+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Japan's Key Technologies for Seismic Large … · 2014-11-26 · Japan's Key Technologies for...

Japan's Key Technologies for Seismic Large … · 2014-11-26 · Japan's Key Technologies for...

Date post: 16-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: votruc
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
14
1 Keynote Speech: Seminar: Steel Design in Chile Intercontinental Hotel, Santiago, May 27, 2014 Japan's Key Technologies for Seismic Protection of New and Existing Buildings Kazuhiko Kasai Professor and Director Structural Engineering Research Center Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan Summary of Experiences & Findings from 3.11 (Building Structures) Acceleration-induced failures and falling of ceiling, electrical & mechanical systems, and loss of building functions. Large displacements of super-tall bldgs. even at long epicentral distance, due to long period ground motions. Difficulty of quick evaluations of damage and functionality in judging continued use of major buildings. Strong motion records of major bldgs. & super-tall bldgs. in Tohoku (>0.4g) and Tokyo (0.1g), clarifying many issues. Protective systems (base isolation & added damping systems) performed well at various epicentral distances. Japan's Key Technologies for Seismic Protection of New and Existing Buildings 1. Introduction to Protective Systems 2. Largest Shake Table Test of Building with Dampers 3Conventional Tall Building Retrofit by Dampers 4Damped Tall Building Performance During 3.11 5Scopes for Tall Buildings with Protective System 6. Conclusions Tokyo Institute of Technology Kasai Lab. Tokyo Institute of Technology Kasai Lab. Coventional System vs. Two Protective Systems Conventional Structure : Dissipates seismic energy by sacrificing main components such as columns, beams, and walls. Base-Isolated Structure : Isolates building from ground shaking. Damped Structure : Mitigates damage and vibration by dissipating seismic energy using dampers installed at building floors or top.
Transcript

1

Keynote Speech:Seminar: Steel Design in Chile

Intercontinental Hotel, Santiago, May 27, 2014

Japan's Key Technologies for Seismic Protection of New and Existing Buildings

Kazuhiko KasaiProfessor and Director

Structural Engineering Research CenterTokyo Institute of Technology, Japan

Summary of Experiences & Findings from 3.11(Building Structures)

• Acceleration-induced failures and falling of ceiling, electrical & mechanical systems, and loss of building functions.

• Large displacements of super-tall bldgs. even at long epicentral distance, due to long period ground motions.

• Difficulty of quick evaluations of damage and functionality in judging continued use of major buildings.

• Strong motion records of major bldgs. & super-tall bldgs. in Tohoku (>0.4g) and Tokyo (≈ 0.1g), clarifying many issues.

• Protective systems (base isolation & added damping systems) performed well at various epicentral distances.

Japan's Key Technologies for Seismic Protection of New and Existing Buildings

1. Introduction to Protective Systems

2. Largest Shake Table Test of Building with Dampers

3.Conventional Tall Building Retrofit by Dampers

4.Damped Tall Building Performance During 3.11

5.Scopes for Tall Buildings with Protective System

6. Conclusions

Tokyo Institute of Technology Kasai Lab.

Tokyo Institute of Technology Kasai Lab.

Coventional System vs. Two Protective Systems

Conventional Structure : Dissipates seismic energy by sacrificing main components such as columns, beams, and walls.Base-Isolated Structure : Isolates building from ground shaking.Damped Structure : Mitigates damage and vibration by dissipating seismic energy using dampers installed at building floors or top.

2

Tokyo Institute of Technology Kasai Lab.

Tokyo Institute of Technology Kasai Lab.

Conventional Structure vs. Two New Structures

ConventionalStructure:Damage Caused bySeismic Energy

Base-IsolatedStructure:Structure Isolatedfrom Ground Motion

Added-Damping Structure:Dampers Absorband DissipateSeismic Energy

Isolator

Damper

← Damping Systemsfor Houses

Our patented techniques were commercialized by two companies.

These damping systems are displayed in our campus.

Demonstration of Added Damping

Systems andBase Isolation Systems

L.A. City Hall

・Originally Built in 1928・Retrofitted in 2001, the Largest Retrofit Project Using Base Isolation

・Historical Super-TallBuilding (137m tall)

・575 Japanese IsolatorsAdopted (High-DampingRubber + Sliding)

3

Devices for Base-Isolation Systems

Oil Damper

Steel DamperIsolator

10

No foundation girders to connect footings

March 11 Performance: Structural Concept

Movement of Lead Rubber Bearing

11

3章 一質点制振構造の力学原理と性能曲線

JSSIパッシブ制振構造設計・施工マニュアル

Amplifier Type

4

Buckling-restrained Brace

Comparison of mechanical behavior between Buckling-restrained Brace and Conventional Brace

Configuration of Buckling-restrained Brace

Brace type damper with core steel member whose buckling is restrained by concrete/steel member

Buckling-restrained BraceConventional Brace

Load

Compression

Tension

Compression

Tension

Load

Buckling

Displacement.Displacement.

Core steel member

Buckling-restrained member

Japan's Key Technologies for Seismic Protection of New and Existing Buildings

1. Introduction to Protective Systems

2. Largest Shake Table Test of Building with Dampers

3.Conventional Tall Building Retrofit by Dampers

4.Damped Tall Building Performance During 3.11

5.Scopes for Tall Buildings with Protective System

6. ConclusionsThe 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering

October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China

VALUE-ADDED 5-STORY STEEL FRAME AND ITS COMPONENTS: PART 1 – FULL-SCALE DAMPER TESTS AND ANALYSES

Major Damper Types Used in Japan

Manual by JSSI (Japan Society for Seismic Isolation)1st, 2nd, and 3rd Editions, 2002, 2005, 2007, and 2013

5

7,000 5,000

12,000

5,00

0 5,

000

10,0

00

Damper

Damper B

A

G1 G3

G2 G2

G2 G2G

11

G13

G11

G13

G12

G12

C2

C2

C1 C1 C1

C3

C3

C1 C2

7,000 5,000

12,000

1st fl.

2nd fl.

3rd fl.

4th fl.

5th fl.

Roof

150

165

165

165

165

2,98

5 3,

000

3,00

0 3,

000

3,85

0

15,8

35

Damper

900

C2 C3 C3

C2 C3 C3

C2 C3 C3

C2 C3 C3

C2 C3 C3

G3 G1

G3 G1

G3 G1

G3 G1

G3 G1

G3 G1

5,000 5,000

10,000

1st fl.

2nd fl.

3rd fl.

4th fl.

5th fl.

Roof

150

165

165

165

165

2,98

5 3,

000

3,00

0 3,

000

3,85

0

15,8

35

Damper

900

C1 C2C3

C1 C2C3

C1 C2C3

C1 C2C3

C1 C2C3

G12 G11

G12 G11

G12 G11

G12 G11

G12 G11

G12 G11

Full-Scale 5-Story Building with DampersSeismically Active Wt .: 4,734 kNFrame Period: 0.74s (x), 0.79s(y)With Elast. Steel Damper: 0.53s (x), 0.56s(y)

Full-Scale 5-story Steel building with Steel Damper

6

Steel Damper Viscous Damper Oil Damper Viscoelastic Damper

7

SummaryThe 5-story building with dampers kept the story

drift angle below the target limit of 1% rad against the catastrophic motion of unscaled Takatori record.

It was so for all four cases of using steel, viscous, oil, and viscoelastic dampers, respectively. Main frame was kept almost elastic.

Peak displacements were 0.45 ~ 0.65 times, and peak accelerations were 0.6 ~ 0.85 times those of the case of undamped building. These indicate good seismic protection of both building and its contents.

Japan's Key Technologies for Seismic Protection of New and Existing Buildings

1. Introduction to Protective Systems

2. Largest Shake Table Test of Building with Dampers

3.Conventional Tall Building Retrofit by Dampers

4.Damped Tall Building Performance During 3.11

5.Scopes for Tall Buildings with Protective System

6. Conclusions

Kasai Lab., Structural Engineering Research Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology

29-Story Building (No Dampers)Name Kogakuin University

Completion 1989

Number of Floors

29 floors above ground6 floors below ground1 floor penthouse

Aspect Ratio EW(X): 3.73; NS(Y): 5.59Frame Type Steel frame with brace

Period (s) (obtained by Kasai lab.)

EW (X): 2.96s, 1.00s

NS (Y) : 3.09s, 0.94s

(From Prof. Hisada)

Guest Professorship Presentation, Tongji Univ., Shanghai

Guest Professorship Presentation, Tongji Univ., ShanghaiDamage to Nonstructural Components (From Prof.Hisada)

Movement of copy machine(25F) Falling of books(25F)

Falling of ceiling:28F(21F, 14F, etc.) Elevator cable damage(another tall bldg., repaired in 3 weeks)

8

Kasai Lab., Structural Engineering Research Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology

Top acceleration Base acceleration

High Frequency Low Frequency

Acc. of 29th level and base

1st mode 2nd mode (Y-direction)

The 2nd mode dominated at 16th floor.

Modal contribution and manner of vibration depend on story level.

The vibration continued for more than 6 min. The recorded responses are well explained based on the modes and modal responses.

Kasai Lab., Structural Engineering Research Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology

29-Story Bldg. (No Dampers), Y-directionModal Contributions to Disp. and Acc.

29th Floor Dispt.

29th Floor Acc.

16th Floor Acc.

3rd 2nd

1st

1st

Kasai Lab., Structural Engineering Research Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology

X-Direction(Finding Good Damper Locations)Damper shown by red color:(Zero-stiffness assigned in the eigenvalue analysis)

1次モード 2次モード

Kasai Lab., Structural Engineering Research Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology

Against March 11 Base Motion (Recorded):Actual Case vs. Retrofitted Case (Oil dampers)

Stor

y No.

No damper

With damper

Displacement(cm)

Story drift(rad)

Absolute Acc.(cm/s2)

Story Shear(kN)

9

Japan's Key Technologies for Seismic Protection of New and Existing Buildings

1. Introduction to Protective Systems

2. Largest Shake Table Test of Building with Dampers

3.Conventional Tall Building Retrofit by Dampers

4.Damped Tall Building Performance During 3.11

5.Scopes for Tall Buildings with Protective System

6. ConclusionsKasai Lab., Structural Engineering Research Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology

Viscous damper (284)

Steel damper (336)

21-story Steel FrameX

Y

21-Story Bldg. with 336 Steel Dampers & 284 Viscous Dampers

Kasai Lab., Structural Engineering Research Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology

41-Story Bldg. with 688 Oil Dampers

41-story Steel Frame+

Oil damper (688)

Steel Core Frame

Oil Damper

( )

Kasai Lab., Structural Engineering Research Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology

54-Story Bldg. Retrofitted by 288 Oil Dampers.

Oil Damper

63m 42m

X Y

54-story Building:Steel Frame +

288 Oil Dampers

10

Kasai Lab., Structural Engineering Research Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology

Viscous Damper

Steel Damper

(a)

Oil Damper

(c)

Oil Damper

(b) X Y

99.6m

21-story Building:

Steel Frame + 336 Steel Dampers + 284 Viscous Dampers

41-story Building:

Steel Frame + 688 Oil Dampers

223m

54-story Building: Steel Frame + 288 Oil Dampers

186.9m

X Y X Y

52m 96m

45.4m 45.4m

42m 63m

Kasai Lab., Structural Engineering Research Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology

54-Story Bldg. (continued): Without damper, the acc. and disp. will increase considerably.

Black: With damper, actual recorded acc. and disp. (double integration).Gray: No damper, modal analysis by assuming 1% damping ratio.

Top Floor Acc.

Top Floor Disp.

Japan's Key Technologies for Seismic Protection of New and Existing Buildings

1. Introduction to Protective Systems

2. Largest Shake Table Test of Building with Dampers

3.Conventional Tall Building Retrofit by Dampers

4.Damped Tall Building Performance During 3.11

5.Scopes for Tall Buildings with Protective System

6. ConclusionsTokyo Institute of Technology Kasai Lab.

Tokyo Institute of Technology Kasai Lab.

duˆ

du ˆ

du

du

du

au粘弾性ダンパー

オイルダンパー

粘性ダンパー

鋼材ダンパー Steel Damper

Viscous Damper

Oil Damper

Viscoelastic Damper

au

duˆdu du = + (sum of deformation at both sideonly for steel damper)

du= + stiffness of supporting memberau

Steel frame is the easiest one to connect dampers !

11

Steel Products and Joining Technology for Construction of Steel-frame Buildings

Wide-flange

Square steel tube

Plate

Circular steel tube

Welding

High-strength bolt

Production Method of Square Tubes

Cold roll-formed square tube Cold press-formed square tube

Section

Size(mm) □-200×6~□-500×22 □-300×9~ □-1000×40

Roll forming +Electric resistance welding

Weld

Press forming+Arc welding (1 seam)

Weld

WeldPress forming +

Arc welding (2 seams)

Weld

Built-up Columnwelded by large heat-input welding method

Submerged arc weldingHeat input 20~60 kJ/mm

Corner weld

Diaphragm plate weld

Electro-slag weldingHeat input 50~100 kJ/mm

New Steel Products for Building Structures

10 20 30 40 500

200

400

600

800

1,000

0

780 N/mm2 steel

SN490SN400

LY100

Strain (%)

Stress (N/mm2)

590 N/mm2 steel

LY225

Higher strength

Heavier thickness and larger cross section Higher performance

TMCP plate TMCP extra-heavy

wide-flange

SN, BCR, BCP- Weldability- Lower yield ratio,

narrower-range yield point- Higher dimensional

accuracy

- LY100, LY225

590N/mm2 steel 780N/mm2 steel

Lower yield point

<Directions of Development of Steel Products for Building Structures>

High-temperature property Fire-resistant steel

DurabilityWeathering steel Stainless steel

New performances

12

- Concrete-Filled Steel Tube (CFT) -

Compensates for demerits of the RC and steelstructures, realizing higher seismic and fireresistance.

0

50

100

150(MN)

Comparison of Axial Strength

RC S355J0 SA440 SA440 CFT

900

900

t=50

900

900

t=50

900

900

t=50

900

900

Fc 90Fc 60

1.0 1.11.4

2.5

Note: This means that RC columns requires much larger cross section for the same strength.

SA440(Tensile Strength 590N/mm2)

Landmark Tower in Yokohama(296.0m, 70-story, Built in 1993)

Roppongi-Hills Tower(238.1m, 54-story, Built in 2003)

Japan’s Tallest Bldg.

13

The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China

CURRENT STATUS OF BUILDING PASSIVE CONTROL IN JAPAN

Development of Damage-Free Structure &Design Specifications by ANUHT

Fig. 8 Super High Strength Steel Considered

200

400

600

800

1,000

(MPa)

00 10 20 30 40 50 (%)

YS650

Stre

ss

Strain

σ

ε

1/60

Level of σy toAchieve θy =

1/75

1/150

1/100

1/60

Level of σy toAchieve θy =

1/75

1/150

1/100

HT620

SN400

SN490 HT440

HSA700

Fig. 9 Catastrophic Earthquakes ConsideredPeriod (sec)

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

Acce

lerati

on (c

m/s2 )

ξ 0 = 0.05

K-NET Oshika 2003 (6.3) K-NET Hiroo 2003 (6.0)K-NET Chokubetsu 2003 (6.3) K-NET Tokamachi 2004 (6.2)K-NET Nagaoka-shisho 2004 (6.1) K-NET Anamizu 2007 (6.3)K-NET Kashiwazaki 2007 (6.3) JMA Kobe 1995 (6.4)JMA Ojiya 2004 (6.3) JMA Kawaguchi 2004 (6.3)Tokyo-Koenji (6.6) Tokyo Bay -Nihonbashi (6.5) ,Artif.1.5×Design Basis Eq.Level ,Artif.

,Artif.

Tokyo Institute of Technology Kasai Lab.

Tokyo Institute of Technology Kasai Lab.

Direct Design Method for Required Performance: E-Defense 5-Story Bldg.

FFa

Ka

umax

u

Frame Kf

Damper Kd Brace Kb

Added Comp. Ka

ud u

0

500

1000

1500

2000

0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02

(rad)

Spa(cm/s2)Tf=0.035H

Tf=0.045H

Tf=0.055H

Ka/Kf

0.250.5124

10

0

0.18

0.75

1.50

=4

Steel Damper

-Using the Performance Curve, -Choose balance among damper and frame

Performance curve gives a variety of solutions for damper stiffness and frame stiffness satisfying the story drift limit. For example,

Solution 1. Relatively stiff damper and flexible frame.Solution 2. Relatively flexible damper and stiff frame.

Solution 1 can lead to smaller response acc. But the frame’s restoring capability will be less, meaning increased potential of residual deform. and non-uniform story drifts over the height of the building.

Solution 2, if acc. is well-controlled, would be a good choice by the above reasons, and the rectangular square tube section is suited best to provide adequate frame stiffness in both x- and y-directions.

Japan's Key Technologies for Seismic Protection of New and Existing Buildings

1. Introduction to Protective Systems

2. Largest Shake Table Test of Building with Dampers

3.Conventional Tall Building Retrofit by Dampers

4.Damped Tall Building Performance During 3.11

5.Scopes for Tall Buildings with Protective System

6. Conclusions

14

ConclusionsSeismic base isolation systems and added damping systems have

become the standard technology to protect human lives, building functionality, and assets against major earthquakes.

Such protective systems are discussed, with emphasis on added damping which most new tall buildings in Japan utilize now. Full-scale tests results using the world’s largest shake table (E-Defense), as well as response records of major buildings at the 2011 Tohoku earthquake indicate beneficial effects of dampers for existing or new buildings.

Supplemental damping technology and steel frame match well, since; 1) dampers are most securely and easily connected to the steel members through welds or bolts; 2) a steel frame, below the yield limit, has a clear undamaged state warranting continued post-quake use of the building, and; 3) a steel frame with square tube columns provides sufficient stiffness for any lateral direction.


Recommended