~:~:~. ';;":~ii~::, ~::::i~ .... c o m m o d i t y cm-ve on F igure 7-3.2.2.2.1. "::~!~!~i~i::-:-i:: ...... :::" i!i~i~i~. '::iiiiiiii::.. .:#::"

....... • i*iiiiiii;:: ::iii::i!i::i!i . . . . . . . . -.::i .... m 2 It 2 ..:$:!~ii . . . . . . . . :f:::i:::::: . . . . . . . . . ~:]:i':~:!.:.:.:.. ....

550 6000 "l I I I I I I I I I I~ l I i I I I l::;::l::'::]K'-::l I I..::~!ii:l::::.l....] riiJ ,~:'1 I I I I I I I I I I I I l l I I I I T I T:i::i:i::L:$::Tq":::l[iiii]i::.Lii$ I I 0 I i I I I t I I I I I ]$1 I I I.:.:t:::::k..I I "l:!:':'~"::l I I I-']i:i:~::"l I I

(~ 500 "1 I I I I f I I I I I I lk I .E:!~:F:'t-'~!~:iii$: I I l::?ik:::L [ I t I I I I |t 10 "~ 4 5 0 5 0 0 0 ~ 1 ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 1 1 1 I~l-..:::r I-::::l:::.l r-::r:::./..t::-i o~ J::~ij. I

1 1 1 1 1 I I l Y t I I t I:':~..~. @ 1 I I I I ' 1 I I I I I I I I I I k l I I I I I~k~ ' I I I I I I I I 400 IIIlI I_, , . , , I , , , , v z . , , . , I I I I I I f

o ~ 4 0 0 0 I I I I I I ¥ t I I~Ic~ t t I I ff.,:;it:,ti::'l I I I I I I I

- - t IM I I I ~ . I I I I ~::'~1 I I I I I I : 300 [ I ~ l X ~ - t - ~ l ~ l ~ X l l ~ l l l ,-, 3 0 0 0 I I I I I I ,I%~@N~&. I I % 1 I I I I I I ' ~ J I I I I I

2 5 0 -I I I I I I I ~,.*'¢.~._~1 I I X . I I I I I I I 1%k l I I I / I I I i I I I i-"~./,'~KJ I I I"%.1 I I I I i I f '~NJ I I I I I I I I I I I '~1"1%.1 I I I'~1,~.1 I I I I I I I r'%,~l I I I

200 2ooo "i I ' ' ' , ' , ' ' ' , ' , " ',,' " ' , I " ' ', ', g p m / f t 2 0.1 0 . 1 5 0 . 2 0 . 2 5 0 . 3 0 . 3 5 0 . 4

L / s e c / m 2 0 . 0 7 5 0 .1 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 5 0 . 1 7 5 0 . 2 0 . 2 2 5 0 . 2 5

S p r i n k l e r d e n s i t y

m 2 ft 2

3 7 5 4 0 0 0

~ 2 8 0 3 0 0 0

190 2 0 0 0 gpm/ft 2 0.1 L/sec/m 2 0.197

F igure 7-3.2.2.2.1 (231-6-2.2.2) Spr ink le r sys tem_des ign curves , 20-ft (6 . l -m) h igh s t o r a g e - - - o rd in a ry t e m p e r a t u r e - r a t e d spr ink le rs .

7-3.2.2.2.2 (231-6-2.2.3) W h e r e u s in g h igh t e m p e r a t u r e - r a t e d spr inklers , a s ingle p o i n t shall be s e l e c t e d f r o m tile a p p r o p r i a t e c o m m o d i t y curve on Fignre 7-3.2.2.2.2.

0 . 1 5 0 .2 0 . 2 5 0 . 3 0

0 . 1 0 2 0 . 1 3 6 0 . 1 7 0 0 . 1 9 7 S p r i n k l e r d e n s i t y

F i b r e 7-3.2.2.2.2 (231-6-2.2.3) Sp r ink l e r sys t em des ign curves , 20- ft (6 . l -m) h igh s to rage - - h igh t e m p e r a t u r e - r a t e d spr inklers .

7-3.2.2.2.3 (231-6-2.2.4) T h e dens i t i e s se l ec ted in a c c o r d a n c e with 7-3.2.2.2.1 or 7-3.2.2.2.2 shall be m o d i f i e d in a c c o r d a n c e with Figure 7-3.2.2.2.3 w i d m u t revisin~::.~he des ign area. ..:::.:::;:;;:'.:.~::..

..::iii:" ":':::: ..:+:.:.:.. 25O

• ..;~:~ " ' : % I

::~il ::. ...... ~ ii:¢: I

:'~ii:: .:i: ] 200 ,'.-::.:~::-:..:

.::f-i :..-: -:::::--iii.:i !.:.:!:!:i :::::: ~::ii~i. J

#q!iiii,,,, .... :::: <".'~?: !::... ::!i:. • • [

"::i:i ,:g!!i: . / I

J ~ ' - I ..... I I ]::: j /

J j f

1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0

4 . 5 6 . 0 7 . 5 9 . 0

S t o r a g e h e i g h t

Figure 7-3.2.2.2.3 (231-6-2.2.4) Cei l ing sp r ink l e r dens i ty vs. s to rage height .

7-3.2.2.2.4 (231-6-2.2.5) W h e r e dry-pipe sys tems are used , the a reas o f o p e r a t i o n i nd i ca t ed in the des ign curves shall be i nc reased by 30 pe rcen t .

7-3.2.2.2.5 (231-6-2.2.6) In the c~tse o f meta l I)in boxes with face a reas no t e x c e e d i n g 16 ft 2 (1.5 m 2) a n d meta l c losed she lves with face a reas no t e x c e e d i n g 16 ft (1.5 m2), d ie a rea of app l i ca t ion shall be p e r m i t t e d to be r e d u c e d by 50 pe rcen t , p rov ided tile m i n i m u m r e q u i r e m e n t s of 7-3.1 t h r o u g h 7-3.1.2.4 are met . ( R O C 13-173)

7-3.2.2.2.6 (231-6-2.2.7) T h e fin,'fl a r ea a n d dens i ty shall n o t be less t h a n tile m i n i m u m spec i f ied in 7-3.1.2.

7-3.2.2.3 (231-6-2.3) Civen tile a rea a n d dens i ty d e t e r m i n e d in a c c o r d a n c e with 7-3.2.2.2, tile fire sp r ink le r sys tem shall be hydrau l ica l ly ca lcu la ted .

7 1 1

Page 160: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

7-3.2.2.4 (231-5-2.6) High Expansion Foam Systems. (ROC 13- 173)

7-3.2.2.4.1 (231-5-2.1) High expansion foam systems flint are installed in addit ion to automatic sprinklers shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 1 IA, Standard for Medium- and High- Expansion Foam Systems. (ROC 13-173)

Exception: This requirem~mt shall not appl~ where nwdified t~ the standard. (ROC 13-173)

7-3.2.2.4.2 (231-5-2.2) High-expression foam used to protect the idle pallet shall have a maximum fill t ime of 4 minutes. (ROC 13- 17"$)

7-3.2.2.4.3 (231-5-2.3) High-expansion foam systems sball be automatic in operation. (ROC 13-173)

7-3.2.2.4.4 (231-5-2.4) Detectors for high-expansion foam systems shall be listed and shall be installed at no more than one-half the listed spacing. (ROC 13-173)

7-3.2.2.4.5 (231-5-2.5) Detection systems, concentrate pumps, generators, and o ther system components fl~at ,are essentkd to the operation of fl~e system shall have an approved standby power source. (ROC 13-173)

7-3.2.2.4.6 (231-5-2.6) A reduction in ceiling density to one-half that required for Class I through Class IV commodities, idle pallets, or plastics (using the secondary demand point) shall be permit ted without revising the design area, but flae density shall be no less than 0.15 gpm/ f t ~ [(6.1 L / m i n ) / m Z ] . (ROC 13-173)

7-3.3 Water Demand Requirements for Plastle and Rubber Commodi t ies

7-3.3.1" (231-7-1) General. See Appendix C.

7-3.3.1.1" (231-7-1.1) Plastics stored up to 25 ft (7.62 m) in height protected by spray sprinklers shall be in accordance with this

hapter. The decision tree (Figure 7-3.3.1.1) shall be used to

7-3.3.1.2" (231-7-1.2) Factors ;fffecting protection requirements such as c losed /open array, clearance between storage and sprinklers, and s table /unstable piles, shall be applicable only to storage of Group A plastics. This decision tree also shall he used to determine protection for commodit ies that are t~ot wholly Group A plastics but contain such quantities and arrangements of the same that they are deemed more hazardous than Chess IV commodit ies . (ROC 13-173)

7-3.3.1.3 (231-7-1.3) ( ; roup B plastics and flee-flowing ( ;roup A plastics shall be protected in d~e same manner :Ls a ('lass IV commodity. See 7-3.2 for protection of these storage commodities with spray sprinklers.

7-3.3.1.4 (231-7-1.4) Group C plastics shall be protected in the same manner ,as a Class IIl commodity. See 7-3.2 for protection of these storage commodit ies wid~ spray sprinklers.

7-3.3.2 (231-7-2) Protection Criteria. 7-3.3.2.1" (231-7-2.1) The design of the sprinkler system shall be based on those conditions dmt routinely or periodically exist in a building that create die greatest water detained. These conditions include the following:

..:::'::..

(a) Pile height .... #;#;::i:.:%:..:::.:.. (b) Clearance (c) Pile stability .:!!ii~::':'::'%i~.::. (d) Array ..:::. "%!i.. "::~ii::~iii-;.::.

Where the distance bi~:t~.r.l roof/ceiJ'f~':l'~eight and top of storage exceeds 20 ft (6.1 m), p r o / ~ i o n sball~--~e provided for the storage height that wo ..~.. ::i~|.~:~...~.~..~..ft (6.1-m) dist~mce between the r o o f / c e i li n g .[~ 61"g~i~ ff:~:~a'~ ~ ! ~ . r a g e.

-:i~::"%::i~ ~ .... .+ : . :+ : . . "::!iiiii#:

.-.-:-:-:-:-.,. -::::

.... #~::"":~::iii~ ii~ ~ ..::~ii'~:.. .~:: ...

I Free.flowing

Class IV

dete rmine lhe protection in each specific situation. -:.::::~:::--, ":::'i!i!~ii::.. ":'::::::

GroupA( .~ff) :!::i:. G..g I):~!i i¢ .... roLpC .:;::.::"-:i-:i.ii:. i~i::ii:. O~slg' Cass

.... ~:,iiiiiii~!ii!',:" '~: ~i~ii '~

de .... ¢"3"if~:~"~": ':%iiiiiiii:;":::N!:n Jx p a n d e d Expan d-i~i-iii;::.. ;iiii: . . . . . . :;iiii ....

::~!iii ~::,. "+:':':':',:.:.:.:.:~ """ ..:~:- %.::::::::,

Cartoned Exl~sed Unstable I

Stable

I Exposed

Table 7-3.3.2.2 Column E

"%ii::ii .... Table 7-3.3.2.2 I ":::i!i~iiii~#:' Column A L I I :"::: I I l

Stable Unstable Stable Unstable Solid Unit Load Cartoned Table 7-3.3.2.2 Table 7-3,3,2.2 Table 7-3.3.2.2 Table 7-3.3.2,2 Table 7-3.3,2.2 Table 7-3.3.2.2

Column E Column D Column B Column C Column A Column C

NOTE: Cartons that contain Group A plastic material shall be permitted to be treated as Class IV commodiites under the following conditions:

(a) there shall be multiple layers of corrugation or equivalent outer material that would significantly delay fire involvement of the Group A plastic, and

(b) the amount and arrangement of Group A plastic material within an ordinary carton would not be expected to significantly increase the fire hazard.

Figure 7-3.3.1.1 (231-7-1.1) Decision tree.

712

Page 161: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

7-3.3.2.2" (231-7-2.2) Design areas and densities for tile appropr ia te storage corffiguration shall be selected f rom Table 7- 3.3.2.2. Tile columns A, B, C, D, and E correspond to die protect ion required by fl~e decision tree (Figure 7-3.3.1.1 ). (ROC 13-173)

Table 7-3.3.2.2 (231-7-2.2) Design Dens i t i e s for Plastic a n d R u b b e r C o m m o d i t i e s

Storage Roof /Ce i l ing H e ~ h t H e i g h t

in ft [ml in f t [ m ]

_<5 [1.52] up to 25 [7.62] up to 15 [4.57]

< 12 [3.661 >15 to :)0 [4 .57to 6.1] >20 to ~2 [6.1 to 9.75] np to 20 [6.1]

1514.5] >20 to 25 [6.1 to 7.62] >25 to 35 [7.62 to lO.67]

20 [6.1]

25 [7.62]

up to 25 [7.62] >25 to ~0 [7.62 to 9.14] >30 to ~5 [9.14 to 10.67] up to 30 [ 9.14] >30 to ~5 [9.14 to 10.67]

O H-2 0.2 [0.141 0.3 [0.201 0.4 [0.27]

0.25 [0.17] 0.4 [o.271

0.45 [0.31] 0.3 [o.2ol

0.45 [0.31] 0.6 [0.411 O.4 [0.271 0.6 [0.41 ]

OH-2 EH-2

0.6 [0.41] 0.8 [0.541 0.5 [0.341 0.8 [0.541 0.9 [0.611 0.6 [0.41] O.9 [0.611 1.2 [0.821

0.75 [0.511 1.2 [0.821

C

OH-2 OH-2 0.3 I0.201 EH-1 0.5 [0.341 EH-2 0.6 [0.41] 0.45 [0.311 0.4 [0.27] 0.3 10.20] 0.6 [0.411 0.45 [0.311 0.7 [0.481 0.55 [0.371

0.45 [0.311 0.35 [0.24] 0.7 [0.481 0.55 [0.371

0.85 [0.58] 0.7 [0.48] 0.55 [0.371 0.45 [0.311 0.85 [0.58] 0.7 [0.48]

OH-2 EH-2 EH-2

O.7 [0.481 0.45 [0.31] 0.7 [0.481

0.85 [0.58] 0.55 [0.37] 0.85 [0.581 1.1 [0.751 0.7 [0.48]

.::..i:..}.,.1 [0.751 .... i'::i: .......... :~::"

N (.) T E S ..::ili:i:i{{{?::.. 1. Min imum clearance between sprinkler deflector ,and top of storage shall be main ta ined as r equ i . r~ ! "%?:::ii::_. 2. Column designations correspond to the configurat ion of plastics storage as follows: -::?:" ":::-:-=: "":'{ii::::ii::..

A: (1) Nonexpanded , unstable .:!y-.::.:.:=i:.. ====={==========j (2) Nonexpanded , stable, solid un i t load

B: Expanded, exposed, stable (1: (1) Expanded, exposed, unstable

(2) Nonexpanded , stable, ca r toned D: Expanded, car toned, unstable E: (1) Expanded, cartoned, stable

(2) Nonexpanded , stable, exposed

"%~i~!::.. ..::/~i:::::::-:::::-:-:-:-,.,-... ":::-~::-.

...... --~-::'-~iii:~!::::-~i~i~iii~i~"::~i::.~:.~:..~ii~:. ..::!i! :~ "":i~iiiiii~....."

.:¢¢~iiiiiiii~ .... • ":':-:':':'- "%ii:=:::::ii!:" "::!=i~!~::..

.... ::~:ii~iiii~:~ .... "::iiiiiii.=i .... .:iiii~! ....

.:!f=::"

()H-2 = 1)ensity requi red for Ordinary Hazard Group 2 occupancies. ~Sii":"'"::~iii~!! '::::= ........... EH-I = Density required for Extra Hazard Group 1 occupancies . . . . . : . . : : , .x:" :::.-..... .=::. "::i.iiiiii!ili::" EH-2 = 1)ensity requi red for Extra Hazard Group 2 occup,-mcies. ":ii::"'%i~i~ii!::,....~ii:=':::::!:':!i~ii~}i:i::,,2ii::: • -::"

4. Hose streams sh~dl be provided in accordance with Table 7-2.3.1....:.::i:i:i:i::.:.. ""~iiiii"ii~.. "::~:!~i!.-:'~::" (ROC 13-173) .... ## ........ ii::iii!ii!ii. ""-'4i::i{ii:i::::?:i..:i:i:.

.::;#ii!~-}-::.. ..#" .:f .... 7-3.3.2.2.1 (231-7-2.2.1) For Table 7-3.3.2.2, tile design are:}s::.....~.., i a ":{{~!i~k-'{==:"7-4.1.2 The sprinkler system criteria of 7.4 is in tended to apply to min immn of 2500 ft ~ (232 m~). ..::=¢: ............. i:::. ":~{ii~i-=::l~u.'.fl.dings with ceiling slopes not exceeding 2 in 12 (16.7%). (ROC

.... i! .... . ..... ":-:{}t:~:161 ) Exo,ptioT~ No. 1: Where, Table 7-3. 3.2.2 all.or~s" densities a~i::}~eas:~i:!?,, "ii:::-::...::-i='.:-! ~:'" selected in accordance with 7-2.3, for Ordinary Hazard G/5"u#~i~?:..,-ii::::':'::::ili:. illlli~::. 7-4.1.3" Sprinkler protect ion criteria for the storage of materials on

"'"iiiii::-i}ii..-::...'::'i ..#::.i .... racks be in section ei ther occur)antics13-1_3) an~. area~density, from that curvl, shall..::i.ii:i::..::!...:iii.~i~.be...~.efltabl~iiii'~.R..OC .:-ii::" shall accordance with 7.4.1 and 7-4.2 for storage up to 25 ft, 7.4.3 for storage over 25 ft, or 7-4.4 for plastics

.... i!::iii:. . . . . :iii~ i: "::i'ii}iiiiii .... storage as appropriate . (ROC 13-173) Exception No. 2: For clos,rt arrays, the area s h~:i~::i~...@~:.::~. ~.. " 4=-:::" redao'd to 200Oft 2 (186 me). " .... :::: ......... ========================= ...... ":':":i'.:iiii's

========================= "::iiiiii?::.. 7-3.3.2.2.2 (231-7-2.2.2) Interpolatio.Ni%f d e ~ i e s b ~ . . 4 ~ storage heights shall be permit ted. Densiti:~i~.lall t~::based tr~iSn the 2500 1i ~ (232 m z ) design area. The "up "{o"~ii.-~'i:~ble is i~ tended to aid in the inter lmlat ion of densities betwee~-~..'.~.,gage heights. Interpolat ion of ce i l ing / roof heigbts shall:~::,...~ permit ted. (ROC 13-173) £9:"

7-3.3.2.3* (231-7-2.5) Where dry-pipe systems are nsed for Group A plastics, the operat ing area shall be increased by 30 percent without revising die density.

7-3.3.2.4 (231-5-2.6) High Expansion Foam Systems. Where high expansion foam is used a reduct ion in ceiling density to one-half that requi red for plastic~ shall be permit ted without revising the design area, but shall be not less than 0.15 g p m / f t ~ [0.10 ( L / s ) / m ~ ] .

7-4+ Fire Control Approach for the Protect ion of C o m m o d i t i e s Stored on Racks

7-4.1 Protect ion Cr i ter ia- General .

7-4.1.1 (231 C-l-l) This section shall apply to storage of materials re[:,resentirJg tile broad range of combustibles stored in facies using s tandard spray sprinkler~.

Exception:* (231C,-6-10) Protection criteria, for Group A plastics as indicated in section 7-4.4 shall be permitted for the protection of the same storage height and configuration of Class L II. II1 and IV commodities.

7-4.1.3.1"[" (231C-C-3-3) Sprinkler protect ion criteria is based on tile assumption that roof vents ,and draft curtains are not being used.

7-4.1.4 (231C-4-3) Flue Space .

7-4.1.4.1t (231C-4-3.1) Storage up to and including 25 ft (7.6 m). In double-row and multiple-row racks widlout solid shelves, a longitudinal (back to back clearance between loads) title space shall not be required. Nominal 6-in. (142.4-mm) transverse title spaces between loads and at rack uprights sball be main ta ined in single-row, double-row, and multiple-row racks. Random variations in file widfll of flue spaces or in thei r vertical a l ignment shall be permit ted. (See Figure 7-4.1.4.1.) (ROC 13-173)

7 1 3

Page 162: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 - - A 9 9 R O C

i l - Conventional i i

g 2 2 2 - . . - - ---- ' i ~ ' - - -

__- _= ~ " ~ ~ = =

_ IZI IZ1C212 , % : : / ec"onv'e\l

Possible transverse flue spaces No longitudinalflue k ~ J l space is necessary

-~t--.---- Rows of storage

-u-[ ........ r - [ ........ r ~ ........ 1 - [ ....... ]"-1 ....... ~ No longitudinal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (back-to-back clearance)

flue space Plan view

Figure 7-4.1.4. I (231 C-4-3.1) Typical double-row rack with back-to- back loads.

7-4.1.4.2 (231C-4-3.2) Storage Height Over 25 ft (7.6 m). Nominal P-in. (142.4-mm) transverse flue spaces between loads and at rack uprights shzt[l I,e maintained ill single-row, dot, ble-row, and muhip le - r .w racks. Nominal 6-in. (152.4-mm) longitudinal flue sp:tces shall he provided in double-row racks. Random ~triations in tile width of the flue spaces or in their vertical a l ignment sball be I,mmitre, I. (ROC 13-17'~)

7-4.1.5 (231C-5-1) Protection Systems.

7-4.1.7 (231C-5-9) Solid and Slatted Shelves.

7-4.1.7.1" (231C-5-10.1) Slatted shelves shall be considered equivalent to solid shelves.

Exc,~Otion: A wet-pipe s~st,w~ that is designed to provide a minimam of O. 6 "gpm/ft e density ow'r a minimum area of 2OOO f t e or K-14 early suppression fast ra~ponse (ESFR) sprinklers operating at a minimum of 50 psi shall be permitted to protect single-row and doubl,~row slatted-shelf racks where all of the following conditions are met."

(a) Sprinkh~rs shall be 5/8-in. orifice spra) sprinklers with a temperature rating of ordinal_, intermediate, or high and shall be listed for storage occupancies or shall be K-14 earl~ suppression fast response (ESFR).

(b) The protected commodities shall be limited to Class 1-IV. Group B plastics. Group C plastics, cartoned (expanded and unexpanded) (,roup A plastics, and exposed (unexpanded) Group A plastics.

(c) Shelves shall be slatted using a minimum nominal 2-in. thick t~ maximum nominal 6-in. wide slat hem in place t~ space~" that maintain a minimum 2-in. operdng between each slat.

(d) Where 5/8-in. orifice sprinklers are used. there shall be no slatted shelf levels in the rack above 12ft. Wire mesh (Kreater than 50 percent opening) shall be permitted for shelf levels above 12 ft.

(e) Transverse flue spaces at least 3 in. wide shall be provided at least eve~ I0 f l horizontally. ..::iiiii::..

09 Longitudinal fl~e spaces at.::~-~:::i~:::#~, wide shaU b,, provided f , r doable row racks. ..::iiiiiiii~::..

(g) The aisle widths shall...b...li!:a'{:~.t.. - 7. 5 ft. (h ) The maximum roof ..~....]~ shalt:i~::.27 fl. (i) The maximum s t o ~ he:}~ht shat~.::~:.e~..:ft. 0") Solid pl~r*,ood or ~m~:'~...~., materials s:~:"not be placed on the slatted

sheh,es so that the~ block the"9.~.r.~, spaces:ii'~'etween slats, nor shall they be placed on the ~ i,~::i::i:g~a"/*::-,aked~¢,./:::;~.'..[.,ROC 13-174) • :~::"%: ........................ :::::::::::::::::::::::i::::::}:::~:, 7-4.1.7.2~ ..~.~"1C-.~']~0:..,.2) Sprinklei-s shall be installed at the ceiling and ben~g~!i!~ach she~:.jn single-, double-, or multiple-row racks with solid" s t { ' ~ , that o ' ~ i c t both longitudinal an~t transverse flue..s.~..e.~.gs. D~]~.... crit~i?ia for combined ceiling and in-rack sp.g..~ff, i '~ :s l la l l 6 ~ . . ~ . " with this storage configuration. .... ~::? ii::? "::~:#:"

-:iiii~....8)ii::::::{-~..j~C.-."~l':~:i Open Top Combustible Containers. 7-4.1.5.1" (231C-5-1.1) Sprinkler systems shall be wet pipe .......... "::iii!~i!!i!i:" ":'::illiiiillii::" svslems. (ROC 13-17'J,) ..:.::i:i:':i:i:i:i:? ":""i:i::. "'" , ~ . • ............ ~:4.1.~:::::.~31 C-5-12) Movable Racks. Rack storage m movable racks F.x,,'pti,,n." In area," that ,ere subject to freeing or where special .... i~::! . . . . . . . i~aall be : i i~ : ec t ed in the same manner ,as multiple-row racks.

-:i::"'"::iiiii~ii::.. ..::ii::" c,,nditions ,'xist. dr~-pipe s~atems and preaction s~sten~ shall be "::iiiiiiii::.::ii':" 7-4.1.10":"(231C-6-3, 7-3 and 8-1.5.2) In-rack sprinklers. Tile p,.,mitt,'d. ( R O e 132173) " ..::ii::::i::::ii .... '::ii::::iiii::::ii:: nnnaber of sprinklers and tile pipe sizing on a line of sprinklers in

..::iiiii¢::"".i."'::::::" "::ii::i::~.'~,s shall be restricted only by hydraulic calculations and not by (ROC 13-173) ::::::: "::::" .]!~y piping scbedule. ..::i:3i:i:i::-. :i!i!i!::.. "%:.. .:::.-

7-4.1.5.2 (2 "J, 1 C-5-1.2) Where dry-pipe s~ tems are used, i|~i::::~ili't:~ ~ ..i::iiii::; i sprinkler arc/Ls of operation shall be increased 3 .0 : . . #~n t o'¢~::::~.l)e ..::i~i!::" .t-e:Ls Sl,eC fled by 7-4.2, 7-4.3, and 7-4.4. Den~:~s a'i]~are:~s s~ : i i ; i .... I,e selected s,, thztt d,c fin:d area of operatio.~ig~..er th..~{:}.0....peg.ce..~.~{:" in,-r<tse is n,,t greater tl,an 6000 fie (557.4...:~e)--:-ii{~-:-1:~i!!i "

. : : : : : : : : : : . . : : : : : .

7-4.1.5.:g (231 C-5-1.3) Where , react}.#fi :"s~:B a#i::~..~..:.preacfion systems shall be treated :Ls dry-pipe .s~tenls. (~.'OC i.9;~,~,)

4i:::.:ii::i::i::i~: . . . . . ::iii? .:fi:: Exception: This requbem~zt shall not ap[5~i-"::::?:'}ii~:;7[ere ..... it can be dem,nstrated that the detection yystem that d~te:~.:..the preaction system cau.~,'s water to be discharged from sprinklers d~iii~ickl~ as the discharge /tom a wet-pipe ~'vstcm. (ROC 1 °,-I 7.g) .:!!ii!:"

7-4.1.5.4 (231C-5-1.4) Detectors for preaction systems shall be installed in accordance with 7-4.1.10. (ROC 1"4-173)

7-4.1.5.5" (231C-5-2.4) In buildings that are used in part for rack snwage of commodities, tile design of tbe ceiling sprinkler system that is within 15 ft (4.6 m) of the racks shall be file same .'ts that provided for fl~e rack storage area. (ROC 13-17"1)

Exception: Where separated t~ a barrier partition that is capable of pn~,enting heat from a fire in the rack storage area ffrom fizsing sprinkler.~ in the nonrach storage area. (ROC 13-173)

7-4.1.6 (231C-5-6) Hose Connections. For first aid fire fighting ,rod mop up operations, small hose [1 1/2 in. (38 mm)] shall be pro~fded in accordance with 5-15.5. (ROC 13-173)

Exception: Hose connections shall not be required for the protection of Class I. H. lIl. and IV comnwdities stored 12 f l or less in height. (ROC 13-173)

7-4.1.11" (231C-7-9, 8-2.5) Horizontal Barriers and In-Rack Sprinklers. Horizontal barriers used in conjunction with in-rack sprinklers to impede vertical fire development slmll be constructed of sheet metal, wood, or similar material and shall extend the Pill length and width of the rack. Barriers shall be fitted within 2 in. (50.8 ram) horizontally a round rack uprights. [See Table 7-4.3.1.5.1. Figares 7-4.3.1.5.1(a), (g). and (]), and Figures 7-4. LI.5.3(c) and (e).l

7-4.1.12 (231C 5-9) High Expansion Foam.

7-4.1.12.1" (231C-5-9.1") Where high-expalasion loam systems are installed, they shall be in accordance with NFPA 11A, Standardfo~ Medium- and High-Expansion Foam S~stems, and they shall be automatic in operation. (ROC 13-173)

Exception: Where modified by_ this standard. (ROC 13-173)

7-4.1.12.2 (231C-5-9.2) In-rack sprinklers shall not be required where high-expansion foam systems are used in combination with ceiling sprinklers. (ROC 13-173)

7-4.1.12.3 (231C-5-9.3) Detectors for Higli-Expansion Foam Systems. Detectors shall be listed and shall be installed in one of the following configurations: (ROC 13-173)

(a) At tile ceiling only where installed at one-balf tile listed linear spacing [e.g., 15 f t x 15 ft (4.6 m x 4.6 m) rather than at 30 ft x30 ft (9.1 m xg.1 m)] (ROC 13-173)

Exception: Ceiling detectors alone shall not be used where the ceiling~roof clearance from the top of the storage exceeds 10 f l (3.1 m) or the height of the storage exceeds 25 f l (7.6 m). (ROC 13-173)

7 1 4

Page 163: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

(h) At tile ceiling at the listed spacing and in racks at al ternate levels (ROC 13-173)

(c) W'here listed for rack storage installation and installed in accordance with ti~e listing to provide response within 1 minu te :ffter igrfition us ing an ignition source that is equivalent to that used in a ~tck storage testing program. (ROC 13-173)

7-4.1.12.4 (231C-~9.4) High-Expans ion Foam Submergence . (ROC 13-17°,)

7-4.1.12.4.1 (231C-5-9.4.1) Storage of Classes I, II, III, and W ( ;ommodi t ies up to arid I~cluding 25 ft (7.6 in) in Height. (ROC 13-173 )

7-4.1.12.4.1.1" (231C-5-9.4.1.1) Where high-expansion foam systems are used without sprinklers, the m a x i m u m suhmergence t ime shall I}e 5 minutes for (floss 1, II, or IIl commodi t ies and 4 minutes for Class IV commodit ies .

7-4.1.12.4.1.2 (231 C-5-9.4.1.2) Where high-expansion foam systems are used in combinatior~ will~ ceiling sprinklers, the m a x i m m n s u b m e r g e u c e t ime shall he 7 minu tes for CI,xss I, II, or III ~ommodi t ies ai~d 5 minu te s for (.',lass IV coinmodit ies.

7-4.1.12.4.1.3 (231C-5-9.,I.1.3) High-Expansion Foam Ceiling Stwinkler Density. Where h igh-expans ion foam systems are used in combina t ion with ceiling sprinklers, tile m i n i m u m ceiling sprinkler desigu density shall be 0.'~ g p m / f C [(8.2 L / m i n ) / m 2 ] for Class I, II, or III connnodities or 0.25 g p m / f t ~ [(10.2 L / m i n ) / m ~] for Cl:~s IV colnmodit ies for the most hydraulically remote 2000-ft 2 (186-m z) operati t ig area. (ROC 13-173)

7-4.1.12.4.2 (231C-5-9.4.2) Storage of Classes I, II, III, and IV ( ;otnmodit ies ()ver 25 fl (7.6 m) in Height. (ROC 13-173)

7-4.2.1.1.2" (231C-6-5.2) In single- or double-row racks widaout solid shelves with s torage over 20 ft (6.1 m) high, or in mnltJple- row racks, or in single- or double-row racks with solid shelves an d storage he igh t up to and inc luding 25 ft (7.6 m), a m i n i m u m of 6- in. (152.4-mm) vertical clem" space shall be ma in ta ined between tile sprinkler deflectors and tile top of a tier of storage. Sprinkler discharge shall no t be obs t ructed by horizont~d rack members .

7-4.2.1.1.3 (231C-6-5.3) In-rack sprinklers at one level only for storage up to m~d including 25 ft (7.6 m) higll shall be located at tile first tier level at or above one-half of the storage height.

7-4-2.1.1.4 (231C-6-5.4) In-rack sprinklers at two levels only for storage up to and including 25 ft (7.6 m) h igh shall be located at the first tier level at or above one-dl ird and two-thirds of tile storage height.

7-4.2.1.2 (231C-6-6) In-Rack Sprinkler Spacing.

7-4.2.1.2.1" (231C-6-6.1) M a x i m u m horizontal spacing of sprinklers in single- or double-row racks with noneucapsulated storage up to and including 25 ft (7.6 m) in he igh t shall Ire in accordance with Table 7-4.2.1.2.1.

For encapsula ted storage, m,'txi~.~m horizontal spaciug shall be 8 ft (2.44 in). (ROC 13-173) .... iii':;:::::::i"-~ ....

..::i:i:i-. "" Table 7-4.2.1.2.1 ~ : ~ : ~ . a . b l e 6-6.1)

• ' I[J.[ ' l l l l ~ ..::-i? "~mmO~.'.~[. Class

Aisle Widths lii '~.. II'::: llI~i~i~:.~::..::i'i:" W 8 ft ~ 2 f'~:!iii .... 12 (~::i::! ~s:" 8 ft 4 ft .., 12 ft ":~:, 8 f(::" 8 ft For SI units: ,-}'::~i~i~-~i!~'ii::iiii ....

..:::.-'.::. "::~.:-:,::.. ...... .:.::::: ::::. .4:::::-. "::::-.

7-4.2.1.2:'~:i:'!!~ 1C-6-6":2~$.......~rinklers installed in racks shall be 7-4.1.12.4.2.1 (2"11C-5-9.~1.2.1) lA/here h igh-expansion foam systems s a c e d withou~!~¢ ard t~ii~ck upr ights are used for storage over 25 ft (7.6 m) high up to and including 35 "P ~..:-:-:.::+. "..--'---.g.-! -:::::" - ' f, (10.7 m) high, they shall be used in combina t ion with ceiling 7....~'~11"~iii(231C-~i#:':in-Rack Sprinkler Discharge Pressure . sprinklers. Tile m a x i m u m submergence time for t h e h i g h - ..::~i..nkl¢:~.::;t~l. ra.¢~,s:-~all discharge at not less than 15 psi (103.4 exl ,ausion foam shall be 5 minutes for Class I, II, or III ..... k~)~--$.~:"~d~-:;~s of commodi t ies . c , ,mmodit ies and 4 mi imtes for ('Ja.~s IV commodit ies . (ROC 1.9, - 173) ..... :iiiiii::ii!::i::!~!i .... "::!::---::.. -

" ..£:" "%~:.~4.2.f.:~.~.::..(.~glC-6-8) In-Rack Sprinkler Water Demand. The 7 - 4 1 1 ° 4 . . . . . . 3"C-59 . . . . . . . r e ' ' ' l ~t " " . i :.':.'~i:::::. i~ater d e ' ~ l d for sprinklers instal ed in racks sball l~e based on

t t z I t , i , - ,~ t 71 wile n gt -ex[: ~ ns on ioanr s 1 ~:-:-:.::. "::i n ' t a f i ' ~ " I tS O er V" n ~ tile runs- ' d U ' i " O- r c ' . . . . . . . . . . . ":-'::::::::-. -'::::"S HI IL~ " O p ~ n o o r . ~ i l y r a i C a l l V rein te s p I n K l e r s I C o u l b u l a t l ( n w d l c e t i i n f f s D r i t l k l e f s t i l e i r n n n n u n l c e i l i n g ..:.. "::'::.::.&.:::.::" ~ , ,

" " ' " 9 ' 2 " ": ' : :g i '" ":-":¢':':'- ~ I O i l O W S ' sprinkler design density shall Le 0 . , g p m / f t [ (8.2 L/mm)/...:.~.!-~:'{gr "::~i::i::i::i" . . . . " ('J,tss I, 1], or ' i l l comn~odities mid 0,25 g p m / f t 2 [(10.2 ..::/~::" : .......... "::i:~:~:~::-.--'i::" L / u l i n ) / m z] for (:[~Lss IV commodi t ies for tile most h , ~ u l i c ~ "~:. ~i~:.!fa) Six sprinklers where only one [eve[ is i n s t a t ed in racks with

2 2 "":':':" :'.-* " . . . . : ' " tv laSS 1, I1, or llI commodi t ies , remote 2000-ft ( 1 8 6 - m ) opera t ing area. (ROC 13-17$:~:"::::i~iii:....::::::::::::.::i~::::-i::.. "iii:::::::::.. " _(b)_ Eight sprinklers where only one level is instxtiled in racks

7-4.2 Protection Criteria for Class I through IV.::~oditie:~i?:i;~:=.....-¢# .... with Class IV commodi t ies . Stored up to and Including 25 ft in Height...:-i~! . . . . . . i..:::ii" . . . . :!:'ij .... than one level is installed in racks with Class I, II, or III 7-4.2.1 In-RackSprinklers . .:!!!ii%i:ii:i::ii::,.::¢iiiii~::i~:~i~i:::::~_j~i_i__.~.::::~: ~::::. "::-i::.

...... iii~ii::i::i::ii:~ .... "%::iii .... ......... 7-4.2.1. I (231 C-6-5) In-Rack Sprinkl~"~::Loc%i.~n. '::ii::i!::i-.-.......-.-.-!:-

7-4.2.1.1. l * t (2glC-6-5.1) The el~a~i~-~:.p.t/~i~-rack sf~¢~'l-,kler deflectors with respect to storage shall : ~ i ~ e a considerat ion in single- or double-row ra,:k storage tip to :~::!~.t.Le:|uding 20 ft (6.1 m) high. (ROC 13-173) ":::iiiiiU

.:~::."

(c) Ten sprinklers (five on each two top levels) where more

commodi t ies . (d) Four teen sprinklers (seven on each Iwo top levels) where

more than one level is installed in racks with Class IV connnodi t ies .

Exa~Jtion: Why're a storaEe rack, due to its h~nffth, requires &'ss than the number of in-rack sprinklers specified, onl~ those in-rack sprinklers in a single rack need to be included in the calculation.

7-4.2.1.5 (231C-6-12) In-Rack Sprinkler Location - Singe and Double Row Racks. In single- or double-row racks without solid shelves, in-rack sprinklers shall be installed in accordasace with Table 74.2.1.5 on the following page.

715

Page 164: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 - - A 9 9 R O C

T a b l e 7 - 4 . 2 . 1 . 5 ( 2 3 1 C - 6 - 1 1 )

Height

Over 12 ft, up to a n d

i n c h . l i n g 20 ft

Over 20 ft, up to a n d

inc lud ing 22 ft

t )ver 22 ft , u p to a n d

inc lud ing 25 fl

or D o u b l e - R o w Racks.

Aisles (ft) Sp r ink le r s

C o m m o d i t y Encap- (44.1) M a n d a t o r y Clggs su la ted (B-6-11.1 ) In-Rack

I1

I11

W

II

Ill

IV

No 4 8

I1

il l

W

No

to a n d 25 ft wit So l id She lves '" ( ] e i l i~ Sprinkler Water Demand

With In-Rack Sprinklers Without In-Rack Sprinklers

Fig.

7-4.2.2.2.1 (a)

Apply Fig C u r v e s 7- Fig. Cu rves

4.2.2.1.3 C&D 7-4.2.2.2.1 (a) G & H Ag~B E&F

Apply Fig. 7-

4.2.2.1.3 Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No .:!i::"

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

4 No 7.4.2.2.2.1 (e) 8 4 No 7-4.2.2.2.1 (b) 8 4 No 74.2.2.2.1 (e) 8 4 No 7.4.2.2.2.1 (c) 8 4 1 level 7-4.2.2.2.1 (f) 8 4 No 74 .2 .2 .2 .1 (d) 8 4 1 level S 4 No 8

74.2.2.2.1 (g)

7 - 4 . 2 . 2 . 2 . ~ ( ~ ) ( . ~ . . : ? ~ : .

'::!:iii!-:::/ 7-4.2.2.2.£(e.!::.fi ~::!!i!:~&D ""::i 4 1 level

8 .-::U "-i~& B 4 No 7- 4 • 2.2 • ~.:i'~i{~.:: . . . . ~i~ . ' :~ :0 ":ii

8 . . . . . . :%, #"X~iiiii i i i . Illl 4 1 level 7~:.~-~'~.~.~e) ":-',i~i!!~:. C&D s ..::S: ~ . . . . . . . . :{!i!! ::~i::iii~ 4 No ::.¢:*-~.:2.zz,.#c) ..::,~,t~ 8 . ":::::::':i::-..-::::" " A& B

• fi'i'~. ;?"i'?"i" 4 1 leve~:~:::::-::':! i::- 7 4 . ~ ! (f) . C & D 8 .':':" ,', ':';';';'?j'i" A & B

A&B .......... ~ ~eva~::~:~:~.. :"7-~:z2..g) C&D

..::f': A & B ..~:::-]i( . . . . . . . i" ":i:: i:::'w;:U"

4~;::i:::::::.:..~:::i: .. i:!::" No :{!.:'~i::"74.2.2.2.1 (a) C& D A&B

.::':i::':"':':~:iiii!i-. ::'~!!i.:'::J e , . v e 7.4.2.2.2.1 (e) C & D iiif 8%: .... i~::i::!i~i~ .... a& ::~!:!:!::ii::.. ~:iii:" .:::.:::" No 7-4.2,2.2. l (b ) C & D

"::ilia..::'-:, ..:::. 1 level 7.4.2,2.2.1 (e) C & D ~'~i:-'--',,- ....... A&B Wf¢ ~:i-" No 7-4.2.2.2.1 (c) C&D 8 A&B 4 1 level 7-4.2.2.2.1 (f) C & D 8 A&B 4 7-4.2.2.2.1 (d) C & D 8 1 level A&B 4 7.4.2.2.2.1 (g) C & D 8 A&B

7.4.2.2.2.1 (e)

%4.2.2.2.1 (b)

C&D A&B C&D A&B C&D Yes 7- :~.2.2 .1 (e) A& B -'::::::::--:'-

. fi:Y"" ":':;:h C & D .::ii~iii:~.-4.2.2."2.1 ( c )

C&D .... ~i:. :~i -.-:% .... A & B ._-i:':!:!:" i:'*':'::': .... ::: "-:::::-:::...:::.

74.2.2:~#!{:~) C& D A& B "::~i~i'::

C&D ..:::" A&.~*:" :ii {ii!+.~:::::::i:~+::-?:i:+:i :iiiiiiii++~:. '~" 7-4.2.2.2.1 (a) "*::?i~i::..

• %i~-+ .... .:Y 7-4.2.2.2.1 (b)

No

7-4.2.2.2.1 (c)

7-4.2.2.2.1 (d)

7.4.2.2.2,1 (a)

7-4.2.2.2,1 (b)

No

7-4.2.2.2.1 (c)

G & H E&F

G & H E&F

( ; & H E&F

( ; & H E&F

(;&H E&F

( ; & H E&F

G & H E&F

( ; & H E&F

G & H E&F

G & H • E&F

G & H E&F

G & H E&F

7 1 6

Page 165: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

7-4.2.1.6T (231C-6-13) Racks.

N F P A 1 3 - - A 9 9 R O C

In-Rack Spr ink le r Locat ion - Multiple Row 7-4.2.1.6.1 (231C-6-13.1) For encapsu la t ed or n o n e n c a p s u l a t e d s torage in mul t ip le- row racks n o d e e p e r t han 16 ft (4.88 m) with aisles 8 ft (2.44 m) or wider , in-rack spr inklers shall be installed in accordance with Table %4.2.1.6.1.

TaMe 7-4.2.1.6.1 (231C Table 6-13.1)

Commodity Height Class

Over 12 ft t ip tO and including

15fl I

II

Ill

IV

()ver 15 ft up to, and including

2O ft I

II

IlI

IV

Over 211 ft tll~ to add including

25 tt [

II

IIl

W

For SI units: ft = 11.3048 m (ROC 13-173)

Sprinklers Encap- Mandatory sulated In-Racks Fig. No.

, to and Iucludint{ 16 ft, Aisles 8 ft or Wider, Storage Height up to 25 ft Ceiling Sprinkler Water Demand

With In-Rack Sprinklers Without In-Rack Sprinklers

Apply Fig. Apply Fig. Curves 7-4.1.7.2 1.25 x Density Fig. No. Curve 7-4.1.7.2 1.25 x Density

$

No 7-4.2.1.1 (a) Yes No 7-4.2, l. 1 (a) No 7-4.2.1.1 (b) Yes 7-4.2.1.1 (b) No No 7-4.2.1.1 (c) Yes 1 level 7-4.2.1.1 (c) No No 7-4.2.1.1 (d) Yes 1 level 7-4.2.1.1 (d)

No 7-4.2.1.1 (a) Yes No 7-4.2.1.1 (a) No 7-4.2.1.1 (b) Yes 7-4.2.1.1 (b) No No 7-4.2.1.1 (c) Yes 1 level 7-4.2.1.1 (c) No 1 level 7-4.2.1.1 (d) Yes 7-4.2.1.1 (d)

No No Yes 1 level No Yes 1 level No Yes No Yes

No 7-4.2.1.1 Ig~l .: i::.. Yes Yes 7-4.2.1.1 I&l:(:::: ~:~':-"::- No 7-4.2.1.1 ..~::~::.. Yes

C& D Yes 7-4.2.1.1 :~'}.=I ~1 "":~:~ 'I:'?':" Yes Yes No 7-4.2.1.1....::"[.: '::i-I&] ~'::~.:.:~::, Yes No

Yes .-ii::i:i~i';: ': '; "::i~'!'-:::!'i ....

C&D Yes ":

.... ::8.:-;"

A & B ,.i:i- 7:.-i-ii:':,:,.,

"::i:!:i--:. ..:......:...:.i! ~::iii :-<-"::::, '::~::~:::i~

No 7-4.2.1.1 :"iii..~ & D 1,50 x density .-:$~$;:k::i::::::::,-.:~..,..~ "::i~?:..

.::¢~!~::::iii}~:: No " ""-'-"i !::.. 6.12(a)":-'.-:i ~:;."-":'Ie, l

.,--~.~,::, ::I~i~.21.1.:~.': '" i l l , .:~?:!': NNi:ii~i? 7"ai~.;::.L-"i{ i&j

~i:.... Yes.:}':! .... :::,7~'1.1 I& d

I i::: "::~.*. " ....

i::'i::1.50 x d~[%it)' i .i

7-4.2.1. l(a) ..::-::::-i:.("

7-42Hlu .... 7-4.2.1..1:t~13)':" i::iiii::i.C&D "::i~:. ::::::::....-::::" 7-4. $1:~.}.iJ. ( c ) :i::i:: ~ .... i::iii~..'?:'}q °

2 levels . .:-.2;.~:~, 1.1 "(:~::'i:~

,.;:ii:: I::':'~'~i~. 1( d N t i?i:i.¢,.&,~, B

J % i i i : : S ? .... .... ~::!ii~iy

~ii:.:if? ~:" No 7-4.2.1.1 l&] Yes i::"

No Yes No

Yes No Yes

Yes No Yes

Yes No

Yes No Yes No Yes No

1.50 x density

No

7 1 7

Page 166: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

7-4 .2 .1 .6 .2 (231C-6-13 .2 ) F o r e n c a p s u l a t e d o r n o n e n c a p s u l a t e d s t o r a g e in m u h i p l e - r o w r a c k s d e e p e r t h a n 16 ft (4 .88 m ) , o r w i t h a i s l e s l ess t h a n 8 f t ( 2 .44 ,n) w ide , i n - r a c k s p r i n k l e r s s h a l l b e i n s t a l l e d in a c c o r d a n c e w i t h T a b l e 7-4 .2 .1 .6 .2 .

Table 7`4.2. !.6.2 (231(] Table 6-13.2 ) Multiple-Row Racks; Rack Depth Over 16 ft or Aisles Narrower than 8 ft, Storal~e Height up to and lncludin~ 25 ft Ceiling Sprinkler Water Demand

With In-Rack Sprinklers Without In-Rack Sprinklers Sprinklers

Encap- Mandatory Apply Fig. sulated In-Racks Fi~. No. Curves 7-4.1.7.2 1.25 x Densit~ Fig. No.

Commodity Hei![ht C l~s

()vcr 12 fl I I I} t l l a n d

including 15 f~ I

II

lrl

IV

~lver 15 fi I I~J [ O a n l l

inchld ing 20 ft I

lI

lU

IV

()vet 20 f~ U]~ to ,and including

25 tt I

11

I11

IV

For SI mfi~s: ft = 0.3114,q m (ROC 13-173

Curves Apply Fig.

7-4.1.7.2 1.25 x Density,

Yes No Yes

Yes No Yes

Yes No

No No

No 7`4.2.1.1 (a) No 7-4.2.1.1 I&,[ Yes 7-4.2.1.1 (a) Yes 7-4.2.1.1 l&~ No No 7`4.2.1.1 (b) No 7`4.2.1,1 I&[ Yes 7-4.2.1.1 (b) C&I.} Yes Yes 7-4.2.1.1 I&,,] No 7-4.2.1.1 (c) No 7-4,2.1,1 Igc0}.!: ~ Yes 1 level 7-4.2.1.1 (c) Yes ='=========='-'='====- No No 7-4.2.1.1(d) No 7-4.2,1,1 .;~ii:i.~ D Yes 1 level 7-4.2.1.1 (d) 1.50 x densit), ":iiil ""::::::::" .... i~ii::i::~-:::

• ::: . . . . . . ::iii!i!l

• :!!i:::::i:iiiiiiii!!~:: ::i::

No 7-4,2.1,1 (a) No :::,.

No 7-4.2.1.1 (b) No #i:- '::iiii!~!iii_i=.::"

Yes 1 level 7`4.2.1.1 (b) C&D Yes Y ~ i ....

No 74211,c .... w Yes 7-4.2.1.1 (c) ..... ~:~:~:~::~e s .... -::i::i:: .... .:~::::~

No 7-4.2.1.1 (d) : :-: :"-":: :~ ": i::.-::....-!:- .... :-~i~i~i~ .... Yes 7-4.2.1.1 (d) ..::ii::i .. 1.50 ~iOe~nsity:. ,::i::"

No 7-4.2.1. l (a ) iiiiiiiii::. ;iii ::::i . " : ~ : " Yes 7-4.2. i. 1 (a) " -'.Yes No 1 level 7-4.2.1.1 (b) .... i::. "::iiiiiil)i:'?:" No .-::i:i:i:i:i:i::-. "::~i~!ii?:.. Yes 74.2.1.1 (b) ./=:.~k 1~)':" N d'::i!i:.i.')i::. :3- Yes No 7-4,2.1.1 ( c ) ..::-~iiil ":i::!i?:.. ":i:;:':i:~ No Yes 7-4.2,1.1 (e~::"" :~iiiiiiii::!i::....:i~ii~iiiii .... ":ii::iii::ii:: .::'ii'::" Yes

.-:::=::.. No 2 levels 7-4.2. l:.l..(..d.) ":?:~'i'i'iii .... .::i.i!~!!!ii .... No Yes 7-4,~:1:'.:'t:~::, .... ~i::~i~i'i: 1.50 x densi ty

. .-:-::!:[:b:.:-. "-::::::::::-. =========================== -.-.-.-.-.~

"::~3!:~b...:3:" -.-.-.-.w.- -.:.:+:...

-.w...-. -.:.:.:+:.. .... ....

% .

7 1 8

Page 167: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

7-4.2.1.6.3" (231C-6-13.3) M:Lximum horizontal spacing of sprinklers on branch lines, in multiple-row racks wid~ encapsulated or nonencapsula ted storage up to and including 25 ft (7.6 m) in height, s h a l l n o t exceed 12 ft (3.7 m) for Class I, II, or III commodit ies arid 8 ft (2.44 m) for Class IV commodities, with area liufimdons of 100 ft ~ (9.29 m ~) per sprinkler for Class 1, II, or IIl commodities and 80 ft ~ (7.43 m ~) per sprinkler for Class IV commodities. The rack pl,as~ view shall be considered in determining the area covered by each sprinkler. The aisles shall not be included in area calculations.

7-4.2.1.6.4 (231C-6-13.2) A minimum of 6 in. (152.4 ram) shall be maintained between the sprinkler deflector and d~e top of a der of s ~ o r a g c .

7-4.2.2t Ceiling Sprinkler Discharge Criteria - Area Density Method

7-4.2.2.1 General.

7-4.2.2.1.1"t (231C-6-9) Ceiling Sprinkler Water Demand. The design curves in Figures 7-4.2.2.1.1(a) d~rough (g) shall apply to nominal 20 ft (6.1 m) height of storage.

CE~g s~l~ dm~y (~ln~ Cure Leg~ Cme Legend

41 6.1 81 10.2 122 t4,3 16.3 18.3 A - , ~ t ~ d o ~ l ~ s E-S~e.o~do~e~l~ wilh 8-1t (244.m) aisles ~hB.ft(Z44+m)~s

(:eiiingsp~m ~ +@m 165°F(/PC) F-gngle~ ~.m,~s ~r~sp~s ~B.ft(?J4.m)? ....

B - S~le-or d~e-ro~ +d 16ff (7PC) ra~sdhfl(~.44~) split,

165°F(74'0) ~+F{141°C

01 015 0,2 0.25 03 0.35 0,4 0.45

C - Single-or double-tin r~ H - S~-o+doub!e+ dh4-ft (1,22~n)aisles or dh4-!t[L22-m)i m~m.<m,~+,+ a~ 165°F~..t..~J 28P'F {141¢)ce+ing sp[~ ++::+:+:++:++

im~s!mkle~s, : : i i i : : : : ~ l ~ D-'Sinole.or ~o~le.r~.:_ amlei:~: t

mu,+p~h .+++:;++~:+l+-,,+.m ~65'~"P0 = .+-:+~-:-~-+::'+" +,< ......::~. ~ .......... ~ +

-:i:'":iii!i:: . . . . ::~: -:i:':'::" .... %+:.

Figure 7-4.2.2. I. l (a) [ 231 C-6-11 (a) ] S p r i n I ~ - ~ + t e m design curves - - 20-ft (6.l-m) high rack storage - - CI~:: 'I nonencapsulated

commodit ies - - convention~'] pallets.

41 6,1

Calmgspi~l~d~y(L~n~

8.1 10,2 122 {4+3 16.3 183 20,4

6OOO

E 050oo

4000

o

010 0.15 0,~0 02~ 0.~0 0~ o.e 0.4~ 0.~

Curve Legend Curve Le~d

W~ O~I244~]~m wWh O-# ~2 44,m)~es w~h 28~ 1141°C1 and 28ff'F [~41~C] ce,llng

m,ra~ ~rPJets wIIh 8-11(2 4 4 ¢ ) ~

~m mh 165"}: ('t4*C) G - ~ . e (Jo~tmtad~ ced~ Sl~itJm ruth 4-11 (122~m}~

I~F (74'+C) and 28~F (I¢'C)~m 9 m+r~spm~ers sprn~s

ruth 44111~¢)aslm or w~4+[t 22.m)~l~s mul~-r~racksw~ and 165"F [N'C} ~ g

S~II~ all~ 165°F (14¢} I-M~l~ro~rad~s ~h

O- S~e-of d~l~rad6 alsl~ ~ 2 ~ [141°C) mh 4.11 (1 22~)ar, lm o( ~11~ ~ m

1S5~: (74°C) Ca~lg 8.fi (2 44e) or ~ 1

i~r~spr~rs cg~ s ~

..::..~i::~i....:__.. " Figure 7-4.2.2.1.1 (b) [ 2 3 ] ~ - ! ~:('~:~,:.Sprinkler system design curves

- - 20-ft (6.l-m) high:.-: .~c'~:i-.stor~ Class II nonencapsulated comm~".~..'..es "" con~;'~..~fi~ial pallets.

C ~ i n ~ . . . . ~ . . i _ _ .... Curve Legmd Curve Lege~l

w~h 8-1~ (2,44.m) ai$1e~ wlhS.lt [2,44~)aJsle~ wi~h2~{141°C} ~2~F(141°C)ce~ ceili~ sprinklers znO spri~Im

E I~(~'tC} F-gngte+r~j~mr~ v in-rz~ s~klers w~h B-~t {2,44~)aisles ! B -Sing}e.or dmble.row and I~F (74'~) ruling

e aJsleseth 16~ (740C) G - 9~.= ~-r0Mra~ o.

"~; in-rad~spri~ers, spri~lers. ~. C-Si~.ofdo~{e.r~ra~s H-Si~e-ordou~le.rmra~

w~h4-1~ (1,22~)aisles or w~h4-~ [L22.m)aisles

in-1~sprin~rs. 8.11(2,t4.~] = ~e[ D- S@ord~uble-rowr~ aisl~ ~ ~6%4~°C)

m~iple.r~racksw~h J - Multiple-tin r~L~ ~h 015 0.20 025 030 035 0.40 045 050 16~(740C]=ili~ 8+t(2,44-m)~"m(~

Ca~g spinkl~ d~y(gl:~ in-rad~s~in~m c~ingspr~

Fiepure 7-4.2.2.1.1(c) [231C-6-11(c)] Sprinkler system design curves - - 20-ft (6.l-m) high rack storage - - Class III nonencapsulated

commodit ies - - conventional pallets.

719

Page 168: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 - - A 9 9 R O C

Ceilirlgs~i~d~qsty(L~n~

6.1 8.2 10.2 12.2 14.3 16.3 18.3 20.4

G~

v

C

m

~ 4000,

C C (1

0

t~ :2000

0.15 0.2~ 0.~ 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50

Cur~ L ~ Curve L(~d

A- 8-fl (2J4.m] ~sfes ~th E- ~ (2,44.mj ais}es ~I~ 2~'F(141'C)c~ti~ ~%41'C)ceit~g spi~'san+165'F(74+C) ~inkl(~s. ~n.rad{ ~oriK(lers. F - 8-ff (2.44.m) ai.s~ +th

B- ~(2,44.rn)ais~ +~h l(PF(74°C)ceing

s~in~sand165°F(TPC) G -4-ff(1.22-m)aides ruth =n-ra~ksp{~s. 28PF(141°C)c~ing

C-4.11(l.22-m) aislesw~h ~i~les. 2~°Fl14t%}~ti~ H-4.,tl.22.m)aisles,~h ~inkla's and I(PF (74°C) 165'F(74'C}~in~ ~.ra~ ~pr~(lers, spinkleo.

D-4.ff(t.2~-m) a~es w~h l~'F(74°C) ceing ~ink~s a~d 16~'F {74°0) m.ra(~ sprinklersl

C(~i~s~i~l~d(~slf(L~n~ 2

6.2 10.2 12.2 14.3 16.3 18.3 204

g

© O. 0

'C

a

o

= 2000

a

1#

0

Curve Legend

A-8.[q2.44.m) ~slesdh ~'F(141'C) oB~£ ~i~sand 165°F(14'C) in.[ad(spinldas

B-E~(2A4.mt~fes~h 1~°F{74"0) ~iting sp~Jersa~d 16ff(74'C)

::.. +.::~:-

..:::::::::::.. --:::;..

Curve L~d

C - 4-ff (1.22-m) aisles ~th

~inklersan~ I~0F174'0) +m~s#~ers.

D- 4-~(L22.m) a~lesrth 16PF[74'C)~ti~g sprinklesa~ I~5+F174'C)

Ceiling @in,dE( dmsty (g~:t 2)

Fignre 7-4 .2 .2 .1 .1(d) [231C-6-11(d)] Sp r ink l e r sys t em des ign curves - - 20-ft (6 , l -m) h igh rack s t o r age - - Class IV n o n e n c a p s u l a t e d

c o m m o d i t i e s - c o n v e n t i o n a l pal le ts . ..::.:i#:::~i~iiiiii?:: " ~%~:..:::, . " ....... ..:::::. .::::::-

..::~z~:.. ":~i::. 10,2 12.2 14,3 16,3 18.3 20,4 22,4 24.5

i . . . . . . ..... % .... ~ ~c D ~ ~i~m~dl6~,F{~eC)+.::~::::~i~s~%:. " % *: 6000 60 Jn, ,Ull l , , , , ,I,, ,,l, n, , ,,,, ,,,,155 ^ in.rad(~k~rs ................. F - ~ : ~ l e s ; ~ :~iY

~" I I I l [ l l l l [ l l l l I I I I I I I I II1[ I l t l I t l l l ,. m~ ~.~,N4.,~,,~,~::~:-:~-:.:i~:~:. i ~ i ~ ..::ii:: 5 IIIIHtIll]l l l l IIII IIII IIII IIII l l l l l =v " - C , ~ . : , ~ ...... ~i:::"ii ~ [ ~ " ~ i i i i .... : ,.- l i l l l l l l l l l l l t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l l c 1~i"[(:.{.:.~-.:~]1.0 :i~:'...~IIr~l~. , ;y" o ~ltl(1

I I I I t l l l l l l l l t l l I I I I t i l l I l l t J i l l I I I I I '~ +1 ~.,~]~:..: ] ~'-.~,..~,~l tlltUtltlllttUt till til l Im Hit ~llll ; ..:.:~s.'::+"~!i~ii .... 2~[l4l,C)c~in 0 m Ht I I I IV I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t~l ' ;e I I 1~ <~":""'-:~$~'-f.; 411 1~ al�~SwIIIl"F'::i:i::: . . . . . . . . . InKB'S Ou"

o ] i l l l l i l l | l i | J [111 I I I I Itl~- ~ ~1~ .~!!" - "1 ' ~ "::-:::i~:::'i"!"~:~ ' r o 4 ~ 4 # i l l l l l l l i l i l l l i I I I I i l l l III. ITpc~'~] i ] i i : : . .2~F[~C)~ / ~ : 4 ~ 22.madesw~h ~ 000

"0 l l l l l | l l i l l l l ! I I I I II11 llli kl u~t'l ' l"l -~ '"+~-+ +~ . . saflol~ PII4~J ]~P{14 UI~|D0 r E - C "&"<:::::;-- , . : .+. . . . . . I I I I I I I I | I N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Bloat I ] ] .:- ~ i n k l r ~ ,~ ; . . L .,.,.~S.~ o." o. I I I I I B I I I I I I I I I I I t l IIII IIII I~,, ,~]]] n . . . . ;'~:":~'~:~" " e

~t~l~ I I I I I I I I l l l l l l I I I I J i l l I I I I I lkl Iklll,~T ~ m I.J-4~(l~.+~[:Bl~Wl$ ~ . . . . . t l l l l l l l l l l l l l 11111 I l l l I I I I II15 II . . . . , "'i

¢ 11111111111111 IIII IIII I I I . r l l T ' [ l l ~ ,= +nklefsandl(~F(74C} o iIIIIili |IBi! II1'11 t i l l l i l t l i l l ISJlT + ~ ~ra~(le~s .~

~ I I I I l l l l i l l i l l I I I l ~ l J l l I I I I N i l I1~1,,'.. ~' ' ",,,, r ~LP~ i® c c ~ I l l l l l l l I l l I l l l I l l l l i l t I l l l I tl

I l l l l l l l l l l l l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ -~ t l l l l f l l l l l l l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1111 ~

~3 I I I I I I I I I I I I l l I l l l 1111 I I I I II11 11111 [} n ~ 1# I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I111 I t l l I I I I I I I I I I I I Im

. . . . . I000

~.~ ~.,~ ~.~ o.~ ~.'~ ,~.+~ ~.~,~ ~.~0 0.25 0.30 0.05 0.40 0,4~ 0.~ 0,~ 0,~

Caf=g s~i;l~a' d=~y (gpm~ ~) Cet~g spink~ d~y ( g ~

• :~::" "%:::;~ .... "::~ ............

Fign.l:.e+:~-4.2.'~!i~..(.f) [23.i[~"6-1 l ( f ) ] Single- o r doub le - row racks - - 2 ~ i : : 0 } ~ . m ) h i g ] ~ . . : : s ~ o r a g e - - sp r i nk l e r sy s t em design curves - - ..:-.#" Clas~i~]II e n c a l ~ , t e d c o m m o d i t i e s - c o n v e n t i o n a l pal le ts .

Cum t~d

A-8-ff(2.44.m)~leswb ~'F{141°CIc~ng

16ff(74'C 1 ia.ra~ @in~rs,

B- ~ (2.44-m) aislesw~h J65'F(74'C)~i~ ~mk~sa~ 165'F(140C)

Cme L~d

C - 4.l~ (1.22.m) aries wlh ~'F(141°C) c~I~g

16ff(74'0) in.m~ s~in~fs.

D - 441(1~.rnl a~sles wdh l~'F(14'O)~ing ~lersan(I 1~'F(74'C)

F'.~ure 7-4.2.2.1.1 (e) [ 231 C-6-1 1 (e) ] Single- o r doub le - row racks - - 20-~ft (6. l -m) h igh rack s t o r a g e - - sprinl~[er sy s t em des ign cu rves - - Class I a n d l] e n c a p s u l a t e d c o m m o d i t i e s - - c o n v e n t i o n a l pal le ts .

F igure 7-4.2.2.1.1 (g) [231C-6-11 (g) ] Single- o r doub le - row raclcs - - 20-ft (6. l -m) h igh rack s t o r age - - sp r i nk l e r sys t em des ign curves - - Class IV e n c a p s u l a t e d c o m m o d i t i e s - - c o n v e n t i o n a l pal lets .

7 2 0

Page 169: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

7-4.2.2.1.2 (251C-6-9.1) The des ign curves ind ica te water d e m a n d s fo r o rd inary t e m p e r a t u r e a n d homin id h igh t e m p e r a t u r e ra ted spr inklers at d~e ceil ing. T h e o rd ina ry t e m p e r a t u r e des ign curves c o r r e s p o n d i n g to o rd inary ra ted t e m p e r a t u r e spr inklers shall be used for spr inklers wid~ ord inary a n d i n t e rmed ia t e t e m p e r a t u r e classification. The higia t e m p e r a t u r e des ign curve c o r r e s p o n d i n g to high t e m p e r a t u r e ra ted spr inklers shall be used for spr inklers I~aving high t e m p e r a t u r e ~,-ating.

7-4.2.2.1.3 (231C-6-9.2) For s torage he igh t t ip to a n d inc lud ing 25 ft (7.6 m) p r o t e c t e d wid~ cei l ing spr inklers only a n d for s torage he ight up to a n d inc lud ing 20 ft (6.1 m) p ro t ec t ed with cei l ing spr inklers a n d m i n i m u m r e q u i r e d in-rack sprinklers , dens i t ies o b t a i n e d f rom des ign cruxes shall be ad jus ted in acco rdance with Figure 7-4.2.2.1.3.

H e i g h t o f s t o r a g e ( m )

3 . 6 6

3 . 0 5 4 . 5 7 6 . 1 0

1 2 5

<D

1 0 0 I ::3 o ¢

E ~ " ~ • • ..:::.

(3> 1 ...~iii:i:!:,:.:.. "E~ ::i:::"

6 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . , .........

; .... i:~ ::i::i:. " ~:.i.-i

' " " i t.. :'::iii~i i~i::" . ~ : - : - : . . : :.~..

Ai::"; """: ~i~: ":! :~:.-'(i::~ ..::ii ~" ~ ":i'i;i "::i~i i~:~:;:.::

_ ,-::t :~'~! ~::, : ~: ~:: :" -I ::::::::i~ ~:: ::"

k::::: :..

0 ; ":: ":':':'% "::;:

0 1 0 1 2 .:i.':" 1 5 2 0 2 5

H e i g h t o f s t o r a g e ( f t )

7 . 6 2

/

J I V

J / r

I I .-:::

?.-:~

~.:~ :::'::':!: "-::~

~ ~::.

:-: ::.::-::.::

9 . 1 4 1 .::.:.:~ !~!

% .:~::

A~ ~i-i ~L-:."i~ i~i~i~ ~-.:~: :::::.:.

-:.-'-~ ":~:~1.. ~::.: '::" '.-:: '

:::i:.~i .... :.i~!!!i #"

i'~i::. *::::: "::i:":i ::::..

:-'.:~i" ;-'::::

3 0 3 5

Figure 7-4.2.2.1.3 (231C-6-9.2) Ceil ing spr inkler densi ty vs s torage h e i g h t .

721

Page 170: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

7-4.2.2.1.4 (231C-6-9.3) For storage height over 20 it (6.1 m) up t ) and including .:~ ft (7A 0 protected with ceiling sprinklers and nlitfinluul required in-rack sprinklers, densities ot,tained fronl design curves shall be used. Densities shall not be at!justed in accordance with Figure 7-4.'2.2.1.3.

74.2.2.1.5 (23106-9.4) For storage height up to an,I in,-lu,ting 20 ft (6.1 m) protected with ceiling sprinklers and with more than one level of in-rack sprinklers, but not in every tier, deusities obtained h'om design era'yes and ad:justed in accordance with Figure 7- 4.2.2.1.3 shall be permit ted to be reduced an additional 20 percent. (See Table 7-4. 2.2.1.5).

Table 7-4.2.2.1.5 (231C- 6-9.2

Storage Height (ft)

Over 12 ft (3.7 m) through 25 ft (7.6 m)

()ver 12 ft (3.7 m) through 20 tt (6.1 m)

()ver 20 fl (6.1 m) through 25 ft (7.6 m)

7-4.2.2.1.6 (23106-9.5)

Adiustment to Ceiling Sprinkler Density, for Storage H

In-Rack Apply Sprinklers Fig. 7-4. 2.2.1.3

None

Minimum required More than min inmm but no t in every tier

In every tier

Minimum required More than minimum but not in every tier

In ever / t i e r

fight and In-Rack Sprinklers Permitted

Ceil ing Sprinklers Density Adjustments

Yes None

Yes None Yes Reduce density 20% from

that of minim~}:i..n-rack s p ri nkl e rs ..:~iii-:.: ......... ::::

Yes Reduce d...~.'"g't "~:i?t0% from that of n~.~.~im~}~i~iD-rack s P ri .n~. "..~ r s:~! !i::. ':: ! :: !ii::ii .......

N o N o ¢i::~":.'?-::. ':-~i~# ~ N o Reduce ~ . s i t y 20%..ffi'om

-i~,Otl.-llli d ~ u m in-'rack

i:. " " " , ' f , ' , ' , , i, No ..:::iii::" RE.~. ce density 40% from

a :" minimum io-r ,ck ~. sp ri n gt~' :"

.~a of sprinkler operation For storage height over 20 ft (6.1 m) up

(m 2)

m and including 25 ft (7.6 m) protected with ceiling sprinklers and wid~ more than the minimum reqtfired level of in-rack sprinklers, but n . t in every tier, densities obtained from design curves shall be permit ted to be reduced 20 percent. Densities shall not be adjusted.::i¢ in . tcc . rdauce with Figure 7-4.2.2.1.3 .(See Table 7-4. 2 2 1.5 ) .. :.iii ::.-

~-::,i!: 7-4.2.2.1.7 (23106-9.6) For storage height up to and includi~g 20 "::'i:: ft ((~.1 m) protected with ceiling sprinklers and lit-rack spr.'.l~..'~, at each tit:r, densities obtained from design curves and adjtls~'~:d in " accordance with Figure 7-4.2.2.1.3 shall be permit ted .t~i ~ r e ~ e d ,t , a,l, til ,,hal 40 percent. (Sec Tal, b. 7-4.2.2.1.5). ":::" "::!iiiii!:::.i:::..i..'ii:i!:!::i!.:.-'::-. "iiii I:

• . : . : . :+: . .,

7-4.2.2.1.8 (231 06-9.7) For storage height o v e . ~ i ! ~ ( 6.1 ~ . ' ~ . . ,::!'~: t~) /rod including 25 ft (7.6 m) protected with..~:]ling "~"]~rinklers':~' in-rack sprinklers at each tier, densities ob . t ~ f N ~ . f r Q ~ g @ : . :¢i .... , uFees shall be permit ted to be reduced 4..Q..~per'i}~?'~)ei~"shall m,t he adjusted in accordance with Fi.g..l:.t~:~-'i::~.2.2!:~, (See Thb/e 7- 4.2. 2.1.5 )." -::i: . . . . . ::iiiiii: "::::::::::-..-::::" 7-4.2.2.1.9t (23106-9.8) Where g:;t[~gmce:~om c e i ~ to top of storage is less than 41/~ ft (1.37 n~'~', t~::::~.p.~i;ikler op~:iZating area indicated in curves E, F, (;, and H in F[~%¢s 7-4.2.2.1.1 (a) through (e) sha be pe 'mi t t ed to be reduced as iff~z~ate~l in Figure 7- 4.2.2. l.q t,ut to not less than 2000 ft z (185.8 "~?-)i:- ( See 7-4.2.2.1.10).

.:!::.-

1500 2000

279 325 372

,. I , i i i i

! i i i

: i ¢[ : :

ii i i i

el ! E l : ' t ! [

" ! 1

i i i ! ! ! ! I i i }

: : [ : i

J J i

i i :

2500 3000 3500 4000

418 557

L

i J i

i

i-

l

!

i

J , 232

J 186

4500

Reduced design area of sprinkler operation (ft 2)

511

465 = o

0 ) o _

418 o

372 ~"

325 = o )

0~ D

279

O

Figure 7-4.2.2.1.9 (231C-6-9.8) Adjustment o f design area of sprinkler operation for clearance from top o f storage to ceiling.

7 2 2

Page 171: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

7-4.2.2.1.10 (231C-6-9.9) Where clear:race f rom ceiling to top of t;k~ss I or II encapsula ted s torage is 1~/~ ft to 3 ft (0.46 m to 0.91 m), the sprinkler opera t ing area indicated in curve F only of Figure 7-4.2.2.1.1(e) shall be permi t ted to be reduced by 50 percen t but to not less thall 2000 sq l't ~ (185.8 me).

7-4.2.2.1.11 (231C-6-9.10) Where solid, flat-bottom, combust ib le pallets are used with storage he igh t up to and inchlding 25 ft (7.6 m), the densit ies tha t are indic~tted in dae design curves shown in Fignres ~ 7-4.2,2.1.1 (a) t h rough (g), based on convent ional paller~s, shall be increased 20 percent for flae given area. The percentage shall be appl ied to the density de t e rmi ned in accordance wida Figure 7.4.2.2.1.3. The increase in density shall not apply where in-rack sprinklers are installed. (ROC 13-173)

7-4.2.3.3 (231C-6-14.3) For encapsu la ted Class IV commodi t ies with storage he igh t up to and inc luding 25 ft (7.6 m) on multiple- row racks, ceiling sprinkler density shall be 50 percent greater than for nonencapsu l a t ed commodi t ies on double-row racks.

' 7 -4 .3 P r o t e c t i o n Criteria for Class I t h r o u g h IV Commodi t i es S t o r e d O v e r 2 5 f t in H e i g h t .

7-4.3.1 G e n e r a l .

7-4.3.1.1 (231C-7-2) In-Rack Sprinkler Spacing. ha-rack sprinklers shall be s taggered borizont~dly mid vertically where installed in accordance with Table 7-4.3.1.5.1, Figures 7-4.3.1.5.1 (at th rough (j), and Figures 7-4.3.1.5.3 (at t h r o u g h (e).

7-4.2.2.2* (231C-6-11) Ceiling Sprinkler Water Demand - - Double- and Single-Row Racks.

7-4.2.2.2.1 (231C-6-11.1) For Cl:tss I, II, III, or IV comnmdi t i es encapsula ted or rmnencapsn la ted in single- or double-row racks, ceiling sprinkler water d e m a n d in terms of density ( g p m / f t z) [ ( L / m i n ) / m e ] and area of sprinkler operat ion [ft 2 (m z) of ceiling or roof] shall be selected f rom dae curves in Figures 7-4.2.2.1.1 (at t h rough (g) as directed by Table 7-4.2.1.5. The curves in Figures 7- 4.2.2.1.1 (at t h rough (g) also shall apply to portable racks a r ranged in tile same m a n n e r as single- or double-row racks or multiple-row racks. The design shall be sufficient to satisfy a single point on the appropria te curve related to the s torage configurat ion ,and commodi ly class. It shall no t be requi red to mee t all points on the selected curve. Figure 7-4.2.2.1.3 shall be used to adjust d te densi ty tot s torage he igh t unless otherwise specified. For SI units: 1 ft = 0.3(148 m.

7-4.2.2. 2.21 (231C-6-11.21 Design curves for single- and double- row racks shall be selected to cor respond to aisle width. For aisle widths between 4 ft (1.22 m) and 8 ft (2.44 m), a direct linear

7 - 4 . 3 . 1 . 2 (23113-7-5) I n - R a c k S p r i n k l e r L o c a t i o n . Ira single-row, double-row, or multiple-row racks, a m i n i m u m 6-in. (152 .4- ram) vertical clear space shall be ma in ta ined between tire sprinkler deflectors and the top of a tier of storage. Face sprinklers in such racks sball be Ioca t eda m i n i m u m of 3 in. (76.2 ram) f rom rack upr ights a n d no more than 18 in. (460 ram) from the aisle face of storage. Longi tudinal flue in-rack sprinklers shall be located at the intersection with die transverse title space and with the deflector located at or below the bot tom of horizontal load beams or above or below other adjacent hor izon~: :gack members . Such in-rack sprinklers shall be a minimnnt..:....~-':$":~.:.., radially f rom dae side of the rack uprights. (ROC 13-175!..::.ii~---ii~::,

7-4.3.1.3 (231G7-6) In- . ~ . ' ~ , S p ~ . r Discharge. Sprinklers in racks shall discharge .a..~!~ rabbi:not le~-.~.).,.a~.. 30 gpm ( 113.6 L / m i n t for all classes of com~'d'i~#.es. (See C : ~ : 2 . I . 4 . )

7-4.3.1.4 (231 ~.:.~'~-'.-:.~...~:,-~..-..7..~}~-')... In-P, d c k Sprinkler Water Demand . The water d e ~ ' ~ . ' : : ~ f . ~ 5 " i ; ' : i ~ : ~ n s t a l l e d in racks shall be based on simulta~.~bns O l 3 ~ t i o n of the most hydraulically rentote sprinkler.~i-'~-i~ll ows: "%: . . . . .

"::i~:i-::.. "~:??:::::'-" it~terpolation between curves shall be made. Tile density given for . . . . . . . . . . . " 9 . . . . . (at: --.-.'.~.~ s r i ' ~ r s wh~}i:e onl one level is installed in racks with ~-11 ( , .44-m) wide atsles shMl be appl ied to ,aisles wider d lan 8 ft . . . . :::i:::i;::~-.':aae P ..;-.:::.::::: . . . . . . . . Y "

(2.'t4 m). The derlsity given for 4-ft (1.22-m) wide ais es shall be (_;..t..~s t , " :~ .o r 11.1 ~..~..llaoames. t ~ ed tc "dsles rlarrower than 4 ft tl 9') m~ down to 3 l / ¢t t l (~/ x:~{-b) Eight sp.~inkK'q's where only one level is installed in racks ' t ! • . . . . . . . • -, x i ~~ / - -2 -~ x . - - ':::::::~:"x¢~.~: (,/:~2~-:-I/~:" ..::-x.:.-- £Oiqlthodltles':: :::" ' " t i l t . Where ats[es are narrower titan 3 / , ft (1.07 m'J racks shall be " ,'-:~:::--"a. " ":':':':-,-,. " , co lside -ecl to be mn tin e row races . . . . ..x.:-:-:-.. (d:~i-iiii::den ~ k l e r s (five on earn two top levels) where more

• " ' - " " .::~'-:'-::'::::::-:iii~iii.~mn":i~i~. leve is installed in racks with (:lass I, II, or III .... ii::i!::" " ~ m m (~':~¢~'.

7-4.2.3 (231C-6-14) Ceiling Sprinkler Water D e m a n d - Multiple.::---"::~ii::::i'~::- .:::::ii:"(d) ~..~i'rteen sprinklers (seven on each two top leve s) wl ere Row Racks. • -..:.. " "%ii!~::.:-:"::: more thfin one level is installed in racks with CI,xss IV

..::i#'i?ii'i!::.. "%iii'i::-.co m mo diti e s. 7-4.2.3.1 (231C-6-14.1) For nonencapsu la t ed Class I, II4ii-t'II, .or "IV ============================= co im od t es ce tag spr nkler water d e m a n d in t e r m s . : ~ : d e n ~ "!:, .:i~:';t.3.1.5 (231C-7-8) In-Rack Sprinkler Location - Double- a n d ( g p m / f t ~) [ ( L / m i n ) / i n " ] and area of sprinkler oper~t]'/~iiit.~.t~i-:~) ":ii}:::i-:: "::"Single-Row Racks. of ceiling or roof] shall be selected from die curve:..s...:/.'D. Fig~:ii~:,7 - " .-:~i "i::" 4.2.2.1.1 (at th rough (d) The curves in Figures.~'- ' .~-.1.1 (a'%~i~ ........ i-:::" 7-4.3.1.5.1" (231C-7-8.1,7-8.1.1) In double-row racks without t lu 'ough (,t) also shall apply to portable r~ks . . -~rang '~: in t h e ' ~ solid shelves and witll a m a x i m u m of 10 ft (3.1 m) between the top mzumer :~s single-, double-, or mu l t ip l e - ro~- - " :~ . T~i:.~t,~si~ sfi:~ll of storage and the ceiling, in-rack sprinklers shall be installed in I,e sufficient to satisfy a single poin t on the a p ~ ' ~ i : e " ~ i ! ~ accordance with Table 7-4.3.1.5.1 and Figures 7-4.3.'1.5.1 (a t related to the storage conf igurat ion m..~..'.:!~..~ocl]~.:~.lass. ]:i:':shall t h rough (j). The h ighes t level of in-rack sprinklers shall be not not I,e requi red to mee t all points o u.-ifl~e s e ' ~ t e d c'(~.e.::i.:.'Fignre 7- more than 10 ft (3.1 m) below the top of storage. (5"e~: Section 7- 4.2.2.1.3 shall be used to adjust de t:...'~:.for s t ~ a g e he'.£~'t no_less 4.1.9.) , , therwise sl,ecified. (.%, A-'7-4.2.[i::2.']:~i-iiii::...-::(" . . . . -"

"::"-i:.i-::. Where a single-row rack is mixed with double-row racks, Table 7- 7-4.2.3.2 (231C-6-14.2) For eucapsn la t ed ( : ' ~ ! : . l , II, or III 4.3.1.5.1 and Figures 7-4.3.1.5.1(a) t h rough 7-4.3.1.5.1 (it shall be commodi t ies with storage he igh t up to and "i~Ni~ding 25 ft (7.6 m) used. ( R O e 13-173) ,m multi]~le-row racks, ceiling sprinkler denghty shall be 25 percent greater ttlau for notiencalasulated commodi t ies on multiple-row Exception." Figures 7-4. ~. 1.5.3(a) throuKh 7-4. 3.1. 5. 3(c) shall be racks, permitted to be used for the proration ofthe single-row racks. (ROC i%

173)

7 2 3

Page 172: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 - - A 9 9 R O C

Table 7-4.3.1.5.1 ?Table ~31C-7-8.1) D o u b l e - R o w Racks wi thout Sol id She lves - - Storage H i g h e r than 25 f t ?7.6 m L Aisle.s 4 f t (1,2 m~ or Wider

In-Rack Sprinklers - -

/ w . v r . . m f i m ~

• . q •

N e a r e s t V " " '

and M a x i m u m H g r i z o n t a l S p a c i n g ~

C o m m o d i t y L o n g i t u d i n a l C la s s H u e ~ F a c e s~

1 II Ill

Maximum

No.. V e r t i c a l 20 ft

H o r i z o n t a l i0 fl (3.1 m ) u n d e r h o r i z o n t a l b a r r i e r s

Ve, r t i ca l 2 0 [t

H o r i z o n t a l 10 ft (3.1 m )

Ver t i ca l i 0 fi

o r at 15 a n d ,~5 H o r i z o n t a l 10 ft (3.1 m l

Vertical 10 ft

1 0 f t ( 3 . 1 m )

Ver t i ca l 20 ft (6.1 m l

1 0 f t ( 3 . 1 m )

Ver t i ca l 25 ft

H o r i z o n tal

V e r t i c a l

.?.9..&

t a 1 1 0 ft

N o n e

3O f__..A

t h a n

7.6X2&ml

30 ft 9. l_O_&m

Area

rt_ ~ m_J

.... ~ii ..::::-:.::::: --:-- x

..::#ii::: i ..::g:

-.:::.-:: :::.- -..

' : : i~ i i i i i

.:f::-"

..: ... ..:.:.:.:+. • d';' ";???.

. . . . . . -.-?"

Horlzon____~ ~ :'::ii::i~..::.:ii:- "i:.:::':i-:" tal 10 f t i " ":"::::

.::iil !:-i!ii~i.!: .:i .... "::?iiiii.:::..

2 0 f t .... ! i ~ i i i : : i::~ ~[II ":::~i!-ii}:iii!i:':'! ii~J::::"

H o r i z o n - : J i i ~ " ! i i i : i iii!~-~:~i.....: Yes

iat.~.::::i.:i:-i. ' - .......... ~ % , "::-iiiiii~:-~

'~::iiii::~::...~¢ . . . . . ~::"I

H o r i z o n - F i i i i i ~ I ~ N o *al 5 f~ l-:# .... l ~ I I

Cei l ing Sprinkler Dens i ty Clearance uo to I0 ft 4~'~

O r d i n a r ~ T e m p e r a t u r g

..::#ii?iiii!.:ii!::...

.. .: ..:: i t . LQ2

.... -:.%:. '::iii::i~iiii:~ ~ .... fi'i'i ":':': "~::"::::"!iih!. :. ' ':::~!}!i ....:.:.- i~i:~

.-::i:i::::: i:!:;:;:::;-:Q~.. '::i~i , ~ ""

%?~ii::.. .. .... i:-:-'.:x I "-:::x. ..:-. ..-.:.:.:.. ,...~. .....-

186

0 .3

0 .3 1 2 2

o._fi3 .122

9.23.5.

0.3_.._fi 14.3

0 .4 16.3

0._._44 16.3

O.4 16.3

0.4 16.3

7 2 4

Page 173: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

Table 7-4.3.1.5.1 (Table ~31C-7-8.1) Double-Row Racks without Solid Shelves - - ~$gra~e Hi~her than 2.~ ft (7.6 m~. ALsl~s 4 ft (1.2 m~ or Wider (conllnued~

I II II1 IV

.Hor izon ta l b a r r i e r s at 20 ft (6.1

Ver t i ca l in te rva l s - - 2 l ines o f

~p r ink l e r s u n d e r b a r r i e r s - m a x i m u m h o r i z o n t a l sDac in~ 10

ft (3.1 m) s t agger¢ .d

Ver t i ca l 15 ft

H) ft (3.1 m)

Ver t i ca l 20 ft

cLqA__t~

20~t

H o r i z o n -

H o r i z o n t a l ~)arriers a t 15 f i (4.6 m i.

Ver t ica l i n t e rva l s - - 2 f ines o f

s p r i n k l e r u~,der b a r r i e r s -

m a x i m u m L o r i z o n t a l s p a c i n g 10 f t (3.1 m ) s t a g g e r e d

l - I i~her 1ban

Ye_.~s

Ye_.ss

o.._~3 ~ 0.4 16.3

O.4 16.3

:~!%. ..:.::::

y ....

14.3 0.4..._.55 18......~3

'Min in~um in - rack s p r i n k l e r d i s c h a r g e , 30 g p m (114 L / r a i n ) ( see Sectzon --7,.0 7-4. 3.1.3)...::#ii::'"'::i!i~ii" -'::ii!iil

: 'Water sh i e ld s r~qui r~ , l (see S e ' t i o , ~ - ~ 5-12.2 ,2_l) . ~AII in - rack s p r i n k l e r s p a c i n g c f i m e n s i o n s s ta r t f r o m the f loor. "F.,r e n c a p s u l a t e d c o m n n , d i t y , i n c r e a s e dens i t y 25 p e r c e n t (see " g " / O ~ ) ~.:!~::iii::::i::.. "::::::::::-- ".::::::::k-. "( 3 e a r a n c e is d i s t a n c e b e t w e e n top o f s t o r a g e a n d c e i l i n g . . . . - - ' - ~ : " "':: . . . . ::iiiii::iiii::~.::i~':" "See A 7 ,o.:~. A 7 ',!, a:3,1 A 7 I0.3"- A-7-4.3.1.5.3, A-7-4.1.9. a n d A-7-4.3.2.1 fo..r..ii~otee ~ ~ r e c , . 9 . . . m m e ~ t i o n s w h e r e c l e a r a n c e is g r e a t e r t h a n 10 ft (3.1 m ) .

tnsrall s p r i n k l e r s at least 3 m . (76.2 r a m ) f r o m u p r i g h t s ( s e e S e c t w n - 7 ~ ~). . .::~i:i:::::i:!i:: . . "iiiiii:.. " ~F'ace, 'Is ~r inklers . . . . shall nor be r e q u i r e d f~r ,a (:lass, I c o m m o d i t y consisti......~ o f n ~ . t l ~ b u ' s t i l ~ : " r o d u c t s . ..... p on w o o d [~allets . . . . . . ( w i t h o u t c o m b u s t i b l e c o n u a i n e r s ) e x c e p t fo r

s " " e~; '7 o t _\ ^ ,_a i x r, • .-..-:- :-.-.. . . . . . " array, sh,,'.*'n m F t g u r . . . . . . ,~ ; . . . . . . xJ, 7-4.3.1.~,.1(~') a n d 7.-4.3.1.5,.:1:~,~:~.:.:.:.:.. ..:-:.:.:.: . . . . :.:.-

"In ~',g . . . . . 7 ~. ! (a) t!:r..u~z~: (ji Z-4.3 i.5.1 ( a / t h r o u g h 7-4.3.1.5...].~!". eacl~il i~uare r e ~ r ~ . ' ~ t s a s t o r a g e c u b e t h a t m e a s . . . . . 4 ft to 5 ft (1.2 m to 1..5 n~) . . . . . ide. Actual I ,~ . . . . . . h e i q h t s -a a vary f ro n ap t r o x l m a t e l y . . . . 18 in ( ) 45 m ) to ¢ ~ i ! ~ . . . .: . . . . . . . . 1 ~:::- ':-~x~.re~r'~:"there.: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c a n be o n e load to six o r s even l oads b e t w e e n i n - r ack spr ink le rs , that, ,are s p a c e d 10 tt (3.1 m ) a p a r t ver t ical ly . ....::::i::.:i::-.... "::ii???:-i-:- "::::iiii--if::

..........~..~..~.. ..::::::::::.. ( R ( ) C 1~173)

"-:::::5:.. ,.:.:.:.:.:..

7 2 5

Page 174: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

S N ~ " ~ Barrier

f--ixD [-ICI

Ng

. . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . ;

~i!:~l~:~:--.i.:;.| :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

..... • ~ ' : ~ . . : . . . . , , . , . , . . . . . . ,

....,....,............., . .

• :.:, . , : . - - i .:.l:.:.x+:+:

~ . _ ~ i i i i i'i'i! . :~/ i i 5 i i ?

-Barriers shown with- background

Elevation Plan view

Note: 1. Symbol X indicates in-rack sprinklers.

Fi#lre 7-4.3.1.5.1 (a) 1231 C-7-8.1 (a) ] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, Class ! commodit ies , storage height 25 ft to maximum 30 ft i7.6 m to

9.1 m).

r - q N

e Fql-q ~

l - q l ~ ' n k

1 x r s

F-]F-]

FqF1

A : : # ~ i # i~ii

x .... %.

:,,,,4i " ", -~-.- S

~ii L

@ l

fq I S L E

" "i:i:i:i:i'l rff" .-::':K ::::"

:iii--i~ii~}-: ........ -iii~i}:i}:;is~::. :%: :: ....

.:,41 :.iiii?} ':Y -'::ii?::::':~':::%:::" "::~:~$!::....::i:"

l-llq I--I(-1 81D

'DD, S x

E A

Plan view (A or B)

........ .... ~ ~::~i'i Alternate location of in-rack sprinklers, Sprinklers shall be permitted ~iiiii:}:}:,, to be installed above loads A and C or above loads B and D, ": :::::::::i:::::-" ~,;~':: 2, Symbol A or X indicates sprinklers on vertical or horizontal stagger,

~ Figure 7-4.3.1.5. l (c) [231C-7-8.1 (c)] In-rack sprinkler arrangemen, • Class I, II, or III commodities, storage height 25 ft to maximum 30

~x~E:ZZ~ (7.6 m to 9.1 m).

~ . t _ . ¢ _ _ t

Elevation Plan v i e w

Notes: 1. Sprinklers labeled 1 (the selected array from Table 7-10.1) shall be

required where loads labeled A or B represent top of storage. 2. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 2 shall be required where loads labeled C

or D represent top of storage. 3, Sprinklers labeled 1 and 3 shall be required where loads labeled

E or F represent top of storage• 4. For storage higher than represented by loads labeled F, the cycle

defined by Notes 2 and 3 is repeated, with stagger as indicated. 5• Symbol A or X indicates sprinklers on vertical or horizontal stagger.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5. 1 (b) 1231 C-7-8.1 (b)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, • Class I commodities, storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m). "

726

Page 175: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

s ,e,el D,@I 3,[3 DGi U@ @@i Ix@ 2,@

D@ ~.-:~.:::-. Si ~ / 8 ~;~ as hCko ~ vn e: l~bse;~n lv aenwd 2 I::levation Plan view ~ i ~ %i}:.:.:~-=.

Notes: #~ i !~s : , y'Elevation Plan view ~-:;:-:.:-::..::::.

1. Sprinklers labeled 1 shall be required where loads labeled A .#::::ii}:i~::, ~":-":"~:~:- represent the top of storage. ..# ........ ~"~ii~!iii~es:

2. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 2 shall be required where Ioad~i~le~i%i:. ̀ :.%-:..:ii!i~ . Sprinklers labeled 1 (the selected array from Table 7-10.1) shall be B or C represent top of storage. " . . . . "-:-~i~.i-!"'::%- .~.

3. Sprinklers labeled 1 2 and 3 shall be required w ~ d s I ~ i ~ ..::¢.:.::' required where loads labeled A or B represent top of storage. D or E represent top of storage . . . . ~" ":,::~..:~ %i~::-'.¢~ .... 2. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 2 shall be required where loads labeled C

4. Sprinklers labeled 1,2, 3, and 4 shall be r e ~ . ~ h ~ . s % ~.s:-:-:- or D represent top of storage. labeled F or G represent top ot storage. ,:.::::..::::,, "::"~J~-~i~i ...... %!!i~iiii:

5. Sprinklers labeled 1,2, 3, 4, and S sh..i~:~¢~uire~:~re.::loads 3. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 3 shall be required where loads labeled E labeled H represent top of storage.::.:::.:iiti::" :i}" ":iii}r: or F represent top of storage.

6. For storage higher than represen~d:~i ..o.~ilabeled R:i" the cycle 4. For storage higher than represented by loads labeled F, the cycle defined by Notes 3, 4, and 5 is repeate~ i ~ , tagger as indicated, defined by Notes 2 and 3 is repeated, with stagger as indicated.

7. The indicated face sprinklers shall be [ ' ~ ,.~be omitted where commodity consists of unwrapped or t ~ac~ ~ea meta~ parts on wood pallets.

8. Symbol A or X indicates sprinklers on vertical or horizontal stagger.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5. l(d) [231C-7-8.1(d)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, Clags 1, II, or III commodities, storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

5. Symbol A or X indicates sprinklers on vertical or horizontal stagger.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5. 1 (e) [ 231 C-7-8. I (e) ] In-rack sprinkler arrangemew Class I, II, or III commodities, storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

727

Page 176: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 --A99 R O C

S

A 21-11-1 E

In-rack levels labeled 1 and 2 are shown in this plan view

FI frlE] 3 ' Ba rer rq i .

A ~%

f] I-t,, NIII -%!!

, . . . , . . . . , . . . . . .

i:i:~i:iii!iii~i~ii :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

i:U.i : . - :~ : : , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . .

i.iL2:=?:?:i:=i:=

......... ii::i::i::!::i A .................................... ii~::~:?: I ....................................

........ ii::ii:!i.i L ................... ::::::::::::::::::::::::: E ....................................

L Barriers shown with. background

............ ii~ii~i::"

Elevation Plan view .... #.#:¢~:;-ii!~i!iii } E le~en j : . .:~ .... Plan view

Notes: ..~.::~L1 ~ i k l e i ~ ] ~ i e d 1 (the selected array from Table 7-10.1) shall be 1. Sprinklers labeled 1 (the selected array from Table 7-10.1) shall be ..:##=:"%i!i~i: r e ~ : : ~ e r e loads labeled A or B represent top of storage.

required where loads labeled A or B represent top of storage . . . . #}::iiiiiii~ ... . . . ~i!2. Spr in~s labeled 1 and 2 shall be required where loads labeled C or D represent top of storage 2. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 2 shall be required where loads label~LO %~i~:'::~i!!". ^ i". . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . .

or D represent top of storage .:::.#; .......... ~ .... "~!=:iiiii}:~.~.:....:~.~prinKlers =aoeeo ]ano 3 sna, De requ=rea wnere =oaas laoe=eo ~-

3. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 3 shall be required where Ioa~lecJi i~: . %:.. :::::--:" or F represent top of storage. or F represent top of storage. ~:" ~ ' ~ " ~ % "~i}. #:=4. For storage higher than represented' by loads labeled F, the cycle

4. For storage higher than represented by loads la~.F:.:~he c~"~i.:--...:#U defined by Notes 2 and 3 is repeated. defined by Notes 2 and 3 is repeated, with s t ~ r as !.~icated. "~# .... 5. Symbols O, A, and X indicate sprinklers on vertical or horizontal

5. Symbol ,t or X indicates sprinklers on v e r t i c ~ : " ~ ~ i i ~ e : i : i stagger.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5. l(f) [231C-7-8.1 ( . f ~ . . ~ i # : i n - ~ ; : s p r i ~ a n g e m e n t , Class 1, II, or III c o m m o d i t i e s ~ e ~ h t ov~.'~5 ft (7.6 m). Figure 7-4.3.1.5. l(g) [231C-7-8.1(g)] In-rack sprinkler arrangemew

Class I, II, or III commodities, storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m). ,::::':':.::.::..

7 2 8

Page 177: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

, V r

k

iF1F1 DF-1

Elevation

,, ,, .... ¢ii~iii~ . . . . . . ~i~;:::~.-.~e~.tiOtl P an v ew (1 and 3)

U E ~ ]~Z] ~- : : : : . %!iiiiiiii~::2...£prinklers labeled 1 and 2 shall be required where loads labeled C .... ~::::iiiiiii %. ~::.. "y%r D represent top of storage.

:l...a_ni:F~ii"!ii~;~iiii~iiiiiiii-.i~:.....:~!i--':" 3. ~gr~nrk2~[s2a~le0d p 10fas~gr3a:eh.all be required where loads labeled E Notes: 1. Sprinklers labeled 1 (the selected array from ~: i 'e 7-1..~1)sha]l b:~iiiii ::ii! ....

required where loads labeled A or B represe.~:~..of 2. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 2 shall be r e q u i r ~ h e ' ~ tds I d B ~ C

or D represent top of storage. : ~ : . ~:~i~.:.. . 3. Sprinklers labeled 1 2 and 3 shall ~ r e q u i r ~ : w h e r ~ ' l a b e l e d

E or F represent top of storage. 4#:":-':~i%:~::.. ..#':" .:.::'.:::"~ 4. Sprinklers labeled 1 2, 3 and 4 shall ~ ' . . ' i~ i red whel:e loads

labeled G represent top of storage. :":'%ii:.:. . . . . . 5. Sprinklers labeled 1,2, 3, 4, and 5 shall b e " ~ i ~ d where loads

labeled H represent top of storage. ....'~iii~." 6. Sprinklers labeled 1,2, 3, 4, and 6 (not 5) sl~'all be required where

loads labeled I or J represent top of storage. 7. Sprinklers labeled 1,2, 3, 4, 6, and 7 shall be required where loads

labeled K represent top of storage. 8. Sprinklers labeled 1,2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 shall be required where loads

labeled L represent top of storage. 9. Sprinklers labeled 1,2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 9 shall be required where

loads labeled M or N represent top of storage. 10. For storage higher than represented by loads labeled N, the cycle

defined by Notes I through 9 is repeated, with stagger as indicated. In the cycle, loads labeled M are equivalent to loads labeled A.

11. Symbols O, X, and ~. indicate sprinklers on vertical or horizontal stagger.

4. For storage higher than represented by loads labeled F, the cycle defined by Notes 2 and 3 is repeated.

5. Symbol X indicates face and in-rack sprinklers.

Figure 7.4.3.1.5.1 (i) [ 231 C-7-8.1 (i) ] In-rack sprinkler arrangement Class I, It, lII, or IV commodities, storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m

Figure 7-4.3.1.5. l(h) (231C-7-8.1(h)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, Class I, If, IIl, or IV commodities, storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

729

Page 178: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

rq rqD r-] I ~ 1 ~ Barrier E ]

3 i~ F ~ : .......................... : r I -~ e ~ii ............. i::itiii@:~.:iiiiiii;iliF I---I

,, ............. ,, @ @ I I

I ' ~ 1 ~ ~ I~l \Barr ier ~ SL ~ ! : i i i i ~ U .....

H HP---1 Pl#4?%FI U L J L J £Barriers shown wiih-~ ~:~iii~ii:::::. :":~iiiiii~iiii~i.d.'.'~

bac,,oroun,:, Q"-:." '":iiiU Elevation Plan view ..@::-::::~.."::ii-i~ .... ':::" r ..L]

Notes: ..::ri~i@i--.. " : ~ 1. Sprinklers labeled 1 (the selected array from Table 7-10.1) shall be " '%iii~::.. I ":~ilii #;: I I

required where loads labeled A or B represent top of storage . . . . . ~:¢r@;-:: ":%iiii-::. ~ 2. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 2 and barrier labeled 1 shall be required ..::#:i!~.; ........ "ii~ii i~ . '":;!iiii~ r ~ t

where loads labeled C represent top of storage. -:#%ii::~... :fi;:~~i~i~iii~:.:.i~ii~ :"::" [ [ [ [ 3. Sprinklers and barriers labeled 1 and 3, shall be required where ..::~.:r~-zii@:ii~:: '%ii!iii::~ .... ':*~~:: I I L.r.J

loads" labeled D or E represent top of storage. .::.:~i! ~:: '%i .... ~z::iliiiiij r - ] E ~ ] 4. For storage higher than represented by loads labeled E, the cycle:-:#";~i~i~+:~:..., j ; ' :# .... I I

defined by Notes 2 and 3 is repeated. ..::-~::, '-i~i#-;. . - : . : - : . : - : - : . : . .

5. Symbol A or X indicates sprinklers on vertical or horizont~iE.e~:i: ":"~-iiiii]i:..-:,.:~-ii -:e: 6. Symbol 0 indicates longitudinal flue space sprinklers. J:iiiiii~f~ii!ii!i~ii!iiii!iiiilz~: ':;~i!ii::~.....,. ~i-:;:: Elevation Plan view

Figure 7-4.3.1.5.1(j)[231C-7-8.1(j)] In-rack ...-::::i-:i:i:::,. ":,:.:i:i::.i::.. :i s , t ; l ~ [ ~ arrari~...e~..i~i Notes: Cla~s I, II, III, or IV commodities, storage..:~lth" " t o ~ . 25 f:.t (~i.~:='m).

7-4.3.1.5.2 (231C-7-8.2) In-rack sprinkleJ:~.-fors~:~ ~e ~ ! : t h a n ,'5 2. ft (7.6 m) in double-row racks sha l l : : i l~ i -~ed '~ ~zontal ly and located in tile horizontal space near..¢.~"the ~ ~ c a l i i " ~ s specified in Table 7-4.3.1..5-.1 and...-.'Fi~.'.t.tes 7.~:.'3.1.5.1~.~-~" tiarough

.... i~::i:i::~ ~ .... 7-4.:~.1.5.3" (231(3-7-8.3) In single-row ra'~::.~..i~hout solid siaelves with storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m) and a . ~ i m u m of 10 ft (3.1 m) between the top of storage and the ceilifig, sprinklers shall be installed in accordance with Figures 7-4-3.1.5.3 (a) through (e).

In single-row racks, where figures siaow in-rack sprinklers in t ran~erse flue spaces centered between tile rack faces, it shall be permitted to position these in-rack sprinklers in dae transverse flue at any point between the load faces.

1. For all storage heights, sprinklers shall be installed in every other tier and staggered as indicated.

2. Symbol & or X indicates sprinklers on vertical or horizontal stagger. 3. Each square in the figure represents a storage cube measuring 4 ft

to 5 ft (1.25 m to 1.56 m) on aside.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5.3(a) (231C-7-8.3(a)] Cia,s 1, II, lII, or IV commodities, in-rack sprinkler arrangement, single-row racks,

storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

730

Page 179: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

0 A

8 E] r-1

n E] E]

m

Elevation

8 E] 8 E] C] £]

~ Barri er

0 0

~/-Barder

"9:":'~!iii!i'!i/=f:==iii iiii::S,iiii~ii:iiii' '::= ] B a r r , ~ w %

P%!:jiiiii:% "!iiiiii.i " '-"::" ~ background Elevation Plan view

Notes: .::.:::- "-~i::..:i: ,::-:.:-:-:.::.=::~.:::. 1. Each square in the figure repres~o(~'cube ~suring 4 ft

to 5 ft (1.25 m to 1.56 m) on a side. ~iii::.. "%'_$!:i:;. .:.

Figure 7..4.3.l.5.3(b) (231C-7-8.3(b)]]:i~tss I, II, or II1 commodities, in-rack sprinkler arrangeni'~nt, single-row racks,

storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

N otes: 1. Each square in the figure represents a storage cube measuring 4 ft

to 5 ft (1.25 m to 1,56 m) on a side.

Figure 7-4.3.1.5.3(c) [231C-7-8.3(c)] Class I, II, or lIl commodities, in-rack sprinkler arrangement, slngle-row racks,

storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

731

Page 180: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

~~/- Barrier

D S

S E

[]

r--I r- -I ~ ~ 1 I K I L_J L J j~: .:~: .%.., ~ I-1 r 7 . ~ i ~ ~'" I I l~Jik I I / / ~.:.- .... Y$~[.. ~ ~ \

r-I [ ] ~..~-o~.,~.,,~...-~- I I ~ .x I I - - :~:~.~. " ,~-~ ~ ~afne l '$ $1]OWl~ wi l l ] - ~

, - - - - , .d¢~iib~@~ ~ "'~i:..~..,.. ' ..;.,~/:" I background . . . . . . ~.-...~i~;.,::~:..::,. % .::.~.':~: Elevation Plan view i::levallon Plan vlew*~.-,;~ .... *.-.:i~ii~:.::i~:

~ i ! "::<~:'~:.4: Notes: Notes: ~ : . J : : ~;;~" 1. Each square in the figure represents a storage cube measuring 4 tt 1. Each square in the figure represents ~ ' ~ e cube measuring 4 ft to 5 ft (1.25 m to 1.56 m) on a side.

to 5 ft (1.25 m to 1.56 m) on a side. ",~.-...-:-:~: ...-~i-:::" F'~mre 7-4.3.1.5.3(e) [231C-7-8.3(e)] Class I, lI, Ill , or IV

F'-ure 7-4 3 l 5 3td ~ 19~1C-7-8 3td~l (~lass I l I III or IV commodities, in-rack sprinkler arrangement, single-row racks, com~n~odities, ~;orar~gkeS~;k~te:v:~f~t77e.~tmi!ng{e~row racks, storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

732

Page 181: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A99 ROC

7-4.3.1.5.4" (231C-7-11) In-Rack Sprinkler Location - Multiple Row Racks. In multiple-row racks with a maximum of 10 ft (3.1 m) between the top of storage and d~e ceiling, in-rack sprinklers shall be inst~dled as indicated in Figures 7-4.3.1.5.4(a), (b), and (c). The highest level of in-rack sprinklers shall be not more than l0 ft (3.1 m) below maximum storage height for Class I, II, or IIl commodit ies or 5 ft (1.52 m) below the top of storage for ('k~ss IV commodit ies . (,See Tabl, e 7-4.3.1.5.4.)

Table 7-4.3.1.5.4 (231C-7-11) In-Rack Sprinklers ~ '~"

Commodi ty : Class

l

I, II, & III

I, 11, Ill, & IV

Encap- s u la t ed

No Yes

A p p r o x i m a t e Vertical Spacing

(ft) 20

No 15 Yes

N o

Yes 10

M a x i m u m H o r i z o n t a l

S p a c i n g In a F lue

(ft) (ft) 12 10

10 10

10 10

Multi de-Row Rac ks, S t o r a ~ Heights over 25 ft

M a x i m u m H o r i z o n t a l

S p a c i n g H e i g h t Across Flue Limit

fit) S t a ~ e r

Between adjacent

H u e s None

Fi[g. No. 7-4.3.1.5.4(a)

7-4.3.1.5.4(b)

7-4.3.1.5.4(~ ~i~

M a x i m u m Spacing

from Top of Storage Ceiling to Highest Sprinkler

In-Rack Operat ing Sprinklers Area

(ft) (ft 2) 10

..:.::i::.:.. :::::::-:-::::::

.... ~!i!~" ":."

.::~.:.:~i~ii~::.. 2000 .. "~ili "% !~.::. ': i~":: ....... "~i~ , ::%'~:.:~i::"

-.:.:~

Cei l ing Sp.rink!ers

Uenstty_ (Igpm/ft~)

165 ° 286 ° Rating Rating

0.25 0.35 0.31 0.44

0.30 0.40 0.37 0.50

0.35 0.45 0.44 0.56

For SI mills: 1 ft = 0.3048 m; C = ~/ (F-32); 1 gpm/ fC = 40.746 (L/min) m NOTES: 'All four rack faces shall be protected by sprinklers located widlin 18 in. of the faces. ~ - i n d i c , ~ l in Figures 7-4.3.1.5.4(a), (b), and (c). ~t shMl not be required for each sprinkler level to protect all faces. (See A-7-4.3.1.5.~.~¥:5.:~'~':.::. "%:. 'All in-rack sprinkler spacing dimensions start f rom file floor. " ""--":'$-i-::, "%i#::" : q n F i g u r e s 7 - 4 3 1 5 4 ( - 0 t h r o u . . . . . . . g h 7 - 4 3 1 5 4 ( c ) . . . . eacbsquare represen t sas to ra~ .v~ e m ~ : ~ n ~ l ~ { t t o 5 f t ( l . 2 2 m t o l . 5 3 m ) o n a s i d e . • . .. , . . .~...:... ~:, ....... ~., Aetual load heights can vary from approximately 18 m. (0.40 m) up to 10 ft....~'~.O~. T h e i ~ , dlere could be as few as one load to as many as six or seven loads between in-r, tck sprinklers dlat are spaced 10 ft.::.(..~5 mlJ i~ar t .v..¢r~-Slly. (ROC 13-173) "::: ":~i~i}~..,-:-i::::::::':'-!!!!~i::::,...~iii. "

,0,~,g,~, ..::!i-"::" -¥. "::-%':':::::¢~:"

.:::::." "%-:'::'::': ,.:::::::: - - ' .~

..::~!~" ".~" . / ~ ' ; ~ 0 5 m)

":~:"" "'%~i'~::-..: ":::'::"~"::'% " .-::i~::':"" " ' : :~ ::!:~:- " : : " ' " . . between sff~nklers

~:::::. x-:.: t . . ~ : ~ L _ J L--.I t . .A t . J

.:., \ N 13.1--I n F-I [B,D, 7:: rqrqnr D

12 I-II-II-I D I

I-IF-I I-I I-I I-I I-I D - . , -

I-II-I I-I I-I I-I FI D I

NOT~:$: 1 ,3~lnktlc$ lablle~ I ~al be ;e~mt~ ~ barn lei:el(~l A r ~ores,mt top 4. f0~ lt~' age h;~h~ I l ln fe~f e~eni~i I~ loads lab~t4ld E, the c~cle

of slo~age. ~ i a ~ by NOI~ 2 and $ is repealed, wi t I l l ,g in U indicaltd, 2 Spnoklws I~bet~l 1 and 2 shall I~ r e~lred if Io~ds lab ia l B ~ C $ Symbol 6 o' X inolcalls sprinklm$ or, v~'toll Of honzonl~l sl~ge"

ref~llseot top of slor~e 3. $pnok~ws la l~ ~1 I ~ld 3 shall I~e r ~ i ' ~ l i f I o ~ labekKI D or E

t~Ot*~'a ~ of swege

Figure 7-4.3.1.5.4(a) (231C-7-11(a)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement - - multiple-row racks, Class I commodit ies , storage height over 25

ft (7 .6 m) .

733

Page 182: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 ~ A 9 9 R O C

Loadingaisle m

,~ X ) i

Loading aisle

t~= vie~

Maximum /--- 101(3.05m)

t - I b',-,",,

L~ingai~

N,M b~,,",s

Leing~J~e

~n~i~ ....:-'::. -.:.

NOTES:

~edS,~n~4~llopolsl~e, -- i, F~. sior~jehi~ lh~nr~esenIedbil~sI~ledS,

the~/deddinedb~N~lesl~2isr~l~i,~lh sla~easin~,

4 ,S~l i~ l~ i~s ~t'~ c~iz~l

NOTES: 1 S~t~lerslabele~ land2shalbel~edilloZslSelelk

ie#eszll~oolstorage 2 Sp~lersl~d 1 and 3 st~l ~ le~led if loads I~bel~ B o C

re~'e~mlt~o of storage

m m r ..:::: ~--~-:---- -.---:.-:::. B_ r]_ r]D . . . . . . t~r4iiiil..:. •

- A - A A 3 I ' ' r'::~t:. "~iiW I I "::~::..~ .:~i::

F~e~rinldes L,~-.j L..J i~ . U ~ .... ~:~ ? 4--..ft... 4

D ][]] ] D r ] D Aa;iqi!i~ U ~ ~ U. ,~.mS~ l~ml x x x 1 ~."~..d::%:.:~t:-~ %X :~::" X t ' .... " :"~f~~:~-i:: . . . . '"~ . . . . . b ~ s

I rlrlrl ,,,,,,=, n n n n n n n i~mlSI1(4.S,m) . . . :@~:@!L::S:: "tnn%mxnm~n l U / II II I I I IU ~'~'n~e~s .::~.#:;M%.::.. :::~iiiiiii~:..:. f l l l l l l II II11 It . . . . . . . andlo~ I .::-..iii@: .:~:" .. ":~i~!!!~!!i!@ .... /OllLJllUllU U J UUUUU I :"*"%"*@~?*:*~: :'b, :::i,~ nnnnnnn

ll~mlO~(3.0Sm)

.... i~:@@:_>....:-:, a~l~ 1

Figure 7-4.3.1.5.4(b) (231 C-7-11 (b)] In-rack sprinkler a r rangement L0~ais~e~li~ - - multiple-row racks, Class I, If, or III commodit ies , s torage

height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

Figure 7-4.3.1.5.4(c) (231 C-7-11 (c) ] In-rack spr inkler a r rangement , (]jass I, II, III, or IV commodi t ies - - multiple-row racks, storage

height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

7 3 4

Page 183: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

7-4.3.1.5.5 (251C-7-12) In-Rack Sprinkler Spacing. Maximum horizontal spacing of sprinklers in multiple-row racks with storage higher than 25 ft (7.6 m) droll be in accordance with F'~gures 7- 4.3.1.5.4(a), 03), and (c).

7-4.3.2 "Ceiling Sprinklers for Single mid Double Row gacks - Area Density M e t h o d

7-4.3.2.1"~f (231C-7-10.1) The water demand for nonencapsulated storage op racks without solid shelves separated by aisles at least 4 ft (1.22 m) wide and with not more than 10 ft. (3.1 m) between the top of storage and the sprinklers shall be based on sprinklers in a 2000-ft ~ ~185.8-m ~ ) operating area, disctwxging a minimum of 0.25 gpm/f t * [ (10.18 L /min ) /m * [ for Class I commodities, 0.3 gpm/f~ t [(.12.2 L / m i n ) / m ~ ] for Glass II and III commodities, and 0.35 gpm/f t * [(14.26 L /min ) /m ~ ] for Class IV commodities for ordinary temperature rated sprinklers or a minimum of 0.35 gpm/fC [(14.26 L / m i n ) / m * ] for Class I commodities, 0.40 gpm/f t s [(16.3 L / m i n ) / m ~ ] for Class II and III commodities, and 0.45 gpm/f t * [(18.3 L / m i n ) / m * ] for Class IV commodities for high temperature rated sprinklers. ( See Tab/e 7- 4.~.I.5.1.)

I Gm~A

I Ca,'to~, ~an(k~l or unexpan~l, and exposed, unexlm~

Plastics

I Group B Class_IV

I Exposed, expanded (o~si~ ~ ~pe of Chapter 7)

I Gmp C Class III

! I 7-4.3.2.2 (251C-7-10.2) Where storage as described in 7-4.3.2.1 is [ ! encapsulated, ceiling sprinkler density shall be 25 percent greater -S~D~ F ~ n g than for nonencapsulated storage. Figures 74 4 23(a) ~ 1 " 74.3.3 Ceil]ng Spl~aklers for Multiple Row Racks - Area Denslty .k . . . . k / . l ' : : ' ~ l - t / . / 4 ~ ~ , . v~

74.$.3.1 (231C-7-13.1) Tile water demand for nonencapsulated lrtgure 7 -~ .4 .~ (2$1OS- l~Dec i s ion tree. storage on racks without solid shelves separated by aisles at least 4 ~ _ ~ ~- ft (1.22 m) wide and with not more than 10 ft (3.1 m) between the 7-4.4.1.2 ( 2 5 1 ~ plastics and£ree-flowing Group A top ofstorage and the sprinklers shall be based on sprinklers in a plastics s h a i l ~ - p s ~ " ~ q ~ e as Class IV commodities. 2000-ft" (185.8-m') operating area for multiple-row racks, ~ " ~ discharging a minimum of 0.25 gpm/fC [ (10.19 L / m i n ) / m 2 ] for 7 - 4 . 4 : i . S ~ t & l . $ ) ~ r ~ p C plastics shall be protected the C, lass I commodities, 0.3 gpm/ IU [(12.2 L / m i n ) / m 2 ] for Class II same as C ~ c o m m ' ~ e s . - and Ill commodities, and 0.35 gpm/fC [(14.26 L / m i n ) / m ~ ] for ~ "~[h~ ~ Class IV commodities for ordinary temperature rated sprinklers 7~_1 .1~(231 . C J [ ~ ..Ceilinl~ Sprinklers shall have a or a minimum of 0.35 gpm/f t z [(14.26 L / m i n ) / m *] for Class I . ~ e - ~ r a ~ g ~ o r d i n a r y , Vm~ermediate, or high temperature. conunodities, 0.40 gpm~ft ~ [(16.8 L / m i n ) / m ~ ] for Class II and III q ~ l ~ J ~ l ~ [ ~ ' ~ commodities, and 0.45 gpm/f t ~ [(18.3 L / m i n ) / m ~ ] for Cla~ IV ~ - - ' ~ "~E~'.' commodities for high temperature rated sprinklers. (See Table 7- , f v ~ c ~ O ' ~ i ~ ldigh temt~ratuw rated sp~inldcfs shall be used where 4.3.1.5.4.) ~ ~ . ~ : 1 . 3 . (ROC 13.175)

7-4.3.3.2 (231C-7-13.2) Where such storage is encapsulated~ ~ 7 - 4 . 4 . 2 In-Rack Sprinklers. ceiling sprinkler density shall be 25 percent greater than fog,,~."~. ' L ~ ~ nonencapsulated storage. . ~ ~ ~ "~1~.4.2.1 (231C-8-1.5.4) In-Rack Sprinkler Clearance. The

. ~ ~ K ~ ~hi.nimum of 6-in. (15~d-mm) vertical clear space shall be 7-4.3.4 (231C-5-9,4.2-.2) High Expansion Foam S y s ~ ~ ~ maintained between the sprinkler deflectors and-the top of a tier of high-expansion foam is used in combination with fe$[[ing " ~ "" ~ r storage. sprinklers, the minimum ceiling sprinkler d e s i g ~ - s h a ~ [ [ L ~ 0.2 gpm/ft 2 [(8.15 L/min) /m2] ~ for Cl~s l ~ r l l i ~ m m o d ~ i ~ 7-4,4.2.2 (2,g108-1.5~) In.Rack Sprinkler Water Demand. The and 0.25 gpm/fC [(10.2 L/min)/mZ]2for ~ c ~ d i ~ e ~ r o r water demand for sprinklers instal]ed in racks shall be based on the most hydraulically remote 2000-ft (1~ 8 - m ~ 5 . ' ~ simultaneous operation of the most hydraulically remote sprinklers

~ ~ .... as follows: 7-4.4 Protection Criteria for P i a s t i c ~ ~ h i e s . ' ~

* ~':.g. ~ . . . . ~ . . . (a) Eight sprinklers where only one level is installed in racks. 7-4.4.1 (231C-8-1) General. F o F ' t l ~ ~ e of GrSfip A plastics '(b) Fourteen sprinklers (seven on eadl top two levels) where stored 5 ft (1.5 m) or less in height~ t h ~ kler design criteria for more than one level is installed in racks. miscellaneous storage specified ;n 7,3.3." " " ,' ~.~t be used. (ROC 13- . 173) 74.4.2.3 (251C-8-2.2) In-Rack Sprinklers - Storage Up to and

Including 25 ft (7.6 m). In-rack sprinklers shall be installed in 7-4.4.1.1t (231C-&1,1) Plastics in corrugated cartons shall be accordance with Figures 7-4.4.2.303) through (g). protected in accordance with Figure 7-4.4.1.1. This decision tree ,also shall be used to determine protection for commodities that are not entirely Group A plastics but contain such quantities and arrangements of Group A plastics that they are deemed more hazardous than Class IV commodities.

735

Page 184: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

0,30 gpm per s@ 12000 sq f~ (12,2 LJminper sqm 1186sq m)

0,45 ~ p~sq~12~OOs@ (18,3 Umin per eq m1186 sq m) Partc:tS, fl(4,57,,m) storage, 5,fl(1,52,m) tolO, ft(3,06m) celingdearance

,:~(I.~.ml~i~e=~ ~.etoI~(l~to:].l-m~=ar~ Sinoje.anddolJ~owr~

0 O0 Oil FTTT] 0 O0 ITN OIO o,~,,~,,,o~, (24,5U~in~ ~Im137~~m) 0 O0 FT~ mm~ O O0 FTT] FTTT] See7.4.43.4, 74.4.3.6, Ito~,~N~LeT.

0,00,~,1-~ 0,00,1Tr],IT~

o o 001-I o oo o= 000

o, 0iO0 i i I t t t E S S S S S S .~ O,O0,~FFT-FI O~O0~FTTI,0ID n n:( E ~ E E ~ ~ Ll W~

~'~' ~®~ . . . , . . , . ~ ' : ' ~ i ~ . ~ . . ;:~i Figure 7-4.4.2.3(a)(Figure 231C-8-2 Part a)5-ft (,.52-m)to 10-f, S~':'~lii~ " ~ , : ,

(3.05-m) storage. . ~ . "~]~ ""~..!F"

"' . . . . . . . . . . % 0 I-I1-1 s ~ - a ~ = ~ ~ai~r=~s " ~ " P I . I I I I (18.3~1pefmz/1~mx) ~ ":':':'!i::. ":":" t

,-, r-,,-, ,-,-n ¢ O UU U U U I I I I J m E r m m

0 O0 OOO I-I-I-I ] O,OO FEn, ] OiOO FTTI! O~OO FITI ~ O D D D:;]D

Ptonvm Pt~vi~ Pl~vlm

S~, double-, and m~e-row ra(:ks 0.30gpmpesqR/2OOOsq~ (12.2L/minpersqm/186sqm) SeeNole2

8 R(2.44 m) max between sp~s

'O SoE E

tiD00 JJJ l-q~l-q~l~~l I I I (

Figure 7-4.4.2.3(c) (Figure 251C-8-2 Part c) 15-ft (4.57-m) storage. 5-ft (1.52-m) to 10-ft (3.05-m) ceiling clearance.

0~00 FFNiFFm ! i i I-I~OFI FITI'ITIT10'I-IFI ITr-I-1

Ele~ea Elmlon~ E~mll~ ~

Figure 7-4.4.2.3(b) (Figure 231C-8-2 Part b) 15-ft (4.57-m) storage. < 5-ft (1.52-m) clearance.

736

Page 185: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 m A 9 9 R O C

Part d: 20-ft (6.10-m) s~r t~ . < 5.It (1.52~) ceiling dewance

Single- and double-row racks 0.00 gpm per ,9: I It / 4000 sq It (24.5 Umin per ,9:1 re / 372 sq m) See 7-4.4.3.4, 7-4 4.3 0, and Note 6.

D DD 71 [3D E],E]E] D~DE] D~E]E]

Plan view

SinGte-, double-, and md~e-row ra~(s 0 45 gpm per sq It / 2000 sq it (18.3 Umin per sq m / 180 sq m) See Note 2

8 It (2.44 m) max between sprinklers

DD ~ 8,DN,~~, NNNN

i~°l:]~ ~l'li I°1 £3E3 i: i :~. i : i

Plan view

D BE] E ] , D D D~DE] E]~DE]

D I-]E] E E ~ : E]oE], tl-IEli

i-i~ E]I-I ~ fTT-I ~

Patle:~O4t(~lO..~ ztomge; ~4(1,52-m)1o10-11(~0~,~c~i~ Cumnoe (SeeNoteS)

0.,159m pa'sqfll2000 sq ~ (1B.3 L/ram par sq m 1186 sq m) S~ Nolo 2 8 It (244 re)m= between spmddws Hoe Note 4

3

Ran tt, e Ran ~e~

030 gpm per s~ltl2000 sqlt (122 L/ram I~ sq m 1186 sq m)

i l i

Plan view ..:::::::::::::. -.:~:::::::. ..,:.:.:.;... ..:.:.:.:.:.. ..:.:.:.:..

r-li l-]E]i FT-A i ~ E]~I-IE]~ f T T ] ~ i ~

k

Elegize .... ~;- -::'~i-. %%.:. ":::'~-~i}:.::...:~ mt i =

. : P

(122L~lnpa'sqm/186~F1: :: "::?~::''':':::::::::.:~:~:~i~i>:'~iiii~::. {122L/mmp~'sqm1186sqm) $~zNole 3

[] ITrl ~ ...... 1-11-] ~

Elevation view Elevation view

,~e NOte 4 ~ : ° 811(2.44 ~i!

• , 0.30 gpm per sq ft/2000 sq It 1 (12.2 L/rain poe" sq m / 186 sq m)

See Note 3 8 It (2 44 m) max between sprk~lers ..::~.-':'i , [i ~i

. ..:.::~.:~i~iii~:i::. "iq DoD ...-:-~::" ........ ~}i~!" , ..~::-

D O D ..... "%-:::$:, "::~::'i:::~ E ~ " E ~

t E]ol--I,~ , ""%ii;!~ [ - ION ~ ~ : ~ %.......-~:.-- . , _

~ I-Iof-I ~

D E D D E ~ E m - N

~D

E@I-1E [;:][:;:] Rtn rml

8 ]t (2 44 m) m a~ bemen spnrl~ers

A I S L E

,liE], 8!E]E]!EEE]~nTN [--IE I-]FIE i - m E i - - ~

Elemion Elei~

FLgure 7-4.4.2.3(e) (Figure 231C-8-2 Part e) 20-ft (6.10-m) storage; 5- f t (1.52-m) to 10-ft (3.05-m) ceiling clearance. (See Note 5)

Elevation view

Figure 7-4.4.2.3(d) (Figure 231C-8-2 Part d) 20-ft (6.10-m) storage; < 5-ft (1.52-m) ceiling clearance.

7 3 7

Page 186: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

I~l: T~I(~,~)II~|~ <~(1=~ ~ ~(~lt01e~ Part g: 25-ft (7.62-m) storage and 5-ft (1.52-m) to lO-ft (3.05-m) ceiling clearance (see Note 5)

(183~in~mz/18hl} SeeNo~e3 8ff(2,44m) m~.~eens~em

, ,

E

030gpm~;12000~ (122L~inp~mx/186mx) ~eN~e4

~ a ~a~a

8ff (2,44 m)max, between inld s

I S L

EI~i~ Ele~=

0.30 gpm per 11x / 2000 ftx (12.2 L/rain per mX/186 mX See Note 4

[ ] I-loCI [ ] I-U-1 [I DII-i, [ ! f-] f-]

r-1 £Z

8 II (2.44 m) max. between sprinklers

J_J I I I I

III1 LI I'l i:l T: I

i , / u

Plan view ..::~::..

1/1/I ..:...':!:!:!:~ . . . . ,:,,. . . . . . . . . . . . .

~ ~ ' "~ j . : . : - i : : : : :~ : .~ i i~ ote~":::~i~.....a~t,s, a t h r o u g h g: I I I ~:. ~::- ;::iii~l. E a c h ' ~ a r e represents a cube measuring 4 ft to 5 ft (1.22 m to I~.-L.~L.;l.~%iiii::.~:!i# .... 1.53 '~) on a side. Actual load heights can vary from approximately

"::'@-i~iiii::. 18 in. (0.46 m) up to 10 ft (3.05 m). Therefore there could be as few ~-1 ] ' ] ' I ..... i::i~iiii.:::..~:@a.s one load to as many as six or seven loads that are spaced 10 ft

!::iii!i~. ] ":~!ii~::[ ] ... ~i!ii i::" apart vertically between in-rack sprinklers. .... i i ~ ::i-:::. ' : 2. Single level of in-rack sprinklers [ z \ x in. or ZHkcx in. (12.7 mm or ~ ¢ iY"

Figure 7-4.4.2.3(f) (Figure 231C-8-2 Part f) 25-ft (7.62-m) storage; < ~f t (1.52-m) ceiling clearance. (See Note 5)

13.5 mm) operating at 15 pst (1.03 bar) minimum] installed on 8 ft to 10 ft (2.5 m to 3.12 m) spacings located, as indicated, in the transverse flue spaces.

3. Single level of in-rack sprinklers [zM\c× in. (13.5 mm) operating at 15 I: (1.03 bar) minimum or z \× in. (12.7 ram) operating at 30 psi (2.07 bar) minimum] installed on 4 ft to 5 ft (1.25 m to 1.56 m) spacings located, as indicated, in the longitudinal flue space at the intersection of every transverse flue space.

4. Two levels of in-rack sprinklers [ z \ x in. or zH\c× in. (12.7 mm or 13.5 operating at 15 psi (1.03 bar) minimum] installed on 8 ft to 10 ft (2.5 m to 3.12 m) spacings located as indicated and staggered in the transverse flue space.

5. Ceiling-only protection shall not be permitted for this storage configuration.

6. 1" Where B\ , - in . (15.9-mm) orifice sprinklers listed for storage use are installed at the ceiling only, the ceiling sprinkler dischar~le criteria shall be permitted to be reduced to 0.6 gpm per ft2/2000 11z (24.5 L/min per m2/186 m2).

7. 1" Where Bk,- in. (15.9-mm) orifice sprinklers listed for storage use are installed at the ceiling only and the ceiling height in the protected area does not exceed 22 ft (6.7 m), the ceiling sprinkler discharge cdteria shall be permitted to be reduced 0.45 gpm per ft2/2000 ft 2 (18.3 L/min per m2/186 m2).

8. 1" Where B \ , -in. (15.9-mm) orifice sprinklers listed for storage use are installed at the ceiling, the in-rack sprinklers shall not be required, provided the ceiling sprinkler discharge cdteda is increased to 0.6 gpm per 112/2000 ft 2 (24 L/rain per m2/186 m 2) and the ceiling height in the protected area does not exceed 27 fl (8.2 m).

Figure 7-4.4.2.3(g) (Figure 231C-8-2 Part g) 25-ft (7.62-m) storage; 5- ft (1.52-m) to 10-ft (3.05-m) ceiling clearance. (See Note 5)

738

Page 187: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

7-4.4.2.4 (231C-8-3.2) In-Rack Sprinkler Location - Storage Over 25 ft (7.6 m) in Height.

7-4.4.2.4.1 (231C-8-3.2.1) In double-row racks widaout solid shelves and with a maximum of 10 ft (3.1 m) hetween the top of storage and d~e ceiling, in-rack sprinklers shall be installed in :tccordance with Figures 7-4.4.2.4.1 (a) or (b). The highest level of in-rack sprinklers shall be not more than 10 ft (3.1 m) below d~e top of stor:tge.

%

D

N I ~ Barrier

Rl-lh

@Fq q

B ........

,..............=....=......w....

• . . - . . w . . . = . . . = . . w . . . . . . ,

: . : . : . . . . . : . : . : . - : : . : . - . : . : . : . : . : . : . :

A ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

S :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

@

@

A I

S L E

~ I ~ l !!~.!:!'!:i::i::!::!i L iiii::ilililiiiiiiiili~iiiiiiiiiiiii N NN .................................... ....:.....;........

i___i E D ~ E ~shown with "::'~'f::"':':::i!}! iii' -Barriers @!~!i!i,.::~}:,:_, ,#i:./ :}::%::Elevation Plan view background ..::~i:~%::.. "::i~ii;~::.

E e v a t on Plan view .-::# . . . . . :'::" " % i i ::ii:- . ..::#:- .%: . . . . . i~.~tes. Notes ':~'::%gi-:.}~&.~:iiiiiiiiii%:. 'ii~,::';; '~""1. Sprinklers labeled 1 shall be required where loads labeled A or B 1. Sprinklers and barriers labeled 1 shall be require.d:.:~[# lo~iiii i } ...... iiiY" represent top of storage.

abe ed A or B represent top of storage. ..#!!::' ":~i? "::~&::'¢ .... 2. Sprinklers labeled 1 and 2 shall be required where loads labeled 2. S rinklers labeled 1 and 2 and barriers labe~i~&shall.i~gu~ed¢::" C renresent ton of storaae

w~ere loads labeled C represent top of stor~ge'.%ii::~::.-:#" =============================== ,r r - - - - - o ' .

3 S-rinklers and barriers labeled 1 and ~ - ~ f e r ~ ~ " whe:~:e" 3. Spnnklers labeled 1 and 3 shall be required where loads labeled D " Io~ds labeled D ore represent top ~ t o r a ~ ~l~i; !": : or E represent top of storage.

4. For storage higher than represent#'~::..~a~;iabeled ~i:"the cycle 4. For storage higher than loads labeled F, the cycle defined by defined by Notes 2 and 3 is repeated. %M~ Notes 2 and 3 is repeated

":"':':':" o o on al " ' 5. Symbol A or X indicates face sprinklers oi~j....~l r h riz t r; ~umh~ Y nH t,=l'~e f~t~c= ~nt~ n r~r,k enr nit" ,'~r~ stagger. :!iiiii}i:.. ,.,. ,.q . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . v ...........

6. Symbol O indicates longitudinal flue s ce ~rinklers. 6. Each square represents a storage cube measuring 4 ft to 5 It 7. Each square represents a storage cube measuring 4 ft to 5 ft (1.22 m to 1.53 m) on a side. Actual load heights can vary from

(1.22 m to 1.53 m) on a side. Actual load heights can vary from approximately 18 in. (0.46 m) up to 10 ft (3.05 m). Therefore, there approximately 18 in. (0.46 m) up to 10 ft (3.05 m). Therefore, there could be as few as one load to as many as six or seven loads could be as few as one load to as many as six or seven loads between in-rack sprinklers that are spaced 10 ft (3.05 m) apart between in-rack sprinklers that are spaced 10 ft (3.05 m) apart vertically, vertically,

Figure 7-4.4.2.4.1(a) (Figure 231C-8-3.2.1(a)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, Group A plastic commodities, storage height over 25

ft (7.6 m)

Figure 7-4.4.2.4.1(b) (Figure 231C-8-3.2.1(b)] ln-racksprinkler arrangement, Group A plastic commodities, storage height over 25

ft (7.6 m)

739

Page 188: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

7-4.4.2.4.2 (231C-8-$.2.2) In-rack sprinklers for storage higher than 25 ft (7.6 m) in double-row racks shall be spaced horizontally and sball be located in die horizontal space nearest d~e vertical intervals specified in Figures %4.4.2.4.1(a) or (b).

7-4.4.2.4.3 (231C-8-3.2.3) In single-row racks wid]out solid shelves with storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m) and a maximum of 10 ft (3.1 m) between die top of storage and the ceiling, sprinklers shall be installed ,'is indicated in Figures 7-4.4.2.4.~,(a), (b), or (c).

NOTE:

N A

D D

X

N Fq

A

S @ F1 @ N N

X

Fq Fq

Iltl~Vlllllllk~\WI Elevation

N X

D

" Fq X

D D

X

D

D X

D X

N X

D A X

F-I r-~ ~'Ji: ~

~ o - % . , : ~ K 1

Plan view ~ "~'~:~.£~,g~ S . A % .. I I

J %~#'~ " : ;~ ' : I I .~%%-: "~%-.:~::. - .... = _ . ,

.,S':" ~ : "~':~:" IIIIIVIIIIIII~W

...:.~:"%,::f" .,,7 Elevation

-~,~:.. NOTE: ,-i:.::: 1. Each square represents a storage cube measuring 4 ft to 5 ft

1. Each square represents a storage cube measuring 4 ft to 5 ft (1.22 m to 1.53 m) on a side. Actual load heights can vary from approximately 18 in. (0.46 m) up to 10 ft (3.05 m). Therefore, there could be as few as one load to as many as six or seven loads between in-rack sprinklers that are spaced 10 ft (3.05 m) apart vertically.

Figure 7-4.4.2.4.3(a) (Ftgure 231C-8-3.2.$(a)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, Group A plastic commodities, single-row racks,

storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

(122 m to 1.53 m) on a side. Actual load heights can vary from approxiamtely 18 in. (0.46 m) up to 10 ft (3.05 m). Therefore, there could be as few as one load to as many as six or seven loads between in-rack sprinklers Ihat are spaced 10 ft (3.05 m) apart vertically.

F'tgure 7-4.4.2.4.$(b) (Figure 231C-8-3.2.3(b)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, Group A plastic commodities, single-row racks,

storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m)

740

Page 189: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A99 R O C

0

0 0

/ ~ X

Barriers 0

X 0

X

0 0

X

D 0

7-4.4.2.4.4 (231C-8-3.2.4) In multiple-row racks wid~out solid shelves with s torage he igh t over 95 ft ~ d a m~tximum of 10 ft (~ m) between dae top of storage and d~e roof/cei l ing, in-rack sprinklers shall be installed as indicated in Figures 7-4.4.2.4.4(a) t h rough 7- 4.4.2.4.4(f).

Max. 18 i n . ~ (.46 m)

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

: : : : : : : ." . . . . . . . . . . . .

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 0 E : . : , : . : . : . . . . . . . . . . . . .

~ .~ : : : . . , . . i ' - , . . . . : ................................ : ~ . . . . , , . . . , , . . . = . = , w . - . - . - .

. : - : - : , : , : , ' - : .1 : .1 : . : , : , : . : , : , :

~ i iN z_ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : - : : : , : , : , . - . I , :1 . : . : . : . : . ; . : . : :=:=/:f:ili ................... : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Face sprinklers

:::.i:: • dit

~ii!ii'ti:ii!i!!ii!iiiiii!iii ......... ~:,::'~

A ~ . : ~

:i:i:i:i:~$i-2i:~:i:-:?Y:i: E E ' .'.::

• ,4) %,,#"= x D i~ ~

,0 ,,.~. -q~: ":HF~ qF,:fq F~''''' in ' b£'~:r~OE i SO X~ O "*= "" ...........

T "" °~: :"~'~=OROO °~ OOi '"r

o nnnn, z,os,,-,-n.,

w."=' A/~:"°!! ~ H --] O ~ FIR O 0 ~ 0 E ':~i :~ f f~h s~.a,~,e~,oseo,s a s,o,d;~"/~,, ,o~., ' ;o, , ' ' " ° °

(1.22 m to 1.53 m) on a ~ . Aolu~ I o a d ~ a n vary from approximately 18 in. (0.46 m) up to 10 It (3~:~). Therefore, there Figure 7-4.4.2.4.4(a)* (Figure 251C-8-3.2.4(a)] In-rack ,prlnkler ~Ulde~ ~;~k ~r~;~l Ioadt~ ~re cr~aY a~ ~x f~i#??n]Otdp,~rt arrma~u~.l i e; ee_rn to~ ra~at2k~: ft oP;~tlCh ean~h uncaT~f t ~ .a6e~. P4n ~ ~$Pcia~t~ c , vertically.

Figure 7-4.4.2.4.3(c) (T~,ure 231C-8-3.2.B(c)] In-racksprinkler arrangement, Group A plastic commodities, single-row racks,

storage height over 25 ft (7.6 m).

74!

Page 190: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 ~ A 9 9 R O C

............... S S ~i::!::!~i::i~i~i::~i:!~c~iii::~i:::~i;:,:: ~i::~i~ L L ; . . . . . ; . . . . , ' , " , " " " " t ' ' ~ ' t

Plan view

JUL qmm J U l l

IS n

000 000 FOOFL/" Ban'i~

h i e J U L I

000000 000000

s ~,, . . . . . . . I J i .~Bani~ ..4:

B~al~ ~"::

gl-.'*

Max. 18 in.~ (,~m)

7 i__

T--

A I S k E

. : : : ,

00~ S NN~

-Max.8fl (2.44 m) Face sprinklers

"i ::u:::;::~::~ iiTi!~ii!71iiliii~iiiii:iii

............... iiiiiiiii~,iiiii!i!iiii~,iiTi~,i~ : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ~ : ; ! ................... ......

~ !:!:!:!:!:!:: .! ::::.::::::::. ...............

.............. U2"i" . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . : :.-.:.

: - : : : - : ' : : -~ : : ! : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

. - . . - . . - . v . - | . . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . .

7

]E O'4,h _

q q F F - ] i q[-~Barrie

00'"0 ._~, , I I

q ~ ~ s [ " ~ ~ l g garrie

][300,30 ,o, ._., S (3.05 m)

~ [ O0 L l ~E approx. ""'J' ~ ' ' l

Elevation Figure 7-4.4.2.4.4(b)* (Figure 231C-8-3.2.4(b)] In-rack sprinkler

arrangement, cartoned plastic and uncartoned unexpanded plastic, muhiple-row racks, storage height over 25-ft (7.62-m). (ROC 13-173)

Figure 7-4.4.2.4.4(c)* (Figure 251C-8-3.2.4(c)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, cartoned plastic, uncartoned uuexpanded plastic, an uncartoned expanded plastic, multiple-row racks, storage height o~

25-ft (7.62-m). (ROC 13-175)

742

Page 191: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

M~18in.~- -~ I.~m/ I I /

~ ~ !~ ~ i W ~ : : : : : : : :: :::::::::: :: :::::::::: ,~ :::::::-: : ::::::l: : ::::::::::

:'~iiiiF,'~ ............ '~'~ .......... ~ .......... ",' .......... "/iiiii!i!i!

~-Max.8ft (2.44m)

Plan view

Face sprinklers ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

',i',i',i',',',itH}',i',i',iii'] '~',N',N x. +:.~:ex+xe:ex+

, . . . . . . . . .= = . . . . . . . . . . .= = . . . . . .

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: A :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: , N',N~,N S ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

L +: :+:c-:~+:+:+:-:~+:...=

• " - ' q t - - - I t - - " e - , - - - ~ e - - - - q e . - -

0 0 0 0 0 0 F ..... ~Barrier

q N F 000 000 i ~I/'Bar" "-:::":::::

000 0 0 ' #: Ju,_ i K""S

l

El~alio~

F'~rure 7-4.4.2.4.4(d)* (Figure 231C-8-3.2.4(d)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, cartoned plastic, uncartoned unexpanded plastic, and uncartoned expanded plastic, multiple-row racks, storage height over

25-ft (7.62-m). (ROC 13-173)

(.M4a~'1)8 in'-~L~ .. ~

II J : NL

_ A I _ , _ I . .

3

4

!

Max. 8 ft ~_.44 m) Face sprinklers A

A I S L E

..:;-~ view

f°l rl

~ S S

E E

Elevation

Figure 7-4.4.2.4.4(e) (Figure 231C-8-3.2.4(e)] In-rack sprinkler arrangement, cartoned plastic, uncartoned unexpanded plastic, an uncartoned expanded plastic, multiple-row racks, storage height o~

25-ft (7.62-m). (ROC 13-173)

743

Page 192: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

Max. 18 in.-~- ~-Max.8ft 1.46 m ) | | "~ |(2.44 m)

~ ~ ~ x ~ x ~8~D~ ~

=,s Er3 8 Plan view

~spdnklers b x 6

~' -L

[I ":~i~: . . . . . .-.:~.......~!(::~ . J

Figure 7-4.4.2.4.4(f)* (Figure 231C-&3~JE:-In-rack sprinkler arrangement, cartoned plastic, uncartone~.~hexpanded plastic, and uncartoned expanded plastic, multil~]'e-row racks, storage

height over 25-ft (7.62-m). (ROC 13-173)

7-4.4.2.4.5 (231C-8-3.4) In-Rack Sprinkler Discharge Pressure. Sprinklers in racks shall discharge at not less allan 30 gpm (113.6 L /min ) .

7-4.4.3 (231C-8-2) Ceiling Sprinklers for Single, Double, and Multiple Row Racks - Storage Height Up to 25 ft - Clearances Up to and Including 10 ft (3.1 m) - - Area Density Method. ( R O C 1 3 - 173)

7-4.4.3.1 (231C-8-2.1) Ceiling Sprinkler Water Demand. For Group A plastic, commodities. . in cartons, encapsulated or nonencapsnlated m single-, double-, and multiple-row racks, ceiling sprinkler water demand in terms of density (gpm/ft ~)

2 2 2 " [ (L /min) /m ] and area of operation [ft ( m ) ] shall be selected from Figure 7-4.4.2.3 (a) through (g). Linear interpolation of design densities and areas of application shall be permitted

between storage heights with tbe same clearances. No interpolation between clearances shall be permitted.

7-4.4.3.2 (231C-8-2.1.1) Single-, Double-, and Muhiple-Row Racks Up to 10-ft (3.l-m) Storage With Up to 10-ft (3.l-m) Clearance. The protection strategies utilizing only ceiling sprinklers, ,as showrl in Figure 7-4.4.2.3 (a), shall be acceptable for single-, double-and multiple-row rack storage. (ROC 13-176)

7-4.4.3.3 (231C-8-2.1.2) Single- and Double-Row Racks Greater than 10 ft to 15-ft (4.6-m) Storage with Less than 5-ft (1.25-m) Clearance. The protection strategy utilizing only ceiling sprinklers, as shown in Figure 7-4.4.2.3 (b), shall be acceptable only for single- and double-row rack storage. (ROC 13-177)

7-4.4.3.4 (231C-8-2.1.3) Single- and Double-Row Rack Storage Greater than 10-ft (3.l-m) up to 15 ft with Clearance from 5 ft to 10 ft; and Single- and Double-Row Rack Storage Up to 20 ft with Less than 5 ft Clearance. The protection strategies utilizing only ceiling sprinklers, as shown in Figures 7-4.4.2.3 (c) and (d), shall be acceptable only for single- and double-row rack storage. (ROC 13- 178)

(ROC 13-173)

7-4.4.3.5 (231C-8-2.1.4) M u l t ~ . : R a c k s - - 15-ft (4.6-m) Storage with Less than 5-ft (~.:.m.) Clearance. Where using the protection strate!k,y utilizin~:~i'~-'::"~iJing sprinklers, as shown in Figure 7.4.4.2.3('g'), for .~.3"$~".ple-~:~:rack storage, the density to be used shall be 0.60 g p ~ * [':~4.5 /S'~-~)..J.m2 J over 2000 ft ~ (186 m~). The combinatio~"~:~.eiling a n d ' : ~ c k sprinklers specified in Figure 7-4.4.2.3 Part (b) s[~!. be pert~i:ted as an alternative. (ROC 13-177) .... :" ::#i~i~:. ~::::i~£i~@::~ .... 7-4.4.3.6 (2~ ,~ ;8 -2~) Muiti'[~l~i~ow Racks - - 15-ft (4.6-m) Storage ~ & 0 - f t (3. I:~.~ Clearance; 20-ft (6-m) Storage with Less that [i-ft ( 1 . ~ ) . C l e a ~ : . T!ae .p.rotection strategies utilizing o n l y . : . ~ g sp i~ .e r s , own m rlgure 7-4.4.2.3 Parts (c) and ( .d,..~.-.:~:':~[l~}.~ot b e " ~ t t e d for multiple-row rack storage. Only d~e ~ .c i f i e~ i~ombipa~ ' s of ceiling ,and in-rack sprinklers shall be

::!-::.-

!l!~:~.4~..~eih.'ngSprlnklers for Single, Double and Multiple Row $ ~ Over 25 ft in Height- Area Density Method.

U7-4.4.4.1 '(231C-8-3.1.1) Ceiling Sprinkler Water Demand. For ~:., Grou., p A plastic commodities in cartons, encapsulated or i~ff'/encapsulated, ceiling sprinkler water demand in terms of ... insity (gpm/ft ~) [ (L /min) /m ~] and ,area of operation [ft 2 (m ~) ] ":"shall be selected from Table 7-4.4.4.1.

Table 7-4.4.4.1 (231C-8-3.1) CeUingSpdnkler Discharge Criteria for Single-, Double-, and Multiple-Row Racks with Storage over

25 ft (7.6 m) in Height Storage Height above Ceiling Sprinklers

Top Level In-Rack Density (gpm/ft~)/Area of Sprinklers App fi-cation (fC)

5 ft or less 0.30/2000 Over 5 ft up to 10 ft 0.45/2000

For SI units: 1 ft = 0.3048 m; 1 gpm = 3.785 L/min; 1 gpm/ft ~ = 40.74 (L /min) /m 2 NOTE: Provide in-rack sprinkler protection per Figures 7- 4.4.2.4.1 (a) and (b) ,and Figures 7-4.4.2.4.3(a) darough (c).

7-4.4.4.2 (231C-8-3.1.2) Where a single-row rack is mixed with double-row racks, eidler Figure 7-4.4.2.3(a) through (g) or Figures 7-4.4.2.4.1 (a) and (b) shall be used in accordance widl the corresponding storage height

Exception: Figures 7-4.4.2.4.3(a) through 7-4.4.2.4.3(c) shall be permitted to be used for the protection of the single-row racks.

7-5* t (231-4-4, 231C-4-7, 231C-4-7.1) Protection of Idle Pallets. (ROC 13-161)

7-5.1 General. (ROC 13-161)

7-5.1.1 Tile following criteria is intended to apply to buildings with ceiling slopes not exceeding 2 in 12 (16.7%). (ROC 13-161)

744

Page 193: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 - - A 9 9 R O C

7-5.1.2 Where dry-pipe systems are used, the sprinkler system design area sh.all be increased by 30%. 0tOC 13-161)

7-5.2 (231-4-4.1) Wood Pallets.

7-5.2.1" (231-4-4.1.1) Pallets shall be stored outside or in a detached structure.

Exception: Indoor pallet storage shall be permitted in accordance with 7- 5.1.2. (ROC 13-179)

7-5.2.2* (231-4-4.1.2) Pallets, where stored indoors, shall be protected as indicated in Table 7-5.2.2, Table 7-6.4.10, Table 7- 6.5.6.1 or Table 7.6.5.8.1 unless the following conditions are met:

(See Table 7-5.2.2 (231-4-4.1.2) below.)

(a) Pallets shall be stored no higher than 6 ft (1.8 m). (b) Each pallet pile of no more than four stacks shall be

separated from other pallet piles by at least 8 ft (1.4 m) of clear space or 25 ft (7.6 m) of commodity.

7-5.2.$t (23104-7.2) Idle wood pallets shall not stored in racks.

Exception.. Idle wooden pallets shall be permitted to be stored in racks when pTot~.tcd in ac~.ordanc~ with the appropriate provisions of Section 7- 6.5,

7-5.3 (231-4-4.2) Plastic Pallets.

7-5.3.1 (231-4-4.2.1) Plastic pallets shall be stored outside o*r in a detached structure.

Exr~ption No. 1: Indoor plastic pallst storage shall be p~raitted in accordance with 7-~.2.2. (ROC 13-179)

Exception No. 2: Indoor storage of nonexpanded po~ethylene sdlid deck pallets shall be permitted to be protected in aceorda~,e with 7-5.1.1.2. (ROC 13-179)

Ext.'priori No. 3: Indoor storage o f ~ l a s t i c ~ shall be permitted to be protected in act.ordan¢e with Table 7-6.5.6.1 or Table 7-6.5..8,,L

Exc~ption No. 4: Indoor storage of non-wood pal l~ laving a denwnstrated fire hazard that is equal to or less titan idle wood palletW"~ and is listed for sudt equivalen ~ shall be peratitted to be p r o t e ~ " accordanae with 7-5.1.1.2. (ROC 13-179) ~ .

A 7-5.$.2 (231-4-4.2.2) Plastic pallets where stored i n d ~ _ ~ . . ~ . protected as follows: . • -,~

(a) Where stored in cutoff rooms tile f o l l o ~ a~ (I) The cutoff rooms sball have at least o ~ (2) The plastic palletstorage shall be se F

remainder of the buildLug by ~hr-rated f~ . (3) The storage shall b, d IllJm[Iktlers~ml~e~'~ :o e (protecte

~L/s)/m ~ ' ~ , ~ ~ ' o r by deliver 0.60 gpm/ft ~ [0.41 ~'~or'ti~ high-exp~msion foam and s p r i n k l e . ~ ~ t . -odin . f ~ o n 5-2.

(4) The storage shall be piled fro, ~nan t2 tt (3.7 m). (5) Any steel columns shall be protec'~l~[~y ldw fireproofing or

a sidewall sprinkler directed to one side c ~ u n m at the top or at the 15-ft (4.6-m) level, whichever is I¢ Flow from these sprinklers shall be ermitted to be omitted | ~m the p ~V~c" sprinkler system demand for hydraulic calculations.

(b) Where stored without cutoffs from other storage the following shall apply:.

(1) Plastic pallet storage shall be piled no higher than 4 ft (1.2 m).

(2) Sprinkler protection shall employ high-temperature-rated sprinklers.

(3) Each pallet pile of no more than two stacks shall be separated from other pallet piles by at least 8 fc (2.4 m) of clear space or 25 ft (7.6 nil) of stored commodity.

7-5.$.3 (231C.4-7-2) Idle plastic pallets shall not he stored in racks.

wEX~tion: Idle plastic pallets shall be permitted to be stored in racks protected in accordance with the appropriate provisions of &aion 7-

6.5. 1

7-6 (231D) Protection of Rubber Tire Storage. (ROC 13-161, 13-

7-6.1 General. (ROC 13-161)

7-6.1.1 The sprinkler system criteda of 7-6 is intended to apply to buildings with ceiling slopes not exceeding 2 in 12 (16.7%). (ROC 15-161)

7-6.~ GeUing Systems.

(ROt: ]3-]8])

7-6.2.1" Sprinkler ~ accordance with Table Section 5-4.1.2 ESFR s n r i n k l e ~

pplication shall be in [a?d spray sprinklers. See ~. For large drop and and (c) respectively.

The is used as follows:

the eJ~q~i~ indicated by the broken line. I acres ~ - g r a p h to the storage height of 14 ft (4.3 m) ~ g h ~ ifftersects the storage height curve at a ie~VofO.45 gpm/ft 2 [(18.3 L/-min) m~)]. 1 ~[own until the sprinkler density intersects the sprinkler M~a curves at 320Oft ~ (397 m ~) for ordinary-temperature rand 200 ft ~ (186 m ~) for high-temperature sprinklers). 61, 13-181)

Height of

Pallet Storage ft[ml

U p t o 6 [1.8] 6 to 8 [1.8 to 2.4] 8to 12 [2.4 to 3.7] 12 to 20 [3.7 to 6.1 ]

Table 7-5.2.2 (231- I) Protection for Indoor Stora~ of Wood Idle Pallets Sprinkler Density Requirements Area of Sprinkler

Demand ft ~ [m 2] gpm/ft ~ [(L/s)/m ~] ~ e m ~ t m g

High Temperature Ordinary Temperature .20 1.14] 2OO0 [180] S000 [279] .30 [-20I 2500 [232! 4oo0 [3721 .60 [.41 ] 3500 [3~] 60oo [557] .60 [.411 4500 [418]

745

Page 194: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 - - A 9 9 R O C

Table 7-6.2.1(a) [231D-Table 4-1.2(a)1 Protect ion Criteria for Rubbe r Ti re Storage Usinl~ S tandard Spra), Sprinklers

Piling Method Piling Height (ft) Sprinkler Discharge Density Areas o f Application (fC) (See Note 2.)

u p to 5 Over 5 to 19

(1) ()n-floor s torage (a) Pyramid piles on-side (b) Odaer a r r angemen t s

such that no horizontal channels are fo rmed (see Note 3) (2) On-floor s torage

(a) Tires on-tread (3) Palletized portable rack storage

(a) On-side or on-tread

(4) Palletized Portable rack storage

(a) ( )n-side

(5) Open portable rack ;torage, ori-side or oil- :read

(6) Single-, double-, a n d :mflti-row fixed rack ;torage on pallets, on-side )r on-tread

Over 12 to 18

Up to 5 Over 5 to 12

I]p to 5

Over 5 to 20 Over 20 to 30

Up to 5

Over 5 to 20 20 to 25

Up to 5

Over 5 to 12 Over 12 to 20

Up to 5

(See Note 2.) ~hrpm/ft e )

0.19

~7) Single-, double-, a n d nult i-row fixed rack ;torage wid~out pallets or ;helves, on-side or on- !read

0.30 0.60

0.19 0.30 0.19

See Figure-%5.2.1.1 0.30 plus h igh-expansion

foam 0.19

See Fi~ure %5.2.1.1 0.60 and

0.90 (see Note 4); or 0.75 wifl~ l -hr fire-resistive rat ing of roof arid ceiling

a s sembly 0.19

0.60 0.60 ,and

0.90 (see Note 4); or 0.30 plus h igh-expansion

foam 0.19

Ordina~ Temp. 2000. 2500

Not allowed

2000 2500 2OO0

3OO0

2OO0

Not al lowed Not allowed Not allowed ..:: :.,-:..

....:..--":!:: ::~:i:!!!~:::::.

2000 ..::":":::!::!'!!:i:, ,.# % . % ....

..::::::-:. ...-. "::i~%:...::i--. ..:.:~<-.'.:-~

5000 "%? ,6 i::" Nd~...~JJ owe d ":.'..'~::..

: . ~ r ~ ~ : . ..... ~'i::- :::-.::'::" 2~)0 ......... -.:.-.:%

:4E::%::. 2ooo

Over 5 to 20 See Figure %5 . 2. +~:'!~::. ..::.:-i "::'!~" . . . . . . . k £": 0.40 plus one I£~:..i.o-ra:~:. ""%;ii~: 3000

s P r in kl.~/g¢':'@iii~: "%1 i'.'- ..,'i." 0.30 p l u s . . : ~ . l - e x p ~ i o n " ~i~'::"" 3000

-::::"f 6~'.~.. ..::!~:' Over 20 to 30 0.30 ,g..[..~... h i g ~ a n s i o n Not ,allowed

,-i:¢:'*'::'::%":f°am::::~i~:~ ., ,'h" Up to 5 .-::-i:"' .::.::. 0.19 -:.z@;...::!.' 2000

.fi~::..":: Over 5 to ~i~::. ii~:!" . . . . . "~i'~0":60 5000

High Temp. 2000 2500 2500

20OO 2500 2000

3000

2000

5000 3000 4000

2000

30OO 5OOO 300O 3000

2000

3000

3000

3000

2000

3000 Over 12 tff'20::i~:.5.~::...::~ :'::':":i.~!~::.:,i~ii 0.60 and Not allowed 5000

":'-"::'-:'-~ :.. "::~!~ (see Note 4); or Not al lowed ~ 0 0 ""-'iii:: ~i~......¢0 plus one level in-rack 3000 3000

::~# "~.":'.".:.":: sprinklers or 4::" 0.30 plus h igh-expans ion 3000 3000

~::::..:::.-::. f oam Over 20 "t~i.:.'-~:" 0.30 plus h igh-expansion Not allowed 3000

.~i~P:" foam Notes:

1. For SI units, 1 ft = 0.3048 m; 1 ft 2 = 0.0929 m2; 1 g p m / f t e = 40.746 ( L / m i n ) / m e 2. Sprinkler discharge densit ies and areas of applicat ion are based on a m a x i m u m clearance of 10 ft between spr inkler deflectors

and tile m a x i m n m available he igh t of storage. The m a x i m u m clearance is no ted f rom actual test ing a n d is no t a definitive l l l e a s u r e l n e n t .

3.* Laced tires on-floor, vertical s tacking on-side (typical t ruck tires), and off-road tires. 4. Water supply shall fulfill bodl requi rements .

(ROe 13-161, 13-181)

746

Page 195: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

Piling Method

Rnbber tire s torage on-side or on-tread in palletized portable racks, or open portable racks, or f ixed

racks widaout solid shelves Notes:

"Fable 7-6.2.1(b) [231D-Table 4-1.2(b)1 Large-Drop Sprinklers (See Note 2.) Pile Height ([t) Number of SprinMers and Maximum Duration (hr)

Minimum Operating Building Height Press'rues (See Note 3.) (ft)

Up to 25 15 Sprinklers @ 75 psi 32 3 (See Note 4.)

Hose Demand (gpm)

500

1. For SI units, 1 ft =0.3048 m; 1 ft ~ = 0.0929 m ~, 1 psi = 6.895 kPa; 1 g p m = 3.785 L / m i n 2. Wet systems only. 3. Sprinkler operat ing pressures a n d n u m b e r of sprinklers in flae design are based on tests in which the clearance was

5 ft to 7 ft between the sprinkler deflector and the m a x i m u m he igh t of storage. 4. The design area shall consist of the most hydraulically d e m a n d i n g area of 15 sprinklers, consist ing of 5 sprinklers on

each of 3 branch lines. T he design shall include a m i n i m u m opera t ing area of 1200 ft a m a x i m u m opera t ing area of 1500 ft e arid shall utilize a h igh- tempera ture- ra ted sprinkler. (ROC 13-161, 13-181)

..::5..

Table 7-6.2.1(c) [Table 231D 4-1.2(c)1 ESFR Piling Method Pile Maximum- Nominal

Height Building K-factor (ft) He~ht

(ft)

Rubber tire storage on- side or on-tread in palletized portable racks, open portable racks, or f ixed races without solid shelves

Up to 25

o f Number of M i n i m 6 ~ .... Sprinklers ~ i ~ . . . . . . . ~--~::,

, ~ " : ' ' ~ i ~ ~ . . ~ ":-~.q, si)

(Se e"Ir!.~ t e.....3) 30 13.5 - 14.5 12 ": ~.-2.:~.:..-::.. 5.(}j#""

(S e e.:...~.4. ) ":::.*r .... ":~:: ...-:U "%} .... :::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::.-

::.~:

24.2- 26.,~U "%}:i: 12"::'~-~i~::.~..::~:. 20 ~ . : (..~e Not~:"

• ..::!?i::" .:~::"

35 : 1~...'~:~.4.5 ": ~i'i~::. 12 75

::ii::i::ii.j:..:f" 2:" ~i~:..e:..~-Note 4)

<:i"::iiiii~:..JNi'i::.. '-~i i %N~ ...... " ii ~,.

12 See Note 4)

-.:.?:.~..--:=

Rubber tire s torage on- side in palletized portable racks, open portable racks, or fixed racks wi thout solid shelves

Up to 25

~ . : : . . 30"-.:'-:':'-::.. ]'~::5 - 14.5 20 Laced tires in open Up to 2 :i _ "%i"!ii portable steel racks (See " " (See Notes 5 Figu re 1-4.10.1 ) .:ii#~ i and 6)

i:;- ,#i:" -:i::" "q;=::::::.

Notes: "-::':i:i:i::-. . 1. For SI units, 1 ft = 0.3048 m; 1 sq ft = 0.0~iisq'::::::-::" :::- m; 1 psi = 6.895 kPa; 1 g p m = 3.785 L / ra in 2. Wet systems only. 3.

4. 5. 6.

I~ration Hose (hr) Demand

(gpm)

1 250

1 250

1 250

30 1 250

75 3 500

Sprinkler opera t ing pressures mad n u m b e r of sprinklers in the design are based on tests in which the clearance was 5 ft to 7 ft hetween the sprinkler deflector and die m a x i m u m he igh t of storage. The shape of tile design area shall be in accordance with Section 7-6.5.4. Where used in this a~plication, ESFR protect ion is expected to control radaer allan to suppress tile fire. The design area s h a h consist of die most hydraulically d e m a n d i n g area of 20 sprinklers, consist ing of 5 sprinklers on each of 4 branch lines. The design sh,'-dl include a m i n i m u m operat ing area of 1600 sq ft.

(ROC 13-160)

7 4 7

Page 196: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

E

r

o

E

03 E

¢) o_ o

I .Sd I2

20

15

10

5000

4000

3000

2000

~ 7

0 0.3

/ /

J /

/ /

/

g /

/

J

. / I I

I

I

t I

I I

I

/ , /

f / /

/

I

I

I

I

iOrdinary temp. / I i sprinklers /

, / i , ¢ i /

i / J

,T I ..... i:ii:: i~i-~:: ..... :~. I High temp. :.!:!:~ / ?~.~;;: i sprinklers ~ ~ ~.-,:.. ~:, -.-

I ::~::::"' i~::.

, : ".:::::: ;:;:.- '

I I i ' l

I i:ii::

I

I

/ /

/

.,..::!.: i:i:::::::: :ii.f..]..

~ i::''i'i: "i:':

0.4 0.5 Sprinkler density (gpm/ft 2)

0 6

Figure 7-6.2.1 Sprinkler system design curves for palletized portable rack storage a n d fixed rack storage with pallets over 5 ft

to 20 ft (1.5 m to 6 m) in height. (ROC 13-161)

7-6.2.2 (231D-4-1.3) In buildings used inpart for tire storage, for die purposes of this standard, the requiredsprinkler protection shall extend 15 ft (4.6 m) beyond the perimeter of tile tire storage area. (ROC 13-161,13-181)

7-6.2.3 (231D-4-2.1) Where bigb expansion foam systems are installed in accordance widl NFPA 11A, a reduction in sprinkler discharge density to one-haft the density specified in Table 7- 5.2.1.1 (a) or 0.24 gpm/sq f t (9.78 L / m i n / s q m), whichever is higher, shall be allowed. (ROC 13-161,13-18D

7-6.3 (231D-4-1.4) In-rack Sprinkler System Requirements. (ROC 13-161,13-181)

7-6.3.1 (231D-4-1.4.1) In-rack sprinklers, where provided, shall be installed in accordance with 7-4, except as modified by 7-5.2.2.2 through 7-5.2.2.4. (ROC 13-161,13-180

7-6.3.2 (231D-4-1.4.2) The maximum horizontal spacing of sprinklers in rack shall be 8 ft (2.4 m). (ROC 13-161,13-181)

7-6.3.3 (231D-4-1.4.3) Sprinklers in racks shall discharge at not less th:~n 30 psi (207 kPa). (ROC 13-161,13-181)

7-6.3.4 (231D-4-1.4.4) Water dem.~ad for sprinklers installed in racks shall be based on s i m u l ~ : k o p e r a t i o n of file most hydraulically remote 12 s p r i ~ where only one level is instailed in ~,c~ mOC 13-161,13-L~5 "%i!ii::i~ ....

(ROC 13-161,13-181).-:.~iiiii!" '::":'~i~: "::"':::iiiiii!i?:ii..:, ..::!:.

7-6.4 (231D-4-3)..Water Su:':~.:...h.'es. (R~::13-161)

7-6.4.1 ( 231D. ~ " " ' : " : : : : " '":'::":::" ~ ~ ! : . . w a t e r supply shall be sufficient to provide th¢:~quirei~,~.rinkler di~'charge density over the required area of ~ . t i ' o n pfi~-::prqvision for generation of high-expansion foam an~ ] n ' ~ : spr inl / ,~ 'where used. (ROC 1$-161)

tal water supplies sball include provision ~ i not ins than 7!~i~;'~pm (2,835 L/min) for bose streams, it,

:i~.e':ilu ired automatic ~ . . t , ! ~ for sprinklers and foam sys~: '~ Wa~:":"~pplies shail be capable of supplying the demand ~or s ~ k l e r , systems and bose streams for not less than 3 hours.

*tio~i No. 1: For on-floor storage ~tp to and including 5 f l (1.5 m) in t, hose stream requirements shall be permitted to be 250 g]Om (946 n), with a upater supp~ duration of not less than 2 hours. (ROC

Exception No. 2: For ESFR and large-drop sprinkler ~. stems approved for rubber tire storage refer to Tables 7-5.2.1.1(b) and (c) for duration and hose demand. (ROC13-181)

.7-6.4.3" (231D-4-3.3) Where dry pipe systems are used, the area of sprinkler application shall be increased by not less than 30 percent. (ROC 13-161)

7-6.5 x (231D-3-3) Miscellaneous Tire Storage. Miscellaneous tire storage shall be protected in accordance with 7-2.3. (ROC 13-161)

7-6.6" (231D-4-4.1) Small Hose. For first aid fire fighting and mop up operations, small hose [1 1/2 in. (38 ram)] shall be provided in accordance with Section 5-15.5. (ROC 13-181)

7-7 (231E) Protection of Baled Cotton Storage. (ROC 13-161)

7-7.1 General. (ROC 13-161)

7-7.1.1 The sprinkler system criteria in Section 7-7 is intended to apply to buildings with ceiling slopes not exceeding 2 in 12 (16.7%). (ROC 13-161)

7 4 8

Page 197: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 ~ A 9 9 R O C

7-7.2 (231E-4-1) Sprinkler Systems. (ROC 13-184)

7-7.2.1 (231EM-1.3) For t iered or rack storage up to a nominal 15 ft (4.6 m) in height , sprinkler discharge densities and areas of applicat ion shall he in accordance wid~ Figure 7-7.2.1. The density provided for the area of operat ion can be taken from any point on the selected curve. It is not necessary to meet more than one point on the selected curve. (ROC 13-184)

Sprinkler density (Usec)/m 2

0.08 0.10 0.14

Curves-A B C 6000 J l ) , l l II

I I I I I I I 55oo I l l I I~I I

| I I I \ I II II I II I t l

0.17 0.20 0.24

D |11 557 I I | 1 I I I I I I 511

7-7.2.2 (231E-4-1.3.1) Where roof or ceiling heights would prohibi t storage above a nominal 10 ft (3.1 m), the sprinkler discharge density shall be permi t ted to be reduced by 20 percent of that indicated in Figure 7-7.2.1 but shall no t be reduced to less than 0.15 g p m / f t ~ [(0.10 L / s e c ) / m ~ ]. (ROC 13-184)

7-7.2.3" (231E-4-1.3.2) Baled storage dmt is not t iered can be based on the single-point design curve E for wet-pipe systems and curve F for dry-pipe systems. (ROC 13-184)

7-7.2.4 (231E-4-1.3.3) In warehouses tha t have mixed rack storage, t iered or un t ie red storage, or a combinat ion of daese, tlae cnrve applicable to the storage configurat ion shall apply and fl~e highest density r ecommenda t ion shall ex tend at least 15 ft (4.6 m) beyond the r e c o m m e n d e d operat ing area.

7-7.2.5 (231E-4-1.3.4) Min imum sprinkler operat ing a r e ~ sl~all be 3000 ft ~ (279 m ~ ) for wet-pipe systems and 3900 ft 2 (363 m ~) for dry- pipe systems; d~e max imum operat ing area shall not exceed 6000 fff (557 m~). No area credit is r e c o m m e n d e d for the use of high tempera ture sprinklers.

11 I I~ I ~1 I$ 7-7.3 (231E-4-2) Water S u p p l i ~ ( " : ~ C 13-184)

~'~ 5000 I$1 ]\J~][~ ~'1\1 465 ~'E 7-7.3.1 (231E-4-2.1) Th~iit"'~l w~rB. . !pp ly available shall be ~ sufficient to provide t.~.~'.--~ec~men~:~.~.~inkler discharge density

~l ~[ I ~ ~ over the area to be p~~te:~,ed, p h , s a ~ m u m of 500 gpm (32 ] ~ [~ ]~J ~ L/sec) for hose streams.~...... (I~C..:.:.. 13-18~"

c o~ [~ [~ ~[ ~ O~ 7-7.3.2 ( 2 3 1 ~ ~ . s shall be capable pfsupply ing the = i~ -~ total demaq.#:':-for s'~.:.~nklefUfffi'/zl-:~ose streams tor not less than 2 4500 I K l Ikl 418 "~ hom-s. ~:-~":, "::~::, ® 1 ~J I I\1\1 ® 4:::::--::::-::- , . . . . . . g I1, I ~ 1 I~1 o ~ '"~iiiiiiii~ .... !iiiiiii~-:"

I1\1 I I\I\1 I kl ~ ( R ~ - ' . " ~ 8 4 ) ':::'!~-~iii:-.-::. ...... -:i .... I I ~ I I ~ ~ I I ~ I I _~ .... ~::i! ~: . . . . ~i'~ii: ~--"-' ....

~ . . . . I l K I I N k I l i ~ , l l o~-~ - : i ~ : , ( ~ . ~ , : ~ . ~ ' ~ 4 - 4 . 1 > S m a l l n o s e . For first aid fire fighting cO ,*uuu 2[El ] 1"~ J ! ~ ] ,~ o,," ,% ...ss._.:..._.:,an~i~..p u~ '~ i~mt ions , small hose [l 1 / / 2 inc. (38 ram)] shall

I,T i i i i ,i i i g i i i r i o(:,,,,:,~:~:~-:.,,~ p(~i~ied!Jn accordimce with Section 5-15.5. (ROC 13-182)

1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...:-¢::~iii~ii~.::. .~ii~- ~;::" l I l l I l l I l ' ~ N J ..:~:. ":'-:~#~.~::"(ROC ,:~182)

Single point I I l~i I I I k l l i i .[#:~:::::::;*~ ...... "-::"ii]:.::. ., " ~ , , , , I I l l ] ] I , I X l I I ~':q " "-::~'~..~i~ ( 2 3 1 F ) P r o t e c t i o n o f R o l l P a e r S t o e (ROC 13-161) 3500 325 I_eesignonq ! ! ! !~.! ! ! ! ! ! .~_~ ! !,.-:t!"! % .::. !~::. P rag" /~ . ~ , , ~ I I I I~[ I I I I I IX. I.:#:%:?::£. ======================== "%.. *;

7 8 1 General (ROC 13-161) I I l i l l l l l l l l I % 1 1 1 1 1 I I N J ~ . J ':F~--I~. ..... -] -ii':~ - I I I~I I I I I I I l I ~ . I I I I l--:F:1"~iiiii!l :~ i %i]]~--J ....

~nnnl I I~IIEI I I I I I I I I~ I I I :.:~liiii.l I ~ : 1 ].~7~!~ "i::" 7-8.I.1 The sprinkler system criteria in Section 7-S is intended to v v J T - - - ! . . . . . . . ! ! . . . I @ j . . " ~ '-':" '":iE~-::...:'.g:::':'::-~i~:~.. :-:.. ~ apply to buildings with ceilin~ slopes not exceedin~ 2 in 12

0.12 0.15 0.20 0.25~:.-::..-..:~:.::.:..0~..iiiii~i.. 0.'td~ ~:: (]6L7%). (ROCVl3-161) ~ " . . j:~::::%i]~: '%ii~::....:,. y-.--

Curve Legend ":'%i!iiifi~::,.::¢:. (gOC 13-21 )

A - Wet-pipe system for tiered storage to ~ !~ (4.6 m)

B - Dry-pipe system for tiered storage to 15 It (4.6 m)

C - Wet-pipe system for rack storage to 15 It (4.6 rn)

D - Dry-pipe system for rack storage to 15 ft (4.6 m)

E - Wet-pipe system for untiered storage

F - Dry-pipe system for untiered storage

Figure 7-7.2.1 Spr inkler system design curves. (ROC 13-184)

7-8.1.2" (231F-5-|.1,1) Where buildings are occupied in par t for vertical roll paper storage and only a p o r t i o n of the sprinkler system is hydraulically designed, the design ,area shall ex tend not less than 20 ft (6.1 m) beyond dae area occupied by the roll paper storage. (ROC 13-21)

7-8.1.3" (231F 5-1.1.2) Wet-pipe systems shall be used in tissue storage areas. (ROC 13-21)

7-8.1.41 (231F 5-1.1.3) Horizontal storage of heavyweight or mediumweight paper shall be protected ,as a closed ,array. (ROC 13-21)

7 4 9

Page 198: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

7-8.1.5 ~ (231F 5-1.1.4) Mediumweight paper shall be permitted to be protected its heavyweight paper where wrapped completely on the sides and both ends, or where wrapped on the sides only with steel bands. (ROC 13-21)

Wrapping material shall be eid~er a single layer of heavyweight paper with a basis weil~ht of 40 lb (18.1 kg), or two layers of heavyweight paper witl~ a basis weight of less than 40 Ib (18.1 kg).

7-8.1.6 = (231F 5-1.1.5) Lightweight paper or tissue paper shall be permitted to be protected as mediumweight paper where wrapped completely on fl~e sides and both ends, or where wrapped on the sides only with steel bands. (ROC 13-21)

Wrapping material shall be eidaer a single layer of heavyweight paper with a basis weight of 40 lb (18.1 kg), or two layers of heavyweight paper with a basis weight of less d'~an 40 lb (18.1 kg).

7-8.1.7 ~ (231F 5-1.1.6) For purposes of sprinkler system design criteria, lightweight class paper shall "be protected its tissue. (ROC I:~21)

(ROC 1:~21)

7-8.2" Protection Criteria. (ROC 13-21)

7-8.2.1 Roll paper storage shall be protected by spray sprinklers in accordance with 7-8.2.2, large drop sprinklers in accordance with 7-8.2.3, or ESFR sprinklers in accordance with %8,2.4. (ROC 13-21)

7-8.2.2" (231F 5-1.3) Spray Sprinklers. (ROC 13-21)

7-8.2.2.1 ~ (23 IF 5-1.2.1) Storage of l~eavyweight or mediumweight classes of rolled paper up to 10 ft (3.1 m) in height shall be protected hy sprinklers designed for Ordinary Hazard, Group 2

densities. (ROC 13-21) .:¢#iiii!iii!i !ii!::~:i'? ~'~f~i~iiiiiiiiiii~i: .:----"

7-8.2.2.2 ~ (231F 5-1.2.2) Storage of tissue and lightweigbt classes of . . - ~ - : : "%~i'-":, Japer up to 10 ft (3.1 m) in height shall bepr0tec ted by sprinklers..-.-"-"" ":%i: ""%i~.:.::..:::.:.:! i:" in accordance with Extra Hazard, Group 1 densities. (ROC 13-2~]~!.:.. ::::~':: -~i~::"

.... i--::.. ':~ "%iii~i..!ii?:. 'i~::" -'::" 7-8.2.2.3 ~ (231F 5-1.3.1) Sprinkler design criteria for sto .r~i~i:io:Fi~ll :::!i'i-iiiii.:i::...:..:. paper 10 ft (3.1 m) high and higher in buildings or strt~'~re~i~:...~.'th .:, "~i¢::" roof or ceilings up to 30 ft (9.1 m) shall be in accor~'.-':-:..~tf~..:i::, %:, -:-:"':" Tables 7-8.2.2.3(a) and (h). For definition of storage hei~::#~":::':" ."::.-'~':

Secti on 1-4.12. (ROe 13-21) i.n~:;:~:~:i!!!i!:!::~ i!i!iiiiiiiiiii#iiii:-..-iii::":: (See Table 7-8.2.2.3 (a) and (b) on the fol:~:...,..,.~, v....,~es.) "::!'i::ii

Table 7-8.2.4 ~ ~ .~ed l ; ~ r S t o ~ i:'i:" Automatic Sprinkler Design Criteria - - ESFR Sprinklers • "::!:":'::':':i~'~ . . . . :':'i?" (magnum height of storage permitted)

I !'{~I?~.:" Heav~rweight " Mediumweight "::i--:,~i!~::.

ESFR K System Pressure Buildi~iii::i #:" Closed Standard Open Closed Standard Factor (psi) Height-.-':.::" (ft) (m) (ft) (m) (ft) (m) (ft) (m) fit) (m)

(bars) (ft) (m)

11.o 11.5

13.5--14.5

13.5--14.5

24.2--26.2

24.2--26.2

(ROC 13-160)

Type

Wet

Wet

Wet

Wet

Wet

7-8-2.2.4" (231F 5-1.3.3) Where dry-pipe systems are used in Heavyweight Class or Mediumweight (;lass storage areas, the are,xs of operation indicated by Tables 7-8.2.2.3(a) and (b) shall he increased by 30 percent. (ROC 13-21)

(ROC 13-21)

7-8.2.2.5 *= (231F 5-1.3.5) High temperature sprinklers shall be used for installationsprotecting roll paper stored 15 ft (4.6 m) or higher. (ROC 13-21)

7-8.2.2.6* (231F 5-1.3.6) Tbe protection area per sprinkler shall not exceed 100 ft 2 (9.3 m 2) or be less dmn 70 ft 2 (6.5 m~). (ROC 13-21)

7-8.2.2 .'P' (231F-5-2.2) Where high-expansion foam systems ,are installed in Heavyweight Class and Mediumweight Class storage areas, sprinkler discharge design densities can be reduced'to not less dlan 0.24 i p m / f t 2 [~(10 Ipm) /m 2 ] wida a minimum operating area of 2000 ftz'(186 m2). (ROC 13-21)

7-8.2.2.8* (231F-5-2.3) Where high-expansion fomn systems are installed in tissue storage areas, sprinkler discharge densities and areas of application shall not be reduced below those provided in Tables 7-8.2.2.3(a) and (b). (RO.,.~x13-21)

.4~':~k.-,. 7-8.2.3 = (231F 5-1.4) Large ~ . , S p ~ ' ~ k l e r s . Where at, tomatic sprinkler system p ro tec t io~-~d l~ . l a rge drop sprinklers, hydraulic design criteria shall be ,~..~"~cifid"~ii.~... ~able 7-8.2.3. Design discharge pressure s h . a : ~ e " ~ psi ('~..-..k. g~). The number of sprinklers to be calcu'l'ff~:a.'s i n d i c a t e ~ ! ~ e d on storage beight, clearance, and system type'::"-"."~..ROC 13~,~')

(See Table 7-8~$~.~:i~..~;0*d.owing pages.) . ~. : : " :~ : : ' - ' . '~ : . -~ : : ,

7-8.2.4" (2.3.~.~ 5 - 1 . ~ F R Spfi'~]ers. Where automatic sprinkler system pr...~'~.on util~..~s. E,.SFR sprinklers, hydraulic design criteria shall be :is s ~ e d in Y..-~..~:~ 7-8.2.4. Design discharge pressure shall,.~&~.i$,pplie~?..'~:..12 o ~ a t i n g sprinklers. (ROC 13-21)

50 3.4 25 7.6 20 6.1 20 6.1 20 6.1 20 6.1 20 6.1

50 3.4 30 9.1 25 7.6 25 7.6 25 7.6 25 7.6 25 7.6

75 5.2 40 12.2 30 9.1 30 9.1 30 9.1 N/A N/A

4~ ~ 30 9.1 25 7.6 25 7.6 25 7.6 25 7.6 25 7.6 2O 1.4

40 12.2 30 9.1 30 9.1 30 9.1 N/A N/A -g6 4-_7- 40 2.8

Tissue

Open All (ft) (m) Arrays

20 6.1 N/A

25 7.6 N/A

N/A N/A

25 7.6 N/A

N/A N/A

750

Page 199: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

%.'..

Table 7-8.2.2.3(a) x Automatic Sprinkler S~,stem Desit~n Criteria - - Spray Sprinklers for Buildings or Structures with Roof or Cei l ln~ up to 30 ft (h~m/ft ~)

"---1 Storage Height (ft)

l0 10 15 15 20 20 25

Clearance (~) <5 >5 -<5 >5 -<5 >5 <5

Closed Array Banded or Unbanded 0.3/2000 0.3/2000 0.3/2000 0.3/2000 0.3/2000 0.3/2000

0.45/2500

Heav~,weisht

Standard Arra~, Open Arrant Closed Array Banded or Unbanded Banded

Mediumweight

Standard Array

Unbanded Banded Unbanded 0.3/2000 0.3/2000 0.3/2000 0.3/2000 0.3/2000 0,3/2000 0.3/2000 0.3/2000 0.3/2000 0.3/2500 0.3/2500 0.3/3000 0.45/3000 0.45/3500

Banded Unhanded 0.3/2000 0.3/2000 0.3/2000 0.3/2000 0.3/2500 0.3/3000 0.3/3000 0.3/3500 0.45/3000 0.45/3500 0.45/3500 0.45/4000 0.6/2500 0.6/3000

0.3/2OOO 0.3/2000 0.3/2000 O.3/20O0 0.3/2000 0.3/2500 0.45/3000

0.3/2000 0.3/2000 0.3/2000 0.3/2500

0.45/2500 0.45/3000 0.6/3000

0.3/2000 0.3/2000

0.45/2500 0.45/3000 0.6/2500 0.6/30OO

O.75/25O0

Open Array Banded or Unbanded 0.3/2000 0.3/2000 0.45/2500 0.45/3000 0.6/25O0 0.6/3000 0.75/2500

T ~ s u e

AUStorage Arrays

0.45/2000 0.45/2500 0.60/2000 0.60/3000 0.75/2500 0.75/3000

Note 1

I

¢,D

O

NOTE l: NOTE 2:

Sprinkler protection requirements fol" tissue stored above 20 ft have not been determined. Densities or areas, or both, shall be permitted to be interpolated between any 5-ft storage height increment.

Page 200: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

-.3"

Storage Height ( m )

3.1 3.1 4.6 4.6 6.1 6.1 7.6

NOTE 1: NOTE 2:

Clearance (m) -<1.5 >1.5 <1.5 >1.5 <1.5 >1.5 <1.5

Table 7-8.2.2.3(b) ~ Automatic Sprinkler S~stem Desii~$n Criteria - - Spray Sprinklers for Bnildin~s or Structures with Roof or Ceilings up to 9.1 m [(Ipm)/m ~]

Heavyweight Medlnmweiight Tissue

Closed Array Banded or Unbanded 12.2/185.8 12.2/185.8 12.2/185.8 12.2/185.8 12.2/185.8 12.2/185.8 18.3/232.3

Standard Arra~

Banded Unbanded 12.2/185.8 12.2/185,8 12.2/185.8 12.2/185.8 12.2/185.8 12.2/185.8 12.2/185.8 12.2/185.8 12.2/185.8 12.2/232.3 12.2/232.3 12,2/278.7 18.3/278.7 18.3/325.2

Opet

Banded 12.2/185.8 12.2/185.8 12.2/232.3 12.2/278.7 18.3/278.7 18.3/325.2 24.5/232.3

Ar~a~,

Unb anded 12,2/185.8 12.2/185.8 12.2/278.7 12.2/322.2 18.3/325.2 18.3/371.6 24.5/278.7

Closed Array Banded or Unbanded 12.2/185.8 12.2/185.8 12.2/185.8 12.2/185:8 12.2/185.8 12.2/232.3 18.3/278.7

Standard Array

Banded 12.2/185.8 12.2/185.8 12.2/185.8 12.2/232.3 18,3/232.3 18.3/278.7 24.5/278.7

Sprinkler protection requirements for tissue stored above 6.1 m have not been determined. Densities or areas, or both, shall be permitted to be interpolated between any 1.5-m storage height inoement.

.............. ~ .... .i~!~i~!~: .:~i!~ ....

Unbauded 12.2/185.8 12.2/185.8 18.3/232.3 18.3/278.7 24.5/232.3 24.5/278.7 30.6/232.3

Open Array Banded or Unbanded 12.2/185.8 12.2/185.8 18.3/232.3 18.3/278.7 24.5/232.3 24.5/278.7 30.6/232.3

All Storage Arrays

18.3/185.8 18.3/232.3 24.5/185.8 24.5/278.7 30.6/232.3 30.6/278.7

Note 1

I c,D

O

Page 201: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

Storage Height Clearance (h) (R) (m) (m)

'20 6.1 <10 < 3.1 20 6.1 <10 < 3.1 26 7.9 < 34 <10.4 26 7.9 < 34 <10.4

Table 7-8.2.3" Automatic

Closed Array

Banded or S~'stem T~pe Unbanded

W 15 D 25 W 15 D N / A

W = wet; D = dly; N/A = not applicable. For definition of storage height, see Section i..4. NOTE:

q$x L,o

Heav~weil~ht

Standard Arra~, Open Array

Banded Unbanded Banded I Unbanded t5 15 z5 [ N / A ~5 25 N / A [ N / A 15 15 15 I N / A

N / A N / A N / A J N / A

25 large drop sprinkMrs @ 75 psi (5.2 bars) for closed or standard array; other arrays N/A.

"::?.% . . . . . . :~

(number of

Medlumwei~ht Closed Array

Banded or Unbanded

15 25

N / A N / A

S ~ n d ~ d A r r ~

Banded Unbanded 15 15 25 25

N / A N / A N / A N / A

Ope .~rray

Tissue

All Storage Banded Unba~dpd Arrays

N / A N / A See Note N / A N / A N / A N / A N / A N / A N / A N / A N / A

p.t O0

I

Page 202: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

7-8.3 ~ (231F-5-3) Water Supplies. (ROC 13-21)

7-8.3.1 ~ (231F 5-3.1) The water supply system for automatic fire protect ion systems shall he d e s i g n e d f o r a m i n i m u m dura t ion of 2 honrs. (ROC 13-21)

Exception: For ESFR sprinklers, the water supp(~ duration shaU be I holt~.

7-8.3.2 ~ (231F 5-3.2) At least 500 gpm (1893 Ipm) shall he added to the spr inkler d e m a n d for large and sm,'dl hose s tream demand . (ROC 13-21)

Exce.ption: For ESFR sprinklers° the hose stream allowance shall be for 250 f.~m (947 lpm).

7-8.3.3 * (231F 5-3.3) The water supply design shall include the d e m a n d of the auton~atic spr inkler system plus the hose streana d e m a n d plus. where provided, the high-expansion foam systeur. (ROC 13-21)

7-8.4 ~ (231F-5-4.1) Small Hose. For first aid fire f ighdng and mop up operations, small bose [1 1 /2 in. (38 mm)] shall be provided in accordance with Section 5-15.5. (ROC 13-21, 13-182)

7-9 (13-5-3) Special Design Approaches. (ROC 13-161)

7-9.1 (1",-5-3.1) General . All special design approaches utilize the hydraulic calculation procedures of Section 8-4, except ,as specified. (ROC 13-161)

7-9.9 (i',-5-3.2) Residential Sprinklers. (ROC 13-161)

7-9.2.1" (13-5-3.2.1) Sprinkler discharge rates shall b e p r o v i d e d in accordance with m i n i m u m flow rates indicated in individual residential sprinkler listings, both for the single sprinkler discharge and the mult iple sprinkler discharge of the design sprinklers. (ROC 13-161)

Table 7-9.4.1.1 ( M-Table 8-1)

C o m m o d i t y

Conf igura t ion Clgss

Palletized I, II, or Ill

Palledzed IV

Pall etized

M a x i m u m Storage Height

Palletized

Car toned or exposed unexpar~ded plastics

Car toned or exposed expanded plastics

Palletized Idle wood p,-dlets

Solid Pile I, II, or Ill

Solid Pile IV

f t m

25 7.6 35 . ~ ..... "::!'.4"-i!!;i...: ~ :~":':'%::, ~

20 6.1 . . : ~ i i i : : 9 A "%! ~ : : i i!-~:':!~::~ - - - - 20 NA

20 6.L..~I" ":~~:::::"~ii~:.~}:.ii Wet 25 Dry NA

,:,:" "':::.':-':-':::. 4"i:;:" ":':"

18 ~-ii::., 26 7.9 Wet Dry

.:.:::."

Solid Pile "Car toned or exposed unexpanded plastics

Note: NA - - Not Allowed. (ROC 13-159)

7-9.2.2* (13-5-3.2.2) The design area shall be that area that i n d u d ~ the 4 hydraulically most demand ing sprinklers. Calculations shall be provided to verify the single (1) operat ing sprinkler criteria and the multiple (4) operat ing sprinkler criteria. (ROC l g l 6 1 )

7-9.2.3 (13-5-3.2.3) Where areas such ,as attics, b;Lsements, or other types of occupancies are outside of dwelling units but withiti the same structure, these areas shall be protected in accord.race witl~ the provisions of this s tandard, including appropr ia te design criteria of 7-2.3. (ROC 13-161)

7-9.2.4 (13-5-3.2.4) Hose stream d e m a n d and water sup[~ly durat iou requ i rements shall be in accordance with ti~ose for Ligm Hazard Occupancies in Table 7-2.3. (ROC 13-161)

%9.3 (13-5-3.3) Quick-Response Early Suppress ion (QRES) Sprinklers. (ROC 13-161) (Reserved) (See 1-4.5.2 and A-I~ t. 5.2.)

7-9.4 (13-5-3.4) Large-Drop Spr inkle~. (ROC 13-161)

7-9.4.1 (13-5-3.4.1) Large<lrop sprinklers sh~dl be permitte,!, to protect ordinary hazard, storage of CkLss I th rough IV commodit ies , plastic commodit ies , miscellaneous storage, and o ther storage as specified in Sections 7-5, 7-6, and 7-8 or by o ther I '~PA standards. (ROC 13-159..).¢#:':":'i"i'~: .....

7-9.4.1.1 (231-8-1.1) P r o t e ~ ' ~ : i ! ~ a l l e t i z e d and solid piled storage of Class I to IV, unexpaa¢[~ , pl~:~ii~.nd expanded p l~ t i c commodit ies shall be ~ii~cd~danc~!~fl t . : . 'Tahle 7-9.4.1.1. (ROC 13-15 9 ) "::'::" ":'::'~i'::.. "%:# ....

- : ~ # ~ i ~ i ~ i ~ ! % : : " :.. ~ ~ ' .....

~ : : I ~ b e~..~.~.CgilOi::'S p ri n kl e r s ~:.b y"'~.~./m u ~:'-'-:'.'~ e :~ rating

M a x i m u m ..:~:!i. ::'~:.-i I i ~ r e ~ . . . . . . .uildin ::,: . . . .

Height ~i~:9...f ,#:;.~u~e ~.,.¢-~::~ "::i~{~.:.:~::..~ ~

ft m ~:# f . -"~yste~ ::_..25 (1.7) 50 (3.4) 75 (5.2)

15 15 25 25

Water Hose Stream Supply D e m a n d Duration

gpm L / m i n hr

500 1900 2

15 15 500 1900 NA NA - - - -

20 6.1 30 9.1 Wet Dff

20 6. l 30 9.1 Wet Dry

20 6.1 30 9,1 Wet Dry

20 6.1 30 9.1 Wet Dry

15 15 500 1900 NA NA - - - -

2

2

NA 15 15 500 1900 2 NA NA NA - - - - - -

15 15 15 500 1900 1 1 /2 25 2.5 25 - - - - - -

500 1900 1 1 /2 15 15 15 25 25 25

NA 15 15 NA NA NA

500 1900 1 1 /2

NA 15 15 500 1900 NA NA NA - - - -

1 1 /2

754

Page 203: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 - - A 9 9 R O C

7-9.4.1.2 (231C-9-1.1) P r o t e c t i o n of Single , D o u b l e a n d M u l t i p l e row rack s to rage w i t h o u t so l id she lves for Class I to IV, u n e x p a n d e d p las t ic c o m m o d i t i e s sha l l be in a c c o r d a n c e wi th T a b l e 7-9.4.1.2. ( R O C 13..159)

Table 7-9.4.1.2 (251C-9-1.1, 2~1C-9-1.4) Large-Drop Sprinkler Design Criteria for Single-, Double-, and Shelves

Maximum Maxim um Ceiling/

Storage Roof Number of Design Sprinklers by Height Hei~bt Minimum Operafin~ Premature [psi (bar)]

Commodity Type of Class ft in ft m System 25 (1.7) 50 (3.4) 75 (5.2)

Hose Stream Demand

gal/mi L/min D

I, II 25 ~/.6 30 9,1

l, II 30 t, l 35 10.7

I, II, IIl 20 6, I 30 9. I

I, II, II1 25 7.6 35 10.7

IV 20 6.1 30 9.1

1V -2-9 5.1 ~ - 25 35

20 6.1 30

Wet 20 20 20 Dr}' 30 30 30

Wet 20 plus one 20 plus one 20 plus one 500 level of in-rack level of in-rack level of in-rack

sprinklers sprinklers sprinklers Dry 30 plus one 30 plus one 30 plus one 500

level of in-rack level of in-rack level of in-rack sprinklers sprinklers sprinklers ., :!:?...

..::!::':"

W e t 15 15 15 ..::i{i~ii::.. "~':~0 , rr 25 ~'5 ~.::+ii::~ "%:i:~

-.:-. :::-'-'-. i';;"-'.-:-::-. gill q

We, l ~ p, us one 15 p, us one ~._+++++"~s+"':" ':':'o~ .... ~ " " ..:-':- level of in-rack level of in-rack le(;+t o~'.~-rack ":~#::"

sprinklers sprinklers spr in ld i~ ........-::--

Dry 25 plus one 25 plus one .~2+~.:':'.~.:~-~i~+j).::. 500 level of in-rack level of in-rg~l( "::~..~...yel"6PTff;'~'~:i~i

sprinklers s 0 r i n kl ea.~'.:'-"." . . . . . i',~,rin Iders / . $.IDjLL" q:'Z:::,.....::.

Wet NA 20 "::~i::iiii.':-"i::.. :.:~::~ 500 Dry NA c ; : ~ :, "":":{~,}i:;; ," "~'~.

We, N~ .~+;+++++::-+.0 Pt~+~+.+++:. +"~..#i5 p,us one 9.1 . . . . +~+i~:+P+/;~++:.: level of in-rack

.-x:~::'{'i:-::. "~'..:~. ers ":': ...... sprinklers Dr}, NA -::#:::"" '"::'i::.::x2i. "":N~::,..-.':i:" - NA

All ".11 Illll. ' . 'f

9.1 We~ ~"'::%-....'#~'+: ~::~ 20 500 Dry .... +++++.A .... "iSiS+if:. . NA NA

4.::-: "::::::::::":+:.. __ :.:+:.:.:::::::::::" "::-:'.:.-.:.. ":::" 7.6 Wet " % + : ' ¢ ~ : ~++> i~ 15 m0

~+++-ii}+:: ":%{+~ .+:iV ++ .... NA NA

10.7 i-Si~i~i~i::.Wet 5!:; ::::... .."~. ~ : : " 30 plus one level 20 plus one 500 ": i::-':;++'?'+~':'J~ii~:ii':':': ":iiiii+{i!+i+++i++' " of in-rack level of in-rack

sprinklers sprinklers

NA 15 plus one level 15 plus one 500 NA of in-rack level of in-rack

sprinklers sprinklers NA NA

(iartoned or exposed

unexpanded plastics

IV 20 6.1 25

( ,'artoned or 25 7 exposed

unexpanded plastics

IV 25 7.6

Cartoned or 20 6.1 exposed

unexpanded plastics

IV- 25 7.6

Carmned or 25 7.6 exposed

unexpanded plastics

35

..z::::::::+.

3 0 ~::':':!i~i~-]'~. Xi i Ii'~':'" W e t "::':i~:

Dry -::..: }..-.....:...::..-.:.

..ii-

25 7, 6 ,I:" We t Dry

NA 15 15 500 NA NA NA

30 9.1 Wet NA 15 plus one level 15 plus one 500 of in-rack level of in-rack sprinklers sprinklers

364) 9.1 D ry NA NA NA

500 1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900

1900"

1900

1900

i i ~ i S c " i : 3 : i s " ~ ...........

Wat.~r Supply

Duration

(hr)

1 1/2

1 1/2

I 1/2

l 1/2

1 1/2

1 1/2

7 5 5

Page 204: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

7-9.4.1.2.1 (231C-9-1.5) For rack storage, a min imum of 6-in. (152.4-mm) longi tudinal fit.re spaces shall be main ta ined in addi t ion to transverse flue spaces. (ROC 13-159)

7-9.4.1.2.2 (231C-~1.9) Where in-rack sprinklers are required by Table 7-9.4.1.2, in-rack spr inkler spacing, design pressure, and hydraulic calculation cri teria shall be in accordance with die requii-ements of Section 7-4 as applicable for tile commodity. (ROC 13-159)

7-9.4.2 (13-5-3.4.2,231C-8-2.1) Protect ion Criteria. (ROC 13-159)

7-9.4.2.1 (13-5-3.4.2.1,231C-8-2.1) Protect ion shall be provided as specified in Tables 7-9.4.1.1 and %9.4.1.2~ Section 7-6, Section %8 or appropr ia te NFPA standards in terms of m i n i m u m opera t ing pressure and tl~e n u m b e r of sprinklers to be included in tile design area. (ROC 13-159, 13-161)

7-9A.7 (13-5-3.4.7,231-8-2.2, 231-8-2.3) Hose stream d e m a n d and water supply dura t ion requ i rements sh~il be in accordance with drose for extra hazard occupancies in Table 7-2.3 or Table 7-9.4.1.1 and Table 7-9.4.1.2, whichever applies. (ROC 13-159, 13-161)

(ROC 13-159)

(ROC 13-159, 13-161)

7-9A.8 (231-8-2.4, 231C-9-1.2) Where large drop sprinklers are installed unde r open wood jois t construct ion, flreir m in imum opera t ing pressure shall be 50 psi (3.4 bar). (ROC 13-159)

Exception: Where each joist channel of open, wood joist construction is ~,lb fire stopped to its fidl depth at intervals not exceeding 20 f l (6.1 m). the lower pressures specified in Table 7-6.4.1.2 shall be permitted to be used. (ROC 13-159)

7-9.4.2.2 (13-5-3.4.2.2) Tile m in im um n u m b e r of design sprinklers for ordiimry hazard arid miscellaneous storage in accordance wifl~ this s tandard shall be 15 for wet pipe a n d p r e a c t i o n systems and 25 for double interlock preact ion systems a n d d r y pipe systems. For o ther storage configurations, tl~e n u m b e r of design sprinklers shall be in accordance with Section 7-6, Section 7-8 or o ther NFPA standarcL°,. (ROC 13-159)

7-9.4.9 (231-8-2.6, 231C-9-1.7) For the purpose of using Table 7- 9.4.1.1 and Table 7-9.4.1.2, preact ion systems shall be classified ,as dry pipe systems. (ROC 13-159)

Exception: Where it can be demonstrated that the detection system activating the preaetion ~stem will cause water to be at the sprinklers

to be treated as when the~ operate, prea~.tion s~stems.,~l~.aU be permitted wet-pipe ~stems. (ROC 13-199) .,.:#"':':"~":-'~i-,.

7-9.4.3 (13-5-3.4.3) Large~trop sprinkler systems shall be designed " ""~:~'- " such that the m i n i m u m opera t ing pressure is no t less than 25 psi (ROC 13-159) ,..::,.':'i!~F%ii~i!~i~::..

(170 kea). (ROC 13-161) ,~iii" ":"~ii~: "%~:.~::.,::~i:. 7-9.4.4 (13-5-3.4.4) For design purposes, 95ps i (650 kPa) sbMl be the max imum discharge pressure at tire hydraulically most remote (ROC 13-161) ":!:"'~iii!~!::..

4 i ~ I

sprinkler. (ROC 13-159) ~::::::.: ......... -.::::.. 7-9.4.10 ( 2 $ 1 ~ ~ . . e e l shall no t require special

7-9.4.5 (13-5-3.4.5) The desigti ,area shall be a rectangular area protect ion ~ e r e T'~t~.lte 7-9.4.1 .i" "and Table 7-9.4.1.2 is applied. having a d imens ion parallel to die b ranch lines at least 1.2 t imes (ROC I~.~-:.13-161)':"~?~ ..... the square root of the area protec ted by die n u m b e r of sprinklers " "~-'%-::, ":-i"-;:i:'ii::" to be included in tile design area. Any fractional sprinkler shall be (RQ:~i~i~159)"':-::'~j!~:::::.:.:, ,.-:'-i-:'::: inc luded in tile design area. ..::!~.:":"~" "~!~!.-': ":~-'.:~:"

. . ~ 4 . 1 1 {~31C-..9-1.~ i::" A m i n i m u m of 6-in. (152.avmm) 7-9.4.6 (13-5-3.4.6) The nominal d imneter of branch line pipes ~ : t ~ i ~ - s ' ~ a . c e s shall be main ta ined in addi t ion to ( including riser nipples) shall be riot less d lan 11/4 in. (33 ram) ..... .-: : : : : . . tra"~e f J ' ~ a c e s . nor greater than 2 in. (51 ram). ..:..:'#:'~':"'-'~i:. "%~i!i:: . . . . .

Exception No. 1: Starter pieces shall be permitted to be 2 /2 in. (64 m~iii:~::. 2i-':-':":" ..-.-.-'i~-': .... ........ s"%i!.~i:~-: (ROC 15-161)

Exception No. 2: Where branch lines are larger than 2 in. (51 m.....~}'~?".:'.~.e ~:;':':"-"~i::~i . . . . . sprinkler shall be supplied by a riser nipple to elevate the spr~gOi?z,r ]3"~n. "',:iIi~5 * (13-5-3.5 231-9, 231C-10) Early Suppression Fast-Response (330 ram)for 21/z-in. (64-ram) pipe and 15 in. (380 mm) f~!~.in. ":%. :~-- .iiii~'~FR) Sprinklers. ( 76-mm ) pipe. These dimensions are measured from the c e f f t ~ . . 9 ~ . ~ , "::.i':i'!::. "" pipe to the deflector. In lieu of this. sprinklers rna~ be o~.s..¢.t h o ~ l b ' a ::~:" 7-9.5.1 (13-5-3.5.1,231-9-1,231C-10-1) ESFR sprinklers shall be minimum of 12 in. (305 ram). .~2"-::~riii: "%ii~i~:, .#i .... permit ted to protect ordinary hazard, storage of Class I th rough IV

• :~:: ".'.'S'~:'s' "::~-":: commodi t ies plastic commodit ies , miscellaneous storage, and • :::'iiii~iiiii" . . . . i~::ii:-::!::-, ~i.. :Y: other storage ,as specified in Sections %5, %6, and %8 or by other . . . . ::%i-:::i-U" ":'::~:~i!::!:::.::~" NFPA standards. (ROC 13-159)

!iii ........ iiii!iiiii ,," !~!f....:~:: iiiii::i::::~ii:.:.:: "":':::-ii:" 7-9.5.1.1" (231-9-1.1) Protect ion of palletized m~d solid pile storage :': 4:" of class I to IV, u-a~toned or unca r toned u n e x p a n d e d plastic,

====================== car toned expanded plastic and idle wood or plastic pNlets sb~d| be "::::::::::-' in accordance widr Table 7-9.5.1,1. (ROC 13-159)

~:~:::...;~'ii:" (See Table 7-9.5.1.1 on the following page.) ?:

756

Page 205: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 ~ A 9 9 R O C

Table 7-9.5.1.1 (Table 231-9-1.1,231-9-2.2, 231-9-2.3, 13-5-3.5.5) ESFR Protection of Palledzed and Solid Pile Storage

Type o f Storage

Palledzed and solid pile storage

( n o open-top COl I G3.i [/~ FS OF solid she-lws)

(ROC 13-159)

Commodity

I. Ca r toned u n e x p a n d e d plastic 2. Ca r toned exp,~lded plasdc

3. lh ,cm-toned u n e x p a n d e d plastic 4, (:kt~s l, CI,~s [I, ( : l~s IIl, o r ( :lass IV corn modities, encapsula ted or unencapsu la ted 5. Id]e wood o r plastic [:,allets h Car toned or t lncar toned unexparMed p 1,~ t ic

2. ( :l,L~,s 1, ( :las,s II, ( :lass III, or ( :lass 1V commodi t ies , enca~su/a ted o r unencapsu /a ted 3. ld e wood or plastic pallets 1. Car toned or unca r toned u n e x p a n d e d plastic

2. Class I, ( ilaxs If, Class III, or Class IV commodi t i e s , encapsu la ted or unencapsu la t ed 1. Car toned u n e x p a n d e d plastic 2. { :I ~ss I, ( : l~s If, (:lass [11, or ( :t,3-s~ IV commodi t ies , ..::i~ ~: e ~ca ~sula ed o r u / e n c a )sutat¢~::::: " " I ' ' - ] " ..~:.::::::::::..

-.::::::::::. -::::::::::..

Maximum l]eight of Storage

ft m

25 7.6

35 10.7

35 10.7 .<::" .::.::..

.-.-:i-ii ii:: % . 1

• ;"i::" "::i:i:i%'_ ~:i.% 1 20 "::~!?.-i~.~/" % ....

..... ~.':.?.::::.... ~ 1 ..... ~i-:~i; ." .:~U::

'"~{ii~ ........ 10.7 .-:..~-;::-

* ~ ~22

Maximum Ceiling/Roof

Height of Buildln~

ft m

30 9.1

Nominal K- Factor

13 .5 - 14.5

# 6 , %,,, 40 12.2 13.~:'~-:~.4., 5 .:5!~:"~5

:?'3::'.v.':;:: !:...-"~-.. 45 ~: 13.7 7.-".'~i:='I3.5- 14.5 90

"%% "" 7.6 11 .0 - 11.5 50

::i#':" 30 9.1 24.2 - 26.2 20

35 I0.7 24.2 - 26.2 30

40 12.2 24.2 - 26.2 40

45 13.7 24.2 - 26.2 50

Sprinkler Design Pressure

x:iii::..

:: :.:x

.:?::

~:sx ":i x:::..

...... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

5.2

27.4

3.4

1.4

2.1

2.8

3.4

Hose Stream

Demand

250 gpm ::f:" (946

L / r a in )

250 gpm (946

L / r a in )

250 gpm (046

L / m l n )

250 gpm (946

L / rn in )

Duration

I h___L

l h r

l h r

7 5 7

Page 206: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

7-6.5.1.2 (231-10-1,1) P r o t e c t i o n of Single , D o u b l e a n d Mul t ip le - Row rack s t o r age of class I to IV, c a r t o n e d or u n c a r t o n e d u n e x p a n d e d plast ic , c a r t o n e d e x p a n d e d plas t ic a n d id le w o o d or p las t ic pa l le t s sha l l be in a c c o r d a n c e wi th Tab le 7-9.5.1.2. ( R O C 1.9,-159)

Excq~tion." ESFR protection as defined shall not appl~ to the following:

a. Rack storage involving solid shelves

k Rack storage involving combustible, open-top cartons or containers (ROC 13-159)

Table %9.5.1.2 (Table 231C-10-1.1,231C-10-3.1, 231C-10-3.2, 13-5-3.5.5) ESFR Protection of Rack Storage without Solid Shelves

Maximum Height of

Storage

Type of Commodi ty ft m Storable*

Single-row rack 1. Cartoned 25 7.6 unexpanded plastic

storage, 2. ( :artoned expanded plastic

double-row 3. Exposed unexpanded plastic

rack storage, 4. Classes 1, II, III, multiple-row and IX I rack storage commodities.

encapsulated or unencapsulated 5. Idle wood ,and pl~t ic pallets t. Cartoned or 35 10.7 exposed unexpanded plastic 2. Cl,',,s~s I, II, III, ,and IV corn modl ties, encapsulated or unencapsulated 3. Idle wood and plastic pallets 1. Cartoned or exposed ,::::::! unexpanded ---:f'" plastic ":':" 2. <;l,'~s~s I, II, Ill, 35 ":Jlff:~!i}i::.. and IV ":':':':':" con, modities. 4~# :=i:: !~'i!ii~.~..2 ":£}~ encapsulated or ...,.., unencapsulated "i'~:i:~J{ii:: . . . . {{::" " "???'-i.r?" I. Cartoned, 2ff'::?!iii :i!::" 6.1 unexpanded p~asti< 25 i~':v:&;6;: 2. elm, s I. II, IlL or IV 30 9.1 commodities, encapsulated or 35 10.7 unencapsulated

*No open-top containers (ROC 15-159)

40 12.2

Maximum Cei l ing /Roof

Height of Building

f~ m

30 9.1

40 12.2 13.5 .~.£~:',t.5 ":~i

:i~-iii!::::: . . . . . . . . . . .

"?" ";'i:i:ij . .ij~'fi'i:h. !~]i:,.

1 3 5 - 1 4 . 5 .. iii} ~:: !}}.-::..45 ... 13.7 13.5 - 14.5

-:p- 25 7.6 11.0 - 11.5

30 9.1 24.2 - 26.2

35 10.7 24.2 - 26.2

40 12.2 24.2 - 26.2

45 13.7 24.2 - 26.2

Sprinkler Design

Pressure In-Rack

Nominal Sprinkler K-Factor psi bar Requirements

13.5 - 14.5 50 3.4 No

Li{ii f'::'~'~.:::.:.

4.~i: t::.. "% .... .-'-'~-~ii.¢~.:i:. "-':.:.:.:.::.. .:::-"

..::.:.:~:" .<:-.. •.. ~...:..

%1 "%: :.::::." 75

i ~ i ":J::"

:~ ::"

90 27.4 No

90 2Z4 Yes

50 3.4 No

20 1.4 No

30 2.1 No

40 2.8 No

50 3.4 Mo

Hose Stream

Demand

250 gpm

(946 L/m in )

250 gpm (946

L/rain)

250 gpm (946

L/rain)

250 gpm (946

L/m in )

D~lration

1 hr

1 hr

1 hr

1 hr

758

Page 207: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

7-9.5.1.2.1 (231C-10-2.5) Where required byTab le 7-9.5.1.2, one level of 17/32-in. orific{, quick response, ordinary t empera tu re in- rack sprinklers shall be installed at the tier level closest to but no t exceeding 1/2 of tile m. tx imum.s torage height. In-rack sprinkler hydraulic design criteri:~ shall be the most hydraulically remote eight heads at 50 psi (3.4 har). In-rack sprinklers shall be located at the intersect ion of the longitudinal and transverse title space. Horizontal spacing shal no t be permi t ted to exceed 5-ft intervids, (ROC 13-159)

7-9.5.1.2.2 (231C-10-4.1) Where ESFR sprinklers are installed, see 7~1.1.3 regard ing special rules fl)r longi tudinal title spaces in doulde row racks. (ROC 1"~-159)

(ROC 13-159, 13-161)

7-9.5.1.3 (13-5-3.5.2) E~';FF [ sprinklers shall be permi t ted to be used in o ther specific hazarc classifications and configurat ions only when proven by lm-ge scale or od]er suitable fire testing. (ROC 13- 159)

7-9.5.2* (231-9-1,231-9-2, 231C-10-2, 231C-I0-3) General Protection Criteria. (ROC 13-159)

7-9.5.2.1 (13-5-3.5.3) ESFR sprinkler systems shall be des igned such that the min inmu- opera t ing pressure is no t less than that indicated in Table 7-9.5.1.1, Table 7-9.5.1.2, Section 7-6, or Section 7-8 for type of storage, commodity, s torage height , and bui lding height involved. (ROC 13-159)

7-9.5.2.2 (13-5-3.5.4,231-9-2.1,231C-10-2.1) T he design area shall consist of the most hydraulically d e m i m d i n g ,area of 12 sprinklers, cousist ing of 4 sprinklers on each of 3 branch lines. Design shall include a m i n i n m m of 960 sq ft (89 m~). (ROC 13-161)

7-9.8t Fire Protection of Steel Columns within Storage Racks. [231C-3-2.3(b), (c) and (d)] Where sprinkler protect ion of building co lumns within the rack s t ructure or verticle rack memb er s suppor t ing tl~e bui ld ing are requi red in lue of fire proofing, sprinkler protect ion in accordance wid~ one of the following shall be provided: (ROC 17,-161)

(a) Sidewall sprinklers at tile 15-ft (4.6-m) elevation, po in ted toward one side of the steel co lumn.

(b) Provision of ceiling sprinkler densi ty for a m i n i m u m of 2000 f~z (185.9 m z) widl 165°F (74°C) or 286°F (141°C) rated sprinklers ,as shown in Table 7-9.8(b) for storage he ights above 15 ft (4.6 m), up to and including 20 ft (6.1 m). (ROC 13-161)

(c) Provision of large d rop or early suppress ion fast response (ESFR) ceiling sprinkler protect ion in accordance with 7-9.4 and 7- 9.5, respectively. (ROC 13-161)

Table 7-9.8(b) Ceiling Sprinkler Densit ies for Protection of Steel . Building Columns

Aisle Width Commodity Class 4 ft (1.22 m) 8 ft (2.44 m)

,gpm/f t ~ [ (L / s l /m~ ] I 0.37 0.33 II ..:.. 0.44 0.37 I I I ..::~{!~!::!i!~::0.49 0.42 W a n d Plastics .:::';:i-~ . . . . ~'68 0.57 NOTE: For aisle widths of .4:.iff'f'~::i~. ft (1.22 m to 2.44 m), a direct linear interpolatio:p':i~."..e..twe'~ii~:ensities may be made.

....-?i!: '::ii::. ':::iiiiii::. . 7-9.8.1 ~ (231D-2-1.2) - ~ e r ' ~ I ' i r e s . " ~ . ¢ ~ fire proofing is no t provided, steel co lumns s'[{~] be pro ..m...~ed ,as follows: (ROC 13-

161) .: :f':'~i}~ ~i--i~::i::!~}i~..:_~ ---ii_::." "

(a) Storag.~ii~:xcee~'.~. g l'5"¥t':'t:f~:ri~,gh 20 ft (4.6 m th rough 6 m) in (ROC 13-159) height. :::ii~'i"iiik.. "::ii::..

One side:wa[}:'ii~inkler'~lv.~,~-ted to one side of the co lumn at a I5-ft 7-9.5.2.'~ (231-9-1.2, 237 C-10-1.2) M ax i mum bui lding he igh t shall (4.6-n...#.:::~..evel. ':~iiiiiii::ii . . . . . . iiiii?: t,e measu red to the un, terside of die roof deck or ceiling. (ROC 13- (b'J:::~t~ge e x d ' ~ i o g - 2 0 ft (6 m) in height . 159, 13-161) ,.::~'o s i t ' v a i l s p r i ' ~ r s , one at die top of the c o h n n n arid file

.::~-"i~.e:y ,af:!~i-$.k-~..J'* "{:4.~:nl) level, both directed to the side of the ( RO C 13-159, 13-161 ) .... " c o } ~ ' ~ . . . . . iiii::ii::ii~::~i#'

::-:-::~-~~::U:~::. ' : :~ .... 7-9.5.2.4 (231-9-2.4) ESFR sprinklers shall be l imited to wet-biDe--: :iff-" ":-ii:'-~cepti~ii~'e above protection shall not be required where storage in systems. (ROC 13-159) " .:::~ :::':':-::i:~:iiiii . . . . . . . . ~xed rac.:~f-::~s protected t~ in-rack sprinklers.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,

7-9.5.2.5* (231C-10-1) General . Early suppress ion fast r e , s ~ e .... ?iii::i::i~:: 7-10 Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria for Special Occupancy (ESFR) sprinklers shall be used only in bui ldings equal t~,'~or.le:s:~ "::ii::i{~...~ards. (ROC 13-161) lh:m the he ight of tile bui lding for which they have be.~-list4:~:.. .:. .~ii:: ii::" ROC 13 159 -:::':-::::- :::::- ":::- ":::"7-10 1 (NFPA 30) Flammable and Combustible Liquids See ( . - . . ) .................................... • ( " . ,

• "::!ii!iiiiiii: . . . . .iiiiiii::' NFPA 3 ), Flammable and Combustible Liquids (:ode for sprinkler ROC 13 159 .... ::i:-.::'.::'-':,., "::ii----, ..--i::" system discharge er t e r a per ta in ing to the )rotection offl-mnn'fl~le ( - - - , ) ========================= ".::::::::::.. ,.::::-" " . l . . . .

.... .:i- . . . . . . i::!i::- . . . . . ::::::::::::::::::::: .... and combust ib le liquids. (ROC 13-161)

(ROC 1 "4-161 ) "*:""::ili::iliiii::'- ============================================== ..... 7-10.2 ~ (NFPA 30B) Aerosol Products . See NFPA 30 B, (:ode for the i~iiiiii{ i ...... -~":::--::" Manufacture and Storage o f Aerosol Products, for spr inkler system 7-9.6 (13-g3.6) Exposu"e Protection. ...?::..

.... i¢ . . . . . . . . i-::ii::i '::i-iii::-:i::.:..-.:ii:. 7-9.6.1 * ( 13-5-3.6.1 ) Pipi ng shall b e . : : ~ r a u li (~itly col c l i ~ e d in accordance with Section fi-4 to fuf:i'~]'s~i~':U~iHmm off i~) ps (48 kPa) at any sprinkler ~ith all sl)rinklers"~'~Jng, .......- _ the exposure o t mrating. ":~ii!iiii::-...:::. ======================= ....

7-9.6.2 (13-5-3.6.2) Where tile water snpply ~ ' ( t s o ther fire protect ion systems, it shall be capable of fu rn i sh ing total d e m a n d for such systems its well as the exposure system demand .

7-9.7 (13-5-3.7) Water Curtains.

7-q.7.1 (13-5-3.7) Sprinklers in a water curtain sucll as descr ibed ill 5-13.3.4 shall be byd~ttilically des igned to provide a discharge of 3 gpm per lineal foot [37 ( L / m i n ) / m ] of water curtain, with no sprinklers dischargirig less than 15 gpm (56.8 L/ ra in) . For water curtains employing au !omatic sprinklers, the n u m b e r of sprinklers calculated in this water curtain shall be tile n u m b e r in the length cor responding to the length parallel to the branch lines iri the area de ternf ined by 6-4.4.1 (a). If a single fire can be expected to operate sprinklers within the ~a ter curtain ,and within the design ,area of a hydraulically cMclflated system, the water supply to the water curtain shall be added to the water d e m a n d of the hydraulic calculations and shall be ha lanced to tile calculated area demand . Hydrztu/ic design cxt[cnlalTious shall include a design area selected to include ceiling sprinklers ad jacent to the water curtain. (.gee 5-I ~.16). (13-209)

discharge criteria per ta in ing to the protect ion of aerosol products. (ROC 13-161)

7-10.3 x (NFPA 33) Spray Application Using Flammable or Combustible Materials. (ROC 13-161)

7-10.3.1 See NFPA 33 for appficable terms no t def ined in Chapter 1.

7-10,3,2 *~ (33-7.2.1) Spray Areas and Mixing Rooms. Tile automat ic sprinkler system in spray areas and mixing rooms shall be d e s i g n e d f o r Extra Hazard (Group 2) occupancies.

(ROC 13-214)

%10.3.3* (3.'4-7.2.3) Water supply for sprinklers shall be sufficient to supply all sprinklers likely to open in any one fire incident wi thout deple t ing the available water for use in hose streams. Where sprinklers are installed to protect spray area.s and mixing rooms only, water shall be permi t ted to be fu rn i shed f rom tile domest ic supply, sul-~ect to the approval of the authori ty having jur isdic t ion and provided the domest ic supply can mee t the design criteria for Extra Hazard (Group 2) occupancies

7-10.3.4 ~ (33-15-3) For spray applicat ion are,'~s us ing styrene cross- l inked the rmose t resins ( commonly known as g l ~ s fiber reinforced

7 5 9

Page 208: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

plastics), ;mtomatic sprinkler systems shall be designed for at least ()rdinary Hazard, Group 2 occupancies. (ROC 13-161, 13-214)

7-10.4 (NFPA 36) Solvent Extraction Plants. (ROC 13-161)

7-10.4.1 See NFPA 36 for applicable terms not defined in Cbapter 1.

7-10.4.2 *x (36-2-9*) Spr inkler Systems.

7-10.5" (NFPA 40) Nitrate Film. (13-212)

7-10.8.1 See NFPA 51 for applicable terms not defined in Chapter 1.

7-10.8.2" (51-2.3.1) Where sprinkler systems are required per section 2-3.1 of NFPA 51, ti/ey shall provide a sprinkler discharge density of at least 0.25 gal per minute per sq ft [(10 L / m i n ) / m ~] over a minimum operat ing area of at least 3000 sq ft (88 mZ).

7-10.9 (NFPA 51A) Acetylene Cylinder Charging Plants.

7-10.9.1 See NFPA 51A for applicable terms not def ined in Chapter 1.

7-10.5.1" See NFPA 40 for applicable terms not def ined in Chapter 1.

7-10.5.2" (40-3.1.2) Where rooms containing nitrate film are required to be sprinklered per NFPA 40, tile sprinkler system shall be installed in accordance with the requirements for extra hazard occupancies .

7-10.9.2" (51A-9-2.2) Where an automatic sprinkler system is required per NFPA 51A it shall be an extra hazard open or closed head sprinkler system.

7-10.10 (NFPA 55) Storage, Use, and Handl ing o f Compressed and Liquefied Gases in Portable Cylinders.

7-10.10.1 See NFPA 55 for applicable terms not def ined in Chapter 1.

7-10.5.3 = (40-3-2.2) Sprinkler System Water Supply. Water 7-10.10.2 ~ (55-2-2.2.1) Where an automatic sprinkler system is supplies for automatic sprinklers shall be based on 20 gpm (1.26 required per NFPA 55, the s p r i n ~ system r~rotecting file gas L/see) per sprinkler for 20 minutes for die total number of c~li-aer stor~,,e and for a d i s ~ i ~ 95 ft ~7 6 m~ beyond in all sp~inr~ter~:c~tOt~ag ~rUlt, rPh.,s 25 percent of dae sprmklers m die i ! ~ i ~ . ~ s s q P a ~ 0 1 ~ ~ - ~ ,dienc~lu~diOgt~le

most hydraulically remog.~i"';'~00 ~ i 7 10 6" (NFPA 42) Storage o f Pyroxylin Plasuc (ROE 13-111)

" " " 7-10.10.3 ( 5 5 - 2 - 2 . 2 . 2 ~ e s p r i n k l ~ e m s are provided per NFPA 55, Section 2-2.2.2 ~ p t i o n Ng/. 1, alley shall be designed

7-10.6.1 See NFPA 42 for applicable terms not defined in Cha t t e r for Ordinary ~ ~ . . . / f f ~ . . : ~ : , o c c u p a n c i e s . (ROC 13-194) • - - - ~ ~ .-...'.~ ~ : ~ :':.~ :. t. ,. " "-'::~. """ ": ~ ~:':::::~:-~:--'.::.

7-10.10.4" ~2-2.2?~-).:..~Where sprinkler systems are provided per NFPA 5 5 ~ o n 2-2-~@. Exception No. 2, alley shall be designed

7-10.6.2 Sprinkler System Water Supply. for Ordi/;ar;~d, d~!~ 1 occupancies. (ROC 13-194)

7- I0.6.2.' 1" (42-2-4.3.1 ) The water su pply for ,automatic sprinklers 7:~-"10i~!!( 5 5 - 2 - 2 ' ' ; ~ ' . . : . . . . .,.:..:. . ~ . : ! ~ l e r e sprinkler systems are required, for. gas shall be based on tile number of sprinklers liab e to be affected in ..::.~pder,,~g..ag~.:.r ..ogffns per NFPA 55, they sball proxade density of any fire section between fire walls or fire-resistive partitions. It ' : a~ ' i .~-~31~- : '~! :per sq ft (0.012 m " / m i n / m ~) for any, including shall be :~ssumed that any one of the following numbers of : : ~ ] # l e ' ~ . b y d ' r ~ l ! c a l l y remote, 2,500 sq ft (71 Sm ' ) or the entire sprinklers can be ,affected and dae condit ion giving maximum flow..# ::: "%..'..9. om ~ t ~ v e r ~s smatter. used as a basis: ..::ii'ii~?-i::.. :."ii:: --:::

(a) Al ~[sr nkler in ,a ~tuh, ::::, ":":~ "%$!i.-'~.::::...::...::~:.::#:"~/.10.11 -~'NFPA.. 59) Storage and Handling~ o f Liquefied Petroleum ,::~::':~.':'::..~ ~:.::':~:~:.:::~ Gases at Utiltty Gas Plants.

(b) All sprinklers in a tote-box storeroom. ..::Y"'¢':"::::; ~'~-.-"-::-:~ ..-s~:- (ca Three-fourths of the sprinklers in a f inished stoc~OOn'/~":x .::.. "~.~'0.11.1 See NFPA 59 for applicable terms no t def ined in Chapter

1 (d) All sprinklers in a section of an isolated s t o r a g ~ ' ~ ! ~ : : . ":!ii~!~:: :::" " , ..**i.'..':i ...... ::iiii::i~i~:::. ,#::"

7-10.6.2.2 = (42-2-4.3.2) T b e w a t e r s u p p l y f o r ~ + t i c s p ~ . ~ : " system shall be based on a flow of 20 gpm p..~..'i~rin~.....~.r 20 ~ii:fi with a minimum rate of flow of 500 gpm. ~uc'I"~:~.~.i~th an. effective pressure at the top line of ~ , ~ . . ¢ . r s ' ~ t les~::~an 40 psi. ..::.'-i~i;." .'!:!:: -

..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.. ..:..... ~:~:~::-" 7-10.7 (NFPA 45) Laboratories ~ e ; i ~ : i c a l s .

~ I~

7-10.7.1 See NFPA 45 for applicable te~"::.'.:~.....defined in Chapter

7-I0.7.2" (45-5-2,1.1) An automatic sprinkler system, where required by Table 3-1 (a) of NFPA 45, depend ing on file construction of the building, the hazard class of file laboratory unit, the construction of die laboratory unit enclosure, and die area of the laboratory uni t shall be in accordance wifll file following:

(a) Automatic sprinkler system protection for Class A and Class B laboratories shall bein accordance widl Ordinary Hazard Group 2 occnpancies.

(b) Automatic sprinkler system protect ion for (;lass C and Class D laboratories shall be in accordance with Ordinary Hazard Group 1 occupancies.

7-10.8 (NFPA 51) Oxygen-Fuel Gas Systems for Welding, Cutting, and Allied Processes.

7-10.11.2" (59-10-5.2) Sprinkler System Water Supply. Tile design of fire water supply and distribution systems, if required by NFPA 59, shall be provide for tile simultaneous supply of those fixed fire protect ion systems, including moni tor nozzles, at their design flow and pressure, involved ha die maximum single incident expected in die plant. An additional supply of 1,000 gpm (63 L/s) sball be awailable for hand hose streams for a per iod of not less than 2 hr. Manually actuated monitors shall be permit ted to be used to angmen t hand hose streams.

7-10.12 x (NFPA 59A) Production, Storage, and Handling of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG). (ROC 13-161)

7-10.12.1 See NFPA 59A for applicable terms not def ined in Chapter 1.

7-10.12.2" (59A-9-5.2) Tile design of fire water supply and distribution systems, if required by NFPA 59A, shall provide for the simultaneous supply of dlose fixed fire protect ion systems, including moni tor nozzles, at their design flow and pressure, involved in the maximum single incident expected in the plant plus an allowance of 1000 gpm (63 L/see) for hand hose streams for not less dlan 2 hours.

7-10.13 ~ (NFPA 96) Ventilation Control and Fire Protection o f Commercial Cooking Operat ions. (ROC 13-161)

7-10.13.1 See NFPA 96 for applicable terms no t defined in Chapter 1.

7-10.13.2 ~ (96- 11-7.5) Sprinkler System Water Supply. Solid fuel appliances widl fire boxes exceeding 5 c u f t (0.14 m °) sball be

760

Page 209: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

provided with a fixed water pipe system with a hose in die immedia te vicinity of d~.e appliance. T h e system shall have a u f i n imum operat ing pressure of 40 psi (275.8 kPa) a n d shall provide a m i n i m u m of 5 g p m per c u f t (18.9 L / r a i n per 0.03 m n) o f fire box volume.

7-10.14 (NFPA 99) Class A H y p e r b a r i c Chambers .

7-10.14.1 See NFPA 99 for applicable te rms not def ined in Chapter 1. (ROC 13-196)

7-10.14.2 * (99-19-2.5.2) In chambers tiiat consist of more flaan orie chmnber c o m p a r t m e n t (lock), the design of the de luge system sltall ensure adequate operat ion when tlae chambe r compar tmen t s are at dif ferent dep ths (pressures) . The design shall ,also ensure the indeper iden t or simult~meous operat ion of de luge systems.

7-10.14.3 = (99-19-2.5.2.2) Water shall be delivered f rom the sprinklers as specified ~n 7-10.8.6 within 3 seconds of activation of any affiliated de luge control. (ROG 1,9,-196)

7-10.14.4"" (99-19-2.5.2 3) W]~ere an au tomat ic sprinkler system is provided per NFPA 99. tbe average spray density at f o o r level shall he not less di,'m 2 gpm per square foot (81.5 L / m i n / m e) witia no

7-10.17.3,1" (214-3-2.3.1) U n d e r the fan decks of counterf low towers, doe rate of applicat ion of water shall be 0.5 g p m / f C (20,4

• L / m i n / m ~) ( inc luding fan open ing) .

7-10.17.3.2 (214-3-2.4.2.3) Crossflow towers with a fill area longer than abe m a x i m u m allowable for d ischarge device be ing used shall have discharge devices placed on both sides of the fill a rea in each jois t channel . The pressure at each discharge device shall be adequate to provide protect ion for half of the length of the fill area. (ROC 13-200)

7-10.17.3.3 = (214-3-2.3.2) U n d e r the fan decks of crossflow towers, the rate of applicat ion of water shall be 0.33 g p m / f t z (13.45 L / m i n / m ~) ( inc luding fan opening) .

7-10.17.3.4 ~ (214-3-2.3.3) Over the fill areas of crossflow towers, the rate of applicat ion of water shall be 0.5 g p m / f C (20.4 L / m i n / m ~ ) .

7-10.17.4 = (214-3-2.4.3) Discharge outlets in crossflow towers shall be directional spray nozzles or o ther approved spray devices a r ranged t~ discharge 0.35 g p m / f t ~ (14.26 L / m i n / m ~) directly on the distri]3utio ,and 0.15 g p m / f t z (6.11 L / m i n / m ~) on the unders ide of the fan deck

floor area larger than " square meter receiving less Plan 1 g p m per square foot (40.75 L / r f i n / m e ) .

7-10.14.5 ~ (9%19-2.5.2.4) The re shall be sufficient water available in the deluge system to mainta in doe flow specified in NFPA 99, Section 1%2.5.2.3 s imul taneously in each chambe r c o m p a r t m e n t (lock) conta in ing the deluge system for 1 minute . The limit on

extension. O n towers having ex tended fan decks that do not comple | enclose flae bot water basin, outlets protec t ing d~e fill shall be locate the distr ibution basin ,as set out . i ~ 2 . 4 . 2 of NFPA 214. (ROC 13-20(

.... "i~!: ............. i:::::

7-10.17.5 = (214-3-2.4.4) For. . .~i~-~.systems in crossflow towers us ing directional spray n o ~ e s i u ' : !~ p e n d a n t position, provisions shall be made to prote..~!~h~!!~nde~:~, of...a combust ib le fan deck at a m i n i m u m of 0.15- ' -" :~/f t "~ (6.11 " ~ * ~ , ~ / m e ) , wltich shall be inc luded ,as part of the a p ' ~ t i o n ra.t~'::tpecified in 7-5.15.3. (ROC m a x i m u m ex t ingu i shmen t dura t ion shall be governed by the

c h a m b e r capacity (bilge capacity also, if so equipped) a n d / o r its 13-200) ..::.~...:~:.:.:..::.:.~.:.::.. dra inage system. .!::." ":iii::::'".'.':.:-:.:iG':~:i:illl..':.~.:!i:iii:-:?::..

7-10.17.6"=...~-~14-3-~:".4.,5) On I'~ffti:filled in crossflow towers that have 7-10.14.6 ~ (99-19-2 . . . . . 5 2 i) The deluge .yss tern shall, have, s tored solid, hota~r.:.::. -.:.:-:.:-" basita-":~.overs, over fl~e complete, bas, n, the d scb-~, ge pressure to operate fo- at least 15 seconds without electrical b ranch outlets p r o t ~ : ~ g the f l ] ~ - ~ a shall be permi t ted to be located power, unde[.::..t~..e b a s ~ i i ~ v e r s . . ~ e s e discharge outlets shall be open

d i r ~ spra)~::"~#'~" or o tber aoproved devices a r ranged to . . . . . . . . . . . . a~ 1 . . . . . . . . . . . d~izharg~-0.35 g p n ~ (14.26 L / m i n / m ) directly on the t q u . l r J t l~ r re , l ~ - t ,~"lxeo t , umeway l r a n m t ~ystems. " : : ~ - ' b u ~3"-'L/" LasS'to "~nd 0 "5 m - ~ . . . . . . . . z- • 4 : : ~ J . . , ~ - ~ , ~., .~ gp / i t t u . ~ L / m i n i m ) on tne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . u f i ' ~ : i ] e 3:~i~tii~?~vater basin covers. (ROC 13-200) ~?lu. l~. l t e e c~et'~_ ~ ~n for appncao~e te rms not ctennect in ..::::~.:.:. -'.'~:-:i::.,.:.:..:::.. "" .....

Gh,tpter 1. .::~.:.:~ii . . . . . "::ii~-..:'10.1'Jf~---~.,,~'t4-3-2.10.2) Exposure Protection. Systems for exterior 7 ~ o I ~ 9 = t ~ a _ ~ ~ ~an . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ : : - .':'~'rotecti~:'shall be des igned with the same at tent ion and care as - - . ~ . - ~ . - x . o ~ . . ] , , , .~ .~ , . , .~w, , , t tuc spHnraer system is ":: '.':::::::::- :-:-'. • .:.- • . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ".'.:::.'...'.-::...-:.-:: interior systems. Pipe s ,zmg shall be based on hydrauhc l n s u t l l e C t per NFPA 13,~ ,~ectlon o-4, i t s n a i l t)e o i a C l o s e n - u . ~ :"~ ' - : :~- c . ~ u l a t ; . . . ' ~ l l a t ~ . . . . . . h , . ~ h A ; . ~ l ~ . r a ~ ~ a t ~ e l a ~ l h o h - . e ~ A a n .

e l . • / • . ~ . .i;:...~:.,.,l:. "-.~*:*~.***:1o ~ • I ~ l l o . t t t L / O u l ~ f f ' l J t ~ l U u t ~ L l l t ~ L / ~ L L O t / ~ l l O L O t ~ u ~ l ~ t t

type ,or ord inary nazarct cmssmcaUon. ..f:"::"" ."'% x%iiii~.~.~imum 0.15 gpm/f tz ' (6 .11 L / m i n / m e) for ,all surfaces being

7-10.16 ~ (NFPA 150) Race Track Stables. ..::!i::i~iii::. ":'i:ii::i" .... ".'~:.. , : ~ o t e c t e d .

_ . f " j':qiiiii:::ii:.:ili ........... ii:- ~i:.: 7-10.17.8~* (214-3-6) Sprinkler System Water Supply 7-10.16.1 See NFPA 150 for applicable terms not....~...c.$.t~ea iff'-?.{~iii!.-:, ::ii!;::" - "

C'hapter 1. , .-# ............. ~::::i::i~ii "::~:"':'~iii'::-'::::'s~ ¢i .... 7-10.17.8.1 ~ (214-3-6.1) Deluge Systems.

7 t ~ 1 0 c l ~ ) ' ~ d ~ 1 5 c e O ' 4 w ~ t 2 ' O / ~ t n m a t ~ : z P a ? ~ k l e r s ~ ~ ! f f i q e d 7-10.17.8.1.1 *x (214-3-6.1.1) Where a}l cells of a cool ing tower are • , ry :,.-:!~:::.. -:-:-:.,.-. " --;'-:::" protected by a single de luge system, doe water supply shall be

- - , _ , ~U"'''::?~!i~!~': "::iiiiiiii'::....:.. adequate to supply all d iscbarge outlets on that system. 7-10.17 (NFPA 214) 'water-Gooling::.:-~bwers,::.i:?::': "-':'.:?~!'.:.::'~::" . .~'-- ':='-::. . ::::.. ~:::::

7-10.17.1 See NFPA 214 for ap li~bi:~iit~.~ not deft:ned in Ghapter 1.

7-10.17.2 x (214-3-2.2) Types o f Systems. ~:::"::::::"~ i:f!':"

7-10.17.2.1 z (214-3-2.2.1) The counterf low tower design lends itself to ei ther dosed- or open-bead systems. Therefore , wet-pipe, dry- pipe, preaction, or de luge systems shall be permi t ted to be used. A deluge system provides a h igher degree of protect ion wbere water supplies ,are adequa te In climates tha t are subject to freezing tempera tures , a de luge system minimizes the possibility of failure due to pipes freezing.

7-10.17.2.2 ~ (214-3-2.2.2) The crossflow design is such tha t it is difficult to locate spriaklers in tbe mos t desirable spots for both water distr ibut ion and hea t detect ion. Tltis si tuation can be solved by separa t ing these t~o funct ions ,and us ing separate water d ischarge and detect ion systems. T he open-head de luge system does dais and, tberefcre , shall be used in crossflow towers.

7-10.17.3 ~ (214-3-2.3) Min imum Rate o f Application.

7-10.17.8.1.2 x (214-3-6.1.2) Where two or more deluge systems are used to protec t a cooling tower and fire-resistant part i t ions are not provided between the deluge systems, die water supply shall be adequa te to supply all discharge outlets in file two most hydraulically d e m a n d i n g adjacent systems.

7-10.17.8.1.3 *x (214-3-6.1;3) Where two or more deluge systems are separated by fire-resistant partit ions, the water supply shall be adequate to supply all d ischarge outlets in the single mos t hydraulically d e m a n d i n g system.

7-10.17.8.2 *x (214-3-6.2) Wet, Dry, and Preaction Systems.

7-10.17.8.2.1 x (214-3-6.2.1) Where each cell of the cooling tower is separa ted by a fire-resistant parti t ion, doe water supply s/tall be adequate to supply all d ischarge outlets in doe hydraulically most d e m a n d i n g single cell.

7-10.17.8.2.2 *= (214-3-6.2.2) Where fire-resistant partitions are not provided between each cell of a cooling tower, the water supply shall be adequate to supply all d ischarge outlets in doe two most hydraulically d e m a n d i n g adjo in ing cells.

761

Page 210: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

7-10.17.8.3 ~ (214-3-6.3) Hose Streams. Water supplies shall be sufficient to include a min imum of 500 gpm (1892.5 L /min ) for hose streams in addit ion to dae sprinkler requirements.

7-10.17.8.4 ~ (214-3-6.4) Duration. An adequate water supply of at least 2-hour durat ion shall be provided for d~e combination of d~e water supply specified in 7-10.17.8.1 or 7-10.17.8.2, p lus the hose stream demand specified in 7-10.17.8.3. (ROC 13-200)

7-10.18 (NFPA 307) Piers, Terminals and Wharves.

7-10.18.1 See NFPA 307 for applicable terms not def ined in Chapter 1.

7-10.18.2 *~ (307-3-3.3.30.5) Piers and Wharves. Where sprinkler systems are required per NFPA 307, dae sprinklers shall be 12.7-ram (1/2-in.) orifice and shall discharge at a min imum pressure of 85 kPa (12.5 psi). Design area shall be based upon fide I,'u'gest area between fire-stops plus an additional ,area embracing at least two I)ranch lines on opposite sides of the fire-stop. Minimum design area shall be not less th:m 465 m e (5,000 ft~). (ROC 13-202)

7-10.18.3 ~ (307-4-4.2) Terminals. Due to the widely varying nature of commodit ies that might pass through transit sheds, container freight stations, t ransload facilities, and similar buildings used for handl ing and temporary storage of general cargo, min inmm sprinkler design criteria shall be based upon ()rdin,'u-y Hazard ( ; roup 2.

7-10.18.4 ~ (307-4-4.3) If the maximum storage lteight that rite building will permit exceeds 3.7 m (12 ft), the sprinkler system shall be des igned for the requirements for Class IV commodit ies piled to the ntaximum height permit ted by building construction. See Sections 7-3 and 7-4. (ROC13-202)

7-I0.18.5 ~ (307-4-4.4) If racks or shelving are present or likely to be present, the sprinkler system shall be des igned for the requirements for Class IV commodities. Protection in warehouses for the long- term storage of specific commodit ies shall be designed for the specific use. See Sections 7-3 and 7-4. (ROC 13-202)

7-10.21 ~ (NFPA 415) Airport Terminal Buildings, Fueling Ramp Drainage, and Loading. (ROC 13-161)

7-10.21.1 See NFPA 415 for applicable terms not def ined in L:bapter 1.

7-10.21.2 ffi (415-2-5.1) Sprinkler System Design.

7-10.21.2.1" (415-2-5.1.1) Passenger handl ing areas in airport terminal buildings shall be classified as an Ordinary Hazard Group 1 Occupancy for tire purpose of sprinkler system design.

7-10.21.2.2 *~ (415-2-5.1.2) Odaer areas of the airport terminal building shall be classified in accordance Chapter 2, based on ltae occupancy of dae area.

(ROC 13-222)

7-10.21.3 x (415-2-5.5) Sprinkler System Water Supply. Water supply from public or private sources shall be adequate to supply maximum calculated sprinkler demand plus a min imum of 500 gpm (18,93 L /min ) for bose streams. The supply shall be available at fide rate specified for a per iod of at least 1 hour.

7-10.22 (NFPA 423) Aircraft En. .~e Test Facilities. (ROC 13-161) ..::i::"":':::=i::-..

7-10.22.1 See NVP:, 4 ~ for .~. i . .car i '~ terms not def ined in Chapter 1. ..-:#~ "%.::"~::..

7-10.22.2 *~ (423-5-6.3)...4:~ e : ~ n e ~:..:.".~gll,~. the minimum design discharge density shaff'~"~.,50 gpm p~""~ ft (0.34 1 per sec per sq m) of protected area. "::i!::, ...::'~:'-:

7-10.22,3 ~ ( 4 . ~ ? ~ : ~ i i ~ ! ~ $ . e s t cells, water supplies shall be capable of,..~.'.:~eting':':~...e largest de inand at the design rate plus hose stream d . . ~ for a'~.,r.iod of 30 min. Hose stream demand sball be a minimu~"!i.~.f 250 g ~ i ( 1 6 L per see). The Iwdraulic calc.q$..~O a n c [ : ~ : wat~: 'supply shall be based on d~e assumption d ~ t II " ~ i n k l e r g ' : ~ i ! : ~ test cell are operating simultaneously.

~-.'.::'~:.. : :- .-: . . . : , ,:.:: -:ii-::Y23.~.~3.::~'~.3"0) Liquid and Solid Oxidizers. (ROC 13-161)

Exception: Buildings not exceeding 465 m z ~5, O00 f l z) total floor area. ":::i!.".:!ii!::'!i .... ".'~iiiiiii:"::i.i: "~- *3":%~.-10~'~-:t.:. Se..e NFPA 430 for applicable terms not def ined in

7-10.19 (NFPA318) Cleanrooms. ..::~'-~i~" ""~mpte'~-~': ::!::"

7-10.19.1 ,gee NFPA 318 for applicable terms not def ined in .-:.. " ...... !?iiiiiii~.:~:¢::'7-10.23.~';' (430-2-11.3) Only wet-pipe sprinkler systems shall be Chapter 1. ~ - ' - . . N-"i~'iii::,employed for protect ion of buildings or areas containing Class 2 or

.::':'i:: . . . . . . . . " % i ~ s 3 oxidizers. (ROe 13-203) .::#ill. ":i::::i: .. .:::.. ~::" ,,

:¢:"%iiiii::.~..::!ii::i::i::i::ii~ii::. :!iiiiiii:: -:"7-10.23.3 (430-2-11.4) Sprinkler System Water Supplies. 7-10.19.2 *~ (318-2-1.2.1) Automatic sprinklers for d ~ a n r o r ~ ' . g r " .:.".-"!:::::"

7-10.23.3.1" (430-2-11.4.1) Water supplies shall be adecjuate for the protect ion of the oxidizer storage by hose streams and automatic

~Fa rinklers. The water system shall be capable of providing not less an 750 gpm (2840 Lpm) where protection is by means of hose

streams, or 500 gpm (1890 Lpm) for hose streams in excess of the automatic sprinkler water demand.

clean zones shall be hydraulically des igned for a ffC-4i "~..~ of 0 - ~ i . . . . . ::-:: g p m / f C [8.15 ( L / m i n ) / m ~ ] over a design a r ~ i ~ f 3 ~ f C (27ff".~:..:-'~-:-'::"

2 ::::: • ::- . .:: - . :::" m ). -i:%i~jiii ....... i!ii:::~i~iii~i:i::.., ':!i:: ~::

(ROC 13-203) .... .-:i"i%i:::'i~!::.. "%~ii-::,::::"::"

7-10.19.3" (318-2-1.2.5)Automatic ~ . . k l e r ~'~tectio~':~:MI be designed and installed in the plefit:irfi~:~i .Kl...i#~erstitial':gpace above cleanrooms for a density of 0.20 gpm/f=~-!i~~. 15 ( L / m i n ) / m z ] over a design area of 3000 ft 2 (278.8 m~). "%iiiiii ..........

7-10.19.4 *~ (318-2-1.2.6.1) Sprinklers install~::'in duct systems shall be hydraulically designed top rov ide 0.5 gpm (1.9 L /min ) over an area derived by multiplying the distance between the sprinklers in a horizontal duct by the width of fide duct. Minimum discharge shall be 20 gpm (76 L /min ) per sprinkler from fide five hydranlically most remote sprinklers.

7-10.23.3.2 x (430-2-11.4.2) Duration of the water supply shall be a minimum of 2 hr.

7-10.23.4 ~ (430-3-3.2) Class 1 Oxidizers. Class I oxidizers in noncombust ib le or combustible containers (paper bags or noncombust ib le containers with removable combustible liners) shall be designated as a Class 1 commodity;, as a Class 2 commodity where conta ined in fiber packs or noncombust ib le containers in combustible packaging; and as a Class 3 commodity where contained in plastic containers. (ROC 13-209)

7-10.20 (NFPA 409) Aircraft Hangers. See NFPA .409, Standard on Aircraft Hangars, for sprinkler system discharge criteria pertaining to the protection of aircraft hangars. (ROC 13-204)

7-10.23.5 Class 2 Oxidizers. (ROC 13-161)

(ROC 13-204)

762

Page 211: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

7-10.23.5.1 *" (430-4-4.1) Sprinkler protect ion for Class 2 oxidizers sball be designed in accordance widl Table 7-10.23.5.1.

Table 7-10.23.5.1" ('Fable 430-4-4.1) Sprinkler Protection for Class 2 Oxidizers Ceiling

Sprinklers Densit Z Area of Type of Storage g p m / f t z Application Storage Height ft (m) (L/min/m ~) fi~ (m ~)

t 'alletized or 8 (2.4) 0.20 (8) 3750 (348) Bulk [2 (3,7) 0.35 (14) 3750 (348) Rack IL ~ (3,7) 0.20 (8) 3750 (348)

16 (4.9) 0.30 (12) 2000 (186)

In-Rack Sprinklers

One line above each

level of storage except

the top level

7-10.23.5.2 ~ (430-4-4.4) Storage Protect ion wifl~ In-Rack Sprinklers. In-rack sprinklers shall be, designed to provide 30 psi (207 kPa) oil tile hydraulically most remote six sprinklers on each level.

7-10.23.6 Class 3 Oxidizers.

7-10.23.6.1"" (430-5-4.1) Sprinkler protect ion for Glass 3 oxidizers shall lie des igned in accordance with Table 7-10.23.6.1.

Table7-10.113.6.1" (Table 430-5-4.1) Sprinkler Protection for Class 3 Oxidizers

Type of Storage Density Area of In-Rack Storage Height ft gpm/ft ~ Appficadon Sprinklers

(m) (L/min/m ~) fd (m ~)

7-10.24.4" (432-5-5.2) Where automatic sprinkler systems are required for Class I organic peroxide formulat ions in quanti t ies exceeding 2000 Ib (908 kg) in de tached storage, per NFPA 432, automat ic sprinkler protect ion shall be of tile deluge type. (ROC 13-190)

7-10.25 Organic Peroxide Form.M~ons . (ROC 13-225a) ..::i'::"" '":::::::..

%10.25.1 See NFPA 432 f o r . ~ b l e terms not def ined in Chapter 1. . ":i~i!!:." ~'~$~i~.

..::'::- ".::~:!:: "-::~:!::~::..

7-10.25.2 Automatic . ~ k l ~ : r s y s t e ~ . z . - " t h e protect ion of storage of organic peroxide f o r e s t a t i o n s shalt-~'~-ovide dae following discharge densit i~. ~ ...... "::~!.:..q, "-"

Palletized or 5 (1.5) 0.35 (14) 5000 (465) Class I - 0 : . ~ q ~ : " ~ : . ~ ! i ~ m / m i n ) Bulk 10 (3) 0.65 (26) 5000 (465) Class 11 ~-~..40 gpui'~.~...cJ ft (16.3 m m / m i n ) Rack 10(3) 0.35(14) 5000(465) 1 level at Class i i.F~::~ji..~?, gpm/~:..f.t,::.( 12.2 m m / m i n )

midpoint of (-/lass IV - 0~:~ii-gpm/so~i[~::"(10.2 r rml /min) ..:::::--:':i:::']~::.. ":::-::-x . ""

7.= .~ :~25~l le s ~ ' [ : m l l be designed to provide tile required 7-10.23.6.2 ~ (430-5-4.4) Storage Protection with In-Rack Sprinklers. - ~ s i t y d~bx.a 3~00.:i~ ft (280 sq m) area for areas protected by a In-rack sprinklers shall he designed to provide 30 psi (207kPa) on " ~ i . : ~ i ~ ~ "system or 3900 sq ft (360 sq m) "for areas tile. bydraulicallY9 most remote, six sprinklers on each evel. (ROC ..s::..:.:.:::::::::..-.:~t~:':::::::::--- r o'~';::"'~,d bv"~:':~;::y ~ p i p e sprinkler system . . . . " Tile ent ire area of an y 13-20. ) ..:_-:'s-" ":'i~ildii$~.-'..':~.~ss than 3000 sq ft (280 sq m) shall be used as tile area

7-10.23.7 Clag~ 4 0 x i d i z e ~ . .:i:~::::~_::_iii. " ....... :....:i~f a p p l l ~ r n . ..::!iii! .... " : ~ ! " 7-10.26 (NFPA 803) Light Water Nuclear Power Plants. (ROC 13-

%10.23.7.1" (430-6-4.1'~ Sprinkler protect ion for Class 4 o ~ i ~ . : "%i::::ii::161:.) shall be installed on a' deluge sprinkler system to provide::~.~'ate~. "":-%i~Y" density of 0.35 g a l / m i n / f t ~ (14.4 L / m i n / m 2) over the..¢~.r.e s~.a.geS?::.. ~-"ff-10.26.1 See NFPA 803 for applicable terms not def ined in area. :':" ":::-"~#:::':'::::iii:- ]ii!!ii~: ' C h a p t e r 1.

..+:::::::::.:,. ".::::::::::.. :::::.-

7-10.24" (NFPA 432) Storage of Organic P e ~ ; ~ : ' : " ~ m u l a ' t i : : ~ i # U

7-10.24.1 See NVPA 432 for applicable te.r...m.s n '~ne~ i : :~ ! ! : : ! i i~ ( ;hapter 1. ..::#i::::':'::::i'iiiiiiiiii: "::'-..:'~j--~ .........

...-.-.-..iii~i~ iiiii "%1¢ . . . .

7-10.24.2" (432-2-8.2) v~qlere a u t ~ i i . ~ . . . . ~ k l e r sys~:ms are required per NFPA 4~,2 they shall p r o v f ~ . ~ e following discharge d e nsi ties: "':..'.:!i.:i.:.::.::...:-:.~:" Class I organic peroxides 0.50 g p ~ q " ft (20. 4 L p m / m 2) Class II organic peroxides 0.40 g p m / s q ft (20. 4 L p m / m e) Cl:~ss III organic percxides 0.30 g p m / s q ft (20. 4 L p m / m 2) (:lass IV org:mic peroxides 0.25 g p m / s q ft (20. 4 L p m / m 2)

7-10.24.2.1 ~ (432-2-8.1L1) The system shall be designed to provide the required density over a 3000 sq ft (279 m 2) area for areas protected by a wet pipe sprinkler system or 3900 sq ft (363 m ~) for areas protected by a dry pipe sprinkler system. The entire area of any building of less tban 3000 sq ft (279 m z) shall be used ,~s the area of application.

7-10.24.3" (432-2-8.3) Sprinkler System Water Supply. Water supplies lbr automati z spr inkler systems, fire hydrants, etc., shall be ca.pable of supplying :be ant ic ipated d e m a n d for at least 90 m i n u t e s .

7-10.26.2"" (803-11-2) The yard mains shall be looped and shall be of sufficient size to mee t the flow requi rements specified in Section 7-5.21.3.

7-10.26.3 z (803-12-4) Tire water supply for die p e r m a n e n t fire protect ion installation shall be based on the max imum antomat ic sprinkler system demand , with s imultaneous flow of 750 gpm at grade (2835 L/ ra in ) for hose streams and the shortest port ion of the fire loop main out of service.

7-10.27 (NFPA 804) Advanced Light Water Reactor Electric Generating Plants.

7-10.27.1 See NFPA 804 for applicable terms not def ined in Cbapter 1.

, x 7-10.27.2 (804-4-7.2.1) Sprinkler System Water Supply. Tile fire water supply shall be calculated on tile basis of tile largest expected flow rate for a per iod of 2 hr, but shall not be less than 300,000 gal (1 135 500 L). This flow rate shall be based on 500 g a l / m i n (1892.5 L/ ra in) for manual hose streams plus tile largest design d e m a n d of any sprinkler system. The fire water supply shall be capable of delivering this design d e m a n d with the hydraulically least demand ing port ion of tire main loop out of service.

7-10.27.3 x (804-7-4.1) Yard Mains. The unde rg round yard fire main loop shall be installed to furnisla ant ic ipated water requirements . Tile type of pipe and water t r ea tment shall be design considerations, with tubercula t ion as one of the parameters. Means for inspect ing and f lushing tile systems shall be provided.

7 6 3

Page 212: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

7-10.27.4 ~ (804-8-4.2) Cable Tunnels .

7-10.27.4.1 ~ (804-8-4.2.2.1) Automat ic sprinkler systems shall be des igned for a densi ty of 0.30 g a l / m i n / f t z (12.2 L / m i n / m ~ ) for file most remote 100 linear ft (30.5 in) of cable t unne l u p to the mos t remote 2500 ft ~ (232.2 mZ).

7-10.27.4.2 ~ (804-84.2.2.3) r)eluge sprinkler systems or de luge spray systems shall be zoned to l imit file area of protect ion to that which the dra inage system can handle witll any two adjacent systems actuated. The systems shall be hydraulically des igned with each zone calculated with the largest ad jacent zone flowing.

7-10.27.5 *~ (804-8-8.2, 804-8-8.2.1) Beneath Turbine Generator Opera t ing Floor. W h e n automat ic sprinkler systems are provided per NFPA 804 ,all areas benea th the turb ine genera tor opera t ing floor shall be pro tec ted by an au tomat ic spr inkler or foam-water sprinkler system. The spr inkler system benead3 the tu rb ine gene ra to r shall take into considera t ion obst ruct ions f rom structural m e m b e r s and p ip ing a n d shall be des igned to a m i n i m u m density of 0.30 g a l / m i n / f t ~ (12.2 L / m i n / m ~) over a m i n i m u m applicat ion of 5000 ft ~ (464.5 m~).

7-10.27.6 *= (804-8-8.3) Turb ine Genera tor Beatings.

7-10.27.6.1 ~ (804-8-8.4) Lubr icat ing oil lines above the turb ine

A-7-2.1.4 (13-A-5-2.1.3) will be moved to A-5-3.1.3. (ROC 13-161)

A-7-2.2.3 (13-A-5-2.2.3) The addit ional pressure tha t is n eed ed at the level of the water supply to accoun t for sprinkler elevation is 0.433 psi per ft (9.8 k P a / m ) of elevation above tile water supply. W h e n backflow prevent ion valves are installed on pipe schedule systems, tile friction losses of die device mus t be accoun ted for when de t e rmin ing acceptable residual pressure at file top level of sprinklers• The friction loss (in psi) shou ld be add ed to tile elevation loss and die residual pressure at d ie top row of sprinklers to de te rmine the total pressure n e e d e d at the water supply.

A-7-2,3.1.1 (13-A-5-2.3.1.1,231-A-6-2.4) Appropr ia te area/densi ty , o ther des ign criteria, a n d water supply requ i rements should be based on scientifically based eng inee r ing analyses tha t may include submi t t ed fire testing, calculations, or results f rom appropr ia te computa t iona l models .

R e c o m m e n d e d water suppl ies ant icipate successful sprinkler operat ion. Because o f the small bu t s t i l / s igni f icant n u m b e r of uncon t ro l l ed fires in spr inklered propert ies, which have various causes, the re should be an adequate water supply available for fire d e p a r t m e n t use.

....:~'::..

opera t ing floor shall be protec ted with an automat ic spr inkler system covering those areas subject to oil accumula t ion , inc luding the area within the turb ine lagging (skirt). T he au tomat ic sprinkler system shall be des igned to a m i n i m u m densi ty of 0.30 g a l / m i n / f t ~ (12.2 L / m i n / m ~).

7-10.27.6.2 ~ (804-8-8.6) If sllaft-driven venti lat ion systems are used,

A-7-2.3.1.3(b) (13-A-5-2.3.1.~. : :xThis sect ion is inc luded to compensa te for possible ~ y i~.~Beration of sprinklers f rom fires in combust ib le conce~.x~" "~'~ces ? ~ d in wood frame, brick veneer, ordin # u on.

":~%. 3 ..... A-7-2.S.l.3(b) . ~ ~ . . . ) Exception No. 2. Composi te wood joists .~.-~ ~ ~ i d wood joists for tile purposes an au tomat ic preact ion sprinkler system providing a density of 0.30

g a l / m i n / f t ~ (12.2 L / m i n / m ~) over the entire area shall be . . . . . . . . . . . . . of this s e c ~ . Thei '~ . .eb m e m b e r s are too thin ,and easily p rowuea t ~ l.~-~lOJ • p e n e t r a t d t l ~ : ~ e q u a t ~ . . . . : c ~ l p a r t m e n t a fire in an unspr ink le red

space. "::-:.:-"i:!!::.. -~:i~:.:::" 7-10.27.7 ~ (804-8-9.2) Standby Emergency Diesel Genera tors and .,.::~:..':i:~-':::, ":=~::.. .:.i::" Combus t ion Turb ines . Sprinkler arid water spray protect ion -f::'::":-i~..:~ii: "%i~%::iii: systems shall be desigr~ed for a 0 . 25 -ga l / m i n / f t 2 (1-0 .19-L/min/m ~) .g~:~ 3 l~Lh l ~ . t 3 ~ 2 3 1 3/bl l Excent ion No 3 This excent ion denstt over the entare a rea (ROC 13-210) " Y . . . . . :" is"~d:• ~ . . ~ l y only when the exposed materials in the slyace 7 1 0 27 8~ "804-8 22" Fire Pum R o o m ' H o u s e I f s r i n k l e r a n d ~ : ' : " ~ t ' r e ' ~ e d c ~ u s t i b l e m a t e r i a l s ° r t ~ r e r e t a r d a n t t r e a t e d w ° ' ° d ~

- • • t - ) P / • P .<:#-""~'::~iii~fln~'~.:'.:'ilta ~ A 703 Standard for Fire Retardant Impregnated Wood water spray systems ,are provided for fire p u m p houses, they shall ..,.:i~?" " ~ d Fire::~'~"~rdant Co'atincs for Buildin~ Materials

e des igned for a m i n i m u m density of 0.2. g z d / m i n / f t (10.19 ":.:fi:"~)'~i~-:.. ~:~I; .#. " L / r a in f ro ~ ) over the entire fire area. (ROC 13-210) ..:-:. "*-:'~-~.:.~!Y" "

. . . . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .::iJ!~i:i:i:i~!iii~::: .- "%ili::i'i?#. -~,2.3.2.3 (13-A-5-2.3.2.3) Exception No. 1. It is no t the in tent of i - lO.Z l . . [oo4-o-2~at.zj un-t t rect Boilers. apr tngler and ~..~ter spray "":::::'~ ~s" e ' to r "ct se o irk se " k " t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~:,- .:.~. !i-"-'.'~ exc ptaon estn the u f qu - respon s p n n lers tr systeurs snan De a e s l g n e a Ior a m m l m u l n nensl ty o t u.~:::::. ::::::.. "::, .:s' • • • o ~ . ....-..:-:-:-:-. .:.:-:.:.. ,:.x ,:-~-~xtra Hazard Occunanc les but rather to indicate tbat tile areas

a l / m i n / f t " (10 19 L / m i n / m ~) over tile entire area ( K ~ : " ~t:~ "':"" ": r , g . . . . i ' !~i~ " "!:" i.i.iiiii and densit ies shown n Figure 5-2 3 migh t not be appropr ia te for use with quick-response sprinklers in those env i ronmen t s due to a

7-10.28" (NFPA 850) Electric genera t ing P l a n ~ . : . ~ i ~ i g h V ' ~ e A":";::" Direct Cur ren t Conver te r Stations. (ROC 13-.~..~]~) 'i::!i?:i' "::~iiiii!}i i::

7-10.29 *x (NFPA 851) Hydroelectric G e n e r a ' t { ~ i i ~ . t ~ i ~ : ~ ]'3- 212)

.... ..==== . . . . . . . (ROC 13-219) ..:::::.-..::::: . . . . . . . ..ii: "i:!:!:~::"

• :..'::" "" - -ii ~]~ii:=:.#...-:-.:" . . . . !¢ .... (ROC 13-220)

"::i:i:i:i::, ..:.. (ROC 13-221) '~ilili~iii::

7-10.30 *~ (NFPA 909) Fire Protect ion in Places o f Worship. (ROC 13-223)

(ROC 13-223)

7-11 (13-5-4) In-Rack Sprinklers. In-rack sprinklers m, 'mdated by this s tandard shall mee t tile r equ i rements of this section. (ROC 13- 161)

7-I1.1 (13-5-4.1) In-rack sprinklers sllall operate at a m i n i m u m of 15 psi (1 bar).

7-11.2 (13-5-4.2) Water Demand .

7-11.2.1 (13-.~4.2.1) Where one level of in-rack sprinklers is installed, for miscel l :meous storage water d e m a n d shall be based on s imul taneous operat ion of the hydraulically mos t d e m a n d i n g 4 adjacent sprinklers.

Appendix Chapter 7

concern with water snpplies.

A-7-2.3.2.8 Example 1: A dry pipe sprinkler system (OH2) in a bui lding with a ceiling slope exceeding 2 in. in 12 in. Tile initial a rea mus t be increased 30 percent for the dry pipe system and the resul t ing ,area an addit ional 30 pe rcen t for the roof slope• If tile poin t 0.20 g p m per sq ft over 1500 sq ft is chosen f rom Figure 7-2•3, the 1500 sq ft a rea is increased 450 sq ft to 1950 sq ft witicla is daen fur ther increased 585 sq ft. Tile final discbarge criteria is t hen 0.20 gpm per sq ft over 2535 sq ft.

Example 2: A wet pipe spr inkler system (LH) in a bui lding with a ceiling slope exceeding 2 in. in 12 in. employes quick response sprinklers qualifying for the 30 pe rcen t reduct ion p e r m i t t e d b y Section %2.3.2.5. The initial a rea mus t be increased 30 pe rcen t for file ceiling slope and the result ing area decreased 30 percent for quick response sprinklers. It does not mat te r if the reduct ion is appl ied first. I r a discharge densi ty of 0.10 g p m per sq ft over 1500 sq ft is chosen fi 'om Figure 5-2.3, d ie 1500 sq ft is increased 450 sq ft resul t ing in 1950 sq ft whicb is then decreased 585 sq ft. Tlle final design is 0.10 gpm per sq ft over 1365 sq ft.

A-7-2.3.3.1 (13-A-5-2.3.3.1) This section allows for calculation of the sprinklers in tile largest room, so long as tile calculation p roduces the greatest hydraulic d e m a n d a m o n g selection of rooms and c o m m u n i c a t i n g spaces. For example , in a ~ase where tile largest r oom has 4 sprinklers a n d a smaller room has 2 sprinklers but communica t e s througil unpro tec ted openings witll 3 o ther rooms, each having 2 sprinklers, file smaller room an d group of c o m m u n i c a t i n g spaces shou ld also be calculated.

764

Page 213: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

Corridors are rooms and shou ld be cons idered as such.

W:dls can ternt inate 3.t a substantial s u s p e n d e d ceiling and need not be ex tended to a rated floor slab above for this section to be applied.

A-7-3.2.1 (231-A-6.1) q'he following p rocedure should be followed in de te rmin ing the p roper density arm area as specified in 7-3.2:

(a) De te rmine die commodi ty cla~s. (b) Select the density and area of applicat ion f rom Figure 7-

3.2.2.2.1 or Figure 7-3.',!.2.2.2. (c) Adjust d ie reqni red density for s torage he igh t in accordance

with Figure 7-3.2.2.2.3. (d) Increase the ope,-ating area by 30 pe rcen t in accordance with

7-3.2.2.2.4 where a dry-pipe system is used. (e) Satisfy the m i n i m u m densit ies and areas ,as indicated in 7-

3.1.2.1 and 7-3.1.2.2.

Example: Storage - - g ree t ing cards in boxes in cartons on pallets Height - - 22 ft (6.7 tn) Clearance - - 6 ft (1.8 m)

Table A-7-3.3.1 explains a n d provides an example of the m e t h o d and p rocedure to follow in us ing this s t andard to de t e rmine proper protect ion for Group A plastics.

Table A-7-3.3.1 Metric Conversion Factors for Examples To convert from to Multipl}, b~'

feet (ft) meter (m) 0.3048

square feet (ft 2) meter/square (m 2) 0,0920 gal/min (gpm) liter/second (L/s) 0,0631

gal per min/ft 2 (gpm/ft 2) liter per second/m 2 0.679

[(L/s)/m 2 ]

Example I. Storage is expanded-car toned-stable , 15 ft (4.57 m) h igh in a 20-ft (6. l-m) building.

Answer 1. Co lumn E - - design densi ty = 0.45 g p m / f t z [0.31 ( L / s ) / m ~) ].

Example 2. Storage is nonexpanded-uns tab le , 15 ft (4.57 m) high in a 20-ft (6. l -m) building.

Sprinklers - - ordinary t empera tu re System tw)e - - drv ' Answer 2. Co lumn A - - design density is listed ,as 0.25 g p m / f t ~ ~ " " [0.17 ( L / s ) / m ~ ) ] , however, it i . s . : .~ .possible tha t the storage can

1. Classification - - Class III be 12 ft (3.66 m) in tiffs 20-ft....{~l-m~:':'building, wlticb wo u ld 2. Selection of dens i ty /a rea 1 0.225 g p m / f t ~ over 3000 ft z [(9.2 require 0.3 [0.2 ( L / s ) / m 2 ) . ~ # ' ~ . e s s the owner can guaran tee

L / n t i n V m ~ l f rom Fi~lre 6-2 2 2 m a t the storage will always:!~ 15"~.~ii~.4 57 m), the design density = , " . " . " " " . . . ' 2 ..f.::" " : :~: : - ~:::$~:5:-. .3. Ad jus tmen t for '~efght of storage using Figure 6-2.2.4 - - 1.15 × 0 . 3 g p m / f t . ..::~:~:? .% ..::!.::::.:: . . . . .

0.225 = 0.259 g p m / f t 2 t (10.553 L / m i n ) / m ~ ] ; r o u n d e d up to 0.26 ~-:]"!~.-., "" " :~f :~ _ ~pm/ f t 2 [(10 6 L /min t / rn ' 2 l Example 3. Storage is a n d ~ x p a n d e d ~ b l e 15-ft (4.57-m) fixed- 2 4. Adj t ts tment o f area of 'opera t ion for dry system - - 1.3 :<3000 he igh t uni t , o a ~ ~ ~ 18-f'i "~ (5.5-m) building. tt = 3900 It' (363 m ) ~ : : ! ~ - - . : ' : ~ : ~

5. Conf i rmat ion th.tt m i n i m u m densit ies ,and areas have been Answer 3...C~]umn':i~...--- dest~iqf':~nsity is 0.25 gl~m/f t . Note that achieved this does ~ . ~ [ o up ti~.-.~.3 g p m / f t ~ [0.2 ( L / s ) / m ] like die

p r e v i o u s " ~ x ~ e becaiJ~i...~ the use of a f ixed-height uni t load. In 7-3.1.2.1, die m i n i m u m design densi ty for a dry sorinkler It wil!....O.£yer b ' ~ f t ( 3 . ~ ~ ) It will always be 15 f t (4.57 m~i or

system is 0.15 g p m / f t ~ [ (6.1 L / m i n ) / m ~ over 242 m ~ ] [satisfied in n ~ i ~ i : "%~i:.'..':.,,...::~ -~" A-7-3.2.1(e)2] for Class Ill. .4~ii :~ "~i ~" ":~::"

P :~ tgraph 7-3.1.2.2 refers to Ordinary Hazard Group 2. The ,...-::~.ple~.:.~or°4g~::ts expanded-exposed-nns table , 20-ft (6. I-n0 cor responding m i n i m u m density at 3000 ft ~ (279 m 2) is 0.17 ....... hf"~::~: 'a 2 ~ 2 - m ) building. g p m / f t z [(6.9 L / m i n ) / t n 2 ] (satisfied); 3000 ft ~ × 1.3 = 3900 ft 2 (363 ..::-ii~-:i~iii":: "%.-::%. ""

'2 2 c 2 ~ ~ nswer~.~ , . .~lnmn C des~ denst t 0 7 m / f t [048 m ' ) , 0 . 1 7 g p m / f t o v e r 3 . 0 0 f t [ ( 6 . 9 L / m i n ) / m o v e r 3 6 3 m ]. ,::_:::':" "::~. :":. ~i~:.,. ." ~ "gn ' y = . gp . The d e s i ~ density m~d area of appl ica t ion equals 0.26 gpm/ft~::~!i~:. . . : i ~ L / s ! / ~ Note tha t ot!aer lower s torage heights shoul d also be

[(1 " " ) e 173 "~ :" . . . . . . cnecKeo"nut tile reveal m e same or lower d e n s m e s (0 7 and over 3900 ft 0.6 L / r a m / m ov r 363 m ]. (ROC 13-1 ) ,. :::!i:..i!i!::...::!Y" ";" Y , , " " • • "" " ..~-~"::, "-'.-'-~%.. 0.6) [0.48 ( L / s ) / m ~ and 0.41 ( L / s ) / m ~ [ so the design densi ty

..::!!ii" .......... ::".:~:, "%~i~,e..~ains at 0.7 g p m / f t ~ [0.48 ( L / s ) / m ~ ]. A-7-3.2.1.1(c) (231-A-6-1.1(c)) Full-scale tests show n ~ i ~ :!::::ii .... • ..... ~;:"~ , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a reciable difference in flae n u m b e r of sprinkler h e ~ : ' : ~ :~:~:-":.:::'- "":~::-. ":::"Example 5. Expanoeo-cartonea-unstao~e, 17 It (b.2 in) n igh in ~z- PP . . . . . . . . -::':~':'::::~ :::'::: 9 " open for ei ther none~capsn la t ed or encapsula ted produeff4-iti~ to " ."i"i!::" ft ( .Tf i -m) budding. 15 ft (4.6 m) high. Te.;t data is no t availal~le for ~ u l a t e ~ i i i - . . . . . . . ..:.ii:::: products s tored h ighe : th,'m 15 ft (4.6 m) . H o U r i : r a c k "":~!::!~ii~i:( i ... . Answer 5. Co lumn D - - 15-ft (4.57 m) storage in a 32-ff (9.75-m) storage tests involving encapsula ted storage ...~i~,(6 ~.~.~gh,.:..: ....:i:::::" bui ld!ng wonld be 0.55 g p m / f t 2 [0.37 ( L / s ) / m ~ 1. 20-ft (6. l-m) increased protect ion v:~s needed over that t ' b r ' ~ ; ~ a , , J ' i ' ~ d " storage in a 32-ft (9.75-m) bui ld ing would be 0.70 g p m / f t ~ [0.48

. . . . . . . . . . . ":--:Y:: ( L / s ) / m ]. Interpolat ion for 17-ft (5.2-m) storage is ,as follows: 0.7 - 0.55 = 0.15

s to rage. ..--i: :i'iii.iii,!ii~i~:~:. ":-::.ii.::.! .... The protect ion specified in Chap~;~::"6 c o ~ n i p l ~ i ~ i i ! !:"

maximun~ of 10-ft (3-rn) clearance....s.:~..~., to~i-tf storag:~:"to sprinkler deflectors for storage hei'gh~:i'~..~$"ft (4.6 n]) and higher.

A-7-3.3.1 (2"~1-A-7-1, "!31-Appendix B) T i :~!~ns i t ies and area of application bare been developed f rom fire t~ ' t data. Most of these test~s were conduc ted with 17/s2_in. (13.5-ram') orifice sprinklers and 80-ft 2 or 100-ft 2 (7.4-ft 2 or 9.3-m 2) sprinkler spacing. These and other tests have indicated that, with densit ies of 0.40 g p m / f t ~

2 1 7 [0.27 ( L / s ) / m ] arid higher, better results are obta ined with /s2- in. (13.5-ram) orifice and 70-ft 2 to 100-ft 2 (7.4-m 2 to 9.3-m 2)

1 sprinkler spacing th,'m where us ing / : i n . (12.7-mm) orifice sprinklers at 50-ft ~ (4.6-m 2) spacing. A discharge pressure of 100 psi (689 kPa) was used as a start ing point on one of the fire tests. It wz, Ls successful, but ! ~ a l l /z-f t (0.5-m) clearance between the top of storage arid ceiling sprinklers. A clearance of 10 ft (3.0 m) could have p rodnced ~t different result due to the tendency of the h igher pressnre to atomize tim water and the greater distance that the fine water droplet ; had to travel to the bu rn ing filel.

0.15/(20- 15) = 0.03 0.03 × (17 - 15) = 0.06 0.55 + 0.06 = 0.61 Design density = 0.61 g p m / f t ~ [0.41 ( L / s ) / m 2]

Example 6. Storage is expanded-exposed-stable , 22-ft (6.71-m) storage in 23.5-ft (7.16-m) building,

Answer 6. Column B - - Could interpolate between 0.6 f fom/f t ~ 2 2 2 - " [0.41 ( L / s ) / m ] a n d 0 . 7 5 g p m / f t [0.51 ( L / s ) / m ], however, this

would be a moo t poin t since the densi ty for 15-ft (4.57-m) storage • in dais 23.5-ft (7.16-m) bui ld ing would be 0.8 g p m / f t 2 [0.54

2 ( L / s ) / m ]. Unless the owner can guaran tee 22-ft (6.71-m) 2 2 storage, the design density = 0.8 g p m / f t [0.54 ( L / s ) / m ]. If the

owner can, in some way acceptable to the author i ty having jur isdic t ion guaran tee 22-ft (6.71-m) storage, the interpolat ion

2 2 would yield a design density of 0.66 g p m / f t [0.45 ( L / s ) / m ].

Example 7. Storage is nonexpanded-s table-exposed, 13.5 ft (4.1 m) h igh in a 15-O (4.57-m) building.

Answer 7. Column E - - 12-ft (3.66-m) storage in a 15-ft (4.57-m) bui ld ing would be EH-2 (0.4 g p m / f t ~ over 2500 ft 2) [0.27 ( L / s ) / n C over 230 m~l .

765

Page 214: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

15-fi (4.57-m) storage in a 15-ft (4.57-m) building would he 0.45 g p m / f C [0.31 (L / s ) /m~] . Interpolation for 13.5-ft (4.1 m) storage is as follows:

0.45 - 0.4 = 0.05 o.o5/(15 - 12) = 0.017 0.017 x (13.5 - 12) = 0.026 0.4 + 0.026 = 0.426 Design density = 0.426 gpm/ f t z [0.29 ( L / s ) / m z]

A-7-3.3.1.1 (231-A-7-1.1) Two direct comparisons between ordinary- tempera ture-and higb-temperature-~,-ated sprinklers are possible:

(a) With nonexpanded polyethylene 1-gal (3.8-L) bottles in corrugated cartons, a 3-ft (0.O-m) clearance, and tile same density, approximately the same number of sprinklers operated (9 at high temperature versus 7 at ordinary tempera ture) .

(h) With exposed, expandedpolys tyrene meat trays, a 9.5-ft (l.9-m) clearance, and the same density, three times as many ordinary-temperature-rated sprinklers opera ted ,as did high- temperature-rated sprinklers (11 at ltigh temperature versus 33 at ordinary temperature ).

The car toned plastics requirements of this s tandard are based to a great extent on test work that used a specific commodity - - 16-oz (0.473-L) polystyrene plastic jars individually separated by thin carton stock within a large corrugated carton [3~/~ fF (0.32 m 2 ) ]. [See Figure A- 7- 3.3. 1.1 (a).]

Ex

pla

Small pieces of plastic in small cartons

Figure A-7-3.3.1.1 .(.~$:" i:~..l-A-7"-'~ii~.~. )l.. Corrugated carton enntainlnlr n l a ~ t i ~ : ~ i ~ . e s " i n d i v i d ~ - s e p a r a t e d by carton

"::~!i::.~m at e rial ,..::-:::"

~ i~ -~ i i~ass IV commodity, however, ;ed on exper ienced j u d g m e n t and only f the consequences of underprotec t ing

:::'.:::~

There are few storage facilities in x or storage a r rangement remains should be aware that tile introduction of

aange protection requirements uld be based on ltigber densities and • the various reductions allowed should ,r evaluation of existing situations, can be quite helpful.

.-::~i:'::-. .iii:: .. Figure A-7-3.3.1.1 (a) [231-A-7-1.1 (a)] ~ - o ~ ' : ~ i ~ ":=i''ii':=="

containing individually separ~..~!~las't~..:'..'~s. '<'-':::::~

()th er (;rot, p A plastic commod/~"~':,~.an . .~ a r r a n ~ in cartons so that ' they are sepa~tted by ~ ] ~ ] e thicknesses of carton material. In such arrangements , I~::.plastAc becomes involved in the fire at any one time. This c~.~.i~.~'esttit in a less vigorous fire tilat can be control led by Clas~i~ commodity protecuon.

( ) tber situations exist in which the plastics componen t is sur rounded by several layers of less hazardous material and is ti~erefore temporarily protected or insulated from a fire involving adjacent plastic produccs. Such condit ions also could p roduce a less vigorous fire and be successfidly handled by Class IV protection. [See Figure A-7-3.3.1.1(b).]

An evaluation for each field situation mine the worst applicable hei.gbt- at can be e x p e c t e d t o appear m a have shown that considerably greater

demands occur where clearance is 10 ft (3.0 m) as compared to 3 ft (0.9 m), and where a pile is stable as compared to an unstable pile. Since a system is designed for a particular clearance, the system could be inadequate when significant areas do no t have piling to tile design height and larger clearances exist between stock and sprinklers. This can also be true where the packaging or ,arrangement is changed so that stable piling is created where unstable piling existed. Recognit ion of fllese conditions is essential to avoid installation of protect ion that is inadequate or becomes inadequate because of changes.

No tests were conducted simulating a peaked roof configuration. However, it is expec ted that tile principles of Section 7-3 still apply. The worst applicable height-clearance relationship dlat can be expected to occur should be found, and protection should be designed for it. If storage is all at the same height, the worst height-clearance relationship creat ing the greatest water demand would occur under tile peak. f f commodit ies are stored higher trader the peak, tile various height-clearance relationships should be tried and tile one creating tile greatest water demand used for designing protection.

766

Page 215: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

A-7-3.3.2.2 (231-A-7-2.2) Test data is not available for all comhirmtions of commodities, storage heights, and clearances. Some of the protection criteria in this s tandard are based on extrapolations of test data for o ther commodit ies :rod storage cortfigurations, its well ,~; available loss data.

For example, there is very limited test data for storage of expanded plastics higher than 20 ft (6 m). Tile protection criteria in this s tandard for expaaded plastics higher than 20 ft (6 m) are extrapolated from test data for expanded plastics storage 20 ft (6 m) and less in height and test data for unexpanded plastics above 20 ft (6 m).

Further ex:mlples can be: found in the protection criteria for clearances up to 15 ft (4.6 m). Test data is limited for clearances greater than 10 ft (3.0 tr) . It should be ,assumed that, if protection is adequate for a given storage height in a building of a given heigbt, die same protection will protect storage of any lesser height in the same building, For example, protection adequate for 20-fi (6. l-m) storage in a 30-ft (10-m) building [10-ft (3.0-m) clearance] would also protect 15-ft (4.6-m) storage in a 30-ft (10- m) building [15-ft (4.6-m) clearance]. Therefore, the protection criteria in Table %2.2 for 15-ft (4.6-m) clearance are based on tile protection criteria for storage 5 ft (1.5 m) higher than the iudicated height with 10-ft (3.0-m) clearance.

Table 7-2.2 is based on tests that were conducted primarily widl higb-teuqmrature-rated, ~7/s~-in. (13.5-ram) orifice sprinklers. ()tiler tests have demon:.trated that where sprinklers are used with orifices greater flaan ~ 7/,z i~l. (13.5 ram), ordinary temperature sprinklers are acceptable.

A-7-3.3.2.3 (231-A-7-2.5) Wet systems are r ecommended for stor:tge occupancies. Dry-pipe systems should be permit ted only wher% it is impractical to provide heat.

A-7-4.1.5.5 (231C-A-5-2.3) Where high temperature rated sprinklers are installed at file ceiling, high temperature ra ted sprinklers also should extend beyond storage in accordance widl Table A-7-4.1.5.5. (ROC 13-t23)

T a b l e A-7-4.1.5.5 (231C-A-5-2.3) Distance Beyond P e r i m e t e r

D e s i g n A r e a f o r H i g h o f H i g h - H a z a r d O c c u p a n c y T e m p e r a t u r e R a t e d f o r H i g h T e m p e r a t u r e R a t e d

S p r i n k l e r s S p r i n k l e r s (ft z) ( m ~) ( f t ) ( m ) 2000 185.8 30 9.14 3O0O 278.7 4O 12.2 4000 371.6 45 13.72 5000 464.5 50 15.24 6000 557.4 55 16.76

A-7-4.1.7.1 (231C-A-~-10.1) "Slatting of decks or walkways or tile use of open grating as a substitute for automatic sprinkler the reunder is not acceptable."

In addition, where shelving of ,'tray type is employed, it is for tile basic purpose of providing an intermediate support between the structural members of the r a~ . .As a result, it becomes almost impossible to define and m a i n ~ ' : : ~ / ~ s v e r s e flue spaces across the rack ,as required in 7-4-1;..~i~:.d. ilh]'strated in Figure 7-4.1-4.1.

A-7-4.1.11 (231C-A-7-9,: : ' .~f~-3.g)--i~lere the ceiling is more than 10 ft (3.I m) abo..";gi~.~)e ~aximd'~!iil~..~ght of storage, a horizontal barrier sbould':~...., installed....~g'bve storage with one line of sprinklers un0~r.,~.!e bar/$%K for Cl'~s I l I , and III commodities : . t ~ : : : : ] ~ i ! ~ i n k l e r s under the barrier for Class IV c o ~ ' o d i ~ , i i J - '~~: :~r inkler arrays should be installed ~ii~dicated:::$,~. Table 7-4.3.1.51 and Figures 7- 4.3.1.5.1 (--'~)":~o.!,gh (j~:i.Z~:i:.iS- A-7-4.1.3 (231C-A-4-5) Tile fire protection system design should

cousider the maximum ;torage height. For new sprinkler B ~s s h o ' ~ of s u ~ ' l e n t stren th to avoid saggm that installatioris, maximum :;tora~e beiizbt is the usable height at which . . .~: . . - , . "-:.-:~'~-- . • " " . g . ' " g

o ~ nt.¢i;t'~r~wlfl~ 1 o ~ and unloading operauons comm ditie, can be sto.-ed a~ove tl'le floor while die minimum . . . . . . . . . . . -] ,:..-~-~:: required unobst ructed space below sprinklers, is maintained. ,#::~!-i-:.Hori~.~).,..m..l b.ar. r~ : s are not required to be provided above a Where evaluating existirtg situations, maximum storage height is the ":::"Cl:'~::..l.:~ii~:'::~:..g. ~:ommodity with in-rack sprinkler arrays in maximum existing storage height if space between tile sprinklers .:...:i:i.:.:i"i':..:..~ec~ce ~ : " F i g u r e s 7-4.3.1.5.1 (a) and (b), provided one line and storage is equal to or greater than that required. .....~y"''%~ in-i~;:.sp,.,r.inklers is installed above the top tier of storage.

A-7-4.l.S Exception (231C-A-6-10) hfformation for dreprotecr~::::.::iii~: . . . . . . s::i~-7-4.1.t.~'i (2SIC-A-5-9.1) Detection systems, concentrate pmnps, of Classes I, II, III, and IV commodit ies was ex t rapola ted fr.~]. ""~i!:.:" generators, and odaer system components that are essential to the fidl-s,-ale fire tests that "xere per formed at different times d#':':fl(ie.. "::i:'."-:'.:-ii--::..opgration of the system should bare ,an approved standby power tests that were used to deveh3p the protection for plastic..::#" ..:.. " :"::~i~J'rce. commodities. It is poss ble that, by selecting certain t ~ t s f r ~ "iii . . . . . . #::: tbe cu ryes sh own i r; Fig'~res 7-4.2.2.1.1 (a) through (g~ ('~":'~ii:..~. "/~-:!-:!:- ':iiiii::'i. "" A-7-4.1.12.4.1.1 (251 C-A-5-9.4.1.1) Wh ere high-expansi on foam is applying the appropriate modifications), tile prot~t i .on sp~i~fi.ed ;#::" contemplated as the protect ion media, consideration should be

¢i - - . -::-=~"-'-~F': - • "::i:i::: ..:::::" • • - " by 7-4., exceeds tile requirements of 7-4.4. In ~ ~atmns, . . :~e, . : : i ..... gwen to possible damage to dae commodity from soaking and wotection specified for plastics al though les~:~tan t l ~ reclnirt~..i!tt;¢ corrosion. Consideration also should be given to the problems

• I " " ~ " : ' > : ' : ' : ' : " : " " ' - - " : " " : ' : " " " " - -

tile :urves shown m Figures 7-4.2.2.1.1 (a) ~r~....g~? ~,.~'~*ii~k."::k ' ..... assocmted w~th the removal of the foam ,after discharge. .tdequately protect Cla~;es I, If, III, and ...I:.V: cofi~itiegSii::::::::ii::::i:i::

This section also allo~s storage areas . . . . :~ i -~ d ~ e d .to protect plastics to store" (:lasses I, II, III, an~i:"-:/V c o ~ o d i t i ~ l o u t a reex~,duation of fire p r o l e c t o n sy s t em, i . . . . . :ii::i::" ..::f.'::"

" "::.::i:i:i::-..-::i:-" "" A-7-4.1.5. ! (231 C-A-5-1.1) Wet systems : ~ : a ' e c o m m e n d e d for rack storage occu parlcies. ":%iiii.::.::.::'~i:"

Dry systems are permi, ted only where it is.~.#.'.'~fOractical to provide heat,

f 'reactiou systems shoukl be considered for rack storage occupancies that are nr heated, particularly where in-rack sprinklers are installed or for d~ose occup,'mcies fllat ;ire highly susceptible to water d:tmage. (ROC 13-1'/3)

A-7-4.2.1.1.1 (231C-A-6-5.1) Where possible, it is r ecommended that in-rack sprinkler deflectors be located at least 6 in. (152.4 ram) above pallet loads.

A-7-4.2.1.1.2 (231C-A-6-5.2) Where possible, it is r ecommended that in-rack sprinklers be located away from rack uprights. (ROC 13-173)

A-7-4.2.1.2.1 (231C-A-6-6.1) Spacing of sprinklers on branch lines in racks in dae various tests demonstrates that maximum spacing ,as specified is proper.

767

Page 216: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

A-7-4.2.1.6.3 (231C-A-6-13.3) In-rack sprinklers at one level only for storage up to and including 25 ft (7.6 m) in multiple-row racks sbould be located at the tier level nearest one-balf to two- thirds of the storage height.

A-7.4.2.2.1.1 (231C-A-6-9) Bulkl~eads are not a substitute for sprinklers in racks. Their installation does not justify reduct ion in sprinkler densities or design operating areas ,as specified in the design curves.

A-7-4.2.2.2 (231CA-6-11) Data indicates that the sprinkler protection criteria in Table 6-11 is ineffective, by itself, for rack storage with solid shelves, if the required flue spaces are not maintained. Use of Table 6-11 and tbe figures it references, along with die additional provisions flint ,are required by this stancktrd, can provide acceptable protection. (ROC 13-173)

A-7-4.3.1.5.1 (231C-A-7-8.1) Where storage tiers are not tile same size on each side of the longitudinal flue, then protect one side of the flue with dm sprinkler at the proper elevation above die load and tbe next level of sprinklers protecting tile other side of the flue with that sprinkler at the proper elevation above that load as indicated in Figure A-7-4-3.1.5.1. The vertical spacing requirements for in-rack sprinklers specified in Tables 7-4-3.1.5.1, 7-4-:~.1.5.4 and Section %4.4 for plastics should be followed.

I

i I l

i × m

i

i

i

i × m

Elevation

with the additional provisions that are required by this standard, can provide acceptable protection. (ROC 13-173)

A-7-4.3.2.1 (231C-A-7-10.1) Water demand for storage beight over 25 ft (7.6 m) on racks without solid shelves separated by aisles at least 4 ft (1.22 m) wide and with more than 10 ft (3.1 m) between the top of storage and the sprinklers sbould be based on sprinklers in a ~000-ft z (185.8-m ~) operat ing area for double-row racks and a 3000-fF (278.7-m 2) operat ing area for multiple-row racks discharging a min imum of 0 . 1 8 g p m / f C [ (7.33 L / m i n ) / m ~ ] for Class I commodities, 0.21 g p m / f t ~ [ ( 8 . 5 6 L / m i n ) / m ~ ] for Class II and llI commodities, and 0.25 g p m / f t ~ [(10.19 L / m i n ) / m 2] for Class IV commodit ies for ordinary temperature rated sprinklers or a minimum of 0.25 l~pm/ft ~ [ (10.19 L / m i n ) / m ~] for Class I commodities, 0.28 g p m / f t 2 [(I 1.41 L / m i n ) / m ~] for Class II and III commodities, and 0.32 g p m / f t e [(13.04 L / m i n ) / m ~] for Class IV commodit ies for high temperature rated sprinklers. (See A-7-4. i . 9 and A-7-4-3.1.5.4 .)

Where such storage is encapsulated, ceiling sprinkler density should be 25 percent greater than for nonencapsula ted storage.

Data indicate that the sprinkler protection criteria in 7-10.1 is ineffective, by itself, for rack storage with solid shelves, if the required flue spaces are not maintained. Use of 7-10.1, along with the additional provisions that are ..r.:-...estuired by dais standard, can provide acceptable protection..::.:!~ii{~!::. ....:~:.....~!:: ........

A-7-4.4.1 (231C-A-8-1) A I ] . : : ~ . ¢ tests of plastics were run with an approximate 10-ft (3....¥~.'.'.~. m ~ . . u . . m clearance between file top of file storage and dae.:..:~!lid~-:sprin~.. ~:,Widfin 30-ft (9. l-m)) high buildings, greater c l e ~ ' ~ : e s above s t ~ e configurations should be compensa ted for by th~i~..dition .o~-'!~frmre in-rack sprinklers or the provision o f . ~ . . e : . . ~ : ' : ' . ~ . f appli'cation, or both. . . . : ~ : ~ : ' : - : : .

A-7-4.4.2.4..4.~i" [ 2 : ~ ' ~ ~ " ' ~ i g u r e 8-3.2.4(a)] The protection area per . . ~ e r u n ~ barriers should be no greater than 80 fi~

7 44 m "-:-:-:-:.:- "-:-:-:-:-:-:-" ( • ~. ,: ..... . ........ .... - ~.-.:::'.-:':~ :::~:.-

A ~ $ 4 ( ~ ) " ~ - 3 . ~ . 4 ~igu~ S-3.2.4(b)l The protection . ~ a p e r ~ r i n k l e r ~ e r barriers sbonld be no greater than 80 ft ~

: # : ~ ~."~!~iiii~:::. ?~!i~ :"

. ~ i ~ - 7 - ~ - . ~ . 4 . 4 ( c ) I23~C-A-8-3 .2 .4 Figure8-3.2.4(c)l The protection ..<~::" ~ e a pe~5~d~/akler under barriers should be no greater than 50 ft e

-:::~'~g::" ::i-~:;~ 65 m ~ :" ....... " - "~ : : - "

.... #{~ii~i{~ii~:::~ "%i!!i~!iA-7-4.4.2.4.4(d) [231C-A-8-3.2.4 Figure 8-3.2.4(d)] The protection

J iliiii~-~.... "~~::- ~:: -.::i~::i:..-:: " . ~ ' A-7-4.4.2.4.4(e) [231C-A-8-3.2.4 Figure 8-3.2.4(e)] The protection . . . . : . : . : . : . .

Ziil i'':'-'i~-::::%~!i!!i'~iiii "%ii~!::..ii:.:ii.ii-iiii::"~i~i::ili area(4.65Perm~) -sprinkler under barriers should be no greater than 50 ft ~

d ............. i:i:i:i:i:, ":-::: ......

~:.:.. 4i!i::" ~:-:i:i:i::-..-::P"

": : : . ' : : : : : : :5 "-: : : : : : : : : : . . " , : : : : : : : : : : . .... % j : -

Figure A-7-4.3.1.5.1 (231C-A-7-8.1) P l ~ m e n t of in-rack sprinkler where rack levels have varying heights.

A-7-4.3.1.5.3 (231C-A-7-8.3) In single-row racks with more than 10 ft (3.1 m) between tile top of storage and dm ceiling, a horizontal barrier should be installed above storage with one line of sprinklers under tile barrier.

A-7-4.3.1.5.4 (231C-A-7-11) In multiple-row racks with more thmi i0 ft (3.1 m) between the maximum height of storage and ceiling, a horizontal barrier should be installed above storage with a level of sprinklers, spaced as stipulated for in-rack sprinklers, installed directly beneath the barrier. In-rack sprinklers should be installed as indicated in Figures 7-4- 5.1.5.4(a) througb (c).

Data indicate that the sprinkler protection criteria in Sectiotl 7-11 is ineffective, by itself, for rack storage with solid shelves, if tim required flue spaces are not maintained. Use of Table 7-11, along

A-7-4.4.2.4.4(f) [231C-A-8-3.2.4 Figure 8-3.2.4(f)] Tile protection area per sprinkler under barriers sbould be no greater than 50 fC (4.65 m~). (ROC 13-173)

A-7-5 (231-A-4-4) Idle pallet storage introduces a severe fire condition, Stacking idle pallets in piles is the best arrangel~nent of combustibles to promote rapid spread of fire, heat release, and complete combustion. Afterpal le ts are used for a short time in warehouses, they dry out a n d e d g e s become frayed and splintered. In this condit ion they are subject to easy ignition from a small ignition source. Again, high piling increases considerably both the challenge to sprinklers and the probability of involving a large number of pallets when fire occurs. Therefore, it is preferable to store pallets outdoors where possible. (ROC 13-173)

A fire in stacks of idle plastic or wooden pallets is one of tile greatest challenges to sprinklers. The undersides of the pallets "create a dry area on which a fire can grow and expand to other dry or partially wet areas. This process of j ump i ng to other dry, closely located, parallel, combustible surfaces continues until the fire bursts through the top of the stack. Once this happens, very little water is able to reach the base of the fire. The only practical me thod of s topping a fire in a large concentrat ion of pallets with ceiling sprinklers is by means of prewetting. In high stacks, this cannot be done without abnormally high water supplies. The storage of empty wood pallets should not be permit ted in an nnspr inklered warehouse containing other storage.

7 6 8

Page 217: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 - - A 9 9 R O C

A-7-5.2.1 (231-A-4-4.1.1) See Table A-7-5-2.1. (ROC 13-161)

Under 50 to Over

Wall T~,pe O p e n i n g s Masonr), N o n e

Wired glass with outside sprinklers and 1-hr doors Wired or plain glass with outside sprinklers and ~/~-hr doors

Wood or metal wiill outs ide sprinklers Wood, metal , or odaer

NOTES:

s torage occupancies. [)~'y systems may be pe rmi t t ed only where it is impract icable to provide beat. (ROC 13-161)

50 Pallets

0

10 (3.0)

*ifl[ ,~ll

200 Pallets

0

10 /3.01

20 (6.1)

30 (9.1)

200 Pallets

20 (6.1/

30 (9.0

50 (1~.2)

1. Fire-resistive protect ion comparable to tha t of the wall also shou ld be provided for combust ib le eave lines, ven t openings , etc. 2. Where pallets are s tored close to a building, the he igh t of storage shou ld be restricted to prevent bu rn ing pallets f rom falling on the building.

3. Manu~tl outside open sprinklers general ly are not a reliable means of protect ion unless property is a t t ended to at all t imes by

phant emergency personnel . 4. O p e n sprinklers control led by a de luge valve ,are preferred. .<:.ii-!~ii~.:..:,.

The test bui lding is a p p r o ~ e l y ~00 f t x 250 ft [50,000 ft ~ (4.65 km~)l in ~ea, of n r # ~ i cons~ct ion, ~ d contains a volume of approximatel.y.~i:~-'.~..., m i ~ : f t s (63,761.86 mS), the

#,-7-5.2.2 (251-A-4-4.1.2) No addit ional protect ion is necessary, equivalent o f a 1 0 0 ~ f t ~ " " ~ t . 2 9 - ~ . ~ : - : ~ i l d i n g 2 2 . 5 ft (6.86 m) provided tile r equ i rements of 7-5.1.2(a) and (b) are met. (ROC high. The test bui lding h~.!:..two p r i m @ ] ~ e i g h t s b e n e a t h a single

13-161) large ceil ing.~kc.~:e.~.t .se~.~ is 3(J~:~t (9.1 m) h igh a n d the west section i s ~ ~ h .

A-7-6.2.1 (2MD-A-4-1.2) The protect ion criteria in Tables 7- The tiss~:i::test s e ~ s was cond:ucted in die 30-ft (9 I-m) 6.2.1 (a! , (b), a n d (c)have been developed f rom fire test d a t a . section, ~ i i ~ . [ . e a r a n c ~ : £ r o ~ the top of s torage to the ceiling vrotecUon requ i rements for o m e r s torage m e m o a s are neyonct nominal ly lO:"~i!t3 1 ml':::.~?-: ":'y" the scope of this st,andard at die p resen t time. From fire test ing .......... : ~ . - ' . . "~":" .

, ~ 2 "A 7 8 ~ ~ s a ical s tora e array used m the nssue with densities of 0.45 g p m / f t [18 B L / m i n ) / m l and higher , ~ ! ~ . . - - [ ~ . "" typ g " " s ~ e s of':~sts (RO~-':'.:~'$-21) there have been indicat ions tha t large orifice sprinklers at greater ..:..-.:.: .:~ • :..-.:~

tl~m 50-ft ~ (4.6-m 2) spacing product better resnlts than the 1/2-in. .:¢(*%.%l.)e.,~¢.:!....~.f~.r'f~ used in j u d g i n g test faihlre inc luded one or (19 . . . . 7-ram) orifice sprinklers at 50-fC (4 6-m ~ ) s p,acin g. ~:.::::..::::.:.m ~i..:.'~.:.::..., il~ ~ : :~win . . g."

Tables 7-6.2.1 (a) and (b) are based on opera t ion o f s tandard :::~.:-':':"::':":::'-8~i: ¢ a ~ i ~ , ~ m r e a d to die nortia end of die stora,,e arra~- . . . . s rinklers l Jse of "quick response" or o ther sp ec al sprinklers .:::::::::::::-'::~!:: "::.ii.,.."...::.:::. , ' , "-:~..~v:: :.. t, i, s~ould be based on apFropriate tests ,as approved by tile authori~::k":'..':'~::.. .¢='Y" (b) "-'-:'~as temloeratures near the ceilin~ main ta ined at high h tvin "urisdiction " ":':':~': ":::" evels r - g J " ,.-:!~!i::.. "::i.::::iiii::[i, I fo a t ime j u d g e d to be sufficient to endange r exposed"

The cur ren t cbaslges to Tables 7-6.2.1 (a), (b), and (c)....:#:::":%:::- ~::~i~i!~+i~.tr.~.ctnral steel; represent test results f rom rubber tire fire tests perform~:. :at tt~.¢ .. ":.-:'-~i~ ~:''. . . . . . . . . . . .

, .-::::::.-:.: "-:::-:.. :::-. :::::" (c) l~lre reaching m e target smcgs Factory Mutual Researc'n (~euter. .-::::-":$~:~-. i:i:':i:;::.. ":i:i::.. ":::" Storage heights and configurat ions or boil,, [e...~....:~ a u t o ' ~ d ..... ~i~":: ,~a~llee~7~88OsU;~2~s a tloa n ~ l ~ e t e s t re ;u l~s !ROC 13-21,

material hand l ing systems above 30 ft (9.1 m)] ~ : t b o s e 4::~i!:: . . . . ::("" t - g p g~ -~ indicated in ilae table h:tve not bad sufficient ~ da~i~evelop '~i i}J .... Fire tests have been conduc ted on 20-ft (6. l -m) and 25-ft (7.6- to establish r e c o m m e n d e d criteria. D e t a i l e ~ n e g ~ : . . r . e v ~ . ~ i ~::" m) h igh vertical s torage of tissue with 10-ft (3 l-m) and 5-ft (1.5- of die protection, sb.ou!d.be conduc ted a 2 ? d . [ a p ~ ~ : : - i i i i : m) cle~ar space to ceili~ng in piles ex tendin~ up to seven co lumns aumor~ty bawngjurtsd~, : tmn. (ROC 13-~..8/t.:.~"..:...':'i~:. "%~i.:. """ in one direct ion and six co lumns in d ,e otl~er direction. In these

.::¢:: . . . . ::!~ii~i: "%~ii:..::ii!:" tests, target co lumns of tissue were located directly across an 8-ft -"'~:~:?'- ~':.'-'~ "2i-i'::" (2 4-m aisle f rom die main lie Three tests were conduc ted A-7-6.2.1 Table 7-6.2.1 a Note 3 "l~J~ .'.,dl.-4-I~ Note-~f'to Table 4- • P " ( ) . . . . . . . . . . . . o o , .

1.2.) Laced tires are not s tored to a s ~ a n t he igh t by this us ,ng /s~-m. (13.5-ram) 28~ F (141 C) lugh t empera tu re " ' A A t ~ t l a "nn" , A X ' ~ , ; ¢" ~ t. Z,4x s o r i n k l e r s o n a 100-ft" (93 -m z) s o a c i n ~ a n d at cons tan t oressures lne tno~ ~ue ~ ~,le ~;mla e h~. lc teu on tl~.::vre xl e v e a l ] - • , v ,

(ROC 13 1811 g ""-~.'~..:-:. " "' " o f 14 psi 60 psi a n d 95 psi (97 kPa, 414 kPa a n d 655 kPa), " " " ":~::ii:::: !!::" respectively. One test was run us ing 0.64-in. (16.3-ram) 286°F

.:;i::" (141°C) high t empera tu re sprinklers on a 100-ft e (9.3-m ~) spacing A-7-6.4.3 (231D-A-4-3.3) Wet systems are r e c o m m e n d e d for tire at a cons tan t p ressure of 50ps i (345 kPa). Two tests were

conduc ted following a scbeduled decay f rom as, initial pressure

A-7-7.2.3 Tiffs unt iered design density limits storage to the be igh t of one bale, on side or on end, ,and would likely probibi t any f imire t iering without redesign of ille sprinkler system. (ROC 13- 184)

o f 138 psi (952 kPa) to a design poin t of 59 psi (407 kPa) if 40 sprinklers opened. The significant characteristic of illese fire tests was the rapid initial f i respread across the surface of the rolls. Ceiling t empera tu res were control led du r ing the decaying pressure tests and du r ing the h igher cons tant pressure tests. With the except ion of file 20-ft (6.1-m) bigb decaying pressure test, the ex ten t of f i respread within the pile could no t be clearly established. Aisle j u m p was exper ienced, except at the 95-psi (655-kPa) cons tant pressure, 20-ft (6. l -m) h igh decaying pressure, and large drop test. Water absorpt ion and pile instability caused pile collapse in all tests. This characterist ic shou ld be cons idered where manual ly at tacking a fire in tissue storage occupancies.

Available fire exper ience in roll tissue s torage occupancies does riot correlate well with the cons tant pressure full-scMe fire tests witb respect to tile n u m b e r of sprinklers opera t ing an d the extent of firespread. Better correlation is no ted with the decaying pressure tests. Th i r t een fires repor ted in s torage occupancies with

#,-7-8 (231F-Appendix B) This Appendix is no t a part of the requ i rements of this NFPA d o c u m e n t but is inc luded for informat ional pnrpose~ only.

This append ix provides a s u m m a r y of the dam developed f rom tile tissue test series of dill-scale roll paper tests conduc ted at tile Factory Mutual Researcb Center , West ( ; loucester, RI.

769

Page 218: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 ~ A 9 9 R O C

storage piles ranging f rom l0 ft to 20 h (3.1 m to 6.1 m) high a n d protected by wet-pipe sprinkler systems rang ing from ordinary hazard design densit ies to design densit ies of 0.6 g p m / f t 2 [ (24,5 l p m ) / m 2 ] were control led widl an average of 17 sprinkler heads. The m,3ximum n u m b e r of wet-pipe sprinkler heads flint opened was 45 and the n f i n i m u m n u m b e r was five, versus 88 a n d 25, respectively, in d~e cons tan t pressure tests. Seventeen sprinkler heads opened in die 90-ft (6. l -m) h igh d e , t y i n g pressure test. ()ne actual fire in tissue s torage provided with a dry-pipe system o p e n e d 143 sprinklers but was repor ted ,as controlled.

One fire test w,~s conduc t ed with plastic-wrapped rolls of heavyweight kraft paper. The on-end storage was in a s tandard configurat ion, 20 ft (6,1 m) h igh with 9~/~-ft (2.9-m) clearance to ceiling sprinklers. T he prescr ibed 0 .30-gpm/f t 2 [ (12 .2-1pm)/m 2] density control led the firespread, bu t protect ion to roof steel was marginal to the poin t where l ight beams and joists migh t be expected to distort. A lower mois ture con ten t in the paper as a r e suh of the protective plastic wrapping was cons idered to be the re,~son for the h igher t empera tu res in this test ,'~s compared to a similar test where the rolls were not wrapped.

N

f -, 26 ft (7.9 m) .I ..::~i.-..-~-:~':iiiiiiiiii% ....

?:::~ ..... ":=:iii!iii,/:"

6 (15,~

/#~i::iiiii~!ii~ii i '"~!~!i~?~i~,. G Target stack

"%i~::....:.-..-:- * Ignition location ~i!i!!i ::~ .... at base of array

Q Tissue paper- approx. 20 ft (6 m) high

Kraft linerboard - 6 rolls 20 ft (6 m) high

Figure A-7-8" (231F-Figure B-I) Plan view of typical tissue storage array. (ROC 13-21)

7 7 0

Page 219: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 --- A99 R O C

Test number Test date Paper type Stack height [ft-in. (m)] Paper, b,'mded Paper, wrapped Fuel array Clearance to ceiling [ft-

in. (m)] Clearance to sprinklers

[ ft-in. (nt)] Sprinkler orifice [in.

( m m ) ] Sprinkler temp. rating [~F (o(.:) ] Sprinkler spacing [ f lx ff

(n'l X | l t) ] Water pressure [psi

(kPa) ]

Moisture content of paper (%)

First sprinkler operation (min:sec)

Tot:d sprinklers open Fin:d flow [gpm (lpm)]

Sprir~kler demand area lit ~ (m ~) ]

Avg. discharge densit,] gpm/t ' t z [ (lpm) / m e ]

Max. 1 rain avg. g,'~s temp. over ignition [°F (°C':]

Duration of higla temp. within acceptable limits

Max. 1 nfin avg. fire plume gas velocity over ignition [f t /sec (m/sec) ]

Target ignited Extent of tire damage

within acceptable limits

Test duration (min)

*Phzuse I Test.

BI* 10/4/79 Tissue 21-10 (6.66) No No Std. 8-2 (2.49)

7-7 (2.31)

17/32 (13.5)

280 (138)

10 x 10 (3.05 x 3.05) 14 (0.67)**

9.3

0:43

88 2575 (9746)**

8800 (817.5)

0.29 (11.8)**

1680 (916)**

No

Yes No

17.4

Table A.7-8 Summar~ of Roll Paper Tissue Tests B$ B4 BS*** B6***

7123180 7130180 10115180 7128182 815182 Tissue Tissue Tissue Tissue Tissue 20-0 (6.1) 21-8 (21.60) 18---6 (6.64) 19-10 (6.05) 25--3 (7.69) No No No No No No No No No No Std. Std. Std. Std. Std. 10-0 (3.05) 8-4 (2.54) 11-6 (3.51) 5-2 (1.58) 4-9 (1.45)

9-5 (2.87) 7-9 (2.36) 10-9 (3.28) 4-7 (1.40) 4-2 (1.27)

17/32 (13.5) 17/32 (13.5) 0'.64 (16.33) 17/32 (13.5) 17/32 (13.5)

280 (138) 280 (138) 280 (138) 280 (138) 280 (138)

10 x 10 lOx 10 lOx 10 lOx 10 lOx 10 (3.05 x 3.05) (3.05 x 3.05) (3.05 x 3.05) (3.05 x 3.05) (3.05 x 3.05) 60 (2.87) 95 (4.55) 50 (2.39) 138 (6.61) 138 (6.61)

initial 102 initial 88 (4.88) final (4.21) final

9.3 10.2 6.0 8.2 9.2

0:32 0:38 0:31 0:28 ..::S:iiiii:%..~ 0:22

33 26 64 17 ..::i"?:-::,~i~i~::. 29 1992 (7540) 1993 (7544) 4907 1 ~ } ( 5 ~ : : . 2156 (8161)

(18573) ~::-:~:, ,.-:-::, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3300 (306.6) 2600 (241.5) 6400 (595) -::~ii:'::i"ti:700"~ 158) ":::'i.::!~i{~i.i~.::¢~. . N : : . . 2900 (269)

0.60 (24.4) 0.77 (31.4) - - .....:::~ ........ 0.9"~.~.3...7.5) ':-'':~ 0.96 (39.1) . ~ ~ initial 0.74

..::-S % . ( g ~ : ~ : : : ~ (30.2) flnaJ 1463 (795) 1634 (890) 15..I.~i~26 ) .... !~!~::..**** *****

Yes Yes MargiNiii .':: yes

40.7 02.4) 50.2 (15.~.~-":~ii~i~::.. t~£~:.(.!.4.~) .:¢:::" - -

Yes ~i:£;. :iiii ti: ~iii ii::-i::" No ... "Ril~a~#:::" IV~r gin ,'d

20 ,4¢" ":'%¢ 25.5 '~-"%~b:....:Y:/- % v::..:.:,,:,=~..'-::."

No Briefly Yes Marginal

45 45

.... %, Y: **Pressure increz~sed to 50 psi (345 kPa) a t . . . ~ . . , ii::::ii ......... ;.'ii; ***Pli:~se 111 tests decaying pressure. ~.-:.:-:-~ "%.-'? ".:::::::::::::::-" ****Maximum steel temperature over ~ o n 3.~-~.% (1~:2°.~i:::" . . . . . Maximum steel temperature o v e / ~ ' , g ' ~ . ~ i i ' ~ : ~ i i ~ "~(i;).

(ROC 1'4-21) ..... ~3~iii-iiii!:! .... "::%~ .... "::::::::" <? ,.-,>#,,. "::iii:.'..iiii::..

771

Page 220: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 1 3 - - A 9 9 R O C

A-7-8.2 = (231F-A-I-I.2) Existing Systems. Sprinkler systems protect ing existing roll paper storage facilities shou ld be evaluated in accordance with Tables A-7-8.2 (a) a n d (b). While fire can be control led by the protec t ion shown in Tables A-7-8.2 (a) ,and (b), grea ter damage can occur when t he densit ies in Tables A-7-8.2 (a) and (b) are used ra ther than those specified in Tahles 7-8.2.2.3(a) and (b). (ROC 13-21)

A-7-8.2.2.4 (231F-A-5-1.3.3) In a dry-pipe system, the area increase of 30 pe rcen t shou ld be c o m p o u n d e d [i.e. 2000 ft ~ (18. .8 m ) (1.67 for low tempera tu re sprinklers ,and 1.3 for dry- pipe systems) = 4343 ft ~ (403.5 m ~) total area]. Where dry-pipe systems are used in existing installations, tile areas of operafiotl indicated by Tables 7-5.4.1.2 (a) a n d (b) shou ld be increased by 30 percent . ( R O C 13-21)

A-7-8.2.2.5 (231F-A-5-1.3.5) Generally, more sprinklers open in fires involving roll paper s torage protec ted by sprinklers rated below the higb t empera tu re range. An i n c r e ~ e of 67 pe rcen t in the design area shou ld be considered. ( R O C 13-21)

A-7-9.2.1 (13-A-5-3.2.1) Tile protect ion area for residential sprinklers with ex t ended coverage a r e ~ is def ined in the listing of the sprinkler as a m a x i m u m square or rec tangular area. Listing inf;~rmatioll is p resented in even 2-ft (.61-m) inc rements f rom 12 ft m 20 f't (3.6 m to 6.1 m) for residential sprinklers. W h e n a sprinkler is selected for an application, its a rea of coverage mus t be equal to or greater than both tile length and width of the hazard area. For example , if the hazard to be protected is a room 14 ft 6 in. (4.3 m) wide and 20 ft 8 in. (6.'~ m) long, a sprinkler that is listed to protect an area of 16 ft x e2 ft (4.9 m x 6.8 m) mus t be selected. The flow used in the calculations is t hen selected as the flow requi red by the listing for tile selected coverage. (See Figure A-7-9.2.1.)

i ~ ~ m ~ m u m ~

I I ft 6 in. (4.5 m)

f

A-7-9.2.2 (13-A-5-3.2.2) See Figure A-7-9.2.2.

0 0

\ / o/

X / \ 1 I \

I \

i/o o\\ (a)

0 0

I .... ========

I I o o

.... ii::ii~iii ii:: "~'ii~ ........ ( )

:ii!i:!illiiii .... - . : . : . : . : . : . .

- . : . : . : . : . : .~ :

J ° .... ~::::il! :~::~ ~ . I "iiii~: k /

\ \ 0 /

ii 0 \ \

~ m ~ m

Figure Ao7-9.2.1 (13-A-5-3.2.1) Determinat ion o f protect ion area o f coverage for residential sprinklers.

(d)

Figure A-7-9.2.2 (13-A-5-3.2.2) Examples o f design area for dwelling units. Calculate a rea i n d i c a t e d b y heavy outl ine and X.

Circle indicates sprinklers . (ROC 13-161)

772

Page 221: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

A-7-9.5 (231-A-9-1,231C-A-10-1, 13-A-5-3.5.1.1) ESFR sprinklers are designed to respond quickly to growing fires and deliver heavy discharge to suppress fires rather daan to control them. ESFR sprinklers shou ld not be relied on to provide suppression if they are used outside tlae design parameters.

While daese sprinklers are in tended primarily for use in high-pile storage situations, this section permits d~eir use and extension into adjacent portions of an occupancy that might have a lesser classification.

A-7-9.5.1.1 (231-A-9-1.3) Storage in single-story or multistory buildings can be permit ted, provided dae maximum cei l ing/ roof height as specified in Table 9-1.1 is satisfied for each storage area.

A-7-9.6.1 (13-A-5-3.6.1) If the system is a deluge type, daen ,all the need to be calculated even if they are located on

erent building faces.

A-7-9.5.2 (231-A-9-2, 231C-A-10-2.1) Design parameters were de te rmined from a series of full-scale fire tests that were conducted as a jo in t effort between Factory Mutual Research Corporation and the National Fire Protection Research Foundation. (Copies of the test reports are available from tire NFPRF.) (ROC 13-159)

A-7-10.$.2" (33-A-7-2) Spray application operations should only be located in buildings that are comple te lypro tec ted by an approved system of automatic sprinklers, ff l oca ted in unsp r in lde red buildings, sprinklers should be installed to protect spray application processes where practical. Because of Ore rapidity ,and intensity of fires that involve spray operations, the available water should be ample to simultaneously supply all sprinkler heads likely to open in one fire without deplet ing the available water for use by

Water su[ )uv arealvoi l]l,

i

deluoesvslem I1¢

w ~ v v

-Sngedeluge system

- Fans typical (4)

-Cels pical(4) I ~!~ ,

• .¢iiiiii ii~: ~ . . . . . "~ IE::

,.:.::.-

Some chamber confi l~rat ions, such as smMI-diameter horizontal cylinders, might have a very tiny "floor," or even no floor at all. For horizontal cylinder chambers arid spherical chambers, "floor level" shall be taken to mean the level at 1/4 diameter below the chamber centerl ine or actual "floor level," whichever gives die larger floor area. (ROC 13-196)

streams. Noncombust ib le draft curtains can be used to limit F'tgure A - 7 - ~ : ~ . . ~ ; 3 - 6 . 1 . 1 ) Single deluge system. hose the number of sprinklers that will open. -:" ' "::::" " "~"::":"

Even when areas adjacent to coating operations ,are considered A-7-10.17~{~" (A-~"~.J...$) Deluge systems separated by fire- under reasonably positive fire cont ro l by adequate automatic - r e s i s t a n t ' ~ 5 ~ . n s can't~$:..r~eated independent ly as worst-case spr ink le rpro tec t ion , damage is possible if operations are water ~.p.ply s ~ o n s . ~ e r to Figure A-7-10.17.8.1.3. c o n d u c t e d o n floors above those containing contents that are ":"':':':~:" " '':':'~ "" highly snsceptible to water damage. Waterproofing and drainage .4:~¢ $ . . . . . . . of spray room floors can assist in reducinl{ water damage on ...:¢!'-'~iiiiii-:~::. .#~-::~$:., %..-":: floors, he. ow. The toroOefr drainafre, of the large volume of v~,tter ...~" "-'-::!:!:-:::-.,.: ::: :::....::-~'""::$:$:...~.::::::::.:::..-. !" _ frequently necessary to ~xtinguis~l spray finislting room fires often . ~ * : . . "::'iii%. " ...... , - - i)glll tlja ~v¢tJam~ I)resents considerable difficultv .-.--'f~" "'::!{:':'~" "::i~i~i!i~::, .-.-::- / tJwg I~t ~/l~/tVull~ • ' ~ - - " .-.':::* :i:.::-~:: ": : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : r I p i

A-7-10.4.2" (36-A-2-9) Water spray systems that are nsed to Y tvniezl t41 solvent extraction process equ ipment or structures should h..~::.. ":-~!~!:-}-~:. I-- "= ,= =,, '1" - - =" "/" == "= "1 ' ~ - ' ' ~ ' I [ ' * " ~ / des ned to rovide a de ns ty of not less than 0 25 m e~*::~i~)~ :%~q -" / / / -. g ~ P • . gp P...::: . . . . :: ............. ::. ] L. l:mC m~ ) of I)r°tected .~.u rface ,area. Deluge systems th~tg::bxe.... . ~..s.ed....:...~ ::.. . . . . . :!::':::". ,. ] for the sa,ne purposes sm,, d be desi~]ed to provide ,:'~..'~,t~'~'('?;i:£ %'.--. ~ii~ ] I I

- 2 - 2 "':" "": :~ ' : ' : ' . "":: ' :"::::::~ "::.::':'::. not less fl~an 0.16 gpm per ft (6.5 L p m / m ) of protected..~t~ce-:- -':-':':'-': [ ] ] h ] ] ] area. Preparation buildi,ags should be p ro t ec t ed - ,~ : .~ .u to~ ' t ; . . ....-.!#':" I ] ] ] ] ] [ sprinkler systems des igned for Ordinary H a ~ . . . . ~ i ~ g i ~ 2). "%iii~iJ:: [ ] a t ] a t ] a t ] at ] ; ,

A-7-10.14.4"(9~l~2.5.2,3Notel, E x p e r i e n t i a l l y - '~}i~::" [ I ( ) . 1 (3 i f) I ( ,l-I--Fanstyplcal(4) when water is discharge, l through conve~t~.~aai ' :~kle i ' :~ i i ; t l s I I i I i ] i i i I , into a hyperbaric a tmosphere , the s p r . ~ . ¢ ; ~ : is r '~ed. . : . .becanse ' ] ] ] | ] ] of increased resistance to water dro~.."~t m o v ~ e n t itff:i~:"denser I ] [ | ] I~ I t~,ll, 1, , ' , , , I / l~ atmosphere. This is so even t h o u ~ . w a t ~ pressure:" I I I I E U~ S ll/g (2111~] differential is maintained above c h a m ~ ' e s s u r e . "l~herefore, it ' I ] / I . . . . ; r ~ ; is necessary to compensate by increasin~';"~: number of sprinkler ] ! I ~ I heads It is r e c o m m e n d e d that spray cove~i~:i~sts be conducted I ] | ]IN~ / at maximum chamber pressure. ('ROC 13-16.'..'~'j:: ' . . . . . . . . . . . = ~ " "

,Iv FJr resistant padi 0ns

(ROC 13-200)

A-7-10.17.8.1.1" (A-3-6.1.1) Where a single deluge system protects an entire water-cooling tower, regardless of dae number of cells, tile water supply needs to be based on the entire deluge system coverage. Refer to Figure A-7-10.17.8.1.1.

Watersu) areatypiqml(1) deugesystem

tvoical o

Figure A-7-10.17.8.1.3 x (214-A-3-6.1.3) Multiple deluge systems.

773

Page 222: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

NFPA 13 - - A 9 9 ROC

A-7- I 0.17.8.2 ~ (A-'~-6.2. I ) Water-cooling towers with each cell se[ aratt 'd I)y a fire-resistant parti t ion and protected hy wet, dry, or prcacti~)u system(s) shonld have tile water supply based on the most d e m a n d i n g individual cell. Refer to Figure A-7-10.17.8.2.

constrtiction, such as double 76.2-mm (3-in.) p lanking where exposed to the e lements . Where no t exposed to physical damage, 19.05-ram (3/4-in.) t reated plywood ex tend ing 1219.2 m m (48 in.) below str ingers with solid blocking between str ingers shou ld provide adequate durabili ty a n d reasonable effectiveness.

Wet, do/, or preaclion / - ~ ' systems ~jpical (4)

I

I 0 0 0 - Fans typical (4) [ -Cells typical (4) I . . . . . . . . L__L_~_-

' - -~ ~ " Fire-resistant partitions Water supply area typical (1)wet, dry, typical (3) or preaction system

Figure A-7-10.17.8.2 ~ (214-A-3-6.2.1) Multiple wet, dry, or preaction systems with fire-resistant partitions.

A-7-10.17.8.2.2" (A-3-6.2.2) Widlout fire-resistant parti t ions

A-7-10.19.2" (318-A-2-1.2.1) Typical conf igurat ions of c leanrooms and their chases and p l enums create n u m e r o u s areas dmt might be she l te red f rom sprinkler protection. These areas can include a i r -mixing boxes, catwMks, hoods, p ro t rnd ing lighting, open w:fffle slabs, equ ipment , piping, duct ing, and cable trays. (;are should be taken to relocate or s u p p l e m e n t sprinkler protection to ensure that sprinkler discharge covers all parts of the occupancy. Care shou ld also be taken to ensure dlat sprinklers are located where heat will be satisfactorily collected for reliable operat ion of the sprinkler.

Gaseous fire suppress ion systems are no t subst i tutes for automat ic sprinkler protection. The large n u m b e r of air changes in c leanrooms can cause dilut ion or stratification of the gaseous agent.

It is r e c o m m e n d e d that sprinkler systems be inspected at least semiannua l ly by a qualif ied inspect ion service. (,See NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water,Based Fire Protection Systems.) The lengt!.]., of t ime between such

• inspect ions can be decreased dtk~.~(-0....ambient a tmosphere , water supply, or local requirements.Of"flae":%~uthority having jurisdict ion.

Prior to taking a s p r i n k l e r : ~ 6 ~ . o u t o f service, one should be certain to receive p e r m i s s ~ frdN[..-"i.'.~..l audaorities having

jur isdic t ion and notify ...a~.:'lS'~onn~..:i~m migh t be ,affected du r ing system shutdown. A ~-...~at;gt~ duriff~.~.~.~.....gtntenance per iods is a r e c o m m e n d e d precaut ior i%Any spring.tiffr system taken out of service for any re~:9_.x.Ls.!~.oni'~t:'b.e retui~]ed to service as prompt ly as possible. :; #::! ::ii.:.!!'~?'iii %i::.:ii~ilil}ii~3..:i~.!.iiiiii;~ ....

A sprinkleg:.:#ysteiN~!g.J.aat hS.g"/3N~" activated shou d be tho rough y inspec ted . . f~ . .damag&and c o m p o n e n t s replaced or repaired p rom ptlf?::"'":""'.r~taklers. ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . t~ '~ ~1.., no t o perate but were sub'ected9 to corros..y..e e efff~.'~.~ of coNgus t ion or e evated teml)eramres

between cells, the worst-c, ase si tuation involves the most shg:..~i-~..inspe~..d.~ ,..'Ra.~" replaced if necessary, in accordance d e m a n d i n g adio in ing cells. Refer to Figure A-7-10.17.8.2.2. ~ t i the":~inimuni%~l}//acement r equ i rements of the authori ty

:::--/~.i..ng~..f..~.ct".m..n~!::"Such sprinklers should be destroyed to '" p? i~: '~I i~ '~ . - : : "~e . (ROC 13-161 )

. . . . : - : . : . : . . . " . : - . - : . : - : - . . . . . . . " - : - : : : : : : : "

Wet, dry, or preaction .... ~':':::'::%iii~'~°8:::~°~) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ # systems typical (4) 4ii:::%iii::::ii . . . . . ~iii~-7-10.1¢J!i~i" (318-A-2-1.6.1) ,Small orifice sprinklers, 3 / 8 it,. (0.5

..::i'iiiii'i::. "%~i~;-~. ram) or larger, can be used.

I ..::f::....,,...:::. -:-:-:-:-:.. I [ .... !'::::iii::" ":i::ii .... .:.. " : : ' i i i i i~C 13-204)

^ . [ 1 .... %0¢ 13-.,04, 0 0 N t m--~-Fantypcalt6F'%i',!i', i,. %iiii~,::::/ .... A-7-10.21.2.2=(415-A-2-5.1.2) The exposure to the airport terminal v v v V I I ..::ii:.i'. )::':: . ":.~::~::i?" bttilding from the airport r amp is significant. The n u m b e r of

I. I - .. .::;?:':,'::~-~.}~. .:-!!';:Ch::. "::- "::::" bu d n~ shr ink ers oner:ttin~r f rom the exoost re fire may )e Celll~0ical (4~::i::~::ii~::?:::i ..... %ii~ ,::-~ greater~haVn f rom anrinternar'l ignit ion sot;roe. "

/ • i ' ~ • ..::~::ii!: . . . . "!ilili! .... ii::::!ili::)ii!:;!::" A-7-10.22.'~ ~ (423-A-5-6.3) Because of the na ture of the test cell . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~----:i;:i':':'i:::i::i::iii:: . . . . ::i'-':::" .:fi':" fire potential , deluge systems are considered more appropria te

[ J ~ . '::i~ii::i::::ii:::iiii::" " than automat ic sprinklers due to their speed of opera t ion and T ~ M^~'{gl~^~'mt,~t s imul taneous dischanze of all nozzles; however, au tomat ic Waler supply area ,,v,,-,,,,,=.~,~o.,,l sprinkle~ ca,-, be ,,,~d.

typical (2) wet, dry, or preaction systems

partitionii~:cal (3)

Figure A-7-10.17.8.2.2 ~ (214-A-3-6.2.2) Multiple wet, dry, or preact ion sys tems with no fire-resistant parti t ions.

A-7-10.18.2" [307-A-3-3.3.3(a)(5)] The use of fire-stops for draft c()ntrol to bank heat, facilitate tile open i ng of sprinkler heads, and prevent the overtaxing of the sprinkler system is particularly impor tan t in the design of sprinkler protect ion for combust ib le substructures . Tile fire wzalls a n d fire-stops of 3-3.3.6 of NFPA 307 shouh l be incorpora ted into the sprinkler system design for this purpose to the m:Lximum extent practical: however, due to limitati()ns in tile size of the design area for the sprinkler system, addit ional fire-stops will normally be needed . These addit ional or su | )p lemeuta l fires-tops need only have l imited fire resistance but slaould be as deep :L~ [:mssible and be of substantial

(a) In small cells [600 ft 2 (56 m ~) or less] where it is likely that all sprinklers would filse at the same time: or

(b) As a backup to a manua l water spray or o ther manual system.

A-7-10.23.5.1 ~ (430-A-4-4.1) For tile purposes of Table 7-10.23.5.1, tbe fire hazard potential of C'lass 2 oxidizers has been considered :Ls approximate ly equal to Group A plastic (non-expanded) , stable cartoned.

A-7-10.23.6.1 * (430-A-5-4.1) For the purposes of Table 7-10.23.6.1, tile sprinkler density has been derived f rom fire loss history.

A-7-10.26.2 Twelve-inch diameter cement- l ined pipe is r e c o m m e n d e d . Main sizes should be des igned to encomp;Lss any ant ic ipated expansion.

The u n d e r g r o u n d main should be a r ranged such that any one break will no t put both a f ixed water extinguisif ing system and hose lines protec t ing the same area out of service. (ROe 13-211)

774

Page 223: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 - - A 9 9 R O C

A-7-10.27.2 ~ (804-A-7-2.1) The water supply for the permanent fire protection water system should be based on providing a 2-hr water supply for both items (a) and (b) as follows:

(a) Either of items (1) or (2) below, whichever is larger: 1. The largest fixed fire suppression system demand; or 2. Any fixed fire suppression system demand that could be

reasonably expected to operate simultaneously during a single event (e.g., turbine underfloor protection in conjunction with other fire protection systems in the turbine area).

(b) The hose stream demand of not less than 500 gal /min ( 1892.5 L/rain).

A-7-10.27.5 ~ (804-A-8-8.2.1) To avoid water application to hot parts or other water-sensitive, areas, and to provide adequate coverage, designs that incorporate ~tems such as fusible element operated spray nozzles might be necessary.

A-7-10.27.6 = (804-A-8-8.3) Additional information concerning turbine generator fire protection can be found in EPRI Research Report 1843-2, "Turbine Generator Fire Protection by Sprinkler System,"July 1985. • ' "

(g) • (850-5-5.1.2) Steam Generator. Boiler front fire protection systems should be designed to cover the fuel oil burners and ignitors, adjacent fuel oil piping and cable, a 20 ft (0.1 m) distance from fl~e burner ,and ignitor including strnctural members and walkways at these levelL Additional coverageshould include areas where oil may collect. Sprinkler and water spray systems should be designed for a density o1~ 0.25 gpm/ fC (0.17 L/sec-m s) over the protected area.

(h) • (850-5-6.3.3) Flue Gas Bag-Type Dust Collectors. The design density should be 0.20 gpm/ft3 (0.14 L/sec-m s) over the plan area of the dust collector. (ROC 13-215)

(i) • (850-5-6.4.3) Electrostatic Precipitators. If mineral oil insulating fluids are used, hydrants or standpipes should be located so that each transformer-rectifier set can be reached by at I.east one hose stream. In addition the following should be provided: (ROC 15- 21~)

Automatic sprinkler protection. Automatic sprinkler systems should be designed for a density of 0.25 gpm/f t s (0.17 L/sec-m s) over 3500 ft s (325 m~). The drain system should be capable of handling oil spillage plus the largest design water flow from the fire protection system. (ROC 13-213)

A-7-10.28 Sprinkler System Discharge Criteria for Electric (ROC 15-213) . ~ Generatin~ Plants and High Voltage Direct Current Converter .~.~:':":'~'~.~. Stations. ~ee NFPA 850 for applicable terms not defined in (j)~ (850-5-6.5.2.2) Scrubber~.ing~'." Where scrubbers have Chapter 1. (ROC 13-213) plastic or rubber linings, ~ o ' l t~ , following methods of

' protection for the b u i f d ~ b o u ~ p T ; o v i d e d : (a) ~ (850-4-2) sprinkler S~stcra Water Supply. Automatic sprinkler ~l~}tec'~on at L~ka~level sized is to provide a

• " density 0.20 gpm/f t ~ (~.-]%le/sec-m 2 ) . ~ area of operation should (850-4-2.1) The water supply for the permanent fire protection be the area 6 f the building~f~lO,000 f ~ ( 9 3 0 m~). Where draft

installation should be basedon providing a 2dw supply for bodl curtains are p r ~ e ~ f operation can be reduced to the items (1) and (2) as follows: " largest area ..s..,~ulfdi~ts~l)lllllt~l~rtains.

1. Eiti~er of items a or b below, wlficbever is larger: (k) • ( 8 ~ i i ~ . ' n e T G e n e r a t o r Area. . • ." - ~ , ~ . ~ -~,~¢

a. The largest fixed fire suppression system demand, • (8~{~.~4.1.i"~.~.~3.e sp,~]tler system beneath the turbine- g . . . ~ : i : a ~ [ s h o u t d ~ a t o consideration obstructions from

b. Any" fixed fire suppression system demands that could ~ , . m . . . e m ~ e . r~_ .d piping and should be designed to a density reasonably be expected to operate simultaneously during a single ~ ~ ~ . ~ 0 L/sec-m z) over a minimum application of event [e.g., turbine under floor protection in conjunction with ~ 6 ~ # : other fire protection system(s) in the turbine area; coal conveyor ~ ~ ~ protection in conjunction with protection for related coal h a n d i l y " ~-..,~ N O ~ , ~ ' avoid water application to hot parts or other water structures during a conveyor, fire; adjacent transformers not ~ - - ~ . , . , .... ~- .sensiti~sensi " mareas, andsuc~tO rovide.adequate coverage, designs, that. adequately separated according to 3-1.31 of NFPA 850. (ROCA3- ~'~~s~ ~'~e incorporate ~tems as fusible element operated directional ~.~: . . 213) . ~ ~ . ~ . . . spray nozzles may be necessary.

2. The hose stream demand of not less than 500 gp .~..~..5 ~ . %. ~'~'~850-5-7.4.1.2 ) The automatic sprinkler system protecting tlae L/sec). " . # ' ~ : : ~ - : : . " : ~ "~'lubricating oil lines above the turbine operating floor should be

....... ~g= " .~.-':.'~:': designed to a density of 0.30 gpm/f t (0.20 L/sec-m ). (850-4-2.2) Where an adequate and reliable . w ~ . ~ p p l y , ~ , ~ ' * " "

a lake cooling pond river or municipal w a t e . , ~ t e r ~ s " ~ (I) • (850-5-7.4.2.1) Turbine-Generator Bearings. Fire protection unavmlable, at least two separate water s u p l i ~ h o ~ pt~s~lt~ed systems for turbme-l~enerator bearings should be designed for a for fire protection purposes with each sup'pyy ~ l a ~ n g density of 0.25 gpmTft ~ (0.17 L/sec-m s) over the protected area. the fire water flow requirements d e t e ~ y 7 = ~ . 2 . 1 . ~'~

~ ~ . ~ . . # (m) ~ (850-5-8.2.1) Cable Spreading Room and Cable Tunnels. (b) (850-4-4.1.3) Yard Mains. ~ i n s s h o ~ be looped Automatic spnnkler systems should be designed for a density of

around the main power block a n t ~ f i ~ [ ~ , l ~ " of suffiLt['ent size to 0.30 gpm/ f f f (0.20 L/sec-m s) over 2500 fd (232 m s) or the most supply fl~e flow requirements determin~l~l~h~ 7-10.20. 2.1 to any remote 100 linear ft (30 m) of cable tunnels up to 2500 ft s (232 point in the yard loop considering the m ~ r . . . g c t path to be out of mS). service. Pipe sizes should be desi"gned to e n ' ~ p a s s any ,anticipated expansion and future water . ,.x,. ds. 0ROC 13-213) (n) • (850-5-9.1.2.1) Emergeny 7 Generators. Sprinkler systems

should be designed for a 0.25 gpm/f t s (0.17 L/sec-m s) density over the fire area. (ROC 18-213) (c) • (850-5-4.6.1) Coal Handling Structures. Sprinkler systems

S should be designed for a minimum of 0.25 Rpm/ft (0.17 L/sec- S S 2 - m ) density.over a 2500 ft (232 m ) area. (I~OC 15-213) (o) • (850-5-9.4) Fire Pumps. ff sprinkler systems are provided for

fire pump houses, they should be designed for a density of 0.25 gpm/f t ~ (0.17 L/sec-m ~) over the fire area. (d) z (850-5-4.6.2) Coal Conveyors. Sprinklers should be designed

for a minimum of 0.25 gpm/f t s (0.17 L/sec-m s) density over 2000 tt 2 (186 m s) of enclosed ,area or the most remote 100 linear ft (30 m) of conveyor structure up to 2000 fC (186 mS).

(e) z (850-5-4.6.4) In areas over conveyor belts and striker plates witifin the stacker reclaimer the water supply should be from a 3000 gal to 5000 gal (11,355 L to 18,925 L) capacity pressure tank . located on board.

(f)x (850-5-4.6.5.1) Sprinklers for bag-type dust collectors should be designed for ordinary hazard systems. Sprinkler systems should be designed for a density of 0.20 gpm (0.013 L/sec) over the projected plan area of the dust collector. (ROC 13-213)

(p) • (850-5-9.6.2) Oib or Coabfueled Auxiliary Boilers. ff a sprinkler system is provided they should be designed for a density of 0.25 gpm/fC (0.17 L/sec-mS) over the entire room.

(q) • Alternative Fuels.

1.• (850-7-$.4.$) Hydraulic Equlpraeng Reservoirs, Coolers, and Associated Oil-filled Equipment. Sprinklers should be over oil- containing equipment and for 20 ft (6.1 m) beyond in all directions. A density 0f 0.25 gpm/ f t s (10.19 L/min-m ~) should be provided. (ROC 15-215)

775

Page 224: Janak - National Fire Protection Association · Susan J. Weigand, Victory Fire Protection, Inc., PA JIM] Rep ... Ernest (Russ) Mower, City of Piano, TX [E] Rep. NFPA Fire Ser~ice

N F P A 13 1 A 9 9 R O C

2? (850-7-3.4.4) Tipping~Receiving Building. Systems should be designed for a m i n im um of 0.25 g p m / f t ~ (10.19 L /m in -m e) over the most remote 3000 ft ~ (279 m e) ( increase by 30 percent for dry pipe systems) of f loor area wida dae protect ion area per spr inkler not to exceed 130 fF (120 m~). High t empera tu re sprinklers [250°F to 300°F.(121°C to 149°C)] should be used.

NOTE: The above requi rements are based on storage heights no t exceeding 20 ft (6.1 m).

3. ~ (850-7-3.4.5.1) The MSW Storage Pit, Charging Floor, and Grapple La~dor~m Areas. Systems should be des igned for a m in imum of 0.20 gpkn/fC (8.15 L / min -m e) over tile most remote 3000 fC (279 m e) (increase by 30 percent for dry pipe systems) of p i t / f loor area wida the protec t ion area per spr inkler no t to exceed 100 ft e (9.3 me). High t empera tn re sprinklers [250°F to 300°F (121°C to 149°C)] sbould be used.

(r) Refuse.Derived Fuels.

1.~ (850-7-4.4.6) Hydraulic Equipmen't, Reservoirs. Coolers, and Associated Oil-filled Equipment. Sprinklers should be over oil- conta in ing equ ipmen t and for 20 ft (6.1 m) beyond in all directions. A density of 0.25 gp in / f t e (10.19 L /m in - m e) should be

(t) (850-7-6) Rubber Tire Fuel. (ROC 13-213)

* (850-7-6.4.10) Hydraulic Equ ipment , Reservoirs, Coolers, and Associated Oil-filled Equipment. Sprinklers should be over oil- conta in ing equ ipmen t and for 20 ft (6.1 m) beyond in all directions. A density of 0.25 g p m / f t e (10.19 L /min -m e) should be provided. (ROC 13-213)

A-7-10.29" Spr inkler System Discharge Criteria for Hydroelectric Generatlng Plants. See NFPA 851 for applicable terms not def ined in Chapter 1. (ROC 13-212)

(a) • (851-4-2.2) Sprinkler Systems Water Suppl~.The water supply for the p e r m a n e n t fire protect ion installation should be based on the largest fixed fire suppression system d e m a n d plus the max imum hose s t ream d e m a n d of no t tess d lan 500 gpm (31.5 L/sec) for a two-hour durat ion.

(b) ~ (851-4-2.3) If a single water supply is utilized, two i n d e p e n d e n t connect ions should be provided. If a situation can arise in which dae primary water supply can become unavailable (e.g., dewater ing of penstocks), an auxiliary supply should be provided. Each supply should be capable of meet ing the

provided. (ROC 13-213) requi rements in 7-5.22.2. (ROC 1..~..~!2 ) .. -.::%--'::::.: ?!~::<.

2. ~ (850-7-4.4.7) Tipping~Receiving Building. Systems should be (c)" (851-5-2.4) Fixed fire ~ c t i ~ n for dais equipment , where designed for a m i n i m u m of 0.25 g p m / f t e (1().19 L /m in -m ~) over provided, shou ld be: .~':":'.:::.. the most remote 3000 ft e (279 m ~) (increase by 30 percent for dry Automatic wet pipe sp . r .~ '~r s y ~ utilizing a design density of pipe systems) of f loor area with flae protect ion area per sprinkler 0.25 g p m / f t e (0.17 L / ~ m ~ % f o r d ; i :~ t i . t .e hazard area (see 3-5.3 of not to exceed 130 ft ~ (12.0 me). High t empera tu re sprinklers [250°F NFPA 803). (ROC 13-~|']~::-. "%:!!#" to 300°F (121°C to 149°(1)] should be used. -.::::.. ..::!~i::"

(d) • ( 8 5 1 - 5 - 5 . ~ ~ : . . . w a t e r spray systems should be NOTE: The above requi rements are based on storage heights designed for a ' ~ e ~ ~ f t ~ (0.20 L/sec-m e) over 2500 ft ~ not exceeding 20 ft (6.1 m). (232 me). ~:] 's coverage is for are--'a protect ion. Individual cable tray

tier c o v e l ~ i ~ p u l d b~'~$.¢quired based on the Fire Risk Evaluation. 3. (850-7-4.4.8) Processing Building. Systems should be designed " "::~i~ii~::.. "%i#::"

for a m i n i m u m of 0.25 g p m / f C (10.19 L /m in -m e) over die most (e).:)::.{.~..1-5-6,1"~i~b/e T~i"nnels. Automatic sprinkler systems remote 3000 ft ~ (279 m ~) (increase by 30 percen t for dry pipe s l ~ d e s i g n ' ~ - " .~...g.'::a density of 0.30 g p m / f F (0.20 L/sec-nC) systems) of f loor ,area with the protect ion ,area per sprinkler no t to , ~ r 2501~.~C (232 ~:~ or tiae most remote 100 l inear ft (30 m) of exceed 130 ft e (12.0 me). . : # ' ~ t~ ."~:~.~9"*~500 ft e (232 me). (ROC 13-212)

-.....:~:x,. -:~.$..-~.-:':y ::::~:::i:~:';- "'-'-~ "-'.'*-. ' "::::::::~:

4.* (850-7-4.4.9) RDF ,Storage Building. Systems should be ..:::'~i~::::':':~:!~:..(f) ~ "~ -5 - . . l 1.2) Emergency Generators. Sprinkler mad water spray des igned for a m i n im um of 0.35 gpm/-ft e (14.26 L / m i n - m e) over ..::#" ~ o t e ~ s t e m s should be des igned for a 0.25 g p m / f t e (0.1"7 tile most remote 3000 ft (279 m ) (increase by 30 percent for d~%j~.::. .:~-'~/sec-i~.~density over the fire area. (ROC 13-212) pipe systems) of f loor area widl the protect ion area per sprin.k:.ler '::~:::'~-~.~#": not to exceed 100 fF (9.3 me). High t empera tu re sprinklers..:{::'~"~,.°.F .... ~i!~!i~.::. (g)" (851-5-12) Air Compressors. Automatic sprinkler protect ion, to 300°F (121°C to 149°C)] should be used. Storage h e i g l ~ ' i n ":" :'~!~(axi a density of 0.25 g p m / f t e (0.17 L/sec-m e) over the postulated excess of 20 ft (6.1 m) will require_ higher_ design densi..t~.~'~.~...,::~.:......~.. "::.]'::-.::..::::::, "::,,..:::.. ,:+~$] spill,_ should be cons idered for ,air compressors conta in ing a

':::" ":::.':i~ii?:.'.:, ..:~:':'~:-':'::'!::, "~i~::. " large quanti ty of oil. (See 4.8.2.) (ROC 13-212) 5. ~ (850-7-4.4.10) RDF Boiler Feed S'~stem Area, Including ~ "~ ..:ii.:':"i ~::"

Hoppers. Chutes. Conveyors. etc. Where prowded, . . .~"d"~ems ~ ! d . . : : ~ .... (h) (851-5-13) H~draultc Systems for Gate and Valve Operators. be des igned for a m in im um of 0.20 g p m / f F (,8.ff5 L / ' ~ n - m e) ~! : : . " Automatic sprinklei" protect ibn des igned for a density o-f 0.25 the most remote 2000 ft" (185.8 m z) ( incre ..a,~?~:.30 ~ t { o r : ~ g p m / f t ~ (0.17 L/sec-m e) over the fire area should be considered pipe systems) of f loor area with the protectJ'on ~ ~ . ~ l e r i~tr hydraulic 'systems not nsing a listed fire-resistant fluid. (See 4- not to exceed 130 ft ~ (12.0 m~). I n t e r n ~ , . e . l l ~ i ' " " ~ ' / 1 ~ ": .... 8.2.) (ROC 13-212) protect ion also should be c o n s i d e r e ~ ( ~ e p e ~ g u ~ # p e c i f i c equ ipmen t design, ceiling heights,.::~..acce~i]ity'fo.~".-:.~anual fire (i) ~ (851-5-14) Fire Pumps. ff sprinkler systems are provided they fighting. ":" "%~?:i-":::..--if;::" ":::" should be designed for a density of 0.25 g p m / f t ~ (0.17 L/sec-m ~)

':i~.~i~i.:.:'~.. over dae fire area. For automat ic foam-water spr inkler systems, a 6. • (850-7-4.4.'11) Shredder Enclosures. S ~ s . # a o u l d be des igned density of 0.16 g p m / f t e (0.11 L/sec-m e) should be provided. (ROC

for a m i n i m u m of 0.25 g p m / f t e (10.19 L / m ~ e) over d~e most 13-212) remote 3000 ft ~ (279 m e) (increase by 30 pe~.'~ent for dry pipe systen~s) of floor area with the protect ion area per sprinkler not-to A-7-10.30 (909-A-10-4.2) Sprinkler systems for specific areas exceed 100 ft ~ (9.3 me). (ROC 13-213)

(s) (850-7-5) Biomass Fuels.

1. ~ (850-7-5.4.4) Biomass Storage Buildings. Systems should be designed for a nf in imum of 0.25 g p m / f t (10.19 L /m in -m ) over the most remote 3000 ft e (279 m e) (increase by 30 percent for dry pipe systems) of f loor area with the protect ion area per sprinkler not to exceed 130 ft e (12.0 me).

NOTE: Biomass fi, els exhibi t a wide r,'mge of bu rn ing characteristics a n d u p o n evaluation can require increased levels of protect ion.

2. x (850-7-5.4.6) Hydraulic Equipment, Reservoirs. Coolers, and Associated Oil-filled Equipment. Sprinklers or spray nozzles should be over oil-containing equ ipmen t and for 20 ft (6.1 m) beyond in ,all

2 2 directions. A density of 0.25 g p m / f t (10.19 L /m in - m ) should be provided.

,associated with religious facilities should be des igned as follows:

(a) All .assembly areas, except state - - Light H~tzard (b) S t a g e s - Ordinary Hazard (Group 2) (c) Kitchens i Ordinary Hazard (Group 1) (d) Storage rooms I Ordinary Hazard (Group 2) (e) Unused a t t i c s / lo f t s / s t eep les /concea led spaces i Light

Hazard (f) Schools/day-care centers i Light Hazard (g) Gift shops i Ordinary Hazard (Group 1) (h) Special exhibi t area - - Ordinary Hazard (Group 2) (i) L i b r a r i e s - Ordinary Hazard (Group 2) (j) ( ) f f i ce s - - Light Hazard (ROC 13-223)

(ROC 13-220)

(ROC 13-159)

776


Recommended