Date post: | 12-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | everett-johnston |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 1 times |
J.Lee Whittington, Ph.D.
University of Dallas College of Business
National Catholic Development Conference
September 2013
What does an over-managed, under-led organization look like?
Could an organization be over-led and under-managed? What would that look like?
Are you a Manager or a Leader?
ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT
(Coping With Complexity)
LEADERSHIP
(Coping With Change)
What Needs to be Done?
Planning and budgeting: establishing detailed steps and timetables for achieving needed results, then allocating the resources necessary to make it happen
Establishing direction: developing a vision of the future – often distant future – and strategies for producing the changes needed to achieve that vision
Source: John Kotter on What Leaders Really Do
ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT
(Coping With Complexity)
LEADERSHIP
(Coping With Change)
Create Network to Accomplish Agenda
Organizing and staffing: establishing some structure for accomplishing plan requirements, staffing that structure with individuals, delegating responsibility and authority for carrying out the plan, providing policies and procedures to help guide people, and creating methods or systems to monitor implementation
Aligning people: communicating direction in words and deeds to all those whose cooperation may be needed so as to influence the creation of teams and coalitions that understand the vision and strategies and that accept their validity
Source: John Kotter on What Leaders Really Do
ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT
(Coping With Complexity)
LEADERSHIP
(Coping With Change)
Ensure the Job Gets Done
Controlling and problem solving: monitoring results, identifying deviations from plan, then planning and organizing to solve these problems.
Motivating and inspiring: energizing people to overcome major political bureaucratic, and resource barriers to change by satisfying basic, but often unfulfilled, human needs
Source: John Kotter on What Leaders Really Do
ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT
(Coping With Complexity)
LEADERSHIP
(Coping With Change)
Consequence Produces a degree of predictability and order and has the potential to consistently produce the short-term results expected by various stakeholders (e.g., for customers, always being on time; for stockholders, being on budget)
Produces change, often to a dramatic degree and has the potential to produce extremely useful change (e.g., new products that customers want, new approaches to labor relations that help make a firm more competitive)
Source: John Kotter on What Leaders Really Do
X
Management
X
Leadership
X
X
X
X
1. Where leaders & managers are currently:
2. Where they
should be:according to
markets, products,
customers and people
Lots of randomcommunicationLots of randomcommunication
Loosestructure
Loosestructure
Break allthe rulesBreak allthe rules
Too muchstructure and
process
Too muchstructure and
process
Narrowly channeled
communication
Narrowly channeled
communication
Real-time communications
Dilemma:Adaptively
innovate andconsistently
execute
Chaos Trap Bureaucratic TrapEffective process management
allows innovation and streamlined execution to co-exist
Follow allthe rulesFollow allthe rules
Adaptiveculture
Semistructures
Transformational LeaderFlexibility and Discretion
Stability and ControlTransactional Managers
Inte
rnal F
ocu
s a
nd
In
teg
ratio
n
A
D
B
C
50
40
30
20
10
10
30
20
40
50Exte
rnal F
ocu
s a
nd
D
iffere
ntia
tion
Leadership Skills
Interpersonal Skills
Knowledge of the Business
Level 5 Leaders build enduring greatness through a paradoxical blend of personal humility and professional will.
They practice the discipline of the “window and the mirror.”
Effective
ActivePassive
Ineffective
Laissez-faire
Contingent Reward1
Inspirational Motivation2
Mgt by Exception – Passive1
Mgt by Exception - Active1
Idealized Influence2
Intellectual Stimulation2
Individualized Consideration2
1- These leader behaviors are typically described as Transactional Leadership
2-These leader behaviors are typically described as Transformational Leadership
Intellectual stimulation shows the degree to which you encourage others to be creative in looking at old problems in new ways, create an environment that is tolerant of seemingly extreme positions, and nurture people to question their own values and beliefs and those of the organization.
Question Assumptions Encourage followers to employ intuition Entertain ideas that may have seemed silly
at first Create imaginative visions Ask followers to rework the same problems
they thought they had solved See unusual patterns
Individualized consideration indicates the degree to which you show interest in others’ well-being, assign projects individually, and pay attention to those who seem less involved in the group.
Answer followers with minimum delay Show concern for follower well-being Assign tasks on the basis of individual
needs and abilities Encourage two-way exchange of ideas Be available when needed Constantly encourage self-development Effectively mentor, counsel, and coach
peers and followers
Idealized influence indicates whether you hold subordinates’ trust, maintain their faith and respect, show dedication to them, appeal to their hopes and dreams, and act as their role model.
Set examples for showing determination Display extraordinary talents Take risks Create a sense of empowerment in
followers Show dedication to “the cause” Create a sense of joint mission Deal with crises Use radical solutions Engender faith in others
Inspirational motivation measures the degree to which you provide a vision, use appropriate symbols and images to help others focus on their work, and try to make others feel their work is significant.
Provide meaning and challenge Paint an optimistic future Mold expectations that create self-fulfilling
prophecies Think ahead Take a first step – often with risk to oneself
Contingent reward shows the degree to which you tell others what to do in order to be rewarded, emphasize what you expect from them, and recognize their accomplishments.
Clarify Expectations about the job and the results you expect
Answer the question: “What does a good job look like?”
Create a clean line of sight between results and rewards
Don’t promise rewards you cannot deliver Keep your promises!
Pygmalion Effect
Shaping expectations through Contingent Reward
The Personal Management Interview
“Participative” “Coaching”
“Delegated” “Telling”
Task Behavior
Relationship Behavior
Low
Low
High
High
“I start with the premise that the function of leadership is to produce more leaders, not
more followers.”
Watch Me
Do It With Me
You Do It, I Watch
You Do It
You Do It, I Watch
Do it With Me
You Do It Watch Me
Will you be a self-serving leader who uses his power to benefit yourself and advance your personal agenda?
Will you be a servant-leader who uses his power to serve others?
“The best test, and most difficult to administer, is this:
Do those served grow as persons? Do they, while being served, become healthier, wiser, freer, more autonomous, more likely themselves to become servants? And what is the effect on the least privileged in society; will they benefit, or, at least, not be further deprived.”
Robert Greenleaf, Servant Leadership, 1977
• Identify and remove obstacles
• Provide the resources and tools that are needed
• Clarify expectations
• Give timely and performance-based feedback
• Affirm the person, even when you don’t approve of the performance